Edgar Filing: FOSTER L B CO

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-10436

L.B. Foster Company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania

25-1324733

(State of Incorporation)

(I. R. S. Employer

Identification No.)


415 Holiday Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania		15220
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(412) 928-3400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class	Outstanding at July 27, 2016
Common Stock, Par Value $.01		10,383,765 Shares

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX


	Page
PART I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited):

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		24

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		36

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		36

PART II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		37

Item 1A. Risk Factors		37

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		37

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		37

Item 6. Exhibits		38

Signature		39

Index to Exhibits		40

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32,805		$	33,312
Accounts receivable - net		81,396			78,487
Inventories - net		95,150			96,396
Prepaid income tax		5,197			1,131
Other current assets		6,779			5,148

Total current assets		221,327			214,474
Property, plant, and equipment - net		108,625			126,745
Other assets:
Goodwill		23,972			81,752
Other intangibles - net		70,420			134,927
Deferred tax assets		37,794			226
Investments		4,638			5,321
Other assets		3,240			3,215

Total assets	$	470,016		$	566,660

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	58,280		$	55,804
Deferred revenue		9,154			6,934
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		7,612			10,255
Accrued warranty		8,749			8,755
Current maturities of long-term debt		1,335			1,335
Other accrued liabilities		11,380			8,563

Total current liabilities		96,510			91,646
Long-term debt		167,030			167,419
Deferred tax liabilities		6,968			8,926
Other long-term liabilities		15,447			15,837
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $.01, authorized 20,000,000 shares; shares issued at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 11,115,779; shares outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 10,296,139 and 10,221,006, respectively		111			111
Paid-in capital		44,003			46,681
Retained earnings		180,914			276,571
Treasury stock - at cost, common stock, shares at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 819,640 and 894,773, respectively		(19,747	)		(22,591	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(21,220	)		(17,940	)

Total stockholders’ equity		184,061			282,832

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	470,016		$	566,660

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share data)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Sales of goods	$	118,070		$	146,780		$	225,985		$	269,576
Sales of services		17,924			24,639			36,319			39,750

Total net sales		135,994			171,419			262,304			309,326
Cost of goods sold		92,638			114,793			179,031			210,987
Cost of services sold		15,543			19,537			31,500			30,596

Total cost of sales		108,181			134,330			210,531			241,583

Gross profit		27,813			37,089			51,773			67,743

Selling and administrative expenses		23,317			24,278			46,134			46,528
Amortization expense		2,789			3,456			6,055			5,613
Asset impairments		128,938			—			128,938			—
Interest expense		1,652			1,288			2,822			1,901
Interest income		(52	)		(37	)		(107	)		(94	)
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		487			186			683			13
Other expense (income)		107			95			822			(708	)

		157,238			29,266			185,347			53,253

(Loss) income before income taxes		(129,425	)		7,823			(133,574	)		14,490
Income tax (benefit) expense		(37,429	)		2,461			(38,746	)		4,841

Net (loss) income	$	(91,996	)	$	5,362		$	(94,828	)	$	9,649

Basic (loss) earnings per common share	$	(8.96	)	$	0.52		$	(9.25	)	$	0.94

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(8.96	)	$	0.52		$	(9.25	)	$	0.93

Dividends paid per common share	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.08		$	0.08

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
	(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Net (loss) income	$	(91,996	)	$	5,362	$	(94,828	)	$	9,649

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(2,660	)		2,901		(2,007	)		(1,486	)
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $291 and $903		(455	)		—		(1,423	)		—
Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, net of tax expense of $38, $47 and $77, $93*		74			92		150			181

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax		(3,041	)		2,993		(3,280	)		(1,305	)

Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(95,037	)	$	8,355	$	(98,108	)	$	8,344

*	Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for pension obligations are charged to selling and administrative expense.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2016			2015
	(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income	$	(94,828	)	$	9,649
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income taxes		(38,475	)		(425	)
Depreciation		7,325			6,775
Amortization		6,055			5,613
Asset impairments		128,938			—
Equity loss in nonconsolidated investments		683			13
Loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment		240			57
Share-based compensation		555			1,896
Excess income tax deficiency (benefit) from share-based compensation		124			(310	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(2,755	)		6,524
Inventories		(231	)		(7,832	)
Other current assets		(959	)		(103	)
Prepaid income tax		(4,262	)		(948	)
Other noncurrent assets		(60	)		(1,257	)
Dividends from LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC		—			90
Accounts payable		3,784			(13,101	)
Deferred revenue		2,412			(1,073	)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(2,658	)		(5,699	)
Other current liabilities		812			(1,113	)
Other liabilities		(145	)		(690	)

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		6,555			(1,934	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment		768			163
Capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment		(5,070	)		(8,246	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(193,871	)
Loans and capital contributions to equity method investment		(575	)		(61	)

Net cash used by investing activities		(4,877	)		(202,015	)

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2016			2015
	(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of debt		(68,174	)		(62,247	)
Proceeds from debt		67,789			254,291
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock awards		—			68
Financing fees		(712	)		(1,670	)
Treasury stock acquisitions		(265	)		(962	)
Cash dividends on common stock paid to shareholders		(829	)		(831	)
Excess income tax (deficiency) benefit from share-based compensation		(124	)		310

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(2,315	)		188,959

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		130			(1,473	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(507	)		(16,463	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		33,312			52,024

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	32,805		$	35,561

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	2,211		$	1,471

Income taxes paid	$	3,987		$	6,379

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all estimates and adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. However, actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer collectively to L.B. Foster Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Recently issued accounting standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating its implementation approach and assessing the impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new accounting requirements include the accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases. The guidance will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

2. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is organized and evaluated by product group, which is the basis for identifying reportable segments. Each segment represents a revenue-producing component of the Company for which separate financial information is produced internally and is subject to evaluation by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources. Each segment is evaluated based upon its respective contribution to the Company’s consolidated results based upon segment profit.

The following table illustrates revenues and profits (losses) from operations of the Company by segment for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016					Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Net Sales		Segment Profit (loss)			Net Sales		Segment Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	67,503	$	(25,168	)	$	131,795	$	(24,427	)
Construction Products		40,348		3,944			72,228		4,392
Tubular and Energy Services		28,143		(102,983	)		58,281		(104,910	)

Total	$	135,994	$	(124,207	)	$	262,304	$	(124,945	)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015					Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Net Sales		Segment Profit			Net Sales		Segment Profit
Rail Products and Services	$	86,882	$	6,413		$	164,558	$	12,485
Construction Products		49,516		5,158			83,806		6,386
Tubular and Energy Services		35,021		358			60,962		2,316

Total	$	171,419	$	11,929		$	309,326	$	21,187

Segment profits (losses) from operations, as shown above, include internal cost of capital charges for assets used in the segment at a rate of generally 1% per month. There has been no change in the measurement of segment profit from operations from December 31, 2015. The internal cost of capital charges are eliminated during the consolidation process.

The following table provides a reconciliation of reportable segment net profit from operations to the Company’s consolidated total:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
(Loss) income for reportable segments	$	(124,207	)	$	11,929		$	(124,945	)	$	21,187
Interest expense		(1,652	)		(1,288	)		(2,822	)		(1,901	)
Interest income		52			37			107			94
Other (expense) income		(107	)		(95	)		(822	)		708
LIFO income		452			406			525			400
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		(487	)		(186	)		(683	)		(13	)
Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination, and other unallocated charges		(3,476	)		(2,980	)		(4,934	)		(5,985	)

(Loss) income before income taxes	$	(129,425	)	$	7,823		$	(133,574	)	$	14,490

The following table illustrates assets of the Company by segment:


	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Rail Products and Services	$	199,217	$	241,222
Construction Products		90,382		86,335
Tubular and Energy Services		112,465		216,715
Unallocated corporate assets		67,952		22,388

Total	$	470,016	$	566,660

3. ACQUISITIONS

TEW Plus, LTD

On November 23, 2015, the Company acquired the 75% balance of the remaining shares of TEW Plus, LTD (“Tew Plus”) for $2,130, net of cash acquired. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew Plus provides telecommunications and security systems to the railway and commercial markets. Their offerings include full installation services including: design; project management; survey; and commissioning along with future maintenance. The results of Tew Plus’ operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Inspection Oilfield Services

On March 13, 2015, the Company acquired IOS Holdings, Inc. (“IOS” or “test and inspection services”) for $167,404, net of cash acquired and a net working capital receivable adjustment of $2,363. The purchase agreement includes an earn-out provision for the seller to generate an additional $60,000 of proceeds upon achieving certain levels of EBITDA during the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2015. The Company has not accrued an estimated earn-out obligation based upon a probability weighted valuation model of the projected EBITDA results, which indicates that the minimum target will not be achieved. Approximately $7,600 of the purchase price relates to amounts held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Houston, TX, IOS is a leading independent provider of tubular management services with operations in every significant oil and gas producing region in the continental United States. The results of IOS’ operations are included within our Tubular and Energy Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Tew Holdings, LTD

On January 13, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD (“Tew”) for $26,467, net of cash acquired. The purchase price includes approximately $4,200 related to working capital and net debt adjustments. The non-domestic cash payment includes approximately $600 which is held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew provides application engineering solutions primarily to the rail market and other major industries. The results of Tew’s operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Acquisition Summary

Each transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which requires an acquiring entity to recognize, with limited exceptions, all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill primarily represents the value paid for each acquisition’s enhancement to the Company’s product and service offerings and capabilities, as well as a premium payment related to the ability to control the acquired assets. The Company has concluded that intangible assets and goodwill values resulting from the IOS, Tew, and Tew Plus transactions are not deductible for tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:


Allocation of Purchase Price	November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus			March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Current assets	$	4,420		$	19,877		$	12,125
Other assets		—			708			—
Property, plant, and equipment		47			51,453	*		2,398
Goodwill		822			69,908	*		8,772
Other intangibles		1,074			50,354	*		14,048
Liabilities assumed		(3,597	)		(23,596	)		(6,465	)

Total	$	2,766		$	168,704		$	30,878

- As a result of the impact of the downturn within the energy markets, the expectations of a prolonged period before recovery, and the reduction in active U.S. land oil rig count, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2015 that resulted in the full impairment of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed an interim impairment test due to further deterioration in projections that resulted in impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as described in Notes 4 and 5.

The following table summarizes the estimates of the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets acquired:


Intangible Asset	November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus		March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Trade name	$	—	$	2,641		$	870
Customer relationships		817		41,171			10,035
Technology		203		4,364			2,480
Non-competition agreements		54		2,178			663

Total identified intangible assets	$	1,074	$	50,354	**	$	14,048

**	- See Note 5 regarding intangible asset impairments.

4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant, and equipment at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consist of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Land	$	14,592	$	17,054
Improvements to land and leaseholds		16,598		16,590
Buildings		33,252		39,366
Machinery and equipment, including equipment under capitalized leases		116,470		118,677
Construction in progress		4,917		11,844

		185,829		203,531

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases		77,204		76,786

	$	108,625	$	126,745

We review our property, plant, and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Due to the deterioration in projected results from the IOS subsidiary within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, the undiscounted cash flows were unable to support the carrying value of the asset group. The Company utilized level 3 unobservable inputs, specifically, the discounted cash flow method, to determine the expected net cash flows generated by the continued use of the assets. As a result of the testing, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment of $14,956 during the period ended June 30, 2016. The impairment is included within “Asset impairments” caption of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The results of the impairment analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016.

5. GOODWILL AND DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table represents the goodwill balance by reportable segment:


	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	48,188		$	5,147	$	28,417		$	81,752
Foreign currency translation impact		(867	)		—		—			(867	)
Disposition		(154	)		—		—			(154	)
Impairment charges		(28,342	)		—		(28,417	)		(56,759	)

Balance at June 30, 2016	$	18,825		$	5,147	$	—		$	23,972

The Company performs goodwill impairment tests annually during the fourth quarter, and also performs interim goodwill impairment tests if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the

carrying amount. Qualitative factors are assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. During the current quarter, various reporting units underperformed against their projections and revised their forecasts downward. The revised forecasts, which were primarily attributable to weakness in the rail and energy markets, indicated longer recovery horizons than we previously projected. In connection with the revisions to the longer term projections and a substantial decline in market capitalization, the Company concluded that these qualitative factors indicated that there was a more likely than not risk that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded its fair value.

As a result of the Company’s qualitative review, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm, the Company performed a quantitative interim test for impairment of goodwill as of June 1, 2016. The valuation included the use of both the income and market approaches. Greater weighting was applied to the income approach as the Company believes it is the most reliable indication of value as it captures forecasted revenues and earnings for the reporting units in the projection period that the market approach may not directly incorporate. In addition, a lack of comparable market transactions in recent months has limited the availability of information necessary for the market approach.

The results of the test indicated that the Rail Technologies (within the Rail Products and Services segment), Chemtec (or “precision measurement systems”), and coated services (Chemtec and coated services are within the Tubular and Energy Services segment) reporting units’ respective fair values were less than their carrying value. All other reporting units that maintain goodwill substantially exceeded their carrying value and were not at risk of impairment. As a result of the continued weakness in the commodity cycles impacting the energy and rail markets, the near term projections of these reporting units have deteriorated and the expected future growth of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units was determined to be insufficient to support the carrying values.

The Company determined the implied fair values of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units by using level 3 unobservable inputs, which incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows of the respective reporting units. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. The resulting fair values of each reporting unit were allocated to the assets and liabilities of the respective reporting unit as if each reporting unit had been acquired in business combinations as of the test date and the fair value was the purchase price paid to acquire each reporting unit. The results of the step 2 analysis indicated that the carrying amounts of the goodwill of Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services exceeded the implied fair values of that goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment of $56,759, which represented the full impairment of goodwill within the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 60% of the Rail Technologies goodwill value. The results of the step 2 analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016.

The following table represents the definite-lived other intangible assets balance by reportable segment:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Rail Products and Services	$	57,470	$	59,226
Construction Products		1,348		1,348
Tubular and Energy Services		31,742		98,166

	$	90,560	$	158,740

Due to the indicators previously noted, the Company performed recoverability tests on reporting units when it was more likely than not that the carrying value of the long-lived asset group would not be recoverable. The results of our testing indicated that the long-lived assets related to the IOS and Chemtec divisions, within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, had carrying values in excess of the asset groups’ fair value. Based upon level 3 unobservable inputs, the Company incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded a $42,982 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the IOS division and a $14,241 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the Chemtec division. The results of the impairment analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016.

The components of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are as follows:


	June 30, 2016
	Weighted Average Amortization In Years		Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Non-compete agreements		5	$	4,319	$	(1,782	)	$	2,537
Patents		10		387		(142	)		245
Customer relationships		17		39,707		(5,518	)		34,189
Trademarks and trade names		14		10,199		(2,831	)		7,368
Technology		14		35,948		(9,867	)		26,081

			$	90,560	$	(20,140	)	$	70,420


	December 31, 2015
	Weighted Average Amortization In Years		Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Non-compete agreements		4	$	6,984	$	(2,495	)	$	4,489
Patents		10		378		(124	)		254
Customer relationships		16		94,338		(8,441	)		85,897
Supplier relationships		5		350		(335	)		15
Trademarks and trade names		13		14,252		(3,025	)		11,227
Technology		13		42,438		(9,393	)		33,045

			$	158,740	$	(23,813	)	$	134,927

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives ranging from 2 to 25 years, with a total weighted average amortization period of approximately 15 years at June 30, 2016. Amortization expense for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $2,789 and $3,456, respectively. Amortization expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $6,055 and $5,613, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2016 and thereafter is as follows:


	Amortization Expense
2016	$	3,687
2017		7,361
2018		7,256
2019		6,525
2020		6,142
2021 and thereafter		39,449

	$	70,420

6. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Credit is extended based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and, while collateral is not required, the Company periodically receives surety bonds that guarantee payment. Credit terms are consistent with industry standards and practices. The amounts of trade accounts receivable at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 have been reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,417 and $1,485, respectively.

7. INVENTORIES

Inventories at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in the following table:


	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Finished goods	$	60,185		$	62,547
Work-in-process		20,252			20,178
Raw materials		20,009			19,492

Total inventories at current costs		100,446			102,217
Less: LIFO reserve		(5,296	)		(5,821	)

	$	95,150		$	96,396

Inventory is generally valued at the lower of last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost or market. Other inventories of the Company are valued at average cost or market, whichever is lower. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end levels and costs.

8. INVESTMENTS

The Company is a member of a joint venture, LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC (“LB Pipe JV”), in which it maintains a 45% ownership interest. LB Pipe JV manufactures, markets, and sells various precision coupling products for the energy, utility, and construction markets and is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2019.

Under applicable guidance for variable interest entities in ASC 810, “Consolidation,” the Company determined that the LB Pipe JV is a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity, as the Company does not have a controlling financial interest and does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LB Pipe JV. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the equity method of accounting remains appropriate.

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a nonconsolidated equity method investment of $4,521 and $5,246, respectively, in LB Pipe JV and other equity investments totaling $117 and $75, respectively.

The Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $476 and $186 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $725 and equity in the income of the LB Pipe JV of $3, respectively.

The Company tested the investment for recoverability during the period ended June 30, 2016 and concluded that the investment value was recoverable based upon the undiscounted cash flows of the LB Pipe JV. The Company continues to monitor the recoverability of the assets associated with LB Pipe JV and the long-term financial projections of the businesses.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, the Company received cash distributions of $90. There were no changes to the members’ ownership interests as a result of the distribution. During 2016, the Company and the other 45% member each executed a revolving line of credit with the LB Pipe JV with an available limit of $750. The Company and the other 45% member each loaned $575 to the LB Pipe JV in an effort to maintain compliance with the LB Pipe JV’s debt covenants with an unaffiliated bank. The Company’s loan with the LB Pipe JV matures on December 15, 2016.

The Company’s exposure to loss results from its capital contributions and lending activity, net of the Company’s share of the LB Pipe JV’s income or loss, and its net investment in the direct financing lease covering the facility used by the LB Pipe JV for its operations, which is described below. The carrying amounts with the maximum exposure to loss of the Company at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are as follows:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
LB Pipe JV equity method investment	$	4,521	$	5,246
Loan receivable		575		—
Net investment in direct financing lease		929		995

	$	6,025	$	6,241

The Company is leasing five acres of land and two facilities to the LB Pipe JV through June 30, 2019, with a 5.5-year renewal period. The current monthly lease payments approximate $17, with a balloon payment of approximately $488, which is required to be paid either at the termination of the lease, allocated over the renewal period, or during the initial term of the lease. This lease qualifies as a direct financing lease under the applicable guidance in ASC 840-30, “Leases.”

The following is a schedule of the direct financing minimum lease payments for the remainder of 2016 and the years 2017 and thereafter:


	Minimum Lease Payments
2016	$	65
2017		140
2018		150
2019		574

	$	929

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

United States

Long-term debt consists of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Revolving credit facility	$	165,270	$	165,000
Capital leases and financing agreements		3,095		3,754

Total		168,365		168,754
Less current maturities		1,335		1,335

Long-term portion	$	167,030	$	167,419

On June 29, 2016, L.B. Foster Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries (“L.B. Foster”) entered into the First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This First Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which had a maximum credit line of $335,000. The First Amendment reduces the permitted borrowings to $275,000.

The Company’s and the domestic guarantors’ obligations under the First Amendment is secured by the grant of a security interest by the domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors in substantially all of the personal property owned by such entities. Additionally, the equity interests in each of the domestic loan parties, other than the Company, and the equity interests held by each domestic loan party in their domestic subsidiaries, are pledged to the lenders as collateral for the lending obligations.

Borrowings under the First Amendment bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to

the Company’s consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%. The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.

The First Amendment provides that liens on the collateral will be released upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the submission by the loan parties of a compliance certificate for two consecutive fiscal quarters, calculated for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending, each evidencing a Leverage Ratio (defined as the Company’s indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000, divided by the Company’s consolidated EBITDA) of less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00; provided that the last day of such two consecutive fiscal quarters cannot be earlier than June 30, 2018.

Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended. The First Amendment revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters: June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 3.25 to 1.00.

At June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

Loans and advances to non-loan parties and loans, advances, and investments by domestic loan parties to subsidiaries that are not loan parties and to foreign loan parties is not permitted to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any one time, provided that, on March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, this limit will increase to $75,000.

The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. Dividends of $829 or $0.08 per share were distributed for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016.

If no drawings on the facility exist, dividends, distributions, and redemptions in excess of $4,000 (or $25,000, as appropriate) per year are subjected to a limitation of $75,000 in the aggregate. The $75,000 aggregate limitation also permits certain loans, investments, and acquisitions.

The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.

At June 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $425 and had gross available borrowing capacity of $109,305. The maturity date of the facility is March 13, 2020.

United Kingdom

A subsidiary of the Company has a credit facility with NatWest Bank for its United Kingdom operations that includes an overdraft availability of £1,500 pounds sterling (approximately $1,997 at June 30, 2016). This credit facility supports the subsidiary’s working capital requirements and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of its United Kingdom operations. The interest rate on this facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.50%. Outstanding performance bonds reduce availability under this credit facility. The subsidiary of the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility as of June 30, 2016. There was approximately $352 in outstanding guarantees (as defined in the underlying agreement) at June 30, 2016. This credit facility was renewed and amended during the fourth quarter of 2015 to include Tew and Tew Plus as parties to the agreement. All other underlying terms and conditions remained unchanged as a result of the renewal. It is the Company’s intention to renew this credit facility with NatWest Bank during the annual review in 2016.

The United Kingdom credit facility contains certain financial covenants that require that subsidiary to maintain senior interest and cash flow coverage ratios. The subsidiary was in compliance with these financial covenants as of June 30, 2016. The subsidiary had available borrowing capacity of $1,645 as of June 30, 2016.

10. Fair Value Measurements

The Company determines the fair value of assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. The fair value hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions of what market participants would use. The fair value hierarchy includes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Cash equivalents - Included within “Cash and cash equivalents” are investments in non-domestic term deposits. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps - To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017 at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on market-observable forward interest rates and represents the estimated amount that the Company would pay to terminate the agreements. As such, the swap agreements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. At June 30, 2016 the interest rate swaps were recorded within other accrued liabilities.


	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	June 30, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Term deposits	$	3,016	$	3,016	$	—	$	—	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	—	$	—

Total assets	$	3,016	$	3,016	$	—	$	—	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	—	$	—

Interest rate swaps	$	2,532	$	—	$	2,532	$	—	$	196	$	—	$	196	$	—

Total liabilities	$	2,532	$	—	$	2,532	$	—	$	196	$	—	$	196	$	—

11. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

(Share amounts in thousands)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share - (Loss) income available to common stockholders:
Net (loss) income	$	(91,996	)	$	5,362	$	(94,828	)	$	9,649
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		10,263			10,284		10,248			10,272

Denominator for basic earnings per common share		10,263			10,284		10,248			10,272
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options		—			—		—			1
Other stock compensation plans		—			86		—			112

Dilutive potential common shares		—			86		—			113

Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions		10,263			10,370		10,248			10,385

Basic (loss) earnings per common share	$	(8.96	)	$	0.52	$	(9.25	)	$	0.94

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(8.96	)	$	0.52	$	(9.25	)	$	0.93

Dividends paid per common share	$	0.04		$	0.04	$	0.08		$	0.08

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, there were approximately 47 and 46 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively.

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” to account for the Company’s share-based compensation. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period. The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $807 and $1,276 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to restricted stock awards and performance unit awards. Stock compensation expense of $555 and $1,896 was recorded for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At June 30, 2016, unrecognized compensation expense for awards that the Company expects to vest approximated $2,170. The Company will recognize this expense over the upcoming three years through June 2019.

Shares issued as a result of vested stock-based compensation generally will be from previously issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company and held as Treasury shares or authorized but previously unissued common stock.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized reductions in excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $124 and excess tax benefits of $310, respectively. The change in excess income tax benefits have been included in cash flows from financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Stock Option Awards

At June 30, 2016, there were no outstanding and exercisable stock options. During the first quarter of 2015, the remaining 7,500 outstanding stock options were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $9.08. There were no new grants of stock option awards during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

Restricted Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards

Under the amended and restated 2006 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the Company grants eligible employees restricted stock and performance unit awards. The forfeitable restricted stock awards granted prior to March 2015 generally time-vest after a four-year holding period, and those granted subsequent to March 2015 generally time-vest ratably over a three-year period, unless indicated otherwise by the underlying restricted stock award agreement. Performance unit awards are offered annually under separate three-year long-term incentive plans. Performance units are subject to forfeiture and will be converted into common stock of the Company based upon the Company’s performance relative to performance measures and conversion multiples as defined in the underlying plan. If the Company’s estimate of the number of performance stock awards expected to vest changes in a subsequent accounting period, cumulative compensation expense could increase or decrease. The change will be recognized in the current period for the vested shares and would change future expense over the remaining vesting period.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company amended its 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan and registered 370,000 additional shares under the amendment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the 2016 Performance Share Unit Program, the Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (consisting of cash and equity components) and the 2016 Free Cash Flow Program (cash award only). The Compensation Committee also certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2013 Performance Share Unit Program. Actual performance resulted in no payout relative to the target performance metrics.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance unit award activity for the period ended June 30, 2016:


	Restricted Stock Units			Performance Stock Units			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		93,817			35,999		$	39.66

Granted		43,283			129,844			12.59
Vested		(43,453	)		—			29.30
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest		—			(93,103	)		24.79
Canceled		(6,021	)		(9,050	)		18.82

Outstanding at June 30, 2016		87,626			63,690		$	22.28

13. RETIREMENT PLANS

Retirement Plans

The Company has seven retirement plans which cover its hourly and salaried employees in the United States: three defined benefit plans (one active / two frozen) and four defined contribution plans. Employees are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan based on employment classification. The Company’s funding contributions to the defined benefit and defined contribution plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), applicable plan policy and investment guidelines. The Company’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum in accordance with the funding standards of ERISA.

The Company’s subsidiary, L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. (“Rail Technologies”), maintains two defined contribution plans for its employees in Canada, as well as a post-retirement benefit plan. In the United Kingdom, Rail Technologies maintains two defined contribution plans and a defined benefit plan.

United States Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United States defined benefit pension plans for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Service cost	$	9		$	9		$	18		$	19
Interest cost		186			185			372			370
Expected return on plan assets		(179	)		(204	)		(358	)		(408	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		69			69			138			138

Net periodic pension cost	$	85		$	59		$	170		$	119

The Company does not expect to contribute to its United States defined benefit plans in 2016.

United Kingdom Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Interest cost	$	75		$	77		$	150		$	153
Expected return on plan assets		(84	)		(83	)		(168	)		(166	)
Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount		5			5			10			10
Recognized net actuarial loss		39			59			78			117

Net periodic pension cost	$	35		$	58		$	70		$	114

United Kingdom regulations require trustees to adopt a prudent approach to funding required contributions to defined benefit pension plans. Employer contributions of approximately $247 are anticipated to the United Kingdom L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. pension plan during 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company contributed approximately $120 to the plan.

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors eight defined contribution plans for hourly and salaried employees across our domestic and international facilities. The following table summarizes the expense associated with the contributions made to these plans.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
United States	$	445	$	747	$	1,137	$	1,429
Canada		67		55		118		114
United Kingdom		160		115		218		198

	$	672	$	917	$	1,473	$	1,741

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Product Liability Claims

The Company is subject to product warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. For certain manufactured products, the Company maintains a product warranty accrual which is adjusted on a monthly basis as a percentage of cost of sales. The product warranty accrual is periodically adjusted based on the identification or resolution of known individual product warranty claims.

The following table sets forth the Company’s product warranty accrual:


	Warranty Liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	8,755
Additions to warranty liability		461
Warranty liability utilized		(467	)

Balance at June 30, 2016	$	8,749

Included within the above table are concrete tie warranty reserves of approximately $7,490 and $7,544 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Concrete Tie Matter

On July 12, 2011, UPRR notified (the “UPRR Notice”) the Company and its subsidiary, CXT Incorporated (“CXT”), of a warranty claim under CXT’s 2005 supply contract relating to the sale of pre-stressed concrete railroad ties to UPRR. UPRR asserted that a significant percentage of concrete ties manufactured in 2006 through 2011 at CXT’s Grand Island, NE facility failed to meet contract specifications, had workmanship defects and were cracking and failing prematurely. Of the 3.0 million ties manufactured between 1998 and 2011 from the Grand Island, NE facility, approximately 1.6 million ties were sold during the period UPRR had claimed nonconformance. The 2005 contract called for each concrete tie which failed to conform to the specifications or had a material defect in workmanship to be replaced with 1.5 new concrete ties, provided, that, within five years of the sale of a concrete tie, UPRR notified CXT of such failure to conform or such defect in workmanship. The UPRR Notice did not specify how many ties manufactured during this period were defective nor the exact nature of the alleged workmanship defect.

Following the UPRR Notice, the Company worked with material scientists and pre-stressed concrete experts to test a representative sample of Grand Island, NE concrete ties and assess warranty claims for certain concrete ties made in its Grand Island, NE facility between 1998 and 2011. The Company discontinued manufacturing operations in Grand Island, NE in early 2011.

2012

During 2012, the Company completed sufficient testing and analysis to further understand this matter. Based upon testing results and expert analysis, the Company believed it discovered conditions, which largely related to the 2006 to 2007 manufacturing period, that can shorten the life of the concrete ties produced during this period. During the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013, the Company reached agreement with UPRR on several matters including a process for the Company and UPRR to work together to identify, prioritize, and replace defective ties that meet the criteria for replacement. This process applies to the ties the Company shipped to UPRR from its Grand Island, NE facility from 1998 to 2011. During most of this period the Company’s warranty policy for UPRR carried a 5 year warranty with a 1.5:1 replacement ratio for any defective ties. In order to accommodate UPRR and other customer concerns, the Company also reverted to a previously used warranty policy providing a 15-year warranty with a 1:1 replacement ratio. This change provided an additional 10 years of warranty protection. In the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company and UPRR also extended the supply of Tucson ties by five years and agreed on a cash payment of $12,000 to UPRR as compensation for concrete ties already replaced by UPRR during the investigation period.

During 2012, as a result of the testing that the Company conducted on concrete ties manufactured at its former Grand Island, NE facility and the developments related to UPRR and other customer matters, the Company recorded pre-tax warranty charges of $22,000 in “Cost of Goods Sold” within its Rail Products and Services segment based on the Company’s estimate of the number of defective concrete ties that will ultimately require replacement during the applicable warranty periods.

2013

Throughout 2013, at UPRR’s request and under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company provided warranty replacement concrete ties for use across certain UPRR subdivisions. The Company attempted to reconcile the quantity of warranty claims for ties replaced and obtain supporting detail for the ties removed. The Company believes that UPRR did not replace concrete ties in accordance with the amended agreement and has not furnished adequate documentation throughout the replacement process in these subdivisions to support its full warranty claim. Based on the information received by the Company to date, the Company believes that a significant number of ties which UPRR replaced in these subdivisions did not meet the criteria to be covered as warranty replacement ties under the amended 2005 supply agreement. The disagreement related to the 2013 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 170,000 ties where the Company provided detailed documentation supporting our position with reason codes that detail why these ties are not eligible for a warranty claim.

In late November 2013, the Company received notice from UPRR asserting a material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement. UPRR’s notice asserted that the failure to honor its claims for warranty ties in these subdivisions was a material breach. Following receipt of this notice, the Company provided information to UPRR to refute UPRR’s claim of breach and included the reconciliation of warranty claims supported by substantial findings from the Company’s track observation team, all within the 90-day cure period. The Company also proposed further discussions to reach agreement on reconciliation for 2013 replacement activities and future replacement activities and a recommended process that will ensure future replacement activities are done with appropriate documentation and per the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

2014

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company further responded within the 90-day cure period to UPRR’s claim and presented a reconciliation for the subdivisions at issue. This proposed reconciliation was based on empirical data and visual observation from Company employees that were present during the replacement process for a substantial majority of the concrete ties replaced. The Company spent considerable time documenting facts related to concrete tie condition and track condition to assess whether the ties replaced met the criteria to be eligible for replacement under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

During 2014, the Company increased its accrual by an additional $8,766 based on revised estimates of ties to be replaced based upon scientific testing and other analysis, adjusted for ties already provided to UPRR. The Company continued to work with UPRR to identify, replace, and reconcile defective ties related to the warranty claim in accordance with the amended 2005 supply agreement. The Company and UPRR met during the third quarter of 2014 to evaluate each other’s position in an effort to work towards agreement on the unreconciled 2013 and 2014 replacement activity as well as the standards and practices to be implemented for future replacement activity and warranty tie replacement.

In November and December of 2014, the Company received additional notices from UPRR asserting that ties manufactured in 2000 were defective and again asserting material breaches of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements as well as certain new ties provided to UPRR being out of specification.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company and UPRR had not been able to reconcile the disagreement related to the 2013 and 2014 warranty replacement activity. The disagreement relating to the 2014 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 90,100 ties that the Company believes are not warranty-eligible.

2015

On January 23, 2015, UPRR filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in the District Court for Douglas County, NE against the Company and its subsidiary, CXT, asserting, among other matters, that the Company breached its express warranty, breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and anticipatorily repudiated its warranty obligations, and that UPRR’s exclusive and limited remedy provisions in the supply agreement have failed of their essential purpose which entitles UPRR to recover all incidental and consequential damages. The Complaint seeks to cancel all duties of UPRR under the contract, to adjudge the Company as having no remaining rights under the contracts, and to recover damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the value of unfulfilled warranty replacement ties and ties likely to become warranty eligible, for costs of cover for replacement ties, and for various incidental and consequential damages. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that UPRR’s exclusive remedy is to receive a replacement tie that meets the contract specifications for each tie that failed to meet the contract specifications or otherwise contained a material defect provided that the Company receives written notice of such failure or defect within 15 years after that tie was produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that the Company’s warranty does not apply to ties that (a) have been repaired or altered without the Company’s written consent in such a way as to affect the stability or reliability thereof, (b) have been subject to misuse, negligence, or accident, or (c) have been improperly maintained or used contrary to the specifications for which such ties were produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement also continues to provide that the Company’s warranty is in lieu of all other express or implied warranties and that neither party shall be subject to or liable for any incidental or consequential damages to the other party. The dispute is largely based on (1) claims submitted that the Company believes are for ties claimed for warranty replacement that are inaccurately rated and are not the responsibility of the Company and claims that do not meet the criteria of a warranty replacement and (2) UPRR’s assertion, which the Company vigorously disputes, that UPRR in future years will be entitled to warranty replacement ties for virtually all of the Grand Island ties. Many thousands of Grand Island ties have been performing in track for over ten years. In addition, a significant amount of Grand Island ties were rated by both parties in the excellent category of the rating system.

In June 2015, UPRR delivered an additional notice alleging deficiencies in certain ties produced in the Company’s Tucson and Spokane locations and other claimed material breaches which the Company contends are unfounded. The Company again responded to UPRR that it was not in material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements and that the ties in question complied with the specifications provided by UPRR.

On June 16 and 17, 2015, UPRR issued formal notice of the termination of the concrete tie supply agreement as well as the termination of the lease agreement at the Tucson, AZ production facility and rejection and revocation of its prior acceptance of certain ties manufactured at the Company’s Spokane, WA production facility. Since that time, UPRR has discontinued submitting purchase orders to the Company for shipment of warranty replacement ties.

On May 29, 2015, the Company and CXT filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims in response to the Complaint, denying liability to UPRR. As a result of UPRR’s subsequent June 16-17, 2015 actions and certain related conduct, the Company on October 5, 2015 amended the pending Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to add, among other things, assertions that UPRR’s conduct in question was wrongful and unjustified and constituted additional grounds for the affirmative defenses to UPRR’s claims and also for the Company’s counterclaims.

2016

By Scheduling Order dated June 29, 2016, an August 31, 2017 deadline for the completion of fact discovery has been established and trial may proceed at some future date after October 30, 2017, and UPRR has filed an amended notice of trial to commence on October 30, 2017. During the first six months of 2016, the parties continue conducting discovery. The Company intends to continue to engage in discussions in an effort to resolve the UPRR matter. However, we cannot predict that such discussions will be successful, or that the results of the litigation with UPRR, or any settlement or judgment amounts, will reasonably approximate our estimated accruals for loss contingencies. Future potential costs pertaining to UPRR’s claims and the outcome of the UPRR litigation could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

As a result of the preliminary status of the litigation and the uncertainty of any potential judgment, an estimate of any additional loss, or a range of loss, associated with this litigation cannot be made based upon currently available information.

Environmental and Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to national, state, foreign, provincial, and/or local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company’s efforts to comply with environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on its future earnings. In the opinion of management, compliance with the present environmental protection laws will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, competitive position, or capital expenditures of the Company.

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company maintained environmental reserves approximating $6,622 and $6,640, respectively. The following table sets forth the Company’s environmental obligation:


	Environmental liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	6,640
Additions to environmental obligations		24
Environmental obligations utilized		(42	)

Balance at June 30, 2016	$	6,622

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. The amounts currently reserved are immaterial to our financial position and liquidity and the estimate of additional loss exposure is immaterial to our results of operations.

15. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was 28.9% and 29.0%, respectively, and 31.5% and 33.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments in the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The $128,938 asset impairment related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets, and resulted in a $38,038 income tax benefit.

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management evaluated all of the activity of the Company and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosure in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Sentences containing words such as “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “expect,” “should,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, or other similar expressions generally should be considered forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may concern, among other things, L.B. Foster Company’s (“the Company’s”) expectations relating to our strategy, goals, projections and plans regarding our financial position, liquidity and capital resources, the outcome of litigation and product warranty claims, results of operations, decisions regarding our strategic growth initiatives, market position, and product development, all of which are based on current estimates that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. The Company cautions readers that various factors could cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Among the factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements are risks and uncertainties related to: an economic slowdown or a continuation of the current economic slowdown in the markets we serve, the risk of doing business in international markets, a decrease in freight or passenger rail traffic, continued and sustained declines in energy prices, a lack of state or federal funding for new infrastructure projects, an increase in manufacturing or material costs, our ability to effectuate our strategy including evaluating potential opportunities such as strategic acquisitions, joint ventures, and other initiatives, and our ability to effectively integrate new businesses and realize anticipated benefits, costs of and impacts associated with shareholder activism, the timeliness and availability of material from major suppliers, labor disputes, the impact of competition, the effective implementation of an enterprise resource planning system, variances in current accounting estimates and assumptions and their ultimate outcomes, the seasonality of the Company’s business, the adequacy of internal and external sources of funds to meet financing needs, the Company’s ability to curb its working capital requirements and manage indebtedness, domestic and international income taxes, foreign currency fluctuations, inflation, economic conditions and regulatory changes caused by the United Kingdom’s likely exit from the European Union, the ultimate number of concrete ties that will have to be replaced pursuant to product warranty claims, an overall resolution of the related contract claims, the costs associated with and the outcome of a lawsuit filed by Union Pacific Railroad (“UPRR”), the loss of future revenues from current customers, risks inherent in litigation, and domestic and foreign governmental regulations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual outcomes could vary materially from those indicated. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, and results of the Company’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as required by securities laws.

General Overview

L.B. Foster Company (“Company”) is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is comprised of three business segments: Rail Products and Services, Construction Products, and Tubular and Energy Services.

Quarter-to-date Results

The segment gross profit measures contained within the MD&A tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performance of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.

The following non-GAAP reconciliation of segment gross profit displays items that have been excluded from segment profit (loss) as disclosed in Note 2 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented above:


Three months ended June 30, 2016	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	14,890		$	8,891	$	3,696		$	27,477
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		10,728			4,909		4,320			19,957
Amortization Expense		988			38		1,763			2,789
Asset Impairments		28,342			—		100,596			128,938

Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)	$	(25,168	)	$	3,944	$	(102,983	)	$	(124,207	)


Three months ended June 30, 2015	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	19,711		$	10,295	$	6,894		$	36,900
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		12,296			5,099		4,120			21,515
Amortization Expense		1,002			38		2,416			3,456
Asset Impairments		—			—		—			—

Reportable Segment Profit	$	6,413		$	5,158	$	358		$	11,929


							Percent of Total Net Sales						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales:
Rail Products and Services	$	67,503		$	86,882			49.6	%		50.7	%		(22.3	)%
Construction Products		40,348			49,516			29.7			28.9			(18.5	)
Tubular and Energy Services		28,143			35,021			20.7			20.4			(19.6	)

Total net sales	$	135,994		$	171,419			100.0	%		100.0	%		(20.7	)%


							Non-GAAP / Reported Gross Profit Percentage						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Gross Profit:
Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services	$	14,890		$	19,711			22.1	%		22.7	%		(24.5	)%
Non-GAAP Construction Products		8,891			10,295			22.0			20.8			(13.6	)
Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services		3,696			6,894			13.1			19.7			(46.4	)

Non-GAAP Segment gross profit		27,477			36,900
LIFO income		452			406			0.3			0.2			11.3
Other		(116	)		(217	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(46.5	)

Total gross profit	$	27,813		$	37,089			20.5	%		21.6	%		(25.0	)%


							Percent of Total Net						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended						Sales Three Months
	June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses	$	23,317		$	24,278			17.1	%		14.2	%		(4.0	)%
Amortization expense		2,789			3,456			2.1			2.0			(19.3	)
Asset impairments		128,938			—			94.8			—			100.0
Interest expense		1,652			1,288			1.2			0.8			28.3
Interest income		(52	)		(37	)		—			—			40.5
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		487			186			0.4			0.1			161.8
Other expense		107			95			0.1			0.1			12.6

Total expenses	$	157,238		$	29,266			115.6	%		17.1	%		*	*%

(Loss) income before income taxes	$	(129,425	)	$	7,823			(95.2	)%		4.6	%		*	*%
Income tax (benefit) expense		(37,429	)		2,461			(27.5	)		1.4			*	*

Net (loss) income	$	(91,996	)	$	5,362			(67.7	)%		3.2	%		*	*%

**	Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

Second Quarter 2016 Compared to Second Quarter 2015 – Company Analysis

Net sales of $135,994 for the period ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $35,425, or 20.7%, compared to the prior year quarter. The change was attributable to decreases of 22.3%, 18.5%, and 19.6% in Rail Products and Services, Construction Products, and Tubular and Energy Services segment sales, respectively.

Gross profit percentage for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was 20.5% or 120 basis points lower than the prior year quarter. The decrease was due to lower margins within the Tubular and Energy Services and Rail Products and Services segments partially offset by increases in Construction Products segment.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $961, or 4.0%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by $1,500 in cost reduction initiatives related to personnel and travel costs as well as a prior year acquisition and integration costs. These reductions were partially offset by $850 of increased litigation related costs for the UPRR matter and, to a lesser extent, increased costs related to the implementation of the Company’s enterprise resource planning system.

The Company recorded non-cash asset impairments of $128,938 ($90,900 net of tax) during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016. During the second quarter 2016, the Company identified various indications that suggested that there was a more likely than not probability that the carrying value of certain assets and reporting units were less than their respective fair values. The impairment indicators included a rapid deterioration in actual performance against forecasts, downward revisions in projected financial results, declines in the Company’s market capitalization, and reductions in new order activity.

Asset groups that had indicators of impairment were analyzed to determine if the carrying value was recoverable. Based upon the recoverability assessment, the Company determined that certain intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment within the test and inspection services division and certain intangible assets within the Chemtec (or “precision measurement systems”) division were impaired. As a result of the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis, the Company recorded a $57,223 definite-lived intangible asset impairment and a $14,956 property, plant, and equipment impairment were recorded within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. The results of the Company’s analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016. The fair values of the remaining asset groups tested for recoverability were substantially in excess of their respective carrying values.

The Company also performed an interim goodwill impairment review as of June 1, 2016 as a result of the adverse effect on certain reporting units of reduced capital spending and cost reduction priorities that oil and gas developers and railroad customers have enacted as well as the indicators previously noted. The forecasts for the Chemtec, coated services, and Rail Technologies reporting units did not indicate a timely recovery to support the carrying values of the reporting units. Accordingly, the Company recognized goodwill impairment of $56,759, which represented the full impairment of goodwill related to the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 60% of the goodwill related to Rail Technologies. The estimated fair values of the remaining reporting units were substantially in excess of the carrying value of those reporting units. The results of the step 2 analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016.

Amortization expense decreased by $667, or 19.3%, of which $463 was attributable to the current year intangible asset impairment, which reduced the June amortization costs.

The Company’s effective income tax rate in the 2016 second quarter was 28.9%, compared to 31.5% in the prior year quarter. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments in the quarter. The $128,938 asset impairment related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets, and resulted in a $38,038 income tax benefit.

Net loss for the second quarter of 2016 was $91,996, or $8.96 per diluted share, compared to net income of $5,362, or $0.52 per diluted share, in the prior year quarter. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings¹ per share value for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2016			2015
Adjusted Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
Net (loss) income, as reported	$	(91,996	)	$	5,362
Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $38,038		90,900			—

Adjusted net (loss) income		(1,096	)		5,362

Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted		10,263			10,370

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as reported	$	(8.96	)	$	0.52

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as adjusted	$	(0.11	)	$	0.52

Results of Operations – Segment Analysis

Rail Products and Services


	Three Months Ended									Percent
	June 30,						Decrease			Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	67,503		$	86,882		$	(19,379	)		(22.3	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	14,890		$	19,711		$	(4,821	)		(24.5	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		22.1	%		22.7	%		(0.6	)%		(2.6	)%

Second Quarter 2016 Compared to Second Quarter 2015

Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $19,379 or 22.3% compared to the prior year period. The decline related to reductions across all of our rail divisions, with the exception of transit product sales. The sales declines were primarily volume driven due to significantly less infrastructure and maintenance spending. Additionally, due to the ongoing litigation with UPRR, our rail divisions experienced a decline in sales to UPRR of approximately $5,200. The rail market continues to experience reductions in commodity carloadings and intermodal rail traffic among the Class 1 railroads. This negative trend is expected to continue throughout the remainder of the year.

The Rail Products and Services segment produced a loss of $25,168 compared to the prior year period profit of $6,413. The decrease was attributable to a $28,342 goodwill impairment related to the Rail Technologies reporting unit along with reductions in gross profit. Non-GAAP gross profit declined by $4,821, or 24.5%, compared to the prior year period. The decline in profitability was primarily attributable to volume related deleveraging within track components and friction management products.

During the quarter, the Rail Products and Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 18.2% compared to the prior year period. All rail product lines experienced reductions in orders relative to the prior year quarter. The Company anticipates continued challenges as rail customers react to significantly reduced rail traffic.

Construction Products


	Three Months Ended						(Decrease) Increase			Percent (Decrease)/Increase
	June 30,						(Decrease) Increase			Percent (Decrease)/Increase
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	40,348		$	49,516		$	(9,168	)		(18.5	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	8,891		$	10,295		$	(1,404	)		(13.6	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		22.0	%		20.8	%		1.2	%		5.8	%

- All results in this Quarterly Report that exclude asset impairment charges are non-GAAP measures used for management reporting purposes. Management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors because they will assist investors in evaluating earnings performance on a comparable year-over-year basis.

Second Quarter 2016 Compared to Second Quarter 2015

Construction Products segment sales decreased $9,168, or 18.5% compared to the prior year period. The reduction relates to weaker sales within piling and bridge products, partially offset by increased sales of precast concrete products.

The Construction Products segment profit declined by $1,214 which was directly attributable to the volume related reduction in sales in the current year period. The precast concrete product line increased sales by $2,436, which favorably impacted gross profit as the increased volumes led to plant efficiencies.

During the quarter, the Construction Products segment had an increase in new orders of 12.7% compared to the prior year period. The increase relates to two significant bridge product projects awarded in the three month period ended June 30, 2016. The bridge order increase was partially offset by declines in piling and precast concrete product orders. We continue to see weakness in order activity within the piling products line.

Tubular and Energy Services


	Three Months Ended									Percent
	June 30,						Decrease			Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	28,143		$	35,021		$	(6,878	)		(19.6	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	3,696		$	6,894		$	(3,198	)		(46.4	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		13.1	%		19.7	%		(6.6	)%		(33.5	)%

Second Quarter 2016 Compared to Second Quarter 2015

Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased $6,878, or 19.6% compared to the prior year period. The decrease related primarily to $9,523 from test and inspection services and $1,408 from the threaded and coated divisions partially offset by an increase of $4,053 related to precision measurement products.

Tubular and Energy Services segment loss was $102,983 compared to segment profit of $358 in the prior year. The decline was primarily attributable to asset impairments of $100,596 related to the test and inspection services, precision measurement products, and coated services reporting units along with reduced gross profit. The non-GAAP gross profit declined by $3,198, or 46.4%, which was largely impacted by our test and inspection services business. The test and inspection services business continues to be negatively impacted by the weakness in the upstream oil and gas market. The margin deterioration was also impacted by precision measurement system sales which produced lower margins due to competitive pressures as a result of the depressed oil and gas market. Profitability in the Tubular and Energy Services segment will be challenged for the remainder of the year.

The Tubular and Energy Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 38.0% compared to the prior year period. Orders for coated products and test and inspection services were down 84.9% and 67.1%, respectively, due to a reduction in midstream oil and gas new project lettings. The reductions were partially offset by an increase of 75.7% in precision measurement systems and threaded orders.

Year-to-date Results

The following non-GAAP reconciliations of segment gross profit displays items that have been excluded from segment profit (loss) as disclosed in Note 2 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented above:


Six months ended June 30, 2016	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	28,831		$	14,465	$	8,279		$	51,575
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		22,928			9,998		8,601			41,527
Amortization Expense		1,988			75		3,992			6,055
Asset Impairments		28,342			—		100,596			128,938

Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)	$	(24,427	)	$	4,392	$	(104,910	)	$	(124,945	)


Six months ended June 30, 2015	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	37,854		$	16,857	$	12,928		$	67,639
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		23,434			10,304		7,101			40,839
Amortization Expense		1,935			167		3,511			5,613
Asset Impairments		—			—		—			—

Reportable Segment Profit	$	12,485		$	6,386	$	2,316		$	21,187


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent of Total Net Sales Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales:
Rail Products and Services	$	131,795		$	164,558			50.3	%		53.2	%		(19.9	)%
Construction Products		72,228			83,806			27.5			27.1			(13.8	)
Tubular and Energy Services		58,281			60,962			22.2			19.7			(4.4	)

Total net sales	$	262,304		$	309,326			100.0	%		100.0	%		(15.2	)%


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Non-GAAP / Reported Gross Profit Percentage Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Gross Profit:
Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services	$	28,831		$	37,854			21.9	%		23.0	%		(23.8	)%
Non-GAAP Construction Products		14,465			16,857			20.0			20.1			(14.2	)
Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services		8,279			12,928			14.2			21.2			(36.0	)

Non-GAAP Segment gross profit		51,575			67,639
LIFO income		525			400			0.2			0.1			31.3
Other		(327	)		(296	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		10.5

Total gross profit	$	51,773		$	67,743			19.7	%		21.9	%		(23.6	)%


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent of Total Net Sales Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses	$	46,134		$	46,528			17.6	%		15.0	%		(0.8	)%
Amortization expense		6,055			5,613			2.3			1.8			7.9
Asset impairments		128,938			—			49.2			—			100.0
Interest expense		2,822			1,901			1.1			0.6			48.4
Interest income		(107	)		(94	)		—			—			13.8
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		683			13			0.3			—			*	*
Other loss (income)		822			(708	)		0.3			(0.2	)		*	*

Total expenses	$	185,347		$	53,253			70.7	%		17.2	%		*	*%

(Loss) income before income taxes	$	(133,574	)	$	14,490			(50.9	)%		4.7	%		*	*%
Income tax (benefit) expense		(38,746	)		4,841			(14.8	)		1.6			*	*

Net (loss) income	$	(94,828	)	$	9,649			(36.1	)%		3.1	%		*	*%

**	Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

First Six Months of 2016 Compared to First Six Months of 2015 – Company Analysis

Net sales of $262,304 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $47,022, or 15.2%, compared to the prior year period. The sales decrease was attributable to decreases of 19.9%, 13.8%, and 4.4% in Rail Products and Services, Construction Products and Tubular and Energy Services segment sales, respectively.

Gross profit percentage for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was 19.7%, or 220 basis points lower than the prior year. The current year margin was significantly impacted by the weakness in the oil and gas market and to a lesser extent reduced activity within the rail market.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $394 over the prior year period. Cost reduction initiatives related to personnel costs of $1,600 and prior year acquisition and integration costs were partially offset by $1,700 in litigation related costs for the UPRR matter and to a lesser extent costs related to the implementation of the Company’s enterprise resource planning system.

The Company recorded non-cash asset impairments of $128,938 ($90,900 net of tax) during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016. During the second quarter 2016, the Company identified various indications that suggested that there was a more likely than not probability that the carrying value of certain assets and reporting units were less than their respective fair values. The impairment indicators included a rapid deterioration in actual performance against forecasts, downward revisions in projected financial results, declines in the Company’s market capitalization, and reductions in new order activity.

Asset groups that had indicators of impairment were analyzed to determine if the carrying value was recoverable. Based upon the recoverability assessment, the Company determined that certain intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment within the test and inspection services division and certain intangible assets within the Chemtec division were impaired. As a result of the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis, the Company recorded a $57,223 definite-lived intangible asset impairment and a $14,956 property, plant, and equipment impairment were recorded within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. The results of the Company’s analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016. The remaining asset groups tested for recoverability were substantially in excess of their respective carrying values.

The Company also performed an interim goodwill impairment review as of June 1, 2016 as a result of the adverse effect on certain reporting units of reduced capital spending and cost reduction priorities that oil and gas developers and railroad customers have enacted as well as the indicators previously noted. The forecasts for the Chemtec, coated services, and Rail Technologies reporting units did not indicate a timely recovery to support the carrying values of the reporting units. Accordingly, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment of $56,759, which represented the full impairment of goodwill related to the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 60% of the Rail Technologies goodwill values. The estimated fair value of the remaining reporting units were substantially in excess of the carrying value of those reporting units. The results of the step 2 analysis are substantially complete and will be finalized during the third quarter 2016.

Other expense was $822 compared to other income of $708 during the prior year which primarily related to the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar in the first quarter of the current year.

The Company’s effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the first six months of 2016 was 29.0%, compared to 33.4% in the prior year period. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments in the current year period. The $128,938 asset impairment related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets, and resulted in a $38,038 income tax benefit.

Net loss for the first six months of 2016 was $94,828, or $9.25 per diluted share, which compares to net income for the 2015 period of $9,649, or $0.93 per diluted share. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share value for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015
Adjusted Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
Net (loss) income, as reported	$	(94,828	)	$	9,649
Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $38,038		90,900			—

Adjusted net (loss) income		(3,928	)		9,649

Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted		10,248			10,385

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as reported	$	(9.25	)	$	0.93

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as adjusted	$	(0.38	)	$	0.93

Results of Operations – Segment Analysis

Rail Products and Services


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Decrease			Percent Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	131,795		$	164,558		$	(32,763	)		(19.9	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	28,831		$	37,854		$	(9,023	)		(23.8	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		21.9	%		23.0	%		(1.1	)%		(4.8	)%

First Six Months of 2016 Compared to First Six Months of 2015

Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $32,763, or 19.9%, compared to the prior year period. For the first six months of 2016, excluding increases within the transit products business, all rail divisions experienced reductions in sales over the prior year period. The sales decline was attributable to lower volumes due to continued weakness in the North American rail market in both commodity carloads as well as intermodal rail traffic. Additionally, due to the ongoing litigation with UPRR, our rail divisions experienced a decline in sales to UPRR of approximately $12,000.

The Rail Products and Services segment loss for the six-months ended June 30, 2016 was $24,427 compared to segment profit of $12,485 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The reduction was primarily attributable to the $28,342 goodwill impairment related to the Rail Technologies reporting unit along with reductions in gross profit. The non-GAAP gross profit decreased by $9,023, or 23.8%, and the non-GAAP gross profit percentage decreased by 110 basis points principally attributable to declines in Rail Technologies and precast concrete tie margins which was negatively impacted by reduced volumes and related deleveraging of the businesses.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the Rail Products and Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 30.6% compared to the prior year period. All rail divisions experienced declines in orders with the exception of the transit division. The rail distribution and Rail Technologies businesses represented 47.0% of the current year decline due to reductions in rail capital spending. The Company anticipates continued challenges as rail customers react to significantly reduced rail traffic.

Construction Products


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Decrease			Percent Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	72,228		$	83,806		$	(11,578	)		(13.8	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	14,465		$	16,857		$	(2,392	)		(14.2	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		20.0	%		20.1	%		(0.1	)%		(0.5	)%

First Six Months of 2016 Compared to First Six Months of 2015

Construction Products segment sales decreased $11,578, or 13.8%, compared to the prior year period. The piling division experienced the largest decline which is attributable to fewer large project opportunities in the market as compared to the prior year period. Additionally, fabricated bridge product sales were down $3,640 over the prior year period largely due to a stronger market during the period ended June 30, 2015. Recent order activity within the fabricated bridge division will benefit the remaining six months of 2016.

The Construction Products segment profit declined by $1,994 as a result of reduced gross profit compared to the prior year. The non-GAAP gross profit decreased by $2,392, or 14.2% due to reductions in piling products gross profit as a result of the decline in volumes. The fabricated bridge and precast concrete products partially offset the reduction in piling products’ profit margins.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the Construction Products segment had an increase in new orders of 2.1% compared to the prior year period. The increase relates to significant project wins within the fabricated bridge business which were largely offset by declines in the piling products business.

Tubular and Energy Services


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Decrease			Percent Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	58,281		$	60,962		$	(2,681	)		(4.4	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	8,279		$	12,928		$	(4,649	)		(36.0	)%

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		14.2	%		21.2	%		(7.0	)%		(33.0	)%

First Six Months of 2016 Compared to First Six Months of 2015

Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased $2,681, or 4.4%, compared to the prior year period. The decrease primarily relates to the test and inspection services division which is being significantly impacted by the upstream oil and gas market and related reduction in active land rigs.

For the six-months ended June 30, 2016, the segment loss was $104,910 compared to segment profit of $2,316 during the prior year period. The reduction was attributable to a $100,596 asset impairment related to the test and inspection services, precision measurement products, and coated services reporting units along with reductions in gross profit. The non-GAAP gross profit declined by $4,649, or 36.0%, and the corresponding percentage declined by 700 basis points compared to the prior year period. The test and inspection services division has negatively impacted profitability due to the declines in volumes. Sales of precision measurement products have increased during the current year, however, due to the increased competition on fewer opportunities, the profitability has been reduced.

The Tubular and Energy Services segment’s new orders decreased by 27.9% compared to the prior year period. Coated services and test and inspection services experienced the most significant reductions at 69.7% and 45.7%, respectively. While the test and inspection services division continues to be impacted by the weakness in the oil and gas market, the recent coated decline relates to the delayed impact of the oil and gas market on mid-stream customers. Management anticipates that the Tubular and Energy Services segment will continue to face significant headwinds throughout the remainder of 2016.

Other

Segment Backlog

Total Company backlog is summarized by business segment in the following table for the periods indicated:


	Backlog
	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2015
Rail Products and Services	$	62,580	$	85,199	$	113,729
Construction Products		66,633		45,371		72,759
Tubular and Energy Services		20,033		34,137		21,277

Total Backlog	$	149,246	$	164,707	$	207,765

While a considerable portion of our business is backlog driven, certain product lines within the Rail Products and Services and Tubular and Energy Services segments are not driven by backlog and therefore have insignificant levels throughout the year.

Warranty

At June 30, 2016, the Company maintained a total product warranty reserve of $8,749 for its estimate of all potential product warranty claims. Of this total, $7,490 reflects the current estimate of the Company’s exposure for potential product warranty claims related to concrete tie production. While the Company believes this is a reasonable estimate of its potential contingencies related to identified concrete tie warranty matters, the Company may incur future charges associated with new customer claims or further development of information for existing customer claims. Thus, there can be no assurance that future potential costs pertaining to warranty claims will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total debt was $168,365 and $168,754 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Our need for liquidity relates primarily to working capital requirements for operations, capital expenditures, joint venture capital obligations, debt service obligations, share repurchases, and dividends.

The change in cash and cash equivalents for year-to-date periods ended June 30 is as follows:


	June 30,
	2016			2015
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	$	6,555		$	(1,934	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(4,877	)		(202,015	)
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(2,315	)		188,959
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		130			(1,473	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(507	)	$	(16,463	)

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, cash flows provided by operating activities were $6,555 compared to a use of $1,934 during the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, income, adjustments to income from operating activities, and dividends from the LB Pipe joint venture provided $10,617 compared to $23,358 in the 2015 period. Working capital and other assets and liabilities used $4,062 in the current period compared to a use of $25,292 in the prior year period.

The Company’s calculation of days sales outstanding at June 30, 2016 was 47 days compared to 56 days at December 31, 2015. We believe our receivables portfolio is strong.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $5,070 and $8,246, respectively. The current year expenditures related primarily to the Birmingham, AL inside diameter coating line upgrade and application development of the Company’s new enterprise resource planning system. The Company also received proceeds of $768 related to the sale of assets and loaned $575 to its LB Pipe JV. Expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2015 related primarily to upgrades to the outside diameter coating line of the Birmingham, AL coating facility as well as general plant and yard improvements across each segment. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD. (“Tew”) and IOS. The total purchase price of these acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was $193,871 as of June 30, 2015.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company had a decrease in outstanding debt of approximately $390 primarily related to payments against the revolving credit facility. The Company also paid $712 in financing fees related to the June 29, 2016 credit facility amendment. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company had an increase in outstanding debt of approximately $192,044 primarily related to drawings against the revolving credit facility to fund domestic acquisition activity. The Company withheld 14,498 shares for approximately $198 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to withholding 19,820 shares for approximately $962 in the prior year period. The shares were withheld from employees to pay their withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards. Cash outflows related to dividends were $829 and $831 for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Financial Condition

At June 30, 2016, we had $32,805 in cash and cash equivalents and a domestic credit facility with $109,305 of availability while carrying $168,365 in total debt. We believe this liquidity will provide the flexibility to operate the business in a prudent manner, continue to service our revolving debt facility, and weather a continued downturn in our markets.

Our priority continues to be short-term maturities and the preservation of our principal balances. Approximately $29,497 of our cash and cash equivalents was held in non-domestic bank accounts, and is not available to fund domestic operations unless repatriated. It is management’s intent to indefinitely reinvest such funds outside of the United States. Approximately $10,760 of the non-domestic cash is maintained within our United Kingdom subsidiaries.

Borrowings under our Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) as amended by the June 29, 2016 First Amendment (“First Amendment”) bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to the Company’s consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%. The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.

Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended by the First Amendment, which revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters: June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 3.25 to 1.00.

At June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. The Company’s current annual dividend is expected to be approximately $1,660.

The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter in into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.

To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017 at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. At June 30, 2016, the swap liability was $2,532 compared to $196 as of December 31, 2015.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. When more than one accounting principle, or method of its application, is generally accepted, management selects the principle or method that, in its opinion, is appropriate in the Company’s specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires management to reach opinions regarding estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these financial statements, management has reached its opinions regarding the best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the financial statements giving due regard to materiality. There have been no material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies or estimates since December 31, 2015. A summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements include operating leases, purchase obligations, and standby letters of credit. A schedule of the Company’s required payments under financial instruments and other commitments as of December 31, 2015 is included in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There were no material changes to these off-balance sheet arrangements during the current quarter. These arrangements provide the Company with increased flexibility relative to the utilization and investment of cash resources.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to risks that increases in interest rates may adversely affect funding costs associated with its variable-rate debt. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively convert a portion of the debt from a variable to a fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contracts. Refer to Note 10 within the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of this report for additional information regarding the swap agreements.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, a 1% change in the interest rate for variable rate debt as of June 30, 2016 would increase or decrease interest expense by approximately $830.

The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. At contract inception, the Company designates its derivative instruments as hedges. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Fluctuations in the fair values of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings within other income as the underlying hedged items affect earnings. To the extent that a change in a derivative does not perfectly offset the change in value of the interest rate being hedged, the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings immediately.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company recorded a current liability of $2,532 related to its LIBOR-based interest rate swap agreements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The Company is subject to exposures to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on firm sale and purchase commitments by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The Company’s risk management objective is to reduce its exposure to the effects of changes in exchange rates on these transactions over the duration of the transactions. The Company did not engage in foreign currency hedging transactions during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

L.B. Foster Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are in the process of integrating the IOS Holdings, Inc. and Tew Plus, Ltd. businesses. We are analyzing, evaluating and, where necessary, implementing changes in controls and procedures relating to these businesses as the integration proceeds. Similarly, as of April 1, 2016, we have transitioned certain product lines into a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. As such, the integration of recent acquisitions and ERP transition may result in additions or changes to our internal control over financial reporting. Otherwise, there were no changes in our “internal control over financial reporting” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Note 14, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the risk factors and other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on March 1, 2016, as well as our quarterly reports filed thereafter, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, financial results, or future performance. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations.

Economic conditions and regulatory changes caused by the United Kingdom’s likely exit from the European Union could adversely affect our business.

In June 2016, the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (“E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit”. It is expected that the U.K. government will initiate a process to withdraw from the E.U. and begin negotiating the terms of its separation. The announcement of Brexit has resulted in significant volatility in the global stock market and currency exchange rate fluctuations that resulted in strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the U.K. pound. The announcement of Brexit and likely withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. may also create global economic uncertainty. The majority of our U.K. operations are heavily concentrated within the U.K. borders; however, this could adversely affect the future growth of our U.K. operations into other European locations. Our U.K. operations represented less than 10% of our total revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company’s purchases of equity securities for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 were as follows:


					Total number of shares		Approximate dollar
			Average		purchased as		value of shares
	Total number		price		part of publicly		that may yet be
	of shares		paid per		announced plans		purchased under
	purchased (1)		share		or programs (2)		the plans or programs
April 1, 2016 - April 30, 2016		—	$	—		—	$	30,000
May 1, 2016 - May 31, 2016		7,660	$	12.61		5,000		29,933
June 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016		—		—		—		29,933

Total		7,660	$	12.61		5,000	$	29,933

(1)	Includes 2,660 shares withheld by the Company to pay taxes upon vesting of restricted stock.

(2)	On December 9, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30,000 of the Company’s common shares until December 31, 2017. This authorization became effective January 1, 2016.

The $30,000 repurchase authorization is restricted under the terms of the First Amendment. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at a maximum annual amount of $4,000 throughout the life of the repurchase authorization.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

This item is not applicable to the Company.

Item 6. Exhibits

All exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:



10.1		2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 25, 2016, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-10436, filed on May 27, 2016.

10.2		First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, between Registrant and PNC Bank N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company including forms of Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on form 8-K, File No. 0-10436, filed on July 1, 2016.

*31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*32.0		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.

*101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

*101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

*101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

*101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

*101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

*	Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


						L.B. FOSTER COMPANY
						(Registrant)

Date: August 9, 2016						By: /s/ David J. Russo
						David J. Russo
						Senior Vice President,
						Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
						(Duly Authorized Officer of Registrant)

Index to Exhibits

All exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:


Exhibit Number		Description

10.1		2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 25, 2016, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-10436, filed on May 27, 2016.

10.2		First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, between Registrant and PNC Bank N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company including forms of Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on form 8-K, File No. 0-10436, filed on July 1, 2016.

*31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*32.0		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.

*101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

*101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

*101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

*101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

*101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

*	Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company