UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 2, 2006
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number 1-11479
|
|
|
E-Z-EM, Inc. |
||
|
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
||
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
11-1999504 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1111 Marcus Avenue, Lake Success, New York |
|
11042 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(516) 333-8230 |
||
|
||
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one).
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
As of October 6, 2006, there were 10,879,881 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding.
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
||
|
|
||
Part I: Financial Information |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item l. |
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006 |
3 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
7 8 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
9 21 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
34 35 |
-2-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
September 2, |
|
June 3, |
|
||
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(audited) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,982 |
|
$ |
6,749 |
|
Debt and equity securities, at fair value |
|
|
28,822 |
|
|
33,446 |
|
Accounts receivable, principally trade, net |
|
|
21,383 |
|
|
20,680 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
29,137 |
|
|
27,028 |
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
890 |
|
|
2,040 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
5,012 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operation |
|
|
280 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
94,219 |
|
|
95,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - AT COST, less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,857 |
|
|
12,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, less accumulated amortization |
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES, at fair value |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH SURRENDER VALUE OF LIFE INSURANCE |
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATION |
|
|
652 |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
$ |
123,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-3-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
September 2, |
|
June 3, |
|
||
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(audited) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
31 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
5,702 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
9,504 |
|
|
12,123 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
204 |
|
|
47 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operation |
|
|
264 |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
15,441 |
|
|
18,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
19,057 |
|
|
21,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.10 per share - authorized, 1,000,000 shares; issued, none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.10 per share - authorized, 16,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 10,870,199 shares at September 2, 2006 and 10,862,899 shares at June 3, 2006 (excluding 89,205 shares held in treasury at September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006) |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
1,086 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
30,248 |
|
|
30,071 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
65,825 |
|
|
64,263 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
6,482 |
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
103,642 |
|
|
101,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
$ |
123,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-4-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
Fourteen |
|
||
|
|
weeks ended |
|
weeks ended |
|
||
|
|
September 2, |
|
September 3, |
|
||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
33,440 |
|
$ |
34,394 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
18,849 |
|
|
18,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
14,591 |
|
|
15,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
11,141 |
|
|
10,219 |
|
Plant closing and operational restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
12,517 |
|
|
11,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
3,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
356 |
|
|
160 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
(116 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
274 |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
851 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operation, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
From discontinued operation, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From total operations |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
From discontinued operation, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From total operations |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-5-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total |
|
Compre- |
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
|
Amount |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at June 3, 2006 |
|
|
10,862,899 |
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
$ |
30,071 |
|
$ |
64,263 |
|
$ |
6,422 |
|
$ |
101,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits on stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
Compensation related to stock option plans, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on debt and equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
(40 |
) |
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 2, 2006 |
|
|
10,870,199 |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
$ |
30,248 |
|
$ |
65,825 |
|
$ |
6,482 |
|
$ |
103,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
-6-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
Fourteen |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
(Earnings) loss from discontinued operation, net of tax |
|
|
221 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
884 |
|
|
915 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
23 |
|
|
14 |
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
288 |
|
|
4 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
21 |
|
|
23 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business divested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
(4,138 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(2,109 |
) |
|
(3,328 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
358 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
43 |
|
|
(169 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
1,025 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(2,619 |
) |
|
(2,787 |
) |
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
157 |
|
|
108 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
78 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operation |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(1,190 |
) |
|
(414 |
) |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(147,140 |
) |
|
(41,495 |
) |
Proceeds from sale |
|
|
151,764 |
|
|
41,372 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-7-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(continued)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
Fourteen |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of debt |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
$ |
(20 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
50 |
|
|
52 |
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock in connection with the stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operation |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
47 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
(4,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
10,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
8,982 |
|
$ |
5,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (net of refunds of $1,162 in 2006) |
|
$ |
(858 |
) |
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
-8-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE A - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
|
|
Nature of Business |
|
|
|
E-Z-EM, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or E-Z-EM) is a leading provider of medical products used by radiologists, gastroenterologists and speech language pathologists primarily in screening for and diagnosing diseases and disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Products are used for colorectal cancer screening, evaluation of swallowing disorders (dysphagia), and testing for other diseases and disorders of the GI system. The Company is also the exclusive worldwide manufacturer and marketer of Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL) for first-responder organizations and military services. RSDL is a patented, broad spectrum liquid chemical warfare agent decontaminant, that neutralizes or removes chemical agents from skin on contact, leaving a non-toxic residue that can be rinsed off with water. The Company also leverages its capacities in manufacturing, automation and quality control by offering contract manufacturing to third-party businesses. |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The consolidated balance sheet as of September 2, 2006, the consolidated statement of stockholders equity and comprehensive income for the period ended September 2, 2006, and the consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 and fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005, have been prepared by the Company without audit. The consolidated balance sheet as of June 3, 2006 was derived from audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normally recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, changes in stockholders equity and comprehensive income, results of operations and cash flows at September 2, 2006 (and for all periods presented) have been made. |
|
|
|
Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006, filed by the Company on August 17, 2006. The results of operations for the periods ended September 2, 2006, and September 3, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the respective full years. |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of E-Z-EM, Inc. and all wholly owned subsidiaries. Toho Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd., the Companys wholly owned Japanese subsidiary, is reported separately as a discontinued operation for all periods presented within the consolidated financial statements (see Note B). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
-9-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE B - DISCONTINUED OPERATION
|
|
|
In February 2006, the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors approved a plan to wind down and close the operations of Toho Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. (Toho), a wholly owned Japanese subsidiary. The decision to close Toho resulted from an inability to generate income from operations and to grow the business due to a limited product offering and scope of operations. Also, a recent change in manufacturing location required a re-registration of Tohos principal products with Japanese regulatory authorities, resulting in a projected interruption of supply during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Management planned a market withdrawal on a staged basis so that current inventory could be sold, accounts receivable collected and the property sold in an organized fashion, while also satisfying all outstanding liabilities. As a result of this plan, foreign currency translation losses of $33,000 included in accumulated other comprehensive income have been charged to results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 in accordance with EITF Issue No. 01-5, Application of FASB Statement No. 52 to an Investment Being Evaluated for Impairment That Will Be Disposed Of. EITF 01-5 requires that accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments be included as part of the carrying amount of a foreign investment being evaluated for impairment under a committed plan of disposal. For all periods presented, Toho is accounted for as a discontinued operation in the Companys financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Amounts in the financial statements and related notes for all periods shown have been reclassified to reflect the discontinued operation. |
|
|
|
For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006, project costs, primarily severance and the above-mentioned impairment, aggregated $230,000, and the Company expects to incur up to an additional $51,000 in project costs during the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Changes in project costs are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
333 |
|
Recorded |
|
|
230 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE B - DISCONTINUED OPERATION (continued)
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of Toho, which are classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2, |
|
June 3, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
178 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
102 |
|
|
229 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operation |
|
$ |
280 |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
651 |
|
$ |
603 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operation |
|
$ |
652 |
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
392 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operation |
|
$ |
264 |
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized results of operations for Toho as reported in earnings (loss) from discontinued operation in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
Fourteen |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From unaffiliated customers |
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(341 |
) |
$ |
10 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operation |
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE C - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Effective June 4, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all stock-based compensation be recognized as an expense in the financial statements and that such cost be measured at the fair value of the award. |
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based compensation awards under its three stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense had been recognized under these plans concerning stock options granted to employees and to members of the Board of Directors, as all such stock options granted had exercise prices equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the dates of grant. |
|
|
|
Additionally, in periods prior to June 4, 2006, the Company followed the disclosure-only requirements of SFAS No. 123 which allowed entities to continue to apply the provisions of APB No. 25 for transactions with employees and directors and provide pro forma net earnings and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employees and directors stock option grants made as if the fair value based method of accounting in SFAS No. 123 had been applied to these transactions. |
|
|
|
SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted using the modified prospective method, which requires the Company to recognize compensation expense on a prospective basis. Therefore, prior period financial statements have not been restated. Under this transition method, the Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after June 4, 2006. The provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) will not apply to any stock options outstanding as of June 4, 2006, since all such options were fully vested. |
|
|
|
For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006, the Company did not recognize any share-based compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements for awards concerning employees or members of the Board of Directors since no stock options were granted nor were there any modifications of outstanding stock options. For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006, and the fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005, pre-tax compensation expense of $21,000 ($13,000 after tax effects) and $23,000 ($15,000 after tax effects), respectively, was recognized for stock options granted in prior years to a former director serving as a consultant. This expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings. |
-12-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE C - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company presented all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the consolidated statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that cash flows from the exercise of stock options resulting from tax benefits in excess of recognized cumulative compensation cost (excess tax benefits) be classified as financing cash flows. |
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per common share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock options granted under these plans to employees and to members of the Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourteen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings, as reported |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of income tax effects |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings |
|
$ |
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
Basic - as reported |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
Basic - pro forma |
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted - as reported |
|
$ |
.23 |
|
Diluted - pro forma |
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions for all plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourteen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
47.86% |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.64% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
None |
|
-13-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE C - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)
|
|
|
The expected life of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future behavior. The expected volatility is estimated using the historical volatility of the Companys stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at the grant date. The Company has not historically issued any dividends and does not expect to in the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
2004 Stock and Incentive Award Plan |
|
|
|
In October 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock and Incentive Award Plan (the 2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to employees and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance units, performance shares and incentive awards to employees, directors and other service providers. A total of 1,008,425 shares of the Companys common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan, including 576,346 shares and 82,079 shares reallocated from the 1983 Stock Option Plan and 1984 Directors and Consultants Stock Option Plan, respectively. A committee of the board administers the 2004 Plan. The committee determines the vesting terms and exercise price of options granted under the 2004 Plan, but for all incentive stock options the exercise price must at least be equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The term of an incentive stock option may not exceed ten years, and up to 800,000 shares of the Companys common stock may be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options. No awards may be granted under the 2004 Plan after October 26, 2014. At September 2, 2006, there were 30,675 shares available for grants of options and other awards under the 2004 Plan. |
|
|
|
1983 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
In 1983, the Company adopted the 1983 Stock Option Plan (the 1983 Plan). The 1983 Plan provides for the grant to key employees of both nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options. A total of 2,041,628 shares (given effect to the reallocation of 576,346 shares to the 2004 Plan) of the Companys common stock may be issued under the 1983 Plan pursuant to the exercise of options. All outstanding stock options have an exercise price of not less than the market value of the shares on the date of grant. Outstanding options are exercisable over a period of time designated by the administrators of the 1983 Plan (but not more than 10 years from the date of grant) and are subject to such other terms and conditions as the administrators have determined. No further options will be issued under the 1983 Plan. |
-14-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE C - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)
|
|
|
1984 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
In 1984, the Company adopted the 1984 Directors and Consultants Stock Option Plan (the 1984 Plan). The 1984 Plan provides for the grant to members of the Board of Directors and consultants of nonqualified stock options. A total of 377,411 shares (given effect to the reallocation of 82,079 shares to the 2004 Plan) of the Companys common stock may be issued under the 1984 Plan pursuant to the exercise of options. All outstanding stock options have an exercise price of not less than the market value of the shares on the date of grant. Outstanding options are exercisable over a period of time designated by the administrators of the 1984 Plan (but not more than 10 years from the date of grant) and are subject to such other terms and conditions as the administrators have determined. No further options will be issued under the 1984 Plan. |
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the stock option activity during the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,358 |
|
$ |
12.23 |
|
|
7.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(7 |
) |
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6 |
) |
$ |
14.39 |
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,345 |
|
$ |
12.25 |
|
|
7.40 |
|
$ |
3,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at end of period |
|
|
1,345 |
|
$ |
12.25 |
|
|
7.40 |
|
$ |
3,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
1,345 |
|
$ |
12.25 |
|
|
7.40 |
|
$ |
3,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005 was $6.67 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes and is based on the Companys closing stock price as of the last business day of the respective period. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 and fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005 was $51,000 and $174,000, respectively. |
-15-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE C - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)
|
|
|
The Company received cash from stock options exercised during the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 and fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005 of $50,000 and $52,000, respectively. The impact of these cash receipts is included in financing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company realized tax benefits from the exercise of stock options during the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 and fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005 of $115,000 and $427,000, respectively. |
|
|
NOTE D - EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding without consideration of potential common stock. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common and potential dilutive common shares outstanding. The calculation takes into account the shares that may be issued upon exercise of stock options, reduced by the shares that may be repurchased with the funds received from the exercise, based on the average price during the period. |
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
Fourteen |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Basic |
|
|
10,867 |
|
|
10,837 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities (stock options) |
|
|
192 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
11,059 |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded from the calculation of earnings per common share, are options to purchase 224,750 and 614,500 shares of common stock for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 and the fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005, respectively, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006, the range of exercise prices on the excluded options was $15.64 to $17.49 per share and, for the fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005, the range of exercise prices on the excluded options was $14.23 to $14.68 per share. |
-16-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE E - EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
|
|
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) released Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining whether impairment for certain debt and equity investments is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impaired loss. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in fiscal 2004, and the Company has complied with the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements. The recognition and measurement requirements of EITF 03-1 were initially effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. In September 2004, the FASB Staff issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-1-1, which delayed the effective date for certain measurement and recognition guidance contained in EITF 03-1. The FSP requires that entities continue to apply previously existing other-than-temporary guidance until a final consensus is reached. The Company does not anticipate that the issuance of a final consensus will materially impact its financial condition or results of operations. |
|
|
|
Effective June 4, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 improve financial reporting by clarifying that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) be recognized as current-period charges and by requiring the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facility. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 has had no current impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations. |
|
|
|
Effective June 4, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition via a cumulative effect adjustment within net income for the period of the change. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 has had no current impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations. |
-17-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE E - EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements. The Interpretation requires that the Company determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. If a tax position meets the more likely than not recognition criteria, FIN 48 requires the tax position be measured at the largest amount of benefit greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company does not believe the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations. |
NOTE F - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
Fourteen |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on debt and equity securities arising during the period |
|
|
100 |
|
|
63 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments arising during the period |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2, |
|
June 3, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrealized holding gain on debt and equity securities |
|
$ |
623 |
|
$ |
523 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
6,482 |
|
$ |
6,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE G - PLANT CLOSING AND OPERATIONAL RESTRUCTURING
|
|
|
In May 2005, the Company substantially completed its plan to further streamline its operations, specifically by moving its powder-based barium production in Westbury, N.Y. to its manufacturing facility in Montreal, Canada. For the fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005, project costs aggregated $158,000. At September 3, 2005, the liability for this restructuring, which is included in accrued liabilities, approximated $296,000. |
|
|
|
Changes in project costs are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
598 |
|
Recorded |
|
|
158 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE H - DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
Debt and equity securities at September 2, 2006 consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities (carried on the balance sheet at fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds with maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 10 years and through 20 years |
|
$ |
14,950 |
|
$ |
14,950 |
|
|
|
|
Due after 20 years |
|
|
13,720 |
|
|
13,720 |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
152 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,822 |
|
$ |
28,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities (carried on the balance sheet at fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
257 |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE H - DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES (continued)
Debt and equity securities at June 3, 2006 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities (carried on the balance sheet at fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds with maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 1 through 10 years |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Due after 10 years and through 20 years |
|
|
|
16,525 |
|
|
|
16,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Due after 20 years |
|
|
|
14,765 |
|
|
|
14,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Other |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,446 |
|
|
$ |
33,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities (carried on the balance sheet at fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
257 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I - INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2, |
|
June 3, |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Finished goods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,585 |
|
$ |
12,140 |
|
||||
|
Work in process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
||
|
Raw materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,902 |
|
|
|
14,284 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,137 |
|
$ |
27,028 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005
(unaudited)
NOTE J - CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
Litigation Matters |
|
|
|
The Company is party to claims, legal actions and complaints that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution of these matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. |
|
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
|
|
In November 2005, Merry X-Ray Corporation (Merry X-Ray), a significant distributor of the Companys products in the U.S., acquired SourceOne Healthcare Technologies, Inc. (SourceOne), the Companys largest distributor in the U.S. For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006 and the fourteen weeks ended September 3, 2005, sales of products to Merry X-Ray, including sales to SourceOne before its acquisition by Merry X-Ray, represented 35% and 41% of total sales, respectively. Approximately 40% and 39% of accounts receivable pertained to Merry X-Ray at September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006, respectively. While the accounts receivable related to this distributor are significant, the Company does not believe the credit loss risk to be significant given the consistent payment history of this distributor. |
|
|
NOTE K - COMMON STOCK |
|
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase Program |
|
|
|
In March 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an aggregate purchase price of up to $3,000,000. During the thirteen weeks ended September 2 2006 no shares were repurchased under this program. In aggregate, the Company has repurchased 74,234 shares of common stock for approximately $716,000 under this program. |
-21-
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following information should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and other information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Statements
Our disclosure and analysis in this report, including but not limited to the information discussed in this Item 2, contain forward-looking information about our companys financial results and estimates, business prospects and products in research that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. From time to time, we also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as anticipate, estimate, expect, project, intend, plan, believe, will, and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operations or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective products or product approvals, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, intellectual property matters, the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings, and financial results.
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from past results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. As a result, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements.
We do not assume any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement that we make, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future. We are also affected by other factors which may be identified from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission some of which are set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors in our Form 10-K filing for the 2006 fiscal year. You are advised to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Forms 10-Q, 8-K and 10-K reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we have attempted to provide a list of important factors which may affect our business, investors are cautioned that other factors may prove to be important in the future and could affect our operating results. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors or to assess the impact of each factor or combination of factors on our business. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
Overview
We are a leading provider of medical diagnostic oral contrast agents and devices used in the diagnosis of abdominal disease. Our customers include radiologists and gastroenterologists. We are focused on becoming a worldwide CT solutions company for the computed tomography (CT) market. This focus is driven by the trend away from older fluoroscopic procedures (e.g., barium
-22-
enema) to CT based applications for imaging the entire abdominal tract because of the enhanced benefits of Multidetector CT technology.
We have pioneered solutions for the emerging area of Virtual Colonography, which may offer unique capabilities for the early detection of colorectal cancer, and have also developed new contrast agents (e.g., VoLumen) that focus on CT and CT Angiography applications in Multidetector CT technology. We also manufacture and market a line of CT power injectors that deliver CT contrast agents.
In May 2006, we announced the launch of our CO2EFFICIENTTM Endoscopic Insufflator, a new device for insufflating, or filling, the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract with carbon dioxide (CO2) gas. CO2EFFICIENT provides a quick and easy way to use CO2 gas insufflation in all endoscopic procedures. We believe that use of this device will improve patient comfort and increase the efficiency of endoscopic procedures, and that we are well positioned to continue building our presence in this market.
In addition to our products for the radiology market, we have continued to focus our efforts in the area of defense decontaminants. Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL) is a liquid skin decontaminant that is effective in neutralizing a broad spectrum of chemical warfare and toxic agents. In April 2005, we purchased from our strategic partner, ODell Engineering, all its assets related to the RSDL technology. We now have exclusive, worldwide rights to the RSDL technology for the military and first-responder markets. Prior to the acquisition, we were the exclusive manufacturer of RSDL under an agreement between ODell Engineering and our Canadian subsidiary.
In mid-December 2004, our principal competitor, Mallinckrodt, a division of Tyco International Ltd., initiated a recall of its liquid barium products due to potential microbial contamination. As a result, our net sales have been favorably affected by our ability to provide replacement products since the recall began. During the fourth quarter of 2006, Mallinckrodt returned to the market with a reduced product offering. In addition, Mallinckrodt announced its decision to partner with a third-party organization to sell its barium products in the U.S. We believe that Mallinckrodts return to the market has had minimal effect on our sales and earnings to date.
In February 2006, the Executive Committee of our Board of Directors approved a plan to wind down and close the operations of Toho Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. (Toho), a wholly owned Japanese subsidiary. We decided to close Toho because we were unable to generate income from operations to grow the business due to a limited product offering and the scope of Tohos operations. Also, a recent change in manufacturing location required us to re-register Tohos principal products with the Japanese regulatory authorities, which we projected would cause an interruption of supply during the first quarter of 2007. We planned a staged market withdrawal to allow us to sell current inventory, collect accounts receivable and sell the property in an organized fashion, while also satisfying all outstanding liabilities. For all periods presented, Toho is accounted for as a discontinued operation in the Companys financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Results of Operations
Our quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005 represent thirteen weeks and fourteen weeks, respectively.
-23-
Consolidated Results of Operations
For the quarter ended September 2, 2006, we reported net earnings of $1,562,000, or $.14 per common share on both a basic and diluted basis, as compared to net earnings of $2,553,000, or $.24 and $.23 per common share on a basic and diluted basis, respectively, for the comparable period of last year.
The following table sets forth earnings from continuing operations and earnings (loss) from discontinued operation for the quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operation |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our results are expressed as a percentage of net sales for the quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005 in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
29.7 |
|
Plant closing and operational restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operation, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-24-
Continuing Operations
Operating profit for the current quarter declined by $1,891,000 due to decreased sales and gross profit and increased operating expenses. Results for the comparable quarter of last year included $158,000 in plant closing and operational restructuring costs related to the moving of our powder-based barium production to our manufacturing facility in Montreal, Canada.
Net sales for the quarter ended September 2, 2006 decreased 3%, or $954,000, as compared to the quarter ended September 3, 2005. Net sales in the first quarter of the prior year benefited from one additional week compared with the current quarter, as well as from approximately $1,600,000 in backlog sales associated with the Mallinckrodt recall. Price increases accounted for slightly less than 1% of net sales for the current quarter, as a significant portion of our domestic products are sold under fixed pricing, long-term group purchasing organization contracts. On a product line basis, the net sales decline resulted from decreased sales of CT imaging contrast products of $1,816,000 and X-ray fluoroscopy products of $298,000, partially offset by increased sales of CT injector systems of $1,058,000.
Net sales in international markets, including direct exports from the U.S., increased 6%, or $548,000, for the current quarter from the prior years quarter due to foreign currency exchange fluctuations, which increased the translated amounts of foreign subsidiaries sales to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes by $453,000, and price increases, which accounted for approximately 1% of net sales in international markets for the current quarter. On a product line basis, the net sales increase resulted primarily from increased sales of CT imaging products of $662,000, X-ray fluoroscopy products of $520,000 and virtual colonoscopy products of $296,000, partially offset by decreased sales of contract manufacturing products of $717,000 and defense decontaminants of $266,000.
The following table sets forth net sales by product category for the quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
CT Imaging Contrast |
|
$ |
9,248 |
|
|
27.6 |
|
$ |
11,064 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
CT Injector Systems |
|
|
6,545 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
5,487 |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CT Imaging |
|
|
15,793 |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
16,551 |
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
X-Ray Fluoroscopy |
|
|
10,858 |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
11,156 |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
Contract Manufacturing |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Accessory Medical Devices |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Gastroenterology |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Virtual Colonoscopy |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
828 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Defense Decontaminants |
|
|
497 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
751 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
832 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
952 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,440 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
$ |
34,394 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, expressed as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 44% for the current quarter from 46% for the comparable quarter of the prior year due to increased costs for purchased finished products and increased materials cost primarily from our barium sulfate suppliers. Increased finished product costs related primarily to finished goods purchased from our Canadian subsidiary which were adversely affected by the continued weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar.
-25-
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $11,141,000 for the quarter ended September 2, 2006 compared to $10,219,000 for the quarter ended September 3, 2005. This increase of $922,000, or 9%, was due primarily to costs of $392,000 associated with an expansion of our North American sales force and additional infrastructure expenses of $305,000 to support our defense decontaminants business.
Research and development (R&D) expenditures remained at 4% of net sales and increased 3% for the current quarter to $1,376,000 from $1,340,000 for the comparable quarter of the prior year. Increased costs of $54,000 for defense decontaminant projects, $53,000 for virtual colonoscopy projects and $40,000 for other projects were partially offset by decreased general regulatory costs of $86,000 and decreased costs of $25,000 for gastroenterology projects. Of the R&D expenditures for the current quarter, approximately 57% related to X-ray fluoroscopy and CT imaging projects, 25% to general regulatory costs, 7% to gastroenterology projects, 4% to virtual colonoscopy projects, 4% to defense decontaminant projects and 3% to other projects. R&D expenditures are expected to continue at or exceed current amounts for the remainder of this fiscal year.
Other income (expense) totaled $560,000 of income for the current quarter compared to expense of $57,000 for the comparable period of last year. This improvement is due to favorable changes in foreign currency exchange gains and losses of $382,000, increased interest income of $196,000 and decreased interest expense of $46,000.
For the quarter ended September 2, 2006, our effective tax rate of 32% differed from the Federal statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to tax-exempt income, partially offset by non-deductible expenses. For the quarter ended September 3, 2005, our effective tax rate of 35% differed from the Federal statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to non-deductible expenses, partially offset by tax-exempt income.
Discontinued Operation
We have consolidated the financial statements of Toho and reported its results as a discontinued operation. Summarized results of operations for Toho as reported in earnings (loss) from discontinued operation in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings for the quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From unaffiliated customers |
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(341 |
) |
$ |
10 |
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operation |
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results for the discontinued operation for the current quarter represent two months of operational activity and, therefore, are not comparative to the results for the prior years first quarter.
-26-
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the quarter ended September 2, 2006, operations and capital expenditures were funded by working capital and cash reserves. Our policy has generally been to fund operations and capital requirements without incurring significant debt. At September 2, 2006, debt (current maturities of long-term debt) was $18,000, as compared to $31,000 at June 3, 2006. We have available $1,811,000 under a bank line of credit, of which no amounts were outstanding at September 2, 2006.
Our contractual obligations and their effect on liquidity and cash flows as of September 2, 2006 are set forth in the table below. We have no variable interest entities or other off-balance sheet obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period as of September 2, 2006 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
More than |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
1,843 |
|
$ |
3,425 |
|
$ |
1,613 |
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations (1) |
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment contract (1) |
|
|
720 |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting contracts (1) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities reflected on the consolidated balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation (2) |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
150 |
|
|
190 |
|
$ |
2,332 |
|
Asset acquisition |
|
|
700 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License arrangements |
|
|
686 |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued severance benefits |
|
|
148 |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,971 |
|
$ |
8,435 |
|
$ |
4,401 |
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
$ |
2,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The non-cancelable operating leases, purchase obligations, and employment and consulting contracts are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The purchase obligations consist primarily of finished product and component parts. |
|
|
(2) |
Deferred compensation costs covering active employees are assumed payable after five years, although certain circumstances, such as termination, would require earlier payment. |
At September 2, 2006, approximately $37,804,000, or 31%, of our assets consisted of cash and cash equivalents and short-term debt and equity securities. The current ratio was 6.10 to 1, with net working capital of $78,778,000, at September 2, 2006, compared to the current ratio of 5.21 to 1, with net working capital of $77,061,000, at June 3, 2006. We believe that our cash reserves, cash provided from operations and existing bank line of credit will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months.
In March 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of up to $3,000,000. During the quarter ended September 2, 2006, no shares were repurchased under this program. In aggregate, we have repurchased 74,234 shares of common stock for approximately $716,000 under this program.
-27-
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 3, 2006. While all these significant accounting policies affect the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require us to use a greater degree of judgment and/or estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
We believe that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgment or estimate methodologies would cause a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report. The accounting policies identified as critical are as follows:
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenues in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, which requires that four basic criteria be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) the price is fixed or determinable; (3) collectibility is reasonably assured; and (4) product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. Decisions relative to criterion (3) regarding collectibility are based upon our judgments, as discussed under Accounts Receivable below. Should conditions change in the future and cause us to determine this criterion is not met, our results of operations may be affected. We recognize revenue on the date the product is shipped, which is when title passes to the customer. Shipping and credit terms are negotiated on a customer-by-customer basis. Products are shipped primarily to distributors at agreed upon list prices. The distributor then resells the products primarily to hospitals and, depending upon contracts between us, the distributor and the hospital, the distributor may be entitled to a rebate. We deduct all rebates from sales and have a provision for rebates based on historical information for all rebates that have not yet been submitted to us by the distributors.
Changes in our rebate allowance for the quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
Provision for rebates |
|
|
6,691 |
|
|
6,963 |
|
Rebate credits issued |
|
|
(6,418 |
) |
|
(6,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
2,139 |
|
$ |
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rebate allowance is comprised of three components:
|
|
|
actual rebate requests received from distributors prior to the closing of our financial statements; |
-28-
|
|
|
an estimate, compiled by distributor, of rebate requests not yet received based on historical submissions, adjusted for any material changes in purchasing patterns or market conditions; and |
|
|
|
an estimate of distributors inventory-on-hand available for future sale pursuant to a group purchasing organization (GPO) contract. We do not have visibility as to the specific inventory levels held by our distributors. However, based on discussions with our customers, who uniformly attempt to maintain a just-in-time purchasing program, and our knowledge of their ordering patterns, we estimate a one-week wholesale inventory level. Since most of our product sales are subject to GPO contracts, most distributor inventory-on-hand will be subject to rebate. This portion of the rebate estimate is derived by first determining the total quantity of each product sold by us during the last week of the fiscal period multiplied by two factors, (a) and (b), where (a) is the percentage of each product rebated during the prior six-month period based on historical sales and (b) is the average rebate paid on that product during this period. |
All product returns must be pre-approved by us and may be subject to a 20% restocking charge. To be accepted, a returned product must be unadulterated, undamaged and have at least 12 months remaining on its stated expiration date.
We record revenue on warranties and extended warranties on a straight-line basis over the term of the related warranty contracts, which generally cover one year. Deferred revenues related to warranties and extended warranties were $729,000 and $688,000 at September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006, respectively. Service costs are expensed as incurred.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are generally due within 30 to 90 days and are stated at amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations and adjust credit limits based upon payment history and the customers current credit worthiness, as determined by a review of their current credit information. We continuously monitor aging reports, collections and payments from customers, and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issues we identify. While such credit losses have historically been within expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee the same credit loss rates will be experienced in the future. We write off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible. Concentration risk exists relative to our accounts receivable, as 40% and 39% of our total accounts receivable balance at September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006, respectively, was concentrated in one distributor. While the accounts receivable related to this distributor are significant, we do not believe the credit risk to be significant given the distributors consistent payment history.
-29-
Changes in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the quarters ended September 2, 2006 and September 3, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
888 |
|
$ |
837 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
23 |
|
|
14 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
911 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
In preparing our financial statements, income tax expense is calculated for each jurisdiction in which we operate. This involves estimating actual current taxes due plus assessing temporary differences arising from differing treatment for tax and accounting purposes that are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are periodically evaluated to determine their recoverability, based primarily on our ability to generate future taxable income. Where their recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance and record a corresponding additional tax expense in our statement of earnings. If actual results differ from our estimates due to changes in assumptions, the provision for income taxes could be materially affected.
Inventories
We value inventories at the lower of cost (on the first-in, first-out method) or market. On a quarterly basis, we review inventory quantities on hand and analyze the provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on product expiration dating and our estimated sales forecast, which is based on sales history and anticipated future demand. Our estimates of future product demand may not be accurate and we may understate or overstate the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. Accordingly, any significant unanticipated changes in demand could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and results of operations. At September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006, our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory was $2,385,000 and $2,053,000, respectively.
Effects of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) released Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining whether impairment for certain debt and equity investments is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impaired loss. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in fiscal 2004, and we have complied with the new disclosure requirements in our consolidated financial statements. The recognition and measurement requirements of EITF 03-1 were initially effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. In September 2004, the FASB Staff issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-1-1, which delayed the effective date for certain measurement and recognition guidance contained in EITF 03-1. The FSP requires that entities continue to apply previously existing other-than-temporary guidance until a final consensus is reached. We do not anticipate that the issuance of a final consensus will materially impact our financial condition or results of operations.
-30-
Effective June 4, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 improve financial reporting by clarifying that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) be recognized as current-period charges and by requiring the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facility. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 has had no current impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Effective June 4, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as an expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS No. 123(R), only certain pro forma disclosures of fair value were required. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule that amended the compliance dates of SFAS No. 123(R) to require the implementation no later than the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) has had no current impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Effective June 4, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition via a cumulative effect adjustment within net income for the period of the change. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 has had no current impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements. The Interpretation requires that we determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. If a tax position meets the more likely than not recognition criteria, FIN 48 requires the tax position be measured at the largest amount of benefit greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We do not believe the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
-31-
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and, to a much lesser extent, interest rates on investments and financing, that could impact our results of operations and financial position. We do not currently engage in any hedging or market risk management tools. There have been no material changes with respect to market risk previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our 2006 fiscal year.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The financial reporting of our international subsidiaries is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Since the functional currency of our international subsidiaries is the local currency, foreign currency translation adjustments are accumulated as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders equity. Assuming a hypothetical aggregate change in the exchange rates of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar of 10% at September 2, 2006, our assets and liabilities would increase or decrease by $4,400,000 and $695,000, respectively, and our net sales and net earnings would increase or decrease by $2,972,000 and $152,000, respectively, on an annual basis.
We also maintain intercompany balances and loans receivable with subsidiaries with different local currencies. These amounts are at risk of foreign exchange losses if exchange rates fluctuate. Assuming a hypothetical aggregate change in the exchange rates of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar of 10% at September 2, 2006, our pre-tax earnings would be favorably or unfavorably impacted by approximately $1,010,000 on an annual basis.
Interest Rate Risk
Our excess cash is invested in highly liquid, short-term, investment grade securities with maturities of less than one year. These investments are not held for speculative or trading purposes. Changes in interest rates may affect the investment income we earn on cash, cash equivalents and debt securities and therefore affect our cash flows and results of operations. As of September 2, 2006, we were exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect to our investments in tax-free municipal bonds in the principal amount of $28,670,000. The bonds bear interest at a floating rate established between seven and 35 days. For the quarter ended September 2, 2006, the after-tax interest rate on the bonds approximated 3.8%. Each 100 basis point (or 1%) fluctuation in interest rates will increase or decrease interest income on the bonds by approximately $287,000 on an annual basis.
As our principal amount of fixed interest rate financing approximated $18,000 at September 2, 2006, a change in interest rates would not materially impact results of operations or financial position. At September 2, 2006, we did not maintain any variable interest rate financing.
As of September 2, 2006, we have available $1,811,000 under a working capital bank line of credit. Advances under this line of credit will bear interest at an annual rate indexed to the Canadian prime rate. We will thus be exposed to interest rate risk with respect to this credit facility to the extent that interest rates rise when there are amounts outstanding under this facility.
-32-
|
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 2, 2006. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Therefore, effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 2, 2006, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter ended September 2, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
-33-
E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Legal Proceedings |
Certain legal proceedings in which we are involved are discussed in Part I, Item 3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
|
|
Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
|
None. |
|
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
|
None. |
|
|
|
Submission Of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
|
None. |
|
|
|
Other Information |
|
|
|
None. |
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended |
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant |
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Summary of the Compensation of the Non-employee Directors of E-Z-EM, Inc. |
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
-34-
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on April 8, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 21, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 25, 2006. |
-35-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Z-EM, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
Date |
October 12, 2006 |
|
/s/ Anthony A. Lombardo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony A. Lombardo, President, |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Director |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date |
October 12, 2006 |
|
/s/ Dennis J. Curtin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice |
|
|
|
President - Chief Financial |
|
|
|
Officer (Principal Financial and |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer) |
-36-