Form 6-K
Table of Contents

 

 

FORM 6-K

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 1-15270

Supplement for the month of June 2010

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.

(Translation of registrant's name into English)

9-1, Nihonbashi 1-chome

Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8645

Japan

(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F       X                Form 40-F              

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):             

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):             

 

 

 


Table of Contents

Information furnished on this form:

EXHIBIT

 

Exhibit Number
1.   (English Translation) Extraordinary Report Pursuant to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: June 29, 2010   By:  

/s/ Shinji Iwai

    Shinji Iwai
    Senior Managing Director


Table of Contents

[Translation of Extraordinary Report Filed with the Director General of the Kanto Finance Bureau]

 

1. Reason for Submission

Given that resolutions were passed in respect of the Proposals to be Resolved at the 106th Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 25, 2010, we hereby submit this Extraordinary Report under the provisions of Article 24-5, Paragraph 4 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan and Article 19, Paragraph 1, Item 9-2, of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Disclosure of Corporate Information.

 

2. Matters Reported

 

(1) Date meeting held

June 25, 2010

 

(2) Proposal acted upon

Proposal: Election of 12 directors

Junichi Ujiie, Kenichi Watanabe, Takumi Shibata, Masanori Itatani, Masanori Nishimatsu, Haruo Tsuji, Hajime Sawabe, Tsuguoki Fujinuma, Hideaki Kubori, Masahiro Sakane, Colin Marshall, Clara Furse to be elected as directors.

 

(3) Number of voting rights expressing an opinion for, against, or abstaining from, the proposal; requirements for the proposal to be approved; results of the resolution

 

Proposal

   For    Against    Abstaining    Result of Resolution
            Ratio of Approval(%)    Approved/Rejected

Junichi Ujiie

   22,251,388    737,622    17,811    94    Approved

Kenichi Watanabe

   22,337,644    651,366    17,812    94    Approved

Takumi Shibata

   22,331,954    657,043    17,824    94    Approved

Masanori Itatani

   22,295,445    693,565    17,811    94    Approved

Masanori Nishimatsu

   22,597,434    391,580    17,807    95    Approved

Haruo Tsuji

   22,294,696    694,316    17,810    94    Approved

Hajime Sawabe

   22,292,344    696,662    17,815    94    Approved

Tsuguoki Fujinuma

   17,016,781    5,972,207    17,819    72    Approved

Hideaki Kubori

   22,304,691    684,316    17,815    94    Approved

Masahiro Sakane

   22,302,577    686,436    17,808    94    Approved

Colin Marshall

   22,656,568    332,453    17,801    96    Approved

Clara Furse

   22,659,702    329,310    17,809    96    Approved

Notes:

1.

The requirement for the proposal to be approved is a vote in favor by a simple majority of the voting rights held by the shareholders present at a meeting attended by shareholders entitled to exercise voting rights holding in aggregate  1/3 or more of the total voting rights.

2. The method for calculating the Ratio of Approval is as follows

This is the ratio of the number of votes in favor of the portion of the voting rights exercised in advance by the day prior to the meeting, to the total voting rights of the shareholders present at the meeting (the portion of the voting rights that were exercised in advance by the day prior to the meeting, as well as those exercised at the meeting).

 

(4) Reasons why a part of the voting rights expressing an opinion for, against, or abstaining from, the proposal that were exercised by shareholders at the meeting were not included in the calculation

As the portion of the votes exercised in advance by the day prior to the meeting satisfied the requirements for the approval of the proposal whereby the resolutions were duly passed in conformance with the Companies Act, the voting rights expressing an opinion for, against, or abstaining from, the proposal that were exercised by shareholders at the meeting were not included in the calculation.

End.