Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2008

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 1-12692

 

 

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   13-3490149

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

 

325 North LaSalle Street, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois   60654
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)

312-923-0030

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x or No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨ or No  x.

As of July 23, 2008, the registrant had 16,480,168 shares of its Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

 

     Page

Part I - Financial Information

  

Item 1. Financial Statements

   3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007 - unaudited

   3

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July  1, 2007 - unaudited

   5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July  1, 2007 - unaudited

   6

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

   7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   14

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   19

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

   20

Part II - Other Information

  

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

   21

Item 1A. Risk Factors

   22

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

   22

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   23

Item 6. Exhibits

   24

Signatures

   25

 

2


Table of Contents

Part I - Financial Information

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(amounts in thousands)

 

     June 29,
2008
   December 30,
2007
     (unaudited)
Assets      

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,950    $ 7,016

Accounts receivable

     5,960      5,102

Inventories

     12,327      13,394

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     5,575      6,560

Income taxes receivable

     —        1,102

Deferred income taxes, net

     6,054      5,578
             

Total current assets

     33,866      38,752
             

Property and equipment, at cost:

     

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

     36,103      33,752

Buildings and leasehold improvements

     114,817      106,476

Land

     8,474      8,474

Construction in progress

     2,122      4,191
             
     161,516      152,893

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     43,365      38,157
             

Net property and equipment

     118,151      114,736
             

Intangible asset

     92,000      92,000

Goodwill

     59,101      59,101

Other assets and deferred expenses, net

     5,571      5,494
             
   $ 308,689    $ 310,083
             

 

3


Table of Contents

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets, Continued

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

     June 29,
2008
    December 30,
2007
 
     (unaudited)  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity     

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 8,791     $ 13,426  

Accrued expenses, including deferred revenue from gift certificates of $18,003 and $22,667

     43,529       49,919  

Current portion of obligation to financial institution

     143       136  

Accrued income taxes

     565       1,031  
                

Total current liabilities

     53,028       64,512  
                

Borrowings under senior revolving credit facility

     56,800       44,300  

Obligation to financial institution, less current maturities

     3,133       3,206  

Deferred income taxes, net

     8,336       8,336  

Other liabilities

     32,362       31,341  
                

Total liabilities

     153,659       151,695  
                

Commitments and contingencies

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. 30,000,000 shares authorized, none issued at June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007, respectively

     —         —    

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share. 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,010,658 and 16,938,155 issued and 15,919,958 and 16,938,155 outstanding at June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007, respectively

     170       169  

Additional paid-in capital

     166,788       165,979  

Treasury stock, 1,090,700 shares at a weighted average cost of $7.72 per share at June 29, 2008 and none at December 30, 2007

     (8,425 )     —    

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     380       218  

Accumulated deficit

     (3,883 )     (7,978 )
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     155,030       158,388  
                
   $ 308,689     $ 310,083  
                

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

     Three month periods ended    Six month periods ended
     June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007
   June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007
     (unaudited)

Revenues

   $ 88,708    $ 85,613    $ 183,147    $ 174,500

Food and beverage costs

     28,449      28,399      59,769      58,508

Restaurant operating expenses

     44,799      41,175      90,643      81,892

Pre-opening costs

     682      829      1,652      1,815

Depreciation and amortization

     3,380      2,574      6,634      4,907

General and administrative expenses

     6,274      6,092      13,232      11,380

Marketing and promotional expenses

     2,345      2,359      4,239      3,817
                           

Operating income

     2,779      4,185      6,978      12,181

Interest expense, net

     650      961      1,399      1,842
                           

Income before income taxes

     2,129      3,224      5,579      10,339

Income tax expense

     396      926      1,484      3,043
                           

Net income

   $ 1,733    $ 2,298    $ 4,095    $ 7,296
                           

Net income per share

           

Basic

   $ 0.11    $ 0.14    $ 0.25    $ 0.43

Diluted

   $ 0.11    $ 0.14    $ 0.25    $ 0.43

Shares used in computing net income per share

           

Basic

     16,126,800      16,936,651      16,370,836      16,926,905

Diluted

     16,127,296      16,952,188      16,370,836      16,967,078

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

 

     Six month periods ended  
     June 29, 2008     July 1, 2007  
     (unaudited)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 4,095     $ 7,296  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges

     8,001       6,364  

Deferred income taxes

     (476 )     1,604  

Change in assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     (854 )     1,447  

Inventories

     1,070       984  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     936       (3,025 )

Income taxes receivable

     1,102       —    

Accounts payable

     (4,640 )     (2,473 )

Accrued expenses

     (5,677 )     (4,085 )

Other liabilities

     795       2,309  

Accrued income taxes

     (463 )     78  
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     3,889       10,499  
                

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Purchases of property and equipment

     (10,794 )     (19,822 )
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (10,794 )     (19,822 )
                

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Borrowings under senior revolving credit facility

     18,500       6,500  

Payments made on senior revolving credit facility

     (6,000 )     —    

Shares vested and forfeited by employees in lieu of paying minimum income taxes

     (147 )     (201 )

Tax benefit related to restricted shares vested during the period

     (58 )     58  

Principal reduction on obligation to financial institution

     (66 )     (61 )

Payment of deferred financing costs

     (144 )     —    

Purchase of treasury stock

     (8,425 )     —    
                

Net cash provided by financing activities

     3,660       6,296  
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     179       (35 )
                

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (3,066 )     (3,062 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     7,016       6,261  
                

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 3,950     $ 3,199  
                

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007

 

1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions relating to assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

The Company uses a 52/53 week fiscal year which ends on the Sunday closest to January 1. Approximately every six or seven years, a 53rd week is added. Fiscal 2008 is a 53 week year. The 53rd week will be included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (“MRG”) was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on October 3, 1988 and until February 14, 2006 was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morton’s Holding Company, Inc. (“MHCI”), which was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on March 10, 2004 and became the direct parent of the Company on June 4, 2004. MHCI was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morton’s Holdings, LLC (“MHLLC”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on April 4, 2002. On February 14, 2006, MHCI was merged with and into MRG, with MRG as the surviving corporation. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” this transaction represented a merger of entities under common control and accordingly MRG recognized the assets and liabilities transferred at their carrying amounts. MHCI was a holding company with no independent operations. MHCI’s only significant assets, other than its investment in MRG, were a deferred tax asset and deferred financing fees associated with its 14.0% senior secured notes, which was MHCI’s only significant liability. In February 2006, the Company and certain selling stockholders completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of 6,000,000 and 3,465,000 shares of common stock, respectively, at $17.00 per share. In March 2006, the underwriters exercised the over-allotment option to purchase 801,950 additional shares of common stock from the Company at $17.00 per share.

 

2) Statements of Cash Flows

For the purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. In addition, accrued purchases of property and equipment are reflected as non-cash transactions in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company paid interest of approximately $1,504,000 (which

 

7


Table of Contents

includes capitalized interest of approximately $62,000) and $1,709,000 (which includes capitalized interest of approximately $150,000), and income taxes, net of refunds, of approximately $1,298,000 and $1,299,000, for the six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively.

 

3) Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 26.6% for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 compared with 29.4% for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. The rate decreased primarily as a result of lower taxable income while the level of tax credits generated remained consistent, partially offset by miscellaneous charges and benefits. Excluding the effect of these net charges, the Company’s effective tax rate for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 approximates 25%. This rate differs from the statutory rate due to the deferred tax assets relating to FICA and other tax credits, and foreign, state and local taxes.

 

4) Net Income per Share

The Company computes net income per common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic and diluted net income per share have been computed by dividing net income by the shares outstanding. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if unvested restricted stock awards were vested. In periods where losses are recorded, potentially dilutive securities would decrease the loss per common share and therefore are not added to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Restricted stock of approximately 592,000 shares and approximately 644,000 shares for the three and six month periods ended June 29, 2008, respectively, were not included in the diluted net income per share calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Restricted stock of approximately 427,000 shares for both the three and six month periods ended July 1, 2007 were not included in the diluted net income per share calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

 

     Three month periods ended    Six month periods ended
     June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007
   June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007

Net income available to common stockholders

   $ 1,733    $ 2,298    $ 4,095    $ 7,296
                           

Shares:

           

Weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding

     16,126,800      16,936,651      16,370,836      16,926,905

Dilutive potential common shares

     496      15,537      —        40,173
                           

Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding

     16,127,296      16,952,188      16,370,836      16,967,078
                           

Basic net income per share

   $ 0.11    $ 0.14    $ 0.25    $ 0.43

Diluted net income per share

   $ 0.11    $ 0.14    $ 0.25    $ 0.43

 

8


Table of Contents
5) Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income for the six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

     Six month periods ended  
     June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007
 

Net income

   $ 4,095    $ 7,296  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

     

Foreign currency translation

     162      (7 )
               

Total comprehensive income

   $ 4,257    $ 7,289  
               

 

6) Stock Based Compensation

Equity Incentive Plan

Prior to the IPO, the Company adopted the 2006 Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “equity incentive plan”). The equity incentive plan provides for the grant of stock options and stock appreciation rights and for awards of shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units and other equity-based awards to employees, officers, directors or consultants. As of June 29, 2008, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that was approved under the equity incentive plan was 1,789,000 shares. If an award granted under the equity incentive plan terminates, lapses or is forfeited before the vesting of the related shares, those shares will again be available to be granted. During fiscal 2006, the Company granted and issued an aggregate of 251,950 shares of restricted stock to certain of its employees and directors pursuant to the equity incentive plan at a weighted average grant date price of $16.96 per share. During fiscal 2007, the Company granted and issued an aggregate of 261,050 shares of restricted stock to certain of its employees and directors pursuant to the equity incentive plan at a weighted average grant date price of $18.48 per share. On February 5, 2008 and May 14, 2008, the Company granted and issued 252,350 shares and 3,800 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to certain of its employees and directors pursuant to the equity incentive plan at a weighted average grant date price of $8.64 per share.

Activity relating to the equity incentive plan during the six month period ended June 29, 2008 was as follows:

 

Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of December 30, 2007

   440,790  

Granted

   256,150  

Vested

   (91,600 )

Forfeited by termination

   (14,730 )
      

Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of June 29, 2008

   590,610  
      

As of June 29, 2008, there were 1,058,450 shares available for grant. In connection with the vesting of shares on January 31, 2008, February 9, 2008 and May 10, 2008, 19,097 shares of the 91,600 shares vested were forfeited at the election of certain employees in lieu of paying employee minimum income taxes in cash. Such forfeited shares were cancelled by the Company.

The Company recognized stock-based compensation for awards issued under the equity incentive plan in the following line items in the consolidated statements of income (amounts in thousands):

 

     Three month periods ended     Six month periods ended  
     June 29,
2008
    July 1,
2007
    June 29,
2008
    July 1,
2007
 

Restaurant operating expenses

   $ 93     $ 80     $ 190     $ 154  

General and administrative expenses

     389       307       794       587  

Marketing and promotional expenses

     15       12       31       24  
                                

Stock-based compensation expense before income tax benefit

     497       399       1,015       765  

Income tax benefit

     (183 )     (148 )     (97 )     (283 )
                                

Net compensation expense

   $ 314     $ 251     $ 918     $ 482  
                                

 

9


Table of Contents

Stock-based compensation expense, net of related income taxes, resulted in a decrease of $0.02 in both basic and diluted net income per share for the three month period ended June 29, 2008. Stock-based compensation expense, net of related income taxes, resulted in a decrease of $0.06 in both basic and diluted net income per share for the six month period ended June 29, 2008. Stock-based compensation expense, net of related income taxes, resulted in a decrease of $0.01 in both basic and diluted net income per share for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Stock-based compensation expense, net of related income taxes, resulted in a decrease of $0.03 in both basic and diluted net income per share for the six month period ended July 1, 2007.

As of June 29, 2008, total remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock-based payment awards, net of estimated forfeitures, was approximately $6,894,000. This cost will be recognized over a five year vesting period from the applicable grant date.

 

7) Financial Information about Geographic Areas

Income before income taxes for the Company’s domestic and foreign operations are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

     Three month periods ended    Six month periods ended
     June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007
   June 29,
2008
   July 1,
2007

Domestic (78 and 74 restaurants at June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively)

   $ 1,249    $ 2,264    $ 3,919    $ 8,297

Foreign (5 and 4 restaurants at June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, respectively)

     880      960      1,660      2,042
                           

Total

   $ 2,129    $ 3,224    $ 5,579    $ 10,339
                           

Domestic income before income taxes includes certain corporate expenses and other charges that are included in domestic operations but not included in the foreign operations.

 

10


Table of Contents
8) Restaurant Activity

On March 7, 2008 and June 1, 2008, a new Morton’s steakhouse was opened in Naperville, Illinois and Coral Gables, Florida, respectively. With the exception of the Morton’s steakhouse in Beverly Hills, California, which was temporarily closed for renovations on June 1, 2008, no Morton’s steakhouses were closed during the six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007. During March 2008, the Company closed its Bertolini’s restaurant in Indianapolis, Indiana.

The Company currently has signed leases for new Morton’s steakhouses in Brooklyn, New York; Ft. Lauderdale, Florida; Indian Wells, California; Leawood/Overland Park, Kansas; Miami Beach, Florida; and Sacramento, California.

 

9) Legal Matters and Contingencies

The Company records legal fees and accruals in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Topic D-77. A liability is recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 5 when the liability is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s accounting policy is to accrue estimated legal defense costs under EITF Topic D-77.

Since August 2002, a number of the Company’s current and former employees in New York, California, Massachusetts and Florida have initiated arbitrations with the American Arbitration Association in their respective states alleging that the Company has violated state (California and Massachusetts arbitrations), state and federal (New York arbitrations) and federal (Florida and Massachusetts arbitrations) wage and hour laws regarding the sharing of tips with other employees and failure to pay for all hours worked. There are two group arbitrations pending in Florida. One is proceeding in Palm Beach as a collective action with approximately 25 claimants. The second is proceeding in Boca Raton with six claimants. In May 2008, a memorandum of understanding was reached to resolve both arbitrations. The settlement is subject to final closing and court approval. There are two group arbitrations pending in New York. In the first, the arbitrator has permitted the approximately 88 claimants to consolidate their arbitrations into one action and proceed as a collective action. The arbitrator has rendered a decision that the wage and hour laws have been willfully violated, and has made an interim award of attorneys’ fees and costs, but there has been no determination as to damages. The Company has moved to vacate that decision. At this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the motion to vacate. The claimants in New York are seeking an aggregate of approximately $1,700,000 in damages, exclusive of liquidated damages and interest, and $1,400,000 in attorneys’ fees. The second New York arbitration was filed in October 2006 and contains similar allegations. There are four named claimants in this arbitration proceeding. The claimants seek to represent a class of current and former employees from the Morton’s steakhouses in New York (Midtown Manhattan), Great Neck and White Plains for a six year time period. The arbitrator has determined that the matter may proceed as a class and has certified a class comprising a group of servers in the New York restaurants. In July 2008, a joint stipulation of settlement and release was reached to resolve the first New York arbitration. The settlement is subject to final closing and court approval. In the case involving Massachusetts state claims only, the arbitrator has ruled that the claimants may proceed as a class, but to date, there are only three people in the class and the arbitrator has ruled that there would be no automatic certification.

In November 2004, current and former employees of the Sacramento, California Morton’s steakhouse commenced a state lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, asserting individual, representative and class claims against the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse and several other Morton’s steakhouses. The plaintiffs asserted claims based on the Company’s alleged failure to provide them with meal and rest periods, and for unlawful tip sharing and unfair competition. The plaintiffs seek restitution of tips, meal and break period compensation and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs have not stated the amount of damages they seek and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiffs. Dismissals with prejudice for all defendants, except the Sacramento

 

11


Table of Contents

Morton’s steakhouse, were granted. The claims against the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse have been moved to arbitration. In June 2008, a joint stipulation of settlement and release was reached to resolve this matter. The settlement is subject to final closing and court approval.

In May 2005, a former employee of the Boston, Massachusetts Morton’s steakhouse filed a nationwide class action complaint in federal court in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, alleging that the sharing of tips with other restaurant employees violates the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint and compel arbitration. While the motion was pending, the plaintiff filed a nationwide collective action demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. The demand for arbitration alleges the same facts as the lawsuit filed in federal court. The Company’s motion to dismiss was granted and the matter is moving forward as an arbitration. The arbitrator has ruled that a nationwide class is appropriate, excluding certain states. The Company has appealed that decision to the district court. The plaintiffs have not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiff.

In March 2006, a former employee of the Burbank, California Morton’s steakhouse filed a class and collective action in Superior Court in Los Angeles, California alleging that the sharing of tips with other restaurant employees violates federal and state laws. The case was brought on behalf of all current and former California servers for a four-year period. The Company moved to dismiss the action and its motion was granted. The plaintiff appealed. In February 2008, a memorandum of understanding was executed resolving this matter. A joint stipulation of settlement and release was executed in June 2008. The settlement is subject to final closing.

In April 2008, a former employee of the Chicago (Wacker), Illinois Morton’s steakhouse filed a nationwide class action complaint in federal court in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the Company failed to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. In addition, also in April 2008, another former employee of the Chicago (Wacker), Illinois Morton’s steakhouse filed a statewide class action complaint in state court in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois County Department alleging that certain food deductions, tip pooling practices and tip credits taken by the Company violate Illinois wage and hour laws. The Company filed motions to dismiss both complaints and compel arbitration for both matters. In July 2008, the plaintiff in the federal action filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit (without prejudice), which was granted by the court. The plaintiff in the state action has not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiff.

In general, the claimants are seeking restitution of tips, the difference between the tip credit wage and the minimum wage, recovery of unpaid compensation, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. We are contesting these matters vigorously. The claimants in Florida, New York (the second case), Massachusetts and Illinois have not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the claimants.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. However, an adverse judgment by a court or arbitrator or a settlement could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations in any given period.

 

12


Table of Contents
10) Purchase of Equity Securities

On January 15, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $4,000,000 of the Company’s common stock. On February 27, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, and the Company entered into, an amendment to the Company’s senior revolving credit facility to allow the repurchase of an additional $6,000,000 of the Company’s common stock. On February 27, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional $6,000,000 of the Company’s common stock, resulting in authorization for the Company to repurchase a total of $10,000,000 of its common stock. The timing and amount of any share repurchases will be determined by the Company’s management based on market conditions and other factors. During the six month period ended June 29, 2008, the Company purchased 1,090,700 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $8,425,000.

 

13


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

Three Month Period Ended June 29, 2008 (13 weeks) compared to Three Month Period Ended July 1, 2007 (13 weeks) and Six Month Period Ended June 29, 2008 (26 weeks) compared to Six Month Period Ended July 1, 2007 (26 weeks)

Our net income decreased $0.6 million, or 24.6%, to $1.7 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $2.3 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Our net income decreased $3.2 million, or 43.9%, to $4.1 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $7.3 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. The decrease is primarily due to an increase in restaurant operating expenses partially offset by the impact of new restaurants, as discussed below. For purposes of this discussion, comparable restaurants refer to Morton’s steakhouses open for all of the six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007.

We believe we will likely incur a net loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 due to the impact of the weakened U.S. economy and the seasonality of our business, with revenues generally being lower in the third quarter than in other quarters primarily due to our reduced summer volume.

Revenues increased $3.1 million, or 3.6%, to $88.7 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $85.6 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Revenues increased $5.8 million due to the opening of seven new restaurants (two in the six month period ended June 29, 2008 and five in fiscal 2007). Revenues decreased $1.5 million, or 1.9%, due to a decrease in revenues from comparable restaurants. Revenues decreased $0.5 million due to the temporary closing of our Morton’s steakhouse in Beverly Hills, California. Revenues decreased $0.4 million due to the closing of our Bertolini’s restaurant in Indianapolis, Indiana. Revenues decreased $0.2 million due to a decrease in revenues from our two Bertolini’s restaurants. Revenues relating to Trevi, our Italian restaurant in Las Vegas, Nevada, decreased $0.1 million when comparing the three month period ended June 29, 2008 (restaurant was open 13 weeks) to the three month period ended July 1, 2007 (restaurant was open 13 weeks). Our Italian restaurant in Las Vegas, Nevada was temporarily closed on September 15, 2006 for renovation of our Bertolini’s restaurant and reopened as Trevi on February 2, 2007. Revenues as a result of gift card breakage income remained consistent for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 when compared to the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Average revenue per restaurant open all of either period being compared decreased 1.2%. Average revenue per restaurant open all of either period being compared, excluding Trevi, decreased 1.0%. Revenues for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 also reflect the impact of aggregate menu price increases of approximately 2.0% in June 2007, 1.5% in December 2007 and 1.0% in February 2008 and the impact of a menu price increase at our Bertolini’s restaurants of approximately 2.0% in April 2007.

Revenues increased $8.6 million, or 5.0%, to $183.1 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $174.5 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. Revenues increased $11.3 million due to the opening of seven new restaurants (two in the six month period ended June 29, 2008 and five in fiscal 2007). Revenues relating to Trevi, our Italian restaurant in Las Vegas, Nevada, increased $0.6 million when comparing the six month period ended June 29, 2008 (restaurant was open 26 weeks) to the six month period ended July 1, 2007 (restaurant was open 21 weeks). Our Italian restaurant in Las Vegas, Nevada was temporarily closed on September 15, 2006 for renovation of our Bertolini’s restaurant and reopened as Trevi on February 2, 2007. Revenues decreased $0.8 million, or 0.5%, due to a decrease in revenues from comparable restaurants. Due to a fiscal calendar shift, the first quarter of fiscal 2008 included New Year’s Eve’s (December 31, 2007) revenue, which was not included in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Excluding the first day of both six month periods, comparable restaurant revenues would have decreased 2.1% (Morton’s –1.9%, Bertolini’s –11.6%) for the six month period ended June 29, 2008. Revenues decreased

 

14


Table of Contents

$0.7 million due to the closing of our Bertolini’s restaurant in Indianapolis, Indiana. Revenues decreased $0.7 million due to the temporary closing of our Morton’s steakhouse in Beverly Hills, California. Revenues decreased $0.3 million due to a decrease in revenues from our two Bertolini’s restaurants. Revenues decreased as a result of decreased gift card breakage income of $0.8 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recognized breakage income from a legacy gift certificate program, after it was determined that the redemption of these certificates was remote based on maintaining objective and reliable historical evidence. No such breakage income from the gift certificates was recorded in the six month period ended June 29, 2008. Average revenue per restaurant open all of either period being compared increased 2.2%. Average revenue per restaurant open all of either period being compared, excluding Trevi, increased 0.6%. Revenues for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 also reflect the impact of aggregate menu price increases of approximately 2.0% in June 2007, 1.5% in December 2007 and 1.0% in February 2008 and the impact of a menu price increase at our Bertolini’s restaurants of approximately 2.0% in April 2007.

Food and beverage costs remained consistent at $28.4 million for the three month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007. These costs increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%, to $59.8 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $58.5 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. The increase was primarily due to the opening of seven additional restaurants (two in the six month period ended June 29, 2008 and five in fiscal 2007). These costs as a percentage of revenues decreased by 1.1% to 32.1% for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from 33.2% for the three month period ended July 1, 2007 and decreased by 0.9% to 32.6% for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from 33.5% for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These decreases were primarily due to the impact of the aggregate menu price increases.

Restaurant operating expenses, which include labor, occupancy and other operating expenses, increased $3.6 million, or 8.8%, to $44.8 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $41.2 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. These costs increased $8.8 million, or 10.7%, to $90.6 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $81.9 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These increases were primarily due to increased salaries, wages and benefits as well as increased utility costs and rent expense primarily due to the opening of seven additional restaurants (two in the six month period ended June 29, 2008 and five in fiscal 2007). Included in the three month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 is non-cash rent (benefit) expense recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 13 of $(31,000) and $0.1 million, respectively. Included in the six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 is non-cash rent (benefit) expense recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 13 of $(7,000) and $0.2 million, respectively. Restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased 2.4% to 50.5% for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from 48.1% for the three month period ended July 1, 2007 and increased 2.6% to 49.5% for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from 46.9% for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These increases were primarily due to deleveraging on the fixed cost base caused by negative comparable restaurant revenues.

Pre-opening costs decreased $0.1, or 17.7%, to $0.7 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $0.8 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. These costs decreased $0.2 million, or 9.0%, to $1.7 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $1.8 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. We expense all costs incurred during restaurant start-up activities, including pre-opening costs, as incurred. The number of restaurants opened, the timing of restaurant openings and the costs per restaurant opened affected the amount of these costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $0.8 million, or 31.3%, to $3.4 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $2.6 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.7 million, or 35.2%, to $6.6 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $4.9 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. The increase in depreciation and amortization relates to new restaurants and capital expenditures related to renovations to existing restaurants.

 

15


Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased $0.2 million, or 3.0%, to $6.3 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $6.1 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. These costs as a percentage of revenues remained consistent at 7.1% for the three month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007. General and administrative expenses increased $1.9 million, or 16.3%, to $13.2 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $11.4 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These costs as a percentage of revenues increased 0.7% to 7.2% for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from 6.5% for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. For the six month period ended June 29, 2008 compared to the six month period ended July 1, 2007, the increases were primarily due to increased salary, bonus, stock-based compensation and benefit costs as well as increased legal expenses primarily related to certain wage and hour and similar labor claims filed against us in 2008.

Marketing and promotional expenses remained consistent at $2.3 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007. These costs as a percentage of revenues decreased 0.2% to 2.6% for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from 2.8% for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Marketing and promotional expenses increased $0.4 million, or 11.1%, to $4.2 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $3.8 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These costs as a percentage of revenues increased 0.1% to 2.3% for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from 2.2% for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These increases were primarily due to an increase in public relations costs and costs relating to our direct mail campaign.

Interest expense, net decreased $0.3 million, or 32.4%, to $0.7 million for the three month period ended June 29, 2008 from $1.0 million for the three month period ended July 1, 2007. Interest expense, net decreased $0.4 million, or 24.0%, to $1.4 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 from $1.8 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. These decreases were due to a decrease in interest rates relating to borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility. There was no interest income for the three and six month periods ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007.

Provision for income taxes consisted of an income tax expense of $1.5 million for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 and $3.0 million for the six month period ended July 1, 2007. Our effective tax rate of 26.6% for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 differs from the statutory rate due to deferred tax assets relating to FICA and other tax credits, and foreign, state and local taxes partially offset by miscellaneous charges and benefits. Our effective tax rate of 29.4% for the six month period ended July 1, 2007, differs from the statutory rate due to the establishment of additional deferred tax assets relating to FICA and other tax credits, state and local taxes and the status of foreign subsidiaries. Our 2008 effective tax rate differs from our 2007 effective tax rate primarily due to lower taxable income while the level of tax credits generated remained consistent, partially offset by miscellaneous charges and benefits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements are to meet our lease obligations and working capital and capital expenditure needs, repurchase our common stock and to pay principal and interest on our debt. Subject to our operating performance, which, if significantly adversely affected, would adversely affect the availability of funds, we expect to finance our operations, including costs of opening currently planned new restaurants for at least the next several years, through cash provided by operations and through borrowings available under our senior revolving credit facility. We cannot be sure, however, that this will be the case and we may seek additional financing in the future. In addition, we rely to a significant degree on landlord contributions as a means of financing the costs of opening new restaurants, and any substantial reduction in the amount of those contributions could adversely affect our liquidity. As of June 29, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.0 million compared to $7.0 million as of December 30, 2007.

 

16


Table of Contents

Working Capital and Cash Flows

As of June 29, 2008, we had, and in the future we may have, a negative working capital balance. Our operations have not required significant working capital and, like many restaurant companies, we have been able to operate with negative working capital since our restaurant guests pay for their food and beverage purchases in cash or by credit card at the time of sale, and we are able to sell many of our food inventory items before payment is due to the suppliers of such. We do not have significant receivables. Our receivables primarily represent amounts due from credit card processors, when customers pay by credit card, and are included in “Accounts Receivable” in our consolidated balance sheets. We receive trade credit based upon negotiated terms in purchasing food and supplies. Funds available from cash sales not needed immediately to pay for current expenses, which consist primarily of food and supplies, rent and payroll, historically have been used for noncurrent capital expenditures and or to repay debt.

Operating Activities

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 were $3.9 million consisting primarily of net income before depreciation and amortization of $12.1 million partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $10.3 million.

Investing Activities

Cash flows used in investing activities for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 were $10.8 million due to purchases of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the six month period ended June 29, 2008 were $3.7 million, primarily consisting of net borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility of $12.5 million partially offset by purchases of treasury stock of $8.4 million.

Debt and Other Obligations

Senior Revolving Credit Facility

On February 14, 2006, we entered into a $115.0 million senior revolving credit facility with Wachovia Bank, N.A. Our senior revolving credit facility matures on February 14, 2011. As of June 29, 2008, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $56.8 million under our senior revolving credit facility at a weighted average interest rate of 3.88%. As of June 29, 2008, we were in compliance with all of our financial covenants.

Mortgages

During 2001, one of our subsidiaries entered into a mortgage loan of $4.0 million with a predecessor of GE Capital Franchise Finance, the proceeds of which were used to fund the purchase of land and construction of a restaurant. The mortgage loan bears interest at 8.98% per annum and is scheduled to mature in March 2021. On June 29, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the aggregate outstanding principal balance due on this mortgage loan was approximately $3.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of which approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of principal is included in “Current portion of obligation to financial institution” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of June 29, 2008, we were in compliance with all of our financial covenants.

 

17


Table of Contents

Restaurant Operating Leases

Our obligations for restaurant operating leases include certain restaurant operating leases for which we, or one of our subsidiaries, guarantees, for a portion of the lease term, the performance of the lease by the subsidiary operating company that is a party thereto.

Contractual Commitments

The following table represents our contractual commitments associated with our debt and other obligations disclosed above as of June 29, 2008:

 

     Remainder
2008
                             
        2009    2010    2011    2012    Thereafter    Total
     (amounts in thousands)

Senior revolving credit facility, including interest (a)

   $ 1,117    $ 2,233    $ 2,233    $ 59,033    $ —      $ —      $ 64,616

Mortgage loan with GE Capital Franchise Finance, including interest

     218      435      435      435      435      3,591      5,549
                                                

Subtotal

     1,335      2,668      2,668      59,468      435      3,591      70,165

Operating leases

     12,996      27,763      29,002      27,852      26,820      210,898      335,331

Purchase commitments

     7,283      —        —        —        —        —        7,283
                                                

Total

   $ 21,614    $ 30,431    $ 31,670    $ 87,320    $ 27,255    $ 214,489    $ 412,779
                                                

 

(a) Interest is based on borrowings as of June 29, 2008 and current interest rates.

During the first six months of fiscal 2008, our expenditures for fixed assets and related investment costs, plus pre-opening costs, approximated $12.4 million. During the first six months of fiscal 2008, capital expenditures were reduced by landlord contributions of approximately $0.8 million. We estimate that we will spend up to approximately $39.0 million in fiscal 2008, including the $12.4 million recorded in the first six months of fiscal 2008, to finance ordinary refurbishment of existing restaurants, remodel the bar area in selected restaurants to include our Bar 1221 concept, add additional Boardrooms in selected restaurants and make capital expenditures for new restaurants. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2008 are expected to be reduced by landlord contributions of approximately $7.9 million. We anticipate that funds generated through operations and through borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility, together with landlord contributions, will be sufficient to fund these currently planned expenditures through the end of fiscal 2008. We cannot be sure, however, that this will be the case.

New Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141R, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value. This statement applies to all business combinations, including combinations among mutual entities and combinations by contract alone. Under SFAS No. 141R, all business combinations will be accounted for by applying the acquisition method. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 will require noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of permanent equity. This statement applies to the accounting for noncontrolling interests and transactions with noncontrolling interest holders in consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008.

 

18


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements, written, oral or otherwise made, represent the Company’s expectation or belief concerning future events. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “thinks,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that these statements are further qualified by important economic and competitive factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, or otherwise, from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, risks of the restaurant industry, including a highly competitive environment and industry with many well-established competitors with greater financial and other resources than the Company, the impact of changes in consumer tastes, local, regional and national economic and market conditions, restaurant profitability levels, expansion plans, a lack of suitable locations, timely construction and opening of new restaurants, higher than anticipated costs to open restaurants, the Company’s liquidity and capital resources, prevailing interest rates, legal and regulatory matters, demographic trends, traffic patterns, weather conditions, employee availability, benefits and cost increases, product safety and availability, supply interruptions, litigation, government regulation, the Company’s ability to maintain adequate financing facilities and other risks detailed in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K and in this and the Company’s other reports filed from time to time with the SEC. In addition, the Company’s ability to expand is dependent upon various factors, such as the availability of attractive sites for new restaurants, the ability to negotiate suitable lease terms, the ability to generate or borrow funds to develop new restaurants and obtain various government permits and licenses and the recruitment and training of skilled management and restaurant employees. Other unknown unpredictable factors also could harm the Company’s results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that actual results or developments anticipated by the Company will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The inherent risk in market risk sensitive instruments and positions primarily relates to potential losses arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and beef and other food product prices.

As of June 29, 2008, we owned and operated five international restaurants, one each in Hong Kong; Macau, China; Singapore; Toronto, Canada; and Vancouver, Canada. As a result, we are subject to risk from changes in foreign exchange rates. These changes result in cumulative translation adjustments, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We do not consider the potential loss resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates, as of June 29, 2008, to be material.

We are also subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our financing activities. This exposure relates to borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility that are payable at floating rates of interest. Our other indebtedness, our mortgage, is payable at a fixed rate of interest. As of June 29, 2008, there were borrowings outstanding under our floating rate senior revolving credit facility of approximately $56.8 million. As a result, a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in interest rates would have an immaterial impact on earnings for the six month period ended June 29, 2008.

We are also exposed to market price fluctuations in beef and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef and other food product prices, this exposure can impact our food and beverage costs. Since we typically set our menu prices in advance of our beef and other food product purchases, we

 

19


Table of Contents

cannot quickly take into account changing costs of beef and other food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our guests through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. To manage this risk in part, we attempt to enter into fixed price purchase commitments. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef or other food product prices. As a result, a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in beef costs would have an impact of approximately $2.0 million on earnings for the six month period ended June 29, 2008.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. These include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 29, 2008. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 29, 2008 at the reasonable assurance level. No changes were made in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

 

20


Table of Contents

Part II - Other Information

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Since August 2002, a number of the Company’s current and former employees in New York, California, Massachusetts and Florida have initiated arbitrations with the American Arbitration Association in their respective states alleging that the Company has violated state (California and Massachusetts arbitrations), state and federal (New York arbitrations) and federal (Florida and Massachusetts arbitrations) wage and hour laws regarding the sharing of tips with other employees and failure to pay for all hours worked. There are two group arbitrations pending in Florida. One is proceeding in Palm Beach as a collective action with approximately 25 claimants. The second is proceeding in Boca Raton with six claimants. In May 2008, a memorandum of understanding was reached to resolve both arbitrations. The settlement is subject to final closing and court approval. There are two group arbitrations pending in New York. In the first, the arbitrator has permitted the approximately 88 claimants to consolidate their arbitrations into one action and proceed as a collective action. The arbitrator has rendered a decision that the wage and hour laws have been willfully violated, and has made an interim award of attorneys’ fees and costs, but there has been no determination as to damages. The Company has moved to vacate that decision. At this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the motion to vacate. The claimants in New York are seeking an aggregate of approximately $1.7 million in damages, exclusive of liquidated damages and interest, and $1.4 million in attorneys’ fees. The second New York arbitration was filed in October 2006 and contains similar allegations. There are four named claimants in this arbitration proceeding. The claimants seek to represent a class of current and former employees from the Morton’s steakhouses in New York (Midtown Manhattan), Great Neck and White Plains for a six year time period. The arbitrator has determined that the matter may proceed as a class and has certified a class comprising a group of servers in the New York restaurants. In July 2008, a joint stipulation of settlement and release was reached to resolve the first New York arbitration. The settlement is subject to final closing and court approval. In the case involving Massachusetts state claims only, the arbitrator has ruled that the claimants may proceed as a class, but to date, there are only three people in the class and the arbitrator has ruled that there would be no automatic certification.

In November 2004, current and former employees of the Sacramento, California Morton’s steakhouse commenced a state lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, asserting individual, representative and class claims against the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse and several other Morton’s steakhouses. The plaintiffs asserted claims based on the Company’s alleged failure to provide them with meal and rest periods, and for unlawful tip sharing and unfair competition. The plaintiffs seek restitution of tips, meal and break period compensation and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs have not stated the amount of damages they seek and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiffs. Dismissals with prejudice for all defendants, except the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse, were granted. The claims against the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse have been moved to arbitration. In June 2008, a joint stipulation of settlement and release was reached to resolve this matter. The settlement is subject to final closing and court approval.

In May 2005, a former employee of the Boston, Massachusetts Morton’s steakhouse filed a nationwide class action complaint in federal court in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, alleging that the sharing of tips with other restaurant employees violates the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint and compel arbitration. While the motion was pending, the plaintiff filed a nationwide collective action demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. The demand for arbitration alleges the same facts as the lawsuit filed in federal court. The Company’s motion to dismiss was granted and the matter is moving forward as an arbitration. The arbitrator has ruled that a nationwide class is appropriate, excluding certain states. The Company has appealed that decision to the district court. The plaintiffs have not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiff.

 

21


Table of Contents

In March 2006, a former employee of the Burbank, California Morton’s steakhouse filed a class and collective action in Superior Court in Los Angeles, California alleging that the sharing of tips with other restaurant employees violates federal and state laws. The case was brought on behalf of all current and former California servers for a four-year period. The Company moved to dismiss the action and its motion was granted. The plaintiff appealed. In February 2008, a memorandum of understanding was executed resolving this matter. A joint stipulation of settlement and release was executed in June 2008. The settlement is subject to final closing.

In April 2008, a former employee of the Chicago (Wacker), Illinois Morton’s steakhouse filed a nationwide class action complaint in federal court in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the Company failed to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. In addition, also in April 2008, another former employee of the Chicago (Wacker), Illinois Morton’s steakhouse filed a statewide class action complaint in state court in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois County Department alleging that certain food deductions, tip pooling practices and tip credits taken by the Company violate Illinois wage and hour laws. The Company filed motions to dismiss both complaints and compel arbitration for both matters. In July 2008, the plaintiff in the federal action filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit (without prejudice), which was granted by the court. The plaintiff in the state action has not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the plaintiff.

In general, the claimants are seeking restitution of tips, the difference between the tip credit wage and the minimum wage, recovery of unpaid compensation, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. We are contesting these matters vigorously. The claimants in Florida, New York (the second case), Massachusetts and Illinois have not stated the amount of damages sought and, at this stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to state the estimated damages sought by the claimants.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. However, an adverse judgment by a court or arbitrator or a settlement could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations in any given period.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On January 15, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $4.0 million of the Company’s common stock. On February 27, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, and the Company entered into, an amendment to the Company’s senior revolving credit facility to allow the repurchase of an additional $6.0 million of the Company’s common stock. On February 27, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional $6.0 million of the Company’s common stock, resulting in authorization for the Company to repurchase a total of $10.0 million of its common stock. The timing and amount of any share repurchases will be determined by the Company’s management based on market conditions and other factors. During the three month period ended June 29, 2008, the Company purchased 327,000 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2.5 million.

 

22


Table of Contents

Period

   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average Price
Paid per Share
   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plan or
Programs
   Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs

April (March 31, 2007 to May 4, 2008)

   52,100    $ 7.79    52,100    $ 3,718,000

May (May 5, 2008 to June 1, 2008)

   115,700    $ 8.29    115,700    $ 2,759,000

June (June 2, 2008 to June 29, 2008)

   159,200    $ 7.44    159,200    $ 1,575,000
               

Total

   327,000    $ 7.79    327,000   
               

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On May 14, 2008, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Four directors were elected at the Annual Meeting to serve until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. The names of these directors and votes cast in favor of their election and shares withheld are as follows:

 

Name

   Votes For    Votes
Withheld

Mr. Stephen E. Paul

   13,820,749    286,465

Mr. David B. Pittaway

   13,805,152    302,062

Ms. Dianne H. Russell

   13,917,448    189,766

Mr. Zane Tankel

   14,047,279    59,935

The terms of office of the following directors continued through and after the meeting:

Mr. William C. Anton

Mr. Thomas J. Baldwin

Mr. John K. Castle

Dr. John J. Connolly

Mr. Robert A. Goldschmidt

Mr. Alan A. Teran

Mr. Justin B. Wender

In addition, the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Company was ratified as follows: 14,084,699 shares were voted for the ratification, 17,508 shares were voted against and 5,007 shares were withheld.

 

23


Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

31.1*

  Certification of Thomas J. Baldwin Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*

  Certification of Ronald M. DiNella Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*

  Certification of Thomas J. Baldwin Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*

  Certification of Ronald M. DiNella Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

* Filed herewith.

 

24


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
    (Registrant)
Date:   August 1, 2008   By:  

/s/ THOMAS J. BALDWIN

      Thomas J. Baldwin
      Chairman of the Board of Directors,
      Chief Executive Officer and President
      (Principal Executive Officer)
Date:   August 1, 2008   By:  

/s/ RONALD M. DINELLA

      Ronald M. DiNella
      Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
      and Treasurer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

25