FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number: 1-10024
BKF Capital Group,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
36-0767530
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
One Rockefeller Plaza,
New York, New York
|
|
10020
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
(212) 332-8400
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o
Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes þ
No o
As of August 1, 2007, 7,973,216 shares of the
registrants common stock, $1.00 par value, were
outstanding.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
3,689
|
|
U.S. Treasury bills
|
|
|
23,474
|
|
|
|
27,430
|
|
Investment advisory trailer fees
and other receivables
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
3,979
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
Fixed assets (net of accumulated
depreciation of $306 and $254, respectively)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
29,165
|
|
|
$
|
36,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,114
|
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued restructuring expense
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
|
|
5,217
|
|
Accrued lease amendment expense
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
10,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value,
authorized 15,000,000 shares, issued and
outstanding 7,973,216 and 7,976,341 shares,
respectively
|
|
$
|
7,973
|
|
|
|
7,976
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
76,003
|
|
|
|
75,883
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(62,437
|
)
|
|
|
(57,184
|
)
|
Unearned compensation
restricted stock and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
21,539
|
|
|
|
26,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
29,165
|
|
|
$
|
36,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
3
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,303
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,359
|
|
Incentive fees and allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
Commission income (net) and other
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
(loss) on investments
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
From consolidated affiliated
partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
(including equity grants of $45, $283, $166 and $470,
respectively)
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
5,925
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
22,503
|
|
Occupancy and equipment rental
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
4,922
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Other operating expenses from
consolidated affiliated partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
12,455
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
12,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
21,822
|
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss)
|
|
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
|
(20,650
|
)
|
|
|
(4,691
|
)
|
|
|
(23,211
|
)
|
Minority interest in consolidated
affiliated partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,671
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
7,976,341
|
|
|
|
8,346,545
|
|
|
|
7,976,341
|
|
|
|
8,323,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,342
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
(loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in Accrued
Restructuring Costs
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
6,656
|
|
Expense for vesting of restricted
stock and stock units
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Unrealized (gain) on investments
in securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
Decrease in U.S. treasury
bills
|
|
|
3,956
|
|
|
|
25,095
|
|
Decrease in investment advisory
trailer fees and other receivable
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
20,838
|
|
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and
other assets
|
|
|
(1,978
|
)
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
Decrease in investments in
affiliated investment partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,620
|
|
Decrease in investments in
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
(Decrease) in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(892
|
)
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
(Decrease) in accrued compensation
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
|
|
(40,171
|
)
|
(Decrease) Increase in accrued
lease amendment expense
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
3,096
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities from consolidated affiliated partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Decrease in due from broker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,531
|
|
Decrease in securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,542
|
|
(Decrease) in securities sold short
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(2,062
|
)
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset additions
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing
activities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
Consolidated affiliated
partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) in partner
contributions received in advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Partner subscriptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Partner redemptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the
beginning of the period
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
|
14,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the
end of the period
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
21,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
June 30, 2007
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
6,826
|
|
|
$
|
87,937
|
|
|
$
|
22,054
|
|
|
$
|
(14,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
102,608
|
|
Grants of restricted stock and
restricted stock units
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,814
|
|
|
|
6,135
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
(1,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
Tax benefit related to employee
compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
Dividend, net of compensation
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,781
|
)
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
7,275
|
|
|
$
|
88,458
|
|
|
$
|
17,508
|
|
|
$
|
(5,395
|
)
|
|
$
|
107,846
|
|
Grants of restricted stock units
and restricted stock
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
5,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,911
|
)
|
|
|
442
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
(6,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,897
|
)
|
Tax benefit related to employee
compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
Dividends, net of compensation
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,811
|
)
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
8,180
|
|
|
$
|
88,887
|
|
|
$
|
(10,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,306
|
)
|
|
$
|
75,593
|
|
Grants of restricted stock units
and restricted stock net of forfeitures
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(9,309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,856
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(4,499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(4,024
|
)
|
Grants of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(47,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
7,976
|
|
|
$
|
75,883
|
|
|
$
|
(57,184
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,627
|
|
Cumulative effect of applying the
provisions of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
Grants of restricted stock units
and restricted stock net of forfeitures
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Grants of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
$
|
7,973
|
|
|
$
|
76,003
|
|
|
$
|
(62,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
6
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated interim financial statements of BKF Capital
Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (BKF or the
Company) included herein have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and
Rule 10-01
of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. These consolidated financial
statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company follows
the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim
reports. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to present fairly the financial position of BKF
Capital Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries at June 30, 2007
and the results of operations for the six months and three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 subject to the
organizations ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements of BKF include its
wholly-owned subsidiaries LEVCO Europe Holdings, Ltd.
(LEVCO Holdings) and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
LEVCO Europe, LLP (LEVCO Europe), BKF Asset
Management, Inc., (BAM), BKFs two wholly-owned
subsidiaries, BKF GP Inc. (BKF GP) and LEVCO
Securities, Inc. (LEVCO Securities) and certain
affiliated investment partnerships for which the Company is
deemed to have a controlling interest in the applicable
partnership. There were, however, no investment partnerships
included in the consolidated statements of financial position as
of June 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006, nor were there
any included in statements of operation and cash flows for
either of the 2007 periods. For the six month and three month
periods ended June 30, 2006 three investment partnerships
were included in the statements of operation and cash flow. All
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company trades on the over the counter market under the
symbol (BKFG).
BAM is an investment advisor which was registered under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended; it withdrew its
registration on December 19, 2006. Prior to that time BAM
provided investment advisory services to its clients which
included U.S. and foreign corporations, mutual funds, limited
partnerships, universities, pension and profit sharing plans,
individuals, trusts,
not-for-profit
organizations and foundations. BAM also participated in broker
consulting programs (Wrap Accounts) with several nationally
recognized financial institutions. LEVCO Securities was
registered with the SEC as a broker- dealer and was a member of
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; it
withdrew its registration on November 30, 2006. BKF GP acts
as the managing general partner of several affiliated investment
partnerships and is registered with the Commodities Futures
Trading Commission as a commodity pool operator.
Going
Concern
The Companys financial statements have been presented on
the basis that it is a going concern which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the
normal course of business. During 2006 and 2005, the company
experienced a total loss of assets under management and as a
result, the Company has had a significant decline in revenues
and no longer has an operating business. The Company continues
to evaluate strategic alternatives: either commence a new
business or liquidate. Historically, the Company has funded its
cash and liquidity needs through cash generated from operations.
Accordingly the cash projected to be generated from operations
will not be sufficient to fund operations and the Company will
need to use its existing working capital to fund operations. As
a result there is substantial doubt about the ability of the
Company to continue as a going concern. The accompanying
financial statements do not reflect any adjustment for the
outcome of this uncertainty.
Consolidation
Accounting Policies
Operating Companies. Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an
interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51
(ARB 51),
7
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidated Financial Statements, to variable
interest entities (VIE), (FIN 46),
which was issued in January 2003 and revised in December 2003
(FIN 46R), defines the criteria necessary to be
considered an operating company (i.e., variable interest entity)
for which the consolidation accounting guidance of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 94,
Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries,
(SFAS 94) should be applied. As required by
SFAS 94, the Company consolidates operating companies in
which BKF has a controlling financial interest. The usual
condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a
majority of the voting interest. FIN 46R defines operating
companies as businesses that have a sufficient legal equity to
absorb the entities expected losses and, in each case, for
which the equity holders have substantive voting rights and
participate substantively in the gains and losses of such
entities. Operating companies in which the Company is able to
exercise significant influence but do not control are accounted
for under the equity method. Significant influence generally is
deemed to exist when the Company owns 20% to 50% of the voting
equity of an operating entity. The Company has determined that
it does not have any VIE. Entities consolidated are based on
equity ownership of the entity by the Company and its affiliates.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
Generally, investment advisory fees are billed quarterly, in
arrears, and are based upon a percentage of the market value of
each account at the end of the quarter. Wrap account fees are
billed quarterly based upon a percentage of the market value of
each account as of the previous quarter end. Incentive fees,
general partner incentive allocations earned from affiliated
investment partnerships, and incentive fees from other accounts
are accrued on a quarterly basis and are billed quarterly or at
the end of their respective contract year, as applicable. Such
accruals may be reversed as a result of subsequent investment
performance prior to the conclusion of the applicable contract
year.
Commissions earned on securities transactions executed by LEVCO
Securities and related expenses are recorded on a trade-date
basis net of any sales credits.
Commissions earned on distribution of an unaffiliated investment
advisors funds are recorded once a written commitment is
obtained from the investor.
Revenue
Recognition Policies for Consolidated Affiliated Partnerships
(CAP)
Marketable securities owned and securities sold short, are
valued at independent market prices with the resultant
unrealized gains and losses included in operations.
Security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.
Interest income and expense are accrued as earned or incurred.
Dividend income and expense are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Investments
in Affiliated Investment Partnerships
BKF GP serves as the managing general partner for several
affiliated investment partnerships (AIP), which
previously engaged in the trading of publicly traded equity
securities, and in the case of one partnership, distressed
corporate debt. The assets and liabilities and results of
operations of the AIP are not included in the Companys
8
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
consolidated statements of financial condition with the
exception of BKF GPs equity ownership and certain AIP
whereby BKF GP is deemed to have a controlling interest in the
partnership (see Note 4). The limited partners of the AIP
have the right to redeem their partnership interests at least
quarterly.
Additionally, the unaffiliated limited partners of the AIP may
terminate BKF GP as the general partner of the AIP at any time.
BKF GP does not maintain control over the unconsolidated AIP,
has not guaranteed any of the AIP obligations, nor does it have
any contractual commitments associated with them. Investments in
the unconsolidated AIP held through BKF GP are recorded based
upon the equity method of accounting.
BKF GPs investment amount in the unconsolidated AIP equals
the sum total of its capital accounts, including incentive
allocations, in the AIP. Each AIP values its underlying
investments in accordance with policies as described in its
audited financial statements and underlying offering memoranda.
It is the Companys general practice to withdraw the
incentive allocations earned from the AIP within three months
after the fiscal year end. BKF GP has general partner liability
with respect to its interest in each of the AIP and has no
investments in the AIP other than its interest in these
partnerships. See Note 5 Investments in
Affiliated Investment Partnerships and Related Revenue.
Long-Lived
Assets
Long-lived assets are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires impairment
losses to be recognized on long-lived assets used in operations
when an indication of an impairment exists. If the expected
future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount
of the assets, an impairment loss would be recognized to the
extent the carrying value of such asset exceeded its fair value.
During the first quarter of calendar year 2006, the Company
completed the amortization of certain long-lived assets
(investment advisory contracts). These investment advisory
contracts relate to cost in excess of the net assets acquired by
BKF in June 1996, were reflected as goodwill, investment
advisory contracts, and employment contracts in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. The Company performed a
valuation of the intangible assets (under
SFAS No. 144) and determined that the estimated
discounted cash flows for the remaining investment advisory
accounts acquired by the Company in 1996 was less than the
carrying value of the related assets as determined using the
Income approach. As a result, the Company recorded a charge of
$1.1 million in the first quarter of 2006 to fully amortize
these contracts. Such amount is reflected in amortization
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Intangible
Assets
The cost in excess of net assets of BKF acquired by the company
in June 1996 was reflected as goodwill, investment advisory
contracts, and employment contracts in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. Through December 31,
2001, goodwill was amortized straight line over 15 years.
Effective January 1, 2002 the Company adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no
longer amortized but is subject to an impairment test at least
annually or when indicators of potential impairment exist. Other
intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their
useful lives. During the second and third quarters of 2006
Goodwill of $14.8 million was fully written off.
Earnings
Per Share
The Company accounts for Earnings Per Share under
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic
earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share
is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the total of the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
and common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings (loss) per share
is computed using the treasury stock method.
9
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted (loss) per share (dollar amounts in thousands, except
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
(4,691
|
)
|
|
|
(23,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
7,976,341
|
|
|
|
8,323,900
|
|
|
|
7,976,341
|
|
|
|
8,346,545
|
|
Dilutive potential shares from
equity grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
7,976,341
|
|
|
|
8,323,900
|
|
|
|
7,976,341
|
|
|
|
8,346,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(2.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In calculating diluted (loss) per share for the three-months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 common stock equivalents of
200,000 and 300,000, respectively, and for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 common stock equivalents of 200,000
and 300,000, respectively were excluded due to their
anti-dilutive effect on the calculation.
Business
Segments
The Company has not presented business segment data, in
accordance with SFAS No. 131 Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, because
it, has historically operated in one business segment, the
investment advisory and asset management business.
Stock
Options
The Company complies with SFAS No. 123R using the
modified prospective method.
Significant
Accounting Policies of Consolidated Affiliated Partnerships
(CAP)
Securities sold short represent obligations to deliver the
underlying securities sold at prevailing market prices and
option contracts written represent obligations to purchase or
deliver the specified security at the contract price. The future
satisfaction of these obligations may be at amounts that are
greater or less than that recorded on the consolidated
statements of financial condition. The CAP monitors their
positions continuously to reduce the risk of potential loss due
to changes in market value or failure of counterparties to
perform.
Minority
Interest
Minority interest in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations represents the minority owners share of the
income or loss of consolidated investment partnerships.
Recent
Accounting Developments
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in a companys financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. The Company adopted
FIN 48 in the first quarter of 2007. The impact of the
adoption of FIN 48 resulted in an increase to beginning
accumulated deficit and an increase to liabilities for taxes and
interest of approximately $562,000. See Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
10
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2006, The FASB issued SFAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and other
Postretirement Plans, which requires an employer to
recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as
an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and
to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which
the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS 158
has no effect on the Companys financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159), which permits certain financial assets
and financial liabilities to be measured at fair value, using an
instrument-by-instrument election. The initial effect of
adopting SFAS 159 must be accounted for as a cumulative-effect
adjustment to opening retained earnings for the fiscal year in
which we apply SFAS 159. Retrospective application of SFAS 159
to fiscal years preceding the effective date is not permitted.
SFAS 159 has no effect on the Companys financial
statements.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, codified as SAB Topic 1.N,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. SAB No. 108 describes the approach that
should be used to quantify the materiality of a misstatement and
provides guidance for correcting
prior-year
errors. SAB No. 108 is effective for annual financial
statements covering the first fiscal year ending after
November 15, 2006 and accordingly the Company follows its
requirements when quantifying financial statement misstatements.
The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not require any changes to
the companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
2.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Risk
|
LEVCO Securities acted as an introducing broker and all
transactions for its customers were cleared through and carried
by a major U.S. securities firm on a fully disclosed basis.
LEVCO Securities had agreed to indemnify its clearing broker for
losses that the clearing broker sustained from the customer
accounts introduced by LEVCO Securities. In the ordinary course
of its business, however, LEVCO Securities did not accept orders
with respect to client accounts if the funds required for the
client to meet its obligations were not on deposit in the client
account at the time the order was placed.
|
|
3.
|
Investment
advisory trailer fees and other receivables
|
Included in investment advisory trailer fees and other
receivables are primarily trailer fees receivable from former
portfolio managers and does not include any accrued incentive
fees as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively.
As required by SFAS 94, the Company consolidated AIP in
which the Company has a controlling financial interest. The
consolidation of these partnerships does not impact the
Companys equity or net income. BKF GP has general partner
liability with respect to its interest in each of the CAP. At
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 there were no
consolidated AIP.
|
|
5.
|
Investments
in Affiliated Investment Partnerships and Related
Revenue
|
As of June 30, 2007 the Company has no remaining
investments in its unconsolidated Affiliated Investment
Partnerships. Nor were there any AIP net earnings included in
the Statement of Operations for the six months or three months
ended June 30, 2007. For the period ended June 30,
2006 the Companys AIP net loss was approximately $481,000
and it lost $2,000 on its invested capital during that period.
Included in the Companys incentive fees and general
partner incentive allocations are approximately $755,000 and $0
payable directly to employee owned and controlled entities
(Employee Entities) for the six months and three
months ended June 30, 2006. There were no such amounts for
the periods ended June 30, 2007. These amounts are included
in the Companys carrying value of the AIP at the end of
the applicable period. These Employee Entities, which serve as
non-managing general partners of several AIP, also bear the
liability for all
11
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
compensation expense relating to the allocated revenue,
amounting to approximately $755,000 and $0 for the six months
and three months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. These
amounts are included in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. There were no such amounts in the 2007 periods.
The Company recorded investment advisory fees and incentive
allocations/fees from unconsolidated affiliated domestic
investment partnerships and affiliated offshore investment
vehicles of approximately $0 and $(0.3) million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and
$0 and $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Second Quarter 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 shares under option were forfeited.
|
|
|
|
3,125 restricted shares were forfeited
|
First Quarter 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 shares under option were granted to the two
directors who became the Chairman and the President/CEO as of
January 2, 2007. The options vest at a rate of 16.67% per
quarter commencing on March 31, 2007 and an additional
16.67% on the last day of the next five calendar quarters
thereof. The option term is ten years.
|
|
|
|
250,000 shares under option were forfeited.
|
Second Quarter 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
181,650 shares of unvested restricted stock were forfeited.
|
|
|
|
The restriction on 4,382 shares of restricted stock was
lifted and delivered.
|
|
|
|
12,500 shares of restricted stock were granted to a
non-employee service provider with a value of approximately
$107,000.
|
First Quarter 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Certain officers and employees of the Company were granted
145,000 shares of restricted stock with a value of
approximately $2.0 million, which vest over a three-year
period. The amount unearned as of March 31, 2006 is
recorded as unearned compensation in the consolidated statement
of financial condition.
|
|
|
|
The Company withheld 74,428 shares of common stock for
required withholding taxes in connection with the delivery of
RSU and restricted stock.
|
|
|
|
11,953 shares of unvested restricted stock were forfeited.
|
|
|
|
The restriction on 5,764 shares of restricted stock was
lifted and delivered.
|
|
|
|
4,592 shares of restricted stock were granted to
non-employee Directors for 2006 Directors fees with a value
of approximately $59,000.
|
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R) requiring that compensation cost
relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
the financial statements. The cost is measured at the grant
date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is
recognized as an expense over the employees requisite
service period (generally the vesting period of the equity
award). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
share-based compensation to employees in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
No. 25), and related interpretations. The Company also
followed the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting
12
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified
prospective method.
There was $161,000 and $489,000 of compensation cost related to
non-qualified stock options recognized in operating results
(included in selling, general and administrative expenses)
during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant
date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected
volatility is based on implied volatilities from the public
trading price of BKF stock. We used a 10 year option life
as the expected term. The expected term represents an estimate
of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the
option is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect
at the time of grant. The following table sets forth the
assumptions used to determine compensation cost for our
non-qualified stock options consistent with the requirements of
SFAS No. 123R.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
and Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
35.45
|
%
|
Expected annual dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Risk free rate of return
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
Expected option term (years)
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
The following table summarizes the information about stock
option activity for the three months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.08
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
Lapsed or canceled
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
18.95
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
66,668
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
At June 30, 2007 there was $218,000 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options,which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1 year. The intrinsic value of options vested during the
three months ended June 30, 2007 was zero. There were no
options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method
prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. The Company adopted FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (FIN48) as of January 1, 2007. As a result
the Company recognized an increase to beginning accumulated
deficit and an increase to the liability for taxes and interests
of approximately $562,000. The liability is a result of exposure
to state income reallocation exposure for years still subject to
audit and based on the results of a recent audit of previous
years.
Interest costs and penalties related to income taxes are
classified as interest expense and general and administrative
costs, respectively, in the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated Federal and
combined state and local tax returns. The Company is currently
subject to a three year statue of limitations by major tax
jurisdictions. Recently the Company settled an examination issue
with New York State and New York City related to income
allocation for the years 1999, 2000 and 2001. New York State has
recently commenced an audit of the years 2002, 2003 and 2004.
13
BKF
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to the differences between
the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis. Future tax benefits
are recognized only to the extent that realization of such
benefits is more likely than not to occur. The Company has
recorded a full valuation reserve of approximately $22.4 and
$20.4 million against its net deferred tax asset as of
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The
Company believes that it is not more likely than not that this
deferred tax benefit will be utilized in the foreseeable future.
The tax receivable of approximately $1.2 million as of
June 30, 2007, represents cash refunds due with respect to
the federal carry back claims for 2004 and 2003 taxes paid and
is included in other assets.
At June 30, 2007 the Company has a net operating loss
carryforward of approximately $48.2 million. The future use
of such carryforward may be impaired as a result of IRS code
section 382 limitations.
During the first six months of 2007 the Company had
$1.1 million of restructuring costs as follows
(in 000,000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
Paid or
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2006
|
|
|
to Expense
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Employee termination costs
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
Lease and fixed asset costs
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Termination of long term lease and
contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is a variety of claims, suits, and
proceedings that arise from time to time, including actions with
respect to contracts, employment, regulatory compliance and
public disclosure. These actions may be commenced by a number of
different constituents, including vendors, former employees,
regulatory agencies, and stockholders. The following is a
discussion of the more significant legal matters involving the
Company.
The Company was a defendant in a lawsuit filed in The United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York
(Court) by a former employee. On June 22, 2007, the case
was dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement between the
parties under which Eckenberger, as plaintiff, released all
claims against the Company. Settlement costs in excess of
previous accruals are included in other expenses for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2007.
The Company was sued in a putative class action securities fraud
case during the second quarter. Also named as defendants are
John A. Levin and Glenn Aigen, former senior executives of
the Company. The named plaintiffs are seeking to certify a class
on behalf of purchasers of the Companys common stock
between May 10, 2004 and October 18, 2005. The
Complaint alleges a violation of Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act against all defendants and a claim for violation of
Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Levin and Aigen
by virtue of their positions in the Company. To date, the
Company has not answered or otherwise responded to the
Complaint. There is a stipulation in effect between the parties
providing that no answer or motion to dismiss the Complaint will
be due until 60 days after the later of (1) the appointment
of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiffs counsel or
(2) the filing of an Amended/Superseding Complaint. The
Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the action.
14
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
OVERVIEW
Historically BKF Capital operated entirely through BKF Asset
Management, Inc. (BKF), previously a registered
investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
BKF specialized in managing equity portfolios for institutional
investors through its long-only equity and alternative
investment strategies. It also acted as the managing general
partner of a number of investment partnerships through its
subsidiary BKF GP Inc.
During 2006 the Company ceased operating its investment advisory
business. At June 30, 2007, it has no operating business
and no assets under management. The Companys principal
assets consist of a significant cash position, sizable net
operating tax losses to potentially carry forward, its status as
an Exchange Act Reporting Company and a small revenue stream
consisting of interest and fee sharing payments from departed
portfolio managers. This revenue stream will be insufficient to
cover operating expenses.
As previously disclosed, the Company has been evaluating
strategic alternatives. Currently, the Company has two options:
|
|
|
|
|
Merging with, acquiring or commencing a business potentially
being funded by a capital raising event; or
|
|
|
|
Liquidating the Company and distributing a portion of the
Companys remaining cash to stockholders.
|
The Company continues to evaluate opportunities within these
strategic alternatives.
RISK
FACTORS
The following risks, among others, sometimes have affected, and
in the future could affect BKFs business, financial
condition or results of operations. The risks described below
are not the only ones facing BKF. Additional risks not presently
known to BKF or that BKF currently deems insignificant may also
impact its business.
BKF
does not believe it is an investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (1940
Act).
BKFs primary business historically has been providing
investment advice and asset management, and not acting or
proposing to act as an investment company as the term is defined
in the 1940 Act. A company may inadvertently be deemed an
investment company, however, by virtue of its asset composition.
A company generally is considered an investment
company if it owns investment securities (as
defined in the 1940 Act) that exceed 40% of its total assets,
exclusive of assets held in cash, money-market mutual funds and
government securities. The significant reduction in BKFs
assets under management has substantially reduced its total
assets, with the remaining assets being concentrated in cash,
cash equivalents and U.S. treasury bills. Although the Company
does not believe it is or was an investment company (and has no
intent to become an investment company) the Company made an
election under
Rule 3a-2
of the 1940 Act as a protective measure. Under
Rule 3a-2,
a company that may otherwise meet the definition of an
investment company is exempted from investment company status
for up to one year, so long as it has a bona fide intent
to promptly (in any event within a one year period) return to
compliance with the numeric asset and/or income tests which form
the investment company definition. The Company made the
Rule 3a-2
election as of June 30, 2006, but since that date has taken
steps to eliminate the circumstances that might have caused it
to be considered an investment company subject to the 1940 Act
registration and regulatory requirements. As a result, BKF does
not believe it is an investment company, and does not believe it
is subject to the attendant limitations, restrictions and
regulation applicable to investment companies.
The
Company could incur material liabilities in connection with a
recently filed lawsuit.
In May 2007, a class action lawsuit was commenced in the United
States District Court of the Southern District of New York, on
behalf of certain persons who purchased or otherwise acquired
publicly traded securities of the Company. The lawsuit was filed
against the Company and two former executives of the Company,
Glenn A. Aigen and John A. Levin
(Defendants). The complaint alleges that Defendants
violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Company
believes that the action is without merit and intends to defend
itself against the action and to take all actions reasonably
required, in the
15
opinion of its counsel, to preserve all of the Companys
available defenses and rights. The ultimate outcome of this
action cannot be predicted and any liability exposure the
Company may face in the event the action is decided or settled
in a manner adverse to the Company cannot be quantified. The
Company believes that its liability, if any, may be shared with
its insurers.
The
ability of BKF to continue as an operating company and a going
concern is dependent on its ability to consummate a merger or an
acquisition and/or to raise additional capital.
The Companys available options include merging with or
acquiring a third party or liquidating. The Company has no
pending transactions. Any such transaction will be subject to
identifying a suitable business and negotiating definitive
agreements. Furthermore, any definitive agreement could be
subject to various conditions, including regulatory approvals.
Therefore, there can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to effect any such transaction. Furthermore, although the
Companys cash position is sufficient to allow it to
operate for a protracted period, the Company believes that it
will need to raise debt or equity capital to finance any such
transaction. The ability to raise additional capital is subject
to market conditions, the willingness of investors in invest in
a new or startup business and other factors. Furthermore,
certain common stock offerings may require stockholder approval.
Also, an equity or rights offering could be dilutive to the
existing stockholders of the Company. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to raise any additional capital on
favorable terms at all. If the Company is unable to effect a
transaction or to raise additional capital, the Company would
expect to be dissolved and liquidated. Furthermore, even if a
transaction or financing occurs, the terms of the transaction or
financing may not be favorable to the Company and its
stockholders and could result in a decline in the stock price of
the Company.
If we
do complete a merger or other transaction you may not have basis
on which to assess the merits or risks of the acquired
business.
Since we have not yet identified a potential target or business
partner, investors have no current basis to evaluate the
possible merits or risks of the target or business
operations. Although we will endeavor to evaluate the risks
inherent in a particular target business, we can not assure you
that we will properly assess all of the significant risk
factors and accordingly, you may lose your investment in the
Company.
If the
Company is liquidated, the stockholders of the Company may not
receive cash proceeds equal to the current stock price or book
value of the Company.
If the Company is dissolved and liquidated, the creditors of the
Company will be paid prior to any distribution to the
stockholders. Furthermore, the Company expects to reserve a
significant portion of its cash to pay for future liabilities,
such as rental expenses, employment termination costs and other
contractual obligations and contingencies. As a result, the cash
remaining to be distributed to stockholders is expected to be
significantly less than the Companys current cash position
and could be less than the stock price or book value of the
Company.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of the results of
operations is based on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition and Consolidated Statements of Operations for BKF
Capital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries.
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2007 as Compared to Three Months
Ended June 2006
Revenues
Total revenues for the second quarter of 2007 were
$0.9 million, reflecting a decrease of 22.1% from
$1.2 million in revenues in the same period in 2006. This
decrease is attributable to the closing of the Companys
business. At June 2007, there were no assets under management, a
decline of $3.2 billion from a year earlier. The
16
long-only strategies which amounted to $3.2 billion of
assets under management during the second quarter of 2006 were
terminated and withdrawn during the third quarter of 2006.
The revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007 are a
result of interest earned on treasury bills and money market
funds and trailer fees from departed portfolio managers, in
addition to the collection of previously unbilled aged advisory
fees.
Expenses
Total expenses for the second quarter of 2007 were approximately
$3.5 million, reflecting a decrease of 84.1% from
$21.8 million in expenses in the same period in 2006.
Employee compensation and benefit expense (including grants of
equity awards) was $0.39 million in the second quarter of
2007, reflecting a decrease of 93.4% from $5.9 million in
the second quarter of 2006. These results primarily reflect the
reduction of personnel relating to the loss of the business.
Occupancy and equipment rental was $0.3 million in the
second quarter of 2007, reflecting a 82.2% decrease from
$1.7 million in the same period in 2006, primarily as the
result of subleasing of excess office space.
Restructuring costs of $0.62 million included primarily
severance costs and losses incurred to settle a long term
telecommunication lease.
Other operating expenses were $1.96 million in the second
quarter of 2007, reflecting a 15.7% increase from
$1.69 million in the same period in 2006 due primarily to
increases in the cost of amortization on insurance policies.
Operating
Loss
Operating loss for the second quarter of 2007 was
$2.58 million, as compared to operating loss of
$20.65 million in the same period in 2006.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007 as Compared to Six Months Ended
June 2006
Revenues
Total revenues for the first half of 2007 were
$1.7 million, reflecting a decrease of 91.7% from
$21.0 million in revenues in the same period in 2006. This
decrease is attributable to the closing of the Companys
business. During the 2007, there were no assets under
management, a decline of approximately $4.0 billion from a
year earlier due the fact that in April 2006, BKF announced that
two of its alternative investment strategies totaling
approximately $0.8 billion at March 31, 2006 would be
wound up as the result of the departures of the senior portfolio
managers for the strategies. Portfolios following these
strategies were liquidated in April 2006 and the proceeds are
being returned to investors. In addition, the long-only
strategies which amounted to $3.2 billion of assets under
management were terminated and withdrawn during the third
quarter of 2006.
The revenues for the six months ended June 2007 are a result of
interest earned on treasury bills and money market funds and
trailer fees from departed portfolio managers, in addition to
the collection of some previously unbilled aged advisory fees.
Expenses
Total expenses for the first half of 2007 were
$6.4 million, reflecting a decrease of 85.5% from
$44.2 million in expenses in the same period in 2006.
Employee compensation and benefit expense (including grants of
equity awards) was $0.92 million in the first half of 2007,
reflecting a decrease of 95.9% from $22.5 million in the
first half of 2006. These results primarily reflect the
reduction of personnel relating to the loss of the business.
Occupancy and equipment rental was $0.54 million in the
first half of 2007, reflecting a 82.8% decrease from
$3.13 million in the same period in 2006, primarily as the
result of subleasing of excess office space.
17
Restructuring expenses of $1.13 million included primarily
severance costs and losses incurred to settle long term office
space and a long term telecommunication leases.
Other operating expenses were $3.49 million in the first
half of 2007, reflecting a 29% decrease from 4.92 million
in the same period in 2006. Despite severely reduced business
operational costs legal fees were high due to the employee
litigation and the amortization of insurance premiums increased
during 2007.
Operating
Loss
Operating loss for the first half of 2007 was $4.7 million,
as compared to operating loss of $23.2 million in the same
period in 2006.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
BKFs current assets as of June 30, 2007 consist
primarily of cash, short-term investments and receivables.
While BKF has historically met its cash and liquidity needs
through cash generated by operating activities, cash flow from
current activities will not be sufficient to fund operations in
the future. BKF will use a portion of its existing working
capital for such purposes.
At June 30, 2007, BKF had cash, cash equivalents and
U.S. Treasury bills of $25.1 million, compared to
$31.1 million at December 31, 2006. This decrease in
cash and cash equivalents reflects the loss of the operating
activities as described above and the resulting funding
shortfall.
OFF
BALANCE SHEET RISK
There has been no material change with respect to the off
balance sheet risk incurred by BKF Capital since
December 31, 2006.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Currently the Company has no assets under management and is not
subject to market risk.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of BKFs management, including the CEO and
CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
BKFs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on
that evaluation, BKFs management, including the CEO and
CFO, concluded that BKFs disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective as of the end of the period
covered by this report. The company had not, on June 30,
2007, when it closed its books, identified the appropriate
adjustments to reflect the adoption of FIN 48. The Company
remediated this issue by reflecting these adjustments prior to
the completion and filing of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10Q. Additionally BKF intends to remediate this
weakness by increasing the knowledge of its employees
responsible for reviewing changes in accounting principles,
including enhanced background research and documentation related
to the accounting changes and increasing the involvement of
third-party advisors in the determination of the appropriate
accounting treatment. There have been no changes in BKFs
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that
occurred during BKFs most recent quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, BKFs internal control over financial reporting.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met.
In addition, the design of any control system is based in part
upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.
Because of these and other inherent limitations of control
systems, there is only reasonable assurance that BKFs
controls will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all
potential future conditions.
18
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The Company was a defendant in a lawsuit filed in The United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York
(Court) by a former employee. On June 22, 2007, the case
was dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement between the
parties under which Eckenberger, as plaintiff, released all
claims against the Company.
The Company was sued in a putative class action securities fraud
case during the second quarter. Also named as defendants are
John A. Levin and Glenn Aigen, former senior executives of the
Company. The named plaintiffs are seeking to certify a class on
behalf of purchasers of the Companys common stock between
May 10, 2004 and October 18, 2005. The complaint
alleges a violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
against all defendants and a claim for violation of Section
20(a) of the Exchange Act against Levin and Aigen by virtue of
their positions with the Company. To date, the Company has not
answered or otherwise responded to the Complaint. There is a
stipulation in effect between the parties providing that no
answer or motion to dismiss the Complaint will be due until 60
days after the later of (1) the appointment of Lead
Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiffs counsel or (2) the
filing of an Amended/Superseding Complaint. The Company intends
to vigorously defend itself against the action.
See Part I. Financial Information. Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Risk Factors and Recent
Events. These risk factors reflect adverse material
developments that have taken place since the filing of the
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains certain statements that are not historical facts,
including, most importantly, information concerning possible or
assumed future results of operations of BKF and statements
preceded by, followed by or that include the words
may, believes, expects,
anticipates, or the negation thereof, or similar
expressions, which constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. For those
statements, BKF claims the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. These
forward-looking statements are based on BKFs current
expectations and are susceptible to a number of risks,
uncertainties and other factors, including the risks
specifically enumerated in Item 2. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and BKFs actual results, performance and
achievements may differ materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such factors include the following:
changes in business strategy; retention and ability of qualified
personnel; the performance of the securities markets and of
value stocks in particular; the investment performance of client
accounts; the retention of significant client
and/or
distribution relationships; competition; the existence or
absence of adverse publicity; quality of management;
availability, terms and deployment of capital; business
abilities and judgment of personnel; labor and employee benefit
costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government
regulations; the costs and other effects of legal and
administrative proceedings; and other risks and uncertainties
referred to in this document and in BKFs other current and
periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately
and many of which are beyond BKFs control. BKF will not
undertake and specifically declines any obligation to
19
publicly release the result of any revisions, which may be made
to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect
the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. In
addition, it is BKFs policy generally not to make any
specific projections as to future earnings, and BKF does not
endorse any projections regarding future performance that may be
made by third parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Chief Financial Officer
|
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BKF Capital Group, Inc.
Harvey J. Bazaar
Chief Executive Officer
and President
J. Clarke Gray
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 10, 2007
21