e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
Commission file number: 0-51582
Hercules Offshore,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
56-2542838
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2200
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
77046
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(713) 350-5100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2008, based on the
closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on such date,
was approximately $3.3 billion. (As of such date, the
registrants directors and executive officers and LR
Hercules Holdings, LP and its affiliates were considered
affiliates of the registrant for this purpose.)
As of February 20, 2009, there were 88,024,585 shares
of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 23,
2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
report.
PART I
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we refer to Hercules Offshore, Inc. and its subsidiaries as
we, the Company or Hercules
Offshore, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
Hercules Offshore, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed in July
2004, with its principal executive offices located at 9 Greenway
Plaza, Suite 2200, Houston, Texas 77046. Hercules
Offshores telephone number at such address is
(713) 350-5100
and our Internet address is www.herculesoffshore.com.
Overview
We provide shallow-water drilling and marine services to the oil
and natural gas exploration and production industry globally. We
provide these services to national oil and gas companies, major
integrated energy companies and independent oil and natural gas
operators.
We report our business activities in six business segments:
(1) Domestic Offshore, (2) International Offshore,
(3) Inland, (4) Domestic Liftboats,
(5) International Liftboats and (6) Delta Towing.
In January 2009, we reclassified four of our cold-stacked jackup
rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 10 of our
cold-stacked inland barges as retired. These rigs would require
extensive refurbishment and currently are not expected to
re-enter active service. As of February 19, 2009, our
business segments included the following:
Domestic Offshore operates 20 jackup rigs and
three submersible rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that can
drill in maximum water depths ranging from 85 to 350 feet.
Fourteen of the jackup rigs are either working on short-term
contracts or available. One is in the shipyard for maintenance
and five are cold-stacked. All three submersibles are
cold-stacked.
International Offshore operates 11 jackup
rigs and one platform rig outside of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico. This segment operates two jackup rigs and one platform
rig in Mexico and two jackup rigs in both Saudi Arabia and
India. We have one jackup rig working offshore in Qatar and
Malaysia and one rig in Gabon whose contract is being negotiated
for early termination. In addition, this segment has one jackup
rig currently undergoing an upgrade in Namibia and one jackup
rig cold-stacked in Trinidad.
Inland operates a fleet of 6 conventional and
11 posted barge rigs that operate inland in marshes, rivers,
lakes and shallow bay or coastal waterways along the
U.S. Gulf Coast. Eight of our inland barges are either
operating on short-term contracts or available and nine are
cold-stacked.
Domestic Liftboats operates 45 liftboats in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
International Liftboats operates 20
liftboats. Eighteen are operating offshore West Africa,
including five liftboats owned by a third party. One liftboat is
operating offshore Middle East. One liftboat is in a Middle
Eastern shipyard undergoing refurbishment and it is being
marketed in the Middle East region.
Delta Towing our Delta Towing business
operates a fleet of 30 inland tugs, 16 offshore tugs, 34 crew
boats, 46 deck barges, 17 shale barges and four spud barges
along and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and along the
Southeastern coast. Currently, 24 crew boats,
13 inland tugs and seven offshore tugs are cold-stacked.
In January 2009, we entered into an agreement with Mosvold
Middle East Jackup Ltd. whereby we will market, manage and
operate two 300 foot, high-specification new-build jackup
drilling rigs. The rigs, which have an independent leg
cantilever design, are under construction in the Middle East and
have expected delivery dates of December 2009 and April 2010. We
will have worldwide, exclusive marketing rights, except in
U.S. sanctioned countries. All operating and capital
expenses incurred to operate the rig will be paid for or
reimbursed by Mosvold Middle East Jackup Ltd. Upon commencement
of a drilling contract, we will receive a commencement fee and
an ongoing management fee for the remainder of the contract.
3
Our
Fleet
Jackup
Drilling Rigs
Jackup rigs are mobile, self-elevating drilling platforms
equipped with legs that can be lowered to the ocean floor until
a foundation is established to support the drilling platform.
Once a foundation is established, the drilling platform is
jacked further up the legs so that the platform is above the
highest expected waves. The rig hull includes the drilling rig,
jackup system, crew quarters, loading and unloading facilities,
storage areas for bulk and liquid materials, helicopter landing
deck and other related equipment.
Jackup rig legs may operate independently or have a lower hull
referred to as a mat attached to the lower portion
of the legs in order to provide a more stable foundation in soft
bottom areas, similar to those encountered in certain of the
shallow-water areas of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Mat rigs
generally are able to more quickly position themselves on the
worksite and more easily move on and off location than
independent leg rigs. Twenty-two of our jackup rigs are
mat-supported and nine are independent leg rigs.
Our rigs are used primarily for exploration and development
drilling in shallow waters. Twenty-four of our rigs have a
cantilever design that permits the drilling platform to be
extended out from the hull to perform drilling or workover
operations over some types of pre-existing platforms or
structures. Seven rigs have a slot-type design, which requires
drilling operations to take place through a slot in the hull.
Slot-type rigs are usually used for exploratory drilling rather
than development drilling, in that their configuration makes
them difficult to position over existing platforms or
structures. Historically, jackup rigs with a cantilever design
have maintained higher levels of utilization than rigs with a
slot-type design.
As of February 19, 2009, 18 of our jackup rigs were
operating under contracts ranging in duration from well-to-well
to three years, at an average contract dayrate of approximately
$94,193. In the following table, ILS means an
independent leg slot-type jackup rig, MC means a
mat-supported cantilevered jackup rig, ILC means an
independent leg cantilevered jackup rig and MS means
a mat-supported slot-type jackup rig.
The following table contains information regarding our jackup
rig fleet as of February 19, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Rated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Water Depth
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Built
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hercules 85
|
|
ILS
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
85/9
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 101
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
100/20
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 110
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
100/20
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Trinidad
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 120
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1958
|
|
|
|
120/22
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 150
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
150/10
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Shipyard
|
Hercules 152
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
150/22
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 153
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1980
|
(c)
|
|
|
150/22
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 156
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
150/14
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Gabon
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 170
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1981
|
(d)
|
|
|
170/16
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Qatar
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 173
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
173/22
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 185
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1982
|
(d)
|
|
|
120/20
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Namibia
|
|
Shipyard
|
Hercules 200
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Ready Stacked
|
Hercules 201
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 202
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 203
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 204
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 205
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Mexico
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 206
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Mexico
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 207
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 208(e)
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1980
|
(f)
|
|
|
200/22
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 211
|
|
MC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
18,000(g)
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Rated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Water Depth
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Built
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hercules 250
|
|
MS
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 251
|
|
MS
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Shipyard
|
Hercules 252
|
|
MS
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Ready Stacked
|
Hercules 253
|
|
MS
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Shipyard
|
Hercules 257
|
|
MS
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 258
|
|
MS
|
|
|
1979
|
(f)
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
India
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 260
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1979
|
(f)
|
|
|
250/12
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
India
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 261
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1979
|
(f)
|
|
|
250/12
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 262
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1982
|
(f)
|
|
|
250/12
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 350
|
|
ILC
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
350/16
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Ready Stacked
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rated drilling depth means drilling depth stated by the
manufacturer of the rig. Depending on deck space and other
factors, a rig may not have the actual capacity to drill at the
rated drilling depth. |
|
(b) |
|
Rigs designated as Contracted are under contract
while rigs described as Ready Stacked are not under
contract but generally are ready for service. Rigs described as
Cold Stacked are not actively marketed, normally
require the hiring of an entire crew and require a maintenance
review and refurbishment before they can function as a drilling
rig. Rigs described as Shipyard are undergoing
maintenance, repairs, or upgrades and may or may not be actively
marketed depending on the length of stay in the shipyard. |
|
(c) |
|
Rig upgrade and/or major refurbishment was completed in 2007. |
|
(d) |
|
Hercules 170 completed its rig upgrade and major
refurbishment in 2006 and Hercules 185 is currently
undergoing an upgrade and major refurbishment that will be
completed in 2009. |
|
(e) |
|
This rig is currently unable to operate in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico due to regulatory restrictions. |
|
(f) |
|
Rig upgrade and/or major refurbishment was completed in 2008. |
|
(g) |
|
Rated workover depth. Hercules 211 is currently
configured for workover activity, which includes maintenance and
repair or modification of wells that have already been drilled
and completed to enhance or resume the wells production. |
Other
Drilling Rigs
A submersible rig is a mobile drilling platform that is towed to
the well site where it is submerged by flooding its lower hull
tanks until it rests on the sea floor, with the upper hull above
the water surface. After completion of the drilling operation,
the rig is refloated by pumping the water out of the lower hull,
so that it can be towed to another location. Submersible rigs
typically operate in water depths of 14 to 85 feet. Our
three submersible rigs are suitable for deep gas drilling.
A platform drilling rig is placed on a production platform and
is similar to a modular land rig. The production platforms
crane is capable of lifting the modularized rig crane that
subsequently sets the rig modules. The assembled rig has all the
drilling, housing and support facilities necessary for drilling
multiple production wells. Most platform drilling rig contracts
are for multiple wells and extended periods of time on the same
platform. Once work has been completed on a particular platform,
the rig can be redeployed to another platform for further work.
We have one platform drilling rig. In the following table,
Sub means a
5
submersible rig and Plat means a platform drilling
rig. The following table contains information regarding our
other drilling rig fleet as of February 19, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Water Depth
|
|
|
Rated Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Built
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hercules 75
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
85/14
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 77
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
1982
|
(c)
|
|
|
85/14
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 78
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
1985
|
(c)
|
|
|
85/14
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Platform 3
|
|
Plat
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Mexico
|
|
Contracted
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rated drilling depth means drilling depth stated by the
manufacturer of the rig. Depending on deck space and other
factors, a rig may not have the actual capacity to drill at the
rated drilling depth. |
|
(b) |
|
Rigs designated as Contracted are under contract
while rigs described as Cold Stacked are not
actively marketed, normally require the hiring of an entire crew
and require a maintenance review and refurbishment before they
can function as a drilling rig. |
|
(c) |
|
Rig upgrade and/or major refurbishment was completed in 2007. |
Barge
Drilling Rigs
Barge drilling rigs are mobile drilling platforms that are
submersible and are built to work in seven to 20 feet of
water. They are towed by tugboats to the drill site with the
derrick lying down. The lower hull is then submerged by flooding
compartments until it rests on the river or sea floor. The
derrick is then raised and drilling operations are conducted
with the barge resting on the bottom. Our barge drilling fleet
consists of 17 conventional and posted barge rigs. A posted
barge is identical to a conventional barge except that the hull
and superstructure are separated by 10 to 14 foot columns, which
increases the water depth capabilities of the rig. Most of our
barge drilling rigs are suitable for deep gas drilling.
The following table contains information regarding our barge
drilling rig fleet as of February 19, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Horsepower
|
|
Rated Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Built
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Conv.
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
9
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Warm Stacked
|
11
|
|
Conv.
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
15
|
|
Conv.
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
17
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Warm Stacked
|
19
|
|
Conv.
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
14,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
27
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1979
|
(c)
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
28
|
|
Conv.
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
29
|
|
Conv.
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
41
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Ready Stacked
|
46
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
48
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Warm Stacked
|
49
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
52
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
55
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
57
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
64
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Warm Stacked
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rated drilling depth means drilling depth stated by the
manufacturer of the rig. Depending on deck space and other
factors, a rig may not have the actual capacity to drill at the
rated drilling depth. |
6
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Rigs designated as Contracted are under contract
while rigs described as Ready Stacked are not under
contract but generally are ready for service. Rigs described as
Warm Stacked may have a reduced number of crew, but
only require a full crew to be ready for service. Rigs described
as Cold Stacked are not actively marketed, normally
require the hiring of an entire crew and require a maintenance
review and refurbishment before they can function as a drilling
rig. |
|
(c) |
|
Rig upgrade and/or major refurbishment was completed in 2008. |
Liftboats
Our liftboats are self-propelled, self-elevating vessels with a
large open deck space, which provides a versatile, mobile and
stable platform to support a broad range of offshore maintenance
and construction services throughout the life of an oil or
natural gas well. Once a liftboat is in position, typically
adjacent to an offshore production platform or well, third-party
service providers perform:
|
|
|
|
|
production platform construction, inspection, maintenance and
removal;
|
|
|
|
well intervention and workover;
|
|
|
|
well plug and abandonment; and
|
|
|
|
pipeline installation and maintenance.
|
Unlike larger and more costly alternatives, such as jackup rigs
or construction barges, our liftboats are self-propelled and can
quickly reposition at a worksite or move to another location
without third-party assistance. Our liftboats are ideal working
platforms to support platform and pipeline inspection and
maintenance tasks because of their ability to maneuver
efficiently and support multiple activities at different working
heights. Diving operations may also be performed from our
liftboats in connection with underwater inspections and repair.
In addition, our liftboats provide an effective platform from
which to perform well-servicing activities such as mechanical
wireline, electrical wireline and coiled tubing operations.
Technological advances, such as coiled tubing, allow more
well-servicing procedures to be conducted from liftboats.
Moreover, during both platform construction and removal, smaller
platform components can be installed and removed more
efficiently and at a lower cost using a liftboat crane and
liftboat-based personnel than with a specialized construction
barge or jackup rig.
The length of the legs is the principal measure of capability
for a liftboat, as it determines the maximum water depth in
which the liftboat can operate. The U.S. Coast Guard
restricts the operation of liftboats to water depths less than
180 feet, so boats with longer leg lengths are useful
primarily on taller platforms. Eight of our liftboats in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico have leg lengths of 190 feet or
greater, which allows us to service approximately 83% of the
approximately 3,900 existing production platforms in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Liftboats are typically moved to a
port during severe weather to avoid the winds and waves they
would be exposed to in open water.
As of February 19, 2009, we owned 45 liftboats operating in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, 13 liftboats operating in West
Africa, one liftboat operating in the Middle East, and one
liftboat undergoing refurbishment in a Middle Eastern shipyard.
In addition, we operated five liftboats owned by a third party
in West Africa. The following table contains information
regarding the liftboats we operate as of February 19, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Leg
|
|
Deck
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Liftboat Name(1)
|
|
Built
|
|
Length
|
|
Area
|
|
|
Deck Load
|
|
Location
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Square feet)
|
|
|
(Pounds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whale Shark
|
|
2005
|
|
260
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
729,000
|
|
UAE
|
|
|
99
|
|
Tigershark
|
|
2001
|
|
230
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
469
|
|
Kingfish
|
|
1996
|
|
229
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
188
|
|
Man-O-War
|
|
1996
|
|
229
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
188
|
|
Wahoo
|
|
1981
|
|
215
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
491
|
|
Blue Shark
|
|
1981
|
|
215
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
Amberjack
|
|
1981
|
|
205
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Bahrain
|
|
|
417
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Leg
|
|
Deck
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Liftboat Name(1)
|
|
Built
|
|
Length
|
|
Area
|
|
|
Deck Load
|
|
Location
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Square feet)
|
|
|
(Pounds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bullshark
|
|
1998
|
|
200
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
859
|
|
Creole Fish
|
|
2001
|
|
200
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
798,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
192
|
|
Cutlassfish
|
|
2006
|
|
200
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
798,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
183
|
|
Black Jack
|
|
1997
|
|
200
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
777
|
|
Swordfish
|
|
2000
|
|
190
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
189
|
|
Mako
|
|
2003
|
|
175
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
654,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
168
|
|
Leatherjack
|
|
1998
|
|
175
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
575,850
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
168
|
|
Oilfish
|
|
1996
|
|
170
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
590,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
495
|
|
Manta Ray
|
|
1981
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
194
|
|
Seabass
|
|
1983
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
186
|
|
F.J. Leleux(2)
|
|
1981
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
407
|
|
Black Marlin
|
|
1984
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
407
|
|
Hammerhead
|
|
1980
|
|
145
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
178
|
|
Pilotfish
|
|
1990
|
|
145
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
292
|
|
Rudderfish
|
|
1991
|
|
145
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
309
|
|
Blue Runner
|
|
1980
|
|
140
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
174
|
|
Starfish
|
|
1978
|
|
140
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Rainbow Runner
|
|
1981
|
|
140
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
174
|
|
Pompano
|
|
1981
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
196
|
|
Sandshark
|
|
1982
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
196
|
|
Stingray
|
|
1979
|
|
130
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Albacore
|
|
1985
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
171
|
|
Moray
|
|
1980
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
178
|
|
Skipfish
|
|
1985
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
91
|
|
Sailfish
|
|
1982
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
179
|
|
Mahi Mahi
|
|
1980
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Triggerfish
|
|
2001
|
|
130
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
195
|
|
Scamp
|
|
1984
|
|
130
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
195
|
|
Rockfish
|
|
1981
|
|
125
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
192
|
|
Gar
|
|
1978
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Grouper
|
|
1979
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Sea Robin
|
|
1984
|
|
120
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Tilapia
|
|
1976
|
|
120
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Charlie Cobb(2)
|
|
1980
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
229
|
|
Durwood Speed(2)
|
|
1979
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
210
|
|
James Choat(2)
|
|
1980
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
210
|
|
Solefish
|
|
1978
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
229
|
|
Tigerfish
|
|
1980
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
210
|
|
Zoal Albrecht(2)
|
|
1982
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
213
|
|
Barracuda
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
93
|
|
Carp
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Cobia
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
94
|
|
Dolphin
|
|
1980
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Leg
|
|
Deck
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Liftboat Name(1)
|
|
Built
|
|
Length
|
|
Area
|
|
|
Deck Load
|
|
Location
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Square feet)
|
|
|
(Pounds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herring
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Marlin
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Corina
|
|
1974
|
|
105
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Pike
|
|
1980
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
92
|
|
Remora
|
|
1976
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
94
|
|
Wolffish
|
|
1977
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Seabream
|
|
1980
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
92
|
|
Sea Trout
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Tarpon
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Palometa
|
|
1972
|
|
105
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Jackfish
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Bonefish
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
97
|
|
Croaker
|
|
1976
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
82
|
|
Gemfish
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
223
|
|
Tapertail
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Palometa and Wolffish are currently
cold-stacked. The Whale Shark is in a shipyard in the UAE
undergoing regulatory and other modifications and repairs and is
expected to re-enter service in the second quarter of 2009. All
other liftboats are either available or operating. |
|
(2) |
|
We operate these vessels; however, they are owned by a third
party. |
Competition
The shallow-water businesses in which we operate are highly
competitive. Domestic drilling and liftboat contracts are
traditionally short term in nature whereas international
drilling and liftboat contracts are longer-term in nature. The
contracts are typically awarded on a competitive bid basis.
Pricing is often the primary factor in determining which
qualified contractor is awarded a job, although technical
capability of service and equipment, unit availability, unit
location, safety record and crew quality may also be considered.
Certain of our competitors in the shallow-water business may
have greater financial and other resources than we have, and may
better enable them to withstand periods of low utilization,
compete more effectively on the basis of price, build new rigs,
acquire existing rigs, and make technological improvements to
existing equipment or replace equipment that becomes obsolete.
Competition for offshore rigs is usually on a global basis, as
drilling rigs are highly mobile and may be moved, at a cost that
is sometimes substantial, from one region to another in response
to demand. However, our mat-supported jackup rigs are less
capable than independent leg jackup rigs of managing variable
sea floor conditions found in most areas outside the Gulf of
Mexico. As a result, our ability to move our rigs to other
regions in response to changes in market conditions is limited.
Additionally, a number of our competitors have independent leg
jackup rigs with generally higher specifications and
capabilities than the independent leg rigs that we currently
operate in the Gulf of Mexico. Particularly during market
downturns when there is decreased rig demand, higher
specification rigs may be more likely to obtain contracts than
lower specification rigs.
Customers
Our customers primarily include major integrated energy
companies, independent oil and natural gas operators and
national oil companies. Chevron Corporation accounted for 12%,
21% and 35% of our consolidated revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. No other
customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated
revenues in any period.
9
Contracts
Our contracts to provide services are individually negotiated
and vary in their terms and provisions. Currently, all of our
drilling contracts are on a dayrate basis. Dayrate drilling
contracts typically provide for payment on a dayrate basis, with
higher rates while the unit is operating and lower rates or a
lump sum payment for periods of mobilization or when operations
are interrupted or restricted by equipment breakdowns, adverse
weather conditions or other factors.
A dayrate drilling contract generally extends over a period of
time covering the drilling of a single well or group of wells or
covering a stated term. These contracts typically can be
terminated by the customer under various circumstances such as
the loss or destruction of the drilling unit or the suspension
of drilling operations for a specified period of time as a
result of a breakdown of major equipment or due to events beyond
the control of either party. In addition, customers in some
instances have the right to terminate our contracts with little
or no prior notice, and without penalty or early termination
payments. The contract term in some instances may be extended by
the customers exercising options for the drilling of additional
wells or for an additional term, or by exercising a right of
first refusal. To date, most of our contracts in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico have been on a short-term basis of less
than six months. Our contracts in international locations have
been longer-term, with contract terms of up to three years. For
contracts over six months in term we may have the right to pass
through certain cost escalations. Our customers may have the
right to terminate, or may seek to renegotiate, existing
contracts if we experience downtime or operational problems
above a contractual limit, if the rig is a total loss, or in
other specified circumstances. A customer is more likely to seek
to cancel or renegotiate its contract during periods of
depressed market conditions. We could be required to pay
penalties if some of our contracts with our customers are
canceled due to downtime or operational problems. Suspension of
drilling contracts results in the reduction in or loss of
dayrates for the period of the suspension. If our customers
terminate or require us to renegotiate some of our significant
contracts, such as the contracts included in our International
Offshore division, and we are unable to secure new contracts on
substantially similar terms, or if contracts are suspended for
an extended period of time, our financial condition and results
of operations could be adversely affected.
A liftboat contract generally is based on a flat dayrate for the
vessel and crew. Our liftboat dayrates are determined by
prevailing market rates, vessel availability and historical
rates paid by the specific customer. Under most of our liftboat
contracts, we receive a variable rate for reimbursement of costs
such as catering, fuel, oil, rental equipment, crane overtime
and other items. Liftboat contracts generally are for shorter
terms than are drilling contracts.
On larger contracts, particularly outside the United States, we
may be required to arrange for the issuance of a variety of bank
guarantees, performance bonds or letters of credit. The issuance
of such guarantees may be a condition of the bidding process
imposed by our customers for work outside the United States. The
customer would have the right to call on the guarantee, bond or
letter of credit in the event we default in the performance of
the services. The guarantees, bonds and letters of credit would
typically expire after we complete the services.
Contract
Backlog
The following table reflects the amount of our contract backlog
by year as of February 19, 2009. We calculate our backlog,
or future contracted revenue, as the contract dayrate multiplied
by the number of days remaining on the contract, assuming full
utilization. Backlog excludes revenues for mobilization,
demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables.
The amount of actual revenues earned and the actual periods
during which revenues are earned will be different than the
amount disclosed or expected due to various factors. Downtime
due to various operational factors, including unscheduled
repairs, maintenance, weather and other factors (some of which
are beyond our control), may result in lower dayrates than the
full
10
contractual operating dayrate. In some of the contracts, our
customer has the right to terminate the contract without penalty
and in certain instances, with little or no notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
43,431
|
|
|
$
|
43,431
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
681,323
|
|
|
|
281,951
|
|
|
|
271,070
|
|
|
|
128,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
726,855
|
|
|
$
|
327,483
|
|
|
$
|
271,070
|
|
|
$
|
128,302
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately
3,100 employees. We require skilled personnel to operate
and provide technical services and support for our rigs, barges
and liftboats. As a result, we conduct extensive personnel
training and safety programs.
Certain of our employees in West Africa are working under
collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, efforts have
been made from time to time to unionize portions of the offshore
workforce in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. We believe that our
employee relations are good.
Insurance
We maintain insurance coverage that includes coverage for
physical damage, third party liability, workers
compensation and employers liability, general liability,
vessel pollution and other coverages. Our insurance coverage
includes self-insured retentions and deductibles that we must
pay or absorb. Additionally, under certain policies, we are
responsible for 10% of the losses above the applicable retention
or deductible. This additional amount is often referred to as
quota share. Management believes that adequate
accruals have been made on known and expected exposures for the
self-insured retentions, deductibles and for our quota share.
However, our insurance is subject to exclusions and limitations
and there is no assurance that such coverage will adequately
protect us against liability from all potential consequences and
damages. Further, while we have a large number of diversified
underwriters, several underwriters that currently provide
coverage under our insurance policies have been impacted by the
recent global financial crisis. If one or more these
underwriters failed, we would be exposed to having portions of
our claims uninsured.
In May 2008, we completed the renewal of all of our key
insurance policies. Our primary marine package provides for hull
and machinery coverage for our rigs and liftboats up to a
scheduled value for each asset. The maximum coverage for these
assets is $2.9 billion; however, coverage for
U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm damage is subject to an
annual aggregate limit on liability of $200.0 million. The
policies are subject to exclusions, limitations, deductibles,
self-insured retention and other conditions. Deductibles for
events that are not U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm
events are 10% of insured values per occurrence for drilling
rigs, and range from $0.3 million to $1.0 million per
occurrence for liftboats, depending on the insured value of the
particular vessel. The deductibles for drilling rigs and
liftboats in a U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm event
are the greater of $10.0 million or the operational
deductible for each U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm. We
are self-insured for 10% above the deductibles for removal of
wreck, sue and labor, collision, protection and indemnity
general liability and hull and physical damage policies. The
protection and indemnity coverage under the primary marine
package has a $5.0 million limit per occurrence with excess
liability coverage up to $200.0 million. The primary marine
package also provides coverage for cargo and charterers
legal liability. Vessel pollution is covered under a Water
Quality Insurance Syndicate policy. In addition to the marine
package, we have separate policies providing coverage for
onshore general liability, employers liability, auto
liability and non-owned aircraft liability, with customary
deductibles and coverage as well as a separate primary marine
package for our Delta Towing business. Due to heavy damages and
significant claims of oil and gas companies as a result of
Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, we expect insurance coverage for
removal of wreck, liability and hull and machinery for our
domestic drilling rigs to be limited or more expensive in the
future. As a result, when we renew our insurance in the second
quarter of 2009, our
11
premiums may increase significantly or we may be required to
assume more risk or carry substantially higher self-insured
retention and deductibles.
Regulation
Our operations are affected in varying degrees by governmental
laws and regulations. Our industry is dependent on demand for
services from the oil and natural gas industry and, accordingly,
is also affected by changing tax and other laws relating to the
energy business generally. In the United States, we are also
subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard, the
National Transportation Safety Board and the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection Service, as well as private industry
organizations such as the American Bureau of Shipping. The Coast
Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board set safety
standards and are authorized to investigate vessel accidents and
recommend improved safety standards, and the U.S. Customs
Service is authorized to inspect vessels at will. Coast Guard
regulations also require annual inspections and periodic drydock
inspections or special examinations of our vessels.
The shorelines and shallow water areas of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico are ecologically sensitive. Heightened environmental
concerns in these areas have led to higher drilling costs and a
more difficult and lengthy well permitting process and, in
general, have adversely affected drilling decisions of oil and
natural gas companies. In the United States, regulations
applicable to our operations include regulations that require us
to obtain and maintain specified permits or governmental
approvals, control the discharge of materials into the
environment, require removal and cleanup of materials that may
harm the environment or otherwise relate to the protection of
the environment. For example, as an operator of mobile offshore
units in navigable U.S. waters and some offshore areas, we
may be liable for damages and costs incurred in connection with
oil spills or other unauthorized discharges of chemicals or
wastes resulting from or related to those operations. Laws and
regulations protecting the environment have become more
stringent and may in some cases impose strict liability,
rendering a person liable for environmental damage without
regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. Some
of these laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the
conduct of or conditions caused by others or for acts which were
in compliance with all applicable laws at the time they were
performed. The application of these requirements or the adoption
of new or more stringent requirements could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
The U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972,
commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, prohibits the
discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters of the United
States without a permit. The regulations implementing the Clean
Water Act require permits to be obtained by an operator before
specified exploration activities occur. Offshore facilities must
also prepare plans addressing spill prevention control and
countermeasures. Historically, the discharge of ballast water
and other substances incidental to the normal operation of
vessels visiting U.S. ports was exempted from the Clean
Water Act permitting requirements. Challenges arising largely
out of foreign invasive species contained in discharges of
ballast water resulted in a 2006 court order that vacated, as of
September 30, 2008, an exemption from Clean Water Act
discharge permit requirements for discharges incidental to
normal operation of a vessel. The district court later delayed
the vacation until February 6, 2009. Pursuant to the
courts ruling and recent legislation, the EPA adopted a
Vessel General Permit that became effective on December 19,
2008. The regulated community was required to comply with the
terms of the Vessel General Permit as of February 6, 2009.
In addition to this federal development, some states have begun
regulating ballast water discharges. Violations of monitoring,
reporting and permitting requirements can result in the
imposition of civil and criminal penalties. We will incur
certain costs associated with the requirements under the Vessel
General Permit and other requirements that may be adopted.
However, we believe that any financial impacts resulting from
the imposition of the permitting exemption and the
implementation of federal and possible state regulation of
ballast water discharges will not be material.
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and
related regulations impose a variety of requirements on
responsible parties related to the prevention of oil
spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills. Few
defenses exist to the liability imposed by OPA, and the
liability could be substantial. Failure to comply with ongoing
requirements or inadequate cooperation in the event of a spill
could subject a responsible party to civil or criminal
enforcement action. OPA also requires owners and operators of
all vessels over 300 gross
12
tons to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard
evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their
potential liabilities under OPA. The 2006 amendments to OPA
require evidence of financial responsibility for a vessel over
300 gross tons in the amount that is the greater of $950
per gross ton or $800,000. Under OPA, an owner or operator of a
fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of
financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the
vessel in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under
OPA. Vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial
responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond,
self-insurance or guarantee. We have obtained the necessary OPA
financial assurance certifications for each of our vessels
subject to such requirements.
The U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act authorizes
regulations relating to safety and environmental protection
applicable to lessees and permittees operating on the outer
continental shelf. Included among these are regulations that
require the preparation of spill contingency plans and establish
air quality standards for certain pollutants, including
particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, sulfur dioxide,
carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides. Specific design and
operational standards may apply to outer continental shelf
vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles and structures. Violations of
lease conditions or regulations related to the environment
issued pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act can
result in substantial civil and criminal penalties, as well as
potential court injunctions curtailing operations and canceling
leases. Such enforcement liabilities can result from either
governmental or citizen prosecution.
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or the
Superfund law, imposes liability without regard to
fault or the legality of the original conduct on some classes of
persons that are considered to have contributed to the release
of a hazardous substance into the environment. These
persons include the owner or operator of a facility where a
release occurred, the owner or operator of a vessel from which
there is a release, and companies that disposed or arranged for
the disposal of the hazardous substances found at a particular
site. Persons who are or were responsible for releases of
hazardous substances under CERCLA may be subject to joint and
several liability for the cost of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment and for
damages to natural resources. Prior owners and operators are
also subject to liability under CERCLA. It is also not uncommon
for third parties to file claims for personal injury and
property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances
released into the environment.
In recent years, a variety of initiatives intended to enhance
vessel security were adopted to address terrorism risks,
including the U.S. Coast Guard regulations implementing the
Maritime Transportation and Security Act of 2002. These
regulations required, among other things, the development of
vessel security plans and on-board installation of automatic
information systems, or AIS, to enhance vessel-to-vessel and
vessel-to-shore communications. We believe that our vessels are
in substantial compliance with all vessel security regulations.
Some operations are conducted in the U.S. domestic trade,
which is governed by the coastwise laws of the United States.
The U.S. coastwise laws reserve marine transportation,
including liftboat services, between points in the United States
to vessels built in and documented under the laws of the United
States and owned and manned by U.S. citizens. Generally, an
entity is deemed a U.S. citizen for these purposes so long
as:
|
|
|
|
|
it is organized under the laws of the United States or a state;
|
|
|
|
each of its president or other chief executive officer and the
chairman of its board of directors is a U.S. citizen;
|
|
|
|
no more than a minority of the number of its directors necessary
to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business are
non-U.S. citizens; and
|
|
|
|
at least 75% of the interest and voting power in the corporation
is held by U.S. citizens free of any trust, fiduciary
arrangement or other agreement, arrangement or understanding
whereby voting power may be exercised directly or indirectly by
non-U.S. citizens.
|
Because we could lose our privilege of operating our liftboats
in the U.S. coastwise trade if
non-U.S. citizens
were to own or control in excess of 25% of our outstanding
interests, our certificate of
13
incorporation restricts foreign ownership and control of our
common stock to not more than 20% of our outstanding interests.
One of our liftboats relies on an exemption from coastwise laws
in order to operate in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. If this
liftboat were to lose this exemption, we would be unable to use
it in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and would be forced to seek
opportunities for it in international locations.
The United States is one of approximately 165 member countries
to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a
specialized agency of the United Nations that is responsible for
developing measures to improve the safety and security of
international shipping and to prevent marine pollution from
ships. Among the various international conventions negotiated by
the IMO is the International Convention for the Prevention of
Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). MARPOL imposes
environmental standards on the shipping industry relating to oil
spills, management of garbage, the handling and disposal of
noxious liquids, harmful substances in packaged forms, sewage
and air emissions.
Annex VI to MARPOL sets limits on sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits
deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances.
Annex VI also imposes a global cap on the sulfur content of
fuel oil and allows for specialized areas to be established
internationally with more stringent controls on sulfur
emissions. For vessels 400 gross tons and greater,
platforms and drilling rigs, Annex VI imposes various
survey and certification requirements. For this purpose, gross
tonnage is based on the International Tonnage Certificate for
the vessel, which may vary from the standard U.S. gross
tonnage for the vessel reflected in our liftboat table above.
The United States has not yet ratified Annex VI. Any
vessels we operate internationally are, however, subject to the
requirements of Annex VI in those countries that have
implemented its provisions. We believe the rigs we currently
offer for international projects are generally exempt from the
more costly compliance requirements of Annex VI and the
liftboats we currently offer for international projects are
generally exempt from or otherwise substantially comply with
those requirements. Accordingly, we do not anticipate incurring
significant costs to comply with Annex VI in the near term.
If the United States does elect to ratify Annex VI in the
future, we could be required to incur potentially significant
costs to bring certain of our vessels into compliance with these
requirements.
Our
non-U.S. operations
are subject to other laws and regulations in countries in which
we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the
importation of and operation of rigs and liftboats, currency
conversions and repatriation, oil and natural gas exploration
and development, environmental protection, taxation of offshore
earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use of local
employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and duties on the
importation and exportation of rigs, liftboats and other
equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become
increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership
of concessions and companies holding concessions, the
exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil
and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of
the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the
amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and
natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Operations in
less developed countries can be subject to legal systems that
are not as mature or predictable as those in more developed
countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal
matters and proceedings.
Although significant capital expenditures may be required to
comply with these governmental laws and regulations, such
compliance has not materially adversely affected our earnings or
competitive position. We believe that we are currently in
compliance in all material respects with the environmental
regulations to which we are subject.
Available
Information
General information about us, including our corporate governance
policies can be found on our Internet website at
www.herculesoffshore.com. On our website we make
available, free of charge, our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically
file or furnish them to the SEC. These filings also are
available at the SECs Internet website at
www.sec.gov. Information contained on our website is not
part of this annual report.
14
Segment
and Geographic Information
Information with respect to revenues, operating income and total
assets attributable to our segments and revenues and long-lived
assets by geographic areas of operations is presented in
Note 16 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 8 of this annual report. Additional
information about our segments, as well as information with
respect to the impact of seasonal weather patterns on domestic
operations, is presented in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Item 7 of this annual report.
15
Our
business depends on the level of activity in the oil and natural
gas industry, which is significantly affected by volatile oil
and natural gas prices.
Our business depends on the level of activity in oil and natural
gas exploration, development and production in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and internationally, and in particular,
the level of exploration, development and production
expenditures of our customers. Oil and natural gas prices and
our customers expectations of potential changes in these
prices significantly affect this level of activity. In
particular, changes in the price of natural gas materially
affect our operations because drilling in the shallow-water
U.S. Gulf of Mexico is primarily focused on developing and
producing natural gas reserves. However, higher prices do not
necessarily translate into increased drilling activity since our
clients expectations about future commodity prices
typically drive demand for our services. Oil and natural gas
prices are extremely volatile and have recently declined
considerably. On July 2, 2008 natural gas prices were
$13.31 per MMBtu at the Henry Hub. They subsequently declined
sharply, reaching a low of $4.33 per MMBtu at the Henry Hub on
February 18, 2009. As of February 19, 2009, the
closing price of natural gas at the Henry Hub was $4.45 per
MMBtu. Oil prices in the past year, based on the spot price for
West Texas intermediate crude, have ranged from a high of
$145.29 as of July 3, 2008, to a low of $31.41 as of
December 22, 2008, with a closing price of $39.48 as of
February 19, 2009. Commodity prices are affected by
numerous factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for oil and natural gas in the United States and
elsewhere;
|
|
|
|
the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering
oil and natural gas, and the relative cost of onshore production
or importation of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
political, economic and weather conditions in the United States
and elsewhere;
|
|
|
|
imports of liquefied natural gas;
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding future commodity prices;
|
|
|
|
advances in exploration, development and production technology;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries, commonly called OPEC, to set and maintain
production levels and pricing;
|
|
|
|
the level of production in non-OPEC countries;
|
|
|
|
domestic and international tax policies and governmental
regulations;
|
|
|
|
the development and exploitation of alternative fuels, and the
competitive, social and political position of natural gas as a
source of energy compared with other energy sources;
|
|
|
|
the policies of various governments regarding exploration and
development of their oil and natural gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
the worldwide military and political environment, uncertainty or
instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak
of armed hostilities or other crises in the Middle East and
other significant oil and natural gas producing regions or
further acts of terrorism in the United States, or
elsewhere; and
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism in the United States and elsewhere.
|
Depending on the market prices of oil and natural gas, and even
during periods of high commodity prices, companies exploring for
and producing oil and natural gas may cancel or curtail their
drilling programs, or reduce their levels of capital
expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of
reasons, including their lack of success in exploration efforts.
Any reduction in the demand for drilling and liftboat services
may materially erode dayrates and utilization rates for our
units, which would adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations. Continued hostilities in the Middle East
and the occurrence or threat of terrorist attacks against the
United States or other countries could cause a downturn in the
economies of the United States and those of other countries. A
lower level of economic activity could result in a decline in
16
energy consumption, which could cause our revenues and margins
to decline and limit our future growth prospects.
The
offshore service industry is highly cyclical, and certain of our
contracts, primarily in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, are short-term
contracts. The volatility of the industry, coupled with our
short-term contracts, could result in sharp declines in our
profitability.
Historically, the offshore service industry has been highly
cyclical, with periods of high demand and high dayrates often
followed by periods of low demand and low dayrates. Periods of
low demand intensify the competition in the industry and often
result in rigs or liftboats being idle for long periods of time.
We may be required to stack rigs or liftboats or enter into
lower dayrate contracts in response to market conditions in the
future. In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, contracts are generally
short term, and oil and natural gas companies tend to respond
quickly to upward or downward changes in prices. Due to the
short-term nature of most of our contracts, including for our
rigs and liftboats in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and for some
of our international liftboats, changes in market conditions can
quickly affect our business. In addition, customers generally
have the right to terminate our contracts with little or no
notice, and without penalty. As a result of the cyclicality of
our industry, we expect our results of operations to be
volatile. Prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates
could result in the recognition of impairment charges if future
cash flow estimates, based upon information available to
management at the time, indicate that our rigs carrying
value may not be recoverable.
A
significant portion of our business is conducted in the
shallow-water U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The mature nature of this
region could result in less drilling activity in the area,
thereby reducing demand for our services.
The U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and in particular the
shallow-water region of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, is a
mature oil and natural gas production region that has
experienced substantial seismic survey and exploration activity
for many years. Because a large number of oil and natural gas
prospects in this region have already been drilled, additional
prospects of sufficient size and quality could be more difficult
to identify. According to the U.S. Energy Information
Administration, the average size of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico
discoveries has declined significantly since the early 1990s. In
addition, the amount of natural gas production in the
shallow-water U.S. Gulf of Mexico has declined over the
last decade. Moreover, oil and natural gas companies may be
unable to obtain financing necessary to drill prospects in this
region. The decrease in the size of oil and natural gas
prospects, the decrease in production or the failure to obtain
such financing may result in reduced drilling activity in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and reduced demand for our services.
Our
industry is highly competitive, with intense price competition.
Our inability to compete successfully may reduce our
profitability.
Our industry is highly competitive. Our contracts are
traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Pricing is
often the primary factor in determining which qualified
contractor is awarded a job, although rig and liftboat
availability, location and technical capability and each
contractors safety performance record and reputation for
quality also can be key factors in the determination. Dayrates
also depend on the supply of rigs and vessels. Generally, excess
capacity puts downward pressure on dayrates. Excess capacity can
occur when newly constructed rigs and vessels enter service,
when rigs and vessels are mobilized between geographic areas and
when non-marketed rigs and vessels are re-activated.
Many other companies in the drilling industry are larger than we
are and have more diverse fleets, or fleets with generally
higher specifications, and greater resources than we have. In
the past, rigs like ours have been stacked earlier in the cycle
of decreased rig demand than our competitors higher
specification rigs and have been reactivated later in the cycle,
which has adversely impacted our business and could be repeated
in the future. In addition, higher specification rigs may be
more adaptable to different operating conditions and have
greater flexibility to move to areas of demand in response to
changes in market conditions. In recent years, an increasing
amount of exploration and production expenditures have been
concentrated in deeper water drilling programs and deeper
formations requiring higher specification rigs. This trend is
expected to
17
continue and could result in a decline in demand for the rigs in
our fleet. Some of our competitors also are incorporated in
tax-haven countries outside the United States, which provides
them with significant tax advantages that are not available to
us as a U.S. company, which may materially impair our
ability to compete with them for many projects that would be
beneficial to our company. In addition, the competitive
environment has intensified as recent mergers within the oil and
natural gas industry have reduced the number of available
customers and suppliers, resulting in increased price
competition and fewer alternatives for sourcing of key supplies.
Finally, competition among drilling and marine service providers
is also affected by each providers reputation for safety
and quality. We may not be able to maintain our competitive
position, and we believe that competition for contracts will
continue to be intense in the foreseeable future. Our inability
to compete successfully may reduce our profitability.
Our
customers may seek to cancel or renegotiate some of our drilling
and liftboat contracts during periods of depressed market
conditions or if we experience downtime, operational
difficulties, or
safety-related
issues.
Currently, all of our drilling contracts with major customers
are dayrate contracts, where we charge a fixed charge per day
regardless of the number of days needed to drill the well.
Likewise, under our current liftboat contracts, we charge a
fixed fee per day regardless of the success of the operations
that are being conducted by our customer utilizing our liftboat.
During depressed market conditions, a customer may no longer
need a rig or liftboat that is currently under contract or may
be able to obtain a comparable rig or liftboat at a lower daily
rate. As a result, customers may seek to renegotiate the terms
of their existing drilling contracts or avoid their obligations
under those contracts. In addition, our customers may have the
right to terminate, or may seek to renegotiate, existing
contracts if we experience downtime, operational problems above
the contractual limit or safety-related issues, if the rig or
liftboat is a total loss, if the rig or liftboat is not
delivered to the customer within the period specified in the
contract or in other specified circumstances, which include
events beyond the control of either party. Some of our contracts
with our customers include terms allowing them to terminate
contracts without cause, with little or no prior notice and
without penalty or early termination payments. In addition, we
could be required to pay penalties if some of our contracts with
our customers are terminated due to downtime, operational
problems or failure to deliver. Some of our other contracts with
customers may be cancelable at the option of the customer upon
payment of a penalty, which may not fully compensate us for the
loss of the contract. Early termination of a contract may result
in a rig or liftboat being idle for an extended period of time.
The likelihood that a customer may seek to terminate a contract
is increased during periods of market weakness. If our customers
cancel some of our significant contracts, such as the contracts
in our International Offshore segment, and we are unable to
secure new contracts on substantially similar terms, our
revenues and profitability could be materially reduced.
We can
provide no assurance that our current backlog of contract
drilling revenue will be ultimately realized.
As of February 19, 2009, our total contract drilling
backlog for our Domestic Offshore, International Offshore and
Inland segments was approximately $726.9 million. We may
not be able to perform under these contracts due to events
beyond our control, and our customers may seek to cancel or
renegotiate our contracts for various reasons, including those
described above or in connection with the financial crisis or
falling commodity prices. Our inability or the inability of our
customers to perform under our or their contractual obligations
may have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Our
business involves numerous operating hazards, and our insurance
may not be adequate to cover our losses.
Our operations are subject to the usual hazards inherent in the
drilling and operation of oil and natural gas wells, such as
blowouts, reservoir damage, loss of production, loss of well
control, punchthroughs, craterings, fires and pollution. The
occurrence of these events could result in the suspension of
drilling or production operations, claims by the operator,
severe damage to or destruction of the property and equipment
involved, injury or death to rig or liftboat personnel, and
environmental damage. We may also be subject to
18
personal injury and other claims of rig or liftboat personnel as
a result of our drilling and liftboat operations. Operations
also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal
operating conditions, failure of subcontractors to perform or
supply goods or services and personnel shortages.
In addition, our drilling and liftboat operations are subject to
perils peculiar to marine operations, including capsizing,
grounding, collision and loss or damage from severe weather.
Tropical storms, hurricanes and other severe weather prevalent
in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, such as Hurricane Gustav in
September 2008, Hurricane Ike in September 2008, Hurricane Rita
in September 2005, Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and
Hurricane Ivan in September 2004, could have a material adverse
effect on our operations. During such severe storms, our
liftboats typically leave location and cease to earn a full
dayrate. Under U.S. Coast Guard guidelines, the liftboats
cannot return to work until the weather improves and seas are
less than five feet. In addition, damage to our rigs, liftboats,
shorebases and corporate infrastructure caused by high winds,
turbulent seas, or unstable sea bottom conditions could
potentially cause us to curtail operations for significant
periods of time until the damages can be repaired.
Damage to the environment could result from our operations,
particularly through oil spillage or extensive uncontrolled
fires. We may also be subject to property, environmental and
other damage claims by oil and natural gas companies and other
businesses operating offshore and in coastal areas. Our
insurance policies and contractual rights to indemnity may not
adequately cover losses, and we may not have insurance coverage
or rights to indemnity for all risks. Moreover, pollution and
environmental risks generally are not totally insurable.
As a result of a number of recent catastrophic events like
Hurricanes Ike, Ivan, Katrina and Rita, insurance underwriters
increased insurance premiums for many of the coverages
historically maintained and issued general notices of
cancellation and significant changes for a wide variety of
insurance coverages. The oil and natural gas industry suffered
extensive damage from Hurricanes Ike, Ivan, Katrina and Rita. As
a result, our insurance costs increased significantly, our
deductibles increased and our coverage for named windstorm
damage was restricted. Any additional severe storm activity in
the energy producing areas of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in
the future could cause insurance underwriters to no longer
insure U.S. Gulf of Mexico assets against weather-related
damage. A number of our customers that produce oil and natural
gas have previously maintained business interruption insurance
for their production. This insurance may cease to be available
in the future, which could adversely impact our customers
business prospects in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and reduce
demand for our services.
If a significant accident or other event resulting in damage to
our rigs or liftboats, including severe weather, terrorist acts,
war, civil disturbances, pollution or environmental damage,
occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or a recoverable
indemnity from a customer, it could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, we may
not be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at
rates we consider reasonable or be able to obtain insurance
against certain risks.
Our
customers may be unable or unwilling to indemnify
us.
Consistent with standard industry practice, our clients
generally assume, and indemnify us against, well control and
subsurface risks under dayrate contracts. These risks are those
associated with the loss of control of a well, such as blowout
or cratering, the cost to regain control or redrill the well and
associated pollution. There can be no assurance, however, that
these clients will necessarily be financially able to indemnify
us against all these risks. Also, we may be effectively
prevented from enforcing these indemnities because of the nature
of our relationship with some of our larger clients.
Additionally, from time to time we may not be able to obtain
agreement from our customer to indemnify us for such damages and
risks.
Our
international operations are subject to additional political,
economic, and other uncertainties not generally associated with
domestic operations.
An element of our business strategy is to continue to expand
into international oil and natural gas producing areas such as
West Africa, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. We
operate liftboats in West Africa, including Nigeria, as well as
operate one liftboat in the Middle East. In addition, we have
one
19
liftboat undergoing regulatory and other modifications and
repairs in the Middle East. We also operate drilling rigs in
India, Southeast Asia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Mexico and West
Africa. We have one jackup rig undergoing an upgrade in Namibia
and one jackup rig cold-stacked in Trinidad. Our international
operations are subject to a number of risks inherent in any
business operating in foreign countries, including:
|
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability, war and acts of
terrorism;
|
|
|
|
potential seizure, expropriation or nationalization of assets;
|
|
|
|
damage to our equipment or violence directed at our employees,
including kidnappings;
|
|
|
|
piracy;
|
|
|
|
increased operating costs;
|
|
|
|
complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment
in remote locations;
|
|
|
|
repudiation, modification or renegotiation of contracts;
|
|
|
|
limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage in
certain areas;
|
|
|
|
import-export quotas;
|
|
|
|
confiscatory taxation;
|
|
|
|
work stoppages or spikes, particularly in the Nigerian and
Mexican labor environment;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
wage and price controls;
|
|
|
|
imposition of trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
imposition or changes in enforcement of local content laws;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on currency or capital repatriations;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations and devaluations; and
|
|
|
|
other forms of government regulation and economic conditions
that are beyond our control.
|
As a result of our international expansion the exposure to these
risks will increase. Our financial condition and results of
operations could be susceptible to adverse events beyond our
control that may occur in the particular countries or regions in
which we are active.
Many governments favor or effectively require that liftboat or
drilling contracts be awarded to local contractors or require
foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies
from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may result in
inefficiencies or put us at a disadvantage when bidding for
contracts against local competitors.
Our
non-U.S. contract
drilling and liftboat operations are subject to various laws and
regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and
regulations relating to the equipment and operation of drilling
rigs and liftboats, currency conversions and repatriation, oil
and natural gas exploration and development, taxation of
offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use
of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and
duties on the importation and exportation of units and other
equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become
increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership
of concessions and companies holding concessions, the
exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil
and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of
the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the
amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and
natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Operations in
less developed countries can be subject to legal systems which
are not as mature or predictable as those in more developed
countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal
matters and proceedings.
20
Due to our international operations, we may experience currency
exchange losses where revenues are received and expenses are
paid in nonconvertible currencies or where we do not hedge an
exposure to a foreign currency. We may also incur losses as a
result of an inability to collect revenues because of a shortage
of convertible currency available to the country of operation,
controls over currency exchange or controls over the
repatriation of income or capital.
A
small number of customers account for a significant portion of
our revenues, and the loss of any of these customers could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
We derive a significant amount of our revenue from a single
major integrated energy company. Chevron Corporation represented
approximately 12%, 21% and 35% of our consolidated revenues for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. In addition, Chevron Corporation accounts for
73.2% of the revenues for our International Liftboats segment.
Our financial condition and results of operations will be
materially adversely affected if Chevron curtails its activities
in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico or Nigeria, terminates its
contracts with us, fails to renew its existing contracts or
refuses to award new contracts to us and we are unable to enter
into contracts with new customers at comparable dayrates. In
addition, the loss of any of our other significant customers
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Reactivation
of non-marketed rigs or liftboats, mobilization of rigs or
liftboats back to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico or new construction of
rigs or liftboats could result in excess supply in the region,
and our dayrates and utilization could be reduced.
If market conditions improve, inactive rigs and liftboats that
are not currently being marketed could be reactivated to meet an
increase in demand. Improved market conditions, particularly
relative to other markets, could also lead to jackup rigs, other
mobile offshore drilling units and liftboats being moved into
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico or could lead to increased
construction and upgrade programs by our competitors. Some of
our competitors have already announced plans to upgrade existing
equipment or build additional jackup rigs with higher
specifications than our rigs. According to ODS-Petrodata, as of
February 20, 2009, 70 jackup rigs had been ordered by
industry participants, national oil companies and financial
investors for delivery through 2011. Not all of the rigs
currently under construction have been contracted for future
work, which may intensify price competition as scheduled
delivery dates occur. In addition, as of February 2009, we
believe there were also 10 liftboats under construction or on
order in the United States that may be used in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico. A significant increase in the supply
of jackup rigs, other mobile offshore drilling units or
liftboats could adversely affect both our utilization and
dayrates.
Upgrade,
refurbishment and repair projects are subject to risks,
including delays and cost overruns, which could have an adverse
impact on our available cash resources and results of
operations.
We make upgrade, refurbishment and repair expenditures for our
fleet from time to time, including when we acquire units or when
repairs or upgrades are required by law, in response to an
inspection by a governmental authority or when a unit is
damaged. We also regularly make certain upgrades or
modifications to our drilling rigs to meet customer or contract
specific requirements. Upgrade, refurbishment and repair
projects are subject to the risks of delay or cost overruns
inherent in any large construction project, including costs or
delays resulting from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
unexpectedly long delivery times for, or shortages of, key
equipment, parts and materials;
|
|
|
|
shortages of skilled labor and other shipyard personnel
necessary to perform the work;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen increases in the cost of equipment, labor and raw
materials, particularly steel;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen design and engineering problems;
|
|
|
|
latent damages or deterioration to equipment and machinery in
excess of engineering estimates and assumptions;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated actual or purported change orders;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
work stoppages;
|
|
|
|
latent damages or deterioration to hull, equipment and machinery
in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions;
|
|
|
|
failure or delay of third-party service providers and labor
disputes;
|
|
|
|
disputes with shipyards and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
delays and unexpected costs of incorporating parts and materials
needed for the completion of projects;
|
|
|
|
failure or delay in obtaining acceptance of the rig from our
customer;
|
|
|
|
financial or other difficulties at shipyards;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; and
|
|
|
|
inability or delay in obtaining customer acceptance or
flag-state, classification society, or regulatory approvals.
|
Significant cost overruns or delays would adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. Additionally,
capital expenditures for rig upgrade and refurbishment projects
could exceed our planned capital expenditures. Failure to
complete an upgrade, refurbishment or repair project on time
may, in some circumstances, result in the delay, renegotiation
or cancellation of a drilling or liftboat contract and could put
at risk our planned arrangements to commence operations on
schedule. We also could be exposed to penalties for failure to
complete an upgrade, refurbishment or repair project and
commence operations in a timely manner. Our rigs and liftboats
undergoing upgrade, refurbishment or repair may not earn a
dayrate during the period they are out of service.
Our
jackup rigs are at a relative disadvantage to higher
specification rigs, which may be more likely to obtain contracts
than lower specification jackup rigs such as ours.
Many of our competitors have jackup fleets with generally higher
specification rigs than those in our jackup fleet. In addition,
the announced construction of new rigs includes approximately 70
higher specification jackup rigs. Further, 22 of our 31 jackup
rigs are mat-supported, which are generally limited to areas
with soft bottom conditions like much of the Gulf of Mexico.
Most of the new rigs available in the second half of 2009 and
beyond are currently without contracts, which may intensify
price competition as scheduled delivery dates occur.
Particularly during market downturns when there is decreased rig
demand, higher specification rigs may be more likely to obtain
contracts than lower specification jackup rigs such as ours. In
the past, lower specification rigs have been stacked earlier in
the cycle of decreased rig demand than higher specification rigs
and have been reactivated later in the cycle, which may
adversely impact our business. In addition, higher specification
rigs may be more adaptable to different operating conditions and
therefore have greater flexibility to move to areas of demand in
response to changes in market conditions. Because a majority of
our rigs were designed specifically for drilling in the
shallow-water U.S. Gulf of Mexico, our ability to move them
to other regions in response to changes in market conditions is
limited. Furthermore, in recent years, an increasing amount of
exploration and production expenditures have been concentrated
in deepwater drilling programs and deeper formations, including
deep natural gas prospects, requiring higher specification
jackup rigs, semisubmersible drilling rigs or drillships. This
trend is expected to continue and could result in a decline in
demand for lower specification jackup rigs like ours, which
could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and
results of operations. Furthermore, one of our customers, Pemex
Exploración y Producción (PEMEX), has
indicated a shifting focus in drilling rig requirements since
the beginning of 2008, with more emphasis placed on independent
leg cantilever rigs rated for 205 foot water depth or greater,
versus mat cantilever rigs rated for 200 foot water depth. It is
possible that demand in Mexico for our 200 foot mat cantilever
fleet could decline and the future contracting opportunities for
such rigs in Mexico could diminish.
22
TODCOs
tax sharing agreement with Transocean may require continuing
substantial payments.
We, as successor to TODCO, and TODCOs former parent
Transocean Holdings Inc. are parties to a tax sharing agreement
that was originally entered into in connection with TODCOs
initial public offering in 2004. The tax sharing agreement was
amended and restated in November 2006. The tax sharing agreement
required us to make an acceleration payment to Transocean upon
completion of the TODCO acquisition. Additionally, the tax
sharing agreement continues to require that additional payments
be made to Transocean based on a portion of the expected tax
benefit from the exercise of certain compensatory stock options
to acquire Transocean common stock attributable to current and
former TODCO employees and board members. The estimated amount
of payments to Transocean related to compensatory options that
remain outstanding at December 31, 2008, assuming a
Transocean stock price of $47.25 per share at the time of
exercise of the compensatory options (the actual price of
Transoceans common stock at December 31, 2008), is
approximately $4.9 million. There is no certainty that we
will realize future economic benefits from TODCOs tax
benefits equal to the amount of the payments required under the
tax sharing agreement.
The
recent worldwide financial and credit crisis could lead to an
extended worldwide economic recession and have a material
adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.
The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the
availability of liquidity and credit to fund the continuation
and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The
shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent
substantial losses in worldwide equity markets could lead to an
extended worldwide economic recession. A slowdown in economic
activity caused by a recession would likely reduce worldwide
demand for energy and result in lower oil and natural gas
prices. Forecasted crude oil prices for 2009 have dropped
substantially in recent months. Demand for our services depends
on oil and natural gas industry activity and expenditure levels
that are directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas
prices. Demand for our services is particularly sensitive to the
level of exploration, development and production activity of,
and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and natural gas
companies, including national oil companies. Any prolonged
reduction in oil and natural gas prices will depress the
immediate levels of exploration, development and production
activity. Perceptions of longer-term lower oil and natural gas
prices by oil and gas companies can similarly reduce or defer
major expenditures given the long-term nature of many
large-scale development projects. Lower levels of activity
result in a corresponding decline in the demand for our
services, which could have a material adverse effect on our
revenue and profitability.
The
global financial crisis may have impacts on our business and
financial condition that we currently cannot
predict.
The continued credit crisis and related instability in the
global financial system has had, and may continue to have, an
impact on our business and our financial condition. We may face
significant challenges if conditions in the financial markets do
not improve. Our ability to access the capital markets may be
severely restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to
access such markets, which could have an impact on our
flexibility to react to changing economic and business
conditions. The credit crisis could have an impact on the
lenders under our credit facility or on our customers, causing
them to fail to meet their obligations to us.
In
order to execute our growth strategy, we may require additional
capital in the future, which may not be available to
us.
Our business is capital-intensive and, to the extent we do not
generate sufficient cash from operations, we may need to raise
additional funds through public or private debt or equity
financings to execute our growth strategy and to fund capital
expenditures. Adequate sources of capital funding may not be
available when needed or may not be available on favorable
terms. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity
securities, dilution to the holdings of existing stockholders
may result. If funding is insufficient at any time in the
future, we may be unable to fund maintenance requirements and
acquisitions, take advantage of business opportunities or
respond to competitive pressures, any of which could harm our
business.
23
Acquisitions
are an important component of our business strategy. Our
acquisition strategy may be unsuccessful if we are unable to
identify and complete future acquisitions, fail to successfully
integrate acquired assets or businesses we acquire, are unable
to obtain financing for acquisitions on acceptable terms or
incorrectly predict operating results.
The acquisition of assets or businesses that are complementary
to our drilling and liftboat operations is an important
component of our business strategy. We believe that acquisition
opportunities may arise from time to time, and any such
acquisition could be significant. At any given time, discussions
with one or more potential sellers may be at different stages.
However, any such discussions may or may not result in the
consummation of an acquisition transaction, and we may not be
able to identify or complete any acquisitions. Any such
transactions could involve the payment by us of a substantial
amount of cash, the incurrence of a substantial amount of debt
or the issuance of a substantial amount of equity. We cannot
predict the effect, if any, that any announcement or
consummation of an acquisition would have on the trading price
of our common stock.
Any future acquisitions could present a number of risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk of incorrect assumptions regarding the future results
of acquired operations or assets or expected cost reductions or
other synergies expected to be realized as a result of acquiring
operations or assets;
|
|
|
|
the risk of failing to integrate the operations or management of
any acquired operations or assets successfully and
timely; and
|
|
|
|
the risk of diversion of managements attention from
existing operations or other priorities.
|
In addition, we may not be able to obtain, on terms we find
acceptable, sufficient financing that may be required for any
such acquisition or investment.
If we are unsuccessful in completing acquisitions of other
operations or assets, our financial condition could be adversely
affected and we may be unable to implement an important
component of our business strategy successfully. In addition, if
we are unsuccessful in integrating our acquisitions in a timely
and cost-effective manner, our financial condition and results
of operations could be adversely affected.
Failure
to retain or attract skilled workers could hurt our
operations.
We require skilled personnel to operate and provide technical
services and support for our rigs and liftboats. The shortages
of qualified personnel or the inability to obtain and retain
qualified personnel could negatively affect the quality and
timeliness of our work. In periods of economic crisis or during
a recession, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining our
skilled workers as these workers may seek employment in less
cyclical or volatile industries or employers. In periods of
recovery or increasing activity, we may have to increase the
wages of our skilled workers, which could negatively impact our
operations and financial results.
Although our domestic employees are not covered by a collective
bargaining agreement, the marine services industry has been
targeted by maritime labor unions in an effort to organize
U.S. Gulf of Mexico employees. A significant increase in
the wages paid by competing employers or the unionization of our
U.S. Gulf of Mexico employees could result in a reduction
of our skilled labor force, increases in the wage rates that we
must pay, or both. If either of these events were to occur, our
capacity and profitability could be diminished and our growth
potential could be impaired.
Governmental
laws and regulations may add to our costs or limit drilling
activity and liftboat operations.
Our operations are affected in varying degrees by governmental
laws and regulations. The industries in which we operate are
dependent on demand for services from the oil and natural gas
industry and, accordingly, are also affected by changing tax and
other laws relating to the energy business generally. We are
also subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Coast
Guard, the National Transportation Safety Board and the
United States Customs and Border Protection Service, as
well as private industry organizations such as the American
Bureau of Shipping. We may be required to make significant
capital expenditures to comply with
24
laws and the applicable regulations and standards of those
authorities and organizations. Moreover, the cost of compliance
could be higher than anticipated. Similarly, our international
operations are subject to compliance with the U.S. Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, certain international conventions and the
laws, regulations and standards of other foreign countries in
which we operate. It is also possible that these conventions,
laws, regulations and standards may in the future add
significantly to our operating costs or limit our activities.
In addition, as our vessels age, the costs of drydocking the
vessels in order to comply with governmental laws and
regulations and to maintain their class certifications are
expected to increase, which could have an adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
Compliance
with or a breach of environmental laws can be costly and could
limit our operations.
Our operations are subject to regulations that require us to
obtain and maintain specified permits or other governmental
approvals, control the discharge of materials into the
environment, require the removal and cleanup of materials that
may harm the environment or otherwise relate to the protection
of the environment. For example, as an operator of mobile
offshore drilling units and liftboats in navigable
U.S. waters and some offshore areas, we may be liable for
damages and costs incurred in connection with oil spills or
other unauthorized discharges of chemicals or wastes resulting
from those operations. Laws and regulations protecting the
environment have become more stringent in recent years, and may
in some cases impose strict liability, rendering a person liable
for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault
on the part of such person. Some of these laws and regulations
may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions
caused by others or for acts that were in compliance with all
applicable laws at the time they were performed. The application
of these requirements, the modification of existing laws or
regulations or the adoption of new requirements, both in
U.S. waters and internationally, could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
We may
not be able to maintain or replace our rigs and liftboats as
they age.
The capital associated with the repair and maintenance of our
fleet increases with age. We may not be able to maintain our
fleet by extending the economic life of existing rigs and
liftboats, and our financial resources may not be sufficient to
enable us to make expenditures necessary for these purposes or
to acquire or build replacement units.
Our
operating and maintenance costs with respect to our rigs do not
necessarily fluctuate in proportion to changes in operating
revenues.
We do not expect our operating and maintenance costs with
respect to our rigs to necessarily fluctuate in proportion to
changes in operating revenues. Operating revenues may fluctuate
as a function of changes in dayrate. But costs for operating a
rig are generally fixed or only semi-variable regardless of the
dayrate being earned. Additionally, if our rigs incur idle time
between contracts, we typically do not de-man those rigs because
we will use the crew to prepare the rig for its next contract.
During times of reduced activity, reductions in costs may not be
immediate as portions of the crew may be required to prepare our
rigs for stacking, after which time the crew members are
assigned to active rigs or dismissed. Moreover, as our rigs are
mobilized from one geographic location to another, the labor and
other operating and maintenance costs can vary significantly. In
general, labor costs increase primarily due to higher salary
levels and inflation. Equipment maintenance expenses fluctuate
depending upon the type of activity the unit is performing and
the age and condition of the equipment. Contract preparation
expenses vary based on the scope and length of contract
preparation required and the duration of the firm contractual
period over which such expenditures are amortized.
We are
subject to litigation that could have an adverse effect on
us.
We are from time to time involved in various litigation matters.
The numerous operating hazards inherent in our business
increases our exposure to litigation, including personal injury
litigation brought against us by our employees that are injured
operating our rigs and liftboats. These matters may include,
among other
25
things, contract disputes, personal injury, environmental,
asbestos and other toxic tort, employment, tax and securities
litigation, and other litigation that arises in the ordinary
course of our business. We have extensive litigation brought
against us in federal and state courts located in Louisiana,
Mississippi and South Texas, areas that were significantly
impacted by the hurricanes in 2005 and, more recently, by
Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. The jury pools in these areas have
become increasingly more hostile to defendants, particularly
corporate defendants in the oil and gas industry. We cannot
predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any claim or
other litigation matter. Litigation may have an adverse effect
on us because of potential negative outcomes, the costs
associated with defending the lawsuits, the diversion of our
managements resources and other factors.
Changes
in effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from
examination of our tax returns could adversely affect our
operating results and financial results.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by
changes in tax laws, both domestically and internationally. They
could also be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of
our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax
treaties, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations
thereof in one or more countries in which we operate. In
addition, we are subject to the potential examination of our
income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities where we file tax returns. We regularly assess the
likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations
to determine the adequacy of our provision for taxes. There can
be no assurance that such examinations will not have an adverse
effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Our
business would be adversely affected if we failed to comply with
the provisions of U.S. law on coastwise trade, or if those
provisions were modified, repealed or waived.
We are subject to U.S. federal laws that restrict maritime
transportation, including liftboat services, between points in
the United States to vessels built and registered in the United
States and owned and manned by U.S. citizens. We are
responsible for monitoring the ownership of our common stock. If
we do not comply with these restrictions, we would be prohibited
from operating our liftboats in U.S. coastwise trade, and
under certain circumstances we would be deemed to have
undertaken an unapproved foreign transfer, resulting in severe
penalties, including permanent loss of U.S. coastwise
trading rights for our liftboats, fines or forfeiture of the
liftboats.
During the past several years, interest groups have lobbied
Congress to repeal these restrictions to facilitate foreign flag
competition for trades currently reserved for
U.S.-flag
vessels under the federal laws. We believe that interest groups
may continue efforts to modify or repeal these laws currently
benefiting
U.S.-flag
vessels. If these efforts are successful, it could result in
increased competition, which could adversely affect our results
of operations.
Our
debt could adversely affect our ability to operate our business
and make it difficult to meet our debt service
obligations.
As of December 31, 2008, we had total outstanding debt of
approximately $1,054.2 billion. This debt represented
approximately 53.7% of our total book capitalization. After
giving effect to the April 2008 increase of $100 million of
available capacity under our revolving credit facility, as of
December 31, 2008, we had up to $250 million of
available capacity under that facility, of which
$29.0 million was committed related to issued standby
letters of credit. We may continue to borrow to fund working
capital or other needs in the near term up to the remaining
availability. Our debt and the limitations imposed on us by our
existing or future debt agreements could have significant
consequences on our business and future prospects, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to obtain necessary financing in the future
for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt
service requirements or other purposes;
|
|
|
|
we may be exposed to risks inherent in interest rate
fluctuations because our borrowings generally are at variable
rates of interest, which would result in higher interest expense
to the extent we have not hedged such risk in the event of
increases in interest rates; and
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
we could be more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our
business that would leave us less able to take advantage of
significant business opportunities and to react to changes in
our business and in market or industry conditions.
|
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our
indebtedness, including the convertible notes issued by us on
June 3, 2008, and to fund planned capital expenditures will
depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is
subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control. Our future cash flows may be insufficient to meet all
of our debt obligations and commitments, and any insufficiency
could negatively impact our business. To the extent we are
unable to repay our indebtedness as it becomes due or at
maturity with cash on hand or from other sources, we will need
to refinance our debt, sell assets or repay the debt with the
proceeds from equity offerings. Additional indebtedness or
equity financing may not be available to us in the future for
the refinancing or repayment of existing indebtedness, and we
may not be able to complete asset sales in a timely manner
sufficient to make such repayments.
Our
senior secured credit agreement imposes significant operating
and financial restrictions, which may prevent us from
capitalizing on business opportunities and taking some
actions.
Our senior secured credit agreement imposes significant
operating and financial restrictions on us. These limitations
are subject to a number of important qualifications and
exceptions. These restrictions limit our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
make investments and other restricted payments, including
dividends;
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
create or incur liens;
|
|
|
|
restrict dividend or other payments by our subsidiaries to us;
|
|
|
|
sell our assets or consolidate or merge with or into other
companies; and
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates.
|
Our credit agreement also requires us to maintain a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio. In
addition, commencing with the year ending December 31,
2008, we are required to prepay our $900.0 million term
loan with 50% of our excess cash flow until the outstanding
principal balance of the term loan is less than
$550.0 million. Our compliance with these provisions may
materially adversely affect our ability to react to changes in
market conditions, take advantage of business opportunities we
believe to be desirable, obtain future financing, fund needed
capital expenditures, finance our acquisitions, equipment
purchases and development expenditures, or withstand a future
downturn in our business.
If we
are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants in the
agreements governing our indebtedness, there could be a default
under the terms of these agreements, which could result in an
acceleration of payment of funds that we have
borrowed.
If we are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants
in the agreements governing our indebtedness or in current or
future debt financing agreements, there could be a default under
the terms of these agreements. Our ability to comply with these
restrictions and covenants, including meeting financial ratios
and tests, may be affected by events beyond our control. If a
default occurs under these agreements, lenders could terminate
their commitments to lend or accelerate the outstanding loans
and declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Borrowings
under other debt instruments that contain cross-acceleration or
cross-default provisions may also be accelerated and become due
and payable. If any of these events occur, our assets might not
be sufficient to repay in full all of our outstanding
indebtedness, and we may be unable to find alternative
financing. Even if we could obtain alternative financing, that
financing might not be on terms that are favorable or
acceptable. If we were unable to repay amounts borrowed, the
holders of the debt could initiate a bankruptcy proceeding or
liquidation proceeding against collateral.
27
We are
a holding company, and we are dependent upon cash flow from
subsidiaries to meet our obligations.
We currently conduct our operations through, and most of our
assets are owned by, both U.S. and foreign subsidiaries,
and our operating income and cash flow are generated by our
subsidiaries. As a result, cash we obtain from our subsidiaries
is the principal source of funds necessary to meet our debt
service obligations. Contractual provisions or laws, as well as
our subsidiaries financial condition and operating
requirements, may limit our ability to obtain cash from our
subsidiaries that we require to pay our debt service
obligations, including payments on the convertible notes.
Applicable tax laws may also subject such payments to us by our
subsidiaries to further taxation.
The inability to transfer cash from our subsidiaries to us may
mean that, even though we may have sufficient resources on a
consolidated basis to meet our obligations, we may not be
permitted to make the necessary transfers from subsidiaries to
the parent company in order to provide funds for the payment of
the parent companys obligations.
We
limit foreign ownership of our company, which may restrict
investment in our common stock and could reduce the price of our
common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation limits the percentage of
outstanding common stock and other classes of capital stock that
can be owned by
non-United
States citizens within the meaning of statutes relating to the
ownership of
U.S.-flagged
vessels. Applying the statutory requirements applicable today,
our certificate of incorporation provides that no more than 20%
of our outstanding common stock may be owned by
non-United States
citizens and establishes mechanisms to maintain compliance with
these requirements. These restrictions may have an adverse
impact on the liquidity or market value of our common stock
because holders may be unable to transfer our common stock to
non-United
States citizens. Any attempted or purported transfer of our
common stock in violation of these restrictions will be
ineffective to transfer such common stock or any voting,
dividend or other rights in respect of such common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation also provides that any
transfer, or attempted or purported transfer, of any shares of
our capital stock that would result in the ownership or control
of in excess of 20% of our outstanding capital stock by one or
more persons who are not United States citizens for purposes of
U.S. coastwise shipping will be void and ineffective as
against us. In addition, if at any time persons other than
United States citizens own shares of our capital stock or
possess voting power over any shares of our capital stock in
excess of 20%, we may withhold payment of dividends, suspend the
voting rights attributable to such shares and redeem such shares.
We
have no plans to pay regular dividends on our common stock, so
investors in our common stock may not receive funds without
selling their shares.
We do not intend to declare or pay regular dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we generally
intend to invest any future earnings in our business. Subject to
Delaware law, our board of directors will determine the payment
of future dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount
of any dividends in light of any applicable contractual
restrictions limiting our ability to pay dividends, our earnings
and cash flows, our capital requirements, our financial
condition, and other factors our board of directors deems
relevant. Our senior secured credit agreement restricts our
ability to pay dividends or other distributions on our equity
securities. Accordingly, stockholders may have to sell some or
all of their common stock in order to generate cash flow from
their investment. Stockholders may not receive a gain on their
investment when they sell our common stock and may lose the
entire amount of their investment.
Provisions
in our charter documents, stockholder rights plan or Delaware
law may inhibit a takeover, which could adversely affect the
value of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, stockholder rights
plan and Delaware corporate law contain provisions that could
delay or prevent a change of control or changes in our
management that a stockholder might consider favorable. These
provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered
beneficial by some
28
of our stockholders. If a change of control or change in
management is delayed or prevented, the market price of our
common stock could decline.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our property consists primarily of jackup rigs, barge rigs,
submersible rigs, a platform rig, marine support vessels,
liftboats and ancillary equipment, substantially all of which we
own. Several of our vessels and substantially all of our other
personal property, are pledged to collateralize our senior
secured credit agreement.
We maintain our principal executive office in Houston, Texas,
which is under lease. We lease office space in Lafayette,
Louisiana; Houma, Louisiana; Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia;
La Romaine, Trinidad; Luanda, Angola; and Ciudad del
Carmen, Mexico. We also lease warehouses and yard facilities in
Houma, Louisiana; Broussard, Louisiana; Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia
and La Romaine, Trinidad. We lease warehouses, office space
and residential premises in Qatar, India, Malaysia, Nigeria and
Cayman Islands. In addition, we lease a waterfront dock and
maintenance facility in Nigeria.
We incorporate by reference in response to this item the
information set forth in Item 1 of this annual report.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In connection with our acquisition of TODCO, we also assumed
certain other material legal proceedings from TODCO and its
subsidiaries.
In October 2001, TODCO was notified by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that
the EPA had identified a subsidiary of TODCO as a potentially
responsible party under CERCLA in connection with the Palmer
Barge Line superfund site located in Port Arthur, Jefferson
County, Texas. Based upon the information provided by the EPA
and our review of our internal records to date, we dispute our
designation as a potentially responsible party and do not expect
that the ultimate outcome of this case will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations,
financial position or cash flows. We continue to monitor this
matter.
Robert E. Aaron et al. vs. Phillips 66 Company et al. Circuit
Court, Second Judicial District, Jones County,
Mississippi. This is the case name used to refer to several
cases that have been filed in the Circuit Courts of the State of
Mississippi involving 768 persons that allege personal
injury or whose heirs claim their deaths arose out of asbestos
exposure in the course of their employment by the defendants
between 1965 and 2002. The complaints name as defendants, among
others, certain of TODCOs subsidiaries and certain
subsidiaries of TODCOs former parent to whom TODCO may owe
indemnity and other unaffiliated defendant companies, including
companies that allegedly manufactured drilling related products
containing asbestos that are the subject of the complaints. The
number of unaffiliated defendant companies involved in each
complaint ranges from approximately 20 to 70. The complaints
allege that the defendant drilling contractors used
asbestos-containing products in offshore drilling operations,
land based drilling operations and in drilling structures,
drilling rigs, vessels and other equipment and assert claims
based on, among other things, negligence and strict liability,
and claims authorized under the Jones Act. The plaintiffs seek,
among other things, awards of unspecified compensatory and
punitive damages. All of these cases were assigned to a special
master who has approved a form of questionnaire to be completed
by plaintiffs so that claims made would be properly served
against specific defendants. As of the date of this report,
approximately 700 questionnaires were returned and the remaining
plaintiffs, who did not submit a questionnaire reply, have had
their suits dismissed without prejudice. Of the respondents,
approximately 100 shared periods of employment by TODCO and
its former parent which could lead to claims against either
company, even though many of these plaintiffs did not state in
their questionnaire answers that the employment actually
involved exposure to
29
asbestos. After providing the questionnaire, each plaintiff was
further required to file a separate and individual amended
complaint naming only those defendants against whom they had a
direct claim as identified in the questionnaire answers.
Defendants not identified in the amended complaints were
dismissed from the plaintiffs litigation. To date, three
plaintiffs named TODCO as a defendant in their amended
complaints. It is possible that some of the plaintiffs who have
filed amended complaints and have not named TODCO as a defendant
may attempt to add TODCO as a defendant in the future when case
discovery begins and greater attention is given to each
individual plaintiffs employment background. We continue
to monitor a small group of these other cases. We have not
determined which entity would be responsible for such claims
under the Master Separation Agreement between TODCO and its
former parent. We intend to defend ourselves vigorously and,
based on the limited information available at this time, do not
expect the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
We and our subsidiaries are involved in a number of other
lawsuits, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course of our
business. We do not believe that ultimate liability, if any,
resulting from any such other pending litigation will have a
material adverse effect on our business or consolidated
financial position. However, we cannot predict with certainty
the outcome or effect of any of the litigation matters
specifically described above or of any such other pending
litigation. There can be no assurance that our belief or
expectations as to the outcome or effect of any lawsuit or other
litigation matter will prove correct, and the eventual outcome
of these matters could materially differ from managements
current estimates.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders
during the fourth quarter of 2008.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Quarterly
Common Stock Prices and Dividend Policy
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol HERO. As of February 20, 2009,
there were 85 stockholders of record. On February 20,
2009, the closing price of our common stock as reported by
NASDAQ was $1.78 per share. The following table sets forth, for
the periods indicated, the range of high and low sales prices
for our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.94
|
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
39.35
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
39.47
|
|
|
|
24.07
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
27.52
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
28.43
|
|
|
$
|
22.93
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
34.98
|
|
|
|
24.88
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
36.97
|
|
|
|
25.45
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
29.24
|
|
|
|
23.80
|
|
30
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since
becoming a publicly held corporation in October 2005, and we do
not intend to declare or pay regular dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we generally intend to
invest any future earnings in our business. Subject to Delaware
law, our board of directors will determine the payment of future
dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount of any
dividends in light of any applicable contractual restrictions
limiting our ability to pay dividends, our earnings and cash
flows, our capital requirements, our financial condition, and
other factors our board of directors deems relevant. Our senior
secured credit agreement restricts our ability to pay dividends
or other distributions on our equity securities.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain
information with respect to our purchases of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of a
|
|
|
may yet be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Plan(2)
|
|
|
Plan(2)
|
|
|
October 1 - 31, 2008
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 1 - 30, 2008
|
|
|
6,336
|
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 1 - 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,548
|
|
|
|
7.22
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the surrender of shares of our common stock to
satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the
vesting of restricted stock issued to employees under our
stockholder-approved long-term incentive plan. |
|
(2) |
|
We did not have at any time during 2008, 2007 or 2006, and
currently do not have, a share repurchase program in place.
However, on June 3, 2008, we completed an offering of
$250.0 million aggregate original principal amount of our
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2038
(Notes). We sold the Notes to the Initial Purchasers
in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and we were
advised by the Initial Purchasers that the Initial Purchasers
resold the Notes only to qualified institutional buyers in
reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act. We used
$49.2 million of the net proceeds to repurchase,
concurrently with the issuance of the Notes, approximately
1,450,000 shares of our common stock in privately
negotiated transactions at a purchase price of $33.95 per share.
For additional information regarding the 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes and the terms of conversion, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Debt and our
Form 8-K
filed June 3, 2008. |
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
We have derived the following condensed consolidated financial
information as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 from our
audited consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of this annual report. The condensed consolidated
financial information as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and
for the year ended December 31, 2005 as well as for the
period from inception (July 27, 2004) to
December 31, 2004 was derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of our annual
report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
condensed consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 2004 was derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
We were formed in July 2004 and commenced operations in August
2004. From our formation to December 31, 2008, we completed
the acquisition of TODCO and several significant asset
acquisitions that
31
impact the comparability of our historical financial results.
Our financial results reflect the impact of the TODCO business
and the asset acquisitions from the dates of closing. We have
included pro forma information related to the TODCO acquisition
in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 8 of this annual report.
In addition, in connection with our initial public offering, we
converted from a Delaware limited liability company to a
Delaware corporation on November 1, 2005. Upon the
conversion, each outstanding membership interest of the limited
liability company was converted to 350 shares of common
stock of the corporation. Share-based information contained
herein assumes that we had effected the conversion of each
outstanding membership interest into 350 shares of common
stock for all periods prior to the conversion. Prior to the
conversion, our owners elected to be taxed at the member unit
holder level rather than at the company level. As a result, we
did not recognize any tax provision on our income prior to the
conversion. Upon completion of the conversion, we recorded a tax
provision of $12.1 million related to the recognition of
deferred taxes equal to the tax effect of the difference between
the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities as of the
effective date of the conversion.
The selected consolidated financial information below should be
read together with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in Item 7 of this annual report and our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
Item 8 of this annual report. In addition, the following
information may not be deemed indicative of our future
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(a)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
|
$
|
161,334
|
|
|
$
|
31,728
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
|
|
158,057
|
|
|
|
55,859
|
|
|
|
9,907
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,069,343
|
)
|
|
|
136,012
|
|
|
|
119,050
|
|
|
|
27,456
|
|
|
|
8,065
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(12.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(12.10
|
)
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (as of end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
106,455
|
|
|
$
|
212,452
|
|
|
$
|
72,772
|
|
|
$
|
47,575
|
|
|
$
|
14,460
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
185,285
|
|
|
|
325,068
|
|
|
|
110,897
|
|
|
|
70,083
|
|
|
|
30,283
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
|
3,643,948
|
|
|
|
605,581
|
|
|
|
354,825
|
|
|
|
132,156
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,042,766
|
|
|
|
890,013
|
|
|
|
91,850
|
|
|
|
93,250
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
907,772
|
|
|
|
2,011,433
|
|
|
|
394,851
|
|
|
|
215,943
|
|
|
|
71,087
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $950.3 million ($950.3 million, net of taxes
or $(10.76) per diluted share) and $376.7 million
($236.7 million, net of taxes or $(2.68) per diluted share)
in impairment of goodwill and impairment of property and
equipment charges, respectively. |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
269,948
|
|
|
$
|
175,741
|
|
|
$
|
124,241
|
|
|
$
|
54,762
|
|
|
$
|
(8,528
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(515,787
|
)
|
|
|
(825,007
|
)
|
|
|
(149,983
|
)
|
|
|
(174,952
|
)
|
|
|
(94,241
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
139,842
|
|
|
|
788,946
|
|
|
|
50,939
|
|
|
|
153,305
|
|
|
|
117,229
|
|
Capital expenditures(a)
|
|
|
585,084
|
|
|
|
155,390
|
|
|
|
204,456
|
|
|
|
168,038
|
|
|
|
94,443
|
|
Deferred drydocking expenditures
|
|
|
17,269
|
|
|
|
20,772
|
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2008 includes the purchase of the Hercules 350, the
Hercules 262 and the Hercules 261 as well as
related equipment. |
33
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 included in
Item 8 of this annual report. The following discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of certain factors, including those set forth under
Risk Factors in Item 1A and elsewhere in this
annual report. See Forward-Looking Statements.
OVERVIEW
We provide shallow-water drilling and marine services to the oil
and natural gas exploration and production industry in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and internationally. We provide these
services to major integrated energy companies, independent oil
and natural gas operators and national oil companies.
In July 2007, we completed the acquisition of TODCO for total
consideration of approximately $2,397.8 million, consisting
of $925.8 million in cash and 56.6 million shares of
common stock. TODCO, a provider of contract drilling and marine
services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and international
markets, owned and operated 24 jackup rigs, 27 barge rigs, three
submersible rigs, nine land rigs, one platform rig and a fleet
of marine support vessels. The TODCO acquisition positioned us
as a leading shallow-water drilling provider as well as expanded
our international presence and diversified our fleet. In the
first quarter of 2008, we furthered our strategic growth
initiative by purchasing two jackup drilling rigs and related
equipment for $220.0 million. In addition, during the
second quarter of 2008, we purchased a third jackup rig and
related equipment for $100.0 million.
We operate our business as six divisions: (1) Domestic
Offshore, (2) International Offshore, (3) Inland,
(4) Domestic Liftboats, (5) International Liftboats,
and (6) Delta Towing. Previously, we reported an
Other segment that included Delta Towing and the
land rigs. The land rigs were sold in December 2007 and the
results of the land rig operations are included in Discontinued
Operation.
In January 2009, we reclassified four of our cold-stacked jackup
rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 10 of our
cold-stacked inland barges as retired. These rigs require
extensive refurbishment and currently are not expected to
re-enter active service. As of February 19, 2009, our
business segments included the following:
Domestic Offshore operates 20 jackup rigs and
three submersible rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that can
drill in maximum water depths ranging from 85 to 350 feet.
Fourteen of the jackup rigs are either working on short-term
contracts or available. One is in the shipyard for maintenance
and five are cold-stacked. All three submersibles are
cold-stacked.
International Offshore operates 11 jackup
rigs and one platform rig outside of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico. This segment operates two jackup rigs and one platform
rig in Mexico and two jackup rigs in both Saudi Arabia and
India. We have one jackup rig working offshore in Qatar and
Malaysia and one rig in Gabon whose contract is being negotiated
for early termination. In addition, this segment has one jackup
rig currently undergoing an upgrade in Namibia and one jackup
rig cold-stacked in Trinidad.
Inland operates a fleet of 6 conventional and
11 posted barge rigs that operate inland in marshes, rivers,
lakes and shallow bay or coastal waterways along the
U.S. Gulf Coast. Eight of our inland barges are either
operating on short-term contracts or available to be contracted
and nine are cold-stacked.
Domestic Liftboats operates 45 liftboats in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
International Liftboats operates 20
liftboats. Eighteen are operating offshore West Africa,
including five liftboats owned by a third party. One liftboat is
operating offshore Middle East. One liftboat is in a Middle
Eastern shipyard undergoing refurbishment and it is being
marketed in the Middle East region.
Delta Towing our Delta Towing business
operates a fleet of 30 inland tugs, 16 offshore tugs, 34 crew
boats, 46 deck barges, 17 shale barges and four spud barges
along and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and along the
Southeastern coast. Currently, 24 crew boats,
13 inland tugs and seven offshore tugs are cold-stacked.
34
Our jackup and submersible rigs and our barge rigs are used
primarily for exploration and development drilling in shallow
waters. Under most of our contracts, we are paid a fixed daily
rental rate called a dayrate, and we are required to
pay all costs associated with our own crews as well as the
upkeep and insurance of the rig and equipment.
Our liftboats are self-propelled, self-elevating vessels that
support a broad range of offshore support services, including
platform maintenance, platform construction, well intervention
and decommissioning services throughout the life of an oil or
natural gas well. Under most of our liftboat contracts, we are
paid a fixed dayrate for the rental of the vessel, which
typically includes the costs of a small crew of four to eight
employees, and we also receive a variable rate for reimbursement
of other operating costs such as catering, fuel, rental
equipment and other items.
Our revenues are affected primarily by dayrates, fleet
utilization, the number and type of units in our fleet and
mobilization fees received from our customers. Utilization and
dayrates, in turn, are influenced principally by the demand for
rig and liftboat services from the exploration and production
sectors of the oil and natural gas industry. Our contracts in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico tend to be short-term in nature and
are heavily influenced by changes in the supply of units
relative to the fluctuating expenditures for both drilling and
production activity. Our international drilling contracts and
some of our liftboat contracts in West Africa are longer term in
nature.
Our operating costs are primarily a function of fleet
configuration and utilization levels. The most significant
direct operating costs for our Domestic Offshore, International
Offshore and Inland segments are wages paid to crews,
maintenance and repairs to the rigs, and insurance. These costs
do not vary significantly whether the rig is operating under
contract or idle, unless we believe that the rig is unlikely to
work for a prolonged period of time, in which case we may decide
to cold-stack or warm-stack the rig.
Cold-stacking is a common term used to describe a rig that is
expected to be idle for a protracted period and typically for
which routine maintenance is suspended and the crews are either
redeployed or laid-off. When a rig is cold-stacked, operating
expenses for the rig are significantly reduced because the crew
is smaller and maintenance activities are suspended. Placing
rigs in service that have been cold-stacked typically requires a
lengthy reactivation project that can involve significant
expenditures and potentially additional regulatory review,
particularly if the rig has been cold-stacked for a long period
of time. Warm-stacking is a term used for a rig expected to be
idle for a period of time that is not as prolonged as is the
case with a cold-stacked rig. Maintenance is continued for
warm-stacked rigs. Crews are reduced but a small crew is
retained. Warm-stacked rigs generally can be reactivated in
three to four weeks.
The most significant costs for our Domestic Liftboats and
International Liftboats segments are the wages paid to crews and
the amortization of regulatory drydocking costs. Unlike our
Domestic Offshore, International Offshore and Inland segments, a
significant portion of the expenses incurred with operating each
liftboat are paid for or reimbursed by the customer under
contractual terms and prices. This includes catering, fuel, oil,
rental equipment, crane overtime and other items. We record
reimbursements from customers as revenues and the related
expenses as operating costs. Our liftboats are required to
undergo regulatory inspections every year and to be drydocked
two times every five years; the drydocking expenses and length
of time in drydock vary depending on the condition of the
vessel. All costs associated with regulatory inspections,
including related drydocking costs, are deferred and amortized
over a period of twelve months.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
On July 11, 2007, we completed the acquisition of TODCO for
total consideration of approximately $2,397.8 million,
consisting of $925.8 million in cash and 56.6 million
shares of common stock. Our results include activity from this
acquired business from the date of acquisition. The acquisition
significantly impacts the comparability of the 2008 and 2007
periods with the 2006 period.
On average, domestic industry conditions were generally weaker
in 2008 as evidenced by lower average jackup, inland barge and
liftboat dayrates in 2008 as compared to 2007. International
industry conditions remained strong throughout 2007 and 2008
with increasing demand for jackups and higher average dayrates
for both jackups and liftboats.
35
The following table sets forth financial information by
operating segment and other selected information for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of rigs (as of end of period)(a)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
382,358
|
|
|
$
|
241,452
|
|
|
$
|
160,761
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
227,884
|
|
|
|
122,131
|
|
|
|
51,862
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
507,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
174,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
66,850
|
|
|
|
35,143
|
|
|
|
8,882
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
|
|
6,105
|
|
|
|
6,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(598,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
78,073
|
|
|
$
|
93,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Offshore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of rigs (as of end of period)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
327,983
|
|
|
$
|
144,778
|
|
|
$
|
30,460
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
147,899
|
|
|
|
59,593
|
|
|
|
13,377
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
150,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
37,865
|
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(11,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
67,809
|
|
|
$
|
12,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of barges (as of end of period)(a)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
162,487
|
|
|
$
|
107,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
125,656
|
|
|
|
56,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
205,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
202,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
43,107
|
|
|
|
16,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(422,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,667
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Liftboats:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of liftboats (as of end of period)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
94,755
|
|
|
$
|
137,745
|
|
|
$
|
133,929
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
54,474
|
|
|
|
59,902
|
|
|
|
49,025
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
|
|
24,969
|
|
|
|
18,854
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
2,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
16,578
|
|
|
$
|
50,684
|
|
|
$
|
63,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Liftboats:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of liftboats (as of end of period)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
85,896
|
|
|
$
|
63,282
|
|
|
$
|
19,162
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
39,122
|
|
|
|
31,879
|
|
|
|
9,874
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,990
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
30,872
|
|
|
$
|
19,896
|
|
|
$
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In January 2009, we retired four Domestic Offshore rigs and ten
Inland barges. |
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Delta Towing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
58,328
|
|
|
$
|
31,921
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
36,676
|
|
|
|
16,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
86,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
10,926
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(80,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,262
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
631,711
|
|
|
|
346,191
|
|
|
|
124,138
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
192,894
|
|
|
|
104,634
|
|
|
|
32,310
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
81,160
|
|
|
|
49,811
|
|
|
|
29,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
|
|
158,057
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(59,486
|
)
|
|
|
(34,859
|
)
|
|
|
(9,278
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,690
|
|
Gain (loss) on early retirement of debt, net
|
|
|
41,313
|
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
6,483
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,135,771
|
)
|
|
|
195,084
|
|
|
|
183,507
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
66,428
|
|
|
|
(59,072
|
)
|
|
|
(64,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,069,343
|
)
|
|
|
136,012
|
|
|
|
119,050
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,070,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth selected operational data by
operating segment for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
|
per Day(2)
|
|
|
per Day(3)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
|
5,907
|
|
|
|
8,166
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,730
|
|
|
$
|
27,906
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
91.6
|
%
|
|
|
119,137
|
|
|
|
49,218
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
4,048
|
|
|
|
5,885
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
40,140
|
|
|
|
21,352
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
10,343
|
|
|
|
15,785
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
%
|
|
|
9,161
|
|
|
|
3,451
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
6,501
|
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
|
per Day(2)
|
|
|
per Day(3)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
73,952
|
|
|
$
|
24,633
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
95.3
|
%
|
|
|
93,465
|
|
|
|
36,673
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
2,279
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
|
|
46,994
|
|
|
|
19,257
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
11,265
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
|
|
12,228
|
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
5,077
|
|
|
|
6,149
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
5,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
|
per Day(2)
|
|
|
per Day(3)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
2,078
|
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
81,480
|
|
|
$
|
24,957
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
95.0
|
%
|
|
|
99,868
|
|
|
|
41,673
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
11,895
|
|
|
|
15,416
|
|
|
|
77.2
|
%
|
|
|
11,259
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
87.9
|
%
|
|
|
10,857
|
|
|
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Utilization is defined as the total number of days our rigs or
liftboats, as applicable, were under contract, known as
operating days, in the period as a percentage of the total
number of available days in the period. Days during which our
rigs and liftboats were undergoing major refurbishments,
upgrades or construction, and days during which our rigs and
liftboats are cold-stacked, are not counted as available days.
Days during which our liftboats are in the shipyard undergoing
drydocking or inspection are considered available days for the
purposes of calculating utilization. |
|
(2) |
|
Average revenue per rig or liftboat per day is defined as
revenue earned by our rigs or liftboats, as applicable, in the
period divided by the total number of operating days for our
rigs or liftboats, as applicable, in the period. Included in
Domestic Offshore revenue is a total of $0.4 million
related to amortization of contract specific capital
expenditures reimbursed by the customer for the year ended
December 31, 2007. There was no such revenue in the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2006. Included in International
Offshore revenue is a total of $11.6 million,
$3.2 million and $2.6 million related to amortization
of deferred mobilization revenue and contract specific capital
expenditures reimbursed by the customer for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Included in
revenue for our International Offshore segment for the year
ended December 31, 2006 is $2.0 million earned for a
timely departure of Hercules 170 from the shipyard in the
second quarter of 2006. Included in International Liftboats
revenue is a total of $0.3 million related to amortization
of deferred mobilization revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2008. There was no such revenue in the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Average operating expense per rig or liftboat per day is defined
as operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization,
incurred by our rigs or liftboats, as applicable, in the period
divided by the total number of available days in the period. We
use available days to calculate average operating expense per
rig or liftboat per day rather than operating days, which are
used to calculate average revenue per rig or liftboat per day,
because we incur operating expenses on our rigs and liftboats
even when they are not under contract and earning a dayrate. In
addition, the operating expenses we incur on our rigs and
liftboats per day when they are not under contract are typically
lower than the
per-day
expenses we incur when they are under contract. Included in
International Offshore operating expense is a total of
$5.6 million, $2.8 million and $1.6 million
related to amortization of deferred mobilization expenses for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. |
Our domestic liftboat operations generally are affected by the
seasonal weather patterns in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
These seasonal patterns may result in increased operations in
the spring, summer and fall periods and
38
a decrease in the winter months. The rainy weather, tropical
storms, hurricanes and other storms prevalent in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico during the year affect our domestic
liftboat operations. During such severe storms, our liftboats
typically leave location and cease to earn a full dayrate. Under
U.S. Coast Guard guidelines, the liftboats cannot return to
work until the weather improves and seas are less than five
feet. Demand for our domestic rigs may decline during hurricane
season as our customers may reduce drilling activity.
Accordingly, our operating results may vary from quarter to
quarter, depending on factors outside of our control.
2008
Compared to 2007
Revenues
Consolidated. Total revenues for 2008 were
$1,111.8 million compared with $726.3 million for
2007, an increase of $385.5 million, or 53%. This increase
resulted primarily from revenues generated from assets acquired
from TODCO (Acquired Assets) in July 2007. Total
revenues included $15.6 million in reimbursements from our
customers for expenses paid by us in 2008 compared with
$15.2 million in 2007.
Domestic Offshore. Revenues for our Domestic
Offshore segment were $382.4 million for 2008 compared with
$241.5 million for 2007, an increase of
$140.9 million, or 58%. Revenues for 2008 include
approximately $266.8 million compared to
$119.4 million for 2007 from the Acquired Assets. Revenue
increased $171.0 million due to additional operating days
primarily from the Acquired Assets, partially offset by a
$30.1 million decrease due to lower average dayrates.
Average revenue per rig per day decreased to $64,730 in 2008
from $73,952 in 2007. Average utilization was 72.3% in 2008
compared with 65.9% in 2007. Revenues for our Domestic Offshore
segment include $1.3 million and $2.4 million in
reimbursements from our customers for expenses paid by us in
2008 and 2007, respectively.
International Offshore. Revenues for our
International Offshore segment were $328.0 million for 2008
compared with $144.8 million for 2007, an increase of
$183.2 million, or 127%. Revenues for 2008 include
approximately $124.5 million compared to $65.1 million
for 2007 from the Acquired Assets. Revenue increased
$143.4 million due to additional operating days primarily
from the Acquired Assets and $39.8 million due to higher
average dayrates. Average revenue per rig per day was $119,137
in 2008 compared with $93,465 in 2007 as a result of the
commencement of Hercules 260 and the associated revenue
from the provision of marine services, and certain rigs
operating at higher dayrates in 2008. Included in our revenues
for the International Offshore segment is a total of
$11.6 million and $3.2 million related to amortization
of deferred mobilization revenue and contract specific capital
expenditures reimbursed by the customer for 2008 and 2007,
respectively. In addition, revenues for our International
Offshore segment included $1.0 million and
$1.5 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Inland. Revenues for our Inland segment were
$162.5 million for 2008 compared with $107.1 million
for the 2007, an increase of $55.4 million, or 52%. The
2007 revenue is for the period from July 11, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 as we did not have an Inland segment
prior to the TODCO acquisition. Average dayrates and average
utilization in 2008 declined to $40,140 and 68.8% from $46,994
and 77.5% in 2007, respectively. Lower revenue per day also
reflects our customers lower drilling activity. Revenues
for our Inland segment include $1.5 million and
$0.7 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Domestic Liftboats. Revenues for our Domestic
Liftboats segment were $94.8 million for 2008 compared with
$137.7 million in 2007, a decrease of $43.0 million,
or 31%. This decrease resulted primarily from lower average
dayrates, which contributed $34.5 million of the decrease,
and fewer operating days, which contributed $8.5 million of
the decrease. Operating days decreased to 10,343 in 2008 from
11,265 in 2007 due primarily to lower customer activity in the
Gulf of Mexico in 2008 as compared to the 2007. Average
utilization also declined to 65.5% in 2008 from 67.3% in 2007.
Average revenue per vessel per day was $9,161 in 2008 compared
with $12,228 in 2007, a decrease of $3,067. Approximately $2,369
of the decrease in average revenue per vessel per day was due to
lower dayrates and approximately $698 was due to mix of vessel
class. Revenues for our Domestic Liftboats segment included
$4.8 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2008 compared with $5.6 million in
2007.
39
International Liftboats. Revenues for our
International Liftboats segment were $85.9 million for 2008
compared with $63.3 million in 2007, an increase of
$22.6 million, or 36%. The increase resulted primarily from
higher average dayrates, which contributed $23.5 million of
the increase, partially offset by fewer operating days.
Operating days decreased from 5,077 days in 2007 to
5,028 days in 2008. Average revenue per liftboat per day
was $17,084 in 2008 compared with $12,464 in 2007, with average
utilization of 77.3% in 2008 compared with 82.6% in 2007.
Revenues for our International Liftboats segment included
$6.3 million and $4.7 million in reimbursements from
our customers for expenses paid by us in 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Delta Towing. Revenues for our Delta Towing
segment were $58.3 million for 2008 compared with
$31.9 million for the 2007, an increase of
$26.4 million, or 83%. Prior to our acquisition of TODCO in
July 2007, we did not have a Delta Towing segment.
Operating
Expenses
Consolidated. Total operating expenses for
2008 were $631.7 million compared with $346.2 million
in 2007, an increase of $285.5 million, or 82%. This
increase is further described below.
Domestic Offshore. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Offshore segment were $227.9 million in 2008
compared with $122.1 million in 2007, an increase of
$105.8 million, or 87%. Operating expenses for 2008 include
approximately $146.8 million associated with the Acquired
Assets compared to approximately $67.9 million in 2007.
Available days increased to 8,166 in 2008 from 4,958 in 2007.
Average operating expenses per rig per day were $27,906 in 2008
compared with $24,633 in 2007. The increase was driven primarily
by higher costs related to labor and repairs and maintenance,
partially offset by lower insurance costs.
International Offshore. Operating expenses for
our International Offshore segment were $147.9 million in
2008 compared with $59.6 million in 2007, an increase of
$88.3 million, or 148%. Operating expenses for 2008 include
approximately $19.9 million associated with the Acquired
Assets compared to $30.2 million in 2007. Available days
increased to 3,005 in 2008 from 1,625 in 2007. Average operating
expenses per rig per day were $49,218 in 2008 compared with
$36,673 in 2007. The increase resulted primarily from higher
costs related to marine service equipment rentals, labor and
additional amortization of deferred mobilization and contract
preparation expenses. Included in operating expense is
$5.6 million in amortization of deferred mobilization
expense in 2008 compared with $2.8 million in 2007.
Inland. Operating expenses for our Inland
segment were $125.7 million in 2008 compared with
$56.6 million in 2007, an increase of $69.0 million,
or 122%. Available days increased to 5,885 in 2008 from 2,941 in
2007 due to the full year of operations in 2008, partially
offset by cold stacking additional barges in 2008. Average
operating expenses per rig per day were $21,352 in 2008 compared
with $19,257 in 2007. The increase was driven primarily by
higher costs related to labor and fuel, partially offset by
lower equipment rental costs. Prior to our acquisition of TODCO
in July 2007, we did not have an Inland segment.
Domestic Liftboats. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Liftboats segment were $54.5 million in 2008
compared with $59.9 million in 2007, a decrease of
$5.4 million, or 9%. Available days decreased to 15,785 in
2008 from 16,749 in 2007. Average operating expenses per vessel
per day were $3,451 in 2008 compared with $3,576 in 2007. The
decrease was primarily due to lower repairs and maintenance and
insurance costs.
International Liftboats. Operating expenses
for our International Liftboats segment were $39.1 million
for 2008 compared with $31.9 million in 2007, an increase
of $7.2 million, or 23%. Average operating expenses per
liftboat per day were $6,018 in 2008 compared with $5,184 in
2007. This increase was driven primarily by costs accrued for a
payment to a former owner, as well as increased repairs and
maintenance costs.
Delta Towing. Operating expenses for our Delta
Towing segment were $36.7 million in 2008 compared with
$16.1 million in 2007, an increase of $20.6 million,
or 129% as we did not have a Delta Towing segment prior to our
acquisition of TODCO in July 2007.
40
Impairment
of Goodwill
In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred
$950.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill.
There were no comparable charges in the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Impairment
of Property and Equipment
In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred
$376.7 million of impairment charges related to certain
property and equipment on our Domestic Offshore and Inland
segments. There were no comparable charges in the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense in 2008 was
$192.9 million compared with $104.6 million in 2007,
an increase of $88.3 million, or 84%. This increase
resulted partially from the full year depreciation related to
the Acquired Assets. Depreciation related to Acquired Assets was
approximately $135.9 million for 2008 compared to
approximately $52.1 million in 2007.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in 2008 were
$81.2 million compared with $49.8 million in 2007, an
increase of $31.3 million, or 63%. The increase is
primarily related to incurring the full year incremental general
and administrative costs associated with the Acquired Assets in
2008, a provision for doubtful accounts receivable of
$6.2 million, as well as $7.5 million in executive
severance related costs.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $24.6 million, or 71%. The
increase was primarily due to interest on our borrowings under
our 2007 senior secured term loan and interest on our
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2008.
Gain
(Loss) on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
In 2008, the gain on early retirement of debt in the amount of
$41.3 million related to the December 2008, redemption
of $88.2 million aggregate principal amount of the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes for a cost of
$44.8 million which resulted in a gain of
$43.4 million and the related write off of
$2.1 million of unamortized issuance costs. In 2007, the
loss on early retirement of debt in the amount of
$2.2 million related to the write off of deferred financing
fees in connection with repayment of term loan principal in
April and July 2007.
Other
Income
Other income in 2008 was $3.3 million compared with
$6.5 million in 2007, a decrease of $3.2 million or
49%. This decrease is primarily due to lower interest income due
to lower cash balances in 2008.
Income
Tax Benefit (Provision)
Income tax benefit was $66.4 million on pre-tax loss of
$1,135.8 million during 2008, compared to a provision of
$59.1 million on pre-tax income of $195.1 million for
2007. The effective tax rate decreased to a tax benefit of 5.8%
in 2008 from a tax provision of 30.3% in 2007. The decrease in
the effective tax rate primarily reflects the impact of the
non-deductible goodwill impairment.
Discontinued
Operation
We had a loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes of
$1.5 million in 2008 compared to income from discontinued
operation, net of taxes of $0.5 million in 2007. The 2008
loss includes the impact of the wind down costs associated with
our land rigs sold in December 2007.
41
2007
Compared to 2006
Revenues
Consolidated. Total revenues for 2007 were
$726.3 million compared with $344.3 million for 2006,
an increase of $382.0 million, or 111%. This increase
resulted primarily from revenues generated from TODCO acquired
in July 2007. Total revenues included $15.2 million in
reimbursements from our customers for expenses paid by us in
2007 compared with $7.5 million in 2006.
Domestic Offshore. Revenues for our Domestic
Offshore segment were $241.5 million for 2007 compared with
$160.8 million for 2006, an increase of $80.7 million,
or 50%. Revenues for 2007 include approximately
$119.4 million from TODCO. Excluding the revenue from
TODCO, revenue decreased by $38.7 million, of which
$23.7 million was due to fewer operating days and
$15.0 million was due to lower average dayrates for our
fleet. Average utilization was 65.9% in 2007 compared with 94.9%
in 2006 primarily due to the stacking of rigs in 2007 and our
customers lower drilling activity. Average revenue per rig
per day was $73,952 in 2007 compared with $81,480 in 2006. Lower
revenue per day also reflects our customers lower drilling
activity. Revenues for our Domestic Offshore segment included
$2.4 million and $1.1 million in reimbursements from
our customers for expenses paid by us in 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
International Offshore. Revenues for our
International Offshore segment were $144.8 million for 2007
compared with $30.5 million for 2006, an increase of
$114.3 million, or 375%. Revenues for 2007 include
approximately $65.1 million from TODCO. Excluding the
impact of the acquisition, revenue increased by
$49.2 million, of which $46.2 million was due
primarily to additional operating days resulting from
Hercules 258 being in service the entire period in 2007.
Included in our revenues for the International Offshore segment
is a total of $3.2 million and $2.6 million related to
amortization of deferred mobilization revenue and contract
specific capital expenditures reimbursed by the customer for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
addition, revenues for our International Offshore segment
included $1.5 million and $0.2 million in
reimbursements from our customers for expenses paid by us in
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Inland. Revenues for our Inland segment were
$107.1 million in 2007, with 2,279 operating days and
average revenue per rig per day of $46,994. Revenues for our
Inland segment included $0.7 million in reimbursements from
our customers for expenses paid by us in 2007. Prior to our
acquisition of TODCO in July 2007, we did not have an Inland
segment.
Domestic Liftboats. Revenues for our Domestic
Liftboats segment were $137.7 million for 2007 compared
with $133.9 million in 2006, an increase of
$3.8 million, or 3%. This increase resulted primarily from
higher average dayrates, which contributed $11.5 million of
the increase, and partially offset by fewer operating days,
which contributed $7.7 million of a decrease. Operating
days decreased to 11,265 in 2007 from 11,895 in 2006 due
primarily to 264 days of severe weather in 2007 as compared
to 2006. Average utilization also declined to 67.3% in 2007 from
77.2% in 2006 as customers repair and maintenance
activities declined. Average revenue per vessel per day was
$12,228 in 2007 compared with $11,259 in 2006. Revenues for our
Domestic Liftboats segment included $5.6 million and
$4.8 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
International Liftboats. Revenues for our
International Liftboats segment were $63.3 million for 2007
compared with $19.1 million in 2006, an increase of
$44.1 million, or 230%. This increase is primarily due to
an acquisition in the fourth quarter 2006 which resulted in an
increase in operating days from 1,765 days in 2006 to
5,077 days in 2007. Average revenue per liftboat per day
was $12,464 in 2007 compared with $10,857 in 2006, with average
utilization of 82.6% in 2007 compared with 87.9% in 2006.
Revenues for our International Liftboats segment included
$4.7 million and $1.4 million in reimbursements from
our customers for expenses paid by us in 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Delta Towing. Revenues for our Delta Towing
segment were $31.9 million in 2007 and included
$0.3 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2007. Prior to our acquisition of TODCO
in July 2007, we did not have a Delta Towing segment.
42
Operating
Expenses
Consolidated. Total operating expenses for
2007 were $346.2 million compared with $124.1 million
in 2006, an increase of $222.1 million, or 179%. This
increase is further described below.
Domestic Offshore. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Offshore segment were $122.1 million in 2007
compared with $51.8 million in 2006, an increase of
$70.3 million, or 135%. Operating expenses for 2007 include
approximately $67.9 million associated with the TODCO
acquisition. Available days increased to 4,958 in 2007 from
2,078 in 2006. Average operating expenses per rig per day were
slightly lower; $24,633 in 2007 compared with $24,957 in 2006.
On a per day basis, average operating expenses per rig decreased
primarily due to lower labor and insurance costs, partially
offset by higher repairs and maintenance costs.
International Offshore. Operating expenses for
our International Offshore segment were $59.6 million in
2007 compared with $13.4 million in 2006, an increase of
$46.2 million, or 345%. Operating expenses for 2007 include
approximately $30.2 million associated with the TODCO
acquisition. Available days increased to 1,625 in 2007 from 321
in 2006. Average operating expenses per rig per day were $36,673
in 2007 compared with $41,673 in 2006. Included in operating
expense is $2.8 million and $1.6 million in
amortization of deferred mobilization expense for 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Inland. Operating expenses for our Inland
segment were $56.6 million in 2007, with 2,941 available
days and average operating expenses per rig per day of $19,257.
Prior to our acquisition of TODCO in July 2007, we did not
have an Inland segment.
Domestic Liftboats. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Liftboats segment were $59.9 million in 2007
compared with $49.0 million in 2006, an increase of
$10.9 million, or 22%. Available days increased to 16,749
in 2007 from 15,416 in 2006. Average operating expenses per
vessel per day increased to $3,576 in 2007 compared with $3,180
in 2006, primarily from an increase in labor costs.
International Liftboats. Operating expenses
for our International Liftboats segment were $31.9 million
for 2007 compared with $9.9 million in 2006, an increase of
$22.0 million, or 223%. The increase is primarily due to
additional liftboats acquired in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Average operating expenses per liftboat per day were $5,184 in
2007 compared with $4,915 in 2006. This increase was driven
primarily by higher repairs and maintenance, fuel and travel
costs.
Delta Towing. Operating expenses for our Delta
Towing segment were $16.1 million in 2007. Prior to our
acquisition of TODCO in July 2007, we did not have a Delta
Towing segment.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense in 2007 was
$104.6 million compared with $32.3 million in 2006, an
increase of $72.3 million, or 224%. This increase resulted
primarily from additional depreciation of approximately
$52.1 million related to assets acquired in the TODCO
acquisition.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in 2007 were
$49.8 million compared with $29.8 million in 2006, an
increase of $20.0 million, or 67%. The increase is
primarily related to incremental general and administrative
costs associated with TODCO, as well as a $10.9 million
increase in corporate labor related costs, which includes
$3.1 million in acquisition and severance related costs.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense in 2007 was $34.9 million compared with
$9.3 million in 2006, an increase of $25.6 million, or
276%. The increase was primarily due to interest on our
borrowings under our new senior secured term loan.
43
Loss
on Early Retirement of Debt
The loss on early retirement of debt in the amount of
$2.2 million related to the write off of deferred financing
fees in connection with repayment of term loan principal in
April and July 2007.
Other
Income
Other income in 2007 was $6.5 million compared with
$4.0 million in 2006, an increase of $2.4 million.
This increase primarily related to additional interest income
earned in 2007.
Discontinued
Operation
We had Income from Discontinued Operation, Net of Taxes of
$0.5 million in 2007 associated with our land rigs acquired
in July 2007 and sold in December 2007.
Income
Tax Provision
Income tax expense was $59.1 million on pre-tax income of
$195.1 million during 2007, compared to $64.5 million
on pre-tax income of $183.5 million for 2006. The effective
tax rate decreased to 30.3% in 2007 from 35.1% in 2006. The
decrease in the effective tax rate results from a higher
percentage of pretax income being derived from our international
operations where a portion of such earnings are permanently
reinvested. The decrease also reflects a lower overall state
income tax rate.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are important to our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and
require managements most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments. Different amounts would be reported under alternative
assumptions. We have evaluated the accounting policies used in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report. We
apply those accounting policies that we believe best reflect the
underlying business and economic events, consistent with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
We believe that our policies are generally consistent with those
used by other companies in our industry.
We periodically update the estimates used in the preparation of
the financial statements based on our latest assessment of the
current and projected business and general economic environment.
During recent months, there has been substantial volatility and
a decline in commodity prices. In addition, there has been
uncertainty in the capital markets and available financing is
limited. If these conditions persist for a prolonged length of
time, our business and the businesses of our customers could be
adversely impacted. This in turn could result in changes to
estimates used in preparing our financial statements, including
the assessment of certain of our assets for impairment. Our
significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to
our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our more
critical accounting policies include those related to property
and equipment, revenue recognition, income tax, allowance for
doubtful accounts, deferred charges, stock-based compensation,
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, goodwill,
and intangible assets. Inherent in such policies are certain key
assumptions and estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits
with banks and all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less. From time to time we may
invest a portion of our available cash in marketable securities.
Marketable securities are classified as available for sale and
are stated at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As
of December 31, 2008, we had no investments in marketable
securities. As of December 31, 2007, we had marketable
securities with a fair value and cost basis of
$39.3 million.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to marketable
securities are calculated using the specific identification
method. Unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, are included
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets until realized. Realized gains or losses are
included in Other,
44
Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Proceeds of
$39.3 million and $112.4 million were received from
sales and maturities of marketable securities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were no
realized or unrealized gains or losses related to these
securities during the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007.
Goodwill
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), we
are required to test for the impairment of goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives on at least an annual
basis. Recoverability of goodwill is evaluated using a two-step
process. The first step involves a comparison of the fair value
of each of the reporting units with its carrying amount. If a
reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair value,
the second step is performed. The second step involves a
comparison of the implied fair value and carrying value of that
reporting units goodwill. To the extent that a reporting
units carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value of
its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value is
estimated using discounted cash flows and other market-related
valuation models, including earnings multiples and comparable
asset market values. In making an assessment of fair value, we
rely on current and past experience concerning our industry
cycles which historically have proven to be extremely volatile.
In addition, we make future assumptions based on a number of
factors including future operating performance, expected
economic conditions and actions we expect to take. Rates used to
discount future cash flows are dependent upon interest rates and
the cost of capital at a point in time. There are inherent
uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in
applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment.
We performed a preliminary annual impairment assessment as of
October 1, 2008. However, during the fourth quarter of
2008, our market capitalization continued to decline
significantly, therefore, we completed our analysis as of
December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, our market
capitalization was significantly below our book value. We
compared the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying
value and determined that each reporting unit was impaired. Upon
completion of step two of the impairment test, we recorded a
goodwill impairment of $950.3 million, which represented
all of our goodwill as of December 31, 2008.
Other
Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisition of TODCO, we allocated
$17.6 million in value to certain international customer
contracts. These amounts are being amortized over the life of
the contracts. As of December 31, 2008, the customer
contracts had a carrying value of $7.2 million, net of
accumulated amortization of $10.4 million, and are included
in Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We
analyzed these intangible assets for impairment as of
December 31, 2008 and noted that the assets were
recoverable under SFAS No. 144.
Amortization expense was $7.6 million and $2.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Future
estimated amortization expense for the carrying amount of
intangible assets as of December 31, 2008 is expected to be
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
4,781
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
2011
|
|
|
658
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment represents 80.6% of our total assets as
of December 31, 2008. Property and equipment is stated at
cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures that
substantially increase the useful lives of our assets are
capitalized and depreciated, while routine expenditures for
maintenance items are expensed as incurred, except for
expenditures for drydocking our liftboats. Drydock costs are
capitalized at
45
cost as Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
amortized on the straight-line method over a period of
12 months (see Deferred Charges below).
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method, after
allowing for salvage value where applicable, over the useful
life of the asset, which is typically 15 years for our rigs
and liftboats. We review our property and equipment for
potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of any asset may not be
recoverable. For property and equipment, the determination of
recoverability is made based on the estimated undiscounted
future net cash flows of the assets being reviewed. Any actual
impairment charge would be recorded using the estimated
discounted value of future cash flows. Our estimates,
assumptions and judgments used in the application of our
property and equipment accounting policies reflect both
historical experience and expectations regarding future industry
conditions and operations. Using different estimates,
assumptions and judgments, especially those involving the useful
lives of our rigs and liftboats and expectations regarding
future industry conditions and operations, would result in
different carrying values of assets and results of operations.
For example, a prolonged downturn in the drilling industry in
which utilization and dayrates were significantly reduced could
result in an impairment of the carrying value of our assets.
During the fourth quarter 2008, demand for our domestic drilling
assets declined dramatically, significantly beyond our
expectations. Demand in these segments is driven by underlying
commodity prices which fell to levels lower than those seen in
several years. The deterioration in these industry conditions in
the fourth quarter has negatively impacted our outlook for 2009
and we responded by cold stacking several additional rigs in
2009. We considered these factors and our change in outlook as
an indicator of impairment and assessed the rig assets of the
Inland and Domestic Offshore segments for impairment. When
analyzing our assets for impairment, we separate our marketable
rigs, those rigs that are actively marketed and can be warm
stacked or cold stacked for short periods of time depending on
market conditions, from our non-marketable rigs, those rigs that
have been cold stacked for an extended period of time or those
rigs that we do not reasonably expect to market in the
foreseeable future. Based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis,
it was determined that the non-marketable rigs for both segments
were impaired and recorded an impairment charge of
$376.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In addition, we analyzed our other segments for impairment as of
December 31, 2008 and noted that each segment had adequate
undiscounted cash flows to recover their property and equipment
carrying values. There were no impairment charges for the
periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues are generated from our rigs and liftboats working under
dayrate contracts as the services are performed. Some of our
contracts also allow us to recover additional direct costs,
including mobilization and demobilization costs, additional
labor and additional catering costs. Additionally, some of our
contracts allow us to receive fees for contract specific capital
improvements to a rig. Under most of our liftboat contracts, we
receive a variable rate for reimbursement of costs such as
catering, fuel, oil, rental equipment, crane overtime and other
items. Revenue for the recovery or reimbursement of these costs
is recognized when the costs are incurred except for
mobilization revenues and reimbursement for contract specific
capital expenditures, which are recognized as services are
performed over the term of the related drilling contract.
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This
standard takes into account the differences between the
financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain
transactions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or
expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
Our net income tax expense or benefit is determined based on the
mix of domestic and international pre-tax earnings or losses,
respectively, as well as the tax jurisdictions in which we
operate. We operate in multiple
46
countries through various legal entities. As a result, we are
subject to numerous domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions and
are taxed on various bases: income before tax, deemed profits
(which is generally determined using a percentage of revenue
rather than profits), and withholding taxes based on revenue.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves consideration of
uncertainties in the application and interpretation of complex
tax regulations in our operating jurisdictions. Changes in tax
laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, or our level of
operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could
have an impact upon the amount of income taxes that we provide
during any given year.
In March 2007, one of our subsidiaries received an assessment
from the Mexican tax authorities related to our operations for
the 2004 tax year. This assessment contests our right to certain
deduction and also claims the subsidiary did not remit
withholding tax due on certain of these deductions. We are
pursuing our alternatives to resolve this assessment. As
required by local statutory requirements, we have provided a
surety bond for an amount equal to $13 million as of
December 31, 2008 to contest these assessments.
Certain of our international rigs are owned or operated,
directly or indirectly, by our wholly owned Cayman Islands
subsidiaries. Most of the earnings from these subsidiaries are
reinvested internationally and remittance to the United States
is indefinitely postponed. We recognized $2.1 million of
deferred U.S. tax expense on foreign earnings which
management expects to repatriate in the future.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable represents approximately 11.3% of our total
assets and 63.7% of our current assets as of December 31,
2008. We continuously monitor our accounts receivable from our
customers to identify any collectability issues. An allowance
for doubtful accounts is established when a review of customer
accounts indicates that a specific amount will not be collected.
We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the
actual amount we believe is not collectable. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was $7.8 million and
$0.6 million in allowance for doubtful accounts,
respectively. During 2008, we increased our allowance for
doubtful accounts for an inland barge customer.
Deferred
Charges
All of our U.S. flagged liftboats are required to undergo
regulatory inspections on an annual basis and to be drydocked
two times every five years to ensure compliance with
U.S. Coast Guard regulations for vessel safety and vessel
maintenance standards. Costs associated with these inspections,
which generally involve setting the vessels on a drydock, are
deferred, and the costs are amortized over a period of
12 months. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, our net
deferred charges related to regulatory inspection costs totaled
$5.4 million and $6.8 million, respectively. The
amortization of the regulatory inspection costs was reported as
part of our depreciation and amortization expense.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the modified prospective
provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004) Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). Prior to the adoptions of
SFAS No. 123R, we followed the intrinsic value method
as prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
Opinion 25) and related interpretations.
SFAS No. 123R requires that compensation cost for
stock options is recognized beginning with the effective date
based on the requirements of (a) SFAS No. 123R
for all share-based payments granted after January 1, 2006
and (b) SFAS No. 123 for all share-based payments
granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remain
unvested on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R
requires that any unearned compensation related to share-based
payments awarded prior to adoption be eliminated against the
appropriate equity account. Under the new standard, our estimate
of compensation expense will require a number of complex and
subjective assumptions including our stock price volatility,
employee exercise patterns (expected life of the options),
future forfeitures and related tax effects.
We are estimating that the cost relating to stock options
granted through December 31, 2008 will be $5.4 million
over the remaining vesting period of 1.8 years and the cost
relating to restricted shares granted through December 31,
2008 will be $9.9 million over the remaining vesting period
of 1.7 years; however, due
47
to the uncertainty of the level of share-based payments to be
granted in the future, these amounts are estimates and subject
to change.
OUTLOOK
Offshore
In general, demand for our drilling rigs is a function of our
customers capital spending plans, which are largely driven
by current commodity prices and their expectations of future
commodity prices. Demand in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico is
particularly driven by natural gas prices, with demand
internationally typically driven by oil prices.
As of February 19, 2009, the spot price for Henry Hub
natural gas was $4.45 per MMBtu, a significant decline from
$8.91 per MMBtu one year earlier. The twelve month strip,
or the average of the next twelve months futures contract,
was $4.84 per MMBtu on February 19, 2009, down from $9.34 a
year earlier. Along with the negative impact the financial
crisis has had on demand, recent increases in onshore production
in the U.S., driven by a significant increase in onshore
drilling activity, have put downward pressure on natural gas
prices. Growing deepwater production and potential increased
deliveries of liquefied natural gas are also factors which have
weighed on prices. These factors, together with decline rates,
weather and industrial demand will likely remain key drivers in
the natural gas market for the foreseeable future.
Oil prices have also declined significantly over the last
several months, relative to the levels of the past several
years. Since June 30, 2008, the price of WTI has declined
from $140.00 to $39.48 on February 19, 2009, with a current
twelve month strip of $46.05 due primarily to the anticipated
effects of global economic weakness, and a significant
strengthening in the U.S. dollar.
Many of our customers have announced significant capital
spending reductions relative to 2008 spending. While the
substantial recent declines in both natural gas and oil prices
are a primary factor, the weak global economic outlook, shut-in
production related to damage sustained during Hurricanes Gustav
and Ike, and a more difficult environment to raise outside
capital, have all contributed to this curtailed level of capital
spending. This is particularly likely for our U.S. Gulf of
Mexico focused customers whose drilling programs are shorter
term in nature and can be adjusted more quickly in response to
commodity price fluctuations. Many of these Gulf of Mexico
focused customers are smaller and employ more financial leverage
and may face difficulty in raising outside funding for drilling
programs. While international spending programs are much
longer-term in nature, and the customers tend to have greater
financial resources, international capital spending is also
expected to decline, following nine years of growth, but to a
lesser degree.
Global demand for jackup rigs has increased significantly over
the last several years with international regions such as the
Middle East, India and Mexico being particularly strong. Demand
for jackups worldwide, excluding the U.S. Gulf of Mexico,
increased from 200 in 2001 to 326 in February 2009. This
international demand has drawn available rigs from the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico. As a result, the supply of jackup rigs
in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico has declined considerably over
the last several years from a high of 157 jackups in 2001 to
only 77 currently, according to published industry sources.
In addition to spurring migration of rigs out of the U.S.,
strong global demand for jackups over the past few years has
encouraged newbuilds. According to ODS-Petrodata, as of
February 20, 2009, 70 jackup rigs have been ordered by
industry participants, national oil companies and financial
investors for delivery through 2011. Given the recent financial
crisis and the weakened outlook, a number of orders have already
been cancelled and we anticipate that several of these remaining
orders will be delayed or cancelled. However, we expect the
majority of these rigs will be delivered and will compete
directly with our fleet. As a result of generally higher
dayrates, longer duration contracts and lower insurance costs,
which are prevalent internationally, among other factors, we
believe the vast majority of the newbuild jackup rigs will
target international regions rather than the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico. Our ability to expand our international drilling
operations may be limited by the increased supply of newbuild
jackup rigs.
While the overall current supply of jackup rigs in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico is 77, several of these rigs are either
in the shipyard or cold-stacked, and the marketed supply is
approximately 60. While the number of
48
jackups located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico has declined
significantly over the last several years, current demand of 45
jackups as of February 20, 2009 is also considerably lower
than three years ago when 88 jackups were operating in January
2006. A combination of factors has resulted in this decline in
the number of rigs from the levels experienced over the previous
several years, including declining target reservoir sizes and
increasing finding, development and lifting costs.
A further reduction in the number of rigs operating in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico is possible; however, the pace of
migration of jackup rigs from the region to international
regions will likely slow as much of the expected growth in
international demand will be met by the aforementioned newbuild
deliveries. Further a modest reduction in the supply in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico may not be sufficient to offset
declining demand resulting from our customers curtailed capital
spending in 2009.
The global financial and credit crisis has reduced the
availability of liquidity and credit to fund the continuation
and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The
shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent
substantial losses in worldwide equity markets could lead to an
extended global recession. A slowdown in economic activity
caused by a recession would likely reduce demand for energy and
result in lower oil and natural gas prices. Such a slowdown in
economic activity would likely result in a corresponding decline
in the demand for our jackup rigs and other services, which
could have a material adverse effect on our revenue,
profitability and liquidity.
While the outlook for drilling activity in 2009 has certainly
been hampered by the aforementioned weaker commodity prices and
the global credit crisis, a number of factors give us optimism
for the longer-term. First, with steep initial decline rates in
many North American natural gas basins and a likely continued
substantial reduction in the rig count in the coming months, the
recent strong natural gas market production growth, could
quickly slow or even reverse. With respect to international
markets, which are typically driven by crude oil prices, the
lack of any significant oil production growth over the last
5 years, despite a more than doubling of international
exploration and production capital spending over this period,
leads us to believe that production would quickly respond to a
decline in exploration and production spending.
Furthermore, the offshore drilling market remains highly
competitive and cyclical, and it has historically been difficult
to forecast future market conditions. While future commodity
price expectations have typically been a key driver for demand
for drilling rigs, other factors also affect our customers
drilling programs, including the quality of drilling prospects,
exploration success, relative production costs, and availability
of insurance and political and regulatory environments.
Additionally, the offshore drilling business has historically
been cyclical, marked by periods of low demand, excess rig
supply and low dayrates, followed by periods of high demand,
short rig supply and increasing dayrates. These cycles have been
volatile and are subject to rapid change.
Inland
The activity for inland barge drilling in the
U.S. generally follows the same drivers as drilling in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico with activity following operators
expectations of prices for natural gas and, to a lesser degree,
crude oil. Barge rig drilling activity historically lags
activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico due to a number of
factors such as the lengthy permitting process that operators
must go through prior to drilling a well in Louisiana, where the
majority of our inland drilling takes place, and the
predominance of smaller independent operators active in inland
waters.
Inland barge drilling activity has slowed over the past year and
dayrates have softened as a result of the number of the key
operators have curtailed or ceased their activity in the inland
market for various reasons including lack of funding, lack of
drilling success and re-allocation of capital to other onshore
basins. We expect activity levels will decline further during
2009, as our inland barge drilling customers are impacted by the
recent drop in commodity prices and may lack external funding
due to the financial crisis.
Liftboats
Demand for liftboats is typically a function of our
customers demand for platform inspection and maintenance,
well maintenance, offshore construction, well plugging and
abandonment and other related
49
activities. Although activity levels for liftboats are not as
closely correlated to movement in commodity prices as for
offshore drilling rigs, commodity prices are still a key driver
of the demand for liftboats. Despite the production maintenance
related nature of the majority of the work, some of the work may
be deferred from time to time.
Following the active 2005 hurricane season, which caused
tremendous damage to the infrastructure in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico, liftboat utilization and dayrates in the region were
stronger than historical levels for approximately two years. As
activity levels declined to more typical levels and supply
increased as approximately 15 new liftboats were delivered for
work in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico over the past two years,
dayrates softened.
Activity levels increased again in late 2008 as customers
addressed damage caused by the hurricanes Gustav and Ike;
however, the damage was not as extensive as from the 2005
hurricane season, so the higher activity levels are expected
only to continue into the first quarter of 2009. Dayrates once
again increased, responding to the tightened supply and demand
balance but are already declining as the preponderance of the
higher priority repair work has been completed.
As of February 2009 we believe that there were another 10
liftboats under construction or on order in the U.S., with
anticipated delivery dates through 2010. Once delivered, these
liftboats may further impact the demand and utilization of our
domestic liftboat fleet.
Our customers growth in international capital spending for
the last several years, coupled with an aging infrastructure and
significant increases in the cost of alternatives for servicing
this infrastructure, has generally resulted in strong demand for
our liftboats in West Africa. As international markets mature
and the focus shifts from exploration to development, in
locations such as West Africa, Middle East and Southeast Asia,
we would expect to experience strong demand growth for
liftboats. However, an expected reduction in exploration and
production companies capital spending in international
markets in 2009, may temporarily slow or reverse this trend.
Over the longer term, we anticipate that there may be contract
opportunities in international locations for liftboats currently
working in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and for newly
constructed liftboats. We recently mobilized two of our
liftboats to the Middle East from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico
and are actively marketing the vessels for use on projects with
short and long-term contract opportunities. While we believe
that international demand for liftboats will continue to
increase over the longer term, the political instability in
certain regions may negatively impact our customers
capital spending plans.
Labor
Markets
We require highly skilled personnel to operate our rigs, barges
and liftboats and to support our business. Competition for
skilled rig personnel may intensify, particularly in
international markets, as 70 new offshore jackup rigs are under
construction and 32 are scheduled to enter the global fleet
during 2009. If competition for personnel intensifies, our labor
costs will likewise increase, although we do not believe at this
time that our operations will be limited.
50
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources
and Uses of Cash
Sources and uses of cash for 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
269.9
|
|
|
$
|
175.7
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Assets
|
|
|
(320.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Business, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(728.4
|
)
|
Additions to Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(264.2
|
)
|
|
|
(155.4
|
)
|
Deferred Drydocking Expenditures
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
Sale of (Investment in) Marketable Securities
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)
|
Proceeds from Sale of Assets, Net
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
109.7
|
|
Insurance Proceeds Received
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(515.8
|
)
|
|
|
(825.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt Borrowings (Repayments), Net
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Long-term Debt Borrowings
|
|
|
350.0
|
|
|
|
900.0
|
|
Long-term Debt Repayments
|
|
|
(121.5
|
)
|
|
|
(97.8
|
)
|
Redemption of 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
(44.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Repurchases
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
139.9
|
|
|
|
789.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
(106.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
139.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Liquidity and Financing Arrangements
Our liquidity is comprised of cash on hand, cash from operations
and availability under our revolving credit facility. We also
maintain a shelf registration statement covering the future
issuance from time to time of various types of securities,
including debt and equity securities. If we issue any debt
securities off the shelf or otherwise incur debt, we would be
required to make prepayments on our term loan to the extent the
debt is not permitted under the term loan. We currently believe
we will have adequate liquidity to fund our operations for the
foreseeable future. However, to the extent we do not generate
sufficient cash from operations, we may need to raise additional
funds through public or private debt or equity offerings.
Our term loan agreement requires that we meet certain financial
ratios and tests, which we currently meet. However, if the
market for our services does not improve or continues to decline
over the near-term, we may not be able to meet the financial
ratios and tests, which would result in an event of default
under our credit agreement and could prevent us from borrowing
under our revolving credit facility, which would in turn have a
material adverse effect on our available liquidity.
Additionally, an event of default could result in us having to
immediately repay all amounts outstanding under our term loan
facility and our revolving credit facility and in the
foreclosure of liens on our assets.
51
Cash
Requirements and Contractual Obligations
Asset
Acquisition
In February 2008, we entered into a definitive agreement to
purchase three jackup drilling rigs and related equipment for
approximately $320.0 million. The purchase of two of the
jackup drilling rigs for $220.0 million was completed in
the first quarter and in the second quarter of 2008 we purchased
the third jackup rig for $100.0 million. We funded the
purchase of the first two rigs with cash on hand and funded the
acquisition of the third jackup rig with cash on hand and a
portion from borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The
$100.0 million borrowed under the revolving credit facility
was repaid with a portion of the proceeds received from the
issuance of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes.
Debt
Our current debt structure is used to fund our business
operations.
In July 2007, we terminated all prior facilities and we entered
into a new $1,050.0 million credit facility, consisting of
a $900.0 million term loan and a $150.0 million
revolving credit facility. On April 28, 2008, we entered
into an agreement with the revolving lenders under our existing
credit facility and certain new lenders to increase the maximum
amount of our revolving credit facility from $150.0 million
to $250.0 million. The increased availability under the
facility is to be used for working capital, capital expenditures
and other general corporate purposes. All borrowings under the
revolving credit facility mature on July 11, 2012, and the
revolving credit facility requires interest-only payments on a
quarterly basis until the maturity date. The facility includes a
diverse group of lenders with no single commitment greater than
$30.0 million. No amounts were outstanding and
$29.0 million in stand-by letters of credit had been issued
under the revolving credit facility as of December 31,
2008. The remaining availability under this revolving credit
facility was $221.0 million at December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2008, $886.5 million was
outstanding on the term loan facility and the interest rate was
3.21%. The annualized effective interest rate was 5.88% for the
year ended December 31, 2008 after giving consideration to
derivative activity. The fair value of the amount outstanding on
the term loan facility as of December 31, 2008 approximated
$571.8 million.
The revolving credit facility and our term loan are governed by
a credit agreement that includes customary events of default and
two financial covenants that are tested quarterly: a fixed
charge coverage ratio and a leverage ratio. Both financial
covenants incorporate our last 12 months of EBITDA, as
defined in the credit agreement. We were in compliance with
these covenants at December 31, 2008. However, if the
market for our services does not improve or continues to decline
over the near-term, we may not be able to meet the financial
ratios and tests, which would result in an event of default
under our credit agreement and could prevent us from borrowing
under our revolving credit facility, which would in turn have a
material adverse effect on our available liquidity.
Additionally, an event of default could result in us having to
immediately repay all amounts outstanding under our term loan
facility and our revolving credit facility and in the
foreclosure of liens on our assets. Other covenants contained in
the credit agreement restrict, among other things, asset
dispositions, mergers and acquisitions, dividends, stock
repurchases and redemptions, other restricted payments, debt,
liens, investments and affiliate transactions.
In May 2008 and July 2007, we entered into derivative
instruments with the purpose of hedging future interest payments
on our term loan facility. We entered into a floating to fixed
interest rate swap with varying notional amounts beginning with
$100.0 million with a settlement date of October 1,
2008 and ending with $75.0 million with a settlement date
of December 31, 2009. We receive an interest rate of
three-month LIBOR and pay a fixed coupon of 2.980% over six
quarters. The terms and settlement dates of the swap match those
of the term loan. We entered into a floating to fixed interest
rate swap with decreasing notional amounts beginning with
$400.0 million with a settlement date of December 31,
2007 and ending with $50.0 million with a settlement date
of April 1, 2009. We receive an interest rate of
three-month LIBOR and pay a fixed coupon of 5.307% over six
quarters. The terms and settlement dates of the swap match those
of the term loan. We also entered into a zero cost LIBOR collar
on $300.0 million of term loan principal over three years,
with
52
a ceiling of 5.75% and a floor of 4.99%. The counterparty is
obligated to pay us in any quarter that actual LIBOR resets
above 5.75% and we pay the counterparty in any quarter that
actual LIBOR resets below 4.99%. The terms and settlement dates
of the collar match those of the term loan. The change in the
fair value of these hedging instruments resulted in a decrease
in derivative assets of $0.3 million and an increase in
derivative liabilities of $10.2 million during the year
ended December 31, 2008. We had net unrealized losses on
hedge transactions of $6.8 million, net of tax of
$3.7 million, $8.9 million, net of tax of
$4.8 million and net unrealized gains of $0.3 million,
net of tax of $0.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We did not
recognize a gain or loss due to hedge ineffectiveness in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to these hedging
instruments. In addition, our interest expense was increased by
$7.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2008
and was decreased by $0.2 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 as a result of our interest rate
derivative instruments.
On June 3, 2008, we completed an offering of
$250.0 million convertible senior notes at a coupon rate of
3.375% (3.375% Convertible Senior Notes) with a
maturity in June 2038. The interest on the notes is payable in
cash semi-annually in arrears, on June 1 and December 1 of each
year until June 1, 2013, after which the principal will
accrete at an annual yield to maturity of 3.375% per year. We
will also pay contingent interest during any six-month interest
period commencing June 1, 2013, for which the trading price
of these notes for a specified period of time equals or exceeds
120% of their accreted principal amount. The notes will be
convertible under certain circumstances into shares of our
common stock at an initial conversion rate of
19.9695 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount
of notes, which is equal to an initial conversion price of
approximately $50.08 per share. Upon conversion of a note, a
holder will receive, at our election, shares of common stock,
cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock. We may
redeem the notes at our option beginning June 6, 2013, and
holders of the notes will have the right to require us to
repurchase the notes on June 1, 2013 and certain dates
thereafter or on the occurrence of a fundamental change. Net
proceeds of $243.5 million were used to purchase
approximately 1.45 million shares, or $49.2 million,
of our common stock, to repay outstanding borrowings under its
senior secured revolving credit facility which totaled
$100.0 million at the time of the offering and for other
general corporate purposes.
During December 2008, we redeemed $88.2 million aggregate
principal amount of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes for
a cost of $44.8 million resulting in a net gain of
$43.4 million. In addition, we expensed $2.1 million
of unamortized issuance costs in connection with the redemption.
The repurchase effectively reduced the number of conversion
shares potentially issuable in relation to the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes from approximately
5.0 million to approximately 3.2 million. The carrying
amount and fair value of the 3.375% Convertible Senior
Notes was $161.8 million and $77.2 million,
respectively at December 31, 2008.
In connection with the TODCO acquisition in July 2007, we
assumed senior notes and an unsecured line of credit with a bank
in Venezuela. The senior notes included 6.95% Senior Notes
due in April 2008, 7.375% Senior Notes due in April 2018,
and 9.5% Senior Notes due in December 2008 (collectively,
Senior Notes). The 6.95% Senior Notes and the
9.5% Senior Notes were repaid in April 2008 and December
2008, respectively. The fair market value of the
7.375% Senior Notes at December 31, 2008 was
approximately $2.5 million based on the most recent market
valuations. In July 2008, the line of credit was changed to an
overdraft facility and the maximum amount available to be drawn
was increased to 9.0 million Bolivares Fuertes from
6.0 million Bolivares Fuertes. The overdraft facility is
designed to manage local currency liquidity in Venezuela. The
maximum amount available to be drawn at December 31, 2008
is 9.0 million Bolivares Fuertes ($4.2 million at the
exchange rate at December 31, 2008), and there was
5.1 million Bolivares Fuertes ($2.5 million at the
exchange rate at December 31, 2008) outstanding at
December 31, 2008.
In 2008, in connection with the renewal of certain of our
insurance policies, we entered into agreements to finance a
portion of our annual insurance premiums. Approximately
$35.2 million was financed through these arrangements, and
$11.1 million was outstanding at December 31, 2008.
The interest rate on these notes is 4.42% and the notes mature
in April 2009.
53
Capital
Expenditures
We expect to spend a total of approximately $90 million on
capital expenditures excluding asset acquisitions during 2009.
Planned capital expenditures include refurbishment and an
upgrade to certain of our rigs, liftboats and other marine
vessels.
Costs associated with refurbishment or upgrade activities which
substantially extend the useful life or operating capabilities
of the asset are capitalized. Refurbishment entails replacing or
rebuilding the operating equipment. An upgrade entails
increasing the operating capabilities of a rig or liftboat. This
can be accomplished by a number of means, including adding new
or higher specification equipment to the unit, increasing the
water depth capabilities or increasing the capacity of the
living quarters, or a combination of each.
We are required to inspect and drydock our liftboats on a
periodic basis to meet U.S. Coast Guard requirements. The
amount of expenditures is impacted by a number of factors,
including, among others, our ongoing maintenance expenditures,
adverse weather, changes in regulatory requirements and
operating conditions. In addition, from time to time we agree to
perform modifications to our rigs and liftboats as part of a
contract with a customer. When market conditions allow, we
attempt to recover these costs as part of the contract cash flow.
The timing and amounts we actually spend in connection with our
plans to upgrade and refurbish other selected rigs and liftboats
are subject to our discretion and will depend on our view of
market conditions and our cash flows. From time to time, we may
review possible acquisitions of rigs, liftboats or businesses,
joint ventures, mergers or other business combinations, and we
may have outstanding from time to time bids to acquire certain
assets from other companies. We may not, however, be successful
in our acquisition efforts. If we do complete any such
acquisitions, we may make significant capital commitments for
such purposes. Any such transactions could involve the payment
by us of a substantial amount of cash. We would likely fund the
cash portion of such transactions, if any, through cash balances
on hand, the incurrence of additional debt, or sales of assets,
equity interests or other securities or a combination thereof.
If we acquire additional assets, we would expect that the
ongoing capital expenditures for our company as a whole would
increase in order to maintain our equipment in a competitive
condition.
Our ability to fund capital expenditures would be adversely
affected if conditions deteriorate in our business, we
experience poor results in our operations or we fail to meet
covenants under our term loan facility.
Contractual
Obligations
Our contractual obligations and commitments principally include
obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness,
FIN 48 liability, surety bonds, letters of credit, future
minimum operating lease obligations, purchase commitments and
management compensation obligations. During 2008, there were no
material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the
specified contractual obligations, other than the issuance of
the $250.0 million of 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes.
54
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and
contingent commitments by period as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations and
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Commitments
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Recorded Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,021,254
|
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,054,217
|
|
Insurance note payable
|
|
|
11,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,126
|
|
FIN 48 liability(b)
|
|
|
17,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,209
|
|
Purchase obligations(a)
|
|
|
16,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,506
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Unrecorded Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
19,110
|
|
|
|
9,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,071
|
|
Surety Bonds
|
|
|
38,905
|
|
|
|
12,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,367
|
|
Management compensation obligations
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
6,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,711
|
|
Purchase obligations(a)
|
|
|
18,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,304
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
6,267
|
|
|
|
5,925
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
4,850
|
|
|
|
19,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
144,490
|
|
|
$
|
52,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,023,745
|
|
|
$
|
8,358
|
|
|
$
|
1,229,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A purchase obligation is defined as an agreement to
purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally
binding on the company and that specifies all significant terms,
including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed,
minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing
of the transaction. These amounts are primarily comprised of
open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors. |
|
(b) |
|
FIN 48 liabilities of $5.7 million have been excluded
from the table above as a reasonably reliable estimate of the
period of cash settlement cannot be made. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Guarantees
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by liens
on several of our vessels and substantially all of our other
personal property. Substantially all of our domestic
subsidiaries, and several of our international subsidiaries,
guarantee the obligations under the credit agreement and have
granted similar liens on several of their vessels and
substantially all of their other personal property.
Letters
of Credit and Surety Bonds
We execute letters of credit and surety bonds in the normal
course of business. While these obligations are not normally
called, these obligations could be called by the beneficiaries
at any time before the expiration date should we breach certain
contractual or payment obligations. As of December 31,
2008, we had $80.4 million of letters of credit and surety
bonds outstanding, consisting of $0.1 million in an
unsecured outstanding letter of credit, $29.0 million
letters of credit outstanding under our revolver and
$51.3 million outstanding in surety bonds that guarantee
our performance as it relates to our drilling contracts,
insurance, tax and other obligations in various jurisdictions.
If the beneficiaries called these letters of credit and surety
bonds, the called amount would become an on-balance sheet
liability, and our available liquidity would be reduced by the
amount called.
55
Accounting
Pronouncements
In October, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset when the
Market for that Asset is not Active (FSP
No. 157-3).
FSP
No. 157-3
clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) in a
market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
FSP
No. 157-3
was effective upon issuance and was adopted by us without
material impact to our financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)
(FSP 14-1),
which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments
that may be settled in cash (including partial cash settlement)
upon conversion.
FSP 14-1
requires issuers to account separately for the liability and
equity components of certain convertible debt instruments in a
manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt
(unsecured debt) borrowing rate when interest cost is
recognized.
FSP 14-1
requires bifurcation of a component of the debt, classification
of that component in equity and the accretion of the resulting
discount on the debt to be recognized as part of interest
expense in our consolidated statement of operations. The
interest rate to be used under
FSP 14-1
will therefore be significantly higher than the rate on our
Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 that is currently used, which
is equal to the coupon rate of 3.375 percent.
FSP 14-1
is effective as of January 1, 2009, requires retrospective
application to the terms of instruments as they existed for all
periods presented and early adoption is not permitted. Had this
new standard been effective for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, we estimate interest expense would have
increased by approximately $4.3 million, and diluted loss
per share from continuing operations would have increased by
approximately $0.03 per share. In addition, we expect the gain
of $43.4 million recognized on the redemption of
$88.2 million of the Convertible Senior Notes due 2038
would have approximated $22.8 million had this new standard
been effective at that time.
FSP 14-1
will have no direct effect on our cash flow.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161).
SFAS No. 161 amends SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133), requiring enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging
activities thereby improving the transparency of financial
reporting. SFAS No. 161 disclosures provide additional
information on how and why derivative instruments are being
used. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R).
SFAS No. 141R replaces SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141), and applies to all
transactions and other events in which one entity obtains
control over one or more other businesses.
SFAS No. 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially
obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets,
liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at
fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration
is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the
date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the amount
of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable
doubt. SFAS No. 141R requires acquirers to expense
acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating
such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as
was previously the case under SFAS No. 141.
SFAS No. 141R may have a significant impact on the
Companys accounting for any business combinations closing
on or after January 1, 2009.
We adopted, without material impact to our consolidated
financial statements, the provisions of SFAS No. 157
related to financial assets and liabilities and to nonfinancial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
under generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements, rather, its application is made pursuant to other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
SFAS No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
56
defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year
for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis. Effective
January 1, 2009, we will adopt the provision for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or
permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis,
which include those measured at fair value in impairment testing
and those initially measured at fair value in a business
combination. We do not expect the provisions of
SFAS No. 157 related to these items to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We adopted, without material impact to our consolidated
financial statements, the provisions of
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159) on January 1,
2008. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to
measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value and requires that unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected be
reported in earnings.
57
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, included
in this annual report that address outlook, activities, events
or developments that we expect, project, believe or anticipate
will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements.
These include such matters as:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into new contracts for our rigs and
liftboats and future utilization rates for the units;
|
|
|
|
the correlation between demand for our rigs and our liftboats
and our earnings and customers expectations of energy
prices;
|
|
|
|
future capital expenditures and refurbishment, repair and
upgrade costs;
|
|
|
|
expected completion times for our refurbishment and upgrade
projects;
|
|
|
|
sufficiency and availability of funds for required capital
expenditures, working capital and debt service;
|
|
|
|
our plans regarding increased international operations;
|
|
|
|
expected useful lives of our rigs and liftboats;
|
|
|
|
liabilities under laws and regulations protecting the
environment;
|
|
|
|
expected outcomes of litigation, claims and disputes and their
expected effects on our financial condition and results of
operations; and
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding improvements in offshore drilling
activity and dayrates, market conditions, demand for our rigs
and liftboats, operating revenues, operating and maintenance
expense, insurance expense and deductibles, interest expense,
debt levels and other matters with regard to outlook.
|
We have based these statements on our assumptions and analyses
in light of our experience and perception of historical trends,
current conditions, expected future developments and other
factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances.
Forward-looking statements by their nature involve substantial
risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected
results, and actual future results could differ materially from
those described in such statements. Although it is not possible
to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and
uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause actual future
results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties
described under Risk Factors in Item 1A of this
annual report and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
oil and natural gas prices and industry expectations about
future prices;
|
|
|
|
demand for offshore drilling rigs and liftboats;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into and the terms of future contracts;
|
|
|
|
the worldwide military and political environment, uncertainty or
instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak
of armed hostilities or other crises in the Middle East and
other oil and natural gas producing regions or further acts of
terrorism in the United States, or elsewhere;
|
|
|
|
the impact of governmental laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of sources of credit and liquidity;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties relating to the level of activity in offshore oil
and natural gas exploration, development and production;
|
|
|
|
competition and market conditions in the contract drilling and
liftboat industries;
|
|
|
|
the availability of skilled personnel;
|
|
|
|
labor relations and work stoppages, particularly in the West
African labor environments;
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
operating hazards such as severe weather and seas, fires,
cratering, blowouts, war, terrorism and cancellation or
unavailability of insurance coverage;
|
|
|
|
the effect of litigation and contingencies; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to achieve our plans or carry out our strategy.
|
Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or
predict. Any of these factors, or a combination of these
factors, could materially affect our future financial condition
or results of operations and the ultimate accuracy of the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of our future performance, and our actual results
and future developments may differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. Management cautions
against putting undue reliance on forward-looking statements or
projecting any future results based on such statements or
present or prior earnings levels. In addition, each
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the
particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are currently exposed to market risk from changes in interest
rates. From time to time, we may enter into derivative financial
instrument transactions to manage or reduce our market risk, but
we do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative
purposes. A discussion of our market risk exposure in financial
instruments follows.
Interest
Rate Exposure
We are subject to interest rate risk on our fixed-interest and
variable-interest rate borrowings. Variable rate debt, where the
interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes us to short-term
changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt, where the
interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes
us to changes in market interest rates reflected in the fair
value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance
maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate.
As of December 31, 2008, the long-term borrowings that were
outstanding subject to fixed interest rate risk consisted of the
7.375% Senior Notes due April 2018 and the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038. The
carrying amount and fair value of the 7.375% Senior Notes
was $3.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The
carrying amount and fair value of the 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes was $161.8 million and $77.2 million,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2008 the interest rate for the
$886.5 million outstanding under the term loan was 3.21%.
If the interest rate averaged 1% more for 2009 than the rates as
of December 31, 2008, annual interest expense would
increase by approximately $8.9 million. This sensitivity
analysis assumes there are no changes in our financial structure
and excludes the impact of our hedging activities. The fair
value of the amount outstanding on the term loan facility as of
December 31, 2008 approximated $571.8 million.
We believe our other debt instruments, which are short term in
nature, totaling $2.5 million as of December 31, 2008
approximate fair value.
Interest
Rate Swaps and Derivatives
We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired
position of fixed and floating rates and may employ hedge
transactions such as interest rate swaps and zero cost LIBOR
collars as tools to achieve that goal. The major risks from
interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates
affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential
increases in interest expense due to market decreases in
floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the
counterparties in such transactions. The counterparties to our
interest rate swaps and zero cost LIBOR collar are creditworthy
multinational commercial banks. We believe that the risk of
counterparty nonperformance is not currently material, but
counterparty risk has recently increased throughout the
financial system. Our interest expense was increased by
$7.7 million in 2008 as a result of our interest rate
derivative transactions. (See the information set forth under
the caption Debt in Part II, Item 7.
59
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources.)
In connection with the credit facility, in July 2007 we entered
into hedge transactions with the purpose of fixing the interest
rate on decreasing notional amounts beginning with
$400.0 million with a settlement date of December 31,
2007 and ending with $50.0 million with a settlement date
of April 1, 2009. We also entered into a zero cost LIBOR
collar on $300.0 million of term loan principal over three
years, with a ceiling of 5.75% and a floor of 4.99%. The table
below provides the scheduled reduction in notional amounts
related to the interest rate swap (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009 March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
In addition, as it relates to our credit facility, in May 2008
we entered into a floating to fixed interest rate swap with the
purpose of fixing the interest rate on varying notional amounts
beginning with $100.0 million with a settlement date of
October 1, 2008 and ending with $75.0 million with a
settlement date of December 31, 2009. The table below
provides the schedule of notional amounts related to the
interest rate swap (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 - March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
April 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
July 1, 2009 - September 30, 2009
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
October 1, 2009 - December 30, 2009
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
60
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Hercules Offshore, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, cash flows and
comprehensive income for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2006 the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payments. In addition,
as described in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2007 the Company adopted the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Hercules Offshore, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 25, 2009,
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2009
61
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Hercules Offshore, Inc.:
We have audited Hercules Offshore, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Hercules Offshore,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Hercules Offshore, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2008 of Hercules Offshore, Inc., and our report dated
February 25, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2009
62
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Hercules Offshore, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and
cash flows of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results
of operations and cash flows of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Houston, Texas
February 23, 2007
63
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
106,455
|
|
|
$
|
212,452
|
|
Marketable Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,300
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Net
|
|
|
293,089
|
|
|
|
221,663
|
|
Insurance Claims Receivable
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
43,342
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
|
|
31,417
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
17,379
|
|
|
|
18,960
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
|
|
23,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,025
|
|
|
|
593,193
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
2,088,530
|
|
|
|
2,060,224
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940,241
|
|
Other Assets, Net
|
|
|
42,340
|
|
|
|
50,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
$
|
3,643,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt and Current Portion of Long-term Debt
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
|
$
|
21,653
|
|
Insurance Note Payable
|
|
|
11,126
|
|
|
|
16,931
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
99,823
|
|
|
|
105,527
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
83,424
|
|
|
|
80,138
|
|
Taxes Payable
|
|
|
32,440
|
|
|
|
23,006
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
36,472
|
|
|
|
20,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,740
|
|
|
|
268,125
|
|
Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion
|
|
|
1,042,766
|
|
|
|
890,013
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
35,529
|
|
|
|
15,493
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
330,088
|
|
|
|
458,884
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000 Shares
Authorized; 89,459 and 88,876 Shares Issued, Respectively;
87,976 and 88,857 Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Respectively
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
1,755,392
|
|
|
|
1,731,882
|
|
Treasury Stock, at Cost, 1,483 Shares and 19 Shares,
Respectively
|
|
|
(50,081
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(14,932
|
)
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
|
|
|
(783,502
|
)
|
|
|
287,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
907,772
|
|
|
|
2,011,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
$
|
3,643,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
64
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
631,711
|
|
|
|
346,191
|
|
|
|
124,138
|
|
Impairment of Goodwill
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
192,894
|
|
|
|
104,634
|
|
|
|
32,310
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
|
81,160
|
|
|
|
49,811
|
|
|
|
29,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,232,720
|
|
|
|
500,636
|
|
|
|
186,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
|
|
158,057
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(59,486
|
)
|
|
|
(34,859
|
)
|
|
|
(9,278
|
)
|
Gain on Disposal of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,690
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
|
|
|
41,313
|
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, Net
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
6,483
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(1,135,771
|
)
|
|
|
195,084
|
|
|
|
183,507
|
|
Income Tax Benefit (Provision)
|
|
|
66,428
|
|
|
|
(59,072
|
)
|
|
|
(64,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(1,069,343
|
)
|
|
|
136,012
|
|
|
|
119,050
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Taxes
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,070,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(12.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(12.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.32
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(12.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
$
|
3.70
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(12.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
$
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
58,897
|
|
|
|
31,327
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
59,563
|
|
|
|
32,203
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
65
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
88,876
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
|
32,008
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
|
30,243
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,618
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
89,459
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
88,876
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
32,008
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,698
|
|
Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,182
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclass of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
Compensation Expense Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
Compensation Capitalized as part of the Purchase Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit From Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,755,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
|
|
(1,464
|
)
|
|
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(50,081
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
Reclass of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Hedge Transactions, Net of
Tax of $3,669, $4,778 and $(150), Respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period, Net of Tax of $8,040, $4,371 and
$(407), Respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,789
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,070,863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(783,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
87,976
|
|
|
$
|
907,772
|
|
|
|
88,857
|
|
|
$
|
2,011,433
|
|
|
|
32,002
|
|
|
$
|
394,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
66
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,070,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,050
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of (gains) losses, net included in net income
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Other comprehensive gains (losses), net
|
|
|
(11,849
|
)
|
|
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,077,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
127,650
|
|
|
$
|
119,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
67
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,070,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,050
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
192,918
|
|
|
|
109,064
|
|
|
|
32,310
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
12,535
|
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
(111,952
|
)
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
|
|
27,200
|
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Deferred Financing Fees
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
Gain on Disposal of Assets
|
|
|
(3,029
|
)
|
|
|
(4,491
|
)
|
|
|
(30,779
|
)
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
(5,860
|
)
|
|
|
(3,836
|
)
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
(Gain) Loss on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
|
|
|
(41,313
|
)
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Goodwill
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in Operating Assets -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
(78,510
|
)
|
|
|
58,827
|
|
|
|
(50,653
|
)
|
Insurance Claims Receivable
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(13,565
|
)
|
|
|
5,919
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other
|
|
|
53,635
|
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
|
|
(12,617
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in Operating Liabilities -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(5,482
|
)
|
|
|
(6,794
|
)
|
|
|
15,842
|
|
Insurance Note Payable
|
|
|
(45,173
|
)
|
|
|
(25,301
|
)
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
17,125
|
|
|
|
15,239
|
|
|
|
11,499
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement Payment
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
(116,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
23,599
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
269,948
|
|
|
|
175,741
|
|
|
|
124,241
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Business, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(728,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Assets
|
|
|
(320,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(264,245
|
)
|
|
|
(155,390
|
)
|
|
|
(204,456
|
)
|
Deferred Drydocking Expenditures
|
|
|
(17,269
|
)
|
|
|
(20,772
|
)
|
|
|
(12,544
|
)
|
Investment in Marketable Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Sale of Marketable Securities
|
|
|
39,300
|
|
|
|
112,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Proceeds Received
|
|
|
30,221
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
61,278
|
|
Proceeds from Sale of Assets, Net
|
|
|
17,045
|
|
|
|
109,745
|
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in Restricted Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(515,787
|
)
|
|
|
(825,007
|
)
|
|
|
(149,983
|
)
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt Borrowings (Repayments), Net
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Borrowings
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Repayments
|
|
|
(121,427
|
)
|
|
|
(97,750
|
)
|
|
|
(1,400
|
)
|
Redemption of 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
(44,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Repurchases
|
|
|
(49,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,198
|
|
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
5,127
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
3,836
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
|
(8,097
|
)
|
|
|
(17,753
|
)
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
(Distributions to) Contributions from Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,732
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
139,842
|
|
|
|
788,946
|
|
|
|
50,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(105,997
|
)
|
|
|
139,680
|
|
|
|
25,197
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
212,452
|
|
|
|
72,772
|
|
|
|
47,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$
|
106,455
|
|
|
$
|
212,452
|
|
|
$
|
72,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
68
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Nature of
Business and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
Hercules Offshore, LLC was formed in July 2004 as a Delaware
limited liability company. On November 1, 2005 in
connection with its initial public offering, Hercules Offshore,
LLC and its subsidiaries was converted to a Delaware corporation
named Hercules Offshore, Inc. (the Conversion). Upon
the Conversion, each outstanding membership unit of the limited
liability company was converted into common stock of the
corporation.
The Company provides shallow-water drilling and marine services
to the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry
in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and international locations
through its Domestic Offshore, International Offshore, Inland,
Domestic Liftboats, International Liftboats and Delta Towing
segments (See Note 16). At December 31, 2008, the
Company owned a fleet of 35 jackup rigs, 27 barge rigs, three
submersible rigs, one platform rig, a fleet of marine support
vessels operated through Delta Towing, a wholly owned
subsidiary, and 60 liftboat vessels and operated an additional
five liftboat vessels owned by a third party. However, in
January 2009, the Company reclassified four of its cold-stacked
jackup rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 10 of
its cold-stacked inland barges as retired. These rigs would
require extensive refurbishment and are not expected to re-enter
active service. The Company operates in ten countries on four
continents.
On July 11, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of
TODCO (See Note 4), a provider of contract oil and gas
drilling services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and
international locations. TODCO owned and operated 24 jackup
rigs, 27 barge rigs, three submersible rigs, nine land rigs, one
platform rig and a fleet of marine support vessels. During the
fourth quarter of 2007, the Company sold the nine land rigs and
related assets (See Note 5). In February 2008, the Company
entered into a definitive agreement to purchase three jackup
drilling rigs and related equipment for $320.0 million. The
Company completed the purchase of the Hercules 350 and
the Hercules 261 and related equipment during March 2008,
while the purchase of the Hercules 262 and related
equipment was completed in May 2008.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
account balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior year
financial information to the current period presentation.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits
with banks and all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less. From time to time the
Company may invest a portion of its available cash in marketable
securities. Marketable securities are classified as available
for sale and are stated at fair value on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2008, the Company had no
investments in marketable securities. At December 31, 2007,
the Company had marketable securities with a fair value and cost
basis of $39.3 million.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to marketable
securities are calculated using the specific identification
method. Unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, are included
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets until realized. Realized gains or losses are
included in Other, Net in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Proceeds of $39.3 million and
$112.4 million were received
69
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
from sales and maturities of marketable securities for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were
no realized or unrealized gains or losses related to these
securities in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues generated from our contracts are recognized as services
are performed. For certain contracts, the Company may receive
lump-sum fees for the mobilization of equipment and personnel.
Mobilization fees received and costs incurred to mobilize a rig
from one market to another under contracts longer than one month
are recognized as services are performed over the term of the
related drilling contract. Amounts related to mobilization fees
are summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Mobilization revenue deferred
|
|
$
|
33,727
|
|
|
$
|
6,517
|
|
|
$
|
5,680
|
|
Mobilization expense deferred
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
Mobilization revenue recognized
|
|
|
11,860
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
Mobilization expense recognized
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
For certain contracts, the Company may receive fees from its
customers for capital improvements to its rigs. Such fees are
deferred and recognized as services are performed over the term
of the related contract. The Company capitalizes such capital
improvements and depreciates them over the useful life of the
asset.
The Company records reimbursements from customers for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenues and the related cost as direct operating
expenses. Total revenues from such reimbursements were
$15.6 million, $15.4 million and $7.5 million for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the modified
prospective provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). Prior to the
adoptions of SFAS No. 123R, the Company followed the
intrinsic value method as prescribed in Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB Opinion 25) and related
interpretations. SFAS No. 123R requires that
compensation cost for stock options is recognized beginning with
the effective date based on the requirements of
(a) SFAS No. 123R for all share-based payments
granted after January 1, 2006 and
(b) SFAS No. 123 for all share-based payments
granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remain
unvested on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R
requires that any unearned compensation related to share-based
payments awarded prior to adoption be eliminated against the
appropriate equity account. Under the new standard, the
Companys estimate of compensation expense will require a
number of complex and subjective assumptions including its stock
price volatility, employee exercise patterns (expected life of
the options), future forfeitures and related tax effects.
The Company estimates the cost relating to stock options granted
through December 31, 2008 will be $5.4 million over
the remaining vesting period of 1.8 years and the cost
relating to restricted shares granted through December 31,
2008 will be $9.9 million over the remaining vesting period
of 1.7 years; however, due to the uncertainty of the level
of share-based payments to be granted in the future, these
amounts are estimates and subject to change.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are stated at the historical carrying amount
net of write-offs and allowance for doubtful accounts.
Management of the Company monitors the accounts receivable from
its customers for any
70
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
collectability issues. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
established based on reviews of individual customer accounts,
recent loss experience, current economic conditions, and other
pertinent factors. Accounts deemed uncollectable are charged to
the allowance. The Company had an allowance of $7.8 million
and $0.6 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. During 2008, the Company increased its allowance
for doubtful accounts for an inland barge customer.
Insurance
Claims Receivable
Insurance claims receivable include amounts the Company incurred
related to insurance claims the Company filed under its
insurance policies. At December 31, 2008 and 2007,
$0.8 million and $43.3 million were outstanding for
insurance claims receivable, respectively. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company received $30.2 million
in proceeds related primarily to the settlement of claims for
damage incurred during Hurricanes Rita and Katrina as well as
damage to Hercules 205 in a collision. In addition, the
Company adjusted its insurance claims receivables by
$13.2 million in its final purchase price allocation and
recorded additional claims of $0.9 million.
Prepaid
Expenses
Prepaid expenses consist of prepaid insurance, prepaid income
tax and other prepayments. At December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, prepaid insurance totaled
$14.3 million and $21.6 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, prepaid taxes totaled
$6.4 million and $6.2 million, respectively.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation. Expenditures for property and equipment and items
that substantially increase the useful lives of existing assets
are capitalized at cost and depreciated. Expenditures for
drydocking the Companys liftboats are capitalized at cost
in Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
amortized on the straight-line method over a period of
12 months. Routine expenditures for repairs and maintenance
are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method, after allowing for salvage value where
applicable, over the useful lives of the assets.
Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed utilizing the
straight-line method over the lease term or life of the asset,
whichever is shorter.
The useful lives of property and equipment for the purposes of
computing depreciation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Drilling rigs and marine equipment (salvage value of 10%)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Drilling machinery and equipment
|
|
|
312
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
37
|
|
Automobiles and trucks
|
|
|
3
|
|
The carrying value of long-lived assets, principally property
and equipment and excluding goodwill, is reviewed for potential
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS No. 144). Factors that might
indicate a potential impairment may include, but are not limited
to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived
asset, a significant change in the long-lived assets
physical condition, a change in industry conditions or a
reduction in cash flows associated with the use of the
long-lived asset. For property and equipment held for use, the
determination of recoverability is made based upon the estimated
undiscounted future net cash flows of the
71
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related asset or group of assets being evaluated. Actual
impairment charges are recorded using an estimate of discounted
future cash flows.
During the fourth quarter 2008, demand for the Companys
domestic drilling assets declined dramatically, significantly
beyond expectations. Demand in these segments is driven by
underlying commodity prices which fell to levels lower than
those seen in several years. The deterioration in these industry
conditions in the fourth quarter has negatively impacted the
Companys outlook for 2009 and the Company responded by
cold stacking several additional rigs. The Company considered
these factors and its change in outlook as an indicator of
impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and
assessed the rig assets of the Inland and Domestic Offshore
segments for impairment. When analyzing its assets for
impairment, the Company separates its marketable rigs, those
rigs that are actively marketed and can be warm stacked or cold
stacked for short periods of time depending on market
conditions, from its non-marketable rigs, those rigs that have
been cold stacked for an extended period of time or those rigs
that the Company currently does not reasonably expect to market
in the foreseeable future. Based on an undiscounted cash flow
analysis, it was determined that the non-marketable rigs for
both segments were impaired. The Company estimated the value of
the discounted cash flows for each segments non-marketable
rigs and recorded an impairment charge of $376.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the
Company analyzed its other segments for impairment as of
December 31, 2008 and noted that each segment had adequate
undiscounted cash flows to recover its property and equipment
carrying values. There were no impairment charges for the
periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of business acquired
over the fair value of the net assets acquired at the date of
acquisition. These assets are not amortized but rather tested
for impairment at least annually by applying a fair-value based
test in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). This test is generally
performed by the Company on October 1 or more frequently if the
Company believes impairment indicators are present. The Company
determined its reporting units to be the same as its operating
segments under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
Recoverability of goodwill is evaluated using a two-step
process. The first step involves a comparison of the fair value
of each of the reporting units with its carrying amount. If a
reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair value,
the second step is performed. The second step involves a
comparison of the implied fair value and carrying value of that
reporting units goodwill. To the extent that a reporting
units carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value of
its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value is
estimated using discounted cash flows and other market-related
valuation models, including earnings multiples and comparable
asset market values. In making an assessment of fair value, the
Company relies on current and past experience concerning its
industry cycles which historically have proven to be extremely
volatile. In addition, the Company makes future assumptions
based on a number of factors including future operating
performance, expected economic conditions and actions the
Company expects to take. Rates used to discount future cash
flows are dependent upon interest rates and the cost of capital
at a point in time. There are inherent uncertainties related to
these factors and managements judgment in applying them to
the analysis of goodwill impairment.
The Company performed a preliminary annual impairment assessment
as of October 1, 2008. However, during the fourth quarter
of 2008, the Companys market capitalization continued to
decline significantly, therefore, the Company completed its
analysis as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31,
2008, the Companys market capitalization was significantly
below its book value. The Company compared the fair value of
each reporting unit to its carrying value and determined that
each reporting unit was impaired. Upon completion of step two of
the impairment test, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment
of $950.3 million, which represented all of the
Companys goodwill as of December 31, 2008.
72
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore
|
|
|
Offshore
|
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
Towing
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the period
|
|
|
513,602
|
|
|
|
133,046
|
|
|
|
206,264
|
|
|
|
87,329
|
|
|
|
940,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
513,602
|
|
|
$
|
133,046
|
|
|
$
|
206,264
|
|
|
$
|
87,329
|
|
|
$
|
940,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price and Other Adjustments
|
|
|
(6,408
|
)
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(507,194
|
)
|
|
|
(150,886
|
)
|
|
|
(205,474
|
)
|
|
|
(86,733
|
)
|
|
|
(950,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisition of TODCO (See Note 4),
the Company allocated $17.6 million in value to certain
international customer contracts. These amounts are being
amortized over the life of the contracts. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the customer contracts had a
carrying value of $7.2 million and $14.8 million, net
of accumulated amortization of $10.4 million and
$2.8 million, respectively, and are included in Other
Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company
analyzed these intangible assets for impairment as of
December 31, 2008 and noted that the assets were
recoverable under SFAS No. 144.
Amortization expense was $7.6 million and $2.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Future estimated amortization expense for the
carrying amount of intangible assets as of December 31,
2008 is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
4,781
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
2011
|
|
|
658
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets
Other assets consist of drydocking costs for marine vessels,
other intangible assets, deferred costs, financing fees,
investments, deposits and other. Drydock costs are capitalized
at cost and amortized on the straight-line method over a period
of 12 months. Drydocking costs, net of accumulated
amortization, at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
$6.5 million and $8.2 million, respectively.
Amortization expense for drydocking costs was
$19.0 million, $18.4 million and $10.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Financing fees are deferred and amortized over the life of the
applicable debt instrument. Unamortized deferred financing fees
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $18.2 million and
$16.2 million, respectively. The amortization expense
related to the deferred financing fees is included in interest
expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Amortization expense for financing fees was $4.0 million,
$1.8 million and $0.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company
recognized a pretax charge of $2.1 million related to the
write off of unamortized issuance costs in connection with the
redemption of a portion of its 3.375% Convertible Senior
Notes in December 2008 (See Note 10). The Company
recognized a pretax charge of $2.2 million in 2007 related
to the write off of deferred financing fees in connection with
the early debt repayment (See Note 10).
73
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Taxes
The Companys income tax provision is based upon the tax
laws and rates in effect in the countries in which the
Companys operations are conducted and income is earned.
The income tax rates imposed and methods of computing taxable
income in these jurisdictions vary substantially. The
Companys effective tax rate is expected to fluctuate from
year to year as operations are conducted in different taxing
jurisdictions and the amount of pre-tax income fluctuates.
Current income tax expense reflects an estimate of the
Companys income tax liability for the current year,
withholding taxes, changes in prior year tax estimates as
returns are filed, or from tax audit adjustments, while the net
deferred tax expense or benefit represents the changes in the
balance of deferred tax assets and liabilities as reported on
the balance sheet.
Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future.
While the Company has considered estimated future taxable income
and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in
assessing the need for the valuation allowances, changes in
these estimates and assumptions, as well as changes in tax laws,
could require the Company to adjust the valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets. These adjustments to the valuation
allowance would impact the Companys income tax provision
in the period in which such adjustments are identified and
recorded.
Certain of the Companys international rigs and liftboats
are owned or operated, directly or indirectly, by the
Companys wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiaries. Most of
the earnings from these subsidiaries are reinvested
internationally and remittance to the United States is
indefinitely postponed. The Company recognized $2.1 million
of deferred U.S. tax expense on foreign earnings which
management expects to repatriate in the future. In certain
circumstances, management expects that, due to the changing
demands of the offshore drilling and liftboat markets and the
ability to redeploy the Companys offshore units, certain
of such units will not reside in a location long enough to give
rise to future tax consequences in that location. As a result,
no deferred tax asset or liability has been recognized in these
circumstances. Should managements expectations change
regarding the length of time an offshore drilling unit will be
used in a given location, the Company would adjust deferred
taxes accordingly (See Note 15).
Use of
Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, management
makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well
as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, including those related to bad debts, investments,
intangible assets, goodwill, property, plant and equipment,
income taxes, insurance, employment benefits and contingent
liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
approximate fair values because of the short-term nature of the
instruments.
The fair value of the Companys 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes, 7.375% Senior Notes and term loan facility is
estimated based on the current rates offered for debt with
similar risks and remaining maturities. The Company believes its
other debt instruments, which are short-term in nature,
approximate fair value.
74
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounting
Pronouncements
In October 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset when the
Market for that Asset is not Active (FSP
No. 157-3).
FSP
No. 157-3
clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) in a
market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
FSP
No. 157-3
was effective upon issuance and was adopted by the Company
without material impact to its financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)
(FSP 14-1),
which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments
that may be settled in cash (including partial cash settlement)
upon conversion.
FSP 14-1
requires issuers to account separately for the liability and
equity components of certain convertible debt instruments in a
manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt
(unsecured debt) borrowing rate when interest cost is
recognized.
FSP 14-1
requires bifurcation of a component of the debt, classification
of that component in equity and the accretion of the resulting
discount on the debt to be recognized as part of interest
expense in the Companys consolidated statement of
operations. The interest rate to be used under
FSP 14-1
will therefore be significantly higher than the rate on the
Companys Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 that is
currently used, which is equal to the coupon rate of
3.375 percent.
FSP 14-1
is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009,
requires retrospective application to the terms of instruments
as they existed for all periods presented and early adoption is
not permitted. Had this new standard been effective for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Company estimates
interest expense would have increased by approximately
$4.3 million, and diluted loss per share from continuing
operations would have increased by approximately $0.03 per
share. In addition, the Company expects the gain of
$43.4 million recognized on the redemption of
$88.2 million of the Convertible Senior Notes due 2038
would have approximated $22.8 million had this new standard
been effective at that time.
FSP 14-1
will have no direct effect on the Companys cash flow.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161).
SFAS No. 161 amends SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133) requiring enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging
activities thereby improving the transparency of financial
reporting. SFAS No. 161s disclosures provide
additional information on how and why derivative instruments are
being used. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R
replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141), and applies to all
transactions and other events in which one entity obtains
control over one or more other businesses.
SFAS No. 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially
obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets,
liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at
fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration
is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the
date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the amount
of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable
doubt. SFAS No. 141R requires acquirers to expense
acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating
such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as
was previously the case under SFAS No. 141.
SFAS No. 141R may have a significant impact on the
Companys accounting for any business combinations closing
on or after January 1, 2009.
The Company adopted, without material impact to its consolidated
financial statements, the provisions of SFAS No. 157
related to financial assets and liabilities and to nonfinancial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework
75
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new
fair value measurements, rather, its application is made
pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FSP
SFAS No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year
for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis. Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company will adopt the provision for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or
permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis,
which include those measured at fair value in impairment testing
and those initially measured at fair value in a business
combination. The Company does not expect the provisions of
SFAS No. 157 related to these items to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
The Company adopted, without material impact to its consolidated
financial statements, the provisions of
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159) on January 1,
2008. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to
measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value and requires that unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected be
reported in earnings.
|
|
2.
|
Property
and Equipment, Net
|
The following is a summary of property and equipment, at cost,
less accumulated depreciation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Drilling rigs and marine equipment
|
|
$
|
2,248,713
|
|
|
$
|
1,914,018
|
|
Drilling machinery and equipment
|
|
|
47,062
|
|
|
|
235,680
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10,615
|
|
|
|
9,722
|
|
Automobiles and trucks
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
15,294
|
|
|
|
10,505
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
2,324,980
|
|
|
|
2,173,357
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(236,450
|
)
|
|
|
(113,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,088,530
|
|
|
$
|
2,060,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used for the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
58,897
|
|
|
|
31,327
|
|
Add effect of stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
59,563
|
|
|
|
32,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average
76
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
number of shares outstanding during the period as adjusted for
the dilutive effect of the Companys stock option and
restricted stock awards. The effect of stock option and
restricted stock awards is not included in the computation for
periods in which a net loss occurs, because to do so would be
anti-dilutive. Stock equivalents of 3,009,099 and 350,080 were
anti-dilutive and are excluded from the calculation of the
dilutive effect of stock equivalents for the diluted earnings
per share calculations for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. There were no anti-dilutive stock
equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
4.
|
Asset
Acquisitions and Business Combination
|
On July 11, 2007, the Company acquired TODCO for total
consideration of approximately $2,397.8 million, consisting
of $925.8 million in cash and 56.6 million shares of
common stock. The fair value of the shares issued was determined
for accounting purposes using an average price of $25.99, which
represented the average closing price of the Companys
stock for a period before and after the date of the merger
agreement with TODCO. In addition, the Company incurred
additional consideration in the amount of $41.6 million
related primarily to transaction related costs, cash payments to
non-continuing employees and the conversion of certain employee
equity awards. The results of TODCO are included in the
Companys results from the date of acquisition. The
acquisition expanded the Companys international presence
and diversified the Companys fleet.
The total consideration was allocated to TODCOs net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their
estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the
net assets was recorded as goodwill (See Note 1).
The final allocation of the consideration is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
235,163
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
190,452
|
|
Insurance Claims Receivable
|
|
|
20,875
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
19,319
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other
|
|
|
14,121
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
1,685,837
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
Other Assets, Net
|
|
|
26,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
3,142,562
|
|
Short-Term Debt
|
|
|
(3,618
|
)
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(82,977
|
)
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
(9,289
|
)
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(64,153
|
)
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
(14,062
|
)
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
(523,520
|
)
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(5,621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
2,439,322
|
|
The following presents the consolidated financial information
for the Company on a pro forma basis assuming the acquisition of
TODCO had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented.
The historical financial information has been adjusted to give
effect to pro forma items that are directly attributable to the
acquisition and expected to have a continuing impact on
consolidated results. These items include adjustments
77
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to record the incremental depreciation expense related to the
increase in fair value of the acquired assets, to record the
additional interest expense related to the incremental
borrowings and to reclassify certain items to conform to the
Companys financial reporting presentation.
The unaudited pro forma financial information set forth below
has been compiled from historical financial statements and other
information, but is not necessarily indicative of the results
that actually would have been achieved had the transaction
occurred on the dates indicated or that may be achieved in the
future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,182.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,189.7
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
193.8
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
In February 2008, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to purchase three jackup drilling rigs and related
equipment for $320.0 million. The Company completed the
purchase of the Hercules 350 and the Hercules 261
and related equipment during March 2008, while the purchase
of the Hercules 262 and related equipment was completed
in May 2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company sold Hercules
256 for gross proceeds of $8.5 million, which
approximated the carrying value of this asset.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company sold the nine
land rigs and related assets purchased in the TODCO acquisition
for gross proceeds of $107.0 million, which approximated
the carrying value of these assets. In addition, during 2007,
the Company sold several marine support vessels purchased in the
TODCO acquisition for gross proceeds of $3.2 million, which
approximated the carrying value of the vessels.
|
|
6.
|
Discontinued
Operation
|
The Company sold its nine land rigs and related equipment in the
fourth quarter of 2007. The results of operations of the land
rig operations are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.
Interest charges have been allocated to the discontinued
operation in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 87-24,
Allocation of Interest to Discontinued Operations. The
interest was allocated based on a pro rata calculation of the
net assets of the discontinued operation to the Companys
consolidated net assets. Interest allocated to the discontinued
operation was $1.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
78
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Operating results and wind down costs of the land rigs were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
|
$
|
40,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,429
|
|
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
(3,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation, Net of Taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Stock-based
Compensation
|
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the modified
prospective provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004) Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). Prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 123R, the Company followed the intrinsic
value method as prescribed in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB Opinion 25) and related interpretations.
SFAS No. 123R requires that compensation cost for
stock options is recognized beginning with the effective date
based on the requirements of (a) SFAS No. 123R
for all share-based payments granted after January 1, 2006
and (b) SFAS No. 123 for all share-based payments
granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remain
unvested on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R
requires that any unearned compensation related to share-based
payments awarded prior to adoption be eliminated against the
appropriate equity account. Additionally,
SFAS No. 123R requires that the excess tax benefit
(the amount of the realized tax benefit related to deductible
compensation cost in excess of the cumulative compensation cost
recognized for financial reporting) be reported prospectively as
cash flows from financing activities. The Company classified
$5.9 million, $3.8 million, and $1.3 million in
excess tax benefits as a financing cash inflow for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
The Companys 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2004
Plan) provides for the granting of stock options,
restricted stock, performance stock awards and other stock-based
awards to selected employees and non-employee directors of the
Company. On April 26, 2006, the Companys stockholders
approved an increase in the shares available for grant or award
under the 2004 Plan by 1.0 million shares. Additionally, in
July 2007, the Companys stockholders approved an increase
in the shares available for grant or award under the 2004 Plan
by an additional 6.8 million shares to a total of
10.3 million. At December 31, 2008, approximately
5.9 million shares were available for grant or award under
the 2004 Plan. The Compensation Committee of the Companys
Board of Directors selects participants from time to time and,
subject to the terms and conditions of the 2004 Plan, determines
all terms and conditions of awards. Most of the option and
restricted stock grants issued after the initial public offering
are subject to a three year vesting period with some effective
one-third on each anniversary of the grant date and others
effective on the third anniversary of the grant date. The
Company issues originally issued shares upon exercise of stock
options and for restricted stock grants. The fair value of
restricted stock grants was calculated based on the average of
the high and low trading price of the Companys stock on
the day of grant for grants prior to 2008. The fair value of
restricted stock grants in 2008 was calculated based on the
closing price of the Companys stock on the day of grant.
The total fair value of restricted stock grants is amortized to
expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The unrecognized compensation cost related to the Companys
unvested stock options and restricted share grants as of
December 31, 2008 was $5.4 million and
$9.9 million, respectively, and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years and
1.7 years, respectively.
Cash received from stock option exercises was $5.1 million,
$2.1 million and $1.2 million during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
79
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recognized $12.5 million, $7.7 million and
$3.1 million in employee stock-based compensation expense
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$4.4 million, $2.7 million and $1.1 million
respectively. In conjunction with the acquisition of TODCO (See
Note 4), the Company assumed 0.3 million stock options
held by former TODCO employees and issued 20,608 restricted
stock awards in exchange for deferred performance units held by
former TODCO employees. All of these awards are fully vested. In
2007, the Company capitalized $3.8 million related to these
awards as part of the purchase price allocation. The Company did
not capitalize any stock-based compensation during 2008 and 2006.
The fair value of the options granted under the 2004 Plan was
estimated on the date of grant using the Trinomial Lattice
option pricing model with the following assumptions used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected price volatility
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options (in years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
6.35
|
|
|
$
|
11.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company used the historical volatility of comparable
companies to estimate its volatility. In addition, the Company
used the simplified method to estimate the expected life of the
options granted. The total fair value of options granted is
amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period.
The following table reflects the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 123R (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Compensation expense related to stock options, net of tax of $736
|
|
$
|
1,367
|
|
Basic earnings per share impact
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share impact
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Cash flow from operating activities impact
|
|
|
(3,374
|
)
|
Cash flow from financing activities impact
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the
2004 Plan as of December 31, 2008 and changes during the
year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,314,802
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
7.98
|
|
|
$
|
17,558
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
947,800
|
|
|
|
15.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(478,169
|
)
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(38,223
|
)
|
|
|
24.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,746,210
|
|
|
|
17.73
|
|
|
|
7.96
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
Vested or Expected to Vest at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,701,707
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
7.94
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,687,810
|
|
|
|
18.42
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
80
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$6.35, and $11.18, respectively. There were no options granted
in 2006. The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008,
2007 and 2006 was $11.7 million, $5.2 million and
$3.4 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about restricted
stock outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and changes
during the year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-Vested at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
282,364
|
|
|
$
|
26.42
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
417,655
|
|
|
|
26.12
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(105,539
|
)
|
|
|
28.15
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(102,176
|
)
|
|
|
26.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
492,304
|
|
|
|
25.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of restricted stock
granted during the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $26.12,
$28.75 and $34.94, respectively. The total fair value of
restricted stock vested during the years ended 2008, 2007 and
2006 was $2.6 million, $1.4 million and
$0.8 million, respectively.
Accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes other than Income
|
|
$
|
17,610
|
|
|
$
|
21,686
|
|
Accrued Payroll and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
36,160
|
|
|
|
27,941
|
|
Accrued Self-Insurance Claims
|
|
|
29,541
|
|
|
|
29,973
|
|
Other
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,424
|
|
|
$
|
80,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company currently has two 401(k) plans in which
substantially all U.S. employees are eligible to
participate. Under the legacy Hercules plan, the Company matched
participant contributions equal to 100% of the first 3% and 50%
of the next 2% of a participants eligible compensation.
Under the plans acquired in the TODCO acquisition (See
Note 4), the Company matched participant contributions
equal to 100% of the first 6% of each participants base
salary for the legacy TODCO plan and for Delta Towings
plan the Company matched participant contributions up to 50% of
the first 6% of each participants eligible compensation.
Effective January 1, 2008, the legacy Hercules plan and
legacy TODCO plan discussed above were merged into one plan and
in 2008 the Company made matching participant contributions
equal to 100% of the first 6% of each participants salary.
In addition, effective January 1, 2008 the Delta Towing
plan was changed and the Company made matching participant
contributions equal to 100% of the first 6% of each
participants base salary. The Company made total matching
contributions of $8.6 million, $5.0 million and
$1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
81
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility, due July 2013
|
|
$
|
886,500
|
|
|
$
|
895,500
|
|
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038
|
|
|
161,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5% Senior Notes, due December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,432
|
|
7.375% Senior Notes, due April 2018
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
6.95% Senior Notes, due April 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
Foreign Overdraft Facility
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
1,054,221
|
|
|
|
911,666
|
|
Less Short-term Debt and Current Portion of Long-term Debt
|
|
|
11,455
|
|
|
|
21,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion
|
|
$
|
1,042,766
|
|
|
$
|
890,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of scheduled long-term debt
maturities by year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,012,254
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,054,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
secured credit agreement
In 2007, the Company repaid and terminated its senior secured
credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions
that, as amended, provided for a $140.0 million term loan
and a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and
recognized a pretax charge of $2.2 million related to the
write off of deferred financing fees in connection with the
early repayment. Additionally, the Company cancelled all
derivative instruments related to the term loan, which included
two interest rate swaps on a total of $70.0 million of the
term loan principal and two interest rate caps on a total of
$20.0 million of the term loan principal (See Note 11).
In connection with the July 2007 acquisition of TODCO (See
Note 4), the Company entered into a new
$1,050.0 million credit facility, consisting of a
$900.0 million term loan facility and a $150.0 million
revolving credit facility. The proceeds from the term loan were
used, together with cash on hand, to finance the cash portion of
the Companys acquisition of TODCO, to repay amounts under
TODCOs senior secured credit facility outstanding at the
closing of the facility and to make certain other payments in
connection with the Companys acquisition of TODCO. In
connection with the credit facility, the Company entered into
derivative instruments with the purpose of hedging future
interest payments (See Note 11).
On April 28, 2008, the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries entered into an agreement with the revolving
lenders under its existing credit facility and certain new
lenders to increase the maximum amount of the Companys
revolving credit facility from $150.0 million to
$250.0 million. The increased availability under the
facility is to be used for working capital, capital expenditures
and other general corporate purposes. All borrowings under the
revolving credit facility mature on July 11, 2012, and the
revolving credit facility requires interest-only payments on a
quarterly basis until the maturity date. The facility includes a
diverse
82
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
group of lenders with no single commitment greater than
$30.0 million. Amounts outstanding under the revolving
credit facility bear interest at the eurodollar rate or the base
prime rate plus a margin. The applicable margin under the
revolving credit facility varies depending on its leverage
ratio, with the applicable margin for revolving loans bearing
interest at the eurodollar rate ranging between 1.25% and 1.75%
per annum and the applicable margin for revolving loans bearing
interest at the base prime rate ranging between 0.25% and 0.75%
per annum. The Company pays a commitment fee on the unused
portion of the revolving credit facility, which ranges between
0.25% and 0.375% depending on its leverage ratio. The Company
pays a letter of credit fee of between 1.25% and 1.75% per annum
with respect to the undrawn amount of each letter of credit
issued under the revolving credit facility. No amounts were
outstanding and $29.0 million in standby letters of credit
had been issued under the revolving credit facility as of
December 31, 2008. The remaining availability under this
revolving credit facility was $221.0 million at
December 31, 2008.
The principal amount of the term loan amortizes in equal
quarterly installments of $2.25 million, with the balance
due on July 11, 2013. In addition, the Company is required
to prepay the term loan with:
|
|
|
|
|
the net proceeds from sales of certain assets to the extent that
the Company does not reinvest the proceeds in its business
within one year;
|
|
|
|
the net proceeds from casualties or condemnations of assets to
the extent that the Company does not reinvest the proceeds in
its business within one year;
|
|
|
|
the net proceeds of debt that the Company incurs to the extent
that such debt is not permitted by the credit agreement;
|
|
|
|
50% of the net proceeds that the Company receives from any
issuance of preferred stock; and
|
|
|
|
commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008,
50% of the Companys excess cash flow until the outstanding
principal balance of the term loan is less than
$550.0 million.
|
Other than the quarterly payments referred to above and these
mandatory prepayments, the term loan facility requires
interest-only payments on a quarterly basis until maturity. The
Company is permitted to prepay amounts outstanding under the
term loan facility at any time without penalty. Amounts
outstanding under the term loan facility bear interest at the
eurodollar rate or the base prime rate plus a margin. The
applicable margin under the term loan facility varies depending
on the Companys leverage ratio, with the applicable margin
for term loans bearing interest at the eurodollar rate ranging
between 1.50% and 1.75% per annum and the applicable margin for
term loans bearing interest at the base prime rate ranging
between 0.50% and 0.75% per annum. As of December 31, 2008,
$886.5 million was outstanding on the term loan facility
and the interest rate was 3.21%. The annualized effective rate
of interest was 5.88% for the year ended December 31, 2008
after giving consideration to derivative activities. The fair
value of the amount outstanding on the term loan facility as of
December 31, 2008 approximated $571.8 million.
The Companys obligations under the credit agreement are
secured by liens on several of its vessels and substantially all
of its other personal property. Substantially all of the
Companys domestic subsidiaries, and several of its
international subsidiaries, guarantee the obligations under the
credit agreement and have granted similar liens on several of
their vessels and substantially all of their other personal
property.
The Companys liquidity is comprised of cash on hand, cash
from operations and availability under the revolving credit
facility. The Company also maintains a shelf registration
statement covering the future issuance from time to time of
various types of securities, including debt and equity
securities. If the Company issues any debt securities off the
shelf or otherwise incur debt, it would be required to make
prepayments on the term loan to the extent the debt is not
permitted under the term loan. The Company currently believes it
will have adequate liquidity to fund its operations for the
foreseeable future. However, to the extent the Company does not
generate sufficient cash from operations, it may need to raise
additional funds through public or private debt or equity
offerings.
83
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys term loan agreement requires that it meet
certain financial ratios and tests, which are currently met.
However, if the market for the Companys services does not
improve or continues to decline over the near-term, it may not
be able to meet the financial ratios and tests, which would
result in an event of default under the credit agreement and
could prevent the Company from borrowing under the revolving
credit facility, which would in turn have a material adverse
effect on the Companys available liquidity. Additionally,
an event of default could result in the Company having to
immediately repay all amounts outstanding under the term loan
facility and the revolving credit facility and in the
foreclosure of liens on assets. Other covenants contained in the
credit agreement restrict, among other things, asset
dispositions, mergers and acquisitions, dividends, stock
repurchases and redemptions, other restricted payments, debt,
liens, investments and affiliate transactions.
Senior
notes and other debt
On June 3, 2008, the Company completed an offering of
$250.0 million convertible senior notes at a coupon rate of
3.375% (3.375% Convertible Senior Notes) with a
maturity in June 2038. The interest on the notes is payable in
cash semi-annually in arrears, on June 1 and December 1 of each
year until June 1, 2013, after which the principal will
accrete at an annual yield to maturity of 3.375% per year. The
Company will also pay contingent interest during any six-month
interest period commencing June 1, 2013, for which the
trading price of these notes for a specified period of time
equals or exceeds 120% of their accreted principal amount. The
notes will be convertible under certain circumstances into
shares of the Companys common stock at an initial
conversion rate of 19.9695 shares of common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of notes, which is equal to an initial
conversion price of approximately $50.08 per share. Upon
conversion of a note, a holder will receive, at the
Companys election, shares of common stock, cash or a
combination of cash and shares of common stock. The Company may
redeem the notes at its option beginning June 6, 2013, and
holders of the notes will have the right to require the Company
to repurchase the notes on June 1, 2013 and certain dates
thereafter or on the occurrence of a fundamental change. Net
proceeds of $243.5 million were used to purchase
approximately 1.45 million shares, or $49.2 million,
of the Companys common stock, to repay outstanding
borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facility
which totaled $100.0 million at the time of the offering
and for other general corporate purposes.
During December 2008, the Company redeemed $88.2 million
aggregate principal amount of the 3.375% Convertible Senior
Notes for a cost of $44.8 million resulting in a net gain
of $43.4 million. In addition, we expensed
$2.1 million of unamortized issuance costs in connection
with the redemption. The repurchase effectively reduced the
number of conversion shares potentially issuable in relation to
the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes from approximately
5.0 million to approximately 3.2 million. The carrying
amount and fair value of the 3.375% Convertible Senior
Notes was $161.8 million and $77.2 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2008.
The Company determined it has the intent and ability to settle
the principal amount of its 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
in cash, and any additional conversion consideration spread (the
excess of conversion value over face value) in shares of the
Companys common stock.
In connection with the TODCO acquisition in July 2007, the
Company assumed senior notes and an unsecured line of credit
with a bank in Venezuela. The senior notes included
6.95% Senior Notes due in April 2008,
7.375% Senior Notes due in April 2018, and 9.5% Senior
Notes due in December 2008 (collectively, Senior
Notes). The 6.95% Senior Notes and the
9.5% Senior Notes were repaid in April 2008 and December
2008, respectively. The fair market value of the
7.375% Senior Notes at December 31, 2008 was
approximately $2.5 million based on the most recent market
valuations. In July 2008, the line of credit was changed to an
overdraft facility and the maximum amount available to be drawn
was increased to 9.0 million Bolivares Fuertes from
6.0 million Bolivares Fuertes. The overdraft facility is
designed to manage local currency liquidity in Venezuela. The
maximum amount available to be drawn at December 31, 2008
was
84
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
9.0 million Bolivares Fuertes ($4.2 million at the
exchange rate at December 31, 2008), and there were
5.1 million Bolivares Fuertes ($2.5 million at the
exchange rate at December 31, 2008) outstanding at
December 31, 2008. The carrying value of $2.5 million
at December 31, 2008 also approximates the fair value of
this overdraft facility due to its short-term nature.
|
|
11.
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging
|
The Company periodically uses derivative instruments to manage
its exposure to interest rate risk, including interest rate swap
agreements to effectively fix the interest rate on variable rate
debt and interest rate collars to limit the interest rate range
on variable rate debt. The Company cancelled an interest rate
swap on $35.0 million of term loan principal in conjunction
with a debt repayment in April 2007 and received proceeds and
recognized a gain of $0.3 million. In July 2007, the
Company cancelled an interest rate swap on $35.0 million of
term loan principal and two interest rate caps on a total of
$20.0 million of term loan principal and received proceeds
and recognized a gain of $0.4 million.
In May 2008 and July 2007, the Company entered into derivative
instruments with the purpose of hedging future interest payments
on its term loan facility. In May 2008, the Company entered into
a floating to fixed interest rate swap with varying notional
amounts beginning with $100.0 million with a settlement
date of October 1, 2008 and ending with $75.0 million
with a settlement date of December 31, 2009. The Company
receives an interest rate of three-month LIBOR and pays a fixed
coupon of 2.980% over six quarters. The terms and settlement
dates of the swap match those of the term loan. In July 2007,
the Company entered into a floating to fixed interest rate swap
with decreasing notional amounts beginning with
$400.0 million with a settlement date of December 31,
2007 and ending with $50.0 million with a settlement date
of April 1, 2009. The Company will receive a payment equal
to the product of three-month LIBOR and the notional amount and
will pay a fixed coupon of 5.307% on the notional amount over
six quarters. The terms and settlement dates of the swap match
those of the term loan. In July 2007, the Company also entered
into a zero cost LIBOR collar on $300.0 million of term
loan principal over three years, with a ceiling of 5.75% and a
floor of 4.99%. The counterparty is obligated to pay the Company
in any quarter that actual LIBOR resets above 5.75% and the
Company pays the counterparty in any quarter that actual LIBOR
resets below 4.99%. The terms and settlement dates of the collar
match those of the term loan.
The following table provides the schedule of notional amounts
related to the May 2008 interest rate swap (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008-March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
April 1, 2009-June 30, 2009
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
July 1, 2009-September 30, 2009
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
October 1,
2009-December 30,
2009
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
The following table provides the scheduled reduction in notional
amounts related to the July 2007 interest rate swap (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009-March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
These hedge transactions are being accounted for as cash flow
hedges under SFAS No. 133, as amended by
SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities (an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133), and SFAS No. 149,
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. The fair value of these hedging
instruments is included in Other, Other Assets, Net, Other
Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities and the cumulative
unrealized loss, net of tax, is included in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
Company did not recognize a gain or loss due to hedge
ineffectiveness in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to
these hedging instruments. The Company expects
85
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to realize $15.6 million of unrealized loss in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
A summary of amounts relating to derivative instruments is
provided below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fair value included in Other
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fair value included in Other Assets, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Fair value included in Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
15,669
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
Fair value included in Other Liabilities
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
8,784
|
|
Cumulative unrealized loss, net of tax of $8,040 and $4,371,
respectively included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(14,932
|
)
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized Gain (Loss) in Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains included in Other, Net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
(7,745
|
)
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements are generally based upon observable and
unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data
obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs
reflect our view of market assumptions in the absence of
observable market information. The Company utilizes valuation
techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. SFAS No. 157
includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and
related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy consists of the
following three levels:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and
market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Inputs are derived from valuation techniques in
which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are
unobservable.
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value
are as follows:
(A) Market approach Uses prices and
other relevant information generated by market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities
(B) Income approach Uses valuation
techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount
based on current market expectations about those future amounts,
including present value techniques, option-pricing models and
excess earnings method
(C) Cost approach Based on the amount
that currently would be required to replace the service capacity
of an asset (replacement cost)
86
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table represents our derivative assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
Identical Asset or
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Technique
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
22,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
The following summarizes investing activities relating to
acquisitions integrated into the Companys operations for
the periods shown (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fair Value of Assets, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
1,974,086
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
940,241
|
|
Common Stock Issuance
|
|
|
(1,475,763
|
)
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
(710,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Consideration, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
728,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized interest
|
|
$
|
55,865
|
|
|
$
|
36,426
|
|
|
$
|
8,246
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
42,854
|
|
|
|
45,893
|
|
|
|
27,363
|
|
During 2008 and 2007, the Company capitalized interest of
$8.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The
Company did not capitalize interest in 2006.
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
the Company had non-cash activities related to its interest rate
derivatives of $(6.8) million, $(8.9) million and
$0.3 million, respectively.
|
|
13.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts at high
credit quality financial institutions or in highly rated money
market funds as permitted by its credit agreement. The balances,
at many times, exceed federally insured limits.
The Company provides services to a diversified group of
customers in the oil and natural gas exploration and production
industry. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of each
customers financial condition. The Company maintains an
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on expected
collectability and establishes a reserve when payment is
unlikely to occur.
87
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Sales to
Major Customers
|
The customer base for the Company is primarily concentrated in
the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry.
Sales to customers exceeding 10 percent or more of the
Companys total revenue are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Chevron Corporation
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
In addition, Chevron Corporation accounted for 73.2% and 84.9%
of the revenue for the Companys International Liftboats
segment in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Income (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(1,248,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
111,064
|
|
|
$
|
168,885
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
112,575
|
|
|
|
84,020
|
|
|
|
14,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,135,771
|
)
|
|
$
|
195,084
|
|
|
$
|
183,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax (benefit) provision consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current-United
States
|
|
$
|
11,733
|
|
|
$
|
23,262
|
|
|
$
|
33,054
|
|
Current-foreign
|
|
|
31,103
|
|
|
|
11,217
|
|
|
|
3,070
|
|
Current-state
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
|
44,703
|
|
|
|
37,763
|
|
|
|
37,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred-United
States
|
|
|
(96,344
|
)
|
|
|
23,315
|
|
|
|
26,597
|
|
Deferred-foreign
|
|
|
(5,683
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Deferred-state
|
|
|
(9,104
|
)
|
|
|
(1,847
|
)
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(111,131
|
)
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
27,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
$
|
(66,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,072
|
|
|
$
|
64,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of and changes in the net deferred taxes were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward (Federal, State &
Foreign)
|
|
$
|
53,868
|
|
|
$
|
95,939
|
|
Credit carryforwards
|
|
|
31,180
|
|
|
|
28,271
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
15,698
|
|
|
|
17,200
|
|
Unearned income
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
4,509
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Stock Based Compensation
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
2,931
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
124,331
|
|
|
|
153,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(428,427
|
)
|
|
|
(582,233
|
)
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
|
(7,820
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(6,001
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(437,040
|
)
|
|
|
(593,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(312,709
|
)
|
|
$
|
(439,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of statutory and effective income tax rates is
as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Goodwill
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Taxes on foreign earnings at greater (lesser) than the U.S.
statutory rate
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective rate
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of consolidated U.S. net operating losses
(NOLs) available as of December 31, 2008 is
approximately $153 million. These NOLs will expire in the
years 2017 through 2024. Because of the TODCO acquisition, the
Companys ability to utilize certain of its tax benefits is
subject to an annual limitation, in addition to certain
additional limitations resulting from TODCOs prior
transactions. However, the Company believes that, in light of
the amount of the annual limitations, it should not have a
material effect on the Companys ability to utilize its tax
benefits for the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company
has $31.2 million of non-expiring alternative minimum tax
credits.
We recognized $2.1 million of deferred U.S. tax expense on
foreign earnings which management expects to repatriate in the
future. The Company has not recorded deferred income taxes on
the remaining undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries
because of managements intent to permanently reinvest such
earnings. At December 31, 2008, the aggregate amount of
undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries was
$108.8 million. Upon distribution of these earnings in the
form of dividends or otherwise, the Company
89
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
may be subject to U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding
taxes. It is not practical, however, to estimate the amount of
taxes that may be payable on the remittance of these earnings.
The Company, as successor to TODCO, and TODCOs former
parent Transocean Ltd. are parties to a tax sharing agreement
that was originally entered into in connection with TODCOs
initial public offering in 2004. The tax sharing agreement was
amended and restated in November 2006 in a negotiated settlement
of disputes between Transocean and TODCO over the terms of the
original tax sharing agreement. The tax sharing agreement
continues to require that additional payments be made to
Transocean based on a portion of the expected tax benefit from
the exercise of certain compensatory stock options to acquire
Transocean common stock attributable to current and former TODCO
employees and board members. The estimated amount of payments to
Transocean related to compensatory options that remain
outstanding at December 31, 2008, assuming a Transocean
stock price of $47.25 per share at the time of exercise of the
compensatory options (the actual price of Transoceans
common stock at December 31, 2008), is approximately
$4.9 million. The Company accounts for the exercise of
Transocean stock options held by current and former TODCO
employees and board members in the period in which such option
is exercised. As tax deductions are generated from the exercise
of the stock options and in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for the Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109) and SFAS No. 123R,
Share Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), the Company takes a
current tax deduction for the value of the stock option tax
deduction, pays Transocean for 55% of the value of the deduction
and increases additional paid-in capital by 45% of the
deduction. Because of the Companys current NOL position,
the tax benefit of the stock option deduction is reclassified as
a reduction in net deferred tax liability. There is no certainty
that the Company will realize future economic benefits from
TODCOs tax benefits equal to the amount of the payments
required under the tax sharing agreement.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (FIN 48). Its adoption did not
have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Operations or
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company did not
derecognize any tax benefits, nor recognize any interest expense
or penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of
adoption. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related
to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. During 2008,
the Company recorded interest and penalties of $3.1 million
through the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition,
we recorded interest and penalties of $6.3 million as a
component of goodwill related to the TODCO acquisition.
The Company, directly or through its subsidiaries, files income
tax returns in the United States, and multiple state and foreign
jurisdictions. The Companys tax returns for 2005 through
2007 remain open for examination by the taxing authorities in
the respective jurisdictions where those returns were filed. In
addition, certain tax returns filed by TODCO and its
subsidiaries are open for years prior to 2004, however TODCO tax
obligations from periods prior to its initial public offering in
2004 are indemnified by Transocean under the tax sharing
agreement, except for the Trinidad and Tobago jurisdiction. The
Companys Trinidadian tax returns are open for examination
for the years 2002 through 2007.
The following table presents the reconciliation of the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2008
to December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken in earlier periods
|
|
|
8,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
13,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
From time to time, our tax returns are subject to review and
examination by various tax authorities within the jurisdictions
in which we operate. We are currently contesting tax assessments
in Mexico, Nigeria, and Venezuela, and may contest future
assessments where we believe the assessments are meritless.
In December 2002, TODCO received an assessment from SENIAT, the
national Venezuelan tax authority, for approximately
$20.7 million (based on the current exchange rates at the
time of the assessment and inclusive of penalties) relating to
calendar years 1998 through 2001. In March 2003, TODCO paid
approximately $2.6 million of the assessment, plus
approximately $0.3 million in interest, and we are
contesting the remainder of the assessment with the Venezuelan
Tax Court. After TODCO made the partial assessment payment, it
received a revised assessment in September 2003 of approximately
$16.7 million (based on the current exchange rates at the
time of the assessment and inclusive of penalties). Thereafter,
TODCO filed an administrative tax appeal with SENIAT and the tax
authority rendered a decision that reduced the tax assessment to
$8.1 million (based on the current exchange rates at the
time of the decision). TODCO then initiated a judicial tax court
appeal with the Venezuelan Tax Court to set aside the
$8.1 million administrative tax assessment. In August 2008,
the Venezuelan Tax Court ruled in favor of TODCO; however,
SENIAT has the right to appeal this case to the Venezuelan
Supreme Court. We do not expect the ultimate resolution of this
assessment to have a material impact on our consolidated results
of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In January
2008, SENIAT commenced an audit for the 2003 calendar year,
which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company
has not yet received any proposed adjustments from SENIAT for
that year.
In March 2007, a subsidiary of the Company received an
assessment from the Mexican tax authorities related to its
operations for the 2004 tax year. This assessment contests the
Companys right to certain deductions and also claims it
did not remit withholding tax due on certain of these
deductions. The Company is pursuing its alternatives to resolve
this assessment. As required by local statutory requirements, we
have provided a surety bond for an amount equal to
$13 million as of December 31, 2008, to contest these
assessments. In 2008, the Mexican tax authorities commenced an
audit for the 2005 tax year. Depending on the ultimate outcome
of the 2004 assessment and the 2005 audit, the Company
anticipates that the Mexican tax authorities could make similar
assessments for other open tax years.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has $10.6 million
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the
effective income tax rate. It is reasonably possible that,
within the next 12 months, total unrecognized tax benefits
may decrease as a result of a potential resolution of the
aforementioned ongoing tax audits. The Company estimates that
these events could reasonably result in a possible decrease in
unrecognized tax benefits of up to $8.0 million.
The Company reports its business activities in six business
segments: (1) Domestic Offshore, (2) International
Offshore, (3) Inland, (4) Domestic Liftboats,
(5) International Liftboats and (6) Delta Towing.
Previously, the Company reported an Other segment
that included Delta Towing and the land rigs. The land rigs were
sold in December 2007 (See Note 5 and 6) and the
results of the land rig operations in 2007 and the wind down
costs in 2008 are included in Discontinued Operation on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The financial information
of the Companys discontinued operation is not included in
the financial information presented for the Companys
reporting segments. The Company eliminates inter-segment revenue
and expenses, if any. The following describes the Companys
reporting segments as of December 31, 2008:
Domestic Offshore includes 24 jackup rigs and
three submersible rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that can
drill in maximum water depths ranging from 85 to 350 feet.
International Offshore includes 11 jackup
rigs and one platform rig outside of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico. The Company has one jackup rig working offshore in Saudi
Arabia and Malaysia, one rig ready
91
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stacked in Gabon and one rig undergoing repairs in Qatar. The
Company has two jackup rigs working offshore in India and two
jackup rigs and one platform rig operating in Mexico. In
addition, the Company had one jackup rig undergoing customer
acceptance in Saudi Arabia, one jackup rig currently undergoing
an upgrade in Namibia and one jackup rig cold-stacked in
Trinidad.
Inland includes a fleet of 12 conventional
and 15 posted barge rigs that operate inland in marshes, rivers,
lakes and shallow bay or coastal waterways along the
U.S. Gulf Coast.
Domestic Liftboats includes 45 liftboats in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
International Liftboats includes 20
liftboats. Eighteen are operating offshore West
Africa, including five liftboats owned by a third party. One
liftboat is operating offshore Middle East. One liftboat is in a
Middle Eastern shipyard undergoing refurbishment and it is being
marketed in the Middle East region.
Delta Towing the Companys Delta Towing
business operates a fleet of 31 inland tugs, 16 offshore tugs,
34 crew boats, 46 deck barges, 17 shale barges and four spud
barges along and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and along the
Southeastern coast. As of December 31, 2008, 14 crew
boats, three inland tugs and six offshore tugs are cold-stacked.
In January 2009, the Company reclassified four of its
cold-stacked rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 10
of its cold-stacked inland barges as retired. These rigs would
require extensive refurbishment and currently are not expected
to re-enter active service.
The Companys jackup rigs, submersible rigs and platform
rigs are used primarily for exploration and development drilling
in shallow waters. The Companys liftboats are
self-propelled, self-elevating vessels that support a broad
range of offshore maintenance and construction services
throughout the life of an oil or natural gas well.
Information regarding reportable segments is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore(a)
|
|
$
|
382,358
|
|
|
$
|
(598,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,850
|
|
|
$
|
241,452
|
|
|
$
|
78,073
|
|
|
$
|
35,143
|
|
International Offshore(b)
|
|
|
327,983
|
|
|
|
(11,647
|
)
|
|
|
37,865
|
|
|
|
144,778
|
|
|
|
67,809
|
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
Inland(c)
|
|
|
162,487
|
|
|
|
(422,152
|
)
|
|
|
43,107
|
|
|
|
107,100
|
|
|
|
33,667
|
|
|
|
16,264
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
94,755
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
|
|
137,745
|
|
|
|
50,684
|
|
|
|
24,969
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
85,896
|
|
|
|
30,872
|
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
63,282
|
|
|
|
19,896
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
Delta Towing(d)
|
|
|
58,328
|
|
|
|
(80,065
|
)
|
|
|
10,926
|
|
|
|
31,921
|
|
|
|
10,262
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
(1,065,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
189,977
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
260,391
|
|
|
$
|
104,106
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,643
|
)
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,749
|
)
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
192,894
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
225,642
|
|
|
$
|
104,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations for the Companys
Domestic Offshore Segment includes $507.2 million and
$174.6 million in impairment of goodwill and impairment of
property and equipment charges, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations for the Companys
International Offshore Segment includes an impairment of
goodwill charge of $150.9 million. |
92
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations for the Companys Inland
Segment includes $205.5 million and $202.1 million in
impairment of goodwill and impairment of property and equipment
charges, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations for the Companys Delta
Towing Segment includes an impairment of goodwill charge of
$86.7 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
160,761
|
|
|
$
|
93,037
|
|
|
$
|
8,882
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
30,460
|
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
133,929
|
|
|
|
63,791
|
|
|
|
18,854
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
Delta Towing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
|
$
|
174,067
|
|
|
$
|
32,206
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,010
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
|
$
|
158,057
|
|
|
$
|
32,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore(a)
|
|
$
|
930,988
|
|
|
$
|
1,504,548
|
|
International Offshore(b)
|
|
|
955,911
|
|
|
|
681,742
|
|
Inland(c)
|
|
|
217,477
|
|
|
|
646,120
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
148,307
|
|
|
|
186,568
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
168,356
|
|
|
|
149,813
|
|
Delta Towing(d)
|
|
|
92,371
|
|
|
|
193,963
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
77,485
|
|
|
|
281,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
$
|
3,643,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2008 Assets for the Companys Domestic Offshore Segment
reflect the $507.2 million and $174.6 million
impairment of goodwill and impairment of property and equipment,
respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
2008 Assets for the Companys International Offshore
Segment reflect the impairment of goodwill of
$150.9 million. |
|
(c) |
|
2008 Assets for the Companys Inland Segment reflect
$205.5 million and $202.1 million impairment of
goodwill and impairment of property and equipment, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
2008 Assets for the Companys Delta Towing Segment reflect
the impairment of goodwill of $86.7 million. |
93
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(a)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures and Deferred Drydocking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
139,893
|
|
|
$
|
22,720
|
|
|
$
|
76,635
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
390,732
|
|
|
|
78,455
|
|
|
|
20,100
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
39,739
|
|
|
|
17,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
12,362
|
|
|
|
16,950
|
|
|
|
66,279
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
20,183
|
|
|
|
53,955
|
|
Delta Towing
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
16,685
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
602,353
|
|
|
$
|
176,162
|
|
|
$
|
217,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the purchase of the Hercules 350, the
Hercules 262 and the Hercules 261 as well as
related equipment (See Note 4). |
A substantial portion of our assets are mobile. Asset locations
at the end of the period are not necessarily indicative of the
geographic distribution of the revenues generated by such assets
during the periods. The following tables present revenues and
long-lived assets by country based on the location of the
service provided (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
697,930
|
|
|
$
|
514,911
|
|
|
$
|
294,690
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
93,544
|
|
|
|
52,501
|
|
|
|
12,392
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
90,815
|
|
|
|
28,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
83,141
|
|
|
|
60,384
|
|
|
|
18,440
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
146,006
|
|
|
|
70,118
|
|
|
|
18,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,226,379
|
|
|
$
|
2,375,874
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
301,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
157,686
|
|
|
|
128,773
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
101,429
|
|
|
|
161,568
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
79,886
|
|
|
|
82,455
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
264,343
|
|
|
|
302,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,130,870
|
|
|
$
|
3,050,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other represents countries in which we operate that individually
had operating revenues or long-lived assets representing less
than 4% of total operating revenues earned or total long-lived
assets. |
94
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company has operating lease commitments that expire at
various dates through 2017. As of December 31, 2008, future
minimum lease payments related to operating leases were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense for all operating leases was $13.3 million,
$2.8 million and $1.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Legal
Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits in the
normal course of business. As of December 31, 2008,
management did not believe any accruals were necessary in
accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies.
In connection with the acquisition of TODCO, the Company assumed
certain material legal proceedings from TODCO and its
subsidiaries.
In October 2001, TODCO was notified by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that
the EPA had identified a subsidiary of TODCO as a potentially
responsible party under CERCLA in connection with the Palmer
Barge Line superfund site located in Port Arthur, Jefferson
County, Texas. Based upon the information provided by the EPA
and the Companys review of its internal records to date,
the Company disputes the Companys designation as a
potentially responsible party and does not expect that the
ultimate outcome of this case will have a material adverse
effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial
position or cash flows. The Company continues to monitor this
matter.
Robert E. Aaron et al. vs. Phillips 66 Company et al. Circuit
Court, Second Judicial District, Jones County,
Mississippi. This is the case name used to refer to several
cases that have been filed in the Circuit Courts of the State of
Mississippi involving 768 persons that allege personal
injury or whose heirs claim their deaths arose out of asbestos
exposure in the course of their employment by the defendants
between 1965 and 2002. The complaints name as defendants, among
others, certain of TODCOs subsidiaries and certain
subsidiaries of TODCOs former parent to whom TODCO may owe
indemnity, and other unaffiliated defendant companies, including
companies that allegedly manufactured drilling-related products
containing asbestos that are the subject of the complaints. The
number of unaffiliated defendant companies involved in each
complaint ranges from approximately 20 to 70. The complaints
allege that the defendant drilling contractors used
asbestos-containing products in offshore drilling operations,
land based drilling operations and in drilling structures,
drilling rigs, vessels and other equipment and assert claims
based on, among other things, negligence and strict liability,
and claims authorized under the Jones Act. The plaintiffs seek,
among other things, awards of unspecified compensatory and
punitive damages. All of these cases were assigned to a special
master who has approved a form of questionnaire to be completed
by plaintiffs so that claims made would be properly served
against specific defendants. As of the date of this report,
approximately
95
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
700 questionnaires were returned and the remaining
plaintiffs, who did not submit a questionnaire reply, have had
their suits dismissed without prejudice. Of the respondents,
approximately 100 shared periods of employment by TODCO and
its former parent which could lead to claims against either
company, even though many of these plaintiffs did not state in
their questionnaire answers that the employment actually
involved exposure to asbestos. After providing the
questionnaire, each plaintiff was further required to file a
separate and individual amended complaint naming only those
defendants against whom they had a direct claim as identified in
the questionnaire answers. Defendants not identified in the
amended complaints were dismissed from the plaintiffs
litigation. To date, three plaintiffs named TODCO as a defendant
in their amended complaints. It is possible that some of the
plaintiffs who have filed amended complaints and have not named
TODCO as a defendant may attempt to add TODCO as a defendant in
the future when case discovery begins and greater attention is
given to each individual plaintiffs employment background.
The Company continues to monitor a small group of these other
cases. The Company has not determined which entity would be
responsible for such claims under the Master Separation
Agreement between TODCO and its former parent. The Company
intends to defend vigorously and, based on the limited
information available at this time, does not expect the ultimate
outcome of these lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on
its consolidated results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in a number of
other lawsuits, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course
of business. The Company does not believe that ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from any such other pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its business
or consolidated financial position.
The Company cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect
of any of the litigation matters specifically described above or
of any other pending litigation. There can be no assurance that
the Companys belief or expectations as to the outcome or
effect of any lawsuit or other litigation matter will prove
correct, and the eventual outcome of these matters could
materially differ from managements current estimates.
Insurance
The Company is self-insured for the deductible portion of its
insurance coverage. Management believes adequate accruals have
been made on known and estimated exposures up to the deductible
portion of the Companys insurance coverage. Management
believes that claims and liabilities in excess of the amounts
accrued are adequately insured. However, our insurance is
subject to exclusions and limitations, and there is no assurance
that such coverage will adequately protect us against liability
from all potential consequences.
The Company maintains insurance coverage that includes coverage
for physical damage, third party liability, workers
compensation and employers liability, general liability,
vessel pollution and other coverages.
In May 2008, the Company completed the renewal of all of its key
insurance policies. The Companys primary marine package
provides for hull and machinery coverage for the Companys
rigs and liftboats up to a scheduled value for each asset. The
maximum coverage for these assets is $2.9 billion; however,
coverage for U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm damage is
subject to an annual aggregate limit on liability of
$200.0 million. The policies are subject to exclusions,
limitations, deductibles, self-insured retention and other
conditions. Deductibles for events that are not U.S. Gulf
of Mexico named windstorm events are 10% of insured values per
occurrence for drilling rigs, and range from $0.3 million
to $1.0 million per occurrence for liftboats, depending on
the insured value of the particular vessel. The deductibles for
drilling rigs and liftboats in a U.S. Gulf of Mexico named
windstorm event are the greater of $10.0 million or the
operational deductible
96
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for each U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm. The Company
is self-insured for 10% above the deductibles for removal of
wreck, sue and labor, collision, protection and indemnity
general liability and hull and physical damage policies. The
protection and indemnity coverage under the primary marine
package has a $5.0 million limit per occurrence with excess
liability coverage up to $200.0 million. The primary marine
package also provides coverage for cargo and charterers
legal liability. Vessel pollution is covered under a Water
Quality Insurance Syndicate policy. In addition to the marine
package, the Company has separate policies providing coverage
for onshore general liability, employers liability, auto
liability and non-owned aircraft liability, with customary
deductibles and coverage as well as a separate primary marine
package for its Delta Towing business.
In 2008, in connection with the renewal of certain of its
insurance policies, the Company entered into agreements to
finance a portion of its annual insurance premiums.
Approximately $35.2 million was financed through these
arrangements of which $11.1 million was outstanding at
December 31, 2008. The interest rate on these notes is
4.42% and the notes mature in April 2009. There was
$16.9 million outstanding in insurance note payable at
December 31, 2007 at an interest rate of 5.75%.
Surety
Bonds and Unsecured Letters of Credit
In connection with the TODCO acquisition in July 2007 (See
Note 4), the Company assumed certain surety bonds. There
was $51.4 million outstanding related to surety bonds at
December 31, 2008. The surety bonds guarantee our
performance as it relates to the Companys drilling
contracts, insurance, tax and other obligations in various
jurisdictions. These obligations could be called at any time
prior to the expiration dates. The obligations that are the
subject of the surety bonds are geographically concentrated
primarily in Mexico.
The Company had $0.1 million in unsecured letters of credit
outstanding at December 31, 2008.
Insurance
Claims
The Company acquired several jackup rigs in the TODCO
acquisition (See Note 4) that were damaged by
Hurricanes Rita and Katrina and one jackup rig that was damaged
in a collision. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
the Company received $30.2 million in proceeds related
primarily to the settlement of claims for damage incurred during
Hurricanes Rita and Katrina as well as damage to Hercules 205
in a collision. At December 31, 2008, $0.8 million
was outstanding for insurance claims receivable.
In August 2005, two of the Companys jackup rigs,
Hercules 120 and Rig 25, sustained damage during
Hurricane Katrina. Rig 25 was insured for
$50.0 million, and the Company reached a settlement with
its insurance underwriters and received net insurance proceeds
of $48.8 million related to this claim in 2006, which
represents the insured value less the negotiated salvage value
of $1.3 million. The Company retained title to the rig and
removed usable materials and equipment to be used on its other
rigs. The Company recognized a gain of $29.6 million in
March 2006 related to its insurance claim on Rig 25,
which represented the gross proceeds of $50.0 million
expected to be received, less the rig book value of
$20.1 million and less $0.3 million of items related
to the salvage operation of the rig not reimbursed by the
Companys insurance carriers. Hercules 120 sustained
substantial damage to its mat and was moved to a shipyard in
Mississippi to repair the damage. The rig returned to service in
April 2006. As of December 31, 2006 all insurance claims
relating to these jackup rigs have been paid.
97
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Unaudited
Interim Financial Data
|
Unaudited interim financial information for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31(a)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
$
|
212,494
|
|
|
$
|
270,106
|
|
|
$
|
315,738
|
|
|
$
|
313,469
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
21,364
|
|
|
|
40,852
|
|
|
|
67,057
|
|
|
|
(1,250,186
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
33,126
|
|
|
|
(1,123,996
|
)
|
Loss from Discontinued Operation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Taxes
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
4,486
|
|
|
$
|
16,443
|
|
|
$
|
32,958
|
|
|
$
|
(1,124,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(12.78
|
)
|
Loss from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(12.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(12.78
|
)
|
Loss from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(12.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $950.3 million and $376.7 million in
impairment of goodwill and impairment of property and equipment
charges, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
$
|
110,464
|
|
|
$
|
99,044
|
|
|
$
|
272,573
|
|
|
$
|
244,197
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
48,044
|
|
|
|
33,104
|
|
|
|
87,604
|
|
|
|
56,890
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
33,391
|
|
|
|
23,466
|
|
|
|
46,352
|
|
|
|
32,803
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
(1,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
33,391
|
|
|
$
|
23,466
|
|
|
$
|
48,371
|
|
|
$
|
31,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys management believes all of the following
transactions were carried out on an arms-length basis.
The Company provided $3.3 million and $0.7 million in
drilling services during the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, to Carrizo Oil and Gas, Inc. There were
no services provided during the year ended December 31,
2006. Two members of the Companys Board of Directors are
members of the Board of Directors of Carrizo Oil and Gas, Inc.
The Company provided $10.3 million and $3.9 million in
drilling services during the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, to Peregrine Oil & Gas of
which a member of the Companys Board of Directors is a
member of the Board of Directors of Peregrine Oil &
Gas. There were no services provided during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
The Company incurred expense of $1.3 million,
$0.4 million and $2.4 million related to transactions
with T-3 Energy Services during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
Companys Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
and a member of the Companys Board of Directors are
members of the Board of Directors for T-3 Energy Services.
The Company provided $22.3 million and $5.7 million in
drilling services during the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, to Hall-Houston Exploration III, L.P. in
which the Company holds a three percent investment. There were
no services provided during the year ended December 31,
2006.
The Company incurred expense of $0.7 million,
$0.8 million and $0.1 million for insurance premiums
with HCC Insurance Holdings during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. A member of
the Companys Board of Directors became a member of the
Board of Directors of HCC Insurance Holdings in November 2008.
The Company incurred expense of $2.4 million and
$0.2 million related to transactions with Louisiana
Electric Rig Service, Inc. during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$1.8 million, $1.1 million and $0.1 million
related to transactions with Southwest Oilfield Products, Inc.
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. There were no payments to Louisiana Electric Rig
Service, Inc. during the year ended December 31, 2006. Two
members of the Companys Board of Directors are Managing
Directors of Lime Rock Partners who purchased Louisiana Electric
Rig Service, Inc. and Southwest Oilfield Products, Inc. in
December 2008 and June 2008, respectively.
The Company paid the expenses of the selling stockholders in
connection with public offerings of the Companys common
stock in April and November 2006, including a single firm of
attorneys for the selling stockholders, other than the
underwriting discounts, commissions and taxes with respect to
shares of common stock sold by the selling stockholders and the
fees and expenses of any other attorneys, accountants and other
advisors separately retained by them. A member of the
Companys Board of Directors and a former Vice President of
the Company were selling stockholders in the April 2006
offering. LR Hercules Holdings, LP and Greenhill &
Co., Inc. and its affiliates were selling stockholders in the
April and November 2006 offerings. The total fees paid by the
Company with respect to the offerings, including expenses paid
on behalf of the selling stockholders, were approximately
$1.2 million.
In January 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with
Mosvold Middle East Jackup Ltd. whereby it will market, manage
and operate two 300 foot, high-specification new-build jackup
drilling rigs. The rigs, which have an independent leg
cantilever design, are under construction in the Middle East and
have expected delivery dates of December 2009 and April 2010.
The Company will have worldwide, exclusive marketing rights,
except in U.S. sanctioned countries. All operating and
capital expenses incurred to operate the rig will be paid for or
reimbursed by Mosvold Middle East Jackup Ltd. Upon commencement
of a drilling contract, the Company will receive a commencement
fee and an ongoing management fee for the remainder of the
contract.
99
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including John T. Rynd, our
Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lisa W. Rodriguez,
our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant
to
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report. Based upon that
evaluation, Mr. Rynd and Ms. Rodriguez, acting in
their capacities as our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer, concluded that, as of
December 31, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective, in all material respects, with respect to the
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, of
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that
we file or submit under the Exchange Act.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we converted a
majority of our domestic and all of our international
locations operational and financial functions to the
Oracle enterprise resource planning (ERP) software
system. The new ERP system affects every aspect of our
operations, including procurement, finance and accounting,
engineering, human resources and benefits and asset maintenance.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, it used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on our
assessment, we have concluded that, as of December 31,
2008, our internal control over financial reporting is effective
based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has audited
managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, as stated in their report entitled
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm which appears herein.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
100
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2008.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethical Practices
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which
applies to, among others, our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and
persons performing similar functions. We have posted a copy of
the code in the Corporate Governance section of our
internet website at www.herculesoffshore.com. Copies of
the code may be obtained free of charge on our website or by
requesting a copy in writing from our Corporate Secretary at 9
Greenway Plaza, Suite 2200, Houston, Texas 77046. Any
waivers of the code must be approved by our board of directors
or a designated board committee. Any amendments to, or waivers
from, the code that apply to our executive officers and
directors will be posted in the Corporate Governance
section of our internet website at
www.herculesoffshore.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2008.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are included as part of this
report:
(1) Financial Statements
(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they
are not applicable or not required, or the information required
thereby is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the notes thereto included in this annual report.
101
(3) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Plan of Conversion (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Hercules Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-126457),
as amended (the
S-1
Registration Statement), originally filed on July 8,
2005).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
effective as of March 18, 2007, by and among Hercules, THE
Hercules Offshore Drilling Company LLC and TODCO (incorporated
by reference to Annex A to the Joint Proxy/Statement
Prospectus included in Part I of Hercules
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration No.
333-142314),
as amended (the
S-4
Registration Statement), originally filed April 24,
2007).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Hercules (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 1, 2005 (File No. 0-51582) (the 2005
Form 8-K)).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hercules (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated July 11, 2007 (File No. 0-51582) (the 2007
Form 8-K)).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Form of specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
S-1
Registration Statement).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2005, between
Hercules and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, as rights agent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the 2005
Form 8-K).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 1, 2008, between Hercules and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent.
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the 2005
Form 8-K).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of July 11, 2007 among Hercules,
as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, as guarantors, UBS
AG, Stamford Branch, as issuing bank, administrative agent and
collateral agent, Amegy Bank National Association and Comerica
Bank, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands
Branch and Jefferies Finance LLC, as co-documentation agents,
and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the 2007
Form 8-K).
Hercules and its subsidiaries are parties to several debt
instruments that have not been filed with the SEC under which
the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of
the total assets of Hercules and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. Pursuant to paragraph 4(iii)(A) of
Item 601(b) of
Regulation S-K,
Hercules agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the
SEC upon request.
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dates as of June 3, 2008, by and between the
Company and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 3, 2008
(File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Note (included in Exhibit 4.6).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of June 20, 2008, between
Hercules and Randall D. Stilley (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 23, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, between
Hercules and Randal R. Reed (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 19, 2008, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)) (the
2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 15,
2008, between Hercules and John T. Rynd (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2008
Form 8-K.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of June 20, 2008,
between Hercules Offshore, Inc. and John T. Rynd (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 23, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2008, by and
between Hercules and Lisa W. Rodriguez (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2008
Form 8-K.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and James W. Noe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Terrell L. Carr (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Todd Pellegrin (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Troy L. Carson (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Expatriate Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2006,
between Hercules and Don P. Rodney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Extension Letter between Hercules and Don P. Rodney, dated
December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 6, 2009
(File No. 0-51582).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 7, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Hercules Offshore 2004 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex E to the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in Part I of the
S-4
Registration Statement).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Hercules Offshore Inc. Amended and Restated
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
*10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.
|
|
*10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees and Consultants.
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Hercules Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
*10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
Hercules Offshore, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Schedule of executive officer and director compensation
arrangements.
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2005,
between Hercules and the holders listed on the signature page
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Hercules Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Increase Joinder, dated as of April 28, 2008, among
Hercules, as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, the
incremental lenders and other lenders party thereto, and UBS AG
Stamford Branch, as administrative agent for the lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 30, 2008 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated May 28, 2008, by and between the
Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co., Banc of America
Securities LLC and UBS Securities LLC, as representatives of the
Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 3, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2006, by and
between Hercules Liftboat Company, LLC and Laborde Marine Lifts,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 3, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2006, by
and among Hercules International Holdings, Ltd., Halliburton
West Africa Ltd. and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
November 1, 2006, by and among Hercules International
Holdings, Ltd., Hercules Oilfield Services Ltd., Halliburton
West Africa Ltd. and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
(File No. 0-51582)).
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
Earnout Agreement, dated November 7, 2006, by and among
Hercules Oilfield Services, Ltd., Halliburton West Africa Ltd.
and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 7, 2006
(File No. 0-51582)).
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Hercules.
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
*23
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hercules pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hercules pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Hercules pursuant to Section 901 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
104
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston, State of
Texas, on February 25, 2009.
HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.
John T. Rynd
Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on
February 25, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
T. RYND
John
T. Rynd
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ LISA
W. RODRIGUEZ
Lisa
W. Rodriguez
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ TROY
L. CARSON
Troy
L. Carson
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
T. REYNOLDS
John
T. Reynolds
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
N. AMONETT
Thomas
N. Amonett
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ SUZANNE
V. BAER
Suzanne
V. Baer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
R. BATES, JR.
Thomas
R. Bates, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
M HAMILTON
Thomas
M Hamilton
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
J. MADONNA
Thomas
J. Madonna
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ F.
GARDNER PARKER
F.
Gardner Parker
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THIERRY
PILENKO
Thierry
Pilenko
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEVEN
A. WEBSTER
Steven
A. Webster
|
|
Director
|
105
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Plan of Conversion (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Hercules Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-126457),
as amended (the
S-1
Registration Statement), originally filed on July 8,
2005).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
effective as of March 18, 2007, by and among Hercules, THE
Hercules Offshore Drilling Company LLC and TODCO (incorporated
by reference to Annex A to the Joint Proxy/Statement
Prospectus included in Part I of Hercules
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration No.
333-142314),
as amended (the
S-4
Registration Statement), originally filed April 24,
2007).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Hercules (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 1, 2005 (File No. 0-51582) (the 2005
Form 8-K)).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hercules (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated July 11, 2007 (File No. 0-51582) (the 2007
Form 8-K)).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Form of specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
S-1
Registration Statement).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2005, between
Hercules and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, as rights agent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the 2005
Form 8-K).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 1, 2008, between Hercules and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent.
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the 2005
Form 8-K).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of July 11, 2007 among Hercules,
as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, as guarantors, UBS
AG, Stamford Branch, as issuing bank, administrative agent and
collateral agent, Amegy Bank National Association and Comerica
Bank, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands
Branch and Jefferies Finance LLC, as co-documentation agents,
and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the 2007
Form 8-K).
Hercules and its subsidiaries are parties to several debt
instruments that have not been filed with the SEC under which
the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of
the total assets of Hercules and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. Pursuant to paragraph 4(iii)(A) of
Item 601(b) of
Regulation S-K,
Hercules agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the
SEC upon request.
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dates as of June 3, 2008, by and between the
Company and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 3, 2008
(File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Note (included in Exhibit 4.6).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of June 20, 2008, between
Hercules and Randall D. Stilley (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 23, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, between
Hercules and Randal R. Reed (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 19, 2008, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)) (the
2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 15,
2008, between Hercules and John T. Rynd (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2008
Form 8-K.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of June 20, 2008,
between Hercules Offshore, Inc. and John T. Rynd (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 23, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2008, by and
between Hercules and Lisa W. Rodriguez (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2008
Form 8-K.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and James W. Noe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Terrell L. Carr (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Todd Pellegrin (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Troy L. Carson (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Expatriate Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2006,
between Hercules and Don P. Rodney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Extension Letter between Hercules and Don P. Rodney, dated
December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 6, 2009
(File No. 0-51582).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 7, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Hercules Offshore 2004 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex E to the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in Part I of the
S-4
Registration Statement).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Hercules Offshore Inc. Amended and Restated
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
*10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.
|
|
*10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees and Consultants.
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Hercules Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
*10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
Hercules Offshore, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Schedule of executive officer and director compensation
arrangements.
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2005,
between Hercules and the holders listed on the signature page
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Hercules Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Increase Joinder, dated as of April 28, 2008, among
Hercules, as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, the
incremental lenders and other lenders party thereto, and UBS AG
Stamford Branch, as administrative agent for the lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 30, 2008 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated May 28, 2008, by and between the
Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co., Banc of America
Securities LLC and UBS Securities LLC, as representatives of the
Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 3, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2006, by and
between Hercules Liftboat Company, LLC and Laborde Marine Lifts,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 3, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2006, by
and among Hercules International Holdings, Ltd., Halliburton
West Africa Ltd. and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
November 1, 2006, by and among Hercules International
Holdings, Ltd., Hercules Oilfield Services Ltd., Halliburton
West Africa Ltd. and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
(File No. 0-51582)).
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
Earnout Agreement, dated November 7, 2006, by and among
Hercules Oilfield Services, Ltd., Halliburton West Africa Ltd.
and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 7, 2006
(File No. 0-51582)).
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Hercules.
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
*23
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hercules pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hercules pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Hercules pursuant to Section 901 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
108