e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
January 30,
2011
|
or
|
|
o
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
000-06920
Applied Materials,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-1655526
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
3050 Bowers Avenue,
|
|
95052-8039
|
P.O. Box 58039
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Santa Clara, California
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(408) 727-5555
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock
as of January 30, 2011: 1,319,407,222
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Marketing and selling
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Restructuring charges and asset impairments (Note 10)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest income and other income, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
2
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 3 and 4)
|
|
$
|
1,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
Short-term investments (Notes 3 and 4)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
Inventories (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
7,142
|
|
|
|
6,765
|
|
Long-term investments (Notes 3 and 4)
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 7)
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
Goodwill, net (Note 8)
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net
(Note 8)
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
11,274
|
|
|
$
|
10,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,914
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Employee benefits and other liabilities (Note 12)
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Note 11):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,447
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
11,925
|
|
|
|
11,511
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(9,546
|
)
|
|
|
(9,396
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
7,839
|
|
|
|
7,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
11,274
|
|
|
$
|
10,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amounts as of January 30, 2011 are unaudited. Amounts as of
October 31, 2010 are derived from the October 31, 2010
audited consolidated financial statements. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
3
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
5,406
|
|
|
$
|
11,511
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
(9,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
7,536
|
|
Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Issuance under stock plans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
5,447
|
|
|
$
|
11,925
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
$
|
(9,546
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
4
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Loss on fixed asset retirements
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Restructuring charges and asset impairments
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Net recognized loss on investments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Employee benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of facility
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt repayments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from common stock issuances
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to stockholders
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
1,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Cash refunds for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
5
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note 1
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
Basis
of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated
condensed financial statements of Applied Materials, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (Applied or the Company) included herein have
been prepared on a basis consistent with the October 31,
2010 audited consolidated financial statements and include all
material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary to fairly present the information set
forth therein. These unaudited interim consolidated condensed
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in Applieds Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 (2010
Form 10-K).
Applieds results of operations for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of future
operating results. Applieds fiscal year ends on the last
Sunday in October of each year. Fiscal 2011 contains
52 weeks, while fiscal 2010 contained 53 weeks, and
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 contained 13 weeks, while
the first quarter of fiscal 2010 contained 14 weeks.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
materially from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, Applied
evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounts
receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial
instruments, inventories, intangible assets and goodwill, useful
lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair
values of share-based awards, and income taxes, among others.
Applied bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue
Recognition
Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
sellers price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is probable. Applieds shipping terms are
customarily FOB Applied shipping point or equivalent terms.
Applieds revenue recognition policy generally results in
revenue recognition at the following points: (1) for all
transactions where legal title passes to the customer upon
shipment, Applied recognizes revenue upon shipment for all
products that have been demonstrated to meet product
specifications prior to shipment; the portion of revenue
associated with certain installation-related tasks is deferred,
and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the
installation-related tasks; (2) for products that have not
been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to
shipment, revenue is recognized at customer technical
acceptance; (3) for transactions where legal title does not
pass at shipment, revenue is recognized when legal title passes
to the customer, which is generally at customer technical
acceptance; (4) for arrangements containing multiple
elements and initiated at or prior to October 25, 2009, the
last day of fiscal 2009, the revenue relating to the undelivered
elements is deferred at their estimated relative fair values
until delivery of the deferred elements; and (5) for
arrangements initiated or materially modified subsequent to
October 25, 2009 containing multiple elements, the revenue
relating to the undelivered elements is deferred using the
relative selling price method utilizing estimated sales prices
until delivery of the deferred elements. Applied limits the
amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the
amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products
or services, future performance obligations or subject to
customer-specified return or adjustment. In cases where Applied
has sold products that have been demonstrated to meet product
specifications prior to shipment, Applied believes that at the
time of delivery, it has an enforceable claim to amounts
recognized as revenue. The completed contract method is used for
SunFabtm
thin film
6
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
lines. Spare parts revenue is generally recognized upon
shipment, and services revenue is generally recognized over the
period that the services are provided.
Applied elected to early adopt amended accounting standards
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for
multiple deliverable revenue arrangements on a prospective basis
for applicable transactions originating or materially modified
after October 25, 2009. The new standard changed the
requirements for establishing separate units of accounting in a
multiple element arrangement and requires the allocation of
arrangement consideration to each deliverable to be based on the
relative selling price. The FASB also amended the accounting
standards for revenue recognition to exclude software that is
contained in a tangible product from the scope of software
revenue guidance when the software is essential to the tangible
products functionality. Implementation of this new
authoritative guidance had an insignificant impact on reported
net sales as compared to net sales under previous guidance, as
the new guidance did not change the units of accounting within
sales arrangements and the elimination of the residual method
for the allocation of arrangement consideration had an
inconsequential impact on the amount and timing of reported net
sales.
For fiscal 2010 and subsequent periods, when a sales arrangement
contains multiple elements, such as hardware and services
and/or
software products, Applied allocates revenue to each element
based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a
deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) if available, third party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not
available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor
TPE is available. Applied generally utilizes the ESP due to the
nature of its products. In multiple element arrangements where
more-than-incidental
software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each
separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software
deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using
the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the
arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy.
If the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable,
the arrangement consideration allocated to the software
deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software
deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue,
as amended.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the FASB amended its existing guidance for
goodwill and other intangible assets. This authoritative
guidance modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for
reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For
those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2
of the goodwill impairment test if there are qualitative factors
indicating that it is more likely than not that a goodwill
impairment exists. The qualitative factors are consistent with
the existing guidance which requires goodwill of a reporting
unit to be tested for impairment between annual tests if an
event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than
not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount. This authoritative guidance becomes effective for
Applied in fiscal 2012. The implementation of this authoritative
guidance is not expected to have a material impact on
Applieds financial position or results of operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on
business combinations. This authoritative guidance requires a
public entity that presents comparative financial statements to
disclose the revenue and earnings of the combined entity as
though the business combinations that occurred during the
current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior
annual reporting period. In addition, this authoritative
guidance expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to
include a description of the nature and amount of material,
nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the
business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue
and earnings. This authoritative guidance is effective
prospectively for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2010. Applied will comply with this authoritative guidance in
fiscal 2012.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair
value measurements, which requires additional disclosures and
clarifications to existing disclosures. This authoritative
guidance requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value
7
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
measurements and also to describe the reasons for these
transfers. This authoritative guidance also requires enhanced
disclosure of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures
for Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements became
effective for Applied in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Disclosures regarding activity within Level 3 fair value
measurements become effective the first interim reporting period
beginning after December 15, 2010. Applied will comply with
this authoritative guidance in the second quarter of fiscal
2011. See Note 4 for information and related disclosures
regarding Applieds fair value measurements.
|
|
Note 2
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
Basic earnings per share is determined using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is determined using the weighted
average number of common shares and potential common shares
(representing the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted
stock units, and employee stock purchase plans shares)
outstanding during the period. Applieds net income has not
been adjusted for any period presented for purposes of computing
basic or diluted earnings per share due to the Companys
non-complex capital structure. For purposes of computing diluted
earnings per share, weighted average potential common shares do
not include stock options with an exercise price greater than
the average fair market value of Applied common stock for the
period as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and
employee stock purchase plans shares
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
8
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 3
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents and Investments
|
Summary
of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following tables summarizes Applieds cash, cash
equivalents and investments by security type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,974
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
Other debt securities*
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term investments
|
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments
|
|
$
|
4,060
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
665
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Other debt securities*
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments
|
|
$
|
3,854
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Other debt securities consist primarily of investment grade
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. |
Maturities
of Investments
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of
Applieds investments at January 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
Due after one through five years
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
Due after five years
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
No single maturity date**
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Securities with no single maturity date include publicly-traded
and privately-held equity securities, and asset-backed and
mortgage-backed securities. |
10
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gains
and Losses on Investments
Gross realized gains and losses on sales of investments during
the three months ended January 30, 2011 and
January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
At January 30, 2011, Applied had a gross unrealized loss of
$3 million due to a decrease in the fair value of certain
fixed income securities. Applied regularly reviews its
investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that
have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in
determining whether an unrealized loss was considered to be
temporary, or
other-than-temporary
and therefore impaired, include: the length of time and extent
to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis; the
financial condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of
the investee; and whether it is more likely than not that
Applied will be required to sell the security prior to recovery.
Generally, the contractual terms of investments in marketable
securities do not permit settlement at prices less than the
amortized cost of the investments. Applied has determined that
the gross unrealized losses on its marketable securities at
January 30, 2011 are temporary in nature and therefore it
did not recognize any impairment of its marketable securities
for the three months ended January 30, 2011. For the three
months ended January 31, 2010, Applied did not recognize
any impairment of its marketable securities. During the three
months ended January 31, 2010, Applied determined that
certain of its equity investments in privately-held companies
were
other-than-temporarily
impaired and, accordingly, recognized impairment charges in the
amount of $1 million.
The following table provides the fair market value of
Applieds investments with unrealized losses that are not
deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired as of January 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Loss Position for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and temporary losses on investments classified
as
available-for-sale
are included within accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), net of any related tax effect. Upon realization, those
amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to results of operations.
|
|
Note 4
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Applieds financial assets are measured and recorded at
fair value, except for equity investments held in privately-held
companies. These equity investments are generally accounted for
under the cost method of accounting and are periodically
assessed for
other-than-temporary
impairment when events or circumstances indicate that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred. Applieds nonfinancial
assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant
and equipment, are recorded at cost and are assessed for
impairment when events or circumstances indicate that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred.
11
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Applied uses the following fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within
the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available
and significant to the fair value measurement:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly,
such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted
prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported
by little or no market activity and that are significant to the
fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
Applieds investments are comprised primarily of debt
securities that are classified as
available-for-sale
and recorded at their fair values. In determining the fair value
of investments, Applied uses pricing information from pricing
services that value securities based on quoted market prices and
models that utilize observable market inputs. In the event a
fair value estimate is unavailable from a pricing service,
Applied generally obtains non-binding price quotes from brokers.
Applied then reviews the information provided by the pricing
services or brokers to determine the fair value of its
short-term and long-term investments. In addition, to validate
pricing information obtained from pricing services, Applied
periodically performs supplemental analysis on a sample of
securities. Applied reviews any significant unanticipated
differences identified through this analysis to determine the
appropriate fair value.
Investments with remaining effective maturities of
12 months or less from the balance sheet date are
classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining
effective maturities of more than 12 months from the
balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. As
of January 30, 2011, substantially all of Applieds
available-for-sale,
short-term and long-term investments were recognized at fair
value that was determined based upon observable inputs.
12
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
Financial assets and liabilities (excluding cash balances)
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below
as of January 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
$
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,139
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,416
|
|
|
$
|
1,927
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,343
|
|
|
$
|
1,317
|
|
|
$
|
1,821
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no significant transfers in and out of Level 1
and Level 2 fair value measurements during both the three
months ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010.
Applied did not have any financial assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis within Level 3 fair value measurements
during the three months ended January 30, 2011 and
January 31, 2010, respectively.
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring
Basis
Equity investments in privately-held companies are generally
accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are
periodically assessed for
other-than-temporary
impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred. If Applied determines that
an
other-than-temporary
impairment has occurred, the investment will be written down to
its estimated fair value based on available information, such as
pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions,
earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance
and any other readily available market data. Equity investments
in privately-held companies totaled $59 million at
January 30, 2011, of which $40 million of investments
were accounted for under the cost method of accounting and
$19 million of investments had been measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis due to an
other-than-temporary
decline in value. At January 31, 2010, equity investments
in privately-held companies totaled $68 million, of which
$52 million of investments were accounted for under the
cost method of accounting and $16 million of investments
had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis due to
an
other-than-temporary
decline in value.
13
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables present the balances of equity securities
at January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 that had been
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, using the
process described above, and the impairment charges recorded
during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Privately-Held
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis during fiscal 2011
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Privately-Held
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis during fiscal 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
The carrying amounts of Applieds financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
payable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate
fair value due to the short maturities of these financial
instruments. At January 30, 2011, the carrying amount of
long-term debt was $205 million and the estimated fair
value was $240 million. At October 31, 2010, the
carrying amount of long-term debt was $205 million and the
estimated fair value was $238 million. The estimated fair
value of long-term debt is determined by Level 2 inputs and
is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or
similar issues.
|
|
Note 5
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Applied conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with
certain transactions denominated in local currencies, such as
Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel, Taiwanese dollar and Swiss
franc. Applied uses derivative financial instruments, such as
forward exchange contracts and currency option contracts, to
hedge certain forecasted foreign currency denominated
transactions expected to occur typically within the next
24 months. The purpose of Applieds foreign currency
management is to mitigate the effect of exchange rate
fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues,
costs and eventual cash flows. The terms of currency instruments
used for hedging purposes are generally consistent with the
timing of the transactions being hedged. Applied does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
Derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign
currency exchange contracts, are recognized on the balance sheet
at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do
not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective
portion of any hedges, are recognized currently in earnings. All
of Applieds derivative financial instruments are recorded
at their fair value in other current assets or in accounts
payable and accrued expenses.
Hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and
documented at the inception of the hedge as cash flow hedges and
are typically entered into once per month. Cash flow hedges are
evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of
the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (AOCI) in
stockholders equity and is reclassified into earnings when
the hedged
14
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transaction affects earnings. The majority of the after-tax net
income or loss related to derivative instruments included in
AOCI at January 30, 2011 is expected to be reclassified
into earnings within 12 months. Changes in the fair value
of currency forward exchange and option contracts due to changes
in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness.
Both ineffective hedge amounts and hedge components excluded
from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized promptly in
earnings. If the transaction being hedged is no longer probable
to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is deemed to be
ineffective, Applied promptly recognizes the gain or loss on the
associated financial instrument in general and administrative
expenses. The amount recognized due to discontinuance of cash
flow hedges that were probable not to occur by the end of the
originally specified time period was not significant for the
three months ended January 30, 2011 and January 31,
2010.
Additionally, forward exchange contracts are generally used to
hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or
liabilities. These derivatives are typically entered into once
per month and are not designated for hedge accounting treatment.
Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these hedges are
recorded promptly in earnings to offset the changes in the fair
value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
Fair values of derivative instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated
Condensed Statement of Operations for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 30, 2011
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Testing
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Testing
|
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of products
sold
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
|
January 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk Contingent Features
If Applieds credit rating were to fall below investment
grade, it would be in violation of credit risk contingent
provisions of the derivative instruments discussed above, and
certain counterparties to the derivative instruments could
request immediate payment on derivative instruments in net
liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative
instruments with credit risk-related contingent features that
were in a net liability position was immaterial as of
January 30, 2011.
Entering into foreign exchange contracts with banks exposes
Applied to credit-related losses in the event of the banks
nonperformance. However, Applieds exposure is not
considered significant.
|
|
Note 6
|
Accounts
Receivable, Net
|
Applied has agreements with various financial institutions to
sell accounts receivable and discount promissory notes from
selected customers. Applied also discounts letters of credit
through various financial institutions. Applied sells its
accounts receivable without recourse. Details of discounted
letters of credit, factored accounts receivable and discounted
promissory notes for the three months ended January 30,
2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Discounted letters of credit
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Factored accounts receivable and discounted promissory notes
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing charges on the sale of receivables and discounting of
letters of credit are included in interest expense in the
accompanying Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and
were not material for both periods presented.
Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $74 million at both January 30, 2011 and
October 31, 2010. Applied sells principally to
manufacturers within the semiconductor, display and solar
industries. As a result of challenging economic and industry
conditions, certain of these manufacturers may experience
difficulties in meeting their obligations in a timely manner.
While Applied believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts
is adequate and represents Applieds best estimate as of
January 30, 2011, Applied will continue to closely monitor
customer liquidity and other economic conditions, which may
result in changes to Applieds estimates regarding
collectability.
16
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 7
|
Balance
Sheet Detail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer service spares
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Finished goods*
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,647
|
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Included in finished goods inventory is $208 million at
January 30, 2011, and $148 million at October 31,
2010, of newly-introduced systems at customer locations where
the sales transaction did not meet Applieds revenue
recognition criteria as set forth in Note 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3-30
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
Demonstration and manufacturing equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
|
|
|
3-15
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,808
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
|
|
(1,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
Warranty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Other accrued taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Restructuring reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
|
$
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Deposits and Deferred Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied received
$39 million in proceeds from the sale of a property located
in North America and incurred a loss of $1 million on the
transaction.
17
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of January 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010 other
accrued expenses included $22 million and $40 million,
respectively, in contractual termination obligation charges.
|
|
Note 8
|
Goodwill,
Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
and Purchased Intangible Assets
Applieds methodology for allocating the purchase price
relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through
established and generally accepted valuation techniques.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of the
acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities
assumed. Applied assigns assets acquired (including goodwill)
and liabilities assumed to one or more reporting units as of the
date of acquisition. Typically, acquisitions relate to a single
reporting unit and thus do not require the allocation of
goodwill to multiple reporting units. If the products obtained
in an acquisition are assigned to multiple reporting units, the
goodwill is distributed to the respective reporting units as
part of the purchase price allocation process.
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment
annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The process
of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets requires significant judgment, especially in
emerging markets. Applied regularly monitors current business
conditions and other factors including, but not limited to,
adverse industry or economic trends, restructuring actions and
lower projections of profitability that may impact future
operating results. For goodwill, Applied performs a two-step
impairment test. In the first step, Applied compares the
estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying
value. Applieds reporting units are consistent with the
reportable segments identified in Note 15, based on the
manner in which Applied operates its business and the nature of
those operations. Applied determines the fair value of each of
its reporting units based on a weighting of income and market
approaches. Under the income approach, Applied calculates the
fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. Estimated future cash flows will be
impacted by a number of factors including anticipated future
operating results, estimated cost of capital
and/or
discount rates. Under the market approach, Applied estimates the
fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings for
comparable companies, as appropriate. If the fair value of the
reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further
testing is performed. If the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the
reporting unit, then Applied would perform the second step of
the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value
of the reporting units goodwill. Applied would then
allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the
assets and liabilities of that unit, as if Applied had acquired
the reporting unit in a business combination, with the fair
value of the reporting unit being the purchase
price. The excess of the purchase price over
the carrying amounts assigned to assets and liabilities
represents the implied fair value of goodwill. If Applied
determined that the carrying value of a reporting units
goodwill exceeded its implied fair value, Applied would record
an impairment charge equal to the difference.
Applied conducted impairment tests in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2010, and the results of the first step of the impairment
test indicated that Applieds goodwill and purchased
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for each of its
reporting units were not impaired.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied
transferred its SunFab thin film solar product from the Energy
and Environmental Solutions segment to the Applied Global
Services segment as it was determined to have reached a
particular stage in the product lifecycle. As a result of this
transfer, Applied reallocated $17 million of goodwill from
its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment to its Applied
Global Services segment.
18
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Details of indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Display
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
$
|
1,336
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
1,354
|
|
|
$
|
1,336
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets that are not subject to amortization
consist primarily of a trade name.
Finite-Lived
Purchased Intangible Assets
Applied amortizes purchased intangible assets with finite lives
using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives
of the assets, ranging from 1 to 15 years.
Applied evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
of an asset group may not be recoverable. Applied assesses the
fair value of the assets based on the amount of the undiscounted
future cash flow that the assets are expected to generate and
recognizes an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future
cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset, plus net
proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are
less than the carrying value of the asset. When Applied
identifies an impairment, Applied reduces the carrying value of
the group of assets to comparable market values, when available
and appropriate, or to its estimated fair value based on a
discounted cash flow approach.
Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally
recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value
assigned to intangible assets is usually based on estimates and
judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle
of products and technology acquired. Applied evaluates the
useful lives of its intangible assets each reporting period to
determine whether events and circumstances require revising the
remaining period of amortization. In addition, Applied reviews
intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be
recoverable. Management considers such indicators as significant
differences in actual product acceptance from the estimates,
changes in the competitive and economic environment,
technological advances, and changes in cost structure.
19
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Details of amortized intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2011
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Display
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
(250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(256
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(253
|
)
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Display
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
$
|
(407
|
)
|
|
$
|
(241
|
)
|
|
$
|
(648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(399
|
)
|
|
$
|
(235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense was $14 million and
$25 million for the three months ended January 30,
2011 and January 31, 2010, respectively.
As of January 30, 2011, future estimated amortization
expense is expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization Expense
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
2012
|
|
|
51
|
|
2013
|
|
|
49
|
|
2014
|
|
|
41
|
|
2015
|
|
|
25
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9
|
Borrowing
Facilities
|
Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in
various currencies of up to $1.1 billion, of which
$1.0 billion is comprised of a
5-year
revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is
scheduled to expire in January 2012. This agreement provides for
borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to
one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance and
includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in
compliance at January 30, 2011. Remaining credit facilities
in the amount of approximately $98 million are with
Japanese banks. Applieds ability to borrow under these
facilities is subject to bank approval at the time of the
borrowing request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to
the banks prime reference rate denominated in Japanese
yen. No amounts were outstanding under any of these facilities
at both January 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010.
20
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 10
|
Restructuring
Charges and Asset Impairments
|
On July 21, 2010, Applied announced a plan to restructure
its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment, which was
expected to impact between 400 to 500 positions globally. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied incurred employee
severance charges of $45 million associated with this
program. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as a result of
changes in Applieds operating environment and business
requirements, Applied revised its workforce reduction under this
program to approximately 200 positions and recorded a favorable
adjustment of $28 million. As of January 30, 2011, the
severance accrual associated with restructuring reserves under
this program was $11 million.
On November 11, 2009, Applied announced a restructuring
program to reduce its global workforce as of October 25,
2009 by approximately 1,300 to 1,500 positions, or 10 to
12 percent, over a period of 18 months. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied recorded restructuring
charges of $104 million associated with this program.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, as a result of changes
in business requirements, Applied revised its global workforce
reduction under this program to approximately 1,000 positions
and recorded a favorable adjustment of $20 million. As of
January 30, 2011, the severance accrual associated with
restructuring reserves under this program was $41 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied favorably
adjusted the remaining severance accrual associated with a
global restructuring program announced in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 by $4 million. As of January 30, 2011, the
severance accrual associated with restructuring reserves under
this program was $1 million.
Changes in severance accruals associated with restructuring
reserves for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Adjustment of restructuring reserves
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, as of January 30, 2011, Applied had
$5 million in restructuring reserves associated with
facilities. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied
recorded asset impairment charges of $3 million related to
a facility
held-for-sale.
|
|
Note 11
|
Stockholders
Equity, Comprehensive Income and Share-Based
Compensation
|
Comprehensive
Income
Components of comprehensive income, on an after-tax basis where
applicable, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on investments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative instruments
qualifying as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income, on an
after-tax basis where applicable, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Pension liability
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on investments net
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments qualifying as cash
flow hedges
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further details on derivative instruments, see Note 5
of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
Stock
Repurchase Program
On March 8, 2010, Applieds Board of Directors
approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing up to
$2.0 billion in repurchases over the next three years
ending in March 2013. Under this authorization, Applied renewed
its systematic stock repurchase program and may also make
supplemental stock repurchases from time to time, depending on
market conditions, stock price and other factors. During the
three months ended January 30, 2011, Applied repurchased
11 million shares of its common stock at an average price
of $13.74 per share for a total cash outlay of
$150 million. Applied did not repurchase any shares of its
common stock during the three months ended January 31, 2010.
Dividends
In December 2010, Applieds Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.07 per share that
will be paid on March 23, 2011 to stockholders of record as
of March 2, 2011. Applied currently anticipates that it
will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the
future, although the declaration and amount of any future cash
dividend are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and
will depend on Applieds financial condition, results of
operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other
factors, as well as a determination that cash dividends are in
the best interest of Applieds stockholders.
Share-Based
Compensation
Applied has adopted stock plans that permit grants to employees
of share-based awards, including stock options, restricted stock
and restricted stock units (also referred to as
performance shares under Applieds principal
equity compensation plan, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan). In
addition, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan provides for the
automatic grant of restricted stock units to non-employee
directors and permits the grant of share-based awards to
consultants. Applied also has two Employee Stock Purchase Plans,
one for United States employees and a second for international
employees (collectively, ESPP), which enable eligible employees
to purchase Applied common stock.
22
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the three months ended January 30, 2011 and
January 31, 2010, Applied recognized share-based
compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP shares,
restricted stock units and restricted stock. Total share-based
compensation and related tax benefits were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
Tax benefit recognized
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
The cost associated with share-based awards that are subject
solely to time-based vesting requirements, less expected
forfeitures, is recognized over the awards service period
for the entire award on a straight-line basis. The cost
associated with performance-based equity awards is recognized
for each tranche over the service period, based on an assessment
of the likelihood that the applicable performance goals will be
achieved.
At January 30, 2011, Applied had $282 million in total
unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to stock option, restricted stock unit and restricted
stock grants, which will be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2.9 years. Under the stock plans, there were
154 million shares available for grant at January 30,
2011.
Stock
Options
Applied grants options to purchase shares of its common stock to
employees and consultants. The exercise price of each stock
option equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on
the date of grant. Most options are scheduled to vest over four
years and expire no later than seven years from the grant date.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model
was developed for use in estimating the value of publicly traded
options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. Applieds employee stock options have
characteristics significantly different from those of publicly
traded options. There were no stock options granted in the three
months ended January 30, 2011.
Stock option activity for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Outstanding, at October 31, 2010
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.99
|
|
Canceled and forfeited
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 30, 2011
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
13.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 30, 2011
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
15.68
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units and Restricted Stock
Restricted stock units are converted into shares of Applied
common stock upon vesting on a
one-for-one
basis. Restricted stock has the same rights as other issued and
outstanding shares of Applied common stock except these shares
have no right to dividends and are held in escrow until the
award vests. Restricted stock units and awards of restricted
stock typically vest over three to four years. Vesting of
restricted stock units and restricted stock usually is subject
to the grantees continued service with Applied and, in
some cases, achievement of specified performance
23
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
goals. The compensation expense related to these awards is
determined using the fair market value of Applied common stock
on the date of the grant, and the compensation expense is
recognized over the vesting period. Beginning in fiscal 2007,
Applied initiated a performance-based equity award program for
named executive officers and other key employees. Awards of
restricted stock units or restricted stock granted under this
program vest only if specific performance goals set by the Human
Resources and Compensation Committee of Applieds Board of
Directors (the Committee) are achieved and if the grantee
remains employed by Applied through the applicable vesting date.
The performance goals require the achievement of targeted
adjusted annual operating profit margin levels as compared to
Applieds peer companies in at least one of the four fiscal
years beginning with the fiscal year of the grant. The fair
value of these performance-based awards is estimated using the
fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of the
grant and assumes that the specified performance goals will be
achieved. If achieved, these awards vest over a specified
remaining service period. If the performance goals are not met,
no compensation expense is recognized and any previously
recognized compensation expense is reversed. The expected cost
of each award is reflected over the service period and is
reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Committee approved the
grant of 2 million performance-based restricted stock units
and 0.1 million performance-based shares of restricted
stock under this program in the three months ended
January 30, 2011. With respect to the performance-based
awards granted in fiscal 2010, as of January 30, 2011,
40 percent of the awards had been earned, subject to
additional time-based vesting requirements. The remaining
60 percent of the awards may still be earned, depending on
future performance in one or more of fiscal years 2011 through
2013. With respect to most of the performance-based awards
granted in fiscal 2008, as of January 30, 2011,
78 percent of the awards had been earned, subject to
additional time-based vesting requirements. The remaining
22 percent of the awards may still be earned depending on
performance during fiscal 2011.
Restricted stock unit and restricted stock activity for the
three months ended January 30, 2011was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock at
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
13.33
|
|
|
|
2.8 Years
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
12.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock at
January 30, 2011
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
12.91
|
|
|
|
3.2 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans
Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Applied
common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to
85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of Applied
common stock at the beginning or end of each
6-month
purchase period, subject to certain limits. No shares were
issued under the ESPP during the three months ended
January 30, 2011 or January 31, 2010. Compensation
expense associated with the ESPP is calculated using the fair
value of the employees purchase rights under the
Black-Scholes model.
|
|
Note 12
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Applied sponsors a number of employee benefit plans, including
defined benefit plans of certain foreign subsidiaries, and a
plan that provides certain medical and vision benefits to
eligible retirees. A summary of the
24
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
components of net periodic benefit costs of these defined and
postretirement benefit plans for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applieds effective income tax rate for the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was a provision of
25.5 percent and 30.3 percent, respectively. The rate
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was lower than the rate for
the comparable period in the prior year primarily due to an
increase in income in jurisdictions outside the U.S. with
lower tax rates. The tax rate further benefited from tax
incentives offered in several jurisdictions. The rate for the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 also included the impact of
legislation restoring the U.S. federal research and
development tax credit, which favorably affected the effective
tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points. The tax rate
for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 included the impact of
restructuring charges. Applieds future effective income
tax rate depends on various factors, such as tax legislation,
the geographic composition of Applieds pre-tax income, and
the tax rate on equity compensation. Management carefully
monitors these factors and timely adjusts the interim income tax
rate accordingly.
A number of Applieds tax returns remain subject to
examination by taxing authorities. These include
U.S. federal returns for fiscal 2005 and later years,
California returns for fiscal 2006 and later years, tax returns
for certain other states for fiscal 2005 and later years, and
tax returns in certain jurisdictions outside of the United
States for fiscal 2003 and later years.
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations, as well
as the amounts and timing of various tax payments that may be
made as part of the resolution process, is highly uncertain.
This could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet
classification of current assets and non-current assets and
liabilities. Applied does not expect a material change in
unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months.
|
|
Note 14
|
Warranty,
Guarantees and Contingencies
|
Warranty
Changes in the warranty reserves during the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
Provisions for warranty
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Applied products are generally sold with a
12-month
warranty period following installation. The provision for the
estimated cost of warranty is recorded when revenue is
recognized. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the
warranty agreement. The warranty provision is based on
historical experience by product, configuration and geographic
region. Quarterly warranty consumption is generally associated
with sales that occurred during the preceding four quarters, and
quarterly warranty provisions are generally related to the
current quarters sales.
Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third
parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of January 30, 2011, the
maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could
be required to make under these guarantee agreements was
approximately $57 million. Applied has not recorded any
liability in connection with these guarantee agreements beyond
that required to appropriately account for the underlying
transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on
historical experience and information currently available, that
it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid
under these guarantee agreements.
Applied also has agreements with various banks to facilitate
subsidiary banking operations worldwide, including overdraft
arrangements, issuance of bank guarantees, and letters of
credit. As of January 30, 2011, Applied Materials Inc. has
provided parent guarantees to banks for approximately
$185 million to cover these services.
Legal
Matters
Semitool
Shareholder Litigation
On November 17, 2009, Applied announced that it was making
a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
Semitool, Inc. (Semitool) in accordance with an Agreement and
Plan of Merger entered into with Semitool. Following this
announcement, three lawsuits were filed by Semitool shareholders
in the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District Court
for the State of Montana, County of Flathead, against Semitool,
Semitools directors, Applied Materials, Inc. and
Applieds acquisition subsidiary. The actions sought
certification of a class of all holders of Semitool common
stock, except the defendants and their affiliates. The
complaints alleged that Semitools directors breached their
fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to maximize
shareholder value and failing to disclose material information,
and that Applied aided and abetted such alleged breaches. The
actions sought injunctive relief, damages and attorneys
fees.
On December 14, 2009, all parties in these cases reached an
agreement in principle to settle the matters and the plaintiffs
withdrew their motion to enjoin consummation of the transaction.
Without admitting any wrongdoing or fault, Semitool disclosed
certain additional information in its
Schedule 14D-9
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 14, 2009. Following the tender of shares
representing over 95 percent of the outstanding shares of
Semitool common stock, the merger of Semitool into
Applieds acquisition subsidiary was completed on
December 21, 2009. Pursuant to a memorandum of
understanding between the parties, plaintiffs conducted
discovery to confirm the fairness and reasonableness of the
settlement and defendants agreed not to object to an application
by plaintiffs counsel for an award of attorneys fees
and expenses in an amount up to $200,000. In November 2010, the
parties filed their Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement,
which, if approved by the Court, will result in a complete and
final discharge of all claims. Under its order issued
January 12, 2011, the Court preliminarily approved the
stipulation and settlement and certified a class of
Semitools public shareholders solely for purposes of
settlement, comprised of all record and beneficial holders of
Semitool common stock from November 17, 2009 through
December 21, 2009 (subject to specified exclusions). The
Court further approved, as to form and content, the notice to
the class and set a settlement hearing for April 4, 2011.
Jusung
Applied has been engaged in several lawsuits and patent and
administrative proceedings with Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd.
and/or
Jusung Pacific Co., Ltd. (Jusung) in Taiwan and South Korea
since 2003, and more
26
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recently in China, involving technology used in manufacturing
LCDs. Applied believes that it has meritorious claims and
defenses against Jusung that it intends to pursue vigorously.
In 2004, Applied filed a complaint for patent infringement
against Jusung in the Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan seeking
damages and a permanent injunction for infringement of a patent
related to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) equipment.
Jusung filed a counterclaim against Applied. On
December 31, 2010, the Hsinchu District Court announced
that it had ruled against Applied and dismissed the lawsuit and
Jusungs counterclaim. Applied appealed the dismissal of
its lawsuit and Jusung appealed the dismissal of its
counterclaim.. Jusung unsuccessfully sought invalidation of
Applieds CVD patent in the Taiwanese Intellectual Property
Office (TIPO). In September 2010, the Supreme Administrative
Court dismissed Jusungs appeal of the TIPOs
decision. In 2009, Jusung filed a second action with the TIPO
seeking invalidation of Applieds CVD patent, which remains
pending.
In 2006, Applied filed an action in the TIPO challenging the
validity of a Jusung patent related to severability of the
transfer chamber on a CVD tool. Jusung sued Applied and AKT
America in Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan alleging
infringement of the same patent. In March 2009, the Hsinchu
District Court dismissed Jusungs lawsuit, and in October,
2010, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court dismissed
Jusungs appeal. Separately, the TIPO granted
Applieds request for invalidation and also revoked
Jusungs patent. In January 2010, the Taiwan Intellectual
Property Court granted Jusungs appeal of the TIPO decision
revoking its patent and remanded the matter to the TIPO for
reconsideration of validity. In November 2009, Applied filed an
action in China with the Patent Reexamination Board of the State
Intellectual Property Office seeking to invalidate this patent.
On June 18, 2010, the Patent Reexamination Board issued a
decision invalidating Jusungs patent in China. Jusung has
appealed this decision.
In 2006, Jusung filed a complaint of private prosecution in the
Taipei District Court of Taiwan alleging that Applieds
outside counsel received from the Court and used a copy of an
expert report that Jusung had filed in the ongoing patent
infringement lawsuits that Jusung had intended to remain
confidential. The complaint names as defendants Applieds
outside counsel in Taiwan, as well as Michael R. Splinter,
Applieds Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
as the statutory representative of Applied. The Taipei District
Court dismissed the private prosecution complaint, and the
matter was transferred to the Taipei District Attorneys
Office. The Taipei District Attorneys Office issued five
successive rulings not to prosecute, each of which Jusung
appealed. In each instance, the Taiwan High Court District
Attorney returned the matter to the Taipei District
Attorneys Office for further consideration, where it is
now pending.
Korea
Criminal Proceedings
In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutors Office for the
Eastern District of Korea (the Prosecutors Office)
indicted employees of several companies for the alleged improper
receipt and use of confidential information belonging to Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), a major Applied customer based
in Korea. The Prosecutors Office did not name Applied or
any of its subsidiaries as a party to the criminal action. The
individuals charged included the former head of Applied
Materials Korea (AMK), who at the time of the indictment was a
vice president of Applied Materials, Inc., and certain other AMK
employees. Hearings on these matters are ongoing in the Seoul
Eastern District Court. Applied and Samsung entered into a
settlement agreement effective as of November 1, 2010,
which resolves potential civil claims related to this matter,
which is separate from and does not affect the criminal
proceedings.
From time to time, Applied receives notification from third
parties, including customers and suppliers, seeking
indemnification, litigation support, payment of money or other
actions by Applied in connection with claims made against them.
In addition, from time to time, Applied receives notification
from third parties claiming that Applied may be or is infringing
or misusing their intellectual property or other rights. Applied
also is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims,
both asserted and unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course
of business.
Although the outcome of the above-described matters or these
claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
Applied does not believe that any of these proceedings or other
claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
27
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 15
|
Industry
Segment Operations
|
Applieds four reportable segments are: Silicon Systems
Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and
Environmental Solutions. Applieds chief operating
decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief
Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make
decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance
for the entire company. Segment information is presented based
upon Applieds management organization structure as of
January 30, 2011 and the distinctive nature of each
segment. Future changes to this internal financial structure may
result in changes to Applieds reportable segments.
Each reportable segment is separately managed and has separate
financial results that are reviewed by Applieds chief
operating decision-maker. Each reportable segment contains
closely related products that are unique to the particular
segment. Segment operating income is determined based upon
internal performance measures used by Applieds chief
operating decision-maker.
Applied derives the segment results directly from its internal
management reporting system. The accounting policies Applied
uses to derive reportable segment results are substantially the
same as those used for external reporting purposes. Management
measures the performance of each reportable segment based upon
several metrics including orders, net sales and operating
income. Management uses these results to evaluate the
performance of, and to assign resources to, each of the
reportable segments. Applied does not allocate to its reportable
segments certain operating expenses that it manages separately
at the corporate level, which include costs related to
share-based compensation; certain management, finance, legal,
human resources, and research, development and engineering
functions provided at the corporate level; and unabsorbed
information technology and occupancy. In addition, Applied does
not allocate to its reportable segments restructuring and asset
impairment charges and any associated adjustments related to
restructuring actions, unless these charges or adjustments
pertain to a specific reportable segment. Segment operating
income excludes interest income/expense and other financial
charges and income taxes. Management does not consider the
unallocated costs in measuring the performance of the reportable
segments.
In fiscal 2010, as part of the restructuring of the Energy and
Environmental Solutions segment, Applied discontinued sales to
new customers of its fully-intergrated SunFab lines but
continued to offer individual tools for thin film solar
manufacturing. Applied is supporting existing SunFab customers
with services, upgrades and capacity increases through its
Applied Global Services segment as these products are considered
to have reached a particular stage in the product lifecycle.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied accounts
for thin film products under its Applied Global Services segment.
The Silicon Systems Group segment includes semiconductor capital
equipment for etch, rapid thermal processing, deposition,
chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, and
wafer packaging.
The Applied Global Services segment includes technically
differentiated products and services to improve operating
efficiency, reduce operating costs and lessen the environmental
impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers
factories. Applied Global Services products consist of
spares, services, certain earlier generation products,
remanufactured equipment, and products that have reached a
particular stage in the product lifecycle. Customer demand for
these products and services is fulfilled through a global
distribution system with trained service engineers located in
close proximity to customer sites.
The Display segment includes products for manufacturing LCDs for
TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices.
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products
for fabricating solar photovoltaic cells and modules, high
throughput
roll-to-roll
coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and
systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass.
28
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net sales and operating income (loss) for each reportable
segment for the three months ended January 30, 2011 and
January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
1,496
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Display
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Display
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied recorded a
favorable adjustment of $28 million related to a
restructuring program, announced in fiscal 2010, that was
reported in the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.
Reconciliations of total segment operating income to
Applieds consolidated operating income for the three
months ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Total segment operating income
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
Corporate and unallocated costs
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
Restructuring and asset impairment benefit (charges), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following companies accounted for at least 10 percent
of Applieds net sales for the three months ended
January 30, 2011, which were for products in multiple
reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Intel Corporation
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
As of January 30, 2011, accounts receivable for those
customers that accounted for at least 10% of Applieds net
sales for the three months ended January 30, 2011 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Intel Corporation
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
29
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
All statements in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and those made by the management of Applied, other than
statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements.
Examples of forward-looking statements include statements
regarding Applieds future financial or operating results,
cash flows and cash deployment strategies, declaration of
dividends, share repurchases, business strategies, projected
costs, products, competitive positions, managements plans
and objectives for future operations, research and development,
acquisitions and joint ventures, growth opportunities,
customers, working capital, liquidity, investment portfolio and
policies, and legal proceedings and claims, as well as industry
trends and outlooks. These forward-looking statements are based
on managements estimates, projections and assumptions as
of the date hereof and include the assumptions that underlie
such statements. Forward-looking statements may contain words
such as may, will, should,
could, would, expect,
plan, anticipate, believe,
estimate, potential and
continue, the negative of these terms, or other
comparable terminology. Any expectations based on these
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and other important factors, including those
discussed in Part II, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, below and elsewhere in this report. Other risks
and uncertainties may be disclosed in Applieds prior
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. These and many
other factors could affect Applieds future financial
condition and operating results and could cause actual results
to differ materially from expectations based on forward-looking
statements made in this document or elsewhere by Applied or on
its behalf. Applied undertakes no obligation to revise or update
any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Applied provides manufacturing equipment, services and software
to the global semiconductor, flat panel display, solar
photovoltaic (PV) and related industries. Applieds
customers include manufacturers of semiconductor wafers and
chips, flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs), solar PV cells
and modules, and other electronic devices. These customers may
use what they manufacture in their own end products or sell the
items to other companies for use in advanced electronic
components. Applied operates in four reportable segments:
Silicon Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and
Energy and Environmental Solutions. A summary of financial
information for each reportable segment is found in Note 15
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. A discussion of
factors that could affect Applieds operations is set forth
under Risk Factors in Item 1A, which is
incorporated herein by reference. Product development and
manufacturing activities occur primarily in North America,
Europe, Israel and Asia. Applieds broad range of equipment
and service products are highly technical and are sold primarily
through a direct sales force.
Applieds results historically have been driven primarily
by worldwide demand for semiconductors, which in turn depends on
end-user demand for electronic products. Each of Applieds
businesses is subject to highly cyclical industry conditions, as
demand for manufacturing equipment and services can change
depending on supply and demand for chips, LCDs, solar PVs and
other electronic devices, as well as other factors, such as
global economic and market conditions, and technological
advances in fabrication processes.
30
The following table presents certain significant measurements
for the three months ended January 30, 2011 and
January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
2,971
|
|
|
$
|
1,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,006
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
1,136
|
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
Gross margin percent
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
4 points
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
Operating margin percent
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
19 points
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Fiscal 2011 contains 52 weeks, while fiscal 2010 contained
53 weeks. The first quarter of fiscal 2011 contained
13 weeks, while the first quarter of fiscal 2010 contained
14 weeks.
Financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected
increased demand across all segments due to more favorable
global economic and industry conditions compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. Total orders in the quarter increased
year-over-year,
primarily due to greater demand for semiconductor equipment and
crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar PV products. Net sales and net
income increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2011
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, led primarily by
stronger sales of semiconductor equipment and services and c-Si
products. Net income in the first quarter of fiscal 2011
included a favorable adjustment to restructuring reserves of
$32 million, offset by asset impairment charges of
$3 million, while net income in the first quarter of 2010
included restructuring charges of $104 million.
Results
of Operations
New
Orders
New orders by geographic region, determined by the location of
customers facilities, for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
China
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Primarily the United States. |
New orders of $3.0 billion for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 were up 51 percent from the first quarter of fiscal
2010. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in
demand for semiconductor products from logic and foundry
customers, as well as increased demand for c-Si products. For
the first quarter of fiscal 2011, customers in
31
Taiwan accounted for $745 million of new orders, followed
by North America with new orders of $679 million and China
with new orders of $653 million.
Applieds backlog for the most recent three fiscal quarters
was as follows: $3.5 billion at January 30, 2011,
$3.2 billion at October 31, 2010, and
$3.1 billion at August 1, 2010. Backlog increased in
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 primarily due to increases in
new orders for the Silicon Systems Group segment and the Energy
and Environmental Solutions segment reflecting increased demand
for semiconductor equipment and c-Si products, respectively.
Backlog consists of: (1) orders for which written
authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates
are within the next 12 months, or shipment has occurred but
revenue has not been recognized; (2) contractual service
revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next
12 months; and (3) orders for SunFab lines that are
anticipated to be recognized as revenue within the next
12 months. Applieds backlog at any particular time is
not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future
periods, due to the potential for customer changes in delivery
schedules or cancellation of orders. The majority of sales in
the Silicon Systems Group, our largest business segment, were
from orders received and shipped in the same quarter.
Net
Sales
Net sales by geographic region ,determined by the location of
customers facilities, for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Primarily the United States. |
Net sales of $2.7 billion for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 were up 45 percent from the first quarter of fiscal
2010. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, customers in China
accounted for $674 million of total net sales followed by
Taiwan with net sales of $635 million and North America
with net sales of $610 million. In the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, the majority of net sales in China reflected
purchases of c-Si products by solar PV manufacturers, and the
majority of net sales in Taiwan were due to purchases of
semiconductor products by logic and foundry customers.
Gross
Margin
Gross margins for the three months ended January 30, 2011
and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
1,136
|
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
Gross margin (% of net sales)
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
4 points
|
|
The increase in the gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 from the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was principally
attributable to higher net sales, more favorable product mix,
improved factory utilization, lower costs
32
from continued manufacturing transition of certain Silicon
Systems Group products to Applieds Singapore Operations
Center, and continued cost control measures. Gross margin during
the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010 included
$11 million and $5 million of share-based compensation
expense, respectively.
Research,
Development and Engineering
Research, Development and Engineering expenses for the three
months ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Applieds future operating results depend to a considerable
extent on its ability to maintain a competitive advantage in the
equipment and service products it provides. Applied believes
that it is critical to continue to make substantial investments
in RD&E to assure the availability of innovative technology
that meets the current and projected requirements of its
customers most advanced designs. Applied historically has
maintained its commitment to investing in RD&E in order to
continue to offer new products and technologies. RD&E
expenses were $270 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 compared to $269 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2010. RD&E expense during the first quarters of
fiscal 2011 and 2010 included $10 million and
$12 million of share-based compensation expense,
respectively. Development cycles range from 12 to 36 months
depending on whether the product is an enhancement of an
existing product, which typically has a shorter development
cycle, or a new product, which typically has a longer
development cycle. Most of Applieds existing products
resulted from internal development activities and innovations
involving new technologies, materials and processes. In certain
instances, Applied acquires technologies, either in existing or
new product areas, to complement its existing technology
capabilities and to reduce time to market.
Marketing,
Selling, General and Administrative
Marketing, selling, general and administrative expenses for the
three months ended January 30, 2011 and January 31,
2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Marketing, selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Marketing, selling, general and administrative expenses were
$221 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared
to $222 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
decline reflected lower general and administrative expenses as a
result of the restructuring of the Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment that occurred in the third quarter of fiscal
2010, offset in part by increased marketing and selling
expenses. Marketing, selling and general and administrative
expenses during the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010
included $12 million and $17 million of share-based
compensation expense, respectively.
Restructuring
and Asset Impairments
Restructuring and asset impairment expenses for the three months
ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Restructuring and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
33
On July 21, 2010, Applied announced a plan to restructure
its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment, which was
expected to impact between 400 to 500 positions globally. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied incurred employee
severance charges of $45 million associated with this
program. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as a result of
changes in Applieds operating environment and business
requirements, Applied revised its workforce reduction associated
with this program to approximately 200 positions and recorded a
favorable adjustment of $28 million. In addition, Applied
favorably adjusted the remaining severance accrual associated
with a global restructuring program announced in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 by $4 million. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied recorded an asset impairment
charge of $3 million related to a facility held for sale.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied announced a
restructuring program to reduce its global workforce as of
October 25, 2009 by approximately 1,300 to 1,500 positions,
or 10 to 12 percent, over a period of 18 months.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied recorded
restructuring charges of $104 million associated with this
program. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, as a result of
changes in business requirements, Applied revised its global
workforce reduction associated with this program to
approximately 1,000 positions and recorded a favorable
adjustment of $20 million.
For further details, see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Net
Interest Income and Other Income, Net
Net interest income and other income, net, for the three months
ended January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Net interest income and other income, net
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
The increase in net interest income and other income, net in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the first quarter of fiscal
2010 was primarily due to an increase in gains realized on sale
of investment securities.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expenses for the three months ended January 30,
2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
4 points
|
|
The change in the tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011
from the rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily
due to an increase in income in jurisdictions outside the
U.S. with lower tax rates. The tax rate further benefited
from tax incentives offered in several jurisdictions. The rate
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 also included the impact of
legislation restoring the U.S. federal research and
development tax credit, which favorably affected the effective
tax rate by 2 percentage points. The tax rate for the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 included the impact of restructuring
charges.. Applieds future effective income tax rate
depends on various factors, such as tax legislation, the
geographic composition of Applieds pre-tax income, and the
tax rate on equity compensation. Management carefully monitors
these factors and timely adjusts the interim income tax rate
accordingly.
Segment
Information
Applied reports financial results in four segments: Silicon
Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and
Environmental Solutions. A description of the products and
services, as well as financial data, for each reportable segment
can be found in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements.
34
Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments certain
operating expenses that it manages separately at the corporate
level. These unallocated costs include costs for share-based
compensation; certain management, finance, legal, human
resources, and RD&E functions provided at the corporate
level; and unabsorbed information technology and occupancy. In
addition, Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments
restructuring and asset impairment charges and any associated
adjustments related to restructuring actions, unless these
charges or adjustments pertain to a specific reportable segment.
The results for each reportable segment are discussed below.
Silicon
Systems Group Segment
The Silicon Systems Group segment includes semiconductor capital
equipment for deposition, etch, rapid thermal processing,
chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, and
wafer packaging. Development efforts are focused on solving
customers key technical challenges, including transistor
performance and nanoscale patterning, and improving chip
manufacturing productivity to reduce costs.
Factors that influenced the competitive environment for the
Silicon Systems Group in the first quarter of fiscal 2011
included the continuing rebound in the semiconductor industry,
driven by higher demand for consumer and computing devices.
Higher factory utilization rates and tight device supply led
manufacturers to increase their wafer fab equipment (WFE)
capital spending, which is the major driver for Silicon Systems
Group net sales.
Certain significant measures for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 points
|
|
New orders increased by $475 million to $1.6 billion
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in new orders was primarily
from logic and foundry customers. Net sales increased by
$526 million to $1.5 billion for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
increase in net sales was primarily due to increased investment
by foundry and logic customers. Four customers accounted for
66 percent of net sales in this segment for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. Approximately 63 percent of net
sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were for orders
received and shipped within the quarter. In the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, customers in North America and Taiwan accounted for
60 percent of total net sales for the Silicon Systems Group
segment. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, customers in
Taiwan and Korea accounted for 66 percent of total net
sales for this segment. The book to bill ratio (new orders
divided by net sales) decreased to 1.1 for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to 1.2 for the first quarter of fiscal
2010, reflecting a higher
year-over-year
increase in net sales relative to demand. Operating income
increased by $237 million to $543 million for the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to first quarter of fiscal
2010. The increase in operating income for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 was due to higher revenue from semiconductor
equipment sales and reflected the continued recovery in the
semiconductor equipment industry during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011.
Operating results of the Silicon Systems Group may be affected
by an agreement between Applied and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
(Samsung) that is generally effective for a three-year period
from November 1, 2010, which provides in part for
volume-based rebates and other incentives to Samsung. The
financial impact of the rebates and incentives on the segment
will depend on the volume of semiconductor equipment purchases
by Samsung.
Applied
Global Services Segment
The Applied Global Services segment encompasses technically
differentiated products, including spares, services, certain
earlier generation equipment products, and remanufactured
equipment, to improve operating
35
efficiency, reduce operating costs, and lessen the environmental
impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers
factories. Customer demand for products and services is
fulfilled through a global distribution system with trained
service engineers located in close proximity to customer sites.
In fiscal 2010, as part of the restructuring of the Energy and
Environmental Solutions segment, Applied discontinued sales to
new customers of its fully-intergrated SunFab lines but
continued to offer individual tools for thin film solar
manufacturing. Applied is supporting existing SunFab customers
with services, upgrades and capacity increases through its
Applied Global Services segment as these products are considered
to have reached a particular stage in the product lifecycle.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied accounts
for thin film products under its Applied Global Services segment.
Industry conditions that affected Applied Global Services
sales of spares and services in the first quarter of fiscal 2011
were principally semiconductor manufacturers wafer starts
as well as additions to the tool installed base.
Certain significant measures for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders increased by $78 million to $552 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in new orders was due
primarily to higher demand for spare parts and refurbished
equipment, reflecting customers higher factory utilization
rates. Net sales increased by $141 million to
$567 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in net sales
was primarily due to higher sales of refurbished equipment. The
book to bill ratio decreased to 1.0 for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, reflecting a higher
year-over-year
increase in net sales relative to demand, compared to 1.1 for
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Operating income increased by
$22 million to $85 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
increase in operating income for the first quarter of fiscal
2011 primarily reflected increased sales of refurbished
equipment. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the operating
margin remained essentially unchanged as a result of lower
margins on remanufactured equipment.
Display
Segment
The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing LCDs
for TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices. The
business is focused on expanding market share by differentiation
with larger-scale substrates, entry into new markets, and
development of products to enable cost reductions through
productivity and uniformity.
The competitive environment for Applieds Display segment
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010, was characterized by decreased capacity
requirements for larger flat panel televisions and growing
global demand for touch screen devices.
Certain significant measures for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
New orders increased by $16 million to $142 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in new orders reflected
increased demand for touch panel and organic light emitting
diode (OLED) systems. Net sales increased by $15 million to
$147 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in net sales
reflected increased purchases by customers of color filter
systems. Four customers accounted for 89 percent of net
sales in the Display segment for the first quarter of fiscal
2011. Customers in Taiwan and China combined accounted for
97 percent of net sales in this segment for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010,
customers in Taiwan and Japan accounted for 64 percent of
total net sales for the Display segment. The book to bill ratio
was 1.0 for both of the first fiscal quarters 2011 and 2010.
Operating income increased by $3 million to
$28 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared
to first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in operating
income was due to an increase in net sales.
Energy
and Environmental Solutions Segment
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products
for fabricating c-Si solar PVs, high throughput
roll-to-roll
coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and
systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass. This
business is focused on delivering solutions to generate and
conserve energy, with an emphasis on lowering the cost to
produce solar power by providing equipment to enhance
manufacturing scale and efficiency. The Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment previously included a fully-integrated
production line for manufacturing thin film solar panels.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied accounts
for thin film products under its Applied Global Services segment
rather than its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied announced a
plan to restructure its Energy and Environmental Solutions
segment in response to adverse market conditions for thin film
solar and as a result, Applied discontinued sales to new
customers of its fully-integrated SunFab lines, but is offering
individual tools for thin film solar manufacturing. Applied is
supporting existing SunFab line customers with services,
upgrades and capacity increases through its Applied Global
Services segment. RD&E efforts to improve thin film panel
efficiency and high-productivity deposition is continuing under
the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.
Certain significant measures for the three months ended
January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011 over 2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
668
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
|
190
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
497
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 points
|
|
New orders increased by $438 million to $668 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in orders reflected
significantly increased demand for c-Si products, particularly
wafering and metallization products. Net sales increased by
$155 million to $476 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
increase in net sales primarily reflected higher sales to c-Si
customers. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2010
included $208 million in revenue from SunFab thin film
customers. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, customers in
China accounted for 79 percent of new orders and
82 percent of net sales in this segment. Europe accounted
for 69 percent of net sales in this segment for the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The book to bill ratio increased to 1.4
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, reflecting increased
demand, compared to 0.7 for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment reported
operating income of $144 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to an operating loss of $36 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Operating income of
$144 million was attributable to higher net sales of c-Si
products and to a favorable adjustment of $28 million
related to a restructuring program, announced in fiscal 2010,
that was reported in the Energy and Environmental Solutions
segment.
37
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Applieds cash, cash equivalents and investments increased
to $4.1 billion at January 30, 2011 from
$3.9 billion at October 31, 2010, due primarily to an
increase in cash generated from operating activities.
Cash, cash equivalents and investments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash-equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
|
$
|
3,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of cash provided by (used in) operating, investing,
and financing activities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(489
|
)
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
Applied generated $425 million of cash from operating
activities for the three months ended January 30, 2011. The
primary sources of cash from operating activities for the three
months ended January 30, 2011 were net income, as adjusted
to exclude the effect of non-cash charges including
depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation,
restructuring and asset impairments, and changes in components
of working capital. The change in working capital for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 was negatively impacted by increased
payments for variable compensation and income taxes. Applied
utilized programs to discount letters of credit issued by
customers of $123 million and $27 million for the
three months ended January 30, 2011 and January 31,
2010, respectively. Discounting of letters of credit depends on
many factors, including the willingness of financial
institutions to discount the letters of credit and the cost of
such arrangements. For the three months ended January 30,
2011 and January 31, 2010, Applied factored accounts
receivable and discounted promissory notes totaling
$36 million and $26 million, respectively. Days sales
outstanding for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 increased to
66 days, compared to 58 days at the end of fiscal
2010, primarily due to a decrease in net sales from the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010, offset by the benefits of discounted
letters of credit and factoring of accounts receivable. Days
sales outstanding varies due to the timing of shipments and the
payment terms. Applieds working capital was
$4.2 billion at January 30, 2011 and $3.9 billion
at October 31, 2010.
Applied used $79 million of cash for investing activities
during the three months ended January 30, 2011. Purchases
of investments, net of proceeds from sales and maturities of
investments, totaled $94 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011. Capital expenditures of $24 million for the
first quarter of fiscal 2011, which included construction in
progress additions in North America, was offset by
$39 million in proceeds received from the sale of a
property located in North America. Investing activities also
include investments in technology and acquisitions of companies
to allow Applied to access new market opportunities or emerging
technologies. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied
acquired Semitool, a public company based in the state of
Montana, for $323 million, net of cash acquired.
Applied used $230 million of cash for financing activities
during the three months ended January 30, 2011, consisting
primarily of $150 million in common stock repurchases and
$93 million in cash dividends paid to stockholders, offset
by $13 million in proceeds from common stock issuances
related to equity compensation awards. In March 2010,
Applieds Board of Directors approved a new stock
repurchase program authorizing up to $2 billion in
repurchases over the next three years ending in March 2013.
In December 2010, Applieds Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.07 per share that
will be paid on March 23, 2011 to stockholders of record as
of March 2, 2011. Applied currently
38
anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a
quarterly basis, although the declaration of any future cash
dividend is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will
depend on Applieds financial condition, results of
operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other
factors, as well as a determination by the Board of Directors
that cash dividends are in the best interests of Applieds
stockholders.
Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in
various currencies of up to $1.1 billion, of which
$1.0 billion is comprised of a
5-year
revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is
scheduled to expire in January 2012. This agreement provides for
borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to
one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance and
includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in
compliance at January 30, 2011. Remaining credit facilities
in the amount of approximately $98 million are with
Japanese banks. Applieds ability to borrow under these
facilities is subject to bank approval at the time of the
borrowing request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to
the banks prime reference rate denominated in Japanese
yen. No amounts were outstanding under any of these facilities
at both January 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010.
In the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third
parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of January 30, 2011, the
maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could
be required to make under these guarantee agreements was
approximately $57 million. Applied has not recorded any
liability in connection with these guarantee agreements beyond
that required to appropriately account for the underlying
transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on
historical experience and information currently available, that
it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid
under these guarantee agreements.
Applied also has agreements with various banks to facilitate
subsidiary banking operations worldwide, including overdraft
arrangements, issuance of bank guarantees, and letters of
credit. As of January 30, 2011, Applied Materials Inc. has
provided parent guarantees to banks for approximately
$185 million to cover these services.
Applieds investment portfolio consists principally of
investment grade money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury
and agency securities, municipal bonds, corporate bonds and
mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, as well as equity
securities. Applied regularly monitors the credit risk in its
investment portfolio and takes appropriate measures, which may
include the sale of certain securities, to manage such risks
prudently in accordance with its investment policies.
At January 30, 2011, Applied had a gross unrealized loss in
its investment portfolio of $3 million due to a decrease in
the fair value of certain fixed income securities. For the three
months ended January 30, 2011, Applied did not recognize
any impairment on its investments.
Applied did not record a bad debt provision during the three
months ended January 30, 2011. During the three months
ended January 31, 2010, Applied recorded a bad debt
provision of $6 million as a result of certain
customers financial condition. While Applied believes that
its allowance for doubtful accounts at January 30, 2011 is
adequate, it will continue to closely monitor customer liquidity
and economic conditions.
Although cash requirements will fluctuate based on the timing
and extent of factors such as those discussed above,
Applieds management believes that cash generated from
operations, together with the liquidity provided by existing
cash balances and borrowing capability, will be sufficient to
satisfy Applieds liquidity requirements for the next
12 months. For further details regarding Applieds
operating, investing and financing activities, see the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in this report.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the
amounts reported. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered
to be critical accounting policies.
39
A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both
material to the presentation of Applieds consolidated
financial statements and that requires management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a
material effect on Applieds financial condition or results
of operations. Specifically, these policies have the following
attributes: (1) Applied is required to make assumptions
about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the
estimate; and (2) different estimates Applied could
reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are
reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on
Applieds financial condition or results of operations.
Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects
cannot be determined with certainty. Applied bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions
believed to be applicable and reasonable under the
circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur,
as additional information is obtained and as Applieds
operating environment changes. These changes have historically
been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial
statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management
is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which
are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged
periods of time. These uncertainties include those discussed in
Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. Based on a
critical assessment of its accounting policies and the
underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application
of those policies, management believes that Applieds
consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, and provide a meaningful presentation
of Applieds financial condition and results of operations.
Management believes that the following are critical accounting
policies:
Revenue
Recognition
Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
sellers price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is probable. Each sale arrangement may contain
commercial terms that differ from other arrangements. In
addition, Applied frequently enters into contracts that contain
multiple deliverables. Judgment is required to properly identify
the accounting units of the multiple deliverable transactions
and to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated
among the accounting units. Moreover, judgment is used in
interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all
criteria of revenue recognition have been met in order for
revenue recognition to occur in the appropriate accounting
period. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales
price between the units of accounting will not affect the amount
of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement,
any material changes in these allocations could impact the
timing of revenue recognition, which could have a material
effect on Applieds financial condition and results of
operations.
In 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued amended
revenue recognition guidance for arrangements with multiple
deliverables and certain software sold with tangible products.
This new guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue
recognition and allows the use of managements best
estimate of selling price for individual elements of an
arrangement when vendor specific evidence or third party
evidence is unavailable. Applied implemented this guidance
prospectively beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for
transactions that were initiated or materially modified during
fiscal 2010. The implementation of the new guidance had an
insignificant impact on reported net sales as compared to net
sales under previous guidance, as the new guidance did not
change the units of accounting within sales arrangements and the
elimination of the residual method for the allocation of
arrangement consideration had an inconsequential impact on the
amount and timing of reported net sales.
Warranty
Costs
Applied provides for the estimated cost of warranty when revenue
is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by
analyzing specific product, current and historical configuration
statistics and regional warranty support costs. Applieds
warranty obligation is affected by product and component failure
rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting
product failures during the warranty period. As Applieds
customer engineers and process support engineers are highly
trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a
significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and
availability of critical replacement parts is another
significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen
component failures or exceptional component performance can also
result in
40
changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ
substantially from Applieds estimates, revisions to the
estimated warranty liability would be required, which could have
a material adverse effect on Applieds business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Applied maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments. This allowance is based on historical
experience, credit evaluations, specific customer collection
history and any customer-specific issues Applied has identified.
Changes in circumstances, such as an unexpected material adverse
change in a major customers ability to meet its financial
obligation to Applied or its payment trends, may require Applied
to further adjust its estimates of the recoverability of amounts
due to Applied, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market,
with cost determined on a
first-in,
first-out basis. The carrying value of inventory is reduced for
estimated obsolescence by the difference between its cost and
the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future
demand. Applied evaluates the inventory carrying value for
potential excess and obsolete inventory exposures by analyzing
historical and anticipated demand. In addition, inventories are
evaluated for potential obsolescence due to the effect of known
and anticipated engineering change orders and new products. If
actual demand were to be substantially lower than estimated,
additional adjustments for excess or obsolete inventory may be
required, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Applied reviews goodwill and intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and also
annually reviews goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives
for impairment. Intangible assets, such as purchased technology,
are generally recorded in connection with a business
acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is usually
based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the
success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. If
actual product acceptance differs significantly from the
estimates, Applied may be required to record an impairment
charge to reduce the carrying value of the reporting unit to its
realizable value. The fair value of a reporting unit is
estimated using both the income approach and the market approach
taking into account such factors as future anticipated operating
results and estimated cost of capital. Management uses
significant judgment when assessing goodwill for potential
impairment, especially in emerging markets. A severe decline in
market value could result in an unexpected impairment charge for
impaired goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Income
Taxes
The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic
composition of worldwide earnings, tax regulations governing
each region, non-tax deductible expenses incurred in connection
with acquisitions and availability of tax credits. Management
carefully monitors the changes in many factors and adjusts the
effective income tax rate as required. If actual results differ
from these estimates, Applied could be required to record a
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets or adjust its
effective income tax rate, which could have a material adverse
effect on Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Applied accounts for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax
assets and liabilities using statutory tax rates for the effect
of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of
recorded assets and liabilities, net operating losses and tax
credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are also reduced by a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion
of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management has
determined that it is more likely than not that Applieds
future taxable income will be sufficient to realize its deferred
tax assets.
41
The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment
in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of
complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner
inconsistent with Applieds expectations could have a
material impact on Applieds results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Applieds investment portfolio includes fixed-income
securities with a fair value of approximately $2.0 billion
at January 30, 2011. These securities are subject to
interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates
increase. Based on Applieds investment portfolio at
January 30, 2011, an immediate 100 basis point
increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in the
fair value of the portfolio of approximately $28 million.
While an increase in interest rates reduces the fair value of
the investment portfolio, Applied will not realize the losses in
the consolidated condensed statement of operations unless the
individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or
the loss is determined to be
other-than-temporary.
Certain operations of Applied are conducted in foreign
currencies, such as Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel,
Taiwanese dollar and Swiss franc. Applied enters into currency
forward exchange and option contracts to hedge a portion of, but
not all, existing and anticipated foreign currency denominated
transactions expected to occur within 24 months. Gains and
losses on these contracts are generally recognized in income at
the time that the related transactions being hedged are
recognized. Because the effect of movements in currency exchange
rates on currency forward exchange and option contracts
generally offsets the related effect on the underlying items
being hedged, these financial instruments are not expected to
subject Applied to risks that would otherwise result from
changes in currency exchange rates. Applied does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes. Net foreign currency gains and losses were not
material for the three months ended January 30, 2011 and
January 31, 2010.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by
Rule 13a-15(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange
Act), Applieds management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as
of the end of the period covered by this report, of the
effectiveness of Applieds disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e).
Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that Applieds disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed in Applieds SEC reports is
(i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and
(ii) accumulated and communicated to Applieds
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As required by
Rule 13a-15(d),
Applieds management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of
Applieds internal control over financial reporting to
determine whether any changes occurred during the fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, Applieds internal control over
financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no
such change during the fiscal quarter.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be
met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events.
42
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information set forth above under the caption Legal
Matters in Note 14 contained in Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements is incorporated herein by
reference.
The risk factors set forth below include any material changes
to, and supersede the description of, the risk factors disclosed
in Item 1A of Applieds 2010
Form 10-K.
The
industries that Applied serves are volatile and difficult to
predict.
As a supplier to the global semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, Applied is subject to business
cycles, the timing, length and volatility of which can be
difficult to predict and which vary by reportable segment. These
industries historically have been cyclical due to sudden changes
in customers manufacturing capacity and advanced
technology requirements and spending, which depend in part on
customers capacity utilization, production volumes, access
to affordable capital, end-use demand, and inventory levels
relative to demand, as well as the rate of technology
transitions. These changes have affected the timing and amounts
of customers purchases and investments in technology, and
continue to affect Applieds orders, net sales, operating
expenses and net income.
To meet rapidly changing demand in the industries it serves,
Applied must accurately forecast demand and effectively manage
its resources and production capacity for each of its segments
as well as across multiple segments. During periods of
increasing demand for its products, Applied must have sufficient
manufacturing capacity and inventory to meet customer demand;
effectively manage its supply chain; attract, retain and
motivate a sufficient number of qualified employees; and
continue to control costs. During periods of decreasing demand,
Applied must reduce costs and align its cost structure with
prevailing market conditions; effectively manage its supply
chain; and motivate and retain key employees. If Applied does
not accurately forecast and timely and appropriately adapt to
changes in its business environment, Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations may be materially
and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes in the
various industries in which it operates.
The global semiconductor, flat panel display, solar and related
industries in which Applied operates are characterized by
ongoing changes affecting some or all of these industries,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing capital requirements for building and operating new
fabrication plants and customers ability to raise the
necessary capital, particularly when financial market conditions
are difficult;
|
|
|
|
differences in growth rates among the semiconductor, display and
solar industries;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of establishing, improving and
maintaining strong relationships with customers;
|
|
|
|
abrupt and unforeseen shifts in the nature and amount of
customer and end-user demand;
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost and complexity for customers to move from
product design to volume manufacturing, which may slow the
adoption rate for new manufacturing technology;
|
|
|
|
the need to reduce the total cost of manufacturing system
ownership, due in part to greater demand for lower-cost consumer
electronics as compared to business information technology
spending;
|
|
|
|
the heightened importance to customers of system reliability and
productivity and the effect on demand for fabrication systems as
a result of their increasing productivity, device yield and
reliability;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of, and difficulties in, developing
products with sufficient differentiation to influence
customers purchasing decisions;
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
requirements for shorter cycle times for the development,
manufacture and installation of manufacturing equipment;
|
|
|
|
price and performance trends for semiconductor devices, LCDs and
solar PVs, and the corresponding effect on demand for such
products;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of the availability of spare parts to
maximize the time that customers systems are available for
production;
|
|
|
|
the increasing role for and complexity of software in Applied
products; and
|
|
|
|
the increasing focus on reducing energy usage and improving the
environmental impact and sustainability associated with
manufacturing operations.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes in the semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, its business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the semiconductor industry.
The greatest portion of Applieds consolidated net sales
and profitability historically has been derived from sales of
manufacturing equipment by the Silicon Systems Group to the
global semiconductor industry. In addition, a majority of the
revenues of Applied Global Services is from sales of service
products to semiconductor manufacturers. The semiconductor
industry is characterized by ongoing changes particular to that
industry in addition to the general industry changes described
in the preceding risk factor, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost of research and development due to many
factors, including: decreasing linewidths on a chip; the use of
new materials such as cobalt and yttrium; new and more complex
device structures; more applications and process steps;
increasing chip design costs; and the increasing cost and
complexity of integrated manufacturing processes;
|
|
|
|
the growing number of types and varieties of semiconductors and
number of applications across multiple substrate sizes;
|
|
|
|
differing market growth rates and capital requirements for
different applications, such as NAND Flash, DRAM, logic and
foundry, and the resulting effect on customers spending
patterns and on Applieds ability to compete in these
market segments;
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost and complexity for semiconductor
manufacturers to move more technically advanced capability and
smaller linewidths to volume manufacturing, and the resulting
impact on the rates of technology transition and investment in
capital equipment;
|
|
|
|
semiconductor manufacturers increasing adoption of more
productive 300mm systems in relation to 200mm system capacity,
and the resulting effect on demand for manufacturing equipment
and services;
|
|
|
|
the decreasing rate of capital expenditures as a percentage of
semiconductor manufacturers revenue;
|
|
|
|
shorter cycle times between customers order placement and
product shipment, which may lead to inventory write-offs and
manufacturing inefficiencies that decrease gross margin;
|
|
|
|
technology developments in related markets, such as lithography,
to which Applied may need to adapt;
|
|
|
|
competitive factors that make it difficult to enhance market
position;
|
|
|
|
the importance of growing market positions in larger market
segments, such as etch and inspection;
|
|
|
|
the increasing concentration of wafer starts in one country,
Korea, where Applieds service penetration and
service-revenue-per-wafer-start have been lower than in other
regions;
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
the increasing fragmentation of semiconductor markets, leading
certain markets to become too small to support the cost of a new
fabrication plant, while others require less technologically
advanced products; and
|
|
|
|
the cost, technical complexity and timing of a proposed industry
transition from 300mm to 450mm wafers.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the semiconductor industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the flat panel display industry.
The global flat panel display industry historically has
experienced considerable volatility in capital equipment
investment levels, due in part to the limited number of LCD
manufacturers and the concentrated nature of LCD end-use
applications. Recently, industry growth has depended to a
considerable extent on consumer demand for increasingly larger
and more advanced TVs. In addition to the general industry
changes described above in the second risk factor, the display
industry is characterized by ongoing changes particular to that
industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the planned expansion of manufacturing facilities in China by
Chinese display manufacturers as well as manufacturers from
other countries, and the ability of non-Chinese manufacturers to
obtain government approvals;
|
|
|
|
technical and financial difficulties associated with
transitioning to larger substrate sizes for LCDs, which may slow
or prevent substrate generation scaling;
|
|
|
|
the effect of a slowing rate of transition to larger substrate
sizes on capital intensity and product differentiation;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of new types of displays, such as
touch panels and OLEDs (organic light-emitting devices);
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties and costs associated with developing new
technologies for use in LCD manufacturing, such as LEDs for
backlighting; and
|
|
|
|
uncertainty with respect to future LCD technology end-use
applications and growth drivers.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the display industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the solar industry.
An increasing portion of Applieds business is in the
emerging solar market, which, in addition to the general
industry changes described above in the second risk factor, is
characterized by ongoing changes specific to the solar industry,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to continually decrease the
cost-per-watt
of electricity produced by solar PV products to at or below grid
parity by, among other things, reducing operating costs and
increasing throughputs for solar PV manufacturing, and improving
the conversion efficiency of solar PVs;
|
|
|
|
the impact on demand for solar PV products arising from the cost
of electricity generated by solar PVs compared to the cost of
electricity from the existing grid or other energy sources;
|
|
|
|
the varying energy policies of governments around the world and
their effect in influencing the rate of growth of the solar PV
market, including the availability and amount of government
incentives for solar power such as tax credits, feed-in tariffs,
rebates, renewable portfolio standards that require electricity
providers to sell a targeted amount of energy from renewable
sources, and goals for solar installations on government
facilities;
|
|
|
|
the growing number of solar PV manufacturers and increasing
global production capacity for solar PVs, primarily in China as
a result of increased solar subsidies and lower manufacturing
costs;
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
the varying levels of operating and industry experience among
solar PV manufacturers and the resulting differences in the
nature and extent of customer support services requested from
Applied;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with marketing and selling manufacturing
equipment and services to a diverse and diffuse customer base;
|
|
|
|
the cost of polysilicon and other materials; and
|
|
|
|
access to affordable financing and capital by customers and
end-users.
|
In addition, current projections for global solar PV production
exceed anticipated near-term end-use demand, which is heavily
dependent on installed cost-per-watt, government policies and
incentives, and the availability of affordable capital. An
oversupply of solar PVs may lead customers to delay or reduce
investments in manufacturing capacity and new technology, and
adversely impact the sales growth rates and/or profitability of
Applieds products. If Applied does not successfully manage
the risks resulting from the ongoing changes occurring in the
solar industry, its business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with the difficult financial
markets and uncertain global economy.
The disruption in the financial markets and global economic
recession that began in 2008 contributed to significant
slowdowns in the industries in which Applied operates. Although
economic and market conditions have improved, continuing
difficulties in the financial markets and uncertainty regarding
the global economic recovery are posing challenges, while some
governments may implement policies to control economic growth.
The markets for semiconductors and flat panel displays in
particular depend largely on consumer spending. Economic
uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in consumer spending and
may cause certain Applied customers to push out, cancel, or
refrain from placing orders for equipment or services, which may
reduce net sales, reduce backlog, and affect Applieds
ability to convert backlog to sales. Difficulties in obtaining
capital, uncertain market conditions, or reduced profitability
may also cause some customers to scale back operations, exit
businesses, merge with other manufacturers, or file for
bankruptcy protection and potentially cease operations, leading
to customers reduced research and development funding
and/or
capital expenditures and, in turn, lower sales
and/or
additional inventory or bad debt expense for Applied. These
conditions may also similarly affect key suppliers, which could
impair their ability to deliver parts and result in delays for
Applieds products or added costs. In addition, these
conditions may lead to strategic alliances by, or consolidation
of, other equipment manufacturers, which could adversely affect
Applieds ability to compete effectively.
Uncertainty about future economic and industry conditions also
makes it more challenging for Applied to forecast its operating
results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that
may affect its business, sources and uses of cash, financial
condition and results of operations. Applied may be required to
implement additional cost reduction efforts, including
restructuring activities,
and/or
modify its business model, which may adversely affect
Applieds ability to capitalize on opportunities in a
market recovery. In addition, Applied maintains an investment
portfolio that is subject to general credit, liquidity, foreign
exchange, market and interest rate risks. The risks to
Applieds investment portfolio may be exacerbated if
financial market conditions deteriorate and, as a result, the
value and liquidity of the investment portfolio and return on
pension assets could be negatively impacted and lead to
impairment charges. If Applied does not timely and appropriately
adapt to changes resulting from the uncertain macroeconomic
environment and industry conditions, Applieds business,
financial condition or results of operations may be materially
and adversely affected.
Applied
must adapt its business and product offerings to respond to
competition and rapid technological changes.
As Applied operates in a highly competitive environment, its
future success depends on many factors, including the effective
commercialization and customer acceptance of its equipment,
services and related products. In addition, Applied must
successfully execute its growth strategy, including enhancing
market share in existing markets, expanding into related
markets, cultivating new markets and exceeding industry growth
rates, while constantly improving its operational performance.
The development, introduction and support of a broadening set of
products in more varied competitive environments have grown
increasingly complex and expensive over time.
46
Furthermore, new or improved products may entail higher costs
and reduced profits. Applieds performance may be adversely
affected if it does not timely, cost-effectively and
successfully:
|
|
|
|
|
develop new products, improve
and/or
develop new applications for existing products, and adapt
similar products for use by customers in different applications
and/or
markets with varying technical requirements;
|
|
|
|
appropriately price and achieve market acceptance of products;
|
|
|
|
differentiate its products from those of competitors and any
disruptive technologies, meet performance specifications, and
drive efficiencies and cost reductions;
|
|
|
|
maintain operating flexibility to enable different responses to
different markets, customers and applications;
|
|
|
|
allocate resources, including people and R&D funding, among
Applieds products and between the development of new
products and the enhancement of existing products, as most
appropriate and effective for future growth;
|
|
|
|
reduce the cost of, and improve the productivity of capital
invested in, R&D activities;
|
|
|
|
accurately forecast demand, work with suppliers and meet
production schedules for its products;
|
|
|
|
improve its manufacturing processes and achieve cost
efficiencies across product offerings;
|
|
|
|
adapt to changes in value offered by companies in different
parts of the supply chain;
|
|
|
|
qualify products for evaluation and, in turn, volume
manufacturing with its customers; and
|
|
|
|
implement changes in its design engineering methodology,
including those that enable reduction of material costs and
cycle time, greater commonality of platforms and types of parts
used in different systems, greater effectiveness of product life
cycle management, and reduced energy usage and environmental
impact.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage these challenges, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Operating
in multiple industries, and the entry into new markets and
industries, entail additional challenges.
As part of its growth strategy, Applied must successfully expand
into related or new markets and industries, either with its
existing products or with new products developed internally or
obtained through acquisitions. The entry into different markets
involves additional challenges, including those arising from:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to devote additional resources to develop new products
for, and operate in, new markets;
|
|
|
|
differing rates of profitability and growth among multiple
businesses;
|
|
|
|
Applieds ability to anticipate demand, capitalize on
opportunities, and avoid or minimize risks;
|
|
|
|
the complexity of managing multiple businesses with variations
in production planning, execution, supply chain management and
logistics;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of new business models;
|
|
|
|
the need to undertake activities to grow demand for end-products;
|
|
|
|
the need to develop adequate new business processes and systems;
|
|
|
|
Applieds ability to rapidly expand its operations to meet
increased demand and the associated effect on working capital;
|
|
|
|
new materials, processes and technologies;
|
|
|
|
the need to attract, motivate and retain employees with skills
and expertise in these new areas;
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
new and more diverse customers and suppliers, including some
with limited operating histories, uncertain
and/or
limited funding, evolving business models
and/or
locations in regions where Applied does not have existing
operations;
|
|
|
|
different customer service requirements;
|
|
|
|
new or different competitors with potentially more financial or
other resources, industry experience
and/or
established customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
entry into new industries and countries, with differing levels
of government involvement, laws and regulations, and business,
employment and safety practices;
|
|
|
|
third parties intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
|
the need to comply with, or work to establish, industry
standards and practices.
|
In addition, Applied has begun applying for and receiving
funding from United States and other government agencies for
certain strategic development programs to increase its R&D
resources and address new market opportunities. As a condition
to this government funding, Applied may be subject to certain
record-keeping, audit, intellectual property rights-sharing
and/or other
obligations.
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
its diversification and entry into new markets and industries,
its business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to the risks of operating a global
business.
In the first quarter fiscal 2011, approximately 77 percent
of Applieds net sales were to customers in regions outside
the United States. Certain of Applieds R&D and
manufacturing facilities, as well as suppliers to Applied, are
also located outside the United States, including in Singapore,
Taiwan, China, Korea, Israel, Italy and Switzerland. Applied is
also expanding its business and operations in new countries. The
global nature of Applieds business and operations presents
challenges, including but not limited to those arising from:
|
|
|
|
|
varying regional and geopolitical business conditions and
demands;
|
|
|
|
political and social attitudes, laws, rules, regulations and
policies within countries that favor domestic companies over
non-domestic companies, including customer- or
government-supported efforts to promote the development and
growth of local competitors;
|
|
|
|
variations among, and changes in, local, regional, national or
international laws and regulations (including intellectual
property, labor, tax, and import /export laws), as well as the
interpretation and application of such laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
global trade issues, including those related to the
interpretation and application of import and export licenses;
|
|
|
|
positions taken by governmental agencies regarding possible
national commercial
and/or
security issues posed by international business operations;
|
|
|
|
fluctuating raw material, commodity and energy costs;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with managing more geographically diverse
operations and projects ;
|
|
|
|
varying customs, practices and expectations of workers in
different regions;
|
|
|
|
variations in the ability to develop relationships with local
customers, suppliers and governments;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates,
including the relative strength or weakness of the
U.S. dollar and the euro;
|
|
|
|
the need to provide sufficient levels of technical support in
different locations;
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
political instability, natural disasters (such as earthquakes,
floods or storms), pandemics, terrorism or acts of war in
locations where Applied has operations, suppliers or sales, or
that may influence the value chain of the industries that
Applied serves;
|
|
|
|
cultural and language differences;
|
|
|
|
shipping costs
and/or
delays;
|
|
|
|
the need to continually improve the Companys operating
cost structure;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and uncertainties associated with the entry into
new countries;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties with respect to economic growth rates in various
countries; and
|
|
|
|
uncertainties with respect to growth rates for the manufacture
and sales of semiconductors, LCDs and solar PVs in the
developing economies of certain countries.
|
Many of these challenges are present in China and Korea, which
are experiencing significant growth of both suppliers and
competitors to Applied. Applied further believes that China and
Korea present large potential markets for its products and
opportunity for growth over the long term, although at lower
projected levels of profitability and margins for certain
products than historically have been achieved in other regions.
In addition, Applied must regularly reassess the size,
capability and location of its global infrastructure and make
appropriate changes, and must have effective change management
processes and procedures to address changes in its business and
operations. These challenges may materially and adversely affect
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated
customer base.
Applieds semiconductor and flat panel display customer
bases historically have been, and are becoming even more, highly
concentrated as a result of economic and industry conditions.
For example, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, four
semiconductor manufacturers accounted for 66 percent of
Silicon Systems Group net sales, and four LCD manufacturers
accounted for 89 percent of Display net sales. Certain
customers have experienced significant ownership or management
changes, consolidated with other manufacturers, outsourced
manufacturing activities, or engaged in collaboration or
cooperation arrangements with other manufacturers. In addition,
customers have entered into strategic alliances or industry
consortia that have increased the influence of key industry
participants in technology decisions made by their partners.
Also, certain semiconductor and display customers are making an
increasingly greater percentage of their respective
industrys capital equipment investments.
In this environment, contracts or orders from a relatively
limited number of semiconductor and display manufacturers have
accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a
substantial portion of Applieds business, which may result
in added complexities in managing customer relationships and
transactions. In addition, the mix and type of customers, and
sales to any single customer, may vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and from year to year. If customers do not
place orders, or they substantially reduce, delay or cancel
orders, Applied may not be able to replace the business. As
Applieds products are configured to customer
specifications, changing, rescheduling or canceling orders may
result in significant, non-recoverable costs. Major customers
may also seek, and on occasion receive, pricing, payment,
intellectual property-related, or other commercial terms that
are less favorable to Applied. These factors could have a
material adverse effect on Applieds business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Manufacturing
interruptions or delays could affect Applieds ability to
meet customer demand and lead to higher costs, while the failure
to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or
obsolete inventory.
Applieds business depends on its timely supply of
equipment, services and related products that meet the rapidly
changing technical and volume requirements of its customers,
which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts,
components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from
suppliers and timely performance by contract manufacturers. Some
key parts may be subject to long lead-times
and/or
obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of
suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by
suppliers located in countries other
49
than the United States, including China and Korea. Cyclical
industry conditions and the volatility of demand for
manufacturing equipment increase capital, technical, operational
and other risks for companies throughout Applieds supply
chain. Further, the adverse conditions in the credit and
financial markets and industry slowdowns in recent periods have
caused, and may continue to cause, some suppliers to scale back
operations, exit businesses, merge with other companies, or file
for bankruptcy protection and possibly cease operations,
potentially affecting Applieds ability to obtain quality
parts on a timely basis. Applied may experience significant
interruptions of its manufacturing operations, delays in its
ability to deliver products or services, increased costs or
customer order cancellations as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the failure or inability of suppliers to timely deliver
sufficient quantities of quality parts on a cost-effective basis;
|
|
|
|
volatility in the availability and cost of materials;
|
|
|
|
difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export
approvals;
|
|
|
|
information technology or infrastructure failures;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters (such as earthquakes, floods or
storms); or
|
|
|
|
other causes (such as regional economic downturns, pandemics,
political instability, terrorism, or acts of war) that could
result in delayed deliveries, manufacturing inefficiencies,
increased costs or order cancellations.
|
If a supplier fails to meet Applieds requirements
concerning quality, cost or other performance factors, Applied
may transfer its business to alternative sourcing, which could
entail manufacturing delays, additional costs, or other
difficulties. In addition, Applieds need to rapidly
increase its business and manufacturing capacity to meet
increases in demand or expedited shipment schedules may
exacerbate any interruptions in Applieds manufacturing
operations and supply chain and the associated effect on
Applieds working capital. Moreover, if actual demand for
Applieds products is different than expected, Applied may
purchase more/fewer parts than necessary or incur costs for
canceling, postponing or expediting delivery of parts. If
Applied purchases inventory in anticipation of customer demand
that does not materialize, or if customers reduce or delay
orders, Applied may incur excess inventory charges. Any or all
of these factors could materially and adversely affect
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with acquisitions and strategic
investments.
Applied has made, and in the future intends to make,
acquisitions of, and investments in, companies, technologies or
products in existing, related or new markets for Applied.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including but not limited
to:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from other operational
matters;
|
|
|
|
inability to complete acquisitions as anticipated or at all;
|
|
|
|
inability to realize anticipated benefits;
|
|
|
|
failure to commercialize purchased technologies;
|
|
|
|
initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively
small supply partners;
|
|
|
|
inability to capitalize on characteristics of new markets that
may be significantly different from Applieds existing
markets and where competitors may have stronger market positions
and customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
failure to attract, retain and motivate key employees from the
acquired business;
|
|
|
|
exposure to new operational risks, rules, regulations, worker
expectations, customs and practices to the extent acquired
businesses are located in countries where Applied has not
historically conducted business;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with managing new, more diverse and more
widespread operations, projects and people;
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights in
key technologies;
|
|
|
|
inadequacy or ineffectiveness of an acquired companys
internal financial controls, disclosure controls and procedures,
and/or
environmental, health and safety, anti-corruption, human
resource, or other policies or practices;
|
|
|
|
impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill as a
result of changing business conditions, technological
advancements or
worse-than-expected
performance of the segment;
|
|
|
|
the risk of litigation or claims associated with a proposed or
completed transaction;
|
|
|
|
unknown, underestimated
and/or
undisclosed commitments or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
inappropriate scale of acquired entities critical
resources or facilities for business needs; and
|
|
|
|
ineffective integration of operations, systems, technologies,
products or employees of an acquired business.
|
Applied also makes strategic investments in other companies,
including companies formed as joint ventures, which may decline
in value
and/or not
meet desired objectives. The success of these investments
depends on various factors over which Applied may have limited
or no control and, particularly with respect to joint ventures,
requires ongoing and effective cooperation with strategic
partners. The risks to Applieds strategic investment
portfolio may be exacerbated by unfavorable financial market and
macroeconomic conditions and, as a result, the value of the
investment portfolio could be negatively impacted and lead to
impairment charges. Mergers and acquisitions and strategic
investments are inherently subject to significant risks, and the
inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and
adversely affect Applieds business, financial condition
and results of operations. If Applied does not successfully
manage the risks associated with acquisitions and strategic
investments, its business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The
ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees is vital
to Applieds success.
Applieds success and competitiveness depend in large part
on its ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees.
Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors,
including fluctuations in global economic and industry
conditions, changes in Applieds management or leadership,
competitors hiring practices, cost reduction activities
(including workforce reductions), and the effectiveness of
Applieds compensation and benefit programs, including its
share-based programs. If Applied does not successfully attract,
retain and motivate key employees, Applied may be unable to
capitalize on its opportunities and its operating results may be
materially and adversely affected.
The
failure to successfully implement and conduct outsourcing
activities and other operational initiatives could adversely
affect results of operations.
To better align its costs with market conditions, locate closer
to customers, enhance productivity, and improve efficiencies,
Applied conducts engineering, software development,
manufacturing, sourcing and other operations in regions outside
the United States, including India, China, and Korea. Applied is
implementing a more distributed manufacturing model, which
includes transitioning certain manufacturing and supply chain
activities from the United States and Europe to Singapore,
Taiwan and other countries in Asia, and completing assembly of
some systems at the customer site. In addition, Applied
outsources certain functions to third parties, including
companies in the United States, India, China, Korea and other
countries. Outsourced functions include contract manufacturing,
engineering, customer support, software development, information
technology support, finance and administrative activities. The
expanding role of third party providers has required changes to
Applieds existing operations and the adoption of new
procedures and processes for retaining and managing these
providers, as well as redistributing responsibilities as
warranted, in order to realize the potential productivity and
operational efficiencies, assure quality and continuity of
supply, and protect Applieds intellectual property. If
Applied does not accurately forecast the amount, timing and mix
of demand for products, or if contract manufacturers or other
outsource providers fail to perform in a timely manner or at
satisfactory quality levels, Applieds ability to meet
customer requirements could suffer, particularly during a market
upturn.
51
In addition, Applied is implementing a comprehensive program to
better align its global organizations and processes, including
initiatives to enhance the Asia supply chain, integrate its
sales teams into the business units, and improve back office and
information technology infrastructure for more efficient
transaction processing. Applied also is implementing a
multi-year, company-wide program to transform certain business
processes, including the transition to a single enterprise
resource planning (ERP) software system to perform various
functions. The implementation of additional functionality to the
ERP system entails certain risks, including difficulties with
changes in business processes that could disrupt Applieds
operations, such as its ability to track orders and timely ship
products, project inventory requirements, manage its supply
chain and aggregate financial and operational data. The
implementation of new initiatives may not achieve the
anticipated benefits and may divert managements attention
from other operational activities, negatively affect employee
morale, or have other unintended consequences.
If Applied does not effectively develop and implement its
outsourcing and relocation strategies, if required export and
other governmental approvals are not timely obtained, if
Applieds third party providers do not perform as
anticipated, or if there are delays or difficulties in enhancing
business processes, Applied may not realize anticipated
productivity improvements or cost efficiencies, and may
experience operational difficulties, increased costs (including
energy and transportation), manufacturing interruptions or
delays, inefficiencies in the structure
and/or
operation of its supply chain, loss of its intellectual property
rights, quality issues, increased product
time-to-market,
and/or
inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which
could materially and adversely affect Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
may incur impairment charges to goodwill or long-lived
assets.
Applied has a significant amount of goodwill and other acquired
intangible assets related to acquisitions. Goodwill and
purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not
amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually during the
fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and more frequently when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset may not be recoverable. The review compares
the fair value for each of Applieds reporting units to its
associated carrying value, including goodwill. Factors that
could lead to impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
include adverse industry or economic trends, reduced estimates
of future cash flows, declines in the market price of Applied
common stock, changes in the Companys strategies or
product portfolio, and restructuring activities. Applieds
valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires
management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical
experience and projections of future operating performance.
Applied may be required to record a charge to earnings during
the period in which an impairment of goodwill or amortizable
intangible assets is determined to exist, which could materially
and adversely affect Applieds results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or
claims and protection of intellectual property
rights.
Applied from time to time is, and in the future may be, involved
in legal proceedings or claims regarding patent infringement,
intellectual property rights, antitrust, environmental
regulations, securities, contracts, product performance, product
liability, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, employment, workplace safety, and other matters.
Applied also on occasion receives notification from customers
who believe that Applied owes them indemnification or other
obligations related to claims made against such customers by
third parties.
In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutors Office for the
Eastern District in Korea indicted certain employees of Applied
Materials Korea (AMK), including the former head of AMK who at
the time of indictment was a vice president of Applied
Materials, Inc., along with employees of several other
companies, alleging the improper receipt and use of the
confidential information of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(Samsung), a major customer. Hearings on these matters are
ongoing in the Seoul Eastern District Court. Applied and Samsung
entered into a settlement agreement effective as of
November 1, 2010, which resolves potential civil claims
related to this matter and which is separate from and does not
affect the criminal proceedings.
Legal proceedings and claims, whether with or without merit, and
associated internal investigations, may (1) be
time-consuming and expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct;
(2) divert managements attention and other
52
Applied resources; (3) inhibit Applieds ability to
sell its products; (4) result in adverse judgments for
damages, injunctive relief, penalties and fines;
and/or
(5) negatively affect Applieds business. There can be
no assurance regarding the outcome of current or future legal
proceedings, claims or investigations. If Applied is not able to
favorably resolve or settle legal proceedings or claims, or in
the event of any adverse findings against Applied or any of its
employees, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
and Applied may suffer harm to its reputation.
Applieds success depends in significant part on the
protection of its intellectual property and other rights.
Infringement of Applieds rights by a third party, such as
the unauthorized manufacture or sale of equipment or spare
parts, could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue
opportunities for Applied. Applieds intellectual property
rights may not provide significant competitive advantages if
they are circumvented, invalidated, rendered obsolete by the
rapid pace of technological change, or if Applied does not
adequately protect or assert these rights. Furthermore, the laws
and practices of other countries, including China, India, Taiwan
and Korea, permit the protection and enforcement of
Applieds rights to varying extents, which may not be
sufficient to adequately protect Applieds rights. Applied
previously entered into an arrangement with one of its
competitors to decrease the risk of patent infringement lawsuits
in the future. There can be no assurance that the intended
results of this arrangement will be achieved or that Applied
will be able to adequately protect its intellectual property
rights with the restrictions associated with the arrangement. If
Applied is not able to favorably resolve or settle claims,
obtain or enforce intellectual property rights, obtain necessary
licenses on commercially reasonable terms,
and/or
successfully prosecute or defend its intellectual property
position, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
and Applied may suffer harm to its reputation.
Changes
in tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could affect results
of operations.
As a global company, Applied is subject to taxation in the
United States and various other countries. Significant judgment
is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities.
Applieds future annual and quarterly tax rates could be
affected by numerous factors, including changes in the:
(1) applicable tax laws; (2) amount and composition of
pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates; or
(3) valuation of Applieds deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
To better align with the increasingly international nature of
its business, Applied is transitioning certain manufacturing,
supply chain, and other operations into Asia, bringing these
activities closer to customers. These changes are expected to
result in a reduction of future operating costs. In Singapore,
Applied has received authorization to use tax incentives that
provide that certain income earned in Singapore will be subject
to tax holidays or reduced income tax rates. To obtain the
benefit of these tax provisions, Applied must meet requirements
relating to various activities. Applieds ability to
realize benefits from these provisions could be materially
affected if, among other things, applicable requirements are not
met, or if Applied incurs net losses for which it cannot claim a
deduction.
In addition, Applied is subject to regular examination by the
Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, and from
time to time initiates amendments to previously filed tax
returns. Applied regularly assesses the likelihood of favorable
or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations and
amendments to determine the adequacy of its provision for income
taxes, which requires estimates and judgments. Although Applied
believes its tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no
assurance that the tax authorities will agree with such
estimates. Applied may have to engage in litigation to achieve
the results reflected in the estimates, which may be
time-consuming and expensive. There can be no assurance that
Applied will be successful or that any final determination will
not be materially different from the treatment reflected in
Applieds historical income tax provisions and accruals,
which could materially and adversely affect Applieds
financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
is subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental and
safety regulations.
Applied is subject to environmental and safety regulations in
connection with its global business operations, including but
not limited to: regulations related to the development,
manufacture and use of its products; recycling and disposal of
materials used in its products or in producing its products; the
operation of its facilities; and the use of its real property.
The failure or inability to comply with existing or future
environmental and safety regulations, such as those related to
climate change, could result in: (1) significant
remediation liabilities; (2) the imposition of
53
fines; (3) the suspension or termination of the
development, manufacture, sale or use of certain of its
products; (4) limitations on the operation of its
facilities or ability to use its real property;
and/or
(5) a decrease in the value of its real property, each of
which could have a material adverse effect on Applieds
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to various risks related to the regulatory
environment.
Applied is subject to various risks related to: (1) new,
different, inconsistent or even conflicting laws, rules and
regulations that may be enacted by legislative bodies
and/or
regulatory agencies in the countries in which Applied operates;
(2) disagreements or disputes between national or regional
regulatory agencies related to international trade; and
(3) the interpretation and application of laws, rules and
regulations. For example, as a public company with global
operations, Applied is subject to the laws of multiple
jurisdictions and the rules and regulations of various governing
bodies, including those related to financial and other
disclosures, corporate governance, privacy, and anti-corruption.
Changes in laws, regulations and standards may create
uncertainty regarding compliance matters. Efforts to comply with
new and changing regulations have resulted in, and are likely to
continue to result in, increased general and administrative
expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from
revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If
Applied is found by a court or regulatory agency not to be in
compliance with applicable laws, rules or regulations, Applied
could be subject to legal or regulatory sanctions, the
publics perception of Applied could decline, and
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
The following table provides information as of January 30,
2011 with respect to the shares of common stock repurchased by
Applied during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
That May Yet be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Program*
|
|
|
the Program*
|
|
|
|
( In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Month #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(November 1, 2010 to
November 28, 2010)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
12.64
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
Month #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(November 29, 2010 to
December 26, 2010)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
13.32
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,572
|
|
Month #3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(December 27, 2010 to
January 30, 2011)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
14.32
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
On March 8, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock
repurchase program for up to $2.0 billion in repurchases
over the next three years, ending March 2013. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed
and Reserved]
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
54
Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table
of Item 601 of
Regulation S-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.60
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.61
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.62
|
|
Settlement Agreement between Applied Materials, Inc. and Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. dated November 1, 2010. (Confidential
treatment has been requested for redacted portions of the
agreement, which redacted portions have been separately provided
to the Securities and Exchange Commission.)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
George S. Davis
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 28, 2011
Thomas S. Timko
Corporate Vice President,
Corporate Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 28, 2011
56