Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
 
For the transition period from              to
Commission File Number: 001-31566
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)  
Delaware
 
42-1547151
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
239 Washington Street, Jersey City, New Jersey
 
07302
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(732) 590-9200
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  ý    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  ý    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
 
ý
  
Accelerated Filer
 
¨
 
 
 
 
Non-Accelerated Filer
 
¨
  
Smaller Reporting Company
 
¨
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emerging Growth Company
 
¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  ý
As of August 1, 2017 there were 83,209,293 shares issued and 66,755,350 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, including 305,645 shares held by the First Savings Bank Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan not otherwise considered outstanding under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.




PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
 
Item Number
Page Number
 
 
 
 
1.
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.
 
 
 
3.
 
 
 
4.
 
 
 
 
1.
 
 
 
1A.
 
 
 
2.
 
 
 
3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
 
 
4.
 
 
 
5.
 
 
 
6.
 
 

2



PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
June 30, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2016
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
 
$
101,028

 
$
92,508

Short-term investments
 
52,374

 
51,789

Total cash and cash equivalents
 
153,402

 
144,297

Securities available for sale, at fair value
 
1,038,968

 
1,040,386

Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $501,338 at June 30, 2017 (unaudited) and $489,287 at December 31, 2016)
 
492,737

 
488,183

Federal Home Loan Bank stock
 
78,949

 
75,726

Loans
 
7,031,048

 
7,003,486

Less allowance for loan losses
 
62,862

 
61,883

Net loans
 
6,968,186

 
6,941,603

Foreclosed assets, net
 
6,603

 
7,991

Banking premises and equipment, net
 
80,349

 
84,092

Accrued interest receivable
 
27,090

 
27,082

Intangible assets
 
421,499

 
422,937

Bank-owned life insurance
 
188,432

 
188,527

Other assets
 
83,068

 
79,641

Total assets
 
$
9,539,283

 
$
9,500,465

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
$
4,743,488

 
$
4,803,426

Savings deposits
 
1,107,051

 
1,099,020

Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
 
308,208

 
290,295

Other time deposits
 
341,790

 
360,888

Total deposits
 
6,500,537

 
6,553,629

Mortgage escrow deposits
 
28,941

 
24,452

Borrowed funds
 
1,676,219

 
1,612,745

Other liabilities
 
49,985

 
57,858

Total liabilities
 
8,255,682

 
8,248,684

Stockholders’ Equity:
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 83,209,293 shares issued and 66,441,753 shares outstanding at June 30, 2017 and 66,082,283 outstanding at December 31, 2016
 
832

 
832

Additional paid-in capital
 
1,008,479

 
1,005,777

Retained earnings
 
573,350

 
550,768

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(1,277
)
 
(3,397
)
Treasury stock
 
(261,215
)
 
(264,221
)
Unallocated common stock held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan
 
(36,568
)
 
(37,978
)
Common stock acquired by the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan
 
(5,511
)
 
(5,846
)
Deferred compensation – Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan
 
5,511

 
5,846

Total stockholders’ equity
 
1,283,601

 
1,251,781

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 
$
9,539,283

 
$
9,500,465

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3



PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
 
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Interest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate secured loans
 
$
47,009

 
$
44,916

 
$
93,020

 
$
89,149

Commercial loans
 
18,100

 
15,374

 
34,920

 
30,326

Consumer loans
 
5,196

 
5,394

 
10,210

 
11,030

Securities available for sale and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
 
6,548

 
5,718

 
13,111

 
11,498

Investment securities held to maturity
 
3,292

 
3,331

 
6,540

 
6,662

Deposits, Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
 
298

 
72

 
555

 
114

Total interest income
 
80,443

 
74,805

 
158,356

 
148,779

Interest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
4,653

 
4,135

 
9,105

 
7,956

Borrowed funds
 
6,735

 
6,760

 
13,161

 
13,844

Total interest expense
 
11,388

 
10,895

 
22,266

 
21,800

Net interest income
 
69,055

 
63,910

 
136,090

 
126,979

Provision for loan losses
 
1,700

 
1,700

 
3,200

 
3,200

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
 
67,355

 
62,210

 
132,890

 
123,779

Non-interest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fees
 
7,255

 
6,711

 
13,260

 
13,172

Wealth management income
 
4,509

 
4,511

 
8,722

 
8,822

Bank-owned life insurance
 
2,549

 
1,369

 
3,938

 
2,701

Net gain on securities transactions
 
11

 
1

 
11

 
97

Other income
 
495

 
1,232

 
1,353

 
2,050

Total non-interest income
 
14,819

 
13,824

 
27,284

 
26,842

Non-interest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Compensation and employee benefits
 
26,910

 
25,741

 
53,758

 
51,771

Net occupancy expense
 
6,195

 
6,068

 
13,150

 
12,502

Data processing expense
 
3,531

 
3,272

 
6,988

 
6,517

FDIC insurance
 
999

 
1,293

 
2,098

 
2,615

Amortization of intangibles
 
695

 
856

 
1,447

 
1,861

Advertising and promotion expense
 
945

 
901

 
1,802

 
1,780

Other operating expenses
 
8,065

 
7,766

 
14,221

 
13,729

Total non-interest expense
 
47,340

 
45,897

 
93,464

 
90,775

Income before income tax expense
 
34,834

 
30,137

 
66,710

 
59,846

Income tax expense
 
10,451

 
8,781

 
18,819

 
17,517

Net income
 
$
24,383

 
$
21,356

 
$
47,891

 
$
42,329

Basic earnings per share
 
$
0.38

 
$
0.34

 
$
0.75

 
$
0.67

Weighted average basic shares outstanding
 
64,357,684

 
63,553,694

 
64,263,065

 
63,452,393

Diluted earnings per share
 
$
0.38

 
$
0.34

 
$
0.74

 
$
0.67

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
 
64,541,071

 
63,726,513

 
64,455,873

 
63,623,134


See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4



PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Net income
 
$
24,383

 
$
21,356

 
$
47,891

 
$
42,329

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
 
1,228

 
2,979

 
1,999

 
10,073

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
 

 

 

 
(57
)
Total
 
1,228

 
2,979

 
1,999

 
10,016

Unrealized (losses) gains on derivatives
 
(3
)
 
(170
)
 
52

 
(591
)
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations
 
37

 
140

 
69

 
239

Total other comprehensive income
 
1,262

 
2,949

 
2,120

 
9,664

Total comprehensive income
 
$
25,645

 
$
24,305

 
$
50,011

 
$
51,993

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.


5



PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
COMMON
STOCK
 
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
 
RETAINED
EARNINGS
 
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
 
TREASURY
STOCK
 
UNALLOCATED
ESOP
SHARES
 
COMMON
STOCK
ACQUIRED
BY DDFP
 
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
DDFP
 
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
832

 
$
1,000,810

 
$
507,713

 
$
(2,546
)
 
$
(269,014
)
 
$
(41,730
)
 
$
(6,517
)
 
$
6,517

 
$
1,196,065

Net income
 

 

 
42,329

 

 

 

 

 

 
42,329

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 

 

 

 
9,664

 

 

 

 

 
9,664

Cash dividends declared
 

 

 
(23,222
)
 

 

 

 

 

 
(23,222
)
Distributions from DDFP
 

 
59

 

 

 

 

 
335

 
(335
)
 
59

Purchases of treasury stock
 

 

 

 

 
(1,557
)
 

 

 

 
(1,557
)
Purchase of employee restricted shares to fund statutory tax withholding
 

 

 

 

 
(1,145
)
 

 

 

 
(1,145
)
Shares issued dividend reinvestment plan
 

 
95

 

 

 
656

 

 

 

 
751

Stock option exercises
 

 
37

 

 

 
2,593

 

 

 

 
2,630

Allocation of ESOP shares
 

 
186

 

 

 

 
1,344

 

 

 
1,530

Allocation of SAP shares
 

 
2,371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,371

Allocation of stock options
 

 
88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
88

Balance at June 30, 2016
 
$
832

 
$
1,003,646

 
$
526,820

 
$
7,118

 
$
(268,467
)
 
$
(40,386
)
 
$
(6,182
)
 
$
6,182

 
$
1,229,563

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6





PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited) (Continued)
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
COMMON
STOCK
 
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
 
RETAINED
EARNINGS
 
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
(LOSS) iNCOME
 
TREASURY
STOCK
 
UNALLOCATED
ESOP
SHARES
 
COMMON
STOCK
ACQUIRED
BY DDFP
 
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
DDFP
 
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
$
832

 
$
1,005,777

 
$
550,768

 
$
(3,397
)
 
$
(264,221
)
 
$
(37,978
)
 
$
(5,846
)
 
$
5,846

 
$
1,251,781

Net income
 

 

 
47,891

 

 

 

 

 

 
47,891

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 

 

 

 
2,120

 

 

 

 

 
2,120

Cash dividends declared
 

 

 
(25,309
)
 

 

 

 

 

 
(25,309
)
Distributions from DDFP
 

 
114

 

 

 

 

 
335

 
(335
)
 
114

Purchases of treasury stock
 

 

 

 

 
(443
)
 

 

 

 
(443
)
Purchase of employee restricted shares to fund statutory tax withholding
 

 

 

 

 
(709
)
 

 

 

 
(709
)
Shares issued dividend reinvestment plan
 

 
284

 

 

 
626

 

 

 

 
910

Stock option exercises
 

 
(1,017
)
 

 

 
3,532

 

 

 

 
2,515

Allocation of ESOP shares
 

 
710

 

 

 

 
1,410

 

 

 
2,120

Allocation of SAP shares
 

 
2,514

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,514

Allocation of stock options
 

 
97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
97

Balance at June 30, 2017
 
$
832

 
$
1,008,479

 
$
573,350

 
$
(1,277
)
 
$
(261,215
)
 
$
(36,568
)
 
$
(5,511
)
 
$
5,511

 
$
1,283,601

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.


7



PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
47,891

 
$
42,329

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles
 
5,971

 
6,585

Provision for loan losses
 
3,200

 
3,200

Deferred tax expense
 
840

 
112

Income on Bank-owned life insurance
 
(3,938
)
 
(2,701
)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities
 
4,911

 
5,037

Accretion of net deferred loan fees
 
(2,422
)
 
(1,627
)
Amortization of premiums on purchased loans, net
 
516

 
514

Net increase in loans originated for sale
 
(13,752
)
 
(7,750
)
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale
 

 
8,457

Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets
 
3,540

 
2,501

ESOP expense
 
2,120

 
1,530

Allocation of stock award shares
 
2,514

 
2,215

Allocation of stock options
 
97

 
88

Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
 
1,199

 

Net gain on sale of loans
 
(348
)
 
(707
)
Net gain on securities transactions
 
(11
)
 
(97
)
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment
 

 
(4
)
Net gain on sale of foreclosed assets
 
(501
)
 
(235
)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable
 
(8
)
 
289

Increase in other assets
 
(3,723
)
 
(15,876
)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
 
(7,873
)
 
13,162

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
40,223

 
57,022

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of investment securities held to maturity
 
25,638

 
17,336

Purchases of investment securities held to maturity
 
(31,572
)
 
(23,930
)
Proceeds from sales of securities
 

 
2,193

Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale
 
100,502

 
92,819

Purchases of securities available for sale
 
(99,268
)
 
(130,788
)
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
 
57,658

 
30,758

Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
 
(60,881
)
 
(28,887
)
Purchases of loans
 

 
(28,590
)
Net increase in loans
 
(13,922
)
 
(216,119
)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
 

 
4

Purchases of premises and equipment
 
(1,108
)
 
(2,411
)
Net cash used in investing activities
 
(22,953
)
 
(287,615
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
 
(53,092
)
 
305,899

Increase in mortgage escrow deposits
 
4,489

 
4,893

Cash dividends paid to stockholders
 
(25,309
)
 
(23,222
)
Shares issued through the dividend reinvestment plan
 
910

 
751


8



 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
Purchases of treasury stock
 
(443
)
 
(1,557
)
Purchase of employee restricted shares to fund statutory tax withholding
 
(709
)
 
(1,145
)
Stock options exercised
 
2,515

 
2,630

Proceeds from long-term borrowings
 
171,980

 
251,652

Payments on long-term borrowings
 
(202,019
)
 
(295,336
)
Net increase in short-term borrowings
 
93,513

 
1,329

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
 
(8,165
)
 
245,894

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
9,105

 
15,301

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
144,297

 
102,226

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
153,402

 
$
117,527

Cash paid during the period for:
 
 
 
 
Interest on deposits and borrowings
 
$
22,422

 
$
21,821

Income taxes
 
$
15,491

 
$
15,676

Non-cash investing activities:
 
 
 
 
Transfer of loans receivable to foreclosed assets
 
$
2,019

 
$
2,529

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

9



PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A. Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Provident Financial Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank (the “Bank,” together with Provident Financial Services, Inc., the “Company”).
In preparing the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition and the consolidated statements of income for the periods presented. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The allowance for loan losses, the valuation of securities available for sale and the valuation of deferred tax assets are material estimates that are particularly susceptible to near-term change.
The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for all of 2017.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements to conform with current year classifications.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K.
B. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
Net
Income
 
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
 
Per
Share
Amount
 
Net
Income
 
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
 
Per
Share
Amount
 
Net income
 
$
24,383

 
 
 
 
 
$
21,356

 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income available to common stockholders
 
$
24,383

 
64,357,684

 
$
0.38

 
$
21,356

 
63,553,694

 
$
0.34

 
Dilutive shares
 
 
 
183,387

 
 
 
 
 
172,819

 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income available to common stockholders
 
$
24,383

 
64,541,071

 
$
0.38

 
$
21,356

 
63,726,513

 
$
0.34

 

10



 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
Net
Income
 
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
 
Per
Share
Amount
 
Net
Income
 
Weighted
Average
Common
Shares
Outstanding
 
Per
Share
Amount
 
Net income
 
$
47,891

 
 
 
 
 
$
42,329

 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income available to common stockholders
 
$
47,891

 
64,263,065

 
$
0.75

 
$
42,329

 
63,452,393

 
$
0.67

 
Dilutive shares
 
 
 
192,808

 
 
 
 
 
170,741

 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income available to common stockholders
 
$
47,891

 
64,455,873

 
$
0.74

 
$
42,329

 
63,623,134

 
$
0.67

 
Anti-dilutive stock options and awards at June 30, 2017 and 2016, totaling 437,904 shares and 580,314 shares, respectively, were excluded from the earnings per share calculations.
Note 2. Investment Securities
At June 30, 2017, the Company had $1.04 billion and $492.7 million in available for sale and held to maturity investment securities, respectively. Many factors, including lack of liquidity in the secondary market for certain securities, variations in pricing information, regulatory actions, changes in the business environment or any changes in the competitive marketplace could have an adverse effect on the Company’s investment portfolio which could result in other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") on certain investment securities in future periods. The total number of held to maturity and available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2017 totaled 266, compared with 419 at December 31, 2016. All securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2017 were analyzed for other-than-temporary impairment. Based upon this analysis, the Company believes that as of June 30, 2017, such securities with unrealized losses do not represent impairments that are other-than-temporary.
Securities Available for Sale
The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and the fair value for securities available for sale at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 

June 30, 2017
 

Amortized
cost

Gross
unrealized
gains

Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
US Treasury obligations
 
$
5,990

 

 
(2
)
 
5,988

Agency obligations

42,058


21


(30
)
 
42,049

Mortgage-backed securities

963,291


7,187


(5,382
)
 
965,096

State and municipal obligations

3,706


115



 
3,821

Corporate obligations
 
21,050

 
401

 
(13
)
 
21,438

Equity securities

397


179



 
576

 

$
1,036,492


7,903


(5,427
)
 
1,038,968

 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Amortized
cost
 
Gross
unrealized
gains
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
US Treasury obligations
 
$
7,995

 
13

 

 
8,008

Agency obligations
 
57,123

 
90

 
(25
)
 
57,188

Mortgage-backed securities
 
952,992

 
7,249

 
(8,380
)
 
951,861

State and municipal obligations
 
3,727

 
19

 
(3
)
 
3,743

Corporate obligations
 
19,013

 
35

 
(11
)
 
19,037

Equity securities
 
397

 
152

 

 
549

 
 
$
1,041,247

 
7,558

 
(8,419
)
 
1,040,386


11



The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2017, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to prepayment or early call privileges of the issuer.
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
 
Amortized
cost
 
Fair
value
Due in one year or less
 
$
44,455

 
44,414

Due after one year through five years
 
7,444

 
7,511

Due after five years through ten years
 
20,905

 
21,371

Due after ten years
 

 

 
 
$
72,804

 
73,296

Mortgage-backed securities totaling $963.3 million at amortized cost and $965.1 million at fair value are excluded from the table above as their expected lives are likely to be shorter than the contractual maturity date due to principal prepayments. Also excluded from the table above are equity securities of $397,000 at amortized cost and $576,000 at fair value.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, no securities were sold or called from the securities available for sale portfolio. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, no securities were sold from the available for sale portfolio. Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale, for the six months ended June 30, 2016, totaled $2.2 million, resulting in gross gains of $95,000 and no gross losses. There were no calls of available for sale securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
The Company did not incur an OTTI charge on securities in the available for sale portfolio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
The following tables represent the Company’s disclosure regarding securities available for sale with temporary impairment at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 

June 30, 2017 Unrealized Losses
 

Less than 12 months
 
12 months or longer
 
Total
 

Fair 
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
US Treasury obligations
 
$
5,988

 
(2
)
 

 

 
5,988

 
(2
)
Agency obligations

31,017

 
(30
)
 

 

 
31,017

 
(30
)
Mortgage-backed securities

480,698

 
(5,380
)
 
47

 
(2
)
 
480,745

 
(5,382
)
Corporate obligations
 

 

 
988

 
(13
)
 
988

 
(13
)


$
517,703

 
(5,412
)
 
1,035

 
(15
)
 
518,738

 
(5,427
)
 

December 31, 2016 Unrealized Losses
 

Less than 12 months
 
12 months or longer
 
Total
 

Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
Agency obligations
 
$
14,000

 
(25
)
 

 

 
14,000

 
(25
)
Mortgage-backed securities
 
553,629

 
(8,377
)
 
65

 
(3
)
 
553,694

 
(8,380
)
State and municipal obligations
 
661

 
(3
)
 

 

 
661

 
(3
)
Corporate obligations
 

 

 
990

 
(11
)
 
990

 
(11
)


$
568,290

 
(8,405
)
 
1,055

 
(14
)
 
569,345

 
(8,419
)
The temporary loss position associated with certain securities available for sale was the result of changes in market interest rates relative to the coupon of the individual security and changes in credit spreads. The Company does not have the intent to sell securities in a temporary loss position at June 30, 2017, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before their prices recover.
The number of available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2017 totaled 83, compared with 87 at December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2017, there were two private label mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position,

12



with an amortized cost of $53,000 and an unrealized loss of $2,000. None of these private label mortgage-backed securities were below investment grade at June 30, 2017.
The Company estimates the loss projections for each security by stressing the individual loans collateralizing the security and applying a range of expected default rates, loss severities, and prepayment speeds in conjunction with the underlying credit enhancement for each security. Based on specific assumptions about collateral and vintage, a range of possible cash flows was identified to determine whether OTTI existed during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company believes that no OTTI of the securities available for sale portfolio existed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
Investment Securities Held to Maturity
The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and the estimated fair value for investment securities held to maturity at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
 
Amortized
cost
 
Gross
unrealized
gains
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
Agency obligations

$
4,306

 

 
(56
)
 
4,250

Mortgage-backed securities

579

 
20

 

 
599

State and municipal obligations

478,564

 
10,746

 
(2,082
)
 
487,228

Corporate obligations

9,288

 
7

 
(34
)
 
9,261

 

$
492,737

 
10,773

 
(2,172
)
 
501,338

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Amortized
cost
 
Gross
unrealized
gains
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
Agency obligations
 
$
4,306

 
2

 
(83
)
 
4,225

Mortgage-backed securities
 
893

 
31

 

 
924

State and municipal obligations
 
473,653

 
6,635

 
(5,436
)
 
474,852

Corporate obligations
 
9,331

 
7

 
(52
)
 
9,286

 
 
$
488,183

 
6,675

 
(5,571
)
 
489,287

The Company generally purchases securities for long-term investment purposes, and differences between amortized cost and fair values may fluctuate during the investment period. There were no sales of securities from the held to maturity portfolio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, proceeds from calls on certain securities in the held to maturity portfolio totaled $7.9 million and $20.7 million, respectively, with gross gains of $11,000 and no gross losses recognized in both the three and six month periods. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, proceeds from calls of certain securities in the held to maturity portfolio totaled $4.3 million and $14.9 million, respectively, with gross gains totaling $1,000 and $2,000, respectively and no gross losses recognized in either period.
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities in the held to maturity portfolio at June 30, 2017 by contractual maturity are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to prepayment or early call privileges of the issuer.
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
 
Amortized
cost
 
Fair
value
Due in one year or less

$
22,961

 
23,006

Due after one year through five years

56,527

 
57,412

Due after five years through ten years

252,672

 
258,915

Due after ten years

159,998

 
161,406



$
492,158

 
500,739

Mortgage-backed securities totaling $579,000 at amortized cost and $599,000 at fair value are excluded from the table above as their expected lives are likely to be shorter than the contractual maturity date due to principal prepayments.

13



The following tables represent the Company’s disclosure on investment securities held to maturity with temporary impairment at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017 Unrealized Losses
 
 
Less than 12 months
 
12 months or longer
 
Total
 
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
Agency obligations

$
3,851

 
(56
)
 

 

 
3,851

 
(56
)
State and municipal obligations

78,613

 
(1,814
)
 
9,198

 
(268
)
 
87,811

 
(2,082
)
Corporate obligations

6,836

 
(34
)
 

 

 
6,836

 
(34
)
 

$
89,300

 
(1,904
)
 
9,198

 
(268
)
 
98,498

 
(2,172
)
 
 
December 31, 2016 Unrealized Losses
 
 
Less than 12 months
 
12 months or longer
 
Total
 
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
 
Gross
unrealized
losses
Agency obligations
 
$
3,525

 
(83
)
 

 

 
3,525

 
(83
)
State and municipal obligations
 
172,152

 
(5,132
)
 
6,617

 
(304
)
 
178,769

 
(5,436
)
Corporate obligations
 
4,697

 
(52
)
 

 

 
4,697

 
(52
)
 
 
$
180,374

 
(5,267
)
 
6,617

 
(304
)
 
186,991

 
(5,571
)
Based upon the review of the held to maturity securities portfolio, the Company believes that as of June 30, 2017, securities with unrealized loss positions shown above do not represent impairments that are other-than-temporary. The review of the portfolio for OTTI considers the percentage and length of time the fair value of an investment is below book value, as well as general market conditions, changes in interest rates, credit risks, whether the Company has the intent to sell the securities and whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the securities before their prices recover.
The number of held to maturity securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2017 totaled 183, compared with 332 at December 31, 2016. The decrease in the number of securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2017, was due to a slight decrease in market interest rates from December 31, 2016 and a tightening of spreads in the municipal bond sector. All temporarily impaired investment securities were investment grade at June 30, 2017.

14



Note 3. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans receivable at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
1,168,557

 
1,211,672

Commercial
 
1,992,449

 
1,978,569

Multi-family
 
1,384,590

 
1,402,054

Construction
 
305,860

 
264,814

Total mortgage loans
 
4,851,456

 
4,857,109

Commercial loans
 
1,687,944

 
1,630,444

Consumer loans
 
492,838

 
516,755

Total gross loans
 
7,032,238

 
7,004,308

Purchased credit-impaired ("PCI") loans
 
1,266

 
1,272

Premiums on purchased loans
 
4,492

 
4,968

Unearned discounts
 
(37
)
 
(39
)
Net deferred fees
 
(6,911
)
 
(7,023
)
Total loans
 
$
7,031,048

 
7,003,486

The following tables summarize the aging of loans receivable by portfolio segment and class of loans, excluding PCI loans (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
 
30-59
Days
 
60-89
Days
 
Non-accrual
 
Recorded
Investment
> 90 days
accruing
 
Total Past
Due
 
Current
 
Total Loans
Receivable
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
4,861

 
3,521

 
9,126

 

 
17,508

 
1,151,049

 
1,168,557

Commercial
 
522

 
1,010

 
8,727

 

 
10,259

 
1,982,190

 
1,992,449

Multi-family
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,384,590

 
1,384,590

Construction
 

 

 
2,517

 

 
2,517

 
303,343

 
305,860

Total mortgage loans
 
5,383

 
4,531

 
20,370

 

 
30,284

 
4,821,172

 
4,851,456

Commercial loans
 
557

 
25

 
16,089

 

 
16,671

 
1,671,273

 
1,687,944

Consumer loans
 
1,735

 
1,516

 
2,448

 

 
5,699

 
487,139

 
492,838

Total gross loans
 
$
7,675

 
6,072

 
38,907

 

 
52,654

 
6,979,584

 
7,032,238

 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
30-59
Days
 
60-89
Days
 
Non-accrual
 
Recorded
Investment
> 90 days
accruing
 
Total Past
Due
 
Current
 
Total Loans
Receivable
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
5,891

 
6,563

 
12,021

 

 
24,475

 
1,187,197

 
1,211,672

Commercial
 

 
80

 
7,493

 

 
7,573

 
1,970,996

 
1,978,569

Multi-family
 

 

 
553

 

 
553

 
1,401,501

 
1,402,054

Construction
 

 

 
2,517

 

 
2,517

 
262,297

 
264,814

Total mortgage loans
 
5,891

 
6,643

 
22,584

 

 
35,118

 
4,821,991

 
4,857,109

Commercial loans
 
1,656

 
357

 
16,787

 

 
18,800

 
1,611,644

 
1,630,444

Consumer loans
 
2,561

 
1,199

 
3,030

 

 
6,790

 
509,965

 
516,755

Total gross loans
 
$
10,108

 
8,199

 
42,401

 

 
60,708

 
6,943,600

 
7,004,308


15



Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The principal amounts of these non-accrual loans were $38.9 million and $42.4 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Included in non-accrual loans were $724,000 and $7.3 million of loans which were less than 90 days past due at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. There were no loans 90 days or greater past due and still accruing interest at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
The Company defines an impaired loan as a non-homogeneous loan greater than $1.0 million for which it is probable, based on current information, all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. Impaired loans also include all loans modified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). A loan is deemed to be a TDR when a loan modification resulting in a concession is made in an effort to mitigate potential loss arising from a borrower’s financial difficulty. Smaller balance homogeneous loans, including residential mortgages and other consumer loans, are evaluated collectively for impairment and are excluded from the definition of impaired loans, unless modified as TDRs. The Company separately calculates the reserve for loan losses on impaired loans. The Company may recognize impairment of a loan based upon: (1) the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate; (2) if a loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of collateral; or (3) the fair value of the loan. Additionally, if impaired loans have risk characteristics in common, those loans may be aggregated and historical statistics may be used as a means of measuring those impaired loans.
The Company uses third-party appraisals to determine the fair value of the underlying collateral in its analysis of collateral dependent impaired loans. A third-party appraisal is generally ordered as soon as a loan is designated as a collateral dependent impaired loan and is updated annually or more frequently, if required.
A specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses is established for each collateral dependent impaired loan with a carrying balance greater than the collateral’s fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Charge-offs are generally taken for the amount of the specific allocation when operations associated with the respective property cease and it is determined that collection of amounts due will be derived primarily from the disposition of the collateral. At each quarter end, if a loan is designated as a collateral dependent impaired loan and the third-party appraisal has not yet been received, an evaluation of all available collateral is made using the best information available at the time, including rent rolls, borrower financial statements and tax returns, prior appraisals, management’s knowledge of the market and collateral, and internally prepared collateral valuations based upon market assumptions regarding vacancy and capitalization rates, each as and where applicable. Once the appraisal is received and reviewed, the specific reserves are adjusted to reflect the appraised value. The Company believes there have been no significant time lapses in the recognition of changes in collateral values as a result of this process.
At June 30, 2017, there were 150 impaired loans totaling $52.7 million. Included in this total were 121 TDRs related to 117 borrowers totaling $31.3 million that were performing in accordance with their restructured terms and which continued to accrue interest at June 30, 2017. At December 31, 2016, there were 141 impaired loans totaling $52.0 million. Included in this total were 114 TDRs to 110 borrowers totaling $29.9 million that were performing in accordance with their restructured terms and which continued to accrue interest at December 31, 2016.
The following table summarizes loans receivable by portfolio segment and impairment method, excluding PCI loans (in thousands):
 

June 30, 2017
 

Mortgage
loans

Commercial
loans

Consumer
loans

Total Portfolio
Segments
Individually evaluated for impairment

$
30,779

 
19,557

 
2,334

 
52,670

Collectively evaluated for impairment

4,820,677

 
1,668,387

 
490,504

 
6,979,568

Total gross loans

$
4,851,456

 
1,687,944

 
492,838

 
7,032,238

 

December 31, 2016
 

Mortgage
loans

Commercial
loans

Consumer
loans

Total Portfolio
Segments
Individually evaluated for impairment

$
29,551

 
20,255

 
2,213

 
52,019

Collectively evaluated for impairment

4,827,558

 
1,610,189

 
514,542

 
6,952,289

Total gross loans

$
4,857,109

 
1,630,444

 
516,755

 
7,004,308


16



The allowance for loan losses is summarized by portfolio segment and impairment classification as follows (in thousands):
 

June 30, 2017
 

Mortgage
loans

Commercial
loans

Consumer
loans

Total
Individually evaluated for impairment

$
1,782

 
2,230

 
92

 
4,104

Collectively evaluated for impairment

27,044

 
28,855

 
2,859

 
58,758

Total gross loans

$
28,826

 
31,085

 
2,951

 
62,862

 

December 31, 2016
 

Mortgage
loans

Commercial
loans

Consumer
loans

Total
Individually evaluated for impairment

$
1,986

 
268

 
80

 
2,334

Collectively evaluated for impairment

27,640

 
28,875

 
3,034

 
59,549

Total gross loans

$
29,626

 
29,143

 
3,114

 
61,883

Loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties that are considered TDRs primarily involve lowering the monthly payments on such loans through either a reduction in interest rate below a market rate, an extension of the term of the loan without a corresponding adjustment to the risk premium reflected in the interest rate, or a combination of these two methods. These modifications generally do not result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. In addition, the Company attempts to obtain additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying such loans. If the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms and our underwriting process shows the borrower has the capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms, the loan will continue to accrue interest. Non-accruing restructured loans may be returned to accrual status when there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible.
The following tables present the number of loans modified as TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, along with their balances immediately prior to the modification date and post-modification as of June 30, 2017 and 2016. There were no loans modified as TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
 

For the three months ended
 

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2016
Troubled Debt Restructurings

Number  of
Loans

Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded 
Investment

Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment

Number  of
Loans

Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment

Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment
 

($ in thousands)
Mortgage loans:












Residential

3

 
$
1,836

 
$
1,796

 

 
$

 
$

Total mortgage loans

3

 
1,836

 
1,796

 

 

 

Total restructured loans

3

 
$
1,836

 
$
1,796

 

 
$

 
$


17



 
 
For the six months ended
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
June 30, 2016
Troubled Debt Restructurings
 
Number  of
Loans
 
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded 
Investment
 
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment
 
Number  of
Loans
 
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment
 
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment
 
 
($ in thousands)
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
6

 
$
2,838

 
$
2,774

 

 
$

 
$

Total mortgage loans
 
6

 
2,838

 
2,774

 

 

 

Commercial loans
 
1

 
1,300

 
1,240

 

 

 

Consumer loans
 
2

 
240

 
232

 

 

 

Total restructured loans
 
9

 
$
4,378

 
$
4,246

 

 
$

 
$

All TDRs are impaired loans, which are individually evaluated for impairment, as previously discussed. Estimated collateral values of collateral dependent impaired loans modified during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 exceeded the carrying amounts of such loans. There were no charge-offs recorded on collateral dependent impaired loans modified during the three months ended June 30, 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, $1.2 million of charge-offs were recorded on collateral dependent impaired loans, and are included in the preceding table. There were no charge-offs recorded on collateral dependent impaired loans for the same periods last year. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the allowance for loan losses associated with the TDRs presented in the preceding tables totaled $0 and $216,000, respectively, and were included in the allowance for loan losses for loans individually evaluated for impairment.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the TDRs presented in the preceding tables had a weighted average modified interest rate of approximately 3.74% and 4.01%, respectively, compared to a weighted average rate of 3.87% and 3.90% prior to modification, respectively.
The following table presents loans modified as TDRs within the 12 month periods ending June 30, 2017 and 2016, and for which there was a payment default (90 days or more past due) within the respective one year period:
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
June 30, 2016
Troubled Debt Restructurings Subsequently Defaulted
 
Number of
Loans
 
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment
 
Number of
Loans
 
Outstanding
Recorded  Investment
 
 
($ in thousands)
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 

 
$

 
1

 
$
252

Total mortgage loans
 

 

 
1

 
252

Commercial loans
 

 

 

 
$

Consumer loans
 

 

 

 

Total restructured loans
 

 
$

 
1

 
$
252

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
There were no payment defaults (90 days or more past due) for loans modified as TDRs within the 12 month periods ending June 30, 2017. TDRs that subsequently default are considered collateral dependent impaired loans and are evaluated for impairment based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less expected selling costs.
PCI loans are loans acquired at a discount primarily due to deteriorated credit quality. As part of the May 30, 2014 acquisition of Team Capital, $5.2 million of the loans acquired were determined to be PCI loans. At the date of acquisition, PCI loans were accounted for at fair value, based upon the then present value of expected future cash flows, with no related allowance for loan losses. PCI loans totaled $1.3 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

18



The following table summarizes the changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Beginning balance
$
172

 
503

 
200

 
676

Accretion
(96
)
 
(419
)
 
(145
)
 
(840
)
Reclassification from non-accretable discount
82

 
244

 
103

 
492

Ending balance
$
158

 
328

 
158

 
328

The activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30,

Mortgage
loans

Commercial
loans

Consumer
loans

Total Portfolio
Segments

Unallocated

Total
2017












Balance at beginning of period

$
29,318

 
29,786

 
3,051

 
62,155

 

 
62,155

Provision charged (credited) to operations

(292
)
 
1,777

 
215

 
1,700

 

 
1,700

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

7

 
73

 
225

 
305

 

 
305

Loans charged-off

(207
)
 
(551
)
 
(540
)
 
(1,298
)
 

 
(1,298
)
Balance at end of period

$
28,826

 
31,085

 
2,951

 
62,862

 

 
62,862

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016












Balance at beginning of period

$
30,849

 
28,255

 
3,087

 
62,191

 

 
62,191

Provision charged (credited) to operations

497

 
1,311

 
(108
)
 
1,700

 

 
1,700

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

401

 
192

 
220

 
813

 

 
813

Loans charged-off

(113
)
 
(3,459
)
 
(199
)
 
(3,771
)
 

 
(3,771
)
Balance at end of period

$
31,634

 
26,299

 
3,000

 
60,933

 

 
60,933

Six months ended June 30,
 
Mortgage
loans
 
Commercial
loans
 
Consumer
loans
 
Total Portfolio
Segments
 
Unallocated
 
Total
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
29,626

 
29,143

 
3,114

 
61,883

 

 
61,883

Provision charged (credited) to operations
 
(423
)
 
3,394

 
229

 
3,200

 

 
3,200

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
 
61

 
531

 
401

 
993

 

 
993

Loans charged-off
 
(438
)
 
(1,983
)
 
(793
)
 
(3,214
)
 

 
(3,214
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
28,826

 
31,085

 
2,951

 
62,862

 

 
62,862

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
32,094

 
25,829

 
3,501

 
61,424

 

 
61,424

Provision charged (credited) to operations
 
(695
)
 
4,269

 
(374
)
 
3,200

 

 
3,200

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
 
573

 
283

 
537

 
1,393

 

 
1,393

Loans charged-off
 
(338
)
 
(4,082
)
 
(664
)
 
(5,084
)
 

 
(5,084
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
31,634

 
26,299

 
3,000

 
60,933

 

 
60,933



19



The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class and loan category, excluding PCI loans (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
Loans with no related allowance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
12,453

 
9,858

 

 
9,963

 
239

 
10,691

 
7,881

 

 
8,027

 
484

Commercial
 
4,600

 
4,472

 

 
4,472

 

 
1,556

 
1,556

 

 
1,586

 
40

Construction
 
2,553

 
2,517

 

 
2,545

 

 
2,553

 
2,517

 

 
2,514

 

Total
 
19,606

 
16,847

 

 
16,980

 
239

 
14,800

 
11,954

 

 
12,127

 
524

Commercial loans
 
19,420

 
15,912

 

 
16,740

 
152

 
21,830

 
18,874

 

 
13,818

 
259

Consumer loans
 
1,445

 
911

 

 
960

 
27

 
1,493

 
981

 

 
1,026

 
59

Total impaired loans
 
$
40,471

 
33,670

 

 
34,680

 
418

 
38,123

 
31,809

 

 
26,971

 
842

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans with an allowance recorded
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
13,890

 
12,856

 
1,636

 
12,930

 
249

 
14,169

 
13,520

 
1,716

 
13,705

 
519

Commercial
 
1,076

 
1,076

 
146

 
1,094

 
27

 
4,138

 
4,077

 
270

 
4,111

 
55

Construction
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
 
14,966

 
13,932

 
1,782

 
14,024

 
276

 
18,307

 
17,597

 
1,986

 
17,816

 
574

Commercial loans
 
3,708

 
3,645

 
2,230

 
3,688

 
35

 
1,381

 
1,381

 
268

 
5,956

 
4

Consumer loans
 
1,434

 
1,423

 
92

 
1,462

 
38

 
1,242

 
1,232

 
80

 
1,259

 
66

Total impaired loans
 
$
20,108

 
19,000

 
4,104

 
19,174

 
349

 
20,930

 
20,210

 
2,334

 
25,031

 
644

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total impaired loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
26,343

 
22,714

 
1,636

 
22,893

 
488

 
24,860

 
21,401

 
1,716

 
21,732

 
1,003

Commercial
 
5,676

 
5,548

 
146

 
5,566

 
27

 
5,694

 
5,633

 
270

 
5,697

 
95

Construction
 
2,553

 
2,517

 

 
2,545

 

 
2,553

 
2,517

 

 
2,514

 

Total
 
34,572

 
30,779

 
1,782

 
31,004

 
515

 
33,107

 
29,551

 
1,986

 
29,943

 
1,098

Commercial loans
 
23,128

 
19,557

 
2,230

 
20,428

 
187

 
23,211

 
20,255

 
268

 
19,774

 
263

Consumer loans
 
2,879

 
2,334

 
92

 
2,422

 
65

 
2,735

 
2,213

 
80

 
2,285

 
125

Total impaired loans
 
$
60,579

 
52,670

 
4,104

 
53,854

 
767

 
59,053

 
52,019

 
2,334

 
52,002

 
1,486

Specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses attributable to impaired loans totaled $4.1 million at June 30, 2017 and $2.3 million at December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, impaired loans for which there was no related allowance for loan losses totaled $33.7 million and $31.8 million, respectively. The average balance of impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $53.9 million.
The Company utilizes an internal nine-point risk rating system to summarize its loan portfolio into categories with similar risk characteristics. Loans deemed to be “acceptable quality” are rated 1 through 4, with a rating of 1 established for loans with minimal risk. Loans that are deemed to be of “questionable quality” are rated 5 (watch) or 6 (special mention). Loans with adverse classifications (substandard, doubtful or loss) are rated 7, 8 or 9, respectively. Commercial mortgage, commercial, multi-family and construction loans are rated individually, and each lending officer is responsible for risk rating loans in their portfolio. These

20



risk ratings are then reviewed by the department manager and/or the Chief Lending Officer and by the Credit Department. The risk ratings are also confirmed through periodic loan review examinations, which are currently performed by an independent third-party. Reports by the independent third-party are presented directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Loans receivable by credit quality risk rating indicator, excluding PCI loans, are as follows (in thousands):
 

At June 30, 2017
 

Residential

Commercial
mortgage

Multi-
family

Construction

Total
mortgages

Commercial

Consumer

Total loans
Special mention

$
3,521

 
25,567

 
552

 

 
29,640

 
19,606

 
1,516

 
50,762

Substandard

9,125

 
25,588

 
520

 
2,517

 
37,750

 
38,015

 
2,448

 
78,213

Doubtful


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total classified and criticized

12,646

 
51,155

 
1,072

 
2,517

 
67,390

 
57,621

 
3,964

 
128,975

Pass/Watch

1,155,911

 
1,941,294

 
1,383,518

 
303,343

 
4,784,066

 
1,630,323

 
488,874

 
6,903,263

Total

$
1,168,557

 
1,992,449

 
1,384,590

 
305,860

 
4,851,456

 
1,687,944

 
492,838

 
7,032,238

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

At December 31, 2016
 

Residential

Commercial
mortgage

Multi-
family

Construction

Total
mortgages

Commercial

Consumer

Total loans
Special mention

$
6,563

 
25,329

 
563

 

 
32,455

 
14,840

 
1,242

 
48,537

Substandard

12,021

 
23,011

 
553

 
2,517

 
38,102

 
47,255

 
2,940

 
88,297

Doubtful


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total classified and criticized

18,584

 
48,340

 
1,116

 
2,517

 
70,557

 
62,095

 
4,182

 
136,834

Pass/Watch

1,193,088

 
1,930,229

 
1,400,938

 
262,297

 
4,786,552

 
1,568,349

 
512,573

 
6,867,474

Total

$
1,211,672

 
1,978,569

 
1,402,054

 
264,814

 
4,857,109

 
1,630,444

 
516,755

 
7,004,308

Note 4. Deposits
Deposits at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Savings
 
$
1,107,051

 
1,099,020

Money market
 
1,535,995

 
1,582,750

NOW
 
1,853,736

 
1,871,298

Non-interest bearing
 
1,353,757

 
1,349,378

Certificates of deposit
 
649,998

 
651,183

Total deposits
 
$
6,500,537

 
6,553,629

Note 5. Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The Bank has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering its full-time employees who had attained age 21 with at least one year of service as of April 1, 2003. The pension plan was frozen on April 1, 2003. All participants in the Plan are 100% vested. The pension plan’s assets are invested in investment funds and group annuity contracts currently managed by the Principal Financial Group and Allmerica Financial.
In addition to pension benefits, certain health care and life insurance benefits are currently made available to certain of the Bank’s retired employees. The costs of such benefits are accrued based on actuarial assumptions from the date of hire to the date the

21



employee is fully eligible to receive the benefits. Effective January 1, 2003, eligibility for retiree health care benefits was frozen as to new entrants and benefits were eliminated for employees with less than ten years of service as of December 31, 2002. Effective January 1, 2007, eligibility for retiree life insurance benefits was frozen as to new entrants and retiree life insurance benefits were eliminated for employees with less than ten years of service as of December 31, 2006.
Net periodic (increase) benefit cost for pension benefits and other post-retirement benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 includes the following components (in thousands):
 

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,
 

Pension
benefits

Other post-
retirement
benefits

Pension
benefits

Other post-
retirement
benefits
 

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016
Service cost

$

 

 
26

 
37

 
$

 

 
52

 
75

Interest cost

307

 
312

 
218

 
285

 
614

 
624

 
436

 
569

Expected return on plan assets

(638
)
 
(612
)
 

 

 
(1,276
)
 
(1,224
)
 

 

Amortization of prior service cost


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of the net loss

230

 
236

 
(169
)
 

 
460

 
472

 
(338
)
 

Net periodic (increase) benefit cost

$
(101
)
 
(64
)
 
75

 
322

 
$
(202
)
 
(128
)
 
150

 
644

In its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company previously disclosed that it does not expect to contribute to the pension plan in 2017. As of June 30, 2017, no contributions have been made to the pension plan.
The net periodic (increase) benefit cost for pension benefits and other post-retirement benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were calculated using the actual January 1, 2017 pension and other post-retirement benefits valuations.
Note 6. Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”. This update provides guidance about changes to terms or conditions of a share-based payment award which would require modification accounting. In particular, an entity is required to account for the effects of a modification if the fair value, vesting condition or the equity/liability classification of the modified award is not the same immediately before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award. ASU 2017-09 is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” This ASU shortens the amortization period for premiums on callable debt securities by requiring that premiums be amortized to the first (or earliest) call date instead of as an adjustment to the yield over the contractual life. This change more closely aligns the accounting with the economics of a callable debt security and the amortization period with expectations that already are included in market pricing on callable debt securities. This ASU does not change the accounting for discounts on callable debt securities, which will continue to be amortized to the maturity date. This guidance includes only instruments that are held at a premium and have explicit call features. It does not include instruments that contain prepayment features, such as mortgage backed securities; nor does it include call options that are contingent upon future events or in which the timing or amount to be paid is not fixed. The effective date for this ASU is fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within the reporting period, with early adoption permitted. Transition is on a modified retrospective basis with an adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. If early adopted in an interim period, adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-retirement Benefit Cost", which requires that companies disaggregate the service cost component from other components of net benefit cost. This update calls for companies that offer post-retirement benefits to present the service cost, which is the amount an employer has to set aside each quarter or fiscal year to cover the benefits, in the same line item with other current employee compensation costs. Other components of net benefit cost will be

22



presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. ASU 2017-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The main objective of this ASU is to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment by requiring that impairment charges be based upon the first step in the current two-step impairment test under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 350. Currently, if the fair value of a reporting unit is lower than its carrying amount (Step 1), an entity calculates any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount (Step 2). The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated by deducting the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit from the reporting unit’s fair value as determined in Step 1. To determine the implied fair value of goodwill, entities estimate the fair value of any unrecognized intangible assets and any corporate-level assets or liabilities that were included in the determination of the carrying amount and fair value of the reporting unit in Step 1. Under ASU 2017-04, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This standard eliminates the requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2. ASU 2017-04 does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. Under ASU 2017-04, an entity will still be able to perform the current optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. The standard will be applied prospectively and is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments," a new standard which addresses diversity in practice related to eight specific cash flow issues: debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (including bank-owned life insurance policies), distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The main objective of this ASU is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments in this ASU require financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses would represent a valuation account that would be deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The income statement would reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. The measurement of expected credit losses would be based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity will be required to use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate in its circumstances. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 are effective for fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption of this ASU is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU requires all lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset, measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, at the lease commencement date. Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged under the new guidance. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach must be applied for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities." This ASU addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This amendment supersedes the guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into

23



different categories, requires equity securities, except equity method investments, to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income, and simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values. The amendment requires public business entities that are required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet to measure that fair value using the exit price notion. The amendment requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. The amendment requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The amendment reduces diversity in current practice by clarifying that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities should apply the amendment by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with the exception of the amendment related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values, which should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the guidance will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." The objective of this amendment is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards. The ASU is effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. Subsequently, the FASB issued the following standards related to ASU 2014-09: ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations;” ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing;” ASU 2016-11, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting;” and ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”. These amendments are intended to improve and clarify the implementation guidance of ASU 2014-09 and have the same effective date as the original standard. The Company's revenue is comprised of net interest income on interest earning assets and liabilities and non-interest income. The scope of guidance explicitly excludes net interest income as well as other revenues associated with financial assets and liabilities, including loans, leases, securities and derivatives. Accordingly, the majority of the Company's revenues will not be affected. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the guidance will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Note 7. Fair Value Measurements
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. The determination of fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. Where quoted market values in an active market are not readily available, the Company utilizes various valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
Fair value is an estimate of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. However, in many instances fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and may not be realized in an immediate sale of the financial instrument.
GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1:
  
Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
 
 
Level 2:
  
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
 
 
Level 3:
  
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

24


The valuation techniques are based upon the unpaid principal balance only, and exclude any accrued interest or dividends at the measurement date. Interest income and expense and dividend income are recorded within the consolidated statements of income depending on the nature of the instrument using the effective interest method based on acquired discount or premium.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The valuation techniques described below were used to measure fair value of financial instruments in the table below on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Securities Available for Sale
For securities available for sale, fair value was estimated using a market approach. The majority of the Company’s securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets. Prices for these instruments are obtained through third party data service providers or dealer market participants with which the Company has historically transacted both purchases and sales of securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotations and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing, a Level 2 input, is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities to benchmark or to comparable securities. The Company evaluates the quality of Level 2 matrix pricing through comparison to similar assets with greater liquidity and evaluation of projected cash flows. As the Company is responsible for the determination of fair value, it performs quarterly analyses on the prices received from the pricing service to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. Specifically, the Company compares the prices received from the pricing service to a secondary pricing source. Additionally, the Company compares changes in the reported market values and returns to relevant market indices to test the reasonableness of the reported prices. The Company’s internal price verification procedures and review of fair value methodology documentation provided by independent pricing services has not historically resulted in an adjustment in the prices obtained from the pricing service. The Company also may hold equity securities and debt instruments issued by the U.S. government and U.S. government-sponsored agencies that are traded in active markets with readily accessible quoted market prices that are considered Level 1 inputs.
Derivatives
The Company records all derivatives on the statement of financial condition at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. The existing interest rate derivatives result from a service provided to certain qualifying borrowers in a loan related transaction and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities. As such, all changes in fair value of the Company’s derivatives are recognized directly in earnings.
The Company also uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges, and which satisfy hedge accounting requirements, involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. These derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash outflows associated with FHLBNY borrowings. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of these derivatives are recognized directly in earnings.
The fair value of the Company's derivatives are determined using discounted cash flow analysis using observable market-based inputs, which are considered Level 2 inputs.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The valuation techniques described below were used to estimate fair value of financial instruments measured on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans
For loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, fair value was estimated using a market approach. The Company measures the fair value of collateral underlying impaired loans primarily through obtaining independent appraisals that rely upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets. These appraisals include adjustments, on an individual case-by-case basis, to comparable assets based on the appraisers’ market knowledge and experience, as well as adjustments for estimated costs to sell between 5% and 10%. The Company classifies these loans as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

25


Foreclosed Assets
Assets acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure are carried at fair value, less estimated selling costs, which range between 5% and 10%. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals that rely upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets. These appraisals include adjustments, on an individual case basis, to comparable assets based on the appraisers’ market knowledge and experience, and are classified as Level 3. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value less estimated selling costs is charged to the allowance for loan losses. A reserve for foreclosed assets may be established to provide for possible write-downs and selling costs that occur subsequent to foreclosure. Foreclosed assets are carried net of the related reserve. Operating results from real estate owned, including rental income, operating expenses, and gains and losses realized from the sales of real estate owned, are recorded as incurred.
There were no changes to the valuation techniques for fair value measurements as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The following tables present the assets and liabilities reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair values as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
(In thousands)

June 30, 2017

Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Measured on a recurring basis:








Securities available for sale:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury obligations
 
$
5,988

 
5,988

 

 

Agency obligations

42,049

 
42,049

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

965,096

 

 
965,096

 

State and municipal obligations

3,821

 

 
3,821

 

Corporate obligations
 
21,438

 

 
21,438

 

Equity securities

576

 
576

 

 

Total securities available for sale

1,038,968

 
48,613

 
990,355

 

 Derivative assets
 
7,946

 

 
7,946

 

 
 
$
1,046,914

 
48,613

 
998,301

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities
 
$
7,560

 

 
7,560

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Measured on a non-recurring basis:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral

$
6,890

 

 

 
6,890

Foreclosed assets

6,603

 

 

 
6,603



$
13,493

 

 

 
13,493


26


 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
(In thousands)

December 31, 2016

Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Measured on a recurring basis:








Securities available for sale:








U.S. Treasury obligations
 
$
8,008

 
8,008

 

 

Agency obligations

57,188

 
57,188

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

951,861

 

 
951,861

 

State and municipal obligations

3,743

 

 
3,743

 

Corporate obligations
 
19,037

 

 
19,037

 

Equity securities

549

 
549

 

 

Total securities available for sale

$
1,040,386

 
65,745

 
974,641

 

Derivative assets
 
7,441

 

 
7,441

 

 
 
$
1,047,827

 
65,745

 
982,082

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities
 
$
6,750

 

 
6,750

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Measured on a non-recurring basis:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral

$
11,001

 

 

 
11,001

Foreclosed assets

7,991

 

 

 
7,991



$
18,992

 

 

 
18,992

There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The Company is required to disclose estimated fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities on and off the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for those assets and liabilities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and short-term investments, the carrying amount approximates fair value.
Investment Securities Held to Maturity
For investment securities held to maturity, fair value was estimated using a market approach. The majority of the Company’s securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets. Prices for these instruments are obtained through third party data service providers or dealer market participants with which the Company has historically transacted both purchases and sales of securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotations and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing, a Level 2 input, is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities to benchmark or comparable securities. The Company evaluates the quality of Level 2 matrix pricing through comparison to similar assets with greater liquidity and evaluation of projected cash flows. As the Company is responsible for the determination of fair value, it performs quarterly analyses on the prices received from the pricing service to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. Specifically, the Company compares the prices received from the pricing service to a secondary pricing source. Additionally, the Company compares changes in the reported market values and returns to relevant market indices to test the reasonableness of the reported prices. The Company’s internal price verification procedures and review of fair value methodology documentation provided by independent pricing services has not historically resulted in adjustment in the prices obtained from the pricing service. The Company also holds debt instruments issued by the U.S. government and U.S. government agencies that are traded in active markets with readily accessible quoted market prices that are considered Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") Stock
The carrying value of FHLBNY stock was its cost. The fair value of FHLBNY stock is based on redemption at par value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.


27


Loans
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial mortgage, residential mortgage, commercial, construction and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and into performing and non-performing categories. The fair value of performing loans was estimated using a combination of techniques, including a discounted cash flow model that utilizes a discount rate that reflects the Company’s current pricing for loans with similar characteristics and remaining maturity, adjusted by an amount for estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The rates take into account the expected yield curve, as well as an adjustment for prepayment risk, when applicable. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of its loan portfolio as Level 3.
The fair value for significant non-performing loans was based on recent external appraisals of collateral securing such loans, adjusted for the timing of anticipated cash flows. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of its non-performing loan portfolio as Level 3.
Deposits
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits and savings deposits, was equal to the amount payable on demand and classified as Level 1. The estimated fair value of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate was estimated using the Company’s current rates offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of its certificates of deposit portfolio as Level 2.
Borrowed Funds
The fair value of borrowed funds was estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates available for debt with similar terms and maturities and is classified by the Company as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Letters of Credit
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit was estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value estimates of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are deemed immaterial.
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.
Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include goodwill and other intangibles, deferred tax assets and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

28


The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments at their carrying and fair values as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Fair values are presented by level within the fair value hierarchy.
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017 Using:
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
value
 
Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant  Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
153,402

 
153,402

 
153,402

 

 

Securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury obligations
 
5,988

 
5,988

 
5,988

 

 

Agency obligations
 
42,049

 
42,049

 
42,049

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
965,096

 
965,096

 

 
965,096

 

State and municipal obligations
 
3,821

 
3,821

 

 
3,821

 

Corporate obligations
 
21,438

 
21,438

 

 
21,438

 

Equity securities
 
576

 
576

 
576

 

 

Total securities available for sale
 
$
1,038,968

 
1,038,968

 
48,613

 
990,355

 

Investment securities held to maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency obligations
 
4,306

 
4,250

 
4,250

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
579

 
599

 

 
599

 

State and municipal obligations
 
478,564

 
487,228

 

 
487,228

 

Corporate obligations
 
9,288

 
9,261

 

 
9,261

 

Total securities held to maturity
 
$
492,737

 
501,338

 
4,250

 
497,088

 

FHLBNY stock
 
78,949

 
78,949

 
78,949

 

 

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
 
6,968,186

 
6,961,290

 

 

 
6,961,290

Derivative assets
 
7,946

 
7,946

 

 
7,946

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits other than certificates of deposits
 
$
5,850,539

 
5,850,539

 
5,850,539

 

 

Certificates of deposit
 
649,998

 
650,663

 

 
650,663

 

Total deposits
 
$
6,500,537

 
6,501,202

 
5,850,539

 
650,663

 

Borrowings
 
1,676,219

 
1,677,676

 

 
1,677,676

 

Derivative liabilities
 
7,560

 
7,560

 

 
7,560

 


29


 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using:
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
value
 
Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant  Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
144,297

 
144,297

 
144,297

 

 

Securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury obligations
 
8,008

 
8,008

 
8,008

 

 

Agency obligations
 
57,188

 
57,188

 
57,188

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
951,861

 
951,861

 

 
951,861

 

State and municipal obligations
 
3,743

 
3,743

 

 
3,743

 

Corporate obligations
 
19,037

 
19,037

 

 
19,037

 

Equity securities
 
549

 
549

 
549

 

 

Total securities available for sale
 
$
1,040,386

 
1,040,386

 
65,745

 
974,641

 

Investment securities held to maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency obligations
 
$
4,306

 
4,225

 
4,225

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
893

 
924

 

 
924

 

State and municipal obligations
 
473,653

 
474,852

 

 
474,852

 

Corporate obligations
 
9,331

 
9,286

 

 
9,286

 

Total securities held to maturity
 
$
488,183

 
489,287

 
4,225

 
485,062

 

FHLBNY stock
 
75,726

 
75,726

 
75,726

 

 

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
 
6,941,603

 
6,924,440

 

 

 
6,924,440

Derivative assets
 
7,441

 
7,441

 

 
7,441

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits other than certificates of deposits
 
$
5,902,446

 
5,902,446

 
5,902,446

 

 

Certificates of deposit
 
651,183

 
653,772

 

 
653,772

 

Total deposits
 
$
6,553,629

 
6,556,218

 
5,902,446

 
653,772

 

Borrowings
 
1,612,745

 
1,617,023

 

 
1,617,023

 

Derivative liabilities
 
6,750

 
6,750

 

 
6,750

 


30



Note 8. Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income, both gross and net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
Before
Tax
 
Tax
Effect
 
After
Tax
 
Before
Tax
 
Tax
Effect
 
After
Tax
Components of Other Comprehensive Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gains arising during the period
 
$
2,048

 
(820
)
 
1,228

 
4,978

 
(1,999
)
 
2,979

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
 
2,048

 
(820
)
 
1,228

 
4,978

 
(1,999
)
 
2,979

Unrealized losses on derivatives (cash flow hedges)
 
(5
)
 
2

 
(3
)
 
(284
)
 
114

 
(170
)
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations
 
61

 
(24
)
 
37

 
234

 
(94
)
 
140

Total other comprehensive income
 
$
2,104

 
(842
)
 
1,262

 
4,928

 
(1,979
)
 
2,949

 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
Before
Tax
 
Tax
Effect
 
After
Tax
 
Before
Tax
 
Tax
Effect
 
After
Tax
Components of Other Comprehensive Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gains arising during the period
 
$
3,336

 
(1,337
)
 
1,999

 
16,833

 
(6,760
)
 
10,073

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
 

 

 

 
(95
)
 
38

 
(57
)
Total
 
3,336

 
(1,337
)
 
1,999

 
16,738

 
(6,722
)
 
10,016

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives (cash flow hedges)
 
87

 
(35
)
 
52

 
(988
)
 
397

 
(591
)
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations
 
114

 
(45
)
 
69

 
399

 
(160
)
 
239

Total other comprehensive income
 
$
3,537

 
(1,417
)
 
2,120

 
16,149

 
(6,485
)
 
9,664


31



The following tables present the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  by Component, net of tax
for the three months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
Unrealized
Gains on Securities
Available for 
Sale
 
Post- Retirement
Obligations
 
Unrealized gains on Derivatives (cash flow hedges)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Unrealized
Gains on Securities
Available
 for 
Sale
 
Post-  Retirement
Obligations
 
Unrealized (losses) on Derivatives (cash flow hedges)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at
March 31,
 
$
261

 
(3,024
)
 
224

 
(2,539
)
 
10,988

 
(6,325
)
 
(494
)
 
4,169

Current period other comprehensive income (loss)
 
1,228

 
37

 
(3
)
 
1,262

 
2,979

 
140

 
(170
)
 
2,949

Balance at June 30,
 
$
1,489

 
(2,987
)
 
221

 
(1,277
)
 
13,967

 
(6,185
)
 
(664
)
 
7,118

 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  by Component, net of tax
for the six months ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
Unrealized
Gains on Securities
Available for 
Sale
 
Post-  Retirement
Obligations
 
Unrealized gains on Derivatives (cash flow hedges)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Unrealized
Gains on Securities
Available
 for 
Sale
 
Post- Retirement
Obligations
 
Unrealized (losses) on Derivatives (cash flow hedges)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31,
 
$
(510
)
 
(3,056
)
 
169

 
(3,397
)
 
3,951

 
(6,424
)
 
(73
)
 
(2,546
)
Current period other comprehensive income (loss)
 
1,999

 
69

 
52

 
2,120

 
10,016

 
239

 
(591
)
 
9,664

Balance at June 30,
 
$
1,489

 
(2,987
)
 
221

 
(1,277
)
 
13,967

 
(6,185
)
 
(664
)
 
7,118

The following tables summarize the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income to the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
Reclassifications From Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income ("AOCI")
 
 
Amount reclassified from AOCI for the three months ended June 30,
 
Affected line item in the Consolidated
Statement of Income
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Details of AOCI:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized net gains on the sale of securities available for sale
 
$

 

 
Net gain on securities transactions
 
 

 

 
Income tax expense
 
 

 

 
Net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Post-retirement obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of actuarial losses
 
61

 
236

 
Compensation and employee benefits (1)
 
 
(24
)
 
(96
)
 
Income tax expense
 
 
37

 
140

 
Net of tax
Total reclassifications
 
$
37

 
140

 
Net of tax

32



 
 
Reclassifications From Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income ("AOCI")
 
 
Amount reclassified from AOCI for the six months ended June 30,
 
Affected line item in the Consolidated
Statement of Income
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Details of AOCI:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available for sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized net gains on the sale of securities available for sale
 
$

 
95

 
Net gain on securities transactions
 
 

 
(38
)
 
Income tax expense
 
 

 
57

 
Net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Post-retirement obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of actuarial losses
 
122

 
472

 
Compensation and employee benefits (1)
 
 
(48
)
 
(190
)
 
Income tax expense
 
 
74

 
282

 
Net of tax
Total reclassifications
 
$
74

 
339

 
Net of tax
(1) 
This item is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 5. Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost.

33




Note 9. Derivative and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities.
Non-designated Hedges. Derivatives not designated in qualifying hedging relationships are not speculative and result from a service the Company provides to certain qualifying commercial borrowers in loan related transactions and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities. The Company executes interest rate swaps with qualified commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that the Company executes with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. The interest rate swap agreement which the Company executes with the commercial borrower is collateralized by the borrower's property financed by the Company. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had 42 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $637.0 million and 36 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $582.2 million, respectively, related to this program. The Company has credit derivatives resulting from participations in interest rate swaps provided to external lenders as part of loan participation arrangements; therefore, they are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company's assets or liabilities.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. The Company’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. 
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash outflows associated with Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $126,000 will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had two outstanding interest rate derivatives with a notional amount of $60.0 million that was designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
At June 30, 2017
 
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
 
Fair
Value
 
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
 
Fair
Value
Derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other assets
 
$
7,575

 
Other liabilities
 
$
7,560

Credit contracts
 
Other assets
 
2

 
Other liabilities
 

Total derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument
 
 
 
$
7,577

 
 
 
$
7,560

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as a a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Interest rate products
 
Other assets
 
$
369

 
Other liabilities
 
$

Total derivatives designated as a hedging instrument
 
 
 
$
369

 
 
 
$


34



 
 
At December 31, 2016
 
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
 
Fair
Value
 
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
 
Fair
Value
Derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other assets
 
$
7,156

 
Other liabilities
 
$
6,750

Credit contracts
 
Other assets
 
3

 
Other liabilities
 

Total derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument
 
 
 
$
7,159

 
 
 
$
6,750

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as a a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other assets
 
$
282

 
Other liabilities
 
$

Total derivatives designated as a hedging instrument
 
 
 
$
282

 
 
 
$

The tables below present the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands).
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) recognized in Income on derivatives for the three months ended
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
June 30, 2017
 
June 30, 2016
Derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other income (expense)
 
$
(166
)
 
$
(425
)
Credit contracts
 
Other income (expense)
 

 
(6
)
Total
 
 
 
$
(166
)
 
$
(431
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other income (expense)
 
$
(51
)
 
$
(92
)
Total
 
 
 
$
(51
)
 
$
(92
)
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) recognized in Income on derivatives for the six months ended
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
June 30, 2017
 
June 30, 2016
Derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other income (expense)
 
$
(392
)
 
$
(965
)
Credit contracts
 
Other income (expense)
 
1

 
98

Total
 
 
 
$
(391
)
 
$
(867
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as a hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate products
 
Other income (expense)
 
$
(108
)
 
$
(238
)
Total
 
 
 
$
(108
)
 
$
(238
)

The Company has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
In addition, the Company has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision that if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well/adequate capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements.

35



As of June 30, 2017, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest, was $2.3 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties, and has posted collateral of $3.8 million against its obligations under these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at June 30, 2017, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained herein are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period or periods, or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” "project," "intend," “anticipate,” “continue,” or similar terms or variations on those terms, or the negative of those terms. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K or supplemented by its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and those related to the economic environment, particularly in the market areas in which the Company operates, competitive products and pricing, fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. Government, changes in government regulations affecting financial institutions, including regulatory fees and capital requirements, changes in prevailing interest rates, acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, credit risk management, asset-liability management, the financial and securities markets and the availability of and costs associated with sources of liquidity.
The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date made. The Company also advises readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. The Company does not have any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect any subsequent events or circumstances after the date of this statement.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company considers certain accounting policies to be critically important to the fair presentation of its financial condition and results of operations. These policies require management to make complex judgments on matters which by their nature have elements of uncertainty. The sensitivity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, and the assumptions and estimates applied, could have a significant impact on its financial condition and results of operations. These assumptions, estimates and judgments made by management can be influenced by a number of factors, including the general economic environment. The Company has identified the following as critical accounting policies:
Adequacy of the allowance for loan losses
Goodwill valuation and analysis for impairment
Valuation of securities available for sale and impairment analysis
Valuation of deferred tax assets
The calculation of the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy of the Company. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that reflects management’s evaluation of the probable losses in the loan portfolio. The Company maintains the allowance for loan losses through provisions for loan losses that are charged to income. Charge-offs against the allowance for loan losses are taken on loans where management determines that the collection of loan principal is unlikely. Recoveries made on loans that have been charged-off are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
Management's evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses includes a review of all loans on which the collectability of principal may not be reasonably assured. For residential mortgage and consumer loans, this is determined primarily by delinquency and collateral values. For commercial real estate and commercial loans, an extensive review of financial performance, payment history and collateral values is conducted on a quarterly basis.
As part of the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, each quarter management prepares an analysis that categorizes the entire loan portfolio by certain risk characteristics such as loan type (residential mortgage, commercial mortgage, construction, commercial, etc.) and loan risk rating.
When assigning a risk rating to a loan, management utilizes a nine point internal risk rating system. Loans deemed to be “acceptable quality” are rated 1 through 4, with a rating of 1 established for loans with minimal risk. Loans deemed to be of “questionable

36



quality” are rated 5 (watch) or 6 (special mention). Loans with adverse classifications (substandard, doubtful or loss) are rated 7, 8 or 9, respectively. Commercial mortgage, commercial and construction loans are rated individually and each lending officer is responsible for risk rating loans in their portfolio. These risk ratings are then reviewed by the department manager and/or the Chief Lending Officer and the Credit Department. The risk ratings are also confirmed through periodic loan review examinations, which are currently performed by an independent third party, and periodically by the Credit Committee in the credit renewal or approval process. In addition, the Bank requires an annual review be performed for commercial and commercial real estate loans above certain dollar thresholds, depending on loan type, to help determine the appropriate risk rating.
Management estimates the amount of loan losses for groups of loans by applying quantitative loss factors to loan segments at the risk rating level, and applying qualitative adjustments to each loan segment at the portfolio level. Quantitative loss factors give consideration to historical loss experience by loan type based upon an appropriate look back period and adjusted for a loss emergence period. Quantitative loss factors are evaluated at least annually. Management completed its annual evaluation of the quantitative loss factors for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. Qualitative adjustments give consideration to other qualitative or environmental factors such as trends and levels of delinquencies, impaired loans, charge-offs, recoveries and loan volumes, as well as national and local economic trends and conditions. Qualitative adjustments reflect risks in the loan portfolio not captured by the quantitative loss factors and, as such, are evaluated from a risk level perspective relative to the risk levels present over the look back period. Qualitative adjustments are evaluated at least quarterly. The reserves resulting from the application of both of these sets of loss factors are combined to arrive at the allowance for loan losses.
Management believes the primary risks inherent in the portfolio are a general decline in the economy, a decline in real estate market values, rising unemployment or a protracted period of elevated unemployment, increasing vacancy rates in commercial investment properties and possible increases in interest rates in the absence of economic improvement. Any one or a combination of these events may adversely affect borrowers’ ability to repay the loans, resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of provisions. Accordingly, the Company has provided for loan losses at the current level to address the current risk in its loan portfolio. Management considers it important to maintain the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans at an acceptable level given current economic conditions, interest rates and the composition of the portfolio.
Although management believes that the Company has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at appropriate levels, additions may be necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis giving consideration to historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such estimates and assumptions are adjusted when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets, volatile securities markets, and declines in the housing and commercial real estate markets and the economy generally have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance or additional write-downs based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
Additional critical accounting policies relate to judgments about other asset impairments, including goodwill, investment securities and deferred tax assets. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment between annual measurement dates.
Management qualitatively determines whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount before performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If an entity concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the entity would be required to perform Step 1 of the assessment and then, if needed, Step 2 to determine whether goodwill is impaired. However, if it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is more than its carrying amount, the entity does not need to apply the two-step impairment test. For this analysis, the Reporting Unit is defined as the Bank, which includes all core and retail banking operations of the Company but excludes the assets, liabilities, equity, earnings and operations held exclusively at the Company level. The guidance provides certain factors an entity should consider in its qualitative assessment in determining whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. The factors include:
Macroeconomic conditions, such as deterioration in economic condition and limited access to capital.
Industry and market considerations, such as increased competition, regulatory developments and decline in market-dependent multiples.

37



Cost factors, such as increased labor costs, cost of materials and other operating costs.
Overall financial performance, such as declining cash flows and decline in revenue or earnings.
Other relevant entity-specific events, such as changes in management, strategy or customers, litigation and contemplation of bankruptcy.
Reporting unit events, such as selling or disposing a portion of a reporting unit and a change in composition of assets.
Management may, based upon its qualitative assessment, or at its option, perform the two-step process to evaluate the potential impairment of goodwill. If, based upon Step 1, the fair value of the Reporting Unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the Reporting Unit is considered not impaired. However, if the carrying amount of the Reporting Unit exceeds its fair value, an additional test must be performed. The second step test compares the implied fair value of the Reporting Unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. An impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2016. Based upon its qualitative assessment of goodwill, the Company concluded it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill was not impaired and no further quantitative analysis (Step 1) was warranted.
The Company’s available for sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in Stockholders’ Equity. Estimated fair values are based on market quotations or matrix pricing as discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. Securities which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost. Management conducts a periodic review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if any declines in the fair values of securities are other-than-temporary. In this evaluation, if such a decline were deemed other-than-temporary, management would measure the total credit-related component of the unrealized loss, and recognize that portion of the loss as a charge to current period earnings. The remaining portion of the unrealized loss would be recognized as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair value of the securities portfolio is significantly affected by changes in interest rates. In general, as interest rates rise, the fair value of fixed-rate securities decreases and as interest rates fall, the fair value of fixed-rate securities increases. The Company determines if it has the intent to sell these securities or if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery. If either exists, the entire decline in value is considered other-than-temporary and would be recognized as an expense in the current period. In its evaluations, the Company did not recognize an other-than-temporary impairment charge on securities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
The determination of whether deferred tax assets will be realizable is predicated on the reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities, utilization against carryback years and estimates of future taxable income. Such estimates are subject to management’s judgment. A valuation allowance is established when management is unable to conclude that it is more likely than not that it will realize deferred tax assets based on the nature and timing of these items. The Company did not require a valuation allowance at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 2017 AND DECEMBER 31, 2016
Total assets increased $38.8 million to $9.54 billion at June 30, 2017, from $9.50 billion at December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $27.6 million increase in total loans and a $6.4 million increase in total investments.
Total loans increased $27.6 million, or 0.4%, to $7.03 billion at June 30, 2017, from $7.00 billion at December 31, 2016. Loan originations totaled $1.62 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The loan portfolio had net increases of $57.5 million in commercial loans, $41.0 million in construction loans and $13.9 million in commercial mortgage loans, partially offset by net decreases of $43.1 million in residential mortgage loans, $23.9 million in consumer loans and $17.5 million in multi-family mortgage loans. Commercial real estate, commercial and construction loans represented 76.4% of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2017, compared to 75.3% at December 31, 2016.
The Company participates in loans originated by other banks, including participations designated as Shared National Credits (“SNCs”). The Company’s gross commitments and outstanding balances as a participant in SNCs were $293.4 million and $207.6 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017. No SNCs were 90 days or more delinquent at June 30, 2017.
The Company had outstanding junior lien mortgages totaling $214.9 million at June 30, 2017. Of this total, 30 loans totaling $1.7 million were 90 days or more delinquent. These loans were allocated total loss reserves of $326,331.

38



The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s non-performing assets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):


June 30, 2017

December 31, 2016
Mortgage loans:




Residential

$
9,126

 
12,021

Commercial

8,727

 
7,493

Multi-family


 
553

Construction

2,517

 
2,517

Total mortgage loans

20,370

 
22,584

Commercial loans

16,089

 
16,787

Consumer loans

2,448

 
3,030

Total non-performing/non-accrual loans

38,907

 
42,401

Total non-performing/accruing loans - 90 days or more delinquent
 

 

Total non-performing loans
 
38,907

 
42,401

Foreclosed assets

6,603

 
7,991

Total non-performing assets

$
45,510

 
50,392

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s 60-89 day delinquent loans as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
$
3,521

 
6,563

Commercial
 
1,010

 
80

Total mortgage loans
 
4,531

 
6,643

Commercial loans
 
25

 
357

Consumer loans
 
1,516

 
1,199

Total 60-89 day delinquent loans
 
$
6,072

 
8,199

At June 30, 2017, the allowance for loan losses totaled $62.9 million, or 0.89% of total loans, compared with $61.9 million, or 0.88% of total loans at December 31, 2016. Total non-performing loans were $38.9 million, or 0.55% of total loans at June 30, 2017, compared to $42.4 million, or 0.61% of total loans at December 31, 2016. The $3.5 million decrease in non-performing loans consisted of a $2.9 million decrease in non-performing residential mortgage loans, a $698,000 decrease in non-performing commercial loans, a $582,000 decrease in non-performing consumer loans and a $553,000 decrease in non-performing multi-family loans, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans. Non-performing loans do not include $1.3 million of purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans acquired from Team Capital.
At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held $6.6 million and $8.0 million of foreclosed assets, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there were 10 additions to foreclosed assets with a carrying value of $2.0 million and 14 properties sold with a carrying value of $2.7 million. Foreclosed assets at June 30, 2017 consisted of $3.5 million of commercial real estate and $3.1 million of residential real estate.
Non-performing assets totaled $45.5 million, or 0.48% of total assets at June 30, 2017, compared to $50.4 million, or 0.53% of total assets at December 31, 2016.
Total investments increased $6.4 million, or 0.4%, to $1.61 billion at June 30, 2017, from $1.60 billion at December 31, 2016, largely due to purchases of mortgage-backed and municipal securities and an increase in unrealized gains on securities available for sale, partially offset by principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities, maturities of municipal and agency bonds and calls of certain mortgage-backed securities.
Total deposits decreased $53.1 million, or 0.8%, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to $6.50 billion. Total core deposits, which consist of savings and demand deposit accounts, decreased $51.9 million to $5.85 billion at June 30, 2017, from $5.90 billion at December 31, 2016, while time deposits decreased $1.2 million to $650.0 million at June 30, 2017, from $651.2 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease in core deposits was largely attributable to a $46.8 million decrease in money market deposits and a $17.6 million decrease in interest bearing demand deposits, partially offset by an $8.0 million increase in savings deposits

39



and a $4.4 million increase in non-interest bearing demand deposits. Core deposits represented 90.0% of total deposits at June 30, 2017, compared to 90.1% at December 31, 2016.
Borrowed funds increased $63.5 million, or 3.9%, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to $1.68 billion, as wholesale funding replaced net outflows of deposits for the period. Borrowed funds represented 17.6% of total assets at June 30, 2017, an increase from 17.0% at December 31, 2016.
Stockholders’ equity increased $31.8 million, or 2.5%, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to $1.28 billion, due to net income earned for the period and an increase in unrealized gains on securities available for sale, partially offset by dividends paid to stockholders. Common stock repurchases made in connection with withholding to cover income taxes on the vesting of stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2017 totaled 42,379 shares at an average cost of $27.18. At June 30, 2017, 3.1 million shares remained eligible for repurchase under the current authorization.
Book value per share and tangible book value per share at June 30, 2017 were $19.32 and $12.98, respectively, compared with $18.94 and $12.54, respectively, at December 31, 2016. Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure. The following table reconciles book value per share to tangible book value per share and the associated calculations (in thousands, except per share data):
 
 
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016

Total stockholders' equity
 
$
1,283,601

 
$
1,251,781

Less: Total intangible assets
 
421,499

 
422,937

Total tangible stockholders' equity
 
$
862,102

 
$
828,844

 
 
 
 
 
Shares outstanding at June 30, 2017 and 2016
 
66,441,753

 
66,082,283

 
 
 
 
 
Book value per share (total stockholders' equity/shares outstanding)
 

$19.32

 

$18.94

Tangible book value per share (total tangible stockholders' equity/shares outstanding)
 

$12.98

 

$12.54

Liquidity and Capital Resources. Liquidity refers to the Company’s ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet financial obligations to its depositors, to fund loans and securities purchases, deposit outflows and operating expenses. Sources of funds include scheduled amortization of loans, loan prepayments, scheduled maturities of investments, cash flows from mortgage-backed securities and the ability to borrow funds from the FHLBNY and approved broker-dealers.
Cash flows from loan payments and maturing investment securities are fairly predictable sources of funds. Changes in interest rates, local economic conditions and the competitive marketplace can influence loan prepayments, prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and deposit flows.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised the leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, that was effective January 1, 2015. Among other things, the rule established a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), adopted a uniform minimum leverage capital ratio at 4%, increased the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets) and assigns a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The rule also required unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital unless a one-time opt-out was exercised. The Company exercised the option to exclude unrealized gains and losses from the calculation of regulatory capital. Additional constraints were also imposed on the inclusion in regulatory capital of mortgage-servicing assets, deferred tax assets and minority interests. The rule limits a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer,” which when fully phased-in will consist of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer was effective on January 1, 2016, with a 0.625% requirement in that year, and will continue to be phased in through January 1, 2019, when the full capital requirement will be effective. For 2017, the capital conservation buffer requirement is 1.25%.


40



As of June 30, 2017, the Bank and the Company exceeded all current minimum regulatory capital requirements as follows:
 

June 30, 2017
 

Required

Required with Capital Conservation Buffer
 
Actual
 

Amount

Ratio

Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount

Ratio
 

(Dollars in thousands)
Bank:(1)





 
 
 
 



Tier 1 leverage capital
 
$
364,596

 
4.00
%
 
$
364,596

 
4.00
%
 
$
812,376

 
8.91
%
Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital

322,030

 
4.50

 
411,483

 
5.75

 
812,376

 
11.35

Tier 1 risk-based capital

429,374

 
6.00

 
518,827

 
7.25

 
812,376

 
11.35

Total risk-based capital

572,498

 
8.00

 
661,951

 
9.25

 
875,390

 
12.23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 leverage capital
 
$
364,609

 
4.00
%
 
$
364,609

 
4.00
%
 
$
864,336

 
9.48
%
Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital

322,044

 
4.50

 
411,500

 
5.75

 
864,336

 
12.08

Tier 1 risk-based capital

429,392

 
6.00

 
518,848

 
7.25

 
864,336

 
12.08

Total risk-based capital

572,522

 
8.00

 
661,979

 
9.25

 
927,198

 
12.96

(1) Under the FDIC's prompt corrective action provisions, the Bank is considered well capitalized if it has: a leverage (Tier 1) capital ratio of at least 5.00%; a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.50%; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.00%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.00%.
COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016
General. The Company reported net income of $24.4 million, or $0.38 per basic and diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to net income of $21.4 million, or $0.34 per basic and diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company reported net income of $47.9 million, or $0.75 per basic share and $0.74 per diluted share, compared to net income of $42.3 million, or $0.67 per basic and diluted share for the same period last year.
Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were favorably impacted by the period-over-period growth in average loans outstanding, growth in both average non-interest bearing and interest bearing core deposits, along with an expansion of the net interest margin. The improvement in the net interest margin was the result of an increase in the yield on earning assets and a stable cost of funds.
Net Interest Income. Total net interest income increased $5.2 million to $69.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $63.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, total net interest income increased $9.1 million, or 7.2%, to $136.1 million, from $127.0 million for the same period in 2016. Interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 increased $5.6 million to $80.4 million, from $74.8 million for the same period in 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest income increased $9.6 million to $158.4 million, from $148.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Interest expense increased $493,000, or 4.5%, to $11.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $10.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense increased $0.5 million to $22.3 million, from $21.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
The net interest margin increased six basis points to 3.17% for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared with 3.11% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The weighted average yield on interest-earning assets increased six basis points to 3.70% for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared with 3.64% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, while the weighted average cost of interest bearing liabilities increased one basis point to 0.67% for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared to the second quarter of 2016. The average cost of interest bearing deposits for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 was 0.36%, compared with 0.33% for the same period last year. Average non-interest bearing demand deposits totaled $1.33 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared with $1.21 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The average cost of borrowed funds for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 was 1.66%, compared with 1.72% for the same period last year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the net interest margin increased four basis points to 3.15%, compared with 3.11% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The weighted average yield on interest earning assets increased two basis points to 3.67% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared with 3.65% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, while the weighted average

41



cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased one basis point for the six months ended June 30, 2017 to 0.66%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The average cost of interest bearing deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was 0.35%, compared with 0.33% for the same period last year. Average non-interest bearing demand deposits totaled $1.33 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared with $1.20 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The average cost of borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was 1.64%, compared with 1.71% for the same period last year.
Interest income on loans secured by real estate increased $2.1 million to $47.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from $44.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Commercial loan interest income increased $2.7 million to $18.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Consumer loan interest income decreased $198,000 to $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the average balance of total loans increased $363.3 million to $6.95 billion, from $6.59 billion for the same period in 2016. The average loan yield for the three months ended June 30, 2017 increased five basis points to 4.02%, from 3.97% for the same period in 2016.
Interest income on loans secured by real estate increased $3.9 million to $93.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $89.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Commercial loan interest income increased $4.6 million to $34.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $30.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Consumer loan interest income decreased $820,000 to $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $11.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the average balance of total loans increased $390.2 million to $6.94 billion, from $6.55 billion for the same period in 2016. The average loan yield for the six months ended June 30, 2017 increased one basis point to 3.98%, from 3.97% for the same period in 2016.
Interest income on investment securities held to maturity decreased $39,000, or 1.2%, to $3.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period last year. Average investment securities held to maturity increased $17.1 million to $493.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $476.5 million for the same period last year. Interest income on investment securities held to maturity decreased $122,000, or 1.8%, to $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. Average investment securities held to maturity increased $14.6 million to $490.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $475.3 million for the same period last year.
Interest income on securities available for sale and FHLBNY stock increased $830,000, or 14.5%, to $6.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $5.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The average balance of securities available for sale and FHLBNY stock increased $56.6 million to $1.13 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. Interest income on securities available for sale and FHLBNY stock increased $1.6 million, or 14.0%, to $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $11.5 million for the same period last year. The average balance of securities available for sale and FHLBNY stock increased $68.5 million to $1.13 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $1.06 billion for the same period in 2016.
The average yield on total securities increased to 2.40% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared with 2.27% for the same period in 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the average yield on total securities was 2.40%, compared with 2.32% for the same period in 2016.
Interest expense on deposit accounts increased $518,000, or 12.5%, to $4.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $4.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense on deposit accounts increased $1.1 million, or 14.4%, to $9.1 million, from $8.0 million for the same period last year. The average cost of interest bearing deposits increased to 0.36% for the second quarter of 2017 and 0.35% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from 0.33% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The average balance of interest bearing core deposits for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 increased $301.4 million to $4.55 billion, from $4.25 billion for the same period in 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, average interest bearing core deposits increased $409.7 million, to $4.56 billion, from $4.15 billion for the same period in 2016. Average time deposit account balances decreased $90.8 million, to $670.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $761.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, average time deposit account balances decreased $100.3 million, to $667.5 million, from $767.8 million for the same period in 2016.
Interest expense on borrowed funds decreased $25,000, or 0.4%, to $6.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $6.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense on borrowed funds decreased $683,000 to $13.2 million, from $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The average cost of borrowings decreased to 1.66% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from 1.72% for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The average cost of borrowings decreased to 1.64% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from 1.71% for the same period last year. Average borrowings increased $46.6 million, or 2.9%, to $1.63 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, from $1.58 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, average borrowings decreased $10.3 million to $1.61 billion, compared to $1.63 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

42



Provision for Loan Losses. Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level management considers necessary to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. In determining the level of the allowance for loan losses, management considers past and current loss experience, evaluations of real estate collateral, current economic conditions, volume and type of lending, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the levels of non-performing and other classified loans. The amount of the allowance is based on estimates, and the ultimate losses may vary from such estimates as more information becomes available or later events change. Management assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and makes provisions for loan losses, if necessary, in order to maintain the adequacy of the allowance.
The Company recorded provisions for loan losses of $1.7 million and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. This compared with provisions for loan losses of $1.7 million and $3.2 million recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had net charge-offs of $1.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, compared with net charge-offs of $3.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2016. At June 30, 2017, the Company’s allowance for loan losses was $62.9 million, or 0.89% of total loans, compared with $61.9 million, or 0.88% of total loans at December 31, 2016.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income totaled $14.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $1.0 million, or 7.2%, compared to the same period in 2016. Income from Bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI") increased $1.1 million to $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2016. This increase was primarily due to death benefit claims recognized in the current quarter. Also contributing to the increase in non-interest income, fee income increased $544,000 to $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the period ended June 30, 2016, largely due to a $454,000 increase in commercial loan prepayment fee income, partially offset by a $107,000 decrease in income from non-deposit investment products. Net gains on securities transactions increased $10,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. Partially offsetting these increases in non-interest income, other income decreased $737,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to a $358,000 decrease in net fees on loan-level interest rate swap transactions, a $131,000 gain recognized on the sale of deposits resulting from a strategic branch divestiture in the prior year, and a $124,000 decrease in net gains on the sale of loans.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, non-interest income totaled $27.3 million, an increase of $442,000, or 1.6%, compared to the same period in 2016. BOLI income increased $1.2 million to $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to the recognition of death benefit claims. Fee income increased $88,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to a $288,000 increase in deposit related fee income and a $107,000 increase in merchant fee income, partially offset by a $303,000 decrease in debit card revenue. Partially offsetting these increases in non-interest income, other income decreased $697,000 to $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2016, principally due to a $359,000 decrease in net gains on loan sales and a $335,000 gain recognized on the sale of deposits resulting from a strategic branch divestiture in the prior year. Wealth management income decreased $100,000 to $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to the discontinuance of income associated with the licensing of indices to exchange traded fund providers. Net gains on securities transactions decreased $86,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016.
Non-Interest Expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, non-interest expense increased $1.4 million to $47.3 million, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. Compensation and benefits expense increased $1.2 million to $26.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $25.7 million for the same period in 2016. This increase was principally due to additional salary expense related to annual merit increases, an increase in the accrual for incentive compensation and an increase in stock-based compensation, partially offset by a decrease in retirement benefit costs. Other operating expenses increased $299,000 to $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, largely due to increases in debit card maintenance expense and legal expense. Data processing expense increased $259,000 to $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, largely due to increases in telecommunication costs and software maintenance expense. In addition, net occupancy costs increased $127,000, to $6.2 million for three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to an increase in seasonal expenses, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense. Partially offsetting these increases in non-interest expense, FDIC insurance expense decreased $294,000 to $1.0 million for three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.3 million for the same period in 2016. This decrease was due to the FDIC's reduction of assessment rates for depository institutions with less than $10.0 billion in assets, effective for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in the FDIC assessment rate was partially offset by an increase in the Company's total assets subject to assessment. Additionally, amortization of intangibles decreased $161,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared with the same period in 2016, as a result of scheduled reductions in amortization.
Non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $93.5 million, an increase of $2.7 million from $90.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Compensation and benefits expense increased $2.0 million to $53.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $51.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to additional salary

43



expense related to annual merit increases, an increase in the accrual for incentive compensation and an increase in stock-based compensation. Net occupancy costs increased $648,000 to $13.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, principally due to an increase in seasonal expenses, combined with an increase in facility maintenance costs. Other operating expenses increased $492,000 to $14.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, largely due to increases in legal and debit card maintenance expenses. In addition, data processing expense increased $471,000 to $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2016, primarily due to increases in telecommunication costs and software maintenance expense. Partially offsetting these increases in non-interest expense, FDIC insurance expense decreased $517,000 to $2.1 million for six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $2.6 million for the same period in 2016. This decrease was due to the FDIC's reduction of assessment rates for depository institutions with less than $10.0 billion in assets, partially offset by an increase in the Company's total assets subject to assessment. Amortization of intangibles decreased $414,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared with the same period in 2016, as a result of scheduled reductions in amortization.
Income Tax Expense. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company’s income tax expense was $10.5 million and $18.8 million, respectively, compared with $8.8 million and $17.5 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates were 30.0% and 28.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared with 29.1% and 29.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as a greater proportion of income in the current year periods was derived from taxable sources. The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU”) 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)" in the third quarter of 2016. Under this guidance, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies associated with share-based compensation are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the application of this guidance resulted in a $1.2 million decrease in income tax expense.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Qualitative Analysis. Interest rate risk is the exposure of a bank’s current and future earnings and capital arising from adverse movements in interest rates. The guidelines of the Company’s interest rate risk policy seek to limit the exposure to changes in interest rates that affect the underlying economic value of assets and liabilities, earnings and capital. To minimize interest rate risk, the Company generally sells all 20- and 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loans at origination. Commercial real estate loans generally have interest rates that reset in five years, and other commercial loans such as construction loans and commercial lines of credit reset with changes in the Prime rate, the Federal Funds rate or LIBOR. Investment securities purchases generally have maturities of five years or less, and mortgage-backed securities have weighted average lives between three and five years.
The Asset/Liability Committee meets on at least a monthly basis to review the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income, net interest margin, net income and the economic value of equity. The Asset/Liability Committee reviews a variety of strategies that project changes in asset or liability mix and the impact of those changes on projected net interest income and net income.
The Company’s strategy for liabilities has been to maintain a stable core-funding base by focusing on core deposit account acquisition and increasing products and services per household. The Company’s ability to retain maturing time deposit accounts is the result of its strategy to remain competitively priced within its marketplace. The Company’s pricing strategy may vary depending upon current funding needs and the ability of the Company to fund operations through alternative sources, primarily by accessing short-term lines of credit with the FHLBNY during periods of pricing dislocation.
Quantitative Analysis. Current and future sensitivity to changes in interest rates are measured through the use of balance sheet and income simulation models. The analysis captures changes in net interest income using flat rates as a base, a most likely rate forecast and rising and declining interest rate forecasts. Changes in net interest income and net income for the forecast period, generally twelve to twenty-four months, are measured and compared to policy limits for acceptable change. The Company periodically reviews historical deposit re-pricing activity and makes modifications to certain assumptions used in its income simulation model regarding the interest rate sensitivity of deposits without maturity dates. These modifications are made to more closely reflect the most likely results under the various interest rate change scenarios. Since it is inherently difficult to predict the sensitivity of interest bearing deposits to changes in interest rates, the changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates cannot be precisely predicted. There are a variety of reasons that may cause actual results to vary considerably from the predictions presented below which include, but are not limited to, the timing, magnitude, and frequency of changes in interest rates, interest rate spreads, prepayments, and actions taken in response to such changes.

44



Specific assumptions used in the simulation model include:
Parallel yield curve shifts for market rates;
Current asset and liability spreads to market interest rates are fixed;
Traditional savings and interest-bearing demand accounts move at 10% of the rate ramp in either direction;
Retail Money Market and Business Money Market accounts move at 25% and 75% of the rate ramp in either direction respectively; and
Higher-balance demand deposit tiers and promotional demand accounts move at 50% to 75% of the rate ramp in either direction
The following table sets forth the results of a twelve-month net interest income projection model as of June 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Change in Interest Rates in
Basis Points (Rate Ramp)
 
Net Interest Income
Dollar
Amount
 
Dollar
Change
 
Percent
Change
-100
 
$
265,569

 
$
(12,525
)
 
(4.5
)%
Static
 
278,094

 

 

+100
 
276,259

 
(1,835
)
 
(0.7
)
+200
 
274,247

 
(3,847
)
 
(1.4
)
+300
 
273,293

 
(4,801
)
 
(1.7
)
The preceding table indicates that, as of June 30, 2017, in the event of a 300 basis point increase in interest rates, whereby rates ramp up evenly over a twelve-month period, net interest income would decrease 1.7%, or $4.8 million. In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, net interest income would decrease 4.5%, or $12.5 million over the same period.

Another measure of interest rate sensitivity is to model changes in economic value of equity through the use of immediate and sustained interest rate shocks. The following table illustrates the result of the economic value of equity model as of June 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
  
 
Present Value of Equity
 
Present Value of Equity
as Percent of Present
Value of Assets
Change in Interest
Rates (Basis Points)
 
Dollar
Amount
 
Dollar
Change
 
Percent
Change
 
Present
Value Ratio
 
Percent
Change
-100
 
$
1,395,507

 
$
64,273

 
4.8
 %
 
14.3
%
 
3.8
 %
Flat
 
1,331,234

 

 

 
13.8

 

+100
 
1,301,027

 
(30,207
)
 
(2.3
)
 
13.6

 
(1.6
)
+200
 
1,258,535

 
(72,699
)
 
(5.5
)
 
13.2

 
(4.1
)
+300
 
1,219,364

 
(111,870
)
 
(8.4
)
 
12.9

 
(6.4
)
The preceding table indicates that as of June 30, 2017, in the event of an immediate and sustained 300 basis point increase in interest rates, the present value of equity is projected to decrease 8.4%, or $111.9 million. If rates were to decrease 100 basis points, the model forecasts a 4.8%, or $64.3 million, increase in the present value of equity.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes in net interest income requires the use of certain assumptions regarding prepayment and deposit decay rates, which may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. While management believes such assumptions are reasonable, there can be no assurance that assumed prepayment rates and decay rates will approximate actual future loan prepayment and deposit withdrawal activity. Moreover, the net interest income table presented assumes that the composition of interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the net interest income table provides an indication of the Company’s interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurement is not intended to and does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on the Company’s net interest income and will differ from actual results.
 
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were evaluated at the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

45



PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various legal actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these legal actions and claims are not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition.

Item 1A.
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors that were previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period
 
(a) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (1)
 
(d) Maximum Number
of Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased under
the Plans or Programs (1)(2)
April 1, 2017 through April 30, 2017
 

 

 

 
3,149,461

May 1, 2017 through May 31, 2017
 

 

 

 
3,149,461

June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017
 
224

 
$
24.09

 
224

 
3,149,237

Total
 
224

 

 
224

 
 
(1)
On October 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the purchase of up to 3,107,077 shares of its common stock under a seventh general repurchase program which commenced upon completion of the previous repurchase program. The repurchase program has no expiration date.
(2)
On December 20, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the purchase of up to 3,017,770 shares of its common stock under an eighth general repurchase program which will commence upon completion of the previous repurchase program. The repurchase program has no expiration date.

46



Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
 
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable
 
Item 5.
Other Information.
None
 
Item 6.
Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed herewith:
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, and any amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission/Registration No. 333-98241.)
 
 
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s December 31, 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2012/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
4.1
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, and any amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission/Registration No. 333-98241.)
 
 
10.1
Employment Agreement by and between Provident Financial Services, Inc and Christopher Martin dated September 23, 2009. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s September 30, 2009 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2009/ File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.2
Change in Control Agreement by and between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and Christopher Martin dated as of December 16, 2015. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.3
Form of Three-Year Change in Control Agreement between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and each of Messrs. Blum, Kuntz and Lyons dated as of December 16, 2015. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.4
Form of Two-Year Change in Control Agreement between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and certain senior officers.(Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.5
Form of One-Year Change in Control Agreement between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and certain senior officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.6
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Provident Bank. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s December 31, 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.7
Retirement Plan for the Board of Managers of Provident Bank. (Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s December 31, 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009 /File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.8
Provident Financial Services, Inc. Board of Directors Voluntary Fee Deferral Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s December 31, 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 

47



10.9
First Savings Bank Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan, as amended. (Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s September 30, 2004 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2004/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.10
Provident Bank Non-Qualified Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s May 27, 2010 Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 3, 2010/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.11
Provident Financial Services, Inc. Amended and Restated the Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. (Filed as an appendix to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2014/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.12
Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s December 31, 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2012/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.13
Provident Financial Services, Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan (Filed as an appendix to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2015/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101
The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report to Stockholders on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
101.INS 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document



48



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
 
August 8, 2017
 
By:
 
/s/ Christopher Martin
 
 
 
 
 
 
Christopher Martin
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
 
August 8, 2017
 
By:
 
/s/ Thomas M. Lyons
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thomas M. Lyons
 
 
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
 
August 8, 2017
 
By:
 
/s/ Frank S. Muzio
 
 
 
 
 
 
Frank S. Muzio
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


49



Exhibit Index
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, and any amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission/Registration No. 333-98241.)
 
 
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s December 31, 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2012/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
4.1
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, and any amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission/Registration No. 333-98241.)
 
 
10.1
Employment Agreement by and between Provident Financial Services, Inc and Christopher Martin dated September 23, 2009. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s September 30, 2009 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2009/ File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.2
Change in Control Agreement by and between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and Christopher Martin dated as of December 16, 2015. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.3
Form of Three-Year Change in Control Agreement between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and each of Messrs. Blum, Kuntz and Lyons dated as of December 16, 2015. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.4
Form of Two-Year Change in Control Agreement between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and certain senior officers.(Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.5
Form of One-Year Change in Control Agreement between Provident Financial Services, Inc. and certain senior officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.6
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Provident Bank. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s December 31, 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.7
Retirement Plan for the Board of Managers of Provident Bank. (Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s December 31, 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009 /File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.8
Provident Financial Services, Inc. Board of Directors Voluntary Fee Deferral Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s December 31, 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.9
First Savings Bank Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan, as amended. (Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s September 30, 2004 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2004/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.10
Provident Bank Non-Qualified Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s May 27, 2010 Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 3, 2010/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.11
Provident Financial Services, Inc. Amended and Restated the Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. (Filed as an appendix to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2014/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.12
Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s December 31, 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2012/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
10.13
Provident Financial Services, Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan (Filed as an appendix to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2015/File No. 001-31566.)
 
 
31.1
 
 

50



31.2
 
 
32
101
The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report to Stockholders on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
101.INS 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


51