DeFi has revolutionized the financial industry. DeFi uses blockchain technology and smart contracts to create a variety of financial services and applications that operate outside of traditional banking institutions.

According to expert Sergey Kondratenko, DeFi democratizes access to financial services by eliminating intermediaries, reduces costs, and promotes global financial inclusion. However, despite the rapid development of this sector, there are significant legal complexities and problems.

Sergey Kondratenko is a recognized specialist in a wide range of e-commerce services with experience for many years. Now, Sergey is the owner and leader of a group of companies engaged not only in different segments of e-commerce but also successfully operating in different jurisdictions, represented on all continents of the world. The main goal is to drive new traffic, create and deliver an online experience that will endear users to the brand, and turn visitors into customers while maximizing the overall profitability of the online business.

The Importance of the DeFi Regulatory Framework

With the growing interest and influx of large investments in DeFi, there is a need to establish a legal framework for this system. Despite the many benefits that DeFi provides, there are still questions about consumer protection, financial stability, and compliance with existing regulations. Therefore, Sergey Kondratenko believes that creating a clear legal framework for DeFi will help prevent fraud, maintain trust in the system, and stimulate the development of responsible innovation.

How is DeFi regulated in different countries?

1. United States (SEC, CFTC, FinCEN)

In the US, oversight of DeFi activity comes from several regulatory bodies: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

• The SEC has jurisdiction over securities and related activities. Sergey Kondratenko explains that in the DeFi context, the SEC may apply its regulatory powers to certain tokens and platforms, depending on whether they meet the securities criteria. If certain DeFi platforms and tokens are designated as securities, they may be subject to registration, disclosure, and other requirements.

• The CFTC regulates commodity futures, options and swaps. DeFi platforms that offer derivatives and other products related to commodities or virtual currencies may be subject to CFTC jurisdiction. These platforms must comply with the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and related regulations to ensure market integrity and protect participants from fraud and manipulation.

• Anti-money laundering and anti-financial crimes (AML/KYC) enforcement authority FinCEN has issued guidance. It states that some DeFi activities may be classified as financial services businesses (MSBs). As such, such platforms must comply with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and implement appropriate AML and KYC procedures to ensure compliance with financial security and anti-fraud regulations.
  

2. European Union (ESMA, EBA)

In the European Union (EU), DeFi is regulated through the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA).

ESMA regulates securities markets and reviews DeFi, influencing regulations such as MiFID II and Prospectus Regulation. The EBA is responsible for the supervision of banks and warns about the risks of virtual currencies and DeFi platforms, highlighting the importance of regulating this area. Both organizations play a key role in ensuring security and compliance in DeFi in the EU.

3. Asia

According to Sergey Kondratenko, regulators’ approaches to DeFi in Asia vary greatly. He gives several examples from the practice of different countries:

• China. Chinese authorities have taken a tough stance on cryptocurrencies and DeFi. They banned cryptocurrency exchanges and initial coin offerings (ICOs). DeFi platforms operating in China may face severe restrictions or be deemed illegal.

• Japan. Japan has created a more detailed regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, requiring registration and compliance with the Financial Services Authority (FSA). This approach aims to ensure control and security in the cryptocurrency market.

• South Korea has also introduced regulation of cryptocurrencies and is actively exploring ways to regulate DeFi platforms. They strive to ensure transparency and prevent illegal activities.
  

Compliance With Norms and Standards in the Area of ​​Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in Defi

As Sergey Kondratenko notes, DeFi poses unique challenges to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) compliance. The expert says that they are characterized by decentralization and, often, anonymity of transactions, which makes it difficult to monitor and detect illegal transactions. Moreover, the lack of intermediaries on DeFi platforms creates barriers to the implementation of conventional AML/CFT measures. The specialist is convinced that regulators and industry participants must assess the risks associated with DeFi and develop special strategies to mitigate them while maintaining the benefits of decentralization.

Depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the services provided by DeFi platforms, they may be subject to AML/CFT regulations. This typically involves implementing robust procedures to identify, assess, and mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing risks. Sergey Kondratenko notes that DeFi platforms may need to collect and verify information about their customers, monitor transactions, and report suspicious activity to the relevant authorities. DeFi users should also be aware of their AML/CFT responsibilities and ensure that their transactions comply with applicable laws and regulations.

AML/CFT compliance in the DeFi context can be challenging due to the decentralized nature of the platforms and the lack of intermediaries. However, there are best practices that can help solve these problems.

DeFi platforms can use analytics tools on the blockchain to monitor transactions to identify suspicious activity.

Sergey Kondratenko: Forecasts for Defi Regulation in the Future

As DeFi evolves, regulators around the world are expected to adopt new approaches and develop specific regulations to address unique challenges. Among possible changes and trends in the field of regulation, Sergey Kondratenko highlights the following:

• Clarifying the existing regulatory framework to provide clearer guidance for DeFi platforms and their users. This will allow for a better understanding of what regulations need to be followed and provide greater transparency in the DeFi space.

• Develop risk-based approaches to DeFi regulation, taking into account the specific risks and benefits associated with different types of platforms and their services. This approach will help adapt regulation to the diversity of DeFi projects.

• Introducing new licensing or registration requirements for DeFi platforms to help ensure compliance with regulatory standards and protect consumer interests. This will also help reduce risks for investors and users.

• Strengthening compliance oversight of DeFi platforms and operators, and collaboration between regulators to address cross-border enforcement challenges. This will help improve oversight and ensure regulatory compliance at a global level.
  

How Should Innovation and Regulation Be Balanced in the Defi Space? – Sergey Kondratenko

The main goal of regulators in this area is to strike a balance between encouraging innovative solutions and protecting the interests of users, as well as financial stability. According to Sergey Kondratenko, excessively strict regulation can hinder the development of innovation and reduce the potential benefits of DeFi. On the other hand, a lack of regulation can lead to increased risks for users and a loss of trust in the ecosystem.

To achieve the right balance, regulators must take a flexible approach, engage with industry participants, and create an appropriate regulatory framework. It may be worth considering the creation of special “sandboxes” in which DeFi platforms could test their products and services in controlled conditions under the supervision of regulators.

International cooperation and harmonization of regulatory frameworks will play a key role in ensuring effective control and establishing a uniform approach to DeFi regulation, believes Sergey Kondratenko. He believes that regulators need to actively collaborate to create common standards: share information on identified risks and best practices, and address joint challenges related to international enforcement.

Regulatory harmonization will help reduce the practice of “regulatory arbitrage,” where DeFi platforms and users seek jurisdictions with less stringent regulations. By creating a more consistent and predictable platform, regulators will be able to promote responsible innovation, protect consumer interests, and ensure long-term success in the DeFi sector.

• Featured News RSS feed
• Investing News RSS feed
• Daily Press Releases RSS feed
• Trading Tips RSS feed
• Investing Videos RSS feed

Follow PressReach on Twitter
Follow PressReach on TikTok
Follow PressReach on Instagram
Subscribe to us on Youtube