chke_Current_Folio_10Q_Taxonomy2015

Table of Contents 

 

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015.

 

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the Transition Period From            to            .

 

Commission file number 0-18640

 


 

CHEROKEE INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

 

 

 

Delaware

 

95-4182437

(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS employer identification number)

 

 

 

5990 Sepulveda Boulevard, Sherman Oaks, CA

 

91411

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Zip Code

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code  (818) 908-9868

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes   No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer 

 

Accelerated filer 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer 

 

Smaller reporting company 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes   No 

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

 

 

 

Class

 

Outstanding at December 4, 2015

Common Stock, $.02 par value per share

 

8,720,012

 

 

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

INDEX

 

 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited): 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets
October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015
 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income
Three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014
 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014
 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
Nine  month period ended October 31, 2015
 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014
 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

 

20 

 

 

 

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 

 

29 

 

 

 

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures 

 

30 

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings 

 

31 

 

 

 

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors 

 

32 

 

 

 

ITEM 6. Exhibits 

 

42 

 

 

 

Signatures 

 

43 

 

 

 

Certifications

 

 

 

 

2


 

Table of Contents 

Part I. Financial Information

 

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

CHEROKEE INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Unaudited

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 31,

 

January 31

 

 

    

2015

    

2015

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

5,709

 

$

7,581

 

Receivables

 

 

8,040

 

 

7,425

 

Income taxes receivable

 

 

741

 

 

919

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

477

 

 

431

 

Deferred tax asset

 

 

455

 

 

412

 

Total current assets

 

 

15,422

 

 

16,768

 

Intangible Assets, net

 

 

47,515

 

 

39,821

 

Goodwill

 

 

5,979

 

 

 —

 

Deferred tax asset

 

 

928

 

 

858

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

1,177

 

 

1,165

 

Other assets

 

 

39

 

 

48

 

Total assets

 

$

71,060

 

$

58,660

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other accrued payables

 

$

2,127

 

$

1,720

 

Current portion of long term debt

 

 

8,456

 

 

7,308

 

Deferred revenue—current

 

 

227

 

 

17

 

Accrued compensation payable

 

 

725

 

 

1,430

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

11,535

 

 

10,475

 

Long term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long term debt

 

 

17,182

 

 

17,836

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

208

 

 

391

 

Other non-current

 

 

1,824

 

 

121

 

Total liabilities

 

 

30,749

 

 

28,823

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.02 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Common stock, $.02 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 8,713,366 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2015 and 8,403,500 issued and outstanding at January 31, 2015

 

 

174

 

 

171

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

27,447

 

 

24,024

 

Retained earnings

 

 

12,690

 

 

5,642

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

40,311

 

 

29,837

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

71,060

 

$

58,660

 

 

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3


 

Table of Contents 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Unaudited

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

October 31,

 

November 1,

 

October 31,

 

November 1,

 

 

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

 

Royalty revenues

 

$

8,098

 

$

8,706

 

$

26,810

 

$

27,431

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

5,415

 

 

4,663

 

 

14,776

 

 

14,042

 

Amortization of trademarks

 

 

212

 

 

233

 

 

633

 

 

699

 

Operating income

 

 

2,471

 

 

3,810

 

 

11,401

 

 

12,690

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(169)

 

 

(201)

 

 

(509)

 

 

(653)

 

Interest income and other income (expense), net

 

 

46

 

 

(2)

 

 

45

 

 

(3)

 

Total other income (expense), net

 

 

(123)

 

 

(203)

 

 

(464)

 

 

(656)

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

2,348

 

 

3,607

 

 

10,937

 

 

12,034

 

Income tax provision

 

 

802

 

 

1,291

 

 

3,889

 

 

3,874

 

Net income

 

$

1,546

 

$

2,316

 

$

7,048

 

$

8,160

 

Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

0.18

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.81

 

$

0.97

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.79

 

$

0.96

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

8,713

 

 

8,424

 

 

8,659

 

 

8,411

 

Diluted

 

 

8,891

 

 

8,566

 

 

8,876

 

 

8,490

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.10

 

 

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4


 

Table of Contents 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Unaudited

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

October 31,

    

November 1,

 

October 31,

    

November 1,

 

 

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

 

Net income

 

$

1,546

 

$

2,316

 

$

7,048

 

$

8,160

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

1,546

 

$

2,316

 

$

7,048

 

$

8,160

 

 

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5


 

Table of Contents 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Unaudited

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

 

 

 

 

    

Shares

    

Par Value

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Total

 

Balance at January 31, 2015

 

8,558

 

$

171

 

$

24,024

 

$

5,642

 

$

29,837

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,607

 

 

 —

 

 

1,607

 

Tax effect from stock option exercises

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

165

 

 

 —

 

 

165

 

Stock option exercises and equity issuances, net of tax

 

155

 

 

3

 

 

1,651

 

 

 —

 

 

1,654

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,048

 

 

7,048

 

Balance at October 31, 2015

 

8,713

 

$

174

 

$

27,447

 

$

12,690

 

$

40,311

 

 

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6


 

Table of Contents 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Unaudited

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

    

October 31, 2015

    

November 1, 2014

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

7,048

 

$

8,160

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

322

 

 

361

 

Amortization of trademarks

 

 

633

 

 

699

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(229)

 

 

38

 

Reversal of uncertain tax liabilities

 

 

 —

 

 

(736)

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1,607

 

 

780

 

Tax effect from stock option exercises

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements

 

 

(267)

 

 

(22)

 

Other, net

 

 

264

 

 

57

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

(591)

 

 

(2,319)

 

Prepaids and other current assets

 

 

(45)

 

 

(104)

 

Income taxes receivable and payable, net

 

 

853

 

 

647

 

Accounts payable and other accrued payables

 

 

45

 

 

(505)

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

90

 

 

(74)

 

Accrued compensation

 

 

(908)

 

 

645

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

8,822

 

 

7,627

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of trademarks, including registration and renewal cost

 

 

(67)

 

 

(59)

 

Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(12,881)

 

 

 —

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

 

(334)

 

 

(519)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(13,282)

 

 

(578)

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from JPMorgan Term Loan

 

 

6,000

 

 

 —

 

Payments of JPMorgan Term Loan

 

 

(5,508)

 

 

(5,191)

 

Debt discount and deferred financing costs

 

 

(30)

 

 

 —

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

1,859

 

 

354

 

Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements

 

 

267

 

 

22

 

Dividends

 

 

 —

 

 

(842)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

2,588

 

 

(5,657)

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(1,872)

 

 

1,392

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

7,581

 

 

3,634

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

5,709

 

$

5,026

 

Cash paid during period for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

$

3,394

 

$

4,093

 

Interest

 

$

467

 

$

627

 

 

See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7


 

Table of Contents 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except percentages, share and per share amounts)

 

(1)   Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2015 and for the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014 have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cherokee Inc. (“Cherokee” or the “Company”) and its consolidated subsidiaries and have not been audited by independent registered public accountants, but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which in the opinion of management of Cherokee are necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated during the consolidation process. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2015 has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP for an audited balance sheet. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending January 30, 2016 or for any other period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.

 

As used herein, the term “Third Quarter” refers to the three months ended October 31, 2015; the term “Nine Months” refers to the nine months ended October 31, 2015; the term “Fiscal 2017” refers to the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017; the term “Fiscal 2016” refers to the fiscal year ending January 30, 2016; the term “Fiscal 2015” refers to the most recent past fiscal year ended January 31, 2015; and the term “Fiscal 2014” refers to the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014.

 

(2)   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Receivables

 

Receivables are reported at amounts the Company expects to be collected, net of allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company records its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon its assessment of various factors, such as: historical experience, age of accounts receivable balances, credit quality of the Company’s licensees, current economic conditions, bankruptcy, and other factors that may affect the Company’s licensees’ ability to pay. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts as of October 31, 2015 or January 31, 2015.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new guidance relating to revenue from contracts with customers that requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board deferred the effective date of this guidance for all entities by one year. As a result, this guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The anticipated impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company is still being evaluated.

 

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and requires additional disclosures if certain

8


 

Table of Contents 

criteria are met. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance will not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

 

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance which modifies existing consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

 

Use of Estimates

 

On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition and deferred revenue, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of long-lived assets, stock based compensation and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical and anticipated results, trends and various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased and money market funds purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) limits. 

 

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

 

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the buyer’s price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from royalty and brand representation agreements are recognized when earned by applying contractual royalty rates to quarterly point of sale data received from the Company’s licensees. The Company’s royalty revenue recognition policy provides for recognition of royalties in the quarter earned.

 

The Company’s agreement with Target Corporation (“Target”) for the Cherokee brand in the U.S. accounts for the majority of the Company’s historical revenues and is structured to provide royalty rate reductions once certain cumulative levels of retail sales are achieved by Target. With respect to Target’s sales in the U.S. of Cherokee branded products other than in the school uniforms category and adult products sold on Target’s website, revenue is recognized by applying the reduced contractual royalty rates prospectively to point of sale data after defined sales thresholds are exceeded. The royalty rate reductions do not apply retroactively to sales since the beginning of the fiscal year. As a result, the Company’s royalty revenues as a percentage of Target’s retail sales in the U.S. are highest at the beginning of each fiscal year and decrease during the fiscal year as Target exceeds sales thresholds as set forth in the Company’s agreement with Target. The amount of Cherokee brand royalty revenue earned by the Company from Target in any quarter is dependent not only on Target’s retail sales of Cherokee branded products in the U.S. in each quarter, but also on the royalty rate then in effect after considering Target’s cumulative level of retail sales for Cherokee branded products in the U.S. for the fiscal year. Historically, with Target, this has caused the Company’s first quarter to be the Company’s highest revenue and most profitable quarter and the Company’s fourth quarter to be the Company’s lowest revenue and least profitable quarter. However, such historical patterns may vary in the future depending upon the terms of any new license agreements, retail sales volumes achieved in each quarter from Target and revenues the Company receives from Target or other licensees that may or may not be subject to reduced royalty rates based upon cumulative sales, including with respect to the Company’s Liz Lange and Completely Me by Liz Lange brands, Cherokee brand in the school uniforms category, Cherokee adult products sold on Target’s website, and the Hawk and Tony Hawk brands.

 

In order to ensure that Cherokee’s licensees are appropriately reporting and calculating royalties owed to Cherokee, all of Cherokee’s license agreements include audit rights to allow Cherokee to validate the amount of the

9


 

Table of Contents 

royalties paid. Any revenue resulting from these audits, or other audits, is recognized in the financial statements of the current reporting period.

 

Franchise revenues includes royalties and franchise fees. Royalties from franchisees are based on a percentage of net sales of the franchisee and are recognized as earned. Initial franchise fees are recorded as deferred revenue when received and are recognized as revenue when a franchised location is opened as all material services and conditions related to the franchise fee have been substantially performed upon the opening. Renewal franchise fees are recognized as revenue when the franchise agreements are signed and the fee is paid since there are no material services and conditions related to the franchise fees.

 

Deferred Financing Costs and Debt Discount

 

Deferred financing costs and debt discounts are capitalized and amortized into interest expense over the life of the debt.

 

Foreign Withholding Taxes

 

Licensing revenue is recognized gross of withholding taxes that are remitted by the Company’s licensees directly to their local tax authorities.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

October 31, 2015

    

January 31, 2015

 

Computer Equipment

 

$

553

 

$

426

 

Software

 

 

79

 

 

62

 

Furniture and Fixtures

 

 

1,644

 

 

1,457

 

Leasehold Improvements

 

 

416

 

 

413

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(1,515)

 

 

(1,193)

 

Property and Equipment, net

 

$

1,177

 

$

1,165

 

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of property and equipment sold or retired are written off, and the resulting gains or losses are included in current operations. Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the related asset.

 

Computers and related equipment and software are depreciated over three years. Furniture and store fixtures are depreciated over the shorter of seven years, or the remaining term of the licensee agreement. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of five years, or the remaining life of the lease term.  Depreciation expense was $115 and $322 for the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and $152 and $361 for the three and nine month periods ended November 1, 2014, respectively.

 

10


 

Table of Contents 

Earnings Per Share Computation (amounts in thousands, including share amounts)

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per-share computations for the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

    

October 31, 2015

    

November 1, 2014

    

October 31, 2015

    

November 1, 2014

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income-numerator for net income per common share and net income per common share assuming dilution

 

$

1,546

 

$

2,316

 

$

7,048

 

$

8,160

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per common share — weighted average shares

 

 

8,713

 

 

8,424

 

 

8,659

 

 

8,411

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

178

 

 

142

 

 

217

 

 

79

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per common share, assuming dilution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed exercises

 

 

8,891

 

 

8,566

 

 

8,876

 

 

8,490

 

 

The computation for the diluted number of shares excludes unexercised stock options that are anti-dilutive. There were 335 and 198 shares underlying anti-dilutive stock options for the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015, respectively, and 502 and 917 shares underlying anti-dilutive stock options for each of the three and nine months periods ended November 1, 2014.

 

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is similar to the computation for basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued.

 

Significant Contracts

 

The terms of the Company’s relationship with Target are set forth in a restated license agreement with Target, which was entered into effective as of February 1, 2008 and amended (i) on January 31, 2013 to add the category of school uniforms, (ii) on April 3, 2013 to provide for a fixed royalty rate of 2% for sales of Cherokee branded products in the category of adult merchandise sold on Target’s website (target.com) in Fiscal 2015 and in future periods and (iii) on January 6, 2014 to reflect Target’s election to renew the agreement through January 31, 2017 and to provide that Target can renew the agreement for successive two (2) year periods, provided that it satisfies the minimum guaranteed royalty payment of $10,500 for the preceding fiscal year (the “Restated Target Agreement”). The Restated Target Agreement grants Target the exclusive right in the United States to use the Cherokee trademarks in various specified categories of merchandise. On September 3, 2015, Target orally informed the Company that the Restated Target Agreement would not be renewed and will terminate at the end of its current term, which expires January 31, 2017.  The non-renewal was confirmed in writing on September 4, 2015.  The Restated Target Agreement, including the existing royalty obligations, will remain in effect and continue to generate revenues to Cherokee in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 through its expiration. The Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and Target will continue to pay the minimum guarantee through that period.

 

Under the current terms of the Restated Target Agreement, the minimum annual guaranteed royalty for Target is $10,500 and applies to all sales made by Target in the United States, other than sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category (which products are subject to a separate minimum guaranteed royalty of $800).Under the Restated Target Agreement, Target has agreed to pay royalties based on a percentage of Target’s net sales of Cherokee

11


 

Table of Contents 

branded merchandise during each fiscal year, which percentage varies according to the volume of sales of merchandise other than sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category and, beginning in Fiscal 2015, other than sales of Cherokee branded products in the adult merchandise category that are made on Target’s website. The Company assumed a separate license agreement with Target for the Liz Lange brand in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the applicable assets in September 2012.

 

In connection with the acquisition of the “Hawk” and “Tony Hawk” signature apparel brands and related trademarks in January 2014, , Cherokee and Kohl’s entered into an amended license agreement. Pursuant to the license agreement, Kohl’s is granted the exclusive right to sell Tony Hawk and Hawk branded apparel and related products in the United States for a four-year term and has agreed to pay Cherokee an annual royalty rate for its sales of Hawk branded signature apparel and related products in the United States, subject to a minimum annual guaranteed royalty of $4,800.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Effective July 16, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2013 Stock Incentive Award Plan (the “2013 Plan”). The 2013 Plan serves as the successor to the 2006 Incentive Award Plan (which includes the 2003 Incentive Award Plan as amended by the adoption of the 2006 Incentive Award Plan) (the “2006 Plan”). The 2013 Plan authorized to be issued (i) 700,000 additional shares of common stock, and (ii) 102,483 shares of common stock previously reserved but unissued under the 2006 Plan. No future grants will be awarded under the 2006 Plan, but outstanding awards previously granted under the 2006 Plan continue to be governed by its terms. Any shares of common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2006 Plan which are forfeited, terminate or expire unexercised and would otherwise have been returned to the share reserve under the 2006 Plan will be available for issuance as common stock under the 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan provides for the issuance of equity-based awards to officers, other employees, and directors.

 

Stock Options

 

Stock options issued to employees are granted at the market price on the date of grant, generally vest over a three-year period, and generally expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options. The Company has also granted non-plan stock options to certain executives as a material inducement for employment. The Company accounts for stock options under authoritative guidance, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values.

 

The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period in the consolidated statements of income. The compensation expense recognized for all stock-based awards is net of estimated forfeitures over the award’s service period.

 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses for stock options for the nine months was $1,607, as compared to $780 for the comparable period in the prior year.

 

12


 

Table of Contents 

A summary of all activity for the Company’s stock options for the Nine Months is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Contractual

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Term

 

Intrinsic

 

 

    

Shares

    

Price

    

(in years)

    

Value

 

Outstanding, at January 31, 2015

 

1,185,767

 

$

15.89

 

3.49

 

2,910

 

Granted

 

335,000

 

$

22.79

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(261,097)

 

$

17.06

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited

 

(146,667)

 

$

17.33

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, at October 31, 2015

 

1,113,003

 

$

17.50

 

4.31

 

2,075

 

Vested and Exercisable at October 31, 2015

 

570,828

 

$

15.38

 

3.00

 

1,443

 

 

As of October 31, 2015, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $2,346, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.29 years. The total fair value of all options which vested during the Nine Months was $677.  

 

Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units

 

In 2013, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”) granted certain performance-based equity awards to executives under the 2006 Plan.

 

The performance metric applicable to such awards is compound stock price growth, using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 1, 2013, or $13.95, as the benchmark. The target growth rate is 10% annually, which results in an average share price target of (i) $15.35 for Fiscal 2014, (ii) $16.88 for Fiscal 2015 and (iii) $18.57 for Fiscal 2016.  The average share price will be calculated as the average of all market closing prices during the January preceding the applicable fiscal year end. If a target is met at the end of a fiscal year, one third of the shares subject to the award will vest. If the stock price target is not met, the relevant portion of the shares subject to the award will not vest but will roll over to the following fiscal year. The executive must continue to be employed by the Company through the relevant vesting dates to be eligible for vesting. The target average share price was met for Fiscal 2015, which resulted in the vesting of two thirds of the shares subject to each award.

 

Since the vesting of these performance-based equity awards is subject to market based performance conditions, the fair value of these awards was measured on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo simulation model for each vesting tranche. The Monte Carlo simulation model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the performance conditions stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair market value for the performance units granted. The Monte Carlo simulation model also uses stock price volatility and other variables to estimate the probability of satisfying the performance conditions and the resulting fair value of the award.

 

In June 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors granted RSUs and stock options to each member of the Board of Directors and to each of the Company’s executive officers under the 2013 Plan. All of the equity awards approved at that meeting vest in equal annual installments over three years, such that the full grants shall be vested on the third anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of the RSU awards was measured on the effective date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock.

 

In August 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors granted a sales-based performance-based equity award to an employee under the 2013 Plan, which vests in five increments dependent upon achievement of certain annual sales targets. The fair value of this award was measured on the effective date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock.

 

Stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock and performance stock units for the Nine Months was $833 compared to $244 for the comparable period in the prior year.

 

13


 

Table of Contents 

A summary of all activity for the Company’s restricted stock and performance stock units for the Nine Months is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Number of

 

Grant-Date

 

 

    

Shares

    

Fair Value

 

Unvested stock at January 31, 2015

 

76,936

 

$

13.02

 

Granted

 

166,000

 

$

22.71

 

Vested

 

(27,435)

 

 

15.74

 

Forfeited

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Unvested stock at October 31, 2015

 

215,501

 

$

20.14

 

 

As of October 31, 2015, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock and performance stock units was approximately $3,516, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.58 years.

 

Intangible Assets

 

The Company holds various trademarks including Cherokee®, Liz Lange®, Completely Me by Liz Lange®, Hawk®, Tony Hawk®, Everyday California®, Flip Flop Shops®, Sideout®, Sideout Sport®, Carole Little®, Saint Tropez-West®, Chorus Line®, All That Jazz®, and others, in connection with numerous categories of apparel and other goods. These trademarks are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and corresponding government agencies in a number of other countries. The Company also holds trademark applications for Cherokee, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Hawk, Tony Hawk, Flip Flop Shops, Sideout, Sideout Sport, Carole Little, Chorus Line, Saint Tropez-West, All That Jazz, and others in numerous countries. The Company intends to renew these registrations, as appropriate, prior to expiration. The Company monitors on an ongoing basis unauthorized uses of the Company’s trademarks, and relies primarily upon a combination of trademark, copyright, know-how, trade secrets, and contractual restrictions to protect the Company’s intellectual property rights both domestically and internationally.

 

Trademark registration and renewal fees are capitalized and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Trademark acquisitions are capitalized and are either amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or are capitalized as indefinite-lived assets, if no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors limit its useful life to Cherokee. Trademarks are evaluated for the possibility of impairment at least annually.

 

During the Nine Months, the Company has acquired various intangible assets related to the Everyday California lifestyle brand and related trademarks and the Flip Flop Shops brand and related trademarks. The consideration for the Everyday Lifestyle brand and assets consisted of an initial cash payment and contingent cash payments dependent upon performance of the assets during Fiscal 2017 and the fiscal year ending January 27, 2018. The consideration for the Flip Flop Shops brand and assets consisted of a cash payment of $12,000. See Note 3 of these consolidated financial statements for further information about the acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand and related assets.

 

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

October 31, 2015

    

January 31, 2015

 

Acquired Trademarks

 

$

54,955

 

$

47,994

 

Other Trademarks

 

 

8,687

 

 

8,621

 

Franchise Agreements

 

 

1,300

 

 

 —

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(17,427)

 

 

(16,794)

 

Total

 

$

47,515

 

$

39,821

 

 

Amortization expense of intangible assets was $633 and $699 for the nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014, respectively. Expected amortization of intangible assets for fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 is approximately $900,  $600,  $300,  $300 and $200, respectively. Certain acquired trademarks are

14


 

Table of Contents 

indefinite lived and not amortized. The weighted average amortization period for other trademarks and franchise agreements was 9.4 and 11 years and 9.4 years as of October 31, 2015 and 9.4 years for trademarks as of January 31, 2015.

Trademark registration and renewal fees capitalized during the Nine Months totaled approximately $67.  Trademark acquisition, registration, and renewal fees capitalized during the nine month periods ended November 1, 2014 totaled $59.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

 

Level 1:  Observable inputs, such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

 

Level 2:  Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborated inputs

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the owner of the assets or liabilities to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price these assets or liabilities

 

The carrying amount of receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Long-term debt approximates fair value due to the variable rate nature of the debt.

 

The realizability of long-lived assets is evaluated periodically as events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to recover the carrying amount. Long-lived assets that will no longer be used in business are written off in the period identified since they will no longer generate any positive cash flows for the Company. Periodically, long-lived assets that will continue to be used by the Company need to be evaluated for recoverability. Such evaluation is based on various analyses, including cash flow and profitability projections. The analyses involve management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the net book value of the assets, the carrying value of the assets will be written down to their estimated fair value, in accordance with authoritative guidance. The estimated undiscounted cash flows used for this nonrecurring fair value measurement are considered a Level 3 input, which consist of unobservable inputs that reflect assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability. These inputs would be based on the best information available, including the Company’s own data.

 

Income Taxes

 

Income tax expense of $802 was recognized for the Third Quarter, resulting in an effective tax rate of 34.2% in the Third Quarter, as compared to 35.8% in the third quarter of last year and compared to 32.4% for the full year of Fiscal 2015. The effective tax rate for the Third Quarter differs from the statutory rate due to the effect of certain permanent nondeductible expenses, the apportionment of income among state jurisdictions, and the benefit of certain tax credits.

 

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $230 and $449, respectively, at October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015. At October 31, 2015, approximately $152 of unrecognized tax benefits would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate.

 

In accordance with authoritative guidance, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included within the provision for taxes in the consolidated statements of income. The total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the Third Quarter was $(36) as compared with $4 in

15


 

Table of Contents 

the third quarter of last year. As of October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015, respectively, the total amount of accrued interest and penalties included in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $51 and $84.

 

The Company has unrecognized tax benefits pertaining to the issue of its taxability in various state tax jurisdictions.  It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease within the next 12 months as a result of the Company’s interaction with these various state tax jurisdictions.  The Company anticipates that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease in the next 12 months by approximately $230.

 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and California and certain other state jurisdictions. For federal income tax purposes, the year ended February 2, 2013 and later tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under the normal three year statute of limitations. For state tax purposes, the year ended January 28, 2012 and later tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under a four year statute of limitations.

 

Marketing and Advertising

 

Generally, the Company’s “Direct to Retail” licensees fund their own advertising programs. Cherokee’s marketing, advertising and promotional costs totaled $858 and $876 for the nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014, respectively. These costs are expensed as incurred and were accounted for as selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

The Company provides marketing expense money to certain large licensees based upon sales criteria to help them build the Company’s licensed brands in their respective territories, thus providing an identifiable benefit to Cherokee. The amounts paid for such marketing expenses during the nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014 were $396 and $168, respectively, and are included in the total marketing, advertising and promotional costs, based upon authoritative guidance.

 

Deferred Rent and Lease Incentives

 

When a lease includes lease incentives (such as a rent abatement) or requires fixed escalations of the minimum lease payments, rental expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease and the difference between the average rental amount charged to expense and amounts payable under the lease is included in deferred rent and lease incentives in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For leasehold allowances, the Company records a deferred lease credit on the consolidated balance sheets and amortizes the deferred lease credit as a reduction of rent expense in the consolidated statements of income over the term of the lease.

 

Comprehensive Income

 

Authoritative guidance establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income, as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. For the three months ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014, the Company has no comprehensive income components and accordingly, net income equals comprehensive income.

 

Treasury Stock

 

Repurchased shares of the Company’s common stock are held as treasury shares until they are reissued or retired. When the Company reissues treasury stock, and the proceeds from the sale exceed the average price that was paid by the Company to acquire the shares, the Company records such excess as an increase in additional paid-in capital.

 

Conversely, if the proceeds from the sale are less than the average price the Company paid to acquire the shares, the Company records such difference as a decrease in additional paid-in capital to the extent of increases previously recorded, with the balance recorded as a decrease in retained earnings.

16


 

Table of Contents 

 

(3)  Business Combinations

FFS Merger

On October 13, 2015, Cherokee entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with FFS Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“FFS”), FFS Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cherokee (“Merger Sub”), and Darin Kraetsch, solely in his capacity as the representative of the FFS equityholders. Flip Flop Shops is a franchise retail chain dedicated to offering the hottest brands and latest styles of flip flops, casual footwear and accessories.

 

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into FFS, with FFS continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cherokee (the “Merger”).

 

Cherokee acquired FFS for the base purchase price of $12,000, consisting of $6,000 in cash and the remaining $6,000 in debt, which is subject to certain adjustments and escrow arrangements. The Merger was treated as a business combination accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The Company has incurred legal, accounting, banking and other professional costs relating to the Merger in the amount of approximately $500 and has included these costs in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Third Quarter. Trademarks have been treated as indefinite‑lived and no amortization has been recorded. Trademarks are evaluated for the possibility of impairment at least annually. Franchise agreements have been treated as finite-lived with corresponding amortization expense. Goodwill primarily relates to the excess cash flows to be generated as the Flip Flop Shops franchise grows through the opening of new stores and the generation of new franchisees. The total amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $5,979. The amounts of revenue and earnings of FFS since the completion of the Merger are included in the consolidated statements of income included herein and totaled approximately $80 and ($37) for the 18 day reporting period.

 

The initial accounting for the Merger is preliminary, as the Company consummated the acquisition on October 13, 2015. This is based upon an initial draft of the purchase price allocation provided to us by a professional services firm. We expect to receive the finalized report in early Calendar 2016. As a result, the purchase price allocation may be adjusted in the future to reflect updated information.

 

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid to seller by Cherokee

$

12,000

 

Allocation of purchase price to trademarks

 

5,700

 

Allocation of purchase price to goodwill

 

5,979

 

Allocation of purchase price to franchise agreements

 

1,300

 

Allocation of purchase price to deferred revenue

 

(1,600)

 

Allocation of purchase price to deferred tax asset

 

579

 

Allocation of purchase price to working capital

 

42

 

 

 

Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma basis, as if the acquisition had been completed as of February 2, 2014, is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

(amounts in thousands)

    

October 31, 2015

    

November 1, 2014

 

October 31, 2015

 

November 1, 2014

Revenues

 

 

8,465

 

 

9,115

 

 

28,069

 

 

28,936

Net Income/Loss

 

 

1,454

 

 

2,204

 

 

6,724

 

 

7,738

Basic EPS

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.92

Diluted EPS

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.76

 

$

0.91

 

 

 

 

 

17


 

Table of Contents 

(4)   Debt

 

Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase

 

On September 4, 2012, Cherokee and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) entered into a credit agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), which was amended on January 31, 2013 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of rights related to the Cherokee brand in the school uniforms category, was further amended on January 10, 2014 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Hawk and Tony Hawk brands, and was further amended on October 13, 2015 in connection with the Merger with FFS. Effective October 13, 2015, Cherokee and JPMorgan entered into amendments to each of (i), the “Credit Agreement, (ii) the term note that was originally issued by Cherokee in favor of JPMorgan as of September 4, 2012 and previously amended by the parties effective January 31, 2013 and January 10, 2014 (as amended, the “2013 Term Note”), (ii)  the term note that was originally issued by Cherokee in favor of JPMorgan as of January 10, 2014 (as amended, the “2014 Term Note”) and (iii) the line of credit note, which was issued by Cherokee in favor of JPMorgan as of September 4, 2012 and previously amended by the parties effective January 10, 2014 (as amended, the “Revolver”).  In addition, pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Cherokee issued to JPMorgan a new term note (the “2015 Term Note” and, together with the foregoing amendments, the “Credit Agreement Amendments”) in exchange for its principal amount of $6,000Pursuant to the Credit Agreement Amendments, the maturity dates of each of the 2013 Term Note, the 2014 Term Note and the Revolver were amended to be March 1, 2017.  The principal outstanding under the 2015 Term Note is to be repaid on a quarterly basis, commencing on November 30, 2015 and continuing thereafter through February 28, 2017 in equal principal installments of $300, with any remaining principal balance due on March 1, 2017.  The 2015 Term Note bears interest equal to either: (i) an adjusted annual LIBOR rate reset monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly, plus 2.75% or 3.00% depending on the applicable senior funded debt ratio or (ii) the Bank’s annual prime rate or such annual prime rate plus 0.25% depending on the applicable senior funded debt ratio, with a floor equal to the 1 month LIBOR rate plus 2.5%. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the definition of “senior funded debt ratio” requires that Cherokee not exceed a ratio equal to (i) 2.25 to 1.00 until the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2016, and (ii) 2.00 to 1.00 thereafter. As of October 31, 2015, borrowings under the credit agreement totaled approximately $26,000 in principal amount under three term notes. The company also has a revolving line of credit in principal amount of $2,000 available for future borrowings.

 

The Credit Agreement Amendments also waive the event of default under the Credit Agreement that resulted from the election by Target in September 2015 to not renew the Restated Target Agreement when the current term expires on January 31, 2017. Prior to JPMorgan’s waiver of this event of default in the Credit Agreement Amendments, the Company and JPMorgan had entered into a forbearance agreement, pursuant to which JPMorgan had agreed that it would not exercise any of its rights or remedies under the Credit Agreement solely with respect to this event of default through October 12, 2015, the day immediately preceding the waiver granted in the Credit Agreement Amendments.

 

Following the issuance of the 2015 Term Note, Cherokee’s total borrowings under the Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Loan”) are evidenced by (i) the 2013 Term Note, which was issued in the principal amount of $16,600, of which approximately $7,000 was outstanding as of October 31, 2015, (ii) the Revolver, which provides Cherokee with a revolving line of credit in the principal amount of $2,000, none of which was outstanding as of October 31, 2015, (iii) the 2014 Term Note, which was issued in the principal amount of $19,000 , of which approximately $13,000 was outstanding as of October 31, 2015 and (iv) the 2015 Term Note in the principal amount of $6,000, all of which was outstanding as of October 31, 2015. Cherokee paid an upfront fee equal to $30 in connection with the issuance of the 2015 Term Note.  The upfront fee is recognized as a debt discount.

 

Consistent with the existing terms of the Credit Agreement, the Loan is secured by continuing security agreements, trademark security agreements and continuing guarantees executed by Cherokee and its subsidiaries, as applicable. In addition, the Credit Agreement includes various restrictions and covenants regarding the operation of Cherokee’s business, including covenants that require Cherokee to obtain JPMorgan’s consent in certain circumstances before Cherokee can: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) make acquisitions, mergers or consolidations in excess of $5,000 on an aggregate basis, (iii) issue any equity securities other than pursuant to Cherokee’s employee equity incentive plans or programs or (iv) repurchase or redeem any outstanding shares of common stock or pay dividends or other distributions, other than stock dividends, to Cherokee’s stockholders. The Credit Agreement also imposes financial covenants, including: (i) a minimum “fixed charge coverage ratio” of at least 1.2 to 1.0 and (ii) a limitation of

18


 

Table of Contents 

Cherokee’s “senior funded debt ratio” as described above. Further, Cherokee has granted a security interest in favor of JPMorgan in all of Cherokee’s assets (including trademarks) as collateral for the Loan. As of October 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with its financial and other covenants under the Credit Agreement. JPMorgan has the right to terminate its obligations under the Credit Agreement, accelerate the payment on any unpaid balance of the Credit Agreement and exercise its other rights, including foreclosing on Cherokee’s assets under the security agreements.

 

(5)   Commitments and Contingencies

 

Trademark Indemnities

 

Cherokee indemnifies certain customers against liability arising from third- party claims of intellectual property rights infringement related to the Company’s trademarks. These indemnities appear in the licensing agreements with the Company’s customers, are not limited in amount or duration and generally survive the expiration of the contracts. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made, the Company is unable to determine the range of estimated losses that it could incur related to such indemnifications.

 

Litigation

 

Estimated amounts for claims that are probable and can be reasonably estimated are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The likelihood of a material change in these estimated reserves would be dependent on new claims as they may arise and the expected probable favorable or unfavorable outcome of each claim. As additional information becomes available, the Company assesses the potential liability related to new claims and existing claims and revises estimates as appropriate. As new claims arise or existing claims evolve, such revisions in estimates of the potential liability could materially impact the results of operations and financial position. The Company may also be involved in various other claims and other matters incidental to the Company’s business, the resolution of which is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. No material amounts were accrued as of October 31, 2015 or January 31, 2015 related to any of the Company’s legal proceedings.

 

(6)   Segment Reporting

 

Authoritative guidance requires public companies to report financial and descriptive information about their reportable operating segments. The Company identifies reportable segments based on how management internally evaluates separate financial information, business activities and management responsibility.

 

The Company operates in a single business segment, the marketing and licensing of brand names and trademarks for apparel, footwear and accessories. Cherokee’s marketing and licensing activities extend to brands that the Company owns and to brands owned by others. Cherokee’s operating activities relating to owned and represented brands are identical and are performed by a single group of marketing professionals. While Cherokee’s principal operations are in the United States, the Company also derives royalty revenues from the Company’s international licensees. Revenues by geographic area based upon the licensees’ country of domicile consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

October 31, 2015

    

November 1, 2014

    

October 31, 2015

    

November 1, 2014

 

U.S. and Canada

 

$

5,725

 

$

6,064

 

$

19,534

 

$

19,724

 

Asia

 

 

996

 

 

887

 

 

2,801

 

 

2,692

 

Latin America

 

 

557

 

 

700

 

 

1,710

 

 

2,143

 

United Kingdom and Europe

 

 

170

 

 

523

 

 

681

 

 

1,714

 

All Others

 

 

650

 

 

532

 

 

2,084

 

 

1,158

 

Total

 

$

8,098

 

$

8,706

 

$

26,810

 

$

27,431

 

 

Long-lived tangible assets have been located in the U.S., Mexico and Asia with net values of approximately $876,  $250 and $51 as of October 31, 2015 and net values of approximately $794,  $299 and $72 as of January 31, 2015.

19


 

Table of Contents 

 

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (this “MD&A”) should be read together with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report. For additional context with which to understand our financial condition and results of operations, refer to the MD&A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 contained in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 16, 2015, as well as the consolidated financial statements and notes contained therein (collectively, our “Annual Report”).  In addition to historical information, this MD&A contains forward-looking statements based upon our current views, expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, among others, the risks described in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report In preparing this MD&A, we presume that readers have access to and have read the MD&A in our Annual Report pursuant to Instruction 2 to paragraph (b) of Item 303 of Regulation S-K. We undertake no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date we file this report to conform such forward-looking statements to actual results or revised expectations, except as otherwise required by law.

 

As used in this MD&A and elsewhere in this report, “Cherokee”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Cherokee Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates or requires otherwise. Additionally, as used herein, the term “Third Quarter” refers to the three months ended October 31, 2015; the term “Nine Months” refers to the nine months ended October 31, 2015; the term “Fiscal 2017” refers to the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017; the term “Fiscal 2016” refers to the fiscal year ending January 30, 2016; the term “Fiscal 2015” refers to the most recent past fiscal year ended January 31, 2015; the term “Fiscal 2014” refers to the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 ; and the term “Fiscal 2013” refers to the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.

 

We have a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31, which aligns us with our retail licensees who generally also operate and plan using such a fiscal year. This results in a 53-week fiscal year approximately every four or five years. Each of Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013 was a 52-week, 52-week and 53-week fiscal year, respectively. Certain of our international licensees report royalties to us for quarterly and annual periods that may differ from ours. We do not believe that the varying quarterly or annual period ending dates from our international licensees have a material impact upon our reported financial results, as these international licensees maintain comparable annual periods in which they report retail sales and royalties to us on a year-to-year basis.

 

We own the registered trademarks or trademark applications for Cherokee®, Liz Lange®, Completely Me by Liz Lange®, Hawk®, Tony Hawk®, Everyday California®, Flip Flop Shops®, Sideout®, Sideout Sport®, Carole Little®, Saint Tropez-West®, Chorus Line®, All That Jazz®, and others. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included or incorporated by reference into this report, the accompanying base prospectus and any applicable free writing prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

 

Overview

 

Cherokee is a global marketer and manager of a portfolio of fashion and lifestyle brands it owns or represents, licensing the Cherokee, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Hawk, Tony Hawk, Sideout, Carole Little, Everyday California , Flip Flop Shops and àle by alessandra brands and related trademarks and other brands in multiple consumer product categories and sectors. We are one of the leading global licensors of style focused lifestyle brands for apparel, footwear, home and accessories. As part of our business strategy, we frequently evaluate other brands and trademarks for acquisition into our portfolio. We enter into license agreements with recognizable retail partners in their respective global locations to provide them the rights to design, manufacture and sell products bearing our brands and to provide them our proprietary 360-degree platform. We believe our retail responsiveness process and 360-degree unique value proposition have allowed Cherokee to address the growing power of the consumer and the present and future needs of the retailers that are selling our portfolio of lifestyle brands. Based on consumer research, retail insights and brand insights that we continually measure, evaluate and incorporate into our 360-degree platform, we believe Cherokee has

20


 

Table of Contents 

become a key strategic partner to our licensees. We refer to this strategy as our “Direct to Retail” or “DTR” licensing model. As of October 31, 2015, we had thirty-three continuing license agreements covering both domestic and international markets, thirteen of which pertained to the Cherokee brand. In connection with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops trademark and related assets, we acquired, and became the franchisor under, franchise agreements with franchisees that have Flip Flop Shops retail stores located worldwide.

 

We derive revenues primarily from licensing our trademarks to retailers all over the world. Our current retail licensee relationships cover over fifty countries and over 9,000 retail stores and online businesses and include relationships with Target Corporation (“Target”), Kohl’s Illinois, Inc. (“Kohl’s”), RT Mart, Comercial Mexicana, TJ Maxx, Nishimatsuya, Sears Canada and Argos. Our two most significant licensees are Target and Kohl’s.

 

Recent Developments

 

Acquisition of Everyday California® Lifestyle Brand

 

On May 14, 2015, Cherokee consummated an asset purchase agreement with Everyday California Holdings, LLC, under which it acquired various assets related to the Everyday California® Lifestyle Brand and related trademarks. The consideration for the assets consisted of an initial cash payment and contingent cash payments dependent upon performance of the assets during Fiscal years 2017 and 2018.

 

Non-Renewal of Restated License Agreement with Target

 

On September 3, 2015, Target orally informed us that it would not renew the restated license agreement for the Cherokee brand in the U.S which expires at the end of its current term on January 31, 2017.  Target confirmed the non-renewal in writing on September 4, 2015.  The restated license agreement with Target, including the existing royalty obligations, will remain in effect and continue to generate revenues to Cherokee in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 through its expiration. The Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and Target will continue to pay the minimum guarantee through that period.

 

Target’s election to not renew the restated license agreement for the Cherokee brand in the U.S. triggered an event of default under our credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”). However, we and JPMorgan immediately entered into a forbearance agreement pursuant to which JPMorgan agreed that it would not exercise its rights or remedies under the credit agreement solely with respect to this event of default through October 12, 2015, and on October 13, 2015, JPMorgan waived this event of default in certain amendments to the credit agreement that were made in connection with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand, discussed below.

 

 

Acquisition of Flip Flop Shops

 

On October 13, 2015, we entered into a merger agreement (“Merger”) with Flip Flop Shops (“FFS”). Upon completion of the Merger, we, through our subsidiaries, own all rights to the Flip Flop Shops trademark and brand name, which is a franchise retail chain dedicated to offering the hottest brands and latest styles of flip flops, casual footwear and accessories, and we are the franchisor for approximately 90 existing Flip Flop Shops franchise shops located in the U.S. Canada, the Caribbean, the Middle East and South Africa and approximately 100 additional retail shops in development worldwide. Flip Flop Shops retail stores carry definitive assortments of recognized brands including OluKai, SANUK, Cobian, Havaianas, Quiksilver, ROXY, Reef, and many more.

 

 

In connection with the Merger with FFS, on October 13, 2015, we amended our credit agreement with JPMorgan to, among other things, (i) extend the maturity date of existing term notes and a line of credit note issued under the credit agreement to March 1, 2017 and (ii) issue a new term note to JPMorgan in exchange for the principal amount of the note of $6 million. As of October 31, 2015, our borrowings under the credit agreement totaled approximately $26 million in principal amount under three term notes, and we also have a revolving line of credit in

21


 

Table of Contents 

principal amount of $2 million available for future borrowings. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information about our credit agreement with JPMorgan.

 

Expansion of Licensing Portfolio

 

In addition to our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand name and related franchise relationships as described above, we have also acquired a number of new licensees for our brands in a variety of territories in our efforts to expand our licensing portfolio in existing and new markets. Below is a discussion of representative license agreements that we have entered into during Fiscal 2016 to date:

 

Cherokee

 

Walmart Canada

 

In September 2015, we entered into a license agreement with Walmart Canada. The agreement covers a broad assortment of Tony Hawk signature apparel, accessory and footwear categories for young men’s and boy’s sizes 4-20, which is expected to launch in the fall of 2016.

 

Sears Canada

 

In April 2015, we entered into a license agreement with Sears Canada Inc. The agreement covers a wide range of Cherokee products in the family lifestyle categories, including men’s, women’s and children’s clothing, footwear and accessories, and is planned to launch in the spring of 2016. Additionally, in May 2015, we entered into a new license agreement with Sears Canada covering Liz Lange maternity and sportswear, including expanded size ranges, to be sold in Sears Canada stores and online at www.sears.ca beginning in the spring of 2016.

 

Argos

 

In January 2015, we entered into a license agreement with Argos, a subsidiary of Home Retail Group plc, covering a broad assortment of Cherokee lifestyle products online, in catalogs and in more than 750 Argos stores across the United Kingdom and Ireland, which launched in late July 2015.

 

Hawk

 

Sports Direct

 

In March 2015, we entered into a license agreement with Sports Direct International plc to launch a broad assortment of Tony Hawk signature clothing and accessories online and in Sports Direct stores throughout Europe in the winter of 2015-2016.

 

Liz Lange

 

Sears Canada

 

In April 2015, we entered into a new license agreement with Sears Canada covering Liz Lange maternity and sportswear, including expanded size ranges, to be sold in Sears Canada stores and online at www.sears.ca beginning in the spring of 2016.

 

Everyday California

 

5 Horizons

 

In August 2015, we entered into a license agreement with 5 Horizons Group for our Everyday California brand. The agreement provides 5 Horizons the rights to manufacture and sell a wide assortment of branded Everyday California

22


 

Table of Contents 

products, including backpacks, bags, luggage, cold and warm weather accessories and select apparel products for adults and kids. Distribution will include specialty and department store retailers as well as resorts in the U.S., Canada and Mexico and select countries in South and Central America, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Product is expected to launch in the spring of 2016.

 

NTD Apparel

 

In May 2015, we entered into a license agreement with NTD Apparel Inc. for our Everyday California brand. The agreement provides NTD Apparel the rights to manufacture and sell Everyday California branded products in certain apparel and accessory categories for adults and kids. The distribution will include specialty and department store retailers, as well as resorts throughout the U.S. and Canada. Product is expected to launch in the spring of 2016.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

There has been no material change to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in our Annual Report.

 

This MD&A is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and deferred revenue, deferred taxes, valuation and impairment of long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation and stock-based compensation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, anticipated results and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates.

 

We consider accounting policies relating to the following areas to be both those most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and those that require the most subjective judgment:

 

·

Revenue recognition and deferred revenue;

 

·

Provision for income taxes and deferred taxes;

 

·

Valuation and impairment of long-lived assets;

 

·

Contingencies and litigation; and

 

·

Accounting for stock-based compensation.

 

You should refer to our Annual Report for a discussion of our policies on revenue recognition, deferred taxes, impairment of long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation and accounting for stock-based compensation.

 

See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.

 

23


 

Table of Contents 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain of our consolidated financial data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Three Months

    

Three Months

 

Nine Months

    

Nine Months

 

 

 

ended October 31,

 

ended November 1,

 

ended October 31,

 

ended November 1,

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

 

Royalty revenues

 

$

8,098

 

$

8,706

 

$

26,810

 

$

27,431

 

Selling, general and, administrative expenses

 

 

5,627

 

 

4,896

 

 

15,409

 

 

14,741

 

Operating income

 

 

2,471

 

 

3,810

 

 

11,401

 

 

12,690

 

Interest income (expense) and other income (expense), net

 

 

(123)

 

 

(203)

 

 

(464)

 

 

(656)

 

Income tax provision

 

 

802

 

 

1,291

 

 

3,889

 

 

3,874

 

Net income

 

$

1,546

 

$

2,316

 

$

7,048

 

$

8,160

 

 

Revenues

 

In the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015, our revenues totaled $8.1 million and $26.8 million, respectively, as compared to $8.7 million and $27.4 million in the three and nine month periods ended November 1, 2014. Revenues for the third quarter and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014 were primarily generated from licensing our trademarks to retailers and, to a lesser extent, wholesalers and our share of licensing revenues from brand representation licensing agreements with other brand owners. The decrease in revenues between periods was principally due to the timing of transitions in the United Kingdom from Tesco to Argos for our Cherokee brand and in Canada from Target Canada to Sears Canada for our Cherokee and Liz Lange brands.  Revenues from Argos began in the third quarter of Fiscal 2016 and we expect revenues from Sears Canada to begin during the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. Additionally, the decrease is due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, which we estimate to be approximately $0.2 million during the Third Quarter and $0.6 million during the Nine Months.

 

Total worldwide retail sales of merchandise bearing the Cherokee brand totaled $332 million and $964 million and approximately $345 million and $1,008 million in the third quarter and nine month periods ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014, respectively.

 

Because we do not have direct oversight over our licensees, we may not have all the information necessary to determine or predict the specific reasons why revenue may increase or decrease in any given period. Given our contractual royalty rate reductions as certain sales volume thresholds are achieved for Cherokee branded products and Hawk and Tony Hawk branded products in various product categories in the U.S., we expect that we will continue to record our highest revenues and profits in our first quarter and our lowest revenues and profits in our fourth quarter.

 

Revenues By Brand

 

The following table sets forth our revenues by brand for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

October 31, 2015

 

November 1, 2014

 

 

October 31, 2015

 

November 1, 2014

 

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

 

Royalty Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

  

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

 

Cherokee Brand Royalty Revenues

 

$

6,134

 

76

%  

$

6,606

 

76

%

 

$

20,226

 

76

%  

$

21,072

 

77

%

 

Hawk Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

1,200

 

15

%  

 

1,316

 

15

%

 

 

3,750

 

14

%  

 

3,765

 

14

%

 

Liz Lange Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

565

 

7

%  

 

586

 

7

%

 

 

1,965

 

7

%  

 

2,049

 

7

%

 

All Other Brand Revenues

 

 

199

 

2

%  

 

198

 

2

%

 

 

869

 

3

%  

 

545

 

2

%

 

Total Royalty Revenue

 

$

8,098

 

100

%  

$

8,706

 

100

%

 

$

26,810

 

100

%  

$

27,431

 

100

%

 

 

24


 

Table of Contents 

Geographic Revenues

 

The following table sets forth our geographic licensing revenues for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

October 31, 2015

 

November 1, 2014

 

October 31, 2015

 

November 1, 2014

 

 

(amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

    

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

    

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

 

Geographic Royalty Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

 

U.S. and Canada

 

$

5,725

 

71

%  

$

6,064

 

70

%

$

19,534

 

73

%  

$

19,724

 

72

%

 

Asia

 

 

996

 

12

%  

 

887

 

10

%

 

2,801

 

10

%  

 

2,692

 

10

%

 

Latin America

 

 

557

 

7

%  

 

700

 

8

%  

 

1,710

 

6

%  

 

2,143

 

8

%

 

United Kingdom and Europe

 

 

170

 

2

%  

 

532

 

6

%

 

681

 

3

%  

 

1,158

 

4

%

 

All others

 

 

650

 

8

%  

 

523

 

6

%

 

2,084

 

8

%  

 

1,714

 

6

%

 

Total Royalty Revenues

 

$

8,098

 

100

%  

$

8,706

 

100

%

$

26,810

 

100

%  

$

27,431

 

100

%

 

 

U.S. and Canada

 

Our largest licensees in the U.S. generally are Target and Kohl’s, which together contributed 55% and 60% of our consolidated revenues for the Third Quarter and the Nine Months, respectively. In Canada, we are transitioning from Target Canada to Sears Canada for our Cherokee and Liz Lange brands.

 

Target currently has approximately 1,800 stores in the United States. Retail sales of Cherokee branded products at Target in the U.S. were slightly higher in the Third Quarter at approximately $259 million, up from $257 million in the third quarter of last year. Target pays royalty revenues to us based on a percentage of its sales of Cherokee branded products pursuant to our restated license agreement with Target. The restated license agreement is structured to provide royalty rate reductions for Target after it has achieved certain levels of retail sales of Cherokee branded products in certain product categories in the U.S. during each fiscal year. Target also pays fixed royalty rates for Target’s sales of Cherokee branded products in the adult merchandise category that are made by Target through its website (target.com) and sales of Cherokee branded products in the category of school uniforms. In addition, Target pays a fixed percentage of net sales of its products bearing the Liz Lange brand in the U.S.

 

Under the current terms of the restated license agreement with Target, the minimum annual guaranteed royalty for Target is $10.5 million and applies to all sales made by Target in the United States, other than sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category (which products are subject to a separate minimum annual guaranteed royalty of $0.8 million).

 

Royalty revenues from our Cherokee brand at Target, excluding sales of Cherokee branded products in Canada and Cherokee branded products sold in the school uniforms category, were $3.5 million and $12.5 million in the Third Quarter and Nine Months, respectively, which accounted for 41%, and 47%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for such periods. Royalty revenues from our Cherokee brand at Target, excluding sales of Cherokee branded products in Canada and Cherokee branded products sold in the school uniforms category, were $3.5 million and $12.5 million for the third quarter and nine months of last year, respectively, which accounted for 40%, and 46%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for such periods.

 

In September 2015, Target informed us that it would not renew the restated license agreement for the Cherokee brand in the U.S., which expires at the end of its current term on January 31, 2017. The restated license agreement with Target, including the existing royalty obligations, will remain in effect and continue to generate revenues to us in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 through its expiration. If Target were to reduce its sales of Cherokee branded products prior to expiration of its license, even if Target continues to pay the minimum annual royalty of $10.5 million required under the restated license agreement with Target, any increased revenues we may receive from other licensees may not be sufficient to offset such a reduction in royalty revenues from Target.

 

25


 

Table of Contents 

Kohl’s. Kohl’s currently has approximately 1,200 stores in the United States. Retail sales of Hawk or Tony Hawk branded products at Kohl’s totaled $26.5 million and $67.7 million in the Third Quarter and Nine Months, respectively, compared to $33.9 million and $87.7 million in the third quarter and first nine months of last year, respectively.

 

Because retail sales did not exceed the contractual minimum guarantees, royalty revenues from our Hawk brand at Kohl’s remained flat between periods at $1.2 million and $3.6 million in the Third Quarter and Nine Months respectively, which accounted for 14% and 13% of our consolidated revenues for such periods, respectively.

 

United Kingdom and Europe

 

We have a number of licensees with rights to our brands in various European countries. One of our more significant European licensees is Argos, a subsidiary of Home Retail Group plc, which launched a broad assortment of Cherokee lifestyle products online, in catalogs and in more than 750 Argos stores across the United Kingdom and Ireland in late July 2015. Revenues from Argos licensees began during the third quarter of Fiscal 2016.

 

Latin America, Asia and Others

 

Other international royalty revenues in the Third Quarter decreased to $2.4 million from $2.6 million in the third quarter of Fiscal 2015, representing a 10.2% decrease. Other international royalty revenues in the Nine Months decreased to $7.3 million from $7.7 million in the first nine months of Fiscal 2015, representing a 5.6% decreaseThe decreases were principally due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. This total includes licensees for Japan, China, Mexico, South Africa, Peru, Israel, Chile, India, and other territories. In local currencies, the majority of our international licensees had growth in retail sales for the Nine Months.

 

The majority of our international licensees are required to pay the royalty revenues owed to us in U.S. dollars. As a consequence, any weakening of the U.S. dollar benefits us in that the total royalty revenues reported from our international licensees increases when the dollar weakens against such foreign currencies. Conversely, any strengthening of the U.S. dollar against an international licensee’s foreign currency results in lower royalty revenues from such licensee. As the U.S. dollar strengthened between periods, the estimated cumulative effect on our revenues of changes to applicable foreign currency exchange rates during the Third Quarter and Nine Months in comparison to the third quarter and first nine months of Fiscal 2015 was estimated at an approximate $0.2 million decrease and an approximate $0.6 million decrease, respectively.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

The following table sets forth detailed information regarding the components for selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months

 

Three Months

 

Nine Months

 

Nine Months

 

 

 

ended October 31,

 

ended November 1,

 

ended October 31,

 

ended November 1,

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

 

Personnel expenses (including salaries, taxes, benefits, consultants and bonus)

 

$

2,332

 

$

2,530

 

$

6,796

 

$

7,757

 

Corporate expenses

 

 

1,271

 

 

1,037

 

 

3,505

 

 

3,077

 

M&A expenses/ IP protection

 

 

557

 

 

 

 

691

 

 

 

Marketing expenses

 

 

264

 

 

385

 

 

1,282

 

 

1,376

 

Product development expenses

 

 

212

 

 

203

 

 

573

 

 

691

 

Non cash stock compensation

 

 

664

 

 

356

 

 

1,607

 

 

780

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

327

 

 

385

 

 

955

 

 

1,060

 

Total selling, general, administrative and amortization expenses

 

$

5,627

 

$

4,896

 

$

15,409

 

$

14,741

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses, including amortization of trademarks, were $5.6 million and $15.4 million for the Third Quarter and Nine Month period of Fiscal 2016, respectively, compared to $4.9 million and

26


 

Table of Contents 

$14.7 million for the third quarter and first nine months of Fiscal 2015, respectively, representing an increase of $0.7 million between periods. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses for the quarter and for the nine month period ended October 31, 2015 was due primarily to an increase in professional fees related to the protection of intellectual property, legal and due diligence costs related to the Everyday California and Flip Flop Shop acquisitions and other potential acquisitions, and an increase in stock based compensation.

 

Interest and Other Income or Expense

 

Our interest expense for the Third Quarter and Nine Months was $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the third quarter and first nine months of Fiscal 2015, respectively.

 

Tax Provision

 

During the Third Quarter and Nine Months, we recorded a tax provision of $0.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, which equates to an effective tax rate of 34.2% and 35.6%, respectively,  compared to a tax provision of $1.3 million and $3.9 million respectively, and an effective tax rate of 35.8% and 32.2%, respectively, recorded for the third quarter and first nine months of last year. The effective tax rate for the Third Quarter differs from the statutory rate due to the effect of certain permanent nondeductible expenses, the apportionment of income among state jurisdictions, and the benefit of certain tax credits. The effective tax rate for the Nine Months differs from the statutory rate due to the effect of certain permanent nondeductible expenses, the apportionment of income among state jurisdictions, and the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits upon the conclusion of income tax examinations.

 

Net Income

 

During the Third Quarter and Nine Months, our net income was $1.5 million and $7.0 million, or $0.17 and $0.79 per diluted share, respectively, compared to $2.3 million and $8.2 million, or $0.27 and $0.96 per diluted share, respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of last year.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash Flows

 

On October 31, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.7 million, which represented a decrease of $1.9 million from January 31, 2015.

 

During the Nine Months, cash provided by our operations was $8.8 million, compared to $7.6 million for the first nine months of Fiscal 2015. The increase of $1.2 million during the Nine Months was primarily due to the changes in:  (i) reversal of uncertain tax liabilities, of which there were none in the Nine Months, as compared to an increase of $0.7 million in the first nine months of Fiscal 2015 (ii) accounts receivable, which increased by $0.6 million in the Nine Months, as compared to an increase of $2.3 million in the same period in the prior year, which was primarily due to an increase in royalty revenues from the Hawk and Tony Hawk brands in Fiscal 2015; and (iii) accrued compensation, which decreased by $0.9 million in the Nine Months as compared to an increase of $0.6 million in the first nine months of last year, which was primarily attributable to accruals for vesting of stock awards in the prior year as well as variances in bonus accruals.

 

Cash used by investing activities during the Nine Months was $13.3 million, which consisted of capital expenditures of property and equipment and trademark registration and renewal costs, as well as acquisitions of intangible assets relating to Everyday California and Flip Flop Shops.  In comparison, during the first nine months of Fiscal 2015, cash used by investing activities was $0.6 million, which consisted of capital expenditures of property and equipment and trademark registration and renewal costs.

 

Cash provided by financing activities was $2.6 million during the Nine Months, which consisted of proceeds of $6 million, from a new term loan under our amended JP Morgan credit agreement for the Flip Flop Shops acquisition, exercise of stock options of $1.9 million and excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements of $0.3 million,

27


 

Table of Contents 

partially offset by principal payments of $5.5 million on our outstanding term loans under our credit agreement with JP Morgan.  In comparison, during the first nine months of Fiscal 2015, cash used in financing activities was $5.7 million, which consisted of principal payments of $5.2 million for the term loan with JP Morgan and dividend payments of $0.8 million, partially offset by proceeds from exercise of stock options of $0.3 million.

 

Uses of Liquidity 

 

Our cash requirements over the next twelve months are primarily to fund our operations and working capital, to make payments of principal and interest under our credit facility with JPMorgan, at our discretion and subject to the terms of the credit facility, to repurchase shares of our common stock or pay dividends as determined by our board of directors (the “Board of Directors”), and, to a lesser extent, to fund capital expenditures. As of October 31, 2015, we had approximately $26 million in principal amount of outstanding indebtedness owed under our credit facility with JPMorgan, all of which is due in March 2017. We may seek to refinance all or a portion of this indebtedness before its maturity date. Any such refinancing would depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at the time, which could affect our ability to obtain attractive refinance terms when desired, or at all. The declaration and payment of any future dividends or repurchases of our common stock are subject to negative covenants contained in our credit facility and, assuming the satisfaction or waiver by JPMorgan of such covenants, would be made solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors and would be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, capital expenditures, and other factors that may be deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Additionally, should an established and marketable brand or similar equity property become available on favorable terms, we would consider using our liquidity to fund such an acquisition opportunity, subject to obtaining any consent required under our JPMorgan credit agreement.

 

Sources of Liquidity

 

We expect our primary sources of liquidity to be cash flow generated from operations, cash and cash equivalents currently on hand, and up to $2 million of funds made available to us pursuant to the revolving line of credit issued by JPMorgan under our credit agreement. We believe our cash flow from operations, together with our cash and cash equivalents currently on hand and access to funds pursuant to the revolving line of credit, will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and other commitments and otherwise support our operations for the next twelve months.

 

In September 2015, Target informed us that it would not renew the restated license agreement for the Cherokee brand in the U.S., which expires at the end of its current term on January 31, 2017. The restated license agreement with Target, including the existing royalty obligations, will remain in effect and continue to generate revenues to us in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 through its expiration. If Target reduces its sales of Cherokee branded products prior to the expiration of the restated license agreement, even if Target continues to pay the minimum annual royalty of $10.5 million required under the restated license agreement, any increased revenues we may receive from other licensees may not be sufficient to offset such a reduction in royalty revenues from Target. Further, replacing the royalty payments received from Target under the restated license agreement will be a significant challenge, and we might not be successful in doing so. If we are not successful in replacing the Target royalty payments with equal or greater payments from other licensees, the termination of this license agreement on January 31, 2017 could have an adverse effect upon our liquidity in the long term.

 

We cannot predict our revenues and cash flow that will be generated from operations in future periods, and our revenues and cash flows could be materially lower than we expect. If our revenues and cash flows are lower than we anticipate, or if our expenses are higher than we anticipate, then we may not have sufficient cash available to fund our planned operations and we could fall out of compliance with the terms of our credit agreement with JPMorgan or our other contractual commitments. In that case, we may need to take steps to reduce expenditures by scaling back operations and reducing staff related to these activities or seek funds from other sources, which may not be available when needed, on acceptable or at all. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report.

 

As of October 31, 2015, we were not the guarantor of any other material third-party obligations and did not have any irrevocable repurchase obligations.

28


 

Table of Contents 

 

Seasonality

 

We have agreed to certain contractual royalty rate reductions with our two most significant licensees, Target and Kohl’s, for sales of certain Cherokee branded products and Hawk and Tony Hawk branded products in various product categories in the U.S. in each fiscal year, which apply for future sales during the applicable fiscal year as certain sales volume thresholds are achieved. Historically, this has caused us to record our highest revenues and profits in our first quarter and our lowest revenues and profits in our fourth quarter. However, such historical patterns and seasonal trends may vary significantly in future periods, depending upon retail sales volumes achieved in each quarter by Target and Kohl’s, the revenues we receive from Target, Kohl’s and our other licensees that may or may not be subject to reduced royalty rates based upon cumulative sales, and the terms of any new license agreements.

 

Inflation and Changing Prices

 

The rate of inflation over the past several years has not had a material effect on our revenues and profits. Since most of our future revenues will be based upon a percentage of sales by our licensees of products bearing our owned or represented trademarks, we do not anticipate that short term future inflation will have a material impact, positive or negative, on future financial results.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Our market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the values of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

 

Interest

 

From time to time we invest our excess cash in interest bearing temporary investments of high quality issuers. Due to the short time the investments are outstanding and their general liquidity, these instruments are classified as cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets and do not represent a material interest rate risk to us. In relation to our credit facility with JPMorgan, a 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have had an immaterial impact on interest expense for the quarter and nine months ended October 31, 2015.

 

Foreign Currency

 

We conduct business in various parts of the world. As most of our international licensees are required to pay the royalty revenues owed to us in U.S. dollars, we are exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates of the foreign currencies in countries in which our licensees do business when they are converted to the U.S. dollar, and significant fluctuations in exchange rates could materially impact our results of operations and cash flow. For the Nine Months, revenues from international licensing activities comprised 28% of our total consolidated revenues.  A hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currencies of countries where our licensees operate would have negatively affected our revenues by approximately $0.8 million for the Nine Months, which represents 3% of our total consolidated revenues reported for the period. Such change is not considered to represent a material effect on our results of operations or cash flow. This compares to a projected negative effect on our revenues of approximately $1.1 million for Fiscal 2015, also representing 3% of our total consolidated revenues for the period, assuming the same hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currencies of countries where our licensees operate. Also, as the U.S. dollar strengthened between periods, the estimated cumulative effect on our total consolidated revenues of

29


 

Table of Contents 

changes to applicable foreign currency exchange rates during the Third Quarter in comparison to the third quarter of Fiscal 2015 was an approximate $0.2 million decrease.

 

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2015.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

During our most recent fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30


 

Table of Contents 

 

 

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. The impact and outcome of litigation, if any, is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that could harm our business. We are not currently aware of any such legal proceedings or claims to which we or our wholly owned subsidiaries are a party that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

 

 

 

31


 

Table of Contents 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

The occurrence of any of the risks and uncertainties and other factors described below and elsewhere in this report, our annual report on Form 10-K for our most recently completed fiscal year and the other documents we file with the SEC could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and share price and could also cause our future business, financial condition and results of operations to differ materially from our historical results and the results contemplated by any forward-looking statements we may make herein, in any other document we file with the SEC, or in any press release or other written or oral statement we may make. You should carefully consider all of these risks and the other information in this report and the other documents we filed with the SEC before making any investment decision with respect to our common stock. The risks described below and elsewhere in this report are not the only ones we face. Additional risks we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our financial condition and business operations.

 

Our business is subject to intense competition.

 

Royalties paid to us under our licensing agreements are generally based on a percentage of our licensees’ net sales of licensed products. Additionally, franchisees of our Flip Flop Shops brand pay us a percentage of their net sales. Merchandise bearing our Cherokee, Carole Little, Sideout, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Hawk, Tony Hawk and Everyday California brands, all of which are manufactured and sold by both domestic and international wholesalers and retail licensees, as well as merchandise sold by Flip Flop Shops retail shops, are subject to extensive competition by numerous domestic and foreign companies. Such competitors with respect to the Cherokee brand include Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Liz Claiborne, and private label brands (developed by retailers) such as Faded Glory, Arizona, Merona, and Route 66. Factors that shape the competitive environment include quality of garment construction and design, brand name, style and color selection, price, fashion and other trends, avenue of purchase (including in stores and online), and the manufacturer’s ability to respond quickly to the retailer on a national basis. In recognition of what we believe is an increasing trend towards consolidation of retailers and what appears to be a de-emphasis by retailers on the manufacture of private label merchandise, our business plan in the United States focuses on creating strategic alliances with major retailers for their sale of products bearing our brands through the licensing of our trademarks directly to retailers and, to a lesser extent and with respect to Flip Flop Shops, entering into franchise relationships with Flip Flop Shops retail store owners. Therefore, our degree of success is dependent on the strength of our brands, consumer acceptance of and desire for our brands, and our licensees’ ability to design, manufacture and sell products bearing our brands and to respond to ever-changing consumer demands. Failures with respect to any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. We cannot control the level of consumer acceptance of our brands and changing preferences and trends may lead customers to purchase other products. Further, we cannot control the level of resources that our licensees or franchisees commit to supporting our brands, and our licensees may choose to support other brands to the detriment of our brands because our license agreements generally do not prevent our licensees from licensing from our competitors. In addition, we compete with other companies owning established trademarks, which have entered into, and could continue to enter into, similar arrangements with retailers in the U.S. and internationally, including with our existing retail partners, thereby competing with us for consumer attention and limited floor and rack space in the same stores in which our branded products are sold.

 

We are subject to risks related to the retail business that are applicable to our licensees and franchisees.

 

There are numerous risks and other factors applicable to the businesses of retailers (including our licensees and franchisees) that can impact the sale of products that bear our brands. Any decline in sales by one or more of our licensees or franchisees could adversely affect our revenues.

 

Factors that may adversely affect our licensees and franchisees and their sales of products bearing our brands include the following, among others: (i) weather, environmental or other conditions that may impact consumer shopping activity in retail stores; (ii) consumer preferences regarding fashion trends and styles, which can be region-dependent and subject to rapid and significant fluctuations; (iii) consumer preferences regarding where to shop; (iv) the growth of online shopping and the ability of our licensees and franchisees to market and sell our branded products through these avenues; (v) changes in the availability or cost of capital in light of the financial condition and capital requirements of

32


 

Table of Contents 

our licensees and franchisees; (vi) shifts in the seasonality of shopping patterns; (vii) declining retail prices; (viii) labor strikes or other interruptions that impact supply chains and transport vendors, such as the labor strikes impacting ports in California and the Pacific Northwest and products that move through these channels; (ix) the impact of excess retail capacity; (x) changes in the cost of accepting various payment methods and changes in the rate of utilization of these payment methods; (xi) material acquisitions or dispositions; (xii) investments in new business strategies; (xiii) the success or failure of significant new business ventures or technologies; (xiv) actions taken or omitted to be taken by legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities and officials; (xv) security breaches; (xvi) natural disasters, the outbreak of war, acts of terrorism or other significant national or international events; and (xvii) the other risks discussed in this Item 1A.

 

We rely on the accuracy of our licensees’ and franchisees’ retail sales reports for reporting and collecting our revenues, and if these reports are untimely or incorrect, our revenues could be delayed or inaccurately reported.

 

Most of our revenues are generated from retailers who license our brands for manufacture and sale of products bearing our brands in their stores and on their websites. In addition, we have a number of franchise agreements with franchisees of the Flip Flop Shops brand. Under our existing agreements, these licensees and franchisees pay us fees based in part on the retail value of products sold. We rely on our licensees and franchisees to accurately report the retail sales in collecting our license and franchise fees, preparing our financial reports, projections and budgets, and directing our sales and marketing efforts. All of our license and franchise agreements permit us to audit our licensees and franchisees. If any of our licensee or franchisee reports understate the retail sales of products they sell, we may not collect and recognize revenues to which we are entitled, or may endure significant expense to obtain compliance.

 

Our business is dependent on the success of our Direct to Retail licensing model.

 

In Direct to Retail licensing, we grant retailers a license to use our trademarks on certain categories of merchandise. In many cases, the licensee is responsible for designing and manufacturing the merchandise, although we typically collaborate with our licensees’ product development staff and merchandisers on design direction, packaging, marketing, and other aspects pertaining to products bearing our trademarks. Over the past two decades, the Direct to Retail licensing model has become more widely accepted by many retailers worldwide, and our business plan is largely based on the continued success of this model with our current licensees and with new retailers we may solicit to license our brands in new territories and additional product categories as we seek to expand our business. Although we believe there are increasing trends towards consolidation of retailers and de-emphasis on the manufacture of private label merchandise, which would support the growth of our Direct to Retail licensing model, this belief may turn out to be wrong. If our current or potential future retail licensees do not perceive our Direct to Retail licensing model to be advantageous to them, then they may move away from this model and instead embrace alternatives, such as purchasing from wholesalers or manufacturing private label products. Such a change in perception could occur for a variety of reasons, including reasons based on retailers’ beliefs or expectations that do not turn out to be accurate.

 

Our business is largely dependent on royalties from Target, which has notified us that it will not renew its current relationship with us.

 

Royalty revenues from our Cherokee brand at Target Corporation (“Target”) accounted for greater than 40% of our consolidated revenues during the first nine months of Fiscal 2016 and each of Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014, and Fiscal 2013. On September 3, 2015, Target orally informed us that it would not renew the restated license agreement for the Cherokee brand in the U.S., which expires at the end of its current term on January 31, 2017.  Target confirmed the non-renewal in writing on September 4, 2015.  The restated license agreement with Target, including the existing royalty obligations, will remain in effect and continue to generate revenues to us in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 through its expiration. The Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and Target will continue to pay the minimum guarantee through that period. If Target were to reduce its sales of Cherokee branded products prior to expiration of its license, even if Target continues to pay the minimum annual royalty of $10.5 million required under the restated license agreement with Target, any increased revenues we may receive from other licensees or franchisees may not be sufficient to offset such a reduction in royalty revenues from Target. Replacing the royalty payments received from Target will be a significant challenge, and we might not be successful in doing so. If we are not successful in replacing the Target royalty payments with equal or greater payments

33


 

Table of Contents 

from other partners, the termination of this license agreement, which currently extends through January 31, 2017 could have an adverse effect upon our revenues and cash flow.

 

In addition, in September 2012 we expanded our relationship with Target as a result of our assumption of an additional license agreement with Target for the Liz Lange brand, which we assumed in connection with our acquisition of assets related to this brand.  We acquired the Liz Lange brand in part based upon our expectation that revenues from Target for this brand would grow in future periods, although such revenue growth may never occur.

 

As a result of our reliance on Target at least through Fiscal 2017, our continued success is dependent on various factors affecting Target’s business, including, for example, perceptions of Target by consumers in the United States. For example, we believe that sales of Cherokee branded products at Target in the United States after the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014 were adversely impacted following Target’s announcement of unauthorized access to payment card data in U.S. stores.

 

Revenues from our Hawk and Tony Hawk brands depend on Kohl’s.

 

In January 2014, we acquired the Hawk and Tony Hawk brands. Concurrently with this acquisition, we entered into a retail license agreement with Kohl’s Illinois, Inc. (“Kohl’s”), pursuant to which Kohl’s is granted the exclusive right to sell Tony Hawk and Hawk-branded apparel and related products in the United States. We agreed to this exclusive license in part based upon our expectation that revenues from Kohl’s for such brands will grow in future periods, although this expectation may turn out to be wrong and such revenue growth may never occur beyond the $4.8 million minimum annual royalty guaranteed under the license agreement.  In April 2015, we entered into an agreement to license the Hawk and Tony Hawk brands with Sports Direct in the United Kingdom, but we do not expect to generate any material revenue from this license in Fiscal 2016.

 

The failure of our licensees or franchisees to sell products bearing our brands, to pay us royalties for such products or to renew their license or franchise agreements with us could result in a decline in our results of operations.

 

Our revenues are dependent on royalty payments made to us under our license and franchise agreements. Although the license agreements for our brands in many cases provide for guaranteed minimum royalty payments to us, the failure of our licensees or franchisees to satisfy their obligations under their agreements with us, their decision to not renew their agreements with us or their inability to grow or maintain their businesses could cause our revenues to suffer. Further, while we are substantially dependent on our relationships with Target and Kohl’s and expect to continue to be at least through Fiscal 2017 when our agreement with Target for the Cherokee brand will expire, the concurrent failure by several of our other material licensees or franchisees to meet their financial obligations to us or to renew their respective license or franchise agreements could materially and adversely impact our results of operation and our financial condition.

 

Our franchise business exposes us to numerous risks.

 

In connection with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand in October 2015, we acquired, and became the franchisor under, a number of franchise agreements with franchisees of this brand. Many of these franchisees maintain one or more Flip Flop Shops retail stores located across the globe, including in the U.S., Canada, the Caribbean, the Middle East and South Africa. This new Flip Flop Shops franchise business exposes us to a variety of risks, including, among others, that: (i) we may not be able to find capable and experienced franchisees who can implement the Flip Flop Shops brand concept and strategies we believe are necessary for the future growth of this brand or produce merchandise and operate stores in a manner consistent with our standards and requirements, which could limit our revenues from this brand and diminish the image and reputation of this brand and our other brands; (ii) even if we are able to attract capable franchise owners, these franchisees may not be able to open new Flip Flop Shops retail stores in a timely manner, or manage and maintain them once opened, if they cannot secure desirable site locations, obtain adequate financing, construct and develop new store locations without delays and attract qualified operating personnel, which could slow the growth of this brand and reduce our franchise revenues; (iii) the third party brands that are sold at Flip Flop Shops stores could decline in popularity or decide to stop selling their merchandise at some or all of the Flip Flop Shops store locations, which could cause sales at these stores to decline; (iv) neighborhood or economic conditions or other

34


 

Table of Contents 

demographic patterns where existing or new Flip Flop Shops stores are located could decline or otherwise change in a negative way, which could result in reduced sales by these store locations; and (v) our franchise business is subject to complex and varying franchise laws and regulations imposed by the U.S. federal, state and foreign jurisdictions in which we operate,  and we may need to devote significant costs and resources in order to learn and comply with these laws and regulations.

 

Our business may be negatively impacted by general economic conditions.

 

Our performance is subject to worldwide economic conditions and the corresponding impact on levels of consumer spending, which may affect our licensees’ and franchisees’ retail sales. It is difficult to predict future levels of consumer spending and any such predictions are inherently uncertain. Many factors affect the level of consumer spending in the apparel industries, including, among others, prevailing economic conditions, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, energy costs, interest rates, the availability of consumer credit, taxation and consumer confidence in future economic conditions. Further, the worldwide apparel industry is heavily influenced by general economic cycles. Purchases of apparel, footwear and accessories tend to decline in periods of recession or uncertainty regarding future economic prospects, as disposable income typically declines. As a result, during periods of economic uncertainty, slowdown or recession, the risks associated with our business are generally more acute and we may not be able to maintain or increase our revenue. In addition to decreased consumer spending generally, these periods may be accompanied by decreased demand for, or additional downward pricing pressure on, the products carrying our brands. Accordingly, any prolonged economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession or any other negative trend in either the U.S. or the global economy is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business prospects.

 

We are subject to additional risks associated with our international licensees and franchisees.

 

We franchise our Flip Flop Shops brand and market and license our other brands outside the United States. Many of our licensees and franchisees are located outside the United States. As a key component of our business strategy, we intend to expand our international sales as well as the support we provide our international licensees and franchisees. During the first nine months of Fiscal 2016, greater than 25% of our revenues were derived from our international licensees. We face numerous risks in doing business outside the United States, including: (i) unusual or burdensome foreign laws or regulatory requirements or unexpected changes to those laws or requirements; (ii) tariffs, trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, trade embargos, and other trade barriers; (iii) difficulties in attracting and retaining qualified personnel to manage foreign licensees and franchisees; (iv) competition from foreign companies; (v) longer accounts receivable collection cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; (vi) less effective and less predictable protection and enforcement of our intellectual property; (vii) changes in the political or economic condition of a specific country or region, particularly in emerging markets; (viii) potentially adverse tax consequences; and (ix) cultural differences in the conduct of business. Any one or more of such factors could cause our future international sales to decline or could cause us to fail to execute on our business strategy involving international expansion. In addition, our business practices in international markets are subject to the requirements of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, any violation of which could subject us to significant fines, criminal sanctions and other penalties.

 

Additionally, and because the majority of our international revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currencies of our international licensees’ or franchisees’ operations may negatively impact our royalty revenues. The main foreign currencies we encounter in our operations are the Mexican Peso, the EURO, the Great British Pound, the South African Rand, the Japanese Yen, the Chinese Yuan, and the Canadian Dollar. We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities to limit the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

 

Our business and the success of our products could be harmed if we are unable to maintain the strength of our brands.

 

Our success to date has been due in large part to the strength of our brands. If we are unable to timely and appropriately respond to changing consumer demand, the strength of our brands may be impaired. Even if we react

35


 

Table of Contents 

appropriately to changes in consumer preferences, consumers may consider one or more of our brands to be outdated or associate one or more of our brands with styles that are no longer popular. In the past, many apparel companies have experienced periods of rapid growth in sales and earnings followed by periods of declining sales and losses. Our business may be similarly affected in the future.

 

We are dependent on our intellectual property, and we may not be able to successfully protect our rights or that we may become involved in costly legal proceedings regarding our intellectual property.

 

We hold various trademarks for our brands, including Cherokee, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Hawk, Tony Hawk, Everyday California, Flip Flop Shops, Sideout and Carole Little and others in connection with apparel, footwear, home and accessories. These trademarks are vital to the success and future growth of our business. These trademarks are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and corresponding government agencies in numerous other countries and we also hold trademark applications for these brands in a number of other countries, although the laws of many countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. These actions taken by us to establish and protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights might not prevent imitation of our products, infringement of our intellectual property rights by unauthorized parties or other challenges to our intellectual property ownership, or prevent the loss of licensing or franchise revenue or other damages caused thereby. If any of these events occurs, our business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially harmed.

 

In the future, we may be required to assert infringement claims against third parties, and one or more parties may assert infringement claims against us. Any resulting litigation could result in significant expense and divert the efforts of our management personnel whether or not such litigation is determined in our favor. Further, if any adverse ruling in any such matter occurs, any resulting limitations in our ability to market or license our brands could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We may become involved in other litigation and administrative proceedings that may materially affect us.

 

From time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including commercial, employment, class action, whistleblower and other litigation and claims, as well as governmental and other regulatory investigations, audits and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. Furthermore, because litigation is inherently unpredictable, the results of any of these actions or legal costs associated with these actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

 

We are dependent on our key management personnel.

 

Our success is highly dependent upon the continued services of our key executives and employees, including, Henry Stupp, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board or Directors, Howard Siegel, our President and Chief Operating Officer, Jason Boling, our Chief Financial Officer, and Brian Curin, the President of our subsidiary FFS Holdings, LLC. We have a limited number of employees and Mr. Stupp’s and our other executives’ leadership and experience in the apparel licensing industry and Mr. Curin’s expertise in the franchising industry is important to the successful implementation of our business and marketing strategy. We do not carry key person life insurance covering any of our executives or other employees. The loss of the services of Mr. Stupp or our other key executives or employees could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

 

We may encounter difficulties in connection with acquisitions or other strategic transactions and we may not realize the expected benefits from these transactions.

 

We regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire or represent new brands. During the past three years, we have consummated five acquisitions: our acquisition of the Liz Lange brands in September 2012; our acquisition of various rights to the Cherokee brand in the category of school uniforms in January 2013; our acquisition of the Hawk and Tony Hawk signature apparel brands in January 2014; our acquisition of the Everyday California Lifestyle brand in May 2015; and our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand in October 2015. In addition, in February 2013, we commenced a

36


 

Table of Contents 

relationship with Alessandra Ambrosio to market and represent her brand àle by alessandra. We expect to continue to consider opportunities to acquire or make investments in other brands or to engage in other strategic transactions that could enhance our portfolio of products and services or expand the breadth of our markets. Our history of acquiring and integrating acquisitions is limited, and we may not be successful in realizing the expected benefits from an acquisition. Future success depends, in part, upon our ability to manage an expanded portfolio of brands, which could pose substantial challenges for management. Acquisitions and other strategic transactions can involve numerous risks and potential difficulties, including, among others: (i) problems assimilating the brands; (ii) significant future charges relating the amortization of intangible assets; (iii) problems maintaining and enforcing standards, procedures, controls, policies and information systems; (iv) difficulty and cost in combining the operations and personnel of any acquired businesses with our operations and personnel, and inability to retain key employees of any acquired businesses; (v) unanticipated costs associated with an acquisition, including accounting and legal charges, capital expenditures, and transaction expenses; (vi) diversion of management’s attention from our core business or our existing brand portfolio; (vii) adverse effects on existing business relationships with our partners; and (viii) risks associated with entering markets or new types of business arrangements in which we have no or limited prior experience, such as, for instance, our acquisition of franchise agreements and entry into the franchising business upon our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand in October 2015. Accordingly, our recent acquisitions as well as any future transactions that we pursue could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

 

In addition, future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available when needed, on favorable terms or at all. If we finance future acquisitions or other strategic transactions by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders would be diluted. If we finance future acquisitions or other strategic transactions by issuing debt, we may become over-leveraged and our ability to operate our business may be restricted by the agreements governing the debt. In addition, we may experience or incur contingent liabilities, amortization expenses or write-offs of goodwill or trademarks in connection with such transactions. Any of these effects could harm our operating results or financial condition.

 

We have incurred a significant amount of indebtedness to pay the cash consideration for our recent acquisitions. Our level of indebtedness, and restrictions under such indebtedness, could adversely affect our operations and liquidity.

 

In order to fund our acquisition of the Liz Lange brands, we entered into a credit facility with JPMorgan on September 4, 2012. We have increased the size of our credit facility on January 31, 2013 in connection with our acquisition of rights related to the Cherokee brand in the school uniforms category, on January 10, 2014 in connection with our acquisition of various assets related to the Hawk and Tony Hawk signature apparel brands, and on October 13, 2015 in connection with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand and associated assets.

 

Approximately $26 million in principal amount was outstanding under our credit facility as of October 31, 2015, and is evidenced by (i) three term notes, which were issued on January 31, 2013, January 10, 2014 and October 13, 2015 in the principal amounts of $16.6 million, $19 million and $6 million, respectively, and (ii) a revolving line of credit, pursuant to which we may borrow up to $2 million in principal.

 

Our indebtedness under the credit facility could adversely affect our operations and liquidity, by, among other things: making it more difficult for us to pay or refinance our debts as they become due during adverse economic and industry conditions because we may not have sufficient cash flows to make our scheduled debt payments; causing us to use a larger portion of our cash flow to fund interest and principal payments, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, product development and capital expenditures and other business activities; making it more difficult for us to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities or other strategic transactions, and to react to changes in market or industry conditions; and limiting our ability to borrow additional monies in the future to fund working capital, product development, capital expenditures, brand acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. All of our outstanding indebtedness owed under the credit facility is due in March 2017. We may seek to refinance all or a portion of this indebtedness before its maturity date. Any such refinancing would depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at the time, which could affect our ability to obtain attractive refinance terms when desired, or at all.

 

37


 

Table of Contents 

In addition, the terms of our indebtedness contain various restrictions and covenants regarding the operation of our business, including covenants that require us to obtain JPMorgan’s consent before we can: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) consummate acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, (iii) issue any equity securities other than pursuant to our employee equity incentive plans or programs, or (iv) repurchase or redeem any outstanding shares of common stock or pay dividends or other distributions, other than stock dividends, to our stockholders. The credit facility also imposes financial covenants, including a minimum “fixed charge coverage ratio” of at least 1.2 to 1.0 and a limitation of our “senior funded debt ratio” to not exceed a ratio equal to (i) 2.25 to 1.00 through our fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2016, and (ii) 2.00 to 1.00 thereafter. Further, as collateral for the credit facility, we granted a security interest in favor of JPMorgan in all of our assets (including trademarks), and our indebtedness is guaranteed by Cherokee’s wholly owned subsidiaries.

 

Target’s election in September 2015 to not renew the restated license agreement for the Cherokee brand in the U.S. triggered an event of default under the credit facility. However, we and JPMorgan immediately entered into a forbearance agreement pursuant to which JPMorgan agreed that it would not exercise any of its rights or remedies under the credit facility solely with respect to this event of default through October 12, 2015, and on October 13, 2015, JPMorgan waived this event of default in connection with certain amendments to the credit facility. In the event of a default under the credit facility that is not forborne, cured or waived in accordance with the terms of the credit facility, JPMorgan has the right to terminate its obligations under the credit facility, accelerate the payment on any unpaid balance of the credit facility and exercise its other rights including foreclosing on our assets under the related security agreements. Our failure to comply with the terms of our indebtedness could result in a material adverse effect to our business, including our financial condition and our liquidity.

 

Our future capital needs may be uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds in the future, and such funds may not be available when needed, on acceptable terms or at all.

 

Our capital requirements in future periods may be uncertain and could depend upon many factors, including: acceptance of, and demand for, our brands; the costs of developing new brands; the extent to which we invest in new brands; the number and timing of our acquisitions and other strategic transactions; the costs associated with our expansion, if any; and the costs of litigation and enforcement activities to defend our trademarks. In the future, we may need to raise additional funds, and such funds may not be available when needed, on favorable terms, or at all. Furthermore, if we issue equity or convertible debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing stockholders would experience dilution and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders, and if we incur additional debt to raise funds, we may become over-leveraged and our ability to operate our business may be restricted by the agreements governing the debt. Moreover, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital transactions, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. If we cannot raise funds when needed and on acceptable terms, or at all, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products and services, execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated customer requirements. This may materially harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

 

Our strategic and marketing initiatives may not be successful.

 

In recent periods, we have invested significant funds and management time in furtherance of our global strategic and marketing initiatives, which are designed to strengthen our brands, assist our licensees in generating increased sales of products bearing our brands and build value for our stockholders over the long term. We expect to continue and, in some cases, expand such initiatives in future periods. While we are hopeful that our efforts in executing on these initiatives will expand our business and build stockholder value over the long term, we may not be successful in doing so and such initiatives may not result in the intended benefits. Any failure by us to execute on our strategic initiatives, or the failure of such initiatives to cause our revenues to grow, could have a materially adverse impact on our operating results and financial performance.

 

38


 

Table of Contents 

We may not pay dividends regularly or at all in the future.

 

The determination regarding the payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our board of directors (“Board of Directors”), and therefore we may not pay any dividends in future periods, whether or not we generate sufficient cash to do so. In addition, pursuant to our credit facility with JPMorgan, we are prohibited from paying dividends without JPMorgan’s consent and in the event that we would be in violation of our covenant regarding our “fixed charge coverage ratio” after giving effect to any proposed dividend or are otherwise then in default of such agreement.

 

We must successfully maintain and/or upgrade our information technology systems.

 

We rely on various information technology systems, including our Enterprise Resource Planning system, to manage our operations, which subjects us to inherent costs and risks associated with maintaining, upgrading, replacing and changing these systems, including impairment of our information technology, potential disruption of our internal control systems, substantial capital expenditures, demands on management time and other risks of delays or difficulties in upgrading existing systems, transitioning to new systems or integrating new systems into our current systems.

 

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of cybersecurity and other system failures.

 

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our licensees and franchisees are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. Although we have not experienced any such cybersecurity or system failure, accident or breach to date, some of our licensees, including Target, have experienced such events. If such an event were to occur to our internal systems, it could result in a material disruption of our operations, substantial costs to rectify or correct the failure, if possible, loss of or damage to our data or applications, inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, or the incurrence of other material liabilities. If additional such events were to occur to our licensees’ or franchisees’ systems, our royalty revenues could be reduced or disrupted due to decreased sales of our branded products as a result of reputational damage or diversion of costs and other resources from selling products bearing our brands. Any of these events could severely harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

 

The trading price of our stock may be volatile and shares of our common stock are relatively illiquid.

 

The trading price of our common stock is likely to be subject to fluctuations as a result of various factors impacting our business, including (i) our financial results, (ii) announcements by us, our retail partners or our competitors, as applicable, regarding or affecting the retail environment either domestically or internationally, the reputation of our brands, our existing or new license agreements and brand representations or acquisitions, strategic alliances or other transactions, (iii) recruitment or departure of key personnel, (iv) changes in the estimates of our financial results or changes in the recommendations of any securities analysts that elect to follow our common stock, and (v) market conditions in the retail industry and the economy as a whole.

 

Further, as a result of our relatively small public float, our common stock may be less liquid than the common stock of companies with broader public ownership. Among other things, trading of a relatively small volume of our common shares may have a greater impact on the trading price for our common stock than would be the case if our public float was larger.

 

Our Certificate of Incorporation allows our Board of Directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

 

Our Certificate of Incorporation allows our Board of Directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, without action by our stockholders. Subject to the approval of JPMorgan pursuant to our credit facility, such shares of preferred stock may be issued on terms determined by our Board of Directors in its discretion, and may have rights, privileges and preferences superior to those of our common stock. For instance, such shares of preferred stock could have liquidation rights that are senior to the liquidation preference applicable to our common stock, could have superior voting or conversion rights, which could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common

39


 

Table of Contents 

stock, or could have other terms that negatively impact the voting control or other rights of our common stockholders. Additionally, the ownership interest of holders of our common stock would be diluted following the issuance of any shares of our preferred stock. Further, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method for discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company.

 

Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income tax returns could adversely affect our net income.

 

We are subject to income taxes in the United States, California and certain other state jurisdictions. Our effective income tax rates could in the future be adversely affected by changes in tax laws or interpretations of those tax laws, or by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We may come under audit by tax authorities, where these authorities may evaluate and disagree with our judgments regarding our tax provisions. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could materially affect our income tax provision, net income or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made. In addition, changes in tax rules may adversely affect our future reported financial results or the way we conduct our business.

 

We previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if repeated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management has previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of Fiscal 2013 and during the first three quarters of Fiscal 2014. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During Fiscal 2014, we developed and implemented a remediation plan that was designed to address these material weaknesses. While we believe our remedial measures have sufficiently addressed our previously identified material weaknesses, it is possible that additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future. In this case, our consolidated financial statements may be more likely to contain material misstatements, in which case we could be required to restate our financial results. Any such restatement of our financial results could lead to substantial additional costs for accounting and legal fees and litigation and could cause our stock price to decline.

 

In addition, while we believe we have strengthened our controls and procedures, our current controls and procedures may not be adequate in future periods to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls in accordance with applicable standards, we may be unable to conclude in future periods that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in ensuring the reliability of our financial reports. If we cannot produce reliable financial reports, our business and financial condition could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information and the market price of our common stock could decline significantly. Moreover, our reputation with lenders, retailers, investors, securities analysts and others may be adversely affected.

 

40


 

Table of Contents 

Compliance with changing securities laws, regulations and financial reporting standards will increase our costs and pose challenges for our management team.

 

Existing, changing and new laws, regulations, listing requirements and other standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure create uncertainty for public companies and significantly increase the costs and risks associated with operating as a publicly traded company in the United States. Our management team devotes significant time and financial resources to comply with existing and evolving standards for public companies. Further, the SEC has passed, promulgated and proposed new rules on a variety of subjects including, for example, with respect to the preparation and filing of financial statements. The existence of new and proposed laws and regulations relating to our financial reporting or that impose additional or more stringent compliance requirements on us could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers. In addition, in order to comply with existing and any new or additional requirements, we may need to add additional accounting staff, engage consultants or change our internal practices, standards and policies, which could significantly increase our costs and divert the time and attention of our management team away from revenue generating activities. Notwithstanding our efforts, it is possible in future periods that our financial and other public reporting may not be considered timely, accurate or complete. If reporting delays or errors actually occur, we could be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC, which could adversely affect our financial results or result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial information and other public disclosures, and could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41


 

Table of Contents 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

 

(a)

Exhibits

 

 

 

 

Exhibit
Number

 

Description of Exhibit

 

 

 

2.1(1)*

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 13, 2015, by and among Cherokee Inc., FFS Merger Sub LLC, FFS Holdings, LLC and Darin Kraetsch, solely in his capacity as the representative of the FFS Holdings, LLC equityholders.

 

 

 

10.1*

 

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

10.2*

 

Third Amendment to Term Note, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

10.3*

 

Second Amendment to Line of Credit Note, dated as of September 4, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

10.4*

 

First Amendment to Term Note B-1, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

10.5*

 

Term Note B-2, dated as of October 13, 2015, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

31.1*

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2*

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1**

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.2**

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

101*

 

The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015; (ii) Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended October 31, 2015; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended October 31, 2015 and November 1, 2014; and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as block of text.

 


*

Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

42


 

Table of Contents 

(1)Schedules and exhibits omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish a supplemental copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: December 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHEROKEE INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Henry Stupp

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Henry Stupp

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Jason Boling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jason Boling

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

43