SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

AKZO NOBEL N.V.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

76 Velperweg, 6824 BM ARNHEM
(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark which financial statement itm the reistered has elected to follw.

Item 17

Item 18

Back to Contents

1

Akzo Nobel N.V.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Back to Contents

2 

Back to Contents

3

PART I

INTRODUCTION

The consolidated financial statements of Akzo Nobel N.V. and subsidiaries appearing in this annual report are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Netherlands (“NL GAAP”). NL GAAP differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The significant differences between NL GAAP and US GAAP affecting Akzo Nobel's net income and shareholder's equity are discussed in Note 22 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Akzo Nobel.

The terms “Akzo Nobel” or “the Company” are sometimes used herein for convenience in contexts where reference is made to the consolidated companies of Akzo Nobel N.V. in general. Such terms are also used for convenience in referring to individual groups and subsidiaries.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, references to “dollars”, “U.S. dollars” and “USD” are to the United States currency. For convenience only (except where noted otherwise), certain euro figures have been translated into dollars at the rate of EUR 0.824 = USD 1.00, the noon buying rate in The City of New York for cable transfers in foreign currencies as announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for customs purposes (the “Noon Buying Rate”) on June 14, 2005. These translations should not be construed as a representation that the euro amounts actually represent such dollar amounts or could be converted into dollars at the rate indicated. On June 14, 2005, the Noon Buying Rate was EUR 0.824 = USD 1.00.

In order to utilize the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Akzo Nobel is providing the following cautionary statement. This document contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Akzo Nobel and certain of the plans and objectives of Akzo Nobel with respect to these items. These statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “assume”, “intend”, “plan”, “project”, “should”, “expect”, “estimate”, “believe” or similar expressions. In particular, among other statements, certain statements in Item 4 “Information on the Company” with regard to strategy, management objectives, including return on investment targets, market trends, market standing, market share estimates based on management’s estimates, benefits that may result from future restructuring programs, the product volumes, the costs and expenditures related to environmental compliance or remediation, Health, Safety and Environment targets, future research and development initiatives, the Pharma pipeline, the statements in Item 8 “Financial Information” with regard to the outcome of disputes with tax authorities, the outcome or consequences of pending or future legal or regulatory proceedings–including the Remeron^® cases, and antitrust investigations and other potential related lawsuits–and their effect on the Company and those statements in Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” with regard to trends in results of operations, margins, overall market and macroeconomic trends, risk management, exchange rates and objectives such as return on capital are forward-looking in nature as are all statements under “Forward Looking Statement on 2005” and Item 11 “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”.

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or

Back to Contents

4 

implied by these forward looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, levels of business spending in major economies (as well as other developments in the economies of the Company’s markets in Asia, Latin America, North America and Europe), the development in market value of pension plan assets, governmental regulations, changes in customer needs, the levels of marketing expenditures by Akzo Nobel and its competitors, the introduction of new products by competitors, raw material and employee costs, future foreign exchange and interest rates, changes in tax rates and product regulation, future business combinations, acquisitions or dispositions, environmental liabilities, and the outcome of tax disputes, antitrust investigations, potential product liability claims and other lawsuits, and wars and acts of terrorism or sabotage.

Statements made in Item 4 “Information on the Company”, referring to Akzo Nobel’s competitive position, are based on the Company’s belief, and in some cases, the statements are also based on information from a range of sources, including analysts’ reports, independent market studies and Akzo Nobel’s internal assessment of market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market participants unless otherwise noted. Such references to the Company’s positioning generally refer to its market share based on sales.

In the analysis of the development of sales, when compared to the previous year, the Company distinguishes between the effects from changed volumes, changed selling prices, currency translation, acquisitions, and divestments. Autonomous sales growth, which sometimes is used in the discussions in this report, is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as the change in sales attributable to changed volumes and selling prices. Autonomous sales growth excludes currency, acquisition, and divestment effects. As a result, autonomous growth numbers reflect comparable sales performance, and are used and analyzed by the Company’s management for this purpose. Because of the comparability of sales performance that can be analyzed by reviewing autonomous growth numbers, the Company’s management believes that these numbers are useful for those reviewing our financial performance. However, the autonomous growth numbers should not be viewed in isolation or as alternatives to the comparable GAAP measure of net sales and should be read in conjunction with such measure.

Item 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

Not applicable.

Item 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

Item 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data set forth on the following pages are derived from previously published financial information of Akzo Nobel, including the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, which appear elsewhere in this annual report. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, such financial statements, including the notes thereto.

The audited consolidated financial statements of Akzo Nobel as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, have been audited by

Back to Contents

5

KPMG Accountants N.V., independent registered public accounting firm, whose report thereon is included in Item 18. The consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were also audited by KPMG Accountants N.V.; however, those balance sheets, statements of income, and statements of cash flows are not included in this Form 20-F.

Reference is made to Note 22 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding differences between NL GAAP and US GAAP that affected Akzo Nobel's net income and shareholders' equity, as well as certain other lines of the Consolidated Statement of Income and the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Back to Contents

6 

The table below sets forth the number of common shares outstanding and the amounts of interim, final and total dividends declared (and the U.S.-dollar equivalents) on the common shares in respect of the fiscal years indicated.

* Dividends per common share in U.S. dollars are based on the Noon Buying Rate at December 31 of each year.

The following table sets forth for the fiscal periods indicated the average exchange rates for U.S. dollars into euros per dollar based on the applicable Noon Buying Rate.

* The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each month during the period.

The following table sets forth for the months indicated the high and low rates for U.S. dollars expressed in euros per dollar.

On June 14, 2005, the noon buying Rate was EUR 0.824 = USD 1.00.

Dividends, if any, will be paid in euros, and any exchange rate fluctuations may affect the USD amounts received by holders of ADRs upon conversion by the depositary of such dividends.

Back to Contents

7

B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not applicable.

C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

D. RISK FACTORS

This section describes some of the risks that could affect the Company’s business. The factors below should be considered in connection with any forward-looking statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F and the cautionary statements contained in the introduction on pages 3 and 4. Forward looking statements can be identified generally as those containing words such as “anticipate”, “assume”, “intend”, “plan”, “project”, “should”, “expect”, “estimate”, “believe”, and words and terms of similar substance in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance.

Doing business inherently involves taking risks, and by taking measured risks the Company strives to be sustainable. This situation calls for creating a proper balance between entrepreneurial attitude and risk levels associated with business opportunities. The Company fosters a high awareness of business risks and internal control procedures, geared to safeguarding transparency in our operations.

Our Risk Management framework complies with the Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework of COSO (the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission). The procedures and results are reviewed by the Board of Management and discussed in the Supervisory Board.

The diversity of businesses within Akzo Nobel leads to a large number of different risk factors, each of which may result in a material impact on a particular business unit but may not materially affect the Company as a whole. The diversity of the Company’s businesses and processes may allow it to offset some risks faced by the Company. However, there can be no assurance that our Risk Management function or our diversity will mitigate any risks we may face. The risks below are not the only ones that Akzo Nobel faces. Some risks are not yet known to Akzo Nobel and some that Akzo Nobel does not currently believe to be material could later turn out to be material. All of these risks could materially affect Akzo Nobel’s

Back to Contents

8 

businesses, revenues, operating income, net income, net assets and liquidity and capital resources. The Company’s risk management systems are focused on timely discovery of such additional risks.

The factors that could affect our financial condition or our business or could cause actual results to differ materially include the following:

The Company may face intense competition from new products and from lower-cost generic products.

The Company’s products that are under patent protection face competition from competitors’ proprietary products. This competition may increase as new products enter the market. The Company faces increasing competition from lower-cost generic products after patents on its products expire and from low-cost producers in other business areas. Loss of patent protection typically leads to loss of sales in the product’s markets and could affect the Company’s future results.

In December 2002, the Company lost an important court case on its major product Remeron^® in the United States, which in 2003 and 2004 led to strong generic competition, loss of market share and a negative impact on performance. In the course of 2004, the Company also lost market exclusivity for Remeron^® in certain countries in Europe.

As new products enter the market, the Company’s products may become obsolete or competitors’ products may be more effective or more effectively marketed and sold than its own products. If Akzo Nobel fails to maintain its competitive position, this could have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operations.

The Company’s research and development efforts may not succeed or its competitors may develop more effective or successful products.

In order to remain competitive, the Company must commit substantial resources each year to research and development through its dedicated resources as well as through various collaborations with third parties. Ongoing investments in new product launches and research and development for future products could produce higher costs without a proportional increase in revenues. Especially in the Pharma businesses, the research and development process can take from six to fourteen years, from discovery to commercial product launch. This process is conducted in various stages, and during each stage there is a substantial risk that the Company will not achieve its goals and accordingly may abandon a product for which it has spent substantial amounts.

In this context it should also be noted that certain studies prepared for the European Commission concluded that European pharmaceutical companies have not only been losing competitiveness to their U.S. peers, but also that this trend has intensified. Unlike the U.S.-based multinationals, the European pharmaceutical companies still lack the background and leverage of a single domestic (European) market. In addition, Europe has been less effective than the United States in encouraging growth of new technology suppliers and innovation specialists in such fields as combinatorial chemistry, genomics, and high-throughput screening.

The Company is looking for more partners to share the burden and success of product development in this area.

If the Company fails to continue developing commercially successful products or fails to find suitable partners, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. If

Back to Contents

9

its competitors develop more effective products or a greater number of successful new products, or if the competitive position of its European operations changes in a negative way, this could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

On the other hand there is also risk involved with the reliance on partners for the sharing of costs and generation of revenues. If these partners do not perform in accordance with our agreements with them, this could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

It can also be the case that due to unwanted side effects of pharmaceutical products, in particular, which appear at a later stage after introduction of a product, the Company may decide or may be forced to withdraw a certain product from the market. This also could have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operation.

Product regulation may adversely affect the Company’s ability to bring new products to market.

The Company and its competitors are subject to strict government controls on the development, manufacture, labeling, distribution and marketing of products. The Company must obtain and maintain regulatory approval for its pharmaceutical and other products from regulatory agencies before certain products may be sold in a particular jurisdiction. The submission of an application to a regulatory authority does not guarantee that a license to market the product will be granted. Each authority may impose its own requirements and delay or refuse to grant approval, even though a product has been approved by another country. In the Company’s principal markets, the approval process for a new product is complex, lengthy and expensive. For pharmaceutical products, the time taken to obtain approval varies by country but generally takes from eight months to several years from the date of application. Regulatory delays, the inability to complete clinical trials successfully, claims and concerns about safety and efficacy, new discoveries, patents and products of competitors and related patent disputes and claims about adverse side effects are only a few of the factors that could adversely affect the realization of product registration. This increases the Company’s cost in developing new products and increases the risk that it will not succeed in selling them successfully.

In this respect, the Company did not receive FDA approval for its antidepressant gepirone ER.

In light of the uncertainties in the hormone therapy area, as also reflected in a number of studies that downgrade some of the perceived positive health effects of treatments, the refiling of additional data with the FDA for Livial^® 1.25 mg (U.S.) is at present to be expected at the end of 2005.

Regulations which limit the prices we may charge for our pharmaceutical products can reduce the Company’s revenues and adversely affect its business and results of operations.

In addition to normal price competition in the marketplace, the prices of Akzo Nobel’s pharmaceutical products are restricted by price controls imposed by governments and health care providers in most countries. Price controls operate differently in different countries and can cause wide variations in prices between markets. Currency fluctuations can aggravate these differences. The existence of price controls can limit the revenues Akzo Nobel earns from its products and may have an adverse effect on its business and results of operations.

Some 30 percent of the Company’s earnings are derived from the healthcare markets. In many of these countries the prices for our products are regulated. In the United States, Medicare reform could result in de facto price controls on prescription drugs. In Europe, the Company’s operations are also subject to price

Back to Contents

10 

and market regulations. Many governments are introducing healthcare reforms in an attempt to curb increasing healthcare costs. In Japan, where Akzo Nobel also operates, governmental price cuts are introduced biannually. In response to rising healthcare costs, many governments and private medical care providers, such as HMOs, have instituted reimbursement schemes that favor the substitution of generic pharmaceuticals for more expensive brand-name pharmaceuticals. In the United States, generic substitution statutes have been enacted by virtually all states and permit or require the dispensing pharmacist to substitute a less expensive generic drug instead of the original brand-name drug. As a result, the Company expects pressures on its pricing and operating results in our pharmaceuticals business to continue.

Risks in production processes can adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

Certain chemical production processes are hazardous, and natural disasters, operator error or other occurrences could result in explosions, fires, or equipment failure, which could result in injury or death, or damage to property or the environment, and business interruption.

It is the Company’s policy to try to mitigate production risks by spreading of production and an adequate inventory policy combined with contingency planning and appropriate risk transfer arrangements (e.g. insurances).

Losses and liabilities arising from such events, in so far as not covered by insurance, would significantly reduce the Company’s revenues or increase costs and could have a material adverse effect on its operations or financial condition.

Inability to access raw materials, growth in cost and expenses for raw materials, petroleum and natural gas and changes in product mix may adversely influence the future results of the Company.

Important raw materials or auxiliary materials for the Company’s production processes are salt, petroleum and petroleum derivatives, natural gas, titanium dioxide, and electricity. Some of these components are available only from a small source of suppliers. Although Akzo Nobel aims to use its purchasing power and long-term relationships with suppliers to acquire raw materials and their constant delivery at the best conditions, the Company cannot assure that it will always be able to establish or maintain good relationships with such suppliers or that such suppliers will continue to exist or be able to supply ingredients in conformity with regulatory requirements or the Company’s requests. In addition, growth in the costs and expenses of these components resulting from a shortage or a change in Akzo Nobel’s product mix may adversely influence the Company’s business and financial results. Akzo Nobel is sensitive to price movements in raw materials. In particular, energy prices pose a risk, presently still aggravated by the unstable situation in the Middle East.

A failure to manage expansion effectively could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Management of the Company’s growth, as well as the commencement of commercial manufacturing and marketing of the Company’s forthcoming products, will require continued expansion of the Company’s systems and internal controls and an increase in the Company’s manufacturing, marketing and sales operations. In addition, the Company intends to continue to add new personnel. Any failure to manage growth effectively and integrate new personnel on a timely basis could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Back to Contents

11

The Company may not be able to identify future acquisitions or may not be successful in integrating acquired businesses.

As part of its business strategy, the Company periodically reviews acquisition prospects and strategic alliances that it expects to complement its existing businesses or increase its revenues. The Company does not know if it will be able to identify any future acquisitions, joint ventures or alliances. A failure to identify future transactions may impair the Company’s future growth.

If the Company is unable to retain key personnel or attract new personnel, it could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Company’s future operating results depend in part upon its ability to attract and retain qualified management, scientific, technical, marketing, and support personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to attract and retain such personnel.

Seasonality may adversely affect the operating results of the Company’s Coatings and Chemicals business.

A portion of the Company’s Coatings and Chemicals business is seasonal, with sales and earnings being relatively higher during the outdoor season and lower during the indoor season. The operating results may be harmed if bad weather delays the outdoor season in the major markets in which the Company operates and the Company is not able to offset during the corresponding financial year the lag in earnings resulting from such delay.

Bad publicity and damage to the Company’s brands could adversely affect its business and results of operations.

The reputation of the Company’s brands is critical to its business. The success in promoting and enhancing its brands is dependent on providing safe high-quality products, particularly in the pharma business. If it fails to successfully promote its brands, or if it receives bad publicity as a result of a product liability case or publicized health or other risks associated with its products, the value of the Company’s brands will be diminished. This could have a material and adverse effect on the business and results of operations.

The outcome of tax disputes, litigation, indemnification and guarantees, and regulatory action could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

In December 2002, summary judgment of noninfringement was obtained by certain generic drug manufacturers, sued by the Company under the U.S. Hatch-Waxman Act, alleging inducement of infringement by such manufacturers of the Company's U.S. patent protecting the use of mirtazapine (Remeron^®) in combination with one or more SSRIs for the treatment of depression. Three of the generic drug manufacturers sued by the Company filed antitrust claims against the Company as counterclaims in the infringement actions brought by the Company. In addition, antitrust claims were filed against the Company in the United States on behalf of nine large chain store and grocery store pharmacies, and by alleged classes of direct and indirect purchasers of Remeron^®. These cases were consolidated in the Federal District Court of New Jersey. In addition to these cases, the state attorneys general of the States of Texas, Florida, and Oregon opened civil investigations to determine if the Company's conduct violated their respective laws and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), working with the State Attorneys General, opened a civil investigation to determine whether the Company violated federal law.

Back to Contents

12 

In April 2004, the Company reached settlements with the three generic manufacturers in an aggregate amount of USD 28 million. In September 2004, the Company reached a settlement with the indirect purchaser class (class of consumers and third party payers in the United States who paid for mirtazapine during the relevant period) for total consideration of USD 36 million. This settlement also resolved the claims and investigations of the three state attorneys general that had commenced investigations as well as the claims of all other states. The FTC announced that in light of the states’ settlement it was closing its investigation without taking any action. The indirect purchasers’ and state attorneys’ general settlement is subject to certain conditions including, but not limited to, approval by the Federal District Court of New Jersey. In September 2004, the Company also settled with the nine large chain store and grocery store plaintiffs. The Company continues to believe that its actions in obtaining and enforcing its intellectual property rights were appropriate. However, given the costs and risks of defending these actions, the Company took the opportunity to resolve these matters. Including legal costs the Company recognized a total pretax charge of EUR 89 million for the Remeron^® cases during 2004.

The action brought by an alleged class of direct purchasers remains pending in the Federal District Court in Newark, New Jersey. In September 2004, the District Court entered an order dismissing three of the five claims brought by those direct purchasers while denying the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. In February 2005 the District Court entered an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of establishing monopoly power and granting the Company’s motion for summary judgment with respect to “establishing monopoly power via the direct evidence approach.” The Court indicated that it would address the Company’s pending motion for summary judgment with respect to “the traditional market definition approach” in a “future opinion.” That motion, as well as the Company’s motion for summary judgment addressed to plaintiff’s two remaining claims, remain outstanding, as does the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and its motion for partial summary judgment with respect to an aspect of one of its claims. No trial date has been set. The Company will continue to defend the remaining claims vigorously.

There are pending against Akzo Nobel N.V. and its subsidiaries a number of other claims, all of which are contested. The Company is also involved in disputes with tax authorities in several jurisdictions. Furthermore, in the context of the divestitures of businesses the relevant Akzo Nobel companies have agreed to indemnify and/or provide guarantees to the buyers (and/or their successors and assigns) regarding certain representations and warranties or developments.

While the outcome of these claims, disputes, indemnifications and guarantees cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes, based upon legal advice and information received, that the final outcome will not materially affect the consolidated financial position of the Company but could be material to the Company’s result of operations or cashflows in any one accounting period.

The Company will be responsible for any liabilities arising out of antitrust litigation.

Akzo Nobel is involved in investigations by the antitrust authorities in the European Union, the United States, and Canada into alleged violations of the respective antitrust laws for some products in these jurisdictions. The Company is fully cooperating with the authorities in these investigations. In addition, the Company is defending civil damage claims in relation to some of these alleged antitrust violations. At December 31, 2003, the Company had a provision for antitrust cases of EUR 75 million. Fines, civil damage settlements, and legal costs incurred in 2004 in connection with these cases amounted to EUR 5 million (2003: EUR 27 million).

Back to Contents

13

In 2004, based on an estimate of probable fines, civil damage claims, and costs to be paid over a number of years to come–taking into account legal advice and the current facts and circumstances–the Company added EUR 110 million to the provision for antitrust cases. This addition to the provision also includes amounts related to the fines of EUR 21 million, imposed by the European Commission in December 2004 in connection with Akzo Nobel companies’ alleged involvement in a cartel for choline chloride, and of EUR 84.5 million, imposed by the European Commission in January 2005 for alleged involvement in a monochloroacetic acid cartel. The Company has appealed both decisions. At December 31, 2004, the provision for antitrust cases amounted to EUR 180 million.

In January 2005 the Company received a Statement of Objections by the EU Commission regarding an alleged EU cartel in Hydrogen Peroxide and Persalts. In this case as well as in investigations by the US DOJ and the Canadian Bureau of Competition into alleged antitrust violations in Hydrogen Peroxide in North America the Company is fully cooperating with the authorities. The Company believes that discussions with the US DOJ regarding a possible disposition of the matter may be finalized in the next few months.

It should be understood, however, that in light of possible future developments such as (a) the outcome of investigations of the various antitrust authorities, (b) potential additional lawsuits by (direct or indirect) purchasers, (c) possible future civil settlements, and (d) rulings or judgments in the pending investigations or in related civil suits, the antitrust cases may result in additional liabilities and related costs. However, the Company at this point in time cannot estimate any additional amount of loss or range of loss in excess of the recorded amounts with sufficient certainty to allow such amount or range of amounts to be meaningful. Moreover, if and to the extent that the contingent liabilities materialize, they are typically paid over a number of years and the timing of such payments cannot be predicted with confidence. The Company believes that the aggregate amount of any additional fines and civil damages to be paid will not materially affect the Company's financial position. The aggregate amount, however, could be material to the Company's results of operations or cash flows in any one accounting period.

With regard to Flexsys, a 50/50 joint venture for rubber chemicals with Solutia Inc., authorities in the United States, Canada, and Europe are investigating alleged antitrust violations in the rubber chemicals industry. We have been informed by Flexsys management that it is cooperating with the authorities and will continue to do so. In April 2005 both Flexsys and the Company received a Statement of Objections by the EU Commission. Based on this Statement of Objections the Company has reason to believe that Flexsys and the Company will not be fined by the EU Commission. We are also aware of a number of purported class actions and individual actions having been filed against Flexsys in federal court (by direct purchasers) and in various state courts (by alleged indirect purchasers) in the United States, and in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, Canada. We are informed that fifteen of the U.S. state court actions have been dismissed against Flexsys on various grounds and that motions to dismiss or otherwise dispose of the remaining cases are still pending in seven remaining state cases. The Company is named as codefendant in the federal actions and in one state action in Tennessee. Flexsys has entered a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the federal class action, subject to certain conditions including but not limited to final court approval. (currently scheduled for June 21, 2005). The settlement resolves the plaintiffs’ claims against the Company. Flexsys has recognized certain provisions for these cases and the Company does not believe that it will be liable for funding any judgments against, settlements made by, or related costs incurred by Flexsys. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in Flexsys, however, may be affected by these cases.

Back to Contents

14 

Product liability claims could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

Given the widespread impact that brand-name drugs have on the health of patient populations, pharmaceutical and medical devices companies have historically been subject to large product-liability claims and settlements caused by the use of their products. The Company also runs the risk of product liability claims from its Coatings and Chemicals products. The Company is currently involved in a number of product liability cases claiming damages as a result of its products. It believes that any reasonably foreseeable unaccrued costs and liabilities associated with such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position but could be materially adverse to its results of operations. There can, however, be no assurance that a future product liability claim or series of claims that are not fully covered by insurance would not have an adverse effect on the Company’s business or results of operations.

The Company’s business will continue to expose it to risks of environmental liabilities.

The Company uses hazardous materials, chemicals, biological and toxic compounds in its product development programs and manufacturing processes, which have exposed it, and in the future could expose it, to risks of accidental contamination and events of noncompliance with environmental laws and regulatory enforcement, and personal injury and property damage claims resulting therefrom. If an accident occurred or if the Company were to discover contamination caused by prior operations, it could be liable for cleanup obligations, damages or fines, which could have an adverse effect on its business and results of operations.

These environmental remediation obligations could significantly reduce the Company’s operating results. In particular, the provisions and accruals for these obligations may be insufficient if the assumptions underlying the accruals prove incorrect or if the Company is held responsible for additional, currently undiscovered contamination.

Stricter environmental, safety and health laws and enforcement policies could result in substantial costs and increase potential liabilities of the Company, and could subject the Company’s handling, manufacture, use, reuse or disposal of substances or pollutants to more rigorous scrutiny than is currently the case.

Consequently, compliance with these laws could result in significant capital expenditures as well as other costs and liabilities, thereby harming Akzo Nobel’s business and operating results.

Exchange rate fluctuations can have a harmful impact on the Company’s financial results.

The Company has operations in more than 80 countries throughout the world. As a result, a substantial portion of its assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are denominated in various currencies other than the euro, principally the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the Swedish krona, the Japanese yen, and Latin American and Asian currencies. Because the Company’s financial statements are denominated in euro, fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a material impact on its reported results.

Back to Contents

15

The Company’s financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if the Company does not successfully mitigate risks associated with interest rate changes.

A portion of the Company’s investments, loans and borrowings bear interest on a non-fixed basis. Accordingly, changes in interest rates can affect the cost of these interest-bearing investments, loans and borrowings. The Company mitigates interest risk by financing noncurrent assets and a certain portion of current assets with equity, long-term liabilities and long-term borrowings with fixed interest rates. In the event that this strategy is not successful, the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company could be materially and adversely affected as a result of changes in interest rates.

Adverse stock market developments may affect assets of pension funds, causing higher pension charges and pension premiums payable.

The Company has a number of defined benefit pension plans, covering the majority of its employees. Plan assets principally consist of long-term interest-earning investments, quoted equity securities, and real estate. The performance of stock markets could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements as some 45 percent of plan assets are equity securities. The poor performance of the stock markets in 2001 and 2002 had a negative influence on the investment results of Akzo Nobel’s pension funds, resulting in additional pension charges, pension premiums and payments to such funds. The pension charges in 2002 were EUR 80 million higher than in 2001, while pension charges for 2003 were EUR 130 million higher than in 2002. Furthermore, the Company recognized an additional minimum unfunded pension liability of EUR 1.8 billion (pre-tax), at December 31, 2002.

As a result of some recovery of the stock markets in 2003, pension charges for 2004 were EUR 50 million lower than in 2003. Due to further recovery of the stock markets in 2004, 2005 pension charges will be EUR 50 million lower than in 2004 (based on International Financial Reporting Standards, under which the Company will report as from January 1, 2005). The additional minimum unfunded pension liability at December 31, 2004, decreased to EUR 1.2 billion (pre-tax).

A downgrading by credit rating agencies could result in higher financing costs or reduced availability of credit.

At present the Company’s long-term credit rating from Moody’s is A3 with a short-term rating of P-2, both with a so-called “stable outlook”. The current long-term credit rating from Standard & Poor’s is A- and their short-term rating is A-2, both with a so-called “negative outlook”.

The present rating is three notches above the so-called “high-yield zone”. However, if the Company’s rating would decline or would approach or enter the high-yield zone, this would result in increased financing costs for the Company and could also reduce availability of credit, especially at commercially acceptable rates.

A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. The rating may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Back to Contents

16 

Because the Company conducts international operations, it is exposed to a variety of risks, many of them beyond its control, that could adversely affect its business.

Akzo Nobel is a global company with operations in Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. In addition to general business risk and the risks described in this section, the Company’s international operations are subject to a variety of potential risks including: political and economic instability, the risk of hyperinflation in some countries, currency and interest-rate fluctuations, lack of local business experience, difficulty in enforcing property rights, local security concerns, and language and other cultural barriers. In addition, changes in the tax laws of some countries where the Company does business can affect the Company’s net income.

Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

Akzo Nobel N.V. is a public limited liability company (“Naamloze Vennootschap”) organized under the law of the Netherlands for an indefinite period. The principal executive offices of Akzo Nobel N.V. are located at Velperweg 76, 6824 BM Arnhem, the Netherlands. Its telephone number is +31 (26) 366 4433 and the fax number is +31 (26) 366 3250. The E-mail address is ACC@akzonobel.com. The address of the Company’s website is www.akzonobel.com. Any correspondence regarding this Annual Report on Form 20-F should be directed to the Company Secretary.

The name and address of the person authorized to receive notices and communications from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is:

OVERVIEW

Akzo Nobel is an international company that serves customers around the world with healthcare products, coatings, and chemicals.

Headquartered in the Netherlands, Akzo Nobel had activities in more than 80 countries and employed 63,600 people during 2004. Sales in 2004 were EUR 12.7 billion, with Pharma, Coatings, and Chemicals accounting for EUR 3.2 billion, EUR 5.2 billion, and EUR 4.3 billion, respectively.

Back to Contents

17

In the pharmaceutical industry, Akzo Nobel is smaller than many of its competitors, but it has significant positions in products for female reproductive therapy and anesthesiology. Akzo Nobel believes that based on sales it is the largest coatings producer in the world; its products and markets vary widely from architectural paints in some countries to industrial coatings in others. In the chemical products industry, Akzo Nobel is a significant competitor in a number of markets, and on a global basis the Company competes with a number of larger chemical companies.

Demand for Akzo Nobel's products, particularly its chemical and coatings products, is generally reflective of the overall health of economies in Western Europe, the United States, and Asia, and is, except for certain Coatings and Chemicals activities, generally not seasonal in nature.

It is Akzo Nobel’s objective to develop or acquire new and defend existing leading positions in its markets, while maintaining structural long-term profitability. In addition to its core business, the Company focuses on the development of new and improved products in major growth sectors that draw on the Company’s technological and marketing know-how. The Company is pursuing expansion in Eastern Europe, SouthEast Asia and Latin America.

A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

Akzo was created in 1969, out of the merger between AKU N.V. (“AKU”) and Koninklijke Zout-Organon N.V., and in 1994 it was renamed Akzo Nobel, after the merger with Nobel Industries AB (“Nobel”).

AKU N.V. was founded in 1911 under the name of N.V. Nederlandsche Kunstzijdefabriek. Over the years this company grew into an international concern with interests in the field of cellulose fibers and, following the Second World War, synthetic textile and carpet fibers as well as industrial fibers. At the time of the 1969 merger, AKU's principal countries of operation were the Netherlands, Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain and several Latin American countries, where activities were often carried out through joint ventures with local partners.

Koninklijke Zout-Organon N.V. was set up in 1967 as a holding company in connection with the merger between Koninklijke Zout-Ketjen N.V. and N.V. Koninklijke Zwanenberg-Organon. Koninklijke Zout-Ketjen N.V. had interests in companies active in salt refining, basic chemicals, specialty chemicals and coatings. While these companies were mainly active in the Netherlands, they had built up major export positions at the time of the merger. N.V. Koninklijke Zwanenberg-Organon consisted of companies active in food/nonfood products and chemical products and of pharmaceutical companies producing brand-name drugs, nonprescription products and raw materials for the pharmaceutical industry.

Nobel was formed in 1984 through the merger of Bofors (established in 1646) and KemaNobel, founded in 1871. At the time of the merger with Akzo in 1994, Nobel was a leading European producer of chemicals (pulp and paper chemicals and surfactants) and coatings (paints for professional and consumer markets, industrial coatings and industrial products). Nobel had operations in more than 30 countries.

In July 1998, Akzo Nobel acquired Courtaulds plc (“Courtaulds”), an international chemical company with leading positions in high-tech industrial coatings and man-made fibers. Its best known brands, International Paints, Courtelle acrylic fibers, and Tencel^®, a new cellulosic fiber, were included in the acquisition. Courtaulds, which was founded in 1816 as a silk weaving company, pioneered the global man-made fiber industry at the beginning of the 20^th century. In the 1960s Courtaulds acquired International Paint and Pinchin Johnson.

Back to Contents

18 

In November 1999, the Company acquired Hoechst Roussel Vet (“HR Vet”), the veterinary business of Hoechst AG. Through this acquisition, Intervet, the veterinary medicines business of Akzo Nobel became a significant player in the veterinary medicines business.

After the Courtaulds acquisition, the fibers operations of Akzo Nobel and Courtaulds were combined into a separate organization, named Acordis. At December 31, 1999, Acordis was sold to a newly established company. Akzo Nobel retained a stake–at present of some 20 percent–in this company, which is gradually divesting its activities.

In September 2003, we announced the plans to divest the Catalysts, Phosphorus Chemicals, and Coating Resins businesses to create room to maneuver and improve the Company’s balance sheet. Together, these solid and profitable businesses represented EUR 0.8 billion in consolidated sales, on an annual basis. In 2004 the divestments were completed generating approximately EUR 1.0 billion.

In February 2005, the new strategic focus for Chemicals was announced, which will result in a smaller, but stronger, portfolio. As a consequence of this new focus, the Company intends to divest several businesses that do not fit in this new strategy, including Ink and Adhesive Resins, Oleochemicals, Salt Specialties, PVC Additives, Solar Salt Australia, and Methyl Amines/Choline Chloride. All the activities earmarked for divestment represent a total of around EUR 700 million in 2004 sales.

Over the years, Akzo Nobel acquired and divested numerous other activities and businesses, which all were of a much lesser size than the ones mentioned above. For recent acquisitions and divestments reference is made to Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

For a list of the Company’s subsidiaries, see Exhibit 8 to this Report, which is incorporated by reference herein.

B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Operations are organized in three groups on the basis of affinity between activities: Pharma, Coatings and Chemicals. Within each group the activities are carried out in business units.

The Board of Management is the highest executive authority. At the corporate level, key tasks are coordinated in the fields of strategy; finance; control; human resources; technology; legal affairs and intellectual property; communications; health, safety, and environment; information management; and risk and insurance management.

STRATEGY

Akzo Nobel is a diversified multicultural group of companies with activities in pharma, coatings, and chemicals. Our ambition is to create above average economic value over the business cycle. We strive to be a company which talented, ambitious people are proud to work for. We also want to be a company that is respected in the societies in which it operates.

Capital allocation is focused on building sustainable leading business positions, reflected in attractive growth, returns significantly above the costs of capital, and substantial operational cash flows. We actively restructure and divest activities that do not meet these criteria. We are led by medium- to long-term value creation.

Back to Contents

19

We develop competitive advantages by combining the focus and entrepreneurial spirit of a decentralized business unit organization with the scale and power of a corporate center that provides access to global capital markets, managerial talent, and best practice management processes.

Our deeply ingrained business principles are the expression of a strong, shared international culture. They give us guidance in the complex, ever changing global environment in which we operate.

We regularly evaluate the added value of the composition of our portfolio in a pragmatic way, driven by our value creation principle. As in the past, we will not shy away from bold moves.

Pharma Group

Our human healthcare activities are experiencing a period of declining sales. As a consequence, we have lowered the cost base and will continue to critically scrutinize the organization for further adjustments. At the same time we will continue to invest heavily in R&D to boost our pipeline. We will focus on in-licensing in areas where we have strong market positions but lack sufficient products. On the other hand, we are actively out-licensing and partnering in areas where we have limited development and marketing capabilities. We are focused on restoring growth in the medium term through the quality of our pipeline.

We have integrated Organon and Diosynth effective January 2005. Diosynth is our focused niche player in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients market and our main biotech activity. Diosynth’s third-party business will be continued under the name Diosynth. The integration will enable us to combine existing biotechnology competencies and reduce the complexity of our organization.

We are the third largest company in animal health in the world. We aim to remain a global leader through autonomous growth, aided by our strong commitment to R&D, and–where appropriate–acquisitions.

Pharma’s medium-term financial targets are a return on sales (ROS) of around 17.5 percent and a return on investment (ROI) of 35 percent. For the long term, we strive for a ROS of over 20 percent and a ROI of 40 percent. In 2004, ROS¹ and ROI² were 12 percent and 16 percent, respectively.

Coatings Group

Our coatings business is the world leader. It embraces most of the markets in both consumer and industrial applications for paints and coatings.

We are focusing on growth in the emerging markets of Asia, Eastern and Central Europe, and South and Central America through autonomous development and acquisitions. We will also continue to enhance our presence in the mature markets through selected acquisitions.

Our ambition is to remain market leader and to participate in the worldwide consolidation of the coatings industry, which we believe is inevitably necessary because our supplier and customer base strengthens globally.

Back to Contents

20 

Our medium-term financial target is 25 percent ROI, leading in due course to around 30 percent. In 2004, ROI was 17.5 percent. However, excluding restructuring and impairment charges, ROI was 20.5 percent.

Chemicals Group

We have a wide spread of activities within our chemicals portfolio with a mixture of good leadership positions and several smaller market penetrations. The financial returns from the various businesses also differ. We are making a determined effort to streamline and fine-tune our Chemicals portfolio by concentrating on actively growing profitable businesses which we have identified within selected strategic markets. This will result in us exiting noncore businesses and rationalizing the support structure around the selected core platforms.

The leading guideline is to focus on profitable growth in those markets where we have a competitive advantage and should achieve sustainable, above-average financial returns.

In February 2005, we announced that as a consequence of this new focus, the Company intends to divest several businesses that do not fit in this new strategy, including Ink and Adhesive Resins, Oleochemicals, Salt Specialties, PVC Additives, Solar Salt Australia, and Methyl Amines/Choline Chloride. All the activities earmarked for divestment represent a total of around EUR 700 million in 2004 sales.

Our financial target is to achieve a ROI of around 17.5 percent over the economic cycle. In 2004, ROI was 33 percent. Excluding gains on divestments and restructuring and impairment charges, ROI was 15 percent.

BUSINESS UNITS

The business units and their products (as at December 31, 2004) are summarized below:

PHARMA GROUP

Organon

Intervet

Diosynth

As of January 1, 2005, Organon and Diosynth were integrated in one business unit, which combines Pharma’s know-how, especially in the biotechnology area, and simplifies supply chain management.

Back to Contents

21

COATINGS GROUP

Decorative Coatings

Industrial Finishes

Powder Coatings

Car Refinishes

Marine & Protective Coatings

Nobilas

As from January 1, 2005, Nobilas has been moved from the Coatings group to Other.

Back to Contents

22 

CHEMICALS GROUP

Pulp and Paper Chemicals

Functional Chemicals

Surface Chemistry

Base Chemicals

Polymer Chemicals

Salt

Energy

In February 2005, we announced that we will streamline the Chemicals portfolio in order to competitively realign the business for growth, profitability, and leadership positions in selected markets. These efforts will result in a smaller portfolio that is stronger, creates more value, and is better structured to meet our financial expectations. The Chemicals activities will be concentrated in five business units: Pulp & Paper Chemicals, Polymer Chemicals, Surfactants, Functional Chemicals, and Base Chemicals (the latter will comprise the Chlor-Alkali, Electrolysis Salt, and Energy businesses). We are committed to ensure that leading positions–which are key to our new strategy–will be established or consolidated. Expansion in growth markets such as China will also be prioritized.

As a consequence of this new focus, the Company intends to divest several businesses that do not fit this new strategy, including Ink and Adhesive Resins, Oleochemicals, Salt Specialties, PVC Additives, Solar Salt Australia, and Methyl Amines/Choline Chloride. All the activities earmarked for divestment represent a total of around EUR 700 million in 2004 sales, and any bids will be expected to reflect the value of the businesses concerned.

Back to Contents

23

ACTIVITIES OF AKZO NOBEL

Industry Segment Information

Akzo Nobel's financial reporting and industry segment information consists of results from the following groups: "Pharma", "Coatings" and "Chemicals". The information presented below illustrates the relative importance of the individual groups.

Percent of total net sales and total operating income

Back to Contents

24 

Below a summary of the activities of each group is given. For more details on Akzo Nobel’s activities, reference is made to “Business Review and Developments at Business Units”. See Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion on factors affecting comparability between periods.

Description of Pharma's Business

Akzo Nobel’s healthcare activities extend around the world. It engages in research, development, manufacturing, sales, and service in strategic areas of human and animal healthcare. These include prescription medicines, veterinary products, as well as complex active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Pharma continues to work hard to reduce the complexity within its business units and improve operational efficiencies. U.S. dollar weakness and increasingly stiff competition, especially for Remeron^® made these steps all the more important. The new strategy developed in 2003 was actively pursued with priorities for a clear focus on leading positions, alliances to strengthen our growth opportunities in other areas, and aggressive cost cutting.

Akzo Nobel’s business unit Organon has an international reputation based on quality products and innovative R&D. It is among a very few international companies conducting research into contraception. Sold as Desogen^® in the United States, Marvelon^® is one of the world’s most prescribed contraceptive pills. However, sales of our oral contraceptives have been adversely affected by generic competition in the United States. NuvaRing^®, our contraceptive vaginal ring, was launched in the United States and Europe in 2002 and over 2003 and 2004 gathered sales momentum. The Company also produces fertility products and medicines for the treatment of menopausal complaints and, as an innovator in the field of psychiatric drugs, is marketing antidepressant Remeron^®. However, after an unfavorable court ruling in December 2002 for Remeron^®, this product lost its market exclusivity in the United States and has faced intense generic competition. In 2004, Remeron^® also lost market exclusivity in certain countries in Europe.

In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company concluded an agreement with Pfizer, whereby Pfizer and Organon will collaborate on the clinical development and manufacturing of asenapine, and co-promote the product in the United States, European Union, Japan and other markets. Asenapine is a potentially new

Back to Contents

25

psychotropic medication for the treatment of a variety of disorders that is in Phase III¹ trials for schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Pfizer made an initial payment of USD 100 million (EUR 88 million) in December 2003. The agreement with Pfizer also provides for additional milestone payments of up to USD 270 million, contingent upon gaining further regulatory approvals and the launch of asenapine in the United States, Europe and Japan, as well as the attainment of certain agreed sales levels.

Together with Sanofi-Synthélabo, the Company developed the new antithrombotic (pentasaccharide) Arixtra^®, which has been approved and launched in the U.S. and Europe. Early in 2004, Organon transferred to Sanofi-Synthélabo its remaining rights and development obligations for Arixtra^® and other oligosaccharides, such as idraparinux (SanOrg 34006), in exchange for revenues based on future sales from jointly developed antithrombotic products.

Diosynth is a leading manufacturer of complex active pharmaceutical ingredients, with production facilities in several countries. The company is active in biochemical extraction and purification, fermentation, industrial cell culture, and organic synthesis. Diosynth’s main products are heparin, insulin, gonadotropic hormones, steroids, synthetic peptides, carbohydrates, and opiate analogs. Through the acquisition of Covance Biotechnology Services Inc (in 2001), the Company believes that Diosynth has sufficient size and products to play a leading role in the developing biopharmaceutical market segment. In 2003 and 2004, Diosynth was increasingly confronted with deteriorating conditions in third-party markets for both chemical and biotech products, and with lower captive demand from Organon. To address this situation, restructuring programs were carried out in 2004.

In January 2005, we completed the integration of Diosynth and Organon. The integrated business unit combines Pharma’s know-how, especially in the biotechnology area, and simplifies supply chain management. Third-party customers of Diosynth will continue to be served under the Diosynth name.

Intervet focuses on the veterinary medicine market, with vaccines for cattle, pigs, sheep, horses, poultry, fish and pets, endocrine fertility products, corticosteroids and antibiotics, including injectors for treating mastitis and metritis. The acquisition of Hoechst Roussel Vet, in November 1999, complemented the product range with specialty medical products for both pets and livestock, and feed additives for livestock. Intervet has an international reputation and works closely with leading research institutes, universities, and other companies. In May 2003, a new vaccine production facility in DeSoto, Kansas, was opened.

In 2002, we decided to enter the human vaccine business because it is a growth market and because we can benefit from our experience in vaccines and biotechnology in general. Based on doses, Intervet is the largest vaccine producer in the world and in terms of sales it is number five. The start-up business, Nobilon, is housed in a new vaccine production facility in Boxmeer, which was opened in December 2003. Nobilon will focus initially on human vaccines. Sales by Nobilon from its own products, however, are not anticipated until after 2007. In the interim, the facility will produce antigens for veterinary vaccines.

The current research and development pipeline of Akzo Nobel Pharma is stated below. The content of the drug development portfolio will change over time as new compounds progress from research to development and from development to market. Owing to the nature of the drug development process, it is not unusual for some compounds, especially those in the early stages of investigation, to be terminated as they progress through development.

Back to Contents

26 

The following is the current pipeline (Phase II and later).

Explanatory remarks

Back to Contents

27

Description of Coatings' Business

Akzo Nobel is a leading producer of paints, finishes, stains, and synthetic resins for industrial applications, professional painters, and the do-it-yourself sector. Product areas are decorative/architectural paint, car refinishes, liquid and powder coatings for industrial use (on wood, plastics and metal), marine and yacht coatings, protective coatings, aerospace coatings, and industrial and consumer adhesives.

Akzo Nobel’s global strategy for its coatings business is to extend leading positions in clearly defined product areas and specialist niche markets, which demand high levels of technical expertise and customer service. Major acquisitions in the last years, combined with organic growth, lifted Coatings to the world’s number one position based on sales. We aim to strengthen this position through further organic growth and bolt-on acquisitions. Growth in mature markets is expected to remain in line with GDP. Opportunities exist in emerging markets and in technology switches often driven by environmental considerations. In the fragmented worldwide coatings market, we, as the world leader, only represent 8 percent. This market is in a process of consolidation, and we believe that our global positions in many fields will enable us to play a leading role.

The Company supports the international initiative of Coatings Care^®–a program for continuous improvement in Safety, Health, and the Environment–and is constantly seeking optimal ways to match the principles of eco-efficiency with those of high performance.

Within the field of decorative coatings, Akzo Nobel has a number of top-quality professional and do-it-yourself brands, which target national markets (e.g. Crown^® (United Kingdom) and Flexa^® (the Netherlands)), multinational markets (e.g. Nordsjö^® and Trimetal^®) and truly international markets (e.g. Sikkens^®, Levis^®, and Sadolin^®). The strength of these brands reflects the Company’s color

Back to Contents

28 

know-how and customer orientation, as well as the excellent performance and high environmental profile of its waterborne and high-solids paints.

Another prominent area is industrial coatings, especially volatile organic compounds (“VOC”)-compliant waterborne paints, high solids, and powder coatings, which are used to beautify and protect metal, plastic, and wooden substrates. Applications range from home appliances to wooden furniture and heavy-duty goods vehicles. The Company is the market leader in powder coatings and is strong in industrial wood finishes, coil coatings, and plastic coatings.

The Car Refinishes business includes the car repair and commercial vehicles sector. With Sikkens^®, Akzo Nobel Coatings has been a major player for years, ensuring a fast, efficient, and top-quality result for every type of repair. Combined worldwide expertise enables it to develop new technologies and products of the highest quality continually. The Company also offers the equipment and expertise to go with these products, such as the revolutionary Automatchic system, which permits bodyshops to measure and match colors on the spot, or the CarInfo II system, which automates administrative processes in the bodyshop and produces a wealth of management information that can greatly improve bodyshop profitability.

The Company is an international market leader in marine, yacht, and protective coatings for heavy-duty applications, such as oil rigs. The Company’s tradename International^® is well known all over the world. The Company supplies antifouling coatings that keep ships’ and yachts’ hulls free of barnacles, making it easier for them to travel through the water thereby saving fuel costs for owners. The Company also provides paints for ships’ superstructures, such as Interfine^®, which transforms rust stains into colorless deposits.

The Company offers a wide range of VOC-compliant coatings and other products qualified by the world’s major aircraft manufacturers and used for aircraft maintenance.

Through Nobilas, the Company provides accident management services to insurers, corporate fleet owners, car leasing, and rental companies. It draws on the knowledge and experience of Car Refinishes in this area of activity. Building the organization and proving the concept was the focus for 2004. Accelerated growth is the objective for next years.

Back to Contents

29

Description of Chemicals' Business

The portfolio of Akzo Nobel Chemicals is a mix of specialty, functional, and commodity chemicals based upon leading positions in selected areas of the chemical industry.

Back to Contents

30 

Akzo Nobel is a leader in environmentally compatible pulp bleaching chemicals, notably with sodium chlorate worldwide, and is strong in hydrogen peroxide. The Company is also a prominent producer of chemicals for the wet-end manufacture of paper and board, notably retention and drainage agents, wet-strength resins, and sizing agents.

Akzo Nobel is strong in functional chemicals. It is the world’s principal producer of chelates, which deliver micronutrients to plants, and make organophosphorus-based fire retardants for plastics and hydraulic fluids. In addition, Akzo Nobel is a leading global producer of ethylene amines. Other key products include monochloroacetic acid, in which the Company leads the worldwide market, as well as carboxymethyl cellulose, which serve as water-soluble thickening agents, and choline chloride, a food and feed additive.

In surfactants, Akzo Nobel is the market leader in cationic (fatty amine-based) surfactants in Europe and a major producer of non-ionic ethylene oxide-based surfactants. The Company also makes specialty cellulose-based rheology additives for paint and building applications.

In Northwest Europe, the Company has leading positions in the production of chlorine and caustic soda for industrial applications.

The Company is the market leader in polymerization catalysts and additives for the processing and manufacturing of plastics worldwide. It produces organic peroxides for thermosetting and cross-linking applications, UV Cure Chemicals for the Graphic Arts, coatings and other industries, and polysulphide chemicals for the aerospace, marine and construction industries.

Akzo Nobel is the largest producer of salt for electrolysis in Northwest Europe, and manufactures high-quality evaporated salt with strong consumer brands such as JOZO^®. The production and electrolysis of salt both require a great deal of energy. By operating in joint ventures with Dutch electricity distribution companies, the Company is able to make use of combined heat and power (cogeneration). The Company has been active in cogeneration since the 1930s.

In addition, the Company has established a strong presence, both globally and regionally, through joint ventures. Joint ventures include Flexsys, with Solutia (number one worldwide in the production of rubber processing chemicals).

In 2004, the Company divested the Catalysts, Phosphorus Chemicals, and Coating Resins businesses to create room to maneuver and improve the Company’s balance sheet. Proceeds were approximately EUR 1.0 billion.

In February 2005, we announced that we will streamline the Chemicals portfolio in order to competitively realign the business for growth, profitability, and leadership positions in selected markets. These efforts will result in a smaller portfolio that is stronger, creates more value, and is better structured to meet our financial expectations. The Chemicals activities will be concentrated in five business units: Pulp & Paper Chemicals, Polymer Chemicals, Surfactants, Functional Chemicals, and Base Chemicals (the latter will comprise the Chlor-Alkali, Electrolysis Salt, and Energy businesses). We are committed to ensure that leading positions–which are key to our new strategy–will be established or consolidated. Expansion in growth markets such as China will also be prioritized.

As a consequence of this new focus, the Company intends to divest several businesses that do not fit this new strategy, including Ink and Adhesive Resins, Oleochemicals, Salt Specialties, PVC Additives, Solar Salt Australia, and Methyl Amines/Choline Chloride. All the activities earmarked for divestment represent a total

Back to Contents

31

of around EUR 700 million in 2004 sales, and any bids will be expected to reflect the value of the businesses concerned.

GEOGRAPHIC DATA

Below, geographic information for Akzo Nobel is presented for net sales, operating income, identifiable assets and expenditures for property, plant and equipment.

See Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion on factors affecting comparability between periods.

Back to Contents

32 

INSURANCE

Akzo Nobel’s insurance policy is part of a general risk management philosophy emphasizing the importance of creation of risk awareness throughout the entire organization and promotion of loss control efforts. Risk finance, normally in the form of insurance, is seen as a last resort to provide financial coverage for mainly catastrophe-like events. Events of frequent nature with limited financial effect are self-insured with the use of 100-percent-owned captive insurance companies. The limits of insurance are based on loss scenarios as well as normal practice in Akzo Nobel’s type of industry.

For property damage/business interruption, for 2005 in general, the exposure retained in the captive insurance arrangements is limited to EUR 12 million per occurrence with an annual aggregate of EUR 25 million. When losses exceed this annual aggregate, external insurers will provide coverage from a deductible level of EUR 1 million. Damages from acts of terrorism are excluded from insurance coverage. For damages from natural disasters Akzo Nobel retains 10 percent of these damages. The maximum amount of loss covered by external insurers for property damage/business interruption is EUR 250 million.

For general and product liability of Coatings, Chemicals, and Intervet and for general liability of Organon (including Diosynth), in 2005 the exposure retained in the captive insurance arrangements is limited to EUR 10 million per claim with an annual aggregate of EUR 20 million. When losses exceed this annual aggregate, external insurers will provide coverage from a deductible level of EUR 0.5 million. For product liability of Organon (including Diosynth), in 2005 the exposure retained in the captive insurance arrangements is limited to EUR 25 million per claim without any annual aggregate. Liabilities as a result of acts of terrorism are excluded from insurance coverage. The maximum amount of loss covered by external insurers for general product liability is EUR 400 million plus in excess thereof USD 300 million.

HUMAN RESOURCES

Akzo Nobel’s decentralized organizational structure supports its ambitions and offers the Company’s employees broad scope and responsibility in various disciplines, permitting them to develop their talents at an early stage of their careers. Akzo Nobel provides opportunities and resources; employees can use these to develop their skills and to be ready for change even before it becomes a necessity.
Some recent developments in this area are described below.

In order to place a stronger focus on identified areas for improvement, the Board of Management has decided to implement a consistent approach to performance management throughout Akzo Nobel. The new Performance & Development Dialog (“P&D Dialog”) program, which is based on best practices from various business units and outside organizations, was launched in December in all business units. The new program includes six core Akzo Nobel competencies which will help embed our values and business principles in each employee’s daily work and behavior. Also included in the process are three people management skills, which will drive people management excellence throughout the Company.

The establishment of this performance appraisal program throughout Akzo Nobel will enable our global businesses to place a more consistent focus on high quality people management. The P&D Dialog supports the annual alignment of individual objectives with business direction, fosters ongoing performance and development dialog, and ensures each year a fair and transparent overall assessment and rating for every employee. The implementation is heavily supported by communication and training at business unit and country level and is targeted to involve the majority of employees in 2005, with completion envisaged in 2006.