UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.  )

 

DIFFERENTIAL BRANDS GROUP INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

 

 

DIFFERENTIAL BRANDS GROUP INC.

1231 S. Gerhart Avenue

Commerce, California 90022

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held Thursday, November 30, 2017

To the Stockholders of Differential Brands Group Inc.:

Notice is hereby given that the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Differential Brands Group Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) will be held at the offices of Dechert LLP located at 1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036 at 9 am Eastern Standard Time, for the following purposes:

These proposals are described more fully in the enclosed proxy statement, which we urge you to read in its entirety.

The board of directors has fixed the close of business on October 3, 2017 as the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any of its adjournments or postponements.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. You must be a stockholder of record at the close of business on October 3, 2017 to vote at the Annual Meeting.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.  Whether or not you plan to attend the 2017 annual meeting in person, we strongly encourage you to vote. Please vote as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the 2017 annual meeting in person. If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person you are requested to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the pre-addressed envelope provided so that it is received by us at least 24 hours before the Annual Meeting or vote by telephone or over the Internet if your voting instruction form describes such voting methods. Your proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted if you return a later-dated proxy card or if you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting if you are the record holder of the shares and can provide a copy of a certificate(s) evidencing your shares.

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority to vote your shares only on routine matters, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. Your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on non-routine matters without instructions from you, in which

case a “broker non-vote” will occur and your shares will not be voted on such matters. The only routine matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting is the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 5). Non-routine matters at the Annual Meeting include the election of directors (Proposal No. 1), the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (Proposal No. 2), the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (Proposal No. 3), and the approval, under applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules, of the removal of the restrictions on the exercise of the SWIMS Warrant and the conversion of the SWIMS Convertible Note to permit the issuance, in excess of 19.99% of the common stock outstanding prior to such issuance, of: (1) the common stock underlying the SWIMS Warrant, (2) the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock underlying the SWIMS Convertible Note, and (3) the common stock underlying the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock (Proposal No. 4).

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2017

THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING, THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10‑K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 ARE AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.DIFFERENTIALBRANDSGROUP.COM/ UNDER “INVESTOR INFORMATION.”

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.  YOU ARE URGED TO FILL IN, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED

PROXY CARD AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. YOUR PROMPT

RETURN OF THE PROXY CARD WILL HELP AVOID THE ADDITIONAL EXPENSE OF

FURTHER SOLICITATION TO ASSURE A QUORUM AT THE MEETING.

THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2017.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

We are a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and have elected to provide in this proxy statement certain scaled disclosures permitted under the Exchange Act for smaller reporting companies. As a result of being a smaller reporting company, we do not provide pay for performance, compensation and risk and compensation ratio disclosures and compensation committee interlocks disclosures, a compensation discussion and analysis or a compensation committee report, among other disclosures. We will remain a “smaller reporting company” until such time as our public float as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter is at least $75 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

DIFFERENTIAL BRANDS GROUP INC.

1231 S. Gerhart Avenue

Commerce, California 90022

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held Monday, November 30, 2017

GENERAL INFORMATION AND VOTING RIGHTS

QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

When and where is the Annual Meeting being held?

This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors (the “Board” or the “Board of Directors”) of Differential Brands Group Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”), a Delaware corporation, for use at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the offices of Dechert LLP located at 1095 Avenue of the Americas on Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9 am Eastern Standard Time, and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Who may attend the Annual Meeting?

Any stockholder, and certain other permitted attendees, may attend the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we ask that you also complete and return the reservation form attached to the end of the Proxy Statement. Please note that space limitations make it necessary to limit attendance to stockholders and one guest. Admission to the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Proof of the Company’s stock ownership as of the record date, along with photo identification, will be required for admission. The “street name” holders will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting their stock ownership as of the record date. No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, use of cell phones or other mobile devices, large bags or packages will be permitted at the Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote?

Only holders of record of our common stock (and holders of our convertible stock that is entitled to vote on an as-converted basis) at the close of business on October 3, 2017 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. On the Record Date, there were 13,317,281 shares of common stock outstanding. On all matters to come before the Annual Meeting, each holder of record of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. The shares of common stock held in our treasury, which are not considered outstanding, will not be voted.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and holding shares in “street name”? Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy?

Stockholders of Record.  If your shares are registered in your name, you are a stockholder of record. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to direct the voting of your shares by returning the enclosed proxy card to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to vote by proxy so that your shares will be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting even if you cannot attend.

Beneficial Owners With Shares Held in “Street Name.” If your shares are held in “street name” at a bank, broker or other similar organization or other nominees, the organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct your nominee holder on how to vote your shares and to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you receive a valid proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee holder. To obtain a valid proxy, you must make a special request of your bank, broker or other nominee. If you do not make this request, you may still vote by following the instructions in the

voting instruction card, which your bank, broker or other nominee has enclosed for you to use in directing such bank, broker or nominee on how to vote your shares.

All Stockholders. All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly executed proxies received prior to the Annual Meeting, and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on those proxies. If no instructions are indicated on a properly executed proxy, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.

How do I vote?

If I vote by proxy, can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting either by filing with the Secretary of the Company at our principal offices a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and expressing a desire to vote your shares in person. If you hold your shares in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. You must contact your bank, broker or other nominee to find out how to do so.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we do not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.

If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the meeting to another time or place in order to solicit additional proxies in favor of the nominees to the Board of Directors, the persons named as proxies and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on these matters according to their best judgment to the same extent as the person delivering the proxy would be entitled to vote. As of the date of this notice, we have not received notice of any other matters that may be properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

What constitutes a quorum?

Pursuant to our existing Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 6, 2015 and as amended as of November 7, 2016 (the “Bylaws”), in order for us to conduct the Annual Meeting, the holders of shares of common stock outstanding representing a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares entitled to vote as of the Record Date of October 3, 2017, must be present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy. This is referred to as a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the number of shares present at the Annual Meeting for determining the presence of a quorum.

What happens if a quorum is not present?

Pursuant to our Bylaws, if a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned to such day and at such time and place as the Chairman of the Annual Meeting may determine. At the adjourned meeting the stockholders may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting. If the adjournment is for more than 30 days, notice of the adjourned meeting will be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting, but otherwise notice of the adjournment is not required.

How will votes be counted?

For Proposal No. 1 (the election of directors), you may vote “FOR” all of the nominees or your vote may be “WITHHELD” for one or more of the nominees. For Proposal No. 3 (advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation), you may vote “ONE YEAR”,”TWO YEARS”, “THREE  YEARS” or “ABSTAIN.” For the other items of business (Proposals Nos. 2, 4 and 5), you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Broker non-votes and abstentions will have the effect as described in each of the proposals as described below.

Proposal No. 1: To Reelect Seven Directors to Serve on the Board of Directors Until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or Until Their Respective Successors Are Elected and Qualified:  Pursuant to our Bylaws, the nominees for reelection to the Board of Directors who receive a plurality of “FOR” votes cast by holders of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be elected. “WITHHELD” votes will be counted as present for the purposes of this vote, but will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal. Brokers, banks and other financial institutions cannot vote your stock on your behalf for this proposal if you have not provided instructions on your voting instruction form; for your vote to be counted, you must submit your voting instructions to your broker or custodian. Broker non-votes will not be counted as present and are not entitled to vote on this proposal.

Proposal No. 2: To Conduct an Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation:  Approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board of Directors or the Company. However, the Board of Directors will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation. Brokers, banks and other financial institutions cannot vote your stock on your behalf for this proposal if you have not provided instructions on your voting instruction form; for your vote to be counted, you must submit your voting instructions to your broker or custodian. Broker non-votes will not be counted as present and are not entitled to vote on this proposal.

Proposal No. 3: To Conduct an Advisory Vote on the Frequency of the Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation:  The frequency that receives a plurality of votes cast by holders of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be selected.  Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board of Directors or the Company. However, the Board of Directors will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation. Brokers, banks and other financial institutions cannot vote your stock on your behalf for the election of directors if you have not provided instructions on your voting instruction form; for your vote to be counted, you must submit your voting instructions to your broker or custodian. Broker non-votes will not be counted as present and are not entitled to vote on this proposal.

Proposal No. 4: To Approve, under Applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules, the Removal of the Restrictions on the Exercise of the SWIMS Warrant and the Conversion of the SWIMS Convertible Note to Permit the Issuance, in Excess of 19.99% of the Common Stock Outstanding prior to such Issuance, of: (1) the Common Stock underlying the SWIMS Warrant, (2) the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock underlying the SWIMS Convertible Note, and (3) the Common Stock underlying the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock:  Pursuant to our Bylaws and the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), the adoption of a more-than‑19.99% common stock issuance (or the issuance of securities convertible into more than 19.99% of outstanding common stock) requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Abstentions will not be counted in determining whether this proposal has been approved. Brokers, banks and other financial institutions cannot vote your stock on your behalf for this proposal if you have not provided instructions on your voting instruction form; for your vote to be counted, you must submit your voting instructions to your broker or custodian. Broker non-votes will not be counted as present and are not entitled to vote on this proposal.

Proposal No. 5: To Ratify the Appointment of CohnReznick LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2017:  Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will not be counted in determining whether this proposal has been approved. Broker non-votes will be counted as present and are entitled to vote on the proposal. If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, the shares may be voted on this proposal at the discretion of your broker.

How will my shares be voted if I do not provide instructions on the proxy card?

Stockholders of Record. If you hold your shares directly in your own name, your shares will not be voted if you do not vote them or provide a proxy. If you hold your shares directly in your own name and you sign and return your proxy card (including over the internet or by telephone) but do not include voting instructions, your proxy will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends on each proposal.

Beneficial Owners. If you hold your shares in “street name” and do not provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee, your broker may vote your shares on “routine” matters even if you do not provide a proxy. The only routine matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting is the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 (Proposal No. 5). If a bank, broker or other nominee votes your shares on these matters in accordance with these rules, your shares will count as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and will count as “FOR” vote, abstention or “AGAINST” vote, as the case may be, depending on how the broker votes. If a brokerage firm signs and returns a proxy on your behalf that does not contain voting instructions, your shares will count as present at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes and will be voted in connection with the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, but will not count as a “FOR” vote for any other matter, including the election of the nominees for directors. Because banks, brokers and other nominees require their customers’ direction to vote on non-routine matters, it is critical that the stockholders provide their banks, brokers and other nominees with voting instructions with respect to the proposals involving non-routine matters (Proposals Nos. 1‑4).

What is a broker non-vote?

A “broker non-vote” occurs when a beneficial owner of shares held by a broker, bank or other nominee fails to provide the stockholder of record with voting instructions on any non-routine matters brought to a vote at the meeting.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies. Our directors, officers and other employees may solicit proxies in person, by telephone, by mail or by other means of communication, but such persons will not be specially compensated for such services. While we presently intend that solicitations will be made only by directors, officers and employees of the Company, we may also retain outside brokers, banks, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries to assist in the solicitation of proxies. Any reasonable charges and expenses incurred in connection with the use of such outside solicitors will be paid by the Company.

HOUSEHOLDING

To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate proxy materials to our stockholders, we are relying on the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that permit us to deliver only one set of proxy materials, including our proxy statement, our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the notice of annual meeting, to multiple stockholders who share an address unless we receive contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” reduces duplicate mailings, thus saving printing and

postage costs as well as natural resources. Each stockholder retains a separate right to vote on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting. Once you have received notice from your broker or us that they or we will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you wish to receive a separate copy of the Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 or other proxy materials, free of charge, or if you wish to receive separate copies of future annual reports or proxy materials, please mail your request to Differential Brands Group Inc., 1231 S. Gerhart Avenue, Commerce, California 90022, attention: Lori Nembirkow, or call us at +1 (323) 890‑1800.

STOCKHOLDER LIST

For at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting, a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, showing the address of and number of shares registered in the name of each stockholder, will be open for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose related to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours at our principal executive offices located at 1231 S. Gerhart Avenue, Commerce, California 90022. The list will also be available for examination at the Annual Meeting.

VOTING RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING

Voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8‑K issued by us within four business days following the Annual Meeting and will be reported on our website at http://www.differentialbrandsgroup.com/.

PROPOSAL NO. 1 — TO REELECT SEVEN DIRECTORS TO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
UNTIL THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OR UNTIL THEIR RESPECTIVE
SUCCESSORS ARE ELECTED AND QUALIFIED

Background of the Proposal

Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, our Board of Directors has nominated seven directors to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2018 (the “2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders”) and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Pursuant to our Bylaws, each member of our Board of Directors is elected at the annual meeting of stockholders and serves until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until a successor has been elected and qualified or his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Additionally, our Bylaws provide that the number of directors of the Company shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by the Board, which is currently seven. All seven nominees listed below currently serve on our Board.

As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8‑K filed with the SEC on January 29, 2016, we completed the acquisition (the “RG Merger”) of all of the outstanding equity interests of RG Parent LLC and its subsidiaries (“RG” or “Robert Graham”), a business engaged in the design, development, sales and licensing of apparel products and accessories that bear the brand name Robert Graham® on January 28, 2016. In connection with the completion of the RG Merger, Samuel J. Furrow resigned from his position as Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and each of Joanne Calabrese and Suhail R. Rizvi resigned as directors of the Company. On January 28, 2016, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement and the Certificate of Designation, and in connection with the consummation of the RG Merger, TCP Denim, LLC designated Matthew Eby, William Sweedler and Andrew Tarshis to serve together with the Company’s continuing directors, Kelly Hoffman and Kent Savage. The Board of Directors then appointed Walter McLallen and Michael Buckley as directors of the Company and William Sweedler as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the nominees named above. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for such other nominee(s) as shall be designated by the then current Board of Directors to fill any vacancy. In accordance with Article III of our Bylaws, vacancies are filled by a majority vote of the remaining Board of Directors or by a sole remaining director. We have no reason to believe that the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected as directors.

As set forth in our Bylaws, the election of directors to the Board is determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders present and entitled to vote. This means that the seven nominees receiving the highest numbers of “FOR” votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be elected as directors.

The table and biographies below set forth information as of the date of this Proxy Statement with respect to the director nominees, all of whom are currently directors of the Company.

William Sweedler has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors since January 2016. Since January 2011, Mr. Sweedler has been a Co Founder and General Partner of Tengram Capital Partners L.P. (“Tengram Capital Partners”), a consumer private equity firm formed to invest in the consumer and retail sectors. Tengram Capital Partners is also currently our largest stockholder, as discussed further in “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” below. Prior to his tenure at Tengram Capital Partners, Mr. Sweedler was the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Windsong Brands, a diversified brand development and investment company that specialized in the acquisition, growth, licensing, and comprehensive management of consumer branded intellectual property and businesses. Mr. Sweedler is currently Chairman of the Board of Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SQBG), as well as a director at the following privately held companies: NEST Fragrances, Tommie Copper, Luciano Barbera and Zanella. Prior to founding Windsong Brands, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Joe Boxer, a wholly owned division of the Iconix Brand Group Inc. (NASDAQ: ICON) of which he was also an Executive Vice President and Director. Mr. Sweedler has a B.S. in Finance and Investments from Babson College with a BS in Finance and Investments. With over 25 years of experience in the consumer sector as an operator and strategic investor, Mr. Sweedler brings strategic vision and guidance to the Company as Chairman of our Board of Directors.

Michael Buckley has served as a member of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer since January 2016. Prior to the RG Merger, Mr. Buckley served as Chief Executive Officer of Robert Graham since June 2011. From 2006 to 2010, Mr. Buckley served as the President of True Religion Apparel Inc. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Buckley served as President and Chief Executive of North American operations for the Ben Sherman Group. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Buckley served as Vice President of Diesel USA, a retail apparel company, where he oversaw all U.S.-based retail and financial operations of Diesel® Jeans U.S.A. Mr. Buckley’s experience with the management of all aspects of operations of an apparel company provides us with leadership and guidance across all aspects of our operations.

Matthew Eby has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2016. Since January 2011, Mr. Eby has been a Co-Founder and General Partner of Tengram Capital Partners where he is responsible for originating, underwriting and monitoring of investments and co manages the daily activities of the firm. Mr. Eby serves as Chairman of NEST Fragrances and Earth Treks and is a member of the board of directors of Algenist. Prior to founding Tengram, Mr. Eby was the founder and Chief Investment Officer of JAWS Estates Capital, the private investment office of Barry Sternlicht and the Sternlicht family. In 2009, on behalf of Starwood Capital Group, he oversaw the initial public offering of Starwood Property Trust (NYSE: STWD), a mortgage REIT focused on commercial real estate properties that raised over $930 million. Prior to founding JAWS, Mr. Eby was an associate at Morgan Stanley where he helped to found a group designed to facilitate interaction between the Investment Banking

Division and the High Net Worth and Retail Divisions. Before entering the investment industry, Mr. Eby served five years as an officer in the U.S. Navy. Mr. Eby holds an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.Sc from the United States Naval Academy. Mr. Eby’s experience with the management of investments and operating activities of brands provides us with guidance as we manage the integration between Robert Graham and Hudson, as well as review other potential strategic acquisitions.

Kelly Hoffman has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June 2004. Since January 2013, Mr. Hoffman has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Ring Energy, Inc. (NYSE: REI), an oil and gas exploration, development and production company with operations in Texas and Kansas. From December 2011 until January 2013, Mr. Hoffman served as a consultant to numerous companies in the oil and gas industry. From April 2008 until December 2011, Mr. Hoffman served as President of Victory Park Resources, a privately-held exploration and production company specializing in the acquisition of oil and gas producing properties in Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico. From 1998 until September 2009, Mr. Hoffman served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Varsity Media Group Inc., a technology and new media company. From 1991 until 1998, Mr. Hoffman owned AOCO Operating, a company that raised capital for the acquisition of property in Texas, Louisiana and New Mexico whereby he purchased over 20,000 acres and drilled over 75 successful oil wells. Mr. Hoffman began his oil and gas career at Amoco Production Company in Texas in various positions. Mr. Hoffman attended Texas Tech University and majored in Business Administration. Mr. Hoffman’s experience with starting up, raising capital and running various companies provides us with practical knowledge and guidance on operations.

Walter McLallen has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2016. Since 2004, Mr. McLallen has served as the Managing Director of Meritage Capital Advisors, an advisory boutique focused on debt and private equity transaction origination, structuring and consulting.  Mr. McLallen has extensive board and organizational experience and has served as a director, Chairman or Vice Chairman on numerous corporate and non-profit boards and committees, with a significant historical focus on consumer products related companies, including private companies, such as Timeless Wine Company, the producer of consumer luxury wine brands Silver Oak, Twomey and OVID since August 2016; Worldwise, a consumer branded pet products company since April 2016; adMarketplace, a search engine advertiser since 2012; Dutchland Plastics, a roto-molding plastics manufacturer since January 2017; and Genus Oncology, an early-stage biotechnology company since 2015. He is also a founder and Co-Chairman of Tomahawk Strategic Solutions, a law enforcement, military and corporate training and security company, since 2014. From 2006 to 2015, Mr. McLallen was the Executive Vice Chairman of Remington Outdoor Company, an outdoor consumer platform he co-founded with a major investment firm. Mr. McLallen was formerly with CIBC World Markets from 1995 to 2004, during which time he was a Managing Director, head of Debt Capital Markets and head of High Yield Distribution. Mr. McLallen started his career in the Mergers & Acquisitions Department of Drexel Burnham Lambert and was a founding member of The Argosy Group L.P. in 1990. He received a B.A. with a double major in Economics and Finance from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Mr. McLallen’s experience with over 25 years in the investment banking, corporate finance advisory, capital markets and financial sector, including significant exposure to financial reporting, accounting, finance, risk management and portfolio management across a broad section of industries, provides us with expertise and guidance on operational, financial and public company reporting requirements.

Kent Savage has served as a member of our Board of Directors since July 2003. Since 2000, Mr. Savage has served as the General Partner of Savage Interests LP, a limited partnership for investments. Since 2012, Mr. Savage has also served as co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Icon.me, LLC. From June 2005 until 2010, Mr. Savage served as Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Famecast, Inc., a privately-held interactive branded entertainment and contest management company. From January 2004 until June 2005, Mr. Savage served as Chief Executive Officer for Digital Lifestyles Group, Inc., a publicly-traded manufacturer and distributor of personal computers, and in connection, Mr. Savage created the hip-e™ computer. Between February 2003 and January 2004, Mr. Savage served in various consulting capacities to start-up companies. From September 2002 until February 2003, Mr. Savage served as Co-Founder, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer for TippingPoint Technologies (NASDAQ: TPTI), which was later acquired by 3Com. From February 1999 until August 2001, Mr. Savage served as co-founder, Chief Executive Officer and President for Netpliance, Inc., which completed an initial public offering (NASDAQ: NPLI). From April 1998 until February 1999, Mr. Savage served as General Manager, Broadband for Cisco Systems Inc.’s service provider line of business. From July 1996 until April 1998, Mr. Savage served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing for

NetSpeed, Inc., which was acquired by Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO). Mr. Savage received his B.S. degree in Business from Oklahoma State University, attended University of Virginia’s Executive Leadership Program, and received his M.B.A. degree from Southern Methodist University. Mr. Savage’s extensive experience as an officer and director at other public companies brings valuable experience and insight regarding our financial and accounting matters, which are also key to his role as chairman of our Audit Committee.

Andrew Tarshis has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2016. Since January 2011, Mr. Tarshis has served as a Partner of Tengram Capital Partners, as well as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance Officer. Prior to joining Tengram, Mr. Tarshis was Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ICON), a brand management and licensing company, where he was involved in all aspects of the Company’s strategic and legal affairs, including M&A, financing, licensing and intellectual property, governance, SEC and other regulatory and compliance matters. Prior to joining Iconix, Mr. Tarshis served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Windsong Allegiance Group, LLC, former owner of the Joe Boxer and Hathaway brands, and as a corporate attorney for Toys R Us, Inc., specializing in intellectual property. Mr. Tarshis received his J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law and a B.A. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Mr. Tarshis’s experience with the management of all aspects of strategic and legal affairs provides us with guidance and brings valuable experience and insight into all legal matters related to our operations and reporting requirements as a public company.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The table and biographies below set forth information as of the date of this Proxy Statement with respect to our executive officers. Our executive officers hold office until the next annual meeting of the Board and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, or removal from office.

 

Michael Buckley has served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors since January 2016. For more information, see Mr. Buckley’s full biography under “Proposal No. 1. Election of Directors.”

Bob Ross has served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2017.  From October 2013 until October 2016, Mr. Ross served as Chief Financial Officer of Nasty Gal, Inc. From April 2010 to January 2013, Mr. Ross served as Chief Financial Officer at Ideeli Inc. From October 1997 to December 2009, Mr. Ross held various financial and operational executive roles at Urban Outfitters.

Peter Kim has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Hudson Clothing LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Hudson”), since its acquisition by us in September 2013 until June 2017 and presently serves as Founder and Vice Chairman of our Hudson board.  Mr. Kim founded Hudson and has been a member of its board of directors since 2002 and was its Chief Executive Officer until June 2017.

BOARD MEETINGS AND BOARD COMMITTEE INFORMATION

Board Meetings

Our Board of Directors manages us through board meetings and through its committees. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (“fiscal 2016”) our Board of Directors held 12 meetings, including six meetings by unanimous written consent. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of all the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees on which such director served. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance at our annual meeting of stockholders, we attempt to accommodate the schedules of each member of our Board of Directors in choosing a date for our annual meeting of stockholders and our annual meeting of our Board of Directors. Directors are generally in attendance at the annual meeting of stockholders.  All of the members of our Board of Directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders in 2016 (the “2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders”) in person or telephonically.

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, non-management directors also meet as needed in executive sessions without management present, with at least one such meeting a year attended only by independent directors. The Chairman of the Board presides over these executive sessions. During fiscal 2016, our non-management met two times in executive session, all of which meetings were comprised of only independent directors.

Committees and Committee Charters

The Board of Directors has established a separately designated audit committee (the “Audit Committee”), compensation and stock option committee (the “Compensation and Stock Option Committee”) and nominating and governance committee (the “Nominating and Governance Committee”) of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may also establish special committees from time to time to perform specifically delegated functions. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter that governs the conduct and responsibilities of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Stock Option Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, copies of which may be found on our website at www.differentialbrandsgroup.com/ in the section titled “Investor Information—Corporate Governance.” You may also request printed copies of the charter(s) by sending written request to the Secretary at the address set forth on the cover of this Proxy Statement. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Proxy Statement and is not incorporated by reference herein.

The following table identifies the current members of our Board serving on the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Hoffman, McLallen and Savage. Mr. Savage serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met or acted through written consent a total of eight times in fiscal 2016.

The principal responsibility of the Audit Committee is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. In that regard, the Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in monitoring (1) our accounting, auditing, and financial reporting processes generally, including the qualifications,

independence and performance of the independent auditor (including pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditor), (2) the integrity of our financial statements, (3) our systems of internal control regarding finance and accounting and (4) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Our Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing with management our major risk exposures and our risk assessment and risk management programs. As discussed above, the Audit Committee has a charter that details its duties and responsibilities, which was adopted by our Board of Directors on November 21, 2013.

Currently, all Audit Committee members are “independent” under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and rules and regulations of the SEC, including Rule 10A‑3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee has sufficient knowledge and understanding of the Company’s financial statements to serve on the Audit Committee and is financially literate within the meaning of Nasdaq listing standards as interpreted by the Board. Mr. Savage has been designated to be an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined under federal securities laws.

Compensation and Stock Option Committee

Currently, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, is comprised of Messrs. McLallen, Sweedler and Tarshis. Mr. Sweedler serves as Chairman of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee met or acted through written consent a total of four times in fiscal 2016.

The Compensation and Stock Option Committee’s responsibilities include determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, reviewing and approving employment agreements, severance arrangements, change in control provisions and special or supplemental benefits applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers and, in consultation with senior management, recommending to the Board of Directors for the Board’s approval our general compensation philosophy and objectives. Additionally, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee reviews and approves incentive compensation and equity-based plans, as well as compensation plans, policies and benefit programs applicable to employees generally, and administers our equity-based compensation plans. In connection with its deliberations, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee seeks the views of management with respect to appropriate compensation levels of the other officers and directors and may recruit compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisers as it deems necessary to provide independent advice regarding market trends and other competitive considerations, and has the sole authority to compensate and oversee the work of such consultants, outside counsel and other advisers. During fiscal 2016, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee did not retain the services of compensation consultants to determine or recommend the amount or form of executive and director compensation. As discussed above, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee has a charter that details its duties and responsibilities, which was adopted by our Board of Directors on November 21, 2013.

In setting the level of cash and equity compensation, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee considers various factors, including our overall performance and the individual’s performance during the year, the uniqueness and relative performance of the executive’s skill set, the expected future contribution to us and competitive conditions. In addition, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee considered the affirmative “say on pay” vote at our annual meeting of stockholders held in 2011 and again at our annual meeting of stockholders held in 2014 and the affirmative golden parachute “say on pay” vote at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and continued to apply the same principles in determining the amounts and types of executive compensation. In addition, our Compensation and Stock Option Committee reviews compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, and considers the recommendation by the Chief Executive Officer for the other Named Executive Officers (as defined below) other than the Chief Executive Officer. As set forth in our Compensation and Stock Option Committee’s charter, the Chief Executive Officer may not be present during voting or deliberations on his compensation.

Currently, all Compensation and Stock Option Committee members are “independent” under applicable Nasdaq listing standards, including the enhanced independence requirements applicable to members of compensation committees.   The Compensation and Stock Option Committee also has the ability to delegate its duties as necessary and appropriate, including the ability to delegate certain of its responsibilities under our equity based compensation plans.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Eby, Savage and Sweedler. Mr. Eby serves as Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee met a total of two times in fiscal 2016.

The principal responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee are (1) assisting our Board of Directors in identifying individuals qualified to serve as members of our Board of Directors, (2) developing and recommending to our Board of Directors a set of corporate governance guidelines, and (3) overseeing the evaluation of our Board of Directors and management. In that regard, the Nominating and Governance Committee also has primary responsibility to recommend to our Board of Directors the director nominees for election by the stockholders at meetings of stockholders and for filling any vacancies and newly created directorships, to periodically review and make recommendations regarding the composition and size of our Board of Directors and committees, to review and make recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to director compensation, to lead the Board’s annual self-evaluation process, to annually recommend to the Board the chairpersons and members of the Board’s committees and to oversee director orientation and continuing education programs.

As discussed above, the Nominating and Governance Committee has a charter that details its duties and responsibilities, which was adopted by our Board of Directors on November 21, 2013. Currently, all Nominating and Governance Committee members are “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Director Nominations

Directors may be nominated by the Board or stockholders in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for developing criteria for the selection of, and recommending to the Board candidates for, new directors for election at stockholder meetings and nominees for vacancies and for reviewing such director candidates, including those nominated by stockholders. The Board’s and Nominating and Governance Committee’s methods for choosing candidates for election to the Board of Directors (other than those formally nominated by our stockholders, as discussed below) include the solicitation of ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources, including existing members of the Board of Directors, executive officers, individuals personally known to the members of the Board of Directors and other research. We may also from time to time retain one or more third-party search firms to identify suitable candidates.

In evaluating the suitability of candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee may take into account many factors, including the potential candidate’s judgment, experience, independence, character, business acumen and such other factors as the Nominating and Governance Committee concludes are pertinent in light of the current needs of our Board of Directors, including an incumbent’s past performance, attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors believes that each candidate should be an individual who has demonstrated integrity and ethics in such candidate’s personal and professional life, has an understanding of elements relevant to the success of a publicly-traded company and has established a record of professional accomplishment in such candidate’s chosen field. Each candidate should be prepared to participate fully in our Board of Directors’ activities, including attendance at and active participation in meetings of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has no stated specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a candidate for a position on our Board of Directors.

We have no formal policy on diversity; however, our Board of Directors believes that its membership should reflect a diversity of experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age. To date, no more specific criteria has been developed other than that set forth in the charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee and our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

There is no specific procedure outlined in the charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee or the Corporate Governance Guidelines to consider recommendations by common stockholder for candidates on our Board of Directors, but such recommended candidates will be considered in accordance with the principal responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee, our Bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and all applicable rules and regulations relating to such nominations by our common stockholders. Any recommendations by stockholders for nominations to our Board of Directors are evaluated in a manner similar to how the Nominating and Governance Committee considers all directors.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that describe, among other matters, the role of the Board of Directors, Board of Directors composition and selection, director independence and other director qualifications, selection of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, our majority voting standard, committees of the Board of Directors, meetings of the Board of Directors, director responsibilities, director compensation, annual performance evaluations, succession planning and the process for stockholders or other interested parties to communicate with our Board of Directors. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, as amended from time to time, can be found on our website at www.differentialbrandsgroup.com/ in the section titled “Investor Information—Corporate Governance.”

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors is led by our Chairman of the Board and our Company is led by our Chief Executive Officer. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board of Directors believes that whether to have the same person occupy the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be decided by the Board of

Directors, from time to time, in its business judgment after considering relevant circumstances. We currently separate the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

We believe that, under normal circumstances, separating the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes balance between the oversight function of the Board of Directors and our operational and strategic direction undertaken by our Chief Executive Officer. We believe that this separation also balances the leadership in the boardroom and at the Company in its day-to-day operational activities. Our Board of Directors will periodically make a determination as to the appropriateness of this policy, including in connection with the recruitment and succession of the Chairman and/or Chief Executive Officer.

In addition, all of our committees have separate committee chairpersons that act as the presiding chair at the particular committee meetings. All members are free to request items for inclusion on the agenda at meetings and have an opportunity to bring up any items of discussion at any time among the Board of Directors or with management.

Compensation of Directors and Officers

The Compensation and Stock Option Committee determines the compensation to be paid to our officers and directors, with recommendations from management as to the amount and/or form of such compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee also makes recommendations to our Board regarding director compensation.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees on May 22, 2003. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.differentialbrandsgroup.com in the section titled “Investor Information — Corporate Governance,” or you may request a free copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics from our Chief Compliance Officer at our principal executive offices located at Differential Brands Group Inc., 1231 S. Gerhart Avenue, Commerce, California 90022 or by calling +1 (323) 890‑1800. You may also find a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 to our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2003 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2004.

To date, there have been no waivers under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We intend to disclose any amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waiver granted from a provision of such code on our website at www.differentialbrandsgroup.com within the same time frame that would otherwise be required by a Current Report on Form 8‑K.

Stockholder Nominations

Our Bylaws provide that nominations of persons for election as directors at a meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected may be made by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or by a stockholder, as set forth below.

For a stockholder to properly bring before an annual meeting a nomination or nomination(s) for election to the Board of Directors, the stockholder must have given timely notice including all of the information regarding the nominee(s) and the stockholder giving the notice, as mandated by our Bylaws, must have been a stockholder of record on the date of giving notice, and must be entitled to vote for the election of directors at the annual meeting. To be timely, such notice must be received by the Secretary of the Company at our principal executive offices located at Differential Brands Group Inc., 1231 S. Gerhart Avenue, Commerce, California 90022 not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. However, if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, under the terms of our Bylaws, notice by the stockholder must be (i) no earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the annual meeting and (ii) not later than the later of the close of business on the 90th day before the annual meeting or the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which the Company first publicly announces the date of the annual meeting.

For a stockholder to properly bring before a special meeting a nomination or nomination(s) for election to the Board of Directors, the stockholder’s notice must be received by the Secretary of the Company at our principal executive offices at the address referenced above (i) not earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day prior to the meeting and (ii) not later than the close of business on the 90th day before the meeting or the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which the Company first publicly announces the date of the special meeting.

Because this Annual Meeting is not being held more than 30 days before the anniversary date of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, written notice from stockholders was required to be received by the close of business on August 9, 2017, which was the 90th day prior to the Annual Meeting.

If the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting is increased, and the Company does not publicly announce the names of the nominees for the additional directorships before the close of the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a stockholder’s notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for the additional directorships, if the notice is received by the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company at the address referenced above by the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which the Company first publicly announces the nominees for additional directorships.

Director Independence

Currently, the following six out of seven members of our Board of Directors are considered “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards and as such term is defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC:

In making its determination that the foregoing directors are independent, the Board of Directors considered all relevant facts and circumstances. As required under Nasdaq listing standards, in making its determination of independence, the Board of Directors considered whether the director had a relationship with the Company which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In addition, the Nasdaq definition of independent director includes a series of objective tests which were considered by the Board. Specifically, a member of the Board of Directors may be considered independent if such member:

There are no current transactions with members of the Board of Directors that needed to be considered for any impact on the respective member’s independence. All current members of our Audit Committee, Compensation and Stock Option Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee are considered to be independent based on the applicable rules of Nasdaq and the SEC. The remaining member of our Board, Mr. Buckley, is not considered independent because he is employed by the Company as its Chief Executive Officer.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders may contact an individual director, the Board of Directors as a group, or a specified Board of Directors committee or group, including the independent directors as a group, by mail, addressed to our corporate office at 1231 S. Gerhart Avenue, Commerce, California 90022, or by email addressed to board@differentialbrandsgroup.com. Each communication should specify the applicable addressee(s) to be contacted, as well as the general topic of the communication. The Secretary will initially receive and process communications before forwarding them to the addressee. Our policy on communications with the Board of Directors is contained in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found on our website at www.differentialbrandsgroup.com in the section titled “Investor Information—Corporate Governance.”

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors oversees our risks in an enterprise-wide approach to understand our material enterprise risks, including operational, financial, strategic, compliance and reputational risks. First, we have a fully independent Audit Committee that is primarily responsible for reviewing with management our major risk exposures and our risk assessment and risk management programs, including our financial risks. Our Audit Committee meets on a quarterly basis and as needed with management and our internal audit consultants to review and discuss these matters. In addition, at the invitation of the Audit Committee, other members of the Board of Directors and management team are also present at these meetings to participate in the discussion on our most significant risks and exposure to risks and the evaluation of these matters to ensure consensus and mutual understanding between our Board of Directors and management. Finally, each of our committees considers their own particular set of risks associated with its responsibilities.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Historically, our non‑employee directors have been compensated for service through an equity grant or on a cash basis. Our non‑employee directors are not compensated in any other manner; however, they are reimbursed for travel and business expenses associated with attending our annual meeting or other in person meetings. Members of our Board of Directors who are employees or directors designated by the TCP Denim, LLC, (the “Series A Designated Directors”) even if they are non-employee directors, receive no additional compensation for service as a member of our Board of Directors.

On December 20, 2016, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors approved a cash payment of $50,000 and a stock award with a fair market value of $50,000 to each of the non-employee independent directors, excluding Series A Designated Directors William Sweedler, Matthew Eby and Andrew Tarshis,

for their service in 2016. In addition, in 2016 cash payments of $98,000 were made to Kent Savage, Kelly Hoffman, Samuel J. Furrow, Joanne Calabrese and Suhail R. Rizvi for their service in 2015.

The following table provides certain information concerning the compensation for services rendered in all capacities by each director serving on our Board of Directors during fiscal 2016. For the compensation of our employee directors during fiscal 2016, our Chief Executive Officer Mr. Buckley and our Former Interim Chief Executive Officer Mr. Furrow, see “Executive Compensation – Summary Compensation Table.”

Members of our Board of Directors who also serve on one or more committees of our Board of Directors do not receive any additional compensation for such service, except the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional cash payment of $15,000 for his service. All directors are also entitled to the protection provided by their indemnification agreements and the indemnification provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as the protection provided by director and office liability insurance provided by us.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview

This Executive Compensation section focuses on the following: (1) the objectives of the executive compensation policies and practices; (2) the objectives that the compensation program is designed to reward; (3) each element of compensation; (4) the rationale for each element of compensation; (5) the methodologies utilized by us in determining the amounts to pay for each element; and (6) how an element of compensation and our rationale for each element fit together within our overall compensation objectives. This discussion relates to our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and certain current and former executive officers, or collectively, our Named Executive Officers.

For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, our “Named Executive Officers,” consisting of (i) our principal executive officer until January 28, 2016, (ii) our principal executive officer through the remainder of the fiscal year and (iii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, include:

Effective February 11, 2015, the Board of Directors appointed Samuel J. Furrow as our Interim Executive Officer. In connection with the completion of the RG Merger, effective January 28, 2016, Samuel J. Furrow resigned as our Interim Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors appointed Michael Buckley as Chief Executive Officer.  On January 26, 2017, Hamish Sandhu resigned as our Chief Financial Officer and the Board of Directors appointed Bob Ross as our Chief Financial Officer.

“Say on Pay” Vote

At our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders held on May 8, 2014, our stockholders were asked to consider and vote on a resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, commonly referred to as “say on pay.” A substantial majority of our stockholders approved the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, with approximately 76 percent of the votes cast in favor of that “say on pay” resolution. While we were pleased with our stockholder support in 2014, we will continue to actively evaluate our executive compensation program.

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is designed to provide proper incentive to management to maximize performance in order to encourage creation of stockholder value and achievement of strategic corporate objectives, attract and retain qualified, skilled and dedicated executives on a long‑term basis, reward past performance and provide incentives for future performance.

In keeping with these objectives, our goal is to (1) align the interests of the executive officers with the interests of our stockholders, (2) ensure the long‑term commitment of our management team, and (3) ensure accountability for both our overall performance and the individual’s performance and contribution.

In setting the level of cash and equity compensation, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of our Board of Directors considers various factors, including our overall performance and the individual’s performance during the year, the uniqueness and relative performance of the executive’s skill set, the expected future contribution to us and competitive conditions. In addition, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee considered our stockholders’ affirmative “say on pay” vote at our annual meeting in October 2011 and again in May 2014 and continued to apply the same principles in determining the amounts and types of executive compensation. In addition, our Compensation and Stock Option Committee reviews compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, and considers the recommendation by the Chief Executive Officer for the other Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.

Elements of Compensation

Our compensation structure for our Named Executive Officers consists of a combination of (1) base salary, (2) long‑term incentive awards primarily through grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) pursuant to our stock incentive plans, (3) company paid benefits, including medical insurance, dental insurance, 401(k) Plan, disability insurance, life insurance and flexible spending accounts, and (4) discretionary cash bonuses for certain of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee also takes into account certain change in control provisions available to our Named Executive Officers.

2016 Compensation

As described below in “Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements,” we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Buckley and a new employment agreement with Mr. Kim each of which became effective upon completion of the RG Merger on January 28, 2016. Also, on January 15, 2016, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors approved a cash bonus of $10,000 to Hamish Sandhu, our former Chief Financial Officer.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning the compensation earned by our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively (rounded to the nearest thousand).

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements

Change in Control Provisions

Each of Mr. Buckley’s and Mr. Kim’s employment agreements contain certain change in control provisions. These provisions provided each person with certain compensation arrangements in the event that a change in control occurs prior to its termination. For more information, see “—Peter Kim” and “—Michael Buckley” below. In addition, our Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Amended and Restated Plan”) contained a change in control provision which provided for the immediate vesting in full of all grants or lapse of all restrictions for all grantees, including our Named Executive Officers, in the event a change in control occurred. In connection with that provision, the remaining shares of Mr. Sandhu’s RSU award immediately vested on January 28, 2016 in connection with the RG Merger.  We no longer grant any shares under our Amended and Restated Plan since the adoption of our Differential Brands Group Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan in November 2016.  In the event of a change in control under our Differential Brands Group Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors or the Compensation and Stock Option Committee has the discretion to accelerate vesting on all or any portion of a particular outstanding award. For more information on our equity incentive plans, see “Compensation Plan Information” below.

Peter Kim

Old Employment Agreement (Through January 2016)

In connection with the acquisition of Hudson, we entered into an employment agreement with Peter Kim pursuant to which Mr. Kim served as the Chief Executive Officer of Hudson. The employment agreement became effective on September 30, 2013 upon completion of the acquisition of Hudson, and had a term of three years.  Mr. Kim’s initial base salary was $500,000 per year, and such amounts were to be reviewed by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee at least annually, provided that the base salary may not be decreased during Mr. Kim’s term of employment. In addition to his base salary, Mr. Kim was eligible to receive an annual discretionary bonus targeted at 50% of his base salary, based on the satisfaction of criteria and performance standards as established in advance and agreed to by Mr. Kim and the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. The employment agreement also provided Mr. Kim with certain other benefits and the reimbursement of certain expenses.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Kim’s employment for any reason or no reason, we were required to pay Mr. Kim for (i) his accrued but unpaid base salary through the date of termination, (ii) any accrued but unused vacation time, (iii) any unreimbursed expenses, and (iv) any bonus amounts that have been earned but have not been paid, and any bonus for the period in which termination occurred, prorated for the partial period, any rights under any benefit or equity plan, program or practice, and his rights to indemnification and directors and officers liability insurance.

In addition, in the event of a termination of Mr. Kim’s employment without “cause” or in the event that Mr. Kim voluntarily terminated his employment for “good reason” (each as defined in his employment agreement), we were also required (i) to make a severance payment to Mr. Kim equal to twelve months of his base salary, payable in twelve monthly installments and (ii) pay for the COBRA premiums (to the extent they exceed applicable active employee rates) on our group medical plan for Mr. Kim and his spouse and dependents for the shorter of the first 12 months of such coverage or his period of COBRA eligibility. Our obligation to provide the foregoing severance benefits was subject to Mr. Kim’s execution of a settlement agreement and release.

The employment agreement also contained exclusivity, non-compete and non-solicitation covenants generally prohibiting Mr. Kim from providing services to a competitor during the term of his employment or soliciting employees during the term of his employment and for 12 months following his termination of employment. In addition, the employment agreement mandated that Mr. Kim’s confidentiality obligations continue even after his termination of employment.

Mr. Kim also entered into a non-competition agreement which also became effective on September 30, 2013 upon completion of the acquisition of Hudson, pursuant to which Mr. Kim agreed not to engage in, compete with or permit his name to be used by or in connection with any premium denim apparel business outside his role with Hudson, that is competitive to us, Hudson or our respective subsidiaries, or to solicit certain personnel for a period of up to three years from the closing of the acquisition.

New Employment Agreement

On September 8, 2015, we entered into a new three‑year employment agreement with Mr. Kim to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Hudson that replaced his previous employment agreement as of January 28, 2016. This employment agreement was amended on June 16, 2017 to change Mr. Kim’s title to Founder and Vice Chairman, provide for a new three-year term of employment and change certain language in his employment agreement to reflect his change in title. Mr. Kim’s annual base salary is $600,000 and Mr. Kim is eligible to receive an annual discretionary bonus targeted at 50% of his base salary, based on the satisfaction of criteria and performance standards as established in advance by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee after consulting with Mr. Kim. The employment agreement also provides Mr. Kim with certain other benefits and the reimbursement of certain expenses. Pursuant to his employment agreement on January 28, 2016, we granted Mr. Kim (i) RSUs in respect of 166,667 shares of common stock that vest and become transferable in three equal, annual installments beginning on January 28, 2017, subject to Mr. Kim’s continuous employment (the “Kim RSU Award”) and (ii) PSUs in respect of 166,667 shares of common stock that are to be earned over a three‑year performance period subject to Mr. Kim’s continuous employment (unless Mr. Kim is terminated without “cause” or for “good reason,” as provided below) (the “Kim PSU Award”). The three-year performance period began on January 28, 2016 and ends on January 28, 2019, and one‑third of the Kim PSU Award is eligible to vest each year starting on January 28, 2017 and ending on January 28, 2019 based on the attainment of annual performance metrics established by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee at the beginning of the applicable year. The performance criteria are as follows: for target EDBITA at (1) less than 80%, 0% of the shares will vest, (2) 80%, 50% of the shares will vest, (3) 90%, 75% of the shares will vest and (4) 100%, 100% of the shares will vest. To the extent that the subsequent year EBITDA target is exceeded and the excess is sufficient to make up for a prior year shortfall, unvested portions of the Kim PSU Award in any completed year will be eligible for vesting in subsequent years. Both the Kim RSU Award and Kim PSU Award vest under and are governed by the terms of the Differential Brands Group Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. Mr. Kim will also be entitled to participate in all regular long‑term incentive programs maintained by us or Hudson on the same basis as similarly‑situated employees.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Kim’s employment for any reason or no reason, we have agreed to pay Mr. Kim for (i) his accrued but unpaid base salary through the date of termination, (ii) any accrued but unused vacation time, (iii) any unreimbursed expenses, and (iv) if not previously paid to Mr. Kim: any bonus amounts that have been earned but have not been paid; any bonus for the period in which termination occurred, prorated for the partial period, with the amount, if any, based on actual performance and paid when bonuses for the applicable period are paid to other senior executives; any rights under any benefit or equity or long‑term incentive plan, program or practice; and his rights to indemnification and directors and officers liability insurance.

In addition, in the event of a termination of Mr. Kim’s employment by us without “cause” or in the event that Mr. Kim voluntarily terminates his employment for “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement), we are also required to make a severance payment to Mr. Kim equal to the lesser of (i) 24 months of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, payable in 24 monthly, equal installments, and (ii) the greater of (A) 12 months of his base salary and (B) the number of months of his base salary remaining on his term of employment. Additionally, any unvested portion of the Kim RSU Award will immediately vest and become transferable and any unvested portion of the Kim PSU Award will continue to vest without regard to Mr. Kim’s continued employment. We have agreed to also pay for the COBRA premiums (to the extent they exceed applicable active employee rates and subject to Mr. Kim timely

electing continuation coverage under COBRA) on our group medical plan for Mr. Kim and his spouse and dependents for the shorter of the first 12 months of such coverage or his period of COBRA eligibility. Our obligation to provide the foregoing severance benefits is subject to Mr. Kim’s execution of a settlement agreement and release of claims.

The employment agreement also contains exclusivity, non‑compete and non‑solicitation covenants generally prohibiting Mr. Kim from providing services to a competitor during the term of his employment or soliciting employees during the term of his employment and for 12 months following his termination of employment. During the term, Mr. Kim is permitted to own an interest in and, when not employed by Hudson, take part in and manage or operate certain other apparel businesses conducted by Mr. Kim’s family from time to time that are not competitive with us and our subsidiaries. In addition, the employment agreement mandates that Mr. Kim’s confidentiality obligations continue even after his termination of employment.

New Non-Competition Agreement

Mr. Kim has also entered into a non‑competition agreement, which became effective as of January 28, 2016, pursuant to which Mr. Kim has agreed not to engage in, compete with or permit his name to be used by or in connection with any premium denim apparel business outside his role with Hudson, that is competitive to us or our subsidiaries for a period of up to three years from January 28, 2016.

Hamish Sandhu

In connection with Mr. Sandhu’s appointment as Chief Financial Officer, we entered into a written offer letter whereby Mr. Sandhu agreed to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the offer letter, Mr. Sandhu’s annual base salary was $205,000, which was increased to $255,000 in November 2008 and $280,000 in December 2012. We also agreed to pay the full cost of participation in our health insurance plan for Mr. Sandhu and his family.

On July 2, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Sandhu. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Sandhu had an initial base salary of $325,000, with such amount subject to review by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee at least annually, provided that the base salary could not be decreased during Mr. Sandhu’s term of employment. In addition to his base salary, Mr. Sandhu was eligible to receive an annual discretionary cash and equity bonus of not less than 10 percent of his base salary, based upon the achievement of financial and other performance criteria as established in advance by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, and with respect to the 2015 fiscal year, as set forth in the employment agreement. The employment agreement also provided Mr. Sandhu with certain other benefits, including premiums for health insurance paid on his behalf and for his family, and life and disability insurance policies paid on his behalf. The employment agreement took effect as of July 2, 2015 with an initial term of one year. The employment agreement automatically renewed for additional one year periods to the extent neither we nor Mr. Sandhu provided 90 days’ advanced notice of non‑renewal prior to the end of the term.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Sandhu’s employment for any reason or no reason, the employment agreement obligated us to pay Mr. Sandhu for (i) his accrued but unpaid base salary through the date of termination, (ii) any accrued but unused vacation time, (iii) any unreimbursed expenses, (iv) any bonus amounts that have been earned but have not been paid, (v) any rights under any benefit or equity plan, and (vi) any ongoing rights to indemnification and directors and officers liability insurance.

In addition, in the event of a termination of Mr. Sandhu’s employment by us without “cause” or in the event that Mr. Sandhu voluntarily terminated his employment for “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement), we were also required (i) to make a severance payment to Mr. Sandhu equal to his annual base salary, payable in equal installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices, (ii) to pay any bonus amounts that had been earned for the period in which termination occurred, prorated for the partial period, and (iii) to pay for the COBRA premiums (to the extent they exceeded applicable active employee rates) on our group medical plan for Mr. Sandhu and his spouse and dependents for the shorter of the first 12 months of such coverage or his period of COBRA eligibility. Our obligation to provide the foregoing severance benefits was subject to Mr. Sandhu’s execution of a settlement agreement and release of claims.

Mr. Sandhu resigned as Chief Financial Officer on January 26, 2017, effective January 31, 2017, and remained an employee until March 8, 2017 to assist with transition matters. On February 28, 2017, we entered into a general release agreement with Mr. Sandhu, effective as of March 8, 2017, containing customary waiver and release of claims provisions. All of Mr. Sandhu’s equity awards had already vested by that date.

The employment agreement also contains exclusivity, non‑compete and non‑solicitation covenants generally prohibiting Mr. Sandhu from providing services to a competitor during the term of his employment or soliciting employees during the term of his employment and for 12 months following his termination of employment. In addition, the employment agreement mandates that Mr. Sandhu’s confidentiality obligations continue even after his termination of employment.

Michael Buckley

On January 28, 2016, in connection with the transactions contemplated by the RG Merger Agreement, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Buckley. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Buckley serves as Chief Executive Officer, reporting to our Board of Directors, for an initial three‑year term with automatic, one‑year renewal terms, unless we or Mr. Buckley gives notice of non-renewal 180 days prior to the end of the then‑current term.

The employment agreement provides that we will pay Mr. Buckley an annual base salary of $600,000 and that Mr. Buckley will be eligible to receive an annual bonus of up to 150% of his base salary, based on our achievement of annual EBITDA targets set by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors after consultation with Mr. Buckley.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, on January 28, 2016, we granted Mr. Buckley (i) RSUs in respect of 433,764 shares of common stock (the “Buckley RSU Award”) and (ii) PSUs in respect of 347,011 shares of common stock that are to be earned over a three-year performance period subject to Mr. Buckley’s continuous employment (the “Buckley PSU Award”).  The Buckley RSU Award vests in annual installments over a three‑year period with the first installment vesting on December 31, 2016, subject to Mr. Buckley’s continued employment through the applicable vesting dates. The three-year performance period began on January 28, 2016 and ends on December 31, 2018, and one‑third of the Buckley PSU Award is eligible to vest each year starting on December 31, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2018, based on the achievement of EBITDA targets set by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee at the beginning of the applicable year. Both the Buckley RSU Award and Buckley PSU Award vest under and are governed by the terms of the Differential Brands Group Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. The employment agreement further provides that the Buckley RSU Award and the Buckley PSU Award will be settled in cash in the event that there are insufficient shares of the Company’s common stock available to settle the applicable award in our common stock.  The performance criteria are as follows: for target EDBITA at (1) less than 80%, 0% of the shares will vest, (2) 80%, 50% of the shares will vest, (3) 90%, 75% of the shares will vest and (4) 100%, 100% of the shares will vest. To the extent that the subsequent year EBITDA target is exceeded and the excess is sufficient to make up for a prior year shortfall, unvested portions of the Buckley PSU Award in any completed year will be eligible for vesting in subsequent years. Upon a “change in control” (as defined in the employment agreement), any unvested portions of the Buckley RSU Award and Buckley PSU Award will immediately vest.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Buckley’s employment by us without “cause” or in the event that Mr. Buckley resigns for “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement), in either case, prior to the expiration of the agreement’s then‑current term, we are required to pay Mr. Buckley severance equal to 3.75 times his base salary, payable in a full lump sum. Upon such termination or resignation, Mr. Buckley and his dependents will receive continued coverage under our group health insurance plans for a period of up to 18 months, any unvested portion of the Buckley RSU Award will immediately vest, 50% of the unvested portion of the Buckley PSU Award will immediately vest and 50% of the unvested portion of the Buckley PSU Award will remain outstanding through completion of the applicable performance period and vest based on actual achievement of the performance metrics. In the event such resignation or termination occurs following our first fiscal quarter of any year, the employment agreement provides that Mr. Buckley will also be entitled to a prorated annual bonus for the year in which his employment terminates. Our obligation to provide the foregoing severance benefits is subject to Mr. Buckley’s execution and non‑revocation of a release of claims.

The employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating non‑disclosure and non‑disparagement. In addition, the employment agreement includes 12‑month post‑termination non‑competition and non‑solicitation provisions.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

See “Executive Compensation— Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” above.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth certain information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2016, which includes the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated Plan. We stopped granting awards under the Amended and Restated Plan in 2016 after the adoption of the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions

Our Audit Committee charter provides that our Audit Committee must review and approve all transactions to which the Company is a participant and in which our executive officers, directors, director nominees or principal stockholders or other related persons have a material interest, to the extent that disclosure would be required under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. We believe that this policy requiring Audit Committee approval of any material transaction involving us and such related parties ensures that such transactions are on terms no less favorable to us than reasonably could have been obtained in arm’s-length transactions with independent third parties. Our related party transactions entered into between December 31, 2015 and the date of this Proxy Statement, all of which were previously approved by our Audit Committee, are described below.

Reportable Related Party Transactions

Agreements with Directors, Officers and Family Members

Peter Kim

In connection with the acquisition of Hudson completed in September 2013, we entered into several agreements, including a stock purchase agreement, a convertible note, a registration rights agreement, an employment agreement and a non-competition agreement with Peter Kim. In connection with the RG Merger completed in January 2016, we entered into the Rollover Agreement (as defined below) and a new employment agreement with Mr. Kim. Mr. Kim also currently has rights under a registration rights agreement described below with respect to shares

of our common stock issuable upon conversion of his Modified Convertible Notes (as defined below) as part of the RG Merger.

For a discussion of the Rollover Agreement and terms of the Modified Convertible Notes, see “Hudson Convertible Notes” below. For a discussion of Mr. Kim’s previous and current employment agreements and non-competition agreements, see “Executive Compensation—Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” above. For information on the past and current registration rights agreements involving Mr. Kim, see the discussion in “Agreements Related to the RG Merger—Registration Rights Agreement” below.

Other Officers and Directors

We have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Buckley, our Chief Executive Officer,  Mr. Kim, the Chief Executive Officer of our Hudson subsidiary, Bob Ross, our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Sandhu, our former Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kim was previously a member of our Board of Directors until February 2015. See “Executive Compensation—Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” for a further discussion of the agreements with our current officers.

Agreements Related to the Joe’s Asset Sale and the RG Merger

Hudson Convertible Notes

We issued convertible notes in connection with the acquisition of Hudson with different interest rates and conversion features for Hudson’s management stockholders, including Mr. Kim, and for our major stockholder Fireman Capital CPF Hudson Co-Invest LP (“Fireman”), respectively. On September 8, 2015, the Company entered into a rollover agreement (the “Rollover Agreement”) with the holders of convertible notes originally issued in connection with the Hudson acquisition, pursuant to which, on January 28, 2016, the holders of the notes contributed the notes to the Company in exchange for the following:

The Modified Convertible Notes are structurally and contractually subordinated to our senior debt and will mature on July 28, 2021. The Modified Convertible Notes accrue interest quarterly on the outstanding principal amount at a rate of 6.5% per annum (increased to 7% as of October 1, 2016 with respect to the Modified Convertible Notes issued to Fireman), which is payable 50% in cash and 50% in additional paid-in-kind notes; provided, however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay 100% of such interest in cash. Beginning on January 28, 2016, the Modified Convertible Notes are convertible by each of the holders into, at our election, shares of our common stock, cash, or a combination of cash and common stock.

If we elect to issue only shares of common stock upon conversion of the Modified Convertible Notes, each of the Modified Convertible Notes would be convertible, in whole but not in part, into a number of shares equal to the conversion amount divided by the market price. The conversion amount is (a) the product of (i) the market price, multiplied by (ii) the quotient of (A) the principal amount, divided by (B) the conversion price, minus (b) the aggregate optional prepayment amounts paid to the holder. The market price is the average of the closing prices for our common stock over the 20 trading day period immediately preceding the notice of conversion.  If we elect to pay cash with respect to a conversion of the Modified Convertible Notes, the amount of cash to be paid per share will be equal to the conversion amount. We will have the right to prepay all or any portion of the principal amount of the Modified Convertible Notes at any time so long as we make a pro rata prepayment on all of the Modified Convertible Notes.

RG Stock Purchase Agreement

In connection with the RG Merger, we entered into the RG Stock Purchase Agreement with TCP Denim, LLC, one of our major stockholders, pursuant to which we issued and sold to TCP Denim, LLC an aggregate of 50,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $50 million in cash (the “RG Stock Purchase Agreement”). The proceeds from the sale of Series A Preferred Stock were used to consummate the RG Merger. Under the form of certificate of designation for the Series A Preferred Stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock entitles the holder thereof to receive cumulative cash dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of 10%, plus accumulated and accrued dividends thereon through such date. As of September 30, 2017, the cumulative dividends totaled $8,752,000. Additionally, if our Board of Directors declares or pays a dividend on the common stock, then each holder of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive a cash dividend on an as-converted basis.

Each holder of the Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to vote on an as-converted basis and together with the holders of common stock as a single class, subject to certain limitations. For so long as a to-be-determined percentage of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, exclusively and as a separate class, will be entitled to elect three members of the board of directors, each of whom may only be removed without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have separate class voting rights with respects to certain matters affecting their rights. Upon any liquidation event, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive the greater of the liquidation preference on the date of determination and the amount that would be payable to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock had such holders converted their shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of common stock immediately prior to such liquidation event. Each share of the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time and without the payment of additional consideration by the holder, at an initial conversion price of $11.16 (after taking into account the Reverse Stock Split (as defined below)).

Registration Rights Agreement

On the closing date of the RG Merger, we entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with TCP Denim, LLC and certain of its affiliates, who are major stockholders of us, the noteholder party to the Rollover Agreement and Michael Buckley, our Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, and subject to certain limitations described therein, we are required to provide certain demand and piggyback registration rights to the parties to the Registration Rights Agreement. In particular, we are required to prepare and file a registration statement on Form S‑1 or S‑3 (or any similar form or successor thereto) for the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), of shares of our common stock (i) issued to the parties to the Registration Rights Agreement in connection with the RG Merger Agreement and the Rollover Agreement and (ii) issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Modified Convertible Notes. Prior to the closing date of the RG Merger, we had a substantially similar registration rights agreement with the holders of the original convertible notes, which included Mr. Kim.

Payments to Tengram Capital Partners

From time to time, we expect to reimburse Tengram Capital Partners, one of our major stockholders, for certain travel and other related expenses of its employees related to services performed on our behalf and at our request.  For fiscal 2016 and the subsequent period until the date of this Proxy Statement, we have recorded expenses of $1,062,000, which also included for fiscal 2016 reimbursements for legal fees incurred by TCP Denim, LLC, one of our major stockholders and an affiliate of Tengram Capital Partners, in connection with the purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock and RG Merger, pre-closing RG Merger management fees that were paid by RG that are non-recurring as a result of the RG Merger and other fees and expenses that are non-recurring as a result of the RG Merger.

SWIMS® Transaction

On July 18, 2016, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding share capital of Norwegian private limited company (aksjeselskap) SWIMS AS (“SWIMS”). SWIMS® is a Scandinavian lifestyle brand known for its range of fashion-forward, water-resistant footwear and sportswear. To finance the acquisition, we issued the following to one of our major stockholders, Tengram Capital Partners Fund II, L.P. (“Tengram Fund II”): (i) a warrant for the

purchase of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share; and (ii) a convertible promissory note in an original principal amount of $13.0 million convertible into up to 4,500,000 shares of our newly issued Class A‑1 Preferred Stock bearing interest at the rate of 3.75% per annum and which matures on January 18, 2018 (the “SWIMS Convertible Note”).

Director Independence

See “Corporate Governance Matters—Director Independence” above.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

In accordance with the written charter of the Audit Committee, which was originally adopted by our Board of Directors on November 21, 2013, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing the quality and integrity of our accounting, auditing, and financial reporting practices. In addition, the Audit Committee recommends to the full Board of Directors the selection of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee’s function is one of oversight, recognizing that the Company’s management is primarily responsible for the Company’s financial statements as well as the Company’s financial reporting processes, principles and internal controls, and that the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, issuing a report relating to its audit and expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. CohnReznick LLP (“CohnReznick”) audited our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and included a report thereon in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Currently, all Audit Committee members are “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards and as such term is defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC, and Mr. Savage has also been designated to be an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.

In performing its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, with management and CohnReznick. The Audit Committee also discussed with CohnReznick all matters required by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including those described in Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of CohnReznick’s examination of the financial statements.

The Audit Committee obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding CohnReznick’s independence and discussed such independence with CohnReznick.

Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and the independent auditors, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC.

After conducting a process to determine the audit firm that would serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016, on July 6, 2016, the Audit Committee dismissed Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Moss Adams’s reports on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2015 and 2014 did not contain an adverse opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles; provided, however, that the report for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2014 included an explanatory paragraph related to the existence of substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Additionally, during the fiscal years ended November 30, 2015 and November 30, 2014 and in the interim period from January 1, 2016 through July 6, 2016, (i) there were no disagreements with Moss Adams on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which subject matter of the disagreements, if not resolved to Moss Adams’s satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement

in connection with its report, and (ii) there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.  The Company provided Moss Adams with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested that Moss Adams furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the above statements made by the Company. A copy of Moss Adam’s letter, dated July 8, 2016, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2016.

Contemporaneous with the determination to dismiss Moss Adams, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of CohnReznick as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016 with immediate effect. During the fiscal years ended November 30, 2015 and November 30, 2014, which were audited by Moss Adams, and during the interim period from January 1, 2016 through July 6, 2016, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with CohnReznick regarding the Company’s financial statements, with respect to: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company or oral advice was provided that CohnReznick concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

The Audit Committee has selected CohnReznick as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and has asked the stockholders to ratify the appointment.

The Audit Committee:

Kent Savage, Chairman of the Audit Committee

Kelly Hoffman

Walter McLallen

The information in this report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material,” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C as promulgated by the SEC, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. The information in this report of the Audit Committee also shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table provides information as of October 27, 2017 concerning beneficial ownership, as that term is defined in Rule 13d‑3 under the Exchange Act, of common stock held by (i) each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors and nominees for election as a director, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The information as to beneficial ownership has been furnished by our respective common stockholders, directors and executive officers, and, unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, each of our common stockholders has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, certain shares of our common stock that a beneficial owner set forth in this table has a right to acquire within 60 days of the date hereof (pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants for the purchase of shares of common stock) are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that owner, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing percentage ownership of any other beneficial owner shown in the table. Percentages are calculated based on 13,317,281 shares of common stock outstanding (excluding treasury shares) as of October 27, 2017. The address for the officers and directors is our corporate office located at 1231 S. Gerhart Avenue, Commerce, California, 90022.

PROPOSAL NO. 2 — TO CONDUCT AN ADVISORY VOTE TO
APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Background of the Proposal

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was added under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are seeking stockholder approval on an advisory, non-binding basis of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the section of this proxy statement titled "Executive Compensation." In this Proposal 2, stockholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

"RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(m) through (q) of Regulation S-K, including the compensation tables and the other narrative executive compensation disclosure in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders."

Stockholders are urged to carefully read the "Executive Compensation" section of this Proxy Statement, which discusses our compensation policies and procedures, including our compensation philosophy, and to refer to the related executive compensation tables. In addition to a fixed amount of base salary, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers is based on a design that ties an executive’s additional compensation to our attainment of financial and other performance measures that, our Board of Directors believes, promote the creation of long-term stockholder value and position our company for long-term success. As disclosed in the Executive Compensation section, the mix of fixed- and performance-based compensation, as well as the terms of restricted stock awards, are designed to enable our company to attract and maintain top talent while, at the same time, creating a relationship between our Company’s performance and overall stockholder return and the Named Executive Officers’ compensation. Our Compensation and Stock Option Committee and Board of Directors believe that the design of the program, and hence the compensation awarded to Named Executive Officers under the current program, fulfills this objective.

Although the vote is advisory and non-binding, our Board of Directors and Compensation and Stock Option Committee value the opinions that our stockholders express in their votes and will consider the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of our compensation program.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ADVISORY, NON-BINDING RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3. — TO CONDUCT AN ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF

THE ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Background of the Proposal

Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was added under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, requires us to submit a non-binding, advisory resolution to stockholders at least once every six years to indicate how frequently they believe we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. In this Proposal 3, we are seeking an advisory, non-binding determination from our stockholders as to the frequency with which stockholders would have an opportunity to provide an advisory approval of our executive compensation program. We are providing stockholders the option of selecting a frequency of every one, two or three years, or abstaining. In voting on this proposal, you should mark your proxy for one, two or three years based on your preference as to the frequency with which future advisory votes on executive compensation should be held. You may also abstain from voting on this proposal.

Our Board of Directors recommends that future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers occur every three years because our Board and Compensation and Stock Option Committee believe that this frequency will provide the most effective means for conducting and responding to the advisory vote based on a number of considerations, including the following:

Stockholders are not being asked to approve the recommendation of our Board of Directors, but rather to indicate their choice among these frequency options.

Although the result of this vote is advisory and non-binding, our Compensation and Stock Option Committee and Board of Directors value the opinions that our stockholders express in their votes and will consider our stockholders’ concerns and take them into account in determining how frequently future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers will occur.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE TO HOLD FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EVERY THREE YEARS.

PROPOSAL NO. 4 — TO APPROVE, UNDER APPLICABLE NASDAQ LISTING RULES, THE REMOVAL 
OF THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE EXERCISE OF THE SWIMS WARRANT AND THE CONVERSION OF
THE SWIMS CONVERTIBLE NOTE TO PERMIT THE ISSUANCE, IN EXCESS OF 19.99% OF THE
COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING PRIOR TO SUCH ISSUANCE, OF: (1) THE COMMON STOCK
UNDERLYING THE SWIMS WARRANT, (2) THE CLASS A‑1 PREFERRED STOCK UNDERLYING THE
SWIMS CONVERTIBLE NOTE, AND (3) THE COMMON STOCK UNDERLYING THE CLASS A‑1 
PREFERRED STOCK

The SWIMS® Transaction

On July 18, 2016, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding share capital of SWIMS®. SWIMS is a Scandinavian lifestyle brand known for its range of fashion-forward, water-resistant footwear and sportswear. To finance the acquisition, we issued the following to one of our major stockholders, Tengram Fund II: (i) the SWIMS Warrant, a warrant for the purchase of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share; and (ii) the SWIMS Convertible Note, a convertible promissory note in an original principal amount of $13.0 million. The SWIMS Convertible Note will convert, at Tengram Fund II’s option or on the maturity date of January 18, 2018 to the extent that the SWIMS Convertible Note has not been repaid in cash on or prior to such date, into up to 4,500,000 newly issued shares of the Company’s  Class A‑1 Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $3.00 per share.  The SWIMS Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 3.75% per annum, which shall compound and be added to the principal balance of the SWIMS Convertible Note on the first day of each calendar month commencing August 1, 2016.  To the extent the SWIMS Convertible Note converts into Class A‑1 Preferred Stock, and subject to certain limitations, such Class A‑1 Preferred Stock (1) will be convertible into common stock at an initial conversion price of $3.00 per share of common stock (subject to adjustment), (2) will be entitled to dividends at a rate of 10% per annum payable quarterly in arrears, (3) will be senior to the common stock upon a liquidation and (4) will have as-converted voting rights alongside the common stock.  We will file a certificate of designation with respect to the Preferred Stock in connection with or prior to any conversion of Class A‑1 Preferred Stock into common stock.

The foregoing descriptions of the SWIMS Warrant, SWIMS Convertible Note and Class A‑1 Preferred Stock, do not purport to be complete and are subject to, and qualified, in their entirety by the full text of the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note, and the form of Certificate of Designation with respect to the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock, which are attached hereto as Annex A, B and C respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Background of the Proposal

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and, as a result, we are subject to the Nasdaq’s Listing Rules. The potential issuance of the securities underlying the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note may implicate certain of the Nasdaq listing standards requiring prior stockholder approval in order to maintain our listing on the Nasdaq Global Market, including the following:

Stockholder approval of this proposal will constitute stockholder approval for purposes of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635 and any other Nasdaq Listing Rule that would prevent the issuance of the securities underlying the SWIMS Warrant, SWIMS Convertible Note and Class A‑1 Preferred Stock.

In order to comply with applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules, the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note were issued with limited exercise and conversion rights. Until our stockholders approve Proposal 4:

Pursuant to the terms of the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note, we have agreed to seek stockholder approval, under applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules, to remove of the restrictions on the exercise of the SWIMS Warrant and the conversion of the SWIMS Convertible Note to permit the issuance, in excess of 19.99% of the common stock outstanding prior to such issuance, of: (1) the common stock underlying the SWIMS Warrant, (2) the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock underlying the SWIMS Convertible Note, and (3) the common stock underlying the Class A‑1 Preferred Stock.

We seek your approval of Proposal 4 in order to comply with the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules and to satisfy our obligations under the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note.

Effect on Current Stockholders

The SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note currently contain limitations on the exercise and conversion rights of the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note, such that absent stockholder approval of Proposal 4, the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note may not be exercised to purchase or be converted into shares of our common stock in excess of 1,610,620 shares of common stock, which represents approximately 19.99% of the common stock outstanding immediately prior to the issuance of the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note. Approval of Proposal 4 may be dilutive to existing stockholders because such approval would allow the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note to be exercised to purchase or be converted into shares of common stock in excess of 1,610,620, which could result in additional shares being issuable upon the exercise of the SWIMS Warrant or the conversion of the SWIMS Convertible Note. If Proposal 4 is approved, the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note, would be exchangeable, subject to certain conditions, into approximately 4,521,641 shares of common stock at the current conversion price of $3.00 per share. At the close of regular trading hours on October 27, 2017, the trading price of our common stock was $1.27 per share.  Although the conversion price is currently higher than the trading price for our common stock, the conversion price may be lower than the trading price at the time that the SWIMS

Warrant is exercised or the SWIMS Convertible Note is converted.  Issuing such additional shares of common stock would result in a reduction of the percentage of ownership interest held by our existing stockholders. Also, the addition of a substantial number of shares of our common stock into the market or the registration of any other securities may significantly and negatively affect the prevailing market price for our common stock. In addition, the issuance of additional shares of common stock could have an anti-takeover effect. Such issuance could dilute the voting power of a person seeking control of the Company, thereby deterring or rendering more difficult a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or an extraordinary corporate transaction opposed by the Company. The issuance of additional shares of common stock to Tengram Fund II would also increase the ownership of common stock and voting power of entities affiliated with Tengram Capital Partners.

The actual number of shares that will be issuable upon the exercise of the SWIMS Warrant or the conversion of the SWIMS Convertible Note will not be known until such exercise or conversion occurs. As described more fully above under "The SWIMS® Transaction", (1) interest on the SWIMS Convertible Note is added to the principal amount of the note, which will increase the number of shares of Class A‑1 Preferred Stock into which the SWIMS Convertible Note is convertible (which shares of Class A‑1 Preferred Stock are, in turn, convertible into common stock) and (2) the exercise price and conversion price, respectively, of the SWIMS Warrant and the SWIMS Convertible Note, which are both currently $3.00 per share, are subject to certain adjustments that are typical for warrants and convertible notes of this type and such adjustments may increase the number of shares underlying the SWIMS Warrant or SWIMS Convertible Note. Any additional interest added to the principal of the SWIMS Convertible Note or decrease in the conversion price of the SWIMS Convertible Note would increase the number of shares due upon conversion of the SWIMS Convertible Note, and any decrease in the exercise price of the SWIMS Warrant would increase the number of shares due upon exercise of the SWIMS Warrant. Furthermore, to the extent that the SWIMS Convertible Note is converted into Class A‑1 Preferred Stock that is not immediately converted into common stock, such Class A‑1 Preferred Stock will be entitled to dividends at a rate of 10% per annum payable quarterly in arrears, and any such accrued but unpaid dividends may, at the election of the holder, be converted into additional shares of common stock.

Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal

If Proposal 4 is not approved by our stockholders at the annual meeting in accordance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note will remain subject to the limitations on the exercise and conversion rights, such that the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note may not be exercised to purchase or be converted into shares of our common stock in excess of 1,610,620 shares of common stock, which represents approximately 19.99% of the common stock outstanding immediately prior to the issuance of the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note. If Tengram Fund II elects to convert the SWIMS Convertible Note but is unable to do so because of the limitation on conversion, Tengram Fund II may instead elect to be repaid in cash (subject to the Subordination provisions contained in the SWIMS Convertible Note). If we do not have sufficient cash on hand, we would have to seek additional financing. Our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms will depend on our future operating performance and financial results, and will be subject, in part, to factors beyond our control, including interest rates and general economic, financial and business conditions. There can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain such financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Interests of Directors in this Proposal

Three of our directors, William Sweedler, Matthew Eby, and Andrew Tarshis are affiliated with Tengram Capital Partners, which, in turn, is affiliated with Tengram Fund II, the holder of the SWIMS Warrant and SWIMS Convertible Note.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, UNDER APPLICABLE NASDAQ LISTING RULES, OF THE REMOVAL OF THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE EXERCISE OF THE SWIMS WARRANT AND THE CONVERSION OF THE SWIMS CONVERTIBLE NOTE TO PERMIT THE ISSUANCE, IN EXCESS OF 19.99% OF THE COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING PRIOR TO SUCH ISSUANCE, OF: (1) THE COMMON STOCK UNDERLYING THE SWIMS WARRANT, (2) THE CLASS A‑1 PREFERRED STOCK UNDERLYING THE SWIMS CONVERTIBLE NOTE, AND (3) THE COMMON STOCK UNDERLYING THE CLASS A‑1 PREFERRED STOCK.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 5 — TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF COHNREZNICK AS THE COMPANY’S 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2017

In July 2016, our Audit Committee determined it to be in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to select CohnReznick to replace Moss Adams as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016, and subsequently approved such appointment. Moss Adams served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015 and for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended November 30, 2014 (“fiscal 2014”), after it replaced Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), our previous independent registered public accounting firm for the first three quarters of fiscal 2014. Moss Adams also audited our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2014.

We have been advised by CohnReznick that it is an independent registered public accounting firm with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and complies with the auditing, quality control and independence standards and rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

While the Audit Committee retains CohnReznick as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of CohnReznick to our stockholders for ratification upon recommendation to do so by the Audit Committee and as a matter of good corporate governance.

Unless contrary instructions are given, shares represented by proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted for the ratification of the selection of CohnReznick as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. If the selection of CohnReznick is not ratified by affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of an independent registered public accounting firm in the light of that vote result. Even if the selection of CohnReznick is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change is in our best interests.

CohnReznick has no financial interest of any kind in the Company, except the professional relationship between auditor and client. Representatives of CohnReznick will be invited to attend the Annual Meeting. If a representative of CohnReznick does attend the Annual Meeting, the representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so chooses, and will be available to respond to questions from stockholders.

Audit Fees

The table below shows the aggregate fees billed by CohnReznick for professional services related to fiscal 2016 and 2015.

 

The table below shows the aggregate fees billed by Moss Adams for professional services related to fiscal 2016 and 2015.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy which requires the Audit Committee’s pre‑approval of audit and non‑audit services performed by the independent auditor to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee approves such services on an ongoing basis prior to the incurrence of any such audit and non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the audit and non-audit services rendered by Moss Adams prior to their dismissal in July 2016 and CohnReznick listed above.