e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-31828
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
06-1694835
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
101 California Street, Suite 1350, San Francisco, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
94111
(Zip Code) |
(415) 217-4500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ
No o.
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non- accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o. No þ.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 24, 2007 was 43,172,839.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains or incorporates by reference certain forward-looking statements under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements convey our
current expectations or forecasts of future events. All statements contained in this Form 10-Q
other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Words such as
anticipates, estimates, expects, projects, intends, plans, believes and words and
terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial
performance identify forward-looking statements.
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be made directly in this
Form 10-Q and they may also be incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q to other documents we
file with the SEC. We base our forward-looking statements upon the current beliefs and
expectations of our management and they are inherently subject to significant business, economic
and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are difficult to predict and
generally beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to
assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.
Actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results discussed in these
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among other things,
statements about:
|
|
|
our ability to meet margin calls on our repurchase agreement financing that may be
required due to further declines in the value of the mortgage-backed securities
collateralizing the agreements; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain or renew sufficient funding to maintain our leverage strategies
and support our liquidity position; |
|
|
|
|
the continued creditworthiness of the holders of mortgages underlying our
mortgage-related assets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to purchase sufficient mortgages for our securitization business; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of the flattening of, or other changes in, the yield curve on our investment
strategies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment rates; |
|
|
|
|
the possible effect of negative amortization of mortgages on our financial condition
and REIT qualification; |
|
|
|
|
the possible impact of our failure to regain or maintain exemptions under the 1940 Act; |
|
|
|
|
potential impacts of our leveraging policies on our net income and cash available for
distribution; |
|
|
|
|
the power of our board of directors to change our operating policies and strategies
without stockholder approval; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of interest rate caps and or proposed federal legislation on our
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities; |
|
|
|
|
the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate
volatility; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to invest up to 10% of our investment portfolio in residuals, leveraged
mortgage derivative securities and shares of other REITs as well as other investments; |
|
|
|
|
our current inability to make cash distributions to our stockholders because of our
liquidity concerns; and |
|
|
|
|
the other factors described in this Form 10-Q, including those under the captions
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Risk Factors and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date of this Form 10-Q or the date of any document incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-Q. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any
person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable law or
regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events
or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
ii
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,285 |
|
|
$ |
5,902 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
8,396 |
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net of allowance for loan losses of $21,282 at
September 30, 2007
and $5,020 at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,369,019 |
|
|
|
5,591,717 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,556 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities pledged as collateral, at fair value |
|
|
907,005 |
|
|
|
2,789,382 |
|
Debt securities, at fair value |
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, at fair value |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
24,023 |
|
|
|
36,736 |
|
Principal receivable |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Derivatives, at fair value |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
13,021 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
52,318 |
|
|
|
25,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,372,437 |
|
|
$ |
8,613,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed notes |
|
$ |
4,030,643 |
|
|
$ |
3,917,677 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
792,231 |
|
|
|
2,707,915 |
|
Warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
752,777 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
637,677 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
294,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
92,788 |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, at fair value |
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
|
43,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions payable |
|
|
13,857 |
|
|
|
14,343 |
|
Accrued interest expense |
|
|
14,231 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
Warrant liability, at fair value |
|
|
68,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
19,854 |
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,462,922 |
|
|
|
8,142,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000 shares authorized; 43,172,839 and 47,808,510 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
548,459 |
|
|
|
583,492 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
(641,547 |
) |
|
|
(115,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(90,485 |
) |
|
|
471,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
5,372,437 |
|
|
$ |
8,613,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
2
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan and securitization portfolio |
|
$ |
86,869 |
|
|
$ |
65,658 |
|
|
$ |
281,527 |
|
|
$ |
133,667 |
|
Spread portfolio |
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
18,947 |
|
|
|
84,001 |
|
|
|
69,757 |
|
Credit sensitive bond portfolio |
|
|
25,268 |
|
|
|
10,493 |
|
|
|
60,495 |
|
|
|
28,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
133,987 |
|
|
|
95,098 |
|
|
|
426,023 |
|
|
|
231,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
112,392 |
|
|
|
73,149 |
|
|
|
349,819 |
|
|
|
172,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
21,595 |
|
|
|
21,949 |
|
|
|
76,204 |
|
|
|
58,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
(11,689 |
) |
|
|
42,406 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
Gains (losses) on sales of mortgage-backed securities, net |
|
|
(137,959 |
) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(153,409 |
) |
|
|
990 |
|
Losses on sales of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(46,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(268,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287,622 |
) |
|
|
(2,179 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities, trading change in fair value |
|
|
(18,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Warrants, change in fair value |
|
|
(46,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expenses) |
|
|
(511,616 |
) |
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
(510,027 |
) |
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing expense |
|
|
5,389 |
|
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,247 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
8,363 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
14,998 |
|
|
|
7,375 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
Management compensation expense to related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,712 |
|
Other general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
28,860 |
|
|
|
16,617 |
|
|
|
61,914 |
|
|
|
31,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(518,881 |
) |
|
|
(6,190 |
) |
|
|
(495,737 |
) |
|
|
29,805 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(520,636 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,595 |
) |
|
$ |
(497,446 |
) |
|
$ |
28,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
(12.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
(12.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
42,790,740 |
|
|
|
38,695,800 |
|
|
|
44,943,803 |
|
|
|
38,937,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
42,790,740 |
|
|
|
38,695,800 |
|
|
|
44,943,803 |
|
|
|
39,066,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
in Excess of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
47,809 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
583,492 |
|
|
$ |
3,842 |
|
|
$ |
(115,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
471,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(497,446 |
) |
|
|
(497,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale,
fair value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of derivative
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(498,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases and retirement of
common stock |
|
|
(4,905 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(41,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance and amortization of
restricted common stock |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
43,173 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
548,459 |
|
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
|
$ |
(641,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(90,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(497,446 |
) |
|
$ |
28,748 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium/(discount) on loans held-for-investment and mortgage-backed securities
and depreciation |
|
|
20,652 |
|
|
|
(941 |
) |
Impairment losses on securities |
|
|
287,622 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
Realized loss on real estate owned |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Negative amortization of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(86,531 |
) |
|
|
(35,004 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
(3,459 |
) |
Net losses on mortgage backed securities held as trading |
|
|
18,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in the fair value of warrants |
|
|
46,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (gain) losses on sales of mortgage-backed-securities available-for-sale |
|
|
153,409 |
|
|
|
(990 |
) |
Net losses on the sales of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
46,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable, net of purchased interest |
|
|
(16,048 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
2,452 |
|
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
12,304 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest expense |
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
(13,183 |
) |
Increase in management compensation payable, incentive compensation payable and other
related-party payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
22,740 |
|
|
|
(12,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(821,436 |
) |
|
|
(1,849,595 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,863,969 |
|
|
|
3,750,554 |
|
Principal payments of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
376,188 |
|
|
|
364,781 |
|
Purchases of loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
(1,679,991 |
) |
|
|
(3,949,480 |
) |
Principal payments of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
1,295,362 |
|
|
|
272,476 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
957,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of derivative instruments |
|
|
(32,979 |
) |
|
|
(2,792 |
) |
Proceeds from derivative instruments |
|
|
40,184 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
Purchase of debt securities |
|
|
(1,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net change in restricted cash |
|
|
(8,437 |
) |
|
|
671 |
|
Other |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
1,988,610 |
|
|
|
(1,409,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,747 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(41,295 |
) |
|
|
(15,832 |
) |
Capitalized financing costs |
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under repurchase agreements |
|
|
31,313,807 |
|
|
|
27,681,403 |
|
Principal payments on repurchase agreements |
|
|
(33,021,207 |
) |
|
|
(29,080,973 |
) |
Borrowings under warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
2,069,957 |
|
|
|
3,806,251 |
|
Paydown of warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
(2,822,551 |
) |
|
|
(3,806,251 |
) |
Borrowings under commercial paper facility |
|
|
3,849,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paydown of commercial paper facility |
|
|
(4,487,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders |
|
|
(28,760 |
) |
|
|
(11,014 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
1,763,061 |
|
|
|
3,062,397 |
|
Principal payments on mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
(1,025,663 |
) |
|
|
(214,187 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
291,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on margin debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,548 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving line of credit |
|
|
43,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(2,008,967 |
) |
|
|
1,429,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
$ |
8,285 |
|
|
$ |
18,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
365,523 |
|
|
$ |
186,786 |
|
Taxes paid |
|
|
4,665 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants |
|
$ |
22,343 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Transfer of loans held-for-investment to real estate owned |
|
|
22,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(18,982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of repurchase agreements |
|
|
18,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale through collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
(3,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in principal receivable |
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
12,478 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash distributions payable to stockholders |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
11,006 |
|
Principal payments of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paydown of warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in unsettled security purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
6
LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1OVERVIEW
Luminent Mortgage Capital Inc., or the Company, was organized as a Maryland corporation on
April 25, 2003. The Company commenced operations on June 11, 2003. The Companys common stock began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the trading symbol LUM on December 19, 2003.
The Company is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, which, together with its subsidiaries,
invests in two core mortgage investment strategies. Under its Residential Mortgage Credit strategy,
the Company invests in mortgage loans purchased from selected high-quality providers within certain
established criteria as well as subordinated mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed
securities that have credit ratings below AAA. Under its Spread strategy, the Company invests
primarily in U.S. agency and other highly-rated single-family, adjustable-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. The Company also generates fee income by managing
portfolios of mortgage-backed securities for other institutions.
The information furnished in these unaudited condensed consolidated interim statements
reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of
the results for the periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless
otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the interim periods do not
necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year. The interim financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006.
Business Conditions and Going Concern
The Companys consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course
of business for the foreseeable future. As the Company announced on August 6, 2007, the mortgage
industry and the financing methods the industry has historically relied upon deteriorated
significantly and in an unprecedented fashion. Effectively, the secondary market for
mortgage-backed securities seized-up, and as a result, the Company simultaneously experienced a
significant increase in margin calls from its repurchase agreement counterparties, or repurchase
agreement lenders, and a decrease in the amount of financing its lenders would provide on a given
amount of collateral. Prices for even the highest quality AAA-rated bonds dropped precipitously.
These events resulted in a rapid and significant loss of liquidity over a short period of time and
caused substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern for a
reasonable period of time.
The Company has implemented a financial strategy to restore investor confidence and will
continue its initiatives in this regard. The Company has taken the following steps that are
intended to assure its customers and investors, that it can fulfill its commitments in the ordinary
course of business:
On September 26, 2007, the Company entered into a definitive credit agreement with Arco
Capital Corporation Ltd., or Arco, that provides for a revolving credit facility in the amount of
the lesser of up to $60.0 million or 85% of eligible asset values as defined in the agreement.
Interest on the outstanding balance is set at one-month LIBOR plus a margin of between 4.00% and
4.50%, depending on the amount outstanding. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had $43.3 million
outstanding on this line of credit. Arco also arranged for repurchase agreement financing, at an
interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 4.00%. The Company had $74.0 million outstanding
on this repurchase agreement facility as of September 30, 2007. See Note 5 for further information
on the terms of these credit facilities.
On December 7, 2007, the Company entered into another amendment to its amended and restated
credit agreement with Arco in order to provide for increases in repurchase agreement financings
from a subsidiary of Arco. The amendment to the credit agreement increased to $190.0 million the
cap on total outstanding amounts of such
7
purchase agreements and credit agreement borrowings. See Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information on the amended agreement.
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, progress in the stabilization of the Companys lending facilities
includes the following achievements.
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has completed the sale of approximately $1.9 billion of mortgage-backed
securities to repay lenders and meet required margin calls. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has completed the sale or refinancing of assets financed by its asset-backed
commercial program, and it no longer has any outstanding commercial paper liabilities under
the asset-backed commercial paper program. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has sold approximately $1.0 billion of loans and has repaid all of its
warehouse lines of credit that were used to finance whole loan purchases. One warehouse line
for $1.0 billion was terminated prior to September 30, 2007, one warehouse line for $500.0
million expired in October 2007, and no balances are currently outstanding on the remaining
warehouse line totaling $1.0 billion. See Note 5 for additional information on the warehouse
facilities. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has stabilized approximately $781.5 million of repurchase agreement financing
with six repurchase agreement lenders by meeting all required margin calls. |
|
|
|
|
The Company is working with an additional repurchase
agreement lender, HSBC, to resolve a dispute on
the fair value of the underlying collateral for that agreement to settle an additional $32.2
million of repurchase agreement financing. |
The Company has taken additional measures to improve its liquidity position that include the
implementation of operating expense reductions including a personnel reduction, the closure of its
San Francisco, CA corporate office on December 31, 2007 and the establishment of its corporate
headquarters in Philadelphia, PA, where the majority of its workforce is currently located.
The Company is currently focused on maintaining the progress made to date in stabilizing its
investment portfolio in the short-term, and then returning to profitability. These efforts are
likely to include additional sales of securities in order to provide additional liquidity and
exploring long-term financing alternatives to replace existing short-term financing. In addition,
the Company is considering alternatives for the resolution of its issues related to its status as a
REIT. See Note 11 for further information on issues concerning the Companys REIT status. There
can be no assurance that further market disruption will not occur or that the Company will be able
to successfully execute its business or liquidity plans discussed herein.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements to the Companys 2006 Form 10-K describes the
Companys significant accounting policies. There have been no significant changes to these policies
during 2007 with the exception of the required adoption of SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain
Hybrid Financial Instruments an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and 140. See the description
of recent accounting pronouncements below.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, issued
Statement of Position, or SOP, 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide
Investment Companies and Accounting for Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for
Investments in Investment Companies. This SOP provides guidance for determining whether an entity
is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies, or the Guide.
Entities that are within the scope of the Guide are required, among other things, to carry their
investments at fair value, with changes in fair value included in earnings. In November 2007, the
AICPA issued a proposed SOP 07-1a. This proposed SOP if implemented would delay indefinitely the
implementation of SOP 07-1 until implementation issues or modifications to SOP
8
07-1 can be
considered. The SOP 07-1a is expected to become effective in January 2008 for financials statements
beginning in years after December 15, 2007.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This Statement allows entities to make an election to record financial
assets and liabilities, with limited exceptions, at fair value on the balance sheet, with changes
in fair value recorded in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company elected not to adopt the Statement early as permitted and is still
evaluating the impact of this Statement on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement
defines fair value in GAAP and expands requirements for disclosure about fair value estimates. SFAS
157 does not require any new fair value measurements. The Company is required to adopt SFAS 157 for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The statement will
have no material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements other than the
requirement to include expanded disclosure.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155. This Statement provides entities with relief
from having to separately determine the fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise
be required to be bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The Statement allows an entity to make an
irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety,
with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Once the fair value election has been made, that
hybrid financial instrument may not be designated as a hedging instrument pursuant to SFAS No. 133.
The Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a
remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins
after September 15, 2006. In January 2007, the FASB released Statement 133 Implementation Issue
No. B40, Embedded Derivatives: Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in
Prepayable Financial Assets (B40). B40 provides a narrow scope exception for certain securitized
interests from the tests required under SFAS No. 133. The Company reviewed all securities that were
purchased subsequent to January 1, 2007 and identified certain hybrid securities which require
bifurcation. The Company has elected to carry these securities at fair value as trading securities,
although these securities were not acquired for resale. The Company will recognize changes in the
fair value of these securities in other income.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 became effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Companys adoption of this interpretation did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3SECURITIES
The Company held $28.6 million of hybrid securities that are classified as trading. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized decreases in fair value of
$18.2 million in its consolidated statement of operations.
The Company had $3 thousand of unrealized gains and no unrealized losses on available-for-sale
securities at September 30, 2007. The following table summarizes the Companys unrealized gains and
losses on securities classified as available-for-sale, which are carried at fair value as of
December 31, 2006.
9
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities,
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
2,930,878 |
|
|
$ |
7,549 |
|
|
$ |
(7,489 |
) |
|
$ |
2,930,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, mortgage-backed securities had a weighted-average
amortized cost, excluding residual interests, of 75.7% and 99.0% of face amount, respectively.
The following table shows the Companys available-for-sale mortgage-backed securities fair
value and gross unrealized losses on temporarily impaired securities, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position at December 31, 2006. The Company had no unrealized losses on available-for-sale
securities at September 30, 2007.
Holding Period of Gross Unrealized Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
8,850 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,850 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
Non-agency-backed
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
971,034 |
|
|
|
(3,058 |
) |
|
|
138,210 |
|
|
|
(4,365 |
) |
|
|
1,109,244 |
|
|
|
(7,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
979,884 |
|
|
$ |
(3,124 |
) |
|
$ |
138,210 |
|
|
$ |
(4,365 |
) |
|
$ |
1,118,094 |
|
|
$ |
(7,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The temporary impairment of securities at December 31, 2006 resulted from the fair value of
the mortgage-backed securities falling below their amortized cost basis and was solely attributable
to changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2006, none of the securities held had been
downgraded by a credit rating agency since their purchase and the Company had the ability and
intent to hold these securities for a period of time that is sufficient to recover all unrealized
losses. As such, the Company does not believe any of these securities were other-than-temporarily
impaired at December 31, 2006.
The Company evaluates available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when conditions warrant such evaluation. Impairment losses of
$268.9 million and $287.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively, were primarily due to assumption changes on certain mortgage-backed securities for
increased loss expectations and increases in the discount rates used to calculate the fair value of
mortgage-backed securities on our Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio. As discussed in Note 1,
due to current business conditions, the Company cannot say with certainty that it has the ability
to hold these securities until recovery of the impairment loss and therefore has recorded the
impairment through its statement of operations.
Impairment losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were zero and $2.2
million, respectively, related to Spread securities that the Company did not intend to hold until
their maturity.
10
The Company accounts for certain of the mortgage-backed securities in its Residential Mortgage
Credit portfolio in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF 99-20, Recognition of
interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized
Financial Assets. Under EITF 99-20, the Company evaluates whether there is other-than-temporary
impairment by discounting projected cash flows using credit, prepayment and other assumptions
compared to prior period projections. If the discounted projected cash flows have decreased due to
a change in the credit, prepayment and other assumptions, then the mortgage-backed security must be
written down to fair value if the fair value is below the amortized cost basis. If there have
been no changes to the Companys assumptions and the change in value is solely due to interest rate
changes, the Company does not recognize an impairment of a mortgage-backed security in its
consolidated statements of operations. It is difficult to predict the timing or magnitude of these
other-than-temporary impairments and impairment losses could be substantial.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company had realized losses of $138.5
million and gains of $0.6 million on the sales of mortgage-backed securities. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, the Company had realized losses of $154.0 million and gains of
$0.6 million on the sales of mortgage-backed securities. The Company sold securities in the third
quarter of 2007 to repay repurchase agreement financing and in order to satisfy margin calls on the
financing of these securities. Securities sold prior to the third quarter of 2007 were selected for
sale due to their rising level of delinquencies in the underlying loan collateral which was noted
in the first quarter of 2007, as well as to reduce the Companys exposure to certain
mortgage-backed asset issuers. During the three months ended September 30, 2006, the Company had
realized gains of $0.3 million and realized losses of $1.0 million on the sale of mortgage-backed
securities and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company had realized gains of
$10.0 million and realized losses of $9.0 million on the sale of mortgage-backed securities. The
Company sold securities during the first nine months of 2006 in order to reposition the portfolio.
The weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities as of September 30, 2007 in the
table below are based upon data provided through subscription-based financial information services,
assuming constant prepayment rates to the balloon or reset date for each security. The prepayment
model considers current yield, forward yield, steepness of the yield curve, current mortgage rates,
mortgage rates of the outstanding loans, loan age, margin and volatility. Actual maturities of the
Companys mortgage-backed securities are affected by the contractual lives of the underlying
mortgages, periodic payments of principal and prepayments of principal, and are generally shorter
than their stated maturities.
Weighted-Average Life of Mortgage-Backed Securities
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted-Average Life |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Coupon |
|
Less than one year |
|
$ |
49,828 |
|
|
$ |
50,383 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
% |
Greater than one year and less than five years |
|
|
814,094 |
|
|
|
814,091 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
Greater than five years |
|
|
43,083 |
|
|
|
60,793 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
907,005 |
|
|
$ |
925,267 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NOTE 4LOANS HELD-FOR-INVESTMENT
The following table summarizes the Companys residential mortgage loans classified as
held-for-investment, which are carried at amortized cost, net of allowance for loan losses.
Components of Residential Mortgage Loans Held-for-Investment
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Principal |
|
$ |
4,287,143 |
|
|
$ |
5,472,325 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
103,158 |
|
|
|
124,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
4,390,301 |
|
|
|
5,596,737 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(21,282 |
) |
|
|
(5,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential
mortgage loans, net of
allowance for loan
losses |
|
$ |
4,369,019 |
|
|
$ |
5,591,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, residential mortgage loans had a weighted-average
amortized cost of 102.4% and 102.3% of face amount, respectively.
Geographic Concentrations of Loans Held-for-Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top five geographic concentrations (% exposure): |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
California |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Virginia |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Nevada |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
In the third quarter of 2007, the Company sold some of its interests in its securitization
trusts that were established to permanently finance its residential mortgage loans. These sales
triggered a reconsideration event in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities, or FIN 46. As a result, the Companys Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2
or 2007-2, securitization no longer qualified for consolidation in the Companys consolidated
financial statements. Residential mortgage loans in the amount of $636.7 million were removed from
the Companys balance sheet along with the related debt of $620.8 million. The Company recorded
$12.8 million in losses on the deconsolidation of this securitization. The Company continues to
hold mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $10.0 million at September 30, 2007 related to
the 2007-2 trust. These assets are included in the Companys mortgage-backed securities portfolio
as of September 30, 2007. All other securitizations other than the 2007-2 securitization continue
to qualify for consolidation as of September 30, 2007.
Allowance for Loan Losses
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
12,297 |
|
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
|
$ |
5,020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,247 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2,172 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
21,282 |
|
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
|
$ |
21,282 |
|
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses and
records a provision for loan losses based on this analysis for loans that are estimated to have
defaulted. At September 30, 2007
12
and December 31, 2006, $135.4 million and $33.9 million,
respectively, of residential mortgage loans were 90 days
or more past due all of which were on non-accrual status. Interest reversed for loans in
non-accrual status at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $4.7 million and $1.0 million,
respectively.
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had $20.3 million and $3.6 million of
real estate owned that is included in other assets on its consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE 5BORROWINGS
The Company leverages its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and loans
held-for-investment through the use of various financing arrangements. The following table presents
summarized information with respect to the Companys borrowings.
Borrowings
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Final Stated |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Collateral(4) |
|
|
Maturities (6) |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed notes (1) (2) |
|
$ |
4,014,145 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
$ |
3,992,911 |
|
|
|
2046 |
|
Repurchase agreements (3) |
|
|
813,681 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
954,046 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations (1) |
|
|
295,432 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
245,696 |
|
|
|
2047 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
2035 |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
8.38 |
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
2027 |
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
|
43,256 |
|
|
|
9.13 |
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,349,302 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
$ |
5,092,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed notes (1) (2) |
|
$ |
3,914,932 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
$ |
3,919,354 |
|
|
|
2046 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,707,915 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
2,909,895 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial paper facility |
|
|
639,871 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
643,823 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
752,777 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
794,420 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
2035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,108,283 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
$ |
8,267,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Outstanding balances for mortgage-backed notes exclude $16.5 million in unamortized premium at September 30, 2007 and $2.7 million at December 31, 2006,
$0.9 million for collateralized debt obligations at September 30, 2007 and zero and $2.2 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively, for commercial paper. The maturity of each class of securities is directly affected by the rate of principal repayments on the associated
residential mortgage loan collateral. As a result, the actual maturity of each series of mortgage-backed notes may be shorter than the stated maturity. |
|
(2) |
|
The carrying amount of loans pledged as collateral is $4.4 billion and $3.9 billion at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Outstanding balances for repurchase agreements include $21.5 million of unamortized debt discounts for the issuance of warrants in conjunction obtaining
certain repurchase agreement financing. |
|
(4) |
|
Collateral for borrowings consists of mortgage-backed securities and loans held-for-investment. |
|
(5) |
|
Borrowing has no stated maturity. |
|
(6) |
|
Mortgage-backed notes, repurchase agreements and collateralized debt obligations mature at various dates. The date above is the last maturity date for
each type of borrowing. |
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had unamortized capitalized financing
costs of $18.9 million and $15.9 million, respectively, related to the Companys borrowings, which
were deferred at the issuance date of the related borrowing and are being amortized using the
effective yield method over the estimated life of the borrowing.
Mortgage-backed notes
The Company has issued non-recourse mortgage-backed notes to provide permanent financing for
its loans held-for-investment. The mortgage-backed notes are issued through securitization trusts
which are comprised of various classes of securities that bear interest at various spreads to the
one-month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. The borrowing rates of the mortgage-backed notes
reset monthly except for $0.2 billion of the notes which, like the underlying loan collateral, are
fixed for a period of three to five years and then become variable based on the
13
average rates of
the underlying loans which will adjust based on LIBOR. Loans held-for-investment collateralize the
mortgage-backed notes. On a consolidated basis, the securitizations are accounted for as financings
in accordance with SFAS No. 140 and qualify for consolidation with the Companys balance sheet in
accordance with FIN 46,
therefore the assets and liabilities of the securitization entities are consolidated on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. See Note 4 for information on the deconsolidation of the
Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2.
Repurchase Agreements
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements with seven third-party financial
institutions to finance the purchase of certain of its mortgage-backed securities. The repurchase
agreements are short-term borrowings that bear interest rates that have historically moved in close
relationship to the three-month LIBOR.
Repurchase Agreement Maturities
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Overnight 1 day or less |
|
$ |
252,235 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Between 2 and 30 days |
|
|
389,037 |
|
|
|
2,070,939 |
|
Between 31 and 90 days |
|
|
172,409 |
|
|
|
201,976 |
|
Between 91 and 636 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
813,681 |
|
|
$ |
2,707,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2007, the Company entered into repurchase agreement financing that was arranged by
Arco. In exchange for the repurchase agreement financing, the Company issued warrants that are
accounted for as a debt discount that will be amortized over the life of the related financing.
The Companys repurchase agreement financing at September 30, 2007 included $74.0 million of
financing provided by Arco with unamortized debt discount of $21.5 million. See Note 14 for
additional information on the Arco financing.
Warehouse Lending Facilities
Mortgage Loan Financing. The Company maintains warehouse lending facilities that are
structured as repurchase agreements. These facilities are the Companys primary source of funding
for acquiring mortgage loans. These warehouse lending facilities are short-term borrowings that
are secured by the loans and bear interest based on LIBOR. In general, the warehouse lending
facilities provide financing for loans for a maximum of 120 days. Proceeds from the issuance of
mortgage-backed notes are used to pay down the outstanding balance of warehouse lending facilities.
Asset-backed Securities Financing. The Company maintained a warehouse lending facility with
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. that was used to purchase mortgage-backed securities
rated below AAA until the Company financed the securities permanently through collateralized debt
obligations, or CDOs. This short-term warehouse lending facility was secured by asset-backed
securities, bearing interest based on LIBOR. The facility was terminated in March 2007 concurrently
with the permanent financing of the asset-backed securities by the CDOs.
14
Warehouse Lending Facilities
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007 |
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Borrowing |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Borrowing |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Average |
|
Counterparty |
|
Capacity |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Mortgage loan financing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
455.2 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
Barclays Bank plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000.0 |
|
|
|
290.1 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
Bear Stearns Mortgage Capital Corp. |
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
Asset-backed securities financing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,500.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
752.8 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007, the Company was not in compliance with certain debt covenants related
to its warehouse lending facilities. There were no borrowings on these facilities and the Company
currently has no intentions to use the facilities. The Bear Stearns Mortgage Capital Corp facility
expired on October 7, 2007.
Commercial Paper Facility
In August 2006, the Company established a $1.0 billion commercial paper facility, Luminent
Star Funding I, to fund its mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Luminent Star Funding I was a
single-seller commercial paper program that provided a financing alternative to repurchase
agreement financing. It issued asset-backed secured liquidity notes that were rated by Standard &
Poors and Moodys. In August 2007, the commercial paper counterparty did not renew the Companys
commercial paper funding. The Company has liquidated all assets financed with commercial paper and,
as of September 30, 2007, the facility was closed.
Collateralized Debt Obligations
In March 2007, the Company issued $400.0 million of collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs,
from Charles Fort CDO I, Ltd., a qualified REIT subsidiary of the Company. The CDOs are
floating-rate pass-through non-recourse certificates that were initially collateralized at closing
by $289.1 million of the Companys mortgage-backed securities and $59.1 million of mortgage-backed
securities that the Company retained from prior whole loan securitizations as well as an uninvested
cash balance that was used to purchase additional securities subsequent to the CDO closing. As of
September 30, 2007, third-party investors held $294.5 million of certificates net of unamortized
debt discounts and the Company retained $103.8 million of certificates including $27.0 million of
subordinated certificates, which provide credit support to the certificates issued to third-party
investors. The interest rates on the certificates reset quarterly and are indexed to three-month
LIBOR. The Company accounted for this securitization transaction as a financing of the
mortgage-backed securities in accordance with SFAS No. 140 and therefore the assets and liabilities
of the securitization entities are included on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
As of September 30, 2007, certain securities with a fair value of $10.9 million that
collateralize the CDO were deemed to be in default by way of ratings downgrades. These securities
have to date continued to make principal and interest payments as required by their individual
structures. Because these securities are deemed to be in default the principal payment structure of
the CDO has converted from a pro-rata principal payment structure to a sequential principal payment
structure where principal payments are paid to the highest rated bonds first and then will be made
sequentially to each class of bond from highest to lowest. In addition, all interest payments
collected by the trust on the securities that are deemed to be in default are made as principal
payments on a sequential pay basis.
Junior Subordinated Notes
Junior subordinated notes consist of 30-year notes issued in March and December 2005 to Diana
Statutory Trust I, or DST I, and Diana Statutory Trust II, or DST II, respectively, unconsolidated
affiliates of the Company
15
formed to issue $2.8 million of the trusts common securities to the
Company and to place $90.0 million of preferred
securities privately with unrelated third-party investors. The Company pays interest to the
trusts quarterly. In August 2007, the Company became contractually prohibited from making payments
of interest because of defaults on its senior securities. These defaults were subsequently cured
and all interest due on the junior subordinated notes was paid in October 2007. The trusts remit
dividends pro rata to the common and preferred trust securities based on the same terms as the
junior subordinated notes.
The DST I notes in the amount of $51.6 million bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.16% per
annum through March 30, 2010 and, thereafter, at a variable rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus
3.75% per annum through maturity. The DST I notes and trust securities mature in March 2035 and are
redeemable on any interest payment date at the option of the Company in whole, but not in part, on
or after March 30, 2010 at the redemption rate of 100% plus accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to
March 30, 2010, upon the occurrence of a special event relating to certain federal income tax or
investment Company events, the Company may redeem the DST I notes in whole, but not in part, at the
redemption rate of 107.5% plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The DST II notes in the amount of $41.2 million bear interest at a variable rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum through maturity. The DST II notes and trust securities
mature in December 2035, the Company may redeem the DST I notes at any interest payment date in
whole, but not in part, at the redemption rate of 100% plus accrued and unpaid interest.
16
Convertible Senior Notes
In June 2007, the Company completed a private offering of $90.0 million of convertible senior
notes that are due in 2027, or the Notes, with a coupon of 8.125%.
Prior to June 1, 2026, upon the occurrence of specified events, the Notes are convertible at
the option of the holder at an initial conversion rate of 89.4114 shares of the Companys common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes. The initial conversion price of $11.18 represented a
22.5% premium to the closing price of $9.13 per share of the Companys common stock on May 30,
2007. On or after June 1, 2026, the Notes are convertible at any time prior to maturity at the
option of the holder. Upon conversion of Notes by a holder, the holder will receive cash up to the
principal amount of such Notes and, with respect to the remainder, if any, of the conversion value
in excess of such principal amount, at the option of the Company in cash or in shares of the
Companys common stock. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances.
Prior to June 5, 2012, the Notes are not redeemable at the Companys option, except to
preserve the Companys status as a REIT. On or after June 5, 2012, the Company may redeem all or a
portion of the Notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid
interest, including additional interest, if any.
Note holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes at a purchase
price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional
interest), if any, on the Notes on June 1, 2012, June 1, 2017, June 1, 2022 or upon the occurrence
of certain change in control transactions prior to June 5, 2012.
In August 2007, due to cross defaults on certain of the Companys repurchase agreement
financing arrangements, the Company had an event of default on the Notes which made them
immediately due and payable. Subsequent to September 30, 2007, the Company was informed by the
trustee of the Notes that the Company had remedied the conditions that gave rise to the event of
default under the agreement.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company is paying a 0.25% interest rate penalty on the Notes due
to its inability to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to
register the securities associated with the convertible debt as required by the agreement. The
Company intends to register the securities when it becomes current on its quarterly reporting
requirement.
Revolving Line of Credit
On September 26, 2007, the Company entered into a definitive credit agreement with Arco that
provides for a revolving credit facility in the amount of the lesser of $60.0 million or 85% of
eligible asset values as defined in the definitive credit agreement. The line of credit matures on
September 26, 2012 and undrawn portions of the facility can be cancelled at the Companys option.
The line of credit bears interest at LIBOR plus 4.00% to 4.50% depending on the outstanding
balance. A commitment fee of 0.50% is payable quarterly on the daily average amount of the unused
line of credit. The facility will be repaid from net proceeds in excess $250,000 from the sale,
transfer or disposition of any property or asset of the Company or from 75% of the Companys annual
excess cash amount as defined in the agreement. The line of credit is secured by all of the assets
of the Company that are not subject to a previous security interest. As of September 30, 2007, the
Company was not in compliance with certain covenants required by this agreement; however, Arco has
continued to allow the Company to draw on the lines of credit and has increased the amount of
financing available to the Company. See Note 14 for additional information on the Arco credit
facility.
NOTE 6CAPITAL STOCK AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Companys charter authorized the issuance of
100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had
43,172,839 and 47,808,510 outstanding shares of common stock, respectively, and no outstanding
shares of preferred stock.
17
Beginning on August 14, 2007, the Company entered into a series of agreements with Arco that
provided it with repurchase agreement financing and a liquidity line of credit. In exchange for the
repurchase agreement financing Arco received warrants to purchase up to 51,000,000 shares of the
Companys common stock representing 49% of the voting interest in the Company and 51% of the
economic interest in the Company on a fully diluted basis. The warrant holders have the right to
elect to receive nonvoting shares for any warrant exercised. The warrants are exercisable until
September 30, 2012 at an exercise price of $0.18 per share subject to anti-dilution adjustments to
maintain the economic ownership percentage of the Company attributable to the warrants at 51% on a
fully-diluted basis. In addition, one of the agreements required that the Companys board of
directors include four directors whom must be satisfactory to Arco. The value of the warrants was
recorded as a liability on the Companys balance sheet with an offsetting balance as a debt
discount. The debt discount will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the
related debt. Changes in fair value of the warrants are recorded as a component of other income.
The initial value of the warrants of $22.3 million was recorded as a liability with an
offsetting amount recorded as debt discount on the related repurchase agreement financing. The debt
discount will be amortized as additional interest expense over the weighted-average life of the
repurchase agreement financing. The remaining weighted-average life of the repurchase agreement
financing at September 30, 2007 was approximately 2.9 years. The change in fair value of the
warrants between the issuance date and September 30, 2007 of $46.6 million was also recorded as a
liability and was recorded as expense in consolidated statement of operations for the period ended
September 30, 2007.
The Company estimates the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Sholes Pricing Model.
Values ascribed to the warrants as of the issuance date of August 14, 2007 and the balance sheet
date of September 30, 2007 was as follows:
Warrants Pricing Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 14, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
4.23 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
Expected volatility (1) |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Dividend yield (2) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys stock price volatility increased dramatically subsequent to
July 31, 2007 due to unprecedented events in the mortgage industry and the
Companys liquidity concerns. That level of volatility is not considered to be
indicative of volatility over the life of the warrants and therefore, expected
volatility was calculated based on the Companys stock price prior to July 31,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has suspended the payment of its second quarter dividend and is
not expecting to declare a dividend over the life of the warrants; therefore
the dividend yield is estimated to be zero. |
On November 7, 2005, the Company announced a share repurchase program to repurchase up to
2,000,000 shares of its common stock at prevailing prices through open market transactions subject
to the provisions of SEC Rule 10b-18 and in privately negotiated transactions. On February 9,
2006, the Company announced an additional share repurchase program for an incremental 3,000,000
shares. On May 7, 2007, the Company announced an additional share repurchase program to acquire up
to an additional 5,000,000 shares of common stock. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
the Company repurchased 4,904,765 shares at a weighted-average price per share of $8.39, including
1,986,000 shares purchased from $18.1 million of the proceeds from the offering of the Notes in
June 2007. The Company has repurchased 7,629,215 shares since the inception of the share repurchase
program and has the remaining authority to acquire up to 2,370,785 more common shares. Currently,
due to the Companys liquidity concerns, the Company has no plans to repurchase shares of its
common stock on the open market.
18
The Company calculates basic net income or loss per share by dividing net income or loss for
the period by the weighted-average shares of its common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted
net income per share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as stock options
and unvested restricted common stock and convertible notes, but uses the average share price for
the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are to be added to the
weighted-average number of shares outstanding. Stock options and unvested restricted common stock
instruments are not taken into account in the case of a net loss as they would be anti-dilutive.
Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
Net income (loss) (in thousands) |
|
$ |
(520,636 |
) |
|
$ |
(520,636 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,595 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding |
|
|
42,790,740 |
|
|
|
42,790,740 |
|
|
|
38,695,800 |
|
|
|
38,695,800 |
|
Additional shares due to
assumed conversion of dilutive
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
42,790,740 |
|
|
|
42,790,740 |
|
|
|
38,695,800 |
|
|
|
38,695,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(12.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
Net income (loss) (in thousands) |
|
$ |
(497,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(497,446 |
) |
|
$ |
28,748 |
|
|
$ |
28,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding |
|
|
44,943,803 |
|
|
|
44,943,803 |
|
|
|
38,937,454 |
|
|
|
38,937,454 |
|
Additional shares due to
assumed conversion of dilutive
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
44,943,803 |
|
|
|
44,943,803 |
|
|
|
38,937,454 |
|
|
|
39,066,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(11.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has 55,000 shares in stock options and 8,047,026 shares in instruments related to
convertible debt which are not included in the above calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect.
In addition, the Company has warrants outstanding to redeem 51,000,000 shares related to its
financing agreements with Arco that are unexercised and anti-dilutive at September 30, 2007.
NOTE 72003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Effective June 4, 2003, the Company adopted a 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and a 2003 Outside
Advisors Stock Incentive Plan. The plans provide for the grant of a variety of long-term incentive
awards to employees and officers of the Company or individual consultants or advisors who render or
have rendered bona fide services as an additional means to attract, motivate, retain and reward
eligible persons. These plans as amended authorize the award of up to 2,000,000 shares of the
Companys common stock at the discretion of the compensation committee of the board of directors of
which 1,850,000 shares comprise the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and 150,000 shares comprise the 2003
Outside Advisors Stock Incentive Plan. The compensation committee determines the exercise price and
the vesting requirement of each grant as well as the maximum term of each grant. The Company uses
19
historical data to estimate stock option exercises and employee termination in its calculations of
stock-based employee compensation expense and expected terms.
Common Stock Available for Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Outside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Stock |
|
|
Advisors Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Total |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares reserved for issuance |
|
|
1,850,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
(1,029,500 |
) |
|
|
(20,760 |
) |
|
|
(1,050,260 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for grant |
|
|
820,500 |
|
|
|
129,240 |
|
|
|
949,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding (shares) |
|
|
55,000 |
|
Weighted-average exercise price |
|
$ |
14.82 |
|
Weighted-average remaining life (years) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
At September 30, 2007, all outstanding stock options were fully vested and had no aggregate
intrinsic value. No stock options were granted, exercised or forfeited during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007.
Common Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Issue Price |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
721,329 |
|
|
$ |
9.13 |
|
Issued |
|
|
269,094 |
|
|
|
9.32 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
990,423 |
|
|
$ |
9.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested Common Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Common |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
555,923 |
|
|
$ |
9.20 |
|
Granted |
|
|
269,094 |
|
|
|
9.32 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(804,257 |
) |
|
|
9.25 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
20,760 |
|
|
$ |
8.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of common stock awards is determined on the grant date using the closing stock
price on the NYSE that day.
The Company had issued common stock awards to certain employees. These awards normally vest
over a period of time but are subject to provisions that accelerate the vesting. The financing
agreement with Arco described in Note 5 represented a change in control as defined in certain of
the stock award agreements and, therefore, certain unvested awards vested on August 30, 2007. Total
stock-based employee compensation expense related to common stock awards for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was $4.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively. Expense related to
the awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $0.3 million and $1.9
million, respectively. At September 30, 2007, stock-based employee compensation expense of $0.2
million related to nonvested common stock awards is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
20
NOTE 8FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of
the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The
fair value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash,
interest receivable, principal receivable, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, warehouse
lending facilities, revolving lines of credit, unsettled securities purchases and accrued interest
expense approximates their carrying value on the consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the
Companys investment securities is reported in Note 3. The fair value of the Companys derivative
instruments is reported in Note 10.
The fair values of the Companys remaining financial instruments that are not reported at fair
value on the consolidated statement of financial position are reported below.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Value |
|
Fair Value |
Loans held-for-investment |
|
$ |
4,369,019 |
|
|
$ |
3,992,911 |
|
|
$ |
5,591,717 |
|
|
$ |
5,586,872 |
|
Mortgage-backed notes |
|
|
4,030,643 |
|
|
|
3,781,117 |
|
|
|
3,917,677 |
|
|
|
3,919,353 |
|
CDOs |
|
|
294,529 |
|
|
|
150,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
91,738 |
|
|
|
92,788 |
|
|
|
91,325 |
|
NOTE 9ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(441,028 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,957 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) on securities
available-for-sale included in net income |
|
|
153,409 |
|
|
|
(993 |
) |
Impairment losses on securities |
|
|
287,622 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Net deferred realized and unrealized gains on cash flow hedges |
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
Net unrealized losses (gains) on equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
|
$ |
3,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company seeks to manage its interest rate risk and credit exposure and protect the
Companys liabilities against the effects of major interest rate changes. Such interest rate risk
may arise from: (1) the issuance and forecasted rollover and repricing of short-term liabilities
with fixed rate cash flows or from liabilities with a contractual variable rate based on LIBOR;
(2) the issuance of long-term fixed rate or floating rate debt through securitization activities or
other borrowings or (3) the change in value of loan purchase commitments. The Company also seeks to
manage its credit risk exposure which may arise from the creditworthiness of the holders of the
mortgages underlying its mortgage-related assets. The Company may use various combinations of
derivative instruments or other risk-sharing arrangements to attempt to manage these risks.
21
Derivative Contracts
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Eurodollar futures contracts sold short |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
(4,149 |
) |
|
|
4,383 |
|
Interest rate cap contracts |
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
Credit default swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,958 |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Derivative Contracts
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Free standing derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
34,673 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
$ |
50,133 |
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
(28,610 |
) |
|
|
(11,994 |
) |
|
|
(6,743 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
Purchase commitment derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys derivative contracts have master netting arrangements allowing us to net gains
and losses in individual contracts with the same counterparty.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategies
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company entered into derivative contracts that it accounted for
under hedge accounting as prescribed by SFAS No. 133. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company
discontinued the use of hedge accounting. Under hedge accounting, prior to the end of the specified
hedge time period, the effective portion of all contract gains and losses, whether realized or
unrealized, was recorded in other comprehensive income or loss. Hedge effectiveness gains included
in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2005 will be amortized during the
specified hedge time period. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, interest
expense decreased by $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, due to the amortization of net
realized gains and hedge ineffectiveness gains. During the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006, interest expense decreased by $0.6 million and $6.9 million, respectively, due to the
amortization of net realized gains and hedge ineffectiveness gains.
NOTE 11INCOME TAXES
The Company is taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As such, the
Company routinely distributes substantially all of the income generated from operations to its
stockholders. As long as the Company retains its REIT status, it generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal or state corporate taxes on its income to the extent that it distributes its REIT
taxable income to its stockholders. The current dislocations in the U.S. residential mortgage
market and the corresponding changed economic conditions, which led to the suspension of payment
of the second quarter cash dividend of $0.32 per share and the omission of a third quarter dividend
also increase the risk that the Company could lose its REIT taxation status in 2007 or a subsequent
taxable year as a result of its inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements, required
sales of assets in order to meet margin calls, lower than expected income on the Companys mortgage
assets as a result of borrower defaults, or other factors. See Risk Factors included in Item 1A
of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for further discussion of tax risks
and the effect of a loss of the Companys REIT status.
22
The Company has a taxable REIT subsidiary that receives management fees in exchange for
various advisory services provided in conjunction with the Companys investment strategies. This
taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to corporate income taxes on its taxable income at a combined
federal and state effective tax rate. The same taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to the
Pennsylvania Capital Stock and Franchise Tax as well as Philadelphia Gross Receipts Tax and
Philadelphia Net Income Tax. The Company also has a taxable REIT subsidiary that purchases
mortgage loans and creates securitization entities as a means of securing long-term collateralized
financing. A provision for the income taxes for taxable REIT subsidiaries has been made and is
shown on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 in the amount of $1.0 million.
Distributions declared per share were zero and $0.62 during three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, and $0.30 and $0.55 per share during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2006, respectively. On June 27, 2007, the Company declared a cash dividend of
$0.32 per share. Subsequently, the Company suspended the payment of the dividend representing an
obligation of $13.6 million due to the Companys liquidity concerns. In addition, the Company has
$24.4 million of undistributed REIT taxable income as of September 30, 2007. In order to maintain
its status as a REIT, the Company must pay the dividend through a cash distribution or
distribution-in-kind prior to September 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate that the dividend
will be paid prior to December 31, 2007. Consequently the Company may incur an excise tax on a
portion of its undistributed REIT taxable income at a rate of 4.00%, payable on March 15, 2008.
Such excise tax has been ratably accrued based upon expected undistributed REIT taxable income at
December 31, 2007, and is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations for the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 in the amount of $0.7 million. The Company is
currently considering various options related to the distribution of its REIT taxable income.
NOTE 12LEGAL MATTERS
Class Action Lawsuits
Following the Companys August 6, 2007 announcement of actions the Companys board of
directors took, the Company and certain officers and directors were named as defendants in six
purported class action lawsuits filed between August 8, 2007 and September 12, 2007 in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California alleging violations of federal securities
laws. These lawsuits seek certification of classes composed of stockholders who purchased the
Companys securities during certain periods, starting as early as October 10, 2006 and concluding
as late as August 6, 2007. The lawsuits allege generally, that the defendants violated federal
securities laws by making material misrepresentations to the market concerning the Companys
operations and prospects, thereby artificially inflating the price of the Companys common stock.
The complaints seek unspecified damages. The lawsuits have been consolidated into a single action
but a consolidated complaint has not yet been filed.
The case involves complex issues of law and fact and has not yet progressed to the point where
the Company can: 1) predict its outcome; 2) estimate damages that might result from the case or 3)
predict the effect that final resolution that the case might have on its business, financial
condition or results of operations, although such effect could be materially adverse. The Company
believes these allegations to be without merit. The Company intends to seek dismissal of these
lawsuits for failure to state a valid legal claim, and if the case is not dismissed on motion, to
vigorously defend itself against these allegations. The Company maintains directors and officers
liability insurance which the Company believes should provide coverage to the Company and its
officers and directors for most or all of any costs, settlements or judgments resulting from the
lawsuit.
In addition, a stockholder derivative action was filed on August 31, 2007 in the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, in which an individual stockholder
purports to assert claims on behalf of the Company against numerous directors and officers for
alleged breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and other similar claims. The Company believes
the allegations in the stockholder derivative complaint to be without merit and has filed motions
to dismiss all claims. Furthermore, any recovery in the derivative lawsuit would be payable to
23
the
Company, and this lawsuit is therefore unlikely to have a material negative effect on its business,
financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 13RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company has ongoing relationships and
has engaged in transactions with several related entities described below.
Beginning on August 14, 2007, the Company entered into a series of financing agreements with
Arco. See Note 5 and Note 6 for additional information on the terms of these agreements.
At September 30, 2007, the Company had $74.0 million outstanding in repurchase agreement
financing that was provided by Gramercy, a company affiliated with Arco, at an interest rate of
9.13%. The repurchase agreements mature in November 2007. In addition, the Company has $43.3
million outstanding on a revolving line of credit provided by Arco at an average interest rate of
9.13%. The line of credit matures on September 26, 2012. See Note 14 for further information on
changes to the Arco agreements subsequent to September 30, 2007.
Arco has also provided guarantees on $172.4 million of repurchase agreement financing with an
unaffiliated third-party.
NOTE 14SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Between September 30, 2007 and December 6, 2007, the Company drew an additional $16.8 million
on the Arco credit facilities, representing a combination of repurchase agreement financing and
revolving line of credit financing. These additional withdraws brought the outstanding balance to
the maximum allowable under the agreements of $125.0 million.
On December 7, 2007, the Company entered into another amendment to its amended and restated
credit agreement with Arco in order to provide for increases in repurchase agreement financings
from a subsidiary of Arco. As of December 12, 2007, the total amount of repurchase agreement
financings made available by Arcos subsidiary increased to approximately $140.0 million, with
additional proceeds to the Company of approximately $66.0 million. The Company used the proceeds
of the additional financings for general corporate purposes, to make interest and other payments on
outstanding obligations and, as required by the credit facility, to repay borrowings under the
credit facility. The amendment to the credit agreement increased to $190.0 million the cap on
total outstanding amounts of such purchase agreements and credit agreement borrowings and decreases
the revolving credit facility commitment to the lesser of up to $16.0 million or 85% of eligible
asset values, subject in all cases to the terms and conditions of the amended and restated credit
agreement.
In August 2007, the Company had an event of default on the convertible senior notes which made
them immediately due and payable. On November 6, 2007, the trustee of convertible senior notes
informed the Company that it had remedied the conditions that gave rise to the event of default
under the agreement. On November 21, 2007, the Company received a notice from the trustee of the
convertible notes that a reporting default had occurred due to a delay in filing the Companys
September 30, 2007 Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reporting default
will be cured by filing our Form 10-Q prior to January 20, 2008.
In August 2007, due to cross defaults on other financing arrangements the Company was
prohibited from making scheduled interest payments on its junior subordinated notes. These events
of default were subsequently cured and all scheduled interest payments due as of September 30, 2007
were made in October 2007.
In December 2007, a repurchase agreement lender alleged that an event of default exists for an
unspecified reason on the Companys repurchase agreement financing that it provided. The repurchase
agreement lender demanded payment of the amount financed by it, plus accrued interest and expenses.
The Company does not agree with the repurchase agreement lender that an event of default exists.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of
this Form 10-Q. This discussion
may contain certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Forward-looking statements are those that are not historical in nature. See Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-looking Statements. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under
Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, Item 1A of our 2006 Form 10-K, elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report or incorporated by reference herein, our actual results may differ materially from
those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.
Overview
Business Conditions and Going Concern
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of
business for the foreseeable future. As we announced on August 6, 2007, the mortgage industry and
the financing methods the industry has historically relied upon deteriorated significantly and in
an unprecedented fashion. Effectively, the secondary market for mortgage-backed securities
seized-up, and as a result, we simultaneously experienced a significant increase in margin calls
from our repurchase agreement counterparties, or repurchase agreement lenders, and a decrease in
the amount of financing our lenders would provide on a given amount of collateral. Prices for even
the highest quality AAA-rated bonds dropped precipitously. These events resulted in a rapid and
significant loss of liquidity over a short period of time and caused substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We have implemented a financial strategy to restore investor confidence and will continue our
initiatives in this regard. We have taken the following steps that are intended to assure our
customers and investors, that we can fulfill our commitments in the ordinary course of business:
On September 26, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with Arco that provides for a
revolving credit facility in the amount of the lesser of up to $60.0 million or 85% of eligible
asset values as defined in the agreement. Interest on the outstanding balance is set at one-month
LIBOR plus a margin of between 4.00% and 4.50%, depending on the amount outstanding. As of
September 30, 2007, we had $43.3 million outstanding on this line of credit. Arco also arranged for
repurchase agreement financing at an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 4.00%. As of
September 30, 2007, we had $74.0 million outstanding on this facility. See Note 5 to our
consolidated financial statement for further information on the terms of these credit facilities.
On December 7, 2007, we entered into another amendment to our amended and restated credit
agreement with Arco in order to provide for increases in repurchase agreement financings from a
subsidiary of Arco. The amendment to the credit agreement increased to $190.0 million the cap on
total outstanding amounts of such purchase agreements and credit agreement borrowings. See Note 14
to our consolidated financial statements for further information on
the amended agreement.
As of September 30, 2007, progress in the stabilization of our lending facilities includes the
following achievements.
|
|
|
We have completed the sale of approximately $1.9 billion of mortgage-backed securities to
repay lenders and meet required margin calls. |
|
|
|
|
We have completed the sale or refinancing of assets financed by our asset-backed
commercial program, and we no longer have any outstanding commercial paper liabilities under
our asset-backed commercial paper program. |
|
|
|
|
We have sold approximately $1.0 billion of loans and have repaid all of our warehouse
lines of credit that were used to finance whole loan purchases. One warehouse line for $1.0
billion was terminated prior to September 30, 2007, and additional warehouse line for $500.0
million expired in October 2007, and no balances are currently outstanding on the remaining
warehouse line totaling $1.0 billion. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information on our warehouse facilities. |
25
|
|
|
We have stabilized $781.5 million of repurchase agreement financing with six repurchase
agreement lenders by meeting all required margin calls. |
|
|
|
|
We are working with an additional repurchase agreement
lender, HSBC, to resolve a dispute on the fair
value of the underlying collateral for that agreement to settle an additional $32.2 million
of repurchase agreement financing. |
We have taken additional measures to improve our liquidity position that include the
implementation of operating expense reductions including a personnel reduction, the closure of our
San Francisco, CA corporate office on December 31, 2007 and the establishment of our corporate
headquarters in Philadelphia, PA, where the majority of our workforce is currently located.
We are currently focused on maintaining the progress made to date of stabilizing our
investment portfolio in the short-term, and then returning to profitability. These efforts will
likely include additional sales of securities in order to provide additional liquidity, and
exploring long-term financing alternatives to replace our existing short-term financing. In
addition, we are considering alternatives for the resolution of our issues related to our status as
a REIT. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for further information on issues
concerning our REIT status. There can be no assurance that further market disruption will not
occur or that we will be able to successfully execute our business or liquidity plans discussed
herein.
Investment Activities
Our primary mission has historically been to provide a secure stream of income for our
stockholders based on the steady and reliable payments of residential mortgages. We are a real
estate investment trust, or REIT, which, together with our subsidiaries, invested in two core
mortgage investment strategies. Under our Residential Mortgage Credit strategy, we invested in
mortgage loans purchased from selected high-quality providers within certain established criteria
as well as subordinated mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities that have
credit ratings below AAA. These securities have significant credit enhancement that provides us
with protection against credit loss. These investments are less sensitive to interest rates, and
therefore more predictable and sustainable. We securitized the loans and mortgage-backed securities
that we have purchased and retain the securitization tranches that we believe are the most valuable
tranches. These securitizations reduce our sensitivity to interest rates and help match the income
we earn on our mortgage assets with the cost of our related liabilities. The debt that we incur in
these securitizations is non-recourse to us; however, we pledge our mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities as collateral for the securities we issue. Under our Spread strategy, we
invested primarily in U.S. agency and other highly-rated single-family, adjustable-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. Given current market conditions we do not intend to
make new investments in our Residential Mortgage Credit or Spread strategy in the near-term. Our
investment strategy is under constant review and will be resumed when we believe the market has
stabilized and opportunities arise.
We intend to continue to seek opportunities to generate fee-based business, including but not
limited to asset management, credit risk management and investments in mortgages located in
emerging market countries and in the U.S., as well as to establish other strategic initiatives in
order to diversify our income streams.
Within the loan market, we have focused on acquiring prime quality, first lien Alt-A
adjustable-rate mortgage loans. In the Alt-A market, borrowers choose the convenience of less than
full documentation in exchange for a slightly higher mortgage rate. We neither directly originate
mortgage loans nor directly service mortgage loans. We purchase pools of mortgage loans from our
diverse network of well-capitalized origination providers. We employ a comprehensive underwriting
process, driven by our experienced personnel, to review the credit risk associated with each
mortgage loan pool we purchase. We require mortgage insurance on all loans with loan-to-value
ratios in excess of 80% and, in all recent securitizations, we purchase supplemental mortgage
insurance down to a 75% loan-to-value ratio level. In addition, we obtain representations and
warranties from each originator to the effect that each loan is underwritten in accordance with the
agreed-upon guidelines. An originator who breaches its representations and warranties may be
obligated to repurchase loans from us.
26
We have also acquired mortgage loans that permit negative amortization. A negative
amortization provision in a mortgage allows the borrower to defer payment of a portion or all of
the monthly interest accrued on the mortgage and to add the deferred interest amount to the
mortgages principal balance. As a result, during periods of negative amortization, the principal
balances of negatively amortizing mortgages will increase and their weighted-average lives will
extend. Our mortgage loans generally can experience negative amortization ranging from 110-125% of
the original mortgage loan balance. As a result, given the relatively low average loan-to-value
ratio of 71.6%, net of mortgage insurance, on our portfolio at September 30, 2007, we believe
that our portfolio would still have a significant homeowners equity cushion even if all
negatively-amortizing loans reached their maximum permitted amount of negative amortization. Our
securitization structures allow the reallocation of principal prepayments on mortgage loans to be
used for interest payments on the debt issued in the securitization trusts. To date, prepayments on
securitized loans have been sufficient to offset negative amortization such that all our
securitization structures have made their required payments to bond holders.
The subprime mortgage banking environment has been experiencing considerable strain from
rising delinquencies and liquidity pressures and some subprime mortgage lenders have failed. The
increased scrutiny of the subprime lending market is one of the factors that have impacted general
market conditions as well as perceptions of our business. Our credit underwriting standards have
been structured to limit our exposure to the types of loans that are currently experiencing high
foreclosure and loss rates. Our mortgage loan portfolio has virtually no exposure to loans with
FICO scores of less than 620 which are generally considered to be subprime loans. The number of
seriously delinquent loans in our loan portfolio was 311 basis points (3.11%) of total loans at
September 30, 2007. This percentage is well within our expectations for performance. Our mortgage
loan portfolio compares favorably with the most recently available industry statistics for prime
ARM loans. At June 30, 2007, our serious delinquencies were 127 basis points (1.27%) compared to
the serious delinquency rate reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association of 202 basis points
(2.02%) at June 30, 2007. Our credit performance compares favorably to subprime performance, for
which the Mortgage Bankers Association reports a serious delinquency rate of 1,240 basis points
(12.40%) at June 30, 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. These accounting principles require us
to make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Our most critical accounting
policies involve decisions and assessments that could significantly affect our reported assets and
liabilities, as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions
and assessments upon which our consolidated financial statements are based were reasonable at the
time made based upon information available to us at that time. See Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of our 2006 Form 10-K for a further discussion of our
significant accounting policies. Management has identified our most critical accounting policies
to be the following:
Interest Income Recognition
We account for interest income on our investments using the effective yield method. For
investments purchased at par, the effective yield is the contractual coupon rate on the investment.
We recognize unamortized premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities in interest income
over the contractual life, adjusted for actual prepayments, of the securities using the effective
interest method. For securities representing beneficial interests in securitizations that are not
highly rated (i.e., mezzanine and subordinate tranches of residential mortgage-backed securities),
we recognize unamortized premiums and discounts over the contractual life, adjusted for estimated
prepayments and estimated credit losses of the securities using the effective interest method. We
review actual prepayment and credit loss experience and recalculate effective yields when
differences arise between prepayments and credit losses originally anticipated compared to amounts
actually received plus anticipated future prepayments.
Interest income on loans includes interest at stated coupon rates adjusted for amortization of
purchase premiums. We recognize unamortized premiums and discounts in interest income over the
contractual life, adjusted for actual prepayments, of the loans using the effective interest
method.
27
Classifications of Investment Securities
We generally classify our investment securities as available-for-sale and carry them on our
consolidated balance sheet at their fair value. The classification of securities as
available-for-sale results in changes in fair value being recorded as adjustments to accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss, which is a component of stockholders equity, rather than
through results of operations. If we classified our available-for-sale securities as trading
securities, our results of operations could experience substantially greater volatility from
period-to-period.
We hold certain hybrid securities which we have elected to account for as trading securities
in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 155, Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 although
these securities were not acquired for resale. Changes in the fair value of trading securities are
required to be reported in the results of operations and therefore we may experience volatility in
our results of operations from period to period due to changes in the fair value of these
securities.
Valuations of Mortgage-backed Securities
Our Spread portfolio of mortgage-backed securities has fair values based on estimates provided
by independent pricing services and dealers in mortgage-backed securities. Because the price
estimates may vary between sources, we make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate
price to use. Different judgments and assumptions could result in different presentations of value.
We estimate the fair value of our Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio of mortgage-backed
securities using internally generated cash flow analysis, available market information and other
appropriate valuation methodologies. We believe the estimates we use reflect the market values we
may be able to receive should we choose to sell the mortgage-backed securities. Our estimates
involve matters of uncertainty, judgment in interpreting relevant market data and are inherently
subjective in nature. Many factors are necessary to estimate market values, including, but not
limited to, interest rates, prepayment rates, amount and timing of credit losses, supply and
demand, liquidity, cash flows and other market factors. We apply these factors to our portfolio as
appropriate in order to determine market values.
We evaluate the determination of other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. When the
fair value of an available-for-sale security is less than amortized cost, we consider whether there
is an other-than-temporary impairment in the value of the security. We consider several factors
when evaluating securities for an other-than-temporary impairment, including the length of time and
the extent to which the market value has been less than the amortized cost, whether the security
has been downgraded by a rating agency and our continued intent and ability to hold the security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. The
determination of other-than-temporary impairment is a subjective process, requiring the use of
judgments and assumptions. If we determine other-than-temporary impairment exists, we write down
the cost basis of the security to the then-current fair value, and record the unrealized loss as a
reduction of current earnings as if we had realize the loss in the period of impairment. If future
evaluations conclude that impairment now considered to be temporary is other-than-temporary, we may
need to realize a loss that would have an impact on income. See Note 3 to our consolidated
financial statements for further detail of temporary and other-than temporary impairment on our
mortgage-backed securities.
Recently, due to disruptions in the mortgage market resulting in our sale of securities to
repay lenders and our ongoing liquidity concerns, we have determined that we may not have the
ability to hold available-for-sale securities that are at an unrealized loss until the loss in
market value is recovered. These securities are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired
and therefore we have recognized all unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities in the
statement of operations.
28
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level that we believe is adequate based on an
evaluation of known and inherent risks related to our loan investments. When determining the
adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, we consider historical and industry loss experience,
economic conditions and trends, the estimated fair values of our loans, credit quality trends and
other factors that we determine are relevant. In our review of national and local economic trends
and conditions we consider, among other factors, national unemployment data, changes in housing
appreciation and whether specific geographic areas where we have significant loan concentrations
are experiencing adverse economic conditions and events such as natural disasters that may affect
the local economy or property values.
To estimate our allowance for loan losses, we first identify impaired loans. We evaluate loans
purchased with relatively smaller balances and substantially similar characteristics collectively
for impairment. We evaluate seriously delinquent loans with balances greater than $1.0 million
individually. We consider loans impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that we
will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement,
including interest payments, or if it is unlikely that the seller will repurchase the loan in
situations were we have the contractual right to request a repurchase. We carry impaired loans at
the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or the fair value of the collateral less costs to
dispose of the property.
We establish our allowance for loan losses using mortgage industry experience and Moodys
rating agency projections for loans with characteristics that are broadly similar to our portfolio.
This analysis begins with actual 60 day or more delinquencies in our portfolio, and projects
ultimate default experience (i.e., the rate at which loans will go to liquidation) on those loans
based on mortgage industry loan delinquency migration statistics. For all loans showing indications
of probable default, we apply a severity factor for each loan, again using loss severity
projections from a model developed by Moodys rating agency for loans broadly similar to the loans
in our portfolio. We then use our judgment to ensure we have considered all relevant factors that
could affect our loss levels and adjust the allowance for loan losses if we believe that an
adjustment is warranted. We include the effect of our contractual right to put loans back to
sellers in the event of early pay default or fraud. We have established procedures to perform
contract enforcement and have been successful in this effort.
Our loss mitigation process begins as part of our underwriting procedures prior to our
purchase of a loan. Our analytical procedures to identify loans with over inflated property values
and weak borrow credit characteristics as well as our sampling techniques for in-depth loan
reviews allow us to customize the loan pool we ultimately purchase and reduce our exposure to loans
that we believe will ultimately default. We are monitoring market conditions particularly related
to home price depreciation and increased foreclosure rates with a special emphasis on monitoring
geographic areas that have been significantly affected by these market conditions where we have a
high concentration of loans such as California, Florida and Nevada. We began purchasing additional
mortgage insurance in the later half of 2006 to provide us with additional protection against
losses that may occur due to these market conditions. We consider the availability of mortgage
insurance to absorb losses when we project loss severity rates. With an average effective LTV on
our loan portfolio of 71.6% including the protection provided by mortgage insurance, we believe we
have a cushion for home price depreciation or additional losses due to higher foreclosure rates
because mortgage insurance will, to the maximum insurance coverage available, absorb losses first
if they occur. We also monitor actual losses and include this analysis in the determination of the
severity factor used to estimate our allowance. To date actual severities have supported the
adequacy of the severity projections used in the allowance estimate. See Note 4 to our consolidated
financial statements for further detail of our allowance for loan losses.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
We may enter into a variety of derivative contracts, including futures contracts, swaption
contracts, interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap contracts, credit default swaps,
risk-sharing arrangements and purchase commitments to purchase mortgage loans as a means of
mitigating our interest rate risk on forecasted interest
29
expense as well as to mitigate our credit
risk on credit sensitive mortgage-backed securities. Effective January 1,
2006, we discontinued the use of hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133. All changes
in value of derivative contracts that had previously been accounted for under hedge accounting are
now recorded in other income or expense and could potentially result in increased volatility in our
consolidated results of operations.
Accounting for Warrants
In August 2007, we issued 51,000,000 warrants in exchange for a repurchase agreement financing
arrangement. The warrants are redeemable for our common stock. In accordance with SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity,
the warrants are to be classified as a liability with the initial value recorded as debt discount
on the related repurchase agreement financing. The debt discount will be amortized as additional
interest expense over the weighted-average life of the repurchase agreement financing. The change
in fair value of the warrants from the issuance date until they are exercised is recorded as a
liability and is recorded as other expense in consolidated statement of operations.
We estimate the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Sholes Pricing Model. The
Black-Sholes model is a commonly used model for estimating the fair value of equity related
instruments, the exercise of which can create more shares of common stock and thus affect our stock
price. The model uses observable data such as risk-free interest rates at a point in time, the
warrant expiration date and the exercise price of the warrants and in addition, the model requires
us to make certain assumptions related to our stock price volatility and future dividend payments
that effect the calculation of the fair value of the warrants. Because all changes in the fair
value of warrants are recorded in other income or expense until the warrants are exercised, changes
in fair value could result in increased volatility in our consolidated results of operations. See
Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the assumptions used in
the estimation of the fair value of our warrants.
Results of Operations
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we had net losses of $520.6 million,
or $12.17 per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted), and of $6.6
million, or $0.17 per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted), respectively. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we had net losses of $497.4 million, or $11.07 per
weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted), and net income of $28.7 million, or $0.74
per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted), respectively.
Losses for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were mainly comprised of
impairment losses due to the decline in value of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio of $268.9
million and $287.6 million, respectively, losses on the sale of mortgage-backed securities of
$138.0 million and $153.4 million, respectively, changes in the fair value of warrants of $46.6
million and losses on the sale of whole loans of $46.5 million.
Due to the significant volume of sales from our mortgage-backed securities portfolio in the
third quarter of 2007 and the higher discount rates applied to determine the fair value of the
mortgage-backed securities portfolio as of September 30, 2007, the historical weighted-average
yield on interest earning assets for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 is
not representative of yields we expect in future periods. As of September 30, 2007, the
weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets is 7.07% and the weighted-average interest
expense on liabilities is 5.69%, excluding the effect of the amortization of discounts, premiums
and debt issuance costs. We define weighted-average yield on average earning assets, net of premium
amortization or discount accretion, as total interest income earned divided by the weighted-average
amortized cost of our mortgage assets during the period.
Total interest income from mortgage assets was $134.0 million and $95.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total interest income from mortgage assets
was $426.0 million and $231.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The increase in interest income is primarily due to the growth of our mortgage loan
portfolio and credit-sensitive bond portfolio as well as higher yields on our mortgage assets that
have resulted from the redeployment of our capital into the higher-yielding assets of our
Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio during the first quarter of 2006.
30
Components of Interest Expense
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Weighted |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Interest expense on mortgage-backed notes |
|
$ |
62,835 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
$ |
38,372 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
% |
Interest expense on repurchase agreement liabilities |
|
|
24,154 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
31,043 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
Interest expense on commercial paper facility |
|
|
12,117 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes |
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
Interest expense on CDOs |
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on convertible senior notes |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on revolving line of credit |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net realized gains on futures and interest
rate swap contracts |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
Net interest income on interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,087 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
Other |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
112,392 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
$ |
73,149 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Weighted |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Interest expense on mortgage-backed notes |
|
$ |
188,544 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
$ |
84,119 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
Interest expense on repurchase agreement liabilities |
|
|
98,240 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
81,547 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
Interest expense on commercial paper facility |
|
|
29,941 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on warehouse lending facilities |
|
|
12,815 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
8,849 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes |
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Interest expense on CDOs |
|
|
12,590 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on convertible senior notes |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on revolving line of credit |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net realized gains on futures and interest
rate swap contracts |
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(6,924 |
) |
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
Net interest expense on interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
Other |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
349,819 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
$ |
172,633 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense consists of interest payments on our debt and the amortization of
mortgage-backed notes and collateralized debt obligations and commercial paper issuance premiums
and discounts and amortization of the expense associated with warrants to Arco in connection with
the financing they provided. Premiums and discounts occur when debt securities are issued at prices
different from their principal value. Interest expense increased during the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2006, primarily due to the increase in the balance of the loans held-for-investment and
mortgage-backed securities portfolios.
31
Components of Other Income
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Realized gains on derivative instruments, net |
|
$ |
33,947 |
|
|
$ |
2,076 |
|
|
$ |
46,843 |
|
|
$ |
2,076 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments, net |
|
|
(28,193 |
) |
|
|
(13,765 |
) |
|
|
(6,743 |
) |
|
|
2,011 |
|
Net interest income on interest rate swaps |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivative related expenses |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
(11,689 |
) |
|
|
42,406 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(268,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287,622 |
) |
|
|
(2,179) |
) |
Sales of mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
9,962 |
|
Losses |
|
|
(138,519 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(153,973 |
) |
|
|
(8,972) |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
(137,959 |
) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(153,409 |
) |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(46,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, trading change in
fair value |
|
|
(18,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Warrants, change in fair value |
|
|
(46,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(511,616 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,522 |
) |
|
$ |
(510,027 |
) |
|
$ |
2,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, our realized losses on the sale of
mortgage-backed securities and other-than-temporary impairment losses were partially offset by
realized and unrealized gains on derivative instruments that were structured to economically hedge
credit risk. Impairment loss of $268.9 million and $287.6 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 were due to assumption changes on certain Residential Mortgage Credit
securities due to increased loss expectations on certain securities and increased discount rates
used to value the securities, which reflect current market conditions for mortgage-backed
securities. Due to the significance of the mortgage industry deterioration discussed above and our
ongoing liquidity concerns, we have recognized all unrealized holding losses on securities in the
consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007.
Impairment losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 related to Spread
securities that we did not intend to hold until their maturity.
Components of Operating Expenses
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Servicing expense |
|
$ |
5,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,526 |
|
|
$ |
18,104 |
|
|
$ |
7,546 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,247 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
8,363 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
14,998 |
|
|
|
7,375 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
Management compensation
expense to related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,712 |
|
Other general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
28,860 |
|
|
$ |
16,617 |
|
|
$ |
61,914 |
|
|
$ |
31,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased
compared to the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 due to costs of managing our
larger and more
diversified investment portfolio as well as the additional diversification we had included in
our financing strategies prior to August 2007, when we began selling significant portions of the
investment portfolio.
We employ third parties to perform servicing of our mortgage loans. Servicing includes
payments processing, collection activities and reporting of loan activity. For the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2006, servicing expense increased $1.9 million or 52.8% and $10.6 million or 139.9%,
respectively. The increases in servicing expenses reflect the increase in the average balance of
our mortgage loan portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, and, to a lesser extent, the cost for purchasing additional
mortgage insurance on our recent securitizations.
For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2006, the provision for loan losses increased $8.5 million and
$15.1 million, respectively. This increase reflects the growth in size and seasoning of our
mortgage loan portfolio.
For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2006, salaries and benefits expense increased $5.4 million or
185.0% and $7.6 million or 103.4%, respectively. The increase in salaries and benefits reflects the
addition of employees from September 30, 2006 to August 30, 2007, to manage our larger and more
diverse portfolio of assets and financing arrangements and well as severance costs related to staff
reductions.
In August 2007, due to the reduction in the size of our investment portfolio we implemented a
cost reduction program which included a reduction in personnel as well as other cost cutting
measures including the consolidation of our office facilities to one location.
REIT taxable income
We calculate REIT taxable income according to the requirements of the Code, rather than GAAP.
We believe that REIT taxable income is a measure of our financial performance because REIT taxable
income, and not GAAP income, is the basis upon which we make our cash distributions to our
stockholders that enable us to maintain our REIT status.
We estimate our REIT taxable income based upon a variety of information from third parties.
Due to the timing of the receipt of some of this information, we make estimates in order to
determine our REIT taxable income and dividend distributions within a reporting period. As a
result, our REIT taxable income estimates are subject to adjustments to reflect the receipt of
information on past events. Our REIT taxable income is also subject to changes in the Code, or in
the interpretation of the Code, with respect to our business model. REIT taxable income for each
fiscal year does not become final until we file our tax return for that fiscal year.
33
Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to REIT Taxable Income
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
GAAP net
income (loss) |
|
$ |
(497,446 |
) |
|
$ |
28,748 |
|
Adjustments to GAAP net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and interest expense, net |
|
|
(23,066 |
) |
|
|
(11,610 |
) |
Impairment losses on mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
287,622 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
18,333 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
Servicing expense |
|
|
17,126 |
|
|
|
6,231 |
|
Warrants expense |
|
|
46,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses (gains) on mortgage-backed securities
and loans, net |
|
|
218,086 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments, net |
|
|
(42,206 |
) |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments to GAAP net income |
|
|
539,191 |
|
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income |
|
|
41,745 |
|
|
|
28,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income per share |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding on dividend record
date during the quarter |
|
|
45,347,747 |
|
|
|
39,652,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Undistributed REIT Taxable Income
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Undistributed REIT taxable income, beginning of period |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,154 |
|
REIT taxable income earned during period |
|
|
41,745 |
|
|
|
28,263 |
|
Distributions declared during period, net of dividend
equivalent rights on restricted stock |
|
|
(27,858 |
) |
|
|
(21,742 |
) |
Other adjustments |
|
|
5,157 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed REIT taxable income, end of period |
|
$ |
23,473 |
|
|
$ |
9,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions per share that were declared during period |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of current year REIT taxable income distributed |
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
|
76.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that these presentations of our REIT taxable income are useful to investors because
they are directly related to the distributions to stockholders we are required to make in order to
retain our REIT status. REIT taxable income entails certain limitations, and by itself is an
incomplete measure of our financial performance over any period. As a result, our REIT taxable
income should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our GAAP-based net income
as a measure of our financial performance.
In addition to the $23.5 million of undistributed REIT taxable income as of September 30,
2007, we have declared but suspended dividends in the amount of $13.6 million, net of dividend
equivalent rights. In order to maintain our status as a REIT, we must pay the dividend through a
cash distribution or distribution-in-kind prior to September 15, 2008. We do not anticipate that
any dividend will be paid prior to December 31, 2007. Consequently, we may incur an excise tax on a
portion of our undistributed REIT taxable income at a rate of 4.00%, payable on March 15, 2008.
Such excise tax has been ratably accrued and is reflected in our consolidated statement of
34
operations as of September 30, 2007. We are currently considering various options related to the
payment of the dividend.
Financial Condition
Mortgage-backed securities
Our investment strategy includes purchases of U.S. agency and other AAA-rated single-family
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities and purchases of
credit-sensitive residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities that have
credit ratings below AAA.
The following table presents our mortgage-backed securities classified as either Residential
Mortgage Credit portfolio assets or Spread portfolio assets and further classified by type of
issuer and/or by rating categories.
Asset Quality
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Securities |
|
Residential Mortgage Credit Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA/Aa rating |
|
$ |
73,714 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
$ |
129,096 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
A/A rating |
|
|
151,776 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
238,623 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
BBB/Baa rating |
|
|
113,313 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
273,359 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment-grade MBS |
|
|
338,803 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
641,078 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment-grade MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB/Ba rating |
|
|
82,786 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
145,741 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
B/B2 rating |
|
|
16,840 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCC/Caa and below |
|
|
17,692 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not rated |
|
|
7,905 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
11,196 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment-grade MBS |
|
|
125,223 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
156,937 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating (1) |
|
BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Residential Mortgage Credit portfolio |
|
|
464,026 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
798,015 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating (1) |
|
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
Spread Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency MBS |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
106,648 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
AAA/Aaa rating |
|
|
442,362 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
2,026,275 |
|
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Spread portfolio |
|
|
442,979 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
2,132,923 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
Weighted-average credit rating |
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
907,005 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,930,938 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average credit rating |
|
|
AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted-average credit rating excludes non-rated mortgage-backed securities of $7.9 million and $11.2 million at September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and includes the effect of credit-related derivative instruments that are a direct economic
hedge of a specific security. |
35
Loans held-for-investment
Residential Loans Held-For Investment Product Data
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Loans as a |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Cost of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Seriously |
|
|
Loans as a |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Months to |
|
|
Fundsa |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Reset |
|
|
Hedging (1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Loans (2) |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Loans (2) |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate
mortgage |
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
2038 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3,191,142 |
|
|
$ |
105,985 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
% |
Hybrid mortgage |
|
|
6.51 |
% |
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,096,001 |
|
|
|
37,038 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7.82 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
4,287,143 |
|
|
$ |
143,023 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate
mortgage |
|
|
8.02 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,089,015 |
|
|
$ |
20,830 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
Hybrid mortgage |
|
|
6.57 |
% |
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,383,310 |
|
|
|
13,053 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
5,472,325 |
|
|
$ |
33,883 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We attempt to mitigate our interest rate risk by hedging the cost of liabilities related to our hybrid residential mortgage loans. Amounts reflect the effect of these hedges on the
months to reset of our residential mortgage loans. In addition at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the financing for $0.2 billion and $0.3 billion of our hybrid residential
mortgage loans, respectively is, like the underlying collateral, fixed for a period of three to five years and then becomes variable based upon the average rates of the underlying loans
which will adjust based on LIBOR. The weighted-average period to
reset of the debt we use to acquire residential mortgage loans was
match funded approximately six months and nine months
at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Seriously delinquent loans are loans 90 or more days past due and loans in foreclosure. |
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our residential mortgage loans
held-for-investment included unamortized premium of $103.2 million and $124.4 million,
respectively. Our residential mortgage loans at September 30, 2007 consisted of $4.3 billion
mortgage loans that collateralize mortgage-backed notes. Our residential mortgage loans
held-for-investment at December 31, 2006 consisted of $4.7 billion of mortgage loans that
collateralized mortgage-backed notes and $0.8 billion of unsecuritized adjustable-rate mortgage
loans.
36
Residential Mortgage Loans Key Metrics
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
Unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
4,287,143 |
|
|
$ |
5,472,325 |
|
Number of loans |
|
|
10,935 |
|
|
|
13,942 |
|
Average loan balance |
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
Weighted-average coupon rate |
|
|
7.82 |
% |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
Weighted-average lifetime cap |
|
|
10.65 |
% |
|
|
10.64 |
% |
Weighted-average original term, in months |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Weighted-average remaining term, in months |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Weighted-average effective loan-to-value ratio (LTV)(1) |
|
|
71.6 |
% |
|
|
72.6 |
% |
Weighted-average FICO score |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
Number of loans with FICO scores below 620 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Percentage of loans with FICO scores above 700 |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
58.5 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 80% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Percentage of loans with LTV greater than 90% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Percentage of loans with effective LTV greater than 80% (1) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Percentage of no documentation loans |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Percentage of loans originated for refinancing purposes |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
Top five geographic concentrations (% exposure): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Virginia |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Nevada |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Occupancy status: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner-occupied |
|
|
85.8 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
Investor |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Property type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
|
83.1 |
% |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
Condominium |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Other residential |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Collateral type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt A first lien |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including the effect of mortgage insurance purchased to cover an additional $1.2 billion of loan principal
at September 30, 2007. |
37
The following table presents our residential mortgage loan portfolio grouped by the
percentages in each of three different documentation types, further stratified by loan-to-value
ratios, net of mortgage insurance, and FICO scores:
Residential Mortgage Loan Quality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FICO Scores |
September 30, 2007 |
|
<620 |
|
620-659 |
|
660-699 |
|
700-739 |
|
740+ |
|
Total |
Full Documentation:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Full Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Documentation:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reduced Documentation |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Documentation:(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total No Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FICO Scores |
December 31, 2006 |
|
<620 |
|
620-659 |
|
660-699 |
|
700-739 |
|
740+ |
|
Total |
Full Documentation:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Full Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Documentation:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reduced Documentation |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Documentation:(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total No Documentation |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£60% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
60.01 - 70% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
70.01 - 80% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
> 80% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Full documentation includes verification of the borrowers income, employment, assets and liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Reduced documentation, sometimes referred to as Alt-A, includes mortgages that comply with most, but
not all, of the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
criteria for a conforming mortgage. Alt-A mortgages are generally high quality, with less than full
documentation verified. |
|
(3) |
|
No documentation excludes verification of borrowers income, employment or assets. |
Delinquencies and Allowance for loan losses
Residential Mortgage Loan Delinquency Status
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
Delinquency status: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 to 59 days |
|
|
362 |
|
|
$ |
140,547 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
$ |
100,710 |
|
60 to 90 days |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
67,116 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
17,389 |
|
90 days or more |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
67,892 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
17,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
275,555 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
135,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosures |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
75,131 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
15,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Delinquencies |
|
|
867 |
|
|
$ |
350,686 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
$ |
150,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We analyzed our allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2007 and recorded a $10.2 million
and $18.4 million provision for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively. Based on our loan loss analysis as of September 30, 2006, we recorded a provision for
loan losses of $1.8 million and $3.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006, respectively. Our allowance for loan loss analysis resulted in our $20.5 million and $4.9
million general allocated allowance at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
39
2006, respectively. We recorded a specific reserve for loans greater than $1.0 million and 90
days or more past due of $3.8 million and zero at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. Our allowance for loan losses represents 15.7% of our loans 90 days or more past due
at September 30, 2007.
Usage of the allowance occurs when a loan proceeds through the foreclosure process and becomes
real estate owned, or REO. When a loan becomes REO, we obtain updated information on the value of
the property that collateralizes the loan and estimate the specific loss on that loan, if any,
based on the expected net proceeds from the final disposition of the property and reduce the
allowance for loan losses by that amount. We also reduce the allowance for any loans that are
disposed of at a loss prior to their becoming REO. We used $1.3 million and $15.0 thousand of the
allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We
used $2.2 million and $15.0 thousand of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We expect delinquencies and losses to continue to
increase as our portfolio seasons but due to our extensive due diligence procedures performed on
loans prior to our purchase of the loan we expect losses to be lower than industry loss averages.
Our use of the allowance for loan losses does not equate to a realized loss for REIT taxable income
purposes.
At September 30, 2007, 61 of the residential loans we owned with an outstanding balance of
$20.3 million were REO as a result of foreclosure on delinquent loans. We reclassified these loans
from loans held-for-investment to other assets on our consolidated balance sheet at the lower of
cost or estimated fair value less costs to dispose of the property.
Asset Repricing Characteristics
Asset Repricing Characteristics
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Mix |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Mix |
|
Residential Mortgage Credit Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM residential loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset 1 month or less |
|
$ |
3,160,911 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,089,015 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
Reset >1 month but < 12 months |
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
nm |
|
Reset >12 months but < 60 months |
|
|
955,604 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
1,180,727 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Reset > 60 months |
|
|
158,196 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
202,299 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
103,158 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
124,412 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(21,282 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(5,020 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
4,369,019 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
5,591,717 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset 1 month or less |
|
|
443,465 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
796,539 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Reset >1 month but < 12 months |
|
|
720 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset >12 months but < 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset > 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
444,185 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
796,539 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
19,842 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
nm |
|
Spread Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset 1 month or less |
|
|
442,979 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
2,024,275 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Reset >1 month but < 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,648 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Reset >12 months but < 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset > 60 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
442,979 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
2,132,923 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage assets |
|
$ |
5,276,025 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,522,655 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the weighted-average period to reset of our total
mortgage assets was approximately 11 months and 10 months, respectively. We attempt to mitigate our
interest rate risk by hedging the cost of liabilities related to our hybrid residential mortgage
loans. Our net asset/liability duration gap
40
was approximately three months and one month at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively.
Our total mortgage assets had a weighted-average coupon of 7.52% and 7.03% at September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Our mortgage assets are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps.
Periodic interest rate caps limit the amount by which the interest rate on a mortgage can increase
during any given period. Lifetime interest rate caps limit the amount by which an interest rate can
increase through the term of a mortgage. The weighted-average lifetime cap of our mortgage-backed
securities was 11.73% and 12.32% at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The
weighted-average lifetime cap of our loans held-for-investment was 10.65% and 10.64% at September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Our mortgage assets have contractual periodic adjustment to their coupon rate based on changes
in an objective index. The percentages of the mortgage assets in our investment portfolio that were
indexed to interest rates are as follows:
Index rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate or |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
Treasury |
|
MTA |
|
COFI |
|
Other |
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
nm% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
The constant payment rate on our total mortgage assets, an annual rate of principal paydowns
for our mortgage assets relative to the outstanding principal balance of our total mortgage assets,
was 25% and 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The constant
payment rate attempts to predict the percentage of principal that will paydown over the next 12
months based on historical principal paydowns. The principal payment rate is not considered an
indication of future principal repayment rates because actual changes in market interest rates will
have a direct impact on the principal prepayments on our mortgage assets.
Securitizations
We create securitization entities as a means of securing long-term collateralized financing
for our residential mortgage loan portfolio and certain mortgage-backed securities in our
portfolio, matching the income earned on the investments with the cost of related liabilities,
otherwise referred to as match-funding our balance sheet. We may use derivative instruments, such
as interest rate swaps, to achieve this result. We transfer residential mortgage loans or
mortgage-backed assets to a separate bankruptcy-remote legal entity from which private-label
multi-class securities are issued. On a consolidated basis, we account for our securitizations as
secured financings and therefore, we record no gain or loss in connection with securitizations. We
evaluate each securitization entity in accordance with FIN 46(R), and we have determined that we
are the primary beneficiary of most of the securitization entities. As such, we consolidate those
securitization entities into our consolidated balance sheet subsequent to securitization. In the
third quarter of 2007, we sold certain interests in our 2007-2 securitization trust, which results
in our no longer qualifying as the primary beneficiary of that trust. The assets and liabilities of
that trust have been deconsolidated from our balance sheet and the remaining interests that we have
retained are recorded as mortgage-backed securities on our balance sheet at September 30, 2007.
Residential mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities transferred to securitization entities
collateralize the securities issued, and, as a result, those investments are not available to us,
our creditors or our stockholders.
41
Mortgage-Backed Notes
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had mortgage-backed notes, net of unamortized
discounts, with an outstanding balance of $4.0 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, and with a
weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.37% and 5.60% per annum, respectively. Each series of
mortgage-backed notes that we have issued consists of various classes of securities that bear
interest at varying spreads to LIBOR. The borrowing rates of the mortgage-backed notes at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 reset monthly based on LIBOR except for $0.2 billion and
$0.3 billion, respectively, of notes which, like the underlying loan collateral, are fixed for a
period of 3 to 5 years and then become variable based on the average rates of the underlying loans
which will adjust based on LIBOR. The stated maturities of the mortgage-backed notes at September
30, 2007 were from 2035 to 2047. The maturity of each class of securities is directly affected by
the rate of principal repayments on the associated residential mortgage loan collateral. As a
result, the actual maturity of each series of mortgage-backed notes may be shorter than its stated
maturity.
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had pledged residential mortgage loans with an
estimated fair value of $4.0 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, as collateral for
mortgage-backed notes issued.
The following table highlights the securitizations we have completed through September 30,
2007, by year of securitization transaction. Amounts presented are as of the transaction execution
dates except for September 30, 2007 remaining unpaid principal balances on loans.
Loan Securitization Highlights
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
Portfolio |
Number of securitizations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Loans, unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
520,568 |
|
|
$ |
4,638,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,369,009 |
|
|
$ |
6,528,104 |
|
Mortgage-backed notes issued to
third parties |
|
|
500,267 |
|
|
|
3,823,913 |
|
|
|
1,332,474 |
|
|
|
5,656,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt retained |
|
|
20,301 |
|
|
|
814,614 |
|
|
|
36,535 |
|
|
|
871,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained investment grade %(1) |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Retained non-investment grade %(1) |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Cost of debt on AAA-rated
mortgage-backed notes spread to
LIBOR(2) |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
Loans, unpaid principal balance
at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
325,605 |
|
|
$ |
3,381,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,229,256 |
|
|
$ |
4,936,802 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retained tranches as a percentage of total mortgage-backed notes issued. |
|
(2) |
|
LUM 2006-3 cost of debt excludes $0.3 billion of AAA mortgage-backed
notes which, like the underlying loan collateral, are fixed for three
to five years and then become variable based upon the average rates of
the underlying loans which will adjust based on LIBOR. |
42
The following table presents the rating categories of the mortgage-backed notes issued in our
loan securitizations completed through September 30, 2007, as of the transaction execution dates.
Loan Securitizations Mortgage-Backed Notes Ratings
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Number of securitizations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Mortgage-backed notes issued
to third-party investors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa rating |
|
$ |
482,307 |
|
|
$ |
3,646,372 |
|
|
$ |
1,294,726 |
|
|
$ |
5,423,405 |
|
AA/Aa rating |
|
|
17,960 |
|
|
|
155,772 |
|
|
|
35,135 |
|
|
|
208,867 |
|
A/A rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,128 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
21,741 |
|
BBB/Baa rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed notes
issued to third-party
investors |
|
$ |
500,267 |
|
|
$ |
3,823,913 |
|
|
$ |
1,332,474 |
|
|
$ |
5,656,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total collateral |
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
82.4 |
% |
|
|
97.3 |
% |
|
|
86.7 |
% |
Debt retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa rating |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
551,441 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
551,441 |
|
AA/Aa rating |
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
42,346 |
|
|
|
8,518 |
|
|
|
57,631 |
|
A/A rating |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
68,856 |
|
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
80,396 |
|
BBB/Bbb rating |
|
|
5,206 |
|
|
|
52,579 |
|
|
|
10,885 |
|
|
|
68,670 |
|
BB/Ba rating |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
39,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,584 |
|
B/B rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
Not rated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,420 |
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
36,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage- backed notes
retained |
|
|
17,439 |
|
|
|
810,555 |
|
|
|
31,413 |
|
|
|
859,407 |
|
Overcollateralization |
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
4,059 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
12,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt retained |
|
$ |
20,301 |
|
|
$ |
814,614 |
|
|
$ |
36,535 |
|
|
$ |
871,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total collateral |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Collateralized Debt Obligations
In March 2007, we issued $400.0 million of CDOs from Charles Fort CDO I, Ltd., our qualified
REIT subsidiary. The CDOs are in the form of floating-rate pass-through certificates that were
collateralized at closing by $289.1 million of our mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
and $59.1 million of mortgage-backed securities which we retained from prior whole loan
securitizations as well as an uninvested cash balance which was subsequently used to purchase
additional securities. Of the $400.0 million of CDOs issued at the closing of the securitization,
third-party investors purchased $296.0 million of non-recourse certificates that provide permanent
financing for the mortgage-backed securities in the CDO and we retained $104.0 million of
certificates including $27.0 million of subordinated certificates, which provide credit support to
the certificates issued to third-party investors. The interest rates on the certificates reset
quarterly and are indexed to three-month LIBOR. As of September 30, 2007, our CDOs had an
outstanding balance, net of unamortized discounts, of $294.5 million, and a weighted-average
interest rate of 6.37%.
Exemption from the Investment Company Act of 1940
We seek to conduct our business so as not to become regulated as an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Investment Company Act). Under Section 3(a)(1) of the
Investment Company Act, a company is deemed to be an investment company if:
it neither is, nor holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, nor proposes to engage
primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; and
it neither is engaged nor proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting,
owning holding or trading in securities and does not own or propose to acquire investment
securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated
basis (the 40% Test).
43
Prior to June 30, 2007, we relied on the 40% Test. Because of the recent market deterioration
and resulting defaults, several of our subsidiaries designed to rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C)
currently fail to hold at least 55% of their assets in mortgage loans or other qualifying assets or
(the 55% Test), and as a result must rely on Section 3(c)(7) to avoid registration as investment
companies. As a result, the Company no longer satisfies the 40% Test.
We are now relying on Rule 3a-2 for our exemption from registration under the Investment
Company Act That rule provides a safe harbor exemption, not to exceed one year, for companies that
have a bona fide intent to be engaged in an excepted activity but that temporarily fail to meet the
requirements for another exemption from registration as an investment company. As required by the
rule, after we learned that we were out of compliance, our board of directors promptly adopted a
resolution declaring our bona fide intent to be engaged in excepted activities within a one-year
period.
Reliance upon Rule 3a-2 is permitted only once every three years. As a result, if we
otherwise fail to maintain our exclusion from registration, within that three-year period, and
another exemption is not available, we may be required to register as an investment company, or we
may be required to acquire and/or dispose of assets in order to meet the 55% Test or other tests
for exclusion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As noted previously, we have experienced significant reductions in liquidity since August 2007
due to recent market deterioration in the mortgage industry. Short-term financing methods
previously available to us, such as the issuance of commercial paper, the availability of
repurchase agreement financing and the use of warehouse lines of credit have become cost
prohibitive or significantly less available and, in some cases, have been eliminated.
Currently, our main source of liquidity is our cash flow from operations, primarily monthly
principal and interest payments we receive on our mortgage-backed securities and $781.5 million of
repurchase agreements in good standing including a $74.0 million repurchase agreement arranged by
Arco as of September 30, 2007. In addition, Arco has entered into a definitive credit agreement
with us to provide a liquidity line of credit and subsequent to September 30, 2007 increased total
available financing to $190.0 million. See Note 5 and Note 14 to our consolidated financial
statements for further information on the Arco agreements.
Our long-term financing includes a combination of the issuance of mortgage-backed notes that
provide financing for our whole loan portfolio and CDOs for the financing of certain
mortgage-backed securities. At September 30, 2007, we had $4.0 million of mortgage-backed notes
with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.37% and $294.5 million of CDOs with a weighted-average
borrowing rate of 6.37%. This long-term financing is non-recourse to us.
Our immediate goal is to stabilize our portfolio by ensuring stable financing for the
securities we intend to hold and liquidating assets we do not intend to hold in order to repay
borrowings and provide us with additional liquidity. As part of this stabilization effort,
management has implemented cost reduction strategies including reductions in personnel in an effort
to ensure that our current cash flow meets our liquidity needs. We regularly review opportunities
in the market to improve our liquidity and maximize profitability for the long-term. If our cash
resources at any time are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may be required to
liquidate additional mortgage-related assets or incur additional debt, sell equity securities or
consider other strategic alternatives. If required, the sale of mortgage-related assets at prices
lower than the carrying value of such assets could result in additional losses.
On May 9, 2007, we paid a cash distribution of $0.30 per share to our stockholders of record
on April 11, 2007, and on June 27, 2007, we declared a cash distribution of $0.32 per share to our
stockholders of record on July 11, 2007. We suspended the payment of the dividend that we declared
on June 27, 2007 due to liquidity considerations. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial
statements for further information about our liquidity. The distributions that we pay are likely to
be taxable dividends, rather than a return of capital. We did not distribute an estimated $9.6
million of our REIT taxable net income for 2006. We declared a spillback distribution for this
amount in September 2007. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for further
information on the
44
payment of dividends. If in the event we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would owe federal and
state income tax on our net taxable income at a combined effective tax rate of 41.0%. See the REIT
Taxable Income section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations for a reconciliation of GAAP net income to REIT taxable income.
In November 2005, we announced a program permitting us to repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares of
our common stock. In February 2006, we announced an additional repurchase authorization to acquire
an incremental 3,000,000 shares. On May 7, 2007, our board approved the repurchase of an additional
5,000,000 shares of common stock. On April 11, 2007, we adopted a stock repurchase plan under Rule
10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Rule 10b5-1 allows a public company to adopt a written, prearranged
stock repurchase plan when it does not have material, non-public information in its possession. The
adoption of this stock repurchase plan allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we
otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed
trading blackout periods. We repurchase our common stock at levels when the return on equity from
doing so is competitive or higher than the return on equity that we can obtain from other
investment opportunities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we repurchased 4,904,765
shares under this program. We have repurchased a total of 7,629,215 shares under the repurchase
program through December 20, 2007. Currently, due to liquidity considerations, we have no immediate
plans to repurchase additional shares on the open market.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations. The table excludes unamortized
discounts and premiums and debt issuance costs as well as accrued interest payable, derivative
contracts because those contracts do not have fixed and determinable payments:
Contractual Obligations
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 - 5 |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1 - 3 years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed notes (1) |
|
$ |
4,014.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,083.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,828.4 |
|
|
$ |
983.6 |
|
|
$ |
118.2 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
813.7 |
|
|
|
813.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDOs (1) |
|
|
295.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
143.9 |
|
|
|
142.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
Revolving credit facility (2) |
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities leases |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,350.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,906.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,972.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,169.9 |
|
|
$ |
301.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The mortgage-backed notes and CDOs have stated maturities through 2047; however, the expected maturity is subject to
change based on the prepayments and loan losses of the underlying mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities. In
addition, we may exercise a redemption option and thereby effect termination and early retirement of the debt. The payments
represented reflect our assumptions for prepayment and credit losses at September 30, 2007 and assume we will exercise our
redemption option. |
|
(2) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a stated maturity of 2012. The terms of the facility require repayment from the sale
of assets and excess cash flows as defined in the agreement. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the third quarter of 2007, we sold some of our interests in the securitization trusts that
were established to permanently finance our residential mortgage loans. As a result, our 2007-2
securitization no longer qualified for consolidation with the our consolidated financial statements
in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, or
FIN 46. Residential mortgage loans in the amount of $636.7 million were removed from our balance
sheet along with the related debt of $620.8 million. We continue to hold mortgage-backed securities
with a fair value of $10.0 million at September 30, 2007 related to the 2007-2 trust. These assets
45
are included in our mortgage-backed securities portfolio as of September 30, 2007.
In 2005, we completed two trust preferred securities offerings in the aggregate amount of
$90.0 million. We received proceeds, net of debt issuance costs, from the preferred securities
offerings in the amount of $87.2 million. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for
further information.
Recent Accounting and Reporting Developments
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recently issued or
proposed accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The primary components of our market risk are credit risk and interest rate risk. We seek to
assume risk that can be quantified from historical experience, to manage that risk, to earn
sufficient compensation to justify taking that risk and to maintain capital levels consistent with
the risk we undertake or to which we are exposed.
Short-Term Financing Risks
We are subject to risks in connection with our usage of short-term financing for our
mortgage-backed securities and whole loan purchases. We finance our purchases of mortgage-backed
securities and whole loans through a combination of repurchase agreements, warehouse lines of
credit and, in the past, have used commercial paper financing, until we secure permanent financing
through the issuance of non-recourse mortgage-backed notes or CDOs. We obtain short-term financing
by borrowing against the market value of our securities or whole loans. At any given time, our
ability to borrow depends on our lenders estimate of the credit quality of our securities,
liquidity and expected cash flow as well as our lenders advance rates on securities. The securities
that we purchase are subject to daily fluctuations in market pricing and as market pricing changes
we may be subject to margin calls from our financing counterparties. A margin call requires us to
post additional collateral or cash with our financing counterparties to maintain the financing on
our securities. We face the risk that we might not be able to meet our debt service obligations or
margin calls and, to the extent that we cannot, we might be forced to liquidate some or all of our
assets at disadvantageous prices that would adversely impact our results of operations and
financial condition. A default on a collateralized borrowing could also result in an involuntary
liquidation of the pledged asset, which would adversely impact our results of operations and
financial condition. Furthermore, if our lenders do not allow us to renew our borrowings or we
cannot replace maturing borrowings on favorable terms or at all, we might be forced to liquidate
some or all of our assets at disadvantageous prices which would adversely impact our results of
operations or financial condition.
Credit Risk
We are subject to credit risk in connection with our investments in residential mortgage loans
and credit sensitive mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities rated below AAA.
The credit risk related to these investments pertains to the ability and willingness to pay of the
borrowers whose mortgages collateralize these investments, which is assessed before credit is
granted or renewed and periodically reviewed throughout the loan or security term. We believe that
loan credit quality is primarily determined by the borrowers credit profiles and loan
characteristics.
We use a comprehensive credit review process. Our analysis of loans includes borrower
profiles, as well as valuation and appraisal data. Our resources include sophisticated industry and
rating agency software. We also outsource underwriting services to review higher risk loans, either
due to borrower credit profiles or collateral valuation issues. Since June 2006, we have evaluated
the accuracy of every appraisal on every loan we have purchased. In addition to statistical
sampling techniques, we create adverse credit and valuation samples, which we individually review.
We reject loans that fail to conform to our standards. We accept only those loans that meet our
careful underwriting criteria.
46
Once we own a loan, our surveillance process includes ongoing analysis through our proprietary
data warehouse and servicer files. We are proactive in our analysis of payment behavior and in loss
mitigation through our servicing relationships.
In addition, we, from time to time, purchase derivative securities such as credit default
swaps or other instruments which change in value based on changes in asset-backed securities
indexes. We use these derivative securities to attempt to mitigate the effect of unforeseen
increases in losses on the investment securities in our portfolio. We may use single-name credit
default swaps to economically hedge changes in value, due to credit, of certain specific investment
securities or use derivative instruments as economic hedges of portions of the investment portfolio
generally. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex and may
produce volatile returns.
We are also subject to credit risk in connection with our investments in mortgage-backed
securities in our Spread portfolio, which we mitigate by holding securities that are either
guaranteed by government or government-sponsored agencies or have credit ratings of AAA.
Concentration Risk
Inadequate diversification of our loan portfolio, such as geographic regions, may result in
losses. As part of our underwriting process, we diversify the geographic concentration risk
exposure in our portfolios.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our investment securities and our
related debt obligations.
Effect on Net Interest Income
We finance our mortgage loans held-for-investment through a combination of warehouse lending
facilities initially, and non-recourse mortgage-backed notes following the securitization of our
loans. Our mortgage loan assets consist of a combination of adjustable-rate mortgage loans and
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans. The interest rates on our warehouse lending facilities and
non-recourse mortgage-backed notes generally reset on a monthly basis. In general, we use
derivative contracts to match-fund the cost of our related borrowings with the income that we
expect to earn from our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans that currently have fixed coupon
rates. If our hedging activities are effective, over a variety of interest rate scenarios the
change in income from our mortgage loans, plus the benefit or cost of our related hedging
activities, will generally offset the change in the cost of our related borrowings such that the
net interest spread from our mortgage loans will remain substantially unchanged.
Our repurchase agreements and CDOs all reset on a short term basis and therefore the fair
value of these instruments would not change materially based on changes in interest rates. The
following sensitivity analysis table shows the estimated impact on the fair value of our interest
rate-sensitive instruments assuming rates instantaneously fall 100 basis points, rise 100 basis
points and rise 200 basis points.
47
Interest Rate Sensitivity
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Fall 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rise 100 |
|
Rise 200 |
|
|
Basis Points |
|
Unchanged |
|
Basis Points |
|
Basis Points |
September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
907.8 |
|
|
$ |
907.0 |
|
|
$ |
906.2 |
|
|
$ |
905.5 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Change as a percent of fair value |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Hedge Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
(14.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Change as a percent of fair value |
|
|
(478.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
603.6 |
% |
|
|
1321.1 |
% |
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Investment(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
4,034.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,992.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,951.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,910.7 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
(82.3 |
) |
Change as a percent of fair value |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Mortgage-backed Notes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
3,787.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,781.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,776.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,770.7 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
Change as a percent of fair value |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Senior convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
70.2 |
|
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
65.1 |
|
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Change as a percent of fair value |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
|
|
(7.1 |
)% |
Junior Subordinated Notes(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
95.5 |
|
|
$ |
91.7 |
|
|
$ |
88.1 |
|
|
$ |
84.7 |
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Change as a percent of fair value |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This asset or liability is carried on our consolidated balance sheet
at amortized cost and therefore a change in interest rates would not
affect the carrying value of the asset or liability. |
nm = not meaningful
It is important to note that the impact of changing interest rates on fair value can change
significantly when interest rates change beyond 100 basis points from current levels. Therefore,
the volatility in the fair value of our assets could increase significantly when interest rates
change beyond 100 basis points. In addition, other factors impact the fair value of our interest
rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market
expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the
event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the fair value of our assets would likely
differ from that shown above and such difference might be material and adverse to our stockholders.
To the extent consistent with maintaining our status as a REIT, we seek to manage our interest
rate risk exposure to protect our portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and related debt against
the effects of major interest rate changes. We generally seek to manage our interest rate risk by:
|
|
|
monitoring and adjusting, if necessary, the reset index and interest rate related to our
mortgage-backed securities and our borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
attempting to structure our borrowing agreements to have a range of different maturities,
terms, amortizations and interest rate adjustment periods; |
|
|
|
|
using derivatives, financial futures, swaps, options, caps, floors and forward sales to
adjust the interest rate- sensitivity of our mortgage-backed securities and our
borrowings; and |
|
|
|
|
actively managing, on an aggregate basis, the interest rate indices, interest rate
adjustment periods and gross reset margins of our mortgage-backed securities and the interest
rate indices and adjustment periods of our borrowings. |
48
Extension Risk
Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities
have interest rates that are fixed for the first few years of the mortgage loan or mortgage-backed
security typically three, five, seven or 10 years and thereafter their interest rates reset
periodically. At September 30, 2007, 23.6% of our total mortgage assets consisted of hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage loans and we held no hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. We
compute the projected weighted-average life of hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage assets based on the
markets assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay these assets. During a
period of interest rate increases, prepayment rates on our hybrid adjustable-rate assets may
decrease and cause the weighted-average life of these assets to lengthen. During a period of
interest rate decreases, prepayment rates on our hybrid adjustable-rate assets may increase and
cause the weighted-average life of these assets to shorten. The possibility that our hybrid
adjustable-rate assets may lengthen due to slower prepayment activity is commonly known as
extension risk. See Prepayment Risk below. We may purchase a variety of hedging instruments to
mitigate these risks. Depending upon the type of derivative contract that we use to hedge these
borrowing costs however, extension risk related to the hybrid adjustable-rate assets being hedged
may cause a mismatch with the hedging instruments and negatively impact the desired result from our
hedging activities. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets and incur losses to
maintain adequate liquidity.
Interest Rate Cap Risk
We also invest in residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities that are based on
mortgages that are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps. These interest
rate caps limit the amount by which the coupon rate of these assets may change during any given
period. However, the borrowing costs related to our mortgage assets are not subject to similar
restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates, interest rate costs on the
borrowings for our mortgage assets could increase without the limitation of interest rate caps,
while the corresponding increase in coupon rates on mortgage assets could be limited by interest
rate caps. This problem will be magnified to the extent that we acquire mortgage assets that are
not based on mortgages that are fully-indexed.
In addition, our mortgage assets may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some
portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. The presence of
these payment caps could result in our receipt of less cash income on our mortgage assets than we
need in order to pay the interest cost on our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net
interest income or cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would negatively
impact our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. We may purchase a variety of
hedging instruments to mitigate these risks.
Prepayment Risk
Prepayments are the full or partial unscheduled repayment of principal prior to the original
term to maturity of a loan. Prepayment rates for mortgage loans and mortgage loans underlying
mortgage-backed securities generally increase when prevailing interest rates fall below the market
rate existing when the mortgage loans were originated. Prepayment rates on mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities generally increase when the difference between long-term and short-term
interest rates declines or becomes negative. In the event that we owned such loan or security and
it is prepaid prior to or soon after the time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate, then we would
have held such loan or security while it was less profitable and lost the opportunity to receive
interest at the fully-indexed rate over the expected life of asset. In addition, we currently own
mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities that were purchased at a premium. The prepayment of
such mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities at a rate faster than anticipated would result
in a write-off of any remaining capitalized premium amount and a consequent reduction of our net
interest income by such amount. At September 30, 2007, 67% of our mortgage loans contained
prepayment penalty provisions compared to 65% at December 31, 2006. Generally, mortgage loans with
prepayment penalty provisions are less likely to prepay than mortgage loans without prepayment
penalty provisions.
49
Inflation
Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, interest
rates and other factors influence our performance far more so than inflation does. Changes in
interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. We
prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, and primarily base our distributions on our REIT taxable net income;
in each case, we measure our activities and balance sheet reference to historical cost and fair
market value without considering inflation.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Conclusion Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At September 30, 2007, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer
have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, and concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and our disclosure controls and procedures are
also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No material changes occurred during the third quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31,
2007 in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
50
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Class Action Lawsuits
Following the August 6, 2007 announcement of actions taken by the board of directors, we and
certain officers and directors were named as defendants in six purported class action lawsuits
filed between August 8, 2007 and September 12, 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California alleging violations of federal securities laws. These lawsuits seek
certification of classes composed of stockholders who purchased our securities during certain
periods, starting as early as October 10, 2006 and concluding as late as August 6, 2007. The
lawsuits allege generally that the defendants violated federal securities laws by making material
misrepresentations to the market concerning our operations and prospects, thereby artificially
inflating the price of our common stock. The complaints seek unspecified damages. The lawsuits
have been consolidated into a single action but a consolidated complaint has not yet been filed.
The case involves complex issues of law and fact and have not yet progressed to the point
where we can: 1) predict its outcome; 2) estimate damages that might result from the case or 3)
predict the effect that final resolution the case might have on our business, financial condition
or results of operations, although such effect could be materially adverse. We believe these
allegations to be without merit. We intend to seek dismissal of these lawsuits for failure to
state a valid legal claim, and if the case is not dismissed on motion, to vigorously defend
ourselves against these allegations. We maintain directors and officers liability insurance which
we believe should provide coverage to us and our officers and directors for most or all of any
costs, settlements or judgments resulting from the lawsuit.
In addition, a stockholder derivative action was filed on August 31, 2007 in the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, in which an individual stockholder
purports to assert claims on our behalf against numerous directors and officers for alleged breach
of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and other similar claims. We believe the allegations in the
stockholder derivative complaint to be without merit and have filed motions to dismiss all claims.
Furthermore, any recovery in the derivative lawsuit would be payable to us, and this lawsuit is
therefore unlikely to have a material negative effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
Item 1A Risk Factors
For additional risk factor information about us, please refer to Item 1A of our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition to the
risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, we
set forth below an additional risk factor that has recently become applicable to our business.
A decline in our stock price below $1.00 may result in the delisting of our common stock by the New
York Stock Exchange.
In recent months the price of our common stock has experienced significant volatility and, has
traded below $1.00. According to the rules of the NYSE on which our common stock is listed, if the
average closing stock price of a stock is below $1.00 at times over a consecutive 30-day trading
period, the stock maybe delisted. If this event were to occur, the NYSE procedures permit us to
submit a plan describing definitive action we have taken, or are taking that would bring us into
conformity with the NYSEs continued listing standards within 18 months. The NYSE has no obligation
to allow us to submit a plan or accept our plan if submitted to them, and if the NYSE were not to
accept our plan it could make an application to the SEC to delist our common stock.
51
The current dislocations in the sub-prime mortgage sector, and the current weakness in the
broader mortgage market, have adversely affected our business and could result in further increases
in our borrowing costs, reductions in our liquidity, reductions in the value of our investment
portfolio and the possible loss of REIT status.
Although our direct exposure to sub-prime mortgages is limited, the current
dislocations in the sub-prime mortgage sector, and the current disruption in the broader mortgage
market, have adversely affected our ability to obtain funding for our whole loan purchases and our
mortgage-backed securities portfolio and have caused some of our counterparties to be unwilling or
unable to provide us with financing on even our highest quality AAA-rated mortgage-backed
securities. These financing trends have increased our financing costs and reduced our liquidity. In
addition, our liquidity has been adversely affected by margin calls under our repurchase
agreements. Our repurchase agreements allow the counterparty to varying degrees, to revalue the
collateral to values that the lender considers reflect appropriate market value. If a counterparty
determines that the value of the collateral has decreased, it may initiate a margin call requiring
us to post additional collateral or cash to cover the decrease. When we are subject to such a
margin call, we must provide the counterparty with additional collateral, cash or repay a portion
of the outstanding borrowing with minimal notice. The current market dislocation has also
negatively impacted the marketability of our whole loans and mortgage-backed securities and due to
our need for additional liquidity and to repay outstanding borrowings; we have been forced to sell
certain amounts of our whole loans and mortgage-backed securities at a time when prices are
depressed. We can not predict how long this market dislocation will last or if further dislocation
will occur in the future. The continuation of the current market environment or further disruptions
in the market could further increase our borrowing costs, further reduce our liquidity and further
reduce the value of our investment portfolio.
The current dislocations in the U.S. residential mortgage market an the corresponding changed
economic conditions also increase the risk that we could lose our REIT status in 2007 or a
subsequent taxable year as a result of our inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements,
required sales of assets in order to meet margin calls, lower than expected income on our mortgage
assets as a result of borrower defaults or other factors. Reference is made to Exemption from the
Investment Company Act of 1940 in Item 2 of this Form 10Q for additional information about the
effect of a loss of our REIT status.
Due to recent market disruptions that resulted in our need to sell assets to satisfy margin calls
on our financing agreements, we are relying on a safe harbor exemption from the Investment Company
Act of 1940 in order to not become regulated as an investment company. Failure to maintain an
exemption from the Investment Company Act would harm our results of
operations.
We seek to conduct our business so as not to become regulated as an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Because we conduct some of our business through
wholly owned subsidiaries, we must ensure not only that we qualify for an exclusion or exemption
from regulation under the Investment Company Act, but also that each of our subsidiaries so
qualifies. Under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, a company is deemed to be an
investment company if:
it neither is, nor holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, nor proposes to engage
primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; and
it neither is engaged nor proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting,
owning holding or trading in securities and does not own or propose to acquire investment
securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated
basis. This test is known as the 40% Test.
The term investment securities excludes U.S. government securities and securities of
majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the
exceptions from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7).
52
We conduct our business primarily through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries. We
must ensure that less than 40% of the value of our total assets consists of interests in
subsidiaries that rely on Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) in order to meet the 40% Test.
Several of our subsidiaries are designed to rely on Section 3(c)(5)(c). We call each of these
a 3(c)(5)(c) subsidiary or a qualifying subsidiary. Based on a series of no-action letters issued
by the SECs Division of Investment Management, or Division, in order for a subsidiary to qualify
for this exemption, at least 55% of that subsidiarys assets must consist of residential mortgage
loans and other assets that are considered the functional equivalent of residential mortgage loans
for purposes of the Investment Company Act (collectively, qualifying real estate assets), and an
additional 25% of that subsidiarys assets must consist of real estate-related assets.
We plan to continue to satisfy the tests with respect to our assets, measured on an
unconsolidated basis. It is not completely settled, however, that the tests are to be measured on
an unconsolidated basis. To the extent the SEC provides further guidance on how to measure assets
for these tests, we will adjust our measurement techniques.
If we fail to qualify for this exemption, our ability to use leverage would be substantially
reduced, and we would be unable to execute our current operating policies and programs.
Because of the recent market deterioration and resulting defaults on our financing obligations
we have sold assets to meet margin calls on our financing agreements and several of the our
subsidiaries designed to rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) currently fail to meet the 55% Test, and as a
result must rely on Section 3(c)(7) to avoid registration as investment companies. As a result, we
no longer satisfy the 40% Test.
We are now relying upon Rule 3a-2 for our exemption from registration under the Investment
Company Act. That rule provides a safe harbor exemption, not to exceed one year, for companies that
have a bona fide intent to be engaged in an excepted activity but that temporarily fail to meet the
requirements for another exemption from registration as an investment company. Our board has
adopted a resolution demonstrating this bona fide intent.
Reliance upon Rule 3a-2 is permitted only once every three years. As a result, if the
subsidiaries designed to rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) fail to meet either the 55% Test or the 25%
Test, or if we otherwise fail to maintain our exclusion from registration, within that three year
period, and another exemption is not available, we may be required to register as an investment
company, or we may be required to acquire and/or dispose of assets in order to meet the 55% Test or
other tests for exclusion. Any such asset acquisitions or dispositions may be of assets that we
would not acquire or dispose of in the ordinary course of our business, may be at unfavorable
prices or may impair our ability to make distributions to shareholders and result in a decline in
the price of our common shares. If we are required to register under the Investment Company Act,
we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including
our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as
defined in the Investment Company Act), and portfolio composition, including restrictions with
respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters. Accordingly, registration
under the Investment Company Act could limit our ability to follow our current investment and
financing strategies, impair our ability to make distributions to our common shareholders and
result in a decline in the price of our common stock.
53
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On August 14, 2007, we entered into a series of agreements with Arco that provided us with
$64.9 million of repurchase agreement financing. In exchange for this financing, we issued to Arco
warrants to purchase up to 51,000,000 shares of our common stock representing 49% of the voting
interest in us and 51% of the economic interest in us on a fully diluted basis. The warrant holders
have the right to elect to receive nonvoting shares for any warrant exercised. The warrants are
exercisable until September 30, 2012 at an exercise price of $0.18 per share subject to
anti-dilution adjustments to maintain the economic ownership percentage in us attributable to the
warrants at 51% on a fully-diluted basis. The agreement further requires that our board of
directors include four directors whom must be satisfactory to Arco.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
In August 2007, we experienced defaults with certain counterparties to our repurchase
agreement financing. These events resulted in a cross-default on our convertible senior notes.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the Signatures section of this report) are
included, or incorporated by reference, in this Form 10-Q.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUMINENT CAPITAL, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ S. Trezevant Moore, Jr.
|
|
|
|
S. Trezevant Moore, Jr. |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: December 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher J. Zyda
|
|
|
|
Christopher J. Zyda |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: December 27, 2007 |
|
55
EXHIBIT INDEX
Pursuant to Item 601(a) (2) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit index immediately precedes any
exhibits filed herewith.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Form 10-Q and are
numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Capital Stock Warrant Agreement dated August 17, 2007 (1) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Letter of Intent between the Registrant and Arco Capital Corporation Ltd., dated
August 16, 2007 (1) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated August 21, 2007 between the Registrant and Arco Capital Corporation
Ltd. (2) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Security and Pledge Agreement, dated August 21, 2007, among the Registrant and its
subsidiaries of the party hereto, as grantors and Arco Capital Corporation Ltd., as secured
party (2) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, dated August 21, 2007 (2) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Retention Agreement between the Registrant and S. Trezevant Moore, Jr., dated August 31,
2007 (3) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Retention Agreement between the Registrant and Christopher J. Zyda, dated August 31, 2007 (3) |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Severance Agreement between Proserpine, LLC and Eleanor Melton, dated August 31, 2007 (3) |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated September 12, 2007 between the Registrant and Arco
Capital Corporation Ltd. (4) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 26, 2007 between the Registrant and
Arco Capital Corporation Ltd. (5) |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amended and Restated Security and Pledge Agreement, dated September 26,, 2007, among the
Registrant and its subsidiaries of the party hereto, as grantors and Arco Capital
Corporation Ltd., as secured party (5) |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, dated September 26, 2007 (5) |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Retention and Separation Agreement between Proserpine, LLC and Ron Viera, dated September
25, 2007 (5) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Separation Agreement between Proserpine, LLC and Eleanor Melton, dated September 28, 2007 (5) |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Consulting Agreement between the Registrant and Eleanor Melton, dated September 28, 2007 (5) |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Karen Chang, dated October 17, 2007 (6) |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between the Registrant and S. Trezevant Moore Jr. ,
dated October 22, 2007 (6) |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 7, 2007 between the
Registrant and Arco Capital Corporation (7) |
56
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Collateral Security Setoff and Netting Agreement dated December 7, 2007 among the Registrant
and its subsidiaries of the party hereto, Arco Capital Corporation Ltd., its parent,
subsidiaries and affiliates (7) |
|
|
|
31.1 *
|
|
Certification of S. Trezevant Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 *
|
|
Certification of Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 *
|
|
Certification of S. Trezevant Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 *
|
|
Certification of Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed August 22, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed August 27, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed September 7, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed September 18, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed October 1, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed October 22, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed December 13, 2007. |
57