e10vq
10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarter ended March 31, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission
File Number 1-31330
Cooper Industries, Ltd.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
98-0355628 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
600 Travis, Suite 5800
|
|
Houston, Texas 77002 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(713) 209-8400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of registrants common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2006 was 92,404,027 Class A common
shares that are held by the public and 10,695,101 Class A common shares and 54,810,129 Class B
common shares that are held by the issuers wholly-owned subsidiaries.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions, where applicable) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,240.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,144.8 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
846.8 |
|
|
|
787.6 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
237.5 |
|
|
|
227.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
144.5 |
|
|
|
111.9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
.37 |
|
|
$ |
.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
-2-
COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
343.6 |
|
|
$ |
452.8 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
930.6 |
|
|
|
842.4 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
609.9 |
|
|
|
538.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other current assets |
|
|
287.0 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,171.1 |
|
|
|
2,131.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
671.7 |
|
|
|
673.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,154.2 |
|
|
|
2,084.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent assets |
|
|
289.0 |
|
|
|
326.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,286.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,215.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
478.0 |
|
|
|
427.8 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
453.2 |
|
|
|
518.0 |
|
Current discontinued operations liability |
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
196.3 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,146.7 |
|
|
|
1,161.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,002.1 |
|
|
|
1,002.9 |
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
|
|
159.9 |
|
|
|
163.0 |
|
Long-term discontinued operations liability |
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
356.4 |
|
|
|
352.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,995.1 |
|
|
|
3,009.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
387.8 |
|
|
|
383.2 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,070.5 |
|
|
|
1,997.4 |
|
Accumulated other nonowner changes in equity |
|
|
(168.3 |
) |
|
|
(176.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,290.9 |
|
|
|
2,205.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
5,286.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,215.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
-3-
COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Restructuring charge payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock options and awards |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(77.2 |
) |
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Cash paid for acquired businesses |
|
|
(83.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment and other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(99.7 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of debt |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(90.1 |
) |
Dividends |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
Subsidiary purchase of parent shares |
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock options and awards |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(38.8 |
) |
|
|
(127.3 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(109.2 |
) |
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
452.8 |
|
|
|
652.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
343.6 |
|
|
$ |
524.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of the effects of acquisitions and translation. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
-4-
COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements of Cooper Industries, Ltd., a
Bermuda company (Cooper), have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States.
The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31 has been prepared
from the books and records without audit. Financial information as of December 31 has been derived
from Coopers audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
information for the periods indicated, have been included. For further information regarding
Coopers accounting policies, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes for
the year ended December 31, 2005 included in Part IV of Coopers 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 2. Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2003, Cooper adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), as amended. Cooper utilized the
prospective method of adoption. Cooper accounted for stock-based compensation awards granted,
modified or settled prior to January 1, 2003 using the intrinsic value method of accounting as
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
and related interpretations (APB No. 25). In accordance with APB No. 25, compensation expense
was recognized for performance-based and restricted stock awards. No compensation expense was
recognized under Coopers fixed stock option plans or Employee Stock Purchase Plan for grants prior
to January 1, 2003.
SFAS No. 123 provided an alternative fair value based method for recognizing stock-based
compensation in which compensation expense was measured at the grant date based on the value of the
award and recognized over the service period, which was usually the vesting period. The fair value
of stock options was estimated on the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The fair value of restricted stock and performance-based awards granted were measured at the market
price on the grant date.
The following table presents pro forma net income and earnings per share as if the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in
2005. In 2005, there were essentially two remaining differences between as reported and pro-forma
net income and earnings per share. First, Cooper accounted for awards granted prior to January 1,
2003 using the intrinsic value method, whereas the pro-forma amounts reflect those award grants as
calculated under SFAS No. 123. Secondly, the pro-forma amounts reflect recognition of the tax
benefits of disqualifying dispositions of stock acquired pursuant to incentive stock options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123.
-5-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
4.0 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based
employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of
related tax effects |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income |
|
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
.94 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
.92 |
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
.94 |
|
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123. Statement 123(R) also supersedes APB No.
25, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Effective January 1, 2006, Cooper
adopted Statement 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Recognition of compensation cost
is based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after January
1, 2006 and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to
January 1, 2006 that remained unvested on that date.
Cooper adopted SFAS No. 123 using the prospective transition method, which applied only to
awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date. Accordingly, compensation cost for
some previously granted awards that were not recognized under SFAS No. 123 are recognized under
Statement 123(R). However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that
standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro
forma net income and earnings per share above.
Cooper uses the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to
employees, as well as the straight-line recognition method for awards subject to graded vesting.
Cooper has recorded an estimate for forfeitures of 2006 awards of stock options, performance-based
shares and restricted stock units. This estimate will be adjusted as actual forfeitures differ
from the estimate. Prior to adoption of Statement 123(R), forfeitures were accounted for as
recognized when they actually occurred. Upon adoption of Statement 123(R), the cumulative effect
of this change in accounting principle, to reflect the compensation cost that would not have been
recognized in periods prior to 2006, had forfeitures been estimated during these periods, was
immaterial.
Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized
compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow.
This requirement reduced net operating cash flows and increased net financing cash flows in the
three months ended March 31, 2006 by $13.9 million.
On March 31, 2006, Cooper has a share-based compensation plan known as the Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), which was approved by Coopers shareholders in April
2004.
-6-
The Plan provides for the granting of stock options, performance-based share awards and
restricted stock units. Since the original Plans inception in 1996, the aggregate number of
shares authorized under the Plan is 17 million. As of March 31, 2006, 4,611,777 shares remain
available for future grants under the Plan of which no more than 2,816,885 shares are available for
grants of performance-based shares and restricted stock units. Activity for each of these
stock-incentive awards is discussed in more detail below. Total
compensation cost that has been charged against income for all share-based compensation
arrangements under the Plan was $6.9 million and $6.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for
all share-based compensation arrangements under the Plan was $2.5 million and $2.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Stock Options
Stock option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of
Coopers stock at the date of grant. Stock option awards generally vest over a three-year period
with one-third vesting in each successive year so that the option is fully exercisable after three
years and generally have five-, seven- and ten-year contractual terms. Stock option awards provide
that, upon a change in control in Cooper (as defined in the Plan), all options will be cancelled
and Cooper will make a cash payment to the employee equal to the difference in the fair market
value of Cooper Class A common shares (or the highest price actually paid for the stock in
connection with the change in control, if higher) and the option price.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model using the assumptions noted in the following table.
Expected volatility in 2006 is based on implied volatilities from traded options on Cooper stock,
historical volatility of Cooper stock, and other factors. Cooper believes that the resulting
blended volatility represents a more accurate estimate of potential fluctuations in Cooper stock.
Cooper uses historical data to estimate employee termination experience. The expected term of
options granted is determined based on historical exercise behavior. The risk-free rate for
periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Risk-free rate |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
A summary of option activity under the Plan as of March 31, 2006, and changes during the three
months then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
5,428,821 |
|
|
$ |
48.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
749,300 |
|
|
$ |
82.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,238,046 |
) |
|
$ |
42.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(31,903 |
) |
|
$ |
69.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,908,172 |
|
|
$ |
55.43 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
156.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,855,721 |
|
|
$ |
55.13 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
156.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,986,772 |
|
|
$ |
44.75 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
$ |
127.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-7-
The weighted-average grant date fair values of options granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were $15.90 and $17.37, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $49.8 million and
$19.6 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2006, total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock options
was $24.1 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9
years. The total fair value of stock options vested during the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005 was $11.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively.
Performance-Based Shares and Restricted Stock Units
Under the Plan, Cooper grants certain executives and other key employees performance-based
share awards with vesting contingent upon meeting Company-wide performance goals, typically tied to
cumulative compound growth in earnings per share over a defined multi-year performance period.
Awards under the performance-based component of the Plan are typically arranged in levels, with
increasing numbers of shares earned as higher levels of growth are achieved. In order to earn the
performance shares, participants are generally required to remain actively employed by Cooper for
the performance period. Under the Plan, Cooper also awards grants of restricted stock units to
certain executives and other key employees in order to provide financial incentive to remain in the
employ of Cooper, thereby enhancing management continuity. Cooper may also utilize restricted
stock units for new executives and other key employees to replace equity compensation forfeited
upon resignation from their former employer. Restricted stock units vest pursuant to time-based
service conditions.
The fair value of each performance-based share and restricted stock unit was calculated at the
average (simple two-point high and low) market price on the date of grant. Performance goals for
the performance-based shares are assumed to be achieved at the maximum level. If goal-level
assumptions are not met, compensation cost is adjusted and previously recognized compensation cost
is reversed. Upon distribution of performance-based shares, Cooper also pays the recipient cash
equal to the aggregate amount of cash dividends that the recipient would have received had they
been the owner of record from the date of grant. Dividends on restricted stock units are payable
on the dividend payment date or on the date when restrictions lapse, depending upon the specific
award. For performance-based share and restricted stock unit awards, upon a change in control in
Cooper (as defined in the Plan), all restrictions on those awards will lapse and shares shall be
issued as otherwise provided in the Plan.
A summary of the status of Coopers nonvested performance-based shares as of March 31, 2006
and changes during the three months then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Performance-Based Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
962,138 |
|
|
$ |
55.05 |
|
Granted |
|
|
259,240 |
|
|
$ |
82.38 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(288,975 |
) |
|
$ |
37.58 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(31,730 |
) |
|
$ |
62.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
900,673 |
|
|
$ |
68.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance-based shares granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $82.38 and $70.89, respectively. The total
intrinsic value of performance-based shares awarded during the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005 was $22.6 million and $16.4 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2006, total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested
performance-based shares was $37.1 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.8 years. The total fair value of performance-based shares vested
during the three months ended March 31, 2006
-8-
was $10.9 million. No performance-based shares vested
during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
A summary of the status of Coopers nonvested restricted stock units as of March 31, 2006, and
changes during the three months then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Restricted Stock Units |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
309,400 |
|
|
$ |
49.97 |
|
Granted |
|
|
8,550 |
|
|
$ |
82.38 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(85,100 |
) |
|
$ |
38.43 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
$ |
43.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
225,350 |
|
|
$ |
55.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $82.38 and $70.89, respectively. The total
intrinsic value of restricted stock units awarded during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005 was $0.7 million and $4.1 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2006, total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested restricted
stock unit compensation arrangements was $3.9 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 2.7 years. The total fair value of restricted stock units vested
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $3.3 million and $0.1 million,
respectively.
Cash received from option exercises for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was
$53.2 million and $25.4 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax
deductions from option exercises totaled $19.1 million and $6.1 million, respectively, for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Cash used to settle equity instruments granted under
all share-based payment arrangements for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was
immaterial in both periods.
Cooper has a practice of repurchasing shares on the open market to satisfy shares issued for
option exercises and share awards and expects to repurchase approximately 2.5 million shares during
2006, based on estimates of option exercises and share awards vesting for the year.
The impact of adopting Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006, on Coopers income before income
taxes, net income and basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31,
2006 was immaterial.
Note 3. Acquisitions
In January 2006, Cooper acquired G&H Technology, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of
advanced, high-reliability connectors and interconnect devices used in aerospace, subsea, military
and industrial applications for total consideration of $41.8 million. G&H Technology, Inc. became
part of the Cooper Crouse-Hinds Division.
In February 2006, Cooper acquired Wheelock, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of fire safety
and emergency incident communication systems and devices for total consideration of $44.2 million.
Wheelock, Inc. became part of the Cooper Menvier Division.
The results of operations of the acquisitions are included in the consolidated income
statements since the respective acquisition dates. Pro-forma net income and earnings per share for
2006, assuming the acquisitions had been made at the beginning of the year, would not be materially
different from reported net income and earnings per share.
-9-
Note 4. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
220.5 |
|
|
$ |
206.1 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
158.7 |
|
|
|
137.9 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
347.2 |
|
|
|
303.7 |
|
Perishable tooling and supplies |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740.6 |
|
|
|
662.1 |
|
Allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
Excess of current standard costs over LIFO costs |
|
|
(65.8 |
) |
|
|
(64.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inventories |
|
$ |
609.9 |
|
|
$ |
538.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5. Shareholders Equity
At March 31, 2006, 92,404,027 Class A common shares, $.01 par value were issued and
outstanding (excluding the 10,695,101 Class A common shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries as
discussed below) compared to 91,556,569 Class A common shares, $.01 par value (excluding the
9,850,101 Class A common shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries) at December 31, 2005. During
the first quarter of 2006, Cooper issued 1,692,458 Class A common shares primarily in connection
with employee incentive and benefit plans and Coopers dividend reinvestment program. During the
first quarter of 2006, Coopers wholly-owned subsidiaries purchased 845,000 Class A common shares
for $69.3 million under the Companys share repurchase plan. The share purchases are recorded by
Coopers wholly-owned subsidiaries as an investment in its parent company that is eliminated in
consolidation.
A wholly-owned subsidiary also owns all the issued and outstanding Class B common shares. The
subsidiarys investment in the Class B common shares is eliminated in consolidation. If at any
time a dividend is declared and paid on the Class A common shares, a like dividend shall be
declared and paid on the Class B common shares in an equal amount per share. During the first
quarter of 2006, Coopers wholly-owned subsidiaries received the regular quarterly dividend of $.37
per share (or an aggregate of $24.1 million) on all Class A and Class B common shares held.
Note 6. Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating Earnings |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Electrical Products |
|
$ |
1,060.6 |
|
|
$ |
968.3 |
|
|
$ |
160.1 |
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
Tools |
|
|
180.3 |
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
$ |
1,240.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,144.8 |
|
|
|
177.4 |
|
|
|
150.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Corporate expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
144.5 |
|
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10-
Note 7. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was 25.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 21.5% for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase is primarily related to increased taxable earnings
in 2005 without a corresponding increase in projected tax benefits.
Cooper is under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2002-2003 tax years.
Cooper is also under examination by various United States state and local taxing authorities as
well as various taxing authorities in other countries. Cooper fully cooperates with all audits,
but defends existing positions vigorously. These audits are in various stages of completion. To
provide for potential tax exposures, Cooper maintains an allowance for tax contingencies, which
management believes is adequate. The results of future audit assessments, if any, could have a
material effect on Coopers cash flows as these audits are completed. However, management does not
believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Coopers consolidated
results of operations.
In 2005, Cooper protested the Internal Revenue Service examination findings for the 2000-2001
tax years. The Internal Revenue Service has challenged Coopers treatment of gains and interest
deductions claimed on its 2000 and 2001 federal income tax returns, relating to transactions
involving government securities. If the proposed adjustments are upheld, it would require that
Cooper pay approximately $26.5 million in taxes plus accrued interest for those years. There would
be an additional payment related to those items for the 2002-2003 tax years of approximately $67.2
million in taxes plus accrued interest if the Internal Revenue Service prevails in its proposed
treatment for the 2000-2001 tax years. Interest will continue to accrue until the matter is
resolved. Cooper believes these transactions were properly reported on its federal income tax
returns in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations in effect during the period involved
and is challenging these adjustments vigorously. While the outcome of proceedings of this type
cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter
will not have a material impact on Coopers consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
-11-
Note 9. Net Income Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental shares from assumed conversions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options, performance-based stock
awards and other employee awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
and common share equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and employee awards are not considered in the calculations if the effect would be
antidilutive.
Note 10. Net Income and Other Nonowner Changes in Equity
The components of net income and other nonowner changes in equity, net of related taxes, were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income and other nonowner changes in equity |
|
$ |
115.7 |
|
|
$ |
78.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Restructuring Charges
During the fourth quarter of 2003, Cooper recorded net restructuring charges of $16.9 million,
or $13.6 million after taxes ($.14 per diluted common share). This represented costs associated
with restructuring projects undertaken in 2003 of $18.4 million, partially offset by a $1.5 million
adjustment of estimates for restructuring projects initiated in 2002.
The most significant action included in the charges was an announcement of the closing of
Cooper Wiring Devices manufacturing operations in New York City. This action included plans for
the withdrawal from a multiple-employer pension plan. Cooper recorded a $12.5 million obligation as
an estimate of Coopers portion of unfunded benefit obligations of the plan. In 2005, Cooper
finalized activities related to withdrawal from the multi-employer pension plan and recorded an
additional $4.0 million pre-tax charge. The remaining $5.9 million charge primarily represents
severance for announced employment reductions at several locations. Substantially all of the
severance payments were made as of March 31, 2006.
A total of 114 salaried and 150 hourly personnel were eliminated as a result of these actions,
and all personnel were terminated as of December 31, 2004. The majority of the severance
obligation was paid in the first half of 2004. The multiple-employer pension obligation is
expected to be paid over 20 years, beginning in 2006.
-12-
See Restructuring Charges in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations for additional information.
Note 12. Charge Related to Discontinued Operations
In October 1998, Cooper sold its Automotive Products business to Federal-Mogul Corporation
(Federal-Mogul). These discontinued businesses (including the Abex product line obtained from
Pneumo-Abex Corporation (Pneumo) in 1994) were operated through subsidiary companies, and the
stock of those subsidiaries was sold to Federal-Mogul pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated August 17, 1998 (1998 Agreement). In conjunction with the sale, Federal-Mogul indemnified
Cooper for certain liabilities of these subsidiary companies, including liabilities related to the
Abex product line and any potential liability that Cooper may have to Pneumo pursuant to a 1994
Mutual Guaranty Agreement between Cooper and Pneumo. On October 1, 2001, Federal-Mogul and several
of its affiliates filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and indicated that Federal-Mogul may not
honor the indemnification obligations to Cooper. As of the date of this filing, Federal-Mogul had
not rejected the 1998 Agreement, which includes the indemnification to Cooper. If Federal-Mogul
rejects the 1998 Agreement, Cooper will be relieved of its future obligations under the 1998
Agreement, including specific indemnities relating to payment of taxes and certain obligations
regarding insurance for its former Automotive Products businesses. To the extent Cooper is
obligated to Pneumo for any asbestos-related claims arising from the Abex product line (Abex
Claims), Cooper has rights, confirmed by Pneumo, to significant insurance for such claims. Based
on information provided by representatives of Federal-Mogul and recent claims experience, from
August 28, 1998 through March 31, 2006, a total of 138,457 Abex Claims were filed, of which 100,026
claims have been resolved leaving 38,431 Abex Claims pending at March 31, 2006, that are the
responsibility of Federal-Mogul. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, 734 claims were
filed and 738 claims were resolved. Since August 28, 1998, the average indemnity payment for
resolved Abex Claims was $2,061 before insurance. A total of $88 million was spent on defense
costs for the period August 28, 1998 through March 31, 2006. Historically, existing insurance
coverage has provided 50% to 80% of the total defense and indemnity
payments for Abex Claims.
However, insurance recovery is currently at a lower percentage (approximately 30%) due to
exhaustion of primary layers of coverage and litigation with certain excess insurers.
With the assistance of independent advisors, Bates White, LLC, in the fourth quarter of 2001
Cooper completed a thorough analysis of its potential exposure for asbestos liabilities in the
event Federal-Mogul rejects the 1998 Agreement. Based on Coopers analysis of its contingent
liability exposure resulting from Federal-Moguls bankruptcy, Cooper concluded that an additional
fourth-quarter 2001 discontinued operations provision of $30 million after-tax, or $.32 per share,
was appropriate to reflect the potential net impact of this issue.
Throughout 2003, Cooper worked towards resolution of the indemnification issues and future
handling of the Abex-related claims within the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy proceedings. This included
negotiations with the representatives of Federal-Mogul, its bankruptcy committees and the future
claimants (the Representatives) regarding
participation in Federal-Moguls proposed 524(g) asbestos trust. Based on the status of the
negotiations in 2004, Cooper concluded that it was probable that Federal-Mogul will reject the 1998
Agreement. Cooper also concluded that the Representatives would require any negotiated settlement
through the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy to be at the high end of the Bates White, LLC liability
analysis and with substantially lower insurance recovery assumptions and higher administrative
costs.
During late February and early March 2004, Cooper reassessed the accrual required based on the
then current status of the negotiations with the Representatives and the liability and insurance
receivable that would be required to be recorded if this matter is not settled within the
Federal-Mogul bankruptcy. Cooper concluded that resolution within the Federal-Mogul proposed
524(g) asbestos trust would likely be within the range of the liabilities, net of insurance
recoveries, that Cooper would accrue if this matter were not settled within the Federal-Mogul
bankruptcy. Accordingly, Cooper recorded a $126.0 million after-tax discontinued operations charge,
net of a $70.9 income tax benefit, in the fourth quarter of 2003.
-13-
In December 2005, Cooper announced that the Company and other parties involved in the
resolution of the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy proceeding had reached an agreement regarding Coopers
participation in Federal Moguls proposed 524 (g) asbestos trust. By participating in this trust,
Cooper would resolve its liability for asbestos claims arising from Coopers former Abex Friction
Products business. The proposed settlement agreement was subject to court approval, approval of 75
percent of the current Abex asbestos claimants and certain other approvals. The settlement would
resolve more than 38,000 pending Abex Claims. Future claims would be resolved through the
bankruptcy trust, and Cooper would be protected against future claims by an injunction to be issued
by the district court upon plan confirmation.
Key terms and aspects of the proposed settlement agreement included Cooper agreeing to pay
$130 million in cash into the trust, with $115 million payable upon Federal-Moguls emergence from
bankruptcy. The remainder would be due on January 15, 2007, or upon emergence from bankruptcy, if
later. Cooper would receive a total of $37.5 million during the funding period from other parties
associated with the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy. Cooper would further provide the trust 1.4 million
shares of the Companys stock upon Federal-Moguls emergence from bankruptcy. The agreement
provided that the trust may, during the first year after issuance, sell these shares to Cooper at
market prices and, thereafter, in open market transactions.
The proposed settlement agreement also provided for further payments by Cooper subject to the
amount and timing of insurance proceeds. Cooper agreed to make 25 annual payments of up to $20
million each, reduced by certain insurance proceeds received by the trust. In years that the
insurance proceeds exceed $17 million, Cooper would be required to contribute $3 million with the
excess insurance proceeds carried over to the next year. The trust would retain 10 percent of the
insurance proceeds for indemnity claims paid by the trust until Coopers obligation is satisfied
and would retain 15 percent thereafter. The agreement also provided for Cooper to receive the
insurance proceeds related to indemnity and defense costs paid prior to the date a stay of current
claims is entered by the bankruptcy court. Cooper would also be required to forego certain claims
and objections in the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, the parties involved had
agreed to petition the court for a stay on all current claims outstanding.
Although the payments related to the settlement could extend to 25 years and the collection of
insurance proceeds could extend beyond 25 years, the liability and insurance would be undiscounted
on Coopers balance sheet as the amount of the actual annual payments is not reasonably
predictable.
A critical term of the proposed settlement was the issuance of a preliminary injunction
staying all pending Abex asbestos claims. At a hearing on January 20, 2006, other parties to the
bankruptcy proceedings were unable to satisfy the courts requirements to grant the required
preliminary injunction. As a result, the proposed settlement agreement will require renegotiation
of certain terms. Cooper remains in active negotiations with the Representatives to resolve its
liability exposure for Abex Claims within the Federal-Mogul proposed 524(g) trust. The final
determination of whether Cooper will participate in the Federal-Mogul 524(g) trust is unknown.
However, Cooper management concluded that, at the date of the filing of its 2005 Form 10-K, the
most likely outcome in the range of potential outcomes was a revised settlement approximating the
December 2005 proposed settlement. Accordingly, Cooper recorded a $227.2 million after-tax
discontinued operations charge, net of a $127.8 million income tax benefit, in the fourth quarter
of 2005.
The fourth quarter 2005 charge to discontinued operations included payments to a 524(g) trust
over 25 years that were undiscounted, and the insurance recoveries only included recoveries where
insurance in place agreements, settlements or policy recoveries were probable. If the negotiations
with the Representatives in early 2004 had resulted in an agreement, Cooper would have paid all the
consideration when Federal-Mogul emerged from bankruptcy and the 524(g) trust was formed and would
have relinquished all rights to insurance. The lack of discounting and the limited recognition of
insurance recoveries in the fourth quarter 2005 charge to discontinued operations were a
significant component of the increase in the accrual for discontinued operations. While it is not
possible to quantify, the accrual for
discontinued operations also includes a premium for resolving the inherent uncertainty
associated with resolving Abex Claims though the tort system. If Cooper is unable to reach a
settlement to participate in the
-14-
Federal-Mogul 524(g) trust, the accrual for discontinued
operations potentially may have to be reduced to the estimated liability and related insurance
recoveries through the tort system. There are numerous assumptions that are required to project
the liability in the tort system and Cooper has not completed the analysis and determined the
liability that would be recorded under this scenario.
Cooper, through Pneumo-Abex LLC, has access to Abex insurance policies with remaining limits
on policies with solvent insurers in excess of $800 million. Cooper included insurance recoveries
of approximately $215 million pre-tax in the fourth quarter 2005 charge to discontinued operations
discussed above. Cooper believes that it is likely that additional insurance recoveries will be
recorded in the future as new insurance in place agreements are consummated and settlements with
insurance carriers are completed. However, extensive litigation with the insurance carriers may be
required to receive those additional recoveries.
If a settlement within the 524(g) trust is in fact achieved on a basis consistent with the
terms discussed above, Cooper will periodically assess the current overall adequacy of the accrual
for discontinued operations, including updates to the assumptions regarding estimates of insurance
recoveries, levels of defense and indemnity payments and other assumptions related to the matter.
As this additional information becomes available, Cooper will record a charge or credit to the
accrual for discontinued operations, which may be significant.
Cooper has continued discussions with the Representatives though the date of filing of its
first quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and as of this date has not been able to reach an agreement with the
Representatives. As the terms of a revised proposed settlement agreement and final determination
of whether Cooper will participate in the Federal-Mogul 524(g) trust are unknown, the accrual for
discontinued operations was not adjusted as of March 31, 2006. If a revised proposed settlement
agreement had been reached on terms that were essentially the same as the December 2005 proposed
settlement agreement, Cooper would have increased the accrual for discontinued operations by $20.0
million pre-tax and incurred a charge to discontinued operations of $12.8 million net of tax
representing the increase in the market value of Coopers common stock included in the December
2005 proposed settlement proposal from December 31, 2005 through March 31, 2006.
From a cash flow perspective, Cooper management continues to believe that a settlement on
terms being discussed would allow Cooper to continue to grow through acquisitions and return cash
to shareholders through dividends and stock repurchases. There is significant uncertainty as to
whether any settlement agreement will be finalized. In addition, any settlement remains subject
to bankruptcy court approval, approval by the current claimants and other matters. At this time,
the exact manner in which this issue will be resolved is not known. The accrual for potential
liabilities related to the Automotive Products sale and the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy was $528.0
million at March 31, 2006 and $526.3 million at December 31, 2005. Cooper has preserved its rights
as a creditor for breach of Federal-Moguls indemnification to Cooper and its rights against all
Federal-Mogul subsidiaries. Cooper intends to take all actions to seek a resolution of the
indemnification issues and future handling of the Abex-related claims within the Federal-Mogul
bankruptcy proceedings.
Note 13. Consolidating Financial Information
Cooper and certain of its principal operating subsidiaries (the Guarantors) fully and
unconditionally guarantee, on a joint and several basis, the registered debt securities of Cooper
Industries, LLC and Cooper US, Inc. The following condensed consolidating financial information is
included so that separate financial statements of Cooper Industries, LLC, Cooper US, Inc. or the
Guarantors are not required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
consolidating financial statements present investments in subsidiaries using the equity method of
accounting. Intercompany investments in the Class A and Class B common shares are accounted for
using the cost method.
-15-
Consolidating Income Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, |
|
|
US, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
823.1 |
|
|
$ |
478.4 |
|
|
$ |
(60.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,240.9 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
580.8 |
|
|
|
326.6 |
|
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
|
|
846.8 |
|
Selling and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
130.1 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237.5 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Equity in earnings
of subsidiaries, net
of tax |
|
|
137.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
(328.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany income
(expense) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(94.4 |
) |
|
|
120.0 |
|
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
266.4 |
|
|
|
(352.7 |
) |
|
|
144.5 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
131.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
80.1 |
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
217.8 |
|
|
$ |
(352.7 |
) |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating Income Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, |
|
|
US, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
751.6 |
|
|
$ |
423.4 |
|
|
$ |
(30.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,144.8 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
536.0 |
|
|
|
281.2 |
|
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
|
|
787.6 |
|
Selling and
administrative expenses |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
123.2 |
|
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227.5 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Equity in earnings
of subsidiaries, net of
tax |
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
(295.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany income
(expense) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
(83.9 |
) |
|
|
134.7 |
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
246.5 |
|
|
|
(319.0 |
) |
|
|
111.9 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
111.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
60.3 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
197.6 |
|
|
$ |
(319.0 |
) |
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-16-
Consolidating Balance Sheets
March 31, 2006
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, |
|
|
US, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Inc |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
77.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
84.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
184.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
343.6 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
528.6 |
|
|
|
392.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930.6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360.3 |
|
|
|
249.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes and
other current assets |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
133.1 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
133.1 |
|
|
|
188.4 |
|
|
|
928.6 |
|
|
|
842.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,171.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, less
accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
332.0 |
|
|
|
298.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018.6 |
|
|
|
1,135.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154.2 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,051.1 |
|
|
|
696.1 |
|
|
|
3,812.0 |
|
|
|
938.2 |
|
|
|
968.1 |
|
|
|
(9,465.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312.7 |
|
|
|
(2,929.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany accounts
receivables |
|
|
642.8 |
|
|
|
638.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,242.8 |
|
|
|
635.2 |
|
|
|
(3,159.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes
receivable |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
680.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3,827.3 |
|
|
|
(4,560.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes and
other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
103.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,800.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,698.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,364.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,415.1 |
|
|
$ |
8,123.0 |
|
|
$ |
(20,114.9 |
) |
|
$ |
5,286.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
243.8 |
|
|
|
180.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478.0 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
195.7 |
|
|
|
140.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453.2 |
|
Current discontinued
operations liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
248.5 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
439.5 |
|
|
|
327.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,146.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
669.4 |
|
|
|
323.8 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002.1 |
|
Intercompany accounts
payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,159.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,159.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes payable |
|
|
385.2 |
|
|
|
278.4 |
|
|
|
1,762.2 |
|
|
|
1,705.7 |
|
|
|
429.2 |
|
|
|
(4,560.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term discontinued
operations liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
190.0 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
423.8 |
|
|
|
1,657.3 |
|
|
|
5,527.9 |
|
|
|
2,229.5 |
|
|
|
876.9 |
|
|
|
(7,720.3 |
) |
|
|
2,995.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Class B common stock |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308.6 |
|
|
|
(308.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par
value |
|
|
3,306.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
1,388.6 |
|
|
|
5,153.6 |
|
|
|
(9,504.2 |
) |
|
|
387.8 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
1,971.5 |
|
|
|
801.0 |
|
|
|
1,951.0 |
|
|
|
(2,910.6 |
) |
|
|
2,070.5 |
|
Accumulated other non-
owner changes in equity |
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
(112.1 |
) |
|
|
(178.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(167.1 |
) |
|
|
329.4 |
|
|
|
(168.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,376.4 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
1,836.4 |
|
|
|
2,185.6 |
|
|
|
7,246.1 |
|
|
|
(12,394.6 |
) |
|
|
2,290.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,800.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,698.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,364.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,415.1 |
|
|
$ |
8,123.0 |
|
|
$ |
(20,114.9 |
) |
|
$ |
5,286.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-17-
Consolidating Balance Sheets
December 31, 2005
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, |
|
|
US, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Inc |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
64.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
144.4 |
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
|
$ |
247.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
452.8 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
469.7 |
|
|
|
364.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842.4 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327.1 |
|
|
|
211.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes and
other current assets |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
130.7 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
130.7 |
|
|
|
247.0 |
|
|
|
842.1 |
|
|
|
845.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,131.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, less
accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
339.5 |
|
|
|
293.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018.3 |
|
|
|
1,065.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084.0 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,887.9 |
|
|
|
759.5 |
|
|
|
3,579.4 |
|
|
|
917.6 |
|
|
|
899.1 |
|
|
|
(9,043.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,547.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312.7 |
|
|
|
(2,859.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany accounts
receivables |
|
|
588.4 |
|
|
|
550.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367.3 |
|
|
|
589.9 |
|
|
|
(3,096.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes
receivable |
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
651.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
3,683.4 |
|
|
|
(4,402.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes and
other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223.5 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,585.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,687.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,114.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,442.4 |
|
|
$ |
7,787.2 |
|
|
$ |
(19,402.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5,215.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
214.7 |
|
|
|
157.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427.8 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
238.8 |
|
|
|
138.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518.0 |
|
Current discontinued
operations liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
196.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196.3 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
250.2 |
|
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
453.5 |
|
|
|
303.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,161.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
670.0 |
|
|
|
323.7 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002.9 |
|
Intercompany accounts
payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,096.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,096.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany notes payable |
|
|
326.0 |
|
|
|
258.7 |
|
|
|
1,652.8 |
|
|
|
1,708.0 |
|
|
|
457.2 |
|
|
|
(4,402.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term
discontinued operations liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.4 |
|
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
116.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
364.0 |
|
|
|
1,640.3 |
|
|
|
5,379.3 |
|
|
|
2,246.5 |
|
|
|
878.6 |
|
|
|
(7,498.8 |
) |
|
|
3,009.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Class B common stock |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272.9 |
|
|
|
(272.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par
value |
|
|
3,232.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
1,388.6 |
|
|
|
5,082.3 |
|
|
|
(9,349.8 |
) |
|
|
383.2 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
1,892.3 |
|
|
|
832.5 |
|
|
|
1,733.2 |
|
|
|
(2,654.5 |
) |
|
|
1,997.4 |
|
Accumulated other non-
owner changes in equity |
|
|
(44.1 |
) |
|
|
(115.0 |
) |
|
|
(186.7 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
|
|
(179.8 |
) |
|
|
374.5 |
|
|
|
(176.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,221.6 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
1,735.0 |
|
|
|
2,195.9 |
|
|
|
6,908.6 |
|
|
|
(11,903.3 |
) |
|
|
2,205.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,585.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,687.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,114.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,442.4 |
|
|
$ |
7,787.2 |
|
|
$ |
(19,402.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5,215.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18-
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, |
|
|
US, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Inc |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(71.4 |
) |
|
$ |
117.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
Cash paid for acquired businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.4 |
) |
|
|
(40.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83.2 |
) |
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to affiliates |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145.5 |
) |
|
|
179.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of loans from affiliates |
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.8 |
) |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
(148.5 |
) |
|
|
155.6 |
|
|
|
(99.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Borrowings from affiliates |
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
108.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(179.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of loans to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intercompany financing
activities |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
(72.9 |
) |
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
Dividends paid to affiliates |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary purchase of parent
shares |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
Issuance of stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock
options and awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
(155.6 |
) |
|
|
(38.8 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59.8 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109.2 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period |
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
247.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
|
$ |
77.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
84.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
184.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
343.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19-
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, |
|
|
US, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Inc |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
(91.4 |
) |
|
$ |
126.8 |
|
|
$ |
(23.1 |
) |
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Cash paid for acquired businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of loans from affiliates |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90.1 |
) |
Borrowings from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of loans to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intercompany financing
activities |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
(79.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
Dividends paid to affiliates |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary purchase of parent
shares |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
Issuance of stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
(48.2 |
) |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
(129.9 |
) |
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
(127.3 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period |
|
|
111.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
294.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
|
$ |
82.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
175.4 |
|
|
$ |
(13.7 |
) |
|
$ |
281.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
524.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20-
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 Compared With Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Net income for the first quarter of 2006 was $107.7 million on revenues of $1,240.9 million
compared with 2005 first quarter net income of $87.8 million on revenues of $1,144.8 million.
First quarter diluted earnings per share increased 24% to $1.14 from $.92 in 2005.
Revenues:
Revenues for the first quarter of 2006 increased 8% compared to the first quarter of 2005.
The impact of foreign currency translation decreased reported revenues by approximately 1% for the
quarter and the impact of acquisitions increased reported revenues by approximately 1% for the
quarter.
Electrical Products segment revenues increased 10% compared to the first quarter of 2005. The
impact of unfavorable currency translation was less than 1% in the quarter. Increased revenues
were driven by strong organic growth across all market channels. Strong demand continued within
core industrial and utility markets. Retail channel sales recovered from fourth quarter inventory
corrections made by the major retailers resulting in strong growth. Construction market demand
remained stable. Successful market penetration initiatives contributed to the overall segment
results, as new product sales and global growth strategies gained traction.
Tools segment revenues for the first quarter of 2006 increased 2% from the first quarter of
2005. Excluding the impact of unfavorable currency translation, revenues increased 3% over the
first quarter of 2005. Demand for hand tools improved primarily from successful new product
introductions and continued strength in industrial markets. Modest improvement in aerospace and
industry sales for industrial power tools was offset by lower shipments of large assembly systems.
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of sales, as a percentage of revenues, was 68.2% for the first quarter of 2006 compared
to 68.8% for the comparable 2005 quarter. The decline in cost of sales percentage resulted from a
slightly improved sales mix, benefits realized from prior restructuring actions and ongoing cost
reductions made through productivity and sourcing initiatives, which offset inflation in key
commodity and transportation costs.
Electrical Products segment cost of sales, as a percentage of revenues, was 67.9% for the
first quarter of 2006 compared to 68.4% for the first quarter 2005. The reduction in cost of sales
percentage resulted from a slight improvement in sales mix, while productivity improvements in
factory operations and materials sourcing efforts offset inflation in key commodity and
transportation costs. Tools segment cost of sales, as a percentage of revenues, was 70.3% for the
first quarter of 2006 compared to 70.8% for the first quarter of 2005. The decrease in cost of
sales percentage was driven by modestly favorable price realization, benefits from prior
restructuring actions and productivity improvements.
Selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, for the first quarter of
2006 were 19.1% compared to 19.9% for the first quarter of 2005. The decline was due to improved
leverage of fixed costs against higher sales levels, cost reductions achieved through prior
restructuring actions and benefits realized from productivity improvement actions, partially offset
by higher pension and incentive and stock-based compensation expenses.
Electrical Products segment selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues,
for the first quarter of 2006 were 17.0% compared to 17.7% for the first quarter of 2005. The
decline in selling and
-21-
administrative expenses percentage resulted from leverage of fixed costs against increased
sales volumes and cost reduction actions targeted at key variable cost components, which more than
offset continuing investment in growth initiatives.
Tools segment selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, for the first
quarter, of 2006 were 20.1% compared to 20.9% for the first quarter of 2005. The decline in
selling and administrative expenses percentage was driven by increased sales volumes providing
leverage against fixed costs and benefits realized from cost improvement initiatives.
Interest expense, net for the first quarter of 2006 decreased $5.7 million from the 2005 first
quarter, primarily as a result of both lower average debt balances and average interest rates on
borrowings. Average debt balances were $1.03 billion and $1.41 billion and average interest rates
were 5.6% and 5.9% for the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decline in the
average interest rates was primarily driven by the conversion of debt balances to lower
interest-rate debt. The debt balance during the first three months of 2005 included 6.25%, 300
million Euro bonds that matured in October 2005. Cooper partially funded repayment of this Euro
bond debt with $325 million, 5.25% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2012. Proceeds from the
notes were swapped to 272.6 million with cross-currency interest-rate swaps, effectively
converting the seven-year U.S. notes to seven-year Euro notes with an annual interest rate of
3.55%.
Operating Earnings:
Electrical Products segment first quarter 2006 operating earnings increased 18% to $160.1
million from $135.4 million for the same quarter of last year, with leverage from revenue
increases, a slightly favorable sales mix and benefits of cost reduction efforts more than
offsetting increased commodity and transportation costs.
Tools segment first quarter 2006 operating earnings increased 18% to $17.3 million compared to
$14.7 million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase resulted from improved sales mix, cost
reductions achieved through productivity improvement initiatives and benefits realized from prior
restructuring actions.
Income Taxes:
The effective tax rate was 25.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 21.5% for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase is primarily related to increased taxable earnings
in 2006 without a corresponding increase in tax benefits.
Restructuring Charges:
During the fourth quarter of 2003, Cooper recorded net restructuring charges of $16.9 million,
or $13.6 million after taxes ($.14 per diluted common share). This represented costs associated
with restructuring projects undertaken in 2003 of $18.4 million, partially offset by a $1.5 million
adjustment of estimates for restructuring projects initiated in 2002.
The most significant action included in the charges was an announcement of the closing of
Cooper Wiring Devices manufacturing operations in New York City. This action included plans for
the withdrawal from a multiple-employer pension plan. Cooper recorded a $12.5 million obligation as
an estimate of Coopers portion of unfunded benefit obligations of the plan. In 2005, Cooper
finalized activities related to withdrawal from the multi-employer pension plan and recorded an
additional $4.0 million pre-tax charge. The remaining $5.9 million charge primarily represents
severance for announced employment reductions at several locations. Substantially all of the
severance payments were made as of March 31, 2006.
A total of 114 salaried and 150 hourly personnel were eliminated as a result of these actions.
The multiple-employer pension obligation is expected to be paid over 20 years beginning in 2006.
Cooper estimates the annual savings from the personnel reductions was approximately $6 million,
(net of additional
-22-
employees added in lower-cost regions) with most of the savings beginning in the first quarter
of 2004. The majority of the eliminated costs previously were reflected as cost of sales.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity:
Coopers operating working capital (defined as receivables and inventories less accounts
payable) increased $109.2 million during the first quarter of 2006. An $88.2 million increase in
receivables and a $71.2 million increase in inventories, partially offset by a $50.2 increase in
accounts payable, were driven by increased sales volumes. In addition, the investment in
inventories was increased during the quarter to improve customer service metrics as well as
position inventory levels for the construction season. Operating working capital turnover (defined
as annualized revenues divided by average quarterly operating working capital) for the 2006 first
quarter of 4.9 turns increased from 4.5 turns in the same period of 2005 and primarily resulted
from revenues growing at a higher rate than the increase in operating working capital. Cooper
continues to execute productivity initiatives focused on improving its working capital position.
Cash provided by operating activities was $25.6 million during the 2006 first quarter. This
cash, plus an additional $109.2 million of cash and cash equivalents and $53.2 million of cash
received from stock option exercises were primarily used to fund capital expenditures of $16.7
million, acquisitions of $83.2 million, dividends of $34.6 million and share purchases of $69.3
million.
Cash provided by operating activities was $20.2 million during the 2005 first quarter. This
cash, plus an additional $128.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and $25.4 million of cash
received from stock option exercises were primarily used to fund capital expenditures of $19.9
million, dividends of $34.6 million, share purchases of $28.0 million and debt reduction of $90.1
million.
In connection with acquisitions accounted for as purchases, Cooper records, to the extent
appropriate, accruals for the costs of closing duplicate facilities, severing redundant personnel
and integrating the acquired businesses into existing Cooper operations. Cash flows from operating
activities are reduced by the amounts expended against the various accruals established in
connection with each acquisition. Spending against these accruals was $6.2 million and $0.5
million during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Cooper currently anticipates a continuation of its long-term ability to annually generate in
excess of $200 million in cash flow available for acquisitions, debt repayments and common stock
repurchases.
As discussed in Note 12 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Cooper is
continuing discussions with the representatives of Federal-Mogul, its bankruptcy committees and the
future claimants regarding settlement of Coopers contingent liabilities related to the Automotive
Products sale to Federal-Mogul. Cooper anticipates that if settlement under the terms discussed in
Note 12 are in fact consummated, that all cash components of the final settlement would be funded
from operating cash flows.
Capital Resources:
Cooper targets a 35% to 45% debt-to-total capitalization ratio. Excess cash flows are
utilized to fund acquisitions or to purchase shares of Cooper common stock. Coopers debt-to-total
capitalization ratio was 30.8% at March 31, 2006, 31.7% at December 31, 2005 and 36.4% at March 31,
2005.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Cooper had cash and cash equivalents of $343.6
million and $452.8 million, respectively. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Cooper had
short-term debt of $6.1 million and $7.6 million, respectively and had no commercial paper
outstanding.
Coopers practice is to back up its short-term debt balance with a combination of cash and
committed credit facilities. At March 31, 2006, Cooper had a $500 million committed credit
facility, which
-23-
matures in November 2009. Short-term debt to the extent not backed up by cash, reduces the
amount of additional liquidity provided by the committed credit facility.
The credit facility agreement is not subject to termination based on a decrease in Coopers
debt ratings or a material adverse change clause. The principal financial covenants in the
agreement limits Coopers debt-to-total capitalization ratio to 60% and require Cooper to maintain
a minimum earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization to interest
ratio of 3 to 1. Cooper is in compliance with all covenants set forth in the credit facility
agreement.
Coopers access to the commercial paper market could be adversely affected by a change in the
credit ratings assigned to its commercial paper. Should Coopers access to the commercial paper
market be adversely affected due to a change in its credit ratings, Cooper would rely on a
combination of available cash and its committed credit facility to provide short-term funding. The
committed credit facility does not contain any provision, which makes its availability to Cooper
dependent on Coopers credit ratings.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2006, there have been no material changes to Coopers off-balance sheet
arrangements and contractual obligations as described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Backlog
Sales backlog represents the dollar amount of all firm open orders for which all terms and
conditions pertaining to the sale have been approved such that a future sale is reasonably
expected. Sales backlog by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Electrical Products |
|
$ |
505.4 |
|
|
$ |
405.4 |
|
Tools & Hardware |
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
575.4 |
|
|
$ |
475.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Safe Harbor Statement
This Form 10-Q includes certain forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
reflect Coopers expectations, objectives and goals with respect to future events and financial
performance, and are based on assumptions and estimates which Cooper believes are reasonable.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, any statements regarding future
revenues, cost and expenses, earnings, earnings per share, margins, cash flows and capital
expenditures. Cooper wishes to caution readers not to put undue reliance on these statements and
that actual results could differ materially from anticipated results. Important factors which may
affect the actual results include, but are not limited to, the resolution of Federal-Moguls
bankruptcy proceedings, political developments, market and economic conditions, changes in raw
material, transportation, and energy costs, industry competition, the ability to execute and
realize the expected benefits from strategic initiatives including revenue growth plans and
cost-control and productivity improvement programs, the magnitude of any disruptions from
manufacturing rationalizations and the implementation of the Enterprise Business System, changes in
mix of products sold, mergers and acquisitions and their integration into Cooper, the timing and
amount of any stock repurchases, changes in financial markets including currency rate fluctuations
and changing legislation and regulations including changes in tax law, tax treaties or tax
regulations. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are intended to qualify for
the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
-24-
Item 3. Quantitive and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The information called for by this item is provided under Item 2. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, Coopers management, under the supervision
and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Coopers disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, Coopers management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of this evaluation.
Cooper is executing a multi-year process of implementing an Enterprise Business System (EBS)
globally. Implementing an EBS system on a global basis involves significant changes in business
processes. The implementation is phased, which reduces the risks associated with making these
changes. In addition, Cooper is taking the necessary steps to monitor and maintain appropriate
internal controls during the implementations.
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Cooper is subject to various suits, legal proceedings and claims that arise in the normal
course of business. While it is not feasible to predict the outcome of these matters with
certainty, management is of the opinion that their ultimate disposition should not have a material
adverse effect on Coopers financial statements.
In October 1998, Cooper sold its Automotive Products business to Federal-Mogul Corporation
(Federal-Mogul). These discontinued businesses (including the Abex product line obtained from
Pneumo-Abex Corporation (Pneumo) in 1994) were operated through subsidiary companies, and the
stock of those subsidiaries was sold to Federal-Mogul pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated August 17, 1998 (1998 Agreement). In conjunction with the sale, Federal-Mogul indemnified
Cooper for certain liabilities of these subsidiary companies, including liabilities related to the
Abex product line and any potential liability that Cooper may have to Pneumo pursuant to a 1994
Mutual Guaranty Agreement between Cooper and Pneumo. On October 1, 2001, Federal-Mogul and several
of its affiliates filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and indicated that Federal-Mogul may not
honor the indemnification obligations to Cooper. As of the date of this filing, Federal-Mogul had
not rejected the 1998 Agreement, which includes the indemnification to Cooper. If Federal-Mogul
rejects the 1998 Agreement, Cooper will be relieved of its future obligations under the 1998
Agreement, including specific indemnities relating to payment of taxes and certain obligations
regarding insurance for its former Automotive Products businesses. To the extent Cooper is
obligated to Pneumo for any asbestos-related claims arising from the Abex product line (Abex
Claims), Cooper has rights, confirmed by Pneumo, to significant insurance for such claims. Based
on information provided by representatives of Federal-Mogul and recent claims experience, from
August 28, 1998 through March 31, 2006, a total of 138,457 Abex Claims were filed, of which 100,026
claims have been resolved leaving 38,431 Abex Claims pending at March 31, 2006, that are the
responsibility of Federal-Mogul. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, 734 claims were
filed and 738 claims were resolved. Since August 28, 1998, the average indemnity payment for
resolved Abex Claims was $2,061 before insurance. A total of $88 million was spent on defense
costs for the period August 28, 1998 through March 31, 2006. Historically, existing insurance
coverage has provided 50% to 80% of the total defense and indemnity
payments for Abex Claims.
However, insurance recovery is currently at a lower percentage (approximately 30%) due to
exhaustion of primary layers of coverage and litigation with certain excess insurers.
-25-
With the assistance of independent advisors, Bates White, LLC, in the fourth quarter of 2001
Cooper completed a thorough analysis of its potential exposure for asbestos liabilities in the
event Federal-Mogul rejects the 1998 Agreement. Based on Coopers analysis of its contingent
liability exposure resulting from Federal-Moguls bankruptcy, Cooper concluded that an additional
fourth-quarter 2001 discontinued operations provision of $30 million after-tax, or $.32 per share,
was appropriate to reflect the potential net impact of this issue.
Throughout 2003, Cooper worked towards resolution of the indemnification issues and future
handling of the Abex-related claims within the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy proceedings. This included
negotiations with the representatives of Federal-Mogul, its bankruptcy committees and the future
claimants (the Representatives) regarding participation in Federal-Moguls proposed 524(g)
asbestos trust. Based on the status of the negotiations in 2004, Cooper concluded that it was
probable that Federal-Mogul will reject the 1998 Agreement. Cooper also concluded that the
Representatives would require any negotiated settlement through the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy to be
at the high end of the Bates White, LLC liability analysis and with substantially lower insurance
recovery assumptions and higher administrative costs.
During late February and early March 2004, Cooper reassessed the accrual required based on the
then current status of the negotiations with the Representatives and the liability and insurance
receivable that would be required to be recorded if this matter is not settled within the
Federal-Mogul bankruptcy. Cooper concluded that resolution within the Federal-Mogul proposed
524(g) asbestos trust would likely be within the range of the liabilities, net of insurance
recoveries, that Cooper would accrue if this matter were not settled within the Federal-Mogul
bankruptcy. Accordingly, Cooper recorded a $126.0 million after-tax discontinued operations charge,
net of a $70.9 income tax benefit, in the fourth quarter of 2003.
In December 2005, Cooper announced that the Company and other parties involved in the
resolution of the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy proceeding had reached an agreement regarding Coopers
participation in Federal Moguls proposed 524 (g) asbestos trust. By participating in this trust,
Cooper would resolve its liability for asbestos claims arising from Coopers former Abex Friction
Products business. The proposed settlement agreement was subject to court approval, approval of 75
percent of the current Abex asbestos claimants and certain other approvals. The settlement would
resolve more than 38,000 pending Abex Claims. Future claims would be resolved through the
bankruptcy trust, and Cooper would be protected against future claims by an injunction to be issued
by the district court upon plan confirmation.
Key terms and aspects of the proposed settlement agreement included Cooper agreeing to pay
$130 million in cash into the trust, with $115 million payable upon Federal-Moguls emergence from
bankruptcy. The remainder would be due on January 15, 2007, or upon emergence from bankruptcy, if
later. Cooper would receive a total of $37.5 million during the funding period from other parties
associated with the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy. Cooper would further provide the trust 1.4 million
shares of the Companys stock upon Federal-Moguls emergence from bankruptcy. The agreement
provided that the trust may, during the first year after issuance, sell these shares to Cooper at
market prices and, thereafter, in open market transactions.
The proposed settlement agreement also provided for further payments by Cooper subject to the
amount and timing of insurance proceeds. Cooper agreed to make 25 annual payments of up to $20
million each, reduced by certain insurance proceeds received by the trust. In years that the
insurance proceeds exceed $17 million, Cooper would be required to contribute $3 million with the
excess insurance proceeds carried over to the next year. The trust would retain 10 percent of the
insurance proceeds for indemnity claims paid by the trust until Coopers obligation is satisfied
and would retain 15 percent thereafter. The agreement also provided for Cooper to receive the
insurance proceeds related to indemnity and defense costs paid prior to the date a stay of current
claims is entered by the bankruptcy court. Cooper would also be required to forego certain claims
and objections in the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, the parties involved had
agreed to petition the court for a stay on all current claims outstanding.
-26-
Although the payments related to the settlement could extend to 25 years and the collection of
insurance proceeds could extend beyond 25 years, the liability and insurance would be undiscounted
on Coopers balance sheet as the amount of the actual annual payments is not reasonably
predictable.
A critical term of the proposed settlement was the issuance of a preliminary injunction
staying all pending Abex asbestos claims. At a hearing on January 20, 2006, other parties to the
bankruptcy proceedings were unable to satisfy the courts requirements to grant the required
preliminary injunction. As a result, the proposed settlement agreement will require renegotiation
of certain terms. Cooper remains in active negotiations with the Representatives to resolve its
liability exposure for Abex Claims within the Federal-Mogul proposed 524(g) trust. The final
determination of whether Cooper will participate in the Federal-Mogul 524(g) trust is unknown.
However, Cooper management concluded that, at the date of the filing of its 2005 Form 10-K, the
most likely outcome in the range of potential outcomes was a revised settlement approximating the
December 2005 proposed settlement. Accordingly, Cooper recorded a $227.2 million after-tax
discontinued operations charge, net of a $127.8 million income tax benefit, in the fourth quarter
of 2005.
The fourth quarter 2005 charge to discontinued operations included payments to a 524(g) trust
over 25 years that were undiscounted, and the insurance recoveries only included recoveries where
insurance in place agreements, settlements or policy recoveries were probable. If the negotiations
with the Representatives in early 2004 had resulted in an agreement, Cooper would have paid all the
consideration when Federal-Mogul emerged from bankruptcy and the 524(g) trust was formed and would
have relinquished all rights to insurance. The lack of discounting and the limited recognition of
insurance recoveries in the fourth quarter 2005 charge to discontinued operations were a
significant component of the increase in the accrual for discontinued operations. While it is not
possible to quantify, the accrual for discontinued operations also includes a premium for resolving
the inherent uncertainty associated with resolving Abex Claims though the tort system. If Cooper
is unable to reach a settlement to participate in the Federal-Mogul 524(g) trust, the accrual for
discontinued operations potentially may have to be reduced to the estimated liability and related
insurance recoveries through the tort system. There are numerous assumptions that are required to
project the liability in the tort system and Cooper has not completed the analysis and determined
the liability that would be recorded under this scenario.
Cooper, through Pneumo-Abex LLC, has access to Abex insurance policies with remaining limits
on policies with solvent insurers in excess of $800 million. Cooper included insurance recoveries
of
approximately $215 million pre-tax in the fourth quarter 2005 charge to discontinued
operations discussed above. Cooper believes that it is likely that additional insurance recoveries
will be recorded in the future as new insurance in place agreements are consummated and settlements
with insurance carriers are completed. However, extensive litigation with the insurance carriers
may be required to receive those additional recoveries.
If a settlement within the 524(g) trust is in fact achieved on a basis consistent with the
terms discussed above, Cooper will periodically assess the current overall adequacy of the accrual
for discontinued operations, including updates to the assumptions regarding estimates of insurance
recoveries, levels of defense and indemnity payments and other assumptions related to the matter.
As this additional information becomes available, Cooper will record a charge or credit to the
accrual for discontinued operations, which may be significant.
Cooper has continued discussions with the Representatives though the date of filing of its
first quarter 2006 Form 10-Q and as of this date has not been able to reach an agreement with the
Representatives. As the terms of a revised proposed settlement agreement and final determination
of whether Cooper will participate in the Federal-Mogul 524(g) trust are unknown, the accrual for
discontinued operations was not adjusted as of March 31, 2006. If a revised proposed settlement
agreement has been reached on terms that were essentially the same as the December 2005 proposed
settlement agreement, Cooper would have increased the accrual for discontinued operations by $20.0
million pre-tax and incurred a charge to discontinued operations of $12.8 million net of tax
representing the increase in the market value of Coopers
-27-
common stock included in the December
2005 proposed settlement proposal from December 31, 2005 through March 31, 2006.
From a cash flow perspective, Cooper management continues to believe that a settlement on
terms being discussed would allow Cooper to continue to grow through acquisitions and return cash
to shareholders through dividends and stock repurchases. There is significant uncertainty as to
whether any settlement agreement will be finalized. In addition, any settlement remains subject
to bankruptcy court approval, approval by the current claimants and other matters. At this time,
the exact manner in which this issue will be resolved is not known. The accrual for potential
liabilities related to the Automotive Products sale and the Federal-Mogul bankruptcy was $528.0
million at March 31, 2006 and $526.3 million at December 31, 2005. Cooper has preserved its rights
as a creditor for breach of Federal-Moguls indemnification to Cooper and its rights against all
Federal-Mogul subsidiaries. Cooper intends to take all actions to seek a resolution of the
indemnification issues and future handling of the Abex-related claims within the Federal-Mogul
bankruptcy proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Coopers
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table reflects activity related to equity securities purchased by Coopers
wholly-owned subsidiaries during the three months ended March 31, 2006:
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Plans or Programs (1) |
|
Plans or Programs (1) |
As of 12/31/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,021,650 |
|
1/01/06 1/31/06 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
77.08 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
6,321,650 |
|
2/01/06 2/28/06 |
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
82.04 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
6,131,650 |
|
3/01/06 3/31/06 |
|
|
455,000 |
|
|
$ |
84.20 |
|
|
|
455,000 |
|
|
|
5,676,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
845,000 |
|
|
$ |
82.01 |
|
|
|
845,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On November 2, 2004, Coopers Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of
up to five million shares of the Coopers Class A common stock. Cooper has also announced
that the Board authorized the repurchase of shares issued from time to time under its equity
compensation plans, matched savings plan and dividend reinvestment plan in order to offset the
dilution that results from issuing shares under these plans. For 2006, Coopers current
estimate is that 2.5 million shares will be issued under equity compensation plans, which is
reflected in the above table. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
-28-
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1 |
|
Form of Executive Stock Incentive Agreement for the Performance Period 2006-2008. |
|
10.2 |
|
Cooper Industries Amended and Restated Management Annual Incentive Plan
(Amended and Restated February 13, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to
Coopers Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25,
2006). |
|
10.3 |
|
Amended and Restated Cooper Industries, Ltd. Directors Stock Plan (Amended and
Restated February 14, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Appendix D to Coopers Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25, 2006). |
|
12. |
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Calendar Years 2001
through 2005 and the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. |
|
23. |
|
Consent of Bates White, LLC. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooper Industries, Ltd.
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 2, 2006 |
/s/ Terry A. Klebe
|
|
|
Terry A. Klebe |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 2, 2006 |
/s/ Jeffrey B. Levos
|
|
|
Jeffrey B. Levos |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
-29-
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
10.1 |
|
Form of Executive Stock Incentive Agreement for the Performance Period 2006-2008. |
|
10.2 |
|
Cooper Industries Amended and Restated Management Annual Incentive Plan
(Amended and Restated February 13, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to
Coopers Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25,
2006). |
|
10.3 |
|
Amended and Restated Cooper Industries, Ltd. Directors Stock Plan (Amended and
Restated February 14, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Appendix D to Coopers Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25, 2006). |
|
12. |
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Calendar Years 2001
through 2005 and the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. |
|
23. |
|
Consent of Bates White, LLC. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |