Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM to .
Commission File No. 1-13179
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
31-0267900 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
5215 N. OConnor Blvd., Suite 2300, Irving, Texas
|
|
75039 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(972) 443-6500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of accelerated
filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
As of October 23, 2008, there were 56,540,605 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding.
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,153,592 |
|
|
$ |
919,247 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(748,668 |
) |
|
|
(605,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
404,924 |
|
|
|
313,583 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
(244,673 |
) |
|
|
(210,135 |
) |
Net earnings from affiliates |
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
4,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
163,640 |
|
|
|
108,229 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(13,105 |
) |
|
|
(15,332 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(8,690 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
143,997 |
|
|
|
95,040 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(26,948 |
) |
|
|
(31,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
117,049 |
|
|
$ |
63,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
117,049 |
|
|
$ |
63,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (expense) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
(105,060 |
) |
|
|
24,637 |
|
Pension and other postretirement effects, net of tax |
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
(2,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(101,494 |
) |
|
|
21,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
15,555 |
|
|
$ |
84,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
3,304,516 |
|
|
$ |
2,653,325 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(2,135,776 |
) |
|
|
(1,771,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,168,740 |
|
|
|
881,473 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
(728,702 |
) |
|
|
(623,253 |
) |
Net earnings from affiliates |
|
|
13,873 |
|
|
|
14,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
453,911 |
|
|
|
272,561 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(38,695 |
) |
|
|
(45,164 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
6,612 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
8,365 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
430,193 |
|
|
|
232,046 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(102,212 |
) |
|
|
(72,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
327,981 |
|
|
$ |
159,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
5.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
327,981 |
|
|
$ |
159,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (expense) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
(70,535 |
) |
|
|
44,769 |
|
Pension and other postretirement effects, net of tax |
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(68,052 |
) |
|
|
42,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
259,929 |
|
|
$ |
202,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
153,431 |
|
|
$ |
370,575 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
2,663 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $17,883
and $14,219, respectively |
|
|
912,042 |
|
|
|
666,733 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
859,289 |
|
|
|
680,199 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
86,666 |
|
|
|
105,221 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
92,665 |
|
|
|
71,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,104,612 |
|
|
|
1,896,771 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $602,429
and $575,280, respectively |
|
|
493,711 |
|
|
|
488,892 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
842,772 |
|
|
|
853,265 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
54,594 |
|
|
|
13,816 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
125,855 |
|
|
|
134,734 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
123,763 |
|
|
|
132,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,745,307 |
|
|
$ |
3,520,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
470,580 |
|
|
$ |
513,169 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
936,601 |
|
|
|
723,026 |
|
Debt due within one year |
|
|
21,695 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,436,782 |
|
|
|
1,250,180 |
|
Long-term debt due after one year |
|
|
547,191 |
|
|
|
550,795 |
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities |
|
|
351,368 |
|
|
|
426,469 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $1.25 par value |
|
|
73,474 |
|
|
|
73,394 |
|
Shares authorized 120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued 58,779 and 58,715, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
579,009 |
|
|
|
561,732 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,059,258 |
|
|
|
774,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,711,741 |
|
|
|
1,409,492 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost 2,977 and 2,406 shares, respectively |
|
|
(219,881 |
) |
|
|
(101,781 |
) |
Deferred compensation obligation |
|
|
7,542 |
|
|
|
6,650 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(89,436 |
) |
|
|
(21,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,409,966 |
|
|
|
1,292,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,745,307 |
|
|
$ |
3,520,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
327,981 |
|
|
$ |
159,874 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used) provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
54,414 |
|
|
|
49,029 |
|
Amortization of intangible and other assets |
|
|
7,519 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(6,200 |
) |
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(16,414 |
) |
|
|
(8,177 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
23,981 |
|
|
|
19,213 |
|
Net earnings from affiliates, net of dividends received |
|
|
(5,911 |
) |
|
|
(6,339 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(280,343 |
) |
|
|
(119,022 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
(190,292 |
) |
|
|
(147,729 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(26,763 |
) |
|
|
(34,831 |
) |
Other assets, net |
|
|
7,571 |
|
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(32,599 |
) |
|
|
(24,111 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and income taxes payable |
|
|
212,336 |
|
|
|
152,866 |
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities |
|
|
(46,034 |
) |
|
|
12,531 |
|
Net deferred taxes |
|
|
(31,914 |
) |
|
|
(10,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(4,803 |
) |
|
|
45,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(72,506 |
) |
|
|
(60,941 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
7,556 |
|
|
|
3,906 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities |
|
|
(62,806 |
) |
|
|
(57,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
16,414 |
|
|
|
8,177 |
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(4,261 |
) |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
Borrowings (payments) under other financing arrangements |
|
|
9,644 |
|
|
|
(4,486 |
) |
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
(134,997 |
) |
|
|
(44,798 |
) |
Payments of dividends |
|
|
(37,348 |
) |
|
|
(17,176 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option activity |
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
13,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(139,334 |
) |
|
|
11,638 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(10,201 |
) |
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(217,144 |
) |
|
|
4,107 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
370,575 |
|
|
|
67,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
153,431 |
|
|
$ |
71,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, and the
related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, are unaudited. In managements opinion, all
adjustments comprising normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such
condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (Quarterly Report) are
presented as permitted by Regulation S-X, as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act), and do not contain certain information included in our annual financial
statements and notes thereto. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements presented in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2007 Annual Report).
Accounting Policies
Significant accounting policies, for which no significant changes have occurred in the three
months ended September 30, 2008, are detailed in Note 1 of our 2007 Annual Report.
Accounting Developments
Pronouncements Implemented
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements; however, it does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which amends SFAS No. 157 by delaying the adoption of
SFAS No. 157 for our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those items
recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequently recurring basis, until
January 1, 2009. Our adoption of SFAS No. 157, as amended, did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS
No. 157 in 2009 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to have a material impact on
our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. It provides entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Our adoption of SFAS No. 159 had
no impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R)
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination recognizes
and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree and goodwill acquired, and expands disclosures about business combinations. SFAS No.
141(R) requires the acquirer to recognize changes in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax
assets in operations. These changes in deferred tax benefits were previously recognized through a
corresponding reduction to goodwill. With the exception of the provisions regarding acquired
deferred taxes and tax contingencies, which are applicable to all business combinations, SFAS No.
141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early
adoption is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
5
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and
reporting standards that require:
|
|
|
the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be
clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity,
but separate from the parents equity; |
|
|
|
|
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the
consolidated statement of income; |
|
|
|
|
changes in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling
financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted for consistently; |
|
|
|
|
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in
the former subsidiary to be initially measured at fair value; and |
|
|
|
|
entities to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. |
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. SFAS No. 160 shall be
applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure
requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We are still evaluating
the impact of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 enhances the current
disclosure framework in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, by requiring entities to provide detailed disclosures about how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect an entitys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We
do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in
conformity with GAAP. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following approval by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance
Contracts. SFAS No. 163 requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to
an event of default and clarifies how SFAS No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance
Enterprises, applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS No. 163 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years, and all interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2008, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprises
risk-management activities. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 163 to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 addresses
whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior
to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per
share under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2008, and all prior period earnings per share data presented should be
retrospectively adjusted. We are still evaluating the impact of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 on our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Although there are no other final pronouncements recently issued that we have not adopted and
that we expect to impact reported financial information or disclosures, accounting promulgating
bodies have a number of pending projects that may directly impact us. We continue to evaluate the
status of these projects, and as these projects become final, we will provide disclosures regarding
the likelihood and magnitude of their impact, if any.
6
2. Acquisition
Flowserve Pump Division acquired the remaining 50% interest in Niigata Worthington Company,
Ltd. (Niigata), a Japanese manufacturer of pumps and other rotating equipment, effective March 1,
2008, for $2.4 million in cash. The incremental interest acquired was accounted for as a step
acquisition and Niigatas results of operations have been consolidated since the date of
acquisition. Prior to this transaction, our 50% interest in Niigata was recorded using the equity
method of accounting. Upon consolidation as of the effective date of the acquisition of the
remaining 50% interest in Niigata, our balance sheet reflected an increase in cash and debt of $5.7
million and $5.8 million, respectively. The purchase price has been allocated on a preliminary
basis to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on initial estimates of fair values at
the date of the acquisition. We continue to evaluate the initial purchase price allocation, which
will be adjusted as additional information relative to the fair values of the assets and
liabilities becomes available. The initial estimate of the fair value of the net assets acquired
exceeded the cash paid and, accordingly, no goodwill was recognized. This acquisition was accounted
for as a bargain purchase, resulting in a gain of $3.4 million, which is included in other income,
net in the condensed consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
due to immateriality. No pro forma information has been provided due to immateriality.
3. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Our stock-based compensation includes stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based
awards, and is accounted for under SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Under this method, we
recorded stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
Options |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
Related income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
Options |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
Related income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Information related to stock options issued to officers, other employees and
directors under all plans described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in
our 2007 Annual Report is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
Value (in millions) |
|
Number of shares
under option: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
677,193 |
|
|
$ |
36.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(347,322 |
) |
|
|
33.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(5,633 |
) |
|
|
47.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
324,238 |
|
|
$ |
39.24 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
209,354 |
|
|
$ |
33.43 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or 2007. The total
fair value of stock options vested during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively. The total fair value of stock options vested during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $3.9 million and $5.4 million, respectively.
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model.
7
As of September 30, 2008, we had $0.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
outstanding unvested stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of less than 1 year. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $4.9 million and $5.6 million,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $27.0 million and $21.5 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards of restricted stock are valued at the closing market price of our
common stock on the date of grant. The unearned compensation is amortized to compensation expense
over the vesting period of the restricted stock. We have unearned compensation of $42.7 million
and $25.9 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, which is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of less than 2 years. These amounts will be
recognized into net earnings in prospective periods as the awards vest. The total fair value of
restricted shares and units vested during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$4.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The total fair value of restricted shares and units
vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $14.9 million and $10.9
million, respectively.
The following table summarizes information regarding restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Number of unvested shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding January 1, 2008 |
|
|
1,092,178 |
|
|
$ |
47.87 |
|
Granted |
|
|
425,073 |
|
|
|
101.96 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(376,612 |
) |
|
|
39.52 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(48,951 |
) |
|
|
66.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,091,688 |
|
|
$ |
70.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of September 30, 2008, includes 290,000 shares
granted with performance-based vesting provisions. Performance-based restricted stock vests upon
the achievement of performance targets, and is issuable in common shares. Our performance targets
are based on our average annual return on net assets over a rolling three-year period as compared
with the same measure for a defined peer group for the same period. Compensation expense is
recognized over a 36-month cliff vesting period based on the fair market value of our common stock
on the date of grant, as adjusted for anticipated forfeitures. During the performance period,
earned and unearned compensation expense is adjusted based on changes in the expected achievement
of the performance targets. Vesting provisions range from 0 to 580,000 shares based on pre-defined
performance targets. As of September 30, 2008, we estimate vesting of 580,000 shares based on
expected achievement of performance targets.
4. Derivative Instruments and Hedges
We enter into forward exchange contracts to manage our risks associated with transactions
denominated in currencies other than the local currency of the operation engaging in the
transaction. Our risk management and derivatives policy specifies the conditions under which we may
enter into derivative contracts. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had $713.5
million and $464.9 million, respectively, of aggregate notional amount in outstanding forward
exchange contracts with third parties. At September 30, 2008, the length of forward exchange
contracts currently in place ranged from 1 day to 27 months.
The fair market value adjustments of our forward exchange contracts are recognized directly in
our current period earnings. The fair value of these outstanding forward contracts at September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was a net liability of $16.5 million and a net asset of $6.6
million, respectively. Net realized and unrealized (losses) gains from the changes in the fair
value of these forward contracts of $(19.0) million and $3.5 million, for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $(0.4) million and $5.1 million, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in other (expense) income, net in the
condensed consolidated statements of income. The significant weakening of the Euro exchange rate
versus the United States (U.S.) Dollar during the three months ended September 30, 2008 is the
primary driver of the net loss from the changes in fair value of forward exchange contracts.
Also as part of our risk management program, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to
hedge exposure to floating interest rates on certain portions of our debt. At September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, we had $385.0 million and $395.0 million, respectively, of notional amount
in outstanding interest rate swaps with third parties. At September 30, 2008, the maximum
remaining length of any interest rate contract in place was approximately 27 months. The fair
value of the interest rate swap agreements was a net liability of $3.4 million and $4.1 million at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Unrealized net gains (losses) from the
changes in fair value of our interest rate swap agreements, net of reclassifications, of $1.0
million and $(2.0) million, net of tax, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $3.9 million and $(1.9) million, net of tax, for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in other comprehensive (loss) income.
8
We are exposed to risk from credit-related losses resulting from nonperformance by
counterparties to our financial instruments. We perform credit evaluations of our counterparties
under forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements and expect all counterparties to
meet their obligations. Our counterparties consist of a diversified group of financial
institutions with high credit ratings. We have not experienced credit losses from our
counterparties.
5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments, shown below, are presented at fair value. Fair value is defined as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is
based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where
observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models may be applied.
Beginning January 1, 2008, assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in our consolidated
balance sheet are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to
measure their fair values. Hierarchical levels, as defined by SFAS No. 157 and directly related to
the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and
liabilities, are as follows:
Level I Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities at the measurement date.
Level II Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level I) are either directly or
indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the
measurement date and for the duration of the instruments anticipated life.
Level III Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk
inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
An asset or a liabilitys categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of significant input to its valuation.
The fair values of our financial instruments at September 30, 2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
Derivative assets |
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred compensation
assets and other
investments |
|
|
15,718 |
|
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
18,705 |
|
|
$ |
7,404 |
|
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
$ |
8,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
23,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred compensation liabilities |
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
26,889 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,111 |
|
|
$ |
3,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Level III inputs are assets and liabilities related to investments and deferred
compensation arrangements. When quoted market prices are unavailable, varying valuation techniques
are used that reflect our best estimates of the assumptions used by market participants. Common
inputs in valuing these assets include securities trade prices, recently reported trades or broker
quotes. The value of all Level III assets was $8.3 million, $8.4 million and $9.9 million at
September 30, 2008, June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The value of all Level III
liabilities was $3.8 million, $4.0 million, and $4.4 million at September 30, 2008, June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively. Changes in these assets and liabilities and their related
impact on our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were immaterial.
9
6. Debt
Debt, including capital lease obligations, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan, interest rate of 5.22% in 2008 and 6.40% in 2007 |
|
$ |
551,118 |
|
|
$ |
555,379 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other |
|
|
17,768 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
568,886 |
|
|
|
557,976 |
|
Less amounts due within one year |
|
|
21,695 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt due after one year |
|
$ |
547,191 |
|
|
$ |
550,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facilities
Our credit facilities, as amended, are comprised of a $600.0 million term loan expiring on
August 10, 2012 and a $400.0 million committed revolving line of credit, which can be utilized to
provide up to $300.0 million in letters of credit, expiring on August 12, 2012. We hereinafter
refer to these credit facilities collectively as our Credit Facilities. At both September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, we had no amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit. We
had outstanding letters of credit of $95.2 million and $115.1 million at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively, which reduced borrowing capacity to $304.8 million and $284.9
million, respectively.
Borrowings under our Credit Facilities bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either
(1) the base rate (which is based on the greater of the prime rate most recently announced by the
administrative agent under our Credit Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2)
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin determined by reference to the
ratio of our total debt to consolidated Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization (EBITDA), which as of September 30, 2008 was 0.875% and 1.50% for borrowings under
our revolving line of credit and term loan, respectively.
We may prepay loans under our Credit Facilities at any time in whole or in part, without
premium or penalty. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we made scheduled
repayments under our Credit Facilities of $1.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively. We have
scheduled repayments under our Credit Facilities of $1.4 million due in the each of the next four
quarters.
European Letter of Credit Facility
On September 14, 2007, we entered into an unsecured European Letter of Credit Facility
(European LOC Facility) to issue letters of credit in an aggregate face amount not to exceed
150.0 million at any time. The initial commitment of 80.0 million was increased to
110.0 million, effective September 12, 2008. The aggregate commitment of the European LOC
Facility may be increased up to 150.0 million as may be agreed among the parties, and may be
decreased by us at our option without any premium, fee or penalty. The European LOC Facility is
used for contingent obligations solely in respect of surety and performance bonds, bank guarantees
and similar obligations. We had outstanding letters of credit drawn on the European LOC Facility
of 87.2 million ($122.8 million) and 35.0 million ($51.1 million) as of September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively. We pay certain fees for the letters of credit written against
the European LOC Facility based upon the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA. As of
September 30, 2008, the annual fees equaled 0.875% plus a fronting fee of 0.1%.
7. Factoring of Accounts Receivable
Through our European subsidiaries, we engaged in non-recourse factoring of certain accounts
receivable. The various agreements had different terms, including options for renewal and mutual
termination clauses. Our Credit Facilities, which are described in Note 6 above, limit factoring
volume to $75.0 million at any given point in time as defined by our Credit Facilities. During the
fourth quarter of 2007, we gave notice of our intent to terminate our major factoring agreements
during 2008. All factoring agreements were terminated by the end of the third quarter of 2008. In
the aggregate, the cash received from factored receivables outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 totaled $0 and $63.9 million, respectively, which represent the factors purchase
of $0 and $68.4 million of our receivables, respectively.
10
8. Inventories
Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in,
first-out method. Inventories, net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
254,571 |
|
|
$ |
221,265 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
675,491 |
|
|
|
499,656 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
271,235 |
|
|
|
246,832 |
|
Less: Progress billings |
|
|
(277,413 |
) |
|
|
(223,980 |
) |
Less: Excess and obsolete reserve |
|
|
(64,595 |
) |
|
|
(63,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
859,289 |
|
|
$ |
680,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Equity Method Investments
Summarized below is combined income statement information, based on the most recent financial
information, for investments in entities we account for using the equity method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
71,365 |
|
|
$ |
102,805 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
16,318 |
|
|
|
23,695 |
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,481 |
|
|
|
16,307 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3,101 |
) |
|
|
(5,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,380 |
|
|
$ |
10,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
259,187 |
|
|
$ |
281,207 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
70,020 |
|
|
|
71,041 |
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
49,788 |
|
|
|
46,874 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(14,776 |
) |
|
|
(14,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
35,012 |
|
|
$ |
32,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As discussed in Note 2, effective March 1, 2008, we purchased the
remaining 50% interest in Niigata, resulting in the full consolidation
of Niigata as of that date. Prior to this transaction, our 50%
interest was recorded using the equity method of accounting. As a
result, Niigatas income statement information includes only the first
two months of 2008. |
The provision for income taxes is based on the tax laws and rates in the countries in which
our investees operate. The tax jurisdictions vary not only by their nominal rates, but also by the
allowability of deductions, credits and other benefits. Our share of net income is reflected in
our condensed consolidated statements of income.
11
10. Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per weighted average share outstanding were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
117,049 |
|
|
$ |
63,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
56,726 |
|
|
|
56,421 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive securities |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
57,280 |
|
|
|
57,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
327,981 |
|
|
$ |
159,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
56,843 |
|
|
|
56,401 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive securities |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
57,489 |
|
|
|
57,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
5.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
For both the three and nine months ended both September 30, 2008 and 2007, we had no options
to purchase common stock that were excluded from the computations of potentially dilutive
securities. For both the three and nine months ended both September 30, 2008 and 2007, restricted
shares excluded from the computations were less than 0.1% of potentially dilutive securities.
11. Legal Matters and Contingencies
Asbestos-Related Claims
We are a defendant in a large number of pending lawsuits (which include, in many cases,
multiple claimants) that seek to recover damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure
to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or distributed by us in the past. While the
aggregate number of asbestos-related claims against us has declined in recent years, there can be
no assurance that this trend will continue. Asbestos-containing materials incorporated into any
such products was primarily encapsulated and used only as components of process equipment, and we
do not believe that any significant emission of asbestos-containing fibers occurred during the use
of this equipment. We believe that a high percentage of the claims are covered by applicable
insurance or indemnities from other companies.
Shareholder Litigation Appeal of Dismissed Class Action Case; Derivative Case Dismissals
In 2003, related lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas,
alleging that we violated federal securities laws. After these cases were consolidated, the lead
plaintiff amended its complaint several times. The lead plaintiffs last pleading was the fifth
consolidated amended complaint (the Complaint). The Complaint alleged that federal securities
violations occurred between February 6, 2001 and September 27, 2002 and named as defendants our
company, C. Scott Greer, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Renee J.
Hornbaker, our former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, and Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse
First Boston LLC, which served as underwriters for our two public stock offerings during the
relevant period. The Complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act,
and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the
Securities Act. The lead plaintiff sought unspecified compensatory damages, forfeiture by
Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of unspecified incentive-based or equity-based compensation and profits
from any stock sales, and recovery of costs. By orders dated November 13, 2007 and January 4, 2008,
the court denied the plaintiffs motion for class certification and granted summary judgment in
favor of the defendants on all claims. The plaintiffs have appealed both rulings to the federal
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. We will defend vigorously this appeal or any other effort by the
plaintiffs to overturn the courts denial of class certification or its entry of judgment in favor
of the defendants.
12
In 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in the 193rd
Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit originally named as defendants Mr. Greer,
Ms. Hornbaker, and former and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., William
C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O.
Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We were named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on the
purported misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the original
lawsuit in this action asserted claims against the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse
of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff
alleged that these purported violations of state law occurred between April 2000 and the date of
suit. The plaintiff sought on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, injunctive relief and/or
the imposition of a constructive trust on defendants assets, disgorgement of compensation, profits
or other benefits received by the defendants from us and recovery of attorneys fees and costs. We
filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case, and the court thereafter ordered the plaintiffs to
replead. On October 11, 2007, the plaintiffs filed an amended petition adding new claims against
the following additional defendants: Kathy Giddings, our former Vice-President and Corporate
Controller; Bernard G. Rethore, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Banc of America
Securities, LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC, which served as underwriters for our public
stock offerings in November 2001 and April 2002, and PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm. On April 2, 2008, the lawsuit was dismissed by the court without
prejudice at the plaintiffs request.
On March 14, 2006, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in
federal court in the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit named as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms.
Hornbaker, and former and current board members Mr. Coble, Mr. Haymaker, Mr. Lewis M. Kling, Mr.
Rusnack, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Rampacek, Mr. Sheehan, Ms. Harris, Mr. Rollans and Mr. Bartlett. We were
named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on certain of the purported misstatements alleged in
the above-described federal securities case, the plaintiff asserted claims against the defendants
for breaches of fiduciary duty that purportedly occurred between 2000 and 2004. The plaintiff
sought on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, disgorgement by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker
of salaries, bonuses, restricted stock and stock options and recovery of attorneys fees and costs.
Pursuant to a motion filed by us, the federal court dismissed that case on March 14, 2007,
primarily on the basis that the case was not properly filed in federal court. On or about March 27,
2007, the same plaintiff re-filed essentially the same lawsuit naming the same defendants in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York. We believed that this new lawsuit was improperly filed in
the Supreme Court of the State of New York and filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case. On
January 2, 2008, the court entered an order granting our motion to dismiss all claims and allowed
the plaintiffs an opportunity to replead. A notice of entry of the dismissal order was served on
the plaintiff on January 15, 2008. To date, the plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint
nor appealed the dismissal order.
United Nations Oil-for-Food Program
We have entered into and disclosed previously in our SEC filings the material details of
settlements with the SEC, the Department of Justice (the DOJ) and the Dutch authorities relating
to products that two of our foreign subsidiaries delivered to Iraq from 1996 through 2003 under the
United Nations Oil-for-Food Program. We believe that a confidential French investigation is still
ongoing, and, accordingly, we cannot predict the outcome of the French investigation at this time.
We currently do not expect to incur additional case resolution costs of a material amount in this
matter; however, if the French authorities take enforcement action against us regarding its
investigation, we may be subject to additional monetary and non-monetary penalties.
In addition to the settlements and governmental investigation referenced above, on June 27,
2008, the Republic of Iraq filed a civil suit in federal court in New York against 93 participants
in the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program, including Flowserve and our two foreign subsidiaries
that participated in the program. We intend to vigorously contest the suit, and we believe that we
have valid defenses to the claims asserted. However, we cannot predict the outcome of the suit at
the present time or whether the resolution of this suit will have a material adverse financial
impact on our company.
Export Compliance
In March 2006, we initiated a voluntary process to determine our compliance posture with
respect to U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations. Upon initial
investigation, it appeared that some product transactions and technology transfers were not handled
in full compliance with U.S. export control laws and regulations. As a result, in conjunction with
outside counsel, we have conducted a voluntary systematic process to further review, validate and
voluntarily disclose export violations discovered as part of this review process. We have completed
the global site visits scheduled as part of this voluntary disclosure
process, and we are nearing completion of our comprehensive disclosures to the appropriate
U.S. government regulatory authorities, although these disclosures may continue to be refined or
supplemented after our initial submittal. Based on our review of the data collected to date, during
the self-disclosure period of October 1, 2002 through October 1, 2007, a number of process pumps,
valves, mechanical seals and parts related thereto apparently were exported, in limited
circumstances, without required export or reexport licenses or without full compliance with all
applicable rules and regulations to a number of different countries throughout the world, including
certain sanctioned countries. The foregoing information is subject to change as our voluntary
reporting process is finalized and we review this submittal with applicable regulatory authorities.
13
We have taken a number of actions to increase the effectiveness of our global export
compliance program. This has included increasing the personnel and resources dedicated to export
compliance, providing additional export compliance tools to employees, improving our export
transaction screening processes and enhancing the content and frequency of our export compliance
training programs.
Any self-reported violations of U.S. export control laws and regulations may result in civil
or criminal penalties, including fines and/or other penalties. Although companies making voluntary
export violation disclosures, as we are currently doing, have historically received reduced
penalties and certain mitigating credits, legislation enacted on October 16, 2007 increased the
maximum civil penalty for certain export control violations (assessed on a per-shipment basis) to
the greater of $250,000 or twice the value of the transaction. While the Department of Commerce has
stated that companies, such as us, that had initiated voluntary self-disclosures prior to the
enactment of this legislation generally would not be subjected to enhanced penalties retroactively,
we are unable to determine at this time how other U.S. government agencies will apply this enhanced
penalty legislation. Accordingly, we are currently unable to definitively determine the full extent
or nature or total amount of penalties to which we might be subject as a result of any such
self-reported violations of the export control laws and regulations.
Other
We are currently involved as a potentially responsible party at four former public waste
disposal sites that may be subject to remediation under pending government procedures. The sites
are in various stages of evaluation by federal and state environmental authorities. The projected
cost of remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged fair share allocation, will remain
uncertain until all studies have been completed and the parties have either negotiated an amicable
resolution or the matter has been judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties
who have similarly been identified, and the identification and location of additional parties is
continuing under applicable federal or state law. Many of the other parties identified are
financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay their share of the remediation
costs. Based on our information about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the
environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it is likely that ultimate remediation
liability costs for each site will be apportioned among all liable parties, including site owners
and waste transporters, according to the volumes and/or toxicity of the wastes shown to have been
disposed of at the sites. We believe that our exposure for existing disposal sites will be less
than $100,000.
In addition to the above public disposal sites, we received a Clean Up Notice on September 17,
2007 with respect to a site in Australia. The site was used for disposal of spent foundry sand. A
risk assessment of the site is currently underway, but it will be several months before the
assessment is completed. We currently believe that additional remediation costs at the site will
not be material.
We are also a defendant in several other lawsuits, including product liability claims, that
are insured, subject to the applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of business, and
we are also involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, none of which,
either individually or in the aggregate, we believe to be material to our business, operations or
overall financial condition. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and resolutions or
dispositions of claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have an adverse impact on our
operating results or cash flows for the reporting period in which any such resolution or
disposition occurs.
Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be quantified with absolute
certainty except as otherwise indicated above, we have established reserves covering exposures
relating to contingencies, to the extent believed to be reasonably estimable and probable based on
past experience and available facts. While additional exposures beyond these reserves could exist,
they currently cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate these potential contingent loss
exposures and, if they develop, recognize expense as soon as such losses become probable and can be
reasonably estimated.
14
12. Retirement and Postretirement Benefits
Components of the net periodic cost for retirement and postretirement benefits for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plans |
|
|
Defined Benefit Plans |
|
|
Medical Benefits |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Amortization of prior service benefit |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost recognized |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of the net periodic cost for retirement and postretirement benefits for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plans |
|
|
Defined Benefit Plans |
|
|
Medical Benefits |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Amortization of prior service benefit |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost recognized |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See additional discussion of our retirement and postretirement benefits in Note 12 to our
consolidated financial statements included in our 2007 Annual Report.
13. Shareholders Equity
On February 26, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in our quarterly cash
dividend to $0.25 per share from $0.15 per share, effective for the first quarter of 2008.
Generally, our dividend date-of-record is in the last month of the quarter, and the dividend is
paid the following month.
On February 26, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $300.0
million of our outstanding common stock over an unspecified time period. The program commenced in
the second quarter of 2008, and we repurchased 0.8 million shares for $100.0 million and
1.1 million shares for $135.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
14. Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we earned $144.0 million before taxes and
provided for income taxes of $26.9 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 18.7%. The
effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three months ended September
30, 2008 primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, as well as a net tax benefit of
$12.4 million arising from our permanent reinvestment in foreign subsidiaries, the release of
certain reserves related to the closure of the statute of limitations in various jurisdictions and
repatriation of cash. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we earned $430.2 million before
taxes and provided for income taxes of $102.2 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 23.8%.
The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to the net impact of foreign
operations, a favorable tax ruling in Luxembourg, our permanent reinvestment in foreign
subsidiaries, the release of certain reserves related to the closure of the statute of limitations
in various jurisdictions and repatriation of cash.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, we earned $95.0 million before taxes and
provided for income taxes of $32.0 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 33.7%. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, we earned $232.0 million before taxes and provided for income
taxes of $72.2 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 31.1%. The effective tax rate varied
from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, changes in tax law, changes in valuation
allowances and net favorable results from various tax audits.
15
In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, which addresses the
determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be
recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN No. 48, we may recognize the tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained
on examination by the taxing authorities. The determination is based on the technical merits of the
position and presumes that each uncertain tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing
authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information.
The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires
increased disclosures. We adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 on January 1, 2007. Interest and
penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in income tax expense.
As of September 30, 2008, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits has decreased by $11.8
million as compared with December 31, 2007, primarily due to the closure of the statute of
limitations in various jurisdictions, including the tax years 2002 through 2004 in the U.S. With
limited exception, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax audits for
years through 2004 or non-U.S. income tax audits for years through 2002. We are currently under
examination for various years in the U.S., Italy, Canada, Venezuela and Argentina.
It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months the effective tax rate will be
impacted by the resolution of some or all of the matters audited by various taxing authorities. It
is also reasonably possible that we will have the statute of limitations close in various taxing
jurisdictions within the next 12 months. As such, we estimate we could record a reduction in our
tax expense of up to approximately $15 million within the next 12 months.
15. Segment Information
We are principally engaged in the worldwide design, manufacture, distribution and service of
industrial flow management equipment. We provide pumps, valves and mechanical seals primarily for
the oil and gas, chemical, power, water and other industries requiring flow management products.
We have the following three divisions, each of which constitutes a business segment:
|
|
|
Flowserve Pump Division (FPD); |
|
|
|
|
Flow Control Division (FCD); and |
|
|
|
|
Flow Solutions Division (FSD). |
Each division manufactures different products and is defined by the type of products and
services provided. Each division has a President, who reports directly to our Chief Executive
Officer, and a Division Vice President Finance, who reports directly to our Chief Accounting
Officer. For decision-making purposes, our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior
executive management use financial information generated and reported at the division level. Our
corporate headquarters does not constitute a separate division or business segment.
We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on each segments operating
income. Amounts classified as All Other include corporate headquarters costs and other minor
entities that do not constitute separate segments. Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at
cost plus a profit margin, with the margin on such sales eliminated in consolidation.
16
The following is a summary of the financial information of the reportable segments reconciled
to the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Pump |
|
|
Control |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
638,767 |
|
|
$ |
363,417 |
|
|
$ |
149,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,152,088 |
|
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
|
$ |
1,153,592 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
20,966 |
|
|
|
23,142 |
|
|
|
(23,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
99,334 |
|
|
|
60,963 |
|
|
|
32,708 |
|
|
|
193,005 |
|
|
|
(29,365 |
) |
|
|
163,640 |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Pump |
|
|
Control |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
496,171 |
|
|
$ |
293,352 |
|
|
$ |
127,671 |
|
|
$ |
917,194 |
|
|
$ |
2,053 |
|
|
$ |
919,247 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
13,035 |
|
|
|
15,002 |
|
|
|
(15,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
68,895 |
|
|
|
41,101 |
|
|
|
30,413 |
|
|
|
140,409 |
|
|
|
(32,180 |
) |
|
|
108,229 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Pump |
|
|
Control |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
1,831,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,811 |
|
|
$ |
437,623 |
|
|
$ |
3,300,370 |
|
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,304,516 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
4,931 |
|
|
|
57,871 |
|
|
|
64,366 |
|
|
|
(64,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
281,153 |
|
|
|
166,920 |
|
|
|
96,562 |
|
|
|
544,635 |
|
|
|
(90,724 |
) |
|
|
453,911 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Flow |
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Pump |
|
|
Control |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Sales to external customers |
|
$ |
1,439,006 |
|
|
$ |
844,071 |
|
|
$ |
365,915 |
|
|
$ |
2,648,992 |
|
|
$ |
4,333 |
|
|
$ |
2,653,325 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
4,652 |
|
|
|
38,458 |
|
|
|
44,404 |
|
|
|
(44,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
175,871 |
|
|
|
118,583 |
|
|
|
81,417 |
|
|
|
375,871 |
|
|
|
(103,310 |
) |
|
|
272,561 |
|
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements, and
notes thereto, and the other financial data included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The
following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements, and notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included in our 2007 Annual Report.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We are an established industry leader with a strong product portfolio of pumps, valves, seals,
automation and aftermarket services in support of global infrastructure industries, including oil
and gas, chemical, power generation and water management, as well as general industrial markets
where our products add value. Our products are integral to the movement, control and protection of
the flow of materials in our customers critical processes. Our business model is influenced by
the capital spending of these industries for the placement of new products into service and
aftermarket services for existing operations. The worldwide installed base of our products is an
important source of aftermarket revenue, where products are expected to ensure the maximum
operating time of many key industrial processes. The aftermarket business includes parts, service
solutions, product life cycle solutions and other value added services, and is generally a higher
margin business and a key component to our profitable growth.
We experienced favorable conditions in 2007 in our key industries, which have continued
through the first nine months of 2008. The demand growth from developing markets and the
optimization and refurbishment needs from mature markets have increased investments in oil and gas,
power and water infrastructure. Along with the growth in industrialization in developing markets,
this has increased the demand for primary chemicals, which has driven investment growth in chemical
manufacturing facilities, particularly in Asia and the Middle East. In the oil and gas industry,
advancements in recovery and processing technologies have created opportunities in heavy oil
processing, deep water production and natural gas liquefaction and regasification, where our
products are well positioned. In the power industry, we provide products and services for all
forms of power generation, and we are one of a limited number of manufacturers with existing
N-stamp certifications required to support the nuclear power industry. The global demand growth
over the past several years has provided us the opportunity to increase our installed base of new
products and drive recurring aftermarket business. We continue to execute on our strategy to
increase our presence in all regions of the global market to capture aftermarket business through
our installed base, as well as to secure new capital projects and process plant expansions.
Although we have experienced strong demand for our products and services in recent periods, we face
challenges affecting many companies in our industry with a significant multinational presence, such
as economic, political and other risks.
We currently employ approximately 16,000 employees in more than 55 countries who are focused
on executing our key strategic objectives across the globe. We continue to build on our geographic
breadth through the implementation of additional Quick Response Centers (QRCs) with the goal to
be positioned as near to our customers as possible for service and support in order to capture this
important aftermarket business. Along with ensuring that we have the local capability to sell,
install and service our equipment in remote regions, it becomes equally imperative to continuously
improve our global operations. Our global supply chain capability is being expanded to meet global
customer demands and ensure the quality and timely delivery of our products. Significant efforts
are underway to reduce the supply base and drive processes across our divisions to find areas of
synergy and cost reduction. We continue to focus on improving on-time delivery
and quality, while reducing warranty costs as a percentage of sales across our global operations
through a focused Continuous Improvement Process (CIP) initiative. The goal of the CIP and lean
manufacturing initiatives are to maximize service fulfillment to customers through on-time
delivery, reduced cycle time and quality at the highest internal productivity. These programs are
a key factor in our margin expansion plans.
Recent disruptions in global financial markets and banking systems are making credit and
capital markets more difficult for companies to access, and are generally driving up the costs of
newly raised debt. We have assessed the implications of these factors on our current business and
determined that these financial market disruptions have not had a significant impact on our
financial position, results of operations or liquidity as of September 30, 2008. However,
continuing volatility in the credit and capital markets could potentially impair our and our
customers ability to access these markets and increase associated costs, and there can be no
assurance that we will not be materially affected by these financial market disruptions as economic
events and circumstances continue to evolve. We have no scheduled loans due to mature in 2008, and
only 1% of our term loan is due to mature in each of 2009 and 2010, and after the effects of $385.0
million of notional interest rate swaps, approximately 70% of our term debt was at fixed rates at
September 30, 2008. Our revolving line of credit and our European LOC Facility are committed and
are held by a diversified group of financial institutions with high credit ratings, principally
Bank of America. Further, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our cash
by $16.7 million to $153.4 million, after taking into account $100.0 million of share repurchases,
$34.8 million in capital expenditures and $14.4 million in quarterly dividend payments. We monitor
the depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents on a regular basis, and we
believe that we have placed our deposits with creditworthy financial institutions.
18
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Our operating income benefitted from strong international currencies in 2007 and through the
first nine months of 2008. However, recent strength of the U.S. Dollar could reduce the benefit or
result in losses in operating income related to currency in future periods.
As discussed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report, FPD acquired the remaining 50% interest in Niigata, a Japanese manufacturer of
pumps and other rotating equipment, effective March 1, 2008, for $2.4 million in cash. The
incremental interest acquired was accounted for as a step acquisition, and Niigatas results of
operations have been consolidated since the date of acquisition. Prior to this transaction, our
50% interest in Niigata was recorded using the equity method of accounting. No pro forma
information has been provided due to immateriality.
Consolidated Results
Bookings, Sales and Backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
1,373.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,061.0 |
|
Sales |
|
|
1,153.6 |
|
|
|
919.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
4,113.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,203.1 |
|
Sales |
|
|
3,304.5 |
|
|
|
2,653.3 |
|
We define a booking as the receipt of a customer order that contractually engages us to
perform activities on behalf of our customer with regard to manufacture, service or support.
Bookings for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $312.5 million, or 29.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$53 million. The increase is attributable to strength in the oil and gas and general industries,
especially in FPD, primarily in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMA), as well as continued
strength in the power and chemical industries, especially in FCD, and $22.2 million in bookings
provided by Niigata.
Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $910.3 million, or 28.4%,
as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$257 million. The increase is attributable to strength in the chemical and power industries across
all of our divisions and strength in the oil and gas and general industries in FPD and FCD, as well
as $47.7 million in bookings provided by Niigata.
Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $234.4 million, or 25.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately $47
million. The increase is attributable to strength in the oil and gas market, especially in FPD,
primarily in EMA and Asia Pacific, including $18.0 million in sales provided by Niigata, and
strength across the power and chemical markets in FCD.
Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $651.2 million, or 24.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$202 million. The increase is attributable to strength in the oil and gas market in FPD, primarily
in EMA and Asia Pacific, including $56.2 million in sales provided by Niigata, and growth in the
power and chemical markets, especially in FCD.
Net sales to international customers, including export sales from the U.S., were approximately
72% and 69% of consolidated sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, compared with approximately 66% and 65% for the same periods in 2007, respectively.
Backlog represents the aggregate value of uncompleted customer orders. Backlog of $3,076.0
million at September 30, 2008 increased by $799.4 million, or 35.1%, as compared with December 31,
2007. Currency effects provided a decrease of approximately $95 million. The net increase reflects
growth in orders for large engineered products, which naturally have longer lead times, and $92.5
million attributable to the acquisition of Niigata.
19
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
404.9 |
|
|
$ |
313.6 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
1,168.7 |
|
|
$ |
881.5 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $91.3 million, or
29.1%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit margin for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 of 35.1% increased from 34.1% for the same period in 2007. The increase is
primarily attributable to FCD, whose gross profit margin increased due primarily to improved
pricing, as well as FPD, whose gross profit margin increased due to original equipment pricing
implemented in 2007 and reduced warranty costs as a percentage of sales. The improvement is also
attributable to CIP initiatives and increased sales, which favorably impacts our absorption of
fixed manufacturing costs. These improvements were slightly offset by a sales shift toward
original equipment during the period for each of our divisions. While both original equipment and
aftermarket sales increased, original equipment growth exceeded that of aftermarket growth during
the period. As a result, original equipment sales increased to approximately 67% of total sales as
compared with approximately 63% of total sales for the same period in 2007. Original equipment
generally carries a lower margin than aftermarket. The impact of metal price increases and
transportation fuel surcharges have been minimized through supply chain initiatives.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $287.2 million, or
32.6%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 of 35.4% increased from 33.2% for the same period in 2007. The increase is
primarily attributable to FPD, whose gross profit margin increased due primarily to improved
original equipment pricing implemented in 2007, CIP initiatives and reduced warranty costs as a
percentage of sales. Additionally, gross profit margin was favorably impacted by specialty pumps,
which had a higher margin, produced during the second and third quarters of 2008. These
improvements were slightly offset by a sales shift toward original equipment during the period for
each of our divisions. While both original equipment and aftermarket sales increased, original
equipment growth exceeded that of aftermarket growth during the period. As a result, original
equipment sales increased to approximately 65% of total sales as compared with approximately 63% of
total sales for the same period in 2007. Original equipment generally carries a lower margin than
aftermarket.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense (SG&A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
SG&A expense |
|
$ |
244.7 |
|
|
$ |
210.1 |
|
SG&A expense as a percentage of sales |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
SG&A expense |
|
$ |
728.7 |
|
|
$ |
623.3 |
|
SG&A expense as a percentage of sales |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
SG&A for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $34.6 million, or 16.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. Currency effects yielded an increase of approximately $8
million. The increase in SG&A is primarily attributable to an $18.4 million increase in other
employees related costs due to annual and long-term incentive compensation plans, including equity
compensation, arising from improved performance and a higher stock price as of the date of grant
and annual merit increases. The increase is also attributable to an $18.3 million increase in
selling and marketing-related expenses in support of increased bookings and sales and overall
business growth, partially offset by an $11.2 million decrease in legal fees and expenses due to
expenses incurred in 2007 that did not recur. SG&A as a percentage of sales for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 of 21.2% improved 170 basis points as compared with the same period in
2007. The improvement is primarily attributable to leverage from higher sales, as well as ongoing
efforts to contain costs.
20
SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $105.4 million, or 16.9%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. Currency effects yielded an increase of approximately $34
million. The increase in SG&A is primarily attributable to a $59.4 million increase in selling and
marketing-related expenses in support of increased bookings and sales and overall business growth.
The increase is also attributable to a $50.6 million increase in other employees related costs due
to annual and long-term incentive compensation plans, including equity compensation, arising from
improved performance and a higher stock price as of the date of grant and annual merit increases,
partially offset by a $19.8 million decrease in legal fees and expenses due to expenses incurred in
2007 that did not recur. SG&A as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 of 22.1% improved 140 basis points as compared with the same period in 2007. The improvement
is primarily attributable to leverage from higher sales, as well as ongoing efforts to contain
costs.
Net Earnings from Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net earnings from affiliates |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net earnings from affiliates |
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
Net earnings from affiliates for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $1.4
million, or 29.2%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Net earnings from affiliates
represent our joint venture interests in Asia Pacific and the Middle East. The decrease in
earnings is primarily attributable to a slight reduction in income in FSD and FCD joint ventures in
India, as well as the impact of the consolidation of Niigata in the first quarter of 2008 when we
purchased the remaining 50% interest.
Net earnings from affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $0.4
million, or 2.8%, as compared with the same period in 2007. The decrease in earnings is primarily
attributable to the impact of the consolidation of Niigata in the first quarter of 2008 when we
purchased the remaining 50% interest.
As discussed above, effective March 1, 2008, we purchased the remaining 50% interest in
Niigata, resulting in the full consolidation of Niigata as of that date. Prior to this
transaction, our 50% interest was recorded using the equity method of accounting, resulting in only
two months of equity earnings from Niigata included herein.
Operating Income and Operating Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
163.6 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
453.9 |
|
|
$ |
272.6 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $55.4 million, or
51.2%, as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $8 million. The increase is primarily a result of the $91.3 million increase in
gross profit, partially offset by the $34.6 million increase in SG&A, as discussed above. Operating
margin of 14.2% increased 240 basis points, due to improved gross profit margin and the decline in
SG&A as a percentage of sales, as discussed above.
Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $181.3 million, or
66.5%, as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $39 million. The increase is primarily a result of the $287.2 million increase in
gross profit, partially offset by the $105.4 million increase in SG&A, as discussed above.
Operating margin of 13.7% increased 340 basis points, due to improved gross profit margin and the
decline in SG&A as a percentage of sales, as discussed above.
21
Interest Expense and Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(13.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(15.3 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(38.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(45.2 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $2.2
million and $6.5 million, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2007. The decreases
are primarily attributable to lower average outstanding debt and decreased interest rates.
Approximately 70% of our term debt was at fixed rates at September 30, 2008, including the effects
of $385.0 million of notional interest rate swaps.
Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $1.3
million and $4.1 million, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2007. The increases
are primarily attributable to a higher average cash balance.
Other (Expense) Income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Other (expense) income, net for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $9.9
million to an expense of $8.7 million as compared with 2007, primarily due to a $22.5 million
increase in losses on forward exchange contracts due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar
exchange rate versus our significant currencies, partially offset by a $10.4 million increase in
transaction gains arising from transactions in currencies other than our sites functional
currencies.
Other income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $6.2 million to
$8.4 million as compared with 2007, primarily due to a $3.4 million gain on the bargain purchase of
the remaining 50% interest in Niigata, as discussed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this Quarterly Report, as well as other individually immaterial
items.
Tax Expense and Tax Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Provision for income tax |
|
$ |
26.9 |
|
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Provision for income tax |
|
$ |
102.2 |
|
|
$ |
72.2 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
Our effective tax rate of 18.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased from
33.7% for the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily due to the net impact of foreign
operations, as well as a net tax benefit of $12.4 million in the third quarter of 2008 arising from
our permanent reinvestment in foreign subsidiaries, the release of certain reserves related to the
closure of the statute of limitations in various jurisdictions and repatriation of cash.
22
Our effective tax rate of 23.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased from
31.1% for the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily due to the net impact of foreign
operations, a favorable tax ruling in Luxembourg, our permanent reinvestment in foreign
subsidiaries, the release of certain reserves related to the closure of the statute of limitations
in various jurisdictions and repatriation of cash.
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(101.5 |
) |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(68.1 |
) |
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, decreased by $123.3 million and $110.4 million, as compared with the same period in
2007. The decreases primarily relate to currency translation adjustments, which reflect the
strengthening of the U.S. Dollar exchange rate versus our significant currencies for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, and the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar exchange rate versus the
Euro for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared with the weakening of the U.S.
Dollar exchange rate for the same periods in 2007.
Business Segments
We conduct our business through three business segments that represent our major product
types:
|
|
|
FPD for engineered pumps, industrial pumps and related services; |
|
|
|
|
FCD for industrial valves, manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, valve
actuators and related services; and |
|
|
|
|
FSD for precision mechanical seals and related services. |
We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on each segments operating
income. See Note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly
Report for further discussion of our segments. The key operating results for our three business
segments, FPD, FCD and FSD, are discussed below.
Flowserve Pump Division
Through FPD, we design, manufacture, distribute and service engineered and industrial pumps
and pump systems and submersible motors (collectively referred to as original equipment). FPD
also manufactures replacement parts and related equipment, and provides a full array of support
services (collectively referred to as aftermarket). FPD has 29 manufacturing facilities
worldwide, eight of which are located in North America, 11 in Europe, four in Latin America and six
in Asia. FPD also has 76 service centers, including those co-located in a manufacturing facility,
in 28 countries.
As discussed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report, FPD acquired the remaining 50% interest in Niigata, a Japanese manufacturer of
pumps and other rotating equipment, effective March 1, 2008, for $2.4 million in cash. The
incremental interest acquired was accounted for as a step acquisition, and Niigatas results of
operations have been consolidated since the date of acquisition. Prior to this transaction, our
50% interest in Niigata was recorded using the equity method of accounting.
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
858.3 |
|
|
$ |
594.9 |
|
Sales |
|
|
639.2 |
|
|
|
496.4 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
194.8 |
|
|
|
147.9 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
2,484.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,869.3 |
|
Sales |
|
|
1,833.5 |
|
|
|
1,440.3 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
575.5 |
|
|
|
408.9 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
281.2 |
|
|
|
175.9 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Bookings for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $263.4 million, or 44.3%,
as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$32 million. Bookings for original equipment increased approximately 60% and represented
approximately 83% of the total bookings increase. Aftermarket bookings increased approximately 17%.
Original equipment bookings strength was driven by the oil and gas, power and general industries.
Niigata provided an increase of $22.2 million in bookings. The increase in oil and gas was
primarily driven by a significant project of approximately $85 million to supply a variety of
pumps to build the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline. These pumps will largely be supplied from
our European operations and are scheduled to ship in 2010.
Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $615.6 million, or 32.9%,
as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$161 million. Bookings for original equipment increased approximately 40% and represented
approximately 77% of the total bookings increase. Aftermarket bookings increased approximately 20%.
Original equipment bookings strength was driven by the oil and gas, power, water and general
industries. The increase in oil and gas was primarily driven by the ADCOP project discussed above.
EMA and North America bookings increased $390.9 million (including currency benefits of
approximately $133 million) and $113.7 million, respectively. Niigata provided an increase of
$47.7 million in bookings.
Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $142.8 million, or 28.8%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$27 million. Both original equipment and aftermarket sales show continued strength, increasing
approximately 42% and 11%, respectively, compared with the same period in 2007. The primary driver
of the improvement in original equipment sales was the continued strength of the oil and gas and
power industries over the past year and the delivery of the related backlog. The increase is also
attributable to increased throughput resulting from capacity expansion, price increases implemented
in 2007 and sales of $18.0 million provided by Niigata.
Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $393.2 million, or 27.3%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$119 million. Both original equipment and aftermarket sales showed continued strength, increasing
approximately 29% and 24%, respectively, as compared with the same period in 2007, driven primarily
by the continued strength of the oil and gas industry. The increase is also attributable to
increased throughput resulting from capacity expansion, price increases implemented in 2007 and
sales of $56.2 million provided by Niigata.
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $46.9 million, or
31.7%, as compared with the same period in 2007, and includes gross profit attributable to Niigata
of $5.6 million. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2008 of 30.5%
increased from 29.8% for the same period in 2007. The increase is attributable to improved original
equipment pricing implemented in 2007, increased throughput and increased sales, which favorably
impacts our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and reduced warranty costs as a percentage of
sales, as well as the impact of CIP initiatives. Additionally, gross
profit margin was favorably impacted by specialty pumps, which had a higher margin, produced
during the period. These improvements were slightly offset by a sales shift toward original
equipment during the period. While both original equipment and aftermarket sales increased,
original equipment growth exceeded that of aftermarket growth during the period. As a result,
original equipment sales increased to approximately 64% of total sales as compared with
approximately 58% of total sales for the same period in 2007. Original equipment generally carries
a lower margin than aftermarket.
24
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $166.6 million, or
40.7%, as compared with the same period in 2007, and includes gross profit attributable to Niigata
of $14.1 million. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of 31.4%
increased from 28.4% for the same period in 2007. The increase is attributable to improved original
equipment pricing implemented in 2007, increased throughput and increased sales, which favorably
impacts our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and reduced warranty costs as a percentage of
sales, as well as the impact of CIP initiatives. Additionally, gross profit margin was favorably
impacted by specialty pumps, which had a higher margin, produced during the second and third
quarters of 2008. These improvements were slightly offset by a sales shift toward original
equipment during the period. While both original equipment and aftermarket sales increased,
original equipment growth exceeded that of aftermarket growth during the period. As a result,
original equipment sales increased to approximately 60% of total sales as compared with
approximately 59% of total sales for the same period in 2007. Original equipment generally carries
a lower margin than aftermarket.
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $30.4 million, or
44.1%, as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $4 million. The increase was due primarily to increased gross profit of $46.9
million, partially offset by a $15.9 million increase in SG&A (including negative currency effects
of approximately $4 million) primarily related to increased selling and marketing-related expenses
in support of increased bookings and sales, $2.8 million of SG&A incurred by Niigata and related
integration costs and increased incentive compensation arising from improved performance.
Operating margin increased 160 basis points as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit
margin, as discussed above, contributed 70 basis points while SG&A as a percentage of sales
improved 110 basis points, resulting primarily from increased sales.
Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $105.3 million, or
59.9%, as compared with the same period in 2007. The increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $21 million. The increase was due primarily to increased gross profit of $166.6
million, partially offset by a $59.3 million increase in SG&A (including negative currency effects
of approximately $16 million) primarily related to increased selling and marketing-related expenses
in support of increased bookings and sales and $7.1 million of SG&A incurred by Niigata and related
integration costs and increased incentive compensation arising from improved performance.
Operating margin increased 310 basis points as compared with the same period in 2007 due primarily
to the increase in gross profit margin of 300 basis points.
Backlog of $2,438.9 million at September 30, 2008 increased by $663.6 million, or 37.4%, as
compared with December 31, 2007. Currency effects provided a decrease of approximately $80
million. Backlog growth is a result of an extended period of bookings growth, primarily in
original equipment, combined with longer supplier and customer lead times, growth in the size of
projects and $92.5 million related to the acquisition of Niigata.
Flow Control Division
Our second largest business segment is FCD, which designs, manufactures and distributes a
broad portfolio of engineered and industrial valves, control valves, actuators, controls and
related services. FCD leverages its experience and application know-how by offering a complete menu
of engineered services to complement its expansive product portfolio. FCD has a total of 43
manufacturing and service facilities in 19 countries around the world, with only five of its 19
manufacturing operations located in the U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
367.6 |
|
|
$ |
324.0 |
|
Sales |
|
|
365.2 |
|
|
|
295.0 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
|
101.1 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
1,187.0 |
|
|
$ |
948.1 |
|
Sales |
|
|
1,035.7 |
|
|
|
848.7 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
371.6 |
|
|
|
295.6 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
34.8 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
166.9 |
|
|
|
118.6 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Bookings for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $43.6 million, or 13.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$14 million. The growth in bookings is primarily attributable to continued strength in EMA and
Asia Pacific, which increased approximately $39 million and approximately $6 million, respectively,
driven by the chemical and power markets.
Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $238.9 million, or 25.2%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$71 million. The growth in bookings is primarily attributable to EMA and Asia Pacific, which
increased by approximately $103 million and approximately $79 million, respectively. Additionally,
North and Latin America increased approximately $57 million. Key growth markets include chemical
and nuclear power.
Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $70.2 million, or 23.8%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$15 million. Sales in EMA increased approximately $31 million and were driven by power and chemical
markets. Asia Pacific increased approximately $25 million primarily due to projects in coal
gasification and chemical markets. Sales in Latin America increased approximately $10 million,
which was driven by strength in the paper markets.
Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $187.0 million, or 22.0%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$60 million. Sales across our markets in EMA demonstrated solid growth of approximately $82
million. Sales in the power markets in North America demonstrated solid growth of approximately
$25 million. Asia Pacific, which increased approximately $52 million, continues to show
substantial sales growth in the chemical market, especially in China. Oil and gas market sales
reflect steady increases in all regions, especially in EMA. Latin America sales increased due
primarily to growth in the paper markets.
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $31.4 million, or
31.1%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit margin for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 of 36.3% increased from 34.3% for the same period in 2007. This improvement
reflects the implementation of price increases and higher sales volumes, which favorably impact our
absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, as well as the implementation of various CIP and supply
chain initiatives, which continue to gain traction. These gains were partially offset by the
inflation in our materials costs.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $76.0 million, or
25.7%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 of 35.9% increased from 34.8% for the same period in 2007. This increase
reflects higher sales levels, which favorably impacts our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs.
Price increases, CIP, investment in new products and increased absorption continue to drive margin
improvement and offset the inflationary
impact of our other raw materials. The impact of metal price increases and transportation
fuel surcharges have been minimized through supply chain initiatives.
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $19.9 million, or
48.4%, as compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $2 million. The increase is principally attributable to the $31.4 million
improvement in gross profit, offset in part by higher SG&A, which increased $11.1 million
(including negative currency effects of approximately $2 million) as compared with the same period
in 2007. Increased SG&A is primarily due to $5.9 million in higher selling costs. SG&A as a
percentage of sales improved 100 basis points, resulting primarily from increased sales.
Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $48.3 million, or
40.7%, as compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $11 million. The increase is principally attributable to the $76.0 million
improvement in gross profit, offset in part by higher SG&A, which increased $29.7 million
(including negative currency effects of approximately $11 million) as compared with the same period
in 2007. Increased SG&A is primarily due to $17.8 million in higher selling costs and $4.0 million
in increased research and development costs. Partially offsetting these cost increases is the
reversal of a net $2.3 million accrual due to a contract settlement and a $1.9 million increase in
net earnings from affiliates generated by our joint venture in India, which is driven by growth in
the oil and gas markets in the Middle East. SG&A as a percentage of sales improved 100 basis
points, resulting primarily from increased sales, as well as the reversal of the accrual for the
settlement.
26
Backlog of $542.5 million at September 30, 2008 increased by $127.8 million, or 30.8%, as
compared with December 31, 2007. Currency effects provided a decrease of approximately $12
million. The increase in backlog is primarily attributable to bookings growth and larger project
business with longer lead times.
Flow Solutions Division
Through FSD, we engineer, manufacture and sell mechanical seals, auxiliary systems and parts,
and provide related services, principally to process industries and general industrial markets,
with similar products sold internally in support of FPD. FSD has nine manufacturing operations,
four of which are located in the U.S. FSD operates 72 QRCs worldwide (including five that are
co-located in a manufacturing facility), including 24 sites in North America, 20 in Europe, and the
remainder in Latin America and Asia. Our ability to rapidly deliver mechanical sealing technology
through global engineering tools, locally-sited QRCs and on-site engineers represents a significant
competitive advantage. This business model has enabled FSD to establish a large number of alliances
with multi-national customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
173.0 |
|
|
$ |
159.4 |
|
Sales |
|
|
170.9 |
|
|
|
140.7 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
77.7 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
|
|
45.8 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bookings |
|
$ |
513.7 |
|
|
$ |
438.4 |
|
Sales |
|
|
495.5 |
|
|
|
404.4 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
223.3 |
|
|
|
182.9 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
45.2 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
|
81.4 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Bookings for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $13.6 million, or 8.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$6 million. The increase is due primarily to increased original
equipment bookings in EMA and North America and increased aftermarket bookings in Latin
America, slightly offset by a decrease in bookings in Asia Pacific, which was attributable to a
certain large project booking in Japan of $2.1 million recorded in the third quarter of 2007 that
did not recur, as well as a $3.6 million increase in interdivision bookings (which are eliminated
and are not included in consolidated bookings as disclosed above). The oil and gas and chemical
markets continue to be our strongest markets.
Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $75.3 million, or 17.2%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$25 million. The increase is due primarily to increased original equipment bookings in EMA, North
America and Latin America and increased aftermarket bookings in all regions, as well as a $12.6
million increase in interdivision bookings (which are eliminated and are not included in
consolidated bookings as disclosed above). The oil and gas and chemical markets continue to be our
strongest markets.
Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $30.2 million, or 21.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$5 million. The increase is due primarily to a $22.2 million increase in customer sales across all
regions. The increase is primarily attributable to increased aftermarket sales in Asia and Latin
America and increased original equipment sales in EMA and North America, where growth in the
chemical and oil and gas markets continued to provide solid bookings and sales, as well as an $8.0
million increase in interdivision sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated
sales as disclosed above).
Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $91.1 million, or 22.5%, as
compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of approximately
$23 million. The increase is due primarily to a $71.7 million increase in customer sales, which is
primarily attributable to increased aftermarket sales in Asia and Latin America, increased original
equipment sales in EMA and North America, where growth in the chemical and oil and gas markets
continued to provide solid bookings and sales, as well as a $19.4 million increase in interdivision
sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated sales as disclosed above).
27
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $13.2 million, or
20.5%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit margin for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 of 45.5% decreased from 45.8% for the same period in 2007. A sales mix shift to
lower margin original equipment business in EMA and North America negatively impacted gross
margins. This decrease was partially offset by increased sales, which favorably impacts our
absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, as well as the impact of cost savings initiatives.
Increases in materials costs have been largely offset through supply chain management efforts and
price increases in mid-2007 and early 2008.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $40.4 million, or
22.1%, as compared with the same period in 2007. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 of 45.1% was comparable to the same period in 2007. A sales mix shift to lower
margin original equipment business in EMA and North America was offset by increased sales, which
favorably impacts our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, as well as the impact of cost
savings initiatives. Increases in materials costs have been largely offset through supply chain
management efforts and price increases in mid-2007 and early 2008.
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $2.3 million, or
7.6%, as compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $1 million. The increase is due to the $13.2 million increase in gross profit
mentioned above, partially offset by a net $10.5 million increase in SG&A (including negative
currency effects of approximately $2 million) due primarily to continued investment in our global
engineering and sales teams and increases in infrastructure to support the global growth of our
business. SG&A as a percentage of sales increased 170 basis points, resulting primarily from
investment in our global selling footprint and engineering support in anticipation of future sales.
Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $15.2 million, or
18.7%, as compared with the same period in 2007. This increase includes currency benefits of
approximately $7 million. The increase is due to the $40.4 million increase in gross profit
mentioned above, partially offset by a net $24.9 million increase in SG&A (including negative
currency effects of approximately $7 million) due primarily to continued investment in our global
engineering and sales teams and increases in infrastructure to support the global growth of our
business. The increase in SG&A was partially offset by the receipt of a $1.3 million legal
settlement, as well as a reduction in other legal fees and expenses.
Backlog of $123.8 million at September 30, 2008 increased by $14.4 million, or 13.2%, as
compared with December 31, 2007. Currency effects provided a decrease of approximately $3 million.
Backlog at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 includes $19.5 million and $18.1 million,
respectively, of interdivision backlog (which is eliminated and not included in consolidated
backlog as disclosed above). Backlog growth is primarily a result of growth in original equipment
bookings with longer lead times. Capacity expansions were completed in 2007, and additional
capacity expansions continued through the first nine months of 2008 to support increased throughput
in all regions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(Amounts in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net cash flows (used) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities |
|
|
(62.8 |
) |
|
|
(57.3 |
) |
Net cash flows (used) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(139.3 |
) |
|
|
11.6 |
|
Existing cash, cash generated by operations and borrowings available under our existing
revolving credit facility are our primary sources of short-term liquidity. Our cash balance at
September 30, 2008 was $153.4 million, as compared with $370.6 million at December 31, 2007. The
decrease in cash primarily reflects a $144.8 million decrease in cash flows from working capital, a
$50.4 million contribution to our U.S. pension plan, capital expenditures of $72.5 million and
share repurchases of $135.0 million, partially offset by a $168.1 million increase in net income.
The cash flows used by operating activities for the first nine months of 2008 primarily
reflect a $168.1 million increase in net income, offset by a $144.8 million decrease in cash flows
from working capital, primarily due to our investment in inventory of $190.3 million, especially
project-related inventory required to support future shipments of products in backlog, and higher
accounts receivable of $280.3 million, resulting primarily from increased sales and a $63.9 million
reduction in factored receivables. These increases were partially offset by higher accrued
liabilities, reflecting increases in advanced cash received from our customers. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we contributed $50.4 million to our U.S. pension plan.
28
Our goal for days sales receivables outstanding (DSO) is 60 days. As of September 30,
2008, we achieved a DSO of 71 days as compared with 69 days as of September 30, 2007. The increase
in DSO is attributable to the termination of our major factoring agreements, as discussed below in
Accounts Receivable Factoring and in Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements
included in this Quarterly Report, partially offset by increased sales. Factoring provided a
decrease in DSO of 7 days as of September 30, 2007. For reference purposes, based on 2008 sales,
an improvement of one day could provide approximately $13 million in cash flow. Increases in
inventory used $190.3 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared
with $147.7 million for the same period in 2007. Inventory turns were 3.5 times as of September
30, 2008, compared with 3.3 times as of September 30, 2007, reflecting the increase in inventory,
which was more than offset by the increase in sales. Our calculation of inventory turns does not
reflect the impact of advanced cash received from our customers. For reference purposes, based on
2008 data, an improvement of one turn could yield approximately $192 million in cash flow.
Cash flows used by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were
$62.8 million, as compared with $57.3 million for the same period in 2007. Capital expenditures
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $72.5 million, an increase of $11.6 million as
compared with the same period in 2007.
Cash flows used by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were
$139.3 million, as compared with $11.6 million of cash flows provided in the same period in 2007.
Cash outflows in 2008 resulted primarily from the repurchase of common shares for $135.0 million
and the payment of $37.3 million in dividends. These were partially offset by inflows of $11.2
million from the exercise of stock options. Cash inflows in 2007 were due primarily to $58.0
million in borrowings under our revolving line of credit. The borrowings were used primarily to
fund increased working capital needs, share repurchases and increased capital spending. Cash
outflows in 2007 included repurchase of common shares for $44.8 million and the payment of
dividends of $17.2 million.
The general credit and capital markets have recently experienced disruption. Continuing
volatility in these markets could potentially impair our ability to access these markets and
increase associated costs. Notwithstanding these adverse market conditions, considering our
current debt structure and cash needs, we currently believe cash flows from operating activities
combined with availability under our existing revolving credit agreement and our existing cash
balance will be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash flow needs for the next 12 months. Cash
flows from operations could be adversely affected by economic, political and other risks associated
with sales of our products, operational factors, competition, fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates and fluctuations in interest rates, among other factors. See Liquidity Analysis and
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements below.
On February 26, 2008 our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $300.0
million of our outstanding common stock over an unspecified time period. The program commenced in
the second quarter of 2008, and we repurchased 0.8 million shares for $100.0 million and 1.1
million shares for $135.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively. While we currently intend to continue our share repurchase program under
its previously disclosed terms for the foreseeable future, any future repurchases will be evaluated
in light of our current financial condition and business outlook.
On February 26, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in our quarterly cash
dividend to $0.25 per share from $0.15 per share, effective for the first quarter of 2008.
Generally, our dividend date-of-record is in the last month of the quarter, and the dividend is
paid the following month. While we currently intend to pay regular quarterly dividends in the
foreseeable future, any future dividends will be reviewed individually and declared by our Board of
Directors at its discretion, dependent on its assessment of our financial condition and business
outlook at the applicable time.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities of various sizes. The cost and terms of any
financing to be raised in conjunction with any acquisition, including our ability to raise
economical capital, is a critical consideration in any such evaluation.
As discussed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in Niigata, effective March 1, 2008, for
$2.4 million in cash.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures were $72.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared
with $60.9 million for the same period in 2007. Capital expenditures in 2008 and 2007 have focused
on capacity expansion, enterprise resource planning application upgrades, information technology
infrastructure and cost reduction opportunities. For the full year 2008, our capital expenditures
are expected to be between approximately $115 million and approximately $125 million. Certain of
our facilities may face capacity constraints in the foreseeable future, which may lead to higher
capital expenditure levels.
29
Financing
Credit Facilities
Our Credit Facilities are comprised of a $600.0 million term loan expiring on August 10, 2012
and a $400.0 million committed revolving line of credit, which can be utilized to provide up to
$300.0 million in letters of credit, expiring on August 12, 2012. At both September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, we had no amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit. We had
outstanding letters of credit of $95.2 million and $115.1 million at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively, which reduced borrowing capacity to $304.8 million and $284.9
million, respectively.
Borrowings under our Credit Facilities bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either
(1) the base rate (which is based on the greater of the prime rate most recently announced by the
administrative agent under our Credit Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2) LIBOR
plus an applicable margin determined by reference to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated
EBITDA, which as of September 30, 2008 was 0.875% and 1.50% for borrowings under our revolving line
of credit and term loan, respectively.
We may prepay loans under our Credit Facilities at any time in whole or in part, without
premium or penalty. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we made scheduled
repayments under our Credit Facilities of $1.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively. We have
scheduled repayments under our Credit Facilities of $1.4 million due in the each of the next four
quarters.
Our obligations under the Credit Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and
severally, by substantially all of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic
subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. In addition, prior to
our obtaining and maintaining investment grade credit ratings, our and the guarantors obligations
under the Credit Facilities are collateralized by substantially all of our and the guarantors
assets.
Additional discussion of our Credit Facilities, including amounts outstanding and applicable
interest rates, is included in Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included
in this Quarterly Report.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge our exposure to cash flows related
to our Credit Facilities. These agreements are more fully described in Note 4 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report, and in Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk below.
European Letter of Credit Facility
On September 14, 2007, we entered into an unsecured European LOC Facility to issue letters of
credit in an aggregate face amount not to exceed 150.0 million at any time. The initial commitment
of 80.0 million was increased to 110.0 million, effective September 12, 2008. The aggregate
commitment of the European LOC Facility may be increased up to 150.0 million as may be agreed
among the parties, and may be decreased by us at our option without any premium, fee or penalty.
The European LOC Facility is used for contingent obligations solely in respect of surety and
performance bonds, bank guarantees and similar obligations. We had outstanding letters of credit
drawn on the European LOC Facility of 87.2 million ($122.8 million) and 35.0 million ($51.1
million) as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. We pay certain fees for the
letters of credit written against the European LOC Facility based upon the ratio of our total debt
to consolidated EBITDA. As of September 30, 2008, the annual fees equaled 0.875% plus a fronting
fee of 0.1%.
See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2007 Annual Report for a
discussion of covenants related to our Credit Facilities and our European LOC Facility. We
complied with all covenants through September 30, 2008.
Accounts Receivable Factoring
Through our European subsidiaries, we engaged in non-recourse factoring of certain accounts
receivable. The various agreements had different terms, including options for renewal and mutual
termination clauses. Our Credit Facilities, which are fully described in Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements included in our 2007 Annual Report, limit factoring volume to
$75.0 million at any given point in time as defined by our Credit Facilities.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we gave notice of our intent to terminate our major
factoring agreements during 2008. All factoring agreements were terminated by the end of the third
quarter of 2008. See Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report for additional information on our accounts receivable factoring.
30
Liquidity Analysis
Recent disruptions in global financial markets and banking systems are making credit and
capital markets more difficult for companies to access, and are generally driving up the costs of
newly raised debt. We have assessed the implications of these factors on our current business and
determined that these financial market disruptions have not had a significant impact on our
financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However, continuing volatility in the
credit and capital markets could potentially impair our and our customers ability to access these
markets and increase associated costs, and there can be no assurance that we will not be materially
affected by these financial market disruptions as economic events and circumstances continue to
evolve. We have no scheduled loans due to mature in 2008, and only 1% of our term loan is due to
mature in each of 2009 and 2010. As noted above, our term loan and our revolving line of credit
both mature in August 2012. After the effects of $385.0 million of notional interest rate swaps,
approximately 70% of our term debt was at fixed rates at September 30, 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, we have a borrowing capacity of $304.8 million on our $400.0 million
revolving line of credit, and in September 2008 we renewed our unsecured European LOC Facility and
increased it from an initial commitment of 80.0 million to a commitment of 110.0 million. We had
outstanding letters of credit drawn on the European LOC Facility of 87.2 million as of September
30, 2008. Our revolving line of credit and our European LOC Facility are committed and are held by
a diversified group of financial institutions with high credit ratings.
Further, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we increased cash by $16.7 million
to $153.4 million, after taking into account $100.0 million of share repurchases, $34.8 million in
capital expenditures and $14.4 million in quarterly dividend payments. We monitor the depository
institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents on a regular basis and we believe that we have
placed our deposits with creditworthy financial institutions.
We utilize a variety of insurance carriers for a wide range of insurance coverage and
continuously monitor their creditworthiness. Based on current credit ratings by industry rating
experts, we currently believe that our carriers have the ability to pay on claims.
Although we have experienced declines in the values of our U.S. pension plan assets, our U.S.
pension plan remains well-funded, and we currently anticipate that our contribution to our U.S.
pension plan in 2009 will not be materially greater than the $50.4 million that we contributed in
the second quarter of 2008. The decline in our U.S. pension plan asset values of approximately $48
million, or 17%, will be recognized into earnings over the actuarially-determined life. We
continue to maintain an asset allocation consistent with our strategy to maximize total return,
while reducing portfolio risks through asset class diversification.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related footnotes contained within
this Quarterly Report. Critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements were discussed in our 2007 Annual Report. These critical policies, for which
no significant changes have occurred in the three months ended September 30, 2008, include:
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition; |
|
|
|
|
Deferred Taxes, Tax Valuation Allowances and Tax Reserves; |
|
|
|
|
Reserves for Contingent Loss; |
|
|
|
|
Retirement and Postretirement Benefits; and |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets. |
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of
estimates and assumptions to determine certain of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information available at
the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as
conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ
materially from those estimates. The significant estimates are reviewed quarterly with the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors.
Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and
uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our condensed
consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective of our consolidated
financial condition and results of operations. This is not to suggest that other general risk
factors, such as changes in worldwide demand, changes in material costs, performance of acquired
businesses and others, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows in future periods. See Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements below.
31
ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
We have presented the information about accounting pronouncements not yet implemented in Note
1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as
amended. Words or phrases such as, may, should, expects, could, intends, plans,
anticipates, estimates, believes, predicts or other similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements, which include, without limitation, statements concerning our
future financial performance, future debt and financing levels, investment objectives, implications
of litigation and regulatory investigations and other management plans for future operations and
performance.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report are based on our current
expectations, projections, estimates and assumptions. These statements are only predictions, not
guarantees. Such forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that
are difficult to predict. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ
materially from what is forecast in such forward-looking statements, and include, without
limitation, the following:
|
|
|
a portion of our bookings may not lead to completed sales, and our ability to convert
bookings into revenues at acceptable profit margins; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with cost overruns on fixed fee projects and in taking customer orders
for large complex custom engineered products requiring sophisticated program management
skills and technical expertise for completion; |
|
|
|
|
the substantial dependence of our sales on the success of the petroleum, chemical, power
and water industries; |
|
|
|
|
the adverse impact of volatile raw materials prices on our products and operating
margins; |
|
|
|
|
economic, political and other risks associated with our international operations,
including military actions or trade embargoes that could affect customer markets,
particularly Middle Eastern markets and global petroleum producers, and
non-compliance with U.S. export/reexport control, foreign corrupt practice laws, economic
sanctions and import laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our furnishing of products and services to nuclear power plant facilities; |
|
|
|
|
potential adverse consequences resulting from litigation to which we are a party, such
as litigation involving asbestos-containing material claims; |
|
|
|
|
a foreign government investigation regarding our participation in the United Nations
Oil-for-Food Program; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with certain of our foreign subsidiaries conducting business operations
and sales in certain countries that have been identified by the U.S. State Department as
state sponsors of terrorism; |
|
|
|
|
our relative geographical profitability and its impact on our utilization of deferred
tax assets, including foreign tax credits, and tax liabilities that could result from
audits of our tax returns by regulatory authorities in various tax jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
|
the potential adverse impact of an impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other
intangibles; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence upon third-party suppliers whose failure to perform timely could
adversely affect our business operations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the global financial markets and the availability of capital; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on our customers ability to make required capital investment and
maintenance expenditures; |
32
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of the markets in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
environmental compliance costs and liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
potential work stoppages and other labor matters; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to protect our intellectual property in the U.S., as well as in foreign
countries; and |
|
|
|
|
obligations under our defined benefit pension plans. |
These and other risks and uncertainties are more fully discussed in the risk factors
identified in Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of our 2007 Annual Report, and may be identified in
our other filings with the SEC and/or press releases from time to time. All forward-looking
statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof,
and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We have market risk exposure arising from changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rate movements. We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by
counterparties to financial instruments, including interest rate swaps and forward exchange
contracts, but we currently expect all counterparties will continue to meet their obligations given
their current creditworthiness.
Interest Rate Risk
Our earnings are impacted by changes in short-term interest rates as a result of borrowings
under our Credit Facilities, which bear interest based on floating rates. At September 30, 2008,
after the effect of interest rate swaps, we had $166.1 million of variable rate debt obligations
outstanding under our Credit Facilities with a weighted average interest rate of 5.22%. A
hypothetical change of 100 basis points in the interest rate for these borrowings, assuming
constant variable rate debt levels, would have changed interest expense by $1.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had
$385.0 million and $395.0 million, respectively, of notional amount in outstanding interest rate
swaps with third parties with varying maturities through December 2010.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
A substantial portion of our operations are conducted by our subsidiaries outside of the U.S.
in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Almost all of our non-U.S. subsidiaries conduct their
business primarily in their local currencies, which are also their functional currencies. Foreign
currency exposures arise from translation of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities into U.S.
Dollars and from transactions, including firm commitments and anticipated transactions, denominated
in a currency other than a non-U.S. subsidiarys functional currency. Generally, we view our
investments in foreign subsidiaries from a long-term perspective and, therefore, do not hedge these
investments. We use capital structuring techniques to manage our investment in foreign
subsidiaries as deemed necessary. We realized net (losses) gains associated with foreign currency
translation of $(105.1) million and $24.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and $(70.5) million and $44.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, which are included in other comprehensive (loss) income.
Based on a sensitivity analysis at September 30, 2008, a 10% change in the foreign currency
exchange rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would have impacted our net earnings by
approximately $26 million, due primarily to the Euro. This calculation assumes that all currencies
change in the same direction and proportion relative to the U.S. Dollar and that there are no indirect
effects, such as changes in non-U.S. Dollar sales volumes or prices. This calculation does not
take into account the impact of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts discussed below.
We employ a foreign currency risk management strategy to minimize potential changes in cash
flows from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements. The use of forward exchange
contracts allows us to mitigate transactional exposure to exchange rate fluctuations as the gains
or losses incurred on the forward exchange contracts will offset, in whole or in part, losses or
gains on the underlying foreign currency exposure. Our policy allows foreign currency coverage
only for identifiable foreign currency exposures, and changes in the fair values of these
instruments are included in other (expense) income, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of income. As of September 30, 2008, we had a U.S. Dollar equivalent of $713.5 million
in aggregate notional amount outstanding in forward exchange contracts with third parties, compared
with $464.9 million at December 31, 2007.
33
Transactional currency gains and losses arising from transactions outside of our sites
functional currencies and changes in fair value of certain forward exchange contracts are included
in our consolidated results of operations. We realized foreign currency net (losses) gains of
$(9.6) million and $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $2.8 million and $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively, which is included in other (expense) income, net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of income. The significant strengthening of the U.S. Dollar exchange rate
versus our significant currencies during the three months ended September 30, 2008 is the primary
driver of the net loss from the changes in fair values of forward exchange contracts.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Exchange Act) are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information
that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report, our management, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2008. Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2008.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Asbestos-Related Claims
We are a defendant in a large number of pending lawsuits (which include, in many cases,
multiple claimants) that seek to recover damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure
to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or distributed by us in the past. While the
aggregate number of asbestos-related claims against us has declined in recent years, there can be
no assurance that this trend will continue. Asbestos-containing materials incorporated into any
such products was primarily encapsulated and used only as components of process equipment, and we
do not believe that any significant emission of asbestos-containing fibers occurred during the use
of this equipment. We believe that a high percentage of the claims are covered by applicable
insurance or indemnities from other companies.
Shareholder Litigation Appeal of Dismissed Class Action Case; Derivative Case Dismissals
In 2003, related lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas,
alleging that we violated federal securities laws. After these cases were consolidated, the lead
plaintiff amended its complaint several times. The lead plaintiffs last pleading was the fifth
consolidated amended complaint (the Complaint). The Complaint alleged that federal securities
violations occurred between February 6, 2001 and September 27, 2002 and named as defendants our
company, C. Scott Greer, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Renee J.
Hornbaker, our former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, and Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse
First Boston LLC, which served as underwriters for our two public stock offerings during the
relevant period. The Complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act,
and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act. The lead plaintiff sought
unspecified compensatory damages, forfeiture by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of unspecified
incentive-based or equity-based compensation and profits from any stock sales, and recovery of
costs. By orders dated November 13, 2007 and January 4, 2008, the court denied the plaintiffs
motion for class certification and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all
claims. The plaintiffs have appealed both rulings to the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. We
will defend vigorously this appeal or any other effort by the plaintiffs to overturn the courts
denial of class certification or its entry of judgment in favor of the defendants.
In 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in the 193rd
Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit originally named as defendants Mr. Greer,
Ms. Hornbaker, and former and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., William
C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O.
Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We were named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on the
purported misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the original
lawsuit in this action asserted claims against the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse
of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff
alleged that these purported violations of state law occurred between April 2000 and the date of
suit. The plaintiff sought on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, injunctive relief and/or
the imposition of a constructive trust on defendants assets, disgorgement of compensation, profits
or other benefits received by the defendants from us and recovery of attorneys fees and costs. We
filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case, and the court thereafter ordered the plaintiffs to
replead. On October 11, 2007, the plaintiffs filed an amended petition adding new claims against
the following additional defendants: Kathy Giddings, our former Vice-President and Corporate
Controller; Bernard G. Rethore, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Banc of America
Securities, LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC, which served as underwriters for our public
stock offerings in November 2001 and April 2002, and PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm. On April 2, 2008, the lawsuit was dismissed by the court without
prejudice at the plaintiffs request.
On March 14, 2006, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in
federal court in the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit named as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms.
Hornbaker, and former and current board members Mr. Coble, Mr. Haymaker, Mr. Lewis M. Kling, Mr.
Rusnack, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Rampacek, Mr. Sheehan, Ms. Harris, Mr. Rollans and Mr. Bartlett. We were
named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on certain of the purported misstatements alleged in
the above-described federal securities case, the plaintiff asserted claims against the defendants
for breaches of fiduciary duty that purportedly occurred between 2000 and 2004. The plaintiff
sought on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, disgorgement by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker
of salaries, bonuses, restricted stock and stock options and recovery of attorneys fees and costs.
Pursuant to a motion filed by us, the federal court dismissed that case on March 14, 2007,
primarily on the basis that the case was not properly filed in federal court. On or about March 27,
2007, the same plaintiff re-filed essentially the same lawsuit naming the same defendants in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York. We believed that this new lawsuit was improperly filed in
the Supreme Court of the State of New York and filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case. On
January 2, 2008, the court entered an order granting our motion to dismiss
all claims and allowed the plaintiffs an opportunity to replead. A notice of entry of the
dismissal order was served on the plaintiff on January 15, 2008. To date, the plaintiff has neither
filed an amended complaint nor appealed the dismissal order.
35
United Nations Oil-for-Food Program
We have entered into and disclosed previously in our SEC filings the material details of
settlements with the SEC, the Department of Justice (the DOJ) and the Dutch authorities relating
to products that two of our foreign subsidiaries delivered to Iraq from 1996 through 2003 under the
United Nations Oil-for-Food Program. We believe that a confidential French investigation is still
ongoing, and, accordingly, we cannot predict the outcome of the French investigation at this time.
We currently do not expect to incur additional case resolution costs of a material amount in this
matter; however, if the French authorities take enforcement action against us regarding its
investigation, we may be subject to additional monetary and non-monetary penalties.
In addition to the settlements and governmental investigation referenced above, on June 27,
2008, the Republic of Iraq filed a civil suit in federal court in New York against 93 participants
in the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program, including Flowserve and our two foreign subsidiaries
that participated in the program. We intend to vigorously contest the suit, and we believe that we
have valid defenses to the claims asserted. However, we cannot predict the outcome of the suit at
the present time or whether the resolution of this suit will have a material adverse financial
impact on our company.
Export Compliance
In March 2006, we initiated a voluntary process to determine our compliance posture with
respect to U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations. Upon initial
investigation, it appeared that some product transactions and technology transfers were not handled
in full compliance with U.S. export control laws and regulations. As a result, in conjunction with
outside counsel, we have conducted a voluntary systematic process to further review, validate and
voluntarily disclose export violations discovered as part of this review process. We have completed
the global site visits scheduled as part of this voluntary disclosure process, and we are nearing
completion of our comprehensive disclosures to the appropriate U.S. government regulatory
authorities, although these disclosures may continue to be refined or supplemented after our
initial submittal. Based on our review of the data collected to date, during the self-disclosure
period of October 1, 2002 through October 1, 2007, a number of process pumps, valves, mechanical
seals and parts related thereto apparently were exported, in limited circumstances, without
required export or reexport licenses or without full compliance with all applicable rules and
regulations to a number of different countries throughout the world, including certain sanctioned
countries. The foregoing information is subject to change as our voluntary reporting process is
finalized and we review this submittal with applicable regulatory authorities.
We have taken a number of actions to increase the effectiveness of our global export
compliance program. This has included increasing the personnel and resources dedicated to export
compliance, providing additional export compliance tools to employees, improving our export
transaction screening processes and enhancing the content and frequency of our export compliance
training programs.
Any self-reported violations of U.S. export control laws and regulations may result in civil
or criminal penalties, including fines and/or other penalties. Although companies making voluntary
export violation disclosures, as we are currently doing, have historically received reduced
penalties and certain mitigating credits, legislation enacted on October 16, 2007 increased the
maximum civil penalty for certain export control violations (assessed on a per-shipment basis) to
the greater of $250,000 or twice the value of the transaction. While the Department of Commerce has
stated that companies, such as us, that had initiated voluntary self-disclosures prior to the
enactment of this legislation generally would not be subjected to enhanced penalties retroactively,
we are unable to determine at this time how other U.S. government agencies will apply this enhanced
penalty legislation. Accordingly, we are currently unable to definitively determine the full extent
or nature or total amount of penalties to which we might be subject as a result of any such
self-reported violations of the export control laws and regulations.
Other
We are currently involved as a potentially responsible party at four former public waste
disposal sites that may be subject to remediation under pending government procedures. The sites
are in various stages of evaluation by federal and state environmental authorities. The projected
cost of remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged fair share allocation, will remain
uncertain until all studies have been completed and the parties have either negotiated an amicable
resolution or the matter has been judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties
who have similarly been identified, and the identification and location of additional parties is
continuing under applicable federal or state law. Many of the other parties identified are
financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay their share of the remediation
costs. Based on our information about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the
environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it is likely that ultimate remediation
liability costs for each site will be apportioned among all liable parties, including site owners
and waste transporters, according to the volumes and/or
toxicity of the wastes shown to have been disposed of at the sites. We believe that our
exposure for existing disposal sites will be less than $100,000.
36
In addition to the above public disposal sites, we received a Clean Up Notice on September 17,
2007 with respect to a site in Australia. The site was used for disposal of spent foundry sand. A
risk assessment of the site is currently underway, but it will be several months before the
assessment is completed. We currently believe that additional remediation costs at the site will
not be material.
We are also a defendant in several other lawsuits, including product liability claims, that
are insured, subject to the applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of business, and
we are also involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, none of which,
either individually or in the aggregate, we believe to be material to our business, operations or
overall financial condition. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and resolutions or
dispositions of claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have an adverse impact on our
operating results or cash flows for the reporting period in which any such resolution or
disposition occurs.
Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be quantified with absolute
certainty except as otherwise indicated above, we have established reserves covering exposures
relating to contingencies, to the extent believed to be reasonably estimable and probable based on
past experience and available facts. While additional exposures beyond these reserves could exist,
they currently cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate these potential contingent loss
exposures and, if they develop, recognize expense as soon as such losses become probable and can be
reasonably estimated.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
None.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On February 26, 2008, our Board of Directors announced the approval of a program to repurchase
up to $300.0 million of our outstanding common stock, which commenced in the second quarter of
2008. The share repurchase program does not have an expiration date, and we reserve the right to
limit or terminate the repurchase program at any time without notice.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased a total of 861,600 shares of our
common stock under the program for $100.0 million (representing an average cost of $116.08 per
share). Since the adoption of this program, we have repurchased a total of 1,129,100 shares of our
common stock under the program for $135.0 million (representing an average cost of $119.58 per
share). We may repurchase up to an additional $165.0 million under the stock repurchase program.
As of September 30, 2008, we had 55.8 million shares issued and outstanding. The following table
sets forth the repurchase data for each of the three months during the quarter ended September 30,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value) That May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
the |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Plan (in millions) |
|
July 1 31 |
|
|
45,812 |
(1) |
|
$ |
134.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
265.0 |
|
August 1 31 |
|
|
396,168 |
(2) |
|
|
126.59 |
|
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
September 1 30 |
|
|
466,600 |
|
|
|
107.17 |
|
|
|
466,600 |
|
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
908,580 |
|
|
$ |
117.01 |
|
|
|
861,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a total of 45,812 shares that were tendered by employees to
satisfy minimum tax withholding amounts for restricted stock awards at
an average price per share of $134.25. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a total of 45 shares that were tendered by employees to
satisfy minimum tax withholding amounts for restricted stock awards at
an average price per share of $127.38, and includes 1,123 shares of
common stock purchased at a price of $121.80 per share by a rabbi
trust that we established in connection with our director deferral
plans pursuant to which non-employee directors may elect to defer
directors quarterly cash compensation to be paid at a later date in
the form of common stock. |
37
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Set forth below is a list of exhibits included as part of this Quarterly Report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Flowserve Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the SEC on August
16, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Flowserve Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 12,
2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
First Amendment to Letter of Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 11, 2008 among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve B.V.
and other subsidiaries of Flowserve Corporation party thereto,
ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as Administrative Agent and an Issuing
Bank, and the other financial institutions party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September
16, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
|
|
Date: October 28, 2008 |
/s/ Lewis M. Kling
|
|
|
Lewis M. Kling |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
Date: October 28, 2008 |
/s/ Mark A. Blinn
|
|
|
Mark A. Blinn |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Latin America Operations |
|
39
Exhibits Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Flowserve Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the SEC on August
16, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Flowserve Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 12,
2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
First Amendment to Letter of Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 11, 2008 among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve B.V.
and other subsidiaries of Flowserve Corporation party thereto,
ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as Administrative Agent and an Issuing
Bank, and the other financial institutions party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September
16, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40