Edgar Filing: FSI INTERNATIONAL INC

Quarterly Report forFSI International, Inc.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended		February 23, 2002


		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to


Commission File Number:		0-17276

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


MINNESOTA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		41-1223238 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


3455 Lyman Boulevard, Chaska, Minnesota (Address of principal executive offices)		55318 (Zip Code)

952-448-5440

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

X IN BALLOT BOX YES OPEN BALLOT BOX NO

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practical date:

Common Stock, No Par Value – 26,176,845 shares outstanding as of March 15, 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements:
		Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of February 23, 2002 (Unaudited) and August 25, 2001
		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the quarters ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001
		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the six months ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001
		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the six months ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001
		Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 2. Changes in Securities
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports On Form 8-K
	Signature
Restated and Amended By-Laws

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q


PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		PAGE NO.

Item 1.	Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements:
		Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of February 23, 2002 (Unaudited) and August 25, 2001	3

		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the quarters ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001	5

		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the six months ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001	6

		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the six months ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001	7

		Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		32

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		33

Item 2.	Changes in Securities		36

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		36

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		36

Item 5.	Other Information		36

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		36

	SIGNATURE		39

PART I. Item 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
FEBRUARY 23, 2002 AND AUGUST 25, 2001

ASSETS
(Unaudited)


				February 23,			August 25,
				2002			2001

Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	42,870,784		$	44,119,833
	Restricted cash				500,000			—
	Marketable securities				5,293,781			10,507,920
	Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,256,000 and $2,134,000, respectively				11,845,512			21,719,174
	Trade accounts receivable from affiliates				11,900,850			19,654,602
	Inventories				44,565,548			48,699,247
	Notes receivable from related party				353,062			658,205
		Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,181,770			4,130,423

			Total current assets		120,511,307			149,489,404

Property, plant and equipment, at cost					113,153,933			112,321,671
	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				(62,628,550	)		(57,192,997	)

					50,525,383			55,128,674

Investment in affiliates					22,279,883			22,158,516
Intangibles, net					13,287,714			14,594,568
Employee receivables					236,047			173,759
Deposits and other assets					3,690,761			3,742,085

				$	210,531,095		$	245,287,006

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
FEBRUARY 23, 2002 AND AUGUST 25, 2001
(continued)

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)


				February 23,			August 25,
				2002			2001

Current liabilities:
	Trade accounts payable			$	6,602,444		$	10,206,932
	Accrued expenses				20,054,533			20,712,286
	Deferred profit				10,483,952			30,350,292

			Total current liabilities		37,140,929			61,269,510

Stockholders’ equity:
		Preferred stock, no par value; 9,700,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding			—			—
		Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no par value: 300,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding			—			—
		Common stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding, 26,163,959 and 25,983,804 shares at February 23, 2002 and August 25, 2001, respectively			195,241,879			194,345,102
		Accumulated deficit			(19,541,519	)		(8,264,819	)
		Accumulative other comprehensive loss			(2,310,194	)		(2,062,787	)

			Total stockholders’ equity		173,390,166			184,017,496

				$	210,531,095		$	245,287,006

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED FEBRUARY 23, 2002 AND FEBRUARY 24, 2001
(Unaudited)


		February 23,			February 24,
		2002			2001

Sales (including sales to affiliates of $6,227,000 and $36,394,000, respectively)		$	41,888,665		$	60,243,917
Cost of sales			29,728,231			35,868,624

	Gross profit		12,160,434			24,375,293
Selling, general and administrative expenses			9,020,105			12,863,226
Research and development expenses			9,680,170			11,043,500

	Operating income (loss)		(6,539,841	)		468,567
Interest expense			(25,034	)		(26,510	)
Interest income			376,508			716,156
Other income, net			19,138			3,451

	Income (loss) before income taxes		(6,169,229	)		1,161,664
Income taxes			—			200,000

Income (loss) before equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates			(6,169,229	)		961,664
Equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates			(364,773	)		1,283,346

	Net income (loss)		($6,534,002	)	$	2,245,010

	Net income (loss) per common share — Basic		($0.25	)	$	0.09
	Net income (loss) per common share — Diluted		($0.25	)	$	0.09
	Weighted average common shares		26,124,083			25,546,979
	Weighted average common and potential common shares		26,124,083			25,847,848

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 23, 2002 AND FEBRUARY 24, 2001
(Unaudited)


			February 23,			February 24,
			2002			2001

Sales (including sales to affiliates of $12,273,000 and $70,624,000, respectively)			$	84,516,156		$	121,742,343
Cost of sales				59,090,562			72,738,915

	Gross profit			25,425,594			49,003,428
Selling, general and administrative expenses				19,862,567			26,012,065
Research and development expenses				17,938,009			20,345,413

	Operating income (loss)			(12,374,982	)		2,645,950
Interest expense				(46,896	)		(48,525	)
Interest income				766,105			1,420,831
Other income, net				10,299			47,181

	Income (loss) before income taxes			(11,645,474	)		4,065,437
Income taxes				—			200,000

Income (loss) before equity in earnings of affiliates				(11,645,474	)		3,865,437
Equity in earnings of affiliates				368,774			2,392,733

		Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax		(11,276,700	)		6,258,170
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax				—			(14,969,008	)

	Net loss			($11,276,700	)		($8,710,838	)

Net income (loss) per common share — Basic
	Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			($0.43	)	$	0.25
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—			(0.59	)

	Net loss per common share			($0.43	)		($0.34	)

Net income (loss) per common share — Diluted
	Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			($0.43	)	$	0.24
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—			(0.58	)

	Net loss per common share			($0.43	)		($0.34	)

Weighted average common shares				26,108,994			25,449,711
Weighted average common and potential common shares				26,108,994			25,925,523

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 23, 2002 AND FEBRUARY 24, 2001
(Unaudited)


					February 23,			February 24,
					2002			2001

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss					($11,276,700	)		($8,710,838	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
			Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes			—			14,969,008
			Depreciation			5,551,458			5,849,231
			Amortization			1,390,186			2,663,410
			Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts			307,720			(306,186	)
			Write-off of accounts receivable			(186,313	)		(810,373	)
			Provision for inventory reserves			2,503,480			1,845,278
			Disposal of inventory			(1,512,989	)		(3,509,009	)
			Equity in earnings of affiliates			(368,774	)		(2,392,733	)
			Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
				Trade accounts receivable		17,506,007			(11,154,827	)
				Inventories		3,222,600			(8,487,309	)
				Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,253,796			(167,286	)
				Trade accounts payable		(3,604,488	)		3,779,369
				Accrued expenses		(657,753	)		(2,185,191	)
				Deferred profit		(19,866,340	)		9,237,901

	Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities					(5,738,110	)		620,445

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Acquisition of property, plant and equipment					(1,027,559	)		(5,084,154	)
	Purchases of marketable securities					(9,028,223	)		(4,984,950	)
	Maturities of marketable securities					12,479,063			10,693,430
	Sale of marketable securities					1,763,299			—
	(Increase) decrease in deposits and other assets					(94,296	)		181,144

		Net cash provided by investing activities				4,092,284			805,470

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Principal payments on long-term debt					—			(60,341	)
	Restricted cash					(500,000	)		—
	Net proceeds from issuance of common stock					896,777			1,358,021

		Net cash provided by financing activities				396,777			1,297,680

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents						(1,249,049	)		2,723,595
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period						44,119,833			34,637,974

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period					$	42,870,784		$	37,361,569

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1)		Summary of Selected Accounting Policies

		Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

		The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The statements have been prepared in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission but omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2001 previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

		Revenue Recognition

		The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain of the Company’s product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements. If the Company has met defined customer acceptance experience levels with both the customer and the specific type of equipment, the Company recognizes equipment revenue upon shipment and transfer of title, with the remainder of the total revenue recognized as the earnings process is completed for other elements. All other product sales with customer specific acceptance provisions are recognized upon customer acceptance. Revenue related to spare part sales is recognized upon shipment. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.

		The Company changed its revenue recognition policy effective August 27, 2000, based on guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $14,969,008, net of tax or $0.59 per share in fiscal 2001, to reflect the cumulative effect of the accounting change as of the beginning of fiscal year 2001.

		Intangible Assets

		Patents, license fees and other intangible assets are capitalized based on their estimated fair value and amortized over their estimated economic or legal lives, whichever is shorter, ranging from 3 to 9 years.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” which change the accounting for business combinations and goodwill. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Thus, amortization of goodwill, including goodwill recorded in past business combinations, ceased upon adoption of that Statement. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and accordingly evaluated its existing intangible assets and goodwill that were acquired in a prior purchase business combination, and determined there were no reclassifications necessary in order to conform with the new criteria in SFAS 141 for recognition apart from goodwill. Upon adoption of SFAS 142, the Company reassessed the useful lives and residual values of all intangible assets acquired in purchase business combinations, and determined that there were no amortization period adjustments necessary. If an intangible asset is identified as having an indefinite useful life, the Company is required to test the intangible asset for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142 within the first year of adoption. Other than goodwill, the Company has no intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.

	In connection with the transitional goodwill impairment evaluation, SFAS 142 required the Company to perform an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. To accomplish this, the Company identified its reporting units and determined the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units as of the date of adoption. The Company determined the fair value of each reporting unit and compared it to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. As of August 26, 2001, each reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeded its fair value, and therefore there was no indication that the reporting unit’s goodwill was impaired. Accordingly, the Company was not required to perform the second step of the transitional impairment test.

	In the second step, the Company would be required to compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities (in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation) to its carrying amount, both of which would be measured as of the date of adoption. This second step is required to be completed as soon as possible, but no later than the end of the year of adoption. The Company did not record any transitional impairment loss.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	As of the date of adoption, the Company had approximately $5,356,000 of unamortized goodwill subject to the transition provisions of SFAS 141 and 142.

	For the second quarter and six month periods ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001, the goodwill amortization, adjusted net income and basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:


		February 23,			February 24,
For the Quarters Ended		2002			2001

Net income (loss)			($6,534,002	)	$	2,245,010
Add back goodwill amortization			—			464,922

Adjusted net income (loss)			($6,534,002	)	$	2,709,932

Basic earnings per share:
	Net income (loss)		($0.25	)	$	0.09
	Goodwill amortization		—			0.02

	Adjusted net income (loss)		($0.25	)	$	0.11

Diluted earnings per share:
	Net income (loss)		($0.25	)	$	0.09
	Goodwill amortization		—			0.01

	Adjusted net income (loss)		($0.25	)	$	0.10


		February 23,			February 24,
For the Six Months Ended		2002			2001

Net loss			($11,276,700	)		($8,710,838	)
Add back goodwill amortization			—			929,845

Adjusted net loss			($11,276,700	)		($7,780,993	)

Basic earnings per share:
	Net loss		($0.43	)		($0.34	)
	Goodwill amortization		—			0.03

	Adjusted net loss		($0.43	)		($0.31	)

Diluted earnings per share:
	Net loss		($0.43	)		($0.34	)
	Goodwill amortization		—			0.04

	Adjusted net loss		($0.43	)		($0.30	)

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Product Warranty

	The Company, in general, warrants new equipment manufactured by the Company to the original purchaser to be free from defects in material and workmanship for one to two years, depending upon the product or customer agreement. Provision is made for the estimated cost of maintaining product warranties at the time the product is sold.

	Inventory Reserves

	The Company records reserves for inventory shrinkage and for potentially excess, obsolete and slow moving inventory. The amounts of these reserves are based upon historical loss trends, inventory levels, physical inventory and cycle count adjustments, expected product lives and forecasted sales demand.

	Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

	Management must make estimates of the uncollectibility of our accounts receivable. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

	Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

	Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the treasury stock method to compute the weighted average common stock outstanding assuming the conversion of potential dilutive common shares. Net loss per share does not include the effect of stock options as their inclusion would be antidilutive.

	Use of Estimates

	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

	Reclassifications

	Certain fiscal 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(2)		Inventories

		Inventories are summarized as follows:


	February 23,		August 25,
	2002		2001

Finished products	$	4,083,364	$	5,621,311
Work-in-process		13,064,183		13,442,526
Subassemblies		2,293,463		1,776,789
Raw materials and purchased parts		25,124,538		27,858,621

	$	44,565,548	$	48,699,247

(3)

Supplementary cash flow information


		Six Months Ended

		February 23,			February 24,
		2002			2001

Schedule of interest and net income taxes paid (received):
	Interest	$	46,896		$	48,525
	Income taxes		($495,000	)	$	824,150

(4)		Comprehensive income (loss)

		Other comprehensive income (loss) pertains to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are not included in the net income (loss) but rather are recorded directly in stockholders’ equity. For the second quarter and six month periods ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001, the only item of other comprehensive income (loss) is related to foreign currency translation adjustment. For the second quarter and six month periods ended February 23, 2002 and February 24, 2001 the net income (loss), items of other comprehensive income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:


		February 23,			February 24,
		2002			2001

For the Quarters Ended:
Net income (loss)			($6,534,002	)	$	2,245,010
Items of other comprehensive income (loss):
	Foreign currency translation		(792,731	)		(742,397	)

Comprehensive income (loss)			($7,326,733	)	$	1,502,613

For the Six Months Ended:
Net loss			($11,276,700	)		($8,710,838	)
Items of other comprehensive income (loss):
	Foreign currency translation		(247,407	)		(855,386	)

Comprehensive loss			($11,524,107	)		($9,566,224	)

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(5)		Realignment Costs

		During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2001, due to the industry slowdown, the Company implemented cost reduction plans that included reductions in its workforce. Accruals of $12,000 related to severance costs which remained at August 25, 2001 were paid or utilized by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2002.

		On December 11, 2001, in response to the continued delay in an industry recovery, the Company implemented additional cost reduction actions which included a 7 percent reduction in the overall workforce, salary cuts for all employees, a 50 percent decrease in planned capital expenditures and a reduction in other discretionary costs. The Company’s headcount was approximately 640 after the reduction.

		The Company recorded approximately $500,000 of realignment charges in the second quarter, primarily related to severance costs. The realignment charges were allocated as follows: $250,000 to cost of goods sold, $230,000 to selling, general and administrative expense and $20,000 to research and development expense. The accruals were paid or utilized by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2002.

(6)		Litigation

		In the fall of 1995, pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase and Shareholder Agreement dated November 30, 1990 between Mr. Hsu and SSI (the “Shareholder Agreement”) and in connection with Mr. Hsu’s termination of his employment with SSI in August 1995, the former shareholders of SSI purchased the shares of SSI common stock then held by Mr. Hsu. In October 1996, Eric C. and Angie L. Hsu (the “plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Southern Division, against Semiconductor Systems, Inc. (“SSI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FSI that was acquired in April 1996, and the former shareholders of SSI.

		In September and October 2000, certain of Mr. Hsu’s claims were tried to a jury in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland, California. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury made the following findings. The jury found that SSI breached the Shareholder Agreement between it and Eric Hsu and that the damages that resulted were approximately $2.4 million. In addition, each of the individual defendant shareholders was found liable for conversion and damages of $4.2 million were awarded. Certain individual defendants were also found to have intentionally interfered with Mr. Hsu’s prospective economic advantage and damages of $3.2 million were awarded. Finally, several individual defendants and SSI were found to have violated certain provisions of the California Corporation Code and damages of $2.4 million were awarded. SSI believes the damages awards are duplicative and not cumulative and that certain of these damages awards may be subject to reduction.

		In proceedings subsequent to the trial, the Court has determined that plaintiffs are entitled to an award against SSI of prejudgment interest on the breach of contract damages (approximately $2.4 million) at 10 percent per annum from October 1996. In addition, the Court has awarded plaintiffs approximately $127,000 in costs and approximately $1.8 million in attorneys’ fees against SSI and the individual defendants. On November 16, 2001, the court signed its final judgment reflecting the jury’s awards, interest, attorneys fees and costs assessed against each of the defendants. The total judgment against SSI together with post judgment interest as of February 23, 2002 aggregates approximately $5.7 million.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Following the entry of judgment, SSI and the other defendants filed post-trial motions seeking reduction in the jury’s damage awards and/or a new trial. The court denied our post-trial motions and there was no reduction in damages against SSI. Subsequent to February 23, 2002, Hsu was awarded an additional $431,000 for attorneys fees and expenses incurred since the judgment was rendered in November 2001.

	SSI and the individual defendants have filed an appeal on a variety of grounds. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2002 second quarter, the Company posted an appeal bond on behalf of SSI and defendants in the amount of $8.3 million. As part of the posting of the bond, the Company entered into a letter of credit in the amount of $2.5 million with the surety company. This letter of credit was collateralized with restricted cash of approximately the same amount.

	The Company, on behalf of SSI, has made a claim with respect to the lawsuit under the escrow created at the time of our acquisition of SSI. The escrow was established to secure certain indemnification obligations of the former shareholders of SSI. The escrow consists of an aggregate of 250,000 shares of FSI Common Stock paid to the former shareholders of SSI as consideration in the acquisition. The former shareholders have agreed to hold FSI and SSI harmless from any claim arising out of any securities transactions between SSI and the shareholders or former shareholders of SSI. The indemnification obligations of the individual SSI shareholders are capped at approximately $4.2 million in the aggregate. Any shares in the escrow returned to FSI to satisfy any indemnification obligations will be valued at $12.125 per share, the per-share price of FSI Common Stock at the time of the SSI acquisition.

	Given the escrowed shares and the additional indemnification by the individual SSI shareholders, along with our litigation reserve, we believe we are adequately reserved for this potential liability. However, there is considerable uncertainty as to the ultimate resolution of this matter and the respective liability, if any, of SSI. We will continue with our appeal process and our defense.

	In September 1995, CFM Technologies, Inc. and CFMT, Inc. (collectively “CFM”) filed a complaint in United States District Court for the District of Delaware against YieldUP, now known as SCD Mountain View, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The complaint alleged that the drying process incorporated in certain YieldUP products infringes a patent held by CFM. On October 14, 1997, the United States District Court held that CFM had failed to produce evidence on three separate elements of the patent claim. On June 30, 1998, the United States District Court of Delaware granted CFM’s petition for re-argument of the issue. The judge has not yet ruled as to whether to sustain his earlier ruling. If the original order is overturned, the litigation may proceed to trial, and the litigation and the associated costs may, and an unfavorable adjudication could, have a material adverse impact on FSI. CFM is asking for monetary damages and an injunction against YieldUP’s use of the products at issue. A loss, if any, resulting from an unfavorable adjudication, cannot presently be estimated.

	CFM filed an additional complaint against YieldUP in United States District Court for the District of Delaware on December 30, 1998. The complaint alleged that the cleaning process incorporated in certain of YieldUP’s products infringes two patents held by CFM: U.S. Patent Nos. 4,917,123 and 4,778,532. YieldUP plans to vigorously defend its intellectual property rights against any and all claims.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

		On April 4, 2000 the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted YieldUP’s motion for summary judgment that the ‘123 and ‘532 patents are invalid. CFM’s motion for rehearing has been denied. On July 29, 2000, the issue of whether CFM or its inventors engaged in inequitable conduct in prosecuting the ‘123 and ‘532 patents was tried before the court. On June 6, 2001, the judge issued his opinion finding that the CFM inventors engaged in inequitable conduct during the prosecution of the patent application. On June 7, 2001, the judge ordered that judgment be entered in favor of YieldUP and against CFM on YieldUP’s defenses of lack of enablement and inequitable conduct. No final appealable judgment has been entered in the second lawsuit. A loss, if any, resulting from an unfavorable adjudication, cannot presently be estimated and the associated costs, and an unfavorable adjudication could have a material adverse impact on FSI. Once judgment is entered based upon the District Court’s granting YieldUP’s summary judgment motion, the District Court’s order may be appealed by CFM.

(7)		New Accounting Pronouncements

		In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 addresses the financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS No. 121 “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.” However, this statement retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for (a) recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and (b) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale.

		SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30 “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions” for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, this Statement retains the requirement of APB No. 30 to report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale. This statement also amends ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements” to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a temporarily controlled subsidiary. The Company is required and plans to adopt the provision of SFAS No. 144 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 144 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SECOND QUARTER AND FIRST HALF OF FISCAL 2002 COMPARED WITH THE SECOND QUARTER AND FIRST HALF OF FISCAL 2001.

The information in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, except for the historical information contained herein, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is subject to the safe harbor created by that statute. Such statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include the length and extent of the current industry downturn; additional order delays or cancellations; savings from our cost-cutting measures may be less than anticipated; we may incur unexpected additional costs as part of our cost cutting measures; general economic conditions; changes in customer capacity requirements and demand for microelectronics; the extent of demand for our products and our ability to meet demand; global trade policies; worldwide economic and political stability; the Company’s successful execution of internal performance plans; the cyclical nature of the Company’s business; volatility of the market for certain products; performance issues with key suppliers and subcontractors, the transition to 300mm products; the level of new orders; the timing and success of current and future product and process development programs; the success of the Company’s affiliated distributors; and litigation and legal proceedings. In addition, readers are also directed to the Risk Factors discussion included herein. Readers also are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as actual results could differ materially. FSI assumes no obligation to publicly release any revisions or updates to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or unanticipated occurrences. Such forward-looking statements are marked with an asterisk (*).

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and footnotes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

Industry:

In calendar 2001, the microelectronics industry experienced the worst decline in its history. Wafer demand decreased 30 percent, semiconductor revenues were down 32 percent, and the semiconductor equipment sales declined approximately 40 percent. Dataquest, the source that we use for comparative purposes, is currently compiling the final 2001 data and is expected to release final numbers in April 2002.

The microelectronics industry is experiencing a modest improvement in overall conditions. A number of semiconductor manufacturers have stated that they plan to increase their spending in the second half of 2002, assuming that their customer demand continues to improve. Since the adoption of SAB101, most revenue is being recorded upon acceptance rather than shipment; therefore, the majority of front-end process equipment companies will not start to reflect the improving orders and shipments until the third or fourth quarter of calendar 2002 and into calendar 2003.

We believe there are some early signs that the recovery has begun and that stronger growth rates are not far beyond the horizon, including:

•		An overall improvement in capacity utilization rates for semiconductor manufacturers, with a number of IDM and foundry manufacturers stating that they have limited excess capacity for sub 0.18 micron and copper devices. For example, an industry analyst has stated that utilization rates for TSMC, a Taiwanese semiconductor foundry manufacturer, are expected to increase from 60 percent in the first quarter to 70 percent in the second quarter;

•		The stabilization and improving spot prices for DRAM and other semiconductor devices. Based upon one industry analyst’s forecast, DRAM revenues are expected to increase over 40 percent this year;

•		The expected increased unit demand for wafers, spare parts, and other consumables; and

•		The anticipated increase in demand for PC’s, wireline and wireless communications, as well as home entertainment products.

These factors have all contributed toward the recent improved demand for semiconductors and a more optimistic outlook, although cautious, by many of our customers.

At the ISS conference in early January, Dataquest forecasted that the worldwide wafer fab equipment market would decrease 20 percent to $18.0 billion from $22 billion in 2001. Their forecast represented a 46 percent decrease in equipment revenues from the peak $33 billion level in 2000. On the other hand, they expect worldwide fab equipment sales to increase 40 percent to $25 billion in calendar 2003, reflecting the initial growth year of an expected 3 year growth cycle.

We believe that any significant increase in equipment spending will be led by investment in 300mm capacity, smaller device feature sizes, and process technology required for new materials such as copper and low-k dielectrics. These are all technology areas where FSI has focused its R&D investment the past few years and represents applications for which we have been receiving orders the past 6 to 12 months.

Critical Accounting Policies:

In accordance with recent Securities and Exchange Commission guidance, those material accounting policies that the Company believes are the most critical to an investor’s understanding of our financial results and condition and require complex management judgment are discussed below.

Our critical accounting policies are as follows:

•		Revenue recognition;

•		Estimating valuation allowances and accrued liabilities; specifically product warranty, inventory obsolescence, allowance for doubtful accounts and assessment of the probability of the outcome of current litigation; and

•		Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain of the Company’s product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements. If the Company has met defined customer acceptance experience levels with both the customer and the specific type of equipment, the Company recognizes equipment revenue upon shipment and transfer of title, with the remainder of the total revenue recognized as the earning process is completed for other elements. All other product sales with customer specific

acceptance provisions are recognized upon customer acceptance. Future revenues may be negatively impacted if the Company is unable to meet customer specific acceptance criteria. Revenue related to spare part sales is recognized upon shipment. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.

Timing of revenue recognition is dependent on the mix of revenue recognized upon shipment versus acceptance and for revenue recognized upon acceptance, it is dependent upon when the acceptance certificates are actually received or customer specific criteria are met.

Product Warranty

The Company records a liability for warranty claims at the time of sale. The amount of the liability is based on the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim, anticipated releases of new products and other factors. Although management believes the likelihood to be relatively low, claims experience could be materially different from actual results because of the introduction of new, more complex products; a change in the Company’s warranty policy in response to industry trends, competition or other external forces; manufacturing changes that could impact product quality; or as yet unrecognized defects in products sold.*

Inventory Reserves

The Company records reserves for inventory shrinkage and for potentially excess, obsolete and slow moving inventory. The amounts of these reserves are based upon historical loss trends, inventory levels, physical inventory and cycle count adjustments, expected product lives and forecasted sales demand. Although management believes the likelihood to be relatively low, results could be materially different if demand for the Company’s products decreased because of economic or competitive conditions, length of the industry downturn, or if products become obsolete because of technical advancements in the industry or by the Company.*

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Management must make estimates of the uncollectibility of our accounts receivables. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Litigation

Management’s current estimated range of liability related to some of the pending litigation is based on claims for which our management can estimate the amount and range of loss. We have recorded the minimum estimated liability related to those claims, where there is a range of loss. Because of the uncertainties related to both the amount and range of loss on the pending litigation, management is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. As additional information becomes available, we will assess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and revise our estimates. Such revisions in our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operation and financial position.*

Valuation of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets and Goodwill

We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill and enterprise level goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

•		Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

•		Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;

•		Significant negative industry or economic trends;

•		Significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and

•		Our market capitalization relative to net book value.

When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill and enterprise level goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Net intangible assets, long-lived assets, and goodwill amounted to $13.5 million as of February 23, 2002.

In 2002, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SAFS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” became effective and as a result, we have ceased to amortize approximately $5.4 million of goodwill. In lieu of amortization, we were required to perform an initial impairment review of our goodwill in 2002 and an annual impairment review thereafter.

We did not record an impairment charge upon completion of the initial impairment review. However, there can be no assurance that at the time that future annual reviews are completed a material impairment charge will not be recorded.*

The Company:

The following table sets forth on a consolidated basis, for the fiscal period indicated, certain income and expense items as a percent of total sales.


		Percent of Sales						Percent of Sales
		Quarter Ended						Six Months Ended

		February 23,			February 24,			February 23,			February 24,
		2002			2001			2002			2001

Sales			100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales			71.0			59.5			69.9			59.8

Gross profit			29.0			40.5			30.1			40.2
Selling, general and administrative			21.5			21.4			23.5			21.4
Research and development			23.1			18.3			21.2			16.7

Operating income (loss)			(15.6	)		0.8			(14.6	)		2.1
Other income, net			0.9			1.1			0.9			1.2

Income (loss) before income taxes			(14.7	)		1.9			(13.7	)		3.3
Income taxes			—			0.3			—			0.2
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates			(0.9	)		2.1			0.4			2.0

	Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax		(15.6	)		3.7			(13.3	)		5.1
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax			—			—			—			(12.3	)

	Net income (loss)		(15.6)	%		3.7	%		(13.3)	%		(7.2)	%

Sales Revenue and Shipments:

The Company recognizes when pursuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller's price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain of the Company's product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements. If the Company has met defined customer acceptance experience levels with both the customer and the specific type of equipment, the Company recognizes equipment revenue upon shipment and transfer of title, with the remainder of the total revenue recognized as the earnings process is completed for other elements. All other product sales with customer acceptance provisions are recognized upon customer acceptance. Revenue related to spare part sales is recognized upon shipment. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.

Sales were $41.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2002, including $6.2 million of sales to affiliates, as compared to $60.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2001, including $36.4 million of sales to affiliates. Sales were $84.5 million for the first half of fiscal 2002, including $12.3 million of sales to affiliates, as compared to $121.7 million for the first half of fiscal 2001, including $70.6 million of sales to affiliates. Both the Microlithography and Surface Conditioning Divisions, as well as our affiliates, experienced year-over-year revenue decreases due to the industry downturn and global recession.

Shipments in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002 were $20.0 million and $34.7 million, respectively, as compared to $73.9 million and $144.3 million, respectively, for the same periods in the prior year.

International sales were $11.3 million and $42.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively, and represented approximately 27% and 71%, respectively, of sales during these quarters. International sales were $17.9 million and $85.2 million for the first half of fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively, and represented 21% and 70%, respectively, of sales during these periods.

Deferred revenue was approximately $26.1 million as of February 23, 2002. Deferred revenue is included in deferred profit, net of deferred cost of goods sold.

Sales are expected to bottom in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 and be $25 to $30 million.* We are expecting an expected increase in our turns business for the third quarter.* Our turns business is comprised of customer orders that are received in the quarter and the corresponding revenue is subsequently recognized in the same quarter such as spare parts and service. We expect shipments to increase to $20 to $25 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, reflecting the sequential increase in orders in the first two quarters of fiscal 2002.

Gross Profit:

FSI’s gross profit margin may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the mix of products sold as some products have higher margins than others, the proportion of international sales as international sales generally have lower margins, competitive pricing pressures and utilization of manufacturing capacity.

Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 was 29.0% as compared to 40.5% for the second quarter of fiscal 2001. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the first half of fiscal 2002 was 30.1% as compared to 40.2% for the first half of fiscal 2001. The decrease in margins is primarily related to product mix and the low shipments based manufacturing capacity utilization rate. Second quarter of fiscal 2002 margins were also impacted by $1.0 million of net additional inventory obsolescence reserves and warranty accruals. In addition, $250,000 of realignment charges were recorded to cost of goods sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2002.

We expect gross margins to be in the range of 24 to 26 percent in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, as margins will continue to be impacted by underutilized manufacturing capacity.* Also, the foreign/domestic mix and product mix is anticipated to be less favorable.*

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 30% to $9.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to $12.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2001. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $19.9 million for the first half of fiscal 2002 as compared to $26.0 million for the same period in fiscal 2001. The decrease in SG&A expense in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002 reflects the cost reduction actions implemented during the second half of fiscal 2001, lower incentive compensation payments that resulted from lower orders and operating return on revenue. The decrease also reflects a $465,000 and $930,000 reduction in amortization expense in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002, respectively, related to the implementation

of SFAS No. 142. The decrease was partially offset by a litigation reserve for attorney’s fees and other appeal costs in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002. The second quarter of fiscal 2002 was also impacted by $250,000 of realignment charges associated with the December reduction in force.

FSI expects the amount of SG&A expenses to decrease slightly to $8.7 to $9.0 million in the third quarter as a result of cost reduction initiatives.*

Research and Development Expenses:

Research and development expenses were $9.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to $11.0 million for the same period in fiscal 2001. Research and development expenses were $17.9 million for the first half of fiscal 2002 as compared to $20.3 million for the same period in fiscal 2001. The decrease in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002 is related to timing of expenses associated with key product development programs and cost reduction actions. Despite the impact on near term financial results, we expect to continue investing in key applications and product development initiatives.* We made a conscious decision not to significantly reduce our R&D expenses as part of our recent cost reductions.

We expect R&D expenses to be approximately $9.0 to $9.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, based on the timing of expenses associated with our new product development activities and other cost reduction actions.* We will continue to remain focused on critical technologies and strategically invest R&D dollars in the immersion technology for surface conditioning products, 300mm products for both resist processing and surface conditioning and other new applications.*

Other Income, Net:

Other income, net was approximately $371,000 and $730,000 for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002, respectively, as compared to $693,000 and $1,419,000 for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2001, respectively. The decrease in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002 relates to a decline in interest income due to short-term interest rates which have declined with the Federal Reserve’s rate reductions, as well as a reduction in average investment balances.

Other income, net is expected to be between $300,000 and $350,000 per quarter for the remainder of fiscal 2002, depending upon the level of investments and the interest rates.*

Income Taxes:

The Company recorded no tax benefit or expense related to its operating losses for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2002. Income tax expense for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2001 was $200,000.

The Company’s deferred tax assets on the balance sheet as of February 23, 2002 have been fully reserved with a valuation allowance. We will not be reducing our valuation allowance in the future until we are consistently profitable on a quarterly basis.

Overall, FSI has net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $65,009,000, which will begin to expire in fiscal year 2011 if not utilized. Of this amount, approximately $15,032,000 is subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitations on utilization. This limitation is approximately $1,382,000 per year.

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates:

The equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates was approximately $365,000 of losses for the second quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to approximately $1.3 million of income for the second quarter of fiscal 2001. The equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates was approximately $369,000 of income for the first half of fiscal 2002, compared to $2.4 million of income for the first half of fiscal 2001. Our affiliates, m•FSI and Metron Technology, have also been impacted by the global industry recession.

We expect equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates to be a $100,000 to $300,000 loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2002.*

Net Income (Loss):

Assuming that the Company can achieve the anticipated revenue, shipments and operating expense levels, we expect a net loss of $10 to $11 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2002.* This should be our low watermark for earnings, as we expect sequential improvement in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.*

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

FSI’s cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were approximately $48.7 million as of February 23, 2002, a decrease of $6.0 million from the end of fiscal 2001. The decrease in cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is primarily due to operating losses resulting in $5.7 million of cash being used in operations.

FSI’s trade accounts receivable decreased by approximately 43% or $17.6 million from the end of fiscal 2001 including a decrease in trade accounts receivable from affiliates of $7.8 million. The decrease relates to the lower shipment levels.

FSI’s inventory decreased approximately $4.1 million to $44.6 million at February 23, 2002 compared to $48.7 million at the end of fiscal 2001. The decrease in inventory was primarily in finished goods and raw materials, reflective of the increase in shipments in the second quarter of 2002 as compared to the first quarter. Our inventory reserves were approximately $7.3 million at the end of the second quarter.

As of February 23, 2002, the Company’s current ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 3.2 to 1.0 and working capital was $83.4 million.

As of February 23, 2002, the Company has no lines of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees of affiliates or other similar type arrangements. The balance of restricted cash as of February 23, 2002 was $500,000.

The Company’s contractual cash obligations related to operating leases at February 23, 2002 are summarized as follows:


Last half of fiscal 2002			428,800
Fiscal 2003			456,600
Fiscal 2004			339,600
Fiscal 2005			301,500
Fiscal 2006			157,100

	Total	$	1,683,600

As previously discussed, the Company has outstanding litigation regarding the Hsu matter. The total judgment against SSI together with post judgment interest as of February 23, 2002 aggregates approximately $5.7 million. Subsequent to February 23, 2002 Hsu was awarded an additional $431,000 for attorneys fees and expenses incurred since the judgment. SSI and the individual defendants have filed an appeal on a variety of grounds. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2002 second quarter, the Company posted an appeal bond on behalf of SSI and defendants in the amount of $8.3 million. As part of the posting of the bond, the Company entered into a letter of credit in the amount of $2.5 million with the surety company. This letter of credit was collateralized with restricted cash of approximately the same amount.

The Company had acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of approximately $1.0 million and $5.1 million for the first half of fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. It is anticipated FSI will invest between $3.0 and $3.5 million in fiscal 2002 in property, plant and equipment with depreciation and amortization of $13.5 to $14.5 million.*

Based upon our current financial forecast, the Company’s goal is to limit its fiscal 2002 cash burn rate to $10.0 to $15.0 million.* The Company believes that with existing cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and internally generated funds, there will be sufficient funds to meet FSI’s current projected working capital and other cash requirements through at least mid fiscal 2003.* Internally generated funds are affected by our sales and operating results and may be negatively impacted by deterioration in industry conditions.

FSI believes that success in its industry requires substantial capital to maintain the flexibility to take advantage of opportunities as they may arise. One of FSI’s strategic objectives is, as market and business conditions warrant, to consider divestitures, investments or acquisitions of businesses, products or technologies particularly those that are complementary to our surface conditioning business.* FSI may fund such activities with additional equity or debt financings.* The sale of additional equity or debt securities, whether to maintain flexibility or to meet strategic objectives, could result in additional dilution to our stockholders.*

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 addresses the financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS No. 121 “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.” However, this statement retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for (a) recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and (b) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale.

SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30 “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions” for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, this Statement retains the requirement of APB No. 30 to report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale. This statement also amends ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements” to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a temporarily controlled subsidiary. The Company is required and plans to adopt the provision of SFAS No. 144 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 144 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

RISK FACTORS

Our business faces significant risks. These risks include those described below and may include additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial. Given the business and the industry in which we operate, the following risk factors should be considered in addition to others described in this report. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks occurs, our business, operating results or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information and risks set forth in this report.

Because our business depends on the amount that manufacturers of microelectronics spend on capital equipment, downturns in the microelectronics industry may adversely affect our results.

The microelectronics industry experiences periodic downturns, which may have a negative effect on our sales and operating results. Our business depends on the amounts that manufacturers of microelectronics spend on capital equipment. The amounts they spend on capital equipment depend on the existing and expected demand for

semiconductor devices and products that use semiconductor devices. The microelectronics industry has experienced downturns in business activity in the past and the industry currently is experiencing a significant downturn. In fact, in calendar 2001 the industry experienced the worst decline in its history. When a downturn occurs, semiconductor manufacturers experience lower demand and increased pricing pressure for their products. As a result, they are likely to purchase less semiconductor processing equipment and have sometimes delayed making decisions to purchase capital equipment. In some cases, semiconductor manufacturers have canceled or delayed orders for our products. The semiconductor industry experienced a downturn in 1998 and 1999, which seriously harmed our operating results during that period. Typically, the semiconductor equipment industry has experienced more pronounced decreases in net sales than the semiconductor industry as a whole.

We, along with others in the industry, have recently experienced a significant downturn in orders for new equipment as well as delays in or cancellations of existing orders. We cannot predict the extent and length of the current downturn. In addition:

•		the semiconductor industry may experience other, possibly more severe and prolonged, downturns in the future;

•		any future recovery of the semiconductor industry may not result in an increased demand by semiconductor manufacturers for capital equipment or our products; and

•		the semiconductor industry may not improve in the near future or at all.

If we do not continue to develop new products, we will not be able to compete effectively.

Our business and results of operations could decline if we do not develop and successfully introduce new or improved products that the market accepts. The technology used in microelectronics manufacturing equipment and processes changes rapidly. Industry standards change constantly and equipment manufacturers frequently introduce new products. We believe that microelectronics manufacturers increasingly rely on equipment manufacturers like us to:

•		Design and develop more efficient manufacturing equipment;

•		Design and implement improved processes for microelectronics manufacturers to use; and

•		Make their equipment compatible with equipment made by other equipment manufacturers.

To compete, we must continue to develop, manufacture, and market new or improved products that meet changing industry standards. To do this successfully, we must:

•		Select appropriate products;

•		Design and develop our products efficiently and quickly;

•		Implement our manufacturing and assembly processes efficiently and on time;

•		Make products that perform well for our customers;

•		Market and sell our products effectively; and

•		Introduce our new products in a way that does not reduce sales of our existing products.

Failure of our products to gain market acceptance would adversely affect our financial condition.

We believe that our growth prospects depend upon our ability to gain customer acceptance of our products and technology, particularly 300 mm products. Market acceptance of products depends upon numerous factors, including compatibility with existing manufacturing processes and products, ability to displace incumbent suppliers, perceived advantages over competing products and the level of customer service available to support such products. Moreover, manufacturers often rely on a limited number of equipment vendors to meet their manufacturing equipment needs. As a result, market acceptance of our products may be affected adversely to the extent potential customers utilize a competitor’s manufacturing equipment. There can be no assurance that sales of new products will remain constant or grow or that we will be successful in obtaining broad market acceptance of our systems and technology.

We expect to spend a significant amount of time and resources to develop new systems and enhance existing systems. In light of the long product development cycles inherent in our industry, we will make these expenditures well in advance of the prospect of deriving revenue from the sale of any new systems. Our ability to commercially introduce and successfully market any new systems is subject to a wide variety of challenges during this development cycle, including start-up bugs, design defects and other matters that could delay introduction of these systems to the marketplace. In addition, since our customers are not obligated by long-term contracts to purchase our systems, our anticipated product orders may not materialize or orders that do materialize may be canceled. As a result, if we do not achieve market acceptance of new products, we may not be able to realize sufficient sales of our systems in order to recoup research and development expenditures. The failure of any of our new products to achieve market acceptance would harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations and cash flows.

Future acquisitions may dilute our shareholders’ ownership interests and have other adverse consequences.

Because of consolidations in the semiconductor equipment industry we serve and other competitive factors, our management will seek to acquire additional product lines, technologies, and businesses if suitable opportunities develop. Acquisitions may result in the issuance of our stock, which may dilute our shareholders’ ownership interests and reduce earnings per share. Acquisitions also may increase debt levels and the related goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition and operating results. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

•		Difficulties in absorbing the new business, product line, or technology;

•		Diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

•		Entering new markets in which we have little or no experience; and

•		Possible loss of key employees of the acquired business.

Because of the volatility of our stock price, the ability to trade FSI shares may be adversely affected and our ability to raise capital through future equity financing may be reduced.

Our stock price has been volatile in the past and may continue to be so in the future. In the 2001 fiscal year, for example, our stock price ranged from $7.75 to $18.50 per share. In the first half of fiscal 2002, our stock price ranged from $6.71 to $16.25.

The trading price of our common shares is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including factors discussed elsewhere in this report and the following:

•		Failure to meet the published expectations of securities analysts for a given quarterly period;

•		Changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

•		Press releases or announcements by or changes in market values of comparable companies;

•		Stock market price and volume fluctuations, which are particularly common among securities of high technology companies;

•		Stock market price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels;

•		Additions or departures of key personnel; and

•		Involvement in or adverse results from litigation.

The prices of technology stocks, including ours, have been particularly affected by extreme fluctuations in price and volume in the stock market generally. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies whose stock is traded. These broad stock market fluctuations may have a negative effect on our future stock price.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. In the future we could be the target of this type of litigation. Securities litigation may result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, which can seriously harm our business.

Because our quarterly operating results are volatile, our stock price could decrease.

In the past, our operating results have fluctuated from quarter to quarter and are likely to do so in the future. These fluctuations may have a significant impact on our stock price. The reasons for the fluctuations in our operating results, such as sales, gross profits, and net income, include:

•		The Timing of Significant Customer Orders and Customer Spending Patterns. During industry downturns, our customers may ask us to delay or even cancel the shipment of equipment orders. Delays and cancellations may adversely affect our operating results in any particular quarter if we are unable to recognize revenue for particular sales in the quarter in which we expected those sales.

•		The Timing of New Product and Service Announcements By Us or Our Competitors. New product announcements by us and our competitors could cause our customers to delay a purchase or to decide to purchase products of one of our competitors which would adversely affect our revenue and, therefore, our results of operations. New product announcements by others may make it necessary for us to reduce prices on our products or offer more service options, which could adversely impact operating margins and net income.

•		The Mix of Products Sold and the Market Acceptance of Our New Product Lines. The mix of products we sell varies from period to period, and because margins vary among or within different product lines, this can adversely affect our results of operations. If we fail to sell our products which generate higher margins, our average gross margins may be lower than expected. If we fail to sell our new product lines, our revenue may be lower than expected.

•		General Global Economic Conditions or Economic Conditions in a Particular Region. When economic conditions in a region or worldwide worsen, customers may delay or cancel their orders. There also may be an increase in the time it takes to collect payment from our customers or even outright payment defaults. This can negatively affect our cash flow and our results.

As a result of the factors we list above, our future operating results are difficult to predict. Further, we base our current and future expense plans in significant part on our expectations of our longer-term future revenue. As a result, we expect our expense levels to be relatively fixed in the short-run. An unanticipated decline in revenue for a particular quarter may disproportionately affect our net income in that quarter. If our revenue is below our

projections, then our operating results will also be below expectations. Any one of the factors we list above, or a combination of them, could adversely affect our quarterly results of operations, and consequently may cause a decline in our share price.

Because international sales are important to us, and because most of our international sales are through our affiliated distributors, reductions in the sales efforts of these affiliates could adversely affect our results.

The profits or losses of our affiliated distributors, Metron Technology B.V. and m•FSI Ltd., can also significantly affect our financial results. We make most of our international sales through these affiliated distributors. As of August 25, 2001 we had a 21% ownership interest in Metron and a 49% interest in m•FSI. Fiscal 2001 sales through m•FSI were $18.0 million or 8% of our total sales. Fiscal 2001 sales through Metron were $93.2 million or 43% of our total sales. In addition, these affiliates also provide service and support to many of our international customers. Metron and m•FSI also distribute or sell products for companies other than us. If either of these affiliates reduced its sales efforts, lost the business of a significant company for which it distributes or sells products, lost a significant customer, or otherwise became less financially viable, it could have a negative effect on our operating results.

We cannot guarantee that Metron or m•FSI will continue to distribute our products or the products of other companies successfully. The failure of Metron or m•FSI to do so could have a significant negative effect on our results of operations.

Changes in demand caused by fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates may reduce our international sales.

Almost all of our direct international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Nonetheless, changes in demand caused by fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates may affect our international sales. Most of our international sales, however, are through our affiliated distributors. Metron’s sales of our products and other companies’ products are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, but Metron’s expenses are generally denominated in foreign currencies. Accordingly, fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates may affect Metron’s financial results. Sales for m•FSI are denominated in yen. As a result, U.S. dollar/yen exchange rates may affect our equity interest in m•FSI’s earnings.

Metron and m•FSI sometimes engage in so-called “hedging” or risk-reducing transactions to try to limit the negative effects that the devaluation of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar could have on operating results. They will do so if a sale denominated in a foreign currency is sufficiently large to justify the costs of hedging. To hedge a sale, Metron or m•FSI typically will commit to buy U.S. dollars and sell the foreign currency at a given price at a future date. If the customer cancels the sale, Metron or m•FSI may be forced to buy U.S. dollars and sell the foreign currency at market rates to meet its hedging obligations and may incur a loss in doing so. To date, the hedging activities of Metron and m•FSI have not had any significant negative effect on us. The adoption of SFAS 133 by Metron and m•FSI may cause more volatility in our equity in earnings of affiliates.*

Because of the need to meet and comply with numerous foreign regulations and policies, the changeability of the political and economic environments in foreign jurisdictions and the difficulty of managing business overseas, we may not be able to sustain our historical level of international sales.

We and our affiliates operate in a global market. In fiscal 2001, approximately 60% of our sales revenue derived from sales outside the United States. In fiscal 2000, this figure was 53%, and in fiscal 1999 it was 29%. These figures include sales through Metron and m•FSI, which accounted for 85% of international sales in 2001, 87% in 2000 and 92% in 1999. We expect that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of total sales. Sales to customers outside the United States involve a number of risks, including the following:

•		Imposition of government controls;

•		Compliance with U.S. export laws and foreign laws;

•		Political and economic instability;

•		Trade restrictions;

•		Changes in taxes and tariffs;

•		Longer payment cycles;

•		Difficulty of administering business overseas; and

•		General economic conditions.

In particular, the Japanese and Asia Pacific markets are extremely competitive. The semiconductor device manufacturers located there are very aggressive in seeking price concessions from suppliers, including equipment manufacturers like us. In fiscal 2001, approximately 38% of our international sales were attributable to these markets.

We seek to meet technical standards imposed by foreign regulatory bodies. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to comply with those standards in the future. Any failure by us to design products to comply with foreign standards could have a significant negative impact on us.

Because of the significant financial resources needed to offer a broad range of products, to maintain customer service and support and to invest in research and development, we may be unable to compete with larger, better established competitors.

The microelectronics equipment industry is highly competitive. We face substantial competition throughout the world. We believe that to remain competitive, we will need significant financial resources to offer a broad range of products, to maintain customer service and support, and to invest in research and development. We believe that the microelectronics industry is becoming increasingly dominated by large manufacturers who have the resources to support customers on a worldwide basis. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing, and customer-support capabilities than us. Large equipment manufacturers may enter the market areas in which we compete. In addition, smaller, emerging microelectronics equipment companies provide innovative technology. We expect that our competitors will continue to improve the design and performance of their existing products and processes. We also expect them to introduce new products and processes with better performance and pricing. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to compete effectively in the United States or elsewhere. This could have a significant negative impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Because we do not have long-term sales commitments with our customers, if these customers decide to reduce, delay or cancel orders or choose to deal with our competitors, then our results will be adversely affected.

If our significant customers, including IBM, Texas Instruments, STMicroelectronics, Philips Semiconductor or 1st Silicon, reduce, delay, or cancel orders, then our operating results could suffer. Our largest customers have changed from year to year, however, sales to FSI’s top five customers accounted for approximately 46%, 45% and 49% of total sales in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Philips Semiconductor accounted for approximately 10% of our sales in fiscal 2001. Texas Instruments accounted for 14%, 15% and 13% of revenues in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. STMicroelectronics represented 11% of revenues in fiscal 2000. IBM accounted for approximately 24% of revenues for fiscal 1999. We currently have no long-term sales commitments with any of our customers. Instead, we generally make sales under purchase orders. Our backlog at August 25, 2001 was $37.1 million of which 44% was comprised of orders from two customers. All orders are subject to cancellation or delay by the customer.

Our backlog may not result in future net sales.

We schedule the production of our systems based in part upon order backlog. Due to possible customer changes in delivery schedules and cancellations of orders, our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period. In addition, while we evaluate each customer order on a case by case basis to determine qualification for inclusion in backlog, there can be no assurance that amounts included in backlog ultimately will result in future sales. A reduction in backlog during any particular period, or the failure of our backlog to result in future sales, could harm our business.

Because we retained certain liabilities from the divestiture of the Chemical Management Division or agreed to indemnify The BOC Group, Inc. (“BOC”) with respect to specified obligations and liabilities, we may experience charges in excess of the reserves established at the time of the divestiture which could negatively impact results from operations.

In connection with the divestiture of the Chemical Management Division, we retained certain liabilities and agreed to indemnify BOC with respect to certain specified obligations and liabilities. If we experience liabilities or charges in excess of established reserves and it is ultimately determined that an adjustment in favor of BOC is warranted, our results of operations could be adversely impacted due to additional costs associated with those reserves or the request to return to BOC a portion of the purchase price because of such adjustments.

It may be difficult for us to compete with stronger competitors resulting from industry consolidation.

In the past several years, we have seen a trend toward consolidation in the microelectronics equipment industry We expect the trend toward consolidation to continue as companies seek to strengthen or maintain their market positions in a rapidly changing industry. We believe that industry consolidations may result in competitors that are better able to compete. This could have a significant negative impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Because we depend upon our management and technical personnel for our success, the loss of key personnel could place us at a competitive disadvantage.

Our success depends to a significant extent upon our management and technical personnel. The loss of a number of these key persons could have a negative effect on our operations. Competition is high for such personnel in our industry in all of our locations. We periodically review our compensation and benefit packages to ensure that they are competitive in the marketplace and make adjustments or implement new programs for that purpose, as appropriate. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to attract and retain the personnel we require to continue to grow and operate profitably.

Our employment costs in the short-term are to a large extent fixed, and therefore any unexpected revenue shortfall could adversely affect our operating results.

Our operating expense levels are based in significant part on our head count, which generally is driven by longer-term revenue goals. For a variety of reasons, particularly the high cost and disruption of lay-offs and the costs of recruiting and training, our head count in the short-term is, to a large extent, fixed. Accordingly, we may be unable to reduce employment costs in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue or gross margin shortfall, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Because our intellectual property is important to our success, the loss or diminution of our intellectual property rights through legal challenge by others or from independent development by others, could adversely affect our business.

We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and other measures. However, we believe that our financial performance will depend more upon the innovation, technological expertise, and marketing abilities of our employees than on such protection. In connection with our intellectual property rights, we face the following risks:

•

Our pending patent applications may not be issued or may be issued with more narrow claims;

•		Patents issued to us may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented;

•		Rights granted under issued patents may not provide competitive advantages to us;

•		Foreign laws may not protect our intellectual property rights; and

•		Others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products, or design around our patents.

As is typical in the semiconductor industry, we occasionally receive notices from others alleging infringement claims. We have been involved in patent infringement litigation in the past and one of our subsidiaries, SCD Mountain View, Inc., is involved in such litigation. We could become involved in similar lawsuits or other patent infringement claims in the future. We cannot guarantee the outcome of such lawsuits or claims, which may have a significant negative effect on our business or operating results.

We are currently exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or claims.

FSI currently is, and in the future, may be, involved in legal proceedings or claims regarding patent infringement, intellectual property rights, contracts and other matters. These legal proceedings and claims, whether with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive to prosecute or defend, and could divert management’s attention and resources. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of current or future legal proceedings or claims. If FSI is not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement of the matter, obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms and/or successfully prosecute or defend its position, FSI’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable, which could require us to incur high sales and marketing expenses with no assurance that a sale will result.

Sales cycles for some of our products can run as long as 12 to 18 months. As a result, we may not recognize revenue from efforts to sell particular products for extended periods of time. We believe that the length of the sales cycle may increase as some current and potential customers centralize purchasing decisions into one decision-making entity. We expect this may intensify the evaluation process and require us to make additional sales and marketing expenditures with no assurance that a sale will result.*

Adoption of the common European currency may adversely affect us and our affiliated distributors by requiring systems modifications and possibly increasing their currency exchange risks.

The use of the Euro (a common European currency unit) began on January 1, 1999 and the transition period expired January 1, 2002. We do not expect the cost of any necessary systems modification to be material and do not anticipate that the introduction and use of the Euro will materially affect our results.* Nor do we expect the Euro to have a material effect on the currency exchange risks of our or our affiliated distributors’ businesses.* Our affiliate, Metron’s new operations management information system is designed to accommodate the elimination of the legacy currencies. If their new system is not successfully implemented, this could have a material adverse effect on their business.

Changes to financial accounting standards may affect the Company’s reported results of operations.

The Company prepares its financial statements to conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The GAAP are subject to interpretation by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in those policies can have a significant effect on the Company’s reported results and may even affect its reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced.

Accounting policies affecting many other aspects of our business, including rules relating to purchase and pooling-of-interests accounting for business combinations, revenue recognition, in-process research and development charges, employee stock purchase plans and stock option grants, have recently been revised or are under review. Changes to those rules or the questioning of the Company’s current accounting practices may have a material

adverse effect on the Company’s reported financial results or on the way it conducts business. In addition, the Company’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires that it make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of those assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the recorded amounts of expenses during the reporting period. A change in the facts and circumstances surrounding those estimates could result in a change to the Company’s estimates and could impact its future operating results.

We do not intend to pay dividends.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings for funding growth and, therefore, do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Special note regarding forward-looking statements.

Some of the statements under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this report are “forward-looking statements.” These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our, or our industry’s, actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors are listed under “Risk Factors’ and elsewhere in this report.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “may,” should,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “could,” “would” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates due to investments in foreign-based affiliates. As of February 23, 2002 our investments in affiliates include a 21% interest in Metron Technology (Metron) and a 49% interest in m•FSI Ltd. Metron operates mainly in Europe, Asia Pacific and the United States. m•FSI Ltd. operates in Japan. Approximately 84% of fiscal 2001 and 70% of the first half of fiscal 2002 sales to affiliates were to Metron. We denominate all U.S. export sales in U.S. dollars.

Metron attempts to limit its exposure to changing foreign currency exchange rates through operational and financial market actions. Products are sold in a number of countries throughout the world resulting in a diverse portfolio of transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Certain short-term foreign currency exposures are managed by the purchase of forward contracts to offset the earnings and cash flow impact of non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables.

We do not have significant exposure to changing interest rates as all material outstanding debt was repaid on September 3, 1999 and all marketable securities consist of debt instruments which mature within one year. As of quarter-end, amortized cost approximates market value for all outstanding marketable securities. We do not undertake any specific actions to cover our exposure to interest rate risk and we are not party to any interest rate risk management transactions. The impact of a 1% change in short-term interest rates would be approximately a $487,000 annual change in investment income based on cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable security balances as of February 23, 2002.

Our investment in our affiliate, Metron, is accounted for by the equity method of accounting and has a carrying value on the balance sheet of approximately $16.7 million. The fair value of Metron is subject to stock market fluctuations. Based on the closing stock price of Metron of $7.95 per share on February 22, 2002, the fair value of our investment in Metron, was approximately $21.4 million. The stock price of Metron ranged from $3.13 to $14.00 per share during fiscal 2001 and from $6.00 to $8.63 per share during the first half of fiscal 2002.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

We generate minor amounts of liquid and solid hazardous waste and use licensed haulers and disposal facilities to ship and dispose of such waste. In the past, we have received notice from state or federal enforcement agencies that we are a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) in connection with the investigation of several hazardous waste disposal sites owned and operated by third parties. In each matter, we have elected to participate in settlement offers made to all de minimis parties with respect to such sites. The risk of being named a PRP is that if any of the other PRP’s are unable to contribute their proportionate share of the liability, if any, associated with the site, those PRP’s that are financially able could be held financially responsible for the shortfall.*

There has and continues to be substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the microelectronics industry. Commercialization of new products or further commercialization of our current products could provoke claims of infringement by third parties. In the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to us, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us or to defend us against claimed infringement of the rights of others and to determine the scope and validity of our proprietary rights. Any such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of effort by us, which by itself could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in our loss of proprietary rights, subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties or prevent us from manufacturing or selling one or more products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.*

Certain of our product lines are intended for use with hazardous chemicals. As a result, we are notified by our customers from time to time of incidents involving our equipment that have resulted in a spill or release of a hazardous chemical. In some cases it may be alleged that we or our equipment are at fault. There can be no assurance that any future litigation resulting from such claims would not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial results.*

In the fall of 1995, pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase and Shareholder Agreement dated November 30, 1990 between Mr. Hsu and SSI (the “Shareholder Agreement”) and in connection with Mr. Hsu’s termination of his employment with SSI in August 1995, the former shareholders of SSI purchased the shares of SSI common stock then held by Mr. Hsu. In October 1996, Eric C. and Angie L. Hsu (the “plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Southern Division, against Semiconductor Systems, Inc. (“SSI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FSI that was acquired in April 1996, and the former shareholders of SSI.

In September and October 2000, certain of Mr. Hsu’s claims were tried to a jury in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland, California. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury made the following findings. The jury found that SSI breached the Shareholder Agreement between it and Eric Hsu and that the damages that resulted were approximately $2.4 million. In addition, each of the individual defendant shareholders was found liable for conversion and damages of $4.2 million were awarded. Certain individual defendants were also found to have intentionally interfered with Mr. Hsu’s prospective economic advantage and damages of $3.2 million were awarded. Finally, several individual defendants and SSI were found to have violated certain provisions of the California Corporation Code and damages of $2.4 million were awarded. SSI believes the damages awards are duplicative and not cumulative and that certain of these damages awards may be subject to reduction.

In proceedings subsequent to the trial, the Court has determined that plaintiffs are entitled to an award against SSI of prejudgment interest on the breach of contract damages (approximately $2.4 million) at 10 percent per annum from October 1996. In addition, the Court has awarded plaintiffs approximately $127,000 in costs and

approximately $1.8 million in attorneys’ fees against SSI and the individual defendants. On November 16, 2001, the court signed its final judgment reflecting the jury’s awards, interest, attorneys fees and costs assessed against each of the defendants. The total judgment against SSI together with post judgment interest as of February 23, 2002 aggregates approximately $5.7 million. Following the entry of judgment, SSI and the other defendants filed post-trial motions seeking reduction in the jury’s damage awards and/or a new trial. The court denied our post-trial motions and there was no reduction in damages against SSI. Subsequent to February 23, 2002, Hsu was awarded an additional $431,000 for attorneys fees and expenses incurred since the judgment was rendered in November 2001.

SSI and the individual defendants have filed an appeal on a variety of grounds. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2002 second quarter, the Company posted an appeal bond on behalf of SSI and defendants in the amount of $8.3 million. As part of the posting of the bond, the Company entered into a letter of credit in the amount of $2.5 million with the surety company. This letter of credit was collateralized with restricted cash of approximately the same amount.

The Company, on behalf of SSI, has made a claim with respect to the lawsuit under the escrow created at the time of our acquisition of SSI. The escrow was established to secure certain indemnification obligations of the former shareholders of SSI. The escrow consists of an aggregate of 250,000 shares of FSI Common Stock paid to the former shareholders of SSI as consideration in the acquisition. The former shareholders have agreed to hold FSI and SSI harmless from any claim arising out of any securities transactions between SSI and the shareholders or former shareholders of SSI. The indemnification obligations of the individual SSI shareholders are capped at approximately $4.2 million in the aggregate. Any shares in the escrow returned to FSI to satisfy any indemnification obligations will be valued at $12.125 per share, the per-share price of FSI Common Stock at the time of the SSI acquisition.

Given the escrowed shares and the additional indemnification by the individual SSI shareholders, along with our litigation reserve, we believe we are adequately reserved for this potential liability. However, there is considerable uncertainty as to the ultimate resolution of this matter and the respective liability, if any, of SSI. We will continue with our appeal process and our defense.

In September 1995, CFM Technologies, Inc. and CFMT, Inc. (collectively “CFM”) filed a complaint in United States District Court for the District of Delaware against YieldUP, now known as SCD Mountain View, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The complaint alleged that the drying process incorporated in certain YieldUP products infringes a patent held by CFM. On October 14, 1997, the United States District Court held that CFM had failed to produce evidence on three separate elements of the patent claim. On June 30, 1998, the United States District Court of Delaware granted CFM’s petition for re-argument of the issue. The judge has not yet ruled as to whether to sustain his earlier ruling. If the original order is overturned, the litigation may proceed to trial, and the litigation and the associated costs may, and an unfavorable adjudication could, have a material adverse impact on FSI. CFM is asking for monetary damages and an injunction against YieldUP’s use of the products at issue. A loss, if any, resulting from an unfavorable adjudication, cannot presently be estimated.

CFM filed an additional complaint against YieldUP in United States District Court for the District of Delaware on December 30, 1998. The complaint alleged that the cleaning process incorporated in certain of YieldUP’s products infringes two patents held by CFM: U.S. Patent Nos. 4,917,123 and 4,778,532. YieldUP plans to vigorously defend its intellectual property rights against any and all claims.

On April 4, 2000 the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted YieldUP’s motion for summary judgment that the ‘123 and ‘532 patents are invalid. CFM’s motion for rehearing has been denied. On July 29, 2000, the issue of whether CFM or its inventors engaged in inequitable conduct in prosecuting the ‘123 and ‘532 patents was tried before the court. On June 6, 2001, the judge issued his opinion finding that the CFM inventors engaged in inequitable conduct during the prosecution of the patent application. On June 7, 2001, the judge ordered that judgment be entered in favor of YieldUP and against CFM on YieldUP’s defenses of lack of enablement and inequitable conduct. No final appealable judgment has been entered in the second lawsuit. A loss, if any, resulting from an unfavorable adjudication, cannot presently be estimated and the associated costs, and an unfavorable adjudication could have a material adverse impact on FSI. Once judgment is entered based upon the District Court’s granting YieldUP’s summary judgment motion, the District Court’s order may be appealed by CFM.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Changes in Securities


	None

ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities


	None

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

	At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 23, 2002, the shareholders approved the following:

	(1)		Election of two Class III Directors to serve a three-year term. The nominated directors were elected as follows:


Director-Nominee	Votes For		Votes Against		Votes Abstentions

Terrence W. Glarner		22,773,824		1,943,067		0
Charles R. Wofford		22,771,704		1,945,187		0

	James A. Bernards and Donald S. Mitchell, as Class I Directors and Willem D. Maris and Krishnamurthy Rajagopal, as Class II Directors, continue to serve as directors of the Company.

	(2)		Proposal to increase the number of shares authorized under the Company’s 1997 Omnibus Stock Plan by 750,000 shares. The proposal received 20,930,896 votes for and 3,290,957 votes against. There were 495,038 abstentions.

	(3)		To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending august 31, 2002. The proposal received 24,634,792 votes for and 42,927 votes against. There were 39,172 abstentions.

ITEM 5. Other Information


	None

ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K


	(a)(3) Exhibits


2.0		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of January 21, 1999 among FSI International, Inc., BMI International, Inc. and YieldUP International, Corporation (12)
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and Among FSI International, Inc., Spectre Acquisition Corp., and Semiconductor Systems, Inc. (1)
2.2		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of June 9, 1999 between FSI International, Inc. and The BOC Group, Inc. (13)
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. (2)
3.2		Restated and Amended By-Laws. (filed herewith)
3.5		Articles of Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation (14)
4.1		Form of Rights Agreement dated as of May 22, 1997 between FSI International, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, National Association, as Rights Agent (4)
4.2		Amendment dated March 26, 1998 to Rights Agreement dated May 22, 1997 by and between FSI International, Inc. and Harris Trust and Saving Bank, National Association as Rights Agent. (5)
4.3		Amendment dated March 9, 2000 to Rights Agreement dated May 22, 1997, as amended


		March 26, 1998 by and between FSI International, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank as Rights Agent. (17)
10.1		FSI International, Inc. 1997 Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended and restated April 2001). (20)
10.2		Split Dollar Insurance Agreement and Collateral Assignment Agreement dated December 28, 1989, between the Company and Joel A. Elftmann. (Similar agreements between the Company and each of Patricia M. Hollister, Luke R. Komarek, Benno G. Sand, Mark Ahmann and John Ely, have been omitted, but will be filed if requested in writing by the Commission.) (6)
10.8		1989 Stock Option Plan. (3)
10.9		Amended and Restated Employees Stock Purchase Plan.(20)
10.10		Shareholders Agreement among FSI International, Inc. and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and Chlorine Engineers Corp. Ltd. dated as of August 14, 1991. (6)
10.11		FSI Exclusive Distributorship Agreement dated as of August 14, 1991 between FSI International, Inc. and m•FSI, Ltd. (6)
10.12		FSI Licensing Agreement dated as of August 14, 1991, between FSI International, Inc. and m•FSI, Ltd. (6)
10.13		Amendment to FSI/Metron Distribution Agreement dated July 31, 1999. (15)
10.15		License Agreement, dated October 15, 1991, between the Company and Texas Instruments Incorporated. (7)
10.16		Amendment No. 1, dated April 10, 1992, to the License Agreement, dated October 15, 1991, between the Company and Texas Instruments Incorporated. (7)
10.17		Amendment effective October 1, 1993 to the License Agreement, dated October 15, 1991 between the Company and Texas Instruments Incorporated. (8)
10.18		Amended and Restated Directors’ Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan. (9)
10.19		Management Agreement between FSI International, Inc. and Donald S. Mitchell, effective as of January 2, 2001. (Similar agreements between the Company and its executive officers have been omitted but will be filed if requested in writing by the commission.)(19)
10.20		FSI International, Inc. 1994 Omnibus Stock Plan. (10)
10.21		FSI International, Inc. 1998 Incentive Plan. (11)
10.23		Distribution Agreement made and entered into as of March 31, 1998 by and between FSI International, Inc. and Metron Technology B.V. (Exhibits to Agreement omitted) (11)
10.26		Summary of Employment Arrangement between the Company and Don Mitchell dated December 12, 1999. (18)
10.27		Distribution Agreement between FSI International, Inc’s. Surface Conditioning Division and Metron Technology B.V. effective July 10, 2000. (18)
10.30		Employment Agreement entered into as of December 12, 1999 by and between FSI International, Inc. and Donald S. Mitchell. (16)
10.31		Agreement made and entered into as of March 4, 2001 by and between FSI International, Inc. and Benno G. Sand. (21)

(1)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (as amended) dated March 21, 1996, SEC File No. 333-1509 and incorporated by reference.
(2)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 24, 1990, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(3)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 1989, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(4)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on June 5, 1997, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(5)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-A/A-1, filed by the Company on April 16, 1998, Sec File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(6)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1991, as amended by Form 8 dated January 7, 1992, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(7)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 29, 1992, File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.

(8)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 1993, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(9)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 28, 1994, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(10)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 1994, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(11)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended August 29, 1998, (as amended) SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(12)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 21, 1999, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(13)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on June 23, 1999, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(14)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 1999, SEC File No. 0-17276, and incorporated by reference.
(15)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 27, 1999, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(16)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 26, 2000, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(17)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 27, 2000, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(18)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2000, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(19)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 24, 2001, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(20)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 26, 2001, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.
(21)		Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2001, SEC File No. 0-17276 and incorporated by reference.

(b)		Reports on Form 8-K

		The Company filed an 8-K pursuant to Regulation FD dated January 23, 2002 with respect to the Company’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in Chaska, Minnesota. The filing contained certain slides from the meeting and the script from which certain Company officials presented at the meeting.

FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


			FSI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

			[Registrant]


DATE:	March 20, 2002

		By:	/s/Patricia M. Hollister
			Chief Financial Officer on behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents