AFLAC INCORPORATED
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-07434
Aflac Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
GEORGIA
|
|
58-1167100 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia
|
|
31999 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(ZIP Code) |
706.323.3431
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
|
|
August 3, 2007 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.10 Par Value
|
|
488,641,617 shares |
AFLAC INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Items other than those listed above are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable.
i
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, principally supplemental health insurance |
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
$ |
3,093 |
|
|
$ |
6,318 |
|
|
$ |
6,098 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Other income |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
7,515 |
|
|
|
7,256 |
|
|
Benefits and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and claims |
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
Acquisition and operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Insurance expenses |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Total acquisition and operating expenses |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
$ |
.82 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.84 |
|
|
|
.81 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
Common shares used in computing earnings per share (In thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
487,900 |
|
|
|
496,951 |
|
|
|
489,219 |
|
|
|
497,491 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
494,227 |
|
|
|
503,286 |
|
|
|
495,435 |
|
|
|
503,927 |
|
|
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ |
.205 |
|
|
$ |
.13 |
|
|
$ |
.39 |
|
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities (amortized cost $27,676 in 2007
and $27,099 in 2006) |
|
$ |
28,612 |
|
|
$ |
28,805 |
|
Perpetual debentures (amortized cost $4,027 in 2007
and $4,341 in 2006) |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
4,408 |
|
Equity securities (cost $15 in 2007 and $16 in 2006) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities (fair value $13,780 in 2007 and $13,369 in 2006) |
|
|
14,249 |
|
|
|
13,483 |
|
Perpetual debentures (fair value $3,846 in 2007
and $4,024 in 2006) |
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
Total investments and cash |
|
|
52,197 |
|
|
|
51,972 |
|
Receivables, primarily premiums |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
Other |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
$ |
59,805 |
|
|
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(continued)
2
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits |
|
$ |
41,079 |
|
|
$ |
40,841 |
|
Unpaid policy claims |
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Other policyholders funds |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
Total policy liabilities |
|
|
45,722 |
|
|
|
45,440 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
51,924 |
|
|
|
51,464 |
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands:
authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued 657,215
shares in 2007 and 655,715 shares in 2006 |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
10,034 |
|
|
|
9,304 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
Pension liability adjustment |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Treasury stock, at average cost |
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
8,341 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
$ |
59,805 |
|
|
Shareholders equity per share |
|
$ |
16.77 |
|
|
$ |
16.93 |
|
|
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(In millions - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
Exercise of stock options, including income tax benefits |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Gain on treasury stock reissued |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
Retained earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
9,304 |
|
|
|
8,048 |
|
Cumulative effect of change adoption of SAB 108 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
Dividends to shareholders |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
10,034 |
|
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
1,957 |
|
Change in unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)
during period, net of income taxes |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment
securities during period, net of income taxes |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
Pension liability adjustment during period,
net of income taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
Treasury stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
Cost of shares issued |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
|
|
(3,100 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,190 |
|
|
$ |
7,308 |
|
|
Amounts have been adjusted for adoption of SAB 108 as of January 1, 2006.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(In millions - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in receivables and advance premiums |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
Increase in policy liabilities |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
Change in income tax liabilities |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from investments sold or matured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities sold |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Fixed maturities matured or called |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Perpetual debentures sold |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Equity securities sold |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Costs of investments acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
(1,827 |
) |
Cash received as collateral on loaned securities, net |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
$ |
(1,742 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,037 |
) |
|
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(continued)
5
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(In millions - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
$ |
(355 |
) |
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
Principal payments under debt obligations |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
Change in investment-type contracts, net |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Treasury stock reissued |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Noncash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Treasury shares issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate stock bonus |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Shareholder dividend reinvestment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Stock compensation grants |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In millions - Unaudited) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized foreign currency translation
gains (losses) during period |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) during period |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
(1,053 |
) |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)
losses included in net earnings |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) during period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Pension liability adjustment during period |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
before income taxes |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
(2,057 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items
of other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of
income taxes |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(157 |
) |
|
$ |
(282 |
) |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
(518 |
) |
|
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). These principles are established primarily by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
us to make estimates when recording transactions resulting from business operations based on
currently available information. The most significant items on our balance sheet that involve a
greater degree of accounting estimates and actuarial determinations subject to changes in the
future are the valuation of investments, deferred policy acquisition costs, and liabilities for
future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims. These accounting estimates and actuarial
determinations are sensitive to market conditions, investment yields, mortality, morbidity,
commission and other acquisition expenses, and terminations by policyholders. As additional
information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates will be
revised and reflected in operating results. Although some variability is inherent in these
estimates, we believe the amounts provided are adequate.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aflac Incorporated (the Parent
Company), its majority-owned subsidiaries and those entities required to be consolidated under
applicable accounting standards. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) contain all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals, which are necessary to fairly present the consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, and the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive
income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, and consolidated
statements of shareholders equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007,
and 2006. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for
the entire year. As a result, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report to shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
The majority of the provisions of this standard apply only to entities that elect the fair value
option (FVO). The FVO may be applied to eligible items on an instrument-by-instrument basis; is
irrevocable unless a new election date occurs; and may only be applied to an entire financial
instrument, and not portions thereof. This standard requires a business enterprise to report
unrealized gains and losses on items for which the FVO has been elected in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, with earlier application permitted under limited circumstances. We do not expect the
adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
8
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This standard applies to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those
accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, SFAS
157 does not require any new fair value measurements. Where applicable, this standard simplifies
and codifies related guidance within GAAP. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, with earlier application encouraged under limited circumstances. We do not
expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our financial position or results
of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS 158). We adopted the recognition and measurement date provisions of this standard effective
December 31, 2006. In the consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the year ended
December 31, 2006, we included in 2006 other comprehensive income a cumulative transition
adjustment, net of income taxes, of $44 million from the adoption of SFAS 158. This cumulative
effect adjustment was properly included in the roll forward of accumulated other comprehensive
income for the year, but it should not have been included in other comprehensive income for the
year. Total comprehensive income for the year, not including the transition adjustment for SFAS
158, was $996 million. Management concluded that the transition adjustment was not material to the
financial statements taken as a whole. We will adjust other comprehensive income for the year ended
December 31, 2006, in our 2007 Form 10-K to reflect the transition adjustment as a direct charge to
accumulated other comprehensive income. The effect of recording the transition adjustment through
other comprehensive income and the subsequent adjustment to reflect the amounts as a direct charge
to accumulated other comprehensive income did not have, nor will it have, any impact on the
consolidated statements of earnings, the consolidated balance sheets, the consolidated statements
of shareholders equity or the consolidated statements of cash flows for any periods presented.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The provisions of FIN 48 clarify the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in
accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process. Under the first step, the enterprise determines
whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing
authorities. The second step is measurement, whereby a tax position that meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to
recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of
benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2006, with earlier application encouraged. We adopted the provisions of this standard
effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on our financial
position or results of operations (see Note 9).
In September 2005, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) 05-1, Accounting by
Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges
9
of Insurance Contracts (SOP 05-1). SOP 05-1 provides accounting guidance on internal replacements
of insurance and investment contracts other than those specifically described in SFAS No. 97,
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for
Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments. SOP 05-1 is effective for internal
replacements occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier adoption
encouraged. Retrospective application of this SOP to previously issued financial statements is not
permitted. We adopted the provisions of this statement effective January 1, 2007. We have
determined that certain of our policy modifications in both the United States and Japan which were
previously accounted for as a continuation of existing coverage will be considered internal
replacements that are substantially changed as contemplated by SOP 05-1 and will be accounted for
as the extinguishment of the affected policies and the issuance of new contracts. The adoption of
this statement did not have a significant impact on our first and second quarter financial position
or results of operations.
Securities and Exchange Commission Guidance: In September 2006, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108). SAB 108 addresses
quantifying the financial statement effects of misstatements, specifically, how the effects of
prior year uncorrected errors must be considered in quantifying misstatements in current year
financial statements. Under the provisions of SAB 108, a reporting entity must quantify and
evaluate errors using a balance sheet approach and an income statement approach. After considering
all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors, if either approach results in a misstatement
that is material, a reporting entitys financial statements must be adjusted. SAB 108 applies to
SEC registrants and is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. In the course of
evaluating balance sheet amounts in accordance with the provisions of SAB 108, we identified the
following amounts that we adjusted for as of January 1, 2006: a tax liability in the amount of $87
million related to deferred tax asset valuation allowances that were not utilized; a tax liability
in the amount of $45 million related to various provisions for taxes that were not utilized; and a
litigation liability in the amount of $11 million related to provisions for various pending
lawsuits that were not utilized. These liabilities were recorded in immaterial amounts prior to
2004 over a period ranging from 10 to 15 years. However, using the dual evaluation approach
prescribed by SAB 108, correction of the above amounts would be material to 2006 earnings. In
accordance with the provisions of SAB 108, the following amounts, net of tax where applicable, have
been reflected as an opening adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2006: a reduction of
tax liabilities in the amount of $132 million; a reduction of litigation reserves in the amount of
$11 million; and a reduction in deferred tax assets in the amount of $4 million. These three
adjustments resulted in a net addition to retained earnings in the amount of $139 million.
For additional information on new accounting pronouncements and their impact, if any, on our
financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10
2. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company consists of two reportable insurance business segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac
U.S., both of which sell individual supplemental health and life insurance.
Operating business segments that are not individually reportable are included in the Other
business segments category. We do not allocate corporate overhead expenses to business segments.
We evaluate and manage our business segments using a financial performance measure called pretax
operating earnings. Our definition of operating earnings excludes the following items from net
earnings on an after-tax basis: realized investment gains/losses, the impact from SFAS 133, and
nonrecurring items. We then exclude income taxes related to operations to arrive at pretax
operating earnings. Information regarding operations by segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aflac Japan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
2,215 |
|
|
$ |
4,385 |
|
|
$ |
4,354 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Other income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total Aflac Japan |
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,196 |
|
|
Aflac U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Other income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total Aflac U.S. |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
Other business segments |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Total business segment revenues |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
7,484 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,764 |
|
|
$ |
3,697 |
|
|
$ |
7,515 |
|
|
$ |
7,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Pretax earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aflac Japan |
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
926 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
Aflac U.S. |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Other business segments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total business segments |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
Interest expense, noninsurance operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Corporate and eliminations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
Pretax operating earnings |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Impact from SFAS 133 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
Income taxes applicable to pretax operating earnings |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation on operating earnings |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
11
Assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aflac Japan |
|
$ |
49,088 |
|
|
$ |
48,850 |
|
Aflac U.S. |
|
|
10,601 |
|
|
|
10,249 |
|
Other business segments |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Total business segments |
|
|
59,812 |
|
|
|
59,209 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
9,731 |
|
|
|
10,023 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(9,429 |
) |
|
|
(9,427 |
) |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
$ |
59,805 |
|
|
3. INVESTMENTS
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we realized pretax investment gains of $15 million
(after-tax, $9 million, or $.02 per diluted share) as a result of sold or redeemed securities. For
the six months ended June 30, 2007, we realized pretax investment gains of $27 million (after-tax,
$18 million, or $.04 per diluted share). Impairment charges were immaterial during the six months
ended June 30, 2007.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we realized pretax investment gains of $50 million
(after-tax, $31 million, or $.06 per diluted share) primarily as a result of the execution of bond
swaps. The bond swaps executed during the second quarter concluded the bond-swap program that we
began in 2005 to take advantage of tax loss carryforwards. For the six months ended June 30, 2006,
we realized pretax investment gains of $64 million (after-tax, $41 million, or $.08 per diluted
share). There were no impairment charges during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The net effect on shareholders equity of unrealized gains and losses from investment
securities at the following dates was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
Unamortized
unrealized gains on securities transferred
to held to maturity |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
Shareholders equity, net unrealized gains on investment securities |
|
$ |
879 |
|
|
$ |
1,450 |
|
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale
securities decreased as a result of the effects of a rising interest
rate environment in both the United States and Japan and a weaker
yen/dollar exchange rate.
As part of our investment activities, we own investments in qualified special purpose entities
(QSPEs). At June 30, 2007, available-for-sale QSPEs totaled $2.6 billion at fair value ($2.7
billion at amortized cost, or 5.5% of total debt securities), compared with $2.3 billion at fair
value ($2.3 billion at amortized cost, or 4.7% of total debt securities) at December 31, 2006. We
have no equity interests in any of the QSPEs, nor do we have control over these entities.
Therefore, our loss exposure is limited to the cost of our investment.
12
We also own investments in variable interest entities (VIEs). We are the primary beneficiary
of VIEs totaling $1.5 billion at fair value ($1.6 billion at amortized cost) as of June 30, 2007
and have consolidated our interests in these VIEs in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The activities of these VIEs
are limited to holding debt securities and utilizing the cash flows from the debt securities to
service our investments therein. The terms of the debt securities mirror the terms of the notes
held by Aflac. The consolidation of these investments does not impact our financial position or
results of operations. We also have interests in VIEs that we are not required to consolidate
totaling $606 million at fair value ($625 million at amortized cost) as of June 30, 2007. The loss
on any of our VIE investments would be limited to its cost.
We lend fixed-maturity securities to financial institutions in short-term security lending
transactions. These short-term security lending arrangements increase investment income with
minimal risk. Our security lending policy requires that the fair value of the securities and/or
cash received as collateral be 102% or more of the fair value of the loaned securities. At June
30, 2007, we had security loans outstanding with a fair value of $1.05 billion, and we held cash in
the amount of $1.08 billion as collateral for these loaned securities. At December 31, 2006, we
had security loans outstanding with a fair value of $780 million, and we held cash in the amount of
$807 million as collateral for these loaned securities.
During the first quarter of 2007, we reclassified an investment from the held-to-maturity
portfolio to the available-for-sale portfolio as a result of a significant deterioration in the
issuers creditworthiness. At the date of transfer, this debt security had an amortized cost of
$169 million and an unrealized loss of $8 million. This investment was sold during the first
quarter at a realized gain of $12 million.
For additional information, see Notes 1 and 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
4. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We have outstanding cross-currency swap agreements related to the $450 million senior notes
(see Note 5). The components of the fair value of the cross-currency swaps were reflected as an
asset or (liability) in the balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Interest rate component |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Foreign currency component |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Accrued interest component |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total fair value of cross-currency swaps |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
13
The following is a reconciliation of the foreign currency component of the cross-currency
swaps included in accumulated other comprehensive income for the six-month periods ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in fair value of cross-currency swaps |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Interest rate component not qualifying for hedge accounting
reclassified to net earnings |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements related to the 20 billion yen variable
interest rate Uridashi notes (see Note 5). The fair value of these swaps and related changes in
fair value, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, were immaterial during
the six-month period ended June 30, 2007.
For additional information on our cross-currency and interest rate swaps and other financial
instruments, see Notes 1 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our annual
report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
5. NOTES PAYABLE
A summary of notes payable follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
6.50% senior notes due April 2009 |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
Yen-denominated Uridashi notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.52% notes due September 2011 (principal amount 15 billion yen) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
2.26% notes due September 2016 (principal amount 10 billion yen) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Variable interest rate notes due September 2011 (.97% at
June 2007, principal amount 20 billion yen) |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Yen-denominated Samurai notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.96% notes paid June 2007 (principal amount 30 billion yen) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
252 |
|
.71% notes due July 2010 (principal amount 40 billion yen) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
1.87% notes due June 2012 (principal amount 30 billion yen) |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Capitalized lease obligations payable through 2013 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,426 |
|
|
In June 2007, the Parent Company issued yen-denominated Samurai notes totaling 30 billion
yen with a five-year maturity. The notes pay interest semiannually, may only be redeemed prior to
maturity upon the occurrence of a tax event as specified in the bond agreement and are not
available to U.S. persons. The bonds were issued in Japan under a Shelf Registration Statement
(SRS) filed in February 2006 for the issuance of up to 100 billion yen of yen-denominated Samurai
notes. These notes are the first issuance from the February 2006 shelf registration. We used the
net proceeds of these Samurai notes to pay in full the .96% Samurai notes that were issued in 2002
and matured in June 2007.
We were in compliance with all of the covenants of our notes payable at June 30, 2007. No
events of default or defaults occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
14
For additional information, see Notes 4 and 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
6. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
The following table is a reconciliation of the number of shares of the Companys common stock
for the six-month periods ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of shares) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Common stock issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
655,715 |
|
|
|
654,522 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
657,215 |
|
|
|
655,277 |
|
|
Treasury stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
163,165 |
|
|
|
155,628 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
7,246 |
|
|
|
4,120 |
|
Dispositions of treasury stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued to AFL Stock Plan |
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
168,732 |
|
|
|
158,153 |
|
|
Shares outstanding, end of period |
|
|
488,483 |
|
|
|
497,124 |
|
|
Outstanding share-based awards are excluded from the calculation of weighted-average
shares used in the computation of basic earnings per share. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007,
stock options to purchase approximately 2.4 million shares, on a weighted-average basis, were
considered to be anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per
share, compared with 1.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. For the six months ended
June 30, 2007, stock options to purchase approximately 2.6 million shares, on a weighted-average
basis, were considered to be anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted
earnings per share, compared with 1.4 million for the six-month period a year ago.
In February 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of 30.0 million shares of our
common stock. We exhausted that authorization during the second quarter of 2007. In February
2006, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an additional 30.0 million shares of our
common stock. As of June 30, 2007, approximately 29.6 million shares were available for purchase
under that share repurchase authorization.
7. SHARE-BASED TRANSACTIONS
The Company has two long-term incentive compensation plans. The first plan allows for grants
of both incentive stock options (ISOs) and non-qualifying stock options (NQSOs). This plan expired
in February 2007, although options granted before that date remain outstanding in accordance with
their terms. The second plan allows for ISOs, NQSOs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and
stock appreciation rights. At June 30, 2007, approximately 23 million shares were available for
future grants under this plan, and the only performance-based awards issued and outstanding were
restricted stock awards.
15
The following table provides information on stock options outstanding and exercisable at June
30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Option |
|
Exercise Price |
(In thousands of shares) |
|
Shares |
|
Per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
18,783 |
|
|
$ |
32.77 |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
14,230 |
|
|
|
29.21 |
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $350
million, with a weighted-average remaining term of 5.5 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of
stock options exercisable at that same date was $316 million, with a weighted-average remaining
term of 4.5 years. We received cash from the exercise of stock options in the amount of $32
million during the first six months of 2007, compared with $22 million in the first six months of
2006. The tax benefit realized as a result of stock option exercises was $24 million in the first
six months of 2007, compared with $11 million in the first six months of 2006.
As of June 30, 2007, total compensation cost not yet recognized in our financial statements
related to restricted stock awards was $27 million, of which $13 million (492 thousand shares) was
related to share-based awards with a performance-based vesting condition. We expect to recognize
these amounts over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. There are no other
contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested.
For additional information on our long-term share-based compensation plans and the types of
share-based awards, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
8. BENEFIT PLANS
Our basic employee defined-benefit pension plans cover substantially all of our full-time
employees in the United States and Japan. The components of retirement expense for the Japanese
and U.S. pension plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Japan |
|
U.S. |
|
Japan |
|
U.S. |
|
Japan |
|
U.S. |
|
Japan |
|
U.S. |
|
Components of
net periodic
benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Expected return on
plan assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Amortization of net
actuarial loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Net
periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
16
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, Aflac Japan contributed approximately $5
million (using the June 30, 2007, exchange rate) to the Japanese pension plan. During the six
months ended June 30, 2007, no contributions had been made to the U.S. pension plan.
For additional information regarding our Japanese and U.S. benefit plans, see Note 12 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
9. INCOME TAXES
We file federal income tax returns in the United States and Japan as well as state or
prefecture income tax returns in various jurisdictions in the two countries. U.S. federal and
state income tax returns for years before 2002 are no longer subject to examination. We have been
examined through March 31, 2004, for Japanese tax purposes.
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48), on January 1, 2007 (see Note 1). There was no change in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the implementation of FIN 48 and therefore no adjustment
to retained earnings upon adoption. Included in the balance of the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits at June 30, 2007, are $50 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is
highly certain, but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because
of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of
the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate, but would
accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The Company has
accrued approximately $2 million for permanent uncertainties, which if reversed would not have a
material effect on the annual effective rate.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
income tax expense. We recognized approximately $500 thousand in interest and penalties during the
three months ended June 30, 2007, compared with approximately $410 thousand in the three months
ended June 30, 2006. We recognized approximately $1 million in interest and penalties during the
first half of both 2007 and 2006. The Company has accrued approximately $30 million for the
payment of interest and penalties as of June 30, 2007, compared with $28 million a year ago.
As of June 30, 2007, there are no material uncertain tax positions for which the total amounts
of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.
For additional information on our Japanese and U.S. taxes, see Note 8 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December
31, 2006.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
We have three outsourcing agreements with IBM. The first agreement provides mainframe
computer operations and support for Aflac Japan. It has a remaining term of nine years and an
aggregate remaining cost of 26.0 billion yen ($211 million using the June 30, 2007, exchange rate).
The second agreement provides distributed computer operations and support for Aflac Japan. It has
a term of nine years and an aggregate cost of 32.0 billion yen ($260 million using the June 30,
2007, exchange rate). The third agreement provides application maintenance and development
services for
17
Aflac Japan. It has a term of five years and a remaining aggregate cost of 10.0 billion
yen ($81 million using the June 30, 2007, exchange rate).
We have entered into two additional outsourcing agreements to provide application maintenance and
development services for our Japanese operation. The first agreement with Accenture has a term of
seven years with an aggregate cost of 5.3 billion yen ($43 million using the June 30, 2007,
exchange rate). The second agreement with NTT DATA has a term of three years with an aggregate
cost of 1.3 billion yen ($10 million using the June 30, 2007, exchange rate).
We lease office space and equipment under various agreements that expire in various years
through 2021. For further information regarding lease commitments, see Note 13 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December
31, 2006.
In 2005, we announced a multiyear building project for additional office space in Columbus,
Georgia. The initial phase was substantially completed in June 2007 at a cost of approximately $26
million. The second phase of the expansion is to be completed in 2009 and is expected to cost
approximately $48 million.
We are a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business.
Senior legal and financial management review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. The final
results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. Although some of this litigation is
pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages
sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, we believe the outcome of pending
litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
18
REVIEW BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The June 30, 2007, and 2006, financial statements included in this filing have been reviewed
by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, in accordance with established
professional standards and procedures for such a review.
The report of KPMG LLP commenting upon its review is included on page 20.
19
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The shareholders and board of directors of Aflac Incorporated:
We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries as of June
30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, and the consolidated statements of
shareholders equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007, and 2006. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Aflac Incorporated
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 27, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions
of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, as of January 1, 2006.
Additionally, as discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement plans, an amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), as
of December 31, 2006.
Atlanta, Georgia
August 7, 2007
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor to encourage
companies to provide prospective information, so long as those informational statements are
identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying
important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in the
forward-looking statements. We desire to take advantage of these provisions. This report contains
cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected herein, and in any other statements made by Company officials in
communications with the financial community and contained in documents filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). Forward-looking statements are not based on historical information
and relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Furthermore,
forward-looking information is subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. In
particular, statements containing words such as expect, anticipate, believe, goal,
objective, may, should, estimate, intends, projects, will, assumes, potential,
target, or similar words as well as specific projections of future results, generally qualify as
forward-looking. Aflac undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
We caution readers that the following factors, in addition to other factors mentioned from
time to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the
forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory developments |
|
|
|
|
assessments for insurance company insolvencies |
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions in the United States and Japan |
|
|
|
|
new product development and customer response to new products and new marketing
initiatives |
|
|
|
|
ability to attract and retain qualified sales associates and employees |
|
|
|
|
ability to repatriate profits from Japan |
|
|
|
|
changes in U.S. and/or Japanese tax laws or accounting requirements |
|
|
|
|
credit and other risks associated with Aflacs investment activities |
|
|
|
|
significant changes in investment yield rates |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates |
|
|
|
|
deviations in actual experience from pricing and reserving assumptions including, but
not limited to, morbidity, mortality, persistency, expenses, and investment yields |
|
|
|
|
level and outcome of litigation |
|
|
|
|
downgrades in the Companys credit rating |
|
|
|
|
changes in rating agency policies or practices |
|
|
|
|
subsidiarys ability to pay dividends to Parent Company |
|
|
|
|
ineffectiveness of hedging strategies |
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in the United States and Japan |
21
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Aflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company)
primarily sell supplemental health and life insurance in the United States and Japan. The
Companys insurance business is marketed and administered through American Family Life Assurance
Company of Columbus (Aflac), which operates in the United States (Aflac U.S.) and as a branch in
Japan (Aflac Japan). Most of Aflacs policies are individually underwritten and marketed through
independent agents. Our insurance operations in the United States and our branch in Japan service
the two markets for our insurance business.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
is intended to inform the reader about matters affecting the financial condition and results of
operations of Aflac Incorporated and its subsidiaries for the period from December 31, 2006, to
June 30, 2007. As a result, the following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes that are included in our annual report to shareholders
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
This MD&A is divided into four primary sections. In the first section, we discuss our
critical accounting estimates. We then follow with a discussion of the results of our operations
on a consolidated basis and by segment. The third section presents an analysis of our financial
condition as well as a discussion of market risks of financial instruments. We conclude by
addressing the availability of capital and the sources and uses of cash in the Capital Resources
and Liquidity section.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make estimates based on currently available information when recording transactions
resulting from business operations. The estimates that we deem to be most critical to an
understanding of Aflacs results of operations and financial condition are those related to
investments, deferred policy acquisition costs and policy liabilities. The preparation and
evaluation of these critical accounting estimates involve the use of various assumptions developed
from managements analyses and judgments. The application of these critical accounting estimates
determines the values at which 96% of our assets and 84% of our liabilities are reported and thus
have a direct effect on net earnings and shareholders equity. Subsequent experience or use of
other assumptions could produce significantly different results. There have been no changes in the
items that we have identified as critical accounting estimates during the six months ended June 30,
2007. For additional information, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of MD&A included
in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
New Accounting Pronouncements
For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on our financial
position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
22
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table is a presentation of items impacting net earnings and net earnings
per diluted share.
Items Impacting Net Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
Per Diluted Share |
|
|
In millions |
|
|
Per Diluted Share |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
.84 |
|
|
$ |
.81 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
Items impacting net
earnings, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment
gains (losses) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
Impact from
SFAS 133 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Realized Investment Gains and Losses
Our investment strategy is to invest in fixed-income securities in order to provide a reliable
stream of investment income, which is one of the drivers of the Companys profitability. We do not
purchase securities with the intent of generating capital gains or losses. However, investment
gains and losses may be realized as a result of changes in the financial markets and the
creditworthiness of specific issuers, tax planning strategies, and/or general portfolio maintenance
and rebalancing. The realization of investment gains and losses is independent of the underwriting
and administration of our insurance products, which are the principal drivers of our profitability.
Realized investment gains in the first six months of 2007 primarily resulted from securities sold
or redeemed during the period. Realized investment gains in the first six months of 2006 primarily
resulted from our bond-swap program, which took advantage of tax loss carryforwards and sales
transactions in the normal course of business.
Impact from SFAS 133
We entered into cross-currency swap agreements to effectively convert our dollar-denominated
senior notes, which mature in 2009, into a yen-denominated obligation. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended (SFAS 133), requires that the change in the fair value of the interest rate component of
the cross-currency swaps, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, be reflected in net earnings
(other income). The impact from SFAS 133 includes the change in fair value of the interest rate
component of the cross-currency swaps, which does not qualify for hedge accounting.
We have also issued yen-denominated Samurai and Uridashi notes. We have designated these
notes as a hedge of our investment in Aflac Japan. If the value of these yen-denominated notes and
the notional amounts of the cross-currency swaps exceed our investment in Aflac Japan, we would be
required to recognize the foreign currency effect on the excess, or ineffective portion, in net
earnings (other income). The ineffective portion would be included in the impact from SFAS 133.
These hedges were effective during the six-month period ended June 30, 2007; therefore, there was
no impact on net earnings.
23
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements related to the 20 billion yen variable
interest rate Uridashi notes and have designated the swap agreements as a hedge of the variability
of the debt cash flows. SFAS 133 requires that the change in the fair value of the swap contracts
be recorded in other comprehensive income so long as the hedge is deemed effective. Any
ineffectiveness would be recognized in net earnings (other income) and would be included in the
impact from SFAS 133. These hedges were effective during the six-month period ended June 30, 2007;
therefore, there was no impact on net earnings.
For additional information, see the Impact from SFAS 133 section of MD&A and Notes 4 and
7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our annual report to shareholders for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
Foreign Currency Translation
Aflac Japans premiums and most of its investment income are received in yen. Claims and
expenses are paid in yen, and we primarily purchase yen-denominated assets to support
yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are
translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. We translate Aflac Japans
yen-denominated income statement into dollars using an average exchange rate for the reporting
period, and we translate its yen-denominated balance sheet using the exchange rate at the end of
the period. However, it is important to distinguish between translating and converting foreign
currency. Except for a limited number of transactions, we do not actually convert yen into
dollars.
Due to the size of Aflac Japan, where our functional currency is the Japanese yen,
fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on our reported results.
In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being
reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being
reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in
relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying
current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. As a result, we view foreign
currency translation as a financial reporting issue for Aflac and not an economic event to our
Company or shareholders. Because changes in exchange rates distort the growth rates of our
operations, management evaluates Aflacs financial performance excluding the impact of foreign
currency translation.
Income Taxes
Our combined U.S. and Japanese effective income tax rate on pretax earnings was 34.6% for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007, compared with 34.7% for the same period in 2006.
Earnings Guidance
We communicate earnings guidance in this report based on the growth in net earnings per
diluted share. However, certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside of managements
control may have a significant impact on actual results. Therefore, our comparison of net earnings
includes certain assumptions to reflect the limitations that are inherent in projections of net
earnings. In comparing period-over-period results, we exclude the effect of realized investment
gains and losses, the impact from SFAS 133 and nonrecurring items. We also assume no impact from
foreign currency translation on the Aflac Japan segment and the Parent Companys yen-denominated
interest expense for a given period in relation to the prior period.
24
Subject to the preceding assumptions, our objective for 2007 is to increase net earnings per
diluted share by 15% to 16% over 2006. If we achieve this objective, the following table shows the
likely results for 2007 net earnings per diluted share, including the impact of foreign currency
translation using various yen/dollar exchange rate scenarios.
2007 Net Earnings Per Share (EPS) Scenarios*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen/Dollar |
|
Net Earnings Per |
|
% Growth |
|
Yen Impact |
Exchange Rate |
|
Diluted Share |
|
Over 2006 |
|
on EPS |
|
105.00 |
|
$ 3.46 - 3.49 |
|
21.4 - 22.5% |
|
$ .18 |
110.00 |
|
3.37 - 3.40 |
|
18.2 - 19.3 |
|
.09 |
116.31** |
|
3.28 - 3.31 |
|
15.1 - 16.1 |
|
- |
120.00 |
|
3.23 - 3.26 |
|
13.3 - 14.4 |
|
(.05) |
125.00 |
|
3.17 - 3.20 |
|
11.2 - 12.3 |
|
(.11) |
|
|
|
|
* Excludes realized investment gains/losses, impact from SFAS 133 and nonrecurring items in 2007 and 2006 |
** Actual 2006 weighted-average exchange rate |
Our
objective for 2008 is to increase net earnings per diluted share by
13% to 15%, on the basis described above.
INSURANCE OPERATIONS
Aflacs insurance business consists of two segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Aflac
Japan, which operates as a branch of Aflac, is the principal contributor to consolidated earnings.
GAAP financial reporting requires that a company report financial and descriptive information about
operating segments in its annual and interim period financial statements. Furthermore, we are
required to report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain revenue and expense items, and
segment assets. We measure and evaluate our insurance segments financial performance using
operating earnings on a pretax basis. We define segment operating earnings as the profits we
derive from our operations before realized investment gains and losses, the impact from SFAS 133,
and nonrecurring items. We believe that an analysis of segment pretax operating earnings is
vitally important to an understanding of the underlying profitability drivers and trends of our
insurance business. Furthermore, because a significant portion of our business is conducted in
Japan, we believe it is equally important to understand the impact of translating Japanese yen into
U.S. dollars.
We evaluate our sales efforts using new annualized premium sales, an industry operating
measure. Total new annualized premium sales, which include new sales and the incremental increase
in premiums due to conversions, represent the premiums that we would collect over a 12-month
period, assuming the policies remain in force. Premium income, or earned premiums, is a financial
performance measure that reflects collected or due premiums that have been earned ratably on
policies in force during the reporting period.
25
AFLAC JAPAN SEGMENT
Aflac Japan Pretax Operating Earnings
Changes in Aflac Japans pretax operating earnings and profit margins are primarily affected
by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency, and investment yields. The following table
presents a summary of operating results for Aflac Japan.
Aflac Japan Summary of Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Premium income |
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
2,215 |
|
|
$ |
4,385 |
|
|
$ |
4,354 |
|
Net investment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen-denominated investment income |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Dollar-denominated investment income |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Other income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,196 |
|
|
Benefits and claims |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
3,368 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Insurance and other expenses |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
4,356 |
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
Pretax operating earnings* |
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
926 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate |
|
|
120.78 |
|
|
|
114.43 |
|
|
|
120.13 |
|
|
|
115.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Dollars |
|
In Yen |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
Percentage change over |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
previous period: |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Premium income |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(.1 |
)% |
|
|
.7 |
% |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Pretax operating earnings* |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
* See Page 25 for our definition of segment operating earnings.
The percentage increases in premium income reflect the growth of premiums in force.
Annualized premiums in force in yen increased 4.3% to 1.10 trillion yen as of June 30, 2007,
compared with 1.06 trillion yen a year ago, and reflect the high persistency of Aflac Japans
business and the sales of new policies. Annualized premiums in force, translated into dollars at
respective period-end exchange rates, were $8.9 billion at June 30, 2007, compared with $9.2
billion a year ago.
Aflac Japan maintains a portfolio of dollar-denominated and reverse-dual currency securities
(yen-denominated debt securities with dollar coupon payments). Dollar-denominated investment
income from these assets accounted for approximately 39% of Aflac Japans investment income in the
first six months of 2007, compared with 37% a year ago. In periods when the yen strengthens in
relation to the dollar, translating Aflac Japans dollar-denominated investment income into yen
lowers growth
26
rates for net investment income, total operating revenues, and pretax operating
earnings in yen terms. In periods when the yen weakens, translating dollar-denominated investment
income into yen magnifies growth rates for net investment income, total operating revenues, and
pretax operating earnings in yen terms. On a constant currency basis, dollar-denominated
investment income accounted for approximately 38% of Aflac Japans investment income during the
first six months of 2007. The following table illustrates the effect of translating Aflac Japans
dollar-denominated investment income and related items into yen by comparing certain segment
results with those that would have been reported had yen/dollar exchange rates remained unchanged
from the comparable period in the prior year.
Aflac Japan Percentage Changes Over Previous Period
Yen Operating Results
For the Periods Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including Foreign Currency Changes |
|
Excluding Foreign Currency Changes** |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Total operating revenues |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Pretax operating
earnings* |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
* See Page 25 for our definition of segment operating earnings.
** Amounts excluding foreign currency changes on dollar-denominated items were
determined using the same yen/dollar
exchange rate for the current period as the comparable period
in the prior year.
The following table presents a summary of operating ratios for Aflac Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
Ratios to total revenues, in dollars: |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Benefits and claims |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
64.9 |
% |
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
|
65.0 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Insurance and other expenses |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Pretax operating earnings* |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
* See Page 25 for our definition of segment operating earnings.
The benefit ratio has declined over the past several years, reflecting the impact of
newer products with lower loss ratios. We have also experienced favorable claim trends in our
major product lines. We expect the benefit ratio to continue to decline in future years primarily
reflecting the shift to newer products and riders and the impact of favorable claim trends. The
operating expense ratio increased slightly in the first six months. However, we expect the
operating expense ratio to be relatively stable for the year in relation to 2006. Due to
improvement in the benefit ratio, the pretax operating profit margin expanded from 16.3% to 17.4%
for the three-month period and from 16.5% to 17.5% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007.
We expect continued expansion in the profit margin in 2007 and 2008.
27
Aflac Japan Sales
Aflac Japans sales for both the second quarter and first half of 2007 were better than
expected. Aflac Japans total new annualized premium sales in yen declined 3.5% in the second
quarter of 2007, compared with the second quarter of 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007,
total new annualized premium sales declined 6.9% compared with the same period a year ago. The
following table presents Aflac Japans total new annualized premium sales for the periods ended
June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Dollars |
|
In Yen |
|
(In millions of dollars and |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Total new
annualized premium sales |
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
Percentage change
over comparable
period in prior year |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
|
|
(9.7 |
)% |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
|
|
(6.9 |
)% |
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
The following table details the contributions to total new annualized premium sales by
major product for the periods ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Medical policies |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
Cancer life |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Ordinary life |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Rider MAX |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Although medical sales improved somewhat over the first quarter of 2007, they continued
to be weak in the second quarter across the industry and for Aflac. Medical sales declined 13.4% in
the second quarter of 2007, compared with the same period a year ago. However, sales of our cancer
insurance product category were again strong during the second quarter of 2007, improving 22.7%
over the same period a year ago. We believe our cancer product sales benefited from advertising and
promotional efforts for that product, in addition to accelerated purchases before a premium rate
increase in September resulting from adoption of new mortality tables. Ordinary life sales
recovered somewhat during the second quarter, increasing 23.3% over the first quarter of 2007.
However, ordinary life sales were down 10.9%, compared with the same period a year ago. We believe
the increase in life insurance sales over the first quarter of 2007 reflects the introduction of
reduced life insurance premium rates that went into effect in April of this year. For our life
insurance products, we adopted the new mortality tables in April 2007, which had the effect of
lowering premium rates for ordinary life products.
We remain encouraged about the prospects for improvement in sales, and we continue to believe
we will produce a modest sales increase in the second half of the year.
Aflac Japan Investments
Growth of investment income in yen is affected by available cash flow from operations, timing
of and yields on new investments, and the effect of yen/dollar exchange rates on dollar-denominated
28
investment income. Aflac Japan has invested in privately issued securities to secure higher
yields than Japanese government or other public corporate bonds would have provided, while still
adhering to prudent standards for credit quality. All of our privately issued securities are rated
investment grade at the time of purchase. These securities are generally issued with standard
documentation for medium-term note programs and have appropriate covenants.
The following table presents the results of Aflac Japans investment activities for the
periods ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
New money yield yen only |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
New money yield blended |
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
Return on
average invested assets, net of
investment expenses |
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
At June 30, 2007, the yield on Aflac Japans investment portfolio, including
dollar-denominated investments, was 4.09%, compared with 4.17% a year ago. See Investments and
Cash on Page 35 for additional information.
Japanese Economy
Japan continues to show signs of economic improvement and while recent events indicate that
Japans economy has begun to recover, the time required for a full economic recovery remains
uncertain. For additional information, see the Japanese Economy section of MD&A in our annual
report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Japanese Regulatory Environment
Japans Financial Services Agency (FSA) adopted new mortality tables effective April 2007,
that will be used when developing our policy premium and reserving assumptions on newly
underwritten policies. These new tables reflect recent improvements in survival rates in Japan. If
our other assumptions remain unchanged, these revisions will generally result in a decrease in
policy premiums for death benefit products and an increase in premium rates for third sector
(health) products and annuities. We reflected the impact of the new mortality table in our product
pricing for the first sector (life) products in April 2007. For the third sector, the revised
tables will be reflected in our product pricing in September 2007.
Additionally, the FSA has implemented a new rule for third sector product reserving. The new
reserving rule was effective April 1, 2007. Under the new rule, we are required to conduct stress
testing of our reserves using a prescribed method that incorporates actual incidence rates. The
results of the tests and their relation to our reserves will determine whether reserve
strengthening is required. While this new reserve requirement will not impact our GAAP financial
statements, we currently estimate that adoption of this requirement will not have a material impact
on our 2007 FSA-based financial statements or on our product pricing.
As disclosed in our 2006 Form 10-K, Aflac Japan, along with the entire Japanese life insurance
industry, began a review of the last five years of paid claims to determine if those claims were
paid fully and accurately. On April 13, 2007, Aflac Japan reported the findings of its review to
the FSA. By the end of June 2007, we had paid all of the affected customers except for a few that
require
29
additional documentation before the claim payment can be made. In addition, we are using this
review to identify process changes that will help ensure that payment errors such as these are not
repeated. The financial impact of paying the claims that were in error was immaterial to our
operations and has been provided for in our financial statements.
AFLAC U.S. SEGMENT
Aflac U.S. Pretax Operating Earnings
Changes in Aflac U.S. pretax operating earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by
morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a
summary of operating results for Aflac U.S.
Aflac U.S. Summary of Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Premium income |
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
$ |
878 |
|
|
$ |
1,933 |
|
|
$ |
1,744 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Other income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
Benefits and claims |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Insurance and other expenses |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
Pretax operating earnings* |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
Percentage change over previous period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium income |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Pretax operating earnings* |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
* See Page 25 for our definition of segment operating earnings.
The percentage increases in premium income reflect the growth of premiums in force. The
increases in annualized premiums in force of 10.6% in the first six months of 2007 and 9.4% for the
same period of 2006 were favorably affected by sales at the worksite primarily through cafeteria
plans and a slight improvement in the persistency of several products. Annualized premiums in
force at June 30, 2007 were $4.2 billion, compared with $3.8 billion a year ago.
30
The following table presents a summary of operating ratios for Aflac U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
Ratios to total revenues: |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Benefits and claims |
|
|
53.1 |
% |
|
|
53.0 |
% |
|
|
52.9 |
% |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Insurance and other expenses |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
Pretax operating earnings* |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
* See Page 25 for our definition of segment operating earnings.
The benefit ratio declined in the first half of 2007. As a percentage of premium income,
the benefit ratio was 59.8% in the first six months of 2007, compared with 60.2% in the first half
of 2006. We expect the benefit ratio to decline slightly in 2007 due to favorable claim cost
trends and the operating expense ratio for 2007 to remain relatively stable, compared with 2006.
Overall, the pretax operating profit margin is expected to increase slightly in 2007.
Aflac U.S. Sales
We were pleased with our U.S. sales results, with total new annualized premium sales rising
11.8% during the second quarter and 11.2% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. The
following table presents Aflacs U.S. total new annualized premium sales for the periods ended June
30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Total new annualized premium sales |
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
Percentage change over comparable
period in prior year |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
The following table details the contributions to total new annualized premium sales by
major product category for the periods ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Accident/disability coverage |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
Cancer expense insurance |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Hospital indemnity products |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Fixed-benefit dental coverage |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Total new annualized premium sales for accident/disability, our leading product category,
increased 12.1% in the second quarter of 2007, while cancer expense insurance increased 8.2% and
our hospital indemnity group increased 20.2%, compared with the same period a year ago.
31
We remain very satisfied with our progress in the ongoing expansion of our U.S. sales force.
Despite the anticipated decline in newly recruited sales associates, the number of average weekly
producing sales associates increased 6.7% in the second quarter of 2007, compared with the
same period a year ago. We believe that the average weekly producing sales associates metric
allows our sales management to actively monitor progress on a real-time basis. Furthermore, we
believe the increase in producing sales associates reflects the success of the training programs we
implemented over the last few years. We remain enthusiastic about the opportunities in the U.S.
market, and continue to look for total new annualized premium sales to increase 6% to 10% for the
full year.
Aflac U.S. Investments
The following table presents the results of Aflacs U.S. investment activities for the periods
ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
New money yield |
|
|
6.51 |
% |
|
|
6.54 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
Return on average invested assets, net of
investment expenses |
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
At June 30, 2007, the portfolio yield on Aflacs U.S. portfolio was 7.01%, compared with
7.19% a year ago. See Investments and Cash on Page 35 for additional information.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Our financial condition has remained strong in the functional currencies of our
operations during the last two years. The yen/dollar exchange rate at the end of each period is
used to translate yen-denominated balance sheet items to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. The
exchange rate at June 30, 2007, was 123.26 yen to one dollar, or 3.4% weaker than the December 31,
2006, exchange rate of 119.11. The weaker yen decreased reported investments and cash by $1.4
billion, total assets by $1.6 billion, and total liabilities by $1.6 billion, compared with the
amounts that would have been reported for the second quarter of 2007 if the exchange rate had
remained unchanged from December 31, 2006.
Market Risks of Financial Instruments
Because we invest in fixed-income securities, our financial instruments are exposed primarily
to two types of market risks: currency risk and interest rate risk.
32
Currency Risk
The functional currency of Aflac Japans insurance operation is the Japanese yen. All of
Aflac Japans premiums, claims and commissions are received or paid in yen, as are most of its
investment income and other expenses. Furthermore, most of Aflac Japans investments, cash and
liabilities are yen-denominated. When yen-denominated securities mature or are sold, the proceeds
are generally reinvested in yen-denominated securities. Aflac Japan holds these yen-denominated
assets to fund its yen-denominated policy obligations. In addition, Aflac Incorporated has
yen-denominated notes payable and cross-currency swaps related to its dollar-denominated senior
notes.
Although we generally do not convert yen into dollars, we do translate financial statement
amounts from yen into dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are
affected by foreign currency fluctuations. We report unrealized foreign currency translation gains
and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income.
On a consolidated basis, we attempt to minimize the exposure of our shareholders equity to
foreign currency translation fluctuations. We accomplish this by investing a portion of Aflac
Japans investment portfolio in dollar-denominated securities, by the Parent Companys issuance of
yen-denominated debt and by the use of cross-currency swaps (see Hedging Activities on Page 42 for
additional information). As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on our net assets is
mitigated. The dollar values of our yen-denominated net assets, which are subject to foreign
currency translation fluctuations for financial reporting purposes, are summarized as follows
(translated at end-of-period exchange rates):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Aflac Japan yen-denominated net assets |
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
2,317 |
|
Parent Company yen-denominated net liabilities |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
|
(1,434 |
) |
|
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets subject to
foreign currency translation fluctuations |
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
883 |
|
|
33
The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by
presenting the dollar values of our yen-denominated assets and liabilities, and our consolidated
yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates.
Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Yen/dollar exchange rates |
|
|
108.26 |
|
|
|
123.26 |
* |
|
|
138.26 |
|
|
|
104.11 |
|
|
|
119.11 |
* |
|
|
134.11 |
|
|
Yen-denominated financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
21,075 |
|
|
$ |
18,510 |
|
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
|
$ |
21,712 |
|
|
$ |
18,978 |
|
|
$ |
16,856 |
|
Perpetual debentures |
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
3,296 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
16,201 |
|
|
|
14,229 |
|
|
|
12,686 |
|
|
|
15,404 |
|
|
|
13,464 |
|
|
|
11,958 |
|
Perpetual debentures |
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Other financial instruments |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
46,028 |
|
|
|
40,427 |
|
|
|
36,041 |
|
|
|
46,371 |
|
|
|
40,531 |
|
|
|
35,998 |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Cross-currency swaps |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Japanese policyholder
protection fund |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
Net yen-denominated
financial instruments |
|
|
44,265 |
|
|
|
38,878 |
|
|
|
34,660 |
|
|
|
44,520 |
|
|
|
38,913 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
Other yen-denominated assets |
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
4,818 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
4,852 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
Other yen-denominated liabilities |
|
|
(49,282 |
) |
|
|
(43,285 |
) |
|
|
(38,588 |
) |
|
|
(49,060 |
) |
|
|
(42,882 |
) |
|
|
(38,086 |
) |
|
Consolidated yen-denominated
net assets subject to foreign
currency fluctuation |
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
|
$ |
883 |
|
|
$ |
784 |
|
|
* Actual period-end exchange rate
We are exposed to economic currency risk only when yen funds are actually converted into
dollars. This primarily occurs when we repatriate funds from Aflac Japan to Aflac U.S., which is
done annually. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of repatriation will differ from the
exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. These repatriations have not
been greater than 80% of Aflac Japans prior year earnings determined in accordance with standards
established by the FSA. A portion of the repatriation may be used to service Aflac Incorporateds
yen-denominated notes payable with the remainder converted into dollars.
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary interest rate exposure is to the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair
value of our investments in debt securities. At June 30, 2007, we had $459 million of net
unrealized gains on total debt securities, compared with $1.7 billion of net unrealized gains on
total debt securities at December 31, 2006. We estimate that the reduction in the fair value of
debt securities we own resulting
from a 100 basis point increase in market interest rates, based on our portfolios at June 30,
2007, and December 31, 2006, would be as follows:
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Effect on yen-denominated debt securities |
|
$ |
(4,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,386 |
) |
Effect on dollar-denominated debt securities |
|
|
(906 |
) |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
Effect on total debt securities |
|
$ |
(5,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,243 |
) |
|
Changes in the interest rate environment have contributed to the unrealized gains on debt
securities we own. However, we do not expect to realize a majority of these unrealized gains
because we have the intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Likewise, should
significant amounts of unrealized losses occur because of increases in market yields, we would not
expect to realize those losses because we have the intent and ability to hold such securities to
maturity or recovery of value.
We attempt to match the duration of our assets with the duration of our liabilities.
Currently, when debt securities we own mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that
of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in
earlier years. Also, our strategy of developing and marketing riders to our older policies has
helped offset the negative investment spread. Despite negative investment spreads, adequate
overall profit margins still exist in Aflac Japans aggregate block of business because of profits
that have emerged from changes in mix of business and favorable experience from mortality,
morbidity, and expenses. For additional information, see the Interest Rate Risk section of MD&A
in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Investments and Cash
Our investment philosophy is to maximize investment income while emphasizing liquidity, safety
and quality. Our investment objective, subject to appropriate risk constraints, is to fund
policyholder obligations and other liabilities in a manner that enhances shareholders equity. We
seek to achieve this objective through a diversified portfolio of fixed-income investments that
reflects the characteristics of the liabilities it supports. Aflac invests primarily within the
debt securities markets.
35
The following table details investment securities by segment.
Investment Securities by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aflac Japan |
|
|
Aflac U.S. |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
21,645 |
|
|
$ |
22,044 |
|
|
$ |
6,865 |
* |
|
$ |
6,659 |
* |
Perpetual debentures |
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total available for sale |
|
|
25,306 |
|
|
|
26,004 |
|
|
|
7,243 |
|
|
|
7,132 |
|
|
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
14,229 |
|
|
|
13,464 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Perpetual debentures |
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total held to maturity |
|
|
18,071 |
|
|
|
17,454 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
$ |
43,377 |
|
|
$ |
43,458 |
|
|
$ |
7,263 |
|
|
$ |
7,151 |
|
|
* Excludes investment-grade available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities held by the Parent Company of $102 in both 2007 and 2006.
We have investments in both publicly issued and privately issued securities. However,
the status of issuance should not be viewed as an indicator of liquidity or as a limitation on the
determination of fair value. The outstanding amount of a particular issuance, as well as the level
of activity in a particular issuance and the state of the market, including credit events and the
interest rate environment, affect liquidity regardless of type of issuance. We routinely assess
the fair value of all of our investments. This process includes evaluating quotations provided by
outside securities pricing sources and/or compiled using data provided by external debt and equity
market sources, as described more fully in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
following table details investment securities by type of issuance.
Investment Securities by Type of Issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Publicly issued securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
15,239 |
|
|
$ |
15,975 |
|
|
$ |
15,092 |
|
|
$ |
16,269 |
|
Perpetual debentures |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Total publicly issued |
|
|
15,424 |
|
|
|
16,162 |
|
|
|
15,278 |
|
|
|
16,467 |
|
|
Privately issued securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
26,686 |
|
|
|
26,417 |
|
|
|
25,490 |
|
|
|
25,905 |
|
Perpetual debentures |
|
|
7,696 |
|
|
|
7,695 |
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
8,256 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total privately issued |
|
|
34,385 |
|
|
|
34,115 |
|
|
|
33,651 |
|
|
|
34,164 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
$ |
49,809 |
|
|
$ |
50,277 |
|
|
$ |
48,929 |
|
|
$ |
50,631 |
|
|
The fair values of our debt securities at June 30, 2007, declined from December 31, 2006,
as a result of the effects of a rising interest rate environment in both the United States and
Japan and a weaker yen/dollar exchange rate.
36
Privately issued securities accounted for 69.0% of total debt securities, at amortized cost,
as of June 30, 2007, compared with 68.8% at December 31, 2006. Privately issued securities held by
Aflac Japan at amortized cost accounted for $32.0 billion, or 64.3%, of total debt securities at
June 30, 2007, and $31.3 billion, or 64.0%, of total debt securities at December 31, 2006.
Reverse-dual currency debt securities accounted for $10.0 billion, or 29.1%, of total privately
issued securities as of June 30, 2007, compared with $9.7 billion, or 28.9%, of total privately
issued securities at December 31, 2006. Aflac Japan has invested in privately issued securities to
secure higher yields than those available from Japanese government bonds. Aflac Japans
investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese
issuers and have longer maturities, thereby allowing us to improve our asset/liability matching and
our overall investment returns. Most of our privately issued securities are issued under
medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings, except
when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants are
required.
Our investment activities expose us to credit risk, which is a consequence of extending credit
and/or carrying investment positions. However, we continue to adhere to prudent standards for
credit quality. We accomplish this by considering our product needs and the overall corporate
objectives, in addition to credit risk. Our investment policy requires that all securities be
rated investment grade at the time of purchase. In evaluating the initial rating, we look at the
overall senior issuer rating, the explicit rating for the actual issue or the rating for the
security class, and, where applicable, the appropriate designation from the Securities Valuation
Office (SVO) of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). All of our securities
have ratings from either a nationally recognized statistical rating organization or the SVO of the
NAIC. In addition, we perform extensive internal credit reviews to ensure that we are consistent
in applying rating criteria for all of our securities. We have no direct investment exposure to
the sub-prime lending market. In light of recent market activity surrounding the sub-prime lending
market, we have performed a review of our investment portfolio and have not identified any material
indirect exposure to that market.
We use specific criteria to judge the credit quality of both existing and prospective
investments. Furthermore, we use several methods to monitor these criteria, including credit
rating services and internal credit analysis. The distributions by credit rating of our purchases
of debt securities, based on acquisition cost, were as follows:
Composition of Purchases by Credit Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
AAA |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
AA |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
A |
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
The large percentage of securities purchased in the AAA rated category primarily reflects
the purchase of U.S. Treasury Bills by Aflac Japan, pending
repatriation of profits to Aflac U.S. which will be completed in the
third quarter of 2007.
37
The distributions of debt securities we own, by credit rating, were as follows:
Composition by Credit Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
AAA |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
AA |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
A |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
BB or lower |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
The overall credit quality of our portfolio remained high in part because our investment
policy prohibits us from purchasing below-investment-grade securities. The increase in AAA and AA
rated holdings compared with December 31, 2006, resulted from purchases and credit rating upgrades
by rating agencies; the offset was a corresponding decrease in the A and BBB rated holdings. The
decline in BB or lower rated securities resulted from the upgrade of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines from
below investment grade to investment grade during the quarter.
In the event of a credit rating downgrade to below-investment-grade status, we do not
automatically liquidate our position. However, if the security is in the held-to-maturity
portfolio, we immediately transfer it to the available-for-sale portfolio so that the securitys
fair value and its unrealized gain/loss are reflected on the balance sheet.
Once we designate a security as below investment grade, we intensify our monitoring of the
issuer. We do not automatically recognize an impairment if the securitys amortized cost exceeds
its fair value. Our investment management starts by reviewing its credit analysis. Included in
this process are an evaluation of the issuer, its current credit posture and an assessment of the
future prospects for the issuer. We then obtain fair value information from at least three
independent pricing sources. Upon determining the fair value, we move our focus to an analysis of
whether or not the decline in fair value, if any, is other than temporary. For securities with an
amortized cost in excess of fair value, investment management then reviews the issue based on our
impairment policy to determine if the investment should be impaired and/or liquidated. The
assessment of whether a decline is other than temporary requires significant management judgment
and is discussed more fully in the Critical Accounting Estimates section of MD&A in our annual
report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006. Securities classified as below
investment grade were as follows:
38
Below-Investment-Grade Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Ahold |
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Ford Motor Credit |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
CSAV |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Ford Motor Company |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
BAWAG |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Tennessee Gas Pipeline |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
964 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
|
* Investment grade at respective reporting date
Occasionally, a debt security will be split rated. This occurs when one rating agency
rates the security as investment grade while another rating agency rates the same security as below
investment grade. Our policy is to review each issue on a case-by-case basis to determine if a
split-rated security should be classified as investment grade or below investment grade. Our
review includes evaluating the issuers credit position as well as current market pricing and other
factors, such as the issuers or securitys inclusion on a credit rating downgrade watch list.
Split-rated securities as of June 30, 2007, represented .2% of total debt securities at amortized
cost and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Moody's |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
|
Investment-Grade |
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Rating |
|
Rating |
|
Rating |
|
Status |
|
Tyco Electronics AMP
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
Ba1
|
|
BBB
|
|
BBB+
|
|
Investment Grade |
Tennessee Gas Pipeline
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Baa3
|
|
BB
|
|
BBB-
|
|
Investment Grade |
Ahold Lease USA Inc.
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Ba1
|
|
BBB-
|
|
N/R*
|
|
Below Investment Grade |
Union Carbide Corp.
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Ba2
|
|
BBB-
|
|
BBB
|
|
Investment Grade |
|
* Not rated
The following table provides details on amortized cost, fair value and unrealized gains
and losses for our investments in debt securities by investment-grade status as of June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Percent |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
of Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade securities |
|
$ |
30,738 |
|
|
$ |
31,833 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
Below-investment- grade securities |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade securities |
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
17,627 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,794 |
|
|
$ |
50,253 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
39
The following table presents an aging of securities in an unrealized loss position as of
June 30, 2007.
Aging of Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Less Than Six Months |
|
to 12 Months |
|
Over 12 Months |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Available-for-sale
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade
securities |
|
$ |
13,639 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
6,640 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
6,389 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
Below-investment-grade securities |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Held-to-maturity
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade
securities |
|
|
11,855 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
4,020 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
6,898 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,422 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
10,660 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
14,215 |
|
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
|
The following table presents a distribution of unrealized losses by magnitude as of June
30, 2007.
Percentage Decline from Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Less than 20% |
|
20% to 35% |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Cost |
|
Loss |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade securities |
|
$ |
13,639 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
13,582 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Below-investment-
grade securities |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade securities |
|
|
11,855 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
11,449 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,422 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
25,449 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
The following table presents the 10 largest unrealized loss positions in our portfolio as
of June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(In millions) |
|
Rating |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
SLM Corp |
|
A |
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
CSAV |
|
BB |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Ahold |
|
BB |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
KBC Group |
|
A |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Nordea Bank |
|
AA |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Unique Zurich Airport |
|
BBB |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Oman |
|
A |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Royal Bank of Scotland |
|
AA |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Alpha Bank |
|
A |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
EFG Euro Bank Ergasias |
|
A |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
The fair value of our investments in debt securities can fluctuate as a result of changes
in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and credit issues. Declines in fair value
noted above resulted from changes in the interest rates, yen/dollar exchange rates, and issuer
credit status. However, we believe that it would be inappropriate to recognize impairment charges
because we believe the
40
changes in fair value are temporary. Based on our evaluation and analysis of specific issuers
in accordance with our impairment policy, impairment charges recognized during the six-month period
ended June 30, 2007 were immaterial. There were no impairment charges recognized during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2006.
Realized losses on investment-grade debt securities were as follows:
Realized Losses on Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
(In millions) |
|
Proceeds |
|
Loss |
|
Proceeds |
|
Loss |
|
Investment-grade securities, length of consecutive unrealized loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than six months |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Six months to 12 months |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Over 12 months |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
There were no disposals of below-investment-grade securities which resulted in losses
during the first six months of 2007.
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaled $1.4 billion, or 2.7% of total
investments and cash, as of June 30, 2007, compared with $1.2 billion, or 2.3%, at December 31,
2006.
For additional information concerning our investments, see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Deferred policy acquisition costs totaled $6.1 billion at June 30, 2007, an increase of $71
million, or 1.2%, compared with $6.0 billion at December 31, 2006. The following table presents
deferred policy acquisition costs by segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Aflac Japan |
|
$ |
3,838 |
|
|
$ |
3,857 |
|
Aflac U.S. |
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
Aflac Japans deferred policy acquisition costs decreased .5% (3.0% increase in yen) for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. The weaker yen at June 30, 2007, decreased reported deferred
policy acquisition costs by $134 million. Deferred policy acquisition costs of Aflac U.S.
increased 4.1% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. The increase in total deferred policy
acquisition costs was primarily driven by total new annualized premium sales.
Policy Liabilities
Policy liabilities totaled $45.7 billion at June 30, 2007, an increase of $282 million, or .6%, compared with $45.4 billion at December 31, 2006. The following table presents policy
liabilities by segment.
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Aflac Japan |
|
$ |
40,040 |
|
|
$ |
40,072 |
|
Aflac U.S. |
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
5,365 |
|
|
Aflac Japans policy liabilities decreased .1% (3.4% increase in yen) for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The weaker yen at June 30, 2007, decreased reported policy liabilities by
$1.4 billion. Policy liabilities of Aflac U.S. increased 5.9% for the six-month period ended June
30, 2007. The increase in total policy liabilities is the result of the growth and aging of our
in-force business.
Notes Payable
Notes payable totaled $1.4 billion at both June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006. The ratio of
debt to total capitalization (debt plus shareholders equity, excluding the unrealized gains and
losses on investment securities) was 16.0% as of June 30, 2007, compared with 17.2% at December 31,
2006. See Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Benefit Plans
Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan have various benefit plans. For additional information on our U.S.
and Japanese plans, see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 12 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our annual report to shareholders for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
Policyholder Protection Fund
The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for
the policyholders of insolvent insurers. See the Policyholder Protection Fund section of MD&A in
our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2006, for additional information.
Hedging Activities
Aflac has limited hedging activities. Our primary exposure to be hedged is our investment in
Aflac Japan, which is affected by changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate. In order to mitigate
this exposure, we have taken the following courses of action. First, Aflac Japan owns
dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of our
investment in Aflac Japan. Second, we have designated the Parent Companys yen-denominated
liabilities (Samurai and Uridashi notes payable and cross-currency swaps) as a hedge of our
investment in Aflac Japan. If the total of these yen-denominated liabilities is equal to or less
than our net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective and the related
exchange effect is reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive
income. Should these yen-denominated liabilities exceed our investment in Aflac Japan, the portion
of the hedge that exceeds our investment in Aflac Japan would be deemed ineffective. As required
by SFAS 133, we would then recognize the foreign exchange effect on the ineffective portion in net
earnings (other income). We estimate that if the ineffective portion was 10 billion yen, we would
report a foreign exchange gain/loss of approximately $1 million for every one yen
weakening/strengthening in the end-of-period yen/dollar exchange rate. At June 30, 2007, our hedge
was effective with yen-denominated assets exceeding yen-denominated liabilities by 50.9 billion
yen, compared with 105.4 billion yen at December 31, 2006. The decrease in our yen-denominated net
asset position resulted from an increasing interest rate environment in Aflac Japan.
42
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2007, we had no material unconditional purchase obligations that were not
recorded on the balance sheet. Additionally, we had no material letters of credit, standby letters
of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Aflac provides the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through dividends
and management fees. Aflac declared dividends to the Parent Company in the amount of $682 million
in the first half of 2007, compared with $452 million for the same period in 2006. During the
first six months of 2007, Aflac paid $41 million to the Parent Company for management fees,
compared with $35 million for the same period of 2006. The primary uses of cash by the Parent
Company are shareholder dividends and our share repurchase program. The Parent Companys sources
and uses of cash are reasonably predictable and are not expected to change materially in the
future.
The Parent Company also accesses debt security markets to provide additional sources of
capital. Capital is primarily used to fund business expansion and capital expenditures. We have a
Shelf Registration Statement (SRS) on file with Japanese regulatory authorities to issue up to 100
billion yen of yen-denominated Samurai notes in Japan. In June 2007, the Parent Company issued 30
billion yen of yen-denominated Samurai notes from this SRS. If issued, the remaining 70 billion
yen (approximately $568 million using the June 30, 2007, exchange rate) of yen-denominated Samurai
notes will not be available to U.S. persons. We also have an SRS on file with Japanese regulatory
authorities to issue up to 100 billion yen of Uridashi notes in Japan. As of June 30, 2007, the
Parent Company had issued 45 billion yen of yen-denominated Uridashi notes from this SRS. If
issued, the remaining 55 billion yen (approximately $446 million using the June 30, 2007,
period-end exchange rate) of yen-denominated Uridashi notes will not be available to U.S. persons.
We believe outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be
available. For additional information, see Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The principal sources of cash for our insurance operations are premiums and investment income.
The primary uses of cash by our insurance operations are policy claims, commissions, operating
expenses, income taxes and payments to the Parent Company for management fees and dividends. Both
the sources and uses of cash are reasonably predictable.
When making an investment decision, our first consideration is based on product needs. Our
investment objectives provide for liquidity through the purchase of investment-grade debt
securities. These objectives also take into account duration matching, and because of the
long-term nature of our business, we have adequate time to react to changing cash flow needs.
As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the
life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of
a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments. We expect our future cash flows
from premiums and our investment portfolio to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for benefits and
expenses.
43
Consolidated Cash Flows
We translate cash flows for Aflac Japans yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using
weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars
causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes
more dollars to be reported. The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity
for the six-month periods ended June 30.
Consolidated Cash Flows by Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
2,329 |
|
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
(373 |
) |
|
Operating Activities
In the first half of 2007, consolidated cash flow from operations increased 6.9%, compared
with the first six months of 2006. The increase in cash flows resulted primarily from the timing
of Aflac Japans tax payments in 2007 and 2006 related to our bond-swap program that started in the
last half of 2005. The following table summarizes operating cash flows by source for the six-month
periods ended June 30.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Aflac Japan |
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
Aflac U.S. and Other Operations |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
Investing Activities
Operating cash flow is primarily used to purchase debt securities to meet future policy
obligations. The following table summarizes investing cash flows by source for the six-month
periods ended June 30.
Cash Used by Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Aflac Japan |
|
$ |
1,278 |
|
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
Aflac U.S. and Other Operations |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
Prudent portfolio management dictates that we attempt to match the duration of our assets
with the duration of our liabilities. Currently, when debt securities we own mature, the proceeds
may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on
policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of our business and our strong
cash flows provides us with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or
yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. When market opportunities arise, we dispose
of selected debt securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of our
assets and liabilities and/or improve future investment yields. As a result, dispositions before
maturity can vary significantly from year to year.
44
Dispositions before maturity were approximately 1% of the year-to-date average investment
portfolio of debt securities available for sale during the six-month period ended June 30, 2007,
compared with approximately 4% a year ago.
Financing Activities
Consolidated cash used by financing activities was $375 million in the first six months of
2007, compared with $526 million for the same period of 2006. The decrease in cash used in
financing primarily resulted from the pay-off of the 2002 Samurai notes and issuance of the
additional Samurai notes in June 2007. In the same six-month period in 2006, we paid off the 2001
Samurai notes but did not issue corresponding debt until the third quarter of 2006. Offsetting the
impact of the timing of the debt issuance, cash returned to shareholders through treasury stock
purchases and dividends was $217 million higher in the first six months of 2007, compared with the
same period in 2006. Cash provided by investment-type contracts was $103 million in the first six
months of 2007, compared with $111 million a year ago.
The following table presents a summary of treasury stock activity during the six-month periods
ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
Shares purchased |
|
|
7,246 |
|
|
|
4,120 |
|
|
Stock issued from treasury |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
Shares issued |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
Dividends to shareholders in the first half of 2007 of $.39 per share increased 50.0%
over the same period of 2006. The following table presents the sources of dividends paid to
shareholders for the six-month periods ended June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Dividends paid in cash |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total dividends to shareholders |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
Regulatory Restrictions
Aflac is domiciled in Nebraska and is subject to its regulations. In addition to limitations
and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, Japans FSA may not allow profit
repatriations from Aflac Japan if the transfers would cause Aflac Japan to lack sufficient
financial strength for the protection of Aflac Japan policyholders.
Payments are made from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company for management fees and to Aflac U.S.
for allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. During the first six months of 2007, Aflac
Japan paid $17 million to the Parent Company for management fees, compared with $12 million for the
same period in 2006. Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan were $17 million for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2007, compared with $15 million a year ago. During the first six months of 2007,
Aflac Japan remitted profits of $250 million (31.0 billion yen) to Aflac U.S., compared with $355
million (40.0 billion yen) in the first half of 2006. We determine the timing of profit
remittances based on corporate needs. We anticipate that Aflac Japan will remit additional profits
of $319 million (39.2
45
billion yen using the June 30, 2007, exchange rate) in the third quarter of 2007. For the
full year, 2007 profit remittances will total 70.2 billion yen (using the June 30, 2007, exchange
rate), compared with full-year remittances of 50.0 billion yen in 2006.
For additional information on regulatory restrictions on dividends, profit repatriations and
other transfers, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the
Regulatory Restrictions section of MD&A, both in our annual report to shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
Rating Agencies
Aflac is rated AA by both Standard & Poors and Fitch Ratings and Aa2 (Excellent) by Moodys
for financial strength. A.M. Best assigned Aflac an A+ (Superior) rating for financial strength
and operating performance. Aflac Incorporateds senior debt, Samurai notes and Uridashi notes are
rated A by Standard & Poors, A+ by Fitch Ratings, and A2 by Moodys.
Other
In July 2007, the board of directors declared the third quarter cash dividend of $.205 per
share. The dividend is payable on September 4, 2007, to shareholders of record at the close of
business on August 17, 2007. In February 2006, the board of directors authorized the purchase of
an additional 30.0 million shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2007, approximately 29.6
million shares were available for purchase under our share repurchase authorization.
For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 10 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
The information required by Item 3 is incorporated by reference from the Market Risks of
Financial Instruments section of MD&A in Part I, Item 2 of this report.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures. |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date). Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the second
fiscal
46
quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
During the second quarter of 2007, we repurchased shares of Aflac stock as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Number of |
|
(b) Average |
|
Announced |
|
Under the |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Plans or |
|
Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
April 1 - April 30 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
31,582,463 |
|
May 1 - May 31 |
|
|
1,395,900 |
|
|
|
52.31 |
|
|
|
1,395,900 |
|
|
|
30,186,563 |
|
June 1 - June 30 |
|
|
604,100 |
|
|
|
52.55 |
|
|
|
604,100 |
|
|
|
29,582,463 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
52.38 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
29,582,463 |
|
|
During June, the 30,000,000 share repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors and announced in February
2004 was exhausted. The remaining 29,582,463 shares available for purchase relate to a 30,000,000 share repurchase
authorization approved by the Board of Directors and announced in February 2006.
47
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders was held on May 7, 2007. Matters submitted to the
shareholders were: (1) Election of 17 members to the board of directors; and (2) Ratification of
the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm for 2007. The proposals were
approved by the shareholders.
The following is a summary of each vote cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number
of abstention and broker non-votes as to each such matter, including a separate tabulation with
respect to each nominee for office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Withheld |
|
Non-Votes |
|
(1) Election of 17 members to the board
of directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel P. Amos |
|
722,597,181 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
18,341,768 |
|
1 |
John Shelby Amos II |
|
718,570,044 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
22,368,905 |
|
1 |
Paul S. Amos II |
|
718,361,405 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
22,577,544 |
|
1 |
Yoshiro Aoki |
|
722,032,972 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
18,905,977 |
|
1 |
Michael H. Armacost |
|
723,192,680 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
17,746,269 |
|
1 |
Kriss Cloninger III |
|
705,142,815 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
35,796,134 |
|
1 |
Joe Frank Harris |
|
716,928,762 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
24,010,187 |
|
1 |
Elizabeth J. Hudson |
|
723,415,659 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
17,523,290 |
|
1 |
Kenneth S. Janke Sr. |
|
704,840,093 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
36,098,856 |
|
1 |
Douglas W. Johnson |
|
728,936,885 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
12,002,064 |
|
1 |
Robert B. Johnson |
|
727,471,835 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
13,467,114 |
|
1 |
Charles B. Knapp |
|
724,585,821 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
16,353,128 |
|
1 |
E. Stephen Purdom, M.D. |
|
719,411,037 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
21,527,912 |
|
1 |
Barbara K. Rimer, Dr. PH |
|
724,742,004 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
16,196,945 |
|
1 |
Marvin R. Schuster |
|
718,014,714 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
22,924,235 |
|
1 |
David Gary Thompson |
|
727,397,094 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
13,541,855 |
|
1 |
Robert L. Wright |
|
727,241,852 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
13,697,097 |
|
1 |
(2) Ratification of appointment of KPMG
LLP as independent registered public
accounting firm |
|
726,680,335 |
|
9,546,184 |
|
4,712,416 |
|
N/A |
|
15 |
|
N/A not applicable
48
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibit Index:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
- |
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended - incorporated by reference from Form
10-Q for June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.0 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
3.1 |
|
-
|
|
Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended - incorporated by reference from Form
10-Q for September 30, 2006, Exhibit 3.1 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
4 |
|
-
|
|
There are no long-term debt instruments in which the total amount of
securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Aflac Incorporated
and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We agree to furnish a copy of
any long-term debt instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request. |
|
|
10.0 * |
|
-
|
|
American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, as amended
and restated October 1, 1989 - incorporated by reference from 1993 Form
10-K, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.1 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended April
1, 2003 - incorporated by reference from 2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.4 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.2 * |
|
-
|
|
Third Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (incorporated by reference from 2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.4), dated
January 1, 2007 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31,
2007, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.3 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended,
effective January 1, 1999 - incorporated by reference from Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-135327, Exhibit 4.1. |
|
|
10.4 * |
|
-
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (incorporated by reference from Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
333-135327, Exhibit 4.1), dated December 29, 2005 - incorporated by
reference from 2005 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.30 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.5 * |
|
-
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (incorporated by reference from Form S-8 Registration Statement No.
333-135327, Exhibit 4.1), dated June 27, 2007. |
|
|
10.6 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Amended and Restated Management Incentive Plan, effective
January 1, 1999 - incorporated by reference from the 2003 Shareholders
Proxy Statement, Exhibit A (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.7 * |
|
-
|
|
1999 Aflac Associate Stock Bonus Plan, as amended, dated February 11, 2003 -
incorporated by reference from 2002 Form 10-K, Exhibit 99.2 (File No.
001-07434). |
|
|
10.8 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan - incorporated by reference from
the 1997 Shareholders Proxy Statement, Appendix B (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.9 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under
the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan - incorporated by reference
from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.5 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.10 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the
Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan - incorporated by reference from
Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.6 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.11 * |
|
-
|
|
Notice of grant of stock options and stock option agreement to officers
under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan - incorporated by
reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.7 (File No.
001-07434). |
|
|
10.12 * |
|
-
|
|
2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated May 3, 2004 -
incorporated by reference from the 2004 Notice and Proxy Statement, Exhibit
B (File No. 001-07434). |
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13* |
|
-
|
|
First Amendment to the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference from the 2004 Notice and Proxy Statement, Exhibit
B), dated May 2, 2005 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March
31, 2005, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.14 * |
|
-
|
|
Second Amendment to the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference from the 2004 Notice and Proxy Statement, Exhibit
B), dated February 14, 2006 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for
March 31, 2006, Exhibit 10.32 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.15 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (NQSO) under the 2004
Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from
Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.16 * |
|
-
|
|
Notice of grant of stock options to non-employee director under the 2004
Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from
Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.17 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the
2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference
from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.3 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.18 * |
|
-
|
|
Notice of restricted stock award to non-employee director under the 2004
Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from
Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.4 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.19 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Officer Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac
Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from Form
8-K dated February 7, 2005, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.20 * |
|
-
|
|
Notice of restricted stock award to officers under the 2004 Aflac
Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from Form
8-K dated February 7, 2005, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.21 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under
the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by
reference from Form 8-K dated February 7, 2005, Exhibit 10.3 (File No.
001-07434). |
|
|
10.22 * |
|
-
|
|
Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the
2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference
from Form 8-K dated February 7, 2005, Exhibit 10.4 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.23 * |
|
-
|
|
Notice of grant of stock options to officers under the 2004 Aflac
Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from Form
8-K dated February 7, 2005, Exhibit 10.5 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.24 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Daniel P. Amos, dated August 1,
1993 - incorporated by reference from 1993 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.4 (File No.
001-07434). |
|
|
10.25 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Kriss Cloninger III, dated
February 14, 1992, and as amended November 12, 1993 - incorporated by
reference from 1993 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.6 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.26 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Akitoshi Kan, dated April 1,
2001, and amended February 1, 2005 - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K
dated February 7, 2005, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.27 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Employment Agreement with Hidefumi Matsui, dated January 1, 1995 -
incorporated by reference from 1994 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.8 (File No.
001-07434). |
|
|
10.28 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Paul S. Amos II, dated January
1, 2005 - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 7, 2005,
Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
10.29 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Retirement Agreement with E. Stephen Purdom, dated February 15, 2000 -
incorporated by reference from 2000 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.13 (File No.
001-07434). |
|
|
10.30 * |
|
-
|
|
Aflac Consulting Arrangement with E. Stephen Purdom - incorporated by
reference from 2006 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.28 (File No. 001-07434). |
|
|
11 |
|
-
|
|
Statement regarding the computation of per-share earnings for the Registrant. |
|
|
12 |
|
-
|
|
Statement regarding the computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
for the Registrant. |
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
-
|
|
Letter from KPMG LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information. |
|
31.1 |
|
|
-
|
|
Certification of CEO dated August 7, 2007, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
-
|
|
Certification of CFO dated August 7, 2007, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
32 |
|
|
-
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO dated August 7, 2007, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
* Management contract or compensatory plan or agreement
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aflac Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2007
|
|
President, Treasurer and
|
|
/s/ Kriss Cloninger III |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
(Kriss Cloninger III) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2007
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
/s/ Ralph A. Rogers, Jr. |
|
|
Financial Services; Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
(Ralph A. Rogers, Jr.) |
52