e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended June 2, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-12867
3COM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2605794 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
350 Campus Drive |
|
|
Marlborough, Massachusetts
|
|
01752 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(508) 323-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share; Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of December 2, 2005, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,189,302,000 based on the closing sale price as reported on
the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System National Market System.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
394,119,756 shares |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
|
|
Document |
|
Parts Into Which Incorporated |
Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held
September 20, 2006 (Proxy Statement) |
|
Part III, to the extent stated herein |
3Com Corporation
Form 10-K Annual Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2006
Table of Contents
ii
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31, with each fiscal quarter
ending on the Friday generally nearest August 31, November 30 and February 28. For presentation
purposes, the periods are shown as ending on August 31, November 30, February 28 and May 31, as
applicable.
We acquired majority (51%) ownership of Huawei-3Com Co., Ltd. (H-3C), a China-based joint
venture, on January 27, 2006 and determined it was then appropriate to consolidate H-3Cs results.
For convenience of close purposes we consolidated the results of H-3C as of February 1, 2006. H-3C
follows a calendar year basis of reporting and therefore results are consolidated on a two-month
time lag. In fiscal 2006, we recorded equity income for the period April 1, 2005 through January
31, 2006 and consolidated H-3Cs results for the period February 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006.
Prior to 2006 we reported our equity in H-3Cs net loss for H-3Cs fiscal period from April 1, 2004
through March 31, 2005 and the date of formation (November 17, 2003) through March 31, 2004 in our
results of operations for fiscal 2005 and 2004.
3Com, the 3Com logo, Digital Vaccine, NBX, IntelliJack, OfficeConnect, TippingPoint Technologies,
and UnityOne are registered trademarks of 3Com Corporation or its subsidiaries. TippingPoint and
VCX are trademarks of 3Com Corporation. Other product and brand names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective owners.
This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, predictions regarding the following aspects of our future:
future growth; H-3C, our joint venture in China, including strategy, growth, management of growth,
dependence, expected benefits, allocations of purchase price, timing and method of consolidation,
tax rate, sales from China, adjustments to preliminary purchase price allocation for 2%
acquisition, intent to purchase additional interest in H-3C, financing alternatives to fund such
purchase, expected return of capital from H-3C, and resources needed to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley
and manage operations; new CEO and EVP and their start dates; impact of SFAS No. 123R and other
accounting regulations; expected annual amortization expense; TippingPoint acquisition and its
expected benefits; environment for enterprise networking equipment; challenges relating to sales
growth; leveraging and enhancing our relationship with H-3C; supply of components; trend towards
Gigabit products; research and development focus; characteristics of IPS and certain H-3C products;
future sales of connectivity products; re-assessment, development and execution of our
go-to-market strategy; strategic product and technology development plans; management of SCN
business to reach sustained profitability; goal of profitability; dependence on China; ability to
satisfy cash requirements for at least the next twelve months; negative cash flow from operating
activities; intent to hold debt investments to maturity; details, effect and benefits of
restructuring activities and expected charges to be incurred; potential additional restructuring
and cost reduction activities; expected sale of land and buildings and private equity interests and
net proceeds therefrom; expected cost savings from restructuring activities and intent to invest in
TippingPoint and H-3C; strategic investments and capital call requirements; potential acquisitions
and strategic relationships; future contractual obligations; recovery of deferred tax assets;
reserves; market risk; outsourcing; competition and pricing pressures; effect of litigation; effect
and insurance coverage for Hemel explosion; and possible repurchase of shares; and you can identify
these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as may, can, will,
should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, intends,
continue, or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors, including those set forth under Part I Item 1A Risk Factors. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based on our assessment of information
available to us at the time this report is filed. We do not intend, and disclaim any obligation,
to update any forward-looking statements.
iii
PRESENTATION OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSCOMMWORKS
The following information relates to the continuing operations of 3Com Corporation and our
consolidated subsidiaries (3Com).
On May 23, 2003, we completed the sale of our CommWorks division and transferred certain assets and
liabilities to UTStarcom, Inc. As a result, we began reporting the CommWorks division as a
discontinued operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. We present the CommWorks division as
discontinued operations for all prior periods on a comparative basis.
iv
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
We provide secure, converged networking solutions on a global scale to organizations of all sizes.
Our products and solutions enable customers to manage business-critical voice, video and data in a
secure, scalable, reliable and efficient network environment. We deliver networking products and
services for enterprises that view their networks as mission critical, and value superior
performance. Our products form integrated solutions and function in multi-vendor environments.
Our products are sold on a worldwide basis through a combination of value added partners and direct
sales representatives.
We deliver products and solutions that support the increasingly complex and demanding application
environments in todays businesses. We aspire to be one of the leading enterprise networking
companies by delivering innovative, secure, feature-rich products and solutions. We believe that
our global presence, brand identity, intellectual property portfolio and strong balance sheet
provide a solid foundation for achieving our objectives.
On January 27, 2006, 3Com completed the purchase of an additional two percent ownership interest in
our joint venture, Huawei-3Com Co., Ltd. (H-3C), from our joint venture partner, Huawei
Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei), which is domiciled in Hong Kong and has its principal operating
center in Hangzhou, China. With the completion of that transaction, 3Com gained majority (51%)
control of the joint venture and has consolidated its results from the transaction closing date.
When the joint venture was formed in 2003, we had three key objectives: first, to establish a
substantial presence in China, a rapidly growing large market; second, to create a resource capable
of building enterprise-class, cutting-edge switching and routing products faster than we could
deliver on our own; and third, to capitalize on a rapidly growing pool of engineering talent. The
joint venture, its history and its products will be discussed in more detail later in this report.
With the consolidation of H-3Cs financial results, 3Com now reports two operating business
segments: the Secure, Converged Networking (SCN) segment, comprising our security, networking, and
voice product offerings (other than H-3C offerings in these areas), and the H-3C segment. See Note
19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for certain financial
information relating to our segments.
In addition to our focus on leveraging H-3C, during the past year we undertook several actions we
believe will enhance our competitiveness, execution and financial performance over the longer term.
First, we continued to manage our expenses in an effort to achieve profitability. These actions
will be discussed in more detail later in this report. Second, we continued to implement our
strategy to compete in the enterprise networking market through:
|
§ |
|
Continued advances in products and solutions; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Increased focus on our customer-facing capabilities in the areas of sales and marketing. |
More specifically, we have introduced multiple new products targeted at the large enterprise
market, including modular and stackable switches and routers sourced from H-3C as well as Internet
Protocol (IP) telephony, security- including products developed and sold through our TippingPoint
Security Division- and wireless networking solutions. We also continue to develop solutions for
the small to medium enterprise market, including security, IP telephony and smart switches that
leverage Power over Ethernet (PoE) technology which means allowing power from the wiring closet
to be supplied to any compliant device to help facilitate the adoption of IP telephony.
During the year ended June 2, 2006, we increased our focus on sales and marketing activities.
Initiatives included the launch and completion of an extensive branding campaign, the development
of an expanded set of enterprise class channels to support direct sales into the large enterprise
market, and the implementation of marketing programs that we believe will improve our effectiveness
and productivity in our existing channels, particularly those that target small and medium-sized
businesses. We are in the midst of re-assessing our go-to-market model and are making changes that
we believe will increase our effectiveness.
3Com was incorporated in California on June 4, 1979 and reincorporated in Delaware on June 12,
1997. Our corporate headquarters are located in Marlborough, Massachusetts. We have offices and
sales capabilities in 35 countries and 60 locations worldwide. Our Web site address is
www.3Com.com. We make available on our Web site, free of charge, our
1
SEC filings (including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K, Section 16 filings on Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendments to those reports)
as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file with or furnish such material to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information contained into our Web site is not
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
SECURED, CONVERGED NETWORKING SCN SEGMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Networking needs vary among customers and, therefore, we offer a broad line of products and
solutions. We strive to meet our customers needs by delivering scalable, feature-rich, high
performance, reliable, and secure standards-based networking solutions.
Our long-term technology-based strategy centers on enterprises and public sector organizations
migrating to secure IP-based infrastructures that deliver converged voice and data applications.
Our products and services can generally be classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Security; |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Telephony; |
|
|
§ |
|
Networking; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Services. |
During fiscal 2006 we determined to end-of-life most of our products in our connectivity business
rather than invest to bring these products into compliance with new European Union standards. We
currently intend to continue to report residual revenue from our connectivity business, which was
$39.8 million and $54.0 million for the years ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, as a separate product
category in our financial disclosures. This category also includes periodic royalty payments from
the licensing of certain of our intellectual property from our connectivity products.
Each of our principal product categories and service offerings is described in greater detail
below.
Security
We have a comprehensive security portfolio that includes end-to-end solutions for core-to-edge
protection. Organizations can choose to implement overlaid or embedded security solutions that are
automatic and centrally manageable and which provide adaptive and dynamic protection.
Our security products include the following:
|
§ |
|
Intrusion Prevention Systems; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Firewalls |
Intrusion Prevention Systems
Our TippingPoint line of intrusion prevention systems (IPS) are hardware-based products utilizing
high-speed network processors and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) that can operate at
multi-Gigabit speeds. Our hardware platform is complemented by a robust security-oriented
operating system and suite of vulnerability filters that can be dynamically updated. We believe
that the TippingPoint IPS is the only IPS that offers VoIP security, bandwidth management,
peer-to-peer protection, and default Recommended Settings to accurately block malicious traffic
automatically upon installation without tuning. The TippingPoints IPS is certified as the first
multi-gigabit network IPS by ICSA Labs, the security industrys central authority for product
certification testing.
The TippingPoint IPS provides application protection, performance protection and infrastructure
protection through total packet inspection, which means that our system reviews all data processed
through it for viruses and other malicious traffic. Application protection capabilities provide
fast, accurate, reliable protection from internal and external cyber attacks. Through its
infrastructure protection capabilities, the TippingPoint IPS protects IP telephony infrastructure,
routers, switches, DNS and other critical infrastructure from targeted attacks and traffic
anomalies. Our performance protection capabilities enable customers to throttle non-mission
critical applications that hijack valuable bandwidth and IT resources, thereby aligning network
resources and business-critical application performance.
The switch-like performance characteristics of the TippingPoint IPS allow it to be placed at the
core, in-line at the perimeter, on internal network segments, and at remote site locations with
minimal or no adverse network impact. Additionally, our IPS
2
solutions are deployed and managed using a scalable, tiered Security Management System (SMS).
Using SMS, customers implement and manage coherent, enterprise-wide security policies based on
rules and thresholds set within the SMS. The SMS offers a rich reporting system, allowing
customized reports to be generated and distributed automatically on a scheduled basis. Support for
multiple user profiles allows a range of users, such as administrators and executives, access to
this management system.
We provide a real-time update service, called Digital Vaccine® service, which automatically and
rapidly delivers vulnerability filters against the latest threats. To facilitate the creation of
Digital Vaccine filters, our Threat Management Center monitors and collects security intelligence
from customers and security agencies around the world. Based on this intelligence, we perform
investigations of new software vulnerabilities and create antidotes that are delivered directly to
our products. Additionally, in fiscal 2006, we launched the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), which
represents a best-of-breed model for rewarding security researchers for responsibly disclosing
discovered vulnerabilities in vendor products. Once our security
experts validate the
authenticity of the vulnerability, 3Com notifies the affected vendor so a patch can be developed,
and the researcher agrees to keep the information confidential until the patch is issued so
affected organizations are not at risk. In addition to protecting all users from zero day threats
by ensuring information is kept confidential until a patch is issued, our TippingPoint customers
are also protected against zero day attacks through security filters delivered through the Digital
Vaccine service.
The products associated with our intrusion prevention systems include the following:
|
§ |
|
5000E (5 Gigabits per second (Gbps)); |
|
|
§ |
|
2400 (2 Gbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
2400E (2 Gbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
1200 (1 Gbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
1200E (1 Gbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
400 (400 Mbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
200 (200 Mbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
100E (100 Mbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
50 (50 Mbps); |
|
|
§ |
|
X505 (integrated IPS, VPN, firewall, Web content filtering); |
|
|
§ |
|
SMS appliance for management; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Digital Vaccine service. |
Firewalls
We offer a range of firewall solutions including embedded, standalone and application or
situation-specific offerings. Our firewall solutions protect networks by preventing unauthorized
network access, blocking attacks and encrypting traffic traveling across the Internet.
Our firewall solutions include the following:
|
§ |
|
E-mail firewall; |
|
|
§ |
|
Secure Router; |
|
|
§ |
|
ADSL Wireless 11g Firewall Router; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Content Filter Services. |
Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony
We offer a broad portfolio of IP telephony products that work together to deliver business-focused
applications, including: next-generation dial tone, IP messaging, IP presence, IP conferencing, IP
mobility and IP customer contact center services. Our secure, Session Initiation Protocol
(SIP)-driven platform and applications are designed to meet the performance expectations of todays
business environments: cost effectiveness, increased user productivity and strengthened customer
interactions. These products include the following:
|
§ |
|
IP Telephony Platforms; |
|
|
§ |
|
Convergence Application Suite; and |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Phones. |
IP Telephony Platforms
3
Our IP telephony platforms deliver converged voice and data services to enterprises with
distributed or single-location networks. Our NBX® platform was initially introduced in 1998,
making it the first-to-market IP-Private Branch Exchange (PBX) system. NBX platforms provide the
benefits of industry-standard, SIP-based call control along with a robust set of built-in
applications to small to medium size businesses. Our VCX platform, introduced in April 2003,
delivers the benefits of SIP-based carrier-class survivability and next-generation network
applications to enterprises with up to thousands of users. Designed for enterprise campus,
multi-site and multinational networks, VCX platforms include modular software components that are
highly scalable performing call control, signaling, application creation and media control.
Convergence Application Suite
Our Convergence Application Suite includes real-time, efficiency-generating applications that share
a common infrastructure for call control, authentication, privacy, location and presence. These
applications are designed to help enterprises lower cost, improve productivity, and strengthen
customer interactions. Our Convergence Application Suite includes the following components:
|
§ |
|
IP Telephony Module. Scalable and flexibly-deployed NBX and VCX solutions delivering proven
reliability and cost-effective capabilities for organizations of all sizes. |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Messaging Module. Messaging with server software for centralized voice mail, fax mail, and
e-mail services. |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Presence Module. Software for improving collaboration and communications. |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Conferencing Module. Audio, video, and data sharing to cost-effectively enhance collaboration.
IP Mobility Module. 802.11 wireless phone and remote telecommuting options designed to address
the increasing needs of a mobile workforce. |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Contact Center Module. Complete multi-media customer interaction management application. |
IP Phones
The advanced features and high-fidelity of our IP Phones are designed to help enterprises function
more productively and meet customer needs more competitively. Our IP Phones are compatible with
our NBX and VCX IP Telephony platforms. In addition to customary features, our phones include
advanced functionality such as PoE and browser-based administration.
Our line of phones consists of the following products:
|
§ |
|
3108 Wireless Phone; |
|
|
§ |
|
3106/3107 Cordless Phones; |
|
|
§ |
|
3105 Attendant Console; |
|
|
§ |
|
3103 Manager Phone; |
|
|
§ |
|
3102 Business Phone; |
|
|
§ |
|
3101 Basic Phone; and |
|
|
§ |
|
3100 Entry Phone. |
Networking
In order to meet the business and technology needs of our customers, our networking infrastructure
products focus on the requirements for a secure, converged network: availability, performance,
scalability and ease-of-use. We focus on reducing complexity by making management and
configuration of secure, converged voice and data networking much easier, and we continue to
innovate around a standards-based, open architecture that supports multi-vendor environments. 3Com
works closely with H-3Cs engineers to help ensure that the networking products sourced from the
joint venture meet the requirements of 3Com customers around the world.
4
We deliver our networking infrastructure capabilities in the following categories of data
networking infrastructure products and solutions, each of which is described in greater detail
below:
|
§ |
|
Local Area Network (LAN) Switches; |
|
|
§ |
|
Routers and Gateways; |
|
|
§ |
|
Mobility and Wireless LAN; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Network and Security Management. |
LAN Switches
Switches are multi-port devices, located in the network core and at the network edge, that join
multiple computers and peripheral devices and serve as the foundation for transporting voice, video
and data over a network. We offer a number of fixed-configuration and modular chassis switches
that provide the performance and flexibility required by our customers.
Our switching products represent a broad offering, including full-featured modular, stackable and
stand-alone switches ranging from 10 Megabits per second (Mbps) to near Terabit per second
performance. Our switches are available as managed units, which are typically found in enterprise
environments and unmanaged, standalone units, typically used by small and medium-sized
organizations. We design our enterprise-class switches to share a common operating system and user
interface that work together to lower the cost of ownership and management. We offer a number of
switching products, which we generally classify in the following families:
|
§ |
|
Core Switching. We offer modular chassis core networking solutions in
our Switch 8800 series and Switch 7700 series of products. They are
highly resilient, secure and convergence-ready, with Layer 2 and Layer
3 IPv4 and IPv6 Gigabit Ethernet and 10-Gigabit connectivity. The
7700 series can also be used in conjunction with the 8800 as either an
aggregation or edge switch capable of delivering PoE, as well as
Quarantine Protection, a feature of our TippingPoint Security
Management System. |
|
|
§ |
|
Gigabit Edge Switching. Our Switch 5500G and Switch 3800 families of
products address the growing requirements for Gigabit speeds at the
edge of the network as well as features such as PoE, security and
Quarantine Protection. These stackable switches are offered in both
24- and 48-port models and include a built-in 10-Gigabit expansion
slot. |
|
|
§ |
|
Workgroup/Desktop Switching. We offer a full range of
fixed-configuration switches that deliver performance and flexibility
to the edge of the network. These include enterprise-class offerings
such as the Switch 5500 family, Switch 4500 and Switch 4200 families
of products, as well as our OfficeConnect® and Baseline series.
Several of these switches are available in managed and unmanaged
configurations, offer line speeds of 10/100/1000 Mbps and incorporate
PoE technology allowing power from the wiring closet to be supplied to
any compliant device, including IP phones, wireless LAN access points
and IntelliJack® products. |
Routers and Gateways
Our enterprise routers, in combination with our other networking infrastructure products, provide a
means of transporting converged voice and data traffic across an IP Wide Area Network (WAN) while
preserving the Quality of Service (QoS) required for mission critical applications.
Our enterprise routers, all of which support a variety of WAN connection speeds, are offered in the
following three families of products:
|
§ |
|
Router 6000 Products. The Router 6000 series of products bring
enterprise-class WAN routing features, redundancy and performance to
the regional offices of large enterprise customers and to the
headquarters of medium-sized businesses. |
|
|
§ |
|
Router 5000 Products. The Router 5000 series of modular products are
designed to connect corporate sites, from small branch to large
regional offices. |
|
|
§ |
|
Router 3000 Products. The Router 3000 series of products provide a
fixed configuration platform to securely connect small offices and
remote offices of large enterprises. |
5
Mobility and Wireless LAN
We offer wireless networking products and solutions that enable users to stay connected to the
network while at their desks or roaming within an enterprise or a large campus environment. The
productivity increase associated with this ease of information access in a secure manner is driving
many businesses to deploy wireless networks. We offer a complete portfolio of high-performance,
standards-based wireless solutions, including 802.11 a/b/g wireless standards, along with wireless
security and policy enforcement.
Our wireless product offerings include the following:
|
§ |
|
Wireless LAN Access Points stand-alone and managed; |
|
|
§ |
|
Wireless Controllers and Switches; |
|
|
§ |
|
Wireless Routers; |
|
|
§ |
|
Wireless Bridges; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Wireless Switch Manager. |
Network and Security Management
We offer flexible and comprehensive network and security management application packages for
advanced IT environments. Our network and security management applications help our customers
manage large and small wired and wireless networks with tools for network monitoring, device
control and fast problem resolution. Our network management applications include the following
solutions:
|
§ |
|
Network Supervisor. Practical, easy-to-use software, downloadable
from the Internet, maps and monitors the network and quickly alerts
administrators to emerging problems. |
|
|
§ |
|
Network Director. Turnkey management application suite offering
advanced monitoring and control features to IT managers. |
|
|
§ |
|
Enterprise Management Suite. Comprehensive and flexible solutions for
very large enterprise environments. |
|
|
§ |
|
Solutions for Open Management Platforms. A selection of solutions
that enable enterprises to choose management applications that meet
their business and technical needs. |
|
|
§ |
|
Security Management System. A scalable and flexible reporting tool
used to manage our intrusion prevention system, TippingPoint SMS
enables users to manage multiple devices and reports on network
security activity. |
Services
We provide our channel partners and customers a single point of accountability for service
performance and quality. Our global service offerings cover key aspects of support that customers
need to keep their data networking and voice solutions operating effectively, including telephone
support, hardware replacement, software updates, dedicated on-site engineers and spare parts. We
also offer high-end professional services and training to provide complete product plus service
solutions for our customers. Our portfolio of professional services includes assessment and
design, project management, training and certifications, installation, and integration services
that are especially important to our customers that purchase higher-end switches, routers and IP
telephony communications systems.
We have a team of highly skilled and professional in-house services experts and also partner with
select third party service providers to deliver elements of the portfolio and offer customers the
benefits of virtually integrated services resources. We signed a support and maintenance services
agreement with Siemens Business Services in September 2004 to help us deliver enhanced service
capabilities to our customers. The deployment of this agreement was completed during our fiscal
year 2006. Our agreement with Siemens Business Services is global and applies to all countries
where we do business with the exception of China, Japan, and Hong Kong as these territories are
supported directly by H-3C. Additionally, we have agreements with local and regional professional
services providers to augment our onsite coverage and meet the demand for our services.
6
HUAWEI-3COM H-3C
H-3C, our joint venture with Huawei Technologies Ltd., a Chinese communications equipment provider,
began operations on November 17, 2003. H-3C is domiciled in Hong Kong, and its principal operating
center is in Hangzhou, China.
At the time of H-3Cs formation, Huawei contributed its enterprise networking business assets in
exchange for a 51 percent ownership interest; the contributed assets consisted of LAN switches and
routers; engineering, sales, and marketing resources; and licenses to related intellectual
property. We contributed cash, assets related to our operations in China and Japan, and licenses
related to certain intellectual property in exchange for a 49 percent ownership interest. On
October 28, 2005, we exercised our right to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest
in H-3C resulting in us owning a majority interest in the venture. We completed this transaction
on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition) and subsequently began consolidating H-3Cs financial
statements and reporting it as a separate operating segment.
On August 8, 2006, we announced that we will begin negotiations with Huawei for the purchase by us
of an additional equity interest in H-3C. We currently own 51% of H-3C and Huawei owns 49%. Under
the terms of our existing shareholders agreement, and as previously disclosed, we each have the
right, commencing on and after November 15, 2006, to initiate a bid process to purchase the equity
interest in H-3C held by the other. The negotiations are intended to result in an agreement
outside of the bid process. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to negotiate
acceptable terms with Huawei or that the transaction will be consummated at all. We may need to
raise equity or debt capital in order to finance any such transaction, and such financing may not
be available on terms acceptable to us. We may also use existing cash to finance a portion of the
consideration for any such transaction, which, if used, would reduce available cash on hand.
We expect H-3C to continue to provide three key benefits to our business significant presence in
the China, Japan, Hong Kong and certain other developing markets, an expanded product line, and
access to lower cost and highly effective engineering talent.
H-3C SEGMENT PRODUCTS
H-3C products can generally be classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking LAN Switches and Routers; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security Firewalls and VPN Gateways; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Network Management Network Management Software and Access Control Server. |
Each of H-3Cs principal product categories are described in greater detail below. H-3C is
significantly dependent on its China operations.
LAN Switches
H-3C offers customers a full portfolio of LAN switch products ranging from switches for the small
business market to enterprise-class switches to Metro Ethernet Switches geared to the carrier
markets. H-3Cs switches enable customers to easily upgrade their network solution as their
business and network requirements grow. H-3C switches also include robust network security
features, and are built to support the convergence of data, voice and video.
|
§ |
|
Core Routing Switches. The S8500 Series 10G Multi-service Core
Routing Switch is a new generation high performance switch. It is
typically used as the core layer of E-government networks, campus
networks, education networks and other enterprise networks as the core
layer or aggregation layer of carriers IP Metro Area Networks (MANs).
Moreover, based on the 10G platform, it supports the new generation
high-speed 10Gbps interface card that provides interconnection between
MANs, campus networks and data centers to construct end-to-end
Ethernet, providing a cost-efficient, high performance and reliable
means to support an enterprises most critical services. Furthermore,
it provides Layer 2 and Layer 3 wire-speed packet forwarding and
distributed MPLS wire-speed forwarding by its high performance, high
density and high reliability chassis architecture design. It also
provides rich service functions, such as a QoS guarantee,
comprehensive security management and high reliability. |
7
|
§ |
|
Multi-Service Switches. The S6500 Series high-end multi-service
switch features high performance, high port density and high
flexibility. It can be applied to the core layer of enterprise
networks, campus networks and education MANs, to the convergence layer
of carriers IP MANs, and to the access layer of data centers. The
S6500 Series switch can provide Layer 2 and Layer 3 switching. It can
provide high-speed links for MAN, campus networks and data centers
based on the 10GE platform and offer service functions, such as
NAT/NetStream/PBR and PoE solutions, a powerful QoS guarantee,
comprehensive security management mechanism and high level
carrier-class reliability. |
|
|
§ |
|
Layer 3 Intelligent and Resilient Switches. The S5600 Series Switches
are innovative switches that improve LAN operating efficiency by
integrating leading technology such as H-3Cs Intelligent Resilient
Framework (IRF). These switches allow high stacking bandwidth up to
96G, high density GE, 10GE uplink and a swappable power supply unit.
We believe that this series represents the next generation of desktop
switches, which can help customers implement a gigabit Ethernet core
network or aggregation layer with high availability as well as
scalability. |
|
|
§ |
|
Layer 2 Intelligent Gigabit Ethernet Switches. The S5000 Series are
intelligent Layer 2 wire-speed Gigabit Ethernet switching products
that provide high capacity with a full range of features. With the
high performance ASIC and flexible modular structure, they provide
Layer 2-Layer 7 intelligent flow classification and ACL policies.
They implement comprehensive service control and user management, and
therefore are suitable for the access layer switches in enterprise
networks and MANs. |
|
|
§ |
|
Ethernet Layer 3 Intelligent and Resilient Switches. The S3900 Series
Ethernet Switches are a new generation of premier multi-layer switches
that are designed to achieve a unified, highly resilient network. One
of the most important and innovative highlights of this series is its
use of stackable technology, which allows network managers to build
cost-effective networks with high resilience, flexibility and the
exceptional performance of larger systems. |
|
|
§ |
|
10/100 Mbps Enhanced Layer 3 Switches. The S3500 Series Switches are
Layer 3 wire-speed Ethernet switches with 10/100M aggregation in
service provider data centers, server cluster, wiring cabinet and
MANs. Running on H-3Cs VRP networking operating system, this series
of products provides robust routing protocols, VLAN switching, traffic
management, QoS, bandwidth control and user management. |
|
|
§ |
|
10/100 Mbps Enhanced Layer 2 Intelligent and Access Switches. The
S3000 and S2000-EI Series are intelligent Layer 2 wire-speed Ethernet
switching products that are designed to meet the needs of
large-capacity switching and high QoS requirements. This series
utilizes high performance ASICs and a flexible modular structure,
providing Layer 2-Layer 7 intelligent flow classification,
comprehensive QoS, robust service control and subscriber management. |
|
|
§ |
|
Unmanaged Ethernet Switches. The S1000/1200 Series is a
non-intelligent, Layer 2 wire speed switch. By deploying plug and
play power and fan-less design, it provides a perfect silent desktop
access solution that is uniquely designed for office use. The S1000
series provides 10/100M Ethernet ports while the S1200 series supports
10/100/1000M Ethernet ports. |
Routers
H-3C offers a full portfolio of router products from carrier-class core routers to modular routers
to small business access routers designed to scale as these businesses grow. H-3C router products
are classified as either NetEngine Series Routers or AR Series Routers. All NetEngine routers are
IPv6 ready and include carrier-class availability with redundancy in all key modules to support
multiple services such as MPLS VPN, MPLS TE, Multicasting and Netstream. The NetEngine Series
Routers are OEM products from Huawei Technologies. The AR Series Routers support multiple
services, integrating data voice and video in one device. They are also easy to manage, offer VPN
functionality as well as support multiple security products including firewalls, IPS and Intrusion
Detection Systems (IDS).
8
|
§ |
|
Terabit and Gigabit Core Routers. The NetEngine family of core
routers consist of products from a high capacity core router, which
can be applied in national backbone networks, provincial backbone
networks and other very large networks, to those that can serve at the
backbone network edge and MAN core, to those working at the core
networks of industries and enterprises. Incorporating advanced
technologies such a 10G/40G interface, three-stage switching fabric,
optical shelf interconnecting for multi-chassis stack, network
processors (NP) for forwarding engine, and the mature, stable VRP
routing software, it is designed to meet the availability requirements
and the multi-service demands of carrier-class and large enterprise
networks. |
|
|
§ |
|
Intelligent Multi-Service Enterprise Core Routers. The AR46
Intelligent Multi-Service Enterprise Core Routers are multi-service
routers with high performance and reliability developed for
enterprise, industry and carrier networks. AR46 routers can serve as
central routers for carrier networks. The AR46 routers are designed
to meet enterprise and carrier requirements for network performance,
service integration, high reliability, high security and three-in-one
solutions. |
|
|
§ |
|
Modular Branch Routers. The AR28 Series are modular multi-service
branch routers, providing flexible LAN and WAN options, comprehensive
security and VPN solutions, and voice and data integration. The
extended performance, high density, enhanced security and concurrent
applications enable the AR28 Series to meet the growing demands of
enterprises. |
|
|
§ |
|
Fixed Port Branch Routers. The AR18 Series Access Routers are
fixed-port products for small-sized enterprises and branch offices.
They feature enhanced security, superior reliability and advanced QoS
services. |
Firewalls
SecPath Firewalls are new-generation firewalls designed to provide a flexible, high-performance
security solution for large and medium-enterprise central sites and service providers. SecPath
firewall series products integrate DoS, DDoS depth defense system, VPN and traffic management
functionality and offer high levels of total throughput for firewall and VPN support.
VPN Gateways
SecPath VPN Gateways provide total VPN solutions from SOHO to large enterprise. They support all
mainstream VPN technologies (such as L2TP VPN, GRE VPN, IPSec VPN, SSL VPN, Dynamic VPN and MPLS
VPN), providing QoS and flow control ability, enabling users to deploy cost-effective remote
access, extranet and intranet security.
Network Management System
The Quidview network management software is a suite of scalable tools for simplifying network
management and maintenance. Quidview implements comprehensive IP-based network management
applications, providing total and unified network management solutions, such as centralized network
monitoring, fault management, performance monitoring, multi-vendor device management, device
management and cluster management. It has the ability to construct effective network management
solutions for all network environments at all levels, according to users demands.
Comprehensive Access Management Server (CAMS)
CAMS is a comprehensive identity-based access control server for the network infrastructure of H-3C
switches, routers and security devices. As the enterprise network user management center, CAMS
provides LAN, VPN, wireless access management, authentication, authorization and accounting,
constructing a multiple service management, maintenance, and security control framework with high
interoperability within existing enterprise systems.
9
CUSTOMERS AND MARKETS
Through our SCN segment we have a global installed base of enterprise and small and medium-sized
business customers. These organizations range across a number of vertical industries, including
education, government, healthcare, manufacturing, finance, insurance and real estate. In addition
to a growing number of enterprise customers (in areas such as government, finance, education,
education, energy, communication, manufacturing, health and commercial buildings markets), H-3C
also has access to a strong, increasing base of carrier customers, primarily through OEM sales to
Huawei and particularly in the Asia Pacific Region.
We target major customer groups that:
|
§ |
|
View their networks as mission-critical tools that help them to deliver mandatory
and/or value-add differentiated services to their customers or constituents; |
|
|
§ |
|
Seek convergence-ready voice and data solutions and wireless solutions that are
standards-based to reduce complexity and protect their investments; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Value networking solutions that are affordable to acquire, operate, maintain and expand. |
SALES, MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
We use a broad distribution channel to bring our products and solutions to our customers. Our
two-tier distribution channel comprises distributors and resellers.
Although a majority of our sales of enterprise networking products are made through our two-tier
distribution channel, we also work with global systems integrators, service providers and direct
marketers. Additionally, we maintain a field sales organization targeting small, medium and large
enterprise accounts in conjunction with our partners.
COMPETITION
We compete in the networking infrastructure market, providing a broad portfolio of secure,
converged voice and data networking products to small, medium, and large size organizations and,
through our H-3C segments OEM sales, carrier customers. The market for our products is
competitive, fragmented and rapidly changing. We expect competition to continue to intensify.
Many of our competitors are bringing new solutions to market, focusing on specific segments of our
target markets and establishing alliances and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) relationships
with larger companies, some of which are our partners as well.
Our principal competitors include Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., D-Link Systems, Inc., Enterasys
Networks, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc., F5 Networks, Inc., Foundry Networks, Inc., Hewlett-Packard
Company, Internet Security Systems, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc, McAfee, Inc., Alcatel, Mitel
Networks Corporation, NETGEAR, Inc., and Nortel Networks Corporation. In addition, H-3C also
competes with key regional competitors such as Allied Telsis, Inc. (formerly Allied Telesyn),
Buffalo Inc., Digital China, Harbour Networks, Hitachi and ZTE Corporation. Many of our
competitors are larger than us and possess greater financial resources.
We believe the primary competitive factors in the enterprise networking infrastructure market are
as follows:
|
§ |
|
Maintain tier-one capability and presence. To maintain tier-one
capability and presence, a provider must have a comprehensive
distribution channel and a strong financial position. In addition,
that provider must have a globally-recognized and preferred brand and
provide strong service and support capabilities. |
|
|
§ |
|
Offer innovative products and solutions. To be considered innovative a
provider must deliver a broad line of products and solutions and
maintain a substantial intellectual property portfolio. |
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Our research and development approach focuses internal investments upon those core activities that
are necessary to deliver differentiated products and solutions and drive reductions in product
costs. Our current areas of focus include convergence, security, wireless networking, and advanced
switching solutions. For activities such as mature technologies or widely available product design
components, we work with contract developers and third parties for sourcing these components.
10
We believe this two-part approach increases our ability to bring products to market in a timely and
low cost manner and ensures that we are focused upon those product attributes that matter most to
our customers and clearly differentiate the products we deliver.
Our SCN segment relies on H-3Cs engineering talent for new product development of enterprise
switches and routers and on certain third party developers for small and medium size networking
offerings. Our SCN segment develops our voice and security offerings. H-3C uses its own engineers
to develop its product portfolio.
Our software provides differentiation across our product lines. In many cases, sophisticated
software underlies the reliability and ease of use that our customers have grown to associate with
our products.
Our research and development expenditures were $101.9 million in fiscal 2006, $94.6 million in
fiscal 2005, and $95.2 million in fiscal 2004.
SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND PRODUCTS
For information regarding customer and product concentration for each of the last three fiscal
years, see Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
We market our products in all significant global markets, primarily through subsidiaries, sales
offices, sales representatives, joint ventures, and relationships with OEMs and distributors with
local presence. Outside the U.S., we have several research and development groups, with the two
most significant being in China and the U.K. We also use contract developers in India. We
maintain sales offices in 35 countries outside the U.S.
In fiscal 2006, approximately 69 percent of our net sales came from sales to customers outside of
North America. Gross margin on sales of our products in foreign countries, and sales of product
that include components obtained from foreign suppliers, can be adversely affected by international
trade regulations, including tariffs and antidumping duties, and by fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. Information concerning our sales by geographic region can be found in
Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
BACKLOG
Our backlog as of June 2, 2006, the last day of our 2006 fiscal year, was approximately $69.8
million (including $45.9 million of H-3C backlog as of March 31, 2006), compared with backlog of
approximately $19.2 million as of June 3, 2005, the last day of our 2005 fiscal year. We include in
our backlog purchase orders for which a delivery schedule has been specified for product shipment
within one year. Generally, orders are placed by our customers on an as-needed basis and may be
canceled or rescheduled by the customers without significant penalty to the customer. Accordingly,
backlog as of any particular date is not necessarily indicative of our future sales.
SEASONALITY
Our revenues and earnings have not demonstrated consistent seasonal characteristics.
MANUFACTURING AND COMPONENTS
For the SCN segment we outsource the majority of our manufacturing and our supply chain management
operations to contract manufacturers and original design manufacturer suppliers, with our H-3C
segment handling the remainder of these functions. This is part of our strategy to maintain global
manufacturing capabilities and to reduce our costs. This subcontracting includes activities such as
material procurement, assembly, test, shipment to our customers and repairs. We believe this
approach enables us to reduce fixed costs and to quickly respond to changes in market demand. We
have contract manufacturing arrangements with several companies, of which Flextronics International
and Jabil Circuits were the two most significant during both fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Based on
current and forecasted demand, our contract manufacturers are expected to have an adequate supply
of components required for the production of our products.
We determine the components that are incorporated in our products and design the supply chain
solution. Our suppliers manufacture based on rolling forecasts. Each of the suppliers procures
components necessary to assemble the products in our
11
forecast and test the products according to our specifications. Products are then shipped directly
to our logistics provider. We generally do not own the components and our customers take title to
our products upon shipment from the logistics provider or, in some cases, upon payment. In certain
circumstances, we may be liable to our suppliers for carrying costs and obsolete material charges
for excess components purchased based on our forecasts.
For the H-3C segment, a significant portion of self-designed products are also manufactured by
contract manufacturers, mainly Flextronics and Flash Electronics. However, H-3C does retain an
in-house manufacturing capability and capacity for pilot run, low volume production, as well as
special projects, and this capability includes a state-of-the-art SMT (surface mount technology)
line, backend assembly and test lines and distribution facilities.
Although we have contracts with our manufacturers, those contracts set forth a framework within
which the supplier may accept purchase orders from us. The contracts do not require them to
manufacture our products on a long-term basis.
We use standard parts and components for our products where it is appropriate. We purchase certain
key components used in the manufacture of our products from single or limited sources.
Purchase commitments with our single- or limited-source suppliers are generally on a purchase order
basis. A number of vendors supply standard product integrated circuits and microprocessors for our
products.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RELATED MATTERS
Through our research and development activities over many years, we have developed a substantial
portfolio of patents covering a wide variety of networking technologies. This ownership of core
networking technologies creates opportunities to leverage our engineering investments and develop
more integrated, powerful, and innovative networking solutions for customers.
We rely on U.S. and foreign patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets to establish and
maintain proprietary rights in our technology and products. We have an active program to file
applications for and obtain patents in the U.S. and in selected foreign countries where potential
markets for our products exist. Our general policy has been to seek to patent those patentable
inventions that we expect to incorporate in our products or that we expect will be valuable
otherwise. As of June 2, 2006, our SCN segment had 1,357 U.S. issued patents (including 1,324
utility patents and 33 design patents) and 382 foreign issued patents. Numerous patent
applications that relate to our research and development activities are currently pending in the
U.S. and other countries. We also have patent cross license agreements with other companies, as
well as with H-3C. The H-3C portfolio includes 49 issued Chinese patents, over 300 pending Chinese
applications, and 6 pending foreign applications. During fiscal 2006, we continued our patent
licensing program, through which we identify potential sources of licensing revenue, including
investigation of situations in which we believe that other companies may be improperly using our
patented technology.
Our SCN segment has registered 45 registered trademarks in the U.S. and has a total of 652
registered trademarks in 78 foreign countries. H-3C has 1 registered trademark in China and has a
total of 40 registered trademarks in 4 foreign countries. Numerous applications for registration
of domestic and foreign trademarks are currently pending for both our SCN and H-3C segments.
EMPLOYEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,927 |
|
Customer service and supply chain operations |
|
|
792 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,315 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SCN segment has 1,562 employees and the H-3C segment has 4,010 employees.
Our employees are not represented by a labor organization and we consider our employee relations to
be satisfactory. The SCN segment employee data is as of June 2, 2006 and the H-3C segment employee
data is as of March 31, 2006, the date of the H-3C balance sheet we consolidated into our fiscal
year 2006 balance sheet.
12
Please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for a discussion of certain restructuring actions affecting SCN employee headcount.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table lists the names, ages and positions held by all executive officers of 3Com as
of July 28, 2006. There are no family relationships between any director (or nominee) or executive
officer and any other director (or nominee) or executive officer of 3Com.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
R. Scott Murray1 |
|
42 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Donald M. Halsted, III |
|
49 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Dechant |
|
44 |
|
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
Neal D. Goldman |
|
55 |
|
Senior Vice President, Management Services, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Willebeek-LeMair |
|
44 |
|
Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President Product Operations |
R. Scott Murray has been 3Coms President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2006. Mr.
Murray is also Chairman of H-3C. Before joining 3Com, Mr. Murray was the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Modus Media International, a global IT services business, from August 2002 to
August 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Murray was President and Chief Operating Officer of Stream
International, a global business-to-business information technology services company, a position he
held from January 2000 to January 2002. Previously, Mr. Murray was the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of The Learning Company. Mr. Murray is also chairman and a director of
Protocol Communications, Inc.
Donald M. Halsted, III joined 3Com in July 2004 and has been 3Coms Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer since August 2004. Mr. Halsted also serves on the Board of H-3C. Prior to
joining 3Com, from November 2003 through July 2004, Mr. Halsted was Vice President of Finance for
Invensys plc, a global automation, controls and process solutions company. From January 1998
through November 2003 he held a series of senior finance and operational roles with Polaroid, a
company that develops and markets instant and digital imaging and consumer electronics products.
Before joining Polaroid, Mr. Halsted held a number of positions of increasing responsibility in
IBMs finance organization from 1979 through 1998.
Robert Dechant has been 3Coms Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing since April
2006. Prior to 3Com, from March 2003 to September 2004, Mr. Dechant was Executive Vice President of
Sales and Marketing for Modus Media International where he led sales, marketing and client
management on a global basis. Before Modus, Mr. Dechant served as Chief Operating Officer (from
December 2001 to January 2003) and Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing (from July 1997 to
November 2001) at Stream International, Inc. He also held sales and marketing leadership positions
with Software Support Inc. which was acquired by Convergys Corporation and Worldtek Travel, Inc. He
also spent nine years in sales and marketing positions at IBM.
Neal D. Goldman has been 3Coms Senior Vice President, Management Services, General Counsel and
Secretary since September 2003. Mr. Goldman also serves on the Board of H-3C. Prior to joining
3Com, Mr. Goldman worked for Polaroid Corporation from August 1997 to September 2003. From March
2003 to September 2003, he was Executive Vice President, Business Development and Chief Legal
Officer of Polaroid and prior to that Mr. Goldman served as Executive Vice President, Chief
Administrative and Legal Officer from July 2001 to June 2002. From August 1997 to July 2001, Mr.
Goldman held a number of senior management and executive positions at Polaroid, including Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and Deputy General Counsel. Before joining Polaroid,
Mr. Goldman served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Nets, Inc. from March 1996
to June 1997. Before joining Nets, Inc.,
|
|
|
1 |
|
Mr. Murray has submitted his resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors,
effective as of the close of business on August 17, 2006. |
13
Mr. Goldman held a number of positions with Lotus Development Corporation, including Vice President
and General Counsel from November 1995 to February 1996 and Deputy General Counsel and Assistant
Secretary from April 1990 to November 1995.
Marc Willebeek-LeMair has been 3Coms Senior Vice President Product Operations since November 2005
and its Chief Technology Officer since May 2005. He was the Chief Technology Officer of 3Coms
TippingPoint Division from January 2005 to May 2005. Prior to 3Com, from August 2001 to January
2005, Dr. Willebeek-LeMair was Chief Technology Officer of TippingPoint Technologies, a company
focused on intrusion prevention systems for enterprise customers that was acquired by 3Com in
January 2005. Previously, from March 1999 to August 2001, Dr. Willebeek-LeMair was Chief Technical
Officer at Netpliance, a consumer information appliance company. From May 1990 to February 1999,
Dr. Willebeek-LeMair held numerous positions with IBM, including Senior Manager of the Intelligent
Network Infrastructure, Technical Staff to the Vice President of Strategy and Manager of Multimedia
Networking. Dr. Willebeek-LeMair has a doctorate in electrical engineering from Cornell University
and he has been granted over 10 patents and has published more than 50 articles.
Newly-Appointed Officers
On August 8, 2006, our Board appointed two new executive officers as follows:
Edgar Masri was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer on August 8, 2006. He is
expected to commence employment with us on or about August 18, 2006. Mr. Masri will also assume
the role of Chairman of H-3C. Mr. Masri will join our Board of Directors effective immediately
following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on September 20, 2006. Before re-joining 3Com, Mr.
Masri was a General Partner from 2000 to March 2006, and more recently an advisor, at Matrix
Partners, a leading technology venture capital firm, where he made investments in the wireless,
broadband and semiconductor industries. Mr. Masri was also Chief Operating Officer at Redline
Communications, a leading provider of advanced broadband wireless access and backhaul solutions
based in Canada, from April to August of 2006. Mr. Masri spent fifteen years as a senior manager
at 3Com, from 1985 to 2000. During this time he served as Senior Vice President and General
Manager of our Network Systems Business Unit and Premises Distribution Unit, President of 3Com
Ventures and held senior roles in our marketing group. Mr. Masri holds a Masters degree in
electrical engineering and computer science and earned an MBA from Stanford University.
Robert Y. L. Mao was appointed our Executive Vice President, Corporate Development on August 8,
2006. He is expected to commence employment with us on or about August 18, 2006. Mr. Mao will
also join the Board of H-3C. Mr. Mao has over 30 years of experience in the telecommunications and
IT industries. Before joining 3Com, Mr. Mao was President and Chief Executive Officer of Greater
China for Nortel Networks from September 1997 to May 2006 and Regional President of Greater China
for Alcatel from September 1995 to September 1997. Nortel and Alcatel are global suppliers of
communication equipment serving both service provider and enterprise customers. At these
positions, Mr. Mao managed operations in the Peoples Republic of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and
Macao. Mr. Mao also held senior managerial and technical positions at Alcatel and ITT in Asia and
the U.S. Mr. Mao holds a Masters degree from Cornell University in Material Science and
Metallurgical Engineering and earned a Masters in Management from MIT. Mr. Mao is the Vice
Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Pacific Telecommunication Council.
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS
Risk factors may affect our future business and results. The matters discussed below could cause
our future results to materially differ from past results or those described in forward-looking
statements and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and stock price.
We have incurred significant net losses in recent fiscal periods, including $101 million for the
year ended May 31, 2006, $196 million for year ended May 31, 2005, and $349 million for year ended
May 31, 2004, and we may not be able to return to profitability.
Although we are taking steps designed to improve our results of operations, such as the
restructuring we announced in June 2006, we cannot provide assurance that we will return to
profitability.
We have faced a number of challenges that have affected our operating results during the current
and past several fiscal years. Specifically, we have experienced, and may continue to experience,
the following, particularly in our SCN segment:
14
|
|
|
declining sales due to price competition and reduced incoming order rate; |
|
|
|
|
risk of increased excess and obsolete inventories; |
|
|
|
|
excess facilities; |
|
|
|
|
operating expenses that, as a percentage of sales, have exceeded our desired financial model; and |
|
|
|
|
disruptions resulting from our workforce reductions and employee attrition. |
We focus primarily on enterprise networking, and our results of operations may fluctuate based on
factors related entirely to conditions in this market.
In fiscal 2004, we began focusing primarily on enterprise networking. This focus reflects a
streamlined management and operating structure encompassing all of our operations. Our focus on
enterprise networking may cause increased risk or volatility associated with decreased
diversification of our business. There will be increased sensitivity to the business risks
associated specifically with the enterprise networking market and our ability to execute
successfully on our strategies to provide superior solutions for larger and multi-site enterprise
environments. To be successful in the enterprise networking market, we will need to be perceived
by decision making officers of large enterprises as committed for the long-term to the high-end
networking business. Also, expansion of sales to large enterprises may be disruptive in a variety
of ways, such as adding larger systems integrators that may raise channel conflict issues with
existing distributors, or a perception of diminished focus on the small and medium enterprise
market.
If we do not respond effectively to increased competition caused by industry volatility and
consolidation our business could be harmed.
Our business could be seriously harmed if we do not compete effectively. We face competitive
challenges that are likely to arise from a number of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
industry volatility resulting from rapid product development cycles; |
|
|
|
|
increasing price competition due to maturation of basic networking technologies; |
|
|
|
|
industry consolidation resulting in competitors with greater financial,
marketing, and technical resources; and |
|
|
|
|
the presence of existing competitors with greater financial resources together
with the potential emergence of new competitors with lower cost structures and
more competitive offerings. |
We may not be able to compensate for lower sales or unexpected cash outlays with cost reductions
sufficient to generate positive net income or cash flow.
Although we have implemented cost and expense reductions with the goal to achieve profitability, we
may need to further reduce costs which may in turn reduce our sales. If we are not able to
effectively reduce our costs and expenses, particularly in our SCN segment, we may not be able to
generate positive net income or cash flow from operations. If we continue to experience negative
cash flow from operations over a prolonged period of time or if we suffer unexpected cash outflows,
our liquidity and ability to operate our business effectively could be adversely affected.
We are unable to predict the exact amount of cost reductions required for us to generate positive
net income or cash flow from operations because it is difficult to predict the amount of our future
sales and gross margins. The amount of our future sales depends, in part, on future economic and
market conditions, which are difficult to forecast accurately.
Efforts to reduce operating expenses have involved, and could involve further, workforce
reductions, closure of offices and sales or discontinuation of businesses, leading to reduced sales
and other disruptions in our business.
Our operating expenses as a percent of sales continue to be higher than our desired long-term
financial model. We have taken, and will continue to take, actions to reduce these expenses. Such
actions have and may in the future include reductions in our workforce, closure of facilities,
relocation of functions and activities to lower cost locations, the sale or discontinuation of
businesses, changes or modifications in IT systems or applications, or process reengineering. As a
result of these actions, the employment of some employees with critical skills may be terminated
and other employees have, and may in the future, leave our company voluntarily due to the
uncertainties associated with our business environment and their job security. In addition,
reductions in overall staffing levels could make it more difficult for us to sustain historic sales
levels, to achieve our
15
growth objectives, to adhere to our preferred business practices and to address all of our legal
and regulatory obligations in an effective manner, which could, in turn, ultimately lead to missed
business opportunities, higher operating costs or penalties.
We are significantly dependent on our H-3C joint venture in China and if H-3C is not successful,
it could materially and adversely impact our business, business prospects and operating results.
H-3C, which is domiciled in Hong Kong and has its principal operations in Hangzhou, China, is
subject to all of the operational risks that normally arise for a technology company with global
operations pertaining to research and development, manufacturing, sales, service, marketing, and
corporate functions. Given the significance of H-3C to our results, if H-3C is not successful our
business will likely be adversely affected.
Our business, business prospects and operating results have significant dependencies upon product
deliveries from H-3C and the results of our H-3C operating segment. In particular, our product
development activities, product manufacturing and procurement of certain products, intellectual
property and channel activities have become increasingly interdependent with those of H-3C.
Sales from our H-3C joint venture and therefore China constitute a material portion of our total
sales, and our business, financial condition and results of operations will to a significant degree
be subject to economic, political and social events in China.
We announced on March 23, 2006 that we have determined it is appropriate to consolidate our joint
venture in China, H-3C, effective as of February 1, 2006. For the three months ended June 2, 2006,
our pro forma consolidated sales were $304 million, assuming we had consolidated H-3C since the
beginning of the period, of which $156 million, or approximately 51%, are attributable to H-3C.
With the commencing of the consolidation of H-3C financial results, our sales are significantly
dependent on China. We expect that a significant portion of our sales will be derived from China
for the foreseeable future. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of
operations are to a significant degree subject to economic, political, legal and social
developments and other events in China and surrounding areas.
Our China joint venture, H-3C, is dependent on Huawei, our co-owner in this venture, in several
material respects, including as an important customer; should Huawei reduce its business with or
operational assistance to H-3C, our business could be materially affected.
H-3C derives a material portion of its sales from or through Huawei. Should Huawei reduce its
business with H-3C, H-3Cs sales will suffer. Further, Huawei provides certain foreign office
support platforms for H-3C. If Huawei ceases this support, international operations will be more
burdensome and expensive for H-3C. Huawei also provides certain information technology, software
licensing and rental of premises to H-3C.
If we fail to adequately evolve our financial and managerial control and reporting systems and
processes, including the management of our H-3C segment, our ability to manage and grow our
business will be negatively affected.
Our ability to successfully offer our products and implement our business plan in a rapidly
evolving market depends upon an effective planning and management process. We will need to
continue to improve our financial and managerial control and our reporting systems and procedures
in order to manage our business effectively in the future. If we fail to implement improved
systems and processes, our ability to manage our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected. For example, now that we control and consolidate our joint venture in China,
H-3C, we are spending additional time, resources and capital to manage its business, operations and
financial results. We will need to adequately incentivize H-3C management and other key employees.
We will also need to manage the multiple channels to our markets. If we are not able to
successfully manage our H-3C venture, our business results could be adversely affected.
We may not be able to complete or finance a transaction with Huawei to purchase additional interest
in our joint venture, H-3C, on favorable terms or at all; if we cannot complete a transaction, our
strategy to further invest in H-3C may not occur, we will be subject to the risks of the bid
process described below and our business may suffer.
On August 8, 2006, we announced that we will begin negotiations with Huawei for the purchase by us
of an additional equity interest in H-3C. We currently own 51% of H-3C and Huawei owns 49%. Under
the terms of our existing shareholders agreement, and as previously disclosed, we each have the
right, commencing on and after November 15, 2006, to initiate a bid process to purchase the equity
interest in H-3C held by the other. The negotiations are intended to result in an agreement
16
outside of the bid process. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to negotiate
acceptable terms with Huawei or that the transaction will be consummated at all. In addition, any
such transaction is subject to regulatory approval by the Chinese government and we cannot provide
assurance that such approval will be granted. We may need to raise equity or debt capital in order
to finance any such transaction, and such financing may not be available on terms acceptable to us.
Any equity financing would be dilutive to our existing stockholders. Any debt financing would
involve using cash generated from operations to service the interest and pay down the principal,
diverting funds that might otherwise be invested in our businesses. We may also use existing cash
to finance a portion of the consideration for any such transaction, which, if used, would reduce
available cash on hand. If we cannot complete a transaction, the bid process risks described below
would apply. If we cannot complete a transaction, our strategy to increase our investment in H-3C
may not be available to us and our business may suffer as a result unless we employ successful
alternative strategies.
We, and our joint venture partner, Huawei, each have the right, starting in November 2006, to
initiate a bid process to buy the other out of our China joint venture, H-3C; if Huawei wins the
bid process, we will no longer be able to consolidate H-3Cs results and may, over time, lose the
right to source and resell H-3Cs products.
Starting in November 2006, Huawei and 3Com each can initiate a bid process to purchase the equity
interest in H-3C owned by the other. Under the bid process, if one party makes a bid to buy out
the other, the party receiving the bid offer must either accept that offer or make its own, higher,
bid to buy out the other party. The bidding process would alternate until one party either
accepts the others bid or fails to make a higher bid. If Huawei wins the bid process to buy out
our equity ownership in H-3C, upon consummation of the closing of that transaction we will no
longer be able consolidate H-3Cs results with ours. Our OEM agreement with H-3C, pursuant to
which we source products from H-3C and resell them, has an initial five-year term ending November
2008. This agreement automatically renews for successive two-year terms unless a party gives the
other party at least 180-days prior written notice that it does not wish to renew the agreement.
Should Huawei win the bid process, it may cause H-3C to terminate its OEM agreement with us
effective November 2008 or during one of the successive terms. Because we source networking
products from H-3C for resale and such products are material to our success, if H-3C terminated its
OEM agreement with us it would adversely impact our financial results.
We may not be successful at identifying and responding to new and emerging market and product
opportunities, or at responding quickly enough to technologies or markets that are in decline.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid technology transitions and short product
life cycles. Therefore, our success depends on our ability to do the following:
|
|
|
identify new market and product opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
predict which technologies and markets will see declining demand; |
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products and solutions in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
gain market acceptance of new products and solutions, particularly in targeted emerging markets; and |
|
|
|
|
rapidly and efficiently transition our customers from older to newer enterprise networking technologies. |
Our financial position or results of operations could suffer if we are not successful in achieving
these goals. For example, our business would suffer if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
there is a delay in introducing new products; |
|
|
|
|
we lose certain channels of distribution or key partners; |
|
|
|
|
our products do not satisfy customers in terms of features, functionality or quality; or |
|
|
|
|
our products cost more to produce than we expect. |
Because we will continue to source products from OEMs and from H-3C and rely on original design
manufacturers to assist in product design, we may not be able to independently identify current
product and technology trends or to respond to such trends through the design and production of new
products as well as if we were working independently.
Our success is dependent on continuing to hire and retain qualified managers and other personnel;
if we are not successful in attracting and retaining these personnel, our business will suffer.
Competition for qualified employees is intense. If we fail to attract, hire, or retain qualified
personnel, our business will be harmed. We have experienced significant turnover in our management
team in the last several years and we may continue to experience change at this level. If we
cannot retain qualified senior managers, our business may not succeed.
17
We expect to utilize strategic relationships and other alliances as key elements in our strategy.
If we are not successful in forming desired ventures and alliances or if such ventures and
alliances are not successful, our ability to achieve our growth and profitability goals could be
adversely affected.
We have announced alliances with third parties, such as IBM, Trapeze Networks and Siemens Business
Services. In the future, we expect to evaluate other possible strategic relationships, including
joint ventures and other types of alliances, and we may increase our reliance on such strategic
relationships to broaden our sales channels, complement internal development of new technologies
and enhancement of existing products, and exploit perceived market opportunities.
If we fail to form the number and quality of strategic relationships that we desire, or if such
strategic relationships are not successful, we could suffer missed market opportunities, channel
conflicts, delays in product development or delivery, or other operational difficulties. Further,
if third parties acquire our strategic partners or if our competitors enter into successful
strategic relationships, we may face increased competition. Any of these difficulties could have
an adverse effect on our future sales and results of operations.
Our strategy of outsourcing functions and operations may fail to reduce cost and may disrupt our
operations.
We continue to look for ways to decrease cost and improve efficiency by contracting with other
companies to perform functions or operations that, in the past, we have performed ourselves. We
have outsourced the majority of our manufacturing and logistics for our SCN products. We now rely
on outside vendors to meet the majority of our manufacturing needs as well as a significant portion
of our IT needs for the SCN segment. Additionally, we outsource certain functions to Siemens
Business Services for technical support and RMA services. To achieve future cost savings or
operational benefits, we may expand our outsourcing activities to cover additional services which
we believe a third party may be able to provide in a more efficient or effective manner than we
could do internally ourselves.
Although we believe that outsourcing will result in lower costs and increased efficiencies, this
may not be the case. Because these third parties may not be as responsive to our needs as we would
be ourselves, outsourcing increases the risk of disruption to our operations. In addition, our
agreements with these third parties sometimes include substantial penalties for terminating such
agreements early or failing to maintain minimum service levels. Because we cannot always predict
how long we will need the services or how much of the services we will use, we may have to pay
these penalties or incur costs if our business conditions change.
Our reliance on industry standards, technological change in the marketplace, and new product
initiatives may cause our sales to fluctuate or decline.
The enterprise networking industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid changes in
technology and customer requirements and evolving industry standards. As a result, our success
depends on:
|
|
|
the convergence of technologies, such as voice, data and video on
single, secure networks; |
|
|
|
|
the timely adoption and market acceptance of industry standards, and
timely resolution of conflicting U.S. and international industry
standards; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to influence the development of emerging industry
standards and to introduce new and enhanced products that are
compatible with such standards. |
Slow market acceptance of new technologies, products, or industry standards could adversely affect
our sales or overall results of operations. In addition, if our technology is not included in an
industry standard on a timely basis or if we fail to achieve timely certification of compliance to
industry standards for our products, our sales of such products or our overall results of
operations could be adversely affected.
A significant portion of our sales is derived from a small number of resellers. If any of these
partners reduces its business with us, our business could be seriously harmed.
We distribute many of our products through two-tier distribution channels that include
distributors, systems integrators and VARs. A significant portion of our sales is concentrated
among a few distributors; our two largest distributors accounted for a combined 30 percent of total
sales for the year ended June 2, 2006, a combined 34 percent of total sales for the year ended
18
May 31, 2005 and a combined 33 percent of total sales for year ended May 31, 2004. If either of
these distributors reduces its business with us, our sales and overall results of operations could
be adversely affected.
We depend on distributors who maintain inventories of our products. If the distributors reduce
their inventories of our products, our sales could be adversely affected.
We work closely with our distributors to monitor channel inventory levels and ensure that
appropriate levels of products are available to resellers and end users. Our target range for
channel inventory levels is between three and five weeks of supply on hand at our distributors.
Partners with a below-average inventory level may incur stock outs that would adversely impact
our sales. If our channel partners reduce their levels of inventory of our products, our sales
would be negatively impacted during the period of change.
If we are unable to successfully develop relationships with system integrators, service providers,
and enterprise VARs, our sales may be negatively affected.
As part of our sales strategy, we are targeting system integrators (SIs), service providers (SPs),
and enterprise VARs (eVARs). In addition to specialized technical expertise, SIs, SPs and eVARs
typically offer sophisticated services capabilities that are frequently desired by larger
enterprise customers. In order to expand our distribution channel to include resellers with such
capabilities, we must be able to provide effective support to these resellers. If our sales,
marketing or services capabilities are not sufficiently robust to provide effective support to such
SIs, SPs, and eVARs, we may not be successful in expanding our distribution model and current SI,
SP, and eVAR partners may terminate their relationships with us, which would adversely impact our
sales and overall results of operations.
The members of the board of our China joint venture designated by our co-owner, Huawei, have
protective rights over the approval of certain matters; accordingly if Huawei does not agree with
us on these matters, these rights could harm 3Coms business by preventing us from taking desired
actions.
The governance documents applicable to our joint venture in China, H-3C, include the requirement
that certain actions be approved by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of H-3Cs board of directors,
including at least one director appointed by 3Com Corporation and one director appointed by Huawei.
This right gives Huaweis board members the right to approve certain matters at the H-3C level,
including the following:
|
|
|
any amendment to the Articles or charter documents; |
|
|
|
|
any voluntary bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution or winding up; |
|
|
|
|
changes in authorized capital stock or the issuance of capital stock (or rights to
acquire capital stock); |
|
|
|
|
any significant merger, acquisition, disposition or other corporate reorganization; |
|
|
|
|
determining the amount of dividends to pay and whether to pay special dividends
not required by the dividend policy; |
|
|
|
|
related party transactions, including loans and capital contributions; |
|
|
|
|
incurrence of debt over a specified amount that falls outside of the approved
budget; and |
|
|
|
|
any sale, exclusive license or other transfer or disposition of any significant
technology or intellectual property. |
If there are disagreements between us and Huawei with respect to these matters, we may not be able
to implement certain actions and the success of this joint venture may be adversely affected.
Our competition with Huawei in the enterprise networking market could have a material adverse
effect on our sales and our results of operations.
As Huawei expands its international operations, there could be increasing instances where we
compete directly with Huawei in the enterprise networking market. As a co-owner and OEM customer
of H-3C, Huawei has access to many of H-3Cs products thereby enhancing Huaweis current ability to
compete directly with us. We could lose a competitive advantage in markets where we compete with
Huawei, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and overall results of operations.
19
We may pursue acquisitions of other companies that, if not successful, could adversely affect our
business, financial position and results of operations.
In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of companies to enhance our existing capabilities. There
can be no assurances that acquisitions that we might pursue will be successful. If we pursue an
acquisition but are not successful in completing it, or if we complete an acquisition but are not
successful in integrating the acquired companys technology, employees, products or operations
successfully, our business, financial position or results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We may be unable to manage our supply chain successfully, which would adversely impact our sales,
gross margin and profitability.
Current business conditions and operational challenges in managing our supply chain affect our
business in a number of ways:
|
|
|
in the past, some key components have had limited availability; |
|
|
|
|
as integration of networking features on a reduced number of computer
chips continues, we are increasingly facing competition from parties
who are our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast demand is diminished; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on, and long-term arrangements with, third-party
manufacturers places much of the supply chain process out of our
direct control and heightens the need for accurate forecasting and
reduces our ability to transition quickly to alternative supply chain
strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
we may experience disruptions to our logistics. |
Some of our suppliers are also our competitors. We cannot be certain that in the future our
suppliers, particularly those who are also in active competition with us, will be able or willing
to meet our demand for components in a timely and cost-effective manner.
There has been a trend toward consolidation of vendors of electronic components. Our reliance on a
smaller number of vendors and the inability to quickly switch vendors increase the risk of
logistics disruptions, unfavorable price fluctuations, or disruptions in supply, particularly in a
supply-constrained environment.
Supplies of certain key components can become tighter as industry demand for such components has
increased. If the resulting increase in component costs and time necessary to obtain these
components persists, we may experience an adverse impact to gross margin.
If overall demand for our products or the mix of demand for our products is significantly different
from our expectations, we may face inadequate or excess component supply or inadequate or excess
manufacturing capacity. This would result in orders for products that could not be manufactured in
a timely manner, or a buildup of inventory that could not easily be sold. Either of these
situations could adversely affect our market share, sales, and results of operations or financial
position.
Our strategies to outsource the majority of our manufacturing requirements to contract
manufacturers may not result in meeting our cost, quality or performance standards. The inability
of any contract manufacturer to meet our cost, quality or performance standards could adversely
affect our sales and overall results from operations.
The cost, quality, performance, and availability of contract manufacturing operations are and will
be essential to the successful production and sale of many of our products. We may not be able to
provide contract manufacturers with product volumes that are high enough to achieve sufficient cost
savings. If shipments fall below forecasted levels, we may incur increased costs or be required to
take ownership of inventory. In addition, a significant component of maintaining cost
competitiveness is the ability of our contract manufacturers to adjust their own costs and
manufacturing infrastructure to compensate for possible adverse exchange rate movements. To the
extent that the contract manufacturers are unable to do so, and we are unable to procure
alternative product supplies, then our own competitiveness and results of operations could be
adversely impacted.
We have implemented a program with our manufacturing partners to ship products directly from
regional shipping centers to customers. Through this program, we are relying on these partners to
fill customer orders in a timely manner. This program
20
may not yield the efficiencies that we expect, which would negatively impact our results of
operations. Any disruptions to on-time delivery to customers would adversely impact our sales and
overall results of operations.
Chinas governmental and regulatory reforms and changing economic environment may impact our
ability to do business in China.
As a result of the historic reforms of the past several decades, multiple government bodies are
involved in regulating and administrating affairs in the enterprise networking industry in China.
These government agencies have broad discretion and authority over all aspects of the networking,
telecommunications and information technology industry in China; accordingly their decision may
impact our ability to do business in China. While we anticipate that the basic principles
underlying the reforms China has made will remain unchanged, any of the following changes in
Chinas political and economic conditions and governmental policies could have a substantial impact
on our business:
|
|
|
the promulgation of new laws and regulations and the interpretation of those
laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
enforcement and application of rules and regulations by the Chinese government; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of measures to control inflation or stimulate growth; or |
|
|
|
|
any actions that limit our ability to develop, manufacture, import or sell our
products in China, or to finance and operate our business in China. |
Furthermore, Chinas economic environment has been changing as a result of Chinas entry, in
December of 2001, into the World Trade Organization, or the WTO. If Chinas entry into the WTO
results in increased competition or has a negative impact on Chinas economy, our business could
suffer. Since early 2004, the Chinese government has implemented certain measures to control the
pace of economic growth. Such measures may cause a decrease in the level of economic activity in
China, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal system may adversely affect us.
We conduct our business in China primarily through our joint venture, H-3C, a Hong Kong entity
which in turn owns a Chinese entity. These entities are generally subject to laws and regulations
applicable to foreign investment in China. In addition, there are uncertainties regarding the
interpretation and enforcement of laws, rules and policies in China. Because many laws and
regulations are relatively new and the Chinese legal system is still evolving, the interpretations
of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform. Moreover, the interpretation of
statutes and regulations may be subject to government policies reflecting domestic political
changes. Finally, enforcement of existing laws or contracts based on existing law may be
uncertain, and it may be difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement, or to obtain
enforcement of a judgment by a court of another jurisdiction. Any litigation in China may be
protracted and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and managements attention.
If tax benefits available to our China joint venture, H-3C, are reduced or repealed, our business
could suffer.
The Chinese government is considering the imposition of a unified corporate income tax that would
phase out, over time, the preferential tax treatment to which H-3C is currently entitled. While it
is not certain whether the government will implement a unified tax structure or whether H-3C will
receive grandfathered status from any new tax, if a new tax structure is implemented, such new
tax structure may adversely affect our financial condition.
H-3C is subject to restrictions on paying dividends and making other payments to us.
Chinese regulations currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits, as
determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Our joint venture, a
Hong Kong entity, does business through a Chinese entity that is required to set aside a portion of
its after-tax profits according to Chinese accounting standards and regulations to fund certain
reserve funds. The Chinese government also imposes controls on the conversion of Renminbi into
foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of China. We may experience difficulties
in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. These
restrictions may in the future limit our ability to receive dividends or repatriate funds from
H-3C.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting that
includes our China joint venture, H-3C, we may not be able to accurately report our financial
results or prevent fraud.
21
The annual evaluation of internal control over financial reporting required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will first include H-3C with respect to our fiscal year ending June 1,
2007 and the related annual report on Form 10-K. If we cannot enhance H-3Cs existing controls by
the evaluation date, our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting
at the end of that period is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our
internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public
accounting firm may not be able to attest to our managements conclusions or may reach an opposite
conclusion. Furthermore, having effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary
for us to produce reliable financial reports and is important to help prevent fraud. If we fail to
achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting on a consolidated basis,
it could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements,
which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price of our common stock.
Furthermore, we anticipate that we will incur considerable costs and use significant management
time and other resources in an effort to bring H-3C into compliance with Section 404 and the other
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
We are subject to risks relating to currency rate fluctuations and exchange controls and we do not
hedge this risk in China.
Due to our consolidation of our joint venture in China, a significant portion of our sales and a
portion of our costs will be made in China and denominated in Renminbi. In July 2005, China
uncoupled the Renminbi from the U.S. dollar and let it float in a narrow band against a basket of
foreign currencies. The move initially revalued the Renminbi by 2.1% against the U.S. dollar;
however, it is uncertain what further adjustments may be made in the future. The Renminbi-U.S.
dollar exchange rate could float, and the Renminbi could appreciate or depreciate relative to the
U.S. dollar. Any movement of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our cash flows,
revenues, operating results and financial position.
We do not currently hedge the currency risk in H-3C through foreign exchange forward contracts or
otherwise and China employs currency controls restricting Renminbi conversion, limiting our ability
to engage in currency hedging activities in China. Various foreign exchange controls are
applicable to us in China, and such restrictions may in the future make it difficult for H-3C or us
to repatriate earnings, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and financial
position.
We may need to engage in complex and costly litigation in order to protect, maintain or enforce our
intellectual property rights; in some jurisdictions, such as China, our rights may not be as strong
as the rights we enjoy in the U.S.
Whether we are defending the assertion of intellectual property rights against us, or asserting our
intellectual property rights against others, intellectual property litigation can be complex,
costly, protracted, and highly disruptive to business operations because it may divert the
attention and energies of management and key technical personnel. Further, plaintiffs in
intellectual property cases often seek injunctive relief and the measures of damages in
intellectual property litigation are complex and often subjective or uncertain. Thus, the
existence of this type of litigation, or any adverse determinations related to such litigation,
could subject us to significant liabilities and costs. If any of our OEM, ODM, or joint venture
partners become involved in intellectual property disputes and are unable to hold us harmless, then
we may incur liabilities or suffer disruption of our business. Any one of these factors could
adversely affect our sales, gross margin, overall results of operations, cash flow or financial
position.
In addition, the legal systems of many foreign countries do not protect or honor intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the legal system of the United States. For example, in
China, the legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are still
in the development stage. It may be very difficult, time-consuming and costly for us to attempt to
enforce our intellectual property rights, and those of our controlled Chinese joint venture, in
these jurisdictions.
We may not be able to defend ourselves successfully against claims that we are infringing the
intellectual property rights of others.
Many of our competitors, such as telecommunications, networking, and computer equipment
manufacturers, have large intellectual property portfolios, including patents that may cover
technologies that are relevant to our business. In addition, many smaller companies, universities,
and individual inventors have obtained or applied for patents in areas of technology that may
relate to our business. The industry continues to be aggressive in assertion, licensing, and
litigation of patents and other intellectual property rights.
22
In the course of our business, we receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of
potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We
evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in
each case whether we must negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the
proprietary technologies, protocols, or specifications in our products. If we are unable to obtain
and maintain licenses on favorable terms for intellectual property rights required for the
manufacture, sale, and use of our products, particularly those that must comply with industry
standard protocols and specifications to be commercially viable, our financial position or results
of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are alleged to infringe the
intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to seek licenses from others or be
prevented from manufacturing or selling our products, which could cause disruptions to our
operations or the markets in which we compete. Finally, even if we have indemnification rights in
respect of such allegations of infringement, from our suppliers or licensors, we may not be able to
recover our losses under those indemnity rights.
Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to volatility in the market
price of our stock.
Historically, our stock price has experienced volatility. We expect that our stock price may
continue to experience volatility in the future due to a variety of potential factors such as:
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash and equivalents and short term investment balances; |
|
|
|
|
variations between our actual financial results and published analysts expectations; and |
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors. |
In addition, over the past several years, the stock market has experienced significant price and
volume fluctuations that have affected the stock prices of many technology companies. These
factors, as well as general economic and political conditions or investors concerns regarding the
credibility of corporate financial statements and the accounting profession, may have a material
adverse affect on the market price of our stock in the future.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own and lease properties in the United States and a number of foreign countries. For information
regarding property, plant and equipment by geographic region for each of the last two fiscal years,
see Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes our significant owned and leased real estate properties as of June
2, 2006 (all facilities are for our SCN segment except where indicated otherwise):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Sq. Ft. |
|
Owned/Leased |
|
Primary Use |
United StatesBoston Area
|
|
|
201,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Corporate
headquarters,
office, research
and development,
and customer
service. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United StatesSan Francisco
Bay Area
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
Office, research
and development,
and customer
service. Under
contract for sale.
See discussion
below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United StatesSan Francisco
Bay Area
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Subleased to
third-party tenant.
Under contract for
sale. See
discussion below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United StatesAustin Area
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Office, research
and development,
and customer
service. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United StatesChicago Area
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Office, research
and development,
and customer
service. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EuropeU.K.
|
|
|
113,000 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
Office, research
and development,
and customer
service. Currently
not being |
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Sq. Ft. |
|
Owned/Leased |
|
Primary Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
utilized.
See Hemel
explosion
discussion below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EuropeU.K.
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Office, research
and development,
and customer
service. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChinaHangzhou
|
|
|
1,682,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Office, research
and development,
manufacturing,
sales, and
training. Used by
our H-3C segment
and leased from
Huawei, our 49%
partner in the H-3C
joint venture. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChinaBeijing
|
|
|
481,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Research and
development,
training, sales and
customer service.
Used by our H-3C
segment and leased
from Huawei, our
49% partner in the
H-3C joint venture. |
As part of our initiatives to maximize our efficiency, we are consolidating our operations wherever
feasible and are actively engaged in efforts to dispose of excess facilities. As of June 2, 2006,
we lease and sublease to third-party tenants approximately 132,000 square feet of office space in
our Mountain View, California leased facility (under contract to be assigned to the proposed buyer
of our Santa Clara, CA land and buildings) and approximately 49,000 square feet in various other
facilities throughout North America and Europe. The facilities under sub-lease are leased
facilities agreements that expire at various times between 2007 and 2008.
On July 24, 2006 we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell the land and three buildings
we currently own in Santa Clara, California for expected net proceeds of $16.1 million. The terms
of the agreement are standard and we expect the closing to occur within 30 days. We expect to
lease back one of the buildings through December 31, 2006.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our present needs in all material respects.
On December 11, 2005, our Europe, Middle East and Africa headquarters facility in Hemel Hempstead,
United Kingdom was damaged by explosions at a third-party oil depot facility which occurred
approximately one quarter mile from our facility. Approximately 300 employees and contractors
worked at our Hemel campus, primarily in our sales, marketing and product operations groups. The
incident occurred during non-business hours and no employee casualties or injuries were reported.
We activated our back-up systems and established business operations at alternative facilities to
ensure business continuity and minimize disruption to our customers. We believe we have sufficient
insurance and recourse against third parties so that any loss incurred by us in connection with
these explosions should not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The
building is currently not being used for operations and the carrying amount of $16.2 million has
been reclassified from property and equipment to other non-current assets and the associated
depreciation has ceased.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The material set forth in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of
Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year
covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
24
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol COMS and has been
quoted on Nasdaq since our initial public offering on March 21, 1984. The following table sets
forth the high and low sale prices as reported on Nasdaq during the last two fiscal years. As of
July 28, 2006, we had approximately 4,616 stockholders of record. We have not paid, and do not
anticipate that we will pay, cash dividends on our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
6.94 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase
program that authorizes expenditures of up to $100.0 million and is effective for a two-year period
through March 31, 2007. We did not repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to this
authorization. However, with prior Audit and Finance Committee approval we are permitted to use
cash to repurchase shares in future periods. In addition, upon vesting of restricted stock awards,
employees are permitted to return to us a portion of the newly vested shares to satisfy the tax
withholding obligations that arise in connection with such vesting.
The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock, including shares returned to satisfy tax
withholding obligations, in the quarter ended June 2, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs(1) |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
March 4, 2006 through March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,972 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
4.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
April 1, 2006 through April 28, 2006 |
|
|
53,142 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
April 29, 2006 through June 3, 2006 |
|
|
992 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
57,106 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 23, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program providing for
expenditures of up to $100.0 million through March 31, 2007, provided that all repurchases are
pre-approved by the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. We did not
repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization in the year ended May 31,
2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents shares surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon
the vesting of restricted stock awards. |
25
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and our consolidated financial
statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our fiscal
year ends on the Friday closest to May 31. Fiscal 2006 consists of the 52 weeks ended June 3, 2006.
Fiscal 2005 consisted of 53 weeks and ended on June 2, 2005. Fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 each
consisted of 52 weeks and fiscal 2004 ended on June 3, 2004, fiscal 2003 ended on May 30, 2003, and
fiscal 2002 ended on May 31, 2002. For convenience, the consolidated financial statements have been
shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month. The following balance sheet data and
statements of operations data for each of the five years ended May 31, 2005 were derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements. Consolidated balance sheets as of May 31, 2006 and 2005
and the related consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended May 31, 2006 and notes thereto appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
On May 23, 2003, we completed the sale of our CommWorks division. Accordingly, the information set
forth in the table below is presented to reflect the CommWorks division as discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year May 31, |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Sales |
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
$ |
651,244 |
|
|
$ |
698,884 |
|
|
$ |
932,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,258,969 |
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
|
|
(349,263 |
) |
|
|
(283,754 |
) |
|
|
(595,950 |
) |
(Loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting
change |
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
|
|
(346,863 |
) |
|
|
(230,093 |
) |
|
|
(453,652 |
) |
(Loss) per share from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.30 |
) |
The provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, are applicable to disposals occurring after our
adoption of SFAS No. 144, effective June 1, 2002. In accordance with such provisions, the table
below does not reflect the CommWorks division as a discontinued operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of May 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Cash, equivalents and short-term investments |
|
$ |
864,347 |
|
|
$ |
844,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,383,356 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,588 |
|
|
$ |
1,382,048 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,861,361 |
|
|
|
1,592,967 |
|
|
|
1,820,818 |
|
|
|
2,062,360 |
|
|
|
2,526,792 |
|
Working capital, net of
discontinued operations of Palm (1) |
|
|
778,064 |
|
|
|
667,949 |
|
|
|
1,213,108 |
|
|
|
1,314,012 |
|
|
|
1,159,822 |
|
Deferred revenue and long-term obligations |
|
|
13,788 |
|
|
|
8,484 |
|
|
|
15,135 |
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
73,365 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(1,087,512 |
) |
|
|
(967,952 |
) |
|
|
(755,244 |
) |
|
|
(405,981 |
) |
|
|
35,814 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,202,362 |
|
|
|
1,274,923 |
|
|
|
1,499,114 |
|
|
|
1,718,597 |
|
|
|
1,950,205 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Working capital is defined as total current assets less total current liabilities. |
During fiscal 2006 we exercised our right to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest
in H-3C and entered into an agreement with Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million.
We were granted regulatory approval by the Chinese government and subsequently completed this
transaction on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition). We consolidated H-3Cs financial statements
from the date of acquisition. The acquisition is being accounted for as a purchase, and
accordingly, the assets purchased and liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance
sheet as of May 31, 2006 using H-3Cs March 31, 2006 balance sheet data. Because H-3C follows a
calendar year end, we report its results on a two-month lag. The operating results of H-3C are
included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition, resulting in the
latter two months of H-3Cs three months ended March 31, 2006 being included in our year ended May
31, 2006 statement of operations.
Our acquisition of TippingPoint on January 31, 2005 was accounted for as a purchase, and
accordingly, the assets purchased and liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance
sheet as of May 31, 2005. The operating results of TippingPoint are included in the consolidated
financial statements since the date of acquisition. Accordingly, fiscal 2006 contains a full year
of TippingPoints results compared to five months of results in fiscal 2005.
26
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and notes thereto included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On May 23, 2003, we completed the sale of our CommWorks division and transferred certain assets and
liabilities to UTStarcom, Inc. As a result of the sale, we reported the CommWorks division as a
discontinued operation beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. Unless otherwise indicated,
the following discussion relates to our continuing operations.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We provide secure, converged networking solutions on a global scale to businesses of all sizes. Our
products and solutions enable customers to manage business-critical voice and data in a secure and
efficient network environment. We deliver networking products and services for enterprises that
view their networks as mission critical and value superior performance. Our products form
integrated solutions and function in multi-vendor environments. Our products are sold on a
worldwide basis through a combination of value added partners and direct sales representatives.
Our long-term technology-based strategy centers on enterprises and public sector organizations
migrating to secure Internet Protocol (IP) based infrastructures that deliver converged voice and
data applications. Our products and services can generally be classified in the following
categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security; |
|
|
§ |
|
Voice; |
|
|
§ |
|
Services; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Connectivity Products. |
We have undergone significant changes in recent years, including:
|
§ |
|
significant headcount reductions and consolidation of facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
restructuring activities which included outsourcing of information
technology, all manufacturing activity in our SCN segment, and other
functions, and selling excess facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
significant changes to our executive leadership; |
|
|
§ |
|
forming the Huawei-3Com joint venture (H-3C); |
|
|
§ |
|
acquisition of majority ownership of H-3C; |
|
|
§ |
|
acquiring TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.; and |
|
|
§ |
|
realigning our sales and marketing channels and expenditures. |
We believe an overview of these significant recent events is helpful to an understanding of our
operating results.
Significant Events
In fiscal 2004, we undertook a number of actions, affecting both sales and expenses. We expanded
our product portfolio to include more Layer 3-plus and higher-end products, additional modular
switches and routers, and a higher-end VoIP offering. We consolidated our operations into a single
integrated business organized along functional lines, and we relocated headquarters and key
management positions and functions from our Santa Clara, California location to our Marlborough,
Massachusetts location. Also, we consolidated our operations into fewer facilities, disposed of
excess real estate, relocated transaction processing activities to lower cost locations, outsourced
our Dublin, Ireland manufacturing operations to our contract manufacturers, and upgraded and
modified our IT infrastructure and systems to more cost-effective alternatives. In addition,
during fiscal 2004, we reduced our overall workforce by approximately forty percent.
27
On November 17, 2003, we formed our joint venture, Huawei-3Com (H-3C), which is domiciled in Hong
Kong and has its principal operating center in Hangzhou, China. We contributed $160.0 million in
cash, assets related to our operations in China and Japan, and licenses to intellectual property
related to those operations in exchange for a 49 percent ownership interest of the joint venture.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we expanded the joint ventures market to include Hong Kong in
addition to China and Japan. In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we further expanded H-3Cs
available markets to include several additional countries. We expect this venture to continue to
provide three key benefits to us an expanded product line, access to lower cost and highly
effective engineering talent, and a significant presence in the China, Japan, Hong Kong, and other
developing markets.
H-3C sells its own products, as well as products it purchases directly from Huawei and us. Outside
of China, Japan, and Hong Kong, we resell H-3Cs products under the 3Comâ brand. Through
this reseller agreement, we have expanded our product line to include router products and modular
switching products. We believe the addition of these products to our product portfolio increases
the size of the market opportunity for which we can compete.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we entered an agreement with Siemens Business Services to
provide expanded service offerings on a global basis for enterprise customers. This agreement was
fully deployed during fiscal 2006.
On January 31, 2005, we acquired TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. (TippingPoint), a provider of
network-based intrusion prevention systems. We believe the acquired technologies are uniquely
qualified to protect a converged voice and data environment. We believe our acquisition of those
technologies will expand our ability to design innovative and reliable voice, data and security
solutions.
During fiscal 2006, we exercised our right to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest
in H-3C and entered into an agreement with Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million
in cash. We were granted regulatory approval by the Chinese government and subsequently completed
this transaction on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition). Consequently, we now own a majority
interest in the joint venture and have determined that the criteria of Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 96-16, Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the Voting
Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights have
been met. Accordingly, we consolidated H-3Cs financial statements from the date of acquisition.
Both partners have the right to initiate a bid process to purchase all of the other partners
ownership interest at any time after the third anniversary of H-3Cs formation.
During fiscal 2006 we undertook several actions that we believe will enhance our competitiveness,
execution and profitability over the longer term. We implemented a strategy to compete in the
enterprise networking market, through the following:
|
§ |
|
continued advances in products; and |
|
|
§ |
|
increased focus on our customer facing capabilities in the areas of sales and marketing. |
We have introduced multiple new products targeted at the large enterprise market, including modular
switches and routers sourced from our joint venture, H-3C, as well as VoIP, security and wireless
solutions. We also continue to develop solutions for the small to medium enterprise market,
including VoIP, smart switches, and Power over Ethernet technology.
During the year ended May 31, 2006 we have increased our focus on sales and marketing activities.
Initiatives included developing an expanded set of enterprise class channels to support effective
sales into the large enterprise market, and implementing marketing programs that we believe will
improve our effectiveness and productivity in our existing channels, particularly those that target
small and medium-sized businesses. We are currently re-assessing our go-to-market model and expect
to make changes that will increase our effectiveness.
Business Environment and Future Trends
Networking industry analysts and participants differ widely in their assessments concerning the
prospects for near-term industry growth. Industry factors and trends also present significant
challenges in the medium term with respect to our goals for sales growth, gross margin improvement
and profitability. Such factors and trends include:
|
§ |
|
Intense competition in the market for higher end, enterprise core routing and switching products; |
|
|
§ |
|
Aggressive product pricing by competitors targeted at gaining share in market segments where we |
28
|
|
|
have had a strong position historically, such as the small to medium-sized enterprise market;
and |
|
|
§ |
|
The advanced nature and ready availability of merchant silicon, which allows low-end competitors
to deliver competitive products and makes it increasingly difficult for us to differentiate our
products. |
Our key focus in fiscal 2007 is to manage our H-3C operating segment for expected growth and to
manage our SCN operating segment towards our goal of a return to profitability while maintaining
strong investment levels in our TippingPoint security products and sales teams. In fiscal 2007, we
plan to continue investment in the H-3C segment that provided strong growth in fiscal 2006. This
involves continued investment in research and development, increased distribution both inside and
outside of China, and growing the infrastructure. We continue to face significant challenges in the SCN segment
with respect to sales growth, gross margin and profitability. Future sales growth for the SCN
segment depends to a substantial degree on increased sales of our networking products, and we
believe our best growth opportunity requires us to expand our product lines targeting selected
enterprise customers. In order to achieve our sales goals in the SCN segment for fiscal 2007, it
is imperative that we continue to enhance the features and capabilities of these products in a
timely manner in order to expand our addressable market opportunities, distribution channels and
market competitiveness. Also, we expect a very competitive, difficult pricing environment for the
foreseeable future; this will likely exert downward pressure on our SCN sales, gross margin and
profitability.
Another key priority will be to determine future H-3C ownership pursuant to the bid process or
otherwise.
On August 8, 2006, we announced that we will begin negotiations with Huawei for the purchase by us
of an additional equity interest in H-3C. We currently own 51% of H-3C and Huawei owns 49%. Under
the terms of our existing shareholders agreement, and as previously disclosed, we each have the
right, commencing on and after November 15, 2006, to initiate a bid process to purchase the equity
interest in H-3C held by the other. The negotiations are intended to result in an agreement
outside of the bid process. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to negotiate
acceptable terms with Huawei or that the transaction will be consummated at all. We may need to
raise equity or debt capital in order to finance any such transaction, and such financing may not
be available on terms acceptable to us. We may also use existing cash to finance a portion of the
consideration for any such transaction, which, if used, would reduce available cash on hand.
In connection with our efforts in the SCN segment to achieve profitability and realign our cost
structure to better reflect our recent performance, on June 28, 2006 we committed to a
restructuring plan consisting of facilities closures and a reduction in workforce. The plan
includes the closure of 21 of 60 existing sites around the world and a reduction in force of
approximately 250 full-time employees in our SCN business segment (which represents approximately
15% of that segments full-time employee base as of the end of June 2, 2006 period). We currently
estimate the total restructuring charges associated with these actions to be in the range of
approximately $10 million to $13 million, of which between $9 million to $12 million is expected to
be cash charges primarily related to severance payments and approximately $1 million is expected to
be cash charges related to facilities closures and consolidation (such as lease termination
payments). The information set forth above includes separate actions taken prior to June 28, 2006
at our Santa Clara, CA facilities. We are also focusing on converting non-core assets, such as
real estate and certain venture investments, to cash, as further discussed elsewhere in this
report.
Our planned actions for fiscal 2007 are based on certain assumptions concerning the overall
economic outlook for the markets in which we operate, the expected demand for our products, our
ability to compete effectively and gain market share, and the cost and expense structure of our
business. These assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. If current economic conditions
deteriorate, or if our planned actions are not successful in achieving our goals, there could be
additional adverse impacts on our financial position, sales, profitability or cash flows. In that
case, we might need to modify our strategic focus and restructure our business again to realign our
resources and achieve additional cost and expense savings.
We are committed to our objective of being a leading provider of secure, converged networking
solutions for small, medium and large enterprises. We believe that our recent initiatives and our
business strategy are consistent with our goals of growth and profitability over the longer term.
On August 8, 2006, our President and Chief Executive Officer, R. Scott Murray, submitted a letter
of resignation from his office as our President and Chief Executive Officer, his membership on our
Board of Directors and his position as Chairman of the Board of H-3C. Mr. Murrays resignations
are effective at the close of business on August 17, 2006 and his departure is voluntary. On
August 8, 2006, our Board of Directors appointed Edgar Masri as our new President and Chief
Executive Officer, effective on his start date which is expected to be on August 18, 2006. Mr.
Masri will also assume the role of Chairman of H-3C. Mr. Masri will join our Board of Directors,
effective immediately following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on September 20, 2006. We also
announced the appointment of Robert Mao as our new Executive Vice President, Corporate Development
to manage our interests in H-3C. We currently expect that these appointments will not materially
change the strategies and key priorities for fiscal 2007 described above or our existing cost
reduction initiatives designed to return our SCN segment to profitability, including the
implementation of our previously-announced June 2006 restructuring plan.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to May 31. Fiscal 2006 consisted of 52 weeks and ended
on June 2, 2006. Fiscal year 2005, consisted of 53 weeks ended on June 3, 2005, and fiscal year
2004 consisted of 52 weeks and ended on May 28,
29
2004. For convenience, the consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on the last
day of the calendar month.
During fiscal 2006 we exercised our right to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest
in H-3C and entered into an agreement with Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million.
We were granted regulatory approval by the Chinese government and subsequently completed this
transaction on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition). Consequently, we now own a majority interest
in the joint venture and have determined that the criteria of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-16,
Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but
the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights have been met.
Accordingly, we consolidate H-3Cs financial statements from the date of acquisition. Both
partners have the right to initiate a bid process to purchase all of the other partners ownership
interest at any time after the third anniversary of H-3Cs formation.
During the three months ended May 31, 2006 we completed our preliminary purchase price allocation.
The acquisition is being accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the assets purchased and
liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2006 using H-3Cs
March 31, 2006 balance sheet data. Because H-3C follows a calendar year end, we report its results
on a two-month lag. The operating results of H-3C are included in the consolidated financial
statements from the date of acquisition, resulting in the latter two months of H-3Cs three months
ended March 31, 2006 being included in our year ended May 31, 2006 statement of operations.
Following the H-3C acquisition we determined that our chief decision making officer receives
reports, manages, and operates our business as two separate units, the SCN business and the H-3C
business. As a result we currently report two operating segments, SCN and H-3C. See footnote Note
19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our segments.
Prior to the acquisition we accounted for our investment in H-3C by the equity method. Under this
method, we recorded our proportionate share of H-3Cs net income or loss based on the most recently
available quarterly financial statements of H-3C under the caption Equity interest in income
(loss) of unconsolidated joint venture in our consolidated financial statements. Since H-3C has
adopted a calendar year basis of reporting, we have reported our equity in H-3Cs net income (loss)
for H-3Cs fiscal period from April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005 in our results of operations for
fiscal 2005 and from the date of formation (November 17, 2003) through March 31, 2004 in our
results of operations for fiscal 2004.
Our acquisition of TippingPoint on January 31, 2005, was accounted for as a purchase, and
accordingly, the assets purchased and liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance
sheet as of May 31, 2005. The operating results of TippingPoint are included in the consolidated
financial statements since the date of acquisition. Accordingly, fiscal 2006 contains a full year
of TippingPoints results compared to five months of results in fiscal 2005.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are outlined in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, which appear in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of those
accounting policies require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
by us. The following items require the most significant judgment and often involve complex
estimation:
Revenue recognition: We recognize a sale when the product has been delivered and risk of loss has
passed to the customer, collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, and the fee is fixed or determinable. The assessment of whether
the fee is fixed or determinable considers whether a significant portion of the fee is due after
our normal payment terms. If we determine that the fee is not fixed or determinable, we recognize
revenue at the time the fee becomes due, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have
been met. Also, sales arrangements may contain customer-specific acceptance requirements for both
products and services. In such cases, revenue is deferred at the time of delivery of the product or
service and is recognized upon receipt of customer acceptance.
For arrangements that involve multiple elements, such as sales of products that include maintenance
or installation services, revenue is allocated to each respective element based on its relative
fair value and recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. We use
the residual method to recognize revenue when an arrangement includes one or more elements to be
delivered at a future date and vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of all the
undelivered elements exists. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements
is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. If evidence
of fair value of one or more undelivered
30
elements does not exist, revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs
or when fair value can be established.
We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including general economic and market
conditions, past transaction history with the customer, and the creditworthiness of the customer.
If we determine that collection of the fee is not reasonably assured, then we defer the fee and
recognize revenue upon receipt of payment. We do not typically request collateral from our
customers. In the H-3C segment, certain customers pay accounts receivable with bills receivable
from Chinese banks with maturities less than six months. These are also referred to as bankers
acceptances.
A significant portion of our sales is made to distributors and value added resellers (VARs).
Revenue is generally recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, assuming all
other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Sales to these customers are recorded net of
appropriate allowances, including estimates for product returns, price protection, and excess
channel inventory levels. We maintain reserves for potential allowances and adjustments; if the
actual level of returns and adjustments differ from the assumptions we use to develop those
reserves, additional allowances and charges might be required.
For sales of products that contain software that is marketed separately, we apply the provisions of
AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Sales of services,
including professional services, system integration, project management, and training, are
recognized upon delivery and completion of performance. Other service revenue, such as that related
to maintenance and support contracts, is recognized ratably over the contract term, provided that
all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Royalty revenue is generally recognized when
we receive payment.
Allowance for doubtful accounts: We monitor payments from our customers on an on-going basis and
maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our
customers to make required payments. When we evaluate the adequacy of our allowances for doubtful
accounts, we take into account various factors including our accounts receivable aging, customer
creditworthiness, historical bad debts, and geographic and political risk. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances might be required.
Inventory: Inventory is stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates cost, or net
realizable value. We perform detailed reviews related to the net realizable value of inventory on
an ongoing basis, for both inventory on hand and inventory that we are committed to purchase,
giving consideration to deterioration, obsolescence, and other factors. If actual market conditions
differ from those projected by management and our estimates prove to be inaccurate, additional
write-downs or adjustments to cost of sales might be required; alternatively, we might realize
benefits through cost of sales for sale or disposition of inventory that had been previously
written off.
Goodwill and intangible assets: Carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite lives are reviewed for possible impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting
literature. We test our goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and in
interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of goodwill may be
impaired. We review the value of our intangible assets in accordance with the applicable accounting
literature for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets
are no longer appropriate. As of May 31, 2006, we had $354.3 million of goodwill and $111.8 million
of net intangible assets remaining on our balance sheet, which we currently believe to be
realizable based on the estimated fair value of these assets. We estimate fair value of goodwill
using third-party valuation reports and the fair value of our intangible assets using estimated
future cash flows of the associated products and technology. It is possible that the estimates and
assumptions used in assessing the carrying value of these assets, such as future sales and expense
levels, may need to be re-evaluated in the case of continued market deterioration, which could
result in further impairment of these assets.
Equity securities and other investments: We account for non-marketable equity securities and other
investments at historical cost or, if we have the ability to exert significant influence over the
investee, by the equity method. Investments accounted for by the equity method include investments
in limited partnership venture capital funds and, prior to the acquisition of majority ownership on
January 27, 2006, the investment in H-3C. In accounting for these investments by the equity
method, we record our proportionate share of the funds net income or loss, or H-3Cs net income or
loss, based on the most recently available quarterly financial statements. Since H-3C has adopted
a calendar year basis of reporting, we reported our equity in H-3Cs net income or loss based on
H-3Cs most recent quarterly financial statements, two months in arrears. For the year ended May
31, 2006 we accounted for H-3C under the equity method for ten months of the year.
31
We review all of our investments for impairment whenever events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be fully recoverable. The
impairment review requires significant judgment to identify events or circumstances that would
likely have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. Investments
identified as having an indication of impairment are subject to further analysis to determine if
the impairment is other than temporary; in the event that the investment impairment is other than
temporary, we would write the investment down to its impaired value.
Restructuring charges: Over the last several years we have undertaken significant restructuring
initiatives. These initiatives have required us to record restructuring charges related to
severance and outplacement costs, lease cancellations, accelerated depreciation and write-downs of
held for sale properties, write-downs of other long-term assets, and other restructuring costs.
Given the significance of our restructuring activities and the time required for execution and
completion of such activities, the process of estimating restructuring charges is complex and
involves periodic reassessments of estimates made at the time the original decisions were made. The
accounting for restructuring costs and asset impairments requires us to record charges when we have
taken actions or have the appropriate approval for taking action, and when a liability is incurred.
Our policies require us to periodically evaluate the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under
our restructuring initiatives. As we continue to evaluate the business, we might be required to
record additional charges for new restructuring activities as well as changes in estimates to
amounts previously recorded.
Warranty: A limited warranty is provided on our products for periods ranging from 90 days to
limited lifetime, depending upon the product, and allowances for estimated warranty costs are
recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such allowances requires us to make
estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under
warranty. If actual return rates and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our
estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost of sales might be required.
Income taxes: We are subject to income tax in a number of jurisdictions. A certain degree of
estimation is required in recording the assets and liabilities related to income taxes, and it is
reasonably possible that such assets may not be recovered and that such liabilities may not be paid
or that payments in excess of amounts initially estimated and accrued may be required. We assess
the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from our future taxable income and,
to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. We
consider historical taxable income, estimates of future taxable income, and ongoing prudent and
feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance. Based on
various factors, including our recent losses, retained deficit, operating performance in fiscal
2006, and estimates of future profitability, we have concluded that future taxable income will,
more likely than not, be insufficient to recover our U.S. net deferred tax assets as of May 31,
2006. Accordingly, we have established an appropriate valuation allowance to offset such deferred
tax assets. In addition to valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, we maintain reserves
for potential tax contingencies arising in jurisdictions in which we do or have done business. Many
of these contingencies arise from periods when we were a substantially larger company. Such
reserves are based on our assessment of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and the expected
potential loss from such contingency, and are monitored by management. These reserves are
maintained until such time as the matter is settled or the statutory period for adjustment has
passed. Adjustments could be required in the future if we determine that the amount to be realized
is greater or less than the valuation allowance we have recorded or that our reserves for tax
contingencies are inadequate. We have U.S. federal loss carryforwards of approximately $2.5
billion as of May 31, 2006 expiring between fiscal years 2007 and 2026.
32
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004
As a result of the acquisition of H-3C, we currently report two operating segments, SCN and H-3C,
for the year ended May 31, 2006. For the years ended May 31, 2005 and 2004 we managed and reported
our operations as a single, integrated business.
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, the percentage of total sales
represented by the line items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Amortization and write-down of intangible assets |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
|
(48.3 |
) |
Gain (loss) on investments, net |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity interest in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint
venture and minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.4 |
) |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Equity interest in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint
venture |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
|
|
(30.0 |
)% |
|
|
(49.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Comparison of fiscal 2006 and 2005
Sales
The increase in sales from the 2005 fiscal year to the 2006 fiscal year was primarily due to the
inclusion of two months of H-3C sales in the current period, as well as increased sales of
TippingPoint security products and the inclusion of TippingPoints results for the full current
period. The increase was partially offset by decreases in networking revenues in our SCN segment.
The following table shows our sales from products categories in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total sales for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
577.0 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
% |
|
$ |
494.5 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
% |
Security |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Voice |
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Services |
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Connectivity Products |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
794.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
651.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of networking products in fiscal 2006 increased 17% from fiscal 2005. Networking revenue
includes sales of the H-3C sourced enterprise products, our Layer 2 and Layer 3 stackable
10/100/1000 managed switching lines, wireless and OfficeConnect hardware, baseline branded small
to medium-sized enterprise market products, and H-3Cs router and switching products. The increase
in sales was primarily driven by the inclusion of two months results from the H-3C joint venture.
We also saw growth from the introduction of the 5500 line of Layer 3 switches sourced from H-3C as
well as growth in our modular core and router products. This growth was partially offset by a
decline in demand for Layer 2 switches and a reduction in average selling prices resulting from
significant price competition, particularly for our 10/100 Mbps switching products as the industry
migrates to gigabit switching solutions, and by a shift in mix towards lower-priced products.
Sales of security products in fiscal 2006 increased 241% from fiscal 2005. Security revenue
includes our TippingPoint products and services, as well as other security products, such as our
embedded firewall product. The increase is primarily attributable to the inclusion of
TippingPoints sales for the full period and, to a lesser extent, organic growth in sales of
security products in fiscal 2006 and the inclusion of H-3Cs security product sales. Sales of our
embedded firewall products increased in the year ended May 31, 2006.
VoIP Telephony revenue includes our VCX and NBX VoIP product lines. Sales of our VoIP telephony
products in fiscal 2006 increased 26% from fiscal 2005. The increase in such sales was due largely
to growth in the demand for our NBX products as well as a shift in focus to larger enterprise
contracts. Incremental sales of VCX products and to a lesser extent, the inclusion of H-3Cs voice
products also contributed to the increase in VoIP telephony sales in fiscal 2006.
Services revenue includes professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint
maintenance which is included in security.
Connectivity products includes our traditional network interface card, personal computer card, and
mini-peripheral component interconnect form factors. Sales of our connectivity products in fiscal
2006 decreased 26% from fiscal 2005. The decrease is a result of lower volumes as well as lower
overall average selling prices in fiscal 2006 compared to the previous fiscal year offset in part
by periodic royalty payments from the licensing of our intellectual property. We believe the lower
volumes resulted from a continuing shift in technology from traditional network interface card
(NIC), personal computer (PC) card, and mini-peripheral component interconnect (Mini-PCI) form
factors to PC chipsets with embedded networking technology for which we have lower market share.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 we made a decision to end-of-life many connectivity products
as we determined that the cost to ensure European Union Restriction of Hazardous Substance (RoHS)
compliance was not commensurate to our future projected revenue streams. We expect sales from
connectivity products to decline again in fiscal 2007 due to reduced demand for our products, our
end of life decision and continued pricing pressures.
34
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
248.5 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
$ |
214.1 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
Latin and South America |
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
298.5 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
294.7 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
175.6 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
794.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
651.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales information by geography to the extent available is reported based on the customers
designated delivery point, except in the case of H-3Cs OEM sales which are based on the hub
locations of H-3Cs OEM partners. Asia Pacific sales increased 107% primarily due to the inclusion
of H-3C results for two months in fiscal 2006.
Gross Profit Margin
Gross margin as a percentage of sales improved 5.3 percentage points from 36.0% of sales in fiscal
2005 to 41.3% of sales in fiscal 2006. Significant components of the improvement in gross profit
margins were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
1) Increased sales of security products and inclusion of
TippingPoint higher margin products for full current period |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
2) Consolidation of H-3C higher margin products |
|
|
2.1 |
|
3) SCN product mix and selling price reductions |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
4) Royalty payment reductions |
|
|
1.1 |
|
5) Other |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
The increase was the result of higher average selling prices and margin for
TippingPoints security products compared to other SCN products as well as the
inclusion of a full year of TippingPoint results in fiscal year 2006. |
|
2) |
|
The increase is due to the inclusion of two months of results of H-3C which
generally have higher gross margins. |
|
3) |
|
The decrease in the SCN margin was the result of lower average selling prices and
an unfavorable shift in product mix. These declines were partially offset by
product cost reductions. |
|
4) |
|
Fiscal year 2005 included final disbursements on two significant royalty payments. |
|
5) |
|
Other cost reduction activities included freight consolidation, and a reduction
in the Connectivity Products business that consequently caused a decrease in unit
shipment per revenue dollar which lowered variable costs. |
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses in fiscal 2006 were $485.2 million, compared to $437.8 million in fiscal 2005, a
net increase of $47.4 million. Included in the increase in operating expenses were H-3C operating
expenses of $36.6 million for the two month period ended May 31, 2006 and the inclusion of a full
year of TippingPoint operating expenses in fiscal 2006 as compared to five months in 2005. Both of
these factors were the primary contributors to increases in sales and marketing expenses of $31.0
million, research and development expenses of $7.3 million, general and administrative expenses of
$12.8 million, and amortization of intangibles of $11.9 million. The increase was partially offset
by the decrease of in-process research and development of $6.1 million and restructuring charges of
$9.5 million.
As a percent of sales, total operating expenses in fiscal 2006 were 61.0%, compared to 67.2% in
fiscal 2005. In aggregate, sales and marketing, research and development, and general and
administrative expenses were 56.5% of sales in fiscal 2006, compared to 61.1% in fiscal 2005, and
increased $51.1 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. We believe that to a
35
significant degree, these expenses are controllable and discretionary over time, but they are not
directly variable with sales levels within a particular period. The most significant component of
the increase of $51.1 was the inclusion of $30.2 million of H-3C expenses for the two months ended
May 31, 2006.
A more detailed discussion of the factors affecting each major component of total operating
expenses is provided below.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2006 increased $31.0 million compared
to fiscal 2005. This increase was due primarily to the inclusion of H-3C expenses for the two
months ended May 31, 2006 and TippingPoints expenses for the entire current fiscal period. In
addition, our investment in our branding campaign and the incurrence of performance related
compensation expenses in the year ended May 31, 2006, which were not incurred in the previous
fiscal year, contributed to the increase. Employee incentive compensation is aligned to the
accomplishment of specific financial objectives and certain of these objectives were met in the
current fiscal year, whereas these objectives were not met in the previous fiscal year. Partially
offsetting these increases were reduced headcount and related expenses in fiscal 2006, compared to
the same period in fiscal 2005.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses in fiscal 2006 increased $7.3 million
compared to fiscal 2005. This increase was due primarily to the inclusion of H-3C expenses for the
two months ended May 31, 2006 and the inclusion of TippingPoints expenses in the current fiscal
period. In addition, a $4.2 million charge resulting from the impairment of licensed software was
incurred for which we had no alternative future use. The increase was offset by reduced workforce
expenses as a result of restructuring activities and reduced project spending in the current year.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2006 increased $12.8
million from fiscal 2005. This increase is due to H-3C expenses for the two months ended May 31,
2006 and the inclusion of TippingPoints expenses in the current fiscal period and $4.6 million
related to executive transition costs in the current year. These transition costs resulted from
the departure of the former Chief Executive Officer and the appointment of the current Chief
Executive Officer on January 25, 2006. In addition, we incurred performance related compensation
expenses in the year ended May 31, 2006, which were not incurred in the previous fiscal year.
Amortization and Write-Down of Intangibles. Amortization and write-down of intangibles were $20.9
million in fiscal 2006 and $9.0 million in fiscal 2005, an increase of $11.9 million. Amortization
and write-down of intangibles increased due to $132.6 million of purchased intangibles acquired in
the acquisition of 2% of the equity of H-3C in fiscal 2006 that are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of between three and five years. Partially
offsetting this increase was a reduction in impairment charges.
In-process research and development. $0.7 million of the total purchase price of 2% of the equity
of H-3C has been preliminarily allocated to in-process research and development and was expensed in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. Projects that qualify as in-process research and development
represent those that have not yet reached technological feasibility and which have no alternative
future use. At the time of acquisition, H-3C had multiple in-process research and development
efforts under way for certain current and future product lines.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges were $14.4 million in fiscal 2006 and $23.9 million
in fiscal 2005. Restructuring charges in fiscal 2006 were composed primarily of charges for actions
taken in fiscal 2006, including employee severance and outplacement costs of $9.6 million, and
facilities-related charges of $1.6 million. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2006 were the result
of reductions in workforce and continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities.
We announced in June 2006 a multi-faceted SCN restructuring plan that will result in significant
restructuring charges in fiscal 2007 described earlier. The plan focuses on reducing components of
the SCN operating segment cost structure in order to achieve our goal of future profitability. The
plan includes: the closure of approximately 21 facilities around the world; a reduction in
workforce of approximately 250 full-time employees, equating to approximately 15% of our SCN
headcount; and focusing our sales, marketing, and services effort. We currently expect that these
actions will result in significant cost savings, although we intend to use some of these savings to
invest in our TippingPoint Security business.
Further actions may be taken if our business activity declines and additional cost reduction
efforts are necessary.
Gain (Loss) on Investments, Net
36
During fiscal 2006, net gains on investments were $4.3 million, primarily reflecting gains from
sales of certain equity securities. During fiscal 2005, net gains on investments were $1.6
million, reflecting $2.2 million of recognized gains from the sale of an investment in a
privately-held company and public traded securities partially offset by a net loss of $0.6 million
due to fair value adjustments of investments in limited partnership venture capital funds.
Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income, net, was $37.3 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $20.7 million
compared to $16.6 million in fiscal 2005. An increase in interest income accounted for $7.7
million of this increase, primarily attributable to higher interest rates applicable to short-term
investments and the inclusion of two months of H-3C results. Also contributing to the increase was
$7.4 million of other income from H-3C for an operating subsidy program by the Chinese VAT
authorities in the form of a partial refund of VAT taxes collected by H-3C from purchasers of
software products, and a reduction in interest expense due to the expiration of our revolving
credit facility in November 2004 according to its terms. Our results reflect a quarterly payment
that was received during the two month period of H-3Cs results that are in our consolidated
financials. Future subsidy payments, which are funded by VAT receipts, are subject to the
discretion of Chinese VAT authorities.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
Our income tax benefit was $14.8 million in fiscal 2006, compared to an income tax provision of
$3.5 million in fiscal 2005. The tax benefit for fiscal 2006 was the result of a $23.0 million
benefit resulting from a tax settlement with foreign tax authorities in the second quarter of
fiscal 2006, for which reserves had been provided in prior years and have now been reversed into
income upon reaching settlement. Partially offsetting income tax provision for fiscal 2006 was the
provision of additional taxes in certain state and foreign jurisdictions. Our income tax provision
for fiscal 2005 was the result of providing for taxes in certain state and foreign jurisdictions,
partially offset by the favorable resolution of an income tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction.
Equity Interest in Income (Loss) of Unconsolidated Joint Venture
As described more fully above, we accounted for our investment in H-3C by the equity method prior
to the acquisition of majority ownership on January 27, 2006. In fiscal 2006 we recorded income of
$11.0 million representing our share of the net income from operations generated by H-3C from April
1, 2005 through January 31, 2006. In fiscal 2005 we recorded a charge of $7.0 million representing
our share of the net loss from operations incurred by H-3C from April 1, 2004 through March 31,
2005.
Minority Interest of Huawei in the (income) of Consolidated Huawei-3Com Joint Venture
In fiscal 2006, we recorded a charge of $11.1 million representing Huawei 49% interest in the net
income reported by the H-3C joint venture for the two month period included in our fiscal 2006.
Comparison of fiscal 2005 and 2004
Sales
The following table shows our sales from enterprise networking products and desktop, mobile and
server connectivity products in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total sales for fiscal 2005
and fiscal 2004 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Enterprise networking |
|
$ |
597.2 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
585.9 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
Desktop, mobile and server
connectivity |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
651.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
698.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of enterprise networking products in fiscal 2005 increased two percent from fiscal 2004. The
increase in sales was primarily driven by certain products in targeted high-growth technology
areas; such products included fixed-configuration Gigabit switches, wireless LAN, and modular
switches and routers sourced from H-3C. Increased sales of these products was largely due to higher
unit volumes, resulting from both the industry shift towards Gigabit switching solutions mentioned
above, as well as enhanced sales and marketing efforts targeting enterprise customers. These
increases were partially offset
37
by a reduction in average selling prices resulting from significant price competition, particularly
for our 10/100 Mbps switching products as the industry migrates to Gigabit switching solutions, and
by a shift in mix towards lower-priced products.
Sales of our desktop, mobile and server connectivity products in fiscal 2005 decreased 52 percent
from fiscal 2004. The decrease in such sales was due largely to lower volumes as well as to lower
overall average selling prices in fiscal 2005 compared to the previous fiscal year. We believe the
lower volumes resulted from a continuing shift in technology from traditional network interface
card (NIC), personal computer (PC) card, and mini-peripheral component interconnect (Mini-PCI) form
factors to PC chipsets with embedded networking technology for which we have lower market share.
The additional week included in fiscal 2005 did not have a significant impact on sales, compared to
fiscal 2004.
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Americas |
|
$ |
271.8 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
263.4 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
294.7 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
319.7 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
84.7 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
115.8 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
651.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
698.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales information by geography is reported based on the customers designated delivery point.
International sales in fiscal 2005 decreased 13 percent compared to fiscal 2004. The major factor
contributing to this decrease was lower sales of our desktop, mobile and server connectivity
products; other important factors contributing to the decrease were lower sales of 10/100 Mbps
switching products, as well as a decline in sales to customers in China, Japan, and Hong Kong
following H-3Cs assumption of responsibility for sales of products into these territories.
Gross Profit Margin
Gross profit margin as a percentage of sales improved 1.2 percentage points from 34.8 percent of
sales in fiscal 2004 to 36.0 percent of sales in fiscal 2005. Significant components of the
improvement in gross margins were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced manufacturing and facility closure |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
IT and facilities-related expenses |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Volume-related impacts |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
|
Gross profit margin benefited compared to fiscal 2004 due to effects
associated with our decision to outsource our remaining manufacturing
operations in Dublin, Ireland during fiscal 2004. In addition to the
absence of impairment and transition costs that were incurred in
fiscal 2004 and not in fiscal 2005, these actions also resulted in
lower operating costs. |
|
|
§ |
|
We allocate and report both IT and facilities-related expenses as a
component of cost of sales and operating expenses. The portion of
such expenses allocated to cost of sales decreased in fiscal 2005 due
to the outsourcing of our IT operations. |
|
|
§ |
|
Volume-related impacts include higher post-sale technical support
costs, manufacturing overhead costs, royalty fees and warranty costs
as a percent of sales. These costs did not decline at the same rate
as sales since a portion of these costs is not directly variable with
sales. |
|
|
§ |
|
In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we entered into an agreement to
contract with Siemens Business Services and enhance our customer
service offerings. This agreement resulted in transition costs in
fiscal 2005 that were not incurred in fiscal 2004. |
Operating Expenses
38
Operating expenses in fiscal 2005 were $437.8 million, compared to $580.9 million in fiscal 2004, a
net decrease of $143.1 million. Included in the net decrease in operating expenses were decreases
in restructuring charges of $135.8 million, general and administrative expenses of $14.4 million,
sales and marketing expenses of $1.0 million and research and development expenses of approximately
$0.6 million. Partially offsetting these decreases were increases in in-process research and
development expenses of $6.8 million and amortization and write-down of intangibles of $2.0
million.
As a percent of sales, total operating expenses in fiscal 2005 were 67.2 percent, compared to 83.1
percent in fiscal 2004. In aggregate, sales and marketing, research and development, and general
and administrative expenses were 61.1 percent of sales in fiscal 2005, compared to 59.2 percent in
fiscal 2004, and decreased $16.0 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. To a significant
degree, these expenses are controllable and discretionary over time, but they are not directly
variable with sales levels within a particular period.
The most significant component of the decrease of $16.0 million was a reduction of IT-related
expenses. We allocate and report both IT and facilities-related expenses as a component of cost of
sales and operating expenses. On an overall basis, total operating expenses in fiscal 2005
reflected a decrease of $15.3 million in IT-related expenses compared to fiscal 2004, largely as a
result of employee reductions and asset write-offs associated with our IT outsourcing initiatives
during fiscal 2004.
A more detailed discussion of the factors affecting each major component of total operating
expenses is provided below.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2005 decreased $1.0 million compared
to fiscal 2004. Sales and marketing expenses as a percent of sales increased to 37.4 percent in
fiscal 2005, compared to 35.0 percent in fiscal 2004. The most significant factors in the $1.0
million decrease were reduced IT expenses, as well as reduced workforce-related and
facilities-related expenses due to our restructuring initiatives. Largely offsetting these
decreases were higher marketing expenses and travel and entertainment expenses.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses in fiscal 2005 decreased $0.6 million
compared to fiscal 2004. Research and development expenses as a percent of sales increased to 14.5
percent in fiscal 2005 compared to 13.6 percent in fiscal 2004. The most significant factors in
the $0.6 million decrease were reduced IT and facilities-related expenses and reduced workforce
expenses as a result of restructuring activities and movement towards lower cost geographies.
Partially offsetting these reductions were increased use of third parties for development work, as
well as an increase in facilities-related expenses.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2005 decreased $14.4
million, or 19.4 percent, from fiscal 2004. As a percent of sales, general and administrative
expenses decreased to 9.2 percent in fiscal 2005 from 10.6 percent in fiscal 2004. The most
significant factors in the $14.4 million decrease were reduced workforce-related expenses due to
our restructuring initiatives, reduced professional services and legal costs relating to fiscal
2004 non-recurring formation costs associated with H-3C, and reduced IT and facilities-related
expenses. Partially offsetting these reductions were lower credits in fiscal 2005 relating to bad
debt expense.
Amortization and Write-Down of Intangibles. Amortization and write-down of intangibles were $9.0
million in fiscal 2005 and $7.0 million in fiscal 2004, an increase of $2.0 million. Amortization
and write-down of intangibles increased due to $69.9 million of purchased intangibles acquired in
the TippingPoint acquisition in fiscal 2005 that are being amortized on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives of between two and six years. Partially offsetting this increase was a
reduction in impairment charges. In fiscal 2004, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.9 million
related to developed and core technology associated with the acquisition of assets from Alteon in
fiscal 2001 and $0.4 million related to developed and core technology associated with the fiscal
1999 acquisition of NBX. In fiscal 2005, impairment charges totaled $1.4 million and solely related
to the developed and core technology associated with NBX.
In-process research and development. $5.1 million of the total purchase price of TippingPoint has
been allocated to in-process research and development and was expensed in the third quarter of
fiscal 2005. Projects that qualify as in-process research and development represent those that
have not yet reached technological feasibility and which have no alternative future use. At the
time of acquisition, TippingPoint had multiple in-process research and development efforts under
way for certain current and future product lines. We utilized the multi-period excess earnings
method to value the in-process research and development. At the time of acquisition, it was
estimated that these development efforts would be completed over the next twelve months at an
estimated cost of approximately $10 million. Additionally, we incurred $1.7 million of in-process
research and development expenses related to technology assets purchased during the first quarter
of fiscal 2005.
39
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges were $23.9 million in fiscal 2005 and $159.7 million
in fiscal 2004. Restructuring charges in fiscal 2005 were composed primarily of charges for actions
taken in fiscal 2005, including severance and outplacement costs of $23.4 million, long-term asset
write-downs and other costs of $1.8 million and facilities-related charges of $0.5 million.
Restructuring charges for fiscal 2005 were the result of reductions in workforce and continued
efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities. Additionally, in fiscal 2005 we recognized
a benefit of $1.7 million primarily relating to a reduction in severance and outplacement costs
partially offset by additional facilities-related charges for the completion of restructuring
activities initiated in fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002.
Restructuring charges in fiscal 2004 were composed primarily of charges for actions taken in fiscal
2004, including facilities-related charges of $89.7 million, severance and outplacement costs of
$59.2 million, and long-term asset write-downs and other costs of $3.2 million. Facilities-related
charges in fiscal 2004 included $47.7 million for an impairment and accelerated depreciation of a
Santa Clara facility due to our plan to vacate the facility and move to a smaller Santa Clara
facility already owned, offset by a $0.4 million gain on the sale of this vacated facility later in
fiscal 2004; $25.1 million for an impairment and accelerated depreciation of our Dublin
manufacturing facility; an $11.2 million impairment and $1.4 million loss on sale of certain other
Santa Clara properties; a loss of $1.1 million related to the sale of our Rolling Meadows, Illinois
facility; charges of $2.7 million related to fair value adjustments of properties classified as
held for sale prior to fiscal 2004; and $0.9 million related to estimated lease obligation costs.
Restructuring charges for fiscal 2004 were the result of reductions in workforce, outsourcing of
our remaining manufacturing operations in Dublin, and efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess
facilities. Additionally, in fiscal 2004 we incurred charges of $7.6 million relating to the
completion of restructuring activities initiated in fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001.
Gain (Loss) on Investments, Net
During fiscal 2005, net gains on investments were $1.6 million, reflecting $2.2 million of
recognized gains from the sale of an investment in a privately-held company and public traded
securities partially offset by a net loss of $0.6 million due to fair value adjustments of
investments in limited partnership venture capital funds. In fiscal 2004, net losses on
investments were $10.9 million, reflecting $16.1 million of write-downs of long term equity
investments partially offset by a gain of $4.3 million recognized upon the sale of an investment in
a privately-held company.
Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income, net, was $16.6 million in fiscal 2005, an increase of $0.7 million
compared to $15.9 million in fiscal 2004. An increase in interest income accounted for $3.5
million of this increase, primarily attributable to higher interest rates applicable to short-term
investments. Partially offsetting this increase was a provision of $2.4 million for unrecoverable
value added tax for prior years that was recorded in fiscal 2005 as a result of an unfavorable tax
authority ruling.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
Our income tax provision was $3.5 million in fiscal 2005, compared to an income tax benefit of $3.1
million in fiscal 2004. Our income tax provision for fiscal 2005 was the result of providing for
taxes in certain state and foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by the favorable resolution of
an income tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction. Included in our fiscal 2004 income tax benefit was
an $8.5 million benefit of a foreign net operating loss carryback. Offsetting this benefit was a
tax provision for tax in certain foreign and domestic state jurisdictions.
Equity Interest in Loss of Unconsolidated Joint Venture
As described more fully above, during fiscal 2005, we accounted for our investment in H-3C by the
equity method. In fiscal 2005, we recorded a charge of $6.9 million representing our share of the
net loss from operations incurred by H-3C from April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005. In fiscal
2004, we recorded a charge of $4.6 million representing our share of the net loss from operations
incurred by H-3C from the date of formation through March 31, 2004. In addition, at the time of
formation of H-3C, we recorded a charge of $12.6 million representing our ownership share (49
percent) of the value attributed to in-process technology contributed to H-3C by Huawei that had
not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. In fiscal 2004, our
total reported loss related to H-3C was $17.2 million.
40
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations in fiscal 2004 related to our CommWorks division that was sold in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. We recorded a loss of $2.4 million in fiscal 2004 due to adjustments
to previous estimates of liabilities related to the sale of CommWorks.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as of May 31, 2006 were $864.3 million, an
increase of approximately $20.2 million compared to the balance of $844.1 million as of May 31,
2005. These balances were comprised of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
|
$ |
268.5 |
|
|
$ |
476.3 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
363.2 |
|
|
|
575.6 |
|
|
|
907.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short term investments |
|
$ |
864.3 |
|
|
$ |
844.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,383.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The May 31, 2006 balances included cash and cash equivalents from H-3C of $169.0 million.
The following table shows the major components of our statements of cash flows for the last three
fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
268.5 |
|
|
$ |
476.3 |
|
|
$ |
415.8 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(86.2 |
) |
|
|
(135.6 |
) |
|
|
(175.3 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
300.8 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
106.6 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
(59.4 |
) |
|
|
128.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
|
$ |
268.5 |
|
|
$ |
476.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $86.2 million for fiscal 2006, primarily reflecting our
loss from continuing operations of $100.7 million. Included in net cash used in operating
activities was cash generated by the H-3C segment for the two months that were consolidated. We
expect that cash flows from operating activities will continue to be negative during fiscal 2007,
and possibly longer, primarily due to continuing net losses. There are no assurances that we can
reduce our net losses and negative cash flow in the foreseeable future, or that we can raise
capital as needed to fund our operations on an ongoing basis. However, based on current business
conditions and our current operating and financial plans, we believe that our existing cash and
equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash
requirements for at least the next 12 months.
In connection with our June 2006 restructuring announcement described above we currently expect to
incur cash charges of approximately $9 million to $12 million for severance costs and $1 million
for facilities closures and consolidation in fiscal 2007.
41
Significant commitments that will require the use of cash in future periods include obligations
under lease, contract manufacturing and outsourcing agreements, as shown in the following table (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
Contractual Obligations (1) |
|
Total |
|
|
one year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
60.5 |
|
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase commitments with
contract manufacturers
(2) |
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing agreements (3) |
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
242.8 |
|
|
$ |
115.0 |
|
|
$ |
95.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes SCN segment obligations as of May 31, 2006 and H-3C segment obligations as of
March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
We have entered into purchase agreements with our contract manufacturers. Pursuant to these
agreements, if our actual orders and purchases fall below forecasted levels, we may be required to
purchase finished goods inventory manufactured to meet our requirements. In addition, we may be
required to purchase raw material and work in process inventory on-hand that is unique to our
products, and we may be required to compensate the contract manufacturers with respect to their
non-cancelable purchase orders for such inventory. The amount shown in the table above represents
our estimate of inventory held by contract manufacturers that we could be required to purchase
within the next 12 months. We do not expect any such required purchases to exceed our requirements
for inventory to meet expected sales of our products to our customers. |
|
(3) |
|
Under our customer service, IT outsourcing agreements and research and development agreement we
are subject to service level commitments and contractor commitments levels providing for annual
minimum payments that vary depending on the levels we choose. The amounts shown in the table above
represent the amounts that would be payable, based on current levels, through the expiration of the
agreements. However, our IT agreement may be terminated at any time upon 120 days notice and the
payment of a termination fee ranging from approximately $0.9 million to $1.3 million, and our
research and development agreement may be terminated at any time with a $0.8 million payment. Our
customer service agreement with Siemens expires in 2011 but may be terminated for convenience
beginning in 2007 subject to certain fees that decline over time. |
We have no material commitments for capital expenditures as of May 31, 2006.
Net cash used in investing activities was $300.8 million for fiscal 2006, including acquired H-3C
cash of $138.4 million offset by an additional two percent ownership interest in H-3C for an
aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million and $17.4 million of outflows related to the purchase of
property and equipment. We made investments totaling $420.9 million in fiscal 2006 and $618.0
million in fiscal 2005, in municipal and corporate bonds and government agency instruments, as well
as investments totaling $0.4 million in fiscal 2006 and $0.3 million in fiscal 2005, in equity
securities. Proceeds from maturities and sales of municipal and corporate bonds and government
agency instruments were $623.8 million in fiscal 2006 and $893.5 million in fiscal 2005, and
proceeds from the sales of equity investments totaled $5.2 million in fiscal 2006 and $37.6 million
in fiscal 2005.
We have selectively made strategic investments in privately held companies and in limited
partnership venture capital funds, which in turn invest in privately held companies. These
investment activities are entered into with the intention of complementing our business strategies
and research and development efforts, and may include a strategic commercial or technology
relationship, such as a component supply agreement or technology license arrangement, with these
privately held companies. We made capital calls on existing investments of $2.7 million in fiscal
2006 and have committed to make additional capital contributions to venture capital funds totaling
$3.7 million. We are contractually obligated to provide funding upon calls for capital. The
expiration dates for such capital calls are generally five to eight years from the inception of the
fund, and the amounts and timing of such calls during that period are at the discretion of the
funds general partners. We estimate that we will pay approximately $2.2 million over the next 12
months as capital calls are made. In June 2006 we agreed to sell all of our limited partnership
interests, subject to general partner approvals, which, when closed, would generate cash of
approximately $17 million and eliminate our future capital call requirements. In July 2006, we
agreed to sell our Santa Clara, CA land and facilities for estimated net proceeds of approximately
$16.1 million, subject to customary closing conditions.
Net cash used in financing activities was $15.7 million for fiscal 2006, which includes no
repurchases of shares in fiscal 2006. On March 23, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a new
stock repurchase program providing for expenditures of up to $100.0 million through March 31, 2007.
Under the new stock repurchase program, we may repurchase shares of our common stock having an
aggregate purchase price of up to $100.0 million in the open market, in privately negotiated
42
transactions with shareholders or using derivate transactions; provided, however, that all
repurchases must be pre-approved by the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors.
There is no requirement that we repurchase shares under the program and the program may be
discontinued at any time. During fiscal 2005, we entered a new agreement facilitating the issuance
of standby letters of credit and bank guarantees required in the normal course of business. As of
May 31, 2006, such bank-issued standby letters of credit and guarantees totaled $6.8 million,
including $6.1 million relating to potential foreign tax, custom, and duty assessments.
During fiscal 2006, we issued approximately 0.7 million shares of our common stock and 9.0 million
shares of treasury stock in connection with our employee stock purchase and option plans with total
proceeds from such issuances of $22.8 million. As of May 31, 2006, our outstanding stock options
as a percentage of outstanding shares were 16 percent.
The owners of H-3C, 3Com and Huawei, have agreed on a return of capital to shareholders of $80.0
million. This is expected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2006, subject to Chinese
regulatory approval, and will result in a $40.8 million reduction in cash and a related decrease in
the minority ownership liability to Huawei due to the cash payment to Huawei.
On August 8, 2006, we announced that we will begin negotiations with Huawei for the purchase by us
of an additional equity interest in H-3C. We currently own 51% of H-3C and Huawei owns 49%. Under
the terms of our existing shareholders agreement, and as previously disclosed, we each have the
right, commencing on and after November 15, 2006, to initiate a bid process to purchase the equity
interest in H-3C held by the other. The negotiations are intended to result in an agreement
outside of the bid process. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to negotiate
acceptable terms with Huawei or that the transaction will be consummated at all. We may need to
raise equity or debt capital in order to finance any such transaction, and such financing may not
be available on terms acceptable to us. We may also use existing cash to finance a portion of the
consideration for any such transaction, which, if used, would reduce available cash on hand.
EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For additional information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk Disclosures. The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves
forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates,
foreign currency exchange rates, and equity security price risk. We do not use derivative
financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Our short-term investments consist mainly of fixed-income securities
with a weighted average maturity of less than one year. These available-for-sale securities are
subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market
interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by ten percent from levels as of May 31,
2006, the fair value of our short-term investments would decline by an immaterial amount. We
currently have the ability and intention to hold our fixed income investments until maturity and,
therefore, we would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any
significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates. If necessary, we may sell
short-term investments prior to maturity to implement management strategies and meet our liquidity
needs.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. Our risk management strategy currently uses forward contracts to
hedge certain foreign currency exposures. The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on
the underlying exposures with gains and losses resulting from the forward contracts that hedge
these exposures. We attempt to reduce the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on corporate
financial results by hedging existing foreign currency exposures and anticipated foreign currency
transactions expected to occur within one month. Anticipated foreign currency transaction exposures
with a maturity profile in excess of one month may be selectively hedged. Translation exposures
are not hedged. Due to the limitations on converting Renminbi, we are limited in our ability to
engage in currency hedging activities in China. Although the impact of currency fluctuations of
Renminbi to date has been slight, fluctuations in currency exchange rates in the future may have a
material adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.
43
Gains and losses on the forward contracts are largely offset by gains and losses on the underlying
exposure. A hypothetical ten percent appreciation of the U.S. Dollar from May 31, 2006 market
rates would increase the unrealized value of our forward contracts by $3.0 million. Conversely, a
hypothetical ten percent depreciation of the U.S. Dollar from May 31, 2006 market rates would
decrease the unrealized value of our forward contracts by $3.0 million. The gains or losses on the
forward contracts are largely offset by the gains or losses on the underlying transactions and
consequently we believe that a sudden or significant change in foreign exchange rates would not
have a material impact on future net income or cash flows.
Equity Security Price Risk. We hold publicly traded equity securities that are subject to market
price volatility. Equity security price fluctuations of plus or minus 50 percent would not have had
a material impact on our financial statements as of May 31, 2006.
44
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
Financial Statement Schedule: |
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves |
|
|
90 |
|
All other schedules are omitted, because they are not required, are not applicable, or the
information is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 3Com Corporation
Marlborough, Massachusetts:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 3Com Corporation and subsidiaries
(3Com) as of June 2, 2006 and June 3, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2006.
Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item
15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of 3Coms
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of 3Com at June 2, 2006 and June 3, 2005, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2006
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also,
in our opinion, such financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of June 2, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
August 11, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 11, 2006
46
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
$ |
651,244 |
|
|
$ |
698,884 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
466,743 |
|
|
|
416,916 |
|
|
|
455,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
328,064 |
|
|
|
234,328 |
|
|
|
243,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
274,745 |
|
|
|
243,700 |
|
|
|
244,703 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
101,870 |
|
|
|
94,584 |
|
|
|
95,195 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
72,596 |
|
|
|
59,833 |
|
|
|
74,245 |
|
Amortization and write-down of intangible assets |
|
|
20,903 |
|
|
|
8,989 |
|
|
|
7,026 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
14,403 |
|
|
|
23,922 |
|
|
|
159,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
485,167 |
|
|
|
437,803 |
|
|
|
580,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(157,103 |
) |
|
|
(203,475 |
) |
|
|
(337,825 |
) |
Gain (loss) on investments, net |
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
(10,899 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
29,085 |
|
|
|
21,406 |
|
|
|
16,534 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
8,235 |
|
|
|
(4,785 |
) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
interest in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint venture, and
minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
(115,450 |
) |
|
|
(185,274 |
) |
|
|
(332,819 |
) |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
14,833 |
|
|
|
(3,490 |
) |
|
|
3,135 |
|
Equity interest in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
(6,922 |
) |
|
|
(17,179 |
) |
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
(11,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
|
|
(346,863 |
) |
Discontinued operations, net of taxes (Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,686 |
) |
|
$ |
(349,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
386,801 |
|
|
|
382,309 |
|
|
|
379,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
501,097 |
|
|
$ |
268,535 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
363,250 |
|
|
|
575,569 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
63,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$16,422 and $15,090, respectively |
|
|
115,120 |
|
|
|
61,664 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
148,819 |
|
|
|
29,311 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
57,835 |
|
|
|
42,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,249,345 |
|
|
|
977,509 |
|
Investment in joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,969 |
|
Property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $232,944 and $238,945, respectively |
|
|
89,109 |
|
|
|
69,535 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
354,259 |
|
|
|
310,367 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
111,845 |
|
|
|
65,882 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
56,803 |
|
|
|
33,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,861,361 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
153,245 |
|
|
$ |
99,632 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
318,036 |
|
|
|
209,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
471,281 |
|
|
|
309,560 |
|
Deferred revenue and long-term obligations |
|
|
13,788 |
|
|
|
8,484 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
173,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized;
none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 990,000 shares authorized;
shares issued: 393,442 and 393,377, respectively |
|
|
2,300,396 |
|
|
|
2,302,190 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, of zero and 8,135 shares, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,821 |
) |
Unamortized stock-based compensation |
|
|
(7,565 |
) |
|
|
(14,011 |
) |
Retained deficit |
|
|
(1,087,512 |
) |
|
|
(967,952 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,957 |
) |
|
|
(5,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,202,362 |
|
|
|
1,274,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,861,361 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
48
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Note |
|
|
Stock-based |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balances, June 1, 2003 |
|
|
367,796 |
|
|
$ |
2,138,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,421 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,474 |
) |
|
$ |
(405,981 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,543 |
) |
|
$ |
1,718,597 |
|
Components of comprehensive income loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349,263 |
) |
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
Net unrealized gain on derivative
instruments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351,008 |
) |
Common stock issued under stock plans, net
of cancellations |
|
|
24,942 |
|
|
|
122,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,423 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
Collection on note receivable for warrants
issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, May 31, 2004 |
|
|
392,738 |
|
|
|
2,262,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,577 |
) |
|
|
(755,244 |
) |
|
|
(5,288 |
) |
|
|
1,499,114 |
|
Components of comprehensive income loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
Net unrealized gain on derivative
instruments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,881 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(14,983 |
) |
|
|
(73,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,545 |
) |
Common stock issued under stock plans, net
of cancellations |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
33,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,760 |
) |
|
|
(17,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,459 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
Stock issued in connection with acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, May 31, 2005 |
|
|
393,377 |
|
|
|
2,302,190 |
|
|
|
(8,135 |
) |
|
|
(39,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,011 |
) |
|
|
(967,952 |
) |
|
|
(5,483 |
) |
|
|
1,274,923 |
|
Components of comprehensive income loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,149 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(2,848 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(4,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,076 |
) |
Common stock issued under stock plans, net
of cancellations |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
8,999 |
|
|
|
44,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,593 |
) |
|
|
(18,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,801 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,863 |
|
Reduction of shares reserved for issuance
of options in connection with acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, May 31, 2006 |
|
|
393,442 |
|
|
$ |
2,300,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,087,512 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,957 |
) |
|
$ |
1,202,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
49
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,686 |
) |
|
$ |
(346,863 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
44,685 |
|
|
|
51,852 |
|
|
|
109,407 |
|
Write-down of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
(Gain) loss on property and equipment disposals |
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(4,741 |
) |
|
|
41,034 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
11,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
(Gain) loss on investments, net |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
10,899 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
(533 |
) |
In-process research and development |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interest in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
(11,016 |
) |
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
17,179 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
5,913 |
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
23,918 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(23,047 |
) |
|
|
(9,629 |
) |
|
|
(12,999 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
19,224 |
|
|
|
(25,175 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(28,172 |
) |
|
|
(21,476 |
) |
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(86,164 |
) |
|
|
(135,594 |
) |
|
|
(175,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(421,279 |
) |
|
|
(618,320 |
) |
|
|
(908,874 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and sales of investments |
|
|
629,036 |
|
|
|
931,122 |
|
|
|
1,056,597 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(17,404 |
) |
|
|
(21,121 |
) |
|
|
(16,014 |
) |
Businesses acquired in purchase transactions, net of cash
acquired |
|
|
110,407 |
|
|
|
(355,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
134,855 |
|
Investment in Huawei-3Com joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
300,760 |
|
|
|
(12,705 |
) |
|
|
106,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
22,801 |
|
|
|
15,459 |
|
|
|
120,423 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(7,076 |
) |
|
|
(73,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
Collection of note receivable issued for warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
|
(59,394 |
) |
|
|
128,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
734 |
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents during period |
|
|
232,562 |
|
|
|
(207,739 |
) |
|
|
60,476 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
268,535 |
|
|
|
476,274 |
|
|
|
415,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
501,097 |
|
|
$ |
268,535 |
|
|
$ |
476,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
Income tax (payments) refunds received, net |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
10,402 |
|
|
|
5,696 |
|
Inventory transferred to property and equipment |
|
|
16,995 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Description of Business
We are incorporated in Delaware. A pioneer in the computer networking industry, we provide secure,
converged networking solutions, as well as maintenance and support services, for enterprises and
public sector organizations of all sizes. Headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts, we have
worldwide operations, including sales, marketing, research and development, and customer service
and support capabilities.
Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies
Fiscal year
Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to May 31. Fiscal 2006 consisted of 52 weeks and ended
on June 2, 2006. Fiscal 2005 consisted of the 53 weeks ended on June 3, 2005 and Fiscal 2004
consisted of the 52 weeks ended on May 28, 2004. For convenience, the consolidated financial
statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month.
Use of estimates in the preparation of consolidated financial statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make assumptions and estimates
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of sales,
costs and expenses during the reporting periods. Such management assumptions and estimates include
allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, product returns, rebates and price protection;
provisions for inventory to reflect net realizable value; estimates of fair value for investments
in privately held companies, goodwill and other intangible assets, estimation of fair value of
acquired businesses, and properties held for sale; valuation allowances against deferred income tax
assets; and accruals for severance costs, compensation, product warranty, other liabilities, and
income taxes, among others. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of 3Com, its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
and Huawei-3Com H-3C, a majority owned joint venture. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions are eliminated in consolidation. As discussed in Note 4 and 6, we accounted for our
investment in the H-3C joint venture by the equity method until we purchased an additional 2%
equity to give us a majority (51%) ownership in H-3C. As of January 27, 2006, the date of the
incremental purchase, we have determined it is appropriate to consolidate H-3C. For convenience of
close purposes the operating results of H-3C are consolidated beginning February 1, 2006. H-3C
follows a calendar year basis of reporting and therefore results are consolidated on a two-month
time lag.
Segment reporting
As of May 31, 2006, we were organized in two reportable segments: Secured Converged Networking
SCN and H-3C. The SCN reportable segment was comprised of all business activities outside of the
joint venture in China. The H-3C segment was comprised of operations of our joint venture in China.
In previous years we had one reportable segment.
Cash equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments in debt securities with maturities of three
months or less when purchased.
Short-term investments
Short-term investments primarily consist of investments in debt securities acquired with maturities
exceeding three months but less than one year. Our intent is to hold our investments in debt
securities to maturity. However, consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, all investments in
debt securities and all investments in equity securities that have readily determinable fair values
have been classified as available-for-sale, since the sale of such investments may be required
prior to maturity to implement management strategies. Our short-term investments are reported at
fair value, with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and included in other
comprehensive loss. Short-term investments are evaluated quarterly for other than temporary
declines in fair value, which are reported in earnings as identified. The cost of investments sold
is based on the specific identification method.
51
Notes receivable
Notes receivable represent bills receivable from four Chinese banks to our H-3C joint venture that
have maturities of less than six months. These notes originate from customers who settle their
commitments to H-3C by providing us these bills issued by the Chinese banks. The Chinese banks are
responsible to pay H-3C. The notes are also referred to as bankers acceptances.
Non-marketable equity securities and other investments
Non-marketable equity securities and other investments consist primarily of direct investments in
private companies and investments in limited partnership venture capital funds. Non-marketable
equity securities and other investments are accounted for at historical cost or, if we had
significant influence over the investee, by the equity method. Cost basis investments are evaluated
quarterly for other than temporary declines in fair value, which are reported in earnings as
identified. Investments accounted for by the equity method include investments in limited
partnership venture capital funds. The net income or loss of limited partnership venture capital
funds, and the fair values of the funds, are obtained from the funds most recently issued
financial statements. We record our proportionate share of the net income or loss of the funds, and
adjustments reflecting changes in the fair values of the funds, in loss on investments, net. Net
investment gains and losses recorded as a result of sales of our investments in the limited
partnership venture capital funds are based on the difference between the net sales proceeds and
the carrying value of the investment at the time of sale. Generally, in connection with such sales
and with the approval of the applicable funds general partners, we are released from all
obligations with respect to future capital calls associated with the investment sold except as
otherwise required by applicable law.
Concentration of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash and equivalents, short-term investments, notes receivable and accounts
receivable. For our cash and equivalents and notes receivable in China we maintain a minimum BB+
rating and for the period ended March 31, 2006 the average rating was A+. For our short-term
investments, we maintain a minimum weighted average credit quality of AA and invest in instruments
with an investment credit rating of A- and better; also, by policy, we limit the amount of credit
exposure from any one institution or issuer.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or market, which approximates actual cost.
Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, with the exception of assets classified as held for sale
(see Note 9), which are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Equipment under
capital leases is stated at the lower of fair market value or the present value of the minimum
lease payments at the inception of the lease. We capitalize eligible costs related to the
application development phase of software developed internally or obtained for internal use.
Capitalized costs related to internal-use software are amortized using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to five years; the amounts
charged to amortization expense were $0.7 million in fiscal 2006, $1.0 million in fiscal 2005, and
$1.1 million in fiscal 2004.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be held and used are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such
assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability of long-lived assets is based on an
estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset.
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the
lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of property and equipment are generally 2-15 years,
except for buildings for which the useful lives are 25-40 years. Depreciation and amortization of
leasehold improvements are computed using the shorter of the remaining lease terms or estimated
useful life.
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets
52
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires goodwill to be tested for impairment
on an annual basis and between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate a potential
impairment. We test our goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth fiscal quarter. There
was no impairment of goodwill in fiscal 2006, 2005, or 2004. Furthermore, SFAS No. 142 requires
purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless
these lives are determined to be indefinite. Purchased intangible assets are carried at cost less
accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets, generally two to seven years.
Revenue recognition
We recognize product revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition.
Specifically, product revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred and risk of loss has passed to the customer, the fee is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where the customer specifies
final acceptance of the product or service, revenue and related costs are deferred until all
acceptance criteria have been met. For sales of products that contain software that is marketed
separately, we apply the provisions of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended.
A significant portion of our sales are made to distributors and resellers through a two-tier
distribution channel. Revenue related to such sales is reduced for allowances for product returns,
price protection, rebates and other offerings established in our sales agreements. We allow for
product return rights that are generally limited to a percentage of sales over a one to three month
period.
Sales of services, including professional services, system integration, project management, and
training, are recognized upon delivery and completion of performance. Other service revenue, such
as that related to maintenance and support contracts, is recognized ratably over the contract term,
provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Royalty revenue is generally
recognized when we receive payment.
For arrangements that involve multiple elements, such as sales of products that include maintenance
or installation services, revenue is allocated to each respective element based on its relative
fair value and recognized when the revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. We
use the residual method to recognize revenue when an arrangement includes one or more elements to
be delivered at a future date and objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of all the
undelivered elements exits. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements
is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue for the
delivered elements, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If
objective and reliable evidence of fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist,
revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be
established.
Product warranty
We provide limited warranty on our products for periods ranging from 90 days to the lifetime of the
product, depending upon the product. The warranty generally includes parts, labor and service
center support. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under our warranty obligations and
record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time sales are recognized. Factors that
affect our warranty liability include the number of installed units, historical and anticipated
rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded
warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as necessary.
Advertising
Costs associated with cooperative advertising programs are estimated and recorded as a reduction of
revenue at the time the related sales are recognized. All other advertising costs are expensed as
incurred in sales and marketing.
Restructuring charges
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure. In connection with these initiatives, we have recorded
significant restructuring charges, as more fully described in Note 5. Generally, costs associated
with an exit or disposal activity are recognized when the liability is incurred. Costs related to
employee separation arrangements requiring future service beyond a specified minimum retention
period are recognized over the service period.
Foreign currency remeasurement and translation
Our foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency transaction
costs. The majority of our SCN sales transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. The majority
of our H-3C sales are denominated in Renminbi. For
53
foreign operations with the local currency as the functional currency, local currency denominated
assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end exchange rates, and sales, costs and expenses
are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. Gains or losses resulting from
foreign currency translation are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in
the consolidated balance sheets. For foreign operations with the U.S. dollar as the functional
currency, foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are remeasured at the year-end
exchange rates except for property and equipment which are remeasured at historical exchange rates.
Foreign currency denominated sales, costs and expenses are recorded at the average exchange rates
during the year. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency remeasurement are included in
other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations.
Our risk management strategy uses forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency exposures.
The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures with gains and
losses resulting from the forward contracts that hedge these exposures. In accordance with SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, these
contracts are recorded at fair value, and fair value changes are expensed in the current period in
interest and other income, net. In addition, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to
hedge exposures related to anticipated foreign currency cash flows. Due to the limitations on
converting Renmimbi we do not engage in currency hedging activities in China. These contracts,
designated as cash flow hedges, also are recorded at fair value. The gain or loss from the
effective portion of the hedge is reported in the consolidated statement of operations in the same
period or periods and manner as the hedged transaction. The gain or loss from the ineffective
portion of the hedge is recognized in other income (expense), net, during the period of change. We
do not enter into derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes, nor do we use leveraged
financial instruments.
Other income (expense), net included net foreign currency losses of $1.5 million in fiscal 2006 and
2005, and $0.9 million for fiscal 2004.
Comprehensive income (loss)
We account for comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income. SFAS No. 130 is a financial statement presentation standard that
requires us to disclose non-owner changes included in equity but not included in net income or
loss. Comprehensive loss presented in the financial statements consists of foreign currency
translation and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities.
An analysis of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Balance as of June 1, 2003 |
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
(3,907 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,543 |
) |
Change in period |
|
|
(2,471 |
) |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2004 |
|
|
(2,107 |
) |
|
|
(3,181 |
) |
|
|
(5,288 |
) |
Change in period |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
|
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
(3,082 |
) |
|
|
(5,483 |
) |
Change in period |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
(2,101 |
) |
|
$ |
(856 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
Stock-based compensation
We account for our employee stock option grants and employee stock purchase plan by the intrinsic
value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, as described more fully in Note 14. The following table illustrates
the pro forma effect on our reported net loss and net loss per share of applying the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation to stock-based
employee compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net loss as reported |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,686 |
) |
|
$ |
(349,263 |
) |
Add stock-based compensation included in
reported net loss, net of tax |
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
Deduct total stock-based compensation
determined
by the fair value-based method, net of tax |
|
|
(25,496 |
) |
|
|
(16,203 |
) |
|
|
(19,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(116,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(209,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(365,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reportedbasic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.92 |
) |
Pro formabasic and diluted |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
(0.96 |
) |
For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value expense of an option is
amortized over the vesting period.
Net loss per share
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive
common shares consist of employee stock options, and restricted stock, and are excluded from the
diluted earnings per share computation in periods where net losses were incurred.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to measure
and recognize compensation expense for stock-based payments at fair value. SFAS No. 123R was
initially effective as of the first interim or annual reporting period that began after June 15,
2005. In April 2005, the SEC issued a rule amending the compliance date which allows companies to
implement SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting
period, that begins after June 15, 2005. As a result, we will implement SFAS No. 123R in the
reporting period starting June 3, 2006. Management is evaluating the two methods of adoption
allowed by SFAS No. 123R, the modified-prospective transition method and the modified-retrospective
transition method, and the related impact on the financial statements. Adoption of SFAS 123R will
have a significant impact on our results of operations, the impact of which we continue to estimate
at this time. See Stock-based compensation above for information related to the pro forma
effects on our reported net loss and net loss per share of applying the fair value recognition
provisions of the previous SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations An Interpretation of SFAS No. 143. This interpretation provides
additional guidance as to when companies should record the fair value of a liability for a
conditional asset retirement obligation when there is uncertainty about the timing and/or method of
settlement of the obligation. We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47 and it did not have a material
impact on our financial statements.
In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting
Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting
for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in
accounting principles required recognition via a cumulative effect adjustment within net income in
the period of the change. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods
financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or
the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective
55
for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, SFAS No.
154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial
statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. This
Interpretation is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. We are
currently evaluating the impact FIN 48 will have on our financial statements.
Note 3: Discontinued Operations
On March 4, 2003, we entered into an agreement to sell selected assets and liabilities of our
CommWorks division to UTStarcom, Inc. in exchange for $100.0 million in cash, subject to certain
closing adjustments. On May 23, 2003, we completed the sale pursuant to the terms of the agreement.
As a result, we reported the CommWorks division as a discontinued operation beginning in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. There were no material assets or liabilities outstanding related to
discontinued operations as of the balance sheet dates presented. The sale of the CommWorks division
generated net cash proceeds of approximately $95.7 million, including transaction costs of $4.3
million.
The amount of $2.4 million included in the caption Discontinued operations in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for fiscal 2004 resulted from adjustments to previous estimates of
liabilities related to the sale of the CommWorks division.
Note 4: Acquisitions
Huawei-3Com
On November 17, 2003, we formed the Huawei-3Com joint venture (H-3C) with a subsidiary of Huawei
Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei). H-3C is domiciled in Hong Kong, and has its principal operating center
in Hangzhou, China.
At the time of formation, we contributed cash of $160.0 million, assets related to our operations
in China and Japan, and licenses related to certain intellectual property in exchange for a 49
percent ownership interest. We recorded our initial investment in H-3C at $160.1 million,
reflecting our carrying value for the cash and assets contributed. Huawei contributed its
enterprise networking business assets including Local Area Network (LAN) switches and routers;
engineering, sales and marketing resources and personnel; and licenses to its related intellectual
property in exchange for a 51 percent ownership interest. Huaweis contributed assets were
valued at $178.2 million at the time of formation. Two years after formation of H-3C, we had the
one-time option to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest from Huawei. On October
28, 2005, we exercised this right and entered into an agreement to purchase an additional two
percent ownership interest in H-3C from Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million. We
were granted regulatory approval by the Chinese government and subsequently completed this
transaction on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition). Consequently, we now own a majority interest
in the joint venture and have determined that the criteria of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-16,
Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but
the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights have been met and,
therefore, consolidated H-3Cs financial statements beginning February 1, 2006, a date used under
the principle of a convenience close. Under the terms of our existing shareholders agreement, and
as previously disclosed, we each have the right, commencing on and after November 15, 2006, to
initiate a bid process to purchase the equity interest in H-3C held by the other.
During the three months ended May 31, 2006, we completed our preliminary purchase price
allocation. The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the assets
purchased and liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31,
2006. The operating results of H-3C for the period February 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006 are
included in the consolidated financial statements, resulting in the latter two months of H-3Cs
three months ended March 31, 2006 being included in our year ended May 31, 2006 statement of
operations.
56
The purchase price categories are shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
Cash paid for common stock |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
Assets contributed |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition direct costs |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the purchase price was allocated to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including in-process research and
development, based on their estimated fair values, The excess purchase price over those values is
recorded as goodwill. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are based on managements estimates and assumptions, and other information
compiled by management. Goodwill recorded as a result of this acquisition is not deductible for
tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill is not amortized but will be reviewed at
least annually for impairment. Purchased intangibles with finite lives will be amortized on a
straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives. The total purchase price has
been allocated on a preliminary basis as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
Net tangible assets assumed |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Existing technology |
|
|
17.8 |
|
Distributor agreements |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
18.2 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total preliminary purchase price allocation |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
The 2006 purchase price allocation is preliminary and may be revised as a result of revisions to
estimates of fair values made at the date of the purchase.
Intangible assets include amounts recognized for the fair value of existing technology,
maintenance agreements, trade name and trademarks, and non-competition agreements. These
intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of approximately five years.
In-process research and development (IPR&D) represents incomplete H-3C research and development
projects that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use as of
the acquisition date. Technological feasibility is established when an enterprise has completed
all planning, designing, coding, and testing activities that are necessary to establish that a
product can be produced to meet its design specifications including functions, features, and
technical performance requirements. At the time of acquisition, H-3C had multiple IPR&D efforts
under way for certain current and future product lines. Purchased IPR&D relates primarily to
projects associated with the H-3C routers and switch products, which had not yet reached
technological feasibility as of the acquisition date and have no alternative future use.
The following pro forma financial information presents the consolidated results of operations of
3Com and H-3C as if the 2% acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented
below. Preliminary adjustments, which reflect the amortization of purchased intangible assets,
in-process research and development and charges to cost of sales for inventory write-ups, have
been made to the consolidated results of operations. We also eliminate the inter-company
activity between the parties in the consolidated results. The 2005 results have been prepared on
a pro forma basis to include the acquisition of TippingPoint (as described below) as if the
TippingPoint acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of fiscal year 2005. The unaudited
proforma financial information is not intended, and should not be taken as representative of our
future consolidated results of operations or financial condition or the results that would have
occurred if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2005.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,151.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,120.3 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
|
|
(177.7 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
($0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
Prior to February 1, 2006, we accounted for our investment in H-3C by the equity method. Under this
method, we recorded our proportionate share of H-3Cs net income or loss based on the most recently
available quarterly financial statements. Prospectively, we will consolidate H-3C based on H-3Cs
most recent financial statements, two months in arrears. Our Consolidated Statement of Operations
for the year ended May 31, 2006 contains ten months of results of H-3C using the equity method.
Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect $110.4 million of the line item businesses
acquired in purchase transactions, net of cash acquired. This reflects acquired cash of $138.4
million on January 31, 2006 offset by the purchase price payment of $28.0 million for an additional
2% ownership of H-3C.
TippingPoint
On January 31, 2005, we completed our acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding common shares
of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. for consideration of $430.0 million. This amount excludes the
cost of integration, as well as other costs related to the transaction. TippingPoint is a
provider of networked-based intrusion prevention systems. The acquisition enabled us to expand
our portfolio of secure, converged voice and data networking solutions.
The TippingPoint acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the assets
purchased and liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31,
2006 and 2005. The operating results of TippingPoint are included in the consolidated financial
statements since the date of acquisition.
The purchase price categories are shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for common stock |
|
$ |
389.5 |
|
Fair value of outstanding stock options assumed |
|
|
36.1 |
|
Acquisition direct costs |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
430.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the purchase price was allocated to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including in-process research and
development, based on their estimated fair values, while the associated deferred stock compensation
was recorded based on intrinsic value. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on managements estimates and assumptions, and other
information compiled by management, including valuations that utilize established valuation
techniques appropriate for the high technology industry. Goodwill recorded as a result of this
acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill is not
amortized but will be reviewed at least annually for impairment. Purchased intangibles with finite
lives will be amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives. As
of February 28, 2006 the purchase price has been finalized. The total purchase price has been
allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets assumed |
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Existing technology |
|
|
39.1 |
|
Maintenance agreements |
|
|
19.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
69.9 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
5.1 |
|
Deferred compensation on unvested stock options |
|
|
9.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
308.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
430.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
58
During the three months ended August 31, 2005, we revised the purchase price allocation by
increasing net tangible assets assumed and reducing goodwill by $1.3 million. This adjustment
related to the revision of an estimate for a contingent liability assumed in the acquisition and
has been incorporated into the purchase price allocation above.
Intangible assets include amounts recognized for the fair value of existing technology,
maintenance agreements, trade name and trademarks, and non-competition agreements. These
intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of approximately five years.
In-process research and development (IPR&D) represents incomplete TippingPoint research and
development projects that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future
use as of the acquisition date. Technological feasibility is established when an enterprise has
completed all planning, designing, coding, and testing activities that are necessary to establish
that a product can be produced to meet its design specifications including functions, features,
and technical performance requirements. At the time of acquisition, TippingPoint had multiple
IPR&D efforts under way for certain current and future product lines. The value assigned to IPR&D
was determined by considering the importance of each project to our overall development plan,
estimating costs to develop the purchased IPR&D into commercially viable products, estimating the
resulting net cash flows from the projects when completed and discounting the net cash flows to
their present value based on the percentage of completion of the IPR&D projects. Purchased IPR&D
relates primarily to projects associated with the TippingPoint UnityOne® products and Software
Management System product, which had not yet reached technological feasibility as of the
acquisition date and have no alternative future use. We utilized the multi-period excess earnings
method to value the IPR&D, using a discount rate of 20 percent. At the time of acquisition, it
was estimated that these development efforts would be completed over the next twelve months at an
estimated cost of approximately $10 million. As of February 28, 2006, these projects have been
completed.
The following pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of 3Com
and TippingPoint as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented
below. Adjustments, which reflect the amortization of purchased intangible assets and deferred
stock compensation, charges to cost of sales for inventory write-ups, and in-process research and
development, have been made to the combined results of operations for fiscal years 2005 and 2004.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of
our consolidated results of operations or financial condition that would have been reported had
the acquisition been completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as
representative of our future consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
675.8 |
|
|
$ |
707.4 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(228.3 |
) |
|
|
(387.7 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
(1.02 |
) |
Note 5: Restructuring Charges
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure.
In fiscal 2001, we began a broad restructuring of our business to enhance the focus and cost
effectiveness of our business units in serving their respective markets. These restructuring
efforts continued through fiscal 2002 and 2003. We took the following specific actions in fiscal
2001, 2002, and 2003 (the Fiscal 2001, 2002, and 2003 Actions):
|
§ |
|
announced the integration of the support infrastructure of two of our business units
to leverage a common infrastructure in order to drive additional costs out of the
business; |
|
|
§ |
|
organized around independent businesses that utilized shared central services; |
|
|
§ |
|
outsourced the manufacturing of certain high volume desktop, mobile and server
connectivity products in a contract manufacturing arrangement; |
|
|
§ |
|
entered into an agreement to outsource certain information technology (IT) functions; |
|
|
§ |
|
reduced our workforce; and |
|
|
§ |
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities.
|
59
In response to continuing sale declines and net losses, we took additional measures to reduce costs
in fiscal 2004 (the Fiscal 2004 Actions). These actions included:
|
§ |
|
Reductions in workforce; |
|
|
§ |
|
outsourcing of our remaining manufacturing operations in Dublin, Ireland; and |
|
|
§ |
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities. |
During fiscal 2005 (the Fiscal 2005 Actions), we took the following additional measures to reduce
costs:
|
§ |
|
Reductions in workforce; and |
|
|
§ |
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities. |
During fiscal 2006 (the Fiscal 2006 Actions), we took the following additional measures to reduce
costs:
|
§ |
|
Reductions in workforce; and |
|
|
§ |
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities. |
Restructuring charges related to these various initiatives were $14.4 million in fiscal 2006, $23.9
million in fiscal 2005, and $159.7 million in fiscal 2004. Such charges were net of credits of
$0.1 million in fiscal 2006, $7.6 million in fiscal 2005, and $8.0 million in fiscal 2004, related
primarily to revisions of previous estimates of employee separation expenses, lease obligation
costs and values on held for sale properties.
Accrued liabilities associated with restructuring charges are included in the caption Accrued
liabilities and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These liabilities are
classified as current because we expect to satisfy such liabilities in cash within the next 12
months.
Fiscal 2006 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2006 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Write-downs |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of June 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
9,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,193 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(4,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
4,877 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The reduction in workforce affected employees involved in research and
development, sales and marketing, customer support, and general and administrative functions.
Through May 31, 2006, the total reduction in workforce associated with actions initiated during
fiscal 2006 included approximately 226 employees who had been separated or were currently in the
separation process and approximately 42 additional employees who had been notified but had not yet
worked their last day.
Fiscal 2005 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2005 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Write-downs |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of June 1, 2004 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
23,391 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(15,186 |
) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(755 |
) |
|
|
(16,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Write-downs |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(8,235 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(9,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,843 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The reduction in workforce affected employees involved in research and
development, sales and marketing, customer support, general and administrative, and manufacturing
functions. Through May 31, 2005, the total reduction in workforce associated with actions initiated
during fiscal 2005 included approximately 300 employees who had been separated or were currently in
the separation process and approximately 100 additional employees who had been notified but had not
yet worked their last day. The provision of $1.9 million recorded in fiscal 2006 relates to
employees separation costs for employees that were not notified or had not worked their last day
until fiscal 2006. For the year ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, total separation payments associated
with actions initiated during fiscal 2005 were approximately $8.2 million and $15.2 million,
respectively.
Long-term asset write-downs were associated with assets that no longer support our continuing
operations. The provision of $1.0 million was related to capitalized software licenses with no
future benefit ($0.5 million) and leasehold improvements in vacated facilities ($0.5 million).
Facilities-related charges included write-downs and accelerated depreciation of properties,
including properties that were classified as held for sale prior to fiscal 2005, as well as
expenses related to lease obligations.
Other restructuring costs of $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively, included payments to suppliers and contract termination fees.
Fiscal 2004 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2004 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Write-downs |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of June 1, 2003 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
59,170 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
89,702 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
152,089 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(53,641 |
) |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
|
|
(89,172 |
) |
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
(146,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2004 |
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1,956 |
) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reduction in workforce affected employees involved in sales and marketing, customer support,
manufacturing, research and development, and general and administrative functions. During fiscal
2005, we recorded a net benefit related to revisions of previous estimates of employee separation
expenses.
Long-term asset write-downs were associated with assets that no longer support our continuing
operations. The provision of $2.1 million was related to capitalized software licenses with no
future benefit ($0.7 million) and leasehold improvements in vacated facilities ($1.5 million).
61
Facilities-related charges included write-downs and accelerated depreciation of properties,
including properties that were classified as held for sale prior to fiscal 2004, as well as
expenses related to lease obligations. In fiscal 2004, we recorded $89.7 million in
facilities-related charges, including $47.7 million for impairment and accelerated depreciation of
a Santa Clara, California facility due to our plan to vacate the facility and move to a smaller
Santa Clara facility already owned, offset by a $0.4 million gain on the sale of this vacated
facility later in fiscal 2004; $25.1 million for impairment and accelerated depreciation of the
Dublin manufacturing facility; $11.2 million for write-down and $1.4 million for loss on the sale
of certain other Santa Clara properties; $2.7 million related to fair value adjustments of
properties classified as held for sale prior to fiscal 2004; $1.1 million for loss on the sale of
the Rolling Meadows, Illinois facility; and $0.9 million related to estimated lease obligation
costs. In fiscal 2005, we recorded a net benefit of $2.0 million in facilities-related charges,
including $2.6 million related to fair value adjustments and $0.4 million for gain on the sale of
Dublin properties; and $0.6 million related to estimated lease obligation costs.
Other restructuring costs of $1.4 million included payments to suppliers and contract termination
fees.
Fiscal 2001, 2002, and 2003 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2001, 2002, and 2003 restructuring actions
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Write-downs |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of June 1, 2001 |
|
$ |
39,902 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
$ |
41,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
43,356 |
|
|
|
13,636 |
|
|
|
47,824 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
109,195 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(78,305 |
) |
|
|
(13,636 |
) |
|
|
(42,470 |
) |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
(137,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2002 |
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
13,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
20,194 |
|
|
|
6,630 |
|
|
|
157,581 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
184,880 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(20,630 |
) |
|
|
(6,630 |
) |
|
|
(154,214 |
) |
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
(184,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2003 |
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,721 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
6,343 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7,638 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(4,478 |
) |
|
|
(1,317 |
) |
|
|
(5,775 |
) |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
(12,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,289 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
9,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,310 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(4,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,661 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
4,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reductions in workforce affected employees involved in sales, customer support, product
development, and general and administrative positions.
Long-term asset write-downs were associated with assets that no longer support our continuing
operations. We recorded $1.3 million in fiscal 2004 primarily for manufacturing and engineering
equipment sold at a price below our original estimates.
Facilities-related charges included accelerated depreciation of buildings, write-downs of land and
buildings held for sale, losses on sales of facilities, and lease obligations.
Other restructuring costs included payments to suppliers and contract termination fees.
62
Note 6: Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
As described in Note 4 we formed the Huawei-3Com joint venture (H-3C) with a subsidiary of Huawei
Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei).
At the time of formation, we contributed cash of $160.0 million, assets related to our operations
in China and Japan, and licenses related to certain intellectual property in exchange for a 49
percent ownership interest. We recorded our initial investment in H-3C at $160.1 million,
reflecting our carrying value for the cash and assets contributed. Huawei contributed its
enterprise networking business assets including Local Area Network (LAN) switches and routers;
engineering, sales, marketing resources and personnel; and licenses to its related intellectual
property in exchange for a 51 percent ownership interest. Huaweis contributed assets were
valued at $178.2 million at the time of formation.
Prior to the acquisition we accounted for our investment by the equity method. Under this method,
we recorded our proportionate share of H-3Cs net income or loss based on the most recently
available quarterly financial statements. Since H-3C follows a calendar year basis of reporting, we
reported our equity in H-3Cs net loss for H-3Cs fiscal period from April 1, 2005 through January
31, 2006 for the fiscal year 2006, April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005 for the fiscal year 2005,
and the date of formation (November 17, 2003) through March 31, 2004 for the fiscal year 2004 in
our results of operations for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004. This represents reporting two months in
arrears.
Summarized information from the balance sheet and statement of operations for H-3C for the ten
month period ended January 31, 2006, and for the year ended March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
404,068 |
|
|
$ |
259,369 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
132,130 |
|
|
|
149,571 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
210,853 |
|
|
|
109,097 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
399,612 |
|
|
$ |
297,977 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
181,553 |
|
|
|
120,498 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
10,132 |
|
|
|
(17,064 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
22,487 |
|
|
|
(14,125 |
) |
In determining our share of the net loss of H-3C certain adjustments are made to H-3Cs reported
results. These adjustments are made primarily to recognize the value and the related amortization
expense associated with Huaweis contributed assets, as well as to defer H-3Cs sales and gross
profit on sales of products sold to us that remained in our inventory at the end of the accounting
period. We recorded income (loss) of $11.0 million in fiscal 2006 (prior to the acquisition of
majority ownership on January 27, 2006) for the period April 1, 2005 through January 31, 2006,
($6.9) million in fiscal 2005 for the period April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005, and ($4.6)
million in fiscal 2004 for the period from the date of formation to March 31, 2004, as our share of
H-3Cs net income (loss); this income (loss) is included in our results of operations under the
caption Equity interest in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint venture.
3Com and H-3C are parties to agreements for the sale of certain products between the two companies.
During the ten months ended January 31, 2006 (date of acquisition) we recorded sales to H-3C of
approximately $10.6 million and made purchases of approximately $53.8 million. During fiscal 2005,
we recorded sales to H-3C of approximately $13.2 million and made purchases of approximately $26.9
million. In addition, we had trade receivables of $1.2 million as of May 31, 2005 and trade
payables of $5.7 million as of May 31, 2005 with H-3C, which are included in the captions Accounts
receivable and Accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
63
Note 7: Investments
Available-for-sale securities consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
$ |
22,816 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
22,720 |
|
U.S. Government and agency securities |
|
|
136,317 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
135,844 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
205,793 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
204,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
364,926 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
363,250 |
|
Publicly traded corporate equity securities |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
365,235 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
(1,702 |
) |
|
$ |
363,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
$ |
41,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
41,222 |
|
U.S. Government and agency securities |
|
|
171,420 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
170,853 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
364,764 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
363,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
577,464 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
575,569 |
|
Publicly traded corporate equity securities |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
577,586 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
(1,941 |
) |
|
$ |
575,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total cost and carrying value of corporate equity securities consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Initial Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Investments in limited partnership venture capital funds |
|
$ |
25,498 |
|
|
$ |
15,794 |
|
Direct investments in private companies |
|
|
12,262 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity investments |
|
$ |
37,760 |
|
|
|
15,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly traded corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Initial Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Investments in limited partnership venture capital funds |
|
$ |
23,441 |
|
|
$ |
13,886 |
|
Direct investments in private companies |
|
|
12,262 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity investments |
|
$ |
35,703 |
|
|
|
13,977 |
|
Publicly traded corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses as of May 31, 2006 relate to securities with a weighted average life of
less than 12 months. Such unrealized losses were the result of rising market interest rates. As
we intend to hold such securities to maturity, we expect to realize the amortized cost of the
securities.
64
Publicly traded corporate equity securities are included in other current assets. Private equity
instruments are included in deposits and other assets.
The following table provides gross realized gains and losses related to our investments (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
5,149 |
|
|
$ |
3,594 |
|
|
$ |
7,154 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
|
|
(18,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
(10,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities as of May 31, 2006 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
299,296 |
|
|
$ |
298,285 |
|
Between one year and three years |
|
|
65,630 |
|
|
|
64,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
364,926 |
|
|
$ |
363,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8: Inventories
Inventories consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
69,386 |
|
|
$ |
27,703 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
12,777 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
66,656 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
148,819 |
|
|
$ |
29,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9: Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, consists of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
6,999 |
|
|
$ |
6,999 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
11,122 |
|
|
|
38,287 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
202,407 |
|
|
|
161,656 |
|
Software |
|
|
63,814 |
|
|
|
69,203 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
21,161 |
|
|
|
20,546 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
13,667 |
|
|
|
10,523 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
322,053 |
|
|
|
308,480 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(232,944 |
) |
|
|
(238,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
89,109 |
|
|
$ |
69,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
Significant property and equipment transactions
For the Year Ended May 31, 2006. On December 11, 2005, our Europe, Middle East and Africa
headquarters facility in Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom was damaged by explosions at a third-party
oil depot facility which occurred approximately one quarter mile from our facility. Approximately
300 employees and contractors worked at our Hemel campus, primarily in our sales, marketing and
product operations groups. The incident occurred during non-business hours and no employee
casualties or injuries were reported. We activated our back-up systems and established business
operations at alternative facilities to ensure business continuity and minimize disruption to our
customers. We believe we have sufficient insurance and recourse against third parties so that any
loss incurred by us in connection with these explosions should not have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations. The building is currently not being used for operations and the
carrying amount of $16.2 million has been reclassified from property and equipment to other
non-current assets and the associated depreciation has been ceased.
For the Year Ended May 31, 2005. In February 2005, we completed the sale of certain properties in
Hemel Hempstead, U.K. that were classified as held for sale. This property, consisting of
approximately 111,000 square feet of office and research and development space, previously had
been used for our administrative and research and development activities. Net proceeds from the
sale resulted in a gain on the sale of $0.1 million that was recorded in restructuring charges in
the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
In November 2004, we completed the sale of our property in Dublin that was classified as held for
sale. This property, consisting of approximately 468,000 square feet of office and manufacturing
space, previously had been used in our manufacturing, research and development, and administrative
activities. Net proceeds from the sale resulted in a gain on the sale of $0.5 million that was
recorded in restructuring charges in the second quarter of fiscal 2005.
For the Year Ended May 31, 2004. In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we sold our 511,000
square foot office and research and development facility in Rolling Meadows. Net proceeds from the
sale were $35.8 million, resulting in a loss on the sale of $1.1 million that was recorded in
restructuring charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. As part of the terms of the
transaction, we entered into an agreement to lease back approximately 43,000 square feet of space
at then-prevailing market rates. This property was not classified as held for sale as of May 31,
2003, due to our intention to lease back a portion of the facility.
As a result of our workforce reductions and relocation of our headquarters from Santa Clara to
Marlborough during fiscal 2004, we had excess office space in several buildings we owned in Santa
Clara. During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we decided to consolidate our office space and
relocate from our then current locations into a smaller, vacant facility that was classified as
held for sale as of May 31, 2003, and had a carrying value of $10.1 million. Due to this decision,
we reclassified this previously held for sale facility as held for use. No impairment charge was
recorded as a result of this reclassification because the carrying value of the facility, which
reflected fair value, was less than what the net book value would have been had depreciation
continued on the facility during the period it was classified as held for sale.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we sold certain properties in Santa Clara that were
classified as held for sale as of May 31, 2003. These properties, consisting of approximately
876,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space and related furniture and fixtures,
previously had been used in our administrative, customer service, research and development, and
manufacturing activities. Net proceeds from the sale were $62.4 million, resulting in a loss on the
sale of $1.4 million that was recorded in restructuring charges in fiscal 2004. Prior to the sale,
we had also recorded impairment charges of $11.2 million as restructuring charges during fiscal
2004 related to this property, as discussed in Note 5.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we sold certain properties in Santa Clara that were not
classified as held for sale as of May 31, 2003. These properties, consisting of approximately
306,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space and related furniture and fixtures,
previously had been used in our administrative, customer service, research and development, and
manufacturing activities. As a result of our decision to vacate and sell this property during
fiscal 2004, an aggregate restructuring charge of $47.7 million was recorded for accelerated
depreciation and impairment charges, as discussed in Note 5. Net proceeds from the sale were $34.5
million, resulting in a gain on the sale of $0.4 million that was recorded in restructuring charges
in fiscal 2004.
On July 24, 2006 we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell the land and three buildings
we currently own in Santa Clara, California for a net purchase price of $16.1 million which has a
book value of approximately $8.2 million at May 31, 2006. The terms of the agreement are standard
and we expect the closing to occur within 30 days. We will lease
66
back one of the buildings through December 31, 2006.
Note 10: Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Existing technology |
|
$ |
203,946 |
|
|
$ |
(114,235 |
) |
|
$ |
89,711 |
|
|
$ |
74,431 |
|
|
$ |
(36,685 |
) |
|
$ |
37,746 |
|
Maintenance contracts |
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(4,222 |
) |
|
|
14,778 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
17,944 |
|
Other |
|
|
15,301 |
|
|
|
(7,945 |
) |
|
|
7,356 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
10,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
238,247 |
|
|
$ |
(126,402 |
) |
|
$ |
111,845 |
|
|
$ |
105,601 |
|
|
$ |
(39,719 |
) |
|
$ |
65,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2006, we recorded approximately $132.7 million of intangible assets related to the
H-3C acquisition and our consolidation of H-3C (See Note 4). These amounts were recognized for the
fair value of existing technology, maintenance agreements, trade name and trademarks, and
non-competition agreements. These intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of
approximately four years.
During fiscal 2005, we recorded approximately $69.9 million of intangible assets related to the
TippingPoint acquisition. See Note 4 for information concerning our TippingPoint acquisition. These
amounts were recognized for the fair value of existing technology, maintenance agreements, trade
name and trademarks, and non-competition agreements. These intangible assets have a weighted
average useful life of approximately five years.
During fiscal 2004, we recorded an impairment of intangible assets, consisting mainly of core and
developed technology associated with our acquisition of the Gigabit Ethernet network interface card
business of Alteon Websystems (Alteon) in fiscal 2001. We determined the amount of the impairment
by comparing the carrying value of the intangible assets against the fair value, which was
estimated as the present value of expected future net cash flows discounted at a rate of ten
percent per year. The impairment resulted from reduced sales and gross margin projections as
compared to the initial projections at the time of the acquisition, due to the
earlier-than-expected discontinuance of an acquired product. As a result of the impairment
analysis, we recorded a write-down of $1.9 million in the caption Amortization and write-down of
intangibles in the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2004.
During fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, we recorded impairments of intangible assets, consisting mainly
of core and developed technology associated with our acquisition of NBX Corporation. We determined
the amount of the impairments by comparing the carrying values of the intangible assets against the
fair values, which were estimated as the present value of expected future net cash flows; the
discount rates assumed for these analyses were ten percent in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, and 14
percent in fiscal 2003. During fiscal 2005 and 2004, the impairment resulted primarily from
reduced sales projections overall, as well as a lower percentage of projected sales coming from
existing technology. During fiscal 2003, the impairment resulted from significantly reduced sales
projections as compared to the initial projections that existed at the date of acquisition,
reflecting both lower projected market growth and a lower percentage of projected sales coming from
existing technology. As a result of these analyses, we recorded write-downs of $1.4 million in
fiscal 2005, $0.4 million in fiscal 2004, and $3.2 million in fiscal 2003 in the caption
Amortization and write-down of intangibles in the consolidated statements of operations.
Annual amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
41,830 |
|
|
$ |
28,429 |
|
|
$ |
21,826 |
|
|
$ |
11,658 |
|
|
$ |
8,102 |
|
67
Note 11: Accrued Liabilities and Other
Accrued liabilities and other consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses |
|
$ |
88,305 |
|
|
$ |
38,346 |
|
Accrued rebates |
|
|
60,301 |
|
|
|
28,114 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
57,050 |
|
|
|
21,756 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
41,791 |
|
|
|
41,782 |
|
Income and other taxes payable |
|
|
25,759 |
|
|
|
46,037 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
13,525 |
|
|
|
17,607 |
|
Other |
|
|
31,305 |
|
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
318,036 |
|
|
$ |
209,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12: Accrued Warranty and Other Guarantees
Products are sold with varying lengths of warranty ranging from 90 days to limited lifetime.
Allowances for estimated warranty obligations are recorded in the period of sale, based on
historical experience related to product failure rates and actual warranty costs incurred during
the applicable warranty period and recorded as part of cost of goods sold. Also, on an ongoing
basis, we assess the adequacy of our allowances related to warranty obligations recorded in
previous periods and may adjust the balances to reflect actual experience or changes in future
expectations.
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for estimated warranty costs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Accrued warranty, beginning of period |
|
$ |
41,782 |
|
|
$ |
43,825 |
|
|
$ |
44,775 |
|
Cost of warranty claims |
|
|
(32,958 |
) |
|
|
(32,910 |
) |
|
|
(34,645 |
) |
Accrual for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
28,424 |
|
|
|
30,867 |
|
|
|
33,795 |
|
Adjustments to preexisting warranties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Reserves related to H-3C at date of acquisition |
|
|
4,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty, end of period |
|
$ |
41,791 |
|
|
$ |
41,782 |
|
|
$ |
43,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13: Borrowing Arrangements and Commitments
During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we repaid total borrowings of $1.3 million that were
assumed in connection with the TippingPoint acquisition.
During fiscal 2005, the revolving credit facility was allowed to expire according to its terms in
November 2004, and we entered into a new arrangement to facilitate the issuance of standby letters
of credit and bank guarantees required in the normal course of business. Since we provide
collateral for any standby letters of credit and bank guarantees issued under this agreement, the
availability of additional issuances is restricted by the amount of cash and short-term investments
that we can provide as collateral. As of May 31, 2006, these facilities were backed by collateral
of $6.8 million provided to the respective banks.
We lease certain of our facilities under operating leases. Leases expire at various dates from
2007 to 2015, and certain leases have renewal options with rentals based upon changes in the
Consumer Price Index or the fair market rental value of the property. We also sublet certain of
our leased and owned facilities to third party tenants. The sublease agreements expire at various
dates from 2007 to 2008.
68
Future operating lease commitments and future rental income as of May 31, 2006 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Lease |
|
|
Future Rental |
|
Fiscal year |
|
Payments |
|
|
Income |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
27,053 |
|
|
$ |
3,806 |
|
2008 |
|
|
18,210 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
2009 |
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
2011 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
60,540 |
|
|
$ |
5,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was approximately $16.3 million in fiscal 2006, $16.5 million in fiscal 2005, and
$21.1 million in fiscal 2004. Rental income, which includes rents received for both owned and
leased property, was $6.8 million in fiscal 2006, $6.0 million in fiscal 2005, and $8.9 million in
fiscal 2004, and is recorded as an offset to operating expenses. Included in rental income was
rental income from Palm, Inc., a former subsidiary whose common stock was distributed to our
stockholders in the form of a stock dividend on July 27, 2000, of $0.8 million in fiscal 2004. We
did not record rental income from Palm, Inc. in fiscal 2005 and 2006.
We make investments in privately-held companies and in limited partnership venture capital funds,
which in turn invest in privately-held companies. We made capital calls on existing investments of
$2.7 million in fiscal 2006. Also, as of May 31, 2006, we were contractually obligated to make
additional capital contributions totaling $3.7 million to certain venture capital funds in the
future. The expiration dates for capital calls related to such obligations are generally five to
eight years from the inception of the fund, and the amounts and timing of such calls during that
period are at the discretion of the funds general partners. Based upon projections provided by the
funds general partners, we estimate that we will pay approximately $2.2 million over the next
twelve months as capital calls are made. We have agreed to sell all of our limited partnership
interests, subject to general partner approvals, which, when closed, would generate cash of
approximately $17.0 million and eliminate our future capital call requirements.
Note 14: Common Stock
Employee Stock Awards.
We have stock option plans under which employees and directors may be granted options or awards of
common stock. Options generally are granted with exercise prices at not less than the fair market
value at the date of the grant, vest annually over two to four years, and expire seven to ten years
after the grant date. In September 2003, our stockholders approved the 2003 Stock Plan (the New
Plan), which replaced the 1983 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Director Plan,
and the Restricted Stock Plan (the Prior Plans) for all stock awards granted subsequent to the
approval date. In connection with the approval of the New Plan, all shares available for issuance
under the Prior Plans (other than those shares underlying outstanding awards) were cancelled, which
included approximately 128 million shares at the time of approval; at the same time, 20.0 million
shares were reserved for issuance under the new plan. In September 2005, our stockholders
authorized an additional 30.0 million shares under the New Plan. As of May 31, 2006, there were
61.4 million shares reserved for options outstanding and 27.7 million shares reserved for future
grants for a total of 89.1 million shares reserved under our stock option plans.
69
A summary of option transactions under the plans follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding, June 1, 2003 |
|
|
85,502 |
|
|
$ |
7.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
10,046 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(22,288 |
) |
|
|
5.01 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(16,375 |
) |
|
|
8.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2004 |
|
|
56,885 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
10,002 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
|
TippingPoint options assumed |
|
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(4,273 |
) |
|
|
2.01 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(13,141 |
) |
|
|
6.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2005 |
|
|
63,359 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
21,974 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,467 |
) |
|
|
2.07 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(18,445 |
) |
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2006 |
|
|
61,421 |
|
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options as of May 31, 2006 |
|
|
Exercisable as of May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - $ 4.00 |
|
|
13,879 |
|
|
$ |
2.82 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
4.01 - 5.00 |
|
|
17,869 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
5.01 - 6.00 |
|
|
16,222 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
10,854 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
6.01 - 7.00 |
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
7.01 - 8.00 |
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
7.71 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
7.74 |
|
8.01 - 22.00 |
|
|
9,789 |
|
|
|
11.44 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
9,737 |
|
|
|
11.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
61,421 |
|
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
32,489 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown above, there were approximately 32.5 million options exercisable as of May 31, 2006 with a
weighted average exercise price of $6.96 per share. By comparison, there were approximately 39.8
million options exercisable as of May 31, 2005 with a weighted average price of $7.20 per share and
40.3 million options exercisable as of May 31, 2004 with a weighted average exercise price of $7.64
per share.
Stock-based Compensation. As discussed above, the 2003 Stock Plan replaced the Restricted Stock
Plan for the issuance of restricted stock. Restricted stock represents shares of common stock that
are reserved for issuance at no cost to key employees. Compensation expense, equal to the fair
market value on the date of the grant, is recognized as the granted shares vest over a one to four
year period. We also grant restricted stock awards whereby the vesting of shares only occurs if
specific goals are achieved or the specified time-based vesting period may be accelerated if
specific milestones are accomplished. In addition, we have recorded deferred compensation expense
in connection with certain acquisitions. Compensation expense recognized for the amortization of
stock-based compensation was $9.9 million in fiscal 2006, $2.8 million in fiscal 2005, and $2.7
million in fiscal 2004.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We have an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) under which eligible
employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to ten percent of their compensation, as defined,
to purchase common stock at a price of
70
85 percent of the lower of the fair market value as of the beginning or the end of the six-month
offering period. In September 2003, our stockholders approved an increase of five million shares
available for issuance under the ESPP.
Preferred Shares Rights Plan. In September 1989, the Board of Directors approved a common stock
purchase rights plan, which was amended and restated in December 1994, and again in March 2001.
In November 2002, the Board of Directors approved a Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Plan (the Preferred Shares Rights Plan), which replaced the March 2001 Plan. The Preferred
Shares Rights Plan provides that the preferred share rights (the Rights) will become exercisable
only following the acquisition by a person or a group of 15 percent or more of the outstanding
common stock or ten days following the announcement of a tender or exchange offer for 15 percent
or more of the outstanding common stock (the Distribution Date). After the Distribution Date,
each Right will entitle the holder to purchase for $55.00 (the Exercise Price), one-one thousandth
of a share of our Series A Participating Preferred Stock (or cash, stock or other assets approved
by the Board of Directors) with economic terms similar to that of one share of our common stock.
Upon a person or a group acquiring 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock, each Right
will allow the holder (other than the acquirer) to purchase common stock or securities of 3Com
having a then current market value of two times the Exercise Price of the Right. In the event
that following the acquisition of 15 percent of the common stock by an acquirer, we are acquired
in a merger or other business combination or 50 percent or more of our assets or earning power is
sold, each Right will entitle the holder to purchase for the Exercise Price, common stock or
securities of the acquirer having a then current market value of two times the Exercise Price. In
certain circumstances, the Rights may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $0.001 per Right.
If not earlier exchanged or redeemed, the Rights will expire on March 8, 2011.
Stock Reserved for Issuance. As of May 31, 2006, we had reserved common stock for issuance as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and restricted stock plans for granted shares |
|
|
61,421 |
|
Stock option and restricted stock plans for future grants |
|
|
27,712 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares reserved for issuance |
|
|
94,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, as of May 31, 2006, we had 0.4 million shares of preferred stock reserved for
issuance under our Preferred Shares Rights Plan.
Stock Repurchase and Option Programs. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Board of
Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes expenditures of up to $100.0
million during a two-year period expiring March 31, 2007, provided that all repurchases are
pre-approved by the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. Our prior stock
repurchase program was announced on March 19, 2003 and permitted expenditures up to $100.0 million
through March 2005.
Pursuant to these authorizations, we did not repurchase any shares during fiscal 2006. We
repurchased 15.0 million shares of our common stock during fiscal 2005 at a cost of $73.5 million.
During fiscal 2004, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As permitted under SFAS No. 123, we have elected to
follow APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for stock-based awards to
employees. Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense associated with employee awards is
measured as the difference, if any, between the price to be paid by an employee and the fair value
of the underlying common stock on the grant date, which is usually the measurement date for
accounting purposes. We generally recognize no compensation expense with respect to stock option
awards. To the extent that we have modified employee awards in connection with our restructuring
activities (usually through extensions of the period of exercise for employees following their
involuntary termination), a charge for compensation expense is recognized at the time the related
cash severance is recorded.
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123.
This information is required to be determined as if we had accounted for our stock-based awards to
employees, including grants of employee stock options (ESOs) and rights to purchase shares under
the ESPP, under the fair value method prescribed by that Statement. Under the fair value method,
compensation expense associated with employee awards is measured at fair value on the measurement
date, which is generally the grant date. See Note 2 for information concerning the pro forma
effect of applying the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee
compensation on our reported net loss and net loss per share.
71
The fair value of ESOs and purchase rights granted under the ESPP in fiscal 2006, 2005, and
2004 has been estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions, and resulting in the following weighted average estimated per-share fair
values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Option Plans |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Volatility
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
|
66.0 |
% |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
|
42.0 |
% |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Per-share fair value
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
In fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, the expected average life of ESOs was estimated at
approximately one and a half years after the vesting date. In fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004
the expected average life of purchase rights granted under the ESPP was estimated at six months
from the subscription date.
Repatriation of earnings. Various foreign exchange controls are applicable to us in China, and
such restrictions may in the future make it difficult for H-3C or us to repatriate earnings.
Note 15: Financial Instruments
The following summary disclosures concerning our financial instruments are made in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which
requires the disclosure of fair value information about both on- and off-balance sheet financial
instruments where it is practicable to estimate the value. Fair value is defined in SFAS No. 107
as the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing
parties, rather than in a forced or liquidation sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
(in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ |
501,097 |
|
|
$ |
501,097 |
|
|
$ |
268,535 |
|
|
$ |
268,535 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
363,250 |
|
|
|
363,250 |
|
|
|
575,569 |
|
|
|
575,569 |
|
Corporate equity securities
|
|
|
16,287 |
|
|
|
16,174 |
|
|
|
14,109 |
|
|
|
13,613 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair values of financial
instruments:
Cash and equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash
and equivalents approximate their estimated fair values.
Short-term investments. The fair values of short-term investments are based on market prices.
Corporate equity securities. Fair value of publicly traded corporate equity securities is based
on quoted market prices. Fair value of privately held corporate equity securities is based on all
available information. For these non-quoted investments, our policy is to regularly review the
assumptions underlying the financial performance of the privately held companies in which the
investments are maintained. If and when a determination is made that a decline in fair value
below the cost basis is other than temporary, the related investment is written down to its
estimated fair value.
Foreign exchange contracts. We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain
balance sheet exposures and intercompany balances against future movements in foreign exchange
rates. In addition, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposures related
to anticipated foreign currency cash flows other than in China. We do not use foreign forward
exchange contracts for speculative or trading purposes.
Our foreign exchange forward contracts require the exchange of foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars
or vice versa, and generally mature in one month or less. We had outstanding foreign exchange
forward contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $39.0 million as of May 31, 2006 and $36.3
million as of May 31, 2005, that had remaining maturities of one
72
month or less. The fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts is based on prevailing
financial market information. The carrying amounts, which were also the estimated fair values, of
foreign exchange forward contracts were not significant as of
May 31, 2006 and 2005. See Note 2 for information concerning our significant accounting policies
for foreign exchange forward contracts.
Because SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from
its disclosure requirements, any aggregation of the fair value amounts presented in the table
above would not necessarily represent the underlying value of all of our financial instruments.
Note 16: Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income (expense), net, consists of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
29,297 |
|
|
$ |
22,807 |
|
|
$ |
19,309 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(1,401 |
) |
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
29,085 |
|
|
$ |
21,406 |
|
|
$ |
16,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
8,235 |
|
|
$ |
(4,785 |
) |
|
$ |
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, other income (expense), net includes $7.3 million of other income from H-3C for an
operating subsidy program by the Chinese VAT authorities in the form of a partial refund of VAT
taxes collected by H-3C from purchasers of software products. In 2005, other income (expense),
net includes a provision of $2.4 million for unrecoverable value added tax for prior years that
was recorded in fiscal 2005 as a result of an unfavorable tax authority ruling, $1.5 million loss
on foreign exchange, and $0.9 million of bank charges. In 2004, other income (expense), net
includes $0.9 million loss on foreign exchange, and $0.8 million of bank charges, offset by $1.1
million of miscellaneous income.
73
Note 17: Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
(14,421 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
(14,221 |
) |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(2,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(14,833 |
) |
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
|
$ |
(3,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net deferred tax assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
975,506 |
|
|
$ |
949,680 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
42,725 |
|
|
|
47,423 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
60,075 |
|
|
|
55,534 |
|
Unrealized losses on private investments, net |
|
|
19,053 |
|
|
|
29,393 |
|
Royalty and purchased research and development |
|
|
9,916 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
Other |
|
|
16,748 |
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,124,023 |
|
|
|
1,089,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves recognized in different periods for tax purposes |
|
|
(146,565 |
) |
|
|
(151,480 |
) |
Acquired intangibles |
|
|
(25,375 |
) |
|
|
(25,348 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(172,961 |
) |
|
|
(177,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(942,758 |
) |
|
|
(912,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets |
|
$ |
8,304 |
|
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2006, related to the acquisition of H-3C and
TippingPoint, and May 31, 2005, related to the acquisition of TippingPoint, include the tax effect
of temporary differences and tax attributes related to these acquisitions. A valuation allowance
was recorded as the realization of the TippingPoint deferred tax assets was uncertain so that the
impact on the net deferred tax assets was zero.
We have net operating loss carryforwards related to the following income tax jurisdictions and
expiration periods: U.S. federal loss carryforwards of approximately $2.5 billion expiring between
fiscal years 2007 and 2026; various state loss carryforwards of approximately $2.3 billion expiring
between 2007 and 2026; and various foreign loss carryforwards with
74
$5.1 million expiring between 2007 and 2013, and $27.2 million with an unlimited carryforward
period. We also have a U.S. federal research credit carryforward of $25.2 million expiring between
2007 and 2026; a U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforward of $9.2 million expiring between
2007 and 2011; and a U.S. federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforward of $10.7 million that
has an unlimited carryforward period.
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance relates to net operating loss and credit
carryforwards and temporary differences for which we believe that realization is uncertain. The
valuation allowance increased $30.6 million in fiscal 2006, $92.5 million in fiscal 2005, and
$146.8 million in fiscal 2004. The total valuation allowance of $942.8 million includes $141.8
million attributable to the tax benefit of stock option deductions, which, if recognized, will be
allocated directly to paid-in-capital.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal
statutory income tax rate to income before taxes as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Tax computed at federal statutory rate |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
State income taxes, net of federal effect |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Provision for combined foreign and U.S.
taxes on certain foreign income at rates
greater than U.S. rates |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Income tax benefit arising from settlement
of foreign tax audit |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible purchased in-process
technology and merger-related charges |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Reversal of previously accrued taxes on
undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(12.8 |
)% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
Loss before income taxes includes foreign losses of $29.9 million in fiscal 2006, $47.9 million in
fiscal 2005 and $263.0 million in fiscal 2004. We have not provided for federal tax on
approximately $304.6 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries because we
consider these earnings to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign subsidiary operations.
During fiscal 2006, we settled a tax audit with foreign tax authorities regarding issues covering
multiple years. This transaction resulted in the release of $24.3 million of our tax reserves
which were previously reported under the caption Accrued liabilities and other on our balance
sheet. The release of the reserves resulted in the following amounts being included in the
statement of operations; a tax benefit of $23.0 million included in the caption Income tax
benefit and a related foreign exchange gain of $1.3 million included in the caption Other income
(expense), net.
H-3C is located in the Hangzhou High-tech Zone and obtained a preferential tax rate from the
Municipal Tax Bureau because we qualified as a high-and-new technology company. H-3C was entitled
to tax concessions beginning in 2004 whereby it was exempted from the PRC income tax for two
consecutive years and will be entitled to a 50% reduction in income tax in the following three
years. Consequently the H-3C statutory tax rate will be 12% in calendar 2006, 2007 and 2008.
We have certain other domestic and foreign income tax audits that are currently in progress. The
outcome of these examinations cannot be predicted with certainty and, should unfavorable rulings be
made, assessments against us could be significant. Many of these contingencies arise from periods
when we were substantially larger. Reserves for contingencies are based on an assessment of the
likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and the expected potential loss from such contingency, and are
monitored by management. These reserves are maintained until such time as the matter is settled or
the statutory period for adjustment has passed. Adjustments could be required in the future if we
determine that the reserves for tax contingencies are inadequate. However, we believe that amounts
currently provided for such matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of the
examinations is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
75
Note 18: Net Loss per Share
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,686 |
) |
|
$ |
(346,863 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
$ |
(195,686 |
) |
|
$ |
(349,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares Basic |
|
|
386,801 |
|
|
|
382,309 |
|
|
|
379,766 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares Diluted |
|
|
386,801 |
|
|
|
382,309 |
|
|
|
379,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share Basic and Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and restricted stock totaling 63.5 million shares in fiscal 2006, 65.1
million shares in fiscal 2005 and 57.6 million shares in fiscal 2004, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share as the net loss for these periods would have made their
effect anti-dilutive.
Note 19: Segment Information
Based on the information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of
making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance, prior to February 1, 2006,
we reported one operating segment, 3Com.
As a result of the acquisition of H-3C, we have two segments that provide information to the
CODM. The operating structure is aligned along the SCN business and the acquired H-3C business.
Each of these segments has designated management teams with direct responsibility over the
operations of the respective segments. Accordingly, our CODM now focuses primarily on information
and analysis for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance.
As a result, we currently report two operating segments, SCN and H-3C.
Management evaluates segment performance based on segment net revenue, operating income (loss), net
income (loss), and net assets.
76
Summarized financial information of our continuing operations by segment in 2006 is as
follows. Note that the 2005 and 2004 are not presented as prior to February 1, 2006 we reported
one operating segment, 3Com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31, 2006 |
|
|
SCN |
|
H-3C |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
$ |
705,339 |
|
|
$ |
108,290 |
|
|
$ |
(18,822 |
) |
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
276,627 |
|
|
|
51,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,064 |
|
Sales and marketing,
research and
development, and
general and
administrative |
|
|
419,008 |
|
|
|
30,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,211 |
|
Restructuring,
amortization, and
in-process
research and
development |
|
|
29,579 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,956 |
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(171,960 |
) |
|
|
14,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157,103 |
) |
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(114,420 |
) |
|
$ |
21,568 |
|
|
$ |
(7,823 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
1,482,670 |
|
|
$ |
406,981 |
|
|
$ |
(28,290 |
) |
|
$ |
1,861,361 |
|
Certain product groups accounted for a significant portion of our sales. Sales from these product
groups as a percentage of total sales for the past three fiscal years were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
577,038 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
% |
|
$ |
494,492 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
% |
|
$ |
516,562 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
% |
Security |
|
|
88,012 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
25,760 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
15,298 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Voice |
|
|
56,632 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
44,950 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
33,899 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Services |
|
|
33,357 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
32,062 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
32,495 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Connectivity Products |
|
|
39,768 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
100,630 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
651,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
698,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales from significant customers as a percentage of total sales for the past three fiscal years
were as follows:
These customers are all part of the SCN segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
Customer |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Ingram Micro, Inc.
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Tech Data Corporation
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. (a customer of the H-3C segment and the minority shareholder of H-3C)
represented approximately 30 percent of our accounts receivable balance as of May 31, 2006. It is
expected that Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. will be a significant customer in the future. Ingram
Micro, Inc. represented approximately 16 percent of our accounts receivable balance as of May 31,
2006, compared to 21 percent for the previous fiscal year. In addition, Tech Data Corporation
represented approximately 9 percent of our accounts receivable balance as of May 31, 2006, compared
to 13 percent for the previous fiscal year.
Note 20: Geographical Information
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
248,532 |
|
|
$ |
214,051 |
|
|
$ |
211,574 |
|
Latin and South America |
|
|
72,164 |
|
|
|
57,717 |
|
|
|
51,854 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
298,545 |
|
|
|
294,753 |
|
|
|
319,705 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
175,566 |
|
|
|
84,723 |
|
|
|
115,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
$ |
651,244 |
|
|
$ |
698,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Sales information by geography is reported based on the customers designated delivery point.
The growth in our international operations, which is due primarily to our acquisition of H-3C, has
increased our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Primary currencies of the revenue is U.S.
dollars and Chinese Renminbi and for expenses include Euros, Singapore Dollars, British Pounds, and
Chinese Renminbi. The income statements of our international operations whose functional currencies
are the local currencies, are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each
applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the
translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions results in increased revenues and
operating expenses. Conversely, our revenues and operating expenses will decrease when the U.S.
dollar strengthens against foreign currencies.
Property and equipment by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
41,186 |
|
|
$ |
39,937 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
10,325 |
|
|
|
24,693 |
|
China |
|
|
32,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4,739 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
89,109 |
|
|
$ |
69,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment includes both assets held for use as well as assets held for sale, and is
reported by geography based on the physical location of the assets at the end of the fiscal year.
As of May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005, property and equipment in the United States and the United
Kingdom exceeded ten percent of total property and equipment, as shown in the table above. As of
May 31, 2006, China property and equipment exceeded ten percent of the total, as shown in the table
above.
During fiscal 2006 our Europe, Middle East and Africa headquarters facility in Hemel Hempstead,
United Kingdom was damaged by explosions at a third-party oil depot facility which occurred
approximately one quarter mile from our facility. Approximately 300 employees and contractors
worked at our Hemel campus, primarily in our sales, marketing and product operations groups. The
incident occurred during non-business hours and no employee casualties or injuries were reported.
We activated our back-up systems and established business operations at alternative facilities to
ensure business continuity and minimize disruption to our customers. We believe we have sufficient
insurance and recourse against third parties so that any loss incurred by us in connection with
these explosions should not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The
building is currently not being used for operations and the carrying amount of $16.2 million has
been reclassified from property and equipment to other non-current assets and the associated
depreciation has been ceased.
During fiscal 2005, we concluded two significant property sales as described below:
|
§ |
|
During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we sold our 468,000 square
foot facility, with an adjacent parcel of land, in Dublin, Ireland. |
|
|
§ |
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we sold 111,000 square feet
of our facility in Hemel Hempstead, U.K. |
On July 24, 2006 we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell the land and three buildings
we currently own in Santa Clara, California for a net purchase price of $16.1 million. The terms
of the agreement are standard and we expect the closing to occur within 30 days. We will lease
back one of the buildings through December 31, 2006.
Note 21: Employee Benefit Plan
We have adopted a plan known as the 3Com 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan) to provide retirement
benefits to domestic employees. As allowed under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, the
401(k) Plan provides tax-deferred salary deductions for eligible employees. Participants may elect
to contribute from one percent to 22 percent of their annual compensation to the 401(k) Plan each
calendar year, limited to a maximum annual amount as set periodically by the Internal Revenue
Service. In addition, the 401 (k) Plan provides for contributions as determined by the Board of
Directors. We match 50 percent for each dollar on the first six percent of eligible annual
compensation contributed by the employee. Employees become vested in our matching contributions
according to a three-year vesting schedule based on initial date of
78
hire. Matching contributions to the 401 (k) Plan totaled $2.2 million in fiscal 2006, $2.2 million
in fiscal 2005, and $2.6 million in fiscal 2004.
Note 22: Litigation
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive and
disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are
difficult to predict. We believe that we have meritorious defenses in each of the cases set forth
below in which we are named as a defendant. An unfavorable resolution of one or more of these
lawsuits could adversely affect our business, financial position, or results of operations. We
cannot estimate the loss or range of loss that may be reasonably possible for any of the
contingencies described and, accordingly, we have not recorded any associated liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheets.
On April 28, 1997, Xerox Corporation (Xerox) filed suit against U.S. Robotics Corporation and U.S.
Robotics Access Corporation in the United States District Court for the Western District of New
York. 3Com completed its acquisition of these defendant companies on June 12, 1997. The case is
now captioned Xerox Corporation v. 3Com Corporation, U.S. Robotics Corporation, U.S. Robotics
Access Corporation, Palm Computing, Inc., and Palm, Inc. (Civil Action Number 97-CV-6182T). Xerox
alleged willful infringement of one of its United States patents. Xerox sought to recover damages
and to permanently enjoin the defendants from infringing the patent in the future. In 2000, the
District Court dismissed the case, ruling that there was no infringement. On appeal, the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and remanded the case to the
District Court for further action. On December 20, 2001, the District Court granted Xeroxs motion
for summary judgment, ruling that the patent was valid and enforceable and had been infringed. The
defendants filed a Notice of Appeal. On February 22, 2002, the District Court denied Xeroxs
motion for an injunction seeking to prohibit further alleged infringement during the appeal and
ordered the defendants to post a bond in the amount of $50 million. Xerox appealed the denial of
the injunction. On February 20, 2003, the Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming-in-part
and reversing-in-part the order of the District Court. The Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of
summary judgment of infringement, reversed the grant of summary judgment of validity and remanded
the case to the District Court to conduct a complete validity analysis. On May 21, 2004, the
District Court awarded summary judgment to the defendants, holding that Xeroxs patent was invalid,
and dismissed the remaining claims. On February 16, 2005, the District Court denied Xeroxs motion
for reconsideration. Xerox appealed the District Courts decision. On June 6, 2006, the Court of
Appeals reversed the District Courts decision regarding the invalidity of Xeroxs patent and
remanded the case to the District Court. On June 28, 2006, Xerox and Palm announced a settlement
of the dispute, resulting in the dismissal of the litigation and Xeroxs full and unconditional
release of the defendants. In connection with the separation of Palm from 3Com, pursuant to the
terms of the Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement (Agreement) dated February 26, 2000
between 3Com and Palm, Palm agreed to indemnify and hold 3Com harmless for any damages or losses
that might arise out of the Xerox litigation. Pursuant to the Agreement, Palm will bear the full
cost of the settlement amount.
On December 5, 2001, TippingPoint and two of its current and former officers and directors, as well
as the managing underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering, were named as defendants in
a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The lawsuit, which is part of a consolidated action that includes over 300
similar actions, is captioned In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Brian Levey vs.
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc., et al. (Civil Action Number 01-CV-10976). The principal
allegation in the lawsuit is that the defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate the initial
public offering and subsequent market price of TippingPoints stock (and the stock of other public
companies) by knowingly assisting the underwriters requirement that certain of their customers had
to purchase stock in a specific initial public offering as a condition to being allocated shares in
the initial public offerings of other companies. In relation to TippingPoint, the purported
plaintiff class for the lawsuit is comprised of all persons who purchased TippingPoint stock from
March 17, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The suit seeks rescission of the purchase prices paid by
purchasers of shares of TippingPoint common stock. On September 10, 2002, TippingPoints counsel
and counsel for the plaintiffs entered into an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiffs
dismissed, without prejudice, TippingPoints former and current officers and directors from the
lawsuit. In May 2003, a memorandum of understanding was executed by counsel for the plaintiffs,
the issuer-defendants and their insurers setting forth the terms of a settlement that would result
in the termination of all claims brought by the plaintiffs against the issuer-defendants and the
individual defendants named in the lawsuit. In August 2003, TippingPoints Board of Directors
approved the settlement terms described in the memorandum of understanding. In May 2004,
TippingPoint signed a settlement agreement on behalf of itself and its current and former directors
and officers with the plaintiffs. This settlement agreement formalizes the previously approved
terms of the memorandum of understanding and, subject to certain conditions, provides for the
complete dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims against TippingPoint and its current and former
directors and officers. Any direct financial impact of the settlement is expected to be borne by
TippingPoints insurers. On August 31, 2005, the District Court issued its preliminary approval of
the settlement terms. The settlement remains subject to numerous conditions, including final
approval by the District Court. There can be no assurance that such conditions will be met. If
the District Court rejects
79
the settlement agreement, in whole or in part, or the settlement does not occur for any other
reason and the litigation against TippingPoint continues, we intend to defend this action
vigorously, and to the extent necessary, to seek indemnification and/or contribution from the
underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering pursuant to its underwriting agreement with
the underwriters. However, there can be no assurance that indemnification or contribution will be
available to TippingPoint or enforceable against the underwriters.
Note 23: Impairment Charge
During the closing process for the three months ended February 28, 2006, management decided to
discontinue certain development plans utilizing a purchased technology license for which we did not
have an alternative use. Management believed this decision indicated that the carrying value of the
related asset may have been impaired and that an impairment analysis should be performed. In
performing the analysis for recoverability, management estimated the future cash flows expected to
result from this license. We recorded a $4.2 million impairment charge based on this
recoverability analysis. The impaired asset was fully written off and recorded in research and
development as of February 28, 2006.
Note 24: Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
Sales |
|
$ |
177,636 |
|
|
$ |
184,332 |
|
|
$ |
177,563 |
|
|
$ |
255,276 |
|
|
$ |
162,349 |
|
|
$ |
151,068 |
|
|
$ |
161,185 |
|
|
$ |
176,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
70,066 |
|
|
|
74,315 |
|
|
|
72,406 |
|
|
|
111,277 |
|
|
|
62,095 |
|
|
|
52,691 |
|
|
|
57,360 |
|
|
|
62,182 |
|
Gross profit margin % |
|
|
39.4 |
% |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(46,685 |
) |
|
|
(42,226 |
) |
|
|
(47,272 |
) |
|
|
(20,920 |
) |
|
|
(34,909 |
) |
|
|
(49,924 |
) |
|
|
(56,311 |
) |
|
|
(62,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(42,041 |
) |
|
|
(10,700 |
) |
|
|
(32,760 |
) |
|
|
(15,174 |
) |
|
|
(35,545 |
) |
|
|
(48,811 |
) |
|
|
(53,005 |
) |
|
|
(58,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
We acquired majority (51%) ownership of Huawei-3Com Co., Ltd. (H-3C), a China-based joint
venture, on January 27, 2006 and determined it was then appropriate to consolidate H-3Cs results.
For convenience of close purposes we consolidated the results of H-3C beginning February 1, 2006.
H-3C follows a calendar year basis of reporting and therefore results are consolidated on a
two-month time lag.
80
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our quarter ended June 2, 2006 pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer
and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of our quarter ended June 2, 2006,
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under the Exchange Act, means controls
and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three months ended June 2, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our annual evaluation of internal control over financial reporting will first include H-3C with
respect to our fiscal year ending June 1, 2007 and the related Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
anticipate that we will incur considerable costs and use significant management time and other
resources in an effort to bring H-3C into compliance with Section 404 and other requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our management has
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2006.
Managements evaluation was based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
(1) |
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our
assets; |
|
|
(2) |
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of our management and board of directors; and |
|
|
(3) |
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that
could have a material effect on our financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Our managements evaluation of and conclusion on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting excludes H-3-C, our China-based joint venture with Huawei. H-3C is a business
segment that we began consolidating during our 2006
81
fiscal year after a purchase business combination transaction in which we acquired an additional
two percent ownership interest in H-3C from Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0
million. Accordingly, we consolidated H-3Cs financial statements from February 1, 2006, a date
used under the principle of a convenience close. The acquisition of H-3C contributed approximately
fourteen percent of our total sales in fiscal 2006 and accounted for approximately twenty-two
percent of our total assets at June 2, 2006.
Based on the COSO criteria and our managements evaluation, our management believes our internal
control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2006 was effective.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has audited the financial
statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on
managements assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as well as on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Important Considerations
The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial
reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in
decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems,
the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may
deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of
disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will be successful
in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to
the appropriate levels of management.
82
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
3Com Corporation
Marlborough, Massachusetts
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, included in Item 9A of the Annual Report on Form 10-K,
that 3Com Corporation and its subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of June 2, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As
described in Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management
excluded from their assessment the internal control over financial reporting at H-3C which was
acquired on February 1, 2006 and whose financial statements reflect total assets and revenues
constituting 22% and 14%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as
of and for the year ended June 2, 2006. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control
over financial reporting at H-3C. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of June 2, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2006, based on
the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of
and for the year ended June 2, 2006 of the Company and our report dated August 11, 2006 expressed
an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 11, 2006
83
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
(a) Directors
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions Nominees and
Other Directors and Board of Directors, Committees and Compensation (section entitled
Committees of the Board only) in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (Proxy Statement).
(b) Executive Officers
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption Executive
Officers of the Registrant in Part I of Item I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(c) Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy Statement.
(d) Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all employees, including
our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer and
persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which is available
on our website at http://www.3com.com, complies with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards
of the Nasdaq Stock Market. H-3C has also adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct which is
also available on our website. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of
Form 8-K, regarding an amendment to or waiver from our code of ethics, by posting the required
information on our Internet website at http://www.3com.com and will send a paper copy to any
shareholder who submits a request in writing to our Secretary.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information contained in the section captioned Executive Compensation and Other Matters
in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information appearing under the captions Executive Compensation and Other Matters
(section entitled Equity Compensation Plan Information only) and Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information contained in the section captioned Related-Party Transactions in the Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information contained in the section captioned Ratification of Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement.
84
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) |
|
(1) Financial Statements See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and
Financial Statement Schedule at page 45 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Financial Statement Schedule See Financial Statement Schedule at page 90 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Exhibits See Exhibit Index at page 86 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
(b) |
|
See Exhibit Index at page 86 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
(c) |
|
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule at page
45 of this Form 10-K. |
85
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
2.1
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
4/4/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the
Registrant and UTStarcom, Inc. dated March
4, 2003
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
6/9/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among
3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to
correct an error in the Certificate of
Merger
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on March
23, 2005
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3/28/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A
Participating Preferred Stock
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002
|
|
8-A/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
3Com Corporation 1983 Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated effective September
30, 2001*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/11/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
3Com Corporation 1984 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, as amended and restated as
of July 15, 2003*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
8/1/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
3Com Corporation Director Stock
Option Plan, as amended*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
10/10/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
3Com Corporation Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended July 1, 2001*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
3Com Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated effective April 30,
2002*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
3Com Corporation 2003 Stock Plan,
as amended*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/3/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated
January 25, 2006 by and between R. Scott
Murray and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003
Stock Plan (Non-Employee Directors)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003
Stock Plan (Employees)*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Form of Performance Accelerated Vesting
Restricted Stock Agreement*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
10.11
|
|
Form of Performance Vesting Restricted
Stock Agreement*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement
Standard 4-Year Vesting*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
(Time-Based Vesting)*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
11/17/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
R. Scott Murray Employment Agreement,
amended and restated as of February 2,
2006, between the registrant and R. Scott
Murray *
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
2/6/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Performance Vesting Restricted Stock
Agreement dated January 25, 2006 by and
between R. Scott Murray and 3Com
Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Offer Letter dated June 19, 2004 between
the Registrant and Donald M, Halsted III*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Offer Letter dated September 12, 2003
between the Registrant and Neal D. Goldman*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Offer Letter dated November 2, 2005 between
the Registrant and Marc Willebeek-LeMair*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement with Bruce Claflin,
effective as of January 1, 2001*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
1/16/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Management Retention Agreement between the
Registrant and Bruce Claflin effective July
15, 2003*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/12/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Severance Agreement dated January 11, 2006
between the registrant and Bruce L. Claflin
*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Executive Officer Fiscal 2007 Compensation
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
Text of Item 1.01
|
|
6/26/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Section 16 Officer Severance Plan, Amended
and Restated Effective March 29, 2006 *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Executive Team Severance Plan effective
March 29, 2006 *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Form of Severance Benefits Agreement *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Form of Management Retention Agreement
between the Registrant and each of its
executive officers (other than Messrs.
Murray and Dechant)*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
3Com Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the
Registrant and its officers and directors
|
|
S-3/A
|
|
333-102591
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/9/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Office Lease, dated as of November 26,
2002, by and between Marlborough Campus
Limited Partnership and the Registrant
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of
November 26, 2002, by and between
Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership and
the Registrant
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of July
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
4/4/05 |
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
10.32
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of July
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
7/22/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Shareholders Agreement by and among
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.
Ltd., 3Com Technologies and Huawei-3Com
Co., Ltd. (the Shareholders Agreement)
dated as of November 15, 2003 (Certain
Portions Omitted; Confidential Treatment
Requested)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2004
(Certain Potions Omitted; Confidential
Treatment Requested)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders
Agreement dated as of January 27, 2006
(Certain Portions Omitted; Confidential
Treatment Requested)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
88
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on the 11th day of August, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3COM CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By |
/s/ R. Scott Murray
|
|
|
|
R. Scott Murray |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the
11th day of August, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer |
/s/
|
R. Scott Murray
|
|
|
|
and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(R. Scott Murray)
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance |
/s/
|
Donald M. Halsted, III
|
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Donald M. Halsted, III)
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
Eric A. Benhamou
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Eric A. Benhamou) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
Gary T. DiCamillo
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gary T. DiCamillo) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
James R. Long
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(James R. Long) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
Raj Reddy
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Raj Reddy) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
Julie St. John
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Julie St. John) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
David C. Wajsgras
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(David C. Wajsgras) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
Paul G. Yovovich
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Paul G. Yovovich) |
|
|
|
|
89
SCHEDULE II
3Com Corporation
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
For the Years Ended May 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
to Costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of |
Description |
|
Beginning of Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Other |
|
Deductions |
|
Period |
Year ended May 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
22,323 |
|
|
$ |
(5,033 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
(1) |
|
$ |
16,276 |
|
Allowance for product returns |
|
|
5,808 |
|
|
|
27,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,107 |
|
|
|
5,917 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
44,775 |
|
|
|
33,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,645 |
|
|
|
43,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
16,276 |
|
|
$ |
(2,251 |
) |
|
$ |
793 |
(2) |
|
$ |
(272 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
15,090 |
|
Allowance for product returns |
|
|
5,917 |
|
|
|
20,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,443 |
|
|
|
5,052 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
43,825 |
|
|
|
30,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,910 |
|
|
|
41,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
15,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
(3) |
|
$ |
(167 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
16,422 |
|
Allowance for product returns |
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
(3) |
|
|
18,416 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
41,782 |
|
|
|
28,424 |
|
|
|
4,543 |
(3) |
|
|
32,958 |
|
|
|
41,791 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Accounts written off net of recoveries |
|
(2) |
|
Represents reserves related to the TippingPoint acquisition |
|
(3) |
|
Represents reserves related to the H-3C acquisition |
90
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
2.1
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
4/4/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the
Registrant and UTStarcom, Inc. dated March
4, 2003
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
6/9/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among
3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to
correct an error in the Certificate of
Merger
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as
amended on March
23, 2005
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3/28/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A
Participating Preferred Stock
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002
|
|
8-A/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
3Com Corporation 1983 Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated effective September
30, 2001*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/11/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
3Com Corporation 1984 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, as amended and restated as
of July 15, 2003*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
8/1/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
3Com Corporation Director Stock
Option
Plan, as amended*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
10/10/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
3Com Corporation Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended July 1, 2001*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
3Com Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated effective April 30,
2002*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
3Com Corporation 2003 Stock Plan, as
amended*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/3/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated
January 25, 2006 by and between R. Scott
Murray and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003
Stock Plan (Non-Employee Directors)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003
Stock Plan (Employees)*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Form of Performance Accelerated Vesting
Restricted Stock Agreement*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
10.11
|
|
Form of Performance Vesting Restricted
Stock Agreement*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement
Standard 4-Year Vesting*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
(Time-Based Vesting)*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
11/17/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
R. Scott Murray Employment Agreement,
amended and restated as of February 2,
2006, between the registrant and R. Scott
Murray *
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
2/6/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Performance Vesting Restricted Stock
Agreement dated January 25, 2006 by and
between R. Scott Murray and 3Com
Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Offer Letter dated June 19, 2004 between
the Registrant and Donald M, Halsted III*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Offer Letter dated September 12, 2003
between the Registrant and Neal D. Goldman*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Offer Letter dated November 2, 2005 between
the Registrant and Marc Willebeek-LeMair*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement with Bruce Claflin,
effective as of January 1, 2001*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
1/16/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Management Retention Agreement between the
Registrant and Bruce Claflin effective July
15, 2003*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/12/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Severance Agreement dated January 11, 2006
between the registrant and Bruce L. Claflin
*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Executive Officer Fiscal 2007 Compensation
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
Text of Item 1.01
|
|
6/26/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Section 16 Officer Severance Plan, Amended
and Restated Effective March 29, 2006 *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Executive Team Severance Plan effective
March 29, 2006 *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Form of Severance Benefits Agreement *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Form of Management Retention Agreement
between the Registrant and each of its
executive officers (other than Messrs.
Murray and Dechant)*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
3Com Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the
Registrant and its officers and directors
|
|
S-3/A
|
|
333-102591
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/9/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Office Lease, dated as of November 26,
2002, by and between Marlborough Campus
Limited Partnership and the Registrant
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of
November 26, 2002, by and between
Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership and
the Registrant
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of July
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
4/4/05 |
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
10.32
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of July
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
7/22/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Shareholders Agreement by and among
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.
Ltd., 3Com Technologies and Huawei-3Com
Co., Ltd. (the Shareholders Agreement)
dated as of November 15, 2003 (Certain
Portions Omitted; Confidential Treatment
Requested)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2004
(Certain Potions Omitted; Confidential
Treatment Requested)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders
Agreement dated as of January 27, 2006
(Certain Portions Omitted; Confidential
Treatment Requested)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
93