f10q.htm




SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
 
OR
 
[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ----- to -----
 

Commission file number 0-13163
   
Acxiom Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
   
DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
71-0581897
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
P.O. Box 8180, 601 E. Third Street,
Little Rock, Arkansas
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
72201
(Zip Code)
   
(501) 342-1000
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
   
             Yes  [X]
             No  [ ]
     
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such filings).
 
 Yes [X]
   No [ ]
     
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
 
Large accelerated filer [X]
 
Accelerated filer   [ ]
   
 
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
 
Smaller reporting company [ ]
   
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
 
   
             Yes  [ ]
              No  [X]
     
             
The number of shares of Common Stock, $ 0.10 par value per share outstanding as of August 3, 2010 was 80,018,814.
 

 
1

 

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2010
                                                                                                        
 
                                                                                                             
                                                                                                            
 Part I.     Financial Information
 
   Page No.
    Item 1.  Financial Statements    
 
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
   3
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the Three Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited) 
   4
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity and Comprehensive  Income
   for the Three Months ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) 
 
   5
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the Three Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)   
 
   6-7
          Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
   8-20
 
   Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
   21-30
 
   Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
 
   31
  
       Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
   31
 Part II.   Other Information
   
   Item 1.  Legal Proceedings     
 32
 
   
   Item 5. Other Information
 
   32
   Item 6.  Exhibits  
 33
 
 Signature    34
 
 
2

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Financial Statements
ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
   
June 30, 2010
   
March 31, 2010
 
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 218,457     $ 224,104  
Trade accounts receivable, net
    183,644       168,522  
Deferred income taxes
    11,765       11,874  
Other current assets
    52,799       54,205  
Total current assets
    466,665       458,705  
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
    240,340       236,839  
Software, net of accumulated amortization
    34,771       38,845  
Goodwill
    464,374       470,261  
Purchased software licenses, net of accumulated amortization
    49,005       51,356  
Deferred costs, net
    72,983       68,914  
Data acquisition costs, net
    20,945       21,931  
Other assets, net
    14,944       16,569  
    $ 1,364,027     $ 1,363,420  
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Current installments of long-term debt
  $ 42,169     $ 42,106  
Trade accounts payable
    40,041       42,774  
Accrued expenses
               
Payroll
    27,664       36,517  
Other
    74,826       75,632  
Deferred revenue
    56,335       55,567  
Income taxes
    3,965       2,460  
Total current liabilities
    245,000       255,056  
Long-term debt
    459,833       458,629  
Deferred income taxes
    63,595       61,284  
Other liabilities
    9,915       9,954  
Commitments and contingencies
               
Equity:
               
Common stock
    11,715       11,662  
Additional paid-in capital
    821,649       814,929  
Retained earnings
    492,048       482,243  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (4,855 )     4,167  
Treasury stock, at cost
    ( 738,601 )     (738,601 )
Total Acxiom stockholders' equity
    581,956       574,400  
Noncontrolling interest
    3,728       4,097  
Total equity
    585,684       578,497  
    $ 1,364,027     $ 1,363,420  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
               

 

 

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
     
For the Three Months ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Revenue:
           
Services
  $ 210,656     $ 199,326  
Products
    59,739       56,655  
Total revenue
    270,395       255,981  
Operating costs and expenses:
               
Cost of revenue
               
Services
    164,650       159,576  
Products
    45,771       45,919  
Total cost of revenue
    210,421       205,495  
Selling, general and administrative
    37,955       37,643  
Gains, losses and other items, net
    (57 )     347  
Total operating costs and expenses
    248,319       243,485  
Income from operations
    22,076       12,496  
Other income (expense):
               
Interest expense
    (5,898 )     (5,505 )
Other, net
    (451 )     (118 )
Total other expense
    (6,349 )     (5,623 )
Earnings before income taxes
    15,727       6,873  
Income taxes
    6,291       2,679  
Net earnings
  $ 9,436     $ 4,194  
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (369 )     -  
Net earnings attributable to Acxiom
  $ 9,805     $ 4,194  
                 
Earnings per share:
               
Basic
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
Diluted
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
                 
Earnings per share attributable to Acxiom stockholders:
               
Basic
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
Diluted
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
               


  4
 

 

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

                                 
Accumulated
                         
   
Common Stock
   
Additional
               
other
   
Treasury Stock
             
   
Number
         
paid-in
   
Comprehensive
   
Retained
   
comprehensive
   
Number
         
Noncontrolling
   
Total
 
   
of shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Income (loss)
   
earnings
   
income (loss)
   
of shares
   
Amount
   
interest
   
equity
 
Balances at March 31, 2010
    116,619,682     $ 11,662     $ 814,929           $ 482,243     $ 4,167       (37,154,236 )   $ (738,601 )   $ 4,097     $ 578,497  
Employee stock awards, benefit plans and other issuances
    258,108       26       3,775     $ -       -       -       -       -       -       3,801  
Restricted stock units vested
    268,909       27       (27 )     -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Non-cash share-based compensation
    -       -       2,972       -       -       -       -       -       -       2,972  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Foreign currency translation
    -       -       -       (9,627 )     -       (9,627 )     -       -       -       (9,627 )
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap
    -       -       -       605       -       605       -       -       -       605  
Net earnings (loss)
    -       -       -       9,805       9,805       -       -       -       (369 )     9,436  
Total comprehensive income
                          $ 783                                                  
Balances at June 30, 2010
    117,146,699     $ 11,715     $ 821,649             $ 492,048     $ (4,855 )     (37,154,236 )   $ (738,601 )   $ 3,728     $ 585,684  
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

 

 

 
ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
     
For the Three Months ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net earnings
  $ 9,436     $ 4,194  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    35,986       40,595  
Deferred income taxes
    1,435       2,496  
Non-cash share-based compensation expense
    2,972       2,388  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (16,836 )     (4,335 )
Deferred costs
    (9,981 )     (906 )
Other assets
    (1,467 )     4,651  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    (7,121 )     (32,017 )
Deferred revenue
    2,564       (900 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    16,988       16,166  
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Capitalized software development costs
    (1,226 )     (2,384 )
Capital expenditures
    (8,752 )     (7,431 )
Data acquisition costs
    (4,326 )     (5,777 )
Payment received from investments
    175       -  
Net cash paid in acquisitions
    (1,978 )     -  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (16,107 )     (15,592 )
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Payments of debt
    (8,964 )     (13,724 )
Sale of common stock
    3,801       2,427  
Acquisition of treasury stock
    -       (307 )
Net cash used in financing activities
    (5,163 )     (11,604 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    (1,365 )     1,534  
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (5,647 )     (9,496 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    224,104       177,166  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 218,457     $ 167,670  
                 


  6
 

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
   
   
For the Three Months ended
 June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
 
Supplemental cash flow information:
           
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
           
Interest
  $ 5,780     $ 5,258  
Income taxes
    3,358       (5,052 )
Payments on capital leases and installment payment arrangements
    5,968       7,794  
Payments on software and data license liabilities
    893       3,878  
Other debt payments, excluding line of credit
    2,103       2,052  
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Acquisition of property and equipment under capital leases and installment payment arrangements
    10,268       3,823  
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
               
                 
                 
                 
                 

 
7

 

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1.           BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Acxiom Corporation (“Registrant,” “Acxiom” or “the Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”).  In the opinion of the Registrant’s management all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods included have been made and the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.  Certain note information has been omitted because it has not changed significantly from that reflected in notes 1 through 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of Item 8 of the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (“2010 Annual Report”), as filed with the Commission on May 26, 2010.  This report and the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in connection with the 2010 Annual Report.  The financial information contained in this report is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other period or for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2011.

Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements are complex and require management to make judgments and/or significant estimates regarding amounts reported or disclosed in these financial statements.  Additionally, the application of certain of these accounting policies is governed by complex accounting principles and their interpretation.  A discussion of the Company’s significant accounting principles and their application is included in note 1 and in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, to the Company’s 2010 Annual Report.

Accounting Changes

The FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force has issued new accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Under previous accounting guidance, one of the requirements for recognition of revenue for a delivered item under a multiple element arrangement was that there must be objective and verifiable evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered item.  The new guidance eliminates that requirement and requires an entity to estimate the selling price of each element in the arrangement.  In addition, absent specific software revenue guidance, the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration is no longer permitted.  Under the new guidance, a multiple-deliverable arrangement is separated into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered items have value to the client on a stand-alone basis and, if the arrangement includes a general right of return related to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company.  If these criteria are not met, the arrangement is accounted for as one unit of accounting, which would result in revenue being recognized ratably over the contract term or being deferred until the earlier of when those criteria are met or when the last undelivered item is delivered.  If the arrangement is separated into multiple units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on each unit’s relative selling price.

The relative selling price for each unit of accounting in a multiple-element arrangement is established using vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE), if available, third-party evidence (TPE), if available, or management’s best estimate of stand-alone selling price (BESP).  In most cases, the Company has neither VSOE nor TPE and therefore uses BESP.  The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the company would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis.  Management’s BESP is determined by considering multiple factors, primarily including actual contractual selling prices when the item is sold on a stand-alone basis, as well as market conditions, competition, internal costs, profit objectives and pricing practices.  The amount of revenue recognized for a delivered element is limited to an amount that is not contingent upon future delivery of additional products or services.  As pricing and marketing strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to BESP, or to the development of VSOE or TPE for individual products or services.  As a result, future revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements could differ from recognition in the current period.  Our relative selling prices are analyzed on an annual basis, or more frequently if we experience significant changes in selling prices.

As allowed, the Company has elected to early-adopt the provisions of the guidance as of April 1, 2010 on a prospective basis for new arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after that date.  The impact of the new accounting standard is not expected to be material going forward, nor would it have had a material impact if it had been applied to the previous fiscal year.  There was also no material impact from implementation of the guidance in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
 
 
8
 

 
The FASB has also issued guidance which amended the scope of existing software revenue recognition guidance.  Tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality are no longer within the scope of software revenue guidance and are accounted for based on other applicable revenue recognition guidance.  In addition, the amendments require that hardware components of a tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the software revenue guidance.  This guidance must be adopted in the same period that the Company adopts the amended guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Therefore, the Company elected to early-adopt this guidance as of April 1, 2010 on a prospective basis for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after that date.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The following paragraphs restate the Company’s revenue recognition accounting policy after implementation of the accounting change.

Revenue Recognition

The Company provides database management and IT management services under long-term arrangements.  These arrangements may require the Company to perform setup activities such as the design and build of a database for the customer under the database management contracts and migration of the customer’s IT environment under IT management contracts.  In the case of database management contracts, the customer does not acquire any ownership rights to the Company’s intellectual property used in the database and the database itself provides no benefit to the customer outside of the utilization of the system during the term of the database management arrangement.  In some cases, the arrangements also contain provisions requiring customer acceptance of the setup activities prior to commencement of the ongoing services arrangement.  Up-front fees billed during the setup phase for these arrangements are deferred and setup costs that are direct and incremental to the contract are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the service term of the contract.  Revenue recognition does not begin until after customer acceptance in cases where contracts contain acceptance provisions.  Once the setup phase is complete and customer acceptance occurs, the Company recognizes revenue over the remaining service term of the contract.  In situations where the arrangement does not require customer acceptance before the Company begins providing services, revenue is recognized over the contract period and no costs are deferred. The Company accounts for all elements under its database management and IT management arrangements as a single unit, since the initial setup activities performed under the arrangements do not have stand-alone value to the client.

Sales of third-party software, hardware and certain other equipment are recognized when delivered.  If such sales are part of a multiple-element arrangement, they are recognized as a separate element unless collection of the sales price is dependent upon delivery of other products or services.  Additionally, the Company evaluates revenue from the sale of data, software, hardware and equipment in accordance with accounting standards to determine whether such revenue should be recognized on a gross or a net basis over the term of the related service agreement.  All of the factors in the accounting standards are considered with the primary factor being whether the Company is the primary obligor in the arrangement.  “Out-of-pocket” expenses incurred by, and reimbursed to, the Company in connection with customer contracts are recorded as gross revenue.

The Company evaluates its database management and IT management arrangements to determine whether the arrangement contains a lease.  If the arrangement is determined to contain a lease, applicable accounting standards require the Company to account for the lease component separately from the remaining components of the arrangement.  In cases where database management or IT management arrangements are determined to include a lease, the lease is evaluated to determine whether it is a capital lease or operating lease and accounted for accordingly.  These lease revenues are not significant to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenues from the licensing of data are recognized upon delivery of the data to the customer in circumstances where no update or other obligations exist.  Revenue from the licensing of data in which the Company is obligated to provide future updates on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis is recognized on a straight-line basis over the license term.  Revenue from the licensing of data to the customer in circumstances where the license agreement contains a volume cap is recognized in proportion to the total records to be delivered under the arrangement.  Revenue from the sale of data on a per-record basis is recognized as the records are delivered.

 
9

 
All taxes assessed on revenue-producing transactions described above are presented on a net basis, or excluded from revenues.

The Company also performs services on a project basis outside of, or in addition to, the scope of long-term arrangements.  The Company recognizes revenue from these services as the services are performed.

The Company does not provide end-users with price-protection or rights of return.  The Company’s contracts provide a warranty that the services or products will meet the agreed-upon criteria or any necessary modifications will be made.  The Company ensures that services or products delivered meet the agreed-upon criteria prior to recognition of revenue.


 
  10

 

2.           EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per share is shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
   
For the quarter ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Basic earnings per share:
           
Numerator – net earnings
  $  9,436     $ 4,194  
Denominator – weighted-average shares outstanding
    79,741       78,667  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
Diluted earnings per share:
               
Numerator – net earnings
  $ 9,436     $ 4,194  
                 
Denominator:
               
Weighted-average shares outstanding
    79,741       78,667  
Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants, and restricted stock as computed under the treasury stock method
    1,715       345  
      81,456       79,012  
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
                 
Basic earnings per share attributable to Acxiom stockholders:
               
Numerator – net earnings
  $  9,805     $ 4,194  
Denominator – weighted-average shares outstanding
    79,741       78,667  
Basic earnings per share attributable to Acxiom stockholders
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Acxiom stockholders:
               
Numerator – net earnings
  $ 9,805     $ 4,194  
                 
Denominator:
               
Weighted-average shares outstanding
    79,741       78,667  
Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants, and restricted stock as computed under the treasury stock method
    1,715           345  
      81,456           79,012  
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Acxiom stockholders
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05  
                 

 
11 

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had options and warrants outstanding providing for the purchase of approximately 11.7 million shares of common stock.  Options, warrants and restricted stock units that were outstanding during the periods presented, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect was antidilutive are shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

   
For the quarter ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Number of shares outstanding under options, warrants and restricted stock units
    5,824       12,120  
Range of exercise prices for options and warrants
  $ 17.76-$75.55     $ 10.22-$268.55  

3.           SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION:

Share-based Compensation Plans

Stock Option Activity
The Company has stock option and equity compensation plans for which a total of 37.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for issuance since inception of the plans.  These plans provide that the option prices of qualified options will be at or above the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant.  Board policy has required that nonqualified options be priced at or above the fair market value of the common stock at the time of grant.  At June 30, 2010, there were a total of 4.6 million shares available for future grants under the plans.

The Company granted 254,133 stock options in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.  The per-share weighted-average fair value of the stock options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $7.54.  This valuation was determined using a customized binomial lattice approach with the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of 0.0%; risk-free interest rate of 3.4%; expected option life of 5.6 years; expected volatility of 52% and a suboptimal exercise multiple of 1.9.

Option activity for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:

   
Number
of shares
   
Weighted-average exercise price
per share
   
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)
   
Aggregate intrinsic value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
    10,368,532     $ 20.33              
Granted
    254,133     $ 17.79              
Exercised
    (197,033 )   $ 14.06           $ 272  
Forfeited or cancelled
    (85,111 )   $ 29.36                
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
    10,340,521     $ 20.31       5.64     $ 8,791  
 
Exercisable at June 30, 2010
    8,810,789     $ 21.45       5.18     $ 5,189  

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between Acxiom’s closing stock price on the last trading day of its first quarter of fiscal 2011 and the exercise price for each in-the-money option) that would have been received by the option holders had vested option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2010.  This amount changes based upon changes in the fair market value of Acxiom’s stock.


 
 12

 

Following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2010:

     
Options outstanding
   
Options exercisable
 
Range of
exercise price
per share
   
Options
outstanding
 
Weighted- average remaining contractual life
 
Weighted-average
exercise price
per share
   
Options
exercisable
   
Weighted-average
exercise price
per share
 
                             
$ 3.69 - $ 9.62       633,209  
8.34 years
  $ 8.75       201,709     $ 8.37  
$ 10.22 - $ 15.00       2,204,358  
6.72 years
  $ 12.41       1,665,259     $ 12.34  
$ 15.10 - $ 19.82       2,576,576  
5.81 years
  $ 16.64       2,129,943     $ 16.59  
$ 20.12 - $ 25.00       2,480,194  
5.41 years
  $ 22.99       2,405,194     $ 22.93  
$ 25.44 - $ 29.30       1,387,564  
4.24 years
  $ 26.81       1,350,064     $ 26.78  
$ 30.93 - $ 39.12       792,995  
3.60 years
  $ 35.70       792,995     $ 35.70  
$ 40.50 - $ 75.55       265,625  
4.06 years
  $ 44.29       265,625     $ 44.29  
          10,340,521  
5.64 years
  $ 20.31       8,810,789     $ 21.45  

Total expense related to stock options for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $0.7 million and $0.5 million respectively.  Future expense for these options is expected to be approximately $5.8 million over the next four years.

Restricted Stock Unit Activity
Non-vested restricted stock unit activity for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:

   
Number
of shares
   
Weighted average fair value per
share at grant date
(in thousands)
   
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)
 
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
    2,495,641     $ 11.15       2.24  
Granted
    648,431     $ 19.75          
Vested
    (268,909 )   $ 11.26          
Forfeited or cancelled
    (618,189 )   $ 9.03          
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
    2,256,974     $ 14.26       2.17  

During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted restricted stock units covering 648,431 shares of common stock with a value at the date of grant of $12.8 million.  Of the restricted stock units granted in the current period, 456,641 vest in equal annual increments over four years.  The remaining 191,790 vest subject to attainment of performance criteria established by the compensation committee of the board of directors.  Each recipient of the performance units may vest in a number of shares from zero to 200% of their award, based on the total shareholder return of Acxiom stock compared to total shareholder return of a group of peer companies established by the committee for the period from April 1, 2010 to March 29, 2013.  The value of the performance units is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model.  Valuation of all other restricted stock units is equal to the quoted market price for the shares on the date of grant.  The expense related to restricted stock in the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $2.3 million.  The expense related to restricted stock in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $1.8 million.  Future expense for restricted stock units is expected to be approximately $24.2 million over the next four years.

4.           ACQUISITIONS:

On April 1, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of a digital marketing business operating in Australia and New Zealand.  The acquisition gives the Company additional market opportunities in this region.  The Company paid $1.8 million in cash, net of cash acquired, and not including amounts, if any, to be paid under an earnout agreement under which the Company may pay up to an additional $0.6 million if the acquired business achieves a revenue target over the next two years.  The value of the earnout is estimated at $0.5 million.  The acquired business has annual revenue of less than $2 million.  The Company has omitted pro forma disclosures related to this acquisition as the pro forma effect of this acquisition is not material.  The results of operation for the acquisition are included in the Company’s consolidated results beginning April 1, 2010.


 
13 

 

The following table shows the allocation of the purchase price for the above acquisition to assets acquired and liabilities assumed (dollars in thousands):
         
Assets acquired:
       
Cash
  $
   547
 
Goodwill
   
1,446
 
Other intangible assets
   
   779
 
Other current and noncurrent assets
   
   184
 
     
2,956
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and capital leases assumed
   
   (120)
 
Net assets acquired
   
2,836
 
Less:
       
Cash acquired
   
   (547)
 
Earnout liability
   
   (532)
 
Net cash paid
  $
 1,757
 


On July 1, 2010, subsequent to the end of the reported quarter, the Company completed the acquisition of 70% of GoDigital Tecnologia E Participacoes, Ltda. (“GoDigital”), a Brazilian marketing services business.  The Company paid $11.7 million, not including amounts, if any, to be paid under an earnout agreement under which the Company may pay up to an additional $9.3 million based on the results of the acquired business over approximately the next two years.  The acquired business has annual revenue of approximately $8 million.  The Company has omitted pro forma disclosures related to this acquisition as the pro forma effect of the acquisition is not material.  The results of operations for GoDigital will be included in the Company’s consolidated results beginning July 1, 2010.

5.           OTHER CURRENT AND NONCURRENT ASSETS:

Other current assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

   
June 30,
 2010
   
March 31,
 2010
 
Current portion of unbilled and notes receivable
  $ 738     $ 907  
Prepaid expenses
    39,783       40,420  
Non-trade receivables
    1,463       1,188  
Assets of non-qualified retirement plan
    10,697       11,564  
Other miscellaneous assets
    118       126  
Other current assets
  $ 52,799     $ 54,205  

Other noncurrent assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

   
June 30,
 2010
   
March 31,
 2010
 
Acquired intangible assets, net
  $ 9,419     $ 9,721  
Noncurrent portion of unbilled and notes receivable
    666       1,873  
Other miscellaneous noncurrent assets
    4,859       4,975  
Other assets
  $ 14,944     $  16,569  

The acquired intangible assets noted above include customer relationship intangibles acquired through purchase acquisitions, net of accumulated amortization.
 
 
  14

 


6.           GOODWILL:

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair values of net assets acquired in business combinations.  Goodwill is reviewed at least annually for impairment under a two-part test.  Impairment exists to the extent that the reporting unit’s recorded goodwill exceeds the residual fair value assigned to goodwill.  Any impairment that results from the completion of the two-part test is recorded as a charge to operations during the period in which the impairment test is completed.  Completion of the Company’s most recent annual impairment test during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 indicated that no potential impairment of its goodwill balances existed as of April 1, 2010.

The carrying amount of goodwill, by business segment, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 is presented in the following table.

(dollars in thousands)
 
 
Information
Services
   
Information
Products
   
Total
 
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $ 348,084     $ 122,177     $ 470,261  
Acquisition
    1,446       -       1,446  
Purchase adjustments
      (9 )     -       (9 )
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment
    (2,197 )     (5,127 )     (7,324 )
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $ 347,324     $ 117,050     $ 464,374  

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as either an operating segment or one step below operating segment, known as a component.  Acxiom’s two segments as presented above are the Information Services segment and the Information Products segment.  Because each of these segments contains both a US component and an International component, and there are some differences in economic characteristics between the US and International components, management has tested a total of four components.  The goodwill amounts as of April 1, 2010 included in each component tested were US Information Services, $306.1 million; US Information Products, $51.2 million; International Information Services, $42.0 million; and International Information Products $71.0 million.

In order to estimate a valuation for each of the four components tested, management used an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model.  Additionally, the analysis was enhanced to include a public company market multiple and a similar transactions comparison.

The income approach involves projecting cash flows for each component into the future and discounting these cash flows at an appropriate discount rate.  Management used budget figures for the first year of the projection model, then projected those figures out into the future years using management’s best estimates of future revenue growth, operating margins, and other cash flow assumptions.  The discount rates used for each component in order to arrive at an estimated fair value were estimated as a weighted-average cost of capital which a marketplace participant would use to value each unit.  These weighted-average costs of capital rates include a market risk, added to a risk-free rate of return, and a size premium that is specific to the components being tested.  The resulting cost of equity is then weighted-averaged with the after-tax cost of debt.

The public company market multiple method was used to estimate values for each of the components by looking at market value multiples to revenue and EBITDA for selected public companies that are believed to be representative of companies that marketplace participants would use to arrive at comparable multiples for the individual component being tested.  These multiples are then used to develop a market value for that component.

The similar transactions method compared multiples based on acquisition prices of other companies believed to be those that marketplace participants would use to compare to the individual components being tested.  Those multiples are then used to develop a market value for that component.

In order to arrive at an estimated value for each component, management used a weighted-average approach to combine the results of each analysis.  Management believes that using multiple valuation approaches and then weighting them appropriately is a technique that a marketplace participant would use.
 
 
 
15

 
As a final test of the valuation results, the total of the values of the components was reconciled to the actual market value of Acxiom Corporation stock as of the April 1, 2010 valuation date.  This reconciliation indicated an implied control premium.  Management believes this control premium is reasonable compared to historical control premiums observed in actual transactions.

Each of the components tested had fair values in excess of the carrying value of the unit, indicating no impairment.  All of the components had a significant excess fair value, except for the International Products component, for which the excess fair value was 12%.  Management believes that the valuations arrived at are reasonable and consistent with what other marketplace participants would use in valuing the Company’s components.  However, management cannot give any assurance that market values will not change in the future.  For example, if discount rates demanded by the market increase, this could lead to a reduction under the income approach.  If the Company’s projections are not achieved in the future, this could lead management to reassess their assumptions and lead to a reduction under the income approach.  If the market price of the Company’s stock decreases, this could cause the Company to reassess the reasonableness of the control premium, which might cause management to assume a higher discount rate under the income approach.  If future similar transactions exhibit lower multiples than those observed in the past, this could lead to a reduction under the similar transactions approach.  And finally, if there is a general decline in the stock market, and particularly in those companies selected as comparable to the Company’s components, this could lead to a reduction under the public company market multiple approach.  The Company’s annual impairment test is performed during the first quarter of each fiscal year, however if there are further triggering events, the Company may be required to perform additional testing at other dates.

7.           LONG-TERM DEBT:

Long-term debt consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

   
June 30,
2010
   
March 31,
2010
 
Term loan credit agreement
  $ 425,500     $ 427,000  
Capital leases and installment payment obligations on land, buildings and equipment payable in monthly payments of principal plus interest at rates ranging from approximately 3% to 8%; remaining terms up to twelve years
    46,051       41,788  
Software license liabilities payable over terms up to three years; effective interest rates ranging from approximately 4% to 7%
    9,109       10,001  
Other debt and long-term liabilities
    21,342       21,946  
Total long-term debt and capital leases
    502,002       500,735  
Less current installments
    42,169       42,106  
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
  $ 459,833     $ 458,629  

Effective September 15, 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement allowing (1) term loans up to an aggregate principal amount of $600 million and (2) revolving credit facility borrowings consisting of revolving loans, letter of credit participations and swing-line loans up to an aggregate amount of $200 million.

In November 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to its term loan credit facility (the “Amendment”).  Under the terms of the Amendment, certain of the lenders have agreed to extend the maturity date of the existing term loan, becoming Tranche 2 Term Lenders.  Lenders who did not agree to extend the maturity date became Tranche 1 Term Lenders.  Certain lenders also agreed to extend the maturity date of the existing revolving loan commitment, becoming Tranche 2 Revolving Lenders.  Lenders who did not agree to extend the maturity date of the revolving loan commitment became Tranche 1 Revolving Lenders.  Of the $450 million balance of the existing term loan on the date of the Amendment, approximately $75 million was held by Tranche 1 Term Lenders and $375 million was held by Tranche 2 Term Lenders.  Of the $200 million revolving loan commitment, $80 million is held by Tranche 1 Revolving Lenders and $120 million is held by Tranche 2 Revolving Lenders.

Tranche 1 of the term loan is payable in quarterly installments of approximately $0.2 million each, through September 30, 2011, followed by four quarterly installments of approximately $13.1 million each with the last payment due September 15, 2012.  Tranche 2 of the term loan is payable in quarterly installments of approximately $1.3 million each, through September 30, 2011, followed by thirteen quarterly installments of $1.5 million each with a final payment of approximately $345.9 million due March 15, 2015.  The Tranche 1 revolving loan commitment expires September 15, 2011 and the Tranche 2 revolving loan commitment expires March 15, 2014.

 
16

 
Revolving credit facility borrowings currently bear interest at LIBOR plus a credit spread, or at an alternative base rate or at the Federal Funds rate plus a credit spread, depending on the type of borrowing.  The LIBOR credit spread is 1.5% for Tranche 1 and 2.75% for Tranche 2.  There were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2010 or March 31, 2010.  Term loan borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus a credit spread which is 1.75% for Tranche 1, and 3.00% for Tranche 2.  The weighted-average interest rate on term loan borrowings at June 30, 2010 was 3.9%.  Outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2010 were $0.5 million.

The term loan allows prepayments before maturity.  The credit agreement is secured by the accounts receivable of Acxiom and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as by the outstanding stock of certain Acxiom subsidiaries.

Under the terms of certain of the above borrowings, the Company is required to maintain certain debt-to-cash flow and debt service coverage ratios, among other restrictions.  At June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with these covenants and restrictions.  In addition, if certain financial ratios and other conditions are not satisfied, the revolving credit facility limits the Company’s ability to pay dividends in excess of $30 million in any fiscal year (plus additional amounts in certain circumstances).

In fiscal 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement.  The agreement provides for the Company to pay interest through July 25, 2011 at a fixed rate of 3.25% plus the applicable credit spread on $95.0 million notional amount while receiving interest for the same period at the LIBOR rate on the same notional amount.  The LIBOR rate as of June 30, 2010 was 0.3%.  The swap was entered into as a cash flow hedge against LIBOR interest rate movements on the term loan.  The Company assesses the effectiveness of the hedge based on the hypothetical derivative method.  There was no ineffectiveness for the period ended June 30, 2010.  Under the hypothetical derivative method, the cumulative change in fair value of the actual swap is compared to the cumulative change in fair value of the hypothetical swap, which has terms that identically match the critical terms of the hedged transaction.  Thus, the hypothetical swap is presumed to perfectly offset the hedged cash flows.  The change in the fair value of the hypothetical swap will then be regarded as a proxy for the present value of the cumulative change in the expected future cash flows from the hedged transactions.  All of the fair values are derived from an interest-rate futures model.  As of June 30, 2010, the hedge relationship qualified as an effective hedge under applicable accounting standards.  Consequently, all changes in fair value of the derivative are deferred and recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) until the related forecasted transaction is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.  The fair market value of the derivative was zero at inception and an unrealized loss of $2.6 million since inception is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) with the offset recorded to other noncurrent liabilities.  The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) may be recognized in the statement of operations if certain terms of the floating-rate debt change, if the floating-rate debt is extinguished or if the interest rate swap agreement is terminated prior to maturity.  The Company has assessed the creditworthiness of the counterparty of the swap and concludes that no substantial risk of default exists as of June 30, 2010.

8.           ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:

Trade accounts receivable are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and credits of $6.2 million at June 30, 2010 and $6.3 million at March 31, 2010.

9.           SEGMENT INFORMATION:

The Company reports segment information consistent with the way management internally disaggregates its operations to assess performance and to allocate resources.  The Information Services segment includes the Company’s global lines of business for Customer Data Integration (CDI), Multichannel Marketing Services, Infrastructure Management Services and Consulting Services.  The Information Products segment is comprised of the Company’s global Consumer Insights and Risk Mitigation Products lines of business and the U.S. Background Screening Products line of business.  The Company’s calculation of segment operating income allocates all corporate expenses, excluding those reported as gains, losses and other items, to the segments.


 
  17

 

The following tables present information by business segment (dollars in thousands):

   
For the quarter ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Revenue:
           
Information services
  $ 210,656     $ 199,326  
Information products
    59,739       56,655  
Total revenue
  $ 270,395     $ 255,981  
                 
Income (loss) from operations:
               
Information services
  $  20,879     $  15,838  
Information products
    1,140         (2,995 )
Other
    57       (347 )
Income from operations
  $ 22,076     $ 12,496  
                 


10.           RESTRUCTURING, IMPAIRMENT AND OTHER CHARGES:

The Company records costs associated with employee terminations and other exit activity in accordance with applicable accounting standards when those costs become probable and are reasonably estimable.  The following table summarizes the restructuring activity for the three months ended June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

   
Associate-related reserves
   
Ongoing
contract costs
   
Total
 
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $ 2,870     $ 12,904     $ 15,774  
Payments
    (1,116 )     (754 )     (1,870 )
Adjustments
    (171 )     (102 )     (273 )
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $ 1,583     $ 12,048     $ 13,631  
                         
The above balances are included in accrued expense on the consolidated balance sheet.

Restructuring Plans

In fiscal 2009, the Company recorded a total of $42.3 million in restructuring charges and adjustments included in gains, losses and other items in the consolidated statement of operations.  The expense includes severance and other associate-related payments of $12.4 million, lease accruals of $3.2 million, asset disposal and write-offs of $26.5 million and adjustments to the fiscal 2008 restructuring plan of $0.2 million.  Included in the asset disposal was a $24.6 million loss incurred as a result of the Company terminating a software contract.

The associate-related payments of $12.4 million relate to the termination of associates in the United States and Europe.  Of the amount accrued, $0.9 million remained accrued as of June 30, 2010.  These costs are expected to be paid out in fiscal 2011.

The lease accruals of $3.2 million were evaluated under the accounting standards which govern exit costs.  These accounting standards require the Company to make an accrual for the liability for lease costs that will continue to be incurred without economic benefit to the Company upon the date that the Company ceases using the leased property.  On or before March 31, 2009, the Company ceased using certain leased office facilities.  The Company attempts to sublease those facilities to the extent possible.  The Company established a liability for the fair value of the remaining lease payments, partially offset by the estimated sublease payments to be received over the course of those leases.  The fair value of these liabilities is based on a net present value model using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate.  These liabilities will be paid out over the remainder of the leased properties’ terms, of which the longest continues through November 2012.  Actual sublease terms may differ from the estimates originally made by the Company.  Any future changes in the estimates or in the actual sublease income could require future adjustments to the liability for these leases, which would impact net income in the period the adjustment is recorded.  The remaining amount accrued at June 30, 2010 is $1.7 million.
 
 
18

 

In fiscal 2008, the Company recorded a total of $75.1 million in restructuring charges and adjustments included in gains, losses and other items in the consolidated statement of operations.  The expense includes severance and other associate-related payments of $19.3 million, lease accruals of $19.0 million, contract accruals of $6.7 million, asset disposal and write-offs of $29.6 million, and other related costs of $0.5 million.

The associate-related payments of $19.3 million relate to associates in the United States and Europe who either have been terminated or are to be terminated.  Of the $19.3 million accrued, $0.6 million remained accrued as of June 30, 2010.  These costs are expected to be paid out in fiscal 2011.

The lease accruals of $19.0 million were evaluated under the accounting standard which governs exit costs.  The remaining amount accrued at June 30, 2010 is $10.2 million.  These liabilities will be paid out over the remainder of the leased properties’ terms, of which the longest continues through November 2021.

The contract accruals of $6.7 million were evaluated under accounting standards which govern exit costs, which require that a liability to terminate a contract before the end of its term be recognized when the contract is terminated in accordance with its terms.  Prior to March 31, 2008, the Company gave notice under certain service contracts to the other parties which caused the Company to incur termination payments under those contracts.  All of these amounts have been paid.

11.           COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Legal Matters

Richard Fresco, et al. v. R.L. Polk and Company and Acxiom Corporation, (U.S. Dist. Court, S.D. Florida, 07-60695) formerly, Linda Brooks and Richard Fresco v. Auto Data Direct, Inc., et al., (U.S. Dist. Court, S.D. Florida, 03-61063) is a putative class action lawsuit, removed to federal court in May 2003, filed against Acxiom and several other information providers.  The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obtained and used drivers’ license data in violation of the federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act.  To date, a class has not been certified.  Among other things, the plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees.  Acxiom has agreed to settle the case and the court approved the settlement on July 27, 2010.  No appeal is expected, but the settlement will not be final until all appeals are exhausted or the time for appeal has run.   Acxiom has accrued $5.0 million for the settlement and ancillary costs to obtain final approval and has paid $2.5 million of this amount into an escrow fund established for the settlement, leaving a remaining accrual of $2.5 million.  Two companion cases, Sharon Taylor, et al., v. Acxiom, et al., (U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas, 207CV001) and Sharon Taylor, et al. v. Biometric Access Company, et al., (U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas, 2:07-CV-00018), were filed in January 2007.  Both Taylor cases were dismissed by the District Court and the dismissal was upheld on appeal on July 14, 2010.

Epsilon Data Management LLC, et al. v. Acxiom Corporation, (192nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, TX, 07-08569) is a case that was brought by a competitor of Acxiom after the acquisition of three long-time data providers and alleges that Acxiom breached certain terms and conditions of the data licenses with those acquired companies in the course of building and distributing Acxiom data products.  The Company and Epsilon have reached a settlement and the case will be dismissed with prejudice.

The Company is involved in a number of actions with the Data Protection Authority of Spain, involving alleged improper usage of individuals’ data.  The Company maintains that the Company’s usage of data has been in compliance with the applicable law.  However, upon advice of counsel and after review of the pending claims, the Company accrued $3.9 million as part of the cost of closure of the Spain office.  During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company reversed $2.4 million of the accrual as some of the claims had been settled for less than the Company originally accrued.  As of June 30, 2010 the Company has a remaining accrual for this matter of $0.4 million.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of all of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Commitments

The Company leases or licenses data processing equipment, software, office furniture and equipment, land and office space under noncancellable operating leases or licenses.  The Company has a future commitment for lease or license payments over the next 30 years of $126.1 million.

 
19

 
In connection with a certain building, the Company has entered into a 50/50 joint venture with a local real estate developer.  The Company is guaranteeing a portion of the loan for the building.  In addition, in connection with the disposal of certain assets, the Company has guaranteed loans for the buyers of the assets.  These guarantees were made by the Company primarily to facilitate favorable financing terms for those third parties.  Should the third parties default on this indebtedness, the Company would be required to perform under its guarantee.  Substantially all of the third-party indebtedness is collateralized by various pieces of real property.  At June 30, 2010 the Company’s maximum potential future payments under this guarantee of third-party indebtedness was $1.5 million.

12.           INCOME TAX

In determining the quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company makes its best estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year. The anticipated effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 is approximately 40%.
 
At June 30, 2010, the Company had $6.5 million in gross unrecognized tax benefits, which is included in other liabilities on the balance sheet. This entire amount, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. The total amount of accrued interest and penalties for such unrecognized tax benefits, and included in the amount above, is $1.0 million. During the current fiscal year, it is reasonably possible that expiration of the statute of limitations could reduce unrecognized tax benefits related to certain tax credits by approximately $3.7 million.

13.           FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

Cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, unbilled and notes receivable, short-term borrowings and trade payables - The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt - The interest rate on the term loan and revolving credit agreement is adjusted for changes in market rates and therefore the carrying value of these loans approximates fair value.  The estimated fair value of other long-term debt was determined based upon the present value of the expected cash flows considering expected maturities and using interest rates currently available to the Company for long-term borrowings with similar terms.  At June 30, 2010, the estimated fair value of long-term debt approximates its carrying value.

Derivative instruments included in other liabilities - The carrying value is adjusted to fair value through other comprehensive income (loss) at each balance sheet date.  The fair value is determined from an interest-rate futures model.

Under applicable accounting standards financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The Company assigned assets and liabilities to the hierarchy in the accounting standards, which is Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2 - significant other observable inputs and Level 3 - significant unobservable inputs.
 
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Assets:
                       
Other current assets
  $ 10,697     $ -     $ -     $ 10,697  
Total assets
  $ 10,697     $ -     $ -     $ 10,697  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Other current liabilities
  $ 10,697     $ -     $ -     $ 10,697  
Other liabilities
    -       2,594       -       2,594  
Total liabilities
  $ 10,697     $ 2,594     $ -     $ 13,291  


 
20 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction and Overview

Acxiom is a recognized leader in marketing technology and services that enable marketers to successfully manage audiences, personalize consumer experiences and create profitable customer relationships.  Our superior industry-focused, consultative approach combines consumer data and analytics, databases, data integration and consulting solutions for personalized, multichannel marketing strategies.  Acxiom leverages over 40 years of experience of data management to deliver high-performance, highly secure, reliable information management services.  Founded in 1969, Acxiom is headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, USA and serves clients around the world from locations in the United States, Europe, South America, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East.

As the Company completes the first quarter of fiscal 2011 the macro economic situation continues to be a challenge for management although there are signs of improvement.  The Company has experienced revenue growth since the low point in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and expects continued revenue recovery in the near term.  During fiscal 2010, the Company focused on several initiatives to drive operating efficiency in information technology and client delivery functions.  Management expects these efficiencies to continue to provide opportunity for margin expansion as revenue recovers.

Highlights of the quarter ended June 30, 2010 are identified below.

 
·  
Revenue of $270.4 million, an increase of 5.6% from $256.0 million in the first fiscal quarter a year ago.
 
·  
Revenue decreased $17.9 million, or 6.2% compared to the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year.
 
·  
Gross margin was 22.2% compared to 19.7% in the same quarter a year ago.
 
·  
Income from operations was $22.1 million, an increase of  76.7% from $12.5 million in the first fiscal quarter last year.
 
·  
Pre-tax earnings were $15.7 million, compared to $6.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
 
·  
Diluted earnings per share were $0.12, an increase of 140% from $0.05 per share in the first fiscal quarter last year.
 
·  
Operating cash flow was $17.0 million compared to operating cash flow of $16.2 million for the same quarter in the prior year.
 
·  
The Company acquired a digital marketing business operating in Australia and New Zealand, and subsequent to quarter end acquired 70% of a marketing services company in Brazil.

The highlights above are intended to identify to the reader some of the more significant events and transactions of the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.  However, these highlights are not intended to be a full discussion of the Company’s results for the quarter.  These highlights should be read in conjunction with the following discussion of Results of Operations and Capital Resources and Liquidity and with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes accompanying this report.


 
 21

 

Results of Operations

A summary of selected financial information for each of the periods reported is presented below (dollars in millions, except per share amounts):
   
For the quarter ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
% Change
 
Revenue
                 
Services
  $ 210.7     $ 199.3       6 %
Products
    59.7       56.7       5 %
    $ 270.4     $ 256.0       6 %
Total operating costs and expenses
    248.3       243.5       (2 )%
Income from operations
  $ 22.1     $ 12.5       77 %
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.12     $ 0.05       140 %


Revenues
Services revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $210.7 million.  This represents an $11.3 million increase or 5.7% when compared to the same period in the prior year.  On a geographic basis, International services decreased $1.3 million while US services increased $12.6 million, or 7.1%.  International services were negatively impacted by the loss of two large services contracts in Europe during the last fiscal year.  US growth was fueled by new Infrastructure Management contracts signed over the last year.  By line of business, revenue increases in Consulting at $2.5 million, or 32.4%, and Infrastructure Management at $13.8 million, or 23.1% were offset by declines in Multi-channel Marketing Services of $2.4 million, or 2.8% and CDI Services of $3.7 million, or 9.4%.  Multi-channel Marketing Services and CDI Services were negatively impacted by the contract losses in Europe.

Products revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $59.7 million, which represents a $3.1 million increase, or 5.4%, compared to the same quarter last year. International operations decreased $0.8 million during the quarter largely due to the unfavorable impact of exchange rate movements.  In the US, product revenue increased $3.9 million, or 9.2%.  All US markets had increases in Consumer Insights revenue for the quarter, and, due to increasing hiring trends, background screening revenue was up significantly in the quarter.

Operating Costs and Expenses
The following table presents the Company’s operating costs and expenses for each of the periods presented (dollars in millions):
 
 
     For the quarter ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
% Change
 
Cost of revenue
                 
Services
  $ 164.6     $ 159.6       (3 )%
Products
    45.8       45.9       -  
Total cost of revenue
  $ 210.4     $ 205.5       (2 )%
Selling, general and administrative
      38.0       37.7       (1 )
Gains, losses and other items, net
      (0.1 )     0.3       116  
Total operating costs and expenses
  $ 248.3     $ 243.5       (2 )%


 
  22

 


 
 
     
    For the quarter ended
June 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Gross profit margin
           
Services
    21.8 %     19.9 %
Products
    23.4       18.9  
Total gross profit margin
    22.2 %     19.7 %
Operating profit margin
    8.2 %     4.9 %

Cost of services revenue of $164.6 million for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 represents an increase of $5.1 million, or 3.2% compared to the same quarter a year ago.  Gross margin for services revenue increased from 19.9% to 21.8%.   After a year of declining margins, margins are increasing as revenue has stabilized and IT and delivery function efficiencies are realized.  Margins were negatively impacted by the lost contracts in Europe.

Cost of products revenue of $45.8 million is flat compared to the same period last year.  Products revenue gross margins increased to 23.4% from 18.9% a year ago.  Margins for products have been impacted in a similar fashion to services.  Additionally, margins have improved due to the fixed cost-nature of certain product costs of revenue.

Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $38.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.  This represents a slight increase compared to $37.6 million reported in the prior-year same quarter.  As a percent of total revenue, these expenses were 14.0% compared to 14.7% a year ago.  Most SG&A costs are relatively flat when compared to the prior year as the Company continues to focus on cost control in these areas.  Some components of SG&A, such as sales commissions, are more variable than others and fluctuate as revenue and sales activity increases or decreases.

Both the current and prior-year balance of gains, losses and other items represents the true-up of restructuring accruals established in prior periods.  The Company evaluated all accruals and made adjustments if necessary.

Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $5.9 million compared to $5.5 million a year ago.  During the quarter ended December 31, 2009 the Company amended the credit agreement to extend $375 million of the term loan an additional 2.5 years, and to extend $120 million of the revolving credit agreement for an additional 2.5 years.  The portions of the original term loan and the revolving credit agreement that has not been extended remain on their original maturity schedules.  The LIBOR credit spread for the interest rate charged on the extended portion of the agreements increased 1.25%.  Although the average balance declined approximately $60 million, the average rate increased 85 basis points, resulting in slightly higher interest expense.

Other expense was $0.5 million and $0.1 million in the current and prior-year quarters, respectively.  Both in the current and prior-year quarter, other income is comprised of interest income on notes receivable and investment income.  Both periods were also negatively impacted by currency translation losses on certain foreign cash accounts.

Income taxes
The anticipated effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 is approximately 40%.  The rate for the prior-year first quarter was 39%.  The current and prior-year rates both reflect the impact of losses in certain foreign jurisdictions.  The Company does not record the tax benefit of those losses due to uncertainty of future benefit.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Working Capital and Cash Flow
Working capital at June 30, 2010 totaled $221.7 million compared to $203.6 million at March 31, 2010.  Total current assets increased $8.0 million due to an increase in trade account receivables of $15.1 million offset by decreases in cash and cash equivalents of $5.6 million and other current assets of $1.4 million.  Current liabilities decreased $10.1 million due to decreases in payroll accruals of $8.9 million, trade accounts payable of $2.7 million and other accrued expenses of $0.8 million, offset by increases in deferred revenue of $0.8 million and income taxes of $1.5 million.

Accounts receivable days sales outstanding was 62 days at June 30, 2010 and was 53 days at March 31, 2010, and is calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
 
23

 

   
June 30,
2010
   
March 31,
2010
 
Numerator – trade accounts receivable, net
  $ 183,644     $ 168,522  
Denominator:
               
Quarter revenue
    270,395       288,342  
Number of days in quarter
    91       90  
Average daily revenue
  $ 2,971     $ 3,204  
Days sales outstanding
    62       53  

Net cash provided by operating activities for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $17.0 million, up 5.1% from $16.2 million in the same period a year ago. This resulted from increases in net earnings of $5.2 million, offset by a reduction in depreciation and amortization and changes in operating assets and liabilities.  Deferred costs increased by $9.1 million due to increased Infrastructure Management contract migration activity.

Investing activities used $16.1 million in cash in the current quarter.  This resulted from capitalization of data acquisition costs of $4.3 million and capitalization of software development costs of $1.2 million.  Capital expenditures were $8.8 million compared to $7.4 million in the same period last year.  The Company paid $1.8 million for the purchase of a digital marketing business operating in Australia and New Zealand.  The remainder of cash paid in acquisitions relates to an earnout payment on a prior acquisition.

Financing activities used $5.2 million in cash in the current quarter.  This included payments of debt of $9.0 million that was comprised of capital lease payments of $6.0 million, software license payments of $0.9 million, and other debt payments of $2.1 million.  Financing activities also include $3.8 million in proceeds from the sale of common stock.

Non-cash investing and financing activities included acquisition of property and equipment under capital leases and installment payment arrangements of $10.3 million in the quarter, compared to $3.8 million in the prior year.  Future payments under these arrangements will be reflected as debt payments.

Credit and Debt Facilities
Effective September 15, 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement allowing (1) term loans up to an aggregate principal amount of $600 million and (2) revolving credit facility borrowings consisting of revolving loans, letter of credit participations and swing-line loans up to an aggregate amount of $200 million.

In November 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to its term loan credit facility (the “Amendment”).  Under the terms of the Amendment, certain of the lenders have agreed to extend the maturity date of the existing term loan, becoming Tranche 2 Term Lenders.  Lenders who did not agree to extend the maturity date became Tranche 1 Term Lenders.  Certain lenders also agreed to extend the maturity date of the existing revolving loan commitment, becoming Tranche 2 Revolving Lenders.  Lenders who did not agree to extend the maturity date of the revolving loan commitment became Tranche 1 Revolving Lenders.  Of the $450 million balance of the existing term loan on the date of the Amendment, approximately $75 million was held by Tranche 1 Term Lenders and $375 million was held by Tranche 2 Term Lenders.  Of the $200 million revolving loan commitment, $80 million is held by Tranche 1 Revolving Lenders and $120 million is held by Tranche 2 Revolving Lenders.

Tranche 1 of the term loan is payable in quarterly installments of approximately $0.2 million each, through September 30, 2011, followed by four quarterly installments of approximately $13.1 million each with the last payment due September 15, 2012.  Tranche 2 of the term loan is payable in quarterly installments of approximately $1.3 million each, through September 30, 2011, followed by thirteen quarterly installments of $1.5 million each with a final payment of approximately $345.9 million due March 15, 2015.  The Tranche 1 revolving loan commitment expires September 15, 2011 and the Tranche 2 revolving loan commitment expires March 15, 2014.

Revolving credit facility borrowings currently bear interest at LIBOR plus a credit spread, or at an alternative base rate or at the Federal Funds rate plus a credit spread, depending on the type of borrowing.  The LIBOR credit spread is 1.5% for Tranche 1 and 2.75% for Tranche 2.  There were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2010 or March 31, 2010.  Term loan borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus a credit spread which is 1.75% for Tranche 1, and 3.00% for Tranche 2.  The weighted-average interest rate on term loan borrowings at June 30, 2010 was 3.9%.

 
24

 
The term loan allows prepayments before maturity.  The credit agreement is secured by the accounts receivable of Acxiom and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as by the outstanding stock of certain Acxiom subsidiaries.

Under the terms of certain of the above borrowings, the Company is required to maintain certain debt-to-cash flow and debt service coverage ratios, among other restrictions.  At June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with these covenants and restrictions.  In addition, if certain financial ratios and other conditions are not satisfied, the revolving credit facility limits the Company’s ability to pay dividends in excess of $30 million in any fiscal year (plus additional amounts in certain circumstances).

Off-Balance Sheet Items and Commitments
In connection with a certain building, the Company has entered into a 50/50 joint venture with a real estate developer.  The Company is guaranteeing a portion of the loan for the building.  In addition, in connection with the disposal of certain assets, the Company has guaranteed loans for the buyers of the assets.  These guarantees were made by the Company primarily to facilitate favorable financing terms for those third parties.  Should the third parties default on this indebtedness, the Company would be required to perform under these guarantees.  Substantially all of the third-party indebtedness is collateralized by various pieces of real property.  At June 30, 2010 the Company’s aggregate maximum potential future payment under these guarantees of third-party indebtedness was $1.5 million.

Outstanding letters of credit which reduce the borrowing capacity under the Company’s revolving credit were $0.5 million at June 30, 2010.

Contractual Commitments
The following table presents Acxiom’s contractual cash obligations, exclusive of interest, and purchase commitments at June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands).  The table does not include the future payment of gross unrealized tax benefit liabilities of $6.5 million or the future payment, if any, against the Company’s non-current interest rate swap liability of $2.6 million as the Company is not able to predict the periods in which these payments will be made. The column for 2011 represents the nine months ending March 31, 2011.  All other columns represent fiscal years ending March 31.

   
For the years ending March 31
 
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
2015
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
Term loan
  $ 4,500     $  32,296     $ 32,296     $ 6,000     $ 350,408     $ -     $ 425,500  
Capital lease and installment payment obligations
    14,530       12,342       8,169       1,308       746       8,956       46,051  
Software license liabilities
    4,423       2,918       1,768       -       -           -       9,109  
Other long-term debt
    12,978       1,630       1,646       528       4,560          -       21,342  
Total long-term obligations
    36,431       49,186       43,879       7,836         355,714       8,956       502,002  
Operating lease payments
    19,976       19,293       16,228       13,981       10,920       45,730       126,128  
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 56,407     $ 68,479     $ 60,107     $ 21,817     $ 366,634     $ 54,686     $ 628,130  

   
For the years ending March 31
 
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
2015
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
Total purchase commitments
  $ 72,385     $ 36,742     $ 22,204     $ 10,931     $ 10,450     $ 9,634     $ 162,346  

Purchase commitments include contractual commitments for the purchase of data and open purchase orders for equipment, paper, office supplies, construction and other items.  Purchase commitments in some cases will be satisfied by entering into future operating leases, capital leases, or other financing arrangements, rather than payment of cash.  The above commitments relating to long-term obligations do not include future payments of interest.  The Company estimates future interest payments on debt and capital leases for the remainder of fiscal 2011 of $20.6 million.


 
25 

 

The following table shows contingencies or guarantees under which the Company could be required, in certain circumstances, to make cash payments as of June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

Guarantee on certain partnership and other loans
 
1,458
Outstanding letters of credit
 
506

The total of partnership and other loans of which the Company guarantees the portion noted in the above table is $5.7 million as of June 30, 2010.

While the Company does not have any other material contractual commitments for capital expenditures, certain levels of investments in facilities and computer equipment continue to be necessary to support the growth of the business.  In some cases, the Company also sells software and hardware to clients.  In addition, new outsourcing or facilities management contracts frequently require substantial up-front capital expenditures to acquire or replace existing assets.  Management believes that the Company’s existing available debt and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future.  The Company also evaluates acquisitions from time to time, which may require up-front payments of cash.  Depending on the size of the acquisition it may be necessary to raise additional capital.  If additional capital becomes necessary as a result of any material variance of operating results from projections or from potential future acquisitions, the Company would first use available borrowing capacity under its revolving credit agreement, followed by the issuance of debt or equity securities.  However, no assurance can be given that the Company would be able to obtain funding through the issuance of debt or equity securities at terms favorable to the Company, or that such funding would be available.

For a description of certain risks that could have an impact on results of operations or financial condition, including liquidity and capital resources, see “Risk Factors” contained in Part I, Item 1A, of the Company’s 2010 Annual Report.

Non-U.S. Operations

The Company has a presence in the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Portugal, Poland, the Middle East, Australia, China and Brazil.   Most of the Company’s exposure to exchange rate fluctuation is due to translation gains and losses as there are no material transactions that cause exchange rate impact.  In general, each of the foreign locations is expected to fund its own operations and cash flows, although funds may be loaned or invested from the U.S. to the foreign subsidiaries subject to limitations in the Company’s revolving credit facility.  These advances are considered to be long-term investments, and any gain or loss resulting from changes in exchange rates as well as gains or losses resulting from translating the foreign financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).  Exchange rate movements of foreign currencies may have an impact on the Company’s future costs or on future cash flows from foreign investments.  The Company has not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These accounting principles require management to make certain judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  The consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report include a summary of significant accounting policies used in the preparation of Acxiom’s consolidated financial statements.  In addition, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis filed as part of the 2010 Annual Report contains a discussion of the policies which management has identified as the most critical because they require management’s use of complex and/or significant judgments.  None of the Company’s critical accounting policies have materially changed since the date of the last annual report except as disclosed below.

Accounting Changes
The FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force has issued new accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Under previous accounting guidance, one of the requirements for recognition of revenue for a delivered item under a multiple element arrangement was that there must be objective and verifiable evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered item.  The new guidance eliminates that requirement and requires an entity to estimate the selling price of each element in the arrangement.  In addition, absent specific software revenue guidance, the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration is no longer permitted.  Under the new guidance, a multiple-deliverable arrangement is separated into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered items have value to the client on a stand-alone basis and, if the arrangement includes a general right of return related to the delivered
 
 
26

 
item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company.  If these criteria are not met, the arrangement is accounted for as one unit of accounting, which would result in revenue being recognized ratably over the contract term or being deferred until the earlier of when those criteria are met or when the last undelivered item is delivered.  If the arrangement is separated into multiple units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on each unit’s relative selling price.

The relative selling price for each unit of accounting in a multiple-element arrangement is established using vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE), if available, third-party evidence (TPE), if available, or management’s best estimate of stand-alone selling price (BESP).  In most cases, the Company has neither VSOE nor TPE and therefore uses BESP.  The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the company would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis.  Management’s BESP is determined by considering multiple factors, primarily including actual contractual selling prices when the item is sold on a stand-alone basis, as well as market conditions, competition, internal costs, profit objectives and pricing practices.  The amount of revenue recognized for a delivered element is limited to an amount that is not contingent upon future delivery of additional products or services.  As pricing and marketing strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to BESP, or to the development of VSOE or TPE for individual products or services.  As a result, future revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements could differ from recognition in the current period.  Our relative selling prices are analyzed on an annual basis, or more frequently if we experience significant changes in selling prices.

As allowed, the Company has elected to early-adopt the provisions of the guidance as of April 1, 2010 on a prospective basis for new arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after that date.  The impact of the new accounting standard is not expected to be material going forward, nor would it have had a material impact if it had been applied to the previous fiscal year.  There was also no material impact from implementation of the guidance in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

The FASB has also issued guidance which amended the scope of existing software revenue recognition guidance.  Tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality are no longer within the scope of software revenue guidance and are accounted for based on other applicable revenue recognition guidance.  In addition, the amendments require that hardware components of a tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the software revenue guidance.  This guidance must be adopted in the same period that the Company adopts the amended guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Therefore, the Company elected to early-adopt this guidance as of April 1, 2010 on a prospective basis for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after that date.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The following paragraphs restate the Company’s revenue recognition accounting policy after implementation of the accounting change.

Revenue Recognition
The Company provides database management and IT management services under long-term arrangements.  These arrangements may require the Company to perform setup activities such as the design and build of a database for the customer under the database management contracts and migration of the customer’s IT environment under IT management contracts.  In the case of database management contracts, the customer does not acquire any ownership rights to the Company’s intellectual property used in the database and the database itself provides no benefit to the customer outside of the utilization of the system during the term of the database management arrangement.  In some cases, the arrangements also contain provisions requiring customer acceptance of the setup activities prior to commencement of the ongoing services arrangement.  Up-front fees billed during the setup phase for these arrangements are deferred and setup costs that are direct and incremental to the contract are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the service term of the contract.  Revenue recognition does not begin until after customer acceptance in cases where contracts contain acceptance provisions.  Once the setup phase is complete and customer acceptance occurs, the Company recognizes revenue over the remaining service term of the contract.  In situations where the arrangement does not require customer acceptance before the Company begins providing services, revenue is recognized over the contract period and no costs are deferred. The Company accounts for all elements under its database management and IT management arrangements as a single unit, since the initial setup activities performed under the arrangements do not have stand-alone value to the client.

Sales of third-party software, hardware and certain other equipment are recognized when delivered.  If such sales are part of a multiple-element arrangement, they are recognized as a separate element unless collection of the sales price is dependent upon delivery of other products or services.  Additionally, the Company evaluates revenue from the sale of data, software, hardware and equipment in accordance with accounting standards to determine whether such
 
 
27

 
revenue should be recognized on a gross or a net basis over the term of the related service agreement.  All of the factors in the accounting standards are considered with the primary factor being whether the Company is the primary obligor in the arrangement.  “Out-of-pocket” expenses incurred by, and reimbursed to, the Company in connection with customer contracts are recorded as gross revenue.

The Company evaluates its database management and IT management arrangements to determine whether the arrangement contains a lease.  If the arrangement is determined to contain a lease, applicable accounting standards require the Company to account for the lease component separately from the remaining components of the arrangement.  In cases where database management or IT management arrangements are determined to include a lease, the lease is evaluated to determine whether it is a capital lease or operating lease and accounted for accordingly.  These lease revenues are not significant to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenues from the licensing of data are recognized upon delivery of the data to the customer in circumstances where no update or other obligations exist.  Revenue from the licensing of data in which the Company is obligated to provide future updates on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis is recognized on a straight-line basis over the license term.  Revenue from the licensing of data to the customer in circumstances where the license agreement contains a volume cap is recognized in proportion to the total records to be delivered under the arrangement.  Revenue from the sale of data on a per-record basis is recognized as the records are delivered.

All taxes assessed on revenue-producing transactions described above are presented on a net basis, or excluded from revenues.

The Company also performs services on a project basis outside of, or in addition to, the scope of long-term arrangements.  The Company recognizes revenue from these services as the services are performed.

The Company does not provide end-users with price-protection or rights of return.  The Company’s contracts provide a warranty that the services or products will meet the agreed-upon criteria or any necessary modifications will be made.  The Company ensures that services or products delivered meet the agreed-upon criteria prior to recognition of revenue.

Valuation of Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as either an operating segment or one step below operating segment, known as a component.  Acxiom’s two segments as presented above are the Information Services segment and the Information Products segment.  Because each of these segments contains both a US component and an International component, and there are some differences in economic characteristics between the US and International components, management has tested a total of four components.  The goodwill amounts as of April 1, 2010 included in each component tested were US Information Services, $306.1 million; US Information Products, $51.2 million; International Information Services, $42.0 million; and International Information Products $71.0 million.

In order to estimate a valuation for each of the four components tested, management used an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model.  Additionally, the analysis was enhanced to include a public company market multiple and a similar transactions comparison.

The income approach involves projecting cash flows for each component into the future and discounting these cash flows at an appropriate discount rate.  Management used preliminary budget figures for the first year of the projection model, then projected those figures out into the future years using management’s best estimates of future revenue growth, operating margins, and other cash flow assumptions.  The discount rates used for each component in order to arrive at an estimated fair value were estimated as a weighted-average cost of capital which a marketplace participant would use to value each unit.  These weighted-average costs of capital rates include a market risk, added to a risk-free rate of return, and a size premium that is specific to the components being tested.  The resulting cost of equity is then weighted-averaged with the after-tax cost of debt.

The public company market multiple method was used to estimate values for each of the components by looking at market value multiples to revenue and EBITDA for selected public companies that are believed to be representative of companies that marketplace participants would use to arrive at comparable multiples for the individual component being tested.  These multiples are then used to develop a market value for that component.

The similar transactions method compared multiples based on acquisition prices of other companies believed to be those that marketplace participants would use to compare to the individual components being tested.  Those multiples are then used to develop a market value for that component.
 
 
28

 

In order to arrive at an estimated value for each component, management used a weighted-average approach to combine the results of each analysis.  Management believes that using multiple valuation approaches and then weighting them appropriately is a technique that a marketplace participant would use.

As a final test of the valuation results, the total of the values of the components was reconciled to the actual market value of Acxiom Corporation stock as of the April 1, 2010 valuation date.  This reconciliation indicated an implied control premium.  Management believes this control premium is reasonable compared to historical control premiums observed in actual transactions.

Each of the components tested had fair values in excess of the carrying value of the unit, indicating no impairment.  All of the components had a significant excess fair value, except for the International Products component, for which the excess fair value was 12%.  Management believes that the valuations arrived at are reasonable and consistent with what other marketplace participants would use in valuing the Company’s components.  However, management cannot give any assurance that market values will not change in the future.  For example, if discount rates demanded by the market increase, this could lead to a reduction under the income approach.  If the Company’s projections are not achieved in the future, this could lead management to reassess their assumptions and lead to a reduction under the income approach.  If the market price of the Company’s stock decreases, this could cause the Company to reassess the reasonableness of the control premium, which might cause management to assume a higher discount rate under the income approach.  If future similar transactions exhibit lower multiples than those observed in the past, this could lead to a reduction under the similar transactions approach.  And finally, if there is a general decline in the stock market, and particularly in those companies selected as comparable to the Company’s components, this could lead to a reduction under the public company market multiple approach.  The Company’s annual impairment test is performed during the first quarter of each fiscal year, however if there are further triggering events, the Company may be required to perform additional testing at other dates.

Forward-looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements.  These statements, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain estimates, assumptions, projections and/or expectations regarding the Company’s financial position, results of operations, market position, product development, growth opportunities, economic conditions, and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation.  Forward-looking statements are often identified by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “foresee,” and similar words or phrases.  These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results and experiences to differ materially from the anticipated results and expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements may include but are not limited to the following:
 
·  
management’s expectations about the macro economy;
 
·  
that the amounts for restructuring and impairment charges and accruals for litigation will be within estimated ranges;
 
·  
that the cash flows used in estimating the recoverability of assets will be within the estimated ranges; and
 
·  
that items which management currently believes are not material will continue to not be material in the future.

Among the factors that may cause actual results and expectations to differ from anticipated results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are the following:
 
·  
the risk factors described in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report and elsewhere in this report and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
 
·  
the possibility that in the event a change of control of the Company is sought that certain clients may attempt to invoke provisions in their contracts resulting in a decline in revenue and profit;
 
·  
the possibility that the integration of acquired businesses may not be as successful as planned;
 
·  
the possibility that the fair value of certain of our assets may not be equal to the carrying value of those assets now or in future time periods;
 
·  
the possibility that sales cycles may lengthen;
 
 
 
29

 
·  
the possibility that we won’t be able to properly motivate our sales force or other associates;
 
·  
the possibility that we may not be able to attract and retain qualified technical and leadership associates, or that we may lose key associates to other organizations;
 
·  
the possibility that we won’t be able to continue to receive credit upon satisfactory terms and conditions;
 
·  
the possibility that competent, competitive products, technologies or services will be introduced into the marketplace by other companies;
 
·  
the possibility that there will be changes in consumer or business information industries and markets that negatively impact the Company;
 
·  
the possibility that we won’t be able to protect proprietary information and technology or to obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms;
 
·  
the possibility that there will be changes in the legislative, accounting, regulatory and consumer environments affecting our business, including but not limited to litigation, legislation, regulations and customs relating to our ability to collect, manage, aggregate and use data;
 
·  
the possibility that data suppliers might withdraw data from us, leading to our inability to provide certain products and services;
 
·  
the possibility that we may enter into short-term contracts which would affect the predictability of our revenues;
 
·  
the possibility that the amount of ad hoc, volume-based and project work will not be as expected;
 
·  
the possibility that we may experience a loss of data center capacity or interruption of telecommunication links or power sources;
 
·  
the possibility that we may experience failures or breaches of our network and data security systems, leading to potential adverse publicity, negative customer reaction, or liability to third parties;
 
·  
the possibility that our clients may cancel or modify their agreements with us;
 
·  
the possibility that we will not successfully complete customer contract requirements on time or meet the service levels specified in the contracts, which may result in contract penalties or lost revenue;
 
·  
the possibility that we experience processing errors which result in credits to customers, re-performance of services or payment of damages to customers; and
 
·  
general and global negative economic conditions.

With respect to the provision of products or services outside our primary base of operations in the United States, all of the above factors apply, along with the difficulty of doing business in numerous sovereign jurisdictions due to differences in scale, competition, culture, laws and regulations.

Other factors are detailed from time to time in periodic reports and registration statements filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company believes that we have the product and technology offerings, facilities, associates and competitive and financial resources for continued business success, but future revenues, costs, margins and profits are all influenced by a number of factors, including those discussed above, all of which are inherently difficult to forecast.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information or otherwise.

 
30 

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Acxiom’s earnings are affected by changes in short-term interest rates primarily as a result of its term loan and revolving credit agreement, which bears interest at a floating rate.  Acxiom currently uses an interest-rate swap agreement to mitigate the changes in interest rate risk on $95 million of its variable interest debt.  Risk can be estimated by measuring the impact of a near-term adverse movement of one percentage point in short-term market interest rates.  If short-term market interest rates increase one percentage point during the next four quarters compared to the previous four quarters, there would be no material adverse impact on Acxiom’s results of operations.  Acxiom has no material future earnings or cash flow expenses from changes in interest rates related to its other long-term debt obligations as substantially all of Acxiom’s remaining long-term debt instruments have fixed rates.  At both June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the fair value of Acxiom’s fixed rate long-term debt approximated carrying value.

The Company has a presence in the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands, Germany, Portugal, Poland, the Middle East, Australia and China.  In general, each of the foreign locations is expected to fund its own operations and cash flows, although funds may be loaned or invested from the U.S. to the foreign subsidiaries.  Therefore, exchange rate movements of foreign currencies may have an impact on Acxiom’s future costs or on future cash flows from foreign investments.  Acxiom, at this time, has not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.


Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

As of June 30, 2010 under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b)  
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such internal control over financial reporting.


 
31 

 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various claims and litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of the business.  None of these, however, are believed to be material in their nature or scope, except those incorporated by reference under this Part II, Item 1.

Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings pending against the Company under Part I, Item 1, Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies, which discussion is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 5. 
Other Information

The 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Acxiom Corporation (the “Company”) was held on August 2, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. CDT at the Acxiom River Market Building, 601 E. Third Street, Little Rock, Arkansas.  The Company’s stockholders voted on the matters set forth below.
 
Jerry D. Gramaglia, Clark M. Kokich and Kevin M. Twomey were elected to the Board of Directors for three-year terms expiring at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The stockholders also approved the 2010 Executive Cash Incentive Plan of Acxiom Corporation and ratified the Board of Directors’ appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2011. The final voting results on these matters were as follows:  
 
1.  Election of Directors:
   
Votes For
Votes Against
Votes Abstained
Broker  Non-Votes
 
Name
       
 
Jerry D. Gramaglia
65,281,002
1,058,355
120,903
7,373,357
 
Clark M. Kokich
65,302,090
1,040,409
117,761
7,373,357
 
Kevin M. Twomey
65,219,549
1,117,978
122,733
7,373,357

2.  Approval of the 2010 Executive Cash Incentive Plan of Acxiom
Votes For
Votes Against
Votes Abstained
70,970,932
2,805,071
57,614

3.  Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2011
Votes For
Votes Against
Votes Abstained
72,159,694
1,621,818
52,105



  32
 

 

Item 6.                      Exhibits

(a)           The following exhibits are filed with this Report:

 
31(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
31(b)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
32(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
32(b)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
101
The following financial information from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and June 30, 2009, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010, and March 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and June 30, 2009, and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.






 
33 

 

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



Acxiom Corporation



Dated:  August 5, 2010


By:         /s/Christopher W. Wolf                                                                
(Signature)
Christopher W. Wolf
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)


 
34