As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2005

Registration No. 333-            

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM S-11/S-3

FOR REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
OF SECURITIES OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE COMPANIES


AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

(Exact Name of Registrant Issuer as Specified in Its Governing Instruments)

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant Issuer as Specified in Its Governing Instruments)

600 Grant Street, Suite 900
Denver, CO 80203
(303) 291-0222

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number Including Area Code, of Registrants’ Principal Executive Offices)

Scott L. Gesell
600 Grant Street, Suite 900
Denver, CO 80203
(303) 291-0222

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)


Copies to:

Jeffrey M. Knetsch, Esq.
Kirsten N. Neisler, Esq.
Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C.
410 Seventeenth Street, 22nd Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202-4437
(303) 223-1100

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

 

Total other expenses

 

118,284

 

124,297

 

190,950

 

127,620

 

Interest income

 

(1,523

)(5)

(1,439

)

(1,616

)

(1,439

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(37,733

)

(38,756

)

(84,913

)

(43,267

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

1,915

 

31

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

Net loss

 

(37,733

)

(38,756

)

(91,547

)

(39,903

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

 

 

(9,752

)

 

Net loss attributable to common unitholders

 

$

(37,733

)

$

(38,756

)

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

 


(1)    Same communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2003 and the communities sold or held for sale before December 31, 2004.

(2)    Excludes segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1, 2003 at which time we had no significant in-community sales operations.

(3)    Excludes $10.1 million of compensation expense related to stock issued in connection with ARC’s IPO.

(4)    Excludes property management expenses incurred in connection with the Hometown acquisition.

(5)    Excludes interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARC’s IPO, the financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition.

75




Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Overview.   Our results for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 include the operations of the 107 communities comprising 20,511 homesites and the retail home sales, insurance, consumer finance and other businesses we acquired in the reorganization for the entire year ended December 31, 2003 and for approximately eight months for the year ended December 31, 2002. In addition to the effects of the reorganization, our results for the year ended December 31, 2003 also reflect the effects on our operations of the 22 community acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003 and exclude the 30 communities that we discontinued in the third and fourth quarters of 2004.

Revenue.   Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $163.2 million, as compared to $136.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $26.7, or 20%. This increase was due to an increase of $33.3 million in rental income and a decrease of $6.6 million in other revenue consisting of sales of manufactured homes and utility and other income.

Rental income increased by $33.3 million, consisting of $20.8 from the communities acquired in the reorganization, $8.0 million from other community acquisitions and $4.5 million from same communities. The increase in same communities revenues consists of $4.2 million from increased rental rates, $3.1 million from home renter rental income partially offset by $2.8 million from lower occupancy.

The decrease in other income of $6.6 million is due to a $10.3 million decrease in sales of manufactured homes partially offset by a $3.7 million increase in utility and other income.

Property Operations Expense.   For the year ended December 31, 2003, total property operations expense was $44.3 million, as compared to $33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $11.0 million, or 33%. The increase was due to increases in expenses of $7.8 million from communities we acquired in the reorganization, $3.1 million from other community acquisitions and $1.0 million from same communities. The increase on a same community basis was due primarily to higher salaries and benefits of $513,000, due to increased staffing and, to a lesser extent, increases in wages and employee benefits and higher bad debt expense of $478,000, as a result of increased tenant defaults caused by general economic conditions and reserves for rent owed by certain finance companies which own repossessed homes in our communities.

Real Estate Taxes Expense.   Real estate taxes expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $10.2 million, as compared to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.6 million, or 55%. The increase was due primarily to communities we acquired in the reorganization, other community acquisitions and an increase in the number of rental homes we own.

Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold.   The cost of manufactured homes sold was $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $7.4 million, or 29%. The decrease was due primarily to a 121 unit decrease in sales of manufactured homes from 629 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2002 to 508 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2003, partially offset by the inclusion of the results of the retail home sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire year in 2003. The gross margin for manufactured homes sold was 15% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 19% for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expense.   For the year ended December 31, 2003, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was $7.4 million, as compared to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 14%. This decrease is due to lower sales of manufactured homes and a lower cost structure as a result of eliminating the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores, partially offset by increases in expenses

76




resulting from the inclusion of results of the retail home sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire period in 2003 as compared to eight months for 2002.

Property Management Expense.   Property management expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.5 million, as compared to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $1.4 million, or 34%. The increase was due primarily to inclusion of the results of the communities we acquired in the reorganization for an entire year in 2003.

General and Administrative Expense.   General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $16.9 million, as compared to $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.8 million, or 29%. The increase was due primarily to the reorganization, a $900,000 one time charge for vacating unused office space, a non-recurring credit of $291,000 against our insurance expenses in 2002, and, in 2003, to higher professional services expenses related primarily to our manufactured home acquisitions. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense was 10% for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to 9.6% for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.   Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $46.5 million, as compared to $37.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $9.4 million, or 25%. The increase relates to the reorganization, other community acquisitions, related capital improvements and rental home acquisitions. This was partially offset by the increase in depreciable lives of community improvements from 20 years to 30 years made in connection with the reorganization.

Retail Home Sales and Insurance Asset and Goodwill Impairment and Other Expense.   At the time of the reorganization, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of manufactured homes, beginning in late 2002 we redirected our retail home sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence and into an in-community presence focused exclusively on sales of homes in our communities. Our in-community retail home sales business operates in conjunction with our consumer finance business through which we provide credit to qualified buyers of homes in our communities.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, we substantially completed the redirection of our retail home sales efforts by selling 11 of our retail dealerships, ceasing operations in the remaining five retail dealerships and beginning in-community retail home sales activities in nearby communities owned by us. With respect to five retail dealerships we closed, we relocated the inventory to nearby manufactured home communities we own.

In connection with these activities, we recorded a charge of $1.4 million, net of sales proceeds of $1.3 million, to write off fixed assets and to record the cost of remaining lease obligations at the retail dealerships we closed in 2003.

At December 31, 2002, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales, finance and insurance operations of $13.6 million. The impairment for the retail home sales and finance operations arose from a deterioration of its operating performance subsequent to the reorganization due to lower projected sales volumes caused by adverse market conditions of the manufactured home sales industry as a whole, the related finance industry, and the market for manufactured home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance operation arose because the insurance operation derives the majority of its revenue from the retail home sales and finance operations. We had no impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Interest Expense.   Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $57.4 million, as compared to $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $13.6 million, or 31%. The increase was due primarily to: additional indebtedness acquired in the reorganization of

77




$380.8 million, additional borrowings of $27.0 million under the rental home credit facility, $20.0 million under the preferred interest, $18.8 million under the BFND credit facility, and $4.3 million of indebtedness assumed in connection with community acquisitions. Such interest expense increases resulting from additional borrowings were partially offset by lower interest rates on variable rate debt.

Interest Income.   Interesto

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of 
Securities To Be Registered

 

 

Discontinued Operations.   In the third quarter of 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell a total of 12 communities and two parcels of land. In addition, we separately entered into a sales agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we entered into agreements to sell an additional 15 communities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we sold the Sunrise Mesa community.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, we have reflected $31,000 of income from the operation of these assets and $3.3 million gain on the sale of the Sunrise Mesa community sale as discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we have reflected $1.0 million of income from the operation of these assets as discontinued operations.

Net Loss Attributable to Common Partnership Unitholders.   As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $39.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $7.2 million, or 15%. The decrease was due to increases of $33.3 million in rental income, $3.7 million in utility and other income, and $2.3 million in income and gain on sale of discontinued operations and decreases of $7.4 million in cost of manufactured homes sold, $1.2 million in retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense and retail home sales and insurance asset and goodwill impairment of $12.1 million offset by decreases of $10.3 million in manufactured home sales, and increases of $11.1 million in property operations expense, $3.6 million in real estate taxes, $1.4 million in property management expenses, $3.7 million in general and adn:center;"> 

Amount To Be
Registered

 

 

 

Proposed Maximum
Offering Price
Per Unit

 

 

 

Proposed Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price

 

 

 

Amount of
Registration Fee

 

71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

 

 

 

$96,600,000(1)

 

78




The following tables present certain information relative to our real estate segment as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 on a historical and “Same Communities” basis. “Same Communities” reflects information for all communities owned by us at both January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. “Same Communities” does not include the twenty-two communities we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2003 or the community sold during 2003 (in thousands, except home, occupancy, community, and per unit information).

 

 

Same
Communities(4)

 

Real Estate
Segment(4)

 

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average total homesites

 

15,717

 

15,824

 

37,316

 

27,463

 

Average total rental homes

 

1,812

 

1,333

 

5,183

 

2,626

 

Average occupied homesites—homeowners

 

13,030

 

13,785

 

29,281

 

24,895

 

Average occupied homesites—rental homes

 

1,376

 

908

 

3,695

 

1,830

 

Average total occupied homesites

 

14,406

 

14,693

 

32,976

 

26,725

 

Average occupancy—rental homes

 

76.0

%

68.1

%

71.3

%

69.7

%

Average occupancy—total

 

91.7

%

92.9

%

88.4

%

97.3

%

For the year ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner rental income

 

$

48,749

 

$

47,479

 

$

94,591

 

$

72,476

 

Home renter rental income

 

10,760

 

7,695

 

31,157

 

19,865

 

Other

 

104

 

(39

)

167

 

(167

)

Rental income

 

59,613

 

55,135

 

125,915

 

92,174

 

Utility and other income

 

6,088

 

5,095

 

13,487

 

10,147

 

Total real estate revenue

 

65,701

 

60,230

 

139,402

 

102,321

 

Real estate expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations expenses

 

19,151

 

18,165

 

45,181

 

33,320

 

Real estate taxes

 

4,566

 

3,681

 

10,137

 

6,671

 

Total real estate expenses

 

23,717

 

21,846

 

55,318

 

39,991

 

Real estate net segment income

 

$

41,984

 

$

38,384

 

$

84,084

 

$

62,330

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total occupied homesite(1)

 

$

380

 

$

342

 

$

352

 

$

319

 

Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite(2)

 

$

312

 

$

287

 

$

269

 

$

243

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total
homesite(3)

 

$

348

 

$

317

 

$

311

 

$

310

 

As of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total communities owned

 

203

 

203

 

329

 

209

 

Total homesites

 

15,735

 

15,668

 

37,552

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

$96,600,000(2)(3)

 

 

 

$11,370

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

6,750,524(4)

 

 

 

Not Applicable(5)

 

 

 

Not Applicable(5)

 

 

 

Not Applicable(5)

 

                                                                                               

(1)              Represents the aggregate principal amount of the notes that were issued by Affordable Residential Communities LP in private placements in August 2005.

(2)              Equals the actual issue price of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being registered.

(3)              Estimated for the sole purpose of determining the registration fee based on Rule 457 under the Securities Act of 1933.

(4)              Reflects the number of shares of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.’s common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes being registered hereunder, under certain conditions specified herein, at the initial rate of 69.8812 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes. Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement also registers such additional number of shares of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.’s common stock as may become deliverable upon conversion of the notes to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions.

(5)              No separate consideration will be received for the shares of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.’s common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes; therefore, no additional registration fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act of 1933.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.

 




SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 26, 2005

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PROSPECTUS

$96,600,000

GRAPHIC

36,805

 

Occupied homesites

 

14,095

 

14,593

 

32,190

 

33,097

 

Total rental homes owned

 

2,012

 

1,636

 

5,558

 

4,423

 

Occupied rental homes

 

1,503

 

1,197

 

4,114

 

3,002

 

 


(1)    Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

79




(2)    Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite defined as homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(3)    Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite defined as total real estate revenue divide by average total homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(4)    Real estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations.

A reconciliation of our net segment income to net loss attributable to common unitholders is as follows:

 

 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Same
Communities

 

As Reported

 

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

Net segment income:

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES INC.

71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

and

Shares of Common Stock Issuable Upon Exchange of the Notes

Affordable Residential Communities LP, or the Partnership, issued $96,600,000 aggregate principal amount of 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025, which are referred to in this prospectus as the notes, in private placements in August 2005. This prospectus will be used by selling securityholders to resell their notes and the common stock of the Partnership’s general partner, Affordable Residential Communities Inc., or ARC, issuable upon exchange of their notes. We will not receive any proceeds from this offering.

The notes bear interest at the rate of 71¤2% per year, payable in cash semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2006. The notes will mature on August 15, 2025. The notes are the Partnership’s senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment with the Partnership’s other senior unsecured indebtedness and effectively rank junior in right of payment to all of the Partnership’s secured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and to the indebtedness and all other liabilities of the Partnership’s subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2005, the Partnership had outstanding $25.8 million of senior unsecured indebtedness and $1,063.2 million of secured indebtedness, and the Partnership’s consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $59.1 million of other liabilities.

Subject to the restrictions on ownership of common stock of ARC, and the conditions described in this prospectus, holders may exchange at any time on or prior to maturity or redemption any outstanding notes (or portions thereof) into shares of ARC common stock, initially at an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price of $14.31 per share of ARC commoe-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

 

 

Holders may require the Partnership to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their notes on August 15, 2010, August, 15, 2015 and August 15, 2020 at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. In addition, if a fundamental change, as described in this prospectus, occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may require the Partnership to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date.

Prior to August 20, 2010, the notes will not be redeemable at the Partnership’s option. Beginning on August 20, 2010, the Partnership may redeem the notes in whole or in part at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the notes to the redemption date if the closing price of ARC common stock has exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30-day trading period.

There is no public market for the notes and we do not intend to apply for listing of the notes on any securities exchange or for quotation of the notes through any automated quotation system. The notes currently trade on the Private Offerings, Resales and Trading through Automated Linkages, or PORTAL, system of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ARC’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC.”  On October 21, 2005, the last quoted sale price of ARC’s common stock was $9.81 per share.

Neither the Partnership nor ARC will receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling securityholders of the notes or the common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. The selling securityholders may offer the notes or the underlying common stock in negotiated transactions or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. In addition, the common stock may be offered from time to time through ordinary brokerage transactions on the New York Stock Exchange. Certain selling securityholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” as defined in the Securities Act of 1933. If any broker-dealers are used by selling securityholders, any commissions paid to broker-dealers and, if broker-dealers purchase any notes or common stock as principals, any profits received by such broker-dealers on the resale of the notes or common stock, may be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, any profits realized by the selling securityholders may be deemed to be underwriting commissions. Other than selling commissions and fees and stock transfer taxes, we will pay all expenses of registering the notes and common stock and certain other expenses.


Investing in the notes and the common stock issuable upon their exchange involves risks.

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16.


Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is [              ], 2005




TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

 

 

3

 

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

 

3

 

 

FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENTS ONLY

 

 

4

 

 

MARKET DATA

 

 

5

 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

 

5

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

41,984

(1)

$

38,384

(1)

$

84,084

 

$

62,330

 

Retail home sales and finance

 

(2)

(2)

(1,772

)

230

 

Insurance

 

1,071

 

204

 

1,071

 

204

 

Corporate and other

 

(469

)

(652

)

(469

)

(652

)

 

 

42,586

 

37,936

 

pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">7

 

 

RISK FACTORS

 

 

16

 

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

 

35

 

 

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

 

 

35

 

 

PRICE RANGE OF ARC COMMON STOCK

 

 

36

 

 

CAPITALIZATION

 

 

37

 

 

 

62,112

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management

 

5,527

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

 

 

38

 

 

SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

 

 

43

 

 

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

4,105

 

5,527

 

4,105

 

General and administrative

 

16,855

 

13,087

 

16,855

 

13,087

 

Retail home sales asset impairment

 

 

 

1,385

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

13,557

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

18,652

 

19,766

 

54

 

 

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

 

86

 

 

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

 

 

87

 

 

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP MANAGEMENT

 

 

110

 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

 

114

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

Interest expense

 

16,021

 

7,026

 

57,386

 

43,804

 

Total other expenses

 

57,055

 

43,984

 

127,620

 

111,611

 

Interest income

 

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

 

POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

 

 

116

 

 

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

 

120

 

 

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

 

 

121

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES

 

 

125

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

 

 

142

 

 

(13,030

)

(4,658

)

(43,267

)

(48,109

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

DESCRIPTION OF ARC CAPITAL STOCK AND PARTNERSHIP UNITS

 

 

146

 

 

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

 

 

152

 

 

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

 

 

174

 

 

31

 

1,040

 

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

3,333

 

 

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

 

176

 

 

LEGAL MATTERS

 

 

178

 

 

EXPERTS

 

 

178

 

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

F-1

 

 

 

2




ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that ARC has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, using a “shelf” registration process. Under this shelf registration process, the selling securityholders may, from time to time, offer for sale the notes owned by them or shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. Each time the selling securityholders offer notes or shares for sale under this prospectus, they will provide a copy of this prospectus and, if applicable, a copy of a prospectus supplement to prospective purchasers. You should read both this prospectus and, if applicable, any supplement thereto.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and, if applicable, any supplement hereto. We have not and the selling securityholders have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. Neither the notes nor any shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are being offered in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information contained in this prospectus speaks only as of the date of this prospectus, unless otherwise specified.

Financial information regarding both ARC and the Partnership is presented in this prospectus because the notes were issued by the Partnership and are exchangeable for shares of ARC common stock.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Forms S-11 and S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect t:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">

 

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders

 

$

(13,030

)

$

(4,658

)

www.sec.gov.

ARC is, and as a result of the offering of the notes, the Partnership will become, subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, and, in accordance with these requirements, ARC files and the Partnership will file reports and other information with the SEC. We are required to file electronic versions of these documents with the SEC. Our reports, proxy statements and other information can be inspected and copied at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC as described above and are available on the SEC’s website.

3




The SEC allows ARC to “incorporate by reference” certain of the information required by this prospectus, which means that ARC can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The infoyle="font-size:10.0pt;">$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)


(1)    Same communities real estate net segment income excludes results of communities acquired after January 1, 2002 and community sold before December 31, 2003.

(2)    Excludes segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1, 2003 at which time we had no significant in-community sales operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity demands have historically been, and, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the nature of the expenditures,  are expected to continue to be, recurring and non-recurring capital improvements of communities, debt repayment, the purchase of new and used homes for lease and sale, funding loans to home buyers, property acquisitions, and partnership interest distributions. We intend to meet these liquidity requirements through our working capital provided by operating activities, available financing under our floor plan line of credit for home purchases, our consumer finance facility to fund home loans, our lease receivables line of credit to be secured by homes in our rental portfolio, other available unsecured financing, and the potential net proceeds from the sale of communities. We consider these sources to be adequate to meet all operating requirements, including recurring capital improvements, debt service, other normally recurring expenditures of a capital nature and, if necessary and

80




appropriate, payment of dividends to ARC’s stockholders to maintain qualification as a REIT in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code.

Our operating cash flows have not been sufficient to cover the distributions to our partners that were made since ARC’s IPO in February 2004. On May 23, 2005, we declared a reduced distribution to our partners for the second quarter of 2005. On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors announced that no distributions would be made on the Partnership’s common partnership units for third quarter of 2005. ARC’s board of directors reviews our practices with respect to the payment of distributions on a quarterly basis. Should our operating cash flows not improve, we may need to take additional action with respect to the payment of distributions, which may include the further reduction or elimination of our distributions to our partners.

Our plan is to increase occupancy through the following activities, as well as other initiatives that may be available to us. To accomplish our plans and objectives for the next 12 months, we may invest significant funds for the purchase of manufactured homes for sale, rent and lease with option to purchase. We expect to commit to these expenditures only as demand warrants and funds permit and we have entered into no significant forward purchase commitments with respect to such purchases. We also plan to make recurring capital expenditures, as necessary and appropriate, to keep our communities up to our standards and for general capital improvements.

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity needs through net cash provided by operations, borrowings under our $50 million floorplan line of credit, borrowings under our lease receivables line of credit which was expanded from $75 million to $150 million in October 2005 and other sources of capital, including the net proceeds from the sale of up to 79 communities that we have identified as held for sale. We also have the ability to sell additional communities if conditions warrant.

In addition, in order to facilitate sales of new and existing homes, we also plan to finance a significant portion of our home sales during 2005. We have a $125 million consumer finance facility to support our in-community home sales financing program under which we may finance up to 90% of the principal amount of qualifying loans made to qualifying home buyers.

We have extended the maturity date of our $85 million revolving credit mortgage facility to September 2006, and expect to refinance or extend our senior variable rate mortgage when due in 2006. In addition to our existing sources of capital, we have significant experience in raising private equity and we may in the future use that experience to enter into financing joint ventures or other similar arrangements if we determine that such a structure would provide an efficient means of raising capital.

Not withstanding the foregoing and based on our historical results, we do not believe that we will be able to fully fund our debt service obligations and recurring capital expenditures, as well as our operating plans and objectives described above, out of operating cash flows. Accordingly, our ability to implement our plans and occupancy objectives described above will depend upon our ability to obtain adequate funding from the financing sources described above or from other available funding sources. We cannot assure that we will be able to sell any or all of the 79 communities currently held for sale or additional communities, sell new or used homes, borrow under our consumer finance line of credit, refinance expiring credit lines or make other arrangements necessary to fund some or all of our activities to increase occupancy. Should we not be able to obtain sufficient funds for these purposes, we may determine that it is necessary to substantially defer or eliminate some or all of our plans and growth objectives that require these funds,rmation incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this prospectus, and information that ARC files later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede information contained in documents filed earlier with the SEC or contained in this prospectus. ARC incorporates by reference in this prospectus the documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC under sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until all of the securities offered hereby are sold:

·       Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004;

·       Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2005;

·       Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on January 12, March 18, March 23, April 5, April 12, May 9, May 23, June 10, July 19, July 29, August 1, August 9, August 22, August 23, September 13, September 27, October 19, and October 26, 2005; and

·       Description of ARC’s capital stock contained in its registration statement on Form 8-A filed on February 9, 2004.

Upon receipt of an oral or written request we will provide, free of charge, to any person to whom a prospectus is delivered, a copy of any or all of the information that has been incorporated by reference in the prospectus but not delivered with the prospectus, other than the exhibits to those documents. Please direct your written requests to: Investor Relations, Affordable Residential Communities Inc., 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80203. Please direct your oral requests to: Investor Relations at (866) 847-8931.

In addition, for as long as any of the notes remain outstanding and during any period in which we are not subject to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we will make available to any prospective purchaser or beneficial owner of the securities in connection with the sale thereof that information required by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act.

FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENTS ONLY

NEITHER THE FACT THAT A REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AN APPLICATION OR A LICENSE HAS BEEN FILED UNDER CHAPTER 421-B OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT WITH THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NOR THE FACT THAT A SECURITY IS EFFECTIVELY REGISTERED OR A PERSON IS LICENSED TO SELL SECURITIES IN THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CONSTITUTES A FINDING BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE THAT ANY DOCUMENT FILED UNDER RSA 421-B IS TRUE, COMPLETE AND NOT MISLEADING. NEITHER ANY SUCH FACT NOR THE FACT THAT AN EXEMPTION OR EXCEPTION IS AVAILABLE FOR A SECURITY OR A TRANSACTION MEANS THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE HAS PASSED IN ANY WAY UPON THE MERITS OR QUALIFICATIONS OF, OR RECOMMENDED OR GIVEN APPROVAL TO, ANY PERSON, SECURITY OR TRANSACTION. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE, OR CAUSE TO BE MADE, TO ANY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER, CUSTOMER OR CLIENT ANY REPRESENTATION INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH.

4




MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

Market data used or incorporated by reference in this prospectus is based on the good faith estimates of our management, which estimates are based upon their review of internal surveys, independent industry publications and other publicly available information. Although we believe these sources are reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of statements regarding the market and industry data presented or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors.”

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation R including community and home purchases, consumer loans, and non-recurring capital expenditures.

81




Cash Flows

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004

Cash provided by operations was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared with $19.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by operations primarily was due to payments made in the first half of 2005 for substantial accruals incurred at the end of 2004 for capital expenditures and repairs and maintenance activities as compared to a relatively low level of such payments in the first half of 2004.

Cash used in investing activities was $39.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $576.8 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash used in investing activities primarily was due to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions in the first half of 2004, as well as proceeds from community sales in the first half of 2005. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.

Cash provided by financing activities was $18.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $579.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily was due to the issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred unit issuances in connection with ARC’s IPO in the first half of 2004, as well as increases in the repayment of existing indebtedness and distribution payments in the first half of 2005.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2003

Cash provided by operations was $27.0 million and $10.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operations for 2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to increased homesites resulting from our Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions.

Cash used in investing activities was $607.6 million and $47.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions and an increase in acquisitions of other communities and manufactured homes. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.

Cash provided by financing activities was $593.8 million and $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred partnership unit issuances in connection with ARC’s IPO, partially offset by the repayment of existing indebtedness and the payment of both common and preferred unit distributions.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Cash provided by operations was $10.7 million and $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease for 2003 was due primarily to changes in operatieform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this prospectus that address results or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, where statements are preceded by, followed by or include the words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words ong assets and liabilities partially offset by a reduction in manufactured home inventory held for sale.

Cash used in investing activities was $47.7 million and $137.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 compared to 2002 was due primarily to reduced levels of community acquisitions and rental home purchases. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.

Cash provided by financing activities was $25.4 million and $137.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 as compared to 2002 was primarily due to lower borrowing for community acquisitions and rental homes, funds provided in 2002 from the

82




reorganization and issuance of common partnership units, partially offset by funding of the rental home credit facility in 2003.

Inflation

Inflation in the U.S. has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 or the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Although the impact of inflation has been relatively insignificant in recent years, it remains a factor in the United States economy and may increase the cost of acquiring or replacing property, plant, and equipment and the costs of labor and utilities.

Commitments

At June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, we had $1,049.3 million of pro forma consolidated indebtedness outstanding with the following repayment obligations (in thousands):

 

 

Debt

 

Operating

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations are subject to risks and uncertainties and can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. These risks, along with the risks disclosed in the section of this prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” and the following factors, could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements:

·       competition from other forms of single or multifamily housing;

·       changes in market rental rates, supply and demand for affordable housing, the cost of acquiring, transporting, setting or selling manufactured homes;

·       the availability of manufactured homes from manufacturers;

·       the availability of cash or financing for us to acquire additional manufactured homes;

·       the ability of manufactured home buyers to obtain financing;

·       our ability to maintain rental rates and maximize occupancy;

·       the level of repossessions by manufactured home lenders;

·       the adverse impact of external factors such as changes in interest rates, inflation and consumer confidence;

·       the ability to identify acquisitions, have funds available for acquisitions, the pace of acquisitions and/or dispositions of communities and new or rental homes;

·       our corporate debt ratings;

·       demand for home purchases in our communities and demand for financing of such purchases;

·       demand for rental homes in our communities;

5




·       the condition of capital markets;

·       actual outcome of the resolution of any conflict;

·       our ability to successfully operate acquired properties;

·       our decision and ability to sell additional communities;

·       ARC’s ability to maintain its REIT status;

·       our ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to ARC’s stockholders and the Partnership’s partnership unitholders;

·       environmental uncertainties and risks related to natural disasters;

·       changes in and compliance with real estate permitting, licensing and zoning laws including legislation affecting monthly leases and rent control and increases in property taxes; and

·       changes in and compliance with licensing requirements regarding the sale or leasing of manufactured homes.

Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this prospectus are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized, or even substantially realized, and that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on us and our business or operations. Forward-looking statements made in this prospectus speak as of the date hereof or as of the date specifically referenced in any such statement set forth herein. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement in this prospectus.

6




SUMMARY

Unless the context otherwise requires or indicates, references in this prospectus to “we,” our company,” “the company,” “our” and “us” refer collectively to Affordable Residential Communities Inc., a Maryland corporation, which we refer to in this prospectus as ARC, and Affordable Residential Communities LP, a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to in this prospectus as the Partnership, together with their subsidiaries. This summary is not complete and does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in the notes and the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including “Risk Factors” and our historical financial statements and the notes to those financial statements, which are included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, and the other financial information appearing elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this prospectus is as of June 30, 2005.

Affordable Residential Communities LP

Overview

The Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership whose sole general partner is ARC. As of June 30, 2005, ARC owned approximately 94.8% of the Partnership’s outstanding partnership interests. ARC is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT.

We acquire, renovate, reposition and operate primarily all-age manufactured home communities. We also lease with the option to purchase, rent and sell manufactured homes, finance sales of manufactured homes and act as agent in the sale of homeowners’ insurance and other related insurance products, all exclusively to residents and prospective residents in our communities.

As of June 30, 2005, we owned and operated 315 manufactured home communities (excluding one community held for sale) in 27 states containing 62,942 homesites. These properties are located in 67 markets across the United States. Our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.5% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of our total homesites. On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all these communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives. After taking into account the proposed sale of these communities, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 6.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

ARC’s predecessor was formed in 1995. In the first quarter of 2004, ARC completed its initial public offering, or IPO, of 25,300,209 shares of ARC common stock (including 2,258,617 shares sold by selling securityholders) and 5,000,000 shares of ARC’s 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. In conjunction with the IPO, we also completed a financing transaction involving Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, consisting of $500 million of new mortgage debt and the repayment of some of our existing indebtedness. We used a portion of the proceeds from ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction to acquire 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown

 

Lease

 

Total

 

 

 

Obligations

 

7




America, L.L.C., or Hometown. See Note 3 to the Partnership’s annual audited financial statements included in this prospectus for a further discussion of the Hometown transaction.

Our principal executive, corporate and property management offices are located at 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado 80203, and our telephone number is (303) 383-7500. Our internet address is www.aboutarc.com. The information contained on our website is not part of this prospectus.

Our Business Objectives

Our principal business objectives are to achieve sustainable long-term growth in cash flow per share and to maximize returns to our stockholders. Our key operating objectives include the following:

Community Renovation and Repositioning.   We utilize a comprehensive four-stage process that we call B-F-F-R to renovate and reposition the communities we acquire and improve their operating performance. B-F-F-R stands for: Buy—acquisition, Fix—physical infrastructure and resident quality, Fill—occupancy level, Run—ongoing, long-term operations. Our prior acquisitions generally have targeted communities that demonstrate opportunities for improvement in operating results due to one or more of the following characteristics:

·Obligations

 

Obligations

 

2005

 

$

107,101

 

 

$

756

 

 

$

107,857

 

2006(1)

 

122,455

 

       below market rate leases;

·       high operating expenses;

·       poor infrastructure and quality of residents;

·       inadequate capitalization; or

·&#eak-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

109

 

 

122,564

 

2007

 

43,046

 

 

112

 

 

43,158

 

2008

a lack of professional management.

While community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently significantly less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operations.

With respect to the other stages of the B-F-F-R process, we have established district and regional management that has a sufficiently limited span of control to allow for strong focus on community development. We also have established a mobile management team positioned to address specific issues related to particular markets and drive new programs. We focus on our communities utilizing B-F-F-R according to their relative occupancy levels as follows:

·       For communities above 90% occupancy, we primarily focus on improving operating margins through expense and overhead management, utility recovery and creation of additional revenue sources (as of June 30, 2005, 131 communities with 23,222 homesites averaging 96% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of the 79 communities, 111 communities with 20,246 homesites averaging 95.5% occupancy);

·       For communities between 80% and 90% occupancy, we focus on sales and leasing activities, resident retention and delivering the necessary homes to the community to allow for occupancy growth (as of June 30, 2005, 96 communities with 20,331 homesites averaging 86% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of the 79 communities, 77 communities with 17,262 homesites averaging 85.9% occupancy); and

·       For communities below 80% occupancy, we focus on developing community management and sales staff, making capital expenditures, supplying necessary homes to provide for occupancy growth and establishing resident standards with respect to behavior and rent payment (as of June 30, 2005, 47 communities with 10,057 homesites between 70% and 80% occupancy averaging 76% occupancy and another 41 communities with 9,332 homesites below 70% occupancy averaging 63% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of the 79 communities,

8




28 communities with 6,825 homesites between 70% and 80% averaging 76% occupancy and another 21 communities with 5,135 homesites below 70% averaging 64.3% occupancy).

Significant Presence in Key Markets.   As of June 30, 2005, approximately 69% of our homesites were located in our 20 largest markets. Upon completion of the proposed sale of the 79 communities, approximately 79% of our homesites will be in our 20 largest markets. We believe we have a leading market share in 15 of these markets, based on number of homesites. To the extent that we acquire new communities, we focus our growth in select markets characterized by limited development, expensive alternative housing costs, a strong, diversified economic base and/or opportunity to increase our market share and achieve economies of scale. Increasing our presence and market share enables us to (i) achieve operating efficiencies and economies of scale by leveraging our local property management infrastructure and other operating overhead over a larger number of communities and homesites, (ii) provide potential residents with a broader range of affordable housing options in their market, (iii) increase our visibility and brand recognition and leverage advertising costs and (iv) obtain more favorable terms and faster turnaround time on construction, renovation, repairs and home installation services. We believe the siyle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

65,765

 

 

56

 

 

65,821

 

2009

 

97,463

 

 

18

 

 

97,481

 

Thereafter

 

609,259

Broad Based Marketing Efforts.   We have developed and implemented a number of marketing initiatives to enhance the visibility of our communities, maintain and improve our occupancy and identify, reward and lengthen the lease duration of our good customers. We have active marketing and sales teams at both the corporate and local market level. Our home lease with option to purchase program allows residents who might not otherwise qualify for home ownership through traditional purchase or financing avenues the opportunity to work towards home ownership while they lease. Our ability to provide financing to our residents and prospective residents is supported by our consumer finance facility. We have also established a Hispanic marketing initiative targeted at addressing the specific needs and cultural preferences of the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population.

Proactive Management to Maximize Occupancy.   In response to challenging industry conditions, particularly the shortage of available consumer financing for the purchase of manufactured housing, we have developed and implemented a range of programs aimed primarily at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, improving resident satisfaction and retention, increasing revenue and improving our operating margins. We focus on converting long-term renters into homeowners and improving occupancy through the sale of older homes for cash, the financing of sales of newer homes and the leasing of newer homes with an option to purchase.

Customer Satisfaction and Quality Control.   Our goal is to meet the needs of our residents or prospective residents for housing alternatives in a clean and attractive environment at affordable prices. We have established a nationwide call center with bilingual staff to manage resident communications and enhance our sales and marketing efforts. We approach our business with a consumer product focus having an emphasis on value and quality for our residents and prospective residents. We have quality assurance programs executed through employee training and adherence to guidelines developed by our senior management, based in part upon surveys of our customers. Our customer focus and quality controls are designed to provide consistency and quality of product and to enable our community managers to effectively market our communities and improve occupancy and resident retention across our portfolio.

Community Acquisitions/Dispositions.   Over the last ten years, ARC has acquired over 340 communities with over 70,000 homesites. We have invested in dedicated resources, including acquisition, due diligence, construction and marketing teams which allowed us to significantly broaden our acquisition prospects, incorporating stabilized and non-stabilized communities. We have compiled a proprietary computer database containing detailed information on over 28,000 manufactured home communities

9




located throughout the United States, which enables us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities quickly, often before the community has been marketed publicly. However, while community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently significantly less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operations. In addition, we also sold more than 30 communities, and have announced plans to sell up to an additional 79 communities, when it became evident that these communities did not fit our market or performance objectives. We continue to evaluate our property portfolio and may sell additional properties in the future.

Key Programs and Initiatives

Home Rental Program.   Our real estate segment revenue consists of homeowner rental income, home renter rental income and utility and other income. We receive homeowner rental income from homeowners who lease homesites in our communities, and we receive home renter rental income from persons who rent manufactured homes and homesites from us in our communities pursuant to our home rental program and our home lease with option to purchase program. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, and the year ended December 31, 2004, home renter rental income totaled $22.9 million, or approximately 20% of o"margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

 

609,259

 

Commitments

 

1,045,089

 

 

1,051

 

 

1,046,140

 

Unamortized premium related to indebtedness assumed in Hometown and DAM acquisitions

 

4,251

 

 

 

 

4,251

 

 

 

$

1,049,340

 

 

$

1,051

 

 

Home Lease with Option to Purchase.   Our home lease with option to purchase program is a program that we initiated in 2004 to address the demand for home ownership in that segment of the population that might not otherwise qualify to finance the purchase of a home or pay cash. Under this program, a resident enters into a long term lease of a home, typically 24 to 72 months. Over the term of the lease, the resident makes rental payments for the home, and makes additional monthly payments which, if the resident elects to exercise the purchase option, are applied to the purchase price of the home. The resident pays a non-refundable option fee at the time of execution of the home lease. The lease may be terminated at any time by the payment of a termination fee by the resident as provided in the lease, and in the event of such termination, the resident forfeits all additional payments made through the date of termination of the lease. The resident has the right to purchase the home at any time during the term of the lease for a stated purchase price as provided in the lease. The resident also executes a separate homesite lease as part of this program, and agrees that upon the exercise of the purchase option to maintain the home in our community for an additional period of at least 48 months. This program is only offered on homes we own located in our communities.

In-Community Retail Home Sales and Consumer Financing Initiative.   Our retail home sales business consists of the sales of manufactured homes in our communities to residents and prospective residents at reasonable prices. Through our consumer financing initiative, we provide loans to qualified residents and prospective residents to facilitate purchases of manufactured homes located in our communities. It is our practice to acquire additional manufactured home inventory for sale in coordination with the sale of our existing inventory.

Our Industry

The manufactured housing industry represents a meaningful portion of the U.S. housing market. In 2000, there were an estimated 22 million people living in manufactured homes in the United States. The manufactured housing industry is primarily focused on providing affordable housing to moderate-income customers. A manufactured home is a single-family house constructed entirely in a factory rather than at a

10



$

1,050,391

 


(1)    $140.5 million of senior variable rate mortgage debt due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month periods at our option and subject to certain conditions.

The fair value of debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, was approximately $1,076.4 million.

83




Consolidated Indebtedness to be Outstanding After Our Offering

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our pro forma consolidated indebtedness outstanding as of June 30, 2005 after giving effect to the sale of the notes and the discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of the 79 communities (dollars in thousands):

an" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Our home lease with option to purchase program is a program that differs significantly from programs offered by some of our competitors, and we are not aware of any home lease with option to purchase program structured similarly to ours. Accordingly, while we believe our program has been structured and is being implemented in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements in all material respects, we have no significant experience operating this program, and neither the structure and terms of the program nor our management and implementation of the program have been subject to review by any court or regulatory agency or authority in any suit or proceeding. We cannot assure you, if any such review were to occur, that the structure and terms of the program and our management and implementation of the program will be found to be in compliance with all such applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Any determination by a court or other agency or authority of competent jurisdiction finding a violation of any applicable legal or regulatory requirements, or the threat of such a determination, could subject us to material costs, fines, penalties, judgments or other payments, or could cause us to have significant issues with respect to the continuation of the

 

 

Amount of
Debt


homesite, with generally the same materials found in site-built homes and in conformity with federal construction and safety standards.

Each homeowner in a manufactured home community leases a homesite from the owner of the community. The manufactured home community owner owns the underlying land, utility connections, streets, lighting, driveways, common area amenities and other capital improvements and is responsible for enforcement of community guidelines and maintenance of the community. Generally, each homeowner is responsible for the maintenance of their home and upkeep of their leased site.

We believe that manufactured home communities have several characteristics that make them an attractive investment when compared to some other types of real estate, particularly multi-family real estate, including the following:

·       significant barriers to the entry of new manufactured home communities into the market;

·       large and growing demographic group of potential customers;

·       comparatively stable resident base;

· 

Percentage
of Total
Debt

 

Weighted
Average 
Interest
Rate

 

Maturity
Date

 

Annual
Debt
Service

 

Balance at
Maturity

 

Fixed Rate Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·       comparatively low recurring capital requirements;

·       improved economies of scale in operation of multiple sites; and

·       affordable homeowner lifestyle.

The manufactured housing industry faces a challenging operating environmen"2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-weight:bold;"> 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009

 

$

83,067

We expect industry conditions to remain difficult for the foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the United States and a continued shortage of available consumer financing for manufactured home buyers. We anticipate that demand for manufactured housing and manufactured home communities will improve if home mortgage interest rates return to higher historical levels, which should reduce the pricing differential between home mortgage interest rates and interest rates for financing the purchase of a manufactured home.

Recent Developments

On September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARC’s board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and would direct ARC’s sales of communities.

On the same date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625 dividend on ARC’s Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnership’s Series C preferred partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on

11




October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARC’s board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARC’s common stock and the quarterly distribution on the Partnership’s common partnership units, in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Also on September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming all 79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives.

In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005). See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006” for a further discussion of this amendment.

In October 2005, we amended our lease receivables facility to increase the size of the faclity from $75 million to $150 million. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by two of our indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP (collectively, “Housing”) and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-m0pt;font-weight:bold;"> 

 

7.9

%

 

 

5.05

%

 

2009

 

$

5,476

 

$

77,590

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012

 

276,278

 

 

26.3

%

 

 

7.35

%

 

2012

 

   23,480

 

12




The Offering

The following is a brief summary of certain terms of this offering. For a more complete description of the terms of the notes, see “Description of Notes” in this prospectus.

Issuer of Notes

 

Affordable Residential Communities LP

Notes Offered

 

$96,600,000 aggregate principal amount of 7½% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025.

Maturity Date

 

August 15, 2025, unless previously redeemed, repurchased or exchanged prior to such date by the Partnership in accordance with their terms.

Inter-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">    244,675

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014

 

189,522

 

 

18.1

%

 

 

5.53

%

 

2014

 

 

71¤2% per year, payable semiannually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2006.

Exchange Rights

 

Holders may present their notes for exchange prior to the close of business on the second business day immediately preceding the stated maturity date based on the applicable exchange rate. The exchange rate is subject to adjustment as described in “Description of Notes—Exchange Rights—Exchange Rate Adjustments.”

 

 

<:9.0pt;">13,163

 

179,975

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

due 2005 through 2031

 

121,641

 

 

The initial exchange rate is 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes. This is equivalent to an initial exchange price of approximately $14.31 per share of ARC common stock.

 

 

Upon exchange of a note, a holder will not receive any cash payment of interest, subject to certain exceptions, and we will not adjust the exchange rate to account for accrued and unpaid interest.

 

 

If a holder elects to exchange its notes in connection with certain specified fundamental changes, as defined herein, that occur prior to August 20, 2015, the holder will be entitled to receive additional shares of ARC common stock as a make whole premium upon exchange in certain circumstances.

 

 

In lieu of delivering shares of ARC common stock upon exchange of any notes, we may elect to pay holders surrendering notes for exchange an amount in cash per note (or a portion of a note) equal to the average closing price of ARC common stock over the five trading day period starting on and including the third trading day following the exchange date multiplied by the exchange rate in effect on the exchange date (or portion of the exchange rate applicable to a portion of a note if a combination of ARC common stock and cash is to be delivered). See “Description of Notes—Exchange Rights.”

 

13




 

Provisional Redemption of the Notes at the Partnership’s Option

 


Prior to August 20, 2010, the notes will not be redeemable at the Partnership’s option. Beginning on August 20, 2010, the Partnership may redeem the notes in whole or in part for cash (in principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest to but not including the redemption date if the closing price of the common stock has exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30-day trading period.

Repurchase of the Notes at Option of Holders on Specified Dates

 


Holders may require the Partnership to repurchase all or a portion of their notes for cash (in principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) on August 15, 2010, August 15, 2015, and August 15, 2020 at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the purchase date.

Repurchase of the Notes at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change

 


If a fundamental change, as defined in this prospectus, occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may require the Partnership to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash (in principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) in an amount equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the repurchase date.

11.6

%

 

 

7.20

%

 

2005 to 2031

 

9,984

 

80,425

 

Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

 

96,600

 

 

9.2

%

 

 

7.50

%

 

2025

 

7,245

 

96,600

 

Other loans

 

1,006

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

8.67

%

 

2005

 

172

 

1,000

 

 

 

768,114

 

 

Ranking

 

The notes:

 

 

·  will be senior unsecured obligations ranking equally in right of payment with the Partnership’s other unsecured senior indebtedness;

 

 

·  will be effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Partnership’s existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and

 

73.2

%

 

 

6.65

 

·  will be effectively junior in right of payment to any existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities or preferred stock of the Partnership’s subsidiaries, including trade payables.

 

 

As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis, the Partnership had outstanding $122.4 million of senior unsecured indebtedness, including the notes, and $926.9 million of secured indebtedness and the Partnership’s consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $195.4 million of other liabilities.

 

14




 

 

The terms of the indenture under which the notes are issued do not limit our or any of our affiliates’ or subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, or issue preferred equity.

Use of Proceeds

 

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the securities offered by this prospectus.

Registration Rights

 

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, we have filed, at our expense, with the SEC a shelf registration statement on Forms S-11 and S-3 covering resales by holders of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. Under the terms of the registration rights agreement, we have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to:

 

 

·  cause the registration statement to become effective as promptly as practicable, but in no event later than 180 days after the earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes; and

 

 

·  keep the registration statement effective until the holders of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all such securities immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume limitations of Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act or any successor rule or otherwise.

 

 

We will be required to pay liquidated damages, subject to certain limitations, to the holders of the notes if we fail to comply with our obligations to register the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes or the registration statement does not become effective within the specified time periods. See “Description of Notes—Registration Rights.”

Transfer Restrictions

 

Our registration of the resale by the holders of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes may not be available to all holders at all times. See “Plan of Distribution.”

Form and Denomination

 

The notes will be issued only in fully registered, book-entry form, in minimum denominations of $1,000 and any integral multiple of $1,000, except under limited circumstances described in “Description of Notes—Book-Entry System.”

Trading

Roman" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-weight:bold;">%

 

 

 

59,520

 

680,265

 

Variable Rate Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006

 

108,520

 

 

10.3

%

 

 

6.22

%

 

2006

 

6,750

 

108,520

 

The notes issued in the original private offerings are eligible for trading on Nasdaq’s screen-based automated trading system known as PORTAL, “Private Offerings, Resale and Trading through Automated Linkages.” However, notes sold using this prospectus will no longer be eligible for trading in the PORTAL Market. We do not intend to apply for listing of the notes on any securities exchange or for quotation of the notes through any automated quotation system.

15




 

New York Stock Exchange Symbol for ARC Common Stock

 


ARC’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC.”

Tax

 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2005

 

58,764

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

6.17

 

The notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes will be subject to special and complex United States federal income tax rules. Prospective purchasers are strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of the notes and shares of ARC common stock. See “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in this prospectus.

Risk Factors

 

See “Risk Factors” and other information included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus for a discussion of the factors you should carefully consider before deciding to purchase notes or ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. There could be other factors to consider in addition to those disclosed, some of which may be unique to a prospective purchaser.

 

Restrictions on Ownership of ARC Stock

Subject to certain exceptions specified in ARC’s charter, no individual may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of various attribution and constructive ownership provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code, more than 7.3% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of ARC’s common stoc="font-size:9.0pt;font-weight:bold;">%

 

2005

 

3,626

 

58,764

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035

 

25,780

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

6.26

%

 

2035

 

1,614

 

25,780

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008

 

9,369

 

 

0.9

%

Tax Status of ARC

ARC has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 1998. ARC believes that its organization and method of operation have enabled it to meet, and its method of operation enables it to continue to meet, the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purp .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">

 

 

6.18

%

 

2008

 

579

 

9,369

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007

 

42,100

 

 

4.0

%

 

 

10.22

%

 

2007

 

4,303

 

42,100

 

Floorplan lines of credit due 2007

 

35,367

 

 

3.4

%

 

 

To maintain its REIT status, ARC must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders. As a REIT, ARC generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on REIT taxable income it currently distributes to its stockholders. If ARC fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Even if ARC qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on its income or property and the income of its taxable REIT subsidiaries will be subject to taxation at normal corporate rates. See “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

16




RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the specific risk factors set forth below, as well as the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, before deciding to purchase any notes or ARC common stock issued upon exchange of the notes. Some factors in this section are “forward-looking statements.” For a discussion of those statements and of other factors for investors to consider, see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” located in the forepart of this prospectus. There could be other factors to consider in addition to those disclosed below, some of which may be unique to a prospective purchaser.

Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations

Adverse economic or other conditions in the markets in which we do business, including our five largest markets of Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; Salt Lake City, Utah; the Front Range of Colorado; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri could negatively affect our occupancy and results of operations.

Our operating results are dependent upon our ability to achieve and maintain a high level of occupancy in our communities. Adverse economic or other conditions in the markets in which we do business, and specifically in metropolitan areas of those markets, may negatively affect our occupancy and rental rates, which in turn, may negatively affect our revenues. If our communities and our financing activities do not generate sufficient funds to meet our cash requirements, including operating and other expenses and capital expenditures, our net income, funds from operations, cash flow, financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions could be adversely affected, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock. The following factors, among others, may adversely affect the occupancy of our communities and/or the revenues generated by our communities:

·       competition from other available manufactured housing sites or available land for the placement of manufactured homes outside of established communities and alternative forms of housing (such as apartment buildings and site built single-family homes);

·       local real estate market conditions such as the oversupply of manufactured housing sites or a reduction in demand for manufactured housing sites in an area;

·6.59

%

 

2007

 

2,331

 

35,367

 

Other loans

 

       the residential rental market, which may limit the extent to which our rents, whether for homes or homesites, may be increased to meet increased expenses without decreasing our occupancy rates;

·       perceptions by prospective tenants of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of our communities and the neighborhoods where they are located;

·       our residents’ performance in accordance with the terms of their contractual obligations;

·       our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance or insurance; or

·       increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, real estate taxes and utilities, or increased costs due to changes in zoning or ordinance requirements or enforcement of the same.

Our communities located in Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; Salt Lake City, Utah; the Front Range of Colorado; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri contain approximately 11.5%, 7.9%, 6.0%, 5.2% and 3.9%, respectively, of our total homesites as of June 30, 2005. After taking into account the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, and assuming that all these communities are sold, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 6.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See “Affordable

16




Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

As a result of the geographic concentration of our communities in these markets, we are particularly exposed to the risks of downturns in these local economies as well as to other local real estate market conditions or other conditions that could adversely affect our occupancy rates, rt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:46.5pt;">

1,326

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

6.97

%

 

2012

Our results of operations also would be adversely affected if our tenants are unable to pay rent or if our homesites or our rental homes are unable to be rented on favorable terms. If we are unable to promptly relet our homesites and rental homes or renew our leases for a significant number of our homesites and rental homes, or if the rental rates upon such renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected rates, then our business and results of operations would be adversely affected. In addition, certain expenditures associated with each community (such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs) generally are not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from such community and could increase without a corresponding increase in rental or other income. Furthermore, real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, will tend to limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or market conditions.

In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rents or an increase in defaults under existing leases, which would adversely affect our net income, funds from operations, cash flow, financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

We may not be able to maintain and improve our occupancy through expansion of our home rental program and our home lease with option to purchase program, which could negatively affect our revenue and our results of operations.

We have responded to the challenging operating environment for manufactured home communities by developing and implementing a range of programs and initiatives aimed at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, including our home rental program and our home lease with option to purchase program. Our ability to maintain and increase occupancy and improve our operating margins in our existing communities in the future will depend to a large degree upon the success of these programs.

Pursuant to our home rental program, we acquire manufactured homes, place them on unoccupied homesites in selected communities in our portfolio and lease them, typically for a one-year lease term. We also acquire repossessed homes in our communities through an offer and bid process with third party finance companies. For the year ended December 31, 2004, rental income received from residents of our rental homes totaled $40.3 million. Our overall occupancy at June 30, 2005 was 84.5% with homeowners occupying 72.6% of our total homesites and tenants in our rental homes occupying approximately 11.9% of our total homesites. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes. If we are unable to improve and maintain occupancy in our communities through expansion of our lease with option to purchase program and our home rental program, our operating results may be negatively affected. Our ownership of rental homes also increases our capital requirements and our operating expenses and subjects us to greater exposure to risks such as releasing risks and mold related claims. In addition, our increased sales and leasing activities increase our

17




exposure to these matters as well as to legal and regulatory compliance costs and risks and to litigation and claims arising out of our sales and leasing activities.

 

188

 

523

 

 

 

281,226

 

 

26.8

%

 

 

6.86

%

 

 

 

19,391

 

280,423

 

 

 

$

1,049,340

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

6.71

%

 

 

 

$

78,911

 

$

960,688

 

 

FFO

As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents income (loss) from continuing operations (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of nprogram, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and also could result in significant changes to the structure and terms of the program, which could increase the costs to us of continuing the program or otherwise adversely affect our ability to continue to maintain the program, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to increase occupancy and improve our results of operations.

We may not be able to maintain and improve our occupancy through expansion of our in-community home sales and financing initiative, which could adversely affect our revenues and our results of operations.

We have responded to the challenging operating environment for manufactured home communities by developing and implementing a range of programs and initiatives aimed at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, including our in-community home sales and financing initiative. Our ability to maintain and increase occupancy and improve our operating margins in our existing communities in the future will depend to some degree upon the success of this initiative. Through our in-community home sales and financing initiative, we intend to significantly expand our capability both to acquire for sale manufactured home inventory and sell these homes to customers in our communities at reasonable prices and to finance sales of these homes to customers in our communities. We have obtained a multiyear debt facility pursuant to which we will be able to fund up to $125.0 million to support loan originations in connection with the sale of homes in our communities. If we are not able to maintain this debt facility, we do not expect to be able to fully fund this initiative, which could significantly impair our ability to maintain or increase our occupancy in our communities and to achieve growth in our revenue and operating margins. Additionally, if we do not have sufficient capital available to purchase additional homes in the future, we may not be able to implement or fully implement these programs or initiatives, which could significantly impair our ability to maintain or increase our occupancy in our communities and to achieve growth in our revenues and operating margins.

The availability of advances of funds under our consumer finance debt facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on this facility include a downgrade of the lender’s credit rating and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if in its judgment this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio.

Although some members of our management group have experience in the consumer finance business, we have limited operating history in the consumer finance business, and we cannot assure you

18




that we will be able to successfully expand this initiative and manage this business. Loans produced by our in-community home sales and financing initiative may have higher default rates than we anticipate, and demand for consumer financing may not be as great as we anticipate or may decline.

Our in-community home sales and financing initiative operates in a regulated industry with significant licensing and consumer protection laws, and the regulatory framework may change in a manner that may adversely affect our operating results. The regulatory environment and associated consumer finance laws create a risk of greater liability from our in-community home sales and financing initiative and could subject us to private claims and awards. This initiative is dependent on licenses granted by state, federal and local regulatory bodies, which may be withdrawn or which may not be renewed and which could have an adverse impact on our ability to achieve our operating objectives. We have obtained many, and are in the process of obtaining all of the remaining state and local licenses and permits necessary for us to implement this initiative in all of the markets in which we operate.

The terms of our acquisition agreement with Hometown may cause us to incur additional costs and liabilities.

Pursuant to the acquisition agreement with Hometown, we have assumed all liabilities and obligations of Hometown with respect to the Hometown communities and the other acquired assets, whether known or unknown, absolute or contingent, and whether arising before or after the date we acquired the Hometown communities, subject to limited exceptions. In addition, Hometown is not required to indemnify us for any inaccuracy in or breach of any of its representations or warranties in the agreement. As a result of these provisions, we are responsible for liabilities and obligations with respect to the Hometown communities and the other acquired assets for which we have no recourse to Hometown or anyone else, and we may incur unanticipated costs in connection with the assumption and satisfaction of these obligations as well as in ownership and operation of the Hometown communities, in excess of our expected costs.

The manufactured housing industry continues to face a challenging operating environment marked by a shortage of available financing for home purchases and a significant decrease in manufactured home shipments, which has put downward pressure on occupancy in manufactured home communities and may continue to do so.

The manufactured housing industry continues to face a challenging operating environment that has resulted in losses, exits from the industry and significant curtailment of activity among manufacturers, retailers and consumer finance companies. According to MHI, industry shipments (a measure of manufacturing production and wholesale sales) have declined from 372,843 homes in 1998 to 130,802 in 2004. We believe this ongoing period of challenging industry conditions was the result of an oversupply of consumer credit from 1994 to 1999, which led to over stimulation in the manufacturing, retail home sales and financing sectors of the industry. When compared to the manufacturing, retail home sales and consumer finance sectors of the manufactured housing industry, the manufactured home community sector has been relatively less affected by the oversupply of consumer credit but is also facing challenging conditions, including an increase in the number of repossessed and abandoned homes, a shortage of consumer financing to support new manufactured home sales and move-ins and resale of existing homes in manufactured home communities, and historically low mortgage interest rates and favorable credit terms for traditional entry-level, site-built housing, all of which has put downward pressure on occupancy levels in our manufactured home communities and may continue to do so. We expect industry conditions will remain difficult for the foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the United States and a continued shortage of consumer financing for manufactured home buyers.

19




We have reported historical accounting losses on a consolidated basis since our inception, and we may continue to report accounting losses in the future.

We had net losses attributable to common partnership unitholders of $36.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and $101.3 million, $39.9 million and $47.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As of June 30, 2005, our retained deficit was $330.4 million. There can be no assurance that we will not continue to incur net losses in the future, which could adversely affect our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and our ability to pay dividends or make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

We may not be successful in identifying suitable acquisitions that meet our criteria, in completing such acquisitions, or in successfully integrating and operating acquired properties, which may impede our growth and negatively affect our results of operations.

Our ability to expand through acquisitions has historically been a significant part of our business expansion strategy and requires us to identify suitable acquisition candidates or investment opportunities that meet our criteria and are compatible with our growth strategy. We may not be successful in identifying suitable real estate properties or other assets that meet our acquisition criteria or in consummating acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms. If we do not have sufficient capital, we may be limited or precluded from pursuing additional acquisitions. Also, a lack of sufficient depth of management may limit or preclude additional acquisitions. Failure to identify or consummate acquisitions will reduce the number of acquisitions we complete and slow our growth, which could in turn adversely affect our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Although we are currently less focused on community acquisition opportunities than in the past, we will continue to evaluate available manufactured home communities in select markets when strategic opportunities arise. Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully integrate and operate them may be exposed to the following significant risks:

·       we may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from local investors and other real estate investors with significant capital, including other publicly traded REITs and institutional investment funds;

84




accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.

The following table calculates our FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004(1)

 

2004(1)(2)

 

2003(3)

 

2002(4)

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(16,351

)

$

(5,326

)

$

(30,384

)

$

(42,578

)

 

$

(84,913

·       even if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other potential acquirers may significantly increase the purchase price which could reduce our profitability;

·       we may not have sufficient capital available to make additional acquisitions, or we may be unable to finance acquisitions at all or on favorable terms;

·       we may spend more than the time and amounts budgeted to make necessary improvements or renovations to acquired properties;

·       we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly multi-property acquisitions, portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and consequently our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected;

·       market conditions or downturns in local economies may result in higher than expected vacancy rates and lower than expected rental rates; and

·       we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities such as liabilities for cleanup of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the former

20




owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.

The availability of competing housing alternatives in our markets could negatively affect occupancy levels and rents in our communities, which could adversely affect our revenue and our results of operations.

All of our properties are located in markets that include other manufactured home communities. The number of competing manufactured home communities in a particular market could have a material effect on our ability to sell our homes, lease our homes and/or homesites and to maintain or raise rents. Other forms of multi-family residential properties and single-family housing, including rental properties, represent competitive alternatives to our communities. The availability of a number of other housing options, such as apartment units and new or existing site-built housing stock, as well as more favorable financing alternatives for the same, could have an adverse effect on our occupancy and rents, which could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could adversely affect our financial condition and our cash flow.

We maintain comprehensive liability, fire, flood (where appropriate), extended coverage and rental loss insurance with respect to our properties with policy specifications, limits and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. Certain types of losses, however, may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, riots or acts of war or terrorism. Should an uninsured loss occur, we could lose both our investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flow from, a property, which could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock. In addition, if any such loss is insured, we may be required to pay a significant deductible on any claim for recovery of such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us for the loss or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage for the loss.

Exposure to mold and contamination related claims that are problematic to insure against could adversely affect our results of operations.

We own a significant number of rental homes, which we lease or sell to third parties. In each of these rental homes, we run a risk of mold, mildew and /or fungus related claims if these items are found in any home. In addition, we provide water and sewer systems in certain of our communities and we are subject to the risk that if a home is not properly connected to a system, or if the integrity of the system is breached, mold or other contamination can develop. If this were to occur, we could incur significant remedial costs and we may also be subject to private damage claims and awards, which could be material. If we become subject to claims in this regard, it could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and insurability, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with operating our communities may affect our results of operations.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, owners and operators of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on or in such property. Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of such

21




substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s or operator’s ability to lease, sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Certain environmental laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials.

In connection with the ownership (direct or indirect), operation, management and development of real properties, we may be considered an owner or operator of such properties or as having arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs, including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property. No assurances can be given that existing environmental studies with respect to any of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of our properties did not create any material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of our properties. Furthermore, material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns may have arisen after the review was completed or may arise in the future; and future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material additional environmental liability, which would adversely affect our financial condition, results from operations, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Increases in taxes may reduce our income.

Costs resulting from changes in real estate tax laws generally are not passed through to tenants directly and will affect us. Increases in income, service or other taxes generally are not passed through to tenants under leases and may adversely affect our net income, funds from operations, cash flow, financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Rent control or rent stabilization legislation and other regulatory restrictions may limit our ability to increase rents or dispose of our properties.

Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and regulations specifically regulating the ownership and operation of manufactured home communities. These laws and regulations include provisions imposing restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and, in certain circumstances, granting to community residents a right of first refusal on a sale of their community by the owner to a third party. Enactments of similar laws and regulations have been or may be considered from time to time in other jurisdictions. We currently own 8,364 homesites in two states that have rent control regulations, Florida and California. These communities represent 9.8% of our total communities and 13.3% of our total homesites. Following the sale of up to 79 65pt;">

)

 

$

(43,267

)

$

(48,109

)

Plus:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization 

 

22,224

 

17,242

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

 

72,014

 

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

Income from discontinued operations.

 

72

 

343

 

1,000

 

795

 

 

22




Costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 may result in unanticipated expenses.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. A number of additional federal, state and local laws may also require modifications to our properties, or restrict certain further renovations of the properties, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. For example, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the ADA or the FHAA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could require substantial capital expenditures. Although we believe that our properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, we have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance and we cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation. If one or more of our communities is not in compliance with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation, then we would be required to incur additional costs to bring the community into compliance. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions could be adversely affected, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

We may incur significant costs complying with other regulations applicable to our business.

The properties in our portfolio, as well as sale of homes located thereon, are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local licensing, fire, health and safety, zoning, use and utility compliance requirements, and disclosure or warranty requirements. If we fail to comply with these various requirements, we might incur governmental fines or private damage awards or may have significant limitations placed on our operations. In addition, requirements may change, and future requirements may require us to materially alter our operations or to make significant unanticipated expenditures that could adversely affect our net income, funds from operations, cash flow and financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Expansion of our existing communities entails certain risks that may negatively affect our operating results.

We may expand our existing communities where a community contains or is adjacent to undeveloped land and where the land is zoned to allow for manufactured housing. The manufactured home community expansion business involves significant risks in addition to those involved in the ownership and operation of established manufactured home communities, including the risks that financing may not be available on favorable terms for expansion projects, that the cost of construction may exceed estimates or budgets, that construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs, that long-term financing may not be available on completion of construction, and that homesites may not be leased on profitable terms or at all. In connection with any expansion of our existing communities, if any of the above occurred, our financial condition, results of operations, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions could be adversely affected, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

23




The pro forma financial data of the Partnership and ARC included in this prospectus may differ from actual results if any of the 79 communities held for sale are not sold or are sold for prices different than those used to prepare the data.

The pro forma financial data of the Partnership and ARC included in this prospectus contemplates the sale of all of the 79 communities identified on September 21, 2005 as held for sale. There can be no assurances that the sale of all or any of these communities will occur, and, to the extent that they do occur, that they will be sold at the community sales prices used by the Partnership and ARC to prepare the pro forma financial data. If any of these communities are not sold or are sold at prices other than those used to prepare the pro forma financial data, actual results for the Partnership and ARC will differ from the results presented in the data.

Risks Related to Our Other Debt Financings

We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash to operate our communities or to pay our quarterly distributions or any distributions necessary to maintain ARC’s REIT status.

As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to ARC’s proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, we had approximately $1,049.3 million of outstanding indebtedness, consisting of $926.9 million of secured debt, as well as the notes and $25.8 million in trust preferred securities which were each unsecured, including (1) a two-year, $150.0 million securedt 0pt;width:37.85pt;">

1,915

 

 

31

 

1,040

 

Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations

 

(18

)

1,085

 

5

 

1,825

 

 

3,134

 

 

2,589

 

1,957

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of loan origination fees.

 

(1,911

)

(855

)

Our level of indebtedness and the limitations imposed on us by our credit agreements could have significant adverse consequences, including the following:

·       our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments;

·       we may be unable to borrow additional funds, either on favorable terms or at all, as needed, including to make acquisitions or to make any distributions, including those required to maintain ARC’s REIT status;

·       we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness;

·       because a portion of our indebtedness bears interest at variable rates, an increase in interest rates could materially increase our interest expense;

·       we may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms;

24




·       after debt service, the amount available for distributions to the Partnership’s limited partners or ARC’s stockholders is reduced;

·       our level of indebtedness could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less indebtedness;

·       we may experience increased vulnerability to economic and industry downturns, reducing our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions;

·       we may default on our obligations and the lenders or mortgagees may foreclose on our properties that secure their loans and receive an assignment of rents and leases;

·       we may violate restrictive covenants in our loan documents, which would entitle the lenders to accelerate our debt obligations;

·       our default under any one of our mortgage loans with cross default or cross collateralization provisions could result in default on other indebtedness or result in the foreclosures of other properties; and

·       we may not be able to acquire additional homes to be held for sale or placed in our rental fleet, or we may not be able to acquire additional communities.

We could become more highly leveraged because our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur.

While some of our debt facility agreements may contain some limitations on the amount of indebtedness that we or ARC may incur, our organizational documents contain no such limitations. Although we intend to maintain a balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and the value of our portfolio, we could alter this balance at any time. If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in debt service could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness, including the notes, and to pay any distributions required to maintain ARC’s REIT status. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, our debt to partners’ capital ratio is 1.7 to 1.

Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense, which would adversely affect our cash flow, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

As of June 30, 2005, approximately 30% of our debt was subject to variable interest rates. An increase in interest rates could increase our interest expense, which would adversely affect our cash flow, our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and our ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis, we had a total of $281.2 million of variable rate debt bearing a weighted average interest rate of approximately 6.9% per annum. On February 26, 2004, we entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement pursuant to which we effectively fixed the base rate portion of the interest rate with respect to $100.0 million of our variable rate debt. As a result, as of June 30, 2005, approximately 80% of our total indebtedness was subject to fixed interest rates until February 2006.

Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.

We seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements that involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial

25




condition, results of operations, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC’s common stock.

Our growth depends on external sources of capital that are outside of our control.

(3,772

)

(1,722

)

 

(5,952

)

 

(3,213

)

(4,129

)

Depreciation expense on furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

(529

)

(81

)

(951

)

(449

)In order to maintain ARC’s qualification as a REIT, it is required under the Internal Revenue Code to annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. In addition, ARC will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that ARC distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income, including any net capital gains. Due to these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any acquisition financing, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we may be required to rely on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain the financing on favorable terms or at all. Any additional indebtedness we incur may increase our leverage. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on:

·       general market conditions;

·       our current level of indebtedness;

·       our current and expected future earnings;

·       our cash flow and cash distributions;

·       the market’s perception of our operations and growth potential; and

·       the market price per share of ARC’s common stock.

If we cannot obtain capital from third-party sources, we may not be able to acquire additional communities or homes to be held for sale or rent when strategic opportunities exist, service our indebtedness, including the notes, and make distributions to ARC’s stockholders necessary to maintain its qualification as a REIT.

Risks Related to Organizational and Corporate Structure

Our business could be harmed if key personnel terminate their employment with us.

 

(1,264

)

 

(1,112

)

(1,019

)

FFO

 

Our success is dependent on the efforts of our executive officers and senior management team. The loss of the services of this key personnel could materially and adversely affect our operations.

ARC’s Vice Chairman has outside business interests that could require time and attention.

Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s Vice Chairman, has outside business interests which include his ownership of Global Mobile Limited Liability Company, or Global Mobile, and JJ&T Enterprises, Inc., or JJ&T, both of which own six manufactured home communities through a commonly owned subsidiary, Global E. In addition, Mr. Jackson’s employment agreement includes an exception to his noncompetition covenant pursuant to which Mr. Jackson is permitted to devote time to the management and operations of Global Mobile and JJ&T, consistent with past practice. As a result, these outside business interests could potentially interfere with Mr. Jackson’s ability to devote time to our business and affairs.

We may change our investment and financing strategies and enter into new lines of business without stockholder or noteholder consent, which may result in riskier investments than our current investments.

We may change our investment and financing strategies and enter into new lines of business at any time without the consent of ARC’s stockholders or the holders of the notes, which could result in our making investments and engaging in business activities that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments and businesses described in this prospectus. A change in our investment strategy or our

26



01pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">3,487

 

12,408

 

8,153

 

(9,977

)

 

(15,066

)

 

1,495

 

(13,202

)

entry into new lines of business may increase our exposure to interest rate and other risk or real estate market fluctuations.

ARC’s failure to qualify as a REIT could result in higher tax expenses and reduced cash available to service our indebtedness.

Although we believe that ARC has operated and intends to continue to operate in a manner that enables it to meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, no assurance can be given that ARC will continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain so qualified. Qualification as a REIT involves the satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.

If ARC fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and specified statutory relief provisions did not apply, ARC would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to its stockholders in computing its taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at corporate tax rates. Moreover, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, ARC also would be disqualified from electing to be a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which such qualification is lost. This treatment could reduce our net earnings available for investment or debt service because of the additional tax liability to ARC for the years involved. As a result of the additional U.S. federal income tax liability, we might need to borrow funds or liquidate certain investments on terms that may be disadvantageous to us in order to pay the applicable tax, and ARC would not be compelled to make distributions to stockholders under the Internal Revenue Code.

Joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on co-venturers’ financial condition and disputes between us and our co-venturers.

We may co-invest in the future with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, acquiring non-controlling interests in or sharing responsibility for managing the affairs of a property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. In such event, we would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. Investments in partnerships, joint ventures, or other entities may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present were a third party not invol;">Less preferred unit distributions.

 

(2,971

)

(2,578

)

(5,942

)

(3,810

)

 

(9,752

)

 

 

 

FFO available to common partnership unitholders

 

$

516

 

$

9,830

 

$

2,211

 

$

(13,787

)

 

$

(24,818

)

 

$

1,495

 

$

(13,202

)


(1)    Our FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2004 includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARC’s IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition.

(2)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes charges for the following: (i) retail losses of $11.2 million related to sales of older vacant homes sold during the fourth quarter at discounts to their original costs and marketing and promotion costs both incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $0.9 million of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million of severance costs related to the fourth quarter resignation of our chief operating officer and the second quarter resignation of other executive officers; (v) approximately $500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities; and (vi) approximately $500,000 related to property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third quarter in the Southeast United States.

(3)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a charge of $1.4 million for retail home sales asset impairment and other expense and a charge of approximately $864,000 for the cost of vacating unused office space and $337,000 in executive severance.

(4)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes charges incurred in the reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including $1.9 million for exit fees and $1.6 million for the write off of unamortized loan costs, and includes a charge of $13.6 million to write off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses. For more details see our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

85




Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We use some derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.

As of June 30, 2005, our pro forma debt outstanding was $1,049.3 million, comprised of $768.1 million of indebtedness subject to fixed interest rates and $281.2 million, or 26.8%, of our total consolidated debt, subject to variable interest rates. In February 2004 we entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement pursuant to which we effectively fixed the base rate portion of the interest rate with respect to $100 million of our variable rate debt. As a result, approximately 80% of our total indebtedness is subject to fixed interest rates for a minimum of two years.

If LIBOR and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.2 million annually. If, after consideration of the interest rate swap agreement described above, LIBOR and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.2 million annually.

Interest risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

The fair value of pro forma debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $1,076.4 million.

86




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

Overview

The Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership whose sole general partner is ARC. As of June 30, 2005, ARC owned approximately 94.8% of the Partnership’s outstanding partnership interests. ARC is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT.

We acquire, renovate, reposition and operate primarily all-age manufactured home communities. We also lease with the option to purchase, rent and sell manufactured homes, finance sales of manufactured homes and act as agent in the sale of homeowners’ insurance and other related insurance products, all exclusively to residents and prospective residents in our communities.

As of June 30, 2005, we owned and operated 315 manufactured home communities (excluding one community held for sale) in 27 states containing 62,942 homesites. These properties are located in 67 markets across the United States. Our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.5% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of our total homesites. On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all these communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives. After taking into account the proposed sale of these communities, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 6.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

ARC’s predecessor was formed in 1995. In the first quarter of 2004, ARC completed its initial public offering, or IPO, of 25,300,209 shares of ARC common stock (including 2,258,617 shares sold by selling securityholders) and 5,000,000 shares of ARC’s 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. In conjunction with the IPO, we also completed a financing transaction involving Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, consisting of $500 million of new mortgage debt and the repayment of some of our existing indebtedness. We used a portion of the proceeds from ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction to acquire 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C., or Hometown. See Note 3 to the Partnership’s annual audited financial statements included in this prospectus for a further discussion of the Hometown acquisition.

Our principal executive, corporate and property management offices are located at 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado 80203, and our telephone number is (303) 383-7500. Our internet address is www.aboutarc.com. The information contained on our website is not part of this prospectus.

Our Business Objectives

Our principal business objectives are to achieve sustainable long-term growth in cash flow per share and to maximize returns to our stockholders. Our key operating objectives include the following:

Community Renovation and Repositioning.   We utilize a comprehensive four-stage process that we call B-F-F-R to renovate and reposition the communities we acquire and improve their operating

87




performance. B-F-F-R stands for: Buy—acquisition, Fix—physical infrastructure and resident quality, Fill—occupancy level, Run—ongoing, long-term operations. Our prior acquisitions generally have targeted communities that demonstrate opportunities for improvement in operating results due to one or more of the following characteristics:

·       below market rate leases;

·       high operating expenses;

·       poor infrastructure and quality of residents;

·       inadequate capitalization; or

·       a lack of professional management.

While community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operations.

With respect to the other stages of the B-F-F-R process, we have established district and regional management that has a sufficiently limited span of control to allow for strong focus on community development. We have also established a mobile management team positioned to address specific issues related to particular markets and drive new programs. We focus on our communities utilizing B-F-F-R according to their relative occupancy levels as follows:

·       For communities above 90% occupancy, we primarily focus on improving operating margins through expense and overhead management, utility recovery and creation of additional revenue sources (as of June 30, 2005, 131 communities with 23,222 homesites averaging 96% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities with 20,246 homesites averaging 95.5% occupancy);

·       For communities between 80% and 90% occupancy, we focus on sales and leasing activities, resident retention and delivering the necessary homes to the community to allow for occupancy growth (as of June 30, 2005, 96 communities with 20,331 homesites averaging 86% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 77 communities with 17,262 homesites averaging 85.9% occupancy); and

·       For communities below 80% occupancy, we focus on developing community management and sales staff, making capital expenditures, supplying necessary homes to provide for occupancy growth and establishing resident standards with respect to behavior and rent payment (as of June 30, 2005, 47 communities with 10,057 homesites between 70% and 80% occupancy averaging 76% occupancy and another 41 communities with 9,332 homesites below 70% occupancy averaging 63% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 28 communities with 6,825 homesites between 70% and 80% averaging 76% occupancy and another 21 communities with 5,135 homesites below 70% averaging 64.3% occupancy).

Significant Presence in Key Markets.   As of June 30, 2005, approximately 69% of our homesites were located in our 20 largest markets. Upon completion of the proposed sale of the 79 communities, approximately 79% of our homesites will be in our 20 largest markets. We believe we have a leading market share in 15 of these markets, based on number of homesites. To the extent that we acquire new communities, we focus our growth in select markets characterized by limited development, expensive alternative housing costs, a strong, diversified economic base and/or opportunity to increase our market share and achieve economies of scale. Increasing our presence and market share enables us to (i) achieve operating efficiencies and economies of scale by leveraging our local property management infrastructure and other operating overhead over a larger number of communities and homesites, (ii) provide potential residents with a broader range of affordable housing options in their market, (iii) increase our visibility and brand recognition and leverage advertising costs and (iv) obtain more favorable terms and faster

88




turnaround time on construction, renovation, repairs and home installation services. We believe the significant size and geographic diversity of our portfolio reduces our exposure to risks associated with geographic concentration, including the risk of economic downturns or natural disasters in any one market in which we operate.

Broad Based Marketing Efforts.   We have developed and implemented a number of marketing initiatives to enhance the visibility of our communities, maintain and improve our occupancy, and identify, reward and lengthen the lease duration of our good customers. We have active marketing and sales teams at both the corporate and local market level. Our home lease with option to purchase program allows residents who might not otherwise qualify for home ownership through traditional purchase or financing avenues the opportunity to work towards home ownership while they lease. Our ability to provide financing to our residents and prospective residents is supported by our consumer finance facility. We have also established a Hispanic marketing initiative targeted at addressing the specific needs and cultural preferences of the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population.

Proactive Management to Maximize Occupancy.   In response to challenging industry conditions, particularly the shortage of available consumer financing for the purchase of manufactured housing, we have developed and implemented a range of programs aimed primarily at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, improving resident satisfaction and retention, increasing revenue and improving our operating margins. We focus on converting long-term renters into homeowners and improving occupancy through the sale of older homes for cash, the financing of sales of newer homes and the leasing of newer homes with an option to purchase.

Customer Satisfaction and Quality Control.   Our goal is to meet the needs of our residents or prospective residents for housing alternatives in a clean and attractive environment at affordable prices. We have established a nationwide call center with bilingual staff to manage resident communications and enhance our sales and marketing efforts. We approach our business with a consumer product focus having an emphasis on value and quality for our residents and prospective residents. We have quality assurance programs executed through employee training and adherence to guidelines developed by our senior management, based in part upon surveys of our customers. Our customer focus and quality controls are designed to provide consistency and quality of product and to enable our community managers to effectively market our communities and improve occupancy and resident retention across our portfolio.

Community Acquisitions/Dispositions.   Over the last ten years, ARC has acquired over 340 communities with over 70,000 homesites. We have invested in dedicated resources, including acquisition, due diligence, construction and marketing teams which allowed us to significantly broaden our acquisition prospects, incorporating stabilized and non-stabilized communities. We have compiled a proprietary computer database containing detailed information on over 28,000 manufactured home communities located throughout the United States, which enables us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities quickly, often before the community has been marketed publicly. However, while community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operation. In addition, we also sold more than 30 communities, and have announced plans to sell up to an additional 79 communities, when it became evident that these communities did not fit our market or performance objectives. We continue to evaluate our property portfolio and may sell additional properties in the future.

Key Programs and Initiatives

Home Rental Program.   Our real estate segment revenue consists of homeowner rental income, home renter rental income and utility and other income. We receive homeowner rental income from homeowners who lease homesites in our communities, and we receive home renter rental income from persons who rent manufactured homes and homesites from us in our communities pursuant to our home rental program and our home lease with option to purchase program. For the six months ended June 30,

89




partners under Delaware law in connection with the management of the Partnership. ARC’s duties as general partner may come into conflict with the duties of its directors and officers to ARC. The Partnership’s partnership agreement does not require us to resolve such conflicts in favor of either ARC or the Partnership’s limited partners.

Unless otherwise provided for in the relevant partnership agreement, Delaware law generally rER='jmsproofassembler',CD='Oct 26 14:06 2005' -->

2005, and the year ended December 31, 2004, home renter rental income totaled $22.9 million, or approximately 20% of our total real estate revenue, and $40.3 million, or approximately 20% of our total real estate revenue, respectively, and homeowner rental income totaled $78.7 million, or approximately 70% of our total real estate revenue, and $145 million, or approximately 71% of our total real estate revenue, respectively. At June 30, 2005, we owned a total of 8,718 homes in our communities with acquisition and improvement costs of $249.2 million, which are rented, available for rent or for sale. These homes had an occupancy rate of approximately 86% at June 30, 2005. We intend to continue to expand our home rental program in the future.

Home Lease with Option to Purchase.   Our home lease with option to purchase program is a program that we initiated in 2004 to address the demand for home ownership in that segment of the population that might not otherwise qualify to finance the purchase of a home or pay cash. Under this program, a resident enters into a long term lease of a home, typically 24 to 84 months. Over the term of the lease, the resident makes rental payments for the home, and makes additional monthly payments which, if the resident elects to exercise the purchase option, are applied to the purchase price of the home. The resident pays a non-refundable option fee at the time of execution of the home lease. The lease may be terminated at any time by the payment of a termination fee by the resident as provided in the lease, and in the event of such termination, the resident forfeits all additional payments made through the date of termination of the lease. The resident has the right to purchase the home at any time during the term of the lease for a stated purchase price as provided in the lease. The resident also executes a separate homesite lease as part of this program, and agrees that upon the exercise of the purchase option to maintain the home in our community for an additional period of at least 48 months. This program is only offered on homes we own located in our communities.

Additionally, the Partnership’s partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of ARC by providing that ARC, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in damages to the Partnership, its limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment, mistakes of fact or law or for any act or omission if ARC, or such director or officer, acted in good faith. In addition, the Partnership is required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and each of its respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or such other persons, provided that the Partnership will not indemnify for (i) willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or (ii) any transaction for which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of our partnership agreement.

The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in our partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict ARC’s fiduciary duties that would be in effect under common law were it not for our partnership agreement.

We may suffer adverse consequences if we expand or enter into new non-real estate business ventures.

We own or invest in businesses that currently or may in the future engage in more diverse and riskier ventures, such as the sale of manufactured homes, the leasing of manufactured homes with an option to purchase, and financing of manufactured home sales on a broader scale (rather than only to customers in our communities), inventory financing, sales of home improvement products, brokerage of manufactured homes, acting as agent for sales of insurance and related products, third-party property management and other non-real estate business ventures that ARC’s management and board of directors determine, using reasonable business judgment, will benefit the Partnership and ARC.

If we seek to enter into new non-real estate business ventures and to grow our existing non-real estate business ventures, we may risk our ability to maintain the REIT status of ARC. In addition, this strategy would expose the holders of our securities to more risk than a business strategy in which our operations are limited to real estate business ventures, because we do not have the same experience in non-real estate business ventures that we do in the ownership and operation of manufactured home communities and the related businesses we conduct.

Certain provisions of Maryland law and ARC’s organizational documents, including the stock ownership limit imposed by its charter, may inhibit market activity in ARC common stock and could prevent or delay a change in control transaction.

ARC’s charter and bylaws, the Partnership’s partnership agreement and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for ARC common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of its stockholders, including

28




supermajority vote and cause requirements for removal of directors and advance notice requirements for director nominations and stockholder proposals.

Pursuant to the provisions of ARC’s charter, no individual, other than Mr. Gerald J. Ford and certain affiliated parties, may beneficially own more than 7.3% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of ARC common stock or more than 7.3% in value of our outstanding shares of ARC’s capital stock. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if the board of directors determines that it is no longer in ARC’s best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a change of control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for ARC common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of its stockholders.

ARC’s board of directors has the power to issue additional shares of stock in a manner that may not be in your best interests. ARC’s charter authorizes the board of directors to amend the charter wn;font-size:10.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt 6.0pt;text-indent:20.0pt;">In-Community Retail Home Sales and Consumer Financing Initiative.   Our retail home sales business consists of the sales of manufactured homes in our communities to residents and prospective residents at reasonable prices. Through our consumer financing initiative, we provide loans to qualified residents and prospective residents to facilitate purchases of manufactured homes located in our communities. It is our practice to acquire additional manufactured home inventory for sale in coordination with the sale of our existing inventory.

Our Industry

The manufactured housing industry represents a meaningful portion of the U.S. housing market. In 2000, there were an estimated 22 million people living in manufactured homes in the United States. The manufactured housing industry is primarily focused on providing affordable housing to moderate-income customers. A manufactured home is a single-family house constructed entirely in a factory rather than at a homesite, with generally the same materials found in site-built homes and in conformity with federal construction and safety standards.

Each homeowner in a manufactured home community leases a homesite from the owner of the community. The manufactured home community owner owns the underlying land, utility connections, streets, lighting, driveways, common area amenities and other capital improvements and is responsible for enforcement of community guidelines that govern resident conduct and maintenance of the community. Generally, each homeowner is responsible for the maintenance of their home and upkeep of their leased site.

We believe that manufactured home communities have several characteristics that make them an attractive investment when compared to some other types of real estate, particularly multi-family real estate, including the following:

·       significant barriers to the entry of new manufactured home communities into the market;

·       large and growing demographic group of potential customers;

90




·       comparatively stable resident base;

·       fragmented ownership of communities;

·       comparatively low recurring capital requirements;

·       improved economies of scale in operation of multiple sites; and

·       affordable homeowner lifestyle.

The manufactured housing industry faces a challenging operating environment, which has resulted in losses, exits from the industry and significant curtailment of activity among manufacturers, retailers and consumer finance companies. According to Manufactured Housing Institute, or MHI, industry shipments (a measure of manufacturers’ home production and wholesale sales) have declined from 372,843 homes in 1998 to 130,802 in 2004. We believe this dramatic decline in production and sales is largely the result of an oversupply of consumer credit from 1994 to 1999, which led to over stimulation in the manufacturing, retail and finance sectors of the industry. Current industry conditions are further exacerbated by low mortgage interest rates and less stringent credit requirements for the purchase of entry-level site built homes, thereby reducing the price competitiveness of manufactured housing.

We expect industry conditions to remain difficult for the foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the United States and a continued shortage of available consumer financing for manufactured home buyers. We anticipate that demand for manufactured housing and manufactured home communities will improve if home mortgage interest rates return to higher historical levels, which should reduce the pricing differential between home mortgage interest rates and interest rates for financing the purchase of a manufactured home.

Recent Developments

On September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARC’s board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and would direct ARC’s sales of communities.

On that date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625 dividend on ARC’s Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnership’s Series C preferred partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARC’s board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARC’s common stock and the quarterly distribution on the Partnership’s common partnership units, in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Also on September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming all 79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives.

In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005). See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006” for a further discussion of this amendment.

In October 2005, we amended our lease receivables facility to increase the size of the faclity from $75 million to $150 million. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible

91




manufactured housing unithout stockholder approval to increase the total number of authorized shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series and issue additional common stock, preferred stock or special voting stock. In addition, ARC’s board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and may set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. Although the board of directors has no intention to do so at the present time, it could issue additional shares of our special voting stock or establish a series of preferred stock that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for ARC common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of its stockholders.

Our rights and the rights of ARC’s stockholders to take action against its directors and officers are limited.

Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, ARC’s charter eliminates its directors’ and officers’ liability to ARC and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. ARC’s bylaws require it to indemnify its directors and officers for liability resulting from actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, ARC and its stockholders may have more limited rights against its directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by ARC’s directors and officers.

Dividends payable by REITs do not generally qualify for the reduced tax rates on qualified dividends.

Until tax years beginning after December 31, 2008, certain qualified dividends payable to individual U.S. stockholders (as such term is defined under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” below) are taxed at 15%. Generally, dividends payable by REITs will not constitute qualified dividends eligible for the reduced rates. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause stockholders who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stock of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the market price of the stock of REITs, including ARC common stock.

In addition, the relative attractiveness of investment in real estate in general may be adversely affected by the newly favorable tax treatment given to corporate dividends, which could negatively affect the value of our properties.

29




Possible legislative or other actions affecting REITs could adversely affect ARC’s stockholders.

The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to the tax law (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect ARC’s stockholders. We cannot predict whether, when, in what forms, or with what effective dates, the tax laws applicable to ARC or its stockholders will be changed.

Risks Related to Ownership of the Notes

Our Markets

The table below provides summary information on our portfolio as of June 30, 2005 for our 20 largest markets:

ilable financing sources to fund these distributions, this will reduce the availability of these funds for other purposes, including repurchase of the notes and the purchase of homes necessary to implement our programs for increasing occupancy. This could adversely affect our financial condition and results from operations and ability to expand our business and further fund our operating and growth initiatives, any of which could adversely affect the market price of the notes and ARC common stock. On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors announced that it had eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARC’s common stock for the quarter ending September 30, 2005.

An increase in interest rates may have an adverse effect on the price of ARC common stock.

One of the factors that may influence the price of ARC common stock in the public market will be the annual distributions to stockholders relative to the prevailing market price of ARC common stock. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, could lead current and prospective holders of ARC common stock to generally expect a higher dividend yield on their investments, including such stock. Under such circumstances, maintaining, decreasing or not appropriately increasing our current level of dividends on ARC common stock would likely adversely affect the market price for ARC common stock and potentially the market price of the notes.

ARC’s common stock price may experience substantial volatility, which may affect your ability, following any exchange, to sell ARC common stock at an advantageous price and could impact the market price, if any, of the notes.

The market price of ARC common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. For example, the market price of ARC common stock on the New York Stock Exchange has fluctuated for the period from October 21, 2004 to October 21, 2005 between $15.12 per share and $9.33 per share and may continue to fluctuate. Therefore, the volatility may affect your ability to sell ARC common stock at an advantageous price. In addition, this may result in greater volatility in the market price, if any, of the notes than would be expected for non-exchangeable debt securities. Market price fluctuations in ARC common stock may be due to acquisitions, dispositions or other material public announcements, including those regarding dividends or changes in management, along with a variety of additional factors including, without limitation, other risks identified in “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements.” In addition, the stock markets in general, including the New York Stock Exchange, recently have experienced extreme price and trading fluctuations. These fluctuations have resulted in volatility in the market prices of securities that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to changes in operating

34




performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of ARC common stock, and the market price of the notes.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the notes or the underlying common stock by selling securityholders.

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

The following financial ratios measure our ability to repay interest from our earnings. Earnings were computed by adding fixed charges (adjusted for capitalized interest) to net loss from continuing operations. Fixed charges consist of interest costs and amortization of debt issuance costs. Pro forma results reflect the effect of the discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of the 79 communities, (in thousands).

Market(1)

 

 

 

The notes are effectively subordinated to the Partnership’s existing and future secured indebtedness.

The notes represent the Partnership’s general obligations. Accordingly, holders of the Partnership’s secured indebtedness will have claims that are superior to the claims of holders of the notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing that other indebtedness. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to ARC’s proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, the Partnership had approximately $1,049.3 million of outstanding indebtedness, consisting of $926.9 million secured indebtedness, as well as the notes and $25.8 million in trust preferred securities which were each unsecured. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution, the assets which serve as collateral for any secured indebtedness will be available to satisfy the obligations under the secured indebtedness before any payments are made on the notes. The terms of the indenture governing the notes do not prohibit the Partnership from incurring future indebtedness.

The notes are effectively subordinated to liabilities of the Partnership’s subsidiaries.

The notes are not guaranteed by the Partnership’s subsidiaries and therefore the notes will be effectively subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution of a subsidiary, following payment by the subsidiary of its liabilities, the subsidiary may not have sufficient assets to make payments to the Partnership. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis, the Partnership’s subsidiaries had an aggregate of $1,023.5 million of existing indebtedness. The terms of the indenture governing the notes do not prohibit the Partnership’s subsidiaries from incurring future indebtedness.

There are no restrictive covenants in the indenture relating to the Partnership’s ability to incur future indebtedness or complete other financing transactions.

The indenture governing the notes does not contain any financial or operating covenants or restrictions on the payment of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness, transactions with affiliates, incurrence of liens or the issuance or repurchase of securities by the Partnership or any of its subsidiaries. The Partnership therefore may incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness that would be effectively senior to the notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, or indebtedness at the subsidiary level to which the notes would be structurally subordinated. The Partnership cannot assure you that it will be able to generate sufficient cash flow to pay the interest on its indebtedness, including the notes, or that future working capital, borrowings or equity financing will be available to pay or refinance any such indebtedness.

30




The make whole premium that may be payable upon exchange in connection with specified fundamental changes may not adequately compensate you for the lost option time value of your notes as a result of such fundamental changes.

If you exchange your notes in connection with a specified fundamental change that occurs prior to August 20, 2015 we may be required to issue you additional shares of ARC common stock as a make whole premium (subject to our ability to elect to pay cash or a combination of cash and shares of ARC common stock in lieu of delivering shares of ARC common stock). The make whole payment is described under “Description of Notes—Exchange Rights—Determination of Make Whole Premium.” While the make whole premium is designed to compensate you for the lost option time value of your notes as a result of a specified fundamental change, the make whole amount is only an approximation of such lost value and may not adequately compensate you for such loss. In addition, if a specified fundamental change occurs after August 20, 2015, there will be no such make whole premium.

Because your right to require repurchase of the notes is limited, the market price of the notes may decline if we enter into a transaction that is not a fundamental change under the indenture.

The term “fundamental change” is limited and may not include every event that might cause the market price of the notes to decline or result in a downgrade of the credit rating of the notes. The Partnership’s obligation to repurchase the notes upon a fundamental change may not preserve the value of the notes in the event of a highly leveraged transaction, reorganization, merger or similar transaction. See “Description of Notes—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.”

If you hold notes, you are not entitled to any rights with respect to the ARC common stock, but you are subject to all changes made with respect to ARC common stock.

If you hold notes, you are not entitled to any rights with respect to the ARC common stock (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to receive any dividends or other distributions on ARC common stock, if any), but you are subject to all changes affecting the ARC common stock. You will only be entitled to rights on the ARC common stock if and when we deliver shares of ARC common stock to you in exchange for your notes. For example, in the event that an amendment is proposed to ARC’s charter requiring stockholder approval and the record date for determining the stockholders of record entitled to vote on the amendment occurs prior to delivery of the ARC common stock, you will not be entitled to vote on the amendment, although you will nevertheless be subject to any changes in the powers, preferences or special rights of ARC common stock.

The Partnership’s ability to repurchase the notes with cash at your option or upon a repurchase event may be limited.

Holders of the notes may require the Partnership to repurchase all or a portion of their notes for cash at specific times and upon the occurrence of specific circumstances involving the events described under “Description of Notes—Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates” and “Description of Notes—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.” The Partnership cannot assure you that, if required, it would have sufficient cash or other financial resources at that time or would be able to arrange financing to pay the repurchase price of the notes in cash. The Partnership’s ability to repurchase the notes in that event may be limited by law, regulatory authorities, the indenture, the terms of other agreements relating to the Partnership’s indebtedness and indebtedness and agreements that the Partnership may enter into in the future which may replace, supplement or amend our existing or future indebtedness. See “Description of Other Indebtedness.”

31




The exchange rate of the notes may not be adjusted for all dilutive events.

The exchange rate of the notes is subject to adjustment for certain events including, but not limited to, the issuance of stock dividends on ARC’s common stock, the issuance of rights or warrants, subdivisions, combinations, distributions of capital stock, indebtedness or assets, cash dividends and certain tender or exchange offers as described under “Description of Notes—Exchange Rights—Exchange Rate Adjustments.” The exchange rate will not be adjusted for other events, such as an issuance of ARC common stock for cash or in connection with an acquisition, that may adversely affect the trading price of the notes or ARC common stock. There can be no assurance that an event that adversely affects the value of the notes, but does not result in an adjustment to the exchange rate, will not occur.

You should consider the U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning the notes.

The U.S. federal income tax treatment of the exchange of the notes into a combination of ARC common stock and cash is uncertain. You are urged to consult your tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences resulting from the exchange of notes into a combination of cash and common stock. A discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of ownership of the notes is contained in this prospectus under the heading “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

An active trading market for the notes may not develop.

The notes constitute a new issue of securities for which there is no established trading market. The notes currently trade on the PORTAL Market. However, the notes sold under this prospectus will no longer be eligible for trading on the PORTAL Market. We do not intend to list the notes on any national or other securities exchange, or on the Nasdaq National Market. As a result, an active trading market for the notes may not develop. If an active trading market does not develop or is not maintained, the market price and liquidity of the notes may be adversely affected. In that case, you may not be able to sell your notes at a particular time or you may not be able to sell your notes at a favorable price. Future trading prices of the notes will depend on many factors, including:

·       our operating and financial condition;

·       the interest of securities dealers in making a market; and

·       the market for similar securities.

If a trading market does not develop, you may be required to hold the notes to maturity unless you exchange them for shares of ARC common stock or cash.

We expect that the trading price of the notes will be significantly affected by the trading price of ARC common stock.

Because the notes are exchangeable into shares of ARC common stock, volatility or depressed prices for ARC common stock could have a similar effect on the trading price of the notes and could limit the amount of cash payable upon exchange of the notes. This may result in greater volatility in the trading price of the notes than would be expected for any non-exchangeable debt securities we may issue. Holders who receive ARC common stock upon exchange of the notes will also be subject to the risk of volatility and depressed prices of ARC common stock. For information on the trading prices of ARC common stock see “Price Range of ARC Common Stock.”

Number
of Total
Homesites

 

Percentage
of Total
Homesites

 

Occupancy

 

Rental Income
Per Occupied
Homesite Per
Month(2)

 

Dallas/Fort Worth, TX

 

 

7,223

 

 

 

11.5

%

 

 

82.7

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

Atlanta, GA

 

 

4,969

 

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

349

 

 

Salt Lake City, UT

 

 

3,792

 

32




An adverse rating of the notes may cause their trading price to fall.

If a rating agency rates the notes, it may assign a rating that is lower than investors’ expectations. Rating agencies also may lower ratings on the notes in the future. If rating agencies assign a lower-than-expected rating or reduce, or indicate that they may reduce, their ratings in the future, the trading price of the notes could significantly decline.

If we elect to satisfy our exchange obligation to holders by paying the cash value of the ARC common stock into which the notes are exchangeable or by a combination of cash and shares of ARC common stock, upon exchange of all or a portion of their notes, holders may not receive any shares of ARC common stock, or they might receive fewer shares of ARC common stock relative to the exchange value of the notes. In addition, there will be a significant delay in settlement, and because the amount of cash and/or ARC common stock that a holder will receive in these circumstances will be based on the sales price of ARC common stock for an extended period between the exchange date and settlement date, holders will bear the market risk with respect to the market price of ARC common stock for such extended period. Finally, our liquidity may be reduced to the extent that we choose to deliver cash rather than shares of ARC common stock upon exchange of the notes.

The failure of our results to meet the estimates of market analysis could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC common stock.

We have not in the past and do not intend to provide estimates of our future fin"padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

6.0

%

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

The accounting treatment of the notes may impact the volatility of ARC common stock.

If certain conversion features of the notes result in those features being considered a derivative embedded in the notes, the associated accounting treatment may cause our non-cash earnings to become more volatile from period to period. Volatility in our earnings may, in turn, affect the trading price of ARC common stock and the notes.

Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of ARC Common Stock

Additional issuances of equity securities by ARC and exchange of the notes for ARC common stock will dilute the ownership interest of ARC’s existing stockholders, including former note holders who had previously exchanged their notes for common stock.

The exchange of some or all of the notes will dilute the ownership interests of ARC’s existing stockholders, including former note holders who had previously exchanged their notes for common stock. Any sales in the public market of the ARC common stock issuable upon such exchange could adversely affect prevailing trading price of ARC common stock. In addition, the existence of the notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the exchange of the notes could depress the price of ARC common stock.

348

 

 

Front Range of CO

 

 

3,287

 

 

 

5.2

ARC may issue equity in the future in connection with acquisitions or strategic transactions, to adjust its ratio of debt to equity, including through repayment of outstanding debt, to fund expansion of its operations, upon exchange of the notes, or for other purposes. To the extent ARC issues additional equity securities, the percentage ownership into which the notes being offered in this offering would exchange could be reduced.

33




ARC’s recent cash distributions to its common and preferred stockholders have exceeded ARC’s operating cash flows.

For the 12 months ended December 31, 2004, and the six months ended June 30, 2005, ARC’s annual cash distribution to its common stockholders and quarterly distributions to its preferred stockholders and the Partnership’s distributions to its limited partners have exceeded our operating cash flows. We funded these distributions from a combination of operating cash flows, cash generated from senior fixed and variable rate mortgage debt incurred in connection with the completion of the IPO of ARC in February 2004, other borrowings, and sales of assets. On May 23, 2005, ARC announced that its board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1875 per share of ARC common stock payable to stockholders of record on June 30, 2005.

Unless operating cash flows increase substantially, we will be required to (1) reduce or eliminate the cash distributions or (2) fund future cash distributions to ARC’s stockholders or the Partnership’s limited partners from other borrowings, sales of some of our properties, and/or other available financing sources or ARC will have to reduce such distributions. If we use working capital or proceeds from such other borrowings, sales of some of ARC’s properties, or other avalign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">

%

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

429

 

 

Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, MO-KS

 

 

2,428

 

 

 

3.9

%

 

 

89.6

%

 

 

285

 

 

Pro Forma

 

 

 

Pro Forma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

2,256

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

88.2

%

 

 

349

 

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

2,178

 

 

 

3.5

%

 

 

Six Months

 

Six Months

 

66.7

%

 

 

273

 

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

1,986

 

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

89.8

%

 

 

368

 

 

St. Louis, MO-IL

 

 

1,912

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

81.0

%

 

 

290

 

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

289

 

 

Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC

Year

 

 

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 

 

June 30, 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2005

 

2004

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 

2000

 

Earnings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

69.5

%

 

 

270

 

 

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL

 

 

1,385

 

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

265

 

 

Inland Empire, CA

 

 

1,223

 

 

 

$

(27,523

)

 

 

$

(30,384

)

 

 

$

(83,527

)

 

$

(84,913

)

$

(43,267

)

$

1.9

%

 

 

95.1

%

 

 

397

 

 

Elkhart-Goshen, IN

 

 

1,212

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

85.6

%

 

 

326

 

 

Charleston-North Charleston, SC

 

(48,109

)

$

(13,949

)

$

(13,975

)

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,179

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

251

 

 

Southeast FL

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

96.0

%

 

 

495

 

 

Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

85.7

%

 

 

340

 

 

Nashville, TN

 

 

1,071

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed charges

 

 

36,364

 

72.8

%

 

 

291

 

 

Sioux City, IA-NE

 

 

 

 

36,364

 

 

 

67,159

 

 

67,159

 

62,041

 

48,164

 

16,818

 

14,422

 

Less capitalized interest

 

 

(485

)

 

 

994

 

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

290

 

 

Syracuse, NY

 

 

931

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

(485

)

 

 

(3,070

)

 

(3,070

)

 

 

 

 

Add amortization of capitalized interest

 

 

160

 

 

 

64.7

%

 

 

340

 

 

Subtotal: Top 20 Markets

 

 

43,530

160

 

 

 

131

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69.2

%

 

Net loss from continuing operations plus fixed charges adjusted for capitalized interest

 

 

8,516

 

 

 

5,655

 

 

 

(19,307

)

 

(20,693

)

18,774

 

 

 

84.5

%

 

 

339

 

 

All Other Markets

55

 

2,869

 

447

 

Fixed charges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,412

 

 

 

30.8

%

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

297

 

 

Total Homesites/Weighted Average Occupancy 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense (including interest in discontinued operations)

 

 

32,074

 

 

 

32,074

 

 

 

62,942

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

84.5

%

 

 

$

326

 

 


(1)    Markets are defined by our management.

(2)    Rental income is defined as homeowner lot rental income, home renter lot and home rental income and other rental income reduced by move-in bonuses and rent concessions. Rental income does not include utility and other income.

After taking into account the proposed sale of the 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

92




Our Communities

As of June 30, 2005, our portfolio consisted of 315 manufactured home communities (net of one community classified as discontinued operations) comprising approximately 62,942 homesites located in 27 states and 67 markets, primarily oriented toward all-age living.

As of June 30, 2005, our communities had an occupancy rate of 84.5% and the average monthly rental income per occupied homesite was $326. Leases for homeowners are generally month-to-month, or in limited cases year-to-year, and require security deposits. In the case of our residents renting homes from us, lease terms are typically one year, and require a security deposit. Under our lease with option to purchase program, residents enter into a long term lease, typically 24 to 84 months, pay a security deposit and option fee and commit to monthly payments creditable to their down payment upon purchase of the home. We commit to the price of the home upon purchase at the end of the lease.

93




The following table sets forth certain information regarding our communities, including the 79 communities we have identified as held for sale, arranged from our largest to smallest market, as of June 30, 2005. Rental income includes homeowner rental income and home renter rental income reduced by move in bonuses and rent concessions.

 

    

&nbsfont-size:8.0pt;">58,011

 

 

58,011

 

58,256

 

43,887

 

14,714

 

13,067

 

Capitalized interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

3,070

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

June 30,

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

3,070

 

 

 

Homesites

 

2005

 

 

 

Amortization of debt issuance
costs

 

 

3,772

 

Per Month

 

Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,772

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

age-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

 

 

Meadow Glen

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

5,952

 

 

5,952

 

3,213

 

4,129

 

1,896

 

1,212

 

Interest factor included in rental expense(1)

 

 

33

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

126

 

 

126

 

572

 

148

 

208

 

143

 

Total fixed charges

 

 

36,364

 

 

 

36,364

 

 

 

67,159

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

64.8

%

 

 

$

289

 

 

Brookside Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

67,159

 

62,041

 

 

 

394

 

 

 

79.7

%

 

 

300

 

 

Southfork

 

 

48,164

 

16,818

 

14,422

 

Deficiency in achieving a 1:1 coverage ratio

 

 

$

27,848

 

 

 

$

30,709

 

 

 

$

86,466

 

 

$

87,852

 

$

43,267

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

380

 

 

Creekside

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

86.7

%

 

 

311

 

$

48,109

 

$

 

 

Village North

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

90.7

%

 

 

393

 

 

Summit Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

13,949

 

$

13,975

 


(1)    Equal to 1¤3 of rent expense, which is an approximation of the interest portion of rent expense.

35




PRICE RANGE OF ARC COMMON STOCK

The shares of ARC common stock are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC.” ARC’s common stock began trading on February 18, 2004, following its IPO. Set forth below, for the applicable periods indicated, are the high and low closing sale prices per share of ARC common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

 

 

High

 

Low

 

83.1

%

 

 

361

 

 

Chalet City

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

18.98

 

$

18.29

 

Second quarter

&nbsadding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.9pt;">

 

257

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

331

 

$

18.67

 

$

14.57

 

Third quarter

 

$

16.94

 

$

14.60

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

14.95

 

$

 

Twin Parks

 

 

 

 ;">

12.48

 

2005

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

76.1

%

 

 

438

 

 

Lakewood

 

 

*

 

 

<12.0pt;">

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

14.03

 

$

11.85

 

Second quarter

 

$

13.62

 

$

12.00

 

Third quarter

 

 

TX

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

82.1

%

 

 

424

 

 

Quail Run

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

$

13.65

 

$

9.84

 

Fourth quarter (through October 21, 2005)

 

$

10.10

 

$

9.48

 

 

On October 21, 2005, the last reported closing sale price of ARC common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $9.81 per share.

36




CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Partnership as of June 30, 2005 (in thousands):

·       on a historical actual basis; and

·       on a pro forma basis to reflect the sale of the notes and the use of proceeds therefrom, and the debt reclassification to liabilities related to assets held for sale as a result of the community sales.

 

 

Historical

 

Offering

 

Discontinued
Operations

 

Pro Forma

 

Cash

 224

 

 

 

78.6

%

 

 

364

 

 

Willow Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

65.4

%

 

$

19,616

 

$

 

409

 

 

Arlington Lakeside

92,519

 

 

$

 

 

$

112,135

 

Long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

218

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009

 

$

98,926

 

$

 

 

$

(1yle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

88.1

%

 

 

342

 

 

Mesquite Meadows

 

)

 

$

83,067

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012

 

302,325

 

 

 

(26,047

)

 

276,278

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014

 

211,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

88.3

%

 

 

309

 

 

Amber Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

60.3

%

 

 

359

 

 

Highland Acres

 

 

 

(22,399

)

 

189,522

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 to 2031

 

153,074

 

 

 

(31,433

)

 

121,641

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006(1)

 

140,468

 

 

 

(31,948

)

 

108,520

 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2006

 

58,764

 

 

 

 

 

58,764

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035 (due to ARC)

 

25,780

 

 

 

 

 

25,780

 

Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

 

 

96,600

 

 

 

 

96,600

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008

 

9,369

 

 

 

 

 

9,369

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007

 

42,100

 

 

 

 

 

42,100

 

Floorplan line of credit due 2007

 

43,945

 

 

 

(8,578

)

 

35,367

 

Other loans

 

2,332

 

 

 

 

 

2,332

 

Total debt

 

1,089,004

 

96,600

 

 

(136,264

)

 

1,049,340

 

Capital:

 

<:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

88.3

%

 

 

382

 

 

Eagle Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred partnership units

 

144,250

 

 

 

 

 

144,250

 

 

94.7

%

 

 

368

 

 

Denton Falls

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

61.3

%

 

 

367

 

 

Terrell Crossing

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

Common partnership units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

73.7

%

 

 

424

 

General partner

 

486,112

 

 

 

(32,908

)

 

453,204

 <7pt;">

 

Rolling Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

Limited partners

 

26,298

 

 

 

(1,816

)

 

24,482

 

Total partners’ capital

 

656,660

&2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

183

 

 

 

87.4

 

 

(34,724

)

 

621,936

 

Total capitalization

 

%

 

 

327

 

 

Dynamic

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

85.9

%

 

 

340

 

 

$

1,745,664

 

$

96,600

 

 

$

(170,988

)

 

$

1,671,276

 


(1)    The senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month periods at our option, and subject to certain conditions.

37




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

As used in this section, the terms “we, 10.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Cottonwood Grove

 

 

 

 

 

The following table shows our selected consolidated historical and pro forma financial data for the periods indicated. You should read our selected consolidated historical and pro forma financial data, together with the notes thereto, in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in our financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this prospectus.

Our historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and our consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 have been derived from our audited historical financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical consolidated balance sheet information as of June 30, 2005 and our consolidated statement of operations information for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of our management, our historical consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the information set forth therein. Our results of operations for the interim period ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the result to be obtained for the full fiscal year.

Our unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been derived from the unaudited pro forma financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet data reflects adjustments to our historical financial data to give effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005, as well as the sale of our 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025, as if the sale of all communities and the sale of the notes had both occurred on June 30, 2005. Our pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations data reflects adjustments to our historical financial data to give effect to the discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of the 79 communities, as if the sales had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. We have based our unaudited pro forma adjustments upon available information and assumptions that we consider reasonable. Our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is not necessarily indicative of what our actual financial position or results of operations would have been as of the date and for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to represent our future financial position or results of operations.

38




Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data

(in thousands, except per unit data)

"padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.9pt;">

 

 

 

Pro Forma
Six Months
Ended 

 

Six Months Ended

 

Pro Forma
Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

TX

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

94.0

%

 

 

428

 

 

Mesquite Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

144

 

 

 

86.1

%

 

 

334

 

 

Silver Leaf

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

89.7

%

 

 

259

 

 

Willow Springs

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

86.3

%

 

 

322

 

 

Aledo

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

2005

 

2004(3)

 

2004

 

2004(3)

 

2003

 

2002(1)

 

294

 

 

Golden Triangle

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

430

 

 

Dynamic II

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

136

 

 

2001

 

2000

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(unaudited)

 face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

95.6

%

 

 

359

 

 

Shadow Mountain

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

74.4

%

 

 

277

 "7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

El Lago

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

e-height:7.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

90.2

%

 

 

348

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

 

$

83,142 

Mesquite Green

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

91.7

%

 

 

293

 

 

Hampton Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

80.7

%

 

 

422

 

 

Sunset Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

 

$

102,224

 

 

 

$

86,210

 

 

 

$

151,431

 

 

$

187,267

 

$

125,915

 

$

92,610

 

$

35,024

 

$

22,605

 

 

325

 

 

Kimberly at Creekside

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

89.7

%

 

 

297

 

 

Oak Park Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

94

&nb

Sales of manufactured homes

 

 

20,957

 

 

 

26,278

 

 

 

2,789

 

 

 

12,275

 

 

15,221

 

21,681

 

31,942

 

 

 

Utility and other income

 

 

9,231

 

 

 

11,481

 

 

 

9,097

 

 

 

15,746

 

 

 

 

91.5

%

 

 

410

 

 

 

94




 

nt-size:1.0pt;"> 

<>

 

    

 

 

20,065

 

15,599

 

11,942

 

2,525

 

1,370

 

Net consumer finance interest income (expense)

 

 

205

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

(40

)

 

 

(102

)

 

104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

 

113,535

 

 

 

140,188

 

 

 

98,056

 

 

 

179,350

 

 

222,657

 

163,195

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

June 30, 

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

2005

 

Per Month

 

Shady Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

75.8

%

 

 

$

332

136,494

 

37,549

 

23,975

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

Creekside Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

90.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

 

 

340

 

 

Hidden Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

81.6

%

 

 

326

 

 

 

31,177

 

 

 

40,363

 

 

 

30,234

El Dorado

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

58,823

 

 

75,150

 

44,295

 

33,341

 

10,742

 

6,095

 

adding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.15pt;">

 

 

 

73.4

%

Real estate taxes

 

 

7,027

 

 

 

8,698

 

 

 

7,390

 

 

 

13,327

 

 

16,621

 

10,247

 

6,633

 

2,432

 

1,373

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

 

18,699

 

 

 

24,405

 

 

 

2,365

 

 

 

14,692

 

 

18,267

 

18,357

 

25,826

 

 

 

Retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations

 

 

7,317

 

 

 

227

 

 

Mulberry Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,317

 

 

 

2,079

 

 

 

8,198

 

 

8,198

 

7,382

 

8,582

 

 

 

Property management

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

3,054

 

 

 

7,127

 

 

7,127

 

5,527

 

4,105

 

2,491

 

2,436

 

General and administrative

 

 

11,618

 

 

 

11,618

 

 

 

19,099

TX

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

 

348

 

 

Zoppe's

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

29,361

 

 

29,361

 

16,855

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

85.0

%

 

 

201

 

 

El Lago II

 

 

13,087

 

9,047

 

7,173

 

Initial public offering costs

 

 

       —

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

84.7

%

 

 

360

 

 

Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,223

 

 

 

82.7

%

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

4,417

 

349

 

 

Atlanta, Georgia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

 

 

Hunter Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

850

 

 

 

       —

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,427

 

 

 

16,685

 

 

16,685

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

33,081

 

 

84.8

%

 

 

$

350

 

 

Landmark Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

509

 

 

 

84.9

%

 

 

338

 

 

Shadowood

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

507

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

361

 

 

 

42,255

 

 

 

32,152

 

 

 

57,761

 

 

72,014

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

14,943

 

 

Riverdale (Colonial Coach)

 

 

 

9,974

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

 

       —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,358

 

 

3,591

 

1,385

 

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

       —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

863

 

 

863

 

  

 

 

GA

 

 

 

436

 

 

 

90.1

%

 

 

336

 

 

Lamplighter Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

13,557

 

 

430

 

 

 

93.3

%

 

Interest expense

 

 

28,007

 

 

 

31,817

 

 

 

27,209

 

 

 

49,862

 

 

56,892

 

 

381

 

 

Stone Mountain

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,386

 

43,804

 

14,714

 

13,067

 

Total expenses

 

 

141,685

 

 

"> 

GA

 

 

 

354

 

 

 

83.6

%

 

 

171,232

 

 

 

141,426

 

 

 

 

383

 

 

Castlewood Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

97.7

%

 

 

324

 

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

264,474

 

 

309,186

 

207,901

 

185,993

 

54,369

 

40,118

 

Interest income

 

 

(627

)

 

 

(660

)

 

 

(792

)

 

 

(1,597

)

 

(1,616

)

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

(2,871

)

(2,168

)

Net loss from continuing operations 

 

 

(27,523

)

 

 

(30,384

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

267

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

390

 

 

Smoke Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

264

 

 

 

)

 

 

(42,578

)

 

 

(83,527

)

 

83.3

%

 

 

353

 

 

Four Seasons

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

(84,913

)

(43,267

)

(48,109

)

(13,949

)

(13,975

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

215

 

 

 

88.4

%

 

 

313

 

 

Marnelle

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

201

 

 

 

95.5

%

 

 

345

 

 

Friendly Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

795

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

98.0

%

 

 

1,915

 

31

 

1,040

 

819

 

(149

 

 

376

 

 

Plantation Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

130

 

)

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

(678

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

309

 

 

Golden Valley

 

 

 

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

(30,062

)

 

 

style="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

GA

(41,783

)

 

 

 

 

 

(91,547

)

(39,903

)

(47,069

)

(13,130

)

(14,124

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

 

(5,942

)

 

 

(5,942

)

 

 

(3,810

)

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

73.8

%

 

 

329

 

 

Lakeside

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

(9,752

)

 

(9,752

)

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

92.2

%

 

 

261

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

Jonesboro (Atlanta Meadows)

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

$

(36,004

)

 

 

$

(45,593

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

$

(13,130

)

$

(14,124

)

Net loss attributable to common unitholders from continuing operations

 

 

$

(33,465

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

100.0

%

 

 

282

 

 

Atlanta, Georgia—Total/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,969

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(93,279

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common partnership unit from continuing operations 

 

 

$

(0.77

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.84

)

 

 

$

(1.24

)

 

 

$

(2.31

)

 

 

 

Camelot

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

in:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$

(2.34

)

$

(2.20

)

$

(2.94

)

$

(1.54

)

$

(2.17

)

Income (loss) per common partnership unit from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

379

 

 

 

99.5

%

 

 

$

385

 

 

Country Club Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

idth:24.0pt;">

99.1

%

 

 

372

 

 

Crescentwood Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

273

 

 

 

97.8

 

 

(0.17

)

0.17

 

0.06

 

0.09

 

(0.02

)

Net loss per common partnership unit

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.83

)

 

 

%

 

 

368

 

&nyle="line-height:7.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$

(1.22

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2.51

)

$

(2.03

Windsor Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

)

249

 

 

 

97.6

%

 

 

384

 

 

Evergreen Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

237

 

 

 

75.9

%

 

 

323

 

 

Riverdale

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

96.2

%

 

 

321

 

 

Villa West

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

94.3

%

 

 

$

(2.88

)

$

(1.45

)

$

(2.19

)

Weighted average units outstanding 

 

 

43,262

 

 

 

43,262

 

 

 

37,531

 

 

 

40,413

 

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

16,353

 

375

 

 

Lakeview Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

9,062

 

6,441

 

Cash Flow Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

209

 

 

 

98.6

%

 

 

353

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunset Vista

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

80.4

%

 

 

352

 

 

Riverside

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

455

 

 

Sundown

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

93.3

%

 

 

339

 

 

Viking Villa

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

191

ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:30.45pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94.2

%

 

 

273

 

 

Washington Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

321

 

 

Overpass Point MHC

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

68.0

%

 

 

276

 

 

Brookside

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

$

989

 

 

 

$

18,971

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

27,034

 

$

10,689

 

$

14,281

 

$

6,626

 

$

 

170

 

 

 

91.2

%

 

 

350

 

 

 

95




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

(3,177

)

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

(39,170

)

 

 

(576,814

)

 

 

 

 

 

(607,615

)

(47,693

)

(137,473

)

(104,638

)

(91,185

)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,995

 

 

 

578,954

 

 

 

 

 

 

593,757

 

25,389

 

137,787

 

84,340

 

111,976

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

79.7

%

 

 

$

322

 

 

Willow Creek Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

137

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

Funds from operations available to common partnership unitholders(2)

 

 

$

2,211

 

 

 

$

2,211

 

 

 

$

(13,787

)

 

 

$

(24,818

)

 

$

(24,818

)

$

1,495

 

$

(13,202

)

$

2,216

 

$

(3,296

)

EBITDA, as adjusted(2)

169

 

 

Kopper View MHC

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

96.7

%

 

 

340

 

 

Redwood Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

97.5

1pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

32,938

 

 

 

43,028

 

 

 

29,418

%

 

 

372

 

 

Salt Lake City, Utah—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,405

 

 

63,516

 

60,532

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,792

 

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

$

348

44,920

 

12,837

 

6,898

 

Cash Distributions Declared Per Unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Front Range of Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A preferred unit distributions 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1.03

 

 

 

$

0.93

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1.97

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Series B and C preferred unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.78

 

 

 

 

 

Common unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harmony Road

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

486

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

$

425

 

 

Stoneybrook

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

426

 

 

 

69.0

%

 

 

399

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.50

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

39




 

 

 

Pro Forma
June 30,

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2005

 

2004(3)

 

 

Wikiup

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

339

 

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

464

 

 

2003

 

2002(1)

Villa West

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

331

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

365

 

 

The Meadows

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

303

 

2001

 

2000

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet data (at period end):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$1,294,134

 

$

1,587,040

 

$

1,532,780

 

$

863,515

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

484

 

 

Mountainside Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

227

 

 

$

854,445

 

$

335,387

 

$

260,161

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  

 

89.9

%

 

 

498

 

 

Thornton Estates

 

112,135

 

19,616

 

39,802

 

26,626

 

38,241

 

23,668

 

37,340

 

Loan reserves and restricted cash

 

35,411

 

35,453

 

31,019

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

98.6

%

 

 

453

 

 

Countryside

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

92.5

%

 

 

332

 

 

Inspiration Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

488

 

 

Pleasant Grove

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,083

 

52,710

 

11,981

 

19,350

 

Total assets

 

1,866,662

 

1,804,786

 

1,813,232

 

 

CO

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

89.3

%

 

 

423

 

 

Loveland

 

 

 

 

 

1,126,069

 

1,136,737

 

429,979

 

343,175

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

1,049,340

 

1,089,004

 

1,001,622

 

773,394

 

736,819

 

238,034

 

186,465

 

Total liabilities

 

1,244,726

 

1,148,126

 

1,097,293

 

817,852

 

788,617

 

271,143

 

204,908

 

Partners’ capital

 

621,936

 

656,660

 

715,939

 

308,217

 

348,120

 

158,836

 

138,267

 

Other Data (at period end):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

96.5

%

 

 

 

Total communities

 

237

 

315

 

315

 

199

 

404

 

 

Sheridan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

209

 

83

 

63

 

Total homesites

 

49,648

 

62,942

 

63,661

 

37,552

 

CO

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

91.9

%

 

 

475

 

 

Grand Meadow

 

36,805

 

15,941

 

11,861

 

Occupancy

 

86.3

%

84.5

%

81.5

%

85.7

%

89.9

%

90.7

%

88.7

%


(1) ize="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

104

 

 

Financial data for the year ended December 31, 2002 reflects the effects of ARC’s reorganization from May 2, 2002, the date of completion of the reorganization, through period end. We accounted for the reorganization under the purchase method of accounting.

(2)             Investors in and analysts following the real estate industry use funds from operations, or FFO, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, as adjusted, as supplemental performance measures. While we believe that net income (as defined in GAAP) is the most appropriate measure, we also believe that FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, are widely used by and relevant to investors, analysts and lenders and are appropriate supplemental measures. FFO reflects the assumption that real estate values rise or fall with market conditions and principally adjusts for the effects of GAAP depreciation and amortization of real estate assets. In addition, FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, are commonly used by the Company in various ratios, pricing multiples/yields and returns and valuation calculations used to measure financial position, performance and value.

FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as “net income, computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus rental property depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.”  Industry analysts consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of the operating performance of an equity REIT primarily because the computation of FFO excludes historical cost depreciation as an expense and thereby facilitates the comparison of REITs which have different cost bases in their assets. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, whereas real estate values have instead historically risen or fallen based upon market conditions. FFO does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and is a supplemental measure of performance that does not replace net income as a measure of performance or net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity. In addition, FFO is not intended as a measure of a REIT’s ability to meet debt principal repayments and other cash requirements, nor as a measure of working capital. Please see the Reconciliation of Net Income to Funds from Operations set forth below.

EBITDA, as adjusted is defined as net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders adjusted to exclude preferred stock distributions, income from discontinued operations, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, and early termination of debt expenses.

FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs, including the repayment of principal on indebtedness and payment of dividends and distributions. FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, should not be considered as substt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

100.0

%

 

 

(3)             Financial data for the year ended 2004 reflects the effects of (a) the ARC IPO, financing transactions and Hometown Communities Acquisition that we completed on February 18, 2004; and (b) the acquisition of the D.A.M. communities we acquired on June 30, 2004 and other community acquisitions.

40




The following table presents the reconciliation of net loss from continuing operations computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO available to common partnership unitholders (in thousands).

width="35" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:26.6pt;">

(83,527

 

 

Pro Forma

 

 

 

 

 

Pro Forma

 

 

361

 

 

Mobile Gardens

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

100

 

 

 

93.0

%

 

 

474

 

 

 

Six Months

 

 

 

Year

 

 

 

 

 

Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Ended
December 31,

 

 

Shady Lane

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

90.6

%

 

 

355

 

 

Commerce Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

98.0

%

 

 

383

 

 

Front Range of Colorado—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,287

 

 

 

89.1

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2005

 

2004(1)

 

2004(1)(2)

 

2004(1)(2)

 

2003(3)

 

2002(4)

 

2001

 

2000

 

Reconcilation of FFO:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

 

$

%

 

 

$

429

 

 

Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas

 

 

 

(27,523

)

 

$

(30,384

)

$

(42,578

)

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

 

 

$

(84,913

)

 

$

(43,267

 

 

 

 

 

 

Springdale Lake

 

 

 

 

)

$

(48,109

)

$

(13,949

)

$

(13,975

)

Plus:

 

 

 

 

 

t 0pt .0001pt;"> 

 

MO

 

 

 

441

 

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

$

292

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

River Oaks

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

397

 

 

 

80.9

%

 

 

279

 

 

Northland

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

33,081

 

281

 

 

 

98.9

%

 

 

285

 

 

Ridgewood Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

271

 

 

Easy Living

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

96.2

%

 

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

 

57,761

 

 

 

72,014

 

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

14,943

 

9,974

 

Incman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

293

 

 

Meadowood

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

(1,861

)

 

1,000

 

795

 

 

529

 

 

 

1,915

 

91.2

%

 

 

255

 

 

Harper Woods

 

 

 

 

31

 

1,040

 

819

 

(149

)

 

 

 

 

KS

 

Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations

 

 

9,179

 

 

5

 

1,825

 

 

17,387

 

 

 

3,134

 

 

2,589

 

1,957

 

2,536

 

2,247

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

88.6

%

 

 

322

 

 

Shawnee Hills

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

73.4

%

 

 

298

 

 

Pine Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amort0pt;">

 

 

KS

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

90.3

 

 

(3,772

)

 

(3,772

)

(1,722

)

 

(5,952

)

 

 

(5,952

%

 

 

285

 

 

Riverside

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

93

)

 

(3,213

)

(4,129

)

(1,896

)

(1,212

)

 

 

 

97.8

%

 

 

285

 

 

Brittany Place

Depreciation expense on furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

 

(951

)

 

(951

)

(449

)

 

(1,264

)

 

 

(1,264

)

 

(1,112

)

(1,019

)

(237

)

(181

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

FFO

 

 

8,153

 

 

8,153

 

(9,977

)

 

(15,066

)

 

 

(15,066

)

 

1,495

 

(13,202

)

2,216

 

(3,296

)

Less preferred unit distributions

 

 

(5,942

)

 

(5,942

)

(3,810

yle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:19.1pt;">

KS

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

91.9

%

 

)

 

(9,752

)

 

 

305

 

 

Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,752

)

 

 

-—

 

 

 

FFO available to
common partnership unitholders

 

 

$

2,211

 

 

$

ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.1pt;">

 

 

 

2,428

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

 

$

285

 

 

Jacksonville, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portside

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,211

 

$

(13,787

)

 

$

(24,818

)

 

 

$

(24,818

)

 

$

1,495

 

$

(13,202

FL

 

 

 

928

 

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

$

335

 

 

CV-Jacksonville

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

643

 

 

 

86.3

%

 

 

361

 

 

Ortega Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

284

 

 

)

$

2,216

 

$

(3,296

)


(1)    FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2004 (actual and pro forma) includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARC’s IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition.

(2)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2004 (actual and pro forma) includes charges for the following: (i) retail losses of $11.2 million related to sales of older vacant homes sold during the fourth quarter at discounts to their original costs and marketing and promotion costs both incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $0.9 million of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million of severance costs primarily related to the fourth quarter resignation of our chief operating officer; (v) approximately $500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities; and (vi) approximately $500,000 related to property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third quarter in the Southeast United States.

(3)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a charge of $1.4 million for retail home sales asset impairment and other expense and a charge of approximately $864,000 for the cost of vacating unused office space and $337,000 in executive severance.

(4)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes charges incurred in the reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including $1.9 million for exit fees and $1.6 million for the write off of unamortized loan costs, and includes a charge of $13.6 million to write off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses.

For more details001pt;text-align:right;"> 

73.9

%

 

 

333

 

 

 

96




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 , see our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

41




The following table presents the reconciliation of our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders computed in accordance with GAAP to EBITDA, as adjusted (in thousands).

 

 

Pro Forma
Six Months
Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Pro Forma
Year Ended
December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

 

 

2005(1)

 

2005

 

2004

 

2004(1)

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Deerpointe2001

 

2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

82.1

%

 

 

$

391

 

 

Reconciliation of EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magnolia Circle

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders

 

 

$

(33,465

)

 

$

(36,004

)

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

$

(45,593

)

 

$

(93,279

)

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

$

(13,130

)

$

(14,124

 

394

 

 

Connie Jean

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

79.0

%

 

 

)

Plus:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

287

 

 

Jacksonville, Florida—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,256

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred partnership unit distributions

 

 

 

88.2

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

Wichita, Kansas

5,942

 

 

5,942

 

3,810

 

 

9,752

 

 

9,752

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Income) loss from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

(322

 

 

 

 

The Towneship at Clifton

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

(795

)

 

 

 

6,634

 

(3,364

)

KS

 

 

 

538

 

 

 

58.4

%

 

 

gin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">(1,040

)

(819

)

149

 

Interest expense

 

 

28,007

 

 

31,817

 

27,209

 

 

49,862

 

 

56,892

 

$

260

 

 

Twin Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

373

 

57,386

 

43,804

 

14,714

 

13,067

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

33,081

 

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

 

57,761

 

 

72,014

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

14,943

 

9,974

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

 

 

 

13,427

 

 

16,685

 

 

73.5

%

 

 

258

 

 

Chisholm Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

61.8

%

 

 

 

 

16,685

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,358

 

 

3,591

 

1,385

 

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

863

 

 

863

 

 

13,557

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ont size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">240

 

 

The Woodlands

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

243

 

 

 

76.1

%

 

 

290

 

 

Navajo Lake Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

66.3

%

 

 

299

 

 

Glen Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

68.4

%

 

 

270

 

 

Sherwood Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

(627

)

 

 

 

62.5

%

 

(660

)

(792

)

 

(1,597

)

 

(1,616

)

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

(2,871

)

(2,168

)

EBITDA, as adjusted

 

 

$

32,938

 

 

$

43,028

 

$

29,418

 

 

$

43,405

 

 

$

63,516

 

$

60,532

 

$

44,920

 

$

12,837

 

$

6,898

 


(1)    Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders excludes income or loss from discontinued operations and any gains or losses from the sale of discontinued operations.

42




SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

As used in this section, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” refer to the Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term “ARC” refers to Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information of the Partnership and ARC as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and for the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from the historical financial statements included elsewhere and incorporated by reference in this prospectus.

The pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect adjustments to the Partnership’s and ARC’s historical financial data to give effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities announced on September 21, 200="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

315

 

 

Sleepy Hollow

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

48.8

%

 

 

1¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025, as if the sale of all communities and the sale of the notes had both occurred on June 30, 2005.

The pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations reflect adjustments to the Partnership’s and ARC’s historical financial data to give effect to the discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of the 79 communities as if the sales had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented.

The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that the Partnership and ARC consider reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual financial position or results of operations would have been as of the date and for the pe valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:21.5pt;">

303

 

 

Park Avenue Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

81.2

%

 

 

350

 

 

El Caudillo

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

92.5

%

 

 

287

 

 

Sunset 77

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

You should read the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information, together with the notes thereto, in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in the financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Partnership and ARC included and incorporated by reference in this prospectus.

43




Affordable Residential Communities LP

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

At June 30, 2005

(in thousands)

 

 

June 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Offering

 

Operations

 

Pro Forma

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,587,040

 

$

 

 

$

(292,906

)

 

$

1,294,134

 

Assets held for sale

 

3,368

 

 

 

279,254

 

 

67.3

%

 

 

201

 

 

Audora

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

86.5

%

 

 

314

 

 

Sycamore Square

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

204

 

 

282,622

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

19,616

 

92,519

 

 

 

 

112,135

 

Tenant notes and other receivables, net

 

32,826

 

 

 

Wichita, Kansas—Total/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

(488

)

 

32,338

 

Inventory

 

307

 

 

 

(5

)

 

302

 

Loan origination costs, net

 

14,510

 

4,081

 

 

 

 

 

2,178

 

 

 

66.7

%

 

 

$

273

 

 

Orlando, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,782

)

 

16,809

 

Loan reserves

 

35,453

 

 

 

(42

)

 

Shadow Hills

 

 

 

 

 

35,411

 

Goodwill

 

85,264

 

 

 

(15,490

)

 

69,774

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

16,087

 

 

 

(2,981

)

 

13,106

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

10,315

 

 

 

(284

)

 

10,031

 

Total assets

 

$

1,804,786

 

$

96,600

 

 

$

(34,724

)

 

$

1,866,662

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable

 

$

1,089,004

 

$

96,600

 

 

$

(136,264

)

 

$

1,049,340

 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

 

FL

 

 

 

664

 

 

 

77.4

%

 

 

$

425

 

 

Siesta Lago

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

489

 

 

 

96.7

%

 

 

383

 

 

Chalet North

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

92.8

%

 

 

377

 

 

College Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

2,656

 

 

 

142,477

 

 

145,133

 

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

97.7

%

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

31,273

 

 

 

(3,261

)

 

28,012

246

 

 

Carriage Court East

 

 

Dividends payable

 

10,084

 

 

 

 

 

10,084

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

15,109

 

 

 

(2,952

)

 

12,157

 

Total liabilities

 

1,148,126

 

96,600

 

 

 

 

1,244,726

 

Partners’ capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred partnership units

 

144,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

99.2

%

 

 

309

 

 

Carriage Court Central

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

96.6

%

 

 

295

 

 

 

 

 

144,250

 

Common partnership units:

 

 

 

Wheel Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

 

54

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

221

 

 

Orlando, Florida—Total/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

486,112

 

 

 

(32,908

)

 

453,204

 

Limited partners

 

26,298

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,986

 

 

 

89.8

%

 

 

$

368

 

 

(1,816

)

 

24,482

 

 

St. Louis, Missouri/Illinois

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total partners’ capital

 

656,660

 

 

 

(34,724

)(1)

 

621,936

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,804,786

 

$

96,600

 

 

$

(34,724

)

 

$

1,866,662

 


(1)    Reflects a loss on the sales of certain of the 79 communities included in assets held for sale of $34.7 million. This loss is non-recurring and therefore was excluded from the pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations. Excludes expected gains on sales of certain of the 79 communities which will be recognized upon closing of the sales.

44




Affordable Residential Communities LP

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

(in thousands, except per unit data)

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

 

 

 

Historical

 

Discontinued
Operations(1)

 

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enchanted Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

506

 

 

 

65.4

%

 

 

$

299

 

 

Mallard Lake

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

315

 

 

Country Club Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

102,224

 

 

$

(19,082

)

 

 

$

83,142

 

 

250

 

 

 

88.8

%

 

 

314

 

 

Siesta Manor

 

 

 

 

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

26,278

 

 

(5,321

)

 

 

20,957

 

 

Utility and other income

 

11,481

 

 

(2,250

)

 

 

9,231

 

 

Net consumer finance interest income

 

205

 

 

 

 

 

205

 

 

Total revenue

 

140,188

 

 

(26,653

)

 

 

113,535

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

40,363

 

 

(9,186

)

 

 

31,177

 

 

Real estate taxes

 

8,698

 

 

(1,671

)

 

 

7,027

 

MO

 

 

 

192

 

 

 

87.5

%

 

 

286

 

 

Brookshire Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

68.8

%

 

 

251

 

 

Castle Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

96.4

%

 

 

237

 

 

Rockview Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

90.1

%

 

 

334

 

 

Oak Grove

 

 

*

 

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

24,405

 

 

(5,706

)

 

 

18,699

 

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

7,317

 

 

 

 

 

7,317

 

 

Property management

 

4,759

 

 

 

 

 

4,759

 

 

General and administrt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">

 

 

 

IL

 

 

11,618

 

 

 

 

 

11,618

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

42,255

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

83.6

%

 

 

286

 

 

Vogel Manor MHC

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

(9,174

)

 

 

33,081

 

 

Interest expense

 

31,817

 

 

(3,810

)

 

 

28,007

 

 

Total expenses

 

171,232

 

 

(29,547

)

 

 

141,685

 

 

Interest income

="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">72

 

 

 

91.7

%

 

 

245

 

 

Bush Ranch

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

69.6

%

 

(660

)

 

33

 

 

 

(627

)

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

(30,384

)

 

 

 

282

 

 

Hidden Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

76.9

%

 

 

312

 

 

St. Louis, Missouri/Illinois—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,861

 

 

 

(27,523

)

 

Preferred unit distributions

 

(5,942

)

 

 

 

 

(5,942

)

 

Net loss attributable to common partnership
unitholders from continuing operations

 

$

(36,326

)

 

$

2,861

 

 

 

$

(33,465

)

 

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(0.84

)

 

$

0.07

 

 

 

$

(0.77

)

 

Weighted average units outstanding

 

43,262

 

 

 

 

 

1,912

 

 

 

81.0

%

 

 

$

290

 

 

 

97




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,262

 

 


(1)    Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations to discontinued operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

45




Affordable Residential Communities LP

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 2004

(in thousands, except per unit data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

 

 

Historical

 

Discontinued
Operations(1)

 

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

187,267

 

 

$

(35,836

)

 

 

$

151,431

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

15,221

 

 

(2,946

)

 

 

12,275

 

 

Utility and other income

 

20,065

 

 

(4,319

)

 

 

15,746

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

 

 

Net consumer finance interest income (expense)

 

104

 

 

(206

)

 

 

(102

)

 

Total revenue

 

222,657

 

 

(43,307

)

 

 

179,350

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Month

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

75,150

 

 

(16,327

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,823

 

 

Real estate taxes

 

16,621

 

 

(3,294

)

 

 

Burntwood

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

 

13,327

 

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

18,267

 

 

(3,575

)

 

 

14,692

 

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

8,198

 

 

410

 

 

 

85.1

%

 

 

$

262

 

 

Westlake

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

 

 

8,198

 

 

Property management

 

7,127

 

 

 

 

 

7,127

 

 

General and administrative

 

29,361

 

 

 

 

 

29,361

 

 

Initial public offering related costs

 

4,417

 

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

16,685

 

 

 

 

 

16,685

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,014

 

335

 

 

 

73.4

%

 

 

291

 

 

Westmoor

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

 

(14,253

)

 

 

57,761

 

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

3,591

 

 

(233

)

 

 

3,358

 

 

Goodwill impairment

284

 

 

 

68.7

%

 

863

 

 

 

 

376

 

 

Meridian Sooner

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

 

 

863

 

 

Interest expense

 

56,892

 

 

 

273

 

 

Golden Rule

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,030

)

 

 

49,862

 

 

Total expenses

 

309,186

 

 

(44,712

)

 

 

264,474

 

 

Interest income

OK

 

 

 

196

 

 

 

80.6

%

 

 

273

 

 

Timberland

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

(1,616

)

 

19

 

 

 

(1,597

)

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

(84,913

)

 

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

78.0

%

 

 

277

 

 

Overholser Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

1,386

 

 

 

(83,527

)

 

Preferred unit distributions

 

(9,752

)

 

 

 

 

(9,752

)

 

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders from continuing operations

 

$

(94,665

)

 

$

1,386

 

 

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

$

(93,279

)

 

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.34

)

 

$

0.03

 

 

 

$

(2.31

)

 

Weighted average units outstanding

 

40,413

 

 

79.4

%

 

 

296

 

 

Glenview

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

71.7

%

 

 

258

 

 

Misty Hollow

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

62.3

%

 

 

293

 

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

$

289

 

 

Greensboro/Winston Salem, North Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,413

 

 


(1)    Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations to discontinued operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

46




Affordable Residential Communities LP
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
(in thousands, except per unit data)

.0pt;">

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Operations(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oakwood Forest

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

469

 

 

 

74.2

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

%

 

 

$

262

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

125,915

 

 

$

(23,910

)

 

$

102,005

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

21,681

 

 

 

 

21,681

 

Utility and other income

 

 

Woodlake

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

15,599

 

 

(2,944

)

 

12,655

 

Total revenue

 

163,195

 

 

(26,854

)

 

136,341

 

Expenses

 

 

307

 

 

 

64.5

%

 

 

293

 

 

Autumn Forest

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

49.8

%

 

 

246

 

 

Village Park

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

87.6

%

 

 

289

 

 

Gallant Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

44,295

 

 

(9,954

)

 

34,341

 

Real estate taxes

 

10,247

 

 

(1,950

)

 

8,297

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

18,357

 

 

(18

NC

 

 

 

84

 

)

 

18,339

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

7,382

 

 

 

 

7,382

 

Property management

 

5,527

 

78.6

%

 

 

234

 

 

Greensboro/Winston Salem, North Carolina—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

69.5

%

 

 

$

270

 

 

Davenport/Moline/Rock Island, Iowa/Illinois

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloverleaf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,527

 

General and administrative

 

16,855

 

 

 

 

16,855

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

46,467

 

 

(9,733

)

 

36,734

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

1,385

 

 

 

 

1,385

 

Interest expense

 

57,386

 

 

(4,687

)

 

52,699

 

Total expenses

 

207,901

 

 

(26,342

)

 

181,559

 

Interest income

 

(1,439

)

 

5

 

 

(1,434

)

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders from continuing operations

 

IL

 

 

 

292

 

 

 

95.9

%

 

 

$

277

 

 

Silver Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

272

$

(43,267

)

 

$

 

 

 

84.2

%

 

 

239

 

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

259

 

(517

)

 

$

 

 

78.4

%

 

 

(43,784

)

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.20

)

 

$

(0.03

)

 

$

(2.23

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

19,699

 

 

 

 

19,699

 


(1)    Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations to discontinued operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

47




Affordable Residential Communities LP
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
(in thousands, except per unit data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

245

 

 

Falcon Farms

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

86.0

%

 

 

278

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Operations(1)

 

Pro Forma

 

 

Lakewood Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

180

 

 

 

96.1

%

 

 

295

 

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

Lakeside

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

76.4

%

 

 

255

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income.

 

$

92,610

 

 

$

(19,581

)

 

$

73,029

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

31,942

 

 

 

 

31,942

 

Utility and other income

 

11,942

 

 

(2,119

)

 

9,823

 

Total revenue

 

136,494

 

 

(21,700

)

 

114,794

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

Whispering Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

86.7

%

 

 

277

 

 

Davenport/Moline/Rock Island, Iowa/Illinois
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,385

 

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

$

265

 

 

Inland Empire, California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desert Palms MHC

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

33,341

 

 

(8,096

309

 

 

 

89.3

%

)

 

25,245

 

Real estate taxes

 

6,633

 

 

(1,549

)

 

5,084

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold.

 

 

 

$

370

 

 

Meridian Terrace

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

257

 

 

 

95.7

%

 

 

424

 

 

Parkview Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

96.0

%

 

25,826

 

 

 

 

25,826

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance.

 

8,582

 

 

426

 

 

Bermuda Palms

 

 

*

 

 

 

pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.3pt;">

 

 

 

8,582

 

Property management

 

4,105

 

 

 

 

4,105

 

General and administrative.

 

13,087

 

 

CA

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

98.4

%

 

 

333

 

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

<:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

13,087

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

37,058

 

 

(7,127

)

 

29,931

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

98.0

%

 

 

13,557

 

 

 

 

13,557

 

Interest expense.

 

43,804

 

 

(728

)

 

43,076

 

Total expenses.

 

185,993

 

 

(17,500

)

 

168,493

 

Interest income

 

(1,390

)

 

12

 

 

(1,378

385

 

 

Lido Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

98.3

%

 

 

468

)

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders from continuing operations.

 

$

(48,109

)

 

$

(4,212

 

 

Inland Empire, California—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,223

 

 

 

95.1

%

 

 

$

397

 

 

 

98




 

)

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Elkhart/Goshen, Indiana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(52,321

)

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.94

)

 

$

(0.26

)

 

$

(3.20

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

16,353

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

16,353

 


(1)    Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

48




Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
At June 30, 2005
(in thousands, except share data)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

June 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Offering

 

Operations

 

Pro Forma

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,587,040

 

$

 

 

$

(292,906

)

 

$

1,294,134

 

Assets held for sale

 

3,368

 

 

 

279,254

 

 

282,622

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadmore

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

72.2

%

 

 

$

340

 

 

 

Highland

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

89.4

%

 

 

263

 

 

 

19,616

 

92,519

 

 

 

 

112,135

 

Tenant notes and other receivables, net

 

32,826

 

 

 

(488

)

 

32,338

 

Inventory

 

307

 

 

 

(5

)

 

302

 

Loan origination costs, net

 

14,510

 

4,081

 

 

(1,782

)

 

16,809

 

Loan reserves

 

35,453

 

 

 

(42

)

 

35,411

 

Goodwill

 

85,264

 

New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Twin Pines

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

96.1

%

 

 

308

 

 

 

Oak Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

 

 

(15,490

)

 

69,774

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

16,087

 

 

 

(2,981

)

 

13,106

 

97.1

%

 

 

308

 

 

10,315

 

 

 

(284

)

 

 

 

Forest Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

80.8

%

 

 

10,031

 

Total assets

 

$

459

 

 

 

Elkhart/Goshen, Indiana—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,212

 

 

 

85.6

%

 

1,804,786

 

$

96,600

 

 

$

(34,724

)

 

$

1,866,662

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

$

326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable

 

$

1,089,004

 

$

96,600

 

 

$

(136,264

)

 

$

1,049,340

 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

2,656

 

 

 

142,477

 

 

145,133

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

31,273

 

 

 

(3,261

)

 

28,012

 

Dividends payable

 

10,084

 

 

Charleston/North Charleston, South Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carnes Crossing

 

 

 

 

 

 

SC

 

 

 

602

 

 

 

75.9

%

 

 

$

,248

 

 

 

Saddlebrook

 

 

 

 

 

 

SC

 

 

 

425

 

 

 

93.2

%

 

 

275

 

 

 

The Pines

 

 

 

 

 

 

SC

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

73.0

%

 

 

181

 

 

 

Charleston/North Charleston, South Carolina
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,179

 

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

$

251

 

 

 

Southeast Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,084

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

15,109

 

 

 

(2,952

in:0pt 0pt .0001pt;"> 

Western Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

)

 

12,157

 

Total liabilities

 

1,148,126

 

96,600

 

395

 

 

 

99.2

%

 

 

$

555

 

 

 

Sunshine City

 

 

*

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

1,244,726

 

Minority interest

 

51,440

 

 

 

(1,816

)

 

49,624

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively; liquidation preference of $25 per share plus accrued but unpaid dividends

 

119,108

 

 

 

 

 

119,108

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 40,955,729 and 40,874,061 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

410

 

 

 

 

350

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

503

 

 

 

Lakeside of the Palm Beaches

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

410

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

791,922

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

260

 

 

 

93.8

%

 

 

395

 

 

 

Havenwood

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

98.3

 

 

791,922

 

Unearned compensation

 

(939

)

 

 

 

 

(939

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

1,206

 

 

 

 

%

 

 

478

 

 

 

Southeast Florida—Total/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

96.0

%

 

 

$

495

 

 

 

Nashville, Tennessee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,206

 

Retained deficit

 

(306,487

)

 

 

(32,908

)(1)

 

(339,395

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

605,220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Countryside Village

 

 

*

 

&nbs 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

(32,908

)

 

572,312

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,804,786

 

$

96,600

 

 

TN

 

 

 

350

 

 

 

69.4

 

$

(34,724

)

 

$

1,866,662

 


(1eak-after:avoid;">%

 

 

$

349

 

 

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

49




Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
(in thousands, except per share data)

k-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

63.3

%

 

 

  Discontinued  

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Operations(1)

in:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">294

 

 

 

Shady Hills

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

84.7

%

 

 

241

 

 

 

Trailmont

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

89.3

%

 

 

304

 

 

 

 

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

102,224

 

 

$

(19,082

)

 

$

83,142

 

Weatherly Estates II

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

67.9

Sales of manufactured homes

 

26,278

 

 

(5,321

)

 

20,957

 

Utility and other income

 

11,481

 

 

(2,250

)

%

 

 

190

 

 

 

Nashville, Tennessee—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,071

 

 

 

72.8

%

 

 

$

291

 

 

 

Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, North Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,231

 

Net consumer finance interest income

 

205

 

 

 

 

205

 

Total revenue

 

140,188

 

 

(26,653

)

 

border:none;font-size:1.0pt;padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt;">

 

Green Spring Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

113,535

 

Expenses

 

 

 

322

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

$

317

 

 

 

Foxhall Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

315

 

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

370

 

 

 

Deerhurst

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

40,363

 

 

(9,186

)

 

31,177

 

Real estate taxes

 

8,698

 

 

(1,671

)

 

7,027

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

24,405

 

 

(5,706

)

 

18,699

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

 

 

 

81.2

%

 

 

325

 

 

 

Stony Brook North

 

 

 

 

7,317

 

 

 

 

7,317

 

Property management

 

4,759

 

 

NC

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

92.9

 

 

 

 

4,759

 

General and administrative

 

11,618

 

 

 

 

11,618

 

%

 

 

402

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

42,255

 

 

(9,174

)

 

33,081

 

Interest expense

 

31,817

 

 

tyle="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

Pleasant Grove

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

70.8

%

 

 

177

)

 

28,007

 

Total expenses

 

171,232

 

 

(29,547

 

 

Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, North Carolina—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

141,685

 

Interest income

 

(660

)

 

33

 

 

85.7

%

 

 

$

340

 

 

 

(627

)

Loss before allocation to minority interest

 

(30,384

)

 

2,861

 

 

 

99




 

 

    

(27,523

)

Minority interest

 

1,170

 

 

(190

)

 

980

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

(29,214

)

 

2,671

 

 

(26,543

 

 

 

 

 

)

Preferred stock dividend

 

(5,156

)

 

 

 

(5,156

)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders from continuing operations

 

$

(34,370

)

 

$

2,671

 

 

$

(31,699

)

Loss per share from continuing operations

 

$

(0.84

)

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

(0.77

)

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

40,869

 

 

 

 

40,869

 

 


(1)             Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

50




Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(in thousands, except per share data)

Homesite

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

  Operations(1)  

 

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Syracuse, New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casual Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

$

187,267

 

 

$

(35,836

)

 

$

151,431

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

15,221

 

 

(2,946

)

 

12,275

 

 

 

 

801

 

 

 

64.7

%

 

 

$

358

 

 

Pine Haven MHP

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

64.6

%

 

 

226

 

 

Syracuse, New York—Total/Weighted Average

 

Utility and other income

 

20,065

 

 

(4,319

)

 

15,746

 

Net consumer finance interest income (expense)

 

104

 

 

(206

)

 

(102

)

Total revenue

 

222,657

 

 

(43,307

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

931

 

 

 

64.7

%

 

 

$

340

 

 

)

 

179,350

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tampa/Lakeland/Winter Haven, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

Property operations

 

75,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Winter Haven Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

97.5

%

<0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.4pt;">

 

 

(16,327

)

 

58,823

 

Real estate taxes

 

16,621

 

 

(3,294

)

 

13,327

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

18,267

 

 

(3,575

)

 

14,692

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

8,198

 

 

font size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

$

230

 

 

Pedaler's Pond

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

93.4

%

 

 

8,198

 

Property management

 

7,127

 

 

 

 

7,127

 

General and administrative

 

29,361

 

 

 

 

29,361

 

Initial public offering related costs

 

4,417

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

306

 

 

Cypress Shores

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

273

 

 

Indian Rocks

 

Early termination of debt

 

16,685

 

 

 

 

16,685

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,014

 

 

(14,253

)

 

57,761

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

3,591

 

 

(233)

 

 

3,358

 

Goodwill impairment

 

863

 

 

 

 

863

 

Interest expense

 

56,892

 

 

(7,030

)

 

49,862

 

Total expenses

 

309,186

 

 

*

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

87.8

%

 

 

323

 

 

Alafia Riverfront

 

 

*

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

97.9

%

 

 

334

 

 

Tampa/Lakeland/Winter Haven, Florida—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 ="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

(44,712

)

 

264,474

 

Interest income

 

(1,616

)

 

19

 

 

(1,597

)

Loss before allocation to minority interest

 

(84,913

)

 

1,386

 

 

(83,527

)

Minority interest

 

5,471

 

 

(66

)

 

5,405

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

(79,442

)

 

1,320

 

 

(78,122

)

Preferred stock dividend

 

 

 

 

860

 

 

 

92.8

%

 

 

$

286

 

 

Sioux City, Iowa/Nebraska

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evergreen Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

518

 

 

 

74.5

%

 

 

$

292

 

 

Siouxland Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

NE

 

 

 

271

 

 

(8,966

)

 

 

 

(8,966

)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders from continuing operations

 

$

(88,408

)

 

$

1,320

 

 

$

(87,088

)

Loss per share from continuing operations

 

$

(2.33

)

 

$

0.03

 

 

$

(2.30

)

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

37,967

 

 

 

 

86.0

%

 

 

dth:9.0pt;">

 

 

37,967

 

 


(1)             Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

51




Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Operations(1)

 

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

289

 

 

Tallview Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

84.9

%

 

 

286

 

 

Sioux City, Iowa/NebraskaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

994

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

$

290

125,915

 

 

$

(23,910

)

 

$

102,005

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

21,681

 

 

 

 

21,681

 

Utility and other income

 

15,599

 

 

(2,944

)

 

12,655

 

Total revenue

 

163,195

 

 

(26,854

)

 

136,341

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

44,366

 

 

(9,954

)

 

34,412

 

Real estate taxes

 

10,247

 

 

(1,950

)

 

8,297

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

18,357

 

 

(18

)

 

18,339

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

7,382

 

 

 

 

7,382

 

Property management

 

5,527

 

 

 

 

5,527

 

General and administrative

 

16,818

 

 

 

 

16,818

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

46,467

 

 

(9,733

)

 

36,734

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

1,385

 

 

 

 

1,385

 

Interest expense

 

 

Des Moines, Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southridge Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

257

 

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

$

346

 

 

Country Club Crossing

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

225

 

 

 

89.3

%

 

 

306

 

 

Sunrise Terrace

 

57,386

 

 

(4,687

)

 

52,699

 

Total expenses

 

207,935

 

 

(26,342

)

 

181,593

 

Interest income

 

(1,439

)

 

5

 

 

(1,434

)

Loss before allocation to minority interest

 

(43,301

)

 

(517

)

 

(43,818

)

Minority interest

 

5,983

 

 

108

 

 

6,091

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders from continuing operations

 

$

(37,318

)

 

$

(409

)

 

$

(37,727

)

 

 

*

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

73.0

%

 

 

245

 

 

Loss per share from continuing operations

 

$

(2.20

)

 

$

(0.02

)

 

$

(2.22

)

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

16,973

 

 

 

 

16,973

 


(1)    Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

52




Ewing Trace

 

 

 

 

 

Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

99.5

%

 

 

313

 

 

Arbor Lake

 

 

*

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued

 

 

 

 

 

Historical

 

Operations(1)

 

Pro Forma

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income.

 

IA

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

77.5

%

 

 

240

 

 

 

$

92,610

 

 

$

(19,581

)

 

$

73,029

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

31,942

 

Des Moines, IowaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0pt;width:6.3pt;">

 

 

 

31,942

 

Utility and other income

 

11,942

 

 

(2,119

)

 

9,823

 

Total revenue

 

136,494

 

 

 

904

 

 

 

86.5

%

 

 

$

305

 

 

Flint, Michigan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Torrey Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

MI

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

80.1

%

(21,700

)

 

114,794

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

33,341

 

 

(8,096

)

 

25,245

 

Real estate taxes

 

6,633

 

 

(1,549

)

 

5,084

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold.

 

25,826

 

 

 

 

25,826

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance.

 

8,597

 

 

 

$

376

 

 

Villa

 

 

 

 

-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

8,597

 

 

 

MI

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

60.5

<0pt .0001pt 20.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Property management

 

4,105

 

 

 

 

4,105

 

General and administrative.

 

13,088

 

 

 %

 

 

355

 

 

13,088

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

37,058

 

 

(7,127

)

 

29,931

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

13,557

 

 

 

 

13,557

 

Interest expense.

 

43,804

 

 

(728

)

 

43,076

 

Total expenses.

 

186,009

 

 

Birchwood Farms

 

 

 

 

 

 

MI

 

 

 

(17,500

)

 

168,509

 

Interest income

 

(1,390

)

 

 

142

 

 

 

88.0

%

 

 

317

 

12

 

 

(1,378

)

 

Flint, MichiganTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

838

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

 

$

358

 

 

Corpus Christi, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Misty Winds

 

 

 

 

 

Loss before allocation to minority interest

 

(48,125

)

 

(4,212

)

 

(52,337

)

Minority interest.

 

TX

 

 

 

 

6,460

 

 

565

 

 

7,025

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders from continuing operations

 

$

(41,665

)

 

$

(3,647

)

 

$

(45,312

)

Loss per share from continuing operations

 

$

(2.87

)

 

$

(0.25

)

 

$

(3.12

)

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

14,535

 

 

 

 

14,535

 


(1)    Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period.

53




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated historical financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and the financial information in the tables below. Financial information contained in this discussion is not presented as of any date or for any period following June 30, 2005, unless otherwise indicated. For a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership of the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, please see “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data.”

General Structure and Recent Developments

Affordable Residential Communities LP is the operating partnership of ARC, a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity REIT which acquires, renovates, repositions and operates primarily all-age manufactured home communities. The Partnership also conducts certain complementary business activities focused on improving and maintaining occupancy in our communities, including the rental of manufactured homes, the retail sale of manufactured homes, the financing of sales of manufactured homes and acting as agent in the sale of homeowners’ insurance and other related insurance products. ARC conducts substantially all of its activities through the Partnership, of which ARC is the sole general partner, holding a 94.8% ownership interest as of June 30, 2005.

Beginning in 1995, ARC’s co-founders founded several companies under the name “Affordable Residential Communities” for the purpose of engaging in the business of acquiring, renovating, repositioning and operating manufactured home communities, as well as certain related businesses. ARC was formed in July 1998 as a Maryland corporation for the purpose of acting as the investment vehicle for and a co-general partner of the Partnership, the fourth real property partnership organized and operated by ARC’s 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">338

 

 

 

90.5

%

 

 

$

301

 

ARC completed its initial public offering in the first quarter of 2004. ARC issued approximately 24.6 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (including, approximately 2.3 million shares sold by existing shareholders). In March 2004, ARC’s underwriters exercised their over-allotment option to purchase 791,592 shares of common stock at $19.00 per share. Concurrent with the IPO, ARC raised $125.0 million of gross proceeds through the issuance of 5.0 million shares of Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. All proceeds were directly contributed to the Partnership.

In connection with ARC’s IPO, we completed the following additional transactions:

·       The acquisition of 90 communities from Hometown America for approximately $615.3 million comprising 26,406 homesites. This includes 11 communities acquired post-closing upon the completion of the loan assumption process, with the final three loan assumptions completed on April 9, 2004.

·       A financing transaction totaling $500.0 million comprising of $215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate mortgage debt with an interest rate of 5.53%, $100.7 million of 5 year fixed rate mortgage debt with an interest rate of 5.05% and $184.0 million of 2 year floating rate mortgage debt. We used the proceeds to repay certain indebtedness and to fund a portion of the Hometown acquisition.

54




 

Seascape

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

257

 

 

 

60.3

%

 

 

321

 

 

Seamist

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

68.8

%

 

 

393

 

 

Corpus Christi, TexasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

755

 

 

·       The closing of a $125 million consumer finance facility (as amended in connection with our lease receivables line of credit) to support our in-community home sales and in-community finance programs.

On June 30, 2004, we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from the D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY, L.P. The communities were located in 3 states and included 3,573 homesites. The total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was approximately $65.5 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million.

In August 2004, we cancelled our $125.0 million senior revolving credit facility and incurred approximately $3.3 million in debt extinguishment costs. In September 2004, we obtained a revolving credit mortgage facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of the Partnership and is secured by 33 communities that previously secured the cancelled senior revolving credit facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to the ARC IPO. Advances under the revolving credit mortgage facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing the loan. As amended in September 2005, the revolving credit mortgage facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005) and has an extended term through September, 2006. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and an additional fee of 0.5% at the amendment date and will pay an advance fee to the extent any advance takes the amount of indebtedness outstanding under the facility above $58.764 million. The facility contains no significant financial covenants. As of June 30, 2005, $58.8 million was outstanding under the revolving credit mortgage facility.

In August 2004, we amended our floorplan lines of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million, secured by manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended lines of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended lines of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended lines of credit require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million, all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the lines of credit as of June 30, 2005. The lines of credit are subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of 0.25% per annum and a termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination date.

In July 2004, we completed the acquisition of the Western Mobile Estates manufactured home community located in West Valley City, Utah, comprising 145 homesites. The total purchase price of $3.8 million included $3.76 million in seller financing. In September, 2004, we completed the acquisition of the Willow Creek Estates manufactured home community located in Ogden, Utah, comprising 137 homesites for a total cash purchase price of $3.2 million.

Also in July 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities comprising 2,933 homesites. In addition to the 12 communities, as part of the auction, we also contracted to sell two parcels of undeveloped commercial land located adjacent to one of our communities in Colorado. The auction was held in September 2004. These sales, other than the sale of one of the 12 properties, closed during the fourth quarter of 2004, resulting in net proceeds to the Partnership of $21.6 million after selling commissions, sales expenses and the repayment of approximately $6.0 million of associated debt. The

55




 

for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and are reflected as real estate and retail asset impairments in the expenses section of the consolidated statements of operations.

Impairment of Goodwill.   We evaluate goodwill for potential impairment using the market values of our equity and multiples of earnings to value our reporting units based on our experience in the industry and industry analyses provided by financial institutions. We perform this evaluation at least annually, and more frequently if events and circumstances warrant. If the market value of our equity decreases, an additional impairment charge related to our goodwill may be necessary.

Allowance for Receivables.   We report receivables net of an allowance for receivables that we may not collect in the future. For receivables relating to community rents (owner and rental), we fully reserve amounts over 60 days past due and, in some cases, we fully reserve amounts currently due based on specific circumstances. For receivables relating to notes arising from the sale of manufactured homes, we reserve amounts currently in default and estimate those receivables impaired at period end that are expected to go into default over the next year, taking into account the expected value of the manufactured home to which we would obtain title in foreclosure.

Inventory Valuations.   We value manufactured home inventory at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on the purchase price of the specific homes, reduced, as applicable, by dealer volume rebates earned from manufacturers when we purchased the homes. We base market value of inventory on estimated net realizable value.

Derivatives.   We manage our exposure to interest rate risk through the use of interest rate swaps and caps and recognize in earnings the ineffective portion of gains or losses associated with these instruments immediately. We obtain values for the interest rate swaps and caps from financial institutions that market these instruments. Our derivative instruments are used for hedging purposes and as such result in no impact to the consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized income related to derivatives is reflected as other comprehensive income within the consolidated statements of partners’ capital and totalled $0.3 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and year ended December 31, 2004, respectively.

Discontinued Operations.   We consider a community to be a discontinued operation when: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the asset, supported by a Board resolution granting approval to proceed with the sale; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year; (v) the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. In accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, “SFAS”, No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we measure each of our assets held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell at the balance sheet date and re-cast any applicable balances and corresponding liabilities related to the communities identified in all comparable periods presented. Depreciation of the assets held for sale, if applicable, is suspended at the date of the determination of discontinuance. Interest

63



 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

O='55',FILE='C:\fc\29914032315_D10496_623837\17291-2-cg.htm',USER='jmsproofassembler',CD='Oct 26 14:02 2005' -->

remaining community continues to be held for sale and was classified as held for sale as of June 30, 2005 based on our intent to sell this community during 2005.

In September 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell three communities, comprising 1,073 homesites, to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of approximately $5.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

In October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities comprising 2,440 homesites. The auction was held in December 2004. Eleven of these 12 sales closed during the first quarter of 2005, resulting in net proceeds of $12.4 million after selling commissions, sales expenses and the repayment of approximately $28.9 million of associated debt included in liabilities related to assets held for sale, and other required debt payments. The remaining community was classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, and was sold in April 2005. Also in October 2004, we entered into agreements to sell three communities comprising 709 homesites to unaffiliated third parties for a total sales price of approximately $7.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

On September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARC’s board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and would direct ARC’s sales of communities.

On that date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625 dividend on ARC’s Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnership’s Series C preferred partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARC’s board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARC’s common stock and the quarterly distribution on the Partnership’s common partnership units, in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Also on September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives.

In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005). See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006” for a further discussion of this amendment.

In October 2005, we amended our lease receivables facility to increase the size of the faclity from $75 million to $150 million. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by two of our indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP (collectively, “Housing”) and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Lease Receivables Facility Due 2008” for a further discussion of this amendment.

56




Overview of Results

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $19.2 million and $36.0 million, as compared to net losses attributable to such unitholders of $7.6 million and $45.6 million for the same periods in 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $101.3 million, as compared to net losses attributable to such holders of $39.9 million and $47.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, funds from operations available to common partnership unitholders, or FFO, was $0.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as compared to FFO of $9.8 million and ($13.8) million for the same periods in 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, FFO was $(24.8) million as compared to $1.5 million and $(13.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Partnership’s results for the six months ended June 30, 2004 reflect the inclusion of one-time charges of $27.9 million related to ARC’s IPO, acquisition of certain assets from Hometown America LLC and the repayment of certain indebtedness. Our results for the year of 2004 were impacted by charges totaling $31.2 million related to ARC’s IPO, financing activities and the Hometown acquisition. The primary components of the charges include: (i) restricted grants of partnership units of $10.1 million associated with ARC’s IPO; (ii) write-off of loan origination costs and exit fees associated with the termination of indebtedness of $16.7 million; and (iii) costs of $4.4 million related to ARC’s IPO. These costs are not expected to recur in future reporting periods.

The Partnership’s results for the year ended December 31, 2004 also were impacted by several other charges including: (i) $11.2 million of retail losses related to sales of older vacant homes during the fourth quarter at discounts to their carrying value and marketing and promotion costs incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $900,000 of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million of severance costs primarily related to the fourth quarter resignation of ARC’s chief operating officer; (v) $500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities; and (vi) $500,000 related to net uninsured property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third quarter in the Southeast United States.

On a same community basis, revenue in the Partnership’s real estate segment of $35.5 million and $71.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, was comparable to real estate segment revenue of $35.6 million and $70.9 million for the same periods in 2004. Such revenue was up 1.4% to $140.2 million from $138.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.

Same community expenses increased 5.2% and 8.4% to $15.2 million and $30.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to the same periods in 2004. As a result, real estate net segment income from same communities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased 4.3% and 5.2% to $20.3 million and $40.7 million, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2004. Such expenses increased 10.0% to $60.3 million from $54.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. As a result, same communities’ real estate net segment income decreased 4.3% to $79.9 million from $83.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. See FFO and real estate net segment income information included in this section for explanations of FFO and real estate net segment income and for reconciliations of real estate net segment income to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

57




Total portfolio occupancy averaged 82.8% and 82.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to 83.2% and 83.8% for the same periods in 2004. Occupancy was 84.5% and 83.0% as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Average same community occupancy was 83.7% and 83.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to 84.6% and 85.0% for the same periods in 2004. Average total portfolio occupancy was 83.0% and 88.4% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and was 81.5% and 85.7% as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Average same community occupancy was 84.6% and 88.5% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decreases mainly are due to lenders moving repossessed homes out of the communities, the lack of available chattel financing for manufactured home buyers, our decision to position our inventory to facilitate conversion of renters to long-term owner residents by holding for sale homes coming off lease, and, in the case of the total portfolio occupancy, the Hometown acquisition.

Net occupancy increased by 874 residents during the second quarter of 2005, or 1.4%, as compared to an increase of 380 residents in the first quarter, primarily due to an increase in home renters resulting from the company’s lease with option to purchase program initiative. In addition, we removed a net 716 lots from our total homesite count in the sec

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

58




The following table summarizes our occupancy net activity for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

Same
Communities

 

Real Estate Segment

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

   2005   

 

   2004   

 

Homeowner activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner move ins

 

99

 

105

001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Pueblo, Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

176

 

 

 

149

 

 

Homeowner move outs

 

(424

)

(378

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meadowbrook

 

 

*

 

 

 

CO

 

(803

)

 

 

(649

)

 

Home sales

 

702

&lign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

387

 

 

53

 

 

989

 

 

 

100

 

 

Repossession move outs

 

(366

)

(554

)

 

(421

)

 

 

(561

)

 

Net homeowner activity

 

11

 

(774

)

 

(59

)

 

 

(961

)

 

Home renter activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63.0

%

 

 

$

301

 

 

Sunset Country

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

70.0

%

 

 

343

 

 

Oasis

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

333

 

 

Pueblo, ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

751

 

 

 

70.0

 

 

Home renter move ins

 

766

 

1,208

 

 

1,081

 

 

 

1,530

 

 

Home renter lease with option to purchase move ins

 

896

 

%

 

 

$

321

 

 

1,232

 

 

 

 

Southern New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Home renter move outs

 

(1,152

)

(996

)

 

t>

 

 

New Twin Lakes

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

256

 

 

(1,380

)

 

 

(1,356

)

 

Net home renter activity

 

510

 

99.6

%

 

 

$

491

 

 

Huguenot Estates

ttom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

212

 

 

933

 

 

 

174

 

 

Net activity

 

521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

99.4

%

(562

)

 

874

 

 

 

(787

)

 

 

 

335

 

 

Spring Valley Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

98.5

%

 

 

645

 

 

Connelly Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

100.0

Acquisitions and other—homeowners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,430

 

 

Acquisitions and other—home renters

 

 

 

%

 

 

389

 

 

Washingtonville Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

Net activity, including acquisitions and other

 

521

 

(562

)

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

874

 

 

 

2,666

 

 

The following reconciles the above activity to the period end occupied homesites.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net homeowner activity

 

11

 

(774

)

 

(59

)

 

 

2,469

:10.0pt;">100.0

%

 

 

560

 

 

Southern New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

739

 

 

 

99.5

%

 

 

$

 

 

Occupied homeowner sites, beginning of period

 

26,004

 

27,840

 

 

478

 

 

Cedar Rapids, Iowa

45,727

 

 

 

44,431

 

 

Occupied homeowner sites, end of period

 

26,015

 

27,066

 

 

45,668

 

 

 

46,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net home renter activity

 

510

 

212

 

 

933

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marion Village

 

197

 

 

Occupied home renter sites, beginning of period

 

5,235

 

4,233

 

 

6,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

 

5,516

 

 

Occupied home renter sites, end of period

 

437

 

 

 

80.3

%

 

 

$

252

 

 

Cedar Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

234

 

 

 

81.6

%

 

 

250

 

 

Cedar Rapids, IowaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

80.8

%

 

 

$

252

 

 

Philadelphia/Wilmington/Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,745

 

4,445

 

 

7,499

 

 

 

5,713

 

 

Total occupied homesites, end of period

 

31,760

 

31,511

 

 

53,167

 

 

 

 

 

Valley ViewDanboro

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

52,613

 

 

Total occupancy percentage(1)

 

85.1

%

%

 

 

$

362

 

 

Valley ViewHoney Brook

 

 

 

83.9

%

 

84.5

%

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

87.6

%

 

 

295

 

 

Sunnyside

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

83.0

%

 


(1)    As a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30, 2005, total occupancy increased by 1.0% (0.5% same communities).

59




The following table summarizes our occupancy net activity for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

Same
Communities

 

Real Estate Segment

 

 

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

97.2

%

 

 

409

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

    2004    

 

Homeowner activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Martin'S

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner move ins

 

315

 

230

 

466

 

 

320

 

 

Homeowner move outs

 

(823

)

(668

)

(1,526

)

 

(1,142

)

 

Home sales

 

1,278

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

303

 

 

Hideaway

 

67

 

1,763

 

 

115

 

 

Repossession move outs

 

(832

face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

40

 

)

(644

)

(943

)

 

(1,045

)

 

Net homeowner activity

 

(62

)

(1,015

)

(240

 

 

82.5

%

 

 

306

 

 

Shady Grove

 

)

 

(1,752

)

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

107.5

%

 

Home renter activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home renter move ins

 

1,391

 

2,495

pt;">

 

297

 

 

Gregory Courts

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

97.4

%

 

 

1,977

 

 

2,980

 

 

Home renter lease with option to purchase move ins

 

1,469

 

 

2,045

 

 

 

349

 

 

Mountaintop

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home renter move outs

 

(2,049

)

(2,164

)

(2,528

)

 

(2,408

)

 

Net home renter activity

 

 

PA

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

94.9

%

811

 

331

 

1,494

 

 

572

 

 

Net activity

 

749

 

(684

)

1,254

 

 

(1,180

)

 

 

 

315

 

 

Acquisitions and other—homeowners

 

 

 

 

 

20,781

 

 

Acquisitions and other—home renters

 

 

 

 

 

908

 

 

Net activity, including acquisitions and other

 Valley ViewMorgantown

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

279

 

 

Scenic View

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

85.0

%

 

 

362

 

 

Nichols

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

348

 

 

Philadelphia/Wilmington/
Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

717

 

 

 

95.4

%

 

 

$

337

 

 

Manhattan, Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

749

 

(684

)

1,254

 

 

20,509

 

 

The following reconciles the above activity to the period end occupied homesites.

 

 

 

 

 

Net homeowner activity

 

(62

)

(1,015

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colonial Gardens

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

(240

)

 

19,029

 

 

Occupied homeowner sites, beginning of period

 

26,077

 

28,081

 

45,908

 

 

27,871

 

 

Occupied homeowner sites, end of period

 

26,015

 

27,066

 

45,668

 

 

342

 

 

 

99.7

46,900

 

 

Net home renter activity

 

811

 

331

 

1,494

 

 

1,480

 

 

Occupied home renter sites, beginning of period

 

4,934

 

4,114

 

6,005

 

 

4,233

 

 

Occupied home renter sites, end of period

 

5,745

 

4,445

 

7,499

 

 

5,713

 

 

Total occupied homesites, end of period

 

31,760

 

31,511

 

53,167

 

 

52,613

 

 

Total occupancy percentage(1)

 

85.1

%

83.9

%

84.5

%

 

83.0

%

 


(1)    As a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30, 2005, total occupancy increased by 1.0% (0.5% same communities).

On June 30, 2005, our total manufactured homes owned was 8,718 homes. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we sold 989 and 1,763 manufactured homes, respectively, from our home inventory, compared with 100 and 115 for the same periods in 2004.

60




The following table summarizes our occupancy net activity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

%

 

 

$

276

 

 

Riverchase

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

291

 

 

Blue Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

97.3

%

 

 

321

 

 

Manhattan, KansasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

648

 

 

 

98.6

%

 

 

$

2004 Same

 

2003 Same

 

 

 

Company Total

 

Communities

 

Communities

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

289

 

 

 

101




 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

2002

 

2004

 

2003

 

2003

 

2002

 

Homeowner activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner move ins

 

543

 

832

 

1,408

 

369

 

805

 

309

 

551

 

Homeowner move outs

 

(2,843

)

(1,330

)

(2,053

)

(1,473

)

(1,327

)

(519

)

(785

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

 

Birmingham, Alabama

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Green Park South

 

 

*

e="font-size:9.0pt;">)

Home sales

 

1,341

 

 

 

964

 

 

 

 

Repossession move outs

 

(2,067

)

(1,868

)

 

 

 

AL

 

(1,401

)

(1,423

)

(1,850

)

(594

)

(407

)

Net homeowner activity

 

(3,026

)

(2,366

)

(2,046

)

(1,563

)

(2,372

)

(804

)

(641

)

Home renter activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

97.3

%

 

 

$

269

 

 

 

100 Oaks

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

70.0

%

 

 

267

 

 

 

Birmingham, AlabamaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

635

 

 

 

87.7

%

 

 

$

268

 

 

 

Tyler, Texas

 

 

 

Home renter move ins

 

5,649

 

4,693

 

4,028

 

4,491

 

4,572

 

1,493

 

1,625

 

Home renter lease to own move ins

 

386

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

 

Home renter move outs

 

(5,171

)

(3,614

)

(1,761

)

(4,288

)

(3,591

)

(1,187

)

(748

)

Net home renter activity

 

864

 

1,079

 

2,267

 

465

 

981

&nng:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shiloh Pines

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

314

 

 

 

73.9

%

 

 

$

335

 

 

 

Eagle Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

279

 

 

 

306

 

877

 

Net activity

 

(2,162

)

(1,287

)

221

 

(1,098

)

(1,391

)

(498

)

236

 

Acquisitions Homeowner

 

21,063

 

470

 

793

 

 

 

 

1

 

Acquisitions Home renter

 

908

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net activity, including acquisitions

 

19,809

 

Rose Country Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

74.3

%

 

 

363

 

 

 

Tyler, TexasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

596

 

 

 

78.4

%

 

 

$

321

 

 

 

Stillwater, Oklahoma

 

 

(817

)

1,014

 

(1,098

)

(1,391

)

(498

)

237

 

The following reconciles the above activity to the period end occupied homesites.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net homeowner activity

 

18,037

 

(1,896

)

(1,253

)

(1,563

)

(2,372

)

(804

)

(640

)

Occupied homeowner sites, beginning of period

 

27,871

 

29,767

 

31,020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crestview

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

237

 

 

 

60.3

%

 

 

$

276

 

 

Eastern Villa

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

125

 

 

27,270

 

29,642

 

13,396

 

14,036

 

Occupied homeowner sites, end of period

 

 

 

86.4

%

 

 

257

 

 

Countryside

45,908

 

27,871

 

29,767

 

25,707

 

27,270

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

69.5

%

 

 

300

 

 

Oakridge / Stonegate

 

 

*

12,592

 

13,396

 

Net home renter activity

 

1,772

 

1,079

 

2,267

 

465

 

981

 

306

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

877

 

Occupied home renter sites, beginning of period 

 

4,233

 

3,154

 

887

 

4,459

 

3,478

 

1,197

 

320

 

Occupied home renter sites, end of period

 

6,005

 

4,233

 

3,154

 

4,924

 

4,459

 

1,503

 

1,197

 

Total occupied homesites, end of period

 

51,913

 

32,104

 

32,921

 

30,631

 

31,729

 

14,095

 

14,593

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, we purchased 4,024 homes including homes purchased in our Hometown and other acquisitions. On December 31, 2004, our total home inventory was 8,286 homes, including 920 homes held for sale.

In the fourth quarter of 2004, we increased sales of older homes primarily through our in-community sales operations in which we focused on affordable price points, increased marketing and training of our employees. In the three months and year ended December 31, 2004, we sold 946 and 1,387 manufactured homes from our home inventory, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, which require us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We have provided a summary of our significant accounting policies in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. We have summarized below those accounting policies that require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments and that have the most significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Our management evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis. These estimates are based on information currently available to management and on various other assumptions management believes are reasonable.

61




Acquisition of Real Estate and Intangible Assets.   When we acquire real estate properties, we all:right;"> 

75.0

%

 

 

303

 

 

Stillwater, OklahomaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

588

 

 

 

70.4

%

 

 

$

282

 

 

Shreveport/Bossier City, Louisiana

 

 

We determine the fair value of the tangible community assets we acquire (other than rental homes discussed below), including land, land improvements and buildings, by valuing the property as if it were vacant. We then allocate the “as-if-vacant” value to land, land improvements and buildings based on our determination of the relative fair values of these assets. We determine the as-if-vacant fair value of the real estate by considering the expected lease-up period for individual communities (based generally on vacancies in the surrounding market and lease-up history for the communities acquired), the expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates), and expected move-in bonuses to tenants.

We value our acquired intangible assets in accordance with purchase accounting for acquisitions by allocating value to above and below market leases, in-place leases and customer relationships. We measure the aggregate value of in-place leases and customer relationships by the excess of the purchase price paid for a property (after adjusting the in-place leases to market) over the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, as set forth above.

We also value the occupied rental homes we acquire as if they were vacant. We determine the as-if-vacant fair value of the manufactured homes by considering the expected lease-up period for the home (based on lease-up history for rental homes in that community) and the expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates). We measure the aggregate value of the intangible assets related to rental homes, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, by the purchase price paid for the rental homes (after adjusting in-place leases to market) less the estimated value of the property as-if-vacant.

Useful Lives of Assets and Amortization Methods.   We determine the useful lives of our real estate assets (generally 30 years) and rental homes (generally three years) based on historical and industry experience with the lives of those particular assets and experience with the timing of significant repairs and replacement of those assets. We have estimated the useful life of acquired community customer relationships as five years based on our experience with the period of time a resident lives in our community and industry experience generally with resident turnover. We have established the life of the rental home customer relationships as the term of the initial related lease. The acquired community customer relationships and rental home customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis since we cannot reliably determine the pattern of economic benefit associated with the individual contracts comprising the intangible assets. We do not have sufficient historical or industry data to reliably estimate the tenure of an individual customer or to pool our customer contracts on a homogeneous basis as a basis to amortize the intangible assets in a manner other than straight line. We will reassess this determination as we gain additional experience with lease renewals. The estimates of useful lives and the amortization method impact the amount of depreciation and amortization expense we report, and therefore the amount of net income or loss we report.

Impairment of Real Estate Assets.   We recognize an impairment loss on a real estate asset (including mobile homes) if the asset’s undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than its depreciated cost whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the real estate asset may not be recoverable. We compute a real estate asset’s undiscounted expected future cash flow using certain estimates and assumptions. We calculate the impairment loss as the difference between the asset’s fair market value and its carrying value.

62




Impairment of Intangible Assets.   We combine our finite-lived intangible assets, which consist primarily of lease and customer intangibles with a finite life, with the related tangible assets (primarily consisting of real estate assets) at the lowest level for which cash flows are readily identifiable. Whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the asset group is tested for recoverability. If the asset group is not recoverable from the undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset group, an impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and the estimated fair value of the asset group. Impairment losses were recorded by the Partnershippt 0pt 0pt;width:6.5pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pinecrest Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

LA

 

 

 

427

 

 

 

75.4

%

 

 

$

198

 

 

Stonegate

 

 

*

 

 

 

LA

 

 

 

157

 

 

97.5

%

 


and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of the communities classified as held for sale continues to be accrued. The results of operations and cash flows of the assets sold and those classified as held for sale are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognize any estimated losses on the sales of communities in the period in which the properties are discontinued and recognize any resulting gains on the sales of communities when realized. A description of the facts and circumstances leading to the expected disposal, the expected manner and timing of that disposal, and, if not separately presented on the face of the balance sheet, the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal group is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. We disclose in the notes to our financial statements (and on the face of the income statement) the gain or loss recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and, if applicable, the amounts of revenue and pretax profit or loss reported in discontinued operations. We disclose, if applicable, in the notes to our financial statements the segment under which the long-lived asset is reported.

64




Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Same Periods in 2004

The following tables present certain information relative to our real estate segment as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. “Same Communities” reflects information for all communities owned by us at both January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005. “Same Communities” does not include the Hometown acquisition, the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition or the six other communities that we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2004 (in thousands, except home, occupancy, community, and per unit information):

 

 

Same

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communities(4)

 

Real Estate Segment(4)

 

 

 

       2005       

 

       2004       

 

       2005        

 

      &nth="22" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:16.3pt;">

 

240

 

 

Shreveport/Bossier City, LouisianaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

584

 

 

 

81.3

%

 

 

$

212

 

 

Las Cruces, New Mexico

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Encantada

 

 

*

bsp;2004       

 

Three Months Ended June 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average total homesites

 

 

37,485

 

 

 

37,554

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

63,493

 

 

 

60,539

 

 

Average total rental homes

 

 

6,388

 

 

 

6,344

 

 

 

8,422

 

 

 

7,609

 

 

Average occupied homesites—homeowners

 

 

26,026

 

 

 

27,446

 

 

 

45,722

 

 

 

45,159

 

 

Average occupied homesites—rental homes

 

 

5,352

 

 

 

4,335

 

 

 

6,841

 

 

 

5,227

 

 

Average total occupied homesites

 

 

31,378

 

 

 

 

 

354

 

 

 

83.9

%

 

 

$

331

 

 

Valley Verde

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

85.1

%

 

 

314

 

 

Las Cruces, New MexicoTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

556

 

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

31,781

 

 

 

52,563

 

 

 

50,386

 

 

Average occupancy—rental homes

 

 

83.8

%

 

 

68.3

%

 

 

81.2

%

 

 

68.7

%

 

Average occupancy—total(5)

 

 

83.7

%

 

 

84.6

%

 

 

82.8

%

 

 

83.2

%

 

Real estate revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

325

 

 

Gainesville, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oak Park Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

344

 

 

 

91.6

%

 

 

$

251

 

 

Whitney

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

248

 

 

Gainesville, FloridaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner rental income

 

 

$

22,505

 

 

 

$

22,990

 

 

 

$

39,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

550

 

 

 

93.6

%

 

 

$

250

 

 

Huntsville, Alabama

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

37,575

 

 

Home renter rental income

 

 

9,245

 

 

 

9,054

 

 

 

Merrimac Manor

 

 

*

 

 

 

t 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">

 

 

 

11,701

 

 

 

9,987

 

 

Other

AL

 

 

 

172

 

 

 

26.7

%

 

 

$

383

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

327

 

 

 

322

 

 

Rental income

 

 

31,908

 

 

 

32,172

 

 

 

51,366

 

 

 

47,884

 

 

Utility and other income

 

 

3,560

 

 

 

3,445

 

Green Cove

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

164

 

 

 

82.9

%

 

 

177

 

 

Cedar Creek

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

60.6

%

 

 

229

 

 

 

 

 

5,421

 

 

 

5,114

 

 

Total real estate revenue

 

 

35,468

 

 

 

35,617

 

 

 

56,787

 

 

 

52,998

 

 

Real estate expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations expenses

 

 

Rambling Oaks

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

85.0

%

 

 

222

 

 

Huntsville, AlabamaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

60.2

%

 

 

$

225

 

 

12,169

 

 

 

11,574

 

 

 

20,042

 

 

 

17,626

 

 

Real estate taxes

 

 

3,033

 

 

 

2,873

 

 

 

4,407

 

 

 

4,080

 

 

Total real estate expenses

 

 

15,202

 

 

 

14,447

 

 

 

24,449

 

 

 

21,706

 

 

Real estate net segment income

 

 

$

20,266

 

 

 

$

21,170

 

 

 

 

102




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Per Occupied 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Scranton/Wilkes/Barre—Hazleton, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.0pt;">

$

32,338

 

 

 

$

31,292

 

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite(1)

 

 

$

377

 

 

 

$

374

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

360

 

 

 

$

351

 

 

Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite(2)

 

 

$

288

 

 

 

$

279

 

 

 

$

287

 

 

 

$

277

 

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite(3)

 

 

$

315

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maple Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

313

 

 

 

87.9

%

 

 

$

229

 

 

Moosic Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

78.9

%

 

 

238

 

 

316

 

 

 

$

298

 

 

 

$

292

 

 


(1)    Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite is defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(2)    Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite is defined as homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(3)    Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite is defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(4)    Real estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations through June 30, 2005.

(5)    As a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30, 2005, average occupancy increased by 0.3% (0.1% same communities).

65




 

valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.35pt;">

 

g:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:14.25pt;">

 

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

 

 

 

 

Same

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

91.1

%

 

 

238

 

 

Scranton/Wilkes/Barre/
Hazleton, Pennsylvania
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communities(4)

 

Real Estate Segment(4)

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

      2005      

 

     2004     

 

Six Months Ended June 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average total homesites

 

37,512

 

37,554

 

 

63,563

 

 

 

53,838

 

 

 

544

 

 

 

85.8

%

 

 

$

233

 

 

Pocatello, Idaho

 

 

 

 

 

Average total rental homes

 

6,422

 

6,059

 

 

8,369

 

 

 

6,918

 

 

Average occupied homesites—homeowt:11.0pt;margin:6.0pt 0pt .0001pt 20.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-20.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,065

 

27,697

 

 

45,838

 

 

 

40,296

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average occupied homesites—rental homes

 

5,189

 

4,241

 

 

6,501

 

 

 

4,824

 

 

 

Philbin Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

ID

 

 

 

111

Average total occupied homesites

 

31,254

 

31,938

 

 

52,339

 

 

 

 

79.3

%

 

 

$

290

 

 

45,120

 

 

Average occupancy—rental homes

 

80.8

%

70.0

%

 

77.7

 

Cowboy

 

 

*

 

 

 

ID

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

79.3

%

 

 

371

 

 

Belaire

 

%

 

 

69.7

%

 

Average occupancy—total(5)

 

83.3

%

85.0

%

 

82.3

%

 

 

83.8

%

 

Real estate revenue

 

*

 

 

 

ID

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

81.0

%

 

 

261

 

 

Pocatello, IdahoTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

453

 

 

 

79.9

%

 

 

$

310

 

 

Gillette, Wyoming 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner rental income

 

$

45,043

 

$

46,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eastview

 

 

$

78,666

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

66,999

 

 

Home renter rental income

 

18,501

 

17,591

 

 

22,932

 

 

 

18,727

 

 

Other

 

272

 

237

 

 

626

 

 

 

484

 

 

Rental income

 

63,816

 

64,232

 

 

102,224

 

 

 

86,210

 

 

Utility and other income

 

7,201

 

 

$

372

 

 

Westview

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

83.1

%

 

 

290

6,697

 

 

10,914

 

 

 

8,950

 

 

Total real estate revenue

 

71,017

 

70,929

 

 

113,138

 

 

 

 

Highview

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

95,160

 

 

Real estate expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

3" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.0pt;">

 

 

94

 

 

 

92.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations expenses

 

24,286

 

22,223

283

 

 

Park Plaza

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,363

 

 

WY

 

 

 

 

30,234

 

 

Real estate taxes

 

6,029

 

5,749

 

 

8,698

 

 

 

7,390

 

 

Total real estate expenses

 

30,315

 

27,972

 

 

49,061

 

 

 

37,624

 

 

Real estate net segment income

 

$

40,702

 

$

42,957

 

 

$

64,077

 

 

 

$

57,536

 

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total occupied homesite(1)

78

 

 

 

93.6

%

 

 

301

 

 

Gillette, WyomingTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

85.9

%

 

 

 

$

379

 

$

$

322

 

 

Casper, Wyoming

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

370

 

 

$

360

 

 

 

$

352

 

 

Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite(2)

 

$

288

 

$

279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hidden Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

$

286

 

 

 

$

277

 

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite(3)

 

$

316

 

$

315

 

 

$

297

 

 

 

$

295

 

$

327

 

 

Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

97.3

%

 

 

272

 

 

Green Valley Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

As of June 30:

 

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

375

 

 

Plainview

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total communities

 

199

 

199

 

 

315

 

 

 

313

 

 

Total homesites

 

37,301

 

37,554

 

 

62,942

 

 

 

63,400

 

 

Occupied homesites

 

31,760

 

31,511

 

 

53,167

 

 

 

Terrace II

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

52,613

 

 

Total rental homes owned

 

 

70

 

 

 

95.7

%

 

 

6,486

 

6,616

 

 

8,718

 

 

 

8,023

 

 

Occupied rental homes

 

5,745

 

4,445

 

 

7,499

 

 

 

357

 

 

Casper, WyomingTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

96.9

%

 

 

$

331

 

 

Grand Forks, North Dakota

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Columbia Heights

5,713

 

 


(1)    Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite is defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(2)    Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite is defined as homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(3)    Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite is defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(4)    Real estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations through June 30, 2005.

(5)    As a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30, 2005, average occupancy increased by 0.3% (0.1% same communities).

66




 

Corporate and other

pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.1pt;">

 

"border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;border-left:none;border-right:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .2pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.0pt;">

(7,561

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

Same

 

 

 

 

 

Communities(1)

 

As Reported

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Net segment income:

 

ND

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

94.7

%

 

 

$

322

< valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .2pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

 

President's Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

ND

$

20,266

 

$

21,170

 

$

32,338

 

$

31,292

 

Retail home sales

 

 

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

88.3

%

 

 

281

 

 

Grand Forks, North DakotaTotal/Weighted Aver.0pt;">

 

(754

)

(1,019

)

Finance and insurance

 

(561

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(130

)

(561

)

(130

 

465

 

 

)

 

92.5

%

 

 

$

308

 

 

Cheyenne, Wyoming

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(130

)

(44

)

(130

)

(44

)

 

 

19,575

 

20,996

 

30,893

 

30,099

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management

 

1,576

Big Country

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

248

 

 

 

82.3

%

 

 

$

(2)

1,011

 

2,494

 

1,600

 

General and administrative

 

6,245

242

 

 

Cimmaron Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

92.1

%

(3)

4,275

 

6,259

 

4,304

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

14,166

 

11,902

 

22,224

 

17,242

 

Interest expense

 

10,413

 

9,736

 

16,544

 

12,729

 

Total other expenses

 

32,400

 

26,924

 

47,521

 

35,875

 

Interest income

 

(277

)

(403

)(5)

(277

)

(450

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(12,548

)

(5,525

)

(16,351

)

(5,326

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

72

 

343

 

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

52

 

 

Net loss

 

(12,548

)

(5,525

)

(16,227

 

302

 

 

Englewood Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

)

(4,983

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

 

 

(2,971

)

(2,578

)

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders

 

 

61

 

 

 

91.8

%

 

 

292

$

(12,548

)

$

(5,525

)

$

(19,198

)

$

 

 

Cheyenne, WyomingTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

461

 

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

$

269

 

 

)


(1)    Same communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2004 and the communities sold or held for sale before June 30, 2005.

(2)    Expense was prorated based on 199 same communities as compared to 315 actual communities in 2005 and 313 actual communities in 2004.

(3)    Excludes amortization of restricted units issued in connection with ARC’s IPO.

(4)    Excludes restricted unit expenses of $10.1 million recognized in connection with ARC’s IPO.

(5)    Excludes interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARC’s IPO, the financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition.

 

67




 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

Same

 

 

 

 

 

Communities(1)

 

 

103




 

pt;">)

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

As Reported

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

Net segment income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

40,702

 

$

42,957

 

$

64,077

 

$

57,536

 

Retail home sales

 

 

 

(3,620

)

(1,192

)

Finance and insurance

 

(802

)

(237

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

)

(802

)

(237

)

Corporate and other

 

(250

)

(119

)

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

(250

)

(119

)

 

 

39,650

 

42,601

 

59,ne-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Per Month

 

Salina, Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,988

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

155

 

 

 

58.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management

 

3,006

(2)

2,075

 

4,759

 

3,054

 

General and administrative

 

11,590

(3)

8,950

 

11,618

 

19,099

 

Initial ARC public offering related costs

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

 

 

13,427

 

 

$

290

 

 

Prairie Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,326

 

24,829

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

Interest expense

 

20,263

 

22,179

 

31,817

 

27,209

 

Total other expenses

 

KS

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

80.8

%

 

 

237

 

 

West Cloud Commons

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

65.1

%

 

 

278

 

 

Salina, KansasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

391

 

 

 

 

60,185

 

58,033

 

90,449

 

99,358

 

Interest income

 

(660

)

(698

)(5)

(660

)

(792

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(19,875

)

(14,374

)

(30,384

)

(42,578

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

1,000

 

795

 

Loss on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

(678

)

67.8

%

 

 

$

266

 

 

Fayetteville/Springdale, Arkansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northder:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .1pt 0pt 0pt;width:37.85pt;">

 

Net loss

 

(19,875

)

(14,374

)

(30,062

)

(41,783

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

 

 

(5,942

)

(3,810

)

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders 

 

$

(19,875

)

$

(14,374

)

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

89.0

%

 

 

$

229

 

 


(1)    Same communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2004 and the communities sold or held for sale before June 30, 2005.

(2)    Expense was prorated based on 199 same communities as compared to 315 actual communities in 2005 and 313 actual communities in 2004.

Western Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

73.5

(3)    Excludes amortization of restricted units issued in connection with ARC’s IPO.

(4)    Excludes restricted unit expenses of $10.1 million recognized in connection with ARC’s IPO.

(5)    Excludes interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARC’s IPO, the financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004

Overview.   Our results for the three months ended June 30, 2005 include the operations of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other 2004 acquisitions for a full quarter, whereas our results for the three months ended June 30, 2004 include the operations of the Hometown communities but not the D.A.M. acquisition.

Revenue.   Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $75.6 million, as compared to $55.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $20.5 million, or 37%. Rental income increased by $3.5 million, primarily due to $3.8 million attributable to 2004 community acquisitions partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease from same communities. The decrease in same communities revenues primarily is due to $1.2 million from lower occupancy partially offset by $0.7 million from

68




increased rental rates and $0.2 million from higher home renter rental income. Revenue from the sale of manufactured homes increased by $16.2 million as we sold 889 more homes in the second quarter of 2005 than in the second quarter of 2004, and a greater percentage of these sales were new homes sold at higher average selling prices. Utility and other income increased by $0.7 million due to our 2004 community acquisitions and improved recovery of utilities from residents.

%

 

 

226

 

 

Oak Glen

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

85.1

%

 

 

225

 

 

Fayetteville/Springdale, ArkansasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property Operations Expense.   For the three months ended June 30, 2005, total property operations expense was $20.0 million, as compared to $17.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $2.4 million, or 14%. The increase primarily is due to additional expense of $1.8 million from 2004 community acquisitions and an increase of $0.6 million in expenses in same communities. The increase in property operations expense from same communities primarily is due to an increase in salaries and benefits of $1.0 million, or 29%, partially offset by a decrease in repairs and maintenance expense of $0.2 million and a decrease in utilities expense of $0.1 million.

Real Estate Taxes Expense.   Real estate taxes expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $4.4 million, as compared to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $0.3 million or 8%. The increase is due primarily to our 2004 community acquisitions.

Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold.   The cost of manufactured homes sold was $16.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $14.4 million. The increase primarily was due to the increase in sales of manufactured homes by 889 units, as compared to the same period in 2004, as discussed above.

Retail Home Sales, Finance and Insurance.   For the three months ended June 30, 2005, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was $4.1 million as compared to $1.5 million for three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $2.6 million. This increase is due to the increase in manufactured homes sold and the costs associated with creating the community based sales and finance organization. The increase is partially offset by the elimination of the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores.

Property Management Expense.   Property management expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $2.5 million, as compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $0.9 million, or 56%. The increase primarily is due to the expansion in 2004 from seven to 12 district offices in 2004 and the related staffing costs for the new districts in connection with the 2004 community acquisitions and the resultant increase in our community portfolio.

General and Administrative Expense.   General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $6.-weight:bold;"> 

 

 

381

 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.   Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $22.2 million, as compared to $17.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $5.0 million, or 29%. The increase primarily is due to increased depreciation on communities acquired in our 2004 acquisitions.

Interest Expense.   Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $16.5 million, as compared to $12.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $3.8 million, or 30%. The increase is due to a higher outstanding average debt balance of approximately $178 million, as well as higher effective weighted average interest rates on our variable rate debt.

Net Loss Attributable to Partners.   As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to our partners was $19.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $7.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $11.6 million or 154%.

69




 

 

83.5

%

 

 

$

228

 

 

Naples, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004

Overview.   Our results for the six months ended June 30, 2005 include the operations of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other 2004 acquisitions for a full six-month period, whereas our results for the six months ended June 30, 2004 include the operations of the Hometown communities from the date of acquisition, February 18, 2004, through June 30, 2004, but not the D.A.M. acquisition.

Revenue.   Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $140.2 million, as compared to $98.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $42.1 million, or 43%. Rental income increased by $16.0 million, primarily due to $16.4 million from 2004 acquisitions partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease from same communities. The decrease in same communities revenues primarily is due to $2.7 million from lower occupancy partially offset by $1.4 million from increased rental rates and $0.9 million from higher home renter rental income. Revenue from the sale of manufactured homes increased by $23.5 million as we sold 1,648 more homes than in the first six months of 2004, and a greater percentage of these sales were new homes sold at higher average selling prices. Utility and other income increased by $2.4 million due to our 2004 acquisitions and improved recovery of utilities from residents.

Property Operations Expense.   For the six months ended June 30, 2005, total property operations expense was $40.4 million, as compared to $30.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $10.2 million, or 34%. The increase primarily is due to additional expense of $8.1 million from 2004 community acquisitions and an increase of $2.1 million in expenses in same communities. The increase in property operations expense from same communities primarily is due to an increase in salaries and benefits of $1.8 million, or 26%, an increase in utilities expense of $0.2 million, or 100%, and an increase in insurance expense of $0.1 million, or 23.6%.

Real Estate Taxes Expense.   Real estate taxes expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $8.7 million, as compared to $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $1.3 million or 18%. The increase is due primarily to our 2004 acquisitions.

 

 

 

 

Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold.   The cost of manufactured homes sold was $24.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $22.0 million.ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.9pt;">

 

Retail Home Sales, Finance and Insurance.   For the six months ended June 30, 2005, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was $7.3 million, as compared to $2.1 million for six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $5.2 million. This increase is due to the increase in manufactured homes sold and the costs associated with creating the community based sales and finance organization. The increase is partially offset by the elimination of the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores.

Property Management Expense.   Property management expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $4.8 million, as compared to $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $1.7 million, or 56%. The increase primarily is due to the expansion in 2004 from seven to 12 district offices in 2004 and the related staffing costs for the new districts in connection with the 2004 acquisitions and the resultant increase in our community portfolio.

General and Administrative Expense.   General and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $11.6 million, as compared to $19.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $7.5 million, or 39%. The decrease primarily was due to a non-recurring $10.1 million expense incurred in the 2004 first quarter in conjunction with ARC’s IPO in whichavoid;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

we granted 530,000 restricted units that vested immediately. The decrease partially was offset by increased salaries and benefits resulting from our acquisition growth, as well as consulting costs related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.

 

Southwind Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

364

 

 

 

87.6

%

 

 

$

399

 

 

Dubuque, Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrace Heights

 

 

*

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

317

70




IPO Related Costs.   During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we incurred $4.4 million in organization and other costs directly related to ARC’s IPO. These costs included legal fees, third party due diligence costs, travel expenses, transfer taxes, filing fees and other miscellaneous items.

Early Termination of Debt.   During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we wrote off $7.1 million of loan origination costs and incurred an expense of $6.3 million related to exit fees applicable to the repayment of debt in the financing transaction.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.   Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $42.3 million, as compared to $32.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $10.1 million, or 31%. The increase primarily is due to increased depreciation on communities acquired in our 2004 acquisitions.

Interest Expense.   Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $31.8 million, as compared to $27.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $4.6 million, or 17%. The increase is due to a higher outstanding average debt balance of approximately $161.0 million, as well as higher effective weighted average interest rates on our variable rate debt.

Preferred Unit Distributions.   As of June 30, 2005, the ARC board of directors had declared quarterly distributions of $0.5156 on each of the 5,000,000 outstanding Series A preferred partnership units and $0.39 on each of the combined 1,005,688 outstanding Series B and C preferred partnership units, paid April 29, 2005, and July 29, 2005, for a combined $5.9 million of preferred unit distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2005. For the second quarter of 2004 the distribution declared and paid also was $0.5156 per unit on the Series A preferred partnership units, or $2.6 million, however, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the distribution declared was $0.4182 per unit, or $1.2 million prorated from funding of the IPO on February 18, 2004. No Series B and C preferred unit distributions were declared in the six months ended June 30, 2004. Preferred unit distributions totaled $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Net Loss Attributable to Partners.   As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to our partners was $36.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $45.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $9.6 million or 21%. Our net loss attributable to our partners for the six months ended June 30, 2004 includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARC’s IPO, the related financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition including: (1) $10.1 million from restricted unit grants; (2) $4.4 million from IPO related organization and other costs; and (3) $13.4 million from the early termination of debt.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2003

Overview.   Our results from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, include the continuing operations of 76 communities acquired from Hometown, comprising 22,970 homesites, from the date of acquisition, February 18, 2004, through December 31, 2004 and, accordingly, are not included in our operations for the first year of 2003. Our results for the year ended December 31, 2004 also include the operations of 36 communities acquired from D.A.M. comprising 3,573 homesites from the date of acquisition, June 30, 2004, through December 31, 2004 and six other acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004, that accordingly, are not included in our operations for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Revenue. 

 

 

77.9

%

   Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $222.7 million, as compared to $163.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $59.5 million, or 36%. This increase is due to an increase of $61.4 million in rental income offset by a decrease of $1.9 million in other revenue consisting of sales of manufactured homes, utility and other income and net consumer finance interest income.

71




The rental income increase of $61.4 million is due to $53.0 million from the Hometown acquisition, $6.5 million from other community acquisitions and $1.9 million from same communities. The increase in same communities revenues is due to $4.6 million from increased rental rates and $4.9 million from home renter rental income partially offset by $7.6 million attributable to lower occupancy.

The decrease in other income of $1.9 million is due to a $6.5 million decrease in sales of manufactured homes partially offset by an increase of $4.6 million in utility and other income and net consumer finance interest income. Sales of manufactured homes were 1,387 units in 2004 and 490 units in 2003. We closed 19 retail dealerships in 2003. Per unit sales prices were substantially lower during the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the same period in 2003, primarily because 2004 sales were of older homes.

Property Operations Expense.   For the year ended December 31, 2004, total property operations expenses were $75.2 million, as compared to $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $30.9 million, or 70%. The increase is due primarily to increases in expenses of $22.1 million from the Hometown acquisition, $4.1 million from D.A.M. and other community acquisitions and $3.7 million from same communities. The increase from same communities is due primarily to higher salaries and benefits of $2.2 million and higher repairs and maintenance of $2.1 million.

Real Estate Taxes Expense.   Real estate taxes expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $16.6 million, as compared to $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $6.4 million or 63%. The increase is due primarily to the Hometown acquisition, other community acquisitions and an increase in same communities in the number of rental homes we own.

Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold.   The cost of manufactured homes sold was $18.3&nbce="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

$

285

 

 

Waterloo, Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sp;million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $0.1 million. The decrease was a result of the mix of used versus new homes sold during the period. The gross margin in manufactured homes sold decreased to a loss of 20% for the year ended December 31, 2004 from a gross profit of 15% for the year ended December 31, 2003, as per unit sales prices were substantially lower during the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily because 2004 sales were of older homes.

Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expense.   For the year ended December 31, 2004, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was $8.2 million, as compared to $7.4 million for year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $0.8 million, or 11%. This increase is due to costs of in-community sales activities begun in the second half of 2004 partially offset by the elimination of the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores.

Property Management Expense.   Property management expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $7.1 million, as compared to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $1.6 million, or 29%. The increase is due primarily to the expansion from seven to 12 district offices and the related staffing costs for the new districts in connection with the Hometown and D.A.M. acquisitions and the resultant increase in our community portfolio.

General and Administrative Expense.   General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $29.4 million, as compared to $16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $12.5 million, or 74%. The increase primarily was due to a one-time charge to salaries and 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Knoll

 

 

 

72




IPO Related Costs.   During the year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred $4.4 million in organization and other costs directly related to ARC’s IPO. These costs included legal fees, third party due diligence costs, travel expenses, transfer taxes, filing fees and other miscellaneous items.

Early Termination of Debt.   During the year ended December 31, 2004, we wrote off $10.4 million of loan origination costs and incurred an expense of $6.3 million related to exit fees applicable to the repayment of debt in the financing transaction.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.   Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $72.0 million, as compared to $46.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $25.5 million, or 55%. The increase is due to increased depreciation of communities acquired in the Hometown acquisition, other community acquisitions, manufactured home acquisitions and an increase in amortization of loan origination costs resulting from recognition of costs to be paid for the consumer finance facility resulting from the lease recize="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

290

 

 

 

95.5

%

 

 

$

214

 

 

El Paso, Texas

Real Estate and Retail Home Asset Impairment.   During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recognized $3.6 million of impairment charges, as compared to $1.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. The charge in 2004 related to $3.0 million of impairment charges from older vacant homes that we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce repair and maintenance costs in the rental home portfolio and approximately $500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities whose estimated fair value was less than their carrying values. The charge in 2003 related to our decision in 2003 to change from selling homes in stand-alone retail dealerships to in-community sales operations.

Goodwill Impairment.   During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recognized $0.9 million of goodwill impairment charges related to our insurance business, reducing goodwill in our insurance business to zero.

Interest Expense.   Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $56.9 million, as compared to $57.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $500,000. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in outstanding debt related to the Hometown acquisition and the related refinancing activities offset by lower interest rates and interest we capitalized related to the development of long-lived assets.

Interest Income.   Interest earned on notes receivable, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and loan reserves was $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Discontinued Operations.   In the third quarter, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell a total of 12 communities and two parcels of land. In addition, we separately entered into a sales agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities. In the fourth quarter we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell an additional 15 communities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we sold the Sunrise Mesa community. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we have reflected $1.9 million of income from the operation of these assets and $8.5 million of loss on the sale of these assets as discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we have reflected $31,000 of income from the operation of these assets and $3.3 million of gain on the sale of these assets as discontinued operations.

Preferred Unit Dividend.   We have recorded a preferred unit dividend at the annual rate of 8.25% or $2.0625 per share on the 5.0 million units of Series A preferred partnership units issued in connection with the IPO on February 18, 2004.

Net Loss Attributable to Common Partnership Unitholders.   As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $101.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to $39.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $61.4 million. Our net

73




loss attributable to common partnership unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes $31.2 million of costs related to ARC’s IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition including (a) $10.1 million from restricted unit grants, (b) $4.4 million from IPO related organization and other costs and (c) $16.7 million from the early termination of debt.

The following tables present certain information relative to our real estate segment as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 on a historical and “Same Communities” basis. “Same Communities” reflects information for all communities owned by us at both January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004. “Same Communities” does not include the Hometown acquisition, the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition, the nine other communities we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2003 or the communities sold during 2003 and 2004 or held for sale as of December 31, 2004 (in thousands, except home, occupancy, community and per unit information).

k-after:avoid;"> 

tom" style="border:none;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.0pt;">

 

valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

 

Same Communities(4)

 

Real Estate Segment(4)

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mission Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

286

 

 

 

67.8

%

 

 

$

298

 

 

Elmira, New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

le="line-height:11.7pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

Average total homesites

 

36,925

 

36,903

 

58,349

 

37,316

 

Average total rental homes

 

6,299

 

4,972

 

7,560

 

5,183

 

Average occupied homesites—homeowners

 

26,699

 

28,923

 

43,318

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collingwood MHP

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

79.2

%

 

 

$

218

 

 

Crestview

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

97

29,281

 

Average occupied homesites—rental homes

 

4,545

 

3,744

 

5,133

 

3,695

 

Average total occupied homesites

 

31,244

 

32,667

 

48,451

 

32,976

 

Average occupancy—rental homes

  

 

 

55.7

%

72.2

%

75.3

%

67.9

%

71.3

%

Average occupancy—total

 

84.6

%

88.5

%

83.0

%

88.4

%

For the year ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner rental income

 

$

90,571

 

$

93,871

 

$

145,839

 

$

94,591

 

Home renter rental income

 

35,767

 

30,894

 

40,330

 

31,157

 

Other

 

482

 

171

 

1,098

 

167

 

Rental income

 

230

 

 

Chelsea

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

84.5

%

 

126,820

 

124,936

 

187,267

 

125,915

 

Utility and other income

 

13,334

 

13,387

 

19,423

 

13,487

 

 

256

 

 

Elmira, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total real estate revenue

 

140,154

 

138,323

 

206,690

 

139,402

 

Real estate expenses

 

 

282

 

 

 

72.7

%

 

 

$

234

 

 

Bloombsburg, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations expenses

 

48,530

 

44,782

 

75,159

 

45,181

 

Real estate taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brookside Village11,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

 

$

235

 

 

Pleasant View Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

69.4

%

 

 

242

 

 

Bloombsburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

279

 

 

 

77.1

%

 

 

$

237

 

 

Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New York

 

10,041

 

16,597

 

10,137

 

Total real estate expenses

 

60,296

 

54,823

 

91,756

 

55,318

 

Real estate net segment income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forest Park

 

$

79,858

 

$<"Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

99.5

%

/p>

83,500

 

$

114,934

 

$

84,084

 

 

$

357

 

 

Birch Meadows

 

 

 

 

Average t 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">

 

occupied homesite(1)

 

$

374

 

$

353

 

$

355

 

NY

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

98.4

%

 

 

372

 

 

$

352

 

Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite(2)

 

$

283

 

$

270

 

$

 

Park D'Antoine

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

style="font-size:10.0pt;">281

 

$

269

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite(3) 

 

$

316

 

$

312

 

$

 

17

 

 

 

94.1

%

 

 

269

 295

 

$

311

 

As of December 31:

 

 

 

 

Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

262

 

 

"line-height:11.7pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

Total communities

 

196

 

196

 

315

 

199

 

98.9

%

 

 

$

354

 

 

 

Total homesites

 

36,925

 

36,923

 

63,661

 

37,552

Huntsville, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tanglewood

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

Occupied homesites

 

30,631

262

 

 

 

77.1

%

 

 

$

301

 

 

 

104




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,814

 

51,913

 

32,190

 

Total rental homes owned

 

6,424

 

5,492

 

8,286

 

5,558

 

Occupied rental homes

 

4,924

 

4,091

 

6,005

 

4,114

 

 


(1)    Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite is defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

74




(2)    Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite is defined as homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(3)    Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite is defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(4)    Real estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations through December 31, 2004.

Reconciliation of our net segment income to net loss attributable to common unitholders is as follows:

 

>83.9

<

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Same Communities(1)

 

As Reported

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carsons

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

86.2

%

 

 

$

213

 

 

Valley ViewChambersburg

2003

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

198

 

 

Green Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

24

2003

 

Net segment income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

79,858

 

$

83,500

 

$

114,934

 

$

84,084

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

211

 

 

Chambersburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

254

nt size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Retail home sales and finance

 

(2)

 

 

 

87.8

%

 

 

$

207

 

 

Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

(2)

(9,683

)

(1,772

)

Insurance

 

(638

)

1,071

 

(638

)

1,071

 

Corporate and other

 

(192

)

(469

)

(192

)

(469

)

 

 

79,028

 

84,102

 

104,421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,914

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management

 

5,685

(4)

5,527

 

7,127

-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

Frieden Manor

 

 

 

 

 

5,527

 

General and administrative

 

19,241

(3)

16,855

 

29,361

 

PA

 

 

 

193

 

 

 

85.5

%

 

 

$

240

 

 

Pine Terrace

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

72.0

 

16,855

 

ARC IPO related costs

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

 

16,685

 

 

Real estate and retail home sales asset
impairment

 

3,591

 

 

3,591

 

1,385

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

863

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

48,116

 

45,394

 

72,014

 

46,467

 

Interest expense

 

41,651

 

%

 

 

214

 

 

Schuylkill Haven, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218

 

 

 

56,521

 

56,892

 

57,386

%

 

 

$

238

 

Total other expenses

 

118,284

 

124,297

 

190,950

 

127,620

 

Interest income

 

(1,523

)(5)

(1,439

)

(1,616

)

(1,439

 

 

Hays, Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(37,733

)

(38,756

)

(84,913

)

(43,267

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,915

 

31

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

Net loss

 

(37,733

)

(38,756

)

(91,547

)

(39,903

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

 

 

(9,752

)

 

 

Countryside

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common unitholders

 

$

(37,733

)

$

(38,756

)

$

80.2

%

 

 

$

253

 

 

Western Slope of Colorado

 

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

 


(1)    Same communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2003 and the communities sold or held for sale before December 31, 2004.

(2)    Excludes segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1, 2003 at which time we had ">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Picture Ranch

 

 

*

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

114

(3)    Excludes $10.1 million of compensation expense related to stock issued in connection with ARC’s IPO.

(4)    Excludes property management expenses incurred in connection with the Hometown acquisition.

(5)    Excludes interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARC’s IPO, the financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition.

75




Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Overview.   Our results for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 include the operations of the 107 communities comprising 20,511 homesites and the retail home sales, insurance, consumer finance and other businesses we acquired in the reorganization for the entire year ended December 31, 2003 and for approximately eight months for the year ended December 31, 2002. In addition to the effects of the reorganization, our results for the year ended December 31, 2003 also reflect the effects on our operations of the 22 community acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003 and exclude the 30 communities that we discontinued in the third and fourth quarters of 2004.

Revenue.   Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $163.2 million, as compared to $136.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $26.7, or 20%. This increase was due to an increase of $33.3 million in rental income and a decrease of $6.6 million in other revenue consisting of sales of manufactured homes and utility and other income.

Rental income increased by $33.3 million, consisting of $20.8 from the communities acquired in the reorganization, $8.0 million from other community acquisitions and $4.5 million from same communities. The increase in same communities revenues consists of $4.2 million from increased rental rates, $3.1 million from home renter rental income partially offset by $2.8 million from lower occupancy.

The decrease in other income of $6.6 million is due to a $10.3 million decrease in sales of manufactured homes partially offset by a $3.7 million increase in utility and other income.

Property Operations Expense.   For the year ended December 31, 2003, total property operations expense was $44.3 million, as compared to $33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $11.0 million, or 33%. The increase was due to increases in expenses of $7.8 million from communities we acquired in the reorganization, $3.1 million from other community acquisitions and $1.0 million from same communities. The increase on a same community basis was due primarily to higher salaries and benefits of $513,000, due to increased staffing and, to a lesser extent, increases in wages and employee benefits and higher bad debt expense of $478,000, as a result of increased tenant defaults caused by general economic conditions and reserves for rent owed by certain finance companies which own repossessed homes in our communities.

Real Estate Taxes Expense.   Real estate taxes expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $10.2 million, as compared to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.6 million, or 55%. The increase was due primarily to communities we acquired in the reorganization, other community acquisitions and an increase in the number of rental homes we own.

Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold.   The cost of manufactured homes sold was $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $7.4 million, or 29%. The decrease was due primarily to a 121 unit decrease in sales of manufactured homes from 629 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2002 to 508 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2003, partially offset by the inclusion of the results of the retail home sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire year in 2003. The gross margin for manufactured homes sold was 15% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 19% for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expense.   For the year ended December 31, 2003, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was $7.4 million, as compared to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 14%. This decrease is due to lower sales of manufactured homes and a lower cost structure as a result of eliminating the costs of maintaining stand">

 

 

 

93.9

%

 

 

$

257

 

 

76




resulting from the inclusion of results of the retail home sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire period in 2003 as compared to eight months for 2002.

Property Management Expense.   Property management expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.5 million, as compared to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $1.4 million, or 34%. The increase was due primarily to inclusion of the results of the communities we acquired in the reorganization for an entire year in 2003.

General and Administrative Expense.   General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $16.9 million, as compared to $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.8 million, or 29%. The increase was due primarily to the reorganization, a $900,000 one time charge for vacating unused office space, a non-recurring credit of $291,000 against our insurance expenses in 2002, and, in 2003, to higher professional services expenses related primarily to our manufactured home acquisitions. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense was 10% for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to 9.6% for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.  

The Vineyards

 

 

*

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

91.8

%

 

 

316

 

 

Western Slope of ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail Home Sales and Insurance Asset and Goodwill Impairment and Other Expense.   At the time of the reorganization, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of manufactured n" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

211

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

$

283

During the year ended December 31, 2003, we substantially completed the redirection of our retail home sales efforts by selling 11 of our retail dealerships, ceasing operations in the remaining five retail dealerships and beginning in-community retail home sales activities in nearby communities owned by us. With respect to five retail dealerships we closed, we relocated the inventory to nearby manufactured home communities we own.

In connection with these activities, we recorded a charge of $1.4 million, net of sales proceeds of $1.3 million, to write off fixed assets and to record the cost of remaining lease obligations at the retail dealerships we closed in 2003.

At December 31, 2002, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales, finance and insurance operations of $13.6 million. The impairment for the retail home sales and finance operations arose from a deterioration of its operating performance subsequent to the reorganization due to lower projected sales volumes caused by adverse market conditions of the manufactured home sales industry as a whole, the related finance industry, and the market for manufactured home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance operation arose because the insurance operation derives the majority of its revenue from the retail home sales and finance operations. We had no impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Interest Expense.   Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $57.4 million, as compared to $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $13.6 million, or 31%. The increase was due primarily to: additional indebtedness acquired in the reorganization of

77




$380.8 million, additional borrowings of $27.0 million under the rental home credit facility, $20.0 million under the preferred interest, $18.8 million under the BFND credit facility, and $4.3 million of indebtedness assumed in connection with community acquisitions. Such interest expense increases resulting from additional borrowings were partially offset by lower interest rates on variable rate debt.

Interest Income.   Interest earned on notes receivable, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and loan reserves was $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Discontinued Operations.   In the third quarter of 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell a total of 12 communities and two parcels of land. In addition, we separately entered into a sales agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we entered into agreements to sell an additional 15 communities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we sold the Sunrise Mesa community.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, we have reflected $31,000 of income from the operation of these assets and $3.3 million gain on the sale of the Sunrise Mesa community sale as discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we have reflected $1.0 million of income from the operation of these assets as discontinued operations.

 

 

Somerset, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss Attributable to Common Partnership Unitholders.   As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $39.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $7.2 million, or 15%. The decrease was due to increases of $33.3 million in rental income, $3.7 million in utility and other income, and $2.3 million in income and gain on sale of discontinued operations and decreases of $7.4 million in cost of manufactured homes sold, $1.2 million in retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense and retail home sales and insurance asset and goodwill impairment of $12.1 million offset by decreases of $10.3 million in manufactured home sales, and increases of $11.1 million in property operations expense, $3.6 million in real estate taxes, $1.4 million in property management expenses, $3.7 million in general and administrative expenses, $9.4 million in depreciation and amortization and $13.5 million in interest expense.

78




The following tables present certain information relative to our real estate segment as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 on a historical and “Same Communities” basis. “Same Communities” reflects information for all communities owned by us at both January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. “Same Communities” does not include the twenty-two communities we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2003 or the community sold during 2003 (in thousands, except home, occupancy, community, and per unit information).

 

 

Same
Communities(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real Estate
Segment(4)

 

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

Sunny Acres

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average total homesites

 

15,717

 

15,824

 

37,316

 

27,463

 

Average total rental homes

 

1,812

 

1,333

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

96.6

%

 

 

$

227

 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,183

 

2,626

 

Average occupied homesites—homeowners

 

13,030

 

13,785

 

29,281

 

 

 

Suburban Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

24,895

 

Average occupied homesites—rental homes

 

1,376

 

908

 

3,695

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

$

223

 

 

Los Alamos, New Mexico

01pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

1,830

 

Average total occupied homesites

 

14,406

 

14,693

 

32,976

 

26,725

 

Average occupancy—rental homes

 

76.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

68.1

%

71.3

%

69.7

%

Average occupancy—total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Royal Crest

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

178

 

 

 

78.1

%

 

91.7

%

92.9

%

88.4

%

97.3

%

For the year ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

473

 

 

Killeen-Temple, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homeowner rental income

 

$

48,749

 

$

47,479

 

$

94,591

 

$

72,476

 

Home renter rental income

 

10,760

 

7,695

 

31,157

 

19,865

 

Other

 

104

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bluebonnet Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

75.1

%

 

 

$

330

 

 

Lancaster, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167

 

(167

)

Rental income

 

59,613

 

55,135

 

125,915

 

92,174

 

Utility and other income

 

6,088

 

5,095

 

13,487

 

10,147

 

Total real estate revenue

 

65,701

 

60,230

 

139,402

 

102,321

 

Real estate expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations expenses

 

19,151

 

18,165

 

45,181 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valley ViewEphrata

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

98.7

%

 

 

$

 

33,320

 

Real estate taxes

 

4,566

 

3,681

 

10,137

 

6,671

 

Total real estate expenses

 

23,717

 

21,846

 

55,318

 

39,991

 

Real estate net segment income

 

$

41,984

 

$

38,384

 

$

84,084

 

$

62,330

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total occupied homesite(1)

 

$

380

 

$

185

 

 

Binghamton, New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

342

 

$

352

 

$

319

 

Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite(2)

 

 

Blue Ridge MHP

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

$

312

 

$

287

 

$

269

 

89.7

%

 

 

$

230

 

 

Kintner Estates

 

$

243

 

Average monthly real estate revenue per total
homesite(3)

 

$

348

 

$

317

 

$

311

 

$

310

 

As of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total communities owned

 

203

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

94.5

%

 

 

252

 

 

Binghamton, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

91.9

%

 

 

$

240

 

 

Cambridge, Maryland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beaver Run

 

 

 

 

 

 

MD

 

 

 

119

 

&nbs="border:none;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.0pt;">

 

203

 

329

 

209

 

Total homesites

 

15,735

 

15,668

 

37,552

 

36,805

 

Occupied homesites

 

14,095

 

14,593

 

32,190

 

33,097

 

Total rental homes owned

 

2,012

 

1,636

 

5,558

 

4,423

 

Occupied rental homes

 

1,503

 

1,197

 

4,114

 

3,002

 

 


(1)    Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

79




(2)    Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite defined as homeowner rental income dividp;

 

100.0

%

 

 

$

229

 

 

(3)    Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite defined as total real estate revenue divide by average total homesites divided by the number of months in the period.

(4)    Real estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations.

A reconciliation of our net segment income to net loss attributable to common unitholders is as follows:

 

 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Same
Communities

 

As Reported

 

 

 

 

105




 

 

    

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

Net segment income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

41,984

(1)

$

38,384

(1)

$

84,084

 

$

62,330

 

Retail home sales and finance

 

(2)

(2)

(1,772

)

230

 

Insurance

 

1,071

 

204

 

1,071

 

204

 

Corporate and other

 

(469

)

(652

)

(469

)

(652

)

 

 

42,586

 

37,936

 

t-align:center;"> 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Reading, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valley ViewReading (Tuckerton)

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

$

315

 

 

Valley ViewFleetwood

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

62,112

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management

 

5,527

 

4,105

 

5,527

 

4,105

 

General and administrative

 

16,855

 

13,087

 

16,855

 

13,087

 

 

30

 

 

 

Retail home sales asset impairment

 

 

 

1,385

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

93.3

%

 

 

305

 

 

Valley ViewWernersville

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

287

 

 

Reading, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

13,557

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

18,652

 

19,766

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

Interest expense

 

16,021

 

7,026

 

57,386

 

43,804

 

Total other expenses

 

57,055

 

43,984

 

127,620

 

111,611

 

Interest income

 

 

90.2

%

 

 

$

307

 

 

Laramie, Wyoming

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Breazeale

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

96.6

%

 

 

$

312

 

 

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(13,030

)

(4,658

)

(43,267

)

(48,109

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

Farmington, New Mexico

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunset Mobile Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

94.6

%

 

 

31

 

1,040

 

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

 

 

 

3,333

 

 

Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders

 

$

(13,030

)

$

(4,658

)

 

 

$

262

 

 

Harrisburg/Lebanon/Carlisle, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)


(1)    Same communities real estate net segment income excludes results of communities acquired after January 1, 2002 and community sold before December 31, 2003.

(2)    Excludes segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1, 2003 at which time we had no significant in-community sales operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity demands have historically been, and, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the nature of the expenditures,  are expected to continue to be, recurring and non-recurring capital improvements of communities, debt repayment, the purchase of new and used homes for lease and sale, funding loans to home buyers, property acquisitions, and partnership interest distributions. We intend to meet these liquidity requirements through our working capital provided by operating activities, available financing under our floor plan line of credit for home purchases, our consumer finance facility to fund home loans, our lease receivables line of credit to be secured by homes in our rental portfolio, other available unsecured financing, and the potential net proceeds from the sale of communities. We consider these sources to be adequate to meet all operating requirements, including recurring capital improvements, debt service, other normally recurring expenditures of a capital nature and, if necessary and

80




appropriate, payment of dividends to ARC’s stockholders to maintain qualification as a REIT in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code.

Our operating cash flows have not been sufficient to cover the distributions to our partners that were made since ARC’s IPO in February 2004. On May 23, 2005, we declared a reduced distribution to our partners for the second quarter of 2005. On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors announced that no distributions would be made on the Partnership’s common partnership units for third quarter of 2005. ARC’s board of directors reviews our practices with respect to the payment of distributions on a quarterly basis. Should our operating cash flows not improve, we may need to take additional action with respect to the payment of distributions, which may include the further reduction or elimination of our distributions to our partners.

Our plan is to increase occupancy through the following activities, as well as other initiatives that may be available to us. To accomplish our plans and objectives for the next 12 months, we may invest significant funds for the purchase of manufactured homes for sale, rent and lease with option to purchase. We expect to commit to these expenditures only as demand warrants and funds permit and we have entered into no significant forward purchase commitments with respect to such purchases. We also plan to make recurring capital expenditures, as necessary and appropriate, to keep our communities up to our standards and for general capital improvements.

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity needs through net cash provided by operations, borrowings under our $50 million floorplan line of c;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monroe Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

100.0

In addition, in order to facilitate sales of new and existing homes, we also plan to finance a significant portion of our home sales during 2005. We have a $125 million consumer finance facility to support our in-community home sales financing program under which we may finance up to 90% of the principal amount of qualifying loans made to qualifying home buyers.

We have extended the maturity date of our $85 million revolving credit mortgage facility to September 2006, and expect to refinance or extend our senior variable rate mortgage when due in 2006. In addition to our existing sources of capital, we have significant experience in raising private equity and we may in the future use that experience to enter into financing joint ventures or other similar arrangements if we determine that such a structure would provide an efficient means of raising capital.

Not withstanding the foregoing and based on our historical results, we do not believe that we will be able to fully fund our debt service obligations and recurring capital expenditures, as well as our operating plans and objectives described above, out of operating cash flows. Accordingly, our ability to implement our plans and occupancy objectives described above will depend upon our ability to obtain adequate funding from the financing sources described above or from other available funding sources. We cannot assure that we will be able to sell any or all of the 79 communities currently held for sale or additional communities, sell new or used homes, borrow under our consumer finance line of credit, refinance expiring credit lines or make other arrangements necessary to fund some or all of our activities to increase occupancy. Should we not be able to obtain sufficient funds for these purposes, we may determine that it is necessary to substantially defer or eliminate some or all of our plans and growth objectives that require these funds,dding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">

%

 

 

$

252

 

 

Total / Weighted Average

 

 

 

81




Cash Flows

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004

Cash provided by operations was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared with $19.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by operations primarily was due to payments made in the first half of 2005 for substantial accruals incurred at the end of 2004 for capital expenditures and repairs and maintenance activities as compared to a relatively low level of such payments in the first half of 2004.

Cash used in investing activities was $39.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $576.8 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash used in investing activities primarily was due to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions in the first half of 2004, as well as proceeds from community sales in the first half of 2005. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.

Cash provided by financing activities was $18.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $579.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily was due to the issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred unit issuances in connection with ARC’s IPO in the first half of 2004, as well as increases in the repayment of existing indebtedness and distribution payments in the first half of 2005.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2003

Cash provided by operations was $27.0 million and $10.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operations for 2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to increased homesites resulting from our Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions.

Cash used in investing activities was $607.6 million and $47.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions and an increase in acquisitions of other communities and manufactured homes. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.

Cash provided by financing activities was $593.8 million and $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred partnership unit issuances in connection with ARC’s IPO, partially offset by the repayment of existing indebtedness and the payment of both common and preferred unit distributions.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Cash provided by operations was $10.7 million and $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease for 2003 was due primarily to changes in operating assets and liabilities partially offset bgin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash used in investing activities was $47.7 million and $137.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 compared to 2002 was due primarily to reduced levels of community acquisitions and rental home purchases. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.

Cash provided by financing activities was $25.4 million and $137.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 as compared to 2002 was primarily due to lower borrowing for community acquisitions and rental homes, funds provided in 2002 from the

82




reorganization and issuance of common partnership units, partially offset by funding of the rental home credit facility in 2003.

Inflation

Inflation in the U.S. has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 or the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Although the impact of inflation has been relatively insignificant in recent years, it remains a factor in the United States economy and may increase the cost of acquiring or replacing property, plant, and equipment and the costs of labor and utilities.

Commitments

At June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, we had $1,049.3 million of pro forma consolidated indebtedness outstanding with the following repayment obligations (in thousands):

 

 

 

62,942

 

 

 

84.5

%

 

 

$

326

 

 

 

On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

Competition

We compete with other owners and operators of manufactured home communities, as well as owners, operators and suppliers of alternative forms of housing such as multifamily housing and site-built homes, including rental properties. All of our properties are located in markets that include other manufactured home communities. The number of competing manufactured home communities in a particular market could have a material effect on our ability to sell our homes or homesites, lease our homes or homesites and to maintain or raise rents. In addition, our communities generally are located in developed areas that include other competitive housing alternatives, such as apartments, land available for the placement of manufactured homes outside of established communities and new or existing site-built housing stock, as well as more favorable financing alternatives for the same. The availability of these competing housing options in the markets in which we operate could have a material effect on our occupancy and rents. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations.” With respect to acquisitions, we may compete with numerous other potential buyers (some with potentially greater resources or superior information), which could drive up acquisition costs and/or impede our ability to acquire additional communities at acceptable prices.

We believe we currently have a leading market share in 15 of our top 20 markets, which collectively represent approximately 69% of our total homesites and 73% of our total rental income.

Regulation

Generally, manufactured home communities are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other

106




common areas. Each state and, in some instances, individual municipalities, have enacted laws that govern the relationships between landlord and tenants. Changes in any of these laws or regulations, as well as changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions or circumstances existing on properties or laws affecting development, construction, operation, upkeep and safety requirements may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of homesites or other impairments to operations, which would adversely affect our cash flows from operating activities. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations.”

The Federal Fair Housing Act, its state law counterparts and the regulations promulgated by HUD and various state agencies, prohibit discrimination in housing on the basis of race or color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living with parents or legal custodians, pregnant women and people securing custody of children under 18) and handicap (disability) and, in some states, on financial capability. A failure to comply with these laws in our operations could result in litigation, fines, penalties or other adverse claims, or could result in limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows fro;line-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Debt

 

Operating

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment

 

Lease

 

Total

 

 

 

Obligations

 

A variety of laws affect the sale of manufactured homes on credit, including the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (Truth-in-Lending), Regulation Z, the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as well as similar state laws or regulations. The Federal Trade Commission has issued or proposed various Trade Regulation Rules dealing with unfair credit practices, collection efforts, preservation of consumers’ claims and defenses and the like.

A variety of laws affect lease with option to purchase arrangements for manufactured homes, including Regulation M, as well as similar state laws. We have developed a lease with option to purchase program which seeks to comply with these laws, but there is little or no application, interpretation or precedent with respect to the application of these laws to our program. A failure to comply with these laws could result in significant costs of bringing our program into compliance, legal actions and limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could have an adverse affect on our cash flows from operations.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. A number of additional federal, state and local laws also exist that may require modifications to the properties, or restrict certain further renovations thereof, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. For example, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after march 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the ADA or the FHAA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature and in substantial capital expenditures. To the extent our properties are not in compliance, we are likely to incur additional costs to comply with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation.

0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Obligations

 

Obligations

 

2005

 

$

107,101

 

 

$

756

 

 

$

107,857

Warranties provided by us are subject to a variety of state laws and regulations. Our sale of manufactured homes may be subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant thereto. Sales practices are governed at both the federal and state level through various consumer protection trade practices and public accommodation laws and regulations.

Insurance activities are subject to state insurance laws and regulations as determined by the particular insurance commissioner for each state in accordance with the McCarran-Ferguson Act, as well as subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant thereto.

Property management activities are often subject to state real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real estate commission for each state.

107




Changes in any of the laws governing our conduct could have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business or could materially affect our financial position, operating income, expense or cash flow.

Rent Control Legislation

Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and regulations specifically regulating the ownership and operation of manufactured home communities. These laws and regulations include provisions imposing restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and, in certain circumstances, granting to community residents a right of first refusalign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">

 

2006(1)

 

122,455

 

 

109

 

 

122,564

 

2007

 

43,046

 

 

112

 

 

43,158

 

2008

 

65,765

 

 

56

 

 

65,821

 

2009

 

97,463

 

 

18

 

 

97,481

 

Thereafter

 

609,259

Environmental Matters

Under federal, state and local environmental regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be required to investigate and clean up a release of hazardous substances at such property, and may, under such laws and common law, be held liable for property damage and other costs incurred by third parties in connection with such releases. The liability under certain of these laws has been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. The failure to properly remediate the property may also adversely affect the owner’s ability to lease, sell or rent the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of our properties, we could be legally responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties that we may acquire or manage in the future. We conduct an environmental review of each property prior to acquisition. We have obtained Phase I reviews on all but one of our properties and are not aware of any environmental issues that may materially impact the operations of any communities. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations.”

Insurance

We believe that our properties are covered by adequate fire, flood and property insurance as well as commercial liability insurance provided by reputable companies and with commercially reasonable deductibles and limits. Furthermore, we believe our businesses and business assets are likewise adequately insured against casualty loss and third-party liabilities. Changes in the insurance market since September 11, 2001, have caused significant increases in insurance costs and deductibles, and have increased the risk that affordable insurance may not be available in the future.

 

 

 

 

609,259

 

Commitments

 

1,045,089

 

 

1,051

 

 

1,046,140

 

Unamortized premium related to indebtedness assumed in Hometown and DAM acquisitions

 

4,251

 

 

 

 

4,251

 

 

 

$

1,049,340

Employees

Our employees are all employed by our management services subsidiary and perform various property management, maintenance, acquisition, renovation and management functions. As of June 30, 2005, our

108




management services subsidiary had 1,167 full-time equivalent employees. None of the employees is represented by a union.

Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various legal actions resulting from our operating activities. These actions consist of litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are covered by liability insurance, and none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows taken as a whole.

109




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

MANAGEMENT

Management by ARC

Pursuant to the Partnership’s partnership agreement, ARC is the sole general partner of the Partnership and has, subject to certain protective rights of limited partners described below, full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in the Partnership’s management and control, including the ability to cause the Partnership to enter into certain major transactions including a merger or a sale of substantially all of its assets. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership Agreement—General; Management of the Partnership.” The management and operation of the Partnership is carried out by ARC, and the persons who perform these management and operation functions on behalf of ARC are employees of ARC’s management services subsidiary, as permitted pursuant to the Partnership’s partnership agreement.

Directors and Executive Officers of ARC

The board of directors of ARC presently consists of ten members. ARC’s board is not classified and thus all of its directors are elected annually. The directors and executive officers of ARC are listed below.

Name

 

 

$

1,051

 

 

$

1,050,391

 


(1)    $140.5 million of senior variable rate mortgage debt due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month periods at our option and subject to certain conditions.

The fair value of debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, was approximately $1,076.4 million.

83




Consolidated Indebtedness to be Outstanding After Our Offering

The following table sets forth certain information with respect0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> 

 

 

Age

 

Position

Larry D. Willard

 

63

 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

James F. Kimsey

 

57

 

width="8" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

Amount of
Debt

 

Percentage
of Total
Debt

 

Weighted
Average 
Interest
Rate

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

Scott D. Jackson

 

50

 

Vice Chairman and Director

John G. Sprengle

 

49

 

Vice Chairman and Director

Maturity
Date

 

Annual
Debt
Service

 

Balance at
Maturity

 

Fixed Rate Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eugene Mercy, Jr.

 

69

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009

 

$

83,067

W. Joris Brinkerhoff

 

54

 

Director

Gerald J. Ford

 

62

 

Director

James R. “Randy” Staff

 

58

 

Director

Carl B. Webb

 

55

 

Director

J. Markham Green

 

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

5.05

%

 

2009

 

$

62

 

Director

Lawrence E. Kreider

 

58

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer

Scott L. Gesell

 

46

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 

The principal occupation and business experience for each of our officers and directors and key employees, for at least the last five years, are as follows:

Larry D. Willard, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director.   Mr. Willard assumed the position of ARC’s Chairman and Chief Executive Offt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">5,476

 

$

77,590

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012

 

276,278

 

 

26.3

James F. Kimsey, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director.   Mr. Kimsey assumed the position of ARC’s President and Chief Operating Officer on September 21, 2005. Mr. Kimsey has also served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Kimsey retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of

110




RailWorks Corporation in 2004, a position he had held since 2002. From 2001 through 2002 he also served as the President of Western Utility Services on behalf of Exelon Infrastructure Services, a successor to Fischback & Moore Electric, LLC for whom Mr. Kimsey was the President and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to 2001. In 1997 Mr. Kimsey founded Kimsey Electrical Contracting, LLC, serving as its Chairman. From 1970 to 1995 he served in various capacities with Sturgeon Electric Co., Inc, succeeding to MYR Group President in 1984, a position he held until 1995. Mr. Kimsey is a graduate of the University of Denver where he received a BSBA degree in Accounting.

Scott D. Jackson, Vice Chairman and Director.   Mr. Jackson assumed the position of ARC’s Vice Chairman on September 21, 2005. Mr. Jackson also co-founded ARC’s predecessor in interest in 1995 and served as ARC’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since ARC’s inception in 1998 until he became ARC’s Vice Chairman. He additionally served as ARC’s Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004 to March 30, 2005. Mr. Jackson directs ARC’s sales of communities. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Jackson served in various senior positions in financial service companies owned or controlled by, among others, Gerald J. Ford. In these capacities, he oversaw corporate finance activities, including financial service company acquisition, disposition and capital financing activities. Previously, Mr. Jackson worked in corporate finance as Vice President of Corporate Finance and served as Co-Head of the Financial Institutions Restructuring Group for Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1987 to 1991; as Senior Vice President and Manager of Republic Bank Capital Markets from 1985 to 1987; and with Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from 1979 to 1985. Mr. Jackson holds a B.S. degree in Business Finance and Marketing from Colorado State University.

John G. Sprengle, Vice Chairman and Director.   Mr. Sprengle co-founded ARC’s predecessor in interest in 1995. Mr. Sprengle has served as a director and Vice Chairman of ARC since April 8, 2002. Mr. Sprengle has also served as ARC’s Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1999, Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to November 1, 2004 and Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004 to March 30, 2005. Prior to 1995, Mr. Sprengle served in various positions at BancTEXAS Group, Inc., a bank holding company. In his final positions, he served as a Seniolign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:8.7pt;">

%

 

 

7.35

%

 

2012

 

   23,480

 

    244,675

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014

 

189,522

 

 

18.1

%

 

 

5.53

%

 

2014

 

Eugene Mercy, Jr., Director.   Mr. Mercy has served as a director of ARC since April 2002. Mr. Mercy is currently a Principal in Granite Capital International Group, a New York money management firm, and a Senior Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Mr. Mercy is a former Limited Partner of Goldman Sachs & Co., where he was in the Securities Sales and Equity Trading Department and the Commercial Real Estate Department. He later became the Partner-in-Charge of the Mortgage Securities Department of Goldman Sachs. In 1996, Mr. Mercy was appointed to the Goldman Sachs Limited Partner Advisory Committee, and after Goldman Sachs’ successful public of:9.0pt;">13,163

 

179,975

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

W. Joris Brinkerhoff, Director.   Mr. Brinkerhoff has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Brinkerhoff founded a Native American owned joint venture, Doyon LTD, in 1978 and served as its operations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer until sellingyle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

due 2005 through 2031

 

121,641

 

 

11.6

%

 

 

7.20

%

111




Alaska petroleum fields. Mr. Brinkerhoff now resides in Denver and manages family interests including oil and gas production, a securities portfolio and various other business interests, as well as actively participating in numerous philanthropic organizations. Mr. Brinkerhoff is a graduate of Montana School of Mines with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering.

Gerald J. Ford, Director.   Mr. Ford has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Ford is a banking and financial institutions entrepreneur who has been involved in numerous mergers and acquisitions of private and public sector financial institutions, primarily in the Southwest United States, over the past 30 years. In this capacity he acquired and consolidated 30 commercial banks from 1975 to 1993, forming First United Bank Group, Inc., a multi-bank holding company for which he functioned as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until its sale in 1994. During this period he also led investment consortiums that acquired numerous financial institutions, forming in succession First Gibraltar Bank, FSB, First Madison Bank and First Nationwide Bank. Mr. Ford also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Golden State Bancorp Inc and California Federal Bank from 1998 to 2002. He currently participates on numerous boards of directors, including Triad Financial Corporation for which he is also Chairman of the Board, First Acceptance Corporation, for which he is also Chairman of the Board, McMoRan Exploration Co., and Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. Mr. Ford holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics, as well-break-after:avoid;"> 

2005 to 2031

 

9,984

 

80,425

 

Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

 

96,600

 

as a Juris Doctorate Degree, from Southern Methodist University where he currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees.

James R. “Randy” Staff, Director.   Mr. Staff has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Staff has been a consultant to Hunter’s Glen Ford, Ltd., an investment partnership, since November 2002. He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ganado Bancshares, Inc. (and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Citizens State Bank, Ganado, Texas) and ABNA Holdings, Inc. (and its 99% owned subsidiary, American Bank, N.A., Dallas, Texas). Previously, Mr. Staff was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Advisor of Golden State Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, California Federal Bank, FSB, from October 1994 until November 2002. During this period he also served as a Director of California Federal Bank, FSB’s subsidiaries, First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation and Auto One Acceptance Corporation. Mr. Staff is currently a member of the Board of Triad Financial Corporation. Mr. Staff attended the University of Houston, graduated from the University of Texas at Austin and was also a Certified Public Accountant.

Carl B. Webb, Director.   Mr. Webb has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Webb was the President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of San Francisco-based California Federal Bank, the fourth largest financial institution in California, from September 1994 until the bank was purchased by a third party in November 2002. Prior to his affiliation with California Federal Bank, Mr. Webb was the President and CEO of First Madison Bank, FSB (1993 and 1994) and First Gibraltar Bank, FSB (1988 to 1993), as well as President and Director of First National Bank at Lubbock (1983 to 1988). Currently, Mr. Webb sits on the Board of Directors of Plum Creek Timber Company and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Triad Financial Corporation. Mr. Webb received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from West Texas A&M University and a Graduate Banking Degree from Southwestern Graduate School of Banking.

J. Markham Green, Director.   Mr. Green has served as a director of ARC since its initial public offering in February 2004. Mr. Green is the Chairman of the Board of PowerOne Media LLC. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Green served as the Chairman of the Financial Institutions and Governments Group of JP Morgan Chase. From 1993 until joining JP Morgan Chase, he invested in and served on the boards of eight start-up companies. From 1973, Mr. Green served in various capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co. before he retired as a general partner in 1992. He was co-head of the Financial Services Industry Group of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and served on several of the firms’ internal committees. Mr. Green is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin and earned an M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University.

112



 

9.2

%

 

 


Lawrence E. Kreider, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer.   Mr. Kreider joined ARC in 2001 as an Executive Vice President, also serving as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2003 and from November 1, 2004 to present, as well as Chief Information Officer since 2002 and Chief Accounting Officer since 2004. During this time he has also served as Executive Vice President Finance. Mr. Kreider has direct responsibility for all financial and information technology activities of ARC and also participates in strategic planning activities. Prior to joining ARC in 2001, Mr. Kreider was Senior Vice President of Finance for Warnaco Group Inc. and President of Warnaco Europe. Prior thereto, Mr. Kreider served in several senior finance positions, including Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, with Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings from 1986 to 1999. Prior thereto, he served in senior finance positions with Zale Corporation, Johnson Matthew Jewelry Corporation and Refinement International Company. Mr. Kreider began his career with Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Kreider holds an masters in business administration from Stanford Graduate School of Business and a bachelor of arts from Yale University.

Scott L. Gesell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel.   Mr. Gesell has served as a Vice President and as the General Counsel and Secretary for ARC since he joined ARC in 1996. Mr. Gesell directs all legal matters for ARC, including overseeing outside counsel, acquisition activities, legal matters related to ARC’s operating businesses and other corporate related activities. Prior to joining ARC, Mr. Gesell served as General Counsel, and then as a Senior Vice President/Director of Legal Operations, overseeing all of the bank’s day-to-day legal operations for First Gibraltar Bank/First Madison Bank/First Nationwide Bank. While with the First Gibraltar, First Madison and First Nationwide Bank, he was significantly involved in mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, as well as corporate and regulatory matters. Prior thereto, he served in various legal capacities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas and was in private practice with the law firm of Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Price in Oklahoma City. Mr. Gesell holds a bachelor of arts and a juris doctor from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. He is a member of the Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas bars.

Compensation

The Partnership has no salaried officers or employees. All of the Partnership’s operational and management functions are performed for it by ARC’s management services subsidiary. The Partnership paid approximately $7.5 million, $11.0 million and $5.7 million to this affiliate for these services for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. None of the directors or officers of ARC receives any compensation from the Partnership. The Partnership does not pay ARC any other compensation for its services as general partner. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Agreement—Distributions”, and “—Allocations of Net Income and Net Loss.”

113




CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Global E Portfolio

ARC’s Vice Chairman, Scott D. Jackson, is the sole stockholder of JJ&T, and together with JJ&T is the 99% owner of Global Mobile. Global Mobile and JJ&T own 100% of the membership interests of Global E, which owns six manufactured home communities with 554 total homesites located in Wyoming. One of our subsidiaries is a party to a property management agreement with Global E pursuant to which the subsidiary manages all of the communities owned by Global E in consideration for a management fee equal to 3% of gross revenues. This subsidiary also is a party to an accounting services agreement with Global E whereby it provides accounting services for Global Mobile in exchange for a fee of $800 per month. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005 our management services subsidiary received $96,000, $132,000 and $197,000, respectively, pursuant to these agreements. Neither the property management agreement nor the accounting services agreement can be amended without ARC’s consent. Mr. Jackson has agreed that he may not terminate either the property management agreement or the accounting services agreement for so long as he is serving as ARC’s Chairman or our Chief Executive Officer. ARC may terminate either of these agreements upon 30 days prior written notice. The right of first refusal granted to ARC pursuant to his employment agreement described below would apply to the disposition of any communities currently owned by Global E.

Mr. Jackson is subject to an employment agreement with ARC which includes a non-competition covenant with an exception to permit him to devote time to the management and operation of Global Mobile Limited Liability Company and JJ&T Enterprises, Inc. consistent with past practice. In addition, Mr. Jackson’s agreement prohibits him from directly or indirectly acquiring any manufactured home communities and also provides ARC with a right of first refusal, for so long as he serves as our chairman or chief executive officer, in connection with any proposed sale by Mr. Jackson of any or all communities he owns directly or indirectly. Pursuant to this right, ARC may acquire such community or communities at 95% of their fair market value.

In addition, beginning April 1, 2005, ARC entered into a written lease agreement with JJ&T for a homesite for our Cheyenne, Wyoming city manager’s office for a monthly rental fee of $230. We have placed a manufactured home we own on the homesite. In the event that the lease is terminated or the property management agreement discussed above is terminated, then JJ & T is obligated to buy the home from us at our cost for the purchase and set up of the home.

Lease by Windstar Aviation Corp.

Global Mobile also has an airplane hangar located at Centennial Airport, Englewood, Colorado. Windstar Aviation Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, owns airplanes that ARC uses in connection with our operations and leases office and airplane hangar space from Global Mobile at Centennial Airport in Englt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">7.50

%

 

2025

 

7,245

 

96,600

 

Other loans

 

1,006

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

8.67

%

 

2005

 

172

 

1,000

 

 

 

768,114

 

 

73.2

%

 

 

6.65

%

 

 

 

59,520

 

680,265

 

Variable Rate Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006

 

108,520

 

 

10.3

%

 

 

6.22

%

 

2006

 

6,750

 

108,520

Affiliate Accounts Receivable

At December 31, 2004 companies owned and controlled by Mr. Jackson owed ARC’s management subsidiary approximately $68,000 in accounts receivable, primarily related to rental homes acquired and property management services performed on behalf of these companies. Pursuant to the terms of the property management agreements between these companies and our management subsidiary, monthly fees for property management services are paid by these companies in the month following incurrence of the fees. At June 30, 2005, these companies owed our management subsidiary approximately $4,000.

114




Directors Holding Partnership Units

Two of ARC’s directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham Green, hold common partnership units in the Partnership through which each of Mr. Mercy and Mr. Green has deferred gains associated with certain properties. Any decision by ARC’s board of directors to dispose of one or more of these properties in which Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has an interest could have tax consequences for Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green, as the case may be.

In connection with any such decision, ARC’s board of directors will determine whether either of Messrs. Green or Mercy has a material financial interest in the transaction that is different from the interests of stockholders generally, and if either Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has such an interest, then such director will abstain from the vote of our board with respect to such proposed transaction.

Affiliate Services to the Partnership

See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Management—Compensation” for a discussion of affiliate services to the Partnership.

115




POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

The following is a discussion of ARC’s policies with respect to investments, financing and certain other activities. These policies apply to all of ARC’s subsidiaries, including the Partnership. The Partnership does not have any separate policies with respect to any of these activities. These policies with respect to these activities have been determined by ARC’s board of directors and, in general, may be amended and revised from time to time at the discretion of ARC’s board of directors without notice to or a vote of ARC’s stockholders, except that changes in certain policies with respect to conflicts of interest must be consistent with legal requirements.

Investment Policies

Investments in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate.   ARC conducts all of its investment activities through the Partnership and its affiliates. Our investment objectives are to increase cash flow, maximize the value of its communities and acquire established income-producing manufactured housing community properties with cash flow growth potential. Additionally, we seek to selectively expand and upgrade both our properties and any newly acquired communities. Our business is focused primarily on manufactured housing community properties and activities directly related thereto including our retail home sales and leasing, consumer finance and other complementary businesses. Our policy is to acquire assets primarily for generation of current income and long-term value appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will sell certain manufactured housing community properties. We have not established a specific policy regarding the relative priority of the investment objectives. For a discussion of our communities and our business and other strategic objectives, see “Business and Properties.”

We expect to pursue our investment objectives through the direct ownership of properties, but may also make investments in other entities. We focus on manufactured housing community properties in those states where we operate and select new markets. We anticipate that newly acquired properties will be located in the U.S. However, future investments, including the activities described below, will not be limited to any geographic area or to a specified percentage of our assets. We believe that opportunities exist to acquire established manufactured housing community properties which do not possess the risks inherent in new development. We believe that, in recent years, the available investment returns have not justified the leasing risk associated with new development and, thus, we do not presently intend to engage in development of new communities. We intend to engage in such future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of ARC’s status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

We also may participate with other entities in the ownership of manufactured home communities through joint ventures or other types of co-ownership. We may enter into joint ventures from time to time if we determine that doing so would be the most effective means of raising capital, including with respect to non-stabilized communities that we acquire. Equity investments may be subject to existing mortgage financing and other indebtedness or such financing or indebtedness may be incurred in connection with acquiring investments. Any such financing or indebtedness will have priority over our equity interest in such property. Investments are also subject to ARC’s policy not to be treated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. In 2003 and 2004, we acquired three and 132 communities, respectively. In 2005 through June 30, we have not acquired any communities.

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages.   While we emphasize equity real estate investments in manufactured housing community properties, we may, at the discretion of ARC’s board of directors, invest in mortgages and other interests related to manufactured housing community properties. We do not presently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of trust, but may do so subject to the investment restrictions applicable to REITs. The mortgages in which we may invest may be either first mortgages or junior mortgages, and may or may not be insured by a governmental agency. Investments in real estate mortgages run the risk that one or more borrowers may default under certain mortgages and that the collateral securing certain mortgages may not be sufficient to enable it to recoup its full investment.

116




Investments in Chattel Paper.   While we emphasize equity real estate investments in manufactured home community properties, we intend to invest in chattel paper. Our consumer finance initiative involves the purchase of consumer installment sales contracts that are secured by chattel (manufactured homes located in its communities). These installment sales contracts are originated and serviced by an unaffiliated third party. Perfection of security interests in chattel varies on a state-by-state basis, but is generally done by reflecting the existence of a security interest on the title to a manufactured home. Foreclosure of this interest also varies from state to state, but generally follows the guidelines set forth in the UCC as adopted in the various states.

Securities or Interests in Entities Primarily Engaged in Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers.   Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification, we may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. We may acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs or similar entities where such investment would be consistent with our investment policies. In any event, we do not intend that investments in securities will require ARC to register as an “investment company” under the 1940 Act, and ARC would intend to divest securities before any such registration would be required. Other than with respect to investments in wholly-owned subsidiaries, we have not engaged in any activities of this type in the last three years.

Investments in Non-Real Estate Ventures.   We may seek to enter into new non-real estate business ventures and to grow our existing non-real estate business ventures. The Partnership owns businesses that currently do or may in the future engage in more diverse and more risky ventures such as the sale of manufactured homes, finance of manufactured home sales, inventory financing, mortgage financing, sales of home improvement products, brokerage of manufactured homes, third-party property management, and other non-real estate business ventures that ARC’s management and board of directors determine, using reasonable business judgment, will benefit it. Any such activity will be conducted through a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary.

Purchase and Sale of Investments.   Our policy is to acquire assets primarily for generation of current income and long-term value appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will sell certain manufactured housing community properties, and in 2003, 2004 and 2005 through September 30, we sold one, 17 and 12 of our communities, respectively. In addition, we also engage in the sale of manufactured homes through our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, ARC Dealership, Inc., or Dealership. Dealership’s manufactured home sales consisted of no homes sold in 2003, 1,341 homes sold in 2004 and 1,763 homes sold in 2005 through June 30.

We have not established a specific policy regarding the percentage of assets that may be invested in any of the foregoing types of investments.

Financing Policies

We presently intend to maintain a ratio of consolidated total indebtedness-to-total market capitalization of 65% or less. ARC’s total market capitalization is defined as the sum of the market value of its outstanding common stock and preferred stock (which may decrease, thereby increasing our debt to total capitalization ratio), plus the aggregate value of partnership units in the Partnership not owned by ARC, plus the book value of its total consolidated indebtedness. Since this ratio is based, in part, upon market values of equity, it will fluctuate with changes in the price of ARC’s common stock; however, we believe that this ratio provides an appropriate indication of leverage for a company whose assets are primarily real estate. ARC’s ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization as of June 30, 2005 was approximately 60% (59% following the sale of the 79 communities, assuming the sale of all communities, and the sale of the notes by the Partnership). ARC’s charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness that it may incur. ARC’s board of directors may from time to time modify its debt policy in light of then-current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of its properties, general conditions in the market for debt and equity securities, fluctuations in the

117




market price of its common stock, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. Accordingly, ARC may increase or decrease its ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization beyond the limits described above. If these policies were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased risk of default on our obligations and a related increase in debt service requirements that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to ARC’s stockholders and the Partnership’s limited partners.

To the extent that ARC’s board of directors determines to obtain additional capital, we may issue debt or equity securities, including additional partnership units in the Partnership, retain earnings (subject to provisions in the Internal Revenue Code requiring distributions of income to maintain REIT status), or pursue a combination of these methods. As long as the Partnership is in existence, the proceeds of all equity capital raised by ARC will be contributed to the Partnership in exchange for additional interests in the Partnership, which will dilute the ownership interests of the existing limited partners. In 2005, we issued $25.8 million of trust preferred securities due 2035 to ARC.

Conflicts of Interest Policies

We have adopted certain policies that are designed to eliminate or minimize certain potential conflicts of interest. In addition, ARC’s board of directors is subject to certain provisions of Maryland law, which are also designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts. However, there can be no assurance that these policies or provisions of law will always be successful in eliminating the influence of such conflicts, and if they are not successful, decisions could be made that might fail to reflect fully the interests of all securityholders.

We reserve the right to dispose of any of our properties, based upon management’s periodic review of our portfolio, if ARC’s board of directors determines that such action would be in the best interest of its stockholders. Any decision to dispose of a property will be made by ARC’s board of directors. Two of our directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham Green, hold common partnership units in the Partnership through which Mr. Mercy has deferred gains associated with all the properties ARC acquired in ARC’s reorganization, and Mr. Green has deferred gains associated with certain properties ARC acquired from Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., I and Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., II in ARC’s reorganization. Any decision by ARC’s board of directors to dispose of one or more of these properties in which Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has an interest could have tax consequences for Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green, as the case may be. In connection with any such decision, ARC’s board of directors will determine whether either of Messrs. Green or Mercy has a material financial interest in the transaction that is different from the interests of stockholders generally, and if either Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has such an interest, then such director will abstain from the vote of our board with respect to such proposed transaction.

Interested Director and Officer Transactions

Pursuant to Maryland law, a contract or other transaction between ARC and a director or between ARC and any other corporation or other entity in which any of its directors is a director or has a material financial interest is not void or voidable solely on the grounds of such common directorship or interest, the presence of such director at the meeting at which the contract or transaction is authorized, approved or ratified or the counting of the director’s vote in favor thereof, provided that:

·       the fact of the common directorship or interest is disclosed or known to ARC’s board of directors or a committee of its board, and ARC’s board or committee authorizes, approves or ratifies the transaction or contract by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested directors, even if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum;

·       the fact of the common directorship or interest is disclosed or known to ARC’s stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction or contract is authorized, approved or ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote (other than the votes of shares owned of record or beneficially by the interested director or corporation or other entity); or

118




·       the transaction or contract is fair and reasonable to ARC.

Furthermore, under Delaware law (where the Partnership is formed), ARC, as general partner, has a fiduciary duty to the partnership and, consequently, such transactions also are subject to the duties of care and loyalty that ARC, as general partner, owes to limited partners in the partnership (to the extent such duties have not been eliminated pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement). ARC requires that all contracts and transactions between it, the Partnership or any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any of ARC’s directors or executive officers or any entity in which such director or executive officer is a director or has a material financial interest, on the other hand, must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of ARC’s disinterested directors. Where appropriate in the judgment of the disinterested directors, ARC’s board of directors may obtain a fairness opinion or engage independent counsel to represent the interests of non-affiliated security holders, although ARC’s board of directors will have no obligation to do so.

Business Opportunities

Pursuant to Maryland law, each ARC director is obligated to offer to ARC any business opportunity (with certain limited exceptions) that comes to him and that we reasonably could be expected to have an interest in pursuing. Mr. Jackson owns interests in certain other properties. ARC does not own any interest in these properties. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Global E Portfolio.”

Policies with Respect to Other Activities

We may, but do not presently intend to, make investments other than as previously described. ARC has authority to offer shares of its common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property and to repurchase or otherwise reacquire shares of its common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property. Similarly, the Partnership may offer additional partnership units, which are redeemable, in exchange for property. We also may make loans to third parties, including joint ventures in which we may participate. As described in “Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership Agreement,” ARC expects, but is not obligated, to issue shares of ARC common stock to holders of partnership units upon exercise of their redemption rights. ARC’s board of directors has no present intention of causing it to repurchase any ARC common stock. ARC may issue preferred stock from time to time, in one or more series, as authorized by its board of directors without the need for stockholder approval. We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or the agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and do not intend to do so. At all times, we intend to make investments in such a manner as to be consistent with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code to qualify as a REIT unless, because of circumstances or changes in the Internal Revenue Code (or the regulations promulgated thereunder), the board of directors determines that it is no longer in ARC’s best interest to continue to have us qualify as a REIT. ARC intends to make investments in such a way that it will not be treated as an investment company under the 1940 Act. ARC’s policies with respect to such activities may be reviewed and modified from time to time by its directors without notice to or the vote of the stockholders. In 2004, we acquired 8,025 common partnership units for total cash consideration of $125,000, and in 2005 through June 30, we acquired 142,077 common partnership units for total cash consideration of $1,836,000.

Reporting Policies

Generally speaking, ARC makes available to its stockholders, and causes the Partnership to make available to its limited partners, audited annual financial statements and annual reports and quarterly unaudited financial statements. ARC is also subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, pursuant to which ARC files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information, including financial statements with the SEC. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, the Partnership will also become subject to the same information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.

119




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Except as noted below, neither ARC nor any director or executive officer of ARC owns any of, and, as of September 30, 2005, no person or entity is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of, the Partnership’s outstanding common partw Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-weight:bold;"> 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2005

 

58,764

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

6.17

Owner

 

 

 

Number
of Units

 

Percentage
of Units
Owned

 

%

 

2005

 

3,626

 

58,764

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035

 

25,780

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

6.26

%

 

2035

 

1,614

 

25,780

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008

 

9,369

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

6.18

%

 

Eugene Mercy, Jr.(1)(2)

 

128,059

 

 

ce="Times New Roman" style="font-size:9.0pt;">2008

 

579

 

9,369

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007

 

42,100

 

 

4.0

%

 

 

10.22

%

 

2007

 

4,303

 

6.95

%

 

J. Markham Green(1)(3)

 

34,871

 

 

1.89

%

 

ARC directors and officers as a group

 

162,930

 

 

8.84

%

 


(1)    Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the address for each executive officer is 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80203.

(2)42,100

 

Floorplan lines of credit due 2007

 

35,367

 

 

3.4

%

 

 

6.59

%

 

2007

 

2,331

 

35,367

 

Other loans

 

1,326

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

6.97

%

 

2012

 

188

 

523

 

 

 

281,226

 

 

26.8

%

 

 

6.86

    Units beneficially owned consist of 128,059 units. In addition, the Mercy Foundation, of which Mr. Mercy is a trustee, owns 26,202 units. This beneficial ownership also includes 23,182 units held by his wife, Susan Mercy, for which he disclaims any beneficial ownership.

(3)    Units beneficially owned consist of 34,871 units.

120




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the Partnership’s partnership agreement, does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and provisions of the partnership agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the partnership agreement, as applicable. As used in this section, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” refer to the Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term “ARC” refers to Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries.

General; Management of the Partnership

We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on September 30, 1998. ARC is our sole general partner. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, as our sole general partner, ARC has, subject to certain protective rights of limited partners described below, full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in our management and control, including the ability to cause us to enter into certain major transactions including a merger or a sale of substantially all of our assets. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC may not be removed as our general partner by our other partners, with or without cause, without ARC’s consent.

Our limited partners expressly acknowledged that ARC, as our general partner, is acting for our benefit, the limited partners and ARC’s stockholders collectively. ARC is under no obligation to give priority to the separate interests of the limited partners or its stockholders in deciding whether to cause us to take or decline to take any actions.

Limited Liability of Limited Partners

The Delaware statute under which we have been formed provides that limited partners are not personally liable to third parties for the obligations of their partnership unless the limited partner is also a general partner, causes a third party to reasonably believe that the limited partner is a general partner in the partnership or participates in the business and control of the partnership. Our partnership agreement also provides that generally no limited partner has any right to participate in or exercise control or management power over our affairs.

Management Liability and Indemnification

ARC, as our general partner, and its directors and officers are not liable to us for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived resulting from errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission, so long as ARC acted in good faith. The partnership agreement provides for indemnification of ARC, any of its officers or directors or the Partnership and other persons as ARC may designate from and against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, fines, settlements and other amounts incurred in connection with any actions relating to our operations, as set forth in the partnership agreement (subject to the exceptions described below under “—Fiduciary Responsibilities”).

Fiduciary Responsibilities

ARC’s directors and officers have duties under applicable Maryland law to manage us in a manner consistent with the b="Times New Roman" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-weight:bold;">%

 

 

 

19,391

 

280,423

 

 

 

$

1,049,340

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

6.71

%

 

 

 

$

78,911

 

$

Our partnership agreement expressly limits ARC’s liability by providing that ARC and its officers and directors are not liable or accountable in damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for errors in

121




judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if ARC or its director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, we are required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or the other persons in connection with any actions relating to our operations, provided that we will not indemnify for willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or any transaction for which the person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement.

Outside Activities of ARC

Our partnership agreement prohibits ARC from entering into or conducting business other than in connection with:

·       the ownership, acquisition or disposition of its partnership interests as general partner;

·       the management of our business;

·       ARC’s operations as a reporting company under the Exchange Act;

·       ARC’s operations as a REIT;

·       the offering, sale, syndication, private placement or public offering of stock, bonds, securities or other interests;

·       financing or refinancing of any type related to us or our assets or activities;

·       any of the foregoing activities as they relate to a subsidiary of the Partnership or of ARC; and

·       such activities as are incidental thereto.

In addition, ARC may not own any assets or take title to assets (other than temporarily in connection with an acquisition prior to contributing such assets to the Partnership) other than interests in its subsidiaries and subsidiaries of the Partnership, its general partnership interests and such cash and cash equivalents, bank accounts or similar instruments or accounts as ARC deems reasonably necessary, taking into account, among other things, the requirements necessary for ARC to carry out its responsibilities contemplated under our partnership agreement, its charter and to qualify as a REIT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if ARC acquires assets in its own name and owns property other than through the Partnership, the partners have agreed to negotiate in good faith to amend the partnership agreement to reflect such activities and the direct ownership of assets by ARC.

ARC and any of its affiliates are entitled to acquire our partnership units and to exercise all rights of a limited partner relating to such units.

Restrictions on Affiliate Transactions

ARC and its affiliates are generally prohibited from selling or conveying any property to the Partnership except pursuant to transactions that are determined by ARC in good faith to be fair and reasonable.

Outside Activities of Limited Partners

Subject to any agreements entered into by a limited partner with ARC, the Partnership or a subsidiary (including, without limitation, any employment agreement), any limited partner and its affiliates shall be entitled to have business interests and engage in business activities in addition to those relating to us, including business interests and activities that are in direct or indirect competition with us or that are enhanced by our activities. Neither we nor any partner shall have any rights in any business ventures of any limited partner pursuant to our partnership agreement. No limited partner or any other person shall have any obligation pursuant to our partnership agreement, subject to any other agreements entered into by

122




such person with ARC, the Partnership or a subsidiary, to offer any interest in any such business ventures to us or any other person.

Distributions

Our partnership agreement provides that holders of our partnership units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available cash (i) first, with respect to any partnership units that are entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any partnership units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests).

Allocations of Net Income and Net Loss

Our net income and net loss are determined and allocated with respect to each fiscal year as of the end of the year. Except as otherwise provided in our partnership agreement, an allocation of a share of net income or net loss is treated as an allocation of the same share of each item of income, gain, loss or deduction that is taken into account in computing net income or net loss. Except as otherwise provided in our partnership agreement, net income and net loss are allocated to the holders of partnership units holding the same class of units in accordance with their respective percentage interests in the class at the end of each fiscal year. The partnership agreement contains provisions for special allocations intended to comply with certain regulatory requirements, including the requirements of Treasury Regulations Sections 1.704-1(b) and 1.704-2. Except as otherwise provided in the partnership agreement, for income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, each item of income, gain, loss and deduction is allocated among our limited partners in the same manner as its correlative item of book income, gain, loss or deduction is allocated pursuant to our partnership agreement.

Meetings of Limited Partners

There will be no regularly scheduled meetings of limited partners. Meetings of our partners may be called by our general partner, ARC, and will be called upon the wri.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:35.0pt;">

960,688

 

 

FFO

As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents income (loss) from continuing operations (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in

84




accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.

The following table calculates our FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Redemption Rights

After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of partnership units, each of our limited partners and certain transferees will have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our partnership agreement, to require ARC to redeem all or a portion of the common partnership units held by the party in exchange for a cash amount equal to the value of our partnership units. On or before the close of business on the fifth business day after ARC receives a notice of redemption, ARC may, in its sole and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of ARC’s common stock imposed under ARC’s charter and the transfer restrictions and other limitations thereof, elect to acquire some or all of the tendered common partnership units from the tendering party in exchange for shares of ARC’s common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of ARC’s common stock for each common partnership unit (subject to antidilution adjustments provided in the partnership agreement). It is ARC’s current intention to exercise this right in connection with any redemption of partnership units. Each limited partner may effect a redemption of partnership units only once in each fiscal quarter, unless otherwise permitted by ARC, in its sole and absolute discretion, and may not effect a redemption for less than 250 partnership units.

123




Transferability of Partnership Units

In general, ARC may not voluntarily withdraw from the Partnership or transfer its interest in us unless the limited partners consent by approval of a majority in interest or immediately after a merger of ARC into another entity and substantially all of the assets of the surviving entity, excluding the general partnership interest held by ARC, are contributed to the partnership as a capital contribution in exchange for partnership units. With certain limited exceptions, the limited partners may not transfer their interests in us, in whole or in part, without ARC’s written consent, which consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. No partnership unit that is paired with shares of ARC’s special voting stock may be transferred unless accompanied by such shares of special voting stock and transferred as a unit. As a result, transfer of partnership units that are paired with shares of special voting stock also will be subject to the restrictions on transfer of special voting stock contained in ARC’s charter.

Issuance of ARC Stock

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, upon the issuance of ARC stock other than in connection with a redemption of partnership units, ARC will generally be obligated to contribute the cash proceeds or other consideration received from the issuance to the Partnership in exchange for, in the case of common stock, common partnership units, or in the case of an issuance of preferred stock, preferred partnership units with designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions that are substantially the same as the designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions of the preferred stock.

Tax Matters

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC is our tax matters partner. Accordingly, ARC has the authority to handle tax audits and to make tax elections under the Internal Revenue Code on our behalf.

Term

The Partnership has perpetual existence, unless dissolved upon:

·       our bankruptcy, judicial dissolution or withdrawal (unless, in the case of a withdrawal, a majority-in-interest of the remaining limited partners agree to continue the partnership and to the appointment of a successor general partner);

·       the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets;

·       redemption (or acquisition by ARC) of all partnership units other than units held by us; or

·       an election by ARC in its capacity as our sole general partner.

Resale Registration Statement for the Limited Partners of the Partnership

Pursuant to the partnership agreement, ARC maintains a registration statement registering the resale by the limited partners of the Partnership of any of ARC’s securities issued to the limited partners upon a redemption of their partnership units. ARC will use all reasonable efforts to keep any shelf registration statement effective until the third anniversary of the date on which the registration statement becomes effective. ARC has the right in its sole discretion, based on valid business purpose to suspend the use of the prospectus comprising a part of the shelf registration statement for a reasonable length of time and from time to time provided that the aggregate number of days in all delay periods occurring in any period of twelve consecutive months shall not exceed 105 days.

In connection with ARC’s reorganization, the limited partners of the Partnership also were granted “piggyback” registration rights in connection with certain registered offerings of ARC’s securities. These piggyback registration rights will terminate when the resale shelf registration statement described in the preceding paragraph becomes effective under the 1933 Act.

124




Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004(1)

 

2004(1)(2)

 

2003(3)

 

2002(4)

 

DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

The following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the notes and the indenture, does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and provisions of the notes and the indenture, which are incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the notes or the indenture, as applicable. As used in this section, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” refer to the Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term “ARC” refers to Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries.

General

We have issued $96,600,000 million aggregate principal amount of notes, and the notes are limited to the aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000. We issued the notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of August 9, 2005, between us, as issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

The terms of the notes include those provisions contained in the notes and the indenture and those made part of the indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The notes are subject to all such terms, and holders of notes are referred to the notes, the indenture and the Trust Indenture Act for a statement thereof. Copies of the indenture and the form of the notes are available for inspection at the corporate trust office of the trustee, currently located at U.S. Bank National Association, 60 Livingston Avenue, EP-MN-WS3C, St. Paul, MN 55107-2292; Attention: Rick Prokosch.

Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 71¤2% per year from and including August 9, 2005 or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Interest will be paid to each registered holder at the close of business on the February 1 or August 1 (whether or not a business day in New York City) immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date, each of which we refer to as a record date. Interest on the notes is computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.

In addition, we will pay additional interest on the notes under the circumstances described below under “—Registration Rights.”

The notes will mature on August 15, 2025 and will be paid against presentation and surrender thereof at the corporate trust office of the trustee unless (1) earlier redeemed by us at our option or repurchased by us at Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(16,351

)

$

(5,326

)

$

(30,384

)

$

(42,578

)

 

$

(84,913

“—Exchange Rights” below. We are not required to maintain a sinking fund for the repayment of the notes.

The notes were issued only in fully registered, book-entry form, in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, except under the limited circumstances described below under “—Book-Entry System.”

If any interest payment date, stated maturity date, redemption date or repurchase date is not a business day in New York City, the payment otherwise required to be made on such date will be made on the next such business day without any additional payment as a result of such delay. All payments will be made in U.S. dollars.

Ranking

The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Partnership and rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured indebtedness. However, the notes are effectively subordinated to our mortgages and

125




other secured indebtedness (to the extent of the value of the collateral securing the same) and to all preferred equity and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2005 we had outstanding $25.8 million of senior unsecured indebtedness and $1,063.2 million of secured indebtedness and our consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $59.1 million of other liabilities. The indenture governing the notes does not prohibit us or any of our affiliates or subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness or issuing preferred equity in the future. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Offering—The notes are effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured indebtedness” and “—The notes are effectively subordinated to liabilities of our subsidiaries.”

Exchange Rights

Subject to the restrictions on ownership of ARC common stock and the conditions described below, holders may exchange at any time on or prior to maturity or redemption any outstanding notes (or $1,000 portions thereof) into shares of ARC common stock initially at an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price of $14.31 per ARC common share). The exchange rate and the equivalent exchange price in effect at any given time are referred to in this prospectus as the “exchange rate” and the “exchange price,” respectively, and will be subject to adjustment as described herein. Holders may exchange notes only in denominations of $1,000 and whole multiples of $1,000. If we call notes for redemption, you may exchange the notes only until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the redemption date unless we fail to pay the redemption price.

Upon exchange of a note, a holder will not receive any cash payment of interest, subject to certain exceptions, and we will not adjust the exchange rate to account for accrued and unpaid interest.

Holders of notes at the close of business on a record date for an interest payment will receive payment of interest payable on the corresponding interest payment date notwithstanding the exchange of such notes at any time after the close of business on the applicable regular record date. Notes tendered for exchange by a holder after the close of business on any record date65pt;">

)

 

$

(43,267

)

$

(48,109

)

Plus:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 < for an interest payment and on or prior to the corresponding interest payment date must be accompanied by payment of an amount equal to the interest that the holder is to receive on the notes; provided, however, that no such payment will be made (1) if we have specified a redemption date that is after such record date and on or prior to such interest payment date or (2) with respect to overdue interest, if any overdue interest exists at the time of exchange with respect to such notes.

If a holder exchanges notes, we will pay any documentary, stamp or similar issue or transfer tax due on the issuance of shares of ARC common stock upon the exchange, if any, unless the tax is due because the holder requests the shares to be issued or delivered to a person other than the holder, in which case the holder will pay that tax prior to receipt of such shares.

A holder wishing to exercise its exchange rights must deliver an irrevocable duly completed exchange notice to the exchange agent. Holders may obtain copies of the required form of the exch/p>

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization 

 

22,224

 

17,242

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

 

72,014

 

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

Income from discontinued operations.

 

72

 

343

 

1,000

 

795

 

 

1,915

 

 

31

 

1,040

 

Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations

 

(18

)

1,085

 

5

 

1,825

 

 

3,134

 

 

2,589

 

1,957

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of loan origination fees.

ange notice from the exchange agent. A certificate, or a book-entry transfer through DTC, for the number of shares of ARC common stock for which any notes are exchanged, together with a cash payment for any fractional shares, will be delivered through the exchange agent as soon as practicable, but within the time periods specified below, following the exchange date (subject to our ability to elect to deliver cash, or a combination of cash and shares of ARC common stock). The trustee will initially act as the exchange agent.

In lieu of delivery of shares of ARC common stock upon all or any portion of the exchanged notes, we may elect to pay holders surrendering notes for exchange an amount in cash per note (or a portion of a note) equal to the average closing price of ARC common stock over the five trading day period starting on and including the third trading day following the exchange date multiplied by the exchange rate in effect on the exchange date (or portion of the exchange rate applicable to a portion of a note if a combination of

126




ARC common stock and cash is to be delivered). We will inform such holders through the trustee no later than two business days following the exchange date of our election to deliver shares of ARC common stock, to pay cash in lieu of delivery of the shares or to deliver a combination of ARC common stock and cash. If we elect to deliver solely shares of ARC common stock, these will be delivered through the exchange agent no later than the third business day following the exchange date. If we elect to deliver a combination of shares of ARC common stock and cash or to pay all of such payment in cash, such delivery and payment will be made to holders surrendering notes no later than the tenth business day following the applicable exchange date.

The “closing price” of ARC common stock on any trading day means the reported last sale price per share (or, if no last sale price is reported, the average of the bid and ask prices per share or, if more than one in either case, the average of the average bid and the average ask prices per share) on such date reported by the New York Stock Exchange or, if ARC common stock is not quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, as reported by the principal national securities exchange or quotation system on which ARC common stock is then listed or otherwise as provided in the indenture.

If a holder has already delivered a repurchase notice as described under either “—Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates” or “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change,” with respect to a note, that holder may not tender that note for exchange until the holder has properly withdrawn the repurchase notice.

Upon surrender of a note for exchange, the holder shall deliver to us cash equal to the amount that we are required to deduct and withhold under applicable law in connection with such exchange; provided, however, that if the holder does not deliver such cash, we may deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise deliverable to such holder the amount required to be deducted and withheld under applicable law.

Holders may surrender their notes for exchange of shares of ARC common stock at the applicable exchange rate at any time prior to the close of business on the second business day immediately preceding the stated maturity date.

Exchange Rate Adjustments

The initial exchange rate will be adjusted for certain events, including:

(1)         the issuance of ARC common stock as a dividend or distribution on ARC common stock;

 

(1,911

)

(855

)

(3,772

)

(1,722

)

 

(5,952

)

 

(3,213

)

(4,129

)

Depreciation expense on furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

(529

)

(81

)

(951

)

(449

)

 

(1,264

)

 

(1,112

e:10.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt 4.0pt 40.0pt;text-indent:-20.0pt;">(2)         subdivisions and combinations of ARC common stock;

(3)         the issuance to all holders of ARC common stock of rights or warrants entitling them to purchase ARC common stock (or securities exchangeable into ARC common stock) at less than (or having an exchange price per share less than) the current market price of ARC common stock;

(4)         the dividend or other distribution to all holders of ARC common stock or shares of ARC capital stock (other than common stock) of evidences of indebtedness or assets, including securities, but excluding (A) the rights and warrants referred to above, (B) dividends and distributions in connection with a reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or conveyance resulting in a change in the exchange consideration pursuant to the second succeeding paragraph or (C) dividends or distributions paid exclusively in cash;

(5)         dividends or other distributions consisting exclusively of cash to all holders of ARC common stock in excess of $0.1875 per share in each fiscal quarter (the “dividend threshold amount”); the dividend threshold amount is subject to adjustment as a result of the same events giving rise to an adjustment to the exchange rate, provided that no adjustment will be made to the dividend threshold amount as a result of any event described in this clause (5); and

127




(6)         payments to holders of ARC common stock in respect of a tender offer or exchange offer for ARC common stock by ARC or any of its subsidiaries to the extent that the cash and fair market value of any other consideration included in the payment per share exceeds the closing price of ARC common stock on the trading day following the last date on which tenders or exchanges may be made pursuant to such tender offer or exchange offer.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an adjustment to the exchange rate pursuant to clauses (5) or (6) above, in no event will the exchange rate exceed 82.1018 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment pursuant to clauses (1) through (4) above.

No adjustment in the exchange rate will be required unless such adjustment would require a change of at least one percent in the exchange rate then in effect at such time. Any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated above, the exchange rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of ARC common stock or any securities exchangeable into or exchangeable for ARC common stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. We will not make any adjustment if holders of notes are entitled to participate in the transactions described above.

In the case of:

·       any reclassification or change of ARC common stock (other than changes resulting from a subdivision or combination); or

·       a consolidation, merger or combination involving ARC or a sale or conveyance to another corporation of all or substantially all of ARC’s property and assets,

in each case as a result of which holders of ARC common stock are entitled to receive stock, other securities, other property or assets (including cash or any combination thereof) with respect to or in exchange for ARC common stock, holders of notes will be entitled thereafter to exchange their notes into the kind and amount of shares of stock, other securities or other property or assets (including cash or any combination thereof) which they would have owned or been entitled to receive upon such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or conveyance had such notes been exchanged into ARC common stock immediately prior to such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or conveyance. In the event holders of ARC common stock have the opportunity to elect the form of consideration to be received in a reclassification, change, consolidation, merger combination, sale or conveyance, we will make adequate provision whereby the holders of the notes shall have the opportunity, on a timely basis, to determine the form of consideration into which all of the notes, treated as a single class, shall be exchangeable. Such determination shall be based on the blended, weighted average of elections made by holders of the notes who participate in such determination and shall be subject to any limitations to which all of the holders of ARC common stock are subject to, such as pro-rata reductions applicable to any portion of the consideration payable. We may not become a party to any such transaction unless its terms are consistent with the foregoing.

If a taxable distribution to holders of ARC common stock or other transaction occurs which results in any adjustment of the exchange price, the holders of notes may, in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution subject to U.S. income tax as a dividend. In certain other circumstances, the absence of an adjustment may result in a taxable dividend to the holders of common stock. See “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.” We may make such reductions in the exchange price, in addition to those set forth above, as the board of directors deems advisable to avoid or diminish any income tax to holders of ARC common stock resulting from any dividend or distribution of stock (or rights to acquire stock) or from any event treated as such for income tax purposes.

We may from time to time, to the extent permitted by law, reduce the exchange price of the notes by any amount for any period of at least 20 days. In that case we will give at least 15 days’ notice of such decrease.

128




Determination of Make Whole Premium

If a transaction described in the first, second or fourth bullet of the definition of change in control (as set forth under “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change”) occurs prior to August 20, 2015 and a holder elects to exchange its notes in connection with such transaction, we will increase the applicable exchange rate for the notes surrendered for exchange by a number of additional ARC common shares (the “additional change in control shares”), as described below. An exchange of notes will be deemed for these purposes to be “in connection with” such a change in control transaction if the notice of exchange of the notes is received by the exchange agent from and including the date that is 15 business days prior to the anticipated effective date of the change in control up to and including the business day prior to the repurchase date as described under “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.”

The number of additional change in control shares will be determined by reference to the table below and is based on the date on which such change in control transaction becomes effective (the “effective date”) and the price (the “stock price”) paid per ARC common share in such transaction. If the holders of ARC common shares receive only cash in the change in control transaction, the stock price shall be the cash amount paid per ARC common share. Otherwise, the stock price shall be the average of the closing sale prices of ARC common shares on the ten consecutive trading days up to but excluding the effective date.

The stock prices set forth in the first row of the table (i.e., the column headers) will be adjusted as of any date on which the exchange rate of the notes is adjusted. The adjusted stock prices will equal the stock prices applicable immediately prior to such adjustment multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the exchange rate immediately prior to the adjustment giving rise to the stock price adjustment and

)

(1,019

)

FFO

 

3,487

 

12,408

 

8,153

 

(9,977

)

 

(15,066

)

 

1,495

 

(13,202

)

Less preferred unit distributions.

 

(2,971

)

(2,578

)

(5,942

)

(3,810

)

 

(9,752

)

 

 

 

FFO available to common partnership unitholders

 

$

516

 

$

9,830

 

$

2,211

 

$

(13,787

)

 

$

(24,818

)

 

$

1,495

 

$

(13,202

)


(1)    Our FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2004 includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARC’s IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition.

(2)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes charges for the following: (i) retail losses of $11.2 million related to sales of older vacant homes sold during the fourth quarter at discounts to their original costs and marketing and promotion costs both incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $0.9 million of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million of severance costs related to the fourth quarter resignation of our chief operating officer and the second quarter resignation of other executive officers; (v) approximately $500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities; and (vi) approximately $500,000 related to property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third quarter in the Southeast United States.

(3)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a charge of $1.4 million for retail home sales asset impairment and other expense and a charge of approximately $864,000 for the cost of vacating unused office space and $337,000 in executive severance.

(4)    FFO for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes charges incurred in the reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including $1.9 million for exit fees and $1.6 million for the write off of unamortized loan costs, and includes a charge of $13.6 million to write off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses. For more details see our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, the denominator of which is the exchange rate as so adjusted. In addition, the number of additional change in control shares will be subject to adjustment in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under “—Exchange Rate Adjustments.”

The following table sets forth the stock price and number of additional change in control shares of ARC common stock to be received per $1,000 principal amount of notes:

Stock Price
on Effective

 

Effective Date

 

Date

 

8/9/2005

 

8/20/2006

 

8/20/2007

 

8/20/2008

 

8/20/2009

 

8/20/2010

 

8/20/2011

 

8/20/2012

 

8/20/2013

 

8/20/2014

 

8/20/2015

 

$12.18

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

85




Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We use some derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.

As of June 30, 2005, our pro forma debt outstanding was $1,049.3 million, comprised of $768.1 million of indebtedness subject to fixed interest rates and $281.2 million, or 26.8%, of our total consolidated debt, subject to variable interest rates. In February 2004 we entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement pursuant to which we effectively fixed the base rate portion of the interest rate with respect to $100 million of our variable rate debt. As a result, approximately 80% of our total indebtedness is subject to fixed interest rates for a minimum of two years.

If LIBOR and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.2 million annually. If, after consideration of the interest rate swap agreement described above, LIBOR and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.2 million annually.

Interest risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

The fair value of pro forma debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $1,076.4 million.

86




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

Overview

The Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership whose sole general partner is ARC. As of June 30, 2005, ARC owned approximately 94.8% of the Partnership’s outstanding partnership interests. ARC is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT.

We acquire, renovate, reposition and operate primarily all-age manufactured home communities. We also lease with the option to purchase, rent and sell manufactured homes, finance sales of manufactured homes and act as agent in the sale of homeowners’ insurance and other related insurance products, all exclusively to residents and prospective residents in our communities.

As of June 30, 2005, we owned and operated 315 manufactured home communities (excluding one community held for sale) in 27 states containing 62,942 homesites. These properties are located in 67 markets across the United States. Our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.5% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of our total homesites. On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all these communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives. After taking into account the proposed sale of these communities, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 6.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

ARC’s predecessor was formed in 1995. In the first quarter of 2004, ARC completed its initial public offering, or IPO, of 25,300,209 shares of ARC common stock (including 2,258,617 shares sold by selling securityholders) and 5,000,000 shares of ARC’s 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. In conjunction with the IPO, we also completed a financing transaction involving Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, consisting of $500 million of new mortgage debt and the repayment of some of our existing indebtedness. We used a portion of the proceeds from ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction to acquire 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C., or Hometown. See Note 3 to the Partnership’s annual audited financial statements included in this prospectus for a further discussion of the Hometown acquisition.

Our principal executive, corporate and property management offices are located at 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado 80203, and our telephone number is (303) 383-7500. Our internet address is www.aboutarc.com. The information contained on our website is not part of this prospectus.

Our Business Objectives

Our principal business objectives are to achieve sustainable long-term growth in cash flow>

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

per share and to maximize returns to our stockholders. Our key operating objectives include the following:

Community Renovation and Repositioning.   We utilize a comprehensive four-stage process that we call B-F-F-R to renovate and reposition the communities we acquire and improve their operating

87




performance. B-F-F-R stands for: Buy—acquisition, Fix—physical infrastructure and resident quality, Fill—occupancy level, Run—ongoing, long-term operations. Our prior acquisitions generally have targeted communities that demonstrate opportunities for improvement in operating results due to one or more of the following characteristics:

·       below market rate leases;

·       high operating expenses;

·       poor infrastructure and quality of residents;

12.2206

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  13.00

 

10.2161

 

9.8807·       inadequate capitalization; or

·       a lack of professional management.

While community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operations.

With respect to the other stages of the B-F-F-R process, we have established district and regional management that has a sufficiently limited span of control to allow for strong focus on community development. We have also established a mobile management team positioned to address specific issues related to particular markets and drive new programs. We focus on our communities utilizing B-F-F-R according to their relative occupancy levels as follows:

·       For communities above 90% occupancy, we primarily focus on improving operating margins through expense and overhead management, utility recovery and creation of additional revenue sources (as of June 30, 2005, 131 communities with 23,222 homesites averaging 96% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities with 20,246 homesites averaging 95.5% occupancy);

·       For communities between 80% and 90% occupancy, we focus on sales and leasing activities, resident retention and delivering the necessary homes to the community to allow for occupancy growth (as of June 30, 2005, 96 communities with 20,331 homesites averaging 86% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 77 communities with 17,262 homesites averaging 85.9% occupancy); and

·       For communities below 80% occupancy, we focus on developing community management and sales staff, making capital expenditures, supplying necessary homes to provide for occupancy growth and establishing resident standards with respect to behavior and rent payment (as of June 30, 2005, 47 communities with 10,057 homesites between 70% and 80% occupancy averaging 76% occupancy and another 41 communities with 9,332 homesites below 70% occupancy averaging 63% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 28 communities with 6,825 homesites between 70% and 80% averaging 76% occupancy and another 21 communities with 5,135 homesites below 70% averaging 64.3% occupancy).

Significant Presenfont>

 

9.5000

 

9.1194

 

   As of June 30, 2005, approximately 69% of our homesites were located in our 20 largest markets. Upon completion of the proposed sale of the 79 communities, approximately 79% of our homesites will be in our 20 largest markets. We believe we have a leading market share in 15 of these markets, based on number of homesites. To the extent that we acquire new communities, we focus our growth in select markets characterized by limited development, expensive alternative housing costs, a strong, diversified economic base and/or opportunity to increase our market share and achieve economies of scale. Increasing our presence and market share enables us to (i) achieve operating efficiencies and economies of scale by leveraging our local property management infrastructure and other operating overhead over a larger number of communities and homesites, (ii) provide potential residents with a broader range of affordable housing options in their market, (iii) increase our visibility and brand recognition and leverage advertising costs and (iv) obtain more favorable terms and faster

88




turnaround time on construction, renovation, repairs and home installation services. We believe the significant size and geographic diversity of our portfolio reduces our exposure to risks associated with geographic concentration, including the risk of economic downturns or natural disasters in any one market in which we operate.

Broad Based Marketing Efforts.   We have developed and implemented a number of marketing initiatives to enhance the visibility of our communities, maintain and improve our occupancy, and identify, reward and lengthen the lease duration of our good customers. We have active marketing and sales teams at both the corporate and local market level. Our home lease with option to purchase program allows residents who might not otherwise qualify for home ownership through traditional purchase or financing avenues the opportunity to work towards home ownership while they lease. Our ability to provide financing to our residents and prospective residents is supported by our consumer finance facility. We have also established a Hispanic marketing initiative targeted at addressing the specific needs and cultural preferences of the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population.

Proactive Management to Maximize Occupancy.   In response to challenging industry conditions, particularly the shortage of available consumer financing for the purchase of manufactured housing, we have developed and implemented a range of programs aimed primarily at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, improving resident satisfaction and retention, increasing revenue and improving our operating margins. We focus on converting long-term renters into homeowners and improving occupancy through the sale of older homes for casottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">

8.6301

 

7.9468

 

7.4436

 

7.0419

 

7.0419

 

7.0419

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  14.00

 

8.3749

 

8.0136

h, the financing of sales of newer homes and the leasing of newer homes with an option to purchase.

Customer Satisfaction and Quality Control.   Our goal is to meet the needs of our residents or prospective residents for housing alternatives in a clean and attractive environment at affordable prices. We have established a nationwide call center with bilingual staff to manage resident communications and enhance our sales and marketing efforts. We approach our business with a consumer product focus having an emphasis on value and quality for our residents and prospective residents. We have quality assurance programs executed through employee training and adherence to guidelines developed by our senior management, based in part upon surveys of our customers. Our customer focus and quality controls are designed to provide consistency and quality of product and to enable our community managers to effectively market our communities and improve occupancy and resident retention across our portfolio.

Community Acquisitions/Dispositions.   Over the last ten years, ARC has acquired over 340 communities with over 70,000 homesites. We have invested in dedicated resources, including acquisition, due diligence, construction and marketing teams which allowed us to significantly broaden our acquisition prospects, incorporating stabilized and non-stabilized communities. We have compiled a proprietary computer database containing detailed information on over 28,000 manufactured home communities located throughout the United States, which enables us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities quickly, often before the community has been marketed publicly. However, while community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operation. In addition, we also sold more than 30 communities, and have announced plans to sell up to an additional 79 communities, when it became evident that these communities did not fit our market or performance objectives. We continue to evaluate our property portfolio and may sell additional properties in the future.

Key Programs and Initiatives

Home Rental Program.   Our real estate segment revenue consists of homeowner rental income, home renter rental income and utility and other income. We receive homeowner rental income from homeowners who lease homesites in our communities, and we receive home renter rental income from persons who rent manufactured homes and homesites from us in our communities pursuant to our home rental program and our home lease with option to purchase program. For the six months ended June 30,

89




2005, and the year ended December 31, 2004, home renter rental income totaled $22.9 million, or approximately 20% of our total real estate revenue, and $40.3 million, or approximately 20% of our total real estate revenue, respectively, and homeowner rental income totaled $78.7 million, or approximately 70% of our total real estate revenue, and $145 million, or approximately 71% of our total real estate revenue, respectively. At June 30, 2005, we owned a total of 8,718 homes in our communities with acquisition and improvement costs of $249.2 million, which are rented, available for rent or for sale. These homes had an occupancy rate of approximately 86% at June 30, 2005. We intend to continue to expand our home rental program in the future.

Home Lease with Option to Purchase.   Our home lease with option to purchase program is a program that we initiated in 2004 to address the demand for home ownership in that segment of the population that

 

7.6469

 

7.2499

 

6.7830

 

6.2169

 

5.5323

 

4.6956

 

3.7746

 

2.7440

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  15.00

 

6.9156

 

6.4409

In-Community Retail Home Sales and Consumer Financing Initiative.   Our retail home sales business consists of the sales of manufactured homes in our communities to residents and prospective residents at reasonable prices. Through our consumer financing initiative, we provide loans to qualified residents and prospective residents to facilitate purchases of manufactured homes located in our communities. It is our practice to acquire additional manufactured home inventory for sale in coordination with the sale of our existing inventory.

Our Industry

The manufactured housing industry represents a meaningful portion of the U.S. housing market. In 2000, there were an estimated 22 million people living in manufactured homes in the United States. The manufactured housing industry is primarily focused on providing affordable housing to moderate-income customers. A manufactured home is a single-family house constructed entirely in a factory rather than at a homesite, with generally the same materials found in site-built homes and in conformity with federal construction and safety standards.

Each homeowner in a manufactured home community leases a homesite from the owner of the community. The manufactured home community owner owns the underlying land, utility connections, streets, lighting, driveways, common area amenities and other capital improvements and is responsible for enforcement of community guidelines that govern resident conduct and maintenance of the community. Generally, each homeowner is responsible for the maintenance of their home and upkeep of their leased site.

We believe that manufactured home communities have several characteristics that make them an attractive investment when compared to some other types of real estate, particularly multi-family real estate, including the following:

·       significant barriers to the entry of new manufactured home communities into the market;

·       large and growing demographic group of potential customers;

90




·       comparatively stable resident base;

·       fragmented ownership of communities;

·       comparatively low recurring capital requirements;

·       improved economies of scale in operation of multiple sites; and

·    7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.0pt;">

 

6.0190

 

5.6616

 

5.2984

 

4.9353

 

4.4068

 

3.6785

 

2.7276

 

1.4954

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  16.00

 

5.9083

 

5.2726

affordable homeowner lifestyle.

The manufactured housing industry faces a challenging operating environment, which has resulted in losses, exits from the industry and significant curtailment of activity among manufacturers, retailers and consumer finance companies. According to Manufactured Housing Institute, or MHI, industry shipments (a measure of manufacturers’ home production and wholesale sales) have declined from 372,843 homes in 1998 to 130,802 in 2004. We believe this dramatic decline in production and sales is largely the result of an oversupply of consumer credit from 1994 to 1999, which led to over stimulation in the manufacturing, retail and finance sectors of the industry. Current industry conditions are further exacerbated by low mortgage interest rates and less stringent credit requirements for the purchase of entry-level site built homes, thereby reducing the price competitiveness of manufactured housing.

We expect industry conditions to remain difficult for the foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the United States and a continued shortage of available consumer financing for manufactured home buyers. We anticipate that demand for manufactured housing and manufactured home communities will improve if home mortgage interest rates return to higher historical levels, which should reduce the pricing differential between home mortgage interest rates and interest rates for financing the purchase of a manufactured home.

Recent Developments

On September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARC’s board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and would direct ARC’s sales of communities.

On that date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625 dividend on ARC’s Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnership’s Series C preferred partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARC’s board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARC’s common stock and the quarterly distribution on the Partnership’s common partnership units, in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Also on September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming all 79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives.

In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005). See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006” for a further discussion of this amendment.

In October 2005, we amended our lease receivables facility to increase the size of the faclity from $75 million to $150 million. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible

91




manufactured housing units owned by two of our indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP (collectively, “Housing”) and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Lease Receivables Facility Due 2008” for a further discussion of this amendment.

Our Markets

The table below provides summary information on our portfolio as of June 30, 2005 for our 20 largest markets:

 

4.6812

 

4.1705

 

Market(1)

 

 

 

Number
of Total
Homesites

 

Percentage
of Total
Homesites

 

Occupancy

 

Rental Income
Per Occupied
Homesite Per
Month(2)

3.7891

 

3.3968

 

3.0046

 

2.6123

 

2.2201

 

 

Dallas/Fadding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">

1.2536

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  17.00

 

5.2941

 

4.5418

 

3.7839

 

3.0444

 

2.3763

 

2.0309

 

1.9261

 

1.6038

 

1.2814

 

0.9591

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  18.00

 

5.0000

 

4.1667

 

3.2881

 

2.4091

 

1.4853

 

0.4825

 

0.4647

 

0.4137

 

0.3656

 

0.2372

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  20.00

 

 

7,223

 

 

 

11.5

%

 

 

 

4.5000

 

3.7500

 

2.8500

 

2.0000

 

1.0000

82.7

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

Atlanta, GA

 

0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.0pt;">

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  25.00

 

3.6000

 

3.0000

 

2.2800

 

1.6000

 

0.8000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

4,969

 

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

349

 

 

Salt Lake City, UT

 

 

3,792

 

 

 

6.0

%

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

348

 

 

Front Range of CO

 

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  30.00

3,287

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

89.1

%

 

3.0000

 

2.5000

 

1.9000

 

1.3333

 

0.6667

 

 

 

429

 

 

Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, MO-KS

 

 

2,428

 

 

 

3.9

%

 

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  40.00

 

89.6

%

 

 

285

 

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

2.2500

 

1.8750

 

1.4250

 

1.0000

 

0.5000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

2,256

 

 

 

3.6

 

0.0000

 

 

  50.00

%

 

 

88.2

%

 

 

349

 

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

2,178

 

 

 

3.5

%

 

 

66.7

%

 

 

273

 

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

1,986

 

1.8000

 

1.5000

 

1.1400

 

0.8000

 

0.4000

 

0.0000

 

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

89.8

%

 

 

368

 

 

St. Louis, MO-IL

 

 

1,912

 

 

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

 

129




The exact stock prices and effective dates may not be set forth in the table, in which case:

(1)         if the stock price is between two stock price amounts in the table or the effective date is between two dates in the table, the additional change in control shares will be determined by straight-line interpolation between the number of additional change in control shares set forth for the higher and lower stock price amounts and the two dates, as applicable, based on a 365-day year;

(2)         if the stock price is in excess of $50.00 per ARC common share (subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be issued upon exchange; and

(3)         if the stock price is less than $12.18 per ARC common share (subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be issued upon exchange.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event will the total number of ARC common shares issuable upon exchange exceed 82.1018 per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under “—Exchange Rate Adjustments.”

Our obligation to deliver the additional change in control shares could be considered a penalty, in which case the enforceability thereof would be subject to general principles of reasonableness of economic remedies.

Provisional Redemption of the Notes at Our Option

We will not have the right to redeem any notes prior to August 20, 2010.

Beginning on August 20, 2010, we may redeem the notes in whole or in part for cash at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, on the notes to the redemption date if the closing price of the common stock has exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30-day trading period.

The “exchange price” as of any day will equal $1,000 divided by the exchange rate. If we redeem the notes, we will make an additional payment equal to the total value of the aggregate amount of the interest otherwise payable on the notes from the last day through which interest was paid on the notes through the date of redemption. We must make these payments on all notes called for redemption, including notes exchanged after the date we mailed the notice.

We will give at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, notice of redemption by mail to holders of notes. Notes or portions of notes called for redemption will be exchangeable by the holder until the close of business on the business day prior to the redemption date.

If we do not redeem all of the notes, the trustee will select the notes to be redeemed in principal amount of $1,000 or integral multiples thereof, by lot or on a pro rata basis. If any notes are to be redeemed in part only, we will issue a new note or notes with a principal amount equal to the unredeemed principal portion thereof. If a portion of your notes is selected for partial redemption and you exchange a portion of your notes, the exchanged portion will be deemed to be taken from the portion selected for redemption.

Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates

Holders of notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part (in principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) on August 15, 2010, August 15, 2015 and August&e-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

3.0

%

 

 

81.0

%

 

 

290

 

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

78.5

%

 

130




Holders must deliver a written repurchase notice to the paying agent, which initially is the trustee, during the period beginning at any time from the opening of business on the date that is 20 days prior to the repurchase date until the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. Our repurchase obligation will be subject to certain additional conditions.

On or before the 20th day prior to each repurchase date, we will provide to the trustee, any paying agent and to all holders of the notes, and to beneficial owners as required by applicable law, a notice stating, among other things:

·       the amount of the repurchase price; and

·       the procedures that holders must follow to require us to repurchase their notes.

We will also disseminate a press release through Dow Jones & Company, Inc. or Bloomberg Business News containing the information specified in such notice or publish that information in a newspaper of general circulation in New York City or on ARC’s website, or through such other public medium as we deem appropriate at that time.

A holder’s notice electing to require us to repurchase notes must specify:

·       that such notice complies with appropriate procedures of The Depository Trust Company, or DTC;

·       the portion of the principal amount of notes to be repurchased, which must be $1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000; and

·       that the notes are to be repurchased by us pursuant to the applicable provisions of the notes.

Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice in whole or in part by a written notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. The notice of withdrawal must specify:

·       the principal amount of notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn;

·       that the withdrawal notice complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in book-entry form; and

·       the principal amount of notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice.

Holders electing to require us to repurchase notes must either effect book-entry transfer of notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures or deliver the notes in certificated form, together with necessary endorsements, to the paying agent prior to the repurchase date to receive payment of the repurchase price on the repurchase date. We will pay the repurchase price within two business days after any such transfer or delivery on or after the repurchase date.

If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the repurchase price of the notes on the business date following the repurchase date, then immediately after the repurchase date:

·       such notes will cease to be outstanding;

·       interest on such notes will cease to accrue; and

·       all rights of holders of such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price.

In connection with any repurchase offer, we will, if required, comply with the provisions of Rule 13e-4, Rule 14e-1, and any other tender offer rules under the Exchange Act which may then be applicable; and file a Schedule TO or any other required schedule under the Exchange Act.

131




Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change

If a fundamental change occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the repurchase date.

Within 20 days after the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are obligated to give to the holders of the notes notice of the fundamental change and of the repurchase right arising as a result of the fundamental change and the repurchase date (which may be no earlier than 15 days and no later than 30 days after the date of such notice). We must also deliver a copy of this notice to the trustee. We will also disseminate a press release through Dow Jones & Company, Inc. or Bloomberg Business News announcing the occurrence of the fundamental change or publish that information in a newspaper of general circulation in New York City or on ARC’s website, or through such other public medium as we deem appropriate at that time.

To exercise its repurchase right, a holder of notes must deliver written notice of such holder’s exercise of its repurchase right to the trustee prior to the close of business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date.

Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice by a written notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to the close of business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date. If a holder of notes delivers a repurchase notice, it may not thereafter surrender such notes for exchange unless such repurchase notice is withdrawn as permitted below. The notice of withdrawal must specify:

·       the principal amount of notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn;

·       that the withdrawal notice complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in book-entry form; and

·       the principal amount of notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice.

Holders electing to require us to repurchase notes must effect book-entry transfer of notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures. We will pay the repurchase price within two business days after any such transfer on or after the repurchase date.

If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the repurchase price of the notes on the repurchase date, then on and after such date:

·       such notes will cease to be outstanding;

·       interest on such notes will cease to accrue; and

·       all rights of holders of such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price.

A “fundamental change” will be deemed to occur upon a change in control or a termination of trading.

A “change in control” will be deemed to have occurred at such time after the original issuance of the notes when the following has occurred:

·       any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) acquires the beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, through a purchase, merger or other acquisition transaction, of 50% or more of the total voting power of the total outstanding voting stock of ARC other than an acquisition by ARC, us, any of its or our subsidiaries or any of its or our employee benefit plans;

132




·       we or ARC consolidates with, or merges with or into, another person or conveys, transfers, leases or otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets to any person, or any person consolidates with or merges with or into ARC or us, other than:

· 

289

 

 

Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

69.5

%

 

 

270

 

 

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL

 

 

1,385

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

265

 

 

Inland Empire, CA

 

 

1,223

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

95.1

%

 

 

397

 

 

Elkhart-Goshen, IN

 

 

1,212

        any transaction (A) that does not result in any reclassification, exchange, or cancellation of outstanding shares of ARC’s capital stock or our partnership units, as the case may be, and (B) pursuant to which holders of ARC’s capital stock or our partnership units, as applicable, immediately prior to the transaction have the entitlement to exercise, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the total voting power of all shares of ARC capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the continuing or surviving person immediately after the transaction or 50% of the voting power of our partnership units as the case may be;

·        any merger solely for the purpose of changing ARC’s or our jurisdiction of formation and resulting in a reclassification, exchange or exchange of outstanding shares of common stock solely into shares of common stock of the surviving entity;

·       during any consecutive two-year period, individuals who at the beginning of that two-year period constituted the board of directors of ARC (together with any new directors whose election to such board of directors, or whose nomination for election by stockholders, was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then still in office who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of ARC then in office; or

·       we or ARC approve a plan of liquidation or dissolution.

Beneficial ownership will be determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The term “person” includes any syndicate or group that would be deemed to be a “person” under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act.

A “termination of trading” is deemed to occur if ARC common stock (or other common stock into which the notes are then exchangeable) is neither listed for trading on a U.S. national securities exchange nor approved for trading on an established automated over-the-counter trading market in the United States.

The definition of fundamental change includes a phrase relating to the conveyance, transfer, lease, or other disposition of “all or substantially all” of the assets of the ARC or us. There is no precise established definition of the phrase “substantially all” under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a holder of notes to require us to repurchase such notes as a result of a conveyance, transfer, lease, or other disposition of less than all of the assets of the ARC or us may be uncertain.

Rule 13e-4 under the Exchange Act requires the dissemination of information to securityholders if an issuer tender offer occurs and may apply if the repurchase option becomes available to holders of the notes. We will comply with this rule to the extent applicable at that time.

We will comply with the provisions of any tender offer rules under the Exchange Act that may then be applicable, and will file any schedule required under the Exchange Act in connection with any offer by us to purchase notes at the option of the holders of notes upon a fundamental change. In some circumstances, the fundamental change purchase feature of the notes may make more difficult or discourage a takeover of us and thus the removal of incumbent management. The fundamental change purchase feature, however, is not the result of management’s knowledge of any specific effort to accumulate shares of common stock or to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, solicitation or otherwise, or part of a plan by management to adopt a series of anti-takeover provisions. Instead, the fundamental change purchase feature is the result of negotiations between us and the initial purchasers of the notes.

133




We may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, at any time purchase the notes in the open market or by tender at any price or by private agreement. Any note purchased by us (a) after the date that is two years from the latest issuance of the notes may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be reissued or sold or may be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation or (b) on or prior to the date referred to in (a), will be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation. Any notes surrendered to the trustee may not be reissued or resold and will be canceled promptly.

The foregoing provisions would not necessarily protect holders of the notes if highly leveraged or other transactions involving us occur that may adversely affect holders. Our ability to repurchase notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change is subject to important limitations. The occurrence of a fundamental change could cause an event of default under, or be prohibited or limited by, the terms of indebtedness that we may incur in the future. Further, we cannot assure you that we would have the financial resources, or would be able to arrange financing, to pay the repurchase price for all the notes that might be delivered by holders of notes seeking to exercise the repurchase right. Any failure by us to repurchase the notes when required following a fundamental change would result in an event of default under the indenture. Any such default may, in turn, cause a default under indebtedness that we may incur in the future.

No notes may be purchased by us at the option of holders upon the occurrence of a fundamental change if there has occurred and is continuing an event of default with respect to the notes, other than a default in the payment of the fundamental change purchase price with respect to the notes.

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

85.6

%

 

 

326

 

 

Charleston-North Charleston, SC

 

 

1,179

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

251

 

 

Southeast FL

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

96.0

%

 

 

No Stockholder Rights for Holders of Notes

Holders of notes, as such, will not have any rights as stockholders of ARC (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to receive any dividends or other distributions on shares of ARC common stock), except in limited circumstances described above under “—Exchange Rights—Exchange Right Adjustments.”

Ownership Limit

In order to assist ARC in maintaining its qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, ownership by any person of more than 7.3% of outstanding ARC common stock is restricted, unless waived or modified by ARC’s board of directors. See “Description of ARC Capital Stock and Our Partnership Units—ARC’s Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

Calculations in Respect of the Notes

Except as explicitly specified otherwise herein, we will be responsible for making all calculations required under the notes. These calculations include, but are not limited to, determinations of the exchange price and exchange rate applicable to the notes. We will make all these calculations in good faith and, absent manifest error, our calculations will be final and binding on holders of the notes. We will provide a schedule of our calculations to the trustee, and the trustee is entitled to rely upon the accuracy of our calculations without independent verification. The trustee will forward our calculations to any holder of notes upon the request.

Merger, Consolidation or Sale

The Partnership may consolidate with, or sell, lease or convey all or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with or into, any other entity, provided that the following conditions are met:

·       we shall be the continuing entity, or the successor entity (if other than the Partnership) formed by or resulting from any consolidation or merger or which shall have received the transfer of assets

134




shall expressly assume payment of the principal of and interest on all of the notes and the due and punctual performance and observance of all of the covenants and conditions in the indenture;

·       if as a result of such transaction the notes become convertible or exchangeable into common stock or other securities issued by a third party, such third party fully and unconditionally guarantees all obligations under the notes and the indenture;

·       immediately after giving effect to the transaction, no Event of Default under the indenture, and no event which, after notice or the lapse of time, or both, would become an Event of Default, shall have occurred and be continuing; and

·       an officer’s certificate and legal opinion covering these conditions shall be delivered to the trustee.

Events of Default

The following are events of default under the indenture:

·       default in the payment of any principal amount or any redemption price, purchase price, or fundamental change purchase price due with respect to the notes, when the same becomes due and payable;

·       default in payment of any interest (including liquidated damages) under the notes, which default continues for 30 days;

·       default in the delivery when due of shares of ARC common stock or any cash in lieu of such shares payable upon exchange with respect to the notes, including any make whole premium, which default continues for 15 days;

·       our failure to comply with any of our other agreements in the notes or the indenture upon our receipt of notice of such default from the trustee or from holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes, and the failure to cure (or obtain a waiver of) such default within 30 days after receipt of such notice;

·       default in the payment of principal when due or resulting in acceleration of other indebtedness of us or any significant subsidiary for borrowed money where the aggregate principal amount with respect to which the default or acceleration has occurred exceeds $5 million and such acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled or such indebtedness repaid within a period of 30 days after written notice to us by the trustee or to us and the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes, provided that if any such default is cured, waived, rescinded or annulled, then the event of default by reason thereof would be deemed not to have occurred; and

·       certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization affecting us.

If an event of default shall have happened and be continuing, either the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding may declare the principal of the notes and any accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration immediately due and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency, the principal amount of the notes together with any accrued interest through the occurrence of such event shall automatically become and be immediately due and payable.

135




Modification

The trustee and we may amend the indenture or the notes with the consent of the holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding. However, the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected is required to:

·       alter the manner of calculation or rate of accrual of interest on the note or change the time of payment;

·       make the note payable in money or securities other than that stated in the note;

·       change the stated maturity of the note;

·       reduce the principal amount, redemption price, purchase price or fundamental change purchase price (including any make-whole premium payable) with respect to the note;

·       make any change that adversely affects the rights of a holder to exchange the note in any material respect;

·       make any change that adversely affects the right to require us to purchase the note in any material respect;

·       impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment with respect to the note or with respect to exchange of the note; or

·       change the provisions in the indenture that relate to modifying or amending the indenture.

Without the consent of any holder of notes, the trustee and we may amend the indenture:

·       to evidence a successor to us and the assumption by that successor of our obligations under the indenture and the notes;

·       to add to our covenants for the benefit of the holders of the notes or to surrender any right or power conferred upon us;

·       to secure our obligations in respect of the notes;

·       to evidence and provide the acceptance of the appointment of a successor trustee under the indenture;

495

 

 

Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

85.7

%

 

 

340

 

 

Nashville, TN

 

 

1,071

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

72.8

%

 

 

291

 

 

Sioux City, IA-NE

 

 

994

 

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

290

 

 

Syracuse, NY

·       to comply with the requirements of the SEC in order to effect or maintain qualification of the indenture under the Trust Indenture Act, as contemplated by the indenture or otherwise;

·       to cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency in the indenture; or

·       to make any change that does not adversely affect the rights of the holders of the notes in any material respect.

The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes may, on behalf of all the holders of all notes:

·       amend, alter or change the terms and provisions of the agreement described below under
“—Agreement between Us and ARC”;

·       waive compliance by us with restrictive provisions of the indenture, as detailed in the indenture; or

·       waive any past default under the indenture and its consequences, except a default in the payment of any amount due, or in the obligation to deliver common stock, with respect to any note or in respect of any provision which under the indenture cannot be modified or amended without the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected.

136




Rule 144A Information

If at any time we or ARC are not subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, we will promptly furnish to the holders, beneficial owners and prospective purchasers of the notes or underlying shares of ARC common stock, upon their request, the information required to be delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933 to facilitate the resale of those notes or shares pursuant to Rule 144A.

Reports to Trustee

We will regularly furnish to the trustee copies of ARC’s annual report to its stockholders, containing audited financial statements, and any other financial reports which ARC furnishes to its stockholders.

Discharge of the Indenture

We may satisfy and discharge our obligations under the indenture by delivering to the trustee for cancellation all outstanding notes or by depositing with the trustee, the paying agent or the exchange agent, if applicable, after the notes have become due and payable, whether at stated maturity or any redemption date, or any purchase date, or a fundamental change purchase date, or upon exchange or otherwise, cash or shares of common stock (as applicable under the terms of the indenture) sufficient to pay all of the outstanding notes and paying all other sums payable under the indenture.

Unclaimed Money

If money deposited with the trustee or paying agent for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or accrued and unpaid interest or additional interest on, the notes remains unclaimed for two years, the trustee and paying agent will pay the money back to us upon our written request. However, the trustee and paying agent have the right to withhold paying the money back to us until they publish in a newspaper of general circulation in New York City, or mail to each holder, a notice stating that the money will be paid back to us if unclaimed after a date no less than 30 days from the publication or mailing. After the trustee or paying agent pays the money back to us, holders of notes entitled to the money must look to us for payment as general creditors, subject to appign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

931

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

64.7

%

 

 

340

 

 

Subtotal: Top 20 Markets

 

 

43,530

 

 

 

69.2

%

 

 

84.5

%

 

 

339

 

 

All Other Markets

 

 

19,412

 

 

Governing Law

The indenture and the notes are governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.

Trustee

U.S. Bank National Association is the trustee, registrar, exchange agent and paying agent.

If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the trustee will be required to use the degree of care and skill of a prudent man in the conduct of his own affairs. The truing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.2pt;">

 

30.8

%

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

297

 

 

Total Homesites/Weighted Average Occupancy 

 

 

62,942

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

84.5

%

 

 

$

326

 

 


(1)    Markets are defined by our management.

(2)    Rental income is defined as homeowner lot rental income, home renter lot and home rental income and other rental income reduced by move-in bonuses and rent concessions. Rental income does not include utility and other income.

After taking into account the proposed sale of the 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

92




Our Communities

As of June 30, 2005, our portfolio consisted of 315 manufactured home communities (net of one community classified as discontinued operations) comprising approximately 62,942 homesites located in 27 states and 67 markets, primarily oriented toward all-age living.

If the trustee becomes one of our creditors, it will be subject to limitations on its rights to obtain payment of claims or to realize on some property received for any such claim, as security or otherwise. The trustee is permitted to engage in other transactions with us. If, however, it acquires any conflicting interest, it must eliminate that conflict or resign.

137




Agreement between Us and ARC

In connection with the issuance of the notes, we and ARC entered into an agreement by which we acknowledge our responsibility as sole obligor of the notes. The agreement provides that if we are obligated to deliver shares of ARC common stock pursuant to the indenture, ARC will issue the required number of shares and deliver them to the exchanging noteholder. At such time, we will issue to ARC an equal number of common partnership units. Under the agreement, ARC has agreed not to consolidate with or merge into another business entity or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets, unless:

·       either (1) ARC is the continuing entity in the case of a merger or consolidation or (2) the resulting, surviving or acquiring entity, if other than ARC, is a U.S. entity and it expressly assumes ARC’s obligations under the agreement and the indenture;

·       immediately after giving effect to the transaction, no event of default under the indenture and no circumstances which, after notice or lapse of time or both, would become an event of default under the indenture, shall have happened and be continuing; and

·       ARC has delivered to the trustee an officers’ certificate and a legal opinion confirming that ARC has complied with the indenture.

No provision of the agreement may be amended, modified, or waived without the consent of a majority in principal amount of notes then outstanding, except that the unanimous consent of the holders of all outstanding notes is required in order to amend, modify, or waive the provisions the agreement that may adversely affect the right of holders of notes to exchange their notes for ARC common stock as provided in the indenture.

Book-Entry System

We have issued the notes in the form of one or more global securities. The global security has been deposited with the trustee as custodian for DTC and registered in the name of a nominee of DTC. Except as set forth below, the global security may be transferred, in whole and not in part, only to DTC or another nominee of DTC. A holder of the notes will hold its beneficial interests in the global security directly through DTC if it has an account with DTC or indirectly through organizations that have accounts with DTC. Notes in definitive certificated form (called “certificated securities”) will be issued only in certain limited circumstances described below.

DTC has advised us that it is:

·       a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York;

·       a member of the Federal Reserve System;

·       a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code; and

·       a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act.

DTC was created to hold securities of institutions that have accounts with DTC (called participants) and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions among its participants in such securities through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of the participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities certificates. DTC’s participants include securities brokers and dealers, which may include the initial purchasers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Access to DTC’s book-entry system is also available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (called, the indirect participants) that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a participant, whether directly or indirectly.

138




We expect that pursuant to procedures established by DTC upon the deposit of the global security with DTC, DTC will credit, on its book-entry registration and transfer system, the principal amount of notes represented by such global security to the accounts of participants. The accounts to be credited shall be designated by the initial purchasers. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global security will be limited to participants or persons that may hold interests through participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global security will be shown on, and the transfer of those beneficial interests will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to participants’ interests), the participants and the indirect participants.

The laws of some jurisdictions may require that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. These limits and laws may impair the ability to transfer or pledge beneficial interests in the global security.

Owners of beneficial interests in global securities who desire to exchange their interests for common stock should contact their brokers or other participants or indirect participants through whom they hold such beneficial interests to obtain information on procedures, including proper forms and cut-off times, for submitting requests for exchange. So long as DTC, or its nominee, is the registered owner or holder of a global security, DTC or its nominee, as the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the notes represented by the global security for all purposes under the indenture and the notes. In addition, no owner of a beneficial interest in a global security will be able to transfer that interest except in accordance with the applicable procedures of DTC.

Except as set forth below, an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security, will not be entitled to have the notes represented by the global security registered in its name, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of certificated securities and will not be considered to be the owner or holder of any notes under the global security. We understand that under existing industry practice, if an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security desires to take any action that DTC, as the holder of the global security, is entitled to take, DTC would authorize the participants to take such action. Additionally, in such case, the participants would authorize beneficial owners owning through such participants to take such action or would otherwise act upon the instructions of beneficial owners owning through them.

We will make payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest (including any liquidated damages) on the notes represented by the global security registered in the name of and held by DTC or its nominee to DTC or its nominee, as the case may be, as the registered owner and holder of the global security. Neither we, the trustee nor any paying agent will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial interests in the global security or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests.

As of June 30, 2005, our communities had an occupancy rate of 84.5% and the average monthly rental income per occupied homesite was $326. Leases for homeowners are generally month-to-month, or in limited cases year-to-year, and require security deposits. In the case of our residents renting homes from us, lease terms are typically one year, and require a security deposit. Under our lease with option to purchase program, residents enter into a long term lease, typically 24 to 84 months, pay a security deposit and option fee and commit to monthly payments creditable to their down payment upon purchase of the home. We commit to the price of the home upon purchase at the end of the lease.

93




The following table sets forth certain information regarding our communities, including the 79 communities we have identified as held for sale, arranged from our largest to smallest market, as of June 30, 2005. Rental income includes homeowner rental income and home renter rental income reduced by move in bonuses and rent concessions.

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

We expect that DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest (including liquidated damages) on the global security, will credit participants’ accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in the principal amount of the global security as shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. We also expect that payments by participants or indirect participants to owners of beneficial interests in the global security held through such participants or indirect participants will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the responsibility of such participants or indirect participants. We will not have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to, or payments made on account of, beneficial interests in the global security for any note or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests or for any other aspect of the relationship between DTC and its participants or indirect participants or the relationship between such participants or indirect participants and the owners of beneficial interests in the global security owning through such participants.

Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected in the ordinary way in accordance with DTC rules and will be settled in same-day funds.

139




DTC has advised us that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction of one or more participants to whose account the DTC interests in the global security is credited and only in respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of notes as to which such participant or participants has or have given such direction. However, if DTC notifies us that it is unwilling to be a depositary for the global security or ceases to be a clearing agency or there is an event of default under the notes, DTC will exchange the global security for certificated securities which it will distribute to its participants and which will be legended, if required, as set forth under “Transfer Restrictions.” Although DTC is expected to follow the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of interests in the global security among participants of DTC, it is under no obligation to perform or continue to perform such procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued at any time. Neither we nor the trustee will have any responsibility, or liability for the performance by DTC or the participants or indirect participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their respective operations.

Registration Rights

We and ARC have agreed, at our expense, to file with the SEC the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We and ARC have agreed to use our respective best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective as promptly as is practicable, but in no event later than 180 days aftpt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

We and ARC have also agreed to provide to each registered holder copies of the prospectus, notify each registered holder when the shelf registration statement has become effective and take certain other actions as are required to permit unrestricted resales of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon the exchange of the notes. A holder who sells securities pursuant to the shelf registration statement generally will be required to be named as a selling securityholder in the related prospectus and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers and will be bound by the provisions of the registration rights agreement that are applicable to that holder (including certain indemnification provisions). If a shelf registration statement covering those securities is not effective, they may not be sold or otherwise transferred except pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and any other applicable securities laws or in a transaction not subject to those laws. Each holder must notify us not later than three business days prior to any proposed sale by that holder pursuant to the shelf registration statement. This notice will be effective for five business days. We and ARC may suspend the holder’s use of the prospectus for a reasonable period not to exceed 30 days in any 90-day period, and not to exceed an aggregate of 90 days in any 12-month period, if we and ARC, in our reasonable judgment, believe we may possess material non-public information the disclosure of which would have a material adverse effect on us and our subsidiaries taken as a whole. Each holder, by its acceptance of a note, agrees to hold any communication by us in response to a notice of a proposed sale in confidence.

If,

·       on the 180th day following the earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes, the shelf registration statement has not been declared effective;

·       the registration statement shall cease to be effective or fail to be usable without being succeeded within five business days by a post-effective amendment or a report filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act that cures the failure of the registration statement to be effective or usable; or

140




·       on the 30th day of any period that the prospectus has been suspended as described in the preceding paragraph, such suspension has not been terminated,

(each, a registration default), additional interest as liquidated damages will accrue on the notes, from and including the day following the registration default to but excluding the day on which the registration default has been cured.

Liquidated Damages

Liquidated damages will be paid semi-annually in arrears, with the first semi-annual payment due on the first interest payment date, as applicable, following the date on which such liquidated damages begin to accrue, and will accrue at a rate per year equal to:

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

June 30,

 

0pt;">·       an additional 0.25 percent of the principal amount to and including the 90th day following such registration default; and

·       an additional 0.50 percent of the principal amount from and after the 91st day following such registration default.

In no event will liquidated damages accrue at a rate per year exceeding 0.50 percent. If a holder has exchanged some or all of its notes into common stock, the holder will not be entitled to receive liquidated damages with respect to the principal amount of the notes exchanged.

We have distributed a questionnaire to each holder to obtain information regarding the holder for inclusion in the prospectus. Holders are required to complete and deliver the questionnaire within 20 business days after receipt of the questionnaire to be named as selling stockholders in this prospectus at the time of effectiveness. A holder will not be entitled to liquidated damages unless it has provided all information requested by the questionnaire prior to the deadline.

The specific provisions relating to the registration described above are contained in the registration rights agreement that was entered into on the closing of the initial offering of the notes. This summary of the registration rights agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the registration rights agreement.

141




DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

At June 30, 2005, the Partnership had $1,089.0 million of outstanding indebtedness. $767.2 million, or 70%, of our total indebtedness was fixed rate and $321.8 million, or 30%, was variable rate. The following table sets forth information with respect to the Partnership’s total indebtedness at June 30, 2005, adjusted to give effect to the original offering of the notes to the initial purchaser and the use of proceeds therefrom. On a pro forma basis, the Partnership had $1,049.3 million of outstanding indebtedness, $768.1 million, or 73%, of our indebtedness was fixed rate and $281.2 million, or 27%, was variable rate. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes.

 

 

Amount

 

Average
Rate

 

Average
maturity

 

 

 

(dollars in
thousands)

 

 

 

(in years)

 

Long-term debt:Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

2005

 

Per Month

 

Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meadow Glen

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009

 

$

83,067

 

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

64.8

%

 

 

$

289

 

 

Brookside Village

 

 

5.05

%

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

394

 

 

 

79.7

%

 

 

300

 

 

Southfork

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012

 

276,278

 

 

7.35

%

 

 

7

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014

 

189,522

 

 

5.53

%

 

 

380

 

 

Creekside

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

9

 

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 to 2031

 

121,641

 

 

7.20

%

 

 

9

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006(1)

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

86.7

%

 

 

311 

108,520

 

 

6.22

%

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Village North

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

90.7

%

 

 

393

 

 

Summit Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2006

 

58,764

 

 

6.17

%

 

 

 

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035 (due to ARC)

 

25,780

 

 

t 0pt;width:19.0pt;">

83.1

%

 

 

361

 

 

Chalet City

 

 

 

6.26

%

 

 

30

 

 

Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

 

96,600

 

 

7.50

%

 

 

20

 

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008

 

9,369

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

6.18

%

 

 

3

 

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007

 

42,100

 

 

10.22

%

 

 

2

 

 

Floorplan line of credit due 2007

 

35,367

 

 

6.59

%

 

 

2

 

 

Other loans

 

2,332

 

 

7.70

%

 

 

3

 

 

257

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

331

 

 

Twin Parks

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

76.1

%

 

 

438

 

 

Lakewood

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

82.1

 

Total debt

 

$

1,049,340

 

 

6.71

%

 

 

 

 

 


(1)    The senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month periods at our option, and subject to certain conditions.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009

We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $98.9 million was outstanding ($83.1 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009.

142




Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012

We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 on May 2, 2002. It is an obligation of some of our special purpose real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and matures on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $302.3 million was outstanding ($276.3 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014

We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 on February 18, 2004 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $211.9 million was outstanding ($189.5 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014.

Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages Due 2005 Through 2031

We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by specific manufactured home communities and subject to early pre-payment penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are as follows:

(a)    Mortgages assumed and one refinanced as part of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately $46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006 through 2028 and have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%.

(b)   Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.06%.

(c)    Notes assumed in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately $29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.18%.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2006

We entered into the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown Communities acquisition. It is an obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a

143




spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006. At our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance, respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by the lenders to refinance the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. We may repay the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. As of June 30, 2005, $140.5 million was outstanding ($108.5 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006.

Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006

In September 2004, we obtained a revolving credit mortgage facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and is secured by 33 communities that previously secured our prior senior revolving credit facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARC’s IPO. Advances under the revolving credit mortgage facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing the loan. As amended in September 2005, the revolving credit mortgage facility bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005) and has an extended term through September, 2006. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and an additional fee of 0.5% at the amendment date and will pay an advance fee to the extent any advance takes the amount of indebtedness outstanding under the facility above $58.764 million. The facility contains no significant financial covenants. As of June 30, 2005, $58.8 million was outstanding under the revolving credit mortgage facility.

Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035 (Due to ARC)

On March 15, 2005, we issued $25.8 million in unsecured trust preferred securities to ARC. The $25.8 million trust preferred securities bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30, 2005). Interest on the securities is paid on the 30th of March, June, September and December of each year. We may redeem these securities on or after March 30, 2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if not redeemed sooner.

<10.0pt;">%

 

 

424

 

 

Quail Run

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Finance Facility Due 2008

We entered into the retail home sales and consumer finance debt facility due in 2006 with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in connection with entering into a two-year secured revolving lease receivables credit facility (see “—Lease Receivables Facility” below). The consumer finance facility, as amended, has a total commitment of $125.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of one of our subsidiaries, and borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing conditional sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR

144




(6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the original committed amount and 0.75% of the amended committed amount and will pay additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional sales contract.

The availability of advances under the consumer finance facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio. As of June 30, 2005, $9.4 million was outstanding under the consumer finance facility.

Lease Receivables Facility Due 2008

On April 6, 2005, we obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving credit facility, or the lease receivables facility, with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, to be used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and for general corporate purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the facility increased to $150 million effective October 14, 2005.

This facility is an obligation of two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP, or, collectively, Housing. Borrowings under the lease receivables facility are secured by an assignment of all lease receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. The fee charged by the lender in connection with the amendment was 0.5%, or $750,000. The ability to access funding under the amended facility is conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent set forth in the amendment.

Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional collateral for the facility.

Floorplan Line Of Credit Due 2007

In August 2004, we amended our floorplan line of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due

145




upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended line of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended line of credit requires us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million, all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the line of credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit is subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and an early termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination date. As of June 30, 2005, $43.9 million was outstanding ($35.4 million on a pro forma basis) on the floorplan line of credit.

DESCRIPTION OF ARC CAPITAL STOCK AND PARTNERSHIP UNITS

The following is a summary of the material terms of the capital stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and the partnership units of the Partnership. Copies of ARC’s charter and its Amended and Restated Bylaws are filed as exhibits to ARC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005. A copy of the Partnership’s Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

General

ARC’s charter provides that it may issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 41,027,689 shares have been issued and are outstanding as of October 21, 2005; 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 5,750,000 shares have been classified as 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock, of which 5,000,000 shares are issued and outstanding as of October 21, 2005; and 5,252,876 shares of special voting stock, par value $.01 per share, of which 3,527,896 shares have been issued and are outstanding as of October 21, 2005. Under Maryland law, ARC’s stockholders generally are not liable for ARC’s debts or obligations.

Common Stock

All shares of ARC common stock outstanding are duly authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of ARC common stock are entitled to receive dividends when authorized by ARC’s board of directors out of assets legally available for the payment of dividends and declared by ARC. They are also entitled to share ratably in ARC’s assets legally available for distribution to ARC’s stockholders in the event of ARC’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after payment of or adequate provision for all of ARC’s known debts and liabilities. These rights are subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of ARC’s stock and to the provisions of ARC’s charter regarding restrictions on transfer of ARC’s stock.

Subject to ARC’s charter restrictions on transfer of ARC’s stock, each outstanding share of ARC common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of ARC stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, including the special voting stock described below, the holders of ARC common stock will possess the exclusive voting power of ARC. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Holders of ARC common stock have no preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund, redemption or appraisal rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any of ARC’s securities. Subject to ARC’s charter restrictions on transfer of stock, all shares of common stock will have equal dividend, liquidation and other rights.

146




Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast at least two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Except for the amendment of the provisions of ARC’s charter relating to the removal of directors and amendment of the charter, ARC’s charter provides for approval of these matters by a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast. Maryland law permits a corporation to transfer="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.75pt;">

 

TX

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

78.6

%

 

 

364

 

 

Willow Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Grants

During 2004 ARC granted to some of its executive officers 95,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted shares were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional 37,500 shares of restricted common stock were forfeited pursuant to the terms of their issuance. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, 3,000 of these shares vested. In April 2005, the ARC board of directors d;text-align:right;"> 

TX

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

65.4

%

 

 

409

 

 

Arlington Lakeside

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

218

 

 

 

88.1

%

 

All shares, vested and unvested, are entitled to receive dividends and to vote unless forfeited.

ARC considers the number of vested shares issued under its 2003 equity incentive plan as common stock outstanding and includes them in the denominator of its calculation of basic earnings per share. ARC also considers the total number of restricted shares granted under our 2003 equity incentive plan in the denominator of our calculation of diluted earnings per share if they are dilutive. ARC returns shares forfeited to the 2003 equity incentive plan as shares eligible for future grant and adjusts any compensation expense previously recorded on such shares in the period the forfeiture occurs.

Special Voting Stock

We and ARC have entered into a pairing agreement pursuant to which each of our 1,830,961 partnership units issued in connection with ARC’s 2002 reorganization was issued as part of a paired unit that includes 1.9268 shares of ARC special voting stock. Each of the paired units is currently exchangeable by its holder for cash, or, at ARC’s election, one share of ARC common stock, and each paired unit entitles its holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of ARC’s stockholders who have voting rights generally. Collectively, our limited partners who hold these paired units and ARC common stock have approximately 5.2% of the total voting power of ARC common stock at June 30, 2005. A holder of special voting stock is not entitled to any regular or special dividend payments or other distributions, including any dividends or other distributions declared or paid with respect to shares of ARC common stock or any of ARC’s other stock, and is not entitled to receive any distributions in the event of liquidation or dissolution. The holders of special voting stock have no class voting rights except as specifically set forth in our charter.

ARC may not issue any additional shares of special voting stock in the future unless such shares are paired with common partnership units. ARC does not intend to issue any additional shares of its special voting stock. Upon any redemption of a partnership unit that is paired with a share of special voting stock

147




in accordance with the redemption provisions of our partnership agreement, the share of special voting stock will be cancelled and will become reclassified as an authorized but unissued share of special voting stock.

Preferred Stock

General

Under ARC’s charter, ARC’s board of directors is authorized without further stockholder action to provide for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, with such terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption in each case, if any, as permitted by Maryland law and as shall be set forth in resolutions providing for the issue of preferred stock adopted by ARC’s board of directors.

8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

The Articles Supplementary adopted by ARC’s board of directors creating ARC’s Series A preferred stock sets forth the number and fixes the terms, designations, powers, preferences, rights, limitations and restrictions of a series of ARC preferred stock classified as 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock. ARC designated up to 5,750,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares of which were issued in connection with the IPO. ARC’s Series A preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “ARC Pr A.” ARC’s Series A preferred stock has the following terms:

·       a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share;

·       ranks senior to ARC common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation;

·       subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of senior stock, is entitled to receive, when and as authorized by ARC’s board of directors and declared by ARC, out of funds legally available for payment thereof, cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 8.25% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference (equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.0625 per share);

·       source of funds for dividends on ARC’s Series A preferred stock is distributions paid on the Partnership’s Series A preferred units;

·       not redeemable prior to February 18, 2009, except in certain limited circumstances relating to maintaining ARC’s ability to qualify as a REIT as described below in “—ARC’s Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer;”

·       redeemable in whole or from time to time in part, on and after February 18, 2009, by ARC, at its option, to the extent permitted by law, at a cash redemption price equal to $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated dividends;

·       does not have any voting rights, except in limited circumstances, including where ARC has not been current on payment of dividends for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive; and

·       is not convertible into or exchangeable for any of ARC’s other property or securities.

Warrants

On August 9, 2000, ARC issued 1,250,000 warrants, each giving its holder the right to purchase one share of ARC common stock at an exercise price of $11.70 per share. On January 23, 2004, in preparation for the IPO, ARC effected a 0.519-for-1 reverse split of ARC common stock. On May 23, 2005, ARC declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.1875 per share of ARC common stock that was paid on

148




July 15, 2005 to holders of record of ARC common stock at the close of business on June 30, 2005. As a result of these events, pursuant to the terms of the warrants, effective immediately following payment of the dividend, the exercise price per share of ARC common stock under the outstanding warrants to purchase ARC common stock was adjusted to $18.103 and the total number of shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exercise of all of such warrants was adjusted to 807,877. The warrants expire if not exercised prior to 5:00 PM, New York City time, on July 23, 2010.

ARC’s Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer

For ARC to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value of ARC’s outstanding shares of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of a taxable year, and ARC’s shares of stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Because its board of directors believes that it is essential for ARC to continue to qualify as a REIT and to provide additional protection for its stockholders in the event of certain transactions, ARC’s board has adopted, and the stockholders have approved, provisions of ARC’s charter restricting the acquisition of shares of ARC’s stock in order to assist ARC in maintaining its REIT qualifications under circumstances that could cause ARC to violate the foregoing requirements.

Subject to certain exceptions specified in ARC’s charter, no individual may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of various attribution and constructive ownership provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 7.3% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of ARC common stock or more than 7.3% in value of the outstanding shares of ARC’s capital stock, other than with respect to Gerald J. Ford and certain affiliated parties for whom the aggregate limit was set by the board of directors of ARC on May 23, 2005 at 19.9%. ARC’s charter further prohibits (i) any individual from owning shares of its stock that would result in ARC being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise cause ARC to fail to qualify as a REIT, (ii) any individual from transferring shares of its stock if the transfer would result in its stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons and (iii) any individual from owning shares of its stock that would result in non U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of its stock. Any person who acquires or intends to acquire shares of ARC’s stock that may violate any of these restrictions, or who is the intended transferee of shares of its stock which are transferred to a trust, as discussed below, is required to give ARC immediate notice and provide ARC with such information as ARC may request in order to determine the effect of the transfer on ARC’s status as a REIT.

ARC’s board of directors may waive the 7.3% ownership limit if evidence satisfactory to it is presented that such ownership will not then or in the future result in ARC being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of its stock or otherwise result in its failing to qualify as a REIT. In order to be considered by the board for exemption, an individual also must not own and must represent that it will not own, directly or indirectly, an interest in a tenant of ARC’s (or a tenant of any entity which ARC owns or controls) that would cause ARC to own, directly or indirectly, more than a 9.8% interest in the tenant. The individual also must agree that any violation or attempted violation of these restrictions will result in the automatic transfer of the shares of stock causing the violation to the trust. As a condition of such waiver, ARC’s board of directors may require a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to it with respect to preserving ARC’s qualification as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if ARC’s board of directors determines that it is no longer in its best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT.

If any issuance or transfer of ARC’s stock would cause the outstanding shares of its stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, such issuance or transfer will be null and void, and the

149




intended transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Any attemptyle="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

342

 

 

Mesquite Meadows

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

ted transfer of ARC’s stock which, if effective, would result in any individual owning shares of its stock in excess of the 7.3% ownership limit, or would result in ARC being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, would result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of ARC’s stock or would otherwise result in ARC failing to qualify as a REIT, will cause the number of shares causing the violation (rounded to the nearest whole share) to be automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more qualifying charitable organizations to be designated by ARC and the intended transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Shares transferred to such trust will remain outstanding, and the trustee of the trust will have all voting and dividend rights pertaining to such shares. Any dividend or other distribution paid prior to ARC’s discovery that shares of stock have been transferred to the trust will be paid by the recipient to the trustee upon demand. Any dividend or distribution paid to the trustee will be held in trust for the charitable beneficiary. Subject to Maryland law, the trustee will have the authority (1) to rescind as void any vote cast by the intended transferee prior to ARC’s discovery that the shares hav

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

88.3

%

 

 

309

 

 

Amber Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

60.3

%

 

 

359

 

 

Highland Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

88.3

%

 

 

382

e been transferred to the trust and (2) to recast the vote not in accordance with the desires of the those acting for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary. However, if ARC has already taken irreversible corporate action, then the trustee will not have the authority to rescind and recast the vote.

Within 20 days of receiving notice from ARC that shares of stock have been transferred to the trust, the trustee of such trust shall sell such shares to a person whose ownership of such shares does not violate the 7.3% or other applicable limitations. Upon a sale of such shares by the trustee, the interest of the charitable beneficiary will terminate, and the sales proceeds would be paid, first, to the original intended transferee, to the extent of the lesser of (1) such transferee’s original purchase price (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and (2) the price received by the trustee, and, second, to the charitable beneficiary, to the extent of any sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the original intended transferee. In addition, shares of stock held in such trust are purchasable by ARC until the trustee has sold the shares at a price equal to the lesser of the price paid for the stock by the original intended transferee (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and the market price for the stock on the date that ARC determines to purchase the stock. Upon such sale to ARC, the interest of the trust in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds to the original intended transferee.

All certificates representing shares of ARC common stock and ARC’s Series A preferred stock bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above. For purposes of the foregoing discussion, shares of special voting stock that are at any time held in trust as a result of the excess share provisions of ARC’s charter shall include any of our partnership units paired therewith.

All persons who own more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Internal Revenue Code or the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder) in the aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of ARC’s stock, excluding special voting stock, must give written notice containing the information specified in ARC’s charter within 30 days after the end of each taxable year, which is December 31. In addition, each stockholder shall upon demand be required to disclose to ARC in writing such information with respect to the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as ARC’s board of directors deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to a REIT or to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental agency.

The ownership limitations may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of ARC by a third party unless ARC’s board of directors determines that maintenance of REIT status is no longer in its best interests.

150




Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for ARC common stock and ARC Series A preferred stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Partnership Units

Series C Partnership Preferred Partnership Units

The Partnership currently has outstanding 705,688 units of Series C preferred partnership units, or Series C PPUs. The Partnership’s Series B

 

 

Eagle Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

·       rank senior to the common partnership units as to the payment of distributions and as to the distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up;

·       subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are entitled to receive quarterly cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum;

·       subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are entitled to a liquidation preference per Series C PPU of $25.00 per unit, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions;

·       may not be redeemed at the Partnership’s option prior to July 30, 2009; on or after such date, the Partnership has the right to redeem the Series C PPUs, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption;

·       at any time after January 1, 2007, any holder of Series C PPUs has the right to require the Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the Series C PPUs held by such holder in exchange for one-eighth of the redemption price in cash and the balance in a negotiable note, bearing interest at a rate of 7% per annum;

·       exchangeable for ARC common stock in some circumstances; and

·       no voting rights or right to consent to any matter.

Common Partnership Units

The 5.2% ownership interest in the Partnership that is not held by ARC as of June 30, 2005 represents outstand.0pt;">

 

 

188

 

 

Holders of the Partnership’s OP units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available cash (i) first, with respect to any OP units that are entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any OP units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests).

151




CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following discussion is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties, and was written to support the promotion or marketing of the offering described herein. Each investor should seek advice based on such person’s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of the notes, the qualification and taxation of ARC as a REIT, and the ownership and disposition of ARC common stock for which the notes may be exchanged. For purposes of this section under the heading “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations,” references to “ARC” mean only Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not its subsidiaries or other lower-tier entities, except as otherwise indicated. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, or the Treasury regulations, current administrative interpretations and practices of the IRS (including administrative interpretations and practices expressed in private letter rulings which are binding on the IRS only with respect to the particular taxpayers who requested and received those rulings) and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. No advance ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS regarding any matter discussed in this summary. The summary is also based upon the assumption that the operation of ARC, and of its subsidiaries and other lower-tier and affiliated entities, will, in each case, be in accordance with its applicable organizational documents or partnership agreement. This summary is for general information only, and does not purport to discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to a particular stockholder in light of its investment or tax circumstances or to stockholders subject to special tax rules, such as:

·       U.S. expatriates;

·       persons who mark-to-market the notes or common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes;

·       subchapter S corporations;

·       U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;

·       financial institutions;

·       insurance companies;

·       broker-dealers;

·       regulated investment companies;

·       trusts and estates;

·       holders who receive the notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation;

·       persons holding the notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion transaction,” “synthetic security” or other integrated investment;

·       persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;

·       persons holding their interest through a partnership or similar pass-through entity;

· 

94.7

%

 

 

368

 

 

Denton Falls

 

 

 

       persons holding a 10% or more (by vote or value) beneficial interest in ARC or The Partnership;

152




and, except to the extent discussed below:

·       tax-exempt organizations; and

·       non-U.S. H;">

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

In addition, this summary does not discuss any non-federal, state, or local tax considerations. This summary deals only with investors who purchase the notes as part of the initial offering for the issue price (as discussed below), and assumes that investors will hold their notes and ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) under the Internal Revenue Code.

Investors considering the purchase of notes should consult their tax advisors with respect to the application of the U.S. federal income tax laws to their particular situations as well as any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means any beneficial owner of a note, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, other than an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, (iv) a trust if (A) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (B) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (v) certain eligible trusts that elect to be taxed as U.S. Persons under applicable Treasury Regulations. As used herein, the term “Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of a note, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, that is not a U.S. Holder.

If a partnership (including for this purpose any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, the treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A holder of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, that is a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, holding and disposing of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note.

U.S. Holders of the Notes

Interest.   If the issue price of a note is less than its stated redemption price at maturity, then the note will be treated as being issued with original issue discount, or OID, for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless the difference between the note’s issue price and its stated redemption price at maturity is less than a statutory de minimis amount (1¤4 of 1 percent of the stated redemption price at maturity of the note times the number of complete years from issuance to maturity). Generally, the “issue price” of a note is the first price at which a substantial amount of the notes is sold to purchasers other than bond houses, brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers. The “stated redemption price at maturity” of a note is the total of all payments to be made under the note other than qualified stated interest (generally, stated interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or property at least annually at a single fixed rate or at certain floating rates that properly take into account the length of the interval between stated interest payments) and, in this case, is expected to equal the principal amount of the note.

It is anticipated that the difference, if any, between the issue price and the stated redemption price at maturity of the notes will be less than the statutory de minimis amount and that the notes, therefore, will not be treated as having been issued with OID. Thus, rather than being characterized as interest, such

153




difference should be characterized as if it were gain from the sale of the notes and must be included in income as principal payments are received on the notes (based on the proportion of the principal payments received to the original principal amount of the notes).

The remaining discussion assumes that the notes have not been issued with OID equal to or in excess of the statutory de minimis amount.

Payments of Stated Interest.   Stated interest on a note without OID generally will be included in the income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income at the time such interest is received or accrued, in accordance with the U.S. Holder’s regular method of tax accounting.

Market Discount.   If a U.S. Holder purchases a note after original issue for an amount that is less than its stated redemption price at maturity, such U.S. Holder will be treated as having purchased such note at a “market discount,” unless such market discount is less than a de minimis amount (1¤61.3

%

 

 

367

 

 

Terrell Crossing

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

73.7

%

 

 

424

 

4 of 1 percent of the stated redemption price of the note at maturity times the number of complete years to maturity after the U.S. Holder acquires the note). Under the market discount rules, a U.S. Holder will be required to treat any partial principal payment on a note, or any gain realized on the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a note, as ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of (i) the amount of such payment or realized gain or (ii) the market discount which has not previously been included in income and is treated as having accrued on such note at the time of such payment or disposition. Market discount will be considered to accrue ratably during the period from the date of acquisition to the maturity date of the note, unless the U.S. Holder elects to accrue market discount on a constant yield basis. Once made, such an election may be revoked only with the consent of the IRS and, therefore, should only be made in consultation with a tax advisor.

A U.S. Holder may be required to defer the deduction of all or a portion of the interest paid or accrued on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase or carry a n7pt;">

 

Rolling Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

87.4

%

 

 

327

 

 

Dynamic

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

85.9

%

 

 

340

 

 

Cottonwood Grove

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

94.0

%

Amortizable Bond Premium.   If a U.S. Holder purchases a debt instrument for an amount that is greater than the sum of all amounts payable on the debt instrument after the purchase date, other than payments of qualified stated interest, such U.S. Holder will be considered to have purchased the debt instrument with “amortizable bond premium,” generally equal in amount to such excess. However, in the case of a debt instrument that may be redeemed prior to maturity at the option of the issuer (such as the notes), the amount of amortizable bond premium is determined by substituting the first date on which the debt instrument may be redeemed (the “redemption date”) for the maturity date and the applicable redemption price on the redemption date for the amount payable at maturity, if the result would maximize the U.S. Holder’s yield to maturity (i.e., result in a smaller amount of amortizable bond premium properly allocable to the period before the redemption date). If the issuer does not in fact exercise its right to redeem the debt instrument on the applicable redemption date, the debt instrument will be treated (solely for purposes of the amortizable bond premium rules) as having matured and then as having been reissued for the U.S. Holder’s “adjusted acquisition price,” which is an amount equal to the U.S. Holder’s basis in

154




the debt instrument (as determined under the applicable Treasury Regulations), less the sum of (i) any amortizable bond premium allocable to prior accrual periods and (ii) any payments previously made on the debt instrument (other than payments of qualified stated interest). The debt instrument deemed to have been reissued will again be subject to the amortizable bond premium rules with respect to the remaining dates on which the debt instrument is redeemable.

A U.S. Holder may elect to amortize bond premium on a debt instrument. Once made, the election applies to all taxable debt instruments then owned and thereafter acquired by the U.S. Holder on or after the first day of the taxable year to which such election applies, and may be revoked only with the consent of the IRS. The election, therefore, should only be made in consultation with a tax advisor. In general, a U.S. Holder amortizes bond premium by offsetting the qualified stated interest allocable to an accrual period with the bond premium allocable to the accrual period, which is determined under a constant yield method pursuant to the applicable Treasury Regulations. If the bond premium allocable to an accrual period exceeds the qualified stated interest allocable to such period, the excess is treated by the U.S. Holder as a bond premium deduction. The bond premium deduction for each accrual period is limited to the amount by which the U.S. Holder’s total interest inclusions on the debt instrument in prior accrual periods exceed the total amount treated by such U.S. Holder as a bond premium deduction on the debt instrument in prior accrual periods. Any amounts not deductible in an accrual period may be carried forward to the next accrual period and treated as bond premium allocable to that period.

Election to Include All Interest in Income Using a Constant Yield Method.   All U.S. Holders may generally, upon election, include in income all interest (including stated interest, acquisition discount, original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market discount, de minimis market discount, and unstated interest, as adjusted by any amortizable bond premium or acquisition premium) that accrues on a debt instrument by using the constant yield method applicable to original issue discount, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. Because this election will affect how the U.S. Holder treats debt instruments other than the notes, it should be made only in consultation with a tax advisor.

Disposition of the Notes.   Upon the sale, exchange (including an exchange for cash and any ARC common stock), redemption, repurchase, retirement or other disposition of a note, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash proceeds and the fair market value of any property (including ARC common stock) received on the disposition (except to the extent such amount is attributable to accrued but unpaid stated interest, which is taxable as ordinary income if not previously included in such holder’s income) and (ii) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the note. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in a note generally will equal the cost of the note to such Holder (i) increased by any accrued market discount if the U.S. Holder has included the accrued market discount in income and (ii) decreased by (A) the amount of any payments, other than qualified stated interest payments, received, and (B) amortizable bond premium taken, with respect to such note. Capital gain or loss recognized upon the disposition of a note will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the note was held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains to non-corporate U.S. Holders is generally 15% (for taxable years through December 31, 2008). The deductibility of capital losses may be subject to limitations.

Upon the exchange of a note for cash and ARC common stock, if any, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in any ARC common stock received equal to the fair market value of such ARC common stock at the time of the exchange. The U.S. Holder’s holding period for any ARC common stock received upon an exchange of notes will begin on the date immediately following the date of such exchange.

Adjustments to Exchange Rate.   The exchange rate is subject to adjustment under specified circumstances. Although it is not clear how or to what extent Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable Treasury regulations would apply to the notes because the notes are issued by The Partnership, rather than ARC, it is possible that the IRS would seek to apply Section 305 to the notes. If

155




Section 305 were applicable, a holder of notes would, in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution of ARC common stock if and to the extent that the exchange rate is adjusted, resulting in ordinary income to the extent of ARC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Adjustments to the exchange rate made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula which has the effect of preventing the dilution of the interest of the holders of the debt instruments will generally not be deemed to result in a constructive distribution of ARC common stock. Certain of the possible adjustments provided in the notes (including, without limitation, adjustments in respect of taxable dividends to ARC’s stockholders) do not qualify as being made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula. If such adjustments are made, we intend to take the position that you will be deemed to have received constructive distributions from ARC, even though you have not received any cash or property as a result of such adjustments. The tax consequences of the receipt of a distribution from ARC are described below under “—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders” and “—Taxation of Tax-Exempt U.S. Stockholders.”

Even if an adjustment to the exchange rate were not to result in a taxable constructive distribution to a holder of notes under Section 305 because the notes are issued by The Partnership rather than ARC, it is possible that the IRS could assert that, under principles similar to those of Section 305, a holder should recognize taxable income, which might be considered interest and that you should include such interest in income upon the adjustment to the exchange rate or, alternatively, accrue such interest prior to such adjustment.

Non-U.S. Holders of the Notes

The rules governing the U.S. fele="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

428

 

 

Mesquite Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

144

 

 

 

86.1

%

 

 

334

 

 

Silver Leaf

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

89.7

%

 

 

259

 

 

Willow Springs

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

86.3

%

 

 

322

 

 

Aledo

 

Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine the effect of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax laws, as well as tax treaties, with regard to an investment in the notes.

Interest.   A Non-U.S. Holder holding the notes on its own behalf generally will be exempt from U.S. federal income and withholding taxes on payments of interest on a note so long as such payments are not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, unless, in the case of interest payments, such Non-U.S. Holder is a direct or indirect 10% or greater partner (as defined in section 871(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code) in The Partnership, a controlled foreign corporation related to The Partnership or a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business.

In order for a Non-U.S. Holder that is an individual or corporation (or entity treated as such for U.S. federal income tax purposes) to qualify for the exemption from taxation, the “withholding agent” (generally, the last U.S. payor or a non-U.S. payor who is a qualified intermediary or withholding foreign partnership) must have received a statement (generally made on IRS Form W-8BEN) from the individual or corporation that: (i) is signed under penalties of perjury by the beneficial owner of the note, (ii) certifies that such owner is not a U.S. Holder and (iii) provides the beneficial owner’s name and address. Certain securities clearing organizations and other entities that are not beneficial owners, may provide a signed statement accompanied by a copy of the beneficial owner’s IRS Form W-8BEN to the withholding agent. An IRS Form W-8BEN is generally effective for the remainder of the year of signature plus three full calendar years unless a change in circumstances renders any information on the form incorrect. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a W-8BEN with a U.S. taxpayer identification number will remain effective until a change in circumstances makes any information on the form incorrect, provided that the withholding agent reports at least annually to the beneficial owner. The beneficial owner must inform the withholding agent within 30 days of such change and furnish a new IRS Form W-8BEN. A Non-U.S. Holder that is not an individual or corporation (or an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding the notes on its own behalf may have substantially increased reporting requirements and should consult its tax advisor.

156




To the extent that interest income with respect to a note is not exempt from the United States tax as described above, a Non-U.S. Holder may still be able to eliminate or reduce such taxes under an applicable income tax treaty.

Disposition of the Notes.   Any gain realized on the sale, redemption, exchange, repurchase, (including an exchange for cash and any ARC common stock), retirement or other taxable disposition of a note by a Non-U.S. Holder (except to the extent such amount is attributable to accrued but unpaid stated interest, which would be taxable as described under the preceding two paragraphs) will be exempt from U.S. federal income and withholding taxes so long as: (i) the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, (ii) in the case of a foreign individual, the Non-U.S. Holder is not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year, and (iii) the notes do not constitute “U.S. real property interests” within the meaning of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, or FIRPTA.

Although the applicable rules are not entirely clear, we intend to take the position that the notes constitute “U.S. real property interests” and, accordingly, that U.S. federal withholding tax applies under FIRPTA to any redemption, repurchase or exchange of the notes (including an exchange of a note for cash and any ARC common stock). Therefore, we intend to withhold 10% of any amounts payable on the redemption, or repurchase or exchange by us of a note (including an exchange of a note for cash and any ARC common stock). Further, any other sale or disposition of a note may be subject to U.S. federal income tax withholding.

You are urged to consult your tax advisor as to whether the sale, redemption, repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA if (i) the ARC common stock are part of a class of stock that is regularly traded on and established securities market and you held notes that, on the date of their acquisition, had a fair market value of 5 percent or less of the fair market value of the ARC common stock, or (ii) ARC is a domestically-controlled REIT. ARC will be a domestically-controlled REIT if at all times during a specified testing period it is a REIT and less than 50% in value of the ARC’s shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. ARC believes that it currently is a domestically-controlled REIT, but because its common stock is publicly traded, there can be no assurance that it in fact is qualified or will continue to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT. If a sale, redemption, repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA, any amounts withheld from such payments to you may be refunded or credited against your federal income tax liability, if any, if you file with the IRS, on a timely basis, the required IRS forms.

Adjustments to Exchange Rate.   The exchange rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Any such adjustment could, in certain circumstances, give rise to a deemed distribution or additional interest payment to Non-U.S. Holders of the notes. See “—United States Holders—Adjustments to Exchange Price” above. In such case, the deemed distribution or additional interest payment would be subject to the rules described below under “—Taxation of Non-U.S. Taxable Stockholders” or under “—Interest” above.

In the case of a deemed distribution or additional interest payment, because such deemed distributions will not give rise to any cash from which any applicable U.S. federal withholding tax can be satisfied, the indenture provides that we may set off any withholding tax that we are required to collect with respect to any such deemed distribution or payment against cash payments of interest or from cash or shares of ARC common stock otherwise deliverable to a holder upon an exchange of notes or a redemption or repurchase of a note.

Except to the extent that an applicable income tax treaty otherwise provides, a Non-U.S. Holder whose gain or interest income with respect to a note is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by such Non-U.S. Holder, although exempt from the withholding tax

157




previously discussed if an appropriate statement is furnished, will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain or interest income at regular U.S. federal income tax rates, as if the holder were a U.S. person, provided that the holder files an IRS Form W-8ECI. In addition, if the Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30 percent of its “dividend equivalent amount” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code for the taxable year, subject to adjustment, unless it qualifies for a lower rate under an applicable tax treaty.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting requirements and back-up withholding at the applicable rate will apply to payments on a note (including stated interest payments and payments of the proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption, repurchase, retirement or other disposition of a note), unless the holder of the note (i) is a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates that fact or (ii) provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies as to its exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Certain penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a holder that is required to supply information but does not do so in the proper manner.

Information reporting requirements and backup withholding generally will not apply to payments on a note to a Non-U.S. Holder if the statement described in “Non-U.S. Holders of the Notes” is duly provided by such Holder, provided that the Withholding Agent does not have actual knowledge that the Holder is a United States person. Information reporting requirements and backup withholding will not apply to any payment of the proceeds of the sale of a note effected outside the United States by a foreign office of a “broker” (as defined in applicable Treasury Regulations), unless such broker (i) is a United States person, (ii) derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, (iii) is a controlled foreign corporation as to the United States or (iv) is a U.S. branch of a foreign bank or a foreign insurance company. Payment of the proceeds of any such sale effected outside the United States by a foreign office of any broker that is described in (i), (ii) or (iii) of the preceding sentence will not be subject to backup withholding, but will be subject to the information reporting requirements unless such broker has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner is a Non-U.S. Holder and certain other conditions are met, or the beneficial owner otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of any such sale to or through the United States office of a broker is subject to information reporting and backup withholding requirements, unless the beneficial owner of the note provides the statement described in “—Non-U.S. Holders of the Notes” or otherwise establishes an exemption.

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

294

 

 

Golden Triangle

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

430

 

 

Dynamic II

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

ext-indent:20.0pt;">Any amount withheld from a payment to a holder of a note under the backup withholding rules is allowable as a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (which might entitle such holder to a refund), provided that such holder furnishes the required information to the IRS.

Taxation of ARC

ARC has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998. ARC believes that it has been organized and has operated in a manner which allows it to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998, and it intends to continue to be organized and operate in such a manner.

ARC has received the opinion of Skadden to the effect that commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998, ARC has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, and that its current and proposed method of operation will enable it to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a

158




REIT. It must be emphasized that the opinion of Skadden is based on various assumptions relating to the organization and operation of ARC, and is conditioned upon representations and covenants made by the management of ARC and affiliated entities regarding its organization, assets, and the past, present and future conduct of its business operations. While ARC believes that it is qualified and operated as a REIT, and intends to continue to operate so that it will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in the circumstances of ARC, no assurance can be given by Skadden or ARC that ARC will so qualify for any particular year. Skadden will have no obligation to advise ARC or the holders of ARC common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed, or of any subsequent change in the applicable law. You should be aware that opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions set forth in such opinions.

Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on the ability of ARC to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual operating results, distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code, the compliance with which will not be reviewed by Skadden. ARC’s ability to qualify as a REIT also requires that it satisfy certain asset tests, some of which depend upon the fair market values of assets directly or indirectly owned by ARC. Such values may not be susceptible to a precise determination. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of ARC’s operations for any taxable year satisfy such requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.

Taxation of REITs in General

As indicated above, qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon ARC’s ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code. The material qualification requirements are summarized below, under “—Requirements for Qualification—General.” While ARC intends to continue to operate so that it qualifies as a REIT, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge ARC’s qualification as a REIT or that it will be able to operate in accordance with the REIT requirements in the future. See “—Failure to Qualify.”

Provided that ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will generally be entitled to a deduction for dividends that it pays and, therefore, will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its net income that is currently distributed to our stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” at the corporate and stockholder levels that results generally from investment in a corporation. Rather, income generated by a REIT generally is taxed only at the stockholder level, upon a distribution of dividends by the REIT.

For tax years through 2008, stockholders who are individual U.S. stockholders (as defined below) are generally taxed on corporate dividends at a maximum rate of 15% (the same as long-term capital gains), thereby substantially reducing, though not completely eliminating, the double taxation that has historically applied to corporate dividends. With limited exceptions, however, dividends received by individual U.S. stockholders (as defined below) from ARC or from other entities that are taxed as REITs will continue to be taxed at rates applicable to ordinary income, which will be as high as 35% through 2010.

Net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT generally do not pass through to the stockholders of the REIT, subject to special rules for certain items, such as capital gains, recognized by REITs.

159




If ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will nonetheless be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances:

·       It will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed net taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains;

·       It may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on our items of tax preference, if any;

·       If it has net income from prohibited transactions, which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a 100% tax. See “—Prohibited Transactions,” and “—Foreclosure Property,” below;

·       If it elects to treat prope

 

 

136

 

 

 

95.6

%

 

 

359

 

 

Shadow Mountain

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

74.4

%

 

 

277

 

 

El Lago

 

 

 

·       If it fails to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but nonetheless maintains its qualification as a REIT because other requirements are met, it will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the greater of (1) the amount by which it fails the 75% gross income test or (2) the amount by which it fails the 95% gross income test (for its taxable year ended December 31, 2004, the amooman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

90.2

%

 

 

348

 

 

Mesquite Green

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

91.7

%

 

 

293

 

 

Hampton Acres

 

 

 

 

unt by which 90% of its gross income exceeds the amount qualifying under the 95% gross income test), as the case may be, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability;

·       Commencing with its taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if it fails to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests, as described below, by larger than a de minimis amount, but its failure is due to reasonable cause and it nonetheless maintains its REIT qualification because of specified cure provisions, it will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate (currently 35%) of the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it failed to satisfy the asset tests;

·       Commencing with its taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if it fails to satisfy any provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in its failure to qualify as a REIT (other than a gross income or asset test requirement) and the violation is due to reasonable cause, it may retain its REIT qualification but it will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure;

·       If it fails to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, or the “required distribution,” it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of (1) the amounts actually distributed (taking into account excess distributions from prior years), plus (2) retained amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level;

·       It may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if it fails to meet record-keeping requirements intended to monitor its compliance with rules relating to the composition of its stockholders, as described below in “—Requirements for Qualification—General;”

160




·       A 100% excise tax may be imposed on some items of income and expense that are directly or constructively paid between ARC and its “taxable REIT subsidiaries” (“TRS”) (as described below) if and to the extent that the IRS successfully adjusts the reported amounts of these items;

·       If it acquires appreciated assets from a corporation that is not a REIT in a transaction in which the adjusted tax basis of the assets in its hands is determined by reference to the adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of the non-REIT corporation, it will be subject to tax on such appreciation at the highest corporate income tax rate then applicable if it subsequently recognizes gain on a disposition of any such assets during the 10-year period following their acquisition from the non-REIT corporation. The results described in this paragraph assume that the non-REIT corporation will not elect, in lieu of this treatment, to be subject to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired by ARC;

·       It may elect to retain and pay income tax on its net long-term capital gain. In that case, a stockholder would include its proportionate share of ARC’s undistributed long-term capital gain (to the extent it makes a timely designation of such gain to the stockholder) in its income, would be deemed to have paid the tax that ARC paid on such gain, and would be allowed a credit for its proportionate share of the tax deemed to have been paid, and an adjustment would be made to increase the stockholder’s basis in ARC common stock; and

·       It may have subsidiaries or own interests in other lower-tier entities that are subchapter C corporations, the earnings of which could be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax.

In addition, ARC and its subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes other than U.S. federal income tax, including payroll taxes and state, local, and foreign income, property and other taxes on assets and operations. As further described below, any TRS in which ARC owns an interest will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its taxable income. It could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated.

Requirements for Qualification—General

The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

(1)         that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2)         the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;

(3)         that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the special Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to REITs;

(4)         that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;

(5)         the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;

 

 

TX

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

80.7

%

(6)         in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include specified entities);

(7)         which meets other tests described below, including with respect to the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its distributions; and

(8)         that makes an election to be a REIT for the current taxable year or has made such an election for a previous taxable year that has not been terminated or revoked.

161




The Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable year, and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Conditions (5) and (6) do not need to be satisfied for the first taxable year for which an election to become a REIT has been made. ARC’s charter provides restrictions regarding the ownership and transfer of its shares, which are intended to assist in satisfying the share ownership requireme>

 

 

422

 

 

Sunset Village

 

 

*

 

 

To monitor compliance with the share ownership requirements, ARC is generally required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of its shares. To do so, ARC must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of its stock, in which the record holders are to disclose the actual owners of the shares, i.e., the persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid by ARC. A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand must be maintained as part of its records. Failure by ARC to comply with these record-keeping requirements could subject it to monetary penalties. If ARC satisfies these requirements and has no reason to know that condition (6) is not satisfied, it will be deemed to have satisfied such condition. A stockholder that fails or refuses to comply with the demand is required by Treasury regulations to submit a statement with its tax return disclosing the actual ownership of the shares and other information.

In addition, a corporation may not qualify as a REIT unless its taxable year is the calendar year. ARC has and will continue to have a calendar taxable year.

Effect of Subsidiary Entities

Ownership of Partnership Interests.   In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, Treasury regulations provide that the REIT is deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnership’s assets and to earn its proportionate share of the partnership’s gross income based on its pro rata share of capital interest in the partnership for purposes of the asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs, as described below. However, solely for purposes of the 10% value test, described below, the determination of a REIT’s interest in partnership assets will be based on the REIT’s proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership, excluding for these purposes, certain excluded securities as described in the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, the assets and gross income of the partnership generally are deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, the proportionate share of ARC of the assets and items of income of partnerships in which it owns an equity interest is treated as its assets and items of income for purposes of applying the REIT requirements described below.

Disregarded Subsidiaries.   If a REIT owns a corporate subsidiary that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary,” that subsidiary is disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of idth:3.75pt;">

 

TX

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

325

 

 

Kimberly at Creekside

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.   A REIT, in general, may jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned, to treat the subsidiary corporation as a TRS. The separate existence of a TRS or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed above, is not ignored for

162




U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such an entity would generally be subject to corporate income tax on its earnings. A REIT is not treated as holding the assets of a TRS or other taxable subsidiary corporation or as receiving any income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued by the subsidiary is an asset in the hands of the REIT, and the REIT generally recognizes as income the dividends, if any, that it receives from the subsidiary. A TRS may be used by the parent REIT to undertake indirectly activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries or render commercially unfeasible (for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as nonqualifying hedging income or inventory sales).

Ce;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

89.7

%

 

 

297

 

 

Oak Park Village

ARC and several of ARC’s corporate subsidiaries, ARC Dealership, Inc., Windstar Aviation Corp., ARC Insurance Services, Inc., ARC Management Services, Inc., ARC DAM Management, Inc., ARC TRS, Inc., Colonial Gardens Water, Inc., and ARCMS, Inc., have made an election for those subsidiaries to be treated as a TRS for U.S. federal income tax purposes. ARC may form additional TRSs in the future. To the extent that any such TRSs pay any taxes, they will hav 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Income Tests

In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, ARC annually must satisfy two gross income tests. First, at least 75% of its gross income for each taxable year, excluding gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in “prohibited transactions,” must be derived from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including “rents from real property,” dividends received from other REITs, interest income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property (including certain types of mortgage-backed securities), and gains from the sale of real estate assets, as well as income from certain kinds of temporary investments. Second, at least 95% of its gross income in each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must be derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% income test described above, as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real property.

Dividend Income.   Dividends received (directly or indirectly) from a REIT, to the extent of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing REIT, will be qualifying income for purposes of both the 95% and 75% gross income tests. Distributions received (directly or indirectly) from TRSs or other corporations that are not REITs or qualified REIT subsidiaries will be classified as dividend income to the extent of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. Such distributions will generally constitute qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, but not under the 75% gross income test.

163




Rents from Real Property.   Rents received will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the gross income tests described above, only if several conditions are met, including the following. If rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under any particular lease, then all of the rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as rents from real property. The determination of whether an item of personal property constitutes real or personal property under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code is subject to both legal and factual considerations and is therefore subject to different interpretations.

In addition, in order for rents received to qualify as “rents from real property,” the rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount will not be excluded from rents from real property solely by being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of sales. Moreover, for rents received to qualify as “rents from real property,” the REIT generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish or render certain services to the tenants of such property, other than through an “independent contractor” who is adequately compensated and from which the REIT derives no income, or through a TRS. A REIT is permitted, however, to perform services that are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:15.8pt;">

TX

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

91.5

%

 

Rental income will qualify as rents from real property only to the extent that the REIT does not directly or constructively own, (1) in the case of any tenant which is a corporation, stock possessing 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, or 10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of such tenant, or (2) in the case of any tenant which is not a corporation, an interest of 10% or more in the assets or net profits of such tenant. However, rental payments from a TRS will qualify as rents from real property even if the REIT owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of the TRS if at least 90% of the property is leased to unrelated tenants and the rent paid by the TRS is substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for comparable space.

Interest Income.   Interest income constitutes qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% gross income test to the extent that the obligation is secured by a mortgage on real property. If interest income is received with respect to a mortgage loan that is secured by both real property and other property and the highest principal amount of the loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the real property on the date that the mortgage loan is acquired or originated, the interest income will be apportioned between the real property and the other property, and income from the arrangement will qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test only to the extent that the interest is allocable to the real font-size:1.0pt;"> 

410

 

 

 

94




 

p;ARC would not have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that Section 856(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that stock owned by such trusts shall be treated, for purposes of the requirement that not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding stock of a REIT is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) by the beneficiaries of such trusts. Certain restrictions on ownership and transfer of ARC’s stock should generally prevent a tax-exempt entity from owning more than 10% of the value of ARC stock, or ARC from becoming a pension-held REIT.

Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of owning ARC stock.

Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders

The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ARC stock applicable to non-U.S. stockholders of ARC stock. For purposes of this summary, a non-U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of ARC stock that is not a U.S. stockholder. The discussion is based on current law and is for general information only. It addresses only selective and not all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation.

Ordinary Dividends.   The portion of dividends received by non-U.S. stockholders payable out of ARC’s earnings and profits that are not attributable to gains from sales or exchanges of U.S. real property interests and which are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholder will generally be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at the rate of 30%, unless reduced or eliminated by an applicable income tax treaty. Under some treaties, however, lower rates generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs.

 

To the extent that interest income is derived from a loan where all or a portion of the amount of interest payable is contingent, such income generally will qualify for purposes of the gross income tests only if it is based upon the gross receipts or sales and not the net income or profits of any person.

Failure to Satisfy the Gross Income Tests.   ARC intends to monitor its sources of income, including any non-qualifying income received, so as to ensure its compliance with the gross income tests. If ARC fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, it may still qualify as a REIT for the year if the failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and, following the identification of such failure, it sets forth a description of each item of gross

164




income that satisfies the gross income tests in a schedule for the taxable year filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Treasury. It is not possible to state whether ARC would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving ARC, it would not qualify as a REIT. As discussed above under “—Taxation of ARC,” even where these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed upon the profit attributable to the amount by which it fails to satisfy the particular gross income test.

Asset Tests

At the close of each calendar quarter, ARC must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature of its assets. First, at least 75% of the value of its total assets must be represented by “real estate assets,” cash, cash items, U.S. government securities and, under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased with new capital. For this purpose, real estate assets include interests in real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property, stock of other corporations that qualify as REITs and certain kinds of mortgage loans. Second, except for securities that qualify for as real estate assets purposes of the 75% test and securities of TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiaries, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by ARC may not exceed 5% of the value of its gross assets. Third, except for securities that qualify for as real estate assets purposes of the 75% test and securities of TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiarieont-weight:bold;line-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

June 30, 

 

Homesite

 

The 10% value test does not apply to certain “straight debt” and other excluded securities, as described in the Internal Revenue Code, including but not limited to any loan to an individual or an estate, any obligation to pay rents from real property and any security issued by a REIT. In addition, (a) a REIT’s interest as a partner in a partnership is not considered a security for purposes of applying the 10% value test; (b) any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income is derived from sources that would qualify for the 75% REIT gross income test; and (c) any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership.

After initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, ARC will not lose its qualification as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values. If ARC fails to satisfy the asset tests because it acquires securities during a quarter, it can cure this failure by disposing of sufficient non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. Commencing with its taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if ARC fails the 5% asset test or the 10% vote or value asset tests at the end of any quarter and such failure is not cured within 30 days thereafter, it may dispose of sufficient assets or otherwise come into compliance with such asset diversification requirements (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in which the identification of the failure to satisfy these asset tests occurred) to cure such a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of its assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000. In addition, if ARC fails any of the asset tests (including a failure of the 5% and 10% asset tests) in excess of the de minimis amount described above, as long as such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, it is permitted to avoid disqualification as a REIT, after the 30 day cure period, by taking steps including the disposition of sufficient assets to meet the asset test or otherwise coming into compliance with such asset diversification requirements (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in which the identification of the failure to satisfy the REIT asset test occurred) and paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate income tax rate (currently 35%) of the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it failed to satisfy the asset test.

165




ARC believes that its assets generally will be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. However, other debt instruments secured by non-real estate assets, or unsecured debt securities may not be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. Moreover, values of some assets, such as the value of the TRSs, may not be susceptible to a precise determination and are subject to change in the future. Furthermore, the proper classification of an instrument as debt or equity for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the application of the REIT asset tests. As an example, an investment in equity securities of a REIT issuer that were determined by the IRS to represent debt securities of such issuer, such securities would also not qualify as real estate assets. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that interests in subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers (including REIT issuers) cause a violation of the REIT asset tests.

Annual Distribution Requirements

In order to qualify as a REIT, ARC is required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to its stockholders in an amount at least equal to:

(a)          the sum of: 90% of its “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and net capital gains) and 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from “foreclosure property” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code); minus

(b)         the sum of specified items of non-cash income that exceeds a percentage of its income.

These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate or in the following taxable year if such distributions are declared in October, November or December of the taxable year, are payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in any such month and are actually paid before the end of January of the following year. Such distributions are treated as both paid by the REIT and received by each stockholder on December 31 of the year in which they are declared. In addition, at the REIT’s election, a distribution for a taxable year may be declared before it timely files its tax return for the year and be paid with or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration, provided that such payment is made during the 12-month period following the close of such taxable year. These distributions are taxable to stockholders in the year in which paid, even though the distributions relate to the REIT’s prior taxable year for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement.

To the extent that a REIT distributes at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, it will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate tax rates on the retained portion. In addition, the REIT may elect to retain, rather than distribute, its net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such gains.

If a REIT fails to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed (taking into account excess distributions from prior periods) and (y) the amounts of income retained on which it paid corporate income tax. ARC intends to make timely distributions so that it is not subject to the 4% excise tax.

It is possible that ARC, from time to time, may not have sufficient cash to meet the distribution requirements due to timing differences between (a) the actual receipt of cash, including receipt of distributions from its subsidiaries and (b) the inclusion of items in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that such timing differences occur, in order to meet the distribution requirements, it might be necessary to arrange for shng:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:64.2pt;">

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

2005

 

Per Month

 

Shady Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

75.8

%

 

 

$

332

 

 

Creekside Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

90.2

%

 

 

340

 

 

Hidden Oaks

 

 

 

 

A REIT may be able to rectify a failure to meet the distribution requirements for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to stockholders in a later year, which may be included in its deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, the REIT may be able to avoid losing its qualification as a REIT or

166




being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. However, it will be required to pay interest and a penalty based on the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.

Prohibited Transactions

Net income derived from a prohibited transaction is subject to a 100% tax. The term “prohibited transaction” generally includes a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held primarily for sale to customers, in the ordinary course of a trade or business by a REIT, by a lower-tier partnership in which the REIT holds an equity interest or by a borrower that has issued a shared appreciation mortgage or similar debt instrument to the REIT. ARC intends to hold its properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of owning and operating properties and to make sales of properties that are consistent with its investment objectives. However, whether property is held “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business” depends on the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any particular property in which ARC holds a direct or indirect interest will not be treated as property held for sale to customers or that certain safe-harbor provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that prevent such treatment will apply. The 100% tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate income tax rates.

Foreclosure Property

Foreclosure property is real property and any personal property incident to such real property (1) that is acquired by a REIT as a result of the REIT having bid on the property at foreclosure or having otherwise reduced the property to ownership or possession by agreement or process of law after there was a default (or default was imminent) on a lease of the property or a mortgage loan held by the REIT and secured by the property, (2) for which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT at a time when default was not imminent or anticipated and (3) for which such REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure property. REITs generally are subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate (currently 35%) on any net income from foreclosure property, including any gain from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that would otherwise be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has been made will not be subject to the 100% tax on gains from prohibited transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute inventory or dealer property in the hands of the selling REIT. ARC does not anticipate that it will receive any income from foreclosure property that is not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, but, if it does receive any such income, ARC intends to elect to treat the related property as foreclosure property.

Failure to Qualify

Commencing with its taxable year beginning January 1, 2005, in the event that ARC violates a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in its failure to qualify as a REIT, specified relief provisions will be available to avoid such disqualification if (1) the violation is due to reasonable cause, (2) it pays a penalty of $50,000 for each failure to satisfy the provision and (3) the violation does not include a violation under the gross income or asset tests described above (for which other specified relief provisions are available). This cure provision reduces the instances that could lead to a disqualification as a REIT for violations due to reasonable cause. If ARC fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and none of the relief provisions of the Internal Revenue Code apply, it will be subject to tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to its stockholders in any year in which it is not a REIT will not be deductible, nor will they be required to be made. Unless entitled to relief under the specific statutory provisions, it will also be

167




disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following a year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether, in all circumstances, ARC will be entitled to statutory relief.

Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders

This section summarizes the taxation of U.S. stockholders that are not tax-exempt organizations. For these purposes, a U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of ARC’s stock that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a U.S. Holder

If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds ARC’s stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding ARC’s stock should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to the partner of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ARC’s stock by the partnership.

Distributions.   Provided that ARC qualifies as a REIT, distributions made to its taxable U.S. stockholders out of current and accumulated earnings and profits, and not designated as capital gain dividends, will generally be taken into account by them as ordinary dividend income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations. In determining the extent to which a distribution with respect to ARC’s stock constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes, earnings and profits will be allocated first to distributions with respect to ARC’s preferred stock, if any, and then to ARC’s common stock. Dividends received from REITs are generally not eligible to be taxed at the preferential qualified dividend income rates applicable to individual U.S. stockholders who receive dividends from taxable subchapter C corporations.

In addition, distributions from ARC that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed to U.S. stockholders as long-term capital gains, to the extent that they do not exceed the actual net capital gain of ARC for the taxable year, without regard to the period for which the U.S. stockholder has held its stock. To the extent that ARC elects under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to retain its net capital gains, U.S. stockholders will be treated as having received, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the undistributed capital gains as well as a corresponding credit for taxes paid by ARC on such retained capital gains. U.S. stockholders will increase their adjusted tax basis in their stock by the difference between their allocable share of such retained capital gain and their share of the tax paid by ARC. Corporate U.S. stockholders may be required to treat up to 20% of some capital gain dividends as ordinary income. Long-term capital gains are generally taxable at maximum federal rates of 15% (through 2008) in the case of U.S. stockholders who are individuals, and 35% for corporations. Capital gains attributable to the sale of depreciable real property held for more than 12 months are subject to a 25% maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for individual U.S. stockholders who are individuals, to the extent of previously claimed depreciation deductions.

Distributions in excess of ARC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a U.S. stockholder to the extent that they do not exceed the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. stockholder’s shares in respect of which the distributions were made, but rather will reduce the adjusted tax basis of these shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of an individual U.S. stockholder’s shares, they will be included in income as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend declared by ARC in October, November or December of any year and payablstyle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

TX

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

81.6

%

 

 

326

 

 

El Dorado

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

73.4

%

 

 

227

 

 

Mulberry Heights

168




With respect to U.S. stockholders who are taxed at the rates applicable to individuals, ARC may elect to designate a portion of its distributions paid to such U.S. stockholders as “qualified dividend income.” A portion of a distribution that is properly designated as qualified dividend income is taxable to non-corporate U.S. stockholders as capital gain, provided that holding period and other requirements are met by both ARC and the U.S. stockholder. The maximum amount of ARC’s distributions eligible to be designated as qualified dividend income for a taxable year is equal to the sum of:

(a)          the qualified dividend income received by ARC during such taxable year from non-REIT C corporations (including dividends attributable to any TRSs, which are subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that ARC designates such dividends as qualified dividend income);

(b)         the excess of any “undistributed” REIT taxable income recognized during the immediately preceding year over the U.S. federal income tax paid by ARC with respect to such undistributed REIT taxable income; and

(c)          the excess of any income recognized during the immediately preceding year attributable to the sale of a built-in-gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a non-REIT C corporation over the U.S. federal income tax paid by ARC with respect to such built-in gain.

Dispositions of ARC’s Stock

In general, a U.S. stockholder will realize gain or loss upon the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of ARC’s stock in an amount equal to the difference between the sum of the fair market value of any property and the amount of cash received in such disposition and the U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the stock at the time of the disposition. In general, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate U.S. stockholders upon the sale or disposition of shares of ARC’s stock will be subwidth:13.95pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

 

348

 

 

Zoppe's

 

Passive Activity Losses and Investment Interest Limitations

Distributions made by ARC and gain arising from the sale or exchange by a U.S. stockholder of ARC’s stock will not be treated as passive activity income. As a result, U.S. stockholders will not be able to apply any “passive losses” against income or gain relating to ARC’s stock. Distributions made by ARC, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally will be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment interest limitation. A U.S. stockholder that elects to treat capital gain dividends, capital gains from the disposition of stock or qualified dividend income as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation will be taxed at ordinary income rates on such amounts.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

60

 

ARC will report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of any tax withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or

169




comes within other exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct taxpayer identification number or social security number may also be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign status.

ARC must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. stockholder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty. A non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless applicable certification requirements are met.

Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC’s stock within the United States is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC’s stock conducted through certain United States related financial intermediaries is subject to information reporting (but not backup withholding) unless the financial intermediary has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner is a non-U.S. stockholder and specified conditions are met or an exemption is otherwise established.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Taxation of Tax-Exempt U.S. Stockholders

U.S. tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from U.S. federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxant-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

85.0

%

 

 

201

 

 

El Lago II

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

i.e. where the acquisition or holding of the property is financed through a borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder), and (2) the stock is not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business, distributions from ARC and income from the sale of ARC stock generally should not give rise to UBTI to a tax-exempt U.S. stockholder.

Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to characterize distributions from us as UBTI.

In certain circumstances, a pension trust (1) that is described in Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, (2) is tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (3) that owns more than 10% of ARC’s stock could be required to treat a percentage of the dividends from us as UBTI if we are a “pension-held REIT.” ARC will not be a pension-held REIT unless (1) either (A) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of ARC’s stock, or (B) a group of pension trusts, each individually holding more than 10% of the value of ARC’s stock, collectively owns more than 50% of such stock;

170




and (2)&nbsding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

59

 

 

 

84.7

%

 

 

360

 

Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In general, non-U.S. stockholders will not be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of ARC stock. In cases where the dividend income from a non-U.S. stockholder’s investment in ARC stock is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the non-U.S. stockholder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the non-U.S. stockholder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. stockholders are taxed with respect to such dividends, and may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on the income after the application of the income tax in the case of a non-U.S. stockholder that is a corporation.

Non-Dividend Distributions.   Unless (A) ARC stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest, or USRPI, or (B) either (1) if the non-U.S. stockholder’s investment in ARC stock is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. stockholder (in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. stockholders with respect to such gain) or (2) if the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States (in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s net capital gain for the year), distributions by ARC which are not dividends out of its earnings and profits will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the non-U.S. stockholder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of ARC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. If ARC’s stock constitutes a USRPI, as described below, distributions by ARC in excess of the sum of its earnings and profits plus the non-U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in its ARC stock will be taxed under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains rates, that would apply to a U.S. stockholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds the stockholder’s share of ARC’s earnings and profits.

171




Capital Gain Dividends.   Under FIRPTA, a distribution made by ARC to a non-U.S. stockholder, to the extent attributable to gains from dispositions oft size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

7,223

 

 

 

Dispositions of Our Stock.   Unless ARC stock constitutes a USRPI, a sale of the stock by a non-U.S. stockholder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under FIRPTA. The stock will not be treated as a USRPI if less than 50% of ARC’s assets throughout a prescribed testing period consist of interests in real property located within the United States, excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a capacity as a creditor. ARC does not expect that more than 50% of its assets will consist of interests in real property located in the United States.

In addition, ARC stock will not constitute a USRPI if ARC is a “domestically controlled REIT.” A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its outstanding stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. ARC believes that it is, and it expects to continue to be, a domestically controlled REIT and, therefore, the sale of ARC stock should not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, because ARC stock is widely held, ARC cannot assure its investors that it is or will remain a domestically controlled REIT. Even if ARC does not qualify as a domestically controlled REIT, a non-U.S. stockholder’s sale of ARC stock nonetheless will generally not be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI, provided that (a) the ARC stock owned is of a class that is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury Department regulations, on an established securities market, and (b) the selling non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less of ARC’s outstanding stock of that class at all times during a specified testing period.

If gain on the sale of ARC stock were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. stockholder would be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of non-resident alien individuals, and the purchaser of the stock could be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the IRS.

Gain from the sale of ARC stock that would not otherwise be subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a non-U.S. stockholder in two cases: (a) if the non-U.S. stockholder’s investment in ARC stock is effectivelt>

82.7

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

Atlanta, Georgia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

172




non-U.S. stockholder, the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, or (b) if the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’ s capital gain.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

 

 

 

ARC will report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of any tax withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or comes within other exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct taxpayer identification number or social security number may also be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign status.

ARC must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. stockholder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty. A non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless applicable certification requirements are met.

Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC stock within the United States is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC stock conducted through certain United States related financial intermediaries is subject tobreak-after:avoid;"> 

 

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

State, Local and Foreign Taxes

ARC and its subsidiaries and stockholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which it or they transact business, own property or reside. ARC owns interests in properties located in a number of jurisdictions, and may be required to file tax returns in certain of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of ARC and its stockholders may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax treatment discussed above. Any foreign taxes incurred by ARC would not pass through to stockholders as a credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability. Prospective stockholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application and effect of state, local and foreign income and other tax laws on an investment in ARC’s stock.

173




SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated was the initial purchaser for the original offering of the notes in private placements. We were advised by the initial purchaser that it sold the notes to “qualified institutional buyers,” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act, in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The notes and the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon the conversion of the notes that may be offered pursuant to this prospectus are being offered by the selling securityholders, which includes their transferees, distributees, pledgees or donees or their successors.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the selling securityholders and the principal amounts of notes and ARC common stock beneficially owned by each selling securityholder that may be offered pursuant to this prospectus. The information is based on information provided to us by or on behalf of the selling securityholders on or prior to October 21, 2005. The selling securityholders may offer all, some or none of the notes or the ARC common stock into which the notes are convertible. Because the selling securityholders may offer all or some portion of the notes or common stock, we cannot estimate the amount of the notes or common stock that will be held by the selling securityholders after any of these sales. Information concerning other selling securityholders will be set forth in prospectus supplements or, if appropriate, post-effective amendments to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, from time to time, if required. The percentage of notes outstanding beneficially owned by each selling securityholder is based on $96.6 million aggregate principal amount of notes outstanding.

For the purposes of the following table, the number of shares of ARC common stock beneficially owned has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, and such information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under Rule 13d-3, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a selling securityholder has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which that selling securityholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this prospectus through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other rights. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes shown in the table assumes conversion of the full amount of notes held by each selling securityholder at an initial conversion rate of 69.8812 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes and a cash payment in lieu of any fractional shares. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes shown in the table below also assumes that we would satisfy our conversion obligation entirely with common stock. This conversion price is subject to adjustment in certain events. Accordingly, the number of conversion shares may increase or decrease from time to time. The number of shares of ARC common stock owned by the other selling securityholders or any future transferee from any such holder assumes that they do not beneficially own any ARC common stock other than the common stock into which the notes are convertible.

No selling securityholder named in the table below beneficially owns two percent or more of ARC’s common stock, based on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding on July 27, 2005. None of the selling securityholders currently listed in the following table has, or within the past three years has had, any position, office or other material relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates.

174




 

="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

 

Principal Amount of Notes(1)

 

Number of Shares of Common Stock(1)(2)

 

Selling Security Holder

 

 

 

Beneficially Owned
Prior to the Offering
and Offered Hereby

 

Percentage
of Notes
Outstanding

 

Beneficially
Owned Prior to
the Offering

 

Percentage of ARC
Common Outstanding
that May Be Sold(3)

 

CC Convertible Arbitrage, Ltd.(4)

 

 

2,500,000

 

 

2.59

 

 

174,703

 

 

 

0.43

 

 

Mohican VCA Master Fund, Ltd.

 

 

750,000

 

 

0.78

 

 

52,411

 

 

 

0.13

 

 

Frontpoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P.(5)

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

1.55

 

 

104,822

 

 

 

0.26

 

 

NFJ Dividend, Premium & Interest Strategy Fund

 

 

2,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hunter Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

850

 

 

 

84.8

%

 

 

$

350

 

 

Landmark Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

2.59

 

 

174,703

 

 

 

0.43

 

 

Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income Fund

 

 

7,500,000

 

 

7.76

 

 

524,109

 

 

 

1.28

 

 

Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income Fund II

 

 

6,500,000

 

 

6.73

 

 

454,228

 

 

 

1.11

 

 

509

 

 

 

84.9

%

 

 

338

 

Vicis Capital Master Fund

 

 

5,000,000

 

 

5.18

 

 

349,406

 

 

 

0.85

 

 

All other holders of notes or future transferees, pledgees, donees, assignees or successors of any such holders(6)

 

 

70,350,000

 

Shadowood

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

507

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

361

 

 

Riverdale (Colonial Coach)

 

 

 

 

 

72.83

 

 

4,916,142

(7)

 

 

12.00

 

 


(1)    Since the date on which we were provided with the information regarding their notes, selling securityholders may have acquired, sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of all or a portion of their notes or the underlying shares of ARC common stock for which the notes may be exchanged. Accordingly, the information provided here for any particular securityholder may understate or overstate, as the case may be, such securityholder’s current ownership. The aggregate principal amount of notes outstanding as of the date of this registration statement is $96,600,000, which is the aggregate principal amount of notes registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Any such changed information will be set forth in supplements to this registration statement if and when necessary.

(2)    For purposes of presenting the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by holders of notes, we assume an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per each $1,000 principal amount of notes (the initial exchange rate), which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $14.31 per share of ARC common stock, and a cash payment in lieu of the issuance of any fractional share interest. However, the conversion price is subject to adjustment as described under “Description of Notes—Exchange Rights—Exchange Rate Adjustments.” As a result, the number of shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes, and as a consequence, the number of shares beneficially owned by the holders of notes, may increase or decrease in the future.

(3)    Percentages based on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding as of July 27, 2005.

(4)    Selling securityholder hase="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

436

 

 

 

90.1

%

 

 

336

 

 

Lamplighter Village

 

 

 

 

 

(5)    FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC is the general partner of FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P. FrontPoint Partners LLC is the managing member of FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC and as such has voting and dispositive power over the securities held by the fund. Philip Duff, W. Gillespie Caffray and Paul Ghaffari are members of the board of managers of FrontPoint Partners LLC and are the sole members of the management committee. Messrs. Duff, Caffray and Ghaffari and FrontPoint Partners LLC and FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC each disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities held by the fund except for their pecuniary interest therein.

(6)    We are unable to provide the names of certain holders of notes and/or ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at this time because they have not provided us with information and/or their notes are evidenced by a global note that has been deposited with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as DTC’s nominee. Information concerning any such holders who are not listed in the above table will be set forth in post-effective amendments from time to time, if and when required.

(7)    Assumes that any other holder of notes or any future transferee from any such holder does not beneficially own any of ARC’s common stock other than the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at the initial exchange rate.

 

GA

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

93.3

%

 

 

381

 

 

Stone Mountain

175




PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the notes and shares on behalf of the selling securityholders. The selling securityholders and their successors, which includes their transferees, distributees, pledgees or donees or their successors, may sell the notes and the underlying common stock directly to purchasers or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. Underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling securityholders or the purchasers. These discounts, concessions or commissions may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved.

The notes and the underlying ARC common stock may be sold in one or more transactions:

·       at fixed prices;

·       at prevailing market prices at the time of sale;

·       at prices related to such prevailing market prices;

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

354

       at varying prices determined at the time of sale; or

·       at negotiated prices.

Such sales may be effected in transactions in the following manner (which may involve crosses or block transactions):

·       on any national securities exchange or quotation;

·       in the over-the-counter market;

·       in transactions otherwise than on such exchanges or services or in the over-the-counter market;

·       through the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise; or

·       through the settlement of short sales.

Selling securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which may in turn engage in short sales of the notes or the underlying ARC common stock and deliver these securities to close out such short positions, or lend or pledge the notes or the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities.

From time to time, one or more of the selling securityholders may distribute, devise, gift, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in some or all of the securities owned by them. Any such distributees, devisees or donees will be deemed to be selling securityholders. Any such pledges, secured parties or persons to whom the securities have been hypothecated will, upon foreclosure in the event of default, be deemed to be selling securityholders.

The aggregate proceeds to the selling securityholders from the sale of the notes or underlying ARC common stock will be the purchase price of the notes or ARC common stock, less any discounts and commissions. A selling securityholder reserves the right to accept and, together with its agents, to reject, any proposed purchase of notes or common stock to 7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.15pt;">

 

 

 

83.6

%

 

 

383

 

 

Castlewood Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

ARC’s underlying common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. We do not intend to list the notes for trading on any national securities exchange or on the Nasdaq National Market. We cannot guarantee that any trading market will develop for the notes.

The notes and underlying ARC common stock may be sold in some states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. The selling securityholders and any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents that

176




participate in the sale of the notes and common stock into which the notes are convertible may be “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. Any discounts, commissions, concessions or profit they earn on any resale of the shares may be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act. Selling securityholders who are “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. The selling securityholders have acknowledged that they understand their obligations to comply, and have agreed to comply, with the prospectus delivery requirements and other provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and the respective rules thereunder, particularly Regulation M thereunder, in connection with any offering of the securities offered hereby.

In addition, any securities covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act may be sold under Rule nt size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">GA

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

97.7

%

 

 

324

 

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

If required, the specific notes or common stock to be sold, the names of the selling securityholders, the respective purchase prices and public offering prices, the names of any agent, dealer or underwriter, and any applicable commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer will be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if appropriate, a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, we and the selling securityholders will be indemnified by each other against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the Securities Act or will be entitled to contribution in connection with these liabilities.

We have agreed to pay substantially all of the expenses incidental to the registration, offering and sale of the notes and underlying common stock to the public, other than applicable transfer taxes and commissions, fees and discounts of underwriters, brokers, dealers and agents.

We have agreed to maintain the effectiveness of this registration statement until the holders of the notes and the common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all such securities immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume limitations of Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act. We may suspend sales under the registration statement upon notice to the selling securityholders in order to update the registration statement or otherwise comply with federal securities laws.

177




LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the notes was passed upon for us by Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C., Denver, Colorado. The validity of the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes was passed upon for us by Venable LLP, Baltimore, Maryland. Certain tax matters will be passed upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities LP as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of an" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

267

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

390

 

 

Smoke Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

The consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. incorporated in this prospectus by reference to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been so incorporated in reliance on the reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

178




INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003

 

 

264

 

 

 

83.3

%

 

 

353

 

 

Four Seasons

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002

 

215

 

 

 

88.4

%

 

 

313

 

 

Marnelle

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

201

 

 

 

95.5

%

 

 

345

 

 

Friendly Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

98.0

%

 

 

376

 

 

Plantation Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004

F-38

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

F-39

309

 

 

Golden Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004

F-40

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

F-41

Schedule III—Real Estate and Related Depreciation as of December 31, 2004

F-61

 

F-1




 

 

 

126

 

 

 

73.8

%

 

 

329

 

 

Lakeside

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of Affordable Residential Communities LP:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Affordable Residential Communities LP and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion the accompanying financial statement schedule “Schedule III” presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Denver, Colorado

October 25, 2005

 

F-2




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(In thousands)

-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,532,780

 

$

863,515

 

Assets held for sale

 

54,123

 

44,362

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

39,802

 

26,626

 

Restricted cash

 

 

13,669

 

Tenant, notes and other receivables, net

 

19,029

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

92.2

%

 

 

261

 

 

Jonesboro (Atlanta Meadows)

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

282

 

 

Atlanta, Georgia—Total/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,969

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,468

 

Inventory

 

11,230

 

3,878

 

Loan origination costs, net

 

14,403

 

11,921

 

Loan reserves

 

31,019

 

32,414

 

Goodwill

 

85,264

 

86,127

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

19,106

 

10,987

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

6,476

 

24,102

 

Total assets

 

$

 

 

Camelot

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

379

 

 

 

99.5

%

 

 

$

385

1,813,232

 

$

1,126,069

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

$

1,001,622

 

$

773,394

 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

 

 

Country Club Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

29,516

 

16,975

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

37,877

 

19,828

 

Distributions payable

 

 

323

 

 

 

99.1

%

 

 

372

 

 

15,505

 

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

12,773

 

7,655

 

Total liabilities

 

1,097,293

 

817,852

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ capital (see Note 4)

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred OP units

 

144,250

 

 

Common OP units:

 

 

Crescentwood Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

273

 

 

 

97.8

%

 

 

368

 

 

Windsor Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

539,382

 

265,578

 

Limited partners

 

32,307

 

42,639

 

 

 

715,939

 

308,217

249

 

 

 

97.6

%

 

 

384

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

1,813,232

Evergreen Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

237

 

 

 

75.9

%

 

 

323

 

 

Riverdale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,126,069

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

187,267

 

$

125,915

 

$

92,610

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

15,221

 

21,681

UT

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

96.2

%

 

 

321

 

 

Villa West

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

31,942

 

Utility and other income

 

20,065

 

15,599

 

11,942

 

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

94.3

%

 

 

375

 

 

Lakeview Estates

 

 

Net consumer finance income

 

104

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

209

 

 

&n:10.0pt;">222,657

 

163,195

 

136,494

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

75bsp;

98.6

%

 

 

353

 

 

Sunset Vista

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

44,295

 

33,341

 

Real estate taxes

 

16,621

 

10,247

 

204

 

 

 

80.4

%

 

 

352

 

 pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

6,633

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

18,267

 

18,357

 

25,826

 

Retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations

 

8,198

 

7,382

Riverside

 

 

 

 

 

8,582

 

Property management

 

7,127

 

5,527

 

4,105

 

General and administrative

 

29,361

 

16,855

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

455

 

 

Sundown

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,087

 

Initial public offering costs

 

4,417

 

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

16,685

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,014

 

UT

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

93.3

%

 

 

339

 

 

Viking Villa

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

Real estate and retail asset impairment

 

3,591

 

1,385

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

863

 

 

13,557

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

191

tyle="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

56,892

 

57,386

 

43,804

 

Total expenses

 

309,186

 

207,901

 

185,993

 

Interest income

 

(1,616

)

(1,439

)

(1,390

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(84,913

)

(43,267

)

(48,109

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

1,915

 

31

 

 

 

94.2

%

 

 

273

 

 

Washington Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

321

 

 

Overpass Point MHC

 

 

1,040

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

 

Net loss

 

(91,547

)

(39,903

)

(47,069

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(9,752

)

 

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

68.0

%

 

 

276

 

 

Brookside

 

 

 

(47,069

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

$

(95,445

)

$

(34,386

)

$

(40,818

)

Limited partners

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

170

 

 

 

91.2

%

 

 

350

 

 

 

95




 

 

    

 

 

(5,854

)

(5,517

)

(6,251

)

 

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Net loss per common OP unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.34

)

$

(2.20

)

$

(2.94

)

Income (loss) per common OP unit from discontinued operations

 

(0.17

)

0.17

 

0.06

 

Net loss per common OP unit

 

$

(2.51

)

$

(2.03

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2.88

)

Weighted average OP units outstanding

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

16,353

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

410,724

 

 

Common OP Unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General
Partner

 

Per Month

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

79.7

%

 

 

Limited
Partners

 

Preferred
OP Unitholders

 

$

322

 

 

Willow Creek Estates

 

Total

 

Balance January 1, 2002

 

$

158,957

 

$

62

 

 

$

 

 

$

159,019

 

Sales of OP units

 

33,760

 

>

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

137

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,760

 

OP Units retired in the Reorganization

 

 

(62

)

 

 

 

92.7

%

 

 

169

 

 

Kopper View MHC

 

 

 

(62

)

OP Units issued in the Reorganization

 

137,652

 

64,820

 

 

 

 

202,472

 

Transfer from limited partners to general partner resulting from issuance of OP units

 

10,413

 

(10,413

)

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

(40,818

)

(6,251

)

 

 

 

(es New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

96.7

%

 

 

340

 

 

Redwood Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

UT

 

 

)

Balance December 31, 2002

 

299,964

 

48,156

 

 

 

 

348,120

 

Net loss

 

(34,386

)

(5,517

)

 

 

 

(39,903

)

Balance December 31, 2003

 

265,578

 

42,639

 

 

 

 

308,217

 

Issuance of common OP units

 

410,724

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

372

 

 

Salt Lake City, Utah—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of preferred OP units

 

 

 

 

144,250

 

 

144,250

 

Restricted common units issued, net of current year amortization

 

199

 

 

 

width="16" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,792

 

 

 

92.1

 

 

199

 

Forfeiture of restricted common OP units

%

 

 

$

348

 

 

Front Range of Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harmony Road

 

 

&n 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

(150

)

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

486

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

$

425

 

 

Stoneybrook

 

 

 

 

 

(150

)

Redemption of OP units

 

 

(125

)

 

 

 

(125

)

Transfer of capital

 

1,737

 

(1,737

ign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">

 

 

 

CO

 

 

)

 

 

 

 

Distributions to OP unitholders

 

(44,469

)

(2,616

)

 

 

 

(47,085

)

Net loss

 

(95,445

 

426

 

 

 

)

(5,854

)

 

 

 

(101,299

)

Other comprehensive income—mark to market of interest rate swap

 

1,208

 

 

 

 

 

1,208

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(100,091

)

Balance December 31, 2004

 

$

539,382

69.0

%

 

 

399

 

 

Wikiup

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

$

32,307

 

 

339

 

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

464

 

 

$

144,250

 

 

$

715,939

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-5




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

92.5

93.0

<;"> 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Cash flow from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Ad 0pt;width:198.05pt;">

Villa West

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

331

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,014

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

 

365

 

 

The Meadows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments to fair value for interest rate caps

 

241

 

 

1,561

 

OP unitholders grant compensation expense

 

10,120

 

 

 

Preferred unit distribution declared

 

8,966

CO

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

484

 

 

Mountainside Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

498

 

 

Thornton Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

98.6

%

 

 

453

 

 

Countryside

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

 

 

 

PPU distributions declared

 

786

 

 

%

 

 

332

 

 

Inspiration Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

Non-cash REIT IPO related costs

 

389

 

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

488

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

10,358

 

Pleasant Grove

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

89.3

%

 

 

423

 

 

Loveland

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

96.5

%

 

 

404

 

 

Sheridan

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

91.9

%

 

 

475

 

 

Grand Meadow

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

 

Retail home sales impairment and other expense

 

 

1,385

 

 

Real estate asset impairment

 

3,591

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

863

 

 

13,557

 

Depreciation included in income from discontinued operations

 

3,134

 

2,613

 

2,026

 

(Gain) loss on sale oft;width:5.15pt;">

 

100.0

%

 

 

361

 

 

Mobile Gardens

 

 

 

8,549

 

(3,333

)

 

Rent expense related to vacated office space

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

864

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions

 

9,322

 

2,596

 

7,148

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

%

 

 

474

 

 

Shady Lane

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

27,034

 

10,689

 

14,281

 

Cash flow from investing activities

 

 

64

 

 

 

90.6

%

 

 

355

 

 

void;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of Hometown communities

 

(507,136

)

Commerce Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of communities and manufactured homes

 

(87,693

)

(34,288

)

(121,611

)

Proceeds from community sales

 

36,922

51

 

 

 

98.0

%

 

 

383

 

 

Front Range of Colorado—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

14,879

 

 

Deposits and deferred acquisition costs on purchase of Hometown assets

 

 

(15,559

)

 

Community improvements and equipment purchases

 

(49,708

)

(12,725

)

(15,862

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(607,615

)

(47,693

)

(137,473

)

Cash flow from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,287

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

$

429

 

 

Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow from REIT IPO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Springdale Lake

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

441

 

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

$

292

 

 

River Oaks

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

397

 

 

 

80.9

%

 

 

279

 

 

Northland

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

 

Common stock offering

 

438,078

 

 

 

Preferred stock offering

 

125,000

 

 

 

Common stock offering expenses

 

(37,421

)

 

 

Preferred stock offering expenses

 

(5,892

)

 

 

Cash flow from REIT IPO related financing transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt issued in the financing transactions

 

500,000

 

281

 

 

 

98.9

%

 

 

285

 

 

Ridgewood Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

277

 

 

Debt paid in the financing transactions

 

(439,048

)

 

 

Payment of loan origination costs

 

(8,122

)

 

 

Release of restricted cash

 

12,278

 

 

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

271

 

 

Easy Living

 

Release of loan reserves

 

19,089

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

96.2

%

 

New loan reserves

 

(14,247

)

 

 

293

 

 

Meadowood

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

91.2

%

 

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-6




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

OP units issued in the Reorganization

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Cash flow from the Reorganization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt issued in the Reorganization

 

 

 

578,000

 

Debt paid in the Reorganization

 

 

 

(431,165

)

Redemption of Limited Partnership interests

 

 

 

(112,966

)

Payment of loan costs

 

 

 

(13,365

)

Net release of restricted cash

 

 

 

2,609

255

 

 

Harper Woods

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

Net release of loan reserves

 

 

 

4,695

 

Other

 

 

140

 

 

 

88.6

%

 

 

322

 

 

 

(4,678

)

Proceeds from the issuance of common OP units

 

 

 

33,760

 

Deferred common and preferred OP unit issuance costs

 

 

Shawnee Hills

 

 

*

 

 

(1,026

)

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

96,421

 

49,038

 

126,119

 

Deferred debt issuance costs

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

73.4

%

 

 

298

 

 

Pine Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of debt

 

(42,660

)

(25,356

)

(14,416

)

Payment of common distributions

 

(33,563

)

 

 

Payment of preferred distributions

 

(7,247

)

 

 

Payment of partnership preferred distributions

 

(524

)

 

 

Repurchase of OP units

 

(125

)

 

 

Restricted cash

 

1,391

 

(240

)

(1,906

)

 

 

KS

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

90.3

%

 

 

285

 

 

Riverside

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

93Loan reserves

 

(3,447

)

6,867

 

(28,185

)

Loan origination costs

 

(6,204

)

(3,894

)

(715

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

593,757

 

25,389

 

137,787

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

97.8

%

 

 

285

 

 

Brittany Place

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

91.9

%

 

 

305

 

 

Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,176

 

(11,615

)

14,595

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

26,626

 

38,241

 

23,646

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

39,802

 

$

26,626

 

$

38,241

 

Non-cash financing and investing transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions

 

$

96,898

 

$

4,294

 

$

5,944

 

Preferred OP units issued in connection with acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

2,428

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

25,142

 

 

 

Distributions declared but not paid

 

13,524

 

 

 

 

Accrual of loan origination costs

 

2,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

285

 

 

Jacksonville, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,820

 

Common stock issued in the Reorganization

 

 

 

137,652

 

Limited Partnership debt assumed in the Reorganization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portside

 

233,915

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

928

 

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

$

335

 

 

CV-Jacksonville

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

643

 

 

 

86.3

%

 

 

361

 

 

Ortega Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

73.9

%

 

 

333

 

 

 

96




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

56,765

 

$

56,941

 

36,077

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-7




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.   Business, Liquidity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business

Affordable Residential Communities LP (formerly Affordable Residential Communities IV, LP) (the “Partnership,” the “Operating Partnership” or “OP”) is a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning and operation of manufactured home communities, the rental of manufactured homes, the retail sale of manufactured homes and other related businesses. We were organized in July of 1998 and operate primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (“ARC” or “REIT”) (formerly known as ARC IV REIT Inc.).

As described in Note 2, on May 2, 2002, ARC completed the acquisition of Affordable Residential Communities, L.P. I (“LP I”), Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., II (“LP II”), Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., III (“LP III”) (collectively, LP I, LP II, and LP III are the “Limited Partnerships”) and their respective subsidiaries and certain of the assets and subsidiaries of ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company (“Holdings”) (the “Reorganization”).

As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of 13 communities classified as discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 63,661 homesites (net of 2,566 homesites classified as discontinued operations) in 27 states with occupancy of 81.5%. Our five largest markets are Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.4% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.8% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, Kansas, with 3.8% of our total homesites. We also conduct a retail home sales business.

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of 22.3 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Partnership issued 23.1 million common OP Units and 5.0 million Series A Preferred OP Units to ARC (See Note 3).

With the proceeds from ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction, we acquired 87 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C. (“Hometown”). We acquired an additional three communities on April 9, 2004 upon the completion of the mortgage debt loan assumption process. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and total 26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for these communities and related assets was approximately $615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $93.1 million (See Note 3).

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of our accounts but the results of operations of the manufactured home communities acquired only for the periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. We have eliminated all significant inter-entity balances and transactions.

F-8




The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Ultimate actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts.

We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to current year presentation.

Rental and Other Property

We carry rental property at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize significant renovations and improvements that substantially improve asset quality and/or extend the useful life of assets and depreciate them over their estimated remaining useful lives. We expense maintenance and repairs as incurred.

Depreciation is computed primarily on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are primarily as follows:

Asset Class

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Deerpointe

 

Estimated Useful
Lives (in Years)

 

Manufactured home communities and improvements

 

 

10 to 30

 

 

Buildings

 

 

10 to 20

 

 

Rental homes

 

 

10

 

 

Furniture and other equipment

 

 

5

 

 

Computer software and hardware

 

 

3

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

In June 2002, we changed our estimate of the depreciable lives of our communities from 20 years to 30 years to conform to industry experience regarding the estimated useful life of manufactured home communities, improvements and buildings. The change resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense by approximately $7.3 million or $0.45 per unit.

Subsequent to December 31, 2004, we changed our estimate of the depreciable life of our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years. Homes will now be depreciated to an estimated salvage value after 3 years of service in our rental home portfolio. This change was made to conform to our intent to sell homes from our rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the repairs and maintenance costs typically incurred on older homes. This change did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We evaluate the recoverability of our investment in rental property whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that full asset recoverability is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental property may be impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability in which we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if a writedown is required. If this review indicates that the asset’s carrying amount will not be fully recoverable, we would reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value. During 2004, we recorded an impairment charge on rental property of approximately $500,000 (see Note 12). For the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, we recorded no impairment charges.

F-9




Discontinued Operations

The Partnership considers a community to be a discontinued operation when: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the asset, supported by a Board resolution granting approval to proceed with the sale; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year; (v) the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. In accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, “SFAS”, No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we measure each of our assets held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell at the balance sheet date and re-cast any applicable balances and corresponding liabilities related to the communities identified in all comparable periods presented. Depreciation of the assets held for sale, if applicable, is suspended at the date of the determination of discontinuance. Interest and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of the communities classified as held for sale continues to be accrued. The results of operations of the assets sold and those classified as held for sale are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognize any estimated losses on the sales of communities in the period in which the properties are discontinued and recognize any resulting gains on the sales of communities when realized. A description of the facts and circumstances leading to the expected disposal, the expected manner and timing of that disposal, and, if not separately presented on the face of the balance sheet, the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal group is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. We disclose in the notes to our financial statements (and on the face of the income statement) the gain or loss recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and, if applicable, the amounts of revenue and pretax profit or loss reported in discontinued operations. We disclose, if applicable, in the notes to our financial statements the segment in which the long-lived asset is reported under.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with maturities less than 90 days from the date of purchase.

Restricted Cash and Loan Reserves

Restricted cash and loan reserves represent reserves established pursuant to the debt agreements as described in Note 6.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable from sales of manufactured homes or assumed in connection with acquisitions are generally collateralized by manufactured homes located in our communities and is recorded at face value less allowances for bad debt less a market discount which the Company feels approximates the fair market value of the note.

Reserves for Bad Debts

We maintain allowances for bad debts on tenant receivables and notes receivable. We fully reserve amounts due from tenants greater than sixty days past due. We establish reserves for notes receivable based on management’s periodic review of specific notes considered wholly or partially uncollectible, plus an amount for estimated future uncollectible amounts based on historical experience. At December 31,

F-10




2004 and 2003, approximately $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, was reserved for tenant and notes receivables. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we charged $3.9 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, to bad debt expense.

Inventory

Inventory consists of new and used manufactured homes held for sale, including costs and materials associated with preparing the units for sale. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on specific identification reduced, as applicable, by dealer volume rebates earned from manufacturers ($14,000 and $101,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively).

Loan Origination Costs

We capitalize loan origination costs associated with financing. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the repayment term of the loans. We amortized $5.9 million, $3.2 million and $4.1 million of loan origination costs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization. The charge in 2002 includes $1.6 million for previously incurred loan origination costs of debt paid in the Reorganization. Accumulated amortization was $6.4 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Reorganization completed on May 2, 2002. We periodically assess and adjust the value of the goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded an impairment charge of $863,000 related to our insurance business as our insurance business estimated fair value was less than its carrying value as of December 31, 2004. For the year end December 31, 2002, we recorded an impairment change of $13.6 million. For additional discussion, see Note 2.

Lease Intangibles and Customer Relationships

We establish the value of lease intangibles and customer relationships at the date of acquisition of a community. We amortize lease intangibles and customer relationships related to community acquisitions on a straight-line basis over the estimated time period that a resident lives in the community (five years). We amortize lease intangibles and customer relationships related to acquisitions of rental homes on a straight-line basis over the lease term (one year). The acquired community customer relationships and rental home customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis since we cannot reliably determine the pattern of economic benefit associated with the individual contracts comprising the intangible assets. We do not have sufficient historical or industry data to reliably estimate the tenure of an individual customer or to pool customer contracts on a homogeneous basis as a basis to amortize the intangible a1.0pt;"> 

FL

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

82.1

%

 

 

$

391

 

 

Magnolia Circle

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

$

6,087FL

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

 

394

 

 

Connie Jean

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

6,003

 

2007

 

3,827

 

2008

 

2,787

 

2009

 

402

 

Total

 

$

19,106

 

 

F-11




Accumulated amortization was $13.3 million and $7.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Impairment of Intangible Assets

We combine our finite-lived intangible assets, which consist primarily of lease and customer intangibles, with other assets located in each community (primarily consisting of real estate assets) as the manufactured home community is the lowest level for which cash flows are readily identifiable. Whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the asset group is tested for recoverability. If the asset group is not recoverable from the undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset group, an impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and the estimated fair value of the asset group.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

Included in prepaid expenses and other assets are prepaid insurance and other prepaid expenses, as well as earnest money deposits which are treated as deposits until the underlying transactions are complete.

Prepaid expenses and other assets as of December 31, 2004 of $6.5 million were lower than the $24.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2003, primarily due to $17.5 million of earnest money deposits held in escrow at December 31, 2003 related to the Hometown acquisition.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual agreement between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and recognize it in income when earned.

We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title, possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no further obligations to perform significant additional activities.

Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization

We capitalize our interest costs (using our average cost of borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively. The long-lived assets on which we capitalize interest include general construction activities in our communities, manufactured homes, and, in the case of the communities acquired in the Hometown acquisition, the cost of the vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making improvements and placing a manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized $3.9 million of interest and internal costs during 2004. No significant interest or internal costs were capitalized during 2003 and 2002.

Income Taxes

We are a partnership for tax purposes and do not pay federal or state income taxes. Our income is taxed to our members in their individual returns, and we therefore do not record an income tax provision.

F-12




FL

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

79.0

%

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of our debt was approximately $1,028.6 million and $813.0 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The fair value of our other financial instruments approximates their carrying vales at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

Interest Rate Caps and Swaps

We use derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates. As required under the guidelines of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, we record all of our derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, we initially report the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassify it into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. We report the ineffective portion of the gain or loss associated with a cash flow hedge in earnings immediately. During 2004, we entered into a $100.0 million interest rate swap agreement with an unrelated third party effectively fixing the interest rate on $100.0 million of our variable rate debt at 5.06%. The swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. At December 31, 2004, $1.2 million of unrealized gain related to this derivative instrument has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the accompanying December 31, 2004 balance sheet.

We further manage our exposure to interest rate risk through the use of interest rate caps which protect us from movements in interest rates above specified levels. We immediately recognize in earnings the change in the fair value of gains or losses associated with interest rate caps. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recorded interest charges of $241,000, $115,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of the interest rate caps. At December 31, 2004 and 2003 theRoman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

287

 

 

Jacksonville, Florida—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,256

 

 

 

88.2

%

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (a component of partners’ capital) as of December 31, 2004 represent unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap which qualifies as a cash flow hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Our comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $100.1 million. There were no unrecognized gains or losses related to our interest rate swap during 2003 and 2002, and therefore, our comprehensive loss for 2003 and 2002, is equal to our net loss to Common OP Unitholders as reported on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

OP Unit Grants

We have included a charge of $10.1 million in general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 representing the value of 530,000 Common OP Units we granted February 18, 2004 under our 2003 equity incentive plan that vested at the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP Units that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 of restricted OP Units were forfeited. We have recorded the unvested portion of the remaining 15,000 outstanding restricted OP Units as unearned compensation on the balance sheet (a component of partners’ capital) and are amortizing the balance ratably over the vesting period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. yle="border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.0pt;">

$

349

 

 

Wichita, KansasShare-Based Payment. SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be

F-13




recognized in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We will apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting period beginning July 1, 2005 at the same time as ARC. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We are still evaluating the impacts of adopting SFAS 123R upon our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

2.   The Reorganization

On May 2, 2002, ARC completed the Reorganization in which each of the Limited Partnerships was merged with a separate subsidiary of ARC (ARC and the Limited Partnerships hereinafter collectively referred to as the “ARC Partnerships”). Also as part of the Reorganization, the retail home sales, insurance and other businesses previously conducted by the subsidiaries of ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company (“Holdings”) were acquired by the Operating Partnership and Holdings was liquidated. ARC became the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, which then indirectly owned and operated its existing portfolio of manufactured home communities and the Limited Partnerships’ portfolios of manufactured home communities, as well as the other businesses previously conducted by the subsidiaries of Holdings.

As a result of the Reorganization, the limited partners received cash ($113.0 million), partnership units in the Operating Partnership paired with 1.9268 shares of special voting shares of ARC par value $.01 per share (collectively, 2.7 million partnership units and special voting stock, hereinafter collectively referred to as “OP Units”) and common units (1.6 million units). As a result of the combination of Holdings’ subsidiaries with the Operating Partnership, Holdings received shares of ARC’s common stock (4.2 million shares) and distributed them to its owners upon the liquidation of Holdings.

In connection with the Reorganization, several of our subsidiaries incurred fixed rate mortgage debt of $310 million and floating rate mortgage debt of $193 million and issued $75 million out of a commitment to issue a preferred interest of $150 million. The proceeds of these borrowings were used to repay existing indebtedness of certain subsidiaries of the ARC Partnerships, fund the cash portion of the consideration to the limited partners of the Limited Partnerships in the Reorganization, pay fees and expenses related to the Reorganization and provide working capital.

We have used the purchase method to account for the combination of the businesses and assets of the Limited Partnerships and Holdings. We have allocated the aggregate purchase price of the businesses and assets of Holdings and the Limited Partnerships to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase
Price
  Allocation  

 

Purchase price, including transaction costs

 

 

$

328,551

 

 

Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

 

The Towneship at Clifton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property

KS

 

 

 

538

 

 

 

58.4

%

 

 

 

 

407,832

 

 

Intangible lease contracts and customer relationship value

 

 

18,917

 

 

Other operating assets and liabilities

 

 

36,033

 

 

Debt assumed

 

 

(233,915

)

$

260

 

 

Twin Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

373

 

 

 

73.5

%

 

 ="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.65pt;">

 

 

 

 

228,867

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

$

99,684

 

 

 

We allocated this goodwill to the real estate reporting unit ($85.3 million), retail home sales and finance reporting unit ($12.1 million) and insurance reporting unit ($2.3 million). At December 31, 2002,

258

 

 

Chisholm Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

61.8

%

 

 

F-14




we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value the reporting units. As a result, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales business $12.1 million and the insurance business of $1.4 million. The impairment for retail home sales business arose as a result of a worsening of conditions since the Reorganization including adverse operating performance in our retail home sale business, the retail home sales industry, the related finance industry and the market for retail home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance business arose because the retail home sales business provides a significant portion of the insurance business’ revenue. We realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2003. See Note 13 for discussion regarding 2004 impairment.

We determined the fair value of the tangible community assets (other than rental homes discussed below) acquired in the Reorganization (which includes land, land improvements, and buildings) by valuing the property as if it were vacant. We then allocated the “as-if-vacant” value to land, land improvements and buildings based on our determination of the relative fair values of these assets.

We determined the as-if-vacant fair value of the real estate by considering the expected lease-up period for individual communities (based on vacancies in the surrounding market and lease-up history for the communities acquired), the expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates), and expected move-in bonuses to tenants.

We measure the aggregate value of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships as the excess of the purchase price paid for a property over the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, as set forth above. We amortize the in-place lease value and tenant relationships for commuont size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">240

 

 

The Woodlands

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

We also determined fair value for the rental manufactured homes acquired in the Reorganization as if they were vacant. We determined the as-if-vacant fair value of the rental homes by considering the expected lease-up period for the home (based on lease-up history for rental homes in that community) and the expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates). We measured the aggregate value of the intangibles related to rental homes, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, by the purchase price paid for the rental homes (after adjusting in-place leases to market) less the fair value of the property as-if-vacant. We amortize the market rate adjustment, in-place leases and tenant relationships over the one-year term of the lease. We have insufficient history with customer relationships in rental homes and there is insufficient industry operating experience with rental homes to support an amortization period in excess of the initial lease term. As we gain more experience with rental home tenant renewals, we may adjust the amortization period for customer relationships in rental homes to consider historical renewals.

In accordance with the procedures described above, we have established the following intangible assets associated with in-place leases and tenant relationships as of the date of acquisition (in thousands):

Community customer relationships

 

 

243

 

 

 

76.1

%

 

 

290

 

 

Navajo Lake Estates

 

 

 

 

$

15,708

 

Community in place lease value

 

1,709

 

Rental customer relationships

 

1,288

 

Rental in-place lease value

 

45

 

Rental above and below market leases

 

167

 

 

 

$

18,917

 

 

F-15




 

 

 

KS

 

 

As a consequence of using the purchase method to account for the Reorganization, our results of operations and financial position include all of our accounts in all periods but include the results of operations of the businesses formerly conducted in the Limited Partnerships and Holdings only for periods subsequent to the Reorganization.

We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information for the year ended December 31, 2002 as if the Reorganization had occurred on January 1, 2002. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the Reorganization had been consummated on January 1, 2002 (amounts in thousands):

Revenue

 

$

176,919

 

Total expenses(1)

 

$

235,545

 

Interest income

 

$

(1,543

)

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(57,083

)

 

160

 

 

 

66.3

%

 

 

299

 

 

Glen Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

68.4

Discontinued operations

 

$

186

 

Net loss

 

$

(56,897

)

Net loss per unit

 

$

(3.35

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

16,973

 


%

 

 

270

 

 

ace="Times New Roman" style="font-size:8.0pt;">(1)    Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002, include non-recurring charges incurred in the Reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including $1.9 million in exit fees and $1.6 million for the write-off of unamortized loan costs, and include a charge of $13.6 million to write-off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses.

3.   REIT IPO and Acquisitions

REIT IPO and Hometown Acquisition

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued 23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units to ARC.

Also in connection with ARC’s IPO, we granted 530,000 common OP Units that vested at the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted OP Units. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted OP Units were forfeited.

Concurrent with the ARC IPO, we completed the refinancing of $240.0 million of our mortgage debt and raised an additional $260.0 million of new mortgage debt. The new mortgage debt, at the time of the ARC IPO, was comprised of $215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.53%, $100.7 million of 5 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.05% and $184.0 million of floating rate debt (see Note 6). Proceeds from the ARC IPO and new debt were used to purchase the Hometown communities, repay our Rental Home Credit Facility and redeem the Preferred Interest issued by one of our subsidiaries.

On February 18, 2004, and subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include 26,406

F-16




homesites. The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired consisted of the following (in thousands):

Cash purchase price

 

$

522,131

 

Debt assumed in connection with acquisition

 

93,139

 

Total purchase price

 

$

615,270

 

 

Our purchase price allocation is (in thousands):

Land

 

$

89,794

 

Rental and other property

 

494,734

 

Inventory

 

9,761

 

Sherwood Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

62.5

%

 

 

315

 

 

Sleepy Hollow

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

48.8

%

 

 

303

 

 

Park Avenue Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

Lease intangibles

 

811

 

Customer relationships

 

14,496

 

Notes receivable

 

5,674

 

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

615,270

 

 

We amortize the lease intangibles acquired on a straight-line basis over the lease term (one year) and the customer relationships acquired on a straight-line basis over the estimated time period that a resident lives in the community (five years).

We assumed management of the Hometown communities prior to our completion of the Hometown acquisition pursuant to a management agreement. We hired all Hometown employees actively employed at the Hometown communities on January 1, 2004, with Hometown reimbursing us for the costs associated with such employment until we completed the acquisition.

D.A.M. Portfolio Acquisition

On June 30, 2004 we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY, L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was approximately $65.5 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt, this acquisition was funded through the issuance of new Series “B”, “C” and “D” Partnership Preferred Units (“PPUs”), for proceeds totaling $33.1 million. All of the “D” series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were redeemed for cash on July 6, 2004. See Note 4 for further discussion of the PPUs.

Our purchase price allocation is (in thousands):

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

81.2

%

 

 

350

 

 

El Caudillo

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

67

 

 

 Land

 

$

9,225

 

92.5

%

 

 

287

Rental and other property

 

55,501

 

Inventory

 

803

 

Customer relationships

 

52

 

Other assets/liabilities, net

 

(78

)

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

65,503

 

 

We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M. acquisitions.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:13.25pt;">

 

 

Sunset 77

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

F-17




year ended December 31, 2003 because the results of Hometown are included in our results for the year ended December 31, 2004 for approximately ten and one-half months (in thousands).

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

52

 

 

 

67.3

%

 

 

201

 

 

"1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Revenue

 

$

236,114

 

$

240,083

 

Total expenses

 

$

321,722

Audora

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

86.5

%

 

 

314

 

 

Sycamore Square

 

 

*

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

204

 

 

Wichita, Kansas—Total/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,178

 

 

 

66.7

%

 

$

280,474

 

Interest income

 

$

(1,676

)

$

(1,919

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(83,932

)

$

(38,472

)

Discontinued operations

 

$

(6,326

) 

 

$

273

 

 

Orlando, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shadow Hills

 

 

 

 

 

$

6,055

 

Net loss

 

$

(90,258

)

$

(32,417

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(100,010

)

$

(32,417

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders per unit

 

$

(2.47

)

$

(1.65

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

 

Other Acquisitions

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 in addition to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions, we acquired six, three and nineteen manufactured home communities, respectively, from unaffiliated third parties for approximately $16.5 million in cash and $3.8 million in assumed debt in 2004, $6.5 million in cash and $4.3 million in assumed debt in 2003, and $52.1 million in cash and $5.9 million in assumed debt in 2002. We accounted for these acquisitions utilizing the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, we have allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. We allocated the majority of the purchase price to the rental property and intangible assets, including customer relationships and leases intangibles.

We have not presented pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 as if these other acquisitions were made on the first day of the year, as the effects of these other acquisitions are not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flow for these periods.

F-18




The table below summarizes all of our manufactured home community acquisitions for the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004.

size:1.0pt;"> 

="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">NA

Date

 

FL

 

 

 

664

 

 

 

77.4

%

 

 

$

425

 

 

Siesta Lago

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

489

 

 

 

96.7

%

 

 

383

 

 

Chalet North

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

92.8

%

 

 

377

 

 

College Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

Portfolio

 

Community

 

Location

 

Homesites

 

Jan-02

 

NA

 

Sundown

 

Clearfield, UT

 

 

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

97.7

%

 

 

200

 

 

Feb-02

 

NA

 

Forest Park

 

Queensbury, NY

 

 

183

 

 

Feb-02

 

NA

 

Birch Meadow Estates

 

Wilton, NY

 

 

64

 

 

Feb-02

 

NA

 

Park D’Antoine

 

Wilton, NY

 

 

18

 

 

Apr-02

 

246

 

 

Carriage Court East

 

NA

 

Valley Verde

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

 

220

 

 

Apr-02

 

NA

 

Arbor Lake

 

Grinnell, IA

 

 

40

 

 

May-02

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

128

 

 

NA

 

Riverside

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

201

 

 

Jun-02

 

99.2

%

 

 

309

 

 

Carriage Court Central

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

96.6

NA

 

Hampton Acres

 

Desoto, TX

%

 

 

295

 

 

Wheel Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

221

 

 

Orlando, Florida—Total/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,986

 

 

 

89.8

%

 

 

$

368

 

 

St. Louis, Missouri/Illinois

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Southridge Estates

 

Des Moines, IA

 

 

302

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Pleasant Grove

 

Raleigh, NC

 

 

72

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Amber Village

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

206

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Village East

 

Terrell, TX

 

 

196

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enchanted Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

506

 

 

 

65.4

%

 

 

$

299

 

 

Mallard Lake

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

315

 

 

Country Club Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

88.8

%

 

 

314

 

 

Siesta Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

192

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Americana #1 & #2

 

Hemet, CA

 

 

 

 

 

87.5

%

 

 

286

 

 

Brookshire Village

309

 

 

Sep-02

 

NA

 

Connelly Village

 

Connelly, NY

 

 

100

 

 

Sep-02

 

NA

 

Cypress Shores

 

Winter Haven, FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

204

 

 

Sep-02

 

NA

 

Grand Meadows

 

Longmont, CO

 

 

104

 

 

Dec-02

 

NA

 

Ble="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:19.1pt;">

MO

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

68.8

%

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

257

 

 

Dec-02

 

 

 

251

 

 

Castle Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

Berryhill Acres

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

244

 

 

Dec-02

 

NA

 

Creekside Terrace

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

250

 

 

Feb-03

 

NA

 

Brookshire Village

 

St. Louis, MO

 

 

202

 

 

Sep-03

 

NA

 

Philbin Estates

 

Pocatello, ID

 

 

180

 

 

Feb-04

 

NA

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

Lebanon, TN

 

 

270

 

 

Feb-04

 

NA

 

Weatherly Estates II

 

Clarksville, TN

 

 

131

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

100 Oaks

 

Fultondale, AL

 

 

235

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Jonesboro

 

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

96.4

%

 

 

237

 

 

Rockview Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

MO

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

90.1

%

 

 

334

 

 

Oak Grove

 

 

*

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

83.6

%

 

 

286

 

 

Vogel Manor MHC

 

 

 

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

 

75

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Bermuda Palms

 

Indio, CA

 

 

185

 

 

MO

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

91.7

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Breazeale

 

Laramie, WY

 

 

%

 

 

245

 

 

Bush Ranch

 

 

 

 

 

117

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Broadmore

 

Goshen, IN

 

 

MO

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

69.6

%

 

 

282

 

 

Hidden Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

370

 

 

Feb-04

MO

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

76.9

%

 

 

312

 

 

St. Louis, Missouri/Illinois—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,912

 

 

 

81.0

%

 

 

$

290

 

 

 

97




 

k-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Per Occupied

 

    

 

 

 

HTA

 

Butler Creek

 

Augusta, GA

 

 

376

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Camden Point

 

Kingsland, GA

 

 

268

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carnes Crossing

 

Summerville, SC

 

 

604

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

 

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Castlewood Estates

 

Mableton, GA

 

 

334

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Casual Estates

 

Liverpool, NY

 

 

961<" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Burntwood

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Riverdale

 

Riverdale, GA

 

 

481 

410

 

 

 

85.1

%

 

 

$

262

 

 

Westlake

 

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Columbia Heights

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

 

302

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

73.4

%

 

 

291

 

 

Westmoor

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

68.7

%

 

 

376

 

 

HTA

 

Conway Plantation

 

Conway, SC

 

 

299

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Crestview

 

Stillwater, OK

 

 

238

 

 

Feb-04

 

Meridian Sooner

 

 

 

 

 

HTA

 

Country Village

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

643

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Eagle Creek

 

Tyler, TX

 

 

194

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Eagle Point

 

Marysville, WA

 

 

230

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Falcon Farms

 

Port Byron, IL

 

 

215

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Forest Creek

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

167

 

 

Feb-04

 

OK

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

273

 

 

Golden Rule

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

196

 

 

HTA

 

Fountainvue

 

Lafontaine, IN

 

 

80.6

%

 

 

273

 

 

Timberland

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

78.0

%

 

 

277

 

 

Overholser Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Foxhall Village

 

Raleigh, NC

 

 

315

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Golden Valley

 

Douglasville, GA

 

 

131

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Huron Estates

 

Cheboygan, MI

 

 

111

 

 

F-19




 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Indian Rocks

 

Largo, FL

 

 

79.4

%

 

 

296

 

 

Glenview

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

71.7

%

 

 

258

 

 

Misty Hollow

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

62.3

%

 

 

293

 

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

148

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Knoll Terrace

 

Corvallis, OR

 

 

212

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

Indio, CA

 

 

151

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakewood

 

Montgomery, AL

 

 

396

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakewood Estates

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

180

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Landmark Village

 

Fairburn, GA

 

 

524

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Marnelle

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

 

205

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Oak Ridge

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

204

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Oakwood Forest

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

482

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

$

289

 

 

Greensboro/Winston Salem, North Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HTA

 

Pedaler’s Pond

 

Lake Wales, FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oakwood Forest

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

469

 

 

 

74.2

%

 

 

$

262

 

 

Woodlake

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

64.5

%

 

 

293

 

 

 

214

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pinecrest Village

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

446

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pleasant Ridge

 

Mount Pleasant, MI

 

 

305

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

President’s Park

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

 

174

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Riverview

 

Clackamas, OR

 

 

133

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Saddlebrook

 

N. Charleston, SC

 

 

425

 

 

Feb-04

Autumn Forest

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

49.8

%

 

 

246

 

 

Village Park<"2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

HTA

 

Sherwood

 

Hartford City, IN

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

134

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Southwind Village

 

Naples, FL

 

 

337

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Springfield Farms

 

Brookline Sta, MO

 

 

290

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Stonegate

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

157

 

 

Feb-04

 

NC

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

87.6

%

 

 

HTA

 

Terrace Heights

 

Dubuque, IA

 

 

317

 

 

 

289

 

 

Gallant Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

NC

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Torrey Hills

 

Flint, MI

 

 

377

 

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

78.6

%

 

 

234

 

 

Greensboro/Winston Salem, North Carolina—Total/Weighted Average

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Twin Pines

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

69.5

%

 

 

$

270

 

 

Davenport/Moline/Rock Island, Iowa/Illinois

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloverleaf

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

292

 

 

 

95.9

%

 

Goshen, IN

 

 

238

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Villa

 

Flint, MI

 

 

319

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Winter Haven Oaks

 

Winterhaven, FL

 

 

343

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Green Park South

 

 

$

277

 

 

Silver Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

272

 

 

 

84.2

%

 

 

239

 

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

259

 

 

 

78.4

%

 

 

245

 

 

Falcon Farms

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

86.0

%

 

 

278

Pelham, AL

 

 

421

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Hunter Ridge

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

 

838

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Friendly Village

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

 

203

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Misty Winds

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

 

354

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shadow Hills

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

670

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Smoke Creek

 

Snellville, GA

 

 

264

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

 

Lakewood Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

180

 

 

 

96.1

%

 

 

295

 

 

Lakeside

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

76.4

%

 

 

255

 

 

Whispering Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

Kennesaw, GA

 

 

273

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sunset Vista

 

Magna, UT

 

 

207

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sea Pines

 

Mobile, AL

 

 

429

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

e="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">45

 

 

 

86.7

%

 

 

277

 

 

Davenport/Moline/Rock Island, Iowa/Illinois
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,385

 

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

$

265

 

 

Inland Empire, California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Montgomery, AL

 

 

628

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

The Pines

 

Ladson, SC

 

 

204

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shady Hills

 

Nashville, TN

 

 

251

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Trailmont

 

Goodlettsville, TN

 

 

131

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Chisholm Creek

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

254

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Big Country

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

 

251

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desert Palms MHC

 

 

*

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Heritage Point

 

Montgomery, AL

 

 

264

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

89.3

%

Lakeside

 

Lithia Springs, GA

 

 

103

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Plantation Estates

 

Douglasville, GA

 

 

138

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Green Acres

 

Petersburg, VA

 

 

 

 

$

370

 

 

Meridian Terrace

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

182

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

 

124

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Evergreen Village

 

Pleasant View, UT

 

 

238

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Four Seasons

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

 

214

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Alafia Riverfront

 

Riverview, FL

 

 

96

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Highland

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

246

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Birchwood Farms

 

Birch Run, MI

 

 

143

 

 

F-20




 

257

 

 

 

95.7

%

 

 

424

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Terrace

t-size:10.0pt;">Parkview Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

96.0

%

 

 

426

 

 

Bermuda Palms

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

98.4

%

 

 

333

 

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

 

Cedar Rapids, IA

 

 

255

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

270

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Creek

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

280

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Encantada

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

 

354

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

98.0

%

 

 

385

 

 

Lido Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

CA

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Royal Crest

 

Los Alamos, NM

 

 

180

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Brookside Village

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

394

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Meadow Glen

 

Keller, TX

 

 

409

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Leaf

 

Mansfield, TX

 

 

145

 

98.3

%

 

 

468

 

 

Inland Empire, California—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,223

 

 

 

95.1

%

 

 

$

397

 

 

 

98




 

<-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Lamplighter Village

 

Marietta, GA

 

 

431

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Shadowood

 

Acworth, GA

 

 

506

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Stone Mountain

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

 

354

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 -after:avoid;text-align:center;"> 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Elkhart/Goshen, Indiana

 

 

 

 

 

Marion Village

 

Marion, IA

 

 

486

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Autumn Forest

 

Brown Summit, NC

 

 

299

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadmore

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

72.2

%

 

 

$

340

 

 

 

Highland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Woodlake

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

IN

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

89.4

%

 

 

263

 

 

 

Twin Pin:right;">308

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Arlington Lakeside

 

Arlington, TX

 

 

233

 

 

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Pine Ridge

 

Sarasota, FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

96.1

%

 

 

308

 

 

 

Oak Ridge

 

 

 

 

126

 

 

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Knoll

 

Waterloo, IA

 

 

290

 

 

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Mallard Lake

 

Pontoon Beach, IL

 

 

278

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

 

IN

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

308

 

 

 

Forest Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

 

NA

 

Kopper View

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

61

 

 

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Overpass Point

 

Tooele, UT

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

80.8

%

 

 

459

 

182

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pleasant View

 

Berwick, PA

 

 

 

 

Elkhart/Goshen, Indiana—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,212

 

 

108

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

 

85.6

%

 

 

$

326

 

 

 

Charleston/North Charleston, South Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carnes Crossing

 

 

D.A.M.

 

Brookside

 

Berwick, PA

 

 

171

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Beaver Run

 

Linkwood, MD

 

 

118

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Carsons

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

130

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Chelsea

 

Sayre, PA

 

 

85

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Collingwood

 

Horseheads, NY

 

 

101

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Crestview

 

Sayre, PA

 

 

98

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

 

 

SC

 

 

 

602

 

 

 

75.9

%

 

 

$

,248

 

 

 

Saddlebrook

 

 

 

 

 

 

SC

 

 

 

425

 

 

 

93.2

%

 

 

275

 

 

 

The Pines

 

 

 

 

 

 

SC

 

 

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Danboro

 

Danboro, PA

 

 

231

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Ephrata

 

Ephrata, PA

 

 

149

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Frieden

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

 

192

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Green Acres

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

24

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Gregory Courts

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

39

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Honey Brook

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

146

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Huguenot

 

Port Jervis, NY

 

 

166

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Maple Manor

 

Taylor, PA

 

 

316

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Monroe Valley

 

Jonestown, PA

 

 

44

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Moosic Heights

 

Avoca, PA

 

 

152

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Mountaintop

&nbe="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

152

 

 

 

73.0

%

 

 

181

 

 

 

Charleston/North Charleston, South Carolina
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,179

 

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

$

251

 

 

 

Southeast Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Narvon, PA

 

 

39

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Haven

 

Blossvale, NY

 

 

130

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunny Acres

 

Somerset, PA

 

 

207

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Suburban

gn:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Western Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

395

 

 

 

99.2

%

 

 

$

555

 

 

 

Sunshine City

 

 

*

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

350

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

503

 

 

 

Lakeside of the Palm Beaches

 

Greenburg, PA

 

 

202

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Blue Ridge

 

 

*

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

260

 

 

 

93.8

%

 

 

Conklin, NY

 

 

69

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Chambersburg I&II

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

100

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Hideaway

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

40

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Kintner

 

Vestal, NY

 

 

55

 

395

 

 

 

Havenwood

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

98.3

%

 

 

478

 

 

 

Southeast Florida—Total/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Martins

 

Nottingham, PA

 

 

60

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Nichols

 

Phoenixville, PA

 

 

10

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Scenic View

 

East Earl, PA

 

 

18

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Shady Grove

 

Atglen, PA

 

 

40

96.0

%

 

 

$

495

 

 

 

Nashville, Tennessee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-21




 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Blandon

 

Fleetwood, PA

 

 

30

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Morgantown

 

Countryside Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

Morgantown, PA

 

 

23

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Tuckerton

 

350

 

 

 

69.4

%

 

 

$

349

 

 

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

63.3

%

 

 

294

 

 

 

Shady Hills

 

Reading, PA

 

 

74

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

84.7

%

 

 

241

 

 

 

Trailmont

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Wernersville

 

Wernersville, PA

 

 

29

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Terrace

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

 

25

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunnyside

 

Trooper, PA

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

 

TN

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

89.3

%

 

 

304

 

 

 

Weatherly Estates II

 

 

*

 

 

 

TN

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

67.9

%

 

 

190

 

 

 

Nashville, Tennessee—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tunkhannock, PA

 

 

79

 

 

Jul-04

 

NA

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

145

 

 

Sep-04

 

NA

 

Willow Creek Estates

 

Ogden, UT

 

 

137

 

 

 

4.   Partners’ Capital

As of December 31, 2004, the Company has a total of 43.3 million Common OP Units, 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units, 300,000 Series B Preferred Units and 706,000 Series C Preferred OP Units outstanding. The following table summarizes our partner capital transactions from inception of the Company (in thousands):

 

 

Year

 

Common
OP Units

 

Series A
Preferred
OP Units

 

 

 

1,071

 

 

Series B
Preferred
OP Units

 

Series C
Preferred
OP Units

 

 

72.8

%

 

 

$

291

 

 

 

Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, North Carolina

 

 

 

 

Series D
Preferred
OP Units

 

Total
Net capital

 

Initial capitalization

 

1998

 

 

1,038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.75pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

20,000

 

Sales of OP Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

4,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78,804

 

Sales of OP Units

 

2000

 

 

2,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,859

 

Sales of OP Units

 

2001

 

 

1,497

 

Green Spring Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

322

 

 

 

89.1

%

 

 

$

317

"bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:9.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

33,700

 

Sales of OP Units

 

2002

 

 

1,498

 

 

 

 

 

Foxhall Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,760

 

OP Units issued in Reorganization

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

315

 

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

370

 

 

 

Deerhurst

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

8,516

 

 

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

202,472

 

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

19,699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

432,595

 

Issuance of Common OP Units in connection with ARC IPO

 

2004

 

 

23,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

410,724

 

Restricted common units issued, net of current year amortization

 

2004

 

 

 

 

81.2

%

 

 

325

 

 

 

Stony Brook North

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

402

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

199

 

 

Pleasant Grove

 

 

 

 

 

 

NC

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

70.8

%

 

 

177

Forfeiture of restricted common OP units

 

2004

 

 

(80

 

 

 

Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, North Carolina—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

85.7

%

 

 

$

340

 

 

 

 

99




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(150

)

Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with ARC IPO

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119,108

 

Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with D.A.M. portfolio acquisition

 

2004

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Syracuse, New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casual Estates

 

 

706

 

 

 

320

 

 

33,142

 

Redemption of Preferred OP Units

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

801

 

 

 

64.7

%

 

 

$

358

 

 

Pine Haven MHP

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

130

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64.6

%

 

 

226

 

 

Syracuse, New York—Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

(320

)

 

(8,000

)

Redemption of Common OP Units

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

931

 

 

 

64.7

%

 

 

$

340

 

 

Tampa/Lakeland/Winter Haven, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(125

)

Common OP Unit distributions

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Winter Haven Oaks

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

$

230

 

 

Pedaler's Pond

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

93.4

%

 

 

306

 

 

Cypress Shores

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

273

 

 

Indian Rocks

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

87.8

%

 

 

 

(47,085

)

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

43,278

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

706

 

 

 

 <>

 

323

 

 

Alafia Riverfront

 

 

*

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

97.9

%

 

 

334

 

 

Tampa/Lakeland/Winter Haven, Florida—Total/Weighted Average

 

940,408

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,208

 

Cumulative net losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(225,677

)

Partners’ capital, December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

715,939

 

 

F-22




Common OP Units

On January 23, 2004 our partners approved a reverse split by which all of our partners received 0.519 Common OP Unit for every Common OP Unit they previously owned. As a result, we have restated all historical Common OP Unit data to give effect to this reverse split.

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued 23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units to ARC.

Also in connection with ARC’s IPO, we granted 530,000 Common OP Units that vested at the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted Common OP Units. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted Common OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted Common OP Units were forfeited.

In addition, as of December 31, 2004 ARC has outstanding warrants to certain ARC shareholders authorizing the purchase of up to 775,000 shares of ARC common stock at $18.85 per share, as adjusted for dividends paid by ARC. The warrants expire on July 23, 2010 and, if exercised, would result in issuance of 775,000 additional Common OP Units. To date, no warrants have been exercised.

We repurchased a total of 8,025 Common OP Units from Common OP Unitholders for total cash of approximately $125,000 during 2004. No repurchases were completed in 2003 or 2002.

Series “A” Preferred OP Units

At the ARC IPO, the Company issued 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units at a price of $25.00 per unit that have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions. The holders of our Series “A” Preferred OP Units are entitled to receive cash distributions at a rate of 8.25% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference. The Series “A” Preferred OP Units have no voting rights and no stated maturity. We may not redeem the Series “A” Preferred OP Units prior to February 18, 2009. On and after February 18, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem our Series “A” Preferred OP Units, in whole or from time to time in part, at a cash redemption price equal to $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, to and including the redemption date. Our Series “A” Preferred OP Units will not be convertible into or exchangeable for any of our other properties or securities.

Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units

At December 31, 2004, we had 300,000 Series “B” Preferred OP Units and 705,688 Series “C” Preferred OP Units outstanding that were issued as part of the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition (see Note 3). Each Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at our election, one share of ARC common stock (which would necessitate the issuance of one Common OP Unit).

The Series “B” OP Units carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “B” OP Units can be redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance at the option of the Operating Partnership. Series “B” OP Unitholders can request redemption of their units after the 1st anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series “B” OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or cash and a note payable, at the Operating Partnership’s option. As of December 31, 2004, we have accrued

F-23




$78,125 of the Series “B” OP Unit preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “B” Preferred Unitholders through that date.

The Series “C” Preferred OP Units carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “C” Preferred OP Units can be redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance at the option of the Operating Partnership. Series “C” Preferred OP Unitholders can request redemption of their units after the two and a half year anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series “C” Preferred OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or with cash and a note payable, at the Operating Partnership’s option. Series “B” and “C” Preferred OP Units have the same priority as to the payment of distributions. As of December 31, 2004, we had accrued $183,773 of the Series “C” Preferred OP Unit preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “C” Preferred OP Unitholders through that date.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

860

 

 

 

92.8

%

 

 

$

286

 

 

Sioux City, Iowa/Nebraska

 

 

 

 

Distributions

On March 10, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1493 per Common OP Unit, prorated from February 18, 2004 to March 31, 2004. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $6.5 million on April 15, 2004 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2004. In addition, on March 10, 2004 we declared a distribution of $0.4182 on each unit of our Series “A” Preferred OP Unit, prorated from February 18, 2004 to April 30, 2004. We paid the Series “A” Preferred OP Units distribution of $2.1 million on April 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2004.

On June 14, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Units. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.6 million on July 15, 2004 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2004. In addition, on June 14, 2004 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid July 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on July 15, 2004. In addition, on July 30, 2004 we paid a $0.13 per unit distribution, prorated from July 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004, on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units.

On September 14, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on October 15, 2004 to unitholders of record on September 30, 2004. Also, on September 14, 2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid October 29, 2004 to unitholders of record on October 15, 2004. In addition, on September 14, 2004 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on October 29, 2004 to unitholders of record on October 15, 2004.

On December 10, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on January 14, 2005 to unitholders of record on December 31, 2004. Also, on December 10, 2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series “A” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid January 31, 2005 to unitholders of record on January 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we had accrued $1.7 million of the Series “A” Preferred OP Unit distribution, representing the portion of the distribution earned by preferred shareholders through that date. In addition, on December 10, 2004 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on January 31, 2005 to unitholders of record on January 15, 2005.

On March 10, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We will pay the total Common OP Unit distm" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:11.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evergreen Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

518

 

 

 

74.5

%

 

 

$

F-24




Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution is payable on April 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2005.

5.   Rental and Other Property, net

The following summarizes rental and other property (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Land

 

292

 

 

Siouxland Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

NE

$

211,383

 

$

119,779

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

86.0

%

 

 

289

 

 

Tallview Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

205

 

Land improvements and buildings

 

1,268,002

 

705,573

 

Rental homes and improvements

 

197,668

 

129,194

 

Furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

12,434

 

8,656

 

Subtotal

 

1,689,487

 

963,202

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(156,707

)

(99,687

)

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,532,780

 

$

 

 

 

84.9

%

 

 

286

 

 

Sioux City, Iowa/NebraskaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

994

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

$

290

863,515

 

 

Land improvements and buildings comprise primarily infrastructure, roads and common area amenities.

6.   Notes Payable

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our debt (in thousands).

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

Des Moines, Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

&nblign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:345.2pt;">

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum

 

$

303,903

 

$

306,767

 

Senior fixed rate mosp;

 

 

Southridge Estates

 

 

 

213,333

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum

 

99,651

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum (5.40% at December 31, 2004)

 

150,871

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

257

 

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

$

346

 

 

Country Club Crossing

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

225

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2005, LIBOR plus 2.85% per annum (3.97% at December 31, 2003)

 

 

174,756

 

BFND credit facility due 2005, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum (4.12% at December 31, 2003)

 

 

 

 

89.3

%

 

52,414

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through 2031, averaging 7.31% per annum

 

153,818

 

40,380

 

Preferred interest due 2005, 14.0% per annum

 

 

170,000

 

Rental home credit facility due 2010, LIBOR plus 4.7% per annum (5.82% at December 31, 2003)

 

 

24,055

 

Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility, LIBOR plus 2.95% (5.35% at December 31, 2004)

 

51,000

 

 

Floorplan lines of credit, ranging from prime plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 7.79% at December 31, 2004)

 

27,999

 

3,897

 

Other loans due 2005

 

1,047

 

1,125

 

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

$

773,394

 

 

The fair value of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $1,028.6 million and $813.0 million, respectively.

F-25




Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012

We entered into the Senior Fixed Ra:1.0pt;"> 

 

306

 

 

Sunrise Terrace

 

 

*

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

73.0

%

 

 

245

 

 

Ewing Trace

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

99.5

%

 

 

313

 

 

Arbor Lake

 

 

*

 

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05%, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2006

We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR rate (5.40% at December 31, 2004) and will mature in February 2006. At our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance, respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by the lenders to refinance the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending

F-26




and property operating expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2005

We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2005 on May 2, 2002. It was an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and was collateralized by 71 manufactured home communities. The floating rate debt bore interest at a variable rate calculated as the one-month LIBOR plus 2.85% (3.97% as of December 31, 2003), amortized over 30 years and would have matured on May 2, 2005. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARC’s IPO, we repaid the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage in full and incurred $1.9 million in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

BFND Credit Facility

We entered into a $150 million credit facility on November 14, 2000, (the “BFND Credit Facility”). Proceeds from the BFND Credit Facility were available for community acquisitions and anticipated capital expenditures with advances up to 70% of the purchase price and related costs. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARC’s IPO, we repaid the BFND Credit Facility in full and incurred $786,000 in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages

We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at the time of acquisition as follows:

a)              Mortgages assumed as part of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately $46.3 million at December 31, 2004, mature from 2006 through 2028 and have an average effective interest rate of 7.56%. These mortgages are secured by 14 specific manufactured home communities.

b)              Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $78.2 million, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective interest rate of 5.12%. These mortgages are secured by 20 specific manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage.

c)               Notes assumed in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately $29.3 million, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.18%. These mortgages are secured by 22 specific manufactured home communities.

Preferred Interest

We entered into the Preferred Interest on May 2, 2002. The Preferred Interest had a preferred distribution rate of 12.5% per annum. On October 17, 2003, we modified our Preferred Interest to increase our borrowing limit by $25.0 million with a preferred distribution rate of 14.0% to apply to all outstanding balances beginning on the date of the first draw of the additional loan amount. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARC’s IPO, we repaid the Preferred Interest obligation in full and incurred $3.4 million in extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

F-27




Rental Home Credit Facility

On December 31, 2002, ARC Housing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of ARC RE, entered into a $27.0 million credit facility collateralized by rental homes (the “Rental Home Credit Facility”). Proceeds from the Rental Home Credit Facility were available for acquisitions of rental homes and related capital expenditures. The Rental Home Credit Facility would have matured on February 1, 2010, bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 4.7% (5.82% at December 31, 2003), required level monthly principal and="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

IA

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

77.5

Senior Revolving Credit Facility

We entered into the Senior Revolving Credit Facility on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility had a total commitment of $125.0 million, and an initial term of three years. The facility was an obligation of our Operating Partnership and was secured by 40 communities owned by a real property subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, our rental homes, and certain other ass.2pt;">

%

 

 

240

 

 

Des Moines, IowaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ets. In August 2004, we cancelled the Senior Revolving Credit Facility and incurred $3.3 million in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by the same 40 communities that previously secured the Senior Revolving Credit Facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARC’s IPO. Advances under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flow of the communities securing the loan. The Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.95% (5.35% at December 31, 2004) and has a term of one year. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and will pay origination fees of 0.5% with each advance. The facility contains no significant financial covenants.

Consumer Finance Facility

We entered into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. The Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility has a total commitment of $225.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of various subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, and borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2004. This facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the debt facility as of December 31, 2004. Upon the initial drawing under this facility, we will pay a commitment fee of 1.00% on the committed amount and additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the sales contract.

F-28




The availability of advances under the retail home sales and consumer finance debt facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if in its judgment this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio (see Note 19).

Floorplan Lines of Credit

In August 2004, we amended our floorplan lines of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million, secured by manufactured homes in inventory. The amended lines of credit mature in September 2007. Under the amended lines of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended lines of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 75bp to the prime rate plus 4.00% (5.50% to 8.75% at December 31, 2004), based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended lines of credit require the Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million. We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the lines of credit as of December 31, 2004. The lines of credit are subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and a termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination date.

The aggregate amount of annual principal maturities for all notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Fixed Rate Debt

 

Variable Rate Debt

 

Total

 

2005

 

 

$

 

904

 

 

 

86.5

%

 

 

$

305

 

 

Flint, Michigan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Torrey Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

MI

 

 

 

377

 

 

 

80.1

%

 

 

$

376

 

 

Villa

 

 

 

 

11,957

 

 

 

$

78,999

 

 

MI

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

60.5

 

 

$

90,956

 

2006

 

 

22,487

 

 

%

 

 

355

 

 

Birchwood Farms

 

 

 

 

 

150,871

 

 

173,358

 

2007

 

 

10,790

 

 

 

MI

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

88.0

%

 

 

317

 

 

 

 

10,790

 

2008

 

 

61,685

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flint, MichiganTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

838

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

 

 

61,685

 

2009

 

 

$

358

 

 

Corpus Christi, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113,456

 

 

 

 

 

113,456

 

Thereafter

 

 

551,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

551,377

 

 

 

 

$

771,752

 

 

 

$

229,870

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

F-29




7.   Loss Per Unit

The following reflects the calculation of loss per unit on a basic and diluted basis (in thousands, except per unit information):

argin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

Years ending December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Loss per unit from continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(84,913

)

$

(43,267

)

$

(48,109

)

 

 

 

 

 

Misty Winds

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred unit distributions

 

(9,752

)

 

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(94,665

)

$

(43,267

 

TX

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

90.5

%)

$

(48,109

)

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.34

)

$

 

 

$

301

 

 

Seascape

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

(2.20

)

$

(2.94

)

257

 

 

 

60.3

%

 

 

321

 

 

Seamist

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

68.8

%

 

 

393

 

 

Corpus Christi, TexasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

755

 

 

 

75.6

%

 

 

$

324

 

 

 

100




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

Income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

1,915

 

$

31

 

$

1,040

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

 

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

$

(6,634

)

$

3,364

 

$

1,040

 

Income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations

 

$

(0.17

)

$

0.17

 

$

0.06

 

Loss per unit to common OP unitholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss to common OP unitholders

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Loss per unit to common OP unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2.51

)

$

(2.03

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

)

$

(2.88

)

Weighted average unit information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units outstanding

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

16,353

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2004 we have excluded 0.9 million common units related to PPUs and restricted common units from the loss per unit calculation as the impact would be anti-dilutive in nature.

8.   Property Operations Expense

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred property operations expenses as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Utilities and telephone

 

$

27,128

 

$

16,911

 

$

13,849

 

Salaries and benefits

 

21,224

 

11,704

 

8,607

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

13,264

 

6,837

 

5,615

 

Insurance

 

3,870

 

2,269

 

1,679

 

Bad debt expense

 

3,745

 

2,394

 

1,464

 

Advertising

 

1,099

 

904

 

553

 

Other operating expenses

 

4,820

 

3,276

 

1,574

 

 

 

$

75,150

 

$

44,295

 

$

33,341

 

 

F-30




9.   Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expenses

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expenses as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Pueblo, Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meadowbrook

 

 

*

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

387

 

 

 

63.0

%

 

 

$

301

 

 

Sunset Country

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Utilities and telephone

 

$

79

 

$

320

 

$

308

 

Salaries and benefits

 

2,310

 

4,469

 

4,991

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

354

 

801

 

268

 

Insurance

 

187

 

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

203

 

179

 

257

 

Bad debt expense

 

188

 

95

 

20

 

 

70.0

%

 

 

343

 

 

Oasis

 

 

Advertising

 

3,632

 

433

 

509

 

Other operating expenses

 

1,448

 

1,085

 

2,229

 

 

 

$

8,198

 

$

7,382

 

$

8,582

 

 

10.   General and Administrative Expense

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred general and administrative expenses as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">

2003

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

 

333

 

 

Pueblo, ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2002

 

Salaries and benefits(b)

 

$

21,087

 

$

9,274

 

$

7,148

 

Travel

 

2,140

 

1,712

 

1,276

 

Professional services

 

 

 

 

 

 

751

 

 

 

70.0

%

 

 

$

321

 

 

Southern New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,580

 

2,205

 

693

 

Insurance

 

1,012

 

384

 

788

 

Rent(a)

 

379

 

1,715

 

444

 

Management fees(c)

 

 

 

1,007

 

Other administrative expenses

 

2,163

 

1,565

 

1,731

 

 

 

$

29,361

 

$

16,855

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Twin Lakes

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

256

 

 

 

99.6

%

 

 

$

491

 

 

Huguenot Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

99.4

%

 

 

335

 

 

Spring Valley Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

98.5

%

 

 

645

 

 

 

$

13,087

 


(a)    Includes approximately $864,000 of one time expenses related to vacating unused corporate office space for the year ended December 31, 2003.

(b)    Includes approximately $10.1 million of one time expenses related to Common OP Units issued to employees in connection with ARC’S IPO.

(c)     Represents fees paid to an affiliate prior to the Reorganiont size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Connelly Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

11.   Discontinued Operations

In September 2003, we sold our Sunrise Mesa Community located in Apache Junction, Arizona for $15.0 million and recorded a gain of $3.3 million after giving effect to net assets sold of $11.5 million and closing costs of $121,000. In connection with the sale, we repaid $10.3 million of our Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2005 related to this community.

In July 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell twelve communities, comprising 2,933 homesites, geographically located where the company does not have market concentration. The auction was held in September 2004. In addition to the twelve communities sold, as part of the auction, the company also contracted to sell two parcels of undeveloped commercial land located adjacent to one of its communities in Colorado. All of these sales, except one, closed during the fourth quarter of 2004. The remaining community continues to be held for sale and classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 based on the company’s intent to sell this community during 2005.

F-31




In September 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of approximately $5.9 million. These sales also closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

In October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell twelve communitiesight;">100

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

389

 

 

Washingtonville Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

560

 

In December 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our Sunswept, Berryhill Acres and Berryhill Commons communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of approximately $8.3 million. These sales also closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, each of the communities sold during 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. We have included $54.1 million and $44.4 million of net assets related to these communities as assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We have also included $29.5 million and $17.0 million of obligations related to these communities as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying balance sheets. In addition, we have recast the operations of each of these communities as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and recorded a loss of $8.5 million related to the sale of the discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 in connection with these sales. The following table summarizes combined balance sheet and income statement information for the discontinued operations noted above (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

Southern New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

739

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

52,848

 

$

43,533

 

Tenant, notes and other receivables, net

 

309

99.5

%

 

 

$

478

 

 

Cedar Rapids, Iowa

 

158

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marion Village

593

 

640

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

373

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

437

 

$

54,123

 

$

44,362

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

80.3

%

 

 

$

252

 

 

Cedar Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

$

28,951

 

$

16,179

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

262

 

312

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

303

 

484

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

234

 

 

 

81.6

%

 

 

250

 

 

Cedar Rapids, IowaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

80.8

%

 

 

$

252

 

 

Philadelphia/Wilmington/Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,516

 

$

16,975

 

 

 

 

For the Year
Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

Valley ViewDanboro

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Statement of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

13,166

 

$

7,278

 

$

6,625

 

Operating expenses

 

11,251

 

7,247

 

5,585

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

1,915

 

$

31

 

$

1,040

 

 

F-32




12.   Asset Impairments

Retail Home Sales Asset Impairment Expense

Prior to 2003, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of manufactured homes, in late 2002 we began redirecting our retail home sales subsidiary’s sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence and into an in-community presence focused exclusively on sales of homes in our communities. During March 2003 we ceased operations at one of our stand-alone retail dealership locations and during June 2003 we sold two of our retail locations recording minor charges to write down fixed assets to fair value.

As of July 1, 2003 we operated the remaining 16 separate, stand-alone dealership retail locations in five states. During the six months ended December 31, 2003 we substantially completed the redirection of our retail home sales subsidiary’s sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence by selling twelve of our retail dealerships, ceasing operations in the remaining four retail dealerships and focusing entirely on in-community retail home sales activities in nearby communities owned by us. In accordance with the terms we have with the buyers of the retail dealerships, we will continue to obtain certain benefits they receive from their inventory purchases and we expect they will continue to refer new residents to our communities. With respect to five of the twelve stand-alone retail dealerships we sold, we will continue to hold and finance inventory at their retail dealership. With respect to the four retail dealerships we closed, we have relocated inventory to nearby manufactured home communities we own. In connection with these activities, we recorded a charge of $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2003 to write off fixed assets net of sales proceeds and to record the cost of remaining lease obligations at the retail dealerships we closed in the third quarter.

Real Estate Asset Impairment

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate long-lived assets based on estimated future undiscounted net cash flows whenever significant events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. If that evaluation indicates that impairment has occurred, a charge is recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the discounted cash flows or fair value of the asset, whichever is more readily determinable.

At December 31, 2004, we evaluated the carrying amount of certain real estate assets for potential impairment and determined write-downs using recent appraisals and capitalization rates to estimate the long-lived assets’ undiscounted future cash flows. As a result of these valuations, we recorded an impairment charge to older vacant mobile homes in our rental home portfolio and to three mobile home communities of $3.0 million and $500,000, respectively.

 

 

PA

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

$

362

 

 

Valley ViewHoney Brook

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

13.   Goodwill Impairment

As discussed in Note 2, in connection with our Reorganization, we allocated goodwill of $12.1 million and $2.3 million to the retail home sales and finance reporting unit and insurance reporting unit, respectively. At December 31, 2002, we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using estimated market values, capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value each reporting unit. As a result of this valuation, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales business of $12.1 million and in the insurance business of $1.4 million. The impairment for the retail home sales business arose as a result of a worsening of conditions since the Reorganization including adverse operating performance in our retail home sales business, the retail home sales industry, the related finance industry and the market for retail home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance business arose because the retail home

F-33




sales business provides a significant portion of the insurance business’ revenue. We realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2003.

At December 31, 2004, we evaluated our remaining goodwill for potential impairment using capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value the real estate and insurance reporting units. As a result of these valuations, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the insurance business of $863,000. The impairment for the insurance business was necessary due to the negative growth projections for the business product.

14.   Employee Savings Plan

The Company provides to its employees a qualified retirement savings plan (“Plan”) designed to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan allows employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to defer a portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis subject to certain maximum amounts. The Plan does not provide for matching contributions to be made by the Company to employee accounts.

15.   Commitments and Contingencies

We lease office space and various pieces of office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. These leases have expiration dates beginning in 2005 through July 2009. Minimum future lease and sublease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

2005

 

$

748

 

2006

 

101

 

2007

 

104

 

2008

 

48

 

2009

 

16

 

Total

 

$

1,017

 

 

In December 2003, we recorded a one time charge of $864,000 for vacating unused office space.

In the normal course of business, from time to time we are involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In the normal course of business, from time to time we incur environmental obligations relating to the ownership and operation of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such environmental obligations, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

During August and September 2004, our manufactured home communities located in the southeastern United States were impacted by hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Our communities sustained aggregate estimated damages of approximately $1.6 million consisting primarily of fallen trees and branches, roof and water damage to clubhouses and buildings, damage to company-owned manufactured homes, and debris removal. The company has adequate property and business interruption insurance coverage. The impact of the hurricanes, net of insurance proceeds, on the company’s 2004 results of operations was $453,000.

F-34




16.   Related Party Transactions

One of our subsidiaries provides accounting services to six communities that are controlled by our Chief Executive Officer under two separate year to year asset management agreements for which we received $27,000 $29,000 and $28,000 in compensation in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Also, during 2004, 2003 and 2002 we billed these same companies controlled by our Chief Executive Officer $105,000, $67,000 and $30,000 for property management expenses in accordance with those agreements. In addition, we lease an airplane hangar from a company controlled by our Chief Executive Officer for which we paid $53,000, $53,000 and $52,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, companies owned by our Chief Executive Officer owed to us approximately $68,000 and $4,000, respectively.

During 2002, we purchased ten mobile homes on behalf of one of these affiliates in its rental unit acquisition operations. As a result, at December 31, 2002 the affiliate owed $206,000 related to these purchases.

During 2002, an officer borrowed $100,000 from a subsidiary in exchange for a note. The note bore interest at 4.75%, required monthly interest payments and matured on June 30, 2005. The note was repaid in full during 2004.

Prior to the Reorganization, a subsidiary of the company reimbursed certain related parties for specific and allocated expenses of $2.7 million during 2002. These expenses included salaries and benefits, rent and travel and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The related party calculated the allocated costs monthly based on the proportion of the subsidiary’s total assets to the total assets under the related party’s control.

Prior to the Reorganization, a subsidiary purchased manufactured homes from a related party amounting to $1.5 million in 2002. The homes were purchased at a price that approximated the related party’s cost and included them in manufactured homes and improvements.

17.   Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

 

 

Quarter ended

 

 

 

Mar 31

 

Jun 30

 

Sep 30

 

 

145

 

 

 

87.6

%

 

 

295

 

Dec 31

 

For the quarters ended 2004:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

 

 

Sunnyside

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

42,981

 

$

55,106

 

$

60,088

 

$

64,482

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

97.2

%

 

 

409

 

 

Martin'S

 

 

Total expenses

 

$

80,539

 

$

60,898

 

$

73,995

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

60

 

$

93,754

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(38,032

)

$

(7,547

)

$

(18,227

)

$

(37,493

)

Loss per unit(a)

 

$

(1.20

)

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

303

 

 

Hideaway

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

82.5

%

 

 

306

 

 

Shady Grove

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.42

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

107.5

%

 

 

297

 

 

Gregory Courts

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

97.4

%

 

 

349

 

 

Mountaintop

 

 

 

 

 

)

$

(0.87

)

For the quarters ended 2003:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

41,390

 

$

42,572

 

$

41,747

 

$

37,486

 

Total expenses

 

$

51,704

 

$

52,663

 

$

53,316

 

 

PA

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

94.9

%

$

50,218

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(9,741

)

$

(9,894

 

 

315

 

 

Valley ViewMorgantown

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

279

 

 

Scenic View

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

85.0

%

 

 

362

 

 

Nichols

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

348

 

 

Philadelphia/Wilmington/
Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

717

 

 

 

95.4

%

 

 

$

337

 

 

Manhattan, Kansas

)

$

(7,882

)

$

(12,386

)

Loss per unit(a)

 

$

(0.49

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.50

)

$

(0.40

)

$

(0.63

)


(a)     Quarterly loss per unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and to changes in the number of common partnership units outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colonial Gardens

 

 

 

 

 

F-35




18.   Segment Information

We operate in three business segments which are based on the nature of business in each segment—real estate, retail home sales and finance and insurance. A summary of our business segment information is shown below (in thousands).

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

342

 

 

 

99.7

%

 

 

$

276

 

 

Riverchase

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

291

 

2002

 

Total revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

206,690

 

$

139,402

 

$

102,321

 

Retail home sales

 

15,248

 

 

 

Blue Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

147

 

 

22,027

 

32,795

 

Finance and insurance

 

719

 

1,766

 

1,378

 

Corporate and other

 

 

 

97.3

%

 

 

321

 

 

Manhattan, KansasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

222,657

 

$

163,195

 

$

136,494

 

tom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.5pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

648

 

 

 

98.6

%

 

 

$

289

 

 

Operating expenses, cost of manufactured homes sold and real estate taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

91,756

 

$

55,318

 

$

39,991

 

Retail home sales

 

24,931

 

23,799

 

32,565

 

Finance and insurance

 

1,357

 

695

 

 

101




 

1,174

 

Corporate and other

 

192

 

469

 

652

 

 

 

$

118,236

 

$

80,281

 

$

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,382

 

Net segment income(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

114,934

 

$

84,084

 

$

62,330

 

Retail hom;">

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

e sales

 

(9,683

)

(1,772

)

230

 

Finance and insurance

 

(638

) 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

 

Community Name

 

 

1,071

 

204

 

Corporate and other

 

(192

)

(469

)

(652

)

 

 

$

104,421

 

$

82,914

 

$

62,112

 

Property management expense

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

 

Birmingham, Alabama

 

font-size:1.0pt;"> 

$

7,127

 

$

5,527

 

$

4,105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Green Park South

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

97.3

%

 

 

General and administrative expense

 

$

29,361

 

$

16,855

 

$

13,087

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

52,815

 

$

35,283

 

$

2,138

 

Retail home sales

 

$

269

 

 

 

100 Oaks

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

70.0

456

 

477

 

%

 

 

267

 

 

 

Birmingham, AlabamaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

635

 

 

 

87.7

%

 

 

$

268

 

  

Finance and insurance

 

195

 

 

 

Corporate and other

 

3,426

 

21,626

 

41,666

 

 

 

$

56,892

 

$

57,386

 

$

43,804

 

Amortization expense

 

$

12,400

 

$

6,961

 

 

Tyler, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

5,723

 

Depreciation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

59,391

 

$

38,482

 

$

30,904

 

Retail home sales

 

92

 

298

 

 

 

 

 

Shiloh Pines

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

314

pt;"> 

Finance and insurance

 

7

 

9

 

 

Corporate and other

 

124

 

 

 

73.9

%

 

 

$

335

 

717

 

431

 

 

 

$

59,614

 

$

39,506

 

$

31,335

 

 

 

 

Eagle Creek

 

 

 

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

177

 

Initial public offering costs

 

$

4,417

 

$

 

$

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

279

 

 

 

Rose Country Estates

 

 

 

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

$

16,685

 

$

 

$

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

$

3,591

 

$

1,385

 

$

 

 

TX

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

74.3

 

Goodwill impairment

 

$

863

 

$

 

%

 

 

363

 

 

 

Tyler, TexasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

$

13,557

 

F-36




 

="font-size:10.0pt;">644,114

Interest income

 

$

(1,616

)

$

(1,439

)

$

(1,390

)

Net loss before discontinued operations

 

$

(84,913 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

596

 

 

 

78.4

%

 

 

$

321

 

 

 

Stillwater, Oklahoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crestview

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

)

$

(43,267

)

$

(48,109

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

1,915

 

$

31

 

$

1,040

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

$

(8,549

)

$

3,333

 

$

 

Preferred unit distributions

 

$

(9,752

)

237

 

 

 

60.3

%

 

 

$

276

 

 

Eastern Villa

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

86.4

%

 

 

257

 

 

Countryside

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

Net loss

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Identifiable assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

1,738,226

 

$

1,108,967

 

$

1,104,228

 

Retail home sales

 

30,053

 

4,043

 

8,867

 

Finance and insurance

 

735

 

118

 

 

 

69.5

%

 

 

300

 

 

Oakridge / Stonegate

 

 

*

 

 

 

OK

 

984

 

1,113

 

Corporate and other

 

44,218

 

12,075

 

22,529

 

 

 

$

1,813,232

 

$

1,126,069

 

$

1,136,737

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

75.0

%

 

 

303

 

 

Stillwater, OklahomaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

588 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70.4

%

 

 

$

282

 

 

Shreveport/Bossier City, Louisiana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pinecrest Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

LA

 

 

 

427

 

 

 

75.4

Real estate

 

$

972,059

 

$

768,373

 

$

726,201

 

Retail home sales

 

28,516

 

3,896

 

9,421

 

Finance and insurance

 

 

 

 

Corporate and other

 

1,047

 

1,125

 

1,197

 

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

$

773,394

 

$

736,819

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

%

 

 

$

198

 

 

Stonegate

 

 

*

 

 

 

LA

 

 

 

157

 

 

$

46,683

 

$

 

 

97.5

%

 

137,209

 

Retail home sales

 

 

4

 

259

 

Finance and insurance

 

4

 

44

 

4

 

Corporate and other

 

419

 

282

 

1

 

 

 

$

644,537

 

$

47,013

 

$

137,473

 


 

240

 

 

Shreveport/Bossier City, LouisianaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

(a)     Net segment income represents total revenues less expenses for property operations, real estate taxes, cost of manufactured homes sold and retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations. Net segment income is a measure of the performance of the properties before the effects of the following expenses: property management, general and administrative, IPO costs, early termination of debt costs, impairment charges, depreciation, amortization, interest and impairment of fixed assets.

19.   Subsequent Events

In March 2005, the Company secured an additional $100.0 million in financing commitments, consisting of an unsecured $25.8 million trust preferred security, and a $75.0 million lease receivables facility secured by substantially all of the Company’s rental homes and the related leases. The $25.8 million trust preferred security was borrowed on March 15, 2005, matures in 30 years, and bears interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. The lease receivables facility commitment is for $75.0 million, decreasing $3.0 million quarterly through March 31, 2007. The facility will bear interest at the 1-month LIBOR plus 7.0%, decreasing to the 1-month LIBOR plus 3.25% if certain conditions are met. The facility will mature in March 2007. The closing of the lease receivable facility will reduce the combined borrowing capacity under the consumer finance facility to $200.0 million and eliminate $25.0 million of previous chattel financing. The lease receivables facility is subject to customary closing conditions and documentation. There can be no assurance that we will close the facility and fund.

 

 

 

 

 

 

584

 

 

 

F-37




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2005 AND DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

 

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,587,040

 

 

$

1,532,780

 

 

Assets held for sale

 

3,368

81.3

%

 

 

$

212

 

 

Las Cruces, New Mexico

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54,123

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

19,616

 

 

39,802

 

 

Tenant notes and other receivables, net

 

32,826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Encantada

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

354

 

 

 

83.9

%

 

 

$

331

 

 

Valley Verde

avoid;"> 

 

19,029

 

 

Inventory

 

307

 

 

11,230

 

 

Loan origination costs, net

 

14,510

 

 

14,403

 

 

Loan reserves

 

35,453

 

 

31,019

 

 

Goodwill

 

85,264

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

85.1

%

 

 

314

 

 

85,264

 

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

16,087

 

 

19,106

 

 

Las Cruces, New MexicoTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

556

 

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

$

325

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

10,315

 

 

6,476

 

 

Total assets

 

$

1,804,786

 

 

$

1,813,232

 

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable (including $25.8 million due to general partner at June 30, 2005)

 

$

1,089,004

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

Gainesville, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

2,656

 

 

29,516

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

31,273

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oak Park Village

 

 

 

 

37,877

 

 

Dividends payable

 

10,084

 

 

15,505

 

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

15,109

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

12,773

 

 

Total liabilities

 

1,148,126

 

 

1,097,293

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred OP units

 

144,250

 

 

144,250

 

 

Common OP units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

486,112

 

 

539,382

 

 

Limited partners

 

26,298

 

 

32,307

 

 

Total partners’ capital

 

656,660

 

 

715,939

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

1,804,786

 

 

$

1,813,232

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-38




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

344

 

 

 

91.6

%

 

 

$

251

 

 

Whitney

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

51,366

 

$

47,884

 

$

102,224

 

$

86,210

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

18,288

 

97.1

%

 

 

248

 

 

Gainesville, FloridaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

2,082

 

26,278

 

2,789

 

Utility and other income

 

5,835

 

5,114

 

11,481

 

9,097

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

550

 

Net consumer finance interest income (expense)

 

155

 

32

 

205

 

(40

/p>

 

 

93.6

%

 

 

$

250

 

 

Huntsville, Alabama

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

Total revenue

 

75,644

 

55,112

 

140,188

 

98,056

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

20,042

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merrimac Manor

 

17,626

 

40,363

 

30,234

 

Real estate taxes

 

4,407

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

172

4,080

 

8,698

 

7,390

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

16,190

 

1,809

 

24,405

 

2,365

 

 

 

26.7

%

 

 

$

383

 

.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.65pt;">

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

4,112

 

1,498

 

7,317

 

2,079

 

Green Cove

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

164

 

 

 

82.9

%

 

 

177

 

 

Cedar Creek

 

Property management

 

2,494

 

1,600

 

4,759

 

3,054

 

General and administrative

 

6,259

 

4,304

 

11,618

 

19,099

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

132

 

Initial public offering related costs

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

 

 

13,427

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

22,224

 

17,242

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

Interest expense

 

16,544

 

12,729

 

31,817

 

27,209

 

Total expenses

 

92,272

 

60,888

 

171,232

 

141,426

 

Interest income

 

(277

)

 

 

60.6

%

 

 

229

 

 

Rambling Oaks

 

 

*

 

 

 

AL

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

85.0

%

 

 

222

 

(450

)

(660

)

(792

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(16,351

 

Huntsville, AlabamaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

)

(5,326

)

(30,384

)

(42,578

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

72

 

343

 

1,000

 

795

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

52

 

 

(678

)

 

Net loss

 

(16,227

)

(4,983

)

(30,062

)

 

60.2

%

 

 

$

225

 

 

 

102




 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

(41,783

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(2,971

)

(2,578

)

(5,942

)

(3,810

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(19,198

)

$

(7,561

)

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

$

(18,193

)

$

(7,126

)

$

(34,065

)

$

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Per Occupied 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

(42,095

)

Limited Partners

 

(1,005

)

(435

)

(1,939

)

(3,498

)

 

 

$

(19,198

)

$

(7,561

)

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Net loss per common OP unit from continuing operations

 

$

(0.45

)

$

(0.18

Per Month

 

Scranton/Wilkes/Barre—Hazleton, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

$

(0.84

)

$

(1.24

)

Income per common OP unit from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

0.01

 

0.02

 

Net loss per common OP unit

 

$

(0.45

)

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.83

)

$

(1.22

)

Weighted average of units outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

Maple Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

313

 

 

 

87.9

%

 

 

$

229

 

 

Moosic Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

78.9

%

 

 

238

 

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

 

43,260

 

43,269

 

43,262

 

37,531

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-39




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

xt-align:right;">(4,434

 

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

79

 

 

 

91.1

%

 

 

238

 

 

Scranton/Wilkes/Barre/
Hazleton, Pennsylvania
Total/Weighted Average

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Cash flow from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to Partners

 

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

OP unit grant compensation expense

 

326

 

10,144

 

Preferred unit distributions declared

 

5,156

 

3,810

 

Partnership preferred unit distributions declared

 

786

 

 

Non-cash ARC IPO related costs

 

 

389

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

7,100

align="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.25pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

544

 

 

 

85.8

%

 

 

$

233

 

 

Pocatello, Idaho

 

 

 

 

Depreciation included in income from discontinued operations

 

5

 

1,859

 

Loss on sale of discontinued operations

 

678

 

 

Gain on sale of manufactured homes

 

(1,873

)

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions

 

(10,340

)

9,110

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

989

 

18,971

 

Cash flow from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of Hometown communities

 

 

(507,136

)

Acquisition of D.A.M. and other communities

 

 

(14,754

)

Purchases of manufactured homes

t:11.0pt;margin:6.0pt 0pt .0001pt 20.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-20.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(68,300

)

(44,856

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philbin Estates

 

Proceeds from community sales

 

48,721

 

 

Proceeds from manufactured home sales

 

13,014

 

 

Community improvements and equipment purchases

 

(32,605

 

*

 

 

 

ID

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

79.3

%

)

(10,068

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(39,170

)

(576,814

)

 

 

$

290

 

 

Cowboy

 

 

*

Cash flow from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow from REIT IPO

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock offering

 

 

 

 

 

ID

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

79.3

%

 

 

371

 

 

Belaire

 

 

*

 

 

 

ID

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

81.0

%

 

 

261

 

 

Pocatello, IdahoTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

437,790

 

Preferred stock offering

 

 

125,000

 

Common stock offering expenses

 

 

(36,813

)

Preferred stock offering expenses

 

 

(5,593

)

Cash flow from REIT IPO related financing transactions

 

 

 

 

 

Debt issued in the financing transactions

 

 

500,000

 

Debt paid in the financing transactions

 

 

(439,048

)

Payment of loan origination costs

 

 

(8,122

)

Release of restricted cash

 

 

453

 

 

 

79.9

%

 

 

$

310

 

 

Gillette, Wyoming

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,278

 

Release of loan reserves

 

 

19,089

 

New loan reserves

 

 

(14,247

)

Proceeds from issuance of debt (including $25.0 million from parent)

 

155,483

 

5,000

 

Repayment of debt

 

(94,352

)

(5,690

)

Payment of OP unit dividends

 

(27,045

)

(6,474

)

Payment of preferred dividends

 

(5,156

)

(2,091

)

Payment of partnership preferred distributions

 

(786

)

 

Repurchase of OP units

 

(1,836

)

 

Restricted cash

 

 

456

 

Loan reserves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eastview

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

 

$

372

 

 

Westview

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

83.1

%

 

 

290

 

 

Highview

 

 

 

)

(992

)

Loan origination costs

 

(3,879

)

(1,589

)

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

94

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

17,995

 

578,954

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(20,186

)

 

92.6

%

 

 

6pt;">

21,111

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

39,802

283

 

 

Park Plaza

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,631

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

19,616

 

$

 

47,742

 

Non-cash financing and investing transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions

 

$

 

$

122,863

 

Preferred OP units issued in connection with acquisitions

 

$

 

$

33,142

 

Notes receivable for manufactured home sales

 

$

11,402

 

$

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

33,931

 

$

28,243

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-40




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

1.   Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business

Affordable Residential Communities LP (the “Partnership,” “Operating Partnership” or “OP”) is a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning and operation of primarily all-age manufactured home communities, the retail sale and financing of manufactured homes, the rental of manufactured homes and other related businesses including acting as agent in the sale of homeowners’ insurance and related products, all exclusively to residents and prospective residents of our communities. We were organized in July 1998 and operate primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (“ARC,” “General Partner,” or “REIT”).

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of approximately 22.3 million shares of its common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding approximately 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of its preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The net proceeds to ARC from its IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. All of the proceeds from the IPO were contributed by ARC to the Partnership in exchange for 23.1 million Common OP units and 5.0 million Series ”A” Preferred OP units. In conjunction with the IPO, ARC also completed a financing transaction consisting of $500.0 million of new mortgage debt and the repayment of certain existing indebtedness (see Note 2).

Concurrent with ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction noted above, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C. (“Hometown”). The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and totaled 26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for these communities and related assets was approximately $615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $93.1 million. See Note 2 for a discussion of the Company’s significant 2004 acquisitions.

As of June 30, 2005, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of one community classified as discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 62,942 homesites (net of 126 homesites classified as discontinued operations) in 27 states with occupancy of 84.5%. Our five largest markets are Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.5% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of our total homesites. We also conduct a retail home sales business.

ARC’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC”. ARC’s Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC-PA”. ARC has no public trading history prior to February 12, 2004.

Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of

F-41




assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts.

The interim consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments that are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership, and all such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our December 31, 2004 financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of our accounts, which include the results of operations of the manufactured home communities acquired only for the periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. We have eliminated all significant interentity balances and transactions.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Rental and Other Property

We carry rental prope;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">WY

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

93.6

%

Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are as follows:

Asset Class

 

 

 

Estimated Useful
Lives (Years)

 

Manufactured home communities and improvements

 

 

10 to 30

 

 

Buildings

 

 

10 to 20

 

 

301

 

 

Gillette, WyomingTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

85.9

%

 

 

 

 

Rental homes

 

 

3

 

 

Furniture and other equipment

 

 

5

 

 

Computer software and hardware

 

 

3

 

 

 

We evaluate the recoverability of our investment in rental property whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the recoverability of the net book value of the asset is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental properidth="5" valign="bottom" style="border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.0pt;">

$

322

 

 

Casper, Wyoming

 

 

 

 

Effective January 1, 2005, we changed our estimate of the depreciable life of our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years. Homes in our rental home portfolio will now be depreciated over 3 years of service to an estimated salvage value of 70%. This change was made to align the depreciable lives of our rental homes to our intent to sell homes from our rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the costs of repairs and maintenance. This change in estimate did not have a material impact on our financial positions, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hidden Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

$

327

 

 

Terrace

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

F-42




Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual agreement between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and recognize it in income when earned. On lease with option to purchase contracts, we defer recognition of all down-payments, supplemental lease payments and sales commissions until the point of sale, which generally is at the end of the lease term.

We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title, possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no further obligations to perform significant additional activities.

OP Unit Grants

We have included a charge of $10.1 million in general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004, representing the value of 530,000 common OP units that were granted on February 18, 2004 under our 2003 equity incentive plan and vested on the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO (see Note 2). In addition, during 2004, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP units that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted units were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted OP units were forfeited pursuant to the terms of their issuance. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, 3,000 of these units vested. In April 2005, the ARC board of directors approved an award of 80,000 common OP units to Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s Chief Executive Officer, under the Company’s 2003 equity incentive plan. The units granted will vest over three years with 20,000 units vesting immediately and 20,000 units vesting on each of the anniversary dates until April 29, 2008. Vesting is subject to Mr. Jackson’s continued employment with the Company and may be accelerated in the event of death, a change in control, or termination other than for cause. Vested units may not be sold by Mr. Jackson until the first anniversary date of vesting without the prior written consent of the Compensation Committee. All units, vested and unvested, are entitled to receive dividends and to vote unless forfeited.

We have recorded the unvested portion of the 72,000 outstanding restricted common OP units as of June 30, 2005 as unearned compensation (a component of partners’ capital) on the balance sheet and are amortizing the balance ratably over the vesting period. We recorded compensation expense related to restricted common OP units of $312,000 and $326,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to $90,000 and $135,000 during the same periods in 2004.

Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization

We capitalize interest costs (using our average cost of borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively. The long-lived assets on which we capitalize interest include general construction activities in our communities, manufactured homes and, in the case of the communities acquired, the cost of the vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making improvements and placing a manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized interest and internal costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to $1.2 million and $1.8 million capitalized during the same periods in 2004.

F-43




Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive Loss

Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (a component of partners’ capital) as of June 30, 2005 represent unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap, which qualifies as a cash flow hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Including these unrecognized gains or losses, our comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $18.5 million and $34.1 million, respectively, compared with a comprehensive loss of $5.3 million and $40.8 million during the same periods in 2004.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”. SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We will be required to apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting period beginning January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements, including options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 123R to have a material impact upon our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

2.   REIT IPO and Acquisitions

REIT IPO and Hometown Acquisition

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its IPO of approximately 22.3&nbst size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

112

 

 

 

97.3

%

 

 

272

 

 

Green Valley Village

 

 

On February 18, 2004 and subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include 26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired consisted of the following (in thousands):

Cash purchase price

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

97.1

%

 

 

375

 

 

Plainview

 $

522,131

 

Debt assumed in connection with the acquisition

 

93,139

 

Total purchase price

 

$

615,270

 

 

F-44




Our purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

97.1

Land

 

$

90,296

 

Rental and other property

 

494,429

 

Manufactured homes

 

9,761

 

Lease intangibles

 

%

 

 

340

 

 

Terrace II

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

70

 

 

 811

 

Customer relationships

 

14,496

 

Notes receivable

 

5,477

 

 

 

$

615,270

 

 

D.A.M. Portfolio Acquisition

On June 30, 2004, we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY, L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was approximately $65.5 million, including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt, this acquisition was funded through the issuance of Series “B”, “C” and “D” Partnership Preferred Units (“PPUs”), for proceeds totaling $33.1 million. All of the “D” series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were redeemed for cash on July 6, 2004. See Note 3 for further discussion of the PPUs.

Our purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):

95.7

%

 

 

Land

 

$

9,225

 

Rental and other property

 

55,501

 

Manufactured homes

 

803

 

Customer relationships

 

52

 

Other assets/liabilities, net

 

(78

)

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

65,503

 

 

We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M. acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if we had consummated the acquisitions on January 1, 2004 (in thousands, except per share information):

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

ont-size:9.5pt;">357

 

 

Casper, WyomingTotal/Weighted
Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

96.9

%

 

 

$

331

 

 

Grand Forks, North Dakota

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Columbia Heights

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual

 

Pro forma

 

Actual

 

 

ND

 

 

 

Pro forma

 

Revenue

 

$

75,644

 

 

$

57,676

 

 

$

140,188

 

$

111,513

 

Total expenses

 

92,272

 

302

 

 

 

94.7

%

 

 

$

322

 

 

President's Park

 

 

 

63,198

 

 

171,232

 

153,962

 

Interest income

 

(277

)

 

(450

)

 

 

 

 

ND

 

 

 

163

 

 

(660

)

(852

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(16,351

)

 

(5,072

)

 

(30,384

)

(41,597

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

124

 

 

343

 

 

322

 

0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

88.3

%

 

 

281

 

 

Grand Forks, North DakotaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

465

 

 

 

9

1,100

 

Net loss

 

$

(16,227

)

 

$

(4,729

)

 

$

(30,062

)

$

(40,497

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(19,198

)

 

$

(7,307

)

 

$

(36,004

)

$

(44,307

%

 

 

$

308

 

 

Cheyenne, Wyoming

 

 

 

 

 

 

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders per unit

 

$

(0.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Big Country

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

248

 

 

 

82.3

%

 

 

$

242

 

 

Cimmaron Village

 

)

 

$

(0.17

)

 

$

(0.83

)

$

(1.18

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

43,260

 

 

43,269

 

 

43,262

 

37,531

 

 

F-45




Other Acquisitions

During the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, in addition to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions, we acquired six manufactured home communities from unaffiliated third parties for approximately $16.5 million in cash and $3.8 million in assumed debt. We accounted for these acquisitions utilizing the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, have allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of their acquisition. We allocated the majority of the purchase price to the rental property and intangible assets, including customer relationships and leases intangibles. No acquisitions were made in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. We have not presented pro forma results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as if these other acquisitions were made on the first day of the year, as the effects of these other acquisitions are not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for those periods.

F-46




The table below summarizes all of our manufactured home community acquisitions for the period January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005:

:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:100.65pt;">

Indio, CA

Date

 

 

 

Portfolio

 

Community

 

Location

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

152

Homesites

Feb-04

 

NA

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

Lebanon, TN

 

270

 

 

 

92.1

%

 

 

302

 

 

Feb-04

 

NA

 

Weatherly Estates II

 

Clarksville, TN

 

131

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

100 Oaks

 

Fultondale, AL

 <;">Englewood Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

235

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Jonesboro

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

75

91.8

%

 

 

292

 

 

Cheyenne, WyomingTotal/Weighted
Average

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Bermuda Palms

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

461

 

 

 

86.8

%

 

 

$

269

 

 

 

185

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Breazeale

 

Laramie, WY

 

117

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Broadmore

 

Goshen, IN

 

370

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Butler Creek

 

Augusta, GA

 

376

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

103




 

 

t .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">

%

style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:8.5pt;">

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

  

Camden Point

 

Kingsland, GA

 

268

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Carnes Crossing

 

Summerville, SC

 

604

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

&void;"> 

HTA

 

Castlewood Estates

 

Mableton, GA

 

334

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Casual Estates

 

Liverpool, NY

 

961

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Riverdale

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Riverdale, GA

 

481

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Columbia Heights

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

302

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Per Month

 

Salina, Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conway Plantation

 

Conway, SC

 

299

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Crestview

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Creek

 

Stillwater, OK

 

238

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Country Village

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

643

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

155

 

Eagle Creek

 

Tyler, TX

 

194

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Eagle Point

 

Marysville, WA

ottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

58.7

%

 

 

$

290

 

 

Prairie Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

80.8

%

 

 

237

 

 

 

230

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Falcon Farms

 

Port Byron, IL

 

215

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Forest Creek

 

Elkhart, IN

 

167

Feb-04

West Cloud Commons

 

 

 

 

 

 

KS

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

65.1

%

 

 

278

 

 

HTA

 

Fountainvue

 

Lafontaine, IN

 

120

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Salina, KansasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foxhall Village

 

Raleigh, NC

 

315

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Golden Valley

 

Douglasville, GA

 

131

Feb-04

 

 

391

 

 

 

67.8

%

 

 

$

HTA

 

Huron Estates

 

Cheboygan, MI

266

 

 

Fayetteville/Springdale, Arkansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

111

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Indian Rocks

 

Largo, FL

 

148

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Knoll Terrace

 

Corvallis, OR

 

212

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

Indio, CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern Hills

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR

 

 

 

gn="right" style="margin:0pt 10.0pt .0001pt 0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">151

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

89.0

%

Lakewood

 

Montgomery, AL

 

396

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakewood Estates

 

Davenport, IA

 

180

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Landmark Village

 

Fairburn, GA

 

524

 

$

229

 

 

Western Park

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Marnelle

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

205

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Oak Ridge

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

AR

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

73.5

 

204

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Oakwood Forest

 

Greensboro, NC

 

482

 

 

226

 

 

Oak Glen

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pedaler’s Pond

 

Lake Wales, FL

 

214

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pinecrest Village

 

Shreveport, LA

 

87

 

 

 

85.1

%

 

 

225

 

446

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pleasant Ridge

 

Mount Pleasant, MI

 

305

 

 

Fayetteville/Springdale, ArkansasTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

381

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

President’s Park

 

 

83.5

%

 

 

$

228

 

 

Naples, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

174

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Riverview

 

Clackamas, OR

 

133

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Saddlebrook

 

N. Charleston, SC

 

425

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sherwood

 

Hartford City, IN

 

134

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southwind Village

 

Naples, FL

 

337

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Springfield Farms

 

Brookline Sta, MO

 

290

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Stonegate

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

 

 

Southwind Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

 

 

 

364

 

 

 

87.6

%

 

 

$

399

 

 

Dubuque, Iowa

 

 

 

157

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Terrace Heights

 

Dubuque, IA

 

317

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Torrey Hills

 

Flint, MI

 

377

F-47




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

&="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;"> 

 

77.1

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

 

Terrace Heights

 

 

*

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

77.9

%

 

 

$

285

 

 

Waterloo, Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Knoll

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA

 

 

 

290

 

 

Twin Pines

 

Goshen, IN

 

238

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Villa

 

Flint, MI

 

319

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Winter Haven Oaks

 

Winterhaven, FL

 

343

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Green Park South

 

Pelham, AL

 

421

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Hunter Ridge

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

838

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Friendly Village

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

203

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Misty Winds

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

354

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shadow Hills

 

Orlando, FL

 

670

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Smoke Creek

 

Snellville, GA

 

264

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

Kennesaw, GA

 

273

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sunset Vista

 

Magna, UT

 

207

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sea Pines

 

Mobile, AL

 

429

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Woodland Hills

 

Montgomery, AL

 

95.5

%

 

 

$

214

 

 

El Paso, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mission Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

628

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

The Pines

 

Ladson, SC

 

204

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shady Hills

 

Nashville, TN

 

251

Feb-04

 

286

 

 

 

67.8

%

 

 

$

298

HTA

 

Trailmont

 

Goodlettsville, TN

 

131

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

Elmira, New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k-after:avoid;">Chisholm Creek

 

Wichita, KS

 

254

Feb

 

 

 

 

 

 

HTA

 

Big Country

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

251

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Heritage Point

 

Montgomery, AL

 

264

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Lithia Springs, GA

 

103

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collingwood MHP

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

101

 

 

HTA

 

Plantation Estates

 

Douglasville, GA

 

79.2

%

 

 

$

218

 

 

Crestview

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

55.7

%

 

 

230

 

 

Chelsea

 

 

 

 

 

138

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Green Acres

 

Petersburg, VA

 

 

182

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Davenport, IA

 

124

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Evergreen Village

 

Pleasant View, UT

 

238

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Four Seasons

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

214

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Alafia Riverfront

 

Riverview, FL

 

96

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Highland

 

Elkhart, IN

 

246

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Birchwood Farms

 

Birch Run, MI

 

143

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Terrace

 

Cedar Rapids, IA

 

255

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

Davenport, IA

 

270

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Creek

 

Davenport, IA

 

280

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Encantada

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

PA

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

84.5

%

 

354

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Royal Crest

 

Los Alamos, NM

 

180

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Brookside Village

 

 

 

256

 

 

Elmira, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

Dallas, TX

 

394

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Meadow Glen

 

Keller, TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

282

 

 

 

409

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Leaf

 

Mansfield, TX

 

145

Mar-04

72.7

%

 

 

$

 

HTA

 

Lamplighter Village

 

Marietta, GA

 

431

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Shadowood

 

Acworth, GA

 

506

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Stone Mountain

234

 

 

Bloombsburg, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

354

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Marion Village

 

Marion, IA

 

 

 

Brookside Village

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

171

 

eak-after:avoid;"> 

486

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Autumn Forest

 

Brown Summit, NC

 

299

 

 

81.9

%

 

 

$

235

 

 

Pleasant View Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt 10.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Woodlake

 

Greensboro, NC

 

308

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Arlington Lakeside

 

Arlington, TX

 

108

 

 

 

69.4

233

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Pine Ridge

 

Sarasota, FL

 

126

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Knoll

 

%

 

 

242

 

 

Bloombsburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

279

 

 

 

Waterloo, IA

 

290

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Mallard Lake

 

Pontoon Beach, IL

 

278

%

 

 

$

237

 

 

Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forest Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

99.5

%

 

 

$

357

 

 

Birch Meadows

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

98.4

%

 

 

372

 

 

Park D'Antoine

 

 

 

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

94.1

%

 

 

269

 

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Kopper View

 

West Valley City, UT

 

61

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Overpass Point

 

Tooele, UT

 

182

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

98.9

%

 

 

$

354

 

 

 

Pleasant View

 

Berwick, PA

 

108

F-48




 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Brookside

 

Berwick, PA

 

Huntsville, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

171

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Beaver Run

 

Linkwood, MD

 

118

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Carsons

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

130

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chelsea

 

Sayre, PA

 

85

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Collingwood

 

Horseheads, NY

 

101

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Crestview

 

Sayre, PA

 

98

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Danboro

 

Danboro, PA

 

231

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Ephrata

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tanglewood

 

 

*

 

 

 

TX

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

77.1

%

 

 

$

301

 

&nbse-break-after:avoid;">Ephrata, PA

 

149

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Frieden

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

 

192

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Green Acres

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

24

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Gregory Courts

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

39

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Honey Brook

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

146

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Huguenot

 

Port Jervis, NY

 

166

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Maple Manor

 

Taylor, PA

 

316

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Monroe Valley

 

Jonestown, PA

 

44

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Moosic Heights

 

Avoca, PA

 

152

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Mountaintop

 

Narvon, PA

 

39

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Haven

 

Blossvale, NY

 

130

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunny Acres

 

104




 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania

Somerset, PA

 

207

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Suburban

 

Greenburg, PA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

size:10.0pt;">202

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Blue Ridge

 

Conklin, NY

 

69

Jun-04

 

 

 

 

 

 

D.A.M.

 

Chambersburg I&II

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

100

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Hideaway

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

40

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Kintner

 

Vestal, NY

 

55

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Martins

 

Nottingham, PA

 

 

 

 

Carsons

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

86.2

%

 

 

$

213

 

 

Valley ViewChambersburg

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

100

 

60

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Nichols

 

Phoenixville, PA

 

10

Jun-04

h="16" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

198

 

 

Green Acres

 

D.A.M.

 

Scenic View

 

East Earl, PA

 

18

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

Shady Grove

 

Atglen, PA

 

40

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Blandon

 

Fleetwood, PA

 

30

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Morgantown

 

Morgantown, PA

 

23

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

211

 

 

Chambersburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

Valley View in Tuckerton

 

Reading, PA

 

74

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Wernersville

 

Wernersville, PA

 

29

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Terrace

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

25

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunnyside

 

Trooper, PA

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

87.8

%

 

 

$

207

 

 

Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

Tunkhannock, PA

 

79

Jul-04

 

NA

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

West Valley City, UT

 

145

Sep-04

 

NA

 

Willow Creek Estates

 

Ogden, UT

 

137

 

3.   Partners’ Capital

On March 16, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on April 15, 2005 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2005. In addition, on March 16, 2005 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid April 30, 2005 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2005. In addition, on March 16, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on April 30, 2005 to the unitholders of record on April 15, 2005.

F-49




On May 23, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1875 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $8.1 million on July 15, 2005 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2005. In addition, on May 23, 2005 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid July 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on July 15, 2005. In addition, on May 23, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on July 29, 2005 to the unitholders of record on July 15, 2005.

At June 30, 2005, Partners’ Capital included 2,261,451 OP Units that were issued to various limited partners and 1,005,688 PPUs issued on June 30, 2004 as part of the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition. Each OP Unit outstanding is paired with 1.9268 shares of ARC’s special voting stock (each a “Paired Equity Unit”) that allows each holder to vote an OP Unit on matters as if it were a common share of ARC’s stock. Each OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at ARC’s election, one share of ARC’s common stock. During the second quarter of 2005, the Partnership redeemed for cash approximately 142,000 OP Units totaling approximately $1.8 million.

The PPUs outstanding as of June 30, 2005 consist of 300,000 Series “B” units and 705,688 Series “C” units. The Series “B” PPUs carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “B” PPUs can be redeemed at the option of the Operating Partnership for ARC’s common stock, cash and/or notes payable after the fifth anniversary of their issuance. In July 2005, according to the terms of the Series “B” PPUs, the Series “B” PPU holders requested redemption of their units, and the Operating Partnership elected to repurchase them for approximately $2.5 million in cash and notes payable totaling approximately $5.0 million. As of June 30, 2005, we have accrued $78,125 of the Series “B” PPU preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “B” preferred unitholders through that date.

The Series “C” PPUs carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “C” PPUs can be redeemed at the option of the Operating Partnership for cash after the fifth anniversary of their issuance. Series “C” PPU holders can request redemption of their units after the two and a half year anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the PPUs or repurchase them with ARC common stock, cash and/or a note payable, at the Operating Partnership’s option. Series “B” and “C” units have the same priority as to the payment of distributions. As of June 30, 2005, we had accrued $183,773 of the Series “C” PPU preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “C” preferred unitholders through that date.

4.   Rental and Other Property, Net

The following summarizes rental and other property (in thousands):

pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">

 

 

 

June 30,
2005

Frieden Manor

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

193

 

 

 

85.5

%

 

 

$

240

 

 

Pine Terrace

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

72.0

 

December 31,
2004

 

Land

 

$

211,822

 

 

%

 

 

214

 

 

Schuylkill Haven, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

&nbalign:left;">$

211,383

 

 

Land improvements and buildings

 

1,297,792

 

 

1,268,002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218

 

 

 

83.9

%

 

 

$

238

 

Rental homes and improvements

 

249,169

 

 

 

Hays, Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

197,668

 

 

Furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

14,478

 

 

12,434

 

 

Subtotal

 

1,773,261

 

 

1,689,487

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Countryside

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(186,221

)

 

(156,707

)

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

 

 

KS

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

1,587,040

 

 

$

80.2

%

 

 

$

253

 

 

Western Slope of Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,532,780

 

 

 

We have capitalized interest and internal costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million in the cost of land and building improvements and manufactured home purchases for the three and six months ended

F-50




June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to $1.7 million and $2.4 million capitalized during the same periods in 2004.

5.   Notes Payable (including $25.8 million due to general partner)

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our notes payable (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum

 

$

302,325

 

 

$

303,903

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014, 5.53% per annum

 

211,921

 

 

213,333

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum

 

98,926

 

 

99,651

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum (6.22% at June 30, 2005)

 

140,468

 

 

150,871

 

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through 2031, averaging 7.31% per annum

 

 

 

 

Picture Ranch

 

 

*

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

93.9

%

 

 

$

257

 

 

The Vineyards

 

 

*

 

 

 

CO

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

91.8

%

 

 

316

 

 

Western Slope of ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

153,074

 

 

153,818

 

 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2005, LIBOR plus 2.95% per annum (6.17% at June 30, 2005)

 

58,764

 

 

51,000

 

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035, LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum (6.26% at June 30, 2005) (due to general partner)

 

25,780

 

 

 

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum (6.18% at June 30, 2005)

 

9,369

 

 

 

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007, LIBOR plus 7.00% per annum (10.22% at June 30, 2005)

 

42,100

 

 

 

 

Floorplan line of credit due 2007, ranging from prime plus 0.75% to prime plus 4.00% per annum (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005)

 

43,945

 

 

27,999

 

 

Other loans

 

 

211

 

 

 

92.9

%

 

 

$

283

 

 

Somerset, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunny Acres

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

96.6

%

 

 

$

227

 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

2,332

 

 

1,047

 

 

 

 

$

1,089,004

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

 

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 on May 2, 2002. It is an obligation of certain of our special purpose real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and matures on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based pret .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

F-51




Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2006

We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006. At our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance, respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by the lenders to refinance the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid.

Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages Due 2005 Through 2031

We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by specific manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are as follows:

a)     Mortgages assumed and one refinanced as part of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately $46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006 through 2028 and have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%.

b)     Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.06%.

c)     Notes assumed in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately $29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.18%.

F-52




Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility

In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by 33 communities that previously secured the cancelled Senior Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 6 to the ARC’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-K), as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to our IPO. Advances under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing the loan. As amended in September 2005, the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September&nb="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.15pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suburban Estates

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

93.1

%

 

 

$

223

 

 

Los Alamos, New Mexico

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Royal Crest

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

178

Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035 (Due to General Partner)

On March 15, 2005, the Company issued $25.8 million in unsecured trust preferred securities to ARC. The $25.8 million trust preferred securities bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30, 2005). Interest on the securities is paid on the 30th of March, June, September and December of each year. The Company may redeem these securities on or after March 30, 2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if not redeemed sooner.

Consumer Finance Facility

We entered into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility (the “Consumer Finance Facility”) on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in connection with entering into a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving lease receivables credit facility (see Lease Receivables Facility below). The Consumer Finance Facility, as amended, has a total commitment of $125.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, and borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing conditional sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR (6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the quarter, we paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the original committed amount and 0.75% of the amended committed amount and will pay additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional sales contract.

The availability of advances under the Consumer Finance Facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio.

F-53




Lease Receivables Facility

On April 6, 2005, the Company obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving credit facility (the “Lease Receivables Facility”) with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. to be used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and for general corporate purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the facility increased to $150 million effective October 14, 2005.

This facility is an obligation of two indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, ARC Housing LLC and ARC Housing TX LP (collectively, “Housing”). Borrowings under the Lease Receivables Facility are secured by an assignment of all lease receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% pafter:avoid;"> 

 

 

78.1

%

 

 

$

473

 

 

Killeen-Temple, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bluebonnet Estates

 

 

*

 

 

Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional collateral for the facility.

Floorplan Lines of Credit

In August 2004, we amended our floorplan line of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended line of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended line of credit requires the Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million, all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the line of credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit is subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and an early:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

TX

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

75.1

F-54




6.   Loss Per Unit

The following table reflects the calculation of loss per unit (amounts in thousands, except per unit information):

2.2pt;">

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

%

 

 

$

330

 

 

Lancaster, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

after:avoid;text-align:center;">Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

      2004      

 

2005

 

2004

 

Loss per unit from continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(16,351

)

 

$

(5,326

)

 

$

(30,384

)

$

(42,578

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(2,971

)

 

(2,578

)

 

(5,942

)

 

Valley ViewEphrata

 

 

 

(3,810

)

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(19,322

)

 

$

(7,904

)

 

$

(36,326

)

$

(46,388

)

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(0.45

)

 

$

(0.18

)

 

$

(0.84

)

$

(1.24

)

Income per unit from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

98.7

%

 

 

$

185

 

 

Binghamton, New York

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

72

 

 

$

343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,000

 

$

795

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(678

)

 

Net income from discontinued operations

 

$

124

 

 

$

343

 

 

$

322

 

$

795

 

Income per unit from discontinued operations

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blue Ridge MHP

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

$

0.01

 

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.02

 

Loss per unit to common OP unitholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

89.7

%

 

 

$

230

 

 

Kintner Estates

 

 

*

 

 

 

NY

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

94.5

%

 

 

252

 

 

Binghamton, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss to common OP unitholders

 

$

(19,198

)

 

$

(7,561

)

 

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Loss per unit to common OP unitholders

 

$

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

91.9

%

 

 

(0.45

)

 

$

$

240

 

 

Cambridge, Maryland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beaver Run

(0.17

)

 

$

(0.83

)

$

(1.22

)

Weighted average unit information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

MD

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

$

229

 

 

 

43,260

 

 

43,269

 

 

43,262

 

37,531

 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, 4.4 million units related to outstanding warrants, PPUs and OP Units and unvested restricted units have been excluded from the diluted loss per unit calculation as the impact would be anti-dilutive in nature. Excluded from the diluted loss per unit calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, were 2.4 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively.

7.   Property Operations Expense

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we incurred property operations expense as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

105




 

Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">1,429

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Utilities and telephone

 

Rental Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">

 

$

7,112

 

$

6,833

 

$

15,075

 

$

11,751

 

Salaries and benefits

 

6,991

 

 

 

 

 

Per Occupied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Occupancy

 

Homesite

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Held for Sale

 

State

 

Homesites

 

06/30/05

 

Per Month

 

Reading, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valley ViewReading (Tuckerton)

 

 

5,255

 

13,018

 

9,262

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

2,695

 

2,594

 

5,362

 

4,129

 

Insurance

 

926

 

827

 

1,803

 

1,400

 

Bad debt expense

 

568

 

610

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

89.9

%

 

 

$

315

 

 

Valley ViewFleetwood

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

93.3

%

 

 

305

 

 

Valley ViewWernersville

 

 

*

 

 

 

PA

 

 

1,095

 

Advertising

 

85

 

256

 

290

 

507

 

Other operating expense

 

1,665

 

1,251

 

3,386

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

287

 

 

Reading, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

90.2

%

 

 

$

307

 

 

Laramie, Wyoming

2,090

 

 

 

$

20,042

 

$

17,626

 

$

40,363

 

$

30,234

 

 

F-55




8.   Retail Home Sales, Finance and Insurance Expense

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we incurred retail home sales, finance and insurance expense as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

    2005    

 

    2004    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Breazeale

 

2005

 

2004

 

Utilities and telephone

 

 

$

70

 

 

 

 

 

WY

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

96.6

%

 

 

 

 

$

16

 

 

$

110

 

$

37

 

Salaries and benefits

 

 

2,105

 

 

 

793

 

 

3,463

 

1,224

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

 

32

 

 

 

$

312

 

 

Farmington, New Mexico

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunset Mobile Village

 

 

*

 

 

 

NM

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

94.6

%

 

96

 

 

51

 

262

 

Insurance

 

 

107

 

 

$

262

 

 <0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

71

 

 

195

 

74

 

Bad debt expense

 

 

280

 

 

 

10

 

 

309

 

10

 

Advertising

 

 

825

 

 

 

154

 

 

1,914

 

208

 

Other operating expense

 

 

693

 

 

 

358

 

 

1,275

 

264

 

 

 

 

$

4,112

 

 

 

$

1,498

 

 

$

7,317

 

$

2,079

 

 

Harrisburg/Lebanon/Carlisle, Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 9.   General and Administrative Expense

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we incurred general and administrative expense as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Monroe Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

    2005    

 

    2004    

 

2005

 

2004

 

Salaries and benefits(a)

 

 

$

3,506

 

 

 

$

2,533

 

 

$

6,646

 

$

15,284

 

Travel

 

%

 

 

$

252

 

 

Total / Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,942

 

 

 

84.5

%

 

 

$

326

 

 

 

On September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.

Competition

We compete with other owners and operators of manufactured home communities, as well as owners, operators and suppliers of alternative forms of housing such as multifamily housing and site-built homes, including rental properties. All of our properties are located in markets that include other manufactured home communities. The number of competing manufactured home communities in a particular market could have a material effect on our ability to sell our homes or homesites, lease our homes or homesites and to maintain or raise rents. In addition, our communities generally are located in developed areas that include other competitive housing alternatives, such as apartments, land available for the placement of manufactured homes outside of established communities and new or existing site-built housing stock, as well as more favorable financing alternatives for the same. The availability of these competing housing options in the markets in which we operate could have a material effect on our occupancy and rents. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations.” With respect to acquisitions, we may compete with numerous other potential buyers (some with potentially greater resources or superior information), which could drive up acquisition costs and/or impede our ability to acquire additional communities at acceptable prices.

We believe we currently have a leading market share in 15 of our top 20 markets, which collectively represent approximately 69% of our total homesites and 73% of our total rental income.

Regulation

Generally, manufactured home communities are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other

106




common areas. Each state and, in some instances, individual municipalities, have enacted laws that govern the relationships between landlord and tenants. Changes in any of these laws or regulations, as well as changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions or circumstances existing on properties or laws affecting development, construction, operation, upkeep and safety requirements may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of homesites or other impairments to operations, which would adversely affect our cash flows from operating activities. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations.”

The Federal Fair Housing Act, its state law counterparts and the regulations promulgated by HUD and various state agencies, prohibit discrimination in housing on the basis of race or color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living with parents or legal custodians, pregnant women and people securing custody of children under 18) and handicap (disability) and, in some states, on financial capability. A failure to comply with these laws in our operations could result in litigation, fines, penalties or other adverse claims, or could result in limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows from operations.

A variety of laws affect the sale of manufactured homes on credit, including the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (Truth-in-Lending), Regulation Z, the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as well as similar state laws or regulations. The Federal Trade Commission has issued or proposed various Trade Regulation Rules dealing with unfair credit practices, collection efforts, preservation of consumers’ claims and defenses and the like.

A variety of laws affect lease with option to purchase arrangements for manufactured homes, including Regulation M, as well as similar state laws. We have developed a lease with option to purchase program which seeks to comply with these laws, but there is little or no application, interpretation or precedent with respect to the application of these laws to our program. A failure to comply with these laws could result in significant costs of bringing our program into compliance, legal actions and limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could have an adverse affect on our cash flows from operations.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. A number of additional federal, state and local laws also exist that may require modifications to the properties, or restrict certain further renovations thereof, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. For example, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after march 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the ADA or the FHAA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature and in substantial capital expenditures. To the extent our properties are not in compliance, we are likely to incur additional costs to comply with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation.

Warranties provided by us are subject to a variety of state laws and regulations. Our sale of manufactured homes may be subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant thereto. Sales practices are governed at both the federal and state level through various consumer protection trade practices and public accommodation laws and regulations.

Insurance activities are subject to state insurance laws and regulations as determined by the particular insurance commissioner for each state in accordance with the McCarran-Ferguson Act, as well as subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant thereto.

Property management activities are often subject to state real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real estate commission for each state.

107




Changes in any of the laws governing our conduct could have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business or could materially affect our financial position, operating income, expense or cash flow.

Rent Control Legislation

Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and regulations specifically regulating the ownership and operation of manufactured home communities. These laws and regulations include provisions imposing restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and, in certain circumstances, granting to community residents a right of first refusal on a sale of their community by the owner to a third party. Enactments of similar laws have been considered from time to time in other jurisdictions. We currently own 8,364 homesites in two states that have rent control regulations, Florida and California. These communities represent 9.8% of our total communities and 13.3% of our total homesites. Following the sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and assuming that all these communities are sold communities, we will own 6,287 homesites in Florida in 21 communities representing 12.7% of our total homesites and 8.9% of our total communities, and no communities in California. We presently expect to continue to operate manufactured home communities, and may in the future acquire manufactured home communities, in areas that either are subject to one or more of these types of laws or regulations or in which legislation with respect to such laws or regulations may be enacted in the future. Laws and regulations regulating landlord/tenant relationships or otherwise relating to the ownership and operation of manufactured home communities, whether existing law or enacted in the future, could limit our ability to increase rents or recover increases in our operating expenses and could make it more difficult for us to dispose obreak-after:avoid;text-align:right;">509

 

 

1,177

 

1,076

 

Professional services

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

499

 

 

2,209

 

1,160

 

Insurance

 

 

329

 

 

 

141

 

 

437

 

Environmental Matters

Under federal, state and local environmental regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be required to investigate and clean up a release of hazardous substances at such property, and may, under such laws and common law, be held liable for property damage and other costs incurred by third parties in connection with such releases. The liability under certain of these laws has been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. The failure to properly remediate the property may also adversely affect the owner’s ability to lease, sell or rent the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of our properties, we could be legally responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties that we may acquire or manage in the future. We conduct an environmental review of each property prior to acquisition. We have obtained Phase I reviews on all but one of our properties and are not aware of any environmental issues that may materially impact the operations of any communities. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Properties and Operations.”

Insurance

We believe that our properties are covered by adequate fire, flood and property insurance as well as commercial liability insurance provided by reputable companies and with commercially reasonable deductibles and limits. Furthermore, we believe our businesses and business assets are likewise adequately insured against casualty loss and third-party liabilities. Changes in the insurance market since September 11, 2001, have caused significant increases in insurance costs and deductibles, and have increased the risk that affordable insurance may not be available in the future.

Employees

Our employees are all employed by our management services subsidiary and perform various property management, maintenance, acquisition, renovation and management functions. As of June 30, 2005, our

108




management services subsidiary had 1,167 full-time equivalent employees. None of the employees is represented by a union.

Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various legal actions resulting from our operating activities. These actions consist of litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are covered by liability insurance, and none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows taken as a whole.

109




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

MANAGEMENT

Management by ARC

Pursuant to the Partnership’s partnership agreement, ARC is the sole general partner of the Partnership and has, subject to certain protective rights of limited partners described below, full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in the Partnership’s management and control, including the ability to cause the Partnership to enter into certain major transactions including a merger or a sale of substantially all of its assets. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership Agreement—General; Management of the Partnership.” The management and operation of the Partnership is carried out by ARC, and the persons who perform these management and operation functions on behalf of ARC are employees of ARC’s management services subsidiary, as permitted pursuant to the Partnership’s partnership agreement.

Directors and Executive Officers of ARC

The board of directors of ARC presently consists of ten members. ARC’s board is not classified and thus all of its directors are elected annually. The directors and executive officers of ARC are listed below.

Name

 

 

 

Age

 

Position

Larry D. Willard

 

63

 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

James F. Kimsey

 

57

 

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

Scott D. Jackson

 

50

 

385

 

Rent

 

 

46

 

 

 

87

 

 

99

 

259

 

Other administrative expense

 

 

534

 

 

 

535

 

 

1,050

 

935

 

 

 

 

$

6,259

 

 

 

$

4,304

 

 

$

11,618

 

$

19,099

 


Vice Chairman and Director

John G. Sprengle

 

49

 

Vice Chairman and Director

Eugene Mercy, Jr.

 

69

 

Director

W. Joris Brinkerhoff

 

54

 

Director

Gerald J. Ford

 

62

 

Director

(a)    The six months ended June 30, 2004 includes $10.1 million incurred in conjunction with ARC’s IPO in which ARC granted 530,000 shares of restricted stock that vested immediately (see Note 1).

10.   Discontinued Operations

In July 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities comprising 2,933 homesites. In addition to the 12 communities, as part of the auction, the Partnership also contracted to sell two parcels of undeveloped commercial land located adjacent to one of its communities in Colorado. The auction was held in September 2004. These sales, other than the sale of one of the 12 properties, closed during the fourth quarter of 2004, resulting in net proceeds to the Partnership of $21.6 million after selling commissions, sales expenses and the repayment of approximately $6.0 million of associated debt. The remaining community continues to be held for sale and was classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2005, based on the Partnership’s intent to sell this community during 2005.

In September 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell three communities, comprising 1,073 homesites, to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of approximately $5.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

F-56




In October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities comprising 2,440 homesites. The auction was held in December 2004. Eleven of these 12 sales closed during the first quarter of 2005, resulting in net proceeds to the Partnership of $12.4 million after selling commissions, sales expenses and the repayment of approximately $28.9 million of associated debt included in liabilities related to assets held for sale, and other required debt payments. The remaining community was sold in April 2005. Also in October 2004, we entered into agreements to sell three communities comprising 709 homesites to unaffiliated third parties for a total sales price of approximately $7.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets, each of the communities sold during 2005 and 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. We have included $3.4 million and $54.1 million of net assets related to these communities as assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. We have also included $2.7 million and $29.5 million of obligations related to these communities as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying balance sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. In addition, we have presented the operations of each of these communities as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and recorded income of $0.1 million and a loss of $0.7 million, respectively, related to the sale of the discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. The following table summarizes combined balance sheet and income statement information for the discontinued operations noted above (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James R. “Randy” Staff

 

58

 

Director

Carl B. Webb<"2" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">

 

Rental and other property, net

 

 

$

3,035

 

 

 

$

52,848

 

 

Tenant, notes and other receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

 

 

 

 

593

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

333

 

 

 

373

 

 

 

55

 

Director

J. Markham Green

 

62

 

Director

Lawrence E. Kreider

 

Total Assets

 

 

$

3,368

 

 

 

$

54,123

58

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer

Scott L. Gesell

 

46

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 

The principal occupation and business experience for each of our officers and directors and key employees, for at least the last five years, are as follows:

Larry D. Willard, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director.    

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable

 

 

$

2,700

 

 

 

$

28,951

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

James F. Kimsey, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director.   Mr. Kimsey assumed the position of ARC’s President and Chief Operating Officer on September 21, 2005. Mr. Kimsey has also served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Kimsey retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of

110




RailWorks Corporation in 2004, a position he had held since 2002. From 2001 through 2002 he also served as the President of Western Utility Services on behalf of Exelon Infrastructure Services, a successor to Fischback & Moore Electric, LLC for whom Mr. Kimsey was the President and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to 2001. In 1997 Mr. Kimsey founded Kimsey Electrical Contracting, LLC, serving as its Chairman. From 1970 to 1995 he served in various capacities with Sturgeon Electric Co., Inc, succeeding to MYR Group President in 1984, a position he held until 1995. Mr. Kimsey is a graduate of the University of Denver where he received a BSBA degree in Accounting.

Scott D. Jackson, Vice Chairman and Director.   Mr. Jackson assumed the position of ARC’s Vice Chairman on September 21, 2005. Mr. Jackson also co-founded ARC’s predecessor in interest in 1995 and served as ARC’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since ARC’s inception in 1998 until he became ARC’s Vice Chairman. He additionally served as ARC’s Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004 to March 30, 2005. Mr. Jackson directs ARC’s sales of communities. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Jackson served in various senior positions in financial service companies owned or controlled by, among others, Gerald J. Ford. In these capacities, he oversaw corporate finance activities, including financial service company acquisition, disposition and capital financing activities. Previously, Mr. Jackson worked in corporate finance as Vice President of Corporate Finance and served as Co-Head of the Financial Institutions Restructuring Group for Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1987 to 1991; as Senior Vice President and Manager of Republic Bank Capital Markets from 1985 to 1987; and with Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from 1979 to 1985. Mr. Jackson holds a B.S. degree in Business Finance and Marketing from Colorado State University.

John G. Sprengle, Vice Chairman and Director.   Mr. Sprengle co-founded ARC’s predecessor in interest in 1995. Mr. Sprengle has served as a director and Vice Chairman of ARC since April 8, 2002. Mr. Sprengle has also served as ARC’s Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1999, Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to November 1, 2004 and Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004 to March 30, 2005. Prior to 1995, Mr. Sprengle served in various positions at BancTEXAS Group, Inc., a bank holding company. In his final positions, he served as a Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, respectively. (1980 to 1986 and 1988 to 1994). Mr. Sprengle served as the Vice President of Administration for the capital markets group of First Republic Bank, Dallas from 1986 to 1987. Mr. Sprengle holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration and Finance from Colorado State University.

Eugene Mercy, Jr., Director.   Mr. Mercy has served as a director of ARC since April 2002. Mr. Mercy is currently a Principal in Granite Capital International Group, a New York money management firm, and a Senior Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Mr. Mercy is a former Limited Partner of Goldman Sachs & Co., where he was in the Securities Sales and Equity Trading Department and the Commercial Real Estate Department. He later became the Partner-in-Charge of the Mortgage Securities Department of Goldman Sachs. In 1996, Mr. Mercy was appointed to the Goldman Sachs Limited Partner Advisory Committee, and after Goldman Sachs’ successful public offering in May 1999, he became a Senior Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Managing member of EMJ Development, LLC and Chairman of the Board of Brownfields Capital LLC. Mr. Mercy is a Trustee Emeritus of the board of Lehigh University, Vice Chairman of Continuum Health Partners, Inc. and former Vice Chairman of the Board of the Loomis Institute. He is a Trustee of Public Color, a Trustee of NY Services for the Handicapped, a member of the board of trustees and executive committee of Seeds of Peace. He is a member of the board of the Vail Village Homeowners Association and a member of the Print and Rare Book Acquisition Committee of the Museum of Modern Art. Mr. Mercy is a graduate of Lehigh University and served as a First Lieutenant in the U.S. Army.

W. Joris Brinkerhoff, Director.   Mr. Brinkerhoff has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Brinkerhoff founded a Native American owned joint venture, Doyon LTD, in 1978 and served as its operations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer until selling his venture interests in 1995 and moving to Denver in 1996. Doyon LTD designed, built, leased and operated state of the art mobile drilling rigs for ARCO and British Petroleum in conjunction with their development of the North Slope

111




Alaska petroleum fields. Mr. Brinkerhoff now resides in Denver and manages family interests including oil and gas production, a securities portfolio and various other business interests, as well as actively participating in numerous philanthropic organizations. Mr. Brinkerhoff is a graduate of Montana School of Mines with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering.

Gerald J. Ford, Director.   Mr. Ford has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Ford is a banking and financial institutions entrepreneur who has been involved in numerous mergers and acquisitions of private and public sector financial institutions, primarily in the Southwest United States, over the past 30 years. In this capacity he acquired and consolidated 30 commercial banks from 1975 to 1993, forming First United Bank Group, Inc., a multi-bank holding company for which he functioned as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until its sale in 1994. During this period he also led investment consortiums that acquired numerous financial institutions, forming in succession First Gibraltar Bank, FSB, First Madison Bank and First Nationwide Bank. Mr. Ford also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Golden State Bancorp Inc and California Federal Bank from 1998 to 2002. He currently participates on numerous boards of directors, including Triad Financial Corporation for which he is also Chairman of the Board, First Acceptance Corporation, for which he is also Chairman of the Board, McMoRan Exploration Co., and Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. Mr. Ford holds a nt-size:10.0pt;">34

 

 

 

262

 

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

 

(78

)

 

 

303

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

$

2,656

 

 

 

$

29,516

James R. “Randy” Staff, Director.   Mr. Staff has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Staff has been a consultant to Hunter’s Glen Ford, Ltd., an investment partnership, since November 2002. He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ganado Bancshares, Inc. (and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Citizens State Bank, Ganado, Texas) and ABNA Holdings, Inc. (and its 99% owned subsidiary, American Bank, N.A., Dallas, Texas). Previously, Mr. Staff was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Advisor of Golden State Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, California Federal Bank, FSB, from October 1994 until November 2002. During this period he also served as a Director of California Federal Bank, FSB’s subsidiaries, First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation and Auto One Acceptance Corporation. Mr. Staff is currently a member of the Board of Triad Financial Corporation. Mr. Staff attended the University of Houston, graduated from the University of Texas at Austin and was also a Certified Public Accountant.

Carl B. Webb, Director.   Mr. Webb has served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Webb was the President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of San Francisco-based California Federal Bank, the fourth largest financial institution in California, from September 1994 until the bank was purchased by a third party in November 2002. Prior to his affiliation with California Federal Bank, Mr. Webb was the President and CEO of First Madison Bank, FSB (1993 and 1994) and First Gibraltar Bank, FSB (1988 to 1993), as well as President and Director of First National Bank at Lubbock (1983 to 1988). Currently, Mr. Webb sits on the Board of Directors of Plum Creek Timber Company and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Triad Financial Corporation. Mr. Webb received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from West Texas A&M University and a Graduate Banking Degree from Southwestern Graduate School of Banking.

J. Markham Green, Director.   Mr. Green has served as a director of ARC since its initial public offering in February 2004. Mr. Green is the Chairman of the Board of PowerOne Media LLC. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Green served as the Chairman of the Financial Institutions and Governments Group of JP Morgan Chase. From 1993 until joining JP Morgan Chase, he invested in and served on the boards of eight start-up companies. From 1973, Mr. Green served in various capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co. before he retired as a general partner in 1992. He was co-head of the Financial Services Industry Group of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and served on several of the firms’ internal committees. Mr. Green is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin and earned an M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University.

112




Lawrence E. Kreider, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer.   Mr. Kreider joined ARC in 2001 as an Executive Vice President, also serving as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2003 and from November 1, 2004 to present, as well as Chief Information Officer since 2002 and Chief Accounting Officer since 2004. During this time he has also served as Executive Vice President Finance. Mr. Kreider has direct responsibility for all financial and information technology activities of ARC and also participates in strategic planning activities. Prior to joining ARC in 2001, Mr. Kreider was Senior Vice President of Finance for Warnaco Group Inc. and President of Warnaco Europe. Prior thereto, Mr. Kreider served in several senior finance positions, including Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, with Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings from 1986 to 1999. Prior thereto, he served in senior finance positions with Zale Corporation, Johnson Matthew Jewelry Corporation and Refinement International Company. Mr. Kreider began his career with Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Kreider holds an masters in business administration from Stanford Graduate School of Business and a bachelor of arts from Yale University.

Scott L. Gesell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel.   Mr. Gesell has served as a Vice President and as the General Counsel and Secretary for ARC since he joined ARC in 1996. Mr. Gesell directs all legal matters for ARC, including overseeing outside counsel, acquisition activities, legal matters related to ARC’s operating businesses and other corporate related activities. Prior to joining ARC, Mr. Gesell served as General Counsel, and then as a Senior Vice President/Director of Legal Operations, overseeing all of the bank’s day-to-day legal operations for First Gibraltar Bank/First Madison Bank/First Nationwide Bank. While with the First Gibraltar, First Madison and First Nationwide Bank, he was significantly involved in mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, as well as corporate and regulatory matters. Prior thereto, he served in various legal capacities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas and was in private practice with the law firm of Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Price in Oklahoma City. Mr. Gesell holds a bachelor of arts and a juris doctor from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. He is a member of the Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas bars.

Compensation

The Partnership has no salaried officers or employees. All of the Partnership’s operational and management functions are performed for it by ARC’s management services subsidiary. The Partnership paid approximately $7.5 million, $11.0 million and $5.7 million to this affiliate for these services for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. None of the directors or officers of ARC receives any compensation from the Partnership. The Partnership does not pay ARC any other compensation for its services as general partner. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Agreement—Distributions”, and “—Allocations of Net Income and Net Loss.”

113




CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Global E Portfolio

ARC’s Vice Chairman, Scott D. Jackson, is the sole stockholder of JJ&T, and together with JJ&T is the 99% owner of Global Mobile. Global Mobile and JJ&T own 100% of the membership interests of Global E, which owns six manufactured home communities with 554 total homesites located in Wyoming. One of our subsidiaries is a party to a property management agreement with Global E pursuant to which the subsidiary manages all of the communities owned by Global E in consideration for a management fee equal to 3% of gross revenues. This subsidiary also is a party to an accounting services agreement with Global E whereby it provides accounting services for Global Mobile in exchange for a fee of $800 per month. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005 our management services subsidiary received $96,000, $132,000 and $197,000, respectively, pursuant to these agreements. Neither the property management agreement nor the accounting services agreement can be amended without ARC’s consent. Mr. Jackson has agreed that he may not terminate either the property management agreement or the accounting services agreement for so long as he is serving as ARC’s Chairman or our Chief Executive Officer. ARC may terminate either of these agreements upon 30 days prior written notice. The right of first refusal granted to ARC pursuant to his employment agreement described below would apply to the disposition of any communities currently owned by Global E.

Mr. Jackson is subject to an employment agreement with ARC which includes a non-competition covenant with an exception to permit him to devote time to the management and operation of Global Mobile Limited Liability Company and JJ&T Enterprises, Inc. consistent with past practice. In addition, Mr. Jackson’s agreement prohibits him from directly or indirectly acquiring any manufactured home communities and also provides ARC with a right of first refusal, for so long as he serves as our chairman or chief executive officer, in connection with any proposed sale by Mr. Jackson of any or all communities he owns directly or indirectly. Pursuant to this right, ARC may acquire such community or communities at 95% of their fair market value.

In addition, beginning April 1, 2005, ARC entered into a written lease agreement with JJ&T for a homesite for our Cheyenne, Wyoming city manager’s office for a monthly rental fee of $230. We have placed a manufactured home we own on the homesite. In the event that the lease is terminated or the property management agreement discussed above is terminated, then JJ & T is obligated to buy the home from us at our cost for the purchase and set up of the home.

Lease by Windstar Aviation Corp.

Global Mobile also has an airplane hangar located at Centennial Airport, Englewood, Colorado. Windstar Aviation Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, owns airplanes that ARC uses in connection with our operations and leases office and airplane hangar space from Global Mobile at Centennial Airport in Englewood, Colorado. The leases were entered into in June 1999, with a 60-month primary term and a renewal option for an additional 60-month term. Lease payments total $4,400 per month during the initial term, and an adjustment tied to the consumer price index is provided for the renewal term.

Affiliate Accounts Receivable

At December 31, 2004 companies owned and controlled by Mr. Jackson owed ARC’s management subsidiary approximately $68,000 in accounts receivable, primarily related to rental homes acquired and property management services performed on behalf of these companies. Pursuant to the terms of the property management agreements between these companies and our management subsidiary, monthly fees for property management services are paid by these companies in the month following incurrence of the fees. At June 30, 2005, these companies owed our management subsidiary approximately $4,000.

114




Directors Holding Partnership Units

Two of ARC’s directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham Green, hold common partnership units in the Partnership through which each of Mr. Mercy and Mr. Green has deferred gains associated with certain properties. Any decision by ARC’s board of directors to dispose of one or more of these properties in which Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has an interest could have tax consequences for Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green, as the case may be.

In connection with any such decision, ARC’s board of d" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

Affiliate Services to the Partnership

See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Management—Compensation” for a discussion of affiliate services to the Partnership.

115




POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

The following is a discussion of ARC’s policies with respect to investments, financing and certain other activities. These policies apply to all of ARC’s subsidiaries, including the Partnership. The Partnership does not have any separate policies with respect to any of these activities. These policies with respect to these activities have been determined by ARC’s board of directors and, in general, may be amended and revised from time to time at the discretion of ARC’s board of directors without notice to or a vote of ARC’s stockholders, except that changes in certain policies with respect to conflicts of interest must be consistent with legal requirements.

Investment Policies

 

    2005    

 

    2004    

 

2005

 

2004

Investments in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate.   ARC conducts all of its investment activities through the Partnership and its affiliates. Our investment objectives are to increase cash flow, maximize the value of its communities and acquire established income-producing manufactured housing community properties with cash flow growth potential. Additionally, we seek to selectively expand and upgrade both our properties and any newly acquired communities. Our business is focused primarily on manufactured housing community properties and activities directly related thereto including our retail home sales and leasing, consumer finance and other complementary businesses. Our policy is to acquire assets primarily for generation of current income and long-term value appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will sell certain manufactured housing community properties. We have not established a specific policy regarding the relative priority of the investment objectives. For a discussion of our communities and our business and other strategic objectives, see “Business and Properties.”

We expect to pursue our investment objectives through the direct ownership of properties, but may also make investments in other entities. We focus on manufactured housing community properties in those states where we operate and select new markets. We anticipate that newly acquired properties will be located in the U.S. However, future investments, including the activities described below, will not be limited to any geographic area or to a specified percentage of our assets. We believe that opportunities exist to acquire established manufactured housing community properties which do not possess the risks inherent in new development. We believe that, in recent years, the available investment returns have not justified the leasing risk associated with new development and, thus, we do not presently intend to engage in development of new communities. We intend to engage in such future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of ARC’s status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

We also may participate with other entities in the ownership of manufactured home communities through joint ventures or other types of co-ownernt-weight:bold;line-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> 

Statement of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

communities, respectively. In 2005 through June 30, we have not acquired any communities.

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages.   While we emphasize equity real estate investments in manufactured housing community properties, we may, at the discretion of ARC’s board of directors, invest in mortgages and other interests related to manufactured housing community properties. We do not presently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of trust, but may do so subject to the investment restrictions applicable to REITs. The mortgages in which we may invest may be either first mortgages or junior mortgages, and may or may not be insured by a governmental agency. Investments in real estate mortgages run the risk that one or more borrowers may default under certain mortgages and that the collateral securing certain mortgages may not be sufficient to enable it to recoup its full investment.

116




Investments in Chattel Paper.   While we emphasize equity real estate investments in manufactured home community properties, we intend to invest in chattel paper. Our consumer finance initiative involves the purchase of consumer installment sales contracts that are secured by chattel (manufactured homes located in its communities). These installment sales contracts are originated and serviced by an unaffiliated third party. Perfection of security interests in chattel varies on a state-by-state basis, but is generally done by reflecting the existence of a security interest on the title to a manufactured home. Foreclosure of this interest also varies from state to state, but generally follows the guidelines set forth in the UCC as adopted in the various states.

Securities or Interests in Entities Primarily Engaged in Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers.   Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification, we may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. We may acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs or similar entities where such investment would be consistent with our investment policies. In any event, we do not intend that investments in securities will require ARC to register as an “investment company” under the 1940 Act, and ARC would intend to divest securities before any such registration would be required. Other than with respect to investments in wholly-owned subsidiaries, we have not engaged in any activities of this type in the last three years.

Investments in Non-Real Estate Ventures.   We may seek to enter into new non-real estate business ventures and to grow our existing non-real estate business ventures. The Partnership owns businesses that currently do or may in the future engage in more diverse and more risky ventures such as the sale of manufactured homes, finance of manufactured home sales, inventory financing, mortgage financing, sales of home improvement products, brokerage of manufac39" colspan="2" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

$

220

 

 

 

$

3,787

 

 

$

1,968

 

$

6,285

 

Purchase and Sale of Investments.   Our policy is to acquire assets primarily for generation of current income and long-term value appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will sell certain manufactured housing community properties, and in 2003, 2004 and 2005 through September 30, we sold one, 17 and 12 of our communities, respectively. In addition, we also engage in the sale of manufactured homes through our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, ARC Dealership, Inc., or Dealership. Dealership’s manufactured home sales consisted of no homes sold in 2003, 1,341 homes sold in 2004 and 1,763 homes sold in 2005 through June 30.

We have not established a specific policy regarding the percentage of assets that may be invested in any of the foregoing types of investments.

Financing Policies

We presently intend to maintain a ratio of consolidated total indebtedness-to-total market capitalization of 65% or less. ARC’s total market capitalization is defined as the sum of the market value of its outstanding common stock and preferred stock (which may decrease, thereby increasing our debt to total capitalization ratio), plus the aggregate value of partnership units in the Partnership not owned by ARC, plus the book value of its total consolidated indebtedness. Since this ratio is based, in part, upon market values of equity, it will fluctuate with changes in the price of ARC’s common stock; however, we believe that this ratio provides an appropriate indication of leverage for a company whose assets are primarily real estate. ARC’s ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization as of June 30, 2005 was approximately 60% (59% following the sale of the 79 communities, assuming the sale of all communities, and the sale of the notes by the Partnership). ARC’s charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness that it may incur. ARC’s board of directors may from time to time modify its debt policy in light of then-current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of its properties, general conditions in the market for debt and equity securities, fluctuations in the

117




market price of its common stock, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. Accordingly, ARC may increase or decrease its ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization beyond the limits described above. If these policies were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased risk of default on our obligations and a related increase in debt service requirements that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to ARC’s stockholders and the Partnership’s limited partners.

To the extent that ARC’s board of directors determines to obtain additional capital, we may issue debt or equity securities, including additional partnership units in the Partnership, retain earnings (subject to provisions in the Internal Revenue Code requiring distributions of income to maintain REIT status), or pursue a combination of these methods. As long as the Partnership is in existence, the proceeds of all equity capital raised by ARC will be contributed to the Partnership in exchange for additional interests in the Partnership, which will dilute the ownership interests of the existing limited partners. In 2005, we issued $25.8 million of trust preferred securities due 2035 to ARC.

Operating expenses

 

 

148

 

 

 

3,444

 

 

Conflicts of Interest Policies

We have adopted certain policies that are designed to eliminate or minimize certain potential conflicts of interest. In addition, ARC’s board of directors is subject to certain provisions of Maryland law, which are also designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts. However, there can be no assurance that these policies or provisions of law will always be successful in eliminating the influence of such conflicts, and if they are not successful, decisions could be made that might fail to reflect fully the interests of all securityholders.

We reserve the right to dispose of any of our properties, based upon management’s periodic review of our portfolio, if ARC’s board of directors determines that such action would be in the best interest of its stockholders. Any decision to dispose of a property will be made by ARC’s board of directors. Two of our directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham Green, hold common partnership units in the Partnership through which Mr. Mercy has deferred gains associated with all the properties ARC acquired in ARC’s reorganization, and Mr. Green has deferred gains associated with certain properties ARC acquired from Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., I and Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., II in ARC’s reorganization. Any decision by ARC’s board of directors to dispose of one or more of these properties in which Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has an interest could have tax consequences for Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green, as the case may be. In connection with any such decision, ARC’s board of directors will determine whether either of Messrs. Green or Mercy has a material financial interest in the transaction that is different from the interests of stockholders generally, and if either Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has such an interest, then such director will abstain from the vote of our board with respect to such proposed transaction.

Interested Director and Officer Transactions

Pursidth:29.0pt;">

968

 

5,490

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

$

72

 

 

·       the fact of the common directorship or interest is disclosed or known to ARC’s board of directors or a committee of its board, and ARC’s board or committee authorizes, approves or ratifies the transaction or contract by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested directors, even if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum;

´pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.25pt;">

 

$

343

 

 

       the fact of the common directorship or interest is disclosed or known to ARC’s stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction or contract is authorized, approved or ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote (other than the votes of shares owned of record or beneficially by the interested director or corporation or other entity); or

118




·       the transaction or contract is fair and reasonable to ARC.

Furthermore, under Delaware law (where the Partnership is formed), ARC, as general partner, has a fiduciary duty to the partnership and, consequently, such transactions also are subject to the duties of care and loyalty that ARC, as general partner, owes to limited partners in the partnership (to the extent such duties have not been eliminated pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement). ARC requires that all contracts and transactions between it, the Partnership or any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any of ARC’s directors or executive officers or any entity in which such director or executive officer is a director or has a material financial interest, on the other hand, must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of ARC’s disinterested directors. Where appropriate in the judgment of the disinterested directors, ARC’s board of directors may obtain a fairness opinion or engage independent counsel to represent the interests of non-affiliated security holders, although ARC’s board of directors will have no obligation to do so.

Business Opportunities

Pursuant to Maryland law, each ARC director is obligated to offer to ARC any business opportunity (with certain limited exceptions) that comes to him and that we reasonably could be expected to have an interest in pursuing. Mr. Jackson owns interests in certain other properties. ARC does not own any interest in these properties. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Global E Portfolio.”

Policies with Respect to Other Activities

We may, but do not presently intend to, make investments other than as previously described. ARC has authority to offer shares of its common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property and to repurchase or otherwise reacquire shares of its common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property. Similarly, the Partnership may offer additional partnership units, which are redeemable, in exchange for property. We also may make loans to third parties, including joint ventures in which we may participate. As described in “Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership Agreement,” ARC expects, but is not obligated, to issue shares of ARC common stock to holders of partnership units upon exercise of their redemption rights. ARC’s board of directors has no present intention of causing it to repurchase any ARC common stock. ARC may issue preferred stock from time to time, in one or more series, as authorized by its board of directors without the need for stockholder approval. We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or the agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and do not intend to do so. At all times, we intend to make investments in such a manner as to be consistent with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code to qualify as a REIT unless, because of circumstances or changes in the Internal Revenue Code (or the regulations promulgated thereunder), the board of directors determines that it is no longer in ARC’s best interest to continue to have us qualify as a REIT. ARC intends to make investments in such a way that it will not be treated as an investment company under the 1940 Act. ARC’s policies with respect to such activities may be reviewed and modified from time to time by its directors without notice to or the vote of the stockholders. In 2004, we acquired 8,025 common partnership units for total cash consideration of $125,000, and in 2005 through June 30, we acquired 142,077 common partnership units for total cash consideration of $1,836,000.

Reporting Policies

Generally speaking, ARC makes available to its stockholders, and causes the Partnership to make available to its limited partners, audited annual financial statements and annual reports and quarterly unaudited financial statements. ARC is also subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, pursuant to which ARC files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information, including financial statements with the SEC. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, the Partnership will also become subject to the same information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.

$

1,000

 

$

795

 

 

11.   Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, from time to time we are involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, which may ultimately

F-57




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Except as noted below, neither ARC nor any director or executive officer of ARC owns any of, and, as of September 30, 2005, no person or entity is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of, the Partnership’s outstanding common part2-go.htm',USER='jmsproofassembler',CD='Oct 24 23:59 2005' -->

result from such legal actions, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In the normal course of business, from time to time we incur environmental obligations relating to the ownership and operation of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, which may ultimately result from such environmental obligations, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

12.   Subsequent Events

In July 2005, according to the terms the Series“B” PPUs, the Series“B” PPU holders requested redemption of their units, and the Operating Partnership elected to repurchase them with approximately $2.5 million in cash and notes payable totaling approximately $5.0 million (see Note 3).

On September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARC’s board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARC’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARC’s board of directors and would direct ARC’s sales of communities.

On that date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625 dividend on ARC’s Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnership’s Series C preferred partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARC’s board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARC’s common stock and the quarterly distribution on the Partnership’s common partnership units, in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Also on September 21, 2005, ARC’s board of directors authorized the sale of approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming that all 79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives.

In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005). See “Description of Other Indebtedness—Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006” for a further discussion of this amendment.

Effective October 14, 2005, two indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of the Partnership amended the two-year, $75 million secured revolving credit facility, raising the commitment amount to $150 million, increasing the borrowing rate from 55% of the net book value of eligible collateral to 65%, and increasing the interest rate from 3.25% over one-month LIBOR to 4.125% over one-month LIBOR.

F-58




13.   Segment Information

We operate in three business segments which are based on the nature of business in each segment—real estate, retail home sales, and finance and insurance. A summary of our business segment information is shown below (in thousands).

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Total revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

56,787

 

$

52,998

 

$

113,138

 

Owner

 

 

 

Number
of Units

 

Percentage
of Units
Owned

 

$

95,160

 

Retail home sales

 

Eugene Mercy, Jr.(1)(2)

 

128,059

 

 

6.95

%

 

J. Markham Green(1)(3)

 

34,871

 

 

1.89

%

 

ARC directors and officers as a group

 

162,930

 

 

8.84

%

 


(1)    Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the address for each executive officer is 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80203.

(2)    Units beneficially owned consist of 128,059 units. In addition, the Mercy Foundation, of which Mr. Mercy is a trustee, owns 26,202 units. This beneficial ownership also includes 23,182 units held by his wife, Susan Mercy, for which he disclaims any beneficial ownership.

(3)    Units beneficially owned consist of 34,871 units.

120




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the Partnership’s partnership agreement, does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and provisions of the partnership agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the partnership agreement, as applicable. As used in this section, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” refer to the Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term “ARC” refers to Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries.

General; Management of the Partnership

We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on September 30, 1998. ARC is our sole general partner. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, as our sole general partner, ARC has, subject to certain protective rights of limited partners described below, full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in our management and control, including the ability to cause us to enter into certain major transactions including a merger or a sale of substantially all of our assets. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC may not be removed as our general partner by our other partners, with or without cause, without ARC’s consent.

Our limited partners expressly acknowledged that ARC, as our general partner, is acting for our benefit, the limited partners and ARC’s stockholders collectively. ARC is under no obligation to give priority to the separate interests of the limited partners or its stockholders in deciding whether to cause us to take or decline to take any actions.

Limited Liability of Limited Partners

The Delaware statute under which we have been formed provides that limited partners are not personally liable to third parties for the obligations of their partnership unless the limited partner is also a general partner, causes a third party to reasonably believe that the limited partner is a general partner in the partnership or participates in the business and control of the partnership. Our partnership agreement also provides that generally no limited partner has any right to participate in or exercise control or management power over our affairs.

Management Liability and Indemnification

ARC, as our general partner, and its directors and officers are not liable to us for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived resulting from errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission, so long as ARC acted in good faith. The partnership agreement provides for indemnification of ARC, any of its officers or directors or the Partnership and other persons as ARC may designate from and against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, fines, settlements and other amounts incurred in connection with any actions relating to our operations, as set forth in the partnership agreement (subject to the exceptions described below under “—Fiduciary Responsibilities”).

Fiduciary Responsibilities

ARC’s directors and officers have duties under applicable Maryland law to manage us in a manner consistent with the bpt;width:34.0pt;">

18,292

 

2,082

 

26,283

 

2,793

 

Finance and insurance

 

563

 

32

 

750

 

94

 

Corporate and other

 

2

 

 

17

 

9

 

 

 

$

75,644

 

$

55,112

 

$

140,188

 

$

98,056

 

Operating expenses, cost of manufactured homes sold and real estate taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

24,449

 

$

21,706

 

$

49,061

 

$

37,624

 

Retail home sales

 

19,046

 

3,101

 

29,903

 

3,985

 

Finance and insurance

 

1,124

 

162

 

1,552

 

331

 

Corporate and other

 

132

 

Our partnership agreement expressly limits ARC’s liability by providing that ARC and its officers and directors are not liable or accountable in damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for errors in

121




judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if ARC or its director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, we are required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or the other persons in connection with any actions relating to our operations, provided that we will not indemnify for willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or any transaction for which the person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement.

Outside Activities of ARC

Our partnership agreement prohibits ARC from entering into or conducting business other than in connection with:

·       the ownership, acquisition or disposition of its partnership inteottom" style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">

44

 

267

 

128

·       the management of our business;

·       ARC’s operations as a reporting company under the Exchange Act;

·       ARC’s operations as a REIT;

·       the offering, sale, syndication, private placement or public offering of stock, bonds, securities or other interests;

·       financing or refinancing of any type related to us or our assets or activities;

·       any of the foregoing activities as they relate to a subsidiary of the Partnership or of ARC; and

·       such activities as are incidental thereto.

In addition, ARC may not own any assets or take title to assets (other than temporarily in connection with an acquisition prior to contributing such assets to the Partnership) other than interests in its subsidiaries and subsidiaries of the Partnership, its general partnership interests and such cash and cash equivalents, bank accounts or similar instruments or accounts as ARC deems reasonably necessary, taking into account, among other things, the requirements necessary for ARC to carry out its responsibilities contemplated under our partnership agreement, its charter and to qualify as a REIT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if ARC acquires assets in its own name and owns property other than through the Partnership, the partners have agreed to negotiate in good faith to amend the partnership agreement to reflect such activities and the direct ownership of assets by ARC.

ARC and any of its affiliates are entitled to acquire our partnership units and to exercise all rights of a limited partner relating to such units.

Restrictions on Affiliate Transactions

ARC and its affiliates are generally prohibited from selling or conveying any property to the Partnership except pursuant to transactions that are determined by ARC in good faith to be fair and reasonable.

Outside Activities of Limited Partners

Subject to any agreements entered into by a limited partner with ARC, the Partnership or a subsidiary (including, without limitation, any employment agreement), any limited partner and its affiliates shall be entitled to have business interests and engage in business activities in addition to those relating to us, including business interests and activities that are in direct or indirect competition with us or that are enhanced by our activities. Neither we nor any partner shall have any rights in any business ventures of any limited partner pursuant to our partnership agreement. No limited partner or any other person shall have any obligation pursuant to our partnership agreement, subject to any other agreements entered into by

122




such person with ARC, the Partnership or a subsidiary, to offer any interest in any such business ventures to us or any other person.

Distributions

Our partnership agreement provides that holders of our partnership units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available cash (i) first, with respect to any partnership units that are entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any partnership units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests).

Allocations of Net Income and Net Loss

Our net income and net loss are determined and allocated with respect to each fiscal year as of the end of the year. Except as otherwise provided in our partnership agreement, an allocation of a share of net income or net loss is treated as an allocation of the same share of each item of income, gain, loss or deduction that is taken into account in computing net income or net loss. Except as otherwise provided in our partnership agreement, net income and net loss are allocated to the holders of partnership units holding the same class of units in accordance with their respective percentage interests in the class at the end of each fiscal year. The partnership agreement contains provisions for special allocations intended to comply with certain regulatory requirements, including the requirements of Treasury Regulations Sections 1.704-1(b) and 1.704-2. Except as otherwise provided in the partnership agreement, for income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, each item of income, gain, loss and deduction is allocated among our limited partners in the same manner as its correlative item of book income, gain, loss or deduction is allocated pursuant to our partnership agreement.

Meetings of Limited Partners

There will be no regularly scheduled meetings of limited partners. Meetings of our partners may be called by our general partner, ARC, and will be called upon the written request to ARC of limited partners holding more than 50% of our outstanding common partnership units.

Redemption Rights

After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of partnership units, each of our limited partners and certain transferees will have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our partnership agreement, to require ARC to redeem all or a portion of the common partnership units held by the party in exchange for a cash amount equal to the value of our partnership units. On or before the close of business on the fifth business day after ARC receives a notice of redemption, ARC may, in its sole and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of ARC’s common stock imposed under ARC’s charter and the transfer restrictions and other limitations thereof, elect to acquire some or all of the tendered common partnership units from the tendering party in exchange for shares of ARC’s common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of ARC’s common stock for each common partnership unit (subject to antidilution adjustments provided in the partnership agreement). It is ARC’s current intention to exercise this right in connection with any redemption of partnership units. Each limited partner may effect a redemption of partnership units only once in each fiscal quarter, unless otherwise permitted by ARC, in its sole and absolute discretion, and may not effect a redemption for less than 250 partnership units.

123




Transferability of Partnership Units

In general, ARC may not voluntarily withdraw from the Partnership or transfer its interest in us unless the limited partners consent by approval of a majority in interest or immediately after a merger of ARC into another entity and substantially all of the assets of the surviving entity, excluding the general partnership interest held by ARC, are contributed to the partnership as a capital contribution in exchange for partnership units. With certain limited exceptions, the limited partners may not transfer their interests in us, in whole or in part, without ARC’s written consent, which consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. No partnership unit that is paired with shares of ARC’s special voting stock may be transferred unless accompanied by such shares of special voting stock and transferred as a unit. As a result, transfer of partnership units that are paired with shares of special voting stock also will be subject to the restrictions on transfer of special voting stock contained in ARC’s charter.

Issuance of ARC Stock

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, upon the issuance of ARC stock other than in connection with a redemption of partnership units, ARC will generally be obligated to contribute the cash proceeds or other consideration received from the issuance to the Partnership in exchange for, in the case of common stock, common partnership units, or in the case of an issuance of preferred stock, preferred partnership units with designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions that are substantially the same as the designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions of the preferred stock.

Tax Matters

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC is our tax matters partner. Accordingly, ARC has the authority to handle tax audits and to make tax elections under the Internal Revenue Code on our behalf.

Term

The Partnership has perpetual existence, unless dissolved upon:

·       our bankruptcy, judicial dissolution or withdrawal (unless, in the case of a withdrawal, a majority-in-interest of the remaining limited partners agree to continue the partnership and to the appointment of a successor general partner);

·       the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets;

·       redemption (or acquisition by ARC) of all partnership units other than units held by us; or

·       an election by ARC in its capacity as our sole general partner.

Resale Registration Statement for the Limited Partners of the Partnership

Pursuant to the partnership agreement, ARC maintains a registration statement registering the resale by the limited partners of the Partnership of any of ARC’s securities issued to the limited partners upon a redemption of their partnership units. ARC will use all reasonable efforts to keep any shelf registration statement effective until the third anniversary of the date on which the registratnt>

 

 

 

$

44,751

 

$

25,013

 

$

80,783

 

$

42,068

 

Net segment income(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

32,338

 

In connection with ARC’s reorganization, the limited partners of the Partnership also were granted “piggyback” registration rights in connection with certain registered offerings of ARC’s securities. These piggyback registration rights will terminate when the resale shelf registration statement described in the preceding paragraph becomes effective under the 1933 Act.

124




DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

The following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the notes and the indenture, does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and provisions of the notes and the indenture, which are incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the notes or the indenture, as applicable. As used in this section, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” refer to the Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term “ARC” refers to Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries.

General

We have issued $96,600,000 million aggregate principal amount of notes, and the notes are limited to the aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000. We issued the notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of August 9, 2005, between us, as issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

The terms of the notes include those provisions contained in the notes and the indenture and those made part of the indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The notes are subject to all such terms, and holders of notes are referred to the notes, the indenture and the Trust Indenture Act for a statement thereof. Copies of the indenture and the form of the notes are available for inspection at the corporate trust office of the trustee, currently located at U.S. Bank National Association, 60 Livingston Avenue, EP-MN-WS3C, St. Paul, MN 55107-2292; Attention: Rick Prokosch.

Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 71¤2% per year from and including August 9, 2005 or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Interest will be paid to each registered holder at the close of business on the February 1 or August 1 (whether or not a business day in New York City) immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date, each of which we refer to as a record date. Interest on the notes is computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.

In addition, we will pay additional interest on the notes under the circumstances described below under “—Registration Rights.”

The notes will mature on August 15, 2025 and will be paid against presentation and surrender thereof at the corporate trust office of the trustee unless (1) earlier redeemed by us at our option or repurchased by us at a holder’s option at certain times as described under “—Provisional Redemption of the Notes at Our Option,” “—Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates” or “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change” below or (2) exchanged at a holder’s option as permitted under “—Exchange Rights” below. We are not required to maintain a sinking fund for the repayment of the notes.

The notes were issued only in fully registered, book-entry form, in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, except under the limited circumstances described below under “—Book-Entry System.”

If any interest payment date, stated maturity date, redemption date or repurchase date is not a business day in New York City, the payment otherwise required to be made on such date will be made on the next such business day without any additional payment as a result of such delay. All payments will be made in U.S. dollars.

Ranking

The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Partnership and rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured indebtedness. However, the notes are effectively subordinated to our mortgages and

125




other secured indebtedness (to the extent of the value of the collateral securing the same) and to all preferred equity and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2005 we had outstanding $25.8 million of senior unsecured indebtedness and $1,063.2 million of secured indebtedness and our consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $59.1 million of other liabilities. The indenture governing the notes does not prohibit us or any of our affiliates or subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness or issuing preferred equity in the future. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Offering—The notes are effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured indebtedness” and “—The notes are effectively subordinated to liabilities of our subsidiaries.”

Exchange Rights

Subject to the restrictions on ownership of ARC common stock and the conditions described below, holders may exchange at any time on or prior to maturity or redemption any outstanding notes (or $1,000 portions thereof) into shares of ARC common stock initially at an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price of $14.31 per ARC common share). The exchange rate and the equivalent exchange price in effect at any given time are referred to in this prospectus as the “exchange rate” and the “exchange price,” respectively, and will be subject to adjustment as described herein. Holders may exchange notes only in denominations of $1,000 and whole multiples of $1,000. If we call notes for redemption, you may exchange the notes only until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the redemption date unless we fail to pay the redemption price.

Upon exchange of a note, a holder will not receive any cash payment of interest, subject to certain exceptions, and we will not adjust the exchange rate to account for accrued and unpaid interest.

Holders of notes at the close of business on a record date for an interest payment will receive payment of interest payable on the corresponding interest payment date notwithstanding the exchange of such notes at any time after the close of business on the applicable regular record date. Notes tendered for exchange by a holder after the close of business on any record date for an interest payment and on or prior to the corresponding interest payment date must be accompanied by payment of an amount equal to the interest that the holder is to receive on the notes; provided, however, that no such payment will be made (1) if we have specified a redemption date that is after such record date and on or prior to such interest payment date or (2) with respect to overdue interest, if any overdue interest exists at the time of exchange with respect to such notes.

If a holder exchanges notes, we will pay any documentary, stamp or similar issue or transfer tax due on the issuance of shares of ARC common stock upon the exchange, if any, unless the tax is due because the holder requests the shares to be issued or delivered to a person other than the holder, in which case the holder will pay that tax prior to receipt of such shares.

A holder wishing to exercise its exchange rights must deliver an irrevocable duly completed exchange notice to the exchange agent. Holders may obtain copies of the required form of the exch.0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$

31,292

 

$

64,077

 

$

57,536

 

Retail home sales

 

(754

)

(1,019

)

(3,620

)

(1,192

)

Finance and insurance

 

(561

)ange notice from the exchange agent. A certificate, or a book-entry transfer through DTC, for the number of shares of ARC common stock for which any notes are exchanged, together with a cash payment for any fractional shares, will be delivered through the exchange agent as soon as practicable, but within the time periods specified below, following the exchange date (subject to our ability to elect to deliver cash, or a combination of cash and shares of ARC common stock). The trustee will initially act as the exchange agent.

In lieu of delivery of shares of ARC common stock upon all or any portion of the exchanged notes, we may elect to pay holders surrendering notes for exchange an amount in cash per note (or a portion of a note) equal to the average closing price of ARC common stock over the five trading day period starting on and including the third trading day following the exchange date multiplied by the exchange rate in effect on the exchange date (or portion of the exchange rate applicable to a portion of a note if a combination of

126




ARC common stock and cash is to be delivered). We will inform such holders through the trustee no later than two business days following the exchange date of our election to deliver shares of ARC common stock, to pay cash in lieu of delivery of the shares or to deliver a combination of ARC common stock and cash. If we elect to deliver solely shares of ARC common stock, these will be delivered through the exchange agent no later than the third business day following the exchange date. If we elect to deliver a combination of shares of ARC common stock and cash or to pay all of such payment in cash, such delivery and payment will be made to holders surrendering notes no later than the tenth business day following the applicable exchange date.

The “closing price” of ARC common stock on any trading day means the reported last sale price per share (or, if no last sale price is reported, the average of the bid and ask prices per share or, if more than one in either case, the average of the average bid and the average ask prices per share) on such date reported by the New York Stock Exchange or, if ARC common stock is not quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, as reported by the principal national securities exchange or quotation system on which ARC common stock is then listed or otherwise as provided in the indenture.

If a holder has already delivered a repurchase notice as described under either “—Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates” or “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change,” with respect to a note, that holder may not tender that note for exchange until the holder has properly withdrawn the repurchase notice.

Upon surrender of a note for exchange, the holder shall deliver to us cash equal to the amount that we are required to deduct and withhold under applicable law in connection with such exchange; provided, however, that if the holder does not deliver such cash, we may

(130

)

(802

)

(237

)

Corporate and other

 

(130

)

Holders may surrender their notes for exchange of shares of ARC common stock at the applicable exchange rate at any time prior to the close of business on the second business day immediately preceding the stated maturity date.

Exchange Rate Adjustments

The initial exchange rate will be adjusted for certain events, including:

(1)         the issuance of ARC common stock as a dividend or distribution on ARC common stock;

(2)         subdivisions and combinations of ARC common stock;

(3)         the issuance to all holders of ARC common stock of rights or warrants entitling them to purchase ARC common stock (or securities exchangeable into ARC common stock) at less than (or having an exchange price per share less than) the current market price of ARC common stock;

(4)         the dividend or other distribution to all holders of ARC common stock or shares of ARC capital stock (other than common stock) of evidences ofndowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">

(44

)

(250

)

(119

)

 

 

$

30,893

 

$

30,099

 

$

indebtedness or assets, including securities, but excluding (A) the rights and warrants referred to above, (B) dividends and distributions in connection with a reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or conveyance resulting in a change in the exchange consideration pursuant to the second succeeding paragraph or (C) dividends or distributions paid exclusively in cash;

(5)         dividends or other distributions consisting exclusively of cash to all holders of ARC common stock in excess of $0.1875 per share in each fiscal quarter (the “dividend threshold amount”); the dividend threshold amount is subject to adjustment as a result of the same events giving rise to an adjustment to the exchange rate, provided that no adjustment will be made to the dividend threshold amount as a result of any event described in this clause (5); and

59,405

 

$

55,988

 

Property management expense

 

$

2,494

 

$

1,600

 

$

4,759

 

$

3,054

 

General and administrative expense

 

$

6,259

 

$

4,304

 

$

127




(6)         payments to holders of ARC common stock in respect of a tender offer or exchange offer for ARC common stock by ARC or any of its subsidiaries to the extent that the cash and fair market value of any other consideration included in the payment per share exceeds the closing price of ARC common stock on the trading day following the last date on which tenders or exchanges may be made pursuant to such tender offer or exchange offer.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an adjustment to the exchange rate pursuant to clauses (5) or (6) above, in no event will the exchange rate exceed 82.1018 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment pursuant to clauses (1) through (4) above.

No adjustment in the exchange rate will be required unless such adjustment would require a change of at least one percent in the exchange rate then in effect at such time. Any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated above, the exchange rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of ARC common stock or any securities exchangeable into or exchangeable for ARC common stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. We will not make any adjustment if holders of notes are entitled to participate in the transactions described above.

In the case of:

·       any reclassification or change of ARC common stock (other than changes resulting from a subdivie:10.0pt;">11,618

 

$

19,099

 

IPO related costs

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

4,417

 

Early termination of debt

 

$

 

$

·       a consolidation, merger or combination involving ARC or a sale or conveyance to another corporation of all or substantially all of ARC’s property and assets,

in each case as a result of which holders of ARC common stock are entitled to receive stock, other securities, other property or assets (including cash or any combination thereof) with respect to or in exchange for ARC common stock, holders of notes will be entitled thereafter to exchange their notes into the kind and amount of shares of stock, other securities or other property or assets (including cash or any combination thereof) which they would have owned or been entitled to receive upon such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or conveyance had such notes been exchanged into ARC common stock immediately prior to such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or conveyance. In the event holders of ARC common stock have the opportunity to elect the form of consideration to be received in a reclassification, change, consolidation, merger combination, sale or conveyance, we will make adequate provision whereby the holders of the notes shall have the opportunity, on a timely basis, to determine the form of consideration into which all of the notes, treated as a single class, shall be exchangeable. Such determination shall be based on the blended, weighted average of elections made by holders of the notes who participate in such determination and shall be subject to any limitations to which all of the holders of ARC common stock are subject to, such as pro-rata reductions applicable to any portion of the consideration payable. We may not become a party to any such transaction unless its terms are consistent with the foregoing.

If a taxable distribution to holders of ARC common stock or other transaction occurs which results in any adjustment of the exchange price, the holders of notes may, in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution subject to U.S. income tax as a dividend. In certain other circumstances, the absence of an adjustment may result in a taxable dividend to the holders of common stostyle="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

$

 

13,427

We may from time to time, to the extent permitted by law, reduce the exchange price of the notes by any amount for any period of at least 20 days. In that case we will give at least 15 days’ notice of such decrease.

128




Determination of Make Whole Premium

If a transaction described in the first, second or fourth bullet of the definition of change in control (as set forth under “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change”) occurs prior to August 20, 2015 and a holder elects to exchange its notes in connection with such transaction, we will increase the applicable exchange rate for the notes surrendered for exchange by a number of additional ARC common shares (the “additional change in control shares”), as described below. An exchange of notes will be deemed for these purposes to be “in connection with” such a change in control transaction if the notice of exchange of the notes is received by the exchange agent from and including the date that is 15 business days prior to the anticipated effective date of the change in control up to and including the business day prior to the repurchase date as described under “—Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.”

The number of additional change in control shares will be determined by reference to the table below and is based on the date on which such change in control transaction becomes effective (the “effective date”) and the price (the “stock price”) paid per ARC common share in such transaction. If the holders of ARC common shares receive only cash in the change in control transaction, the stock price shall be the cash amount paid per ARC common share. Otherwise, the stock price shall be the average of the closing sale prices of ARC common shares on the ten consecutive trading days up to but excluding the effective date.

The stock prices set forth in the first row of the table (i.e., the column headers) will be adjusted as of any date on which the exchange rate of the notes is adjusted. The adjusted stock prices will equal the stock prices applicable immediately prior to such adjustment multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the exchange rate immediately prior to the adjustment giving rise to the stock price adjustment and the denominator of which is the exchange rate as so adjusted. In addition, the number of additional change in control shares will be subject to adjustment in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under “—Exchange Rate Adjustments.”

The following table sets forth the stock price and number of additional change in control shares of ARC common stock to be received per $1,000 principal amount of notes:

Stock Price
on Effective

 

Effective Date

 

Date

 

8/9/2005

 

8/20/2006

 

8/20/2007

 

8/20/2008

 

8/20/2009

 

8/20/2010

 

8/20/2011

 

8/20/2012

 

8/20/2013

 

8/20/2014

 

8/20/2015

 

$12.18

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

12.2206

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  13.00

 

10.2161

 

9.8807

 

9.5000

 

9.1194

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.6301

 

7.9468

 

7.4436

 

7.0419

 

7.0419

 

Real estate

 

$

15,008

 

$

12,107

 

$

29,382

 

$

7.0419

 

 

0.0000

 

 

24,476

 

Retail home sales

 

588

 

33

 

888

 

(31

)

Corporate and other

 

948

 

589

 

1,547

 

2,764

 

 

 

$

16,544

 

$

12,729

 

$

31,817

 

$

27,209

 


(a)     Net segment income represents total revenues less expenses for property operations, real estate taxes, cost of manufactured homes sold and retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations. Net segment income is a measure of the performance of the properties before the effects of the following expenses: property management, general and administrative, IPO related costs, depreciation, amortization, early termination of debt, impairment charges, interest expense and the effect of discontinued operations.

F-59



  14.00

 

8.3749

 

8.0136

 

7.6469

 

7.2499

 

6.7830

 

6.2169

 

5.5323

 

4.6956

 

3.7746

 

2.7440

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  15.00

 

6.9156

 

6.4409

 

6.0190

 

5.6616

 

5.2984

 

4.9353

 

4.4068

 

3.6785

 

2.7276

 

1.4954

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Amortization expense

 

$

3,256

 

$

2,530

 

$

6,791

 

$

4,660

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

18,842

 

$

14,904

 

$

35,212

 

$

27,591

 

Retail home sales

 

9

 

13

 

15

 

19

 

Finance and insurance

 

2

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  16.00

 

5.9083

 

5.2726

 

2

 

3

 

3 

4.6812

 

4.1705

 

3.7891

 

3.3968

 

3.0046

 

2.6123

 

2.2201

 

1.2536

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  17.00

 

5.2941

 

4.5418

 

3.7839

 

3.0444

 

2.3763

 

2.0309

 

1.9261

 

1.6038

 

1.2814

 

0.9591

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  18.00

 

5.0000

 

4.1667

 

nt>

 

Corporate and other

 

115

 

(207

)

234

 

(121

3.2881

 

2.4091

 

1.4853

 

0.4825

 

0.4647

 

)

 

 

$

18,968

 

$

14,712

 

$

ter:avoid;text-align:right;">0.4137

 

0.3656

 

0.2372

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  20.00

 

4.5000

 

3.7500

 

35,464

 

$

27,492

 

Interest income

 

$

(277

)

$

(450

)

$

2.8500

 

2.0000

 

1.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

 &nbs;">

(660

)

$

(792

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(16,351

 

3.6000

 

3.0000

 

2.2800

 

1.6000

 

0.8000

)

$

(5,326

)

$

(30,384

)

$

(42,578

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

72

 

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  30.00

 

3.0000

 

2.5000

 

1.9000

 

1.3333

 

0.6667

 

$

343

 

$

1,000

 

$

795

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

$

52

 

$

 

$

(678

)

$

 

Net loss

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  40.00

 

2.2500

 

1.8750

 

1.4250

 

1.0000

 

0.5000

$

(16,227

)

$

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

  50.00

 

1.8000

 

1.5000

 

1.1400

 

0.8000

 

0.4000

 

0.0000

(4,983

)

$

(30,062

)

$

(41,783

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

$

(2,971

)

$

(2,578

)

$

(5,942

)

$

(3,810

)

Net loss attributable to partners

 

$

(19,198

)

$

(7,561

)

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

 

0.0000

 

 

yle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">

 

 

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Identifiable assets

 

 

129




The exact stock prices and effective dates may not be set forth in the table, in which case:

(1)         if the stock price is between two stock price amounts in the table or the effective date is between two dates in the table, the additional change in control shares will be determined by straight-line interpolation between the number of additional change in control shares set forth for the higher and lower stock price amounts and the two dates, as applicable, based on a 365-day year;

(2)         if the stock price is in excess of $50.00 per ARC common share (subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be issued upon exchange; and

(3)         if the stock price is less than $12.18 per ARC common share (subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be issued upon exchange.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event will the total number of ARC common shares issuable upon exchange exceed 82.1018 per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under “—Exchange Rate Adjustments.”

Our obligation to deliver the additional change in control shares could be considered a penalty, in which case the enforceability thereof would be subject to general principles of reasonableness of economic remedies.

Provisional Redemption of the Notes at Our Option

We will not have the right to redeem any notes prior to August 20, 2010.

Beginning on August 20, 2010, we may redeem the notes in whole or in part for cash at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, on the notes to the redemption date if the closing price of the common stock has exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30-day trading period.

The “exchange price” as of any day will equal $1,000 divided by the exchange rate. If we redeem the notes, we will make an additional payment equal to the total value of the aggregate amount of the interest otherwise payable on the notes from the last day through which interest was paid on the notes through the date of redemption. We must make these payments on all notes called for redemption, including notes exchanged after the date we mailed the notice.

We will give at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, notice of redemption by mail to holders of notes. Notes or portions of notes called for redemption will be exchangeable by the holder until the close of business on the business day prior to the redemption date.

If we do not redeem all of the notes, the trustee will select the notes to be redeemed in principal amount of $1,000 or integral multiples thereof, by lot or on a pro rata basis. If any notes are to be redeemed in part only, we will issue a new note or notes with a principal amount equal to the unredeemed principal portion thereof. If a portion of your notes is selected for partial redemption and you exchange a portion of your notes, the exchanged portion will be deemed to be taken from the portion selected for redemption.

Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates

Holders of notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part (in principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) on August 15, 2010, August 15, 2015 and August 15, 2020 for cash equal to 100% of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

1,721,766

 

 

$

1,738,226

 

 

Retail home sales

 

55,510

 

 

30,053

 

 

Finance and insurance

 

13,028

 

 

735

 

 

Corporate and other

 

14,482

 

 

44,218

 

 

 

 

$

1,804,786

 

130




Holders must deliver a written repurchase notice to the paying agent, which initially is the trustee, during the period beginning at any time from the opening of business on the date that is 20 days prior to the repurchase date until the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. Our repurchase obligation will be subject to certain additional conditions.

On or before the 20th day prior to each repurchase date, we will provide to the trustee, any paying agent and to all holders of the notes, and to beneficial owners as required by applicable law, a notice stating, among other things:

·       the amount of the repurchase price; and

·       the procedures that holders must follow to require us to repurchase their notes.

We will also disseminate a press release through Dow Jones & Company, Inc. or Bloomberg Business News containing the information specified in such notice or publish that information in a newspaper of general circulation in New York City or on ARC’s website, or through such other public medium as we deem appropriate at that time.

A holder’s notice electing to require us to repurchase notes must specify:

·       that such notice complies with appropriate procedures of The Depository Trust Company, or DTC;

·       the portion of the principal amount of notes to be repurchased, which must be $1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000; and

·       that the notes are to be repurchased by us pursuant to the applicable provisions of the notes.

Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice in whole or in part by a written notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. The notice of withdrawal must specify:

·       the principal amount of notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn;

·       that the withdrawal notice complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in book-entry form; and

·       the principal amount of notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice.

Holders electing to require us to repurchase notes must either effect book-entry transfer of notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures or deliver the notes in certificated form, together with necessary endorsements, to the paying agent prior to the repurchase date to receive payment of the repurchase price on the repurchase date. We will pay the repurchase price within two business days after any such transfer or delivery on or after the repurchase date.

If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the repurchase price of the notes on the business date following the repurchase date, then immediately after the repurchase date:

·       such notes will cease to be outstanding;

·       interest on such notes will cease to accrue; and

·       all rights of holders of such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price.

In connection with any repurchase offer, we will, if required, comply with the provisions of Rule 13e-4, Rule 14e-1, and any other tender offer rules under the Exchange Act which may then be applicable; and file a Schedule TO or any other required schedule under the Exchange Act.

131




Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change

If a fundamental change occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the repurchase date.

Within 20 days after the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are obligated to give to the holders of the notes notice of the fundamental change and of the repurchase right arising as a result of the fundamental change and the repurchase date (which may be no earlier than 15 days and no later than 30 days after the date of such notice). We must also deliver a copy of this notice to the trustee. We will also disseminate a press release through Dow Jones & Company, Inc. or Bloomberg Business News announcing the occurrence of the fundamental change or publish that information in a newspaper of general circulation in New York City or on ARC’s website, or through such other public medium as we deem appropriate at that time.

To exercise its repurchase right, a holder of notes must deliver written notice of such holder’s exercise of its repurchase right to the trustee prior to the close of business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date.

Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice by a written notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to the close of business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date. If a holder of notes delivers a repurchase notice, it may not thereafter surrender such notes for exchange unless such repurchase notice is withdrawn as permitted below. The notice of withdrawal must specify:

·       the principal amount of notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn;

·       that the withdrawal notice complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in book-entry form; and

·       the principal amount of notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice.

Holders electing to require us to repurchase notes must effect book-entry transfer of notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures. We will pay the repurchase price within two business days after any such transfer on or after the repurchase date.

If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the repurchase price of the notes on the repurchase date, then on and after such date:

·       such notes will cease to be outstanding;

·       interest on such notes will cease to accrue; and

 

$

1,813,232

 

 

Notes payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

1,007,579

 

 

$

972,575

 

·       all rights of holders of such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price.

A “fundamental change” will be deemed to occur upon a change in control or a termination of trading.

A “change in control” will be deemed to have occurred at such time after the original issuance of the notes when the following has occurred:

·       any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) acquires the beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, through a purchase, merger or other acquisition transacle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">

 

Retail home sales

 

43,945

 

 

27,999

 

 

Finance and insurance

 

9,369

 

 

 

 

Corporate and other

 

28,111

 

 

132




·       we or ARC consolidates with, or merges with or into, another person or conveys, transfers, leases or otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets to any person, or any person consolidates with or merges with or into ARC or us, other than:

·        any transaction (A) that does not result in any reclassification, exchange, or cancellation of outstanding shares of ARC’s capital stock or our partnership units, as the case may be, and (B) pursuant to which holders of ARC’s capital stock or our partnership units, as applicable, immediately prior to the transaction have the entitlement to exercise, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the total voting power of all shares of ARC capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the continuing or surviving person immediately after the transaction or 50% of the voting power of our partnership units as the case may be;

·        any merger solely for the purpose of changing ARC’s or our jurisdiction of formation and resulting in a reclassification, exchange or exchange of outstanding shares of common stock solely into shares of common stock of the surviving entity;

·       during any consecutive two-year period, individuals who at the beginning of that two-year period constituted the board of directors of ARC (together with any new directors whose election to such board of directors, or whose nomination for election by stockholders, was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then still in office who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of ARC then in office; or

·       we or ARC approve a plan of liquidation or dissolution.

Beneficial ownership will be determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The term “person” includes any syndicate or group that would be deemed to be a “person” under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act.

A “termination of trading” is deemed to occur if ARC common stock (or other common stock into which the notes are then exchangeable) is neither listed for trading on a U.S. national securities exchange nor approved for trading on an established automated over-the-counter trading market in the United States.

The definition of fundamental change includes a phrase relating to the conveyance, transfer, lease, or other disposition of “all or substantially all” of the assets of the ARC or us. There is no precise established definition of the phrase “substantially all” under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a holder of notes to require us to repurchase such notes as a result of pt .0001pt;text-align:right;">1,048

 

 

 

 

$

1,089,004

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

                                                                                                    a conveyance, transfer, lease, or other disposition of less than all of the assets of the ARC or us may be uncertain.

F-60




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
REAL ESTATE AND RELATED DEPRECIATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)

SCHEDULE III

Registration Rights

We and ARC have agreed, at our expense, to file with the SEC the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We and ARC have agreed to use our respective best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective as promptly as is practicable, but in no event later than 180 days after the earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes and to keep the registration statement effective until such date that the holders of the notes and the common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all such securities immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume limitations of Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act or any successor rule thereto or otherwise.

We and ARC have also agreed to provide to each registered holder copies of the prospectus, notify each registered holder when the shelf registration statement has become effective and take certain other actions as are required to permit unrestricted resales of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon the exchange of the notes. A holder who sells securities pursuant to the shelf registration statement generally will be required to be named as a selling securityholder in the related prospectus and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers and will be bound by the provisions of the registration rights agreement that are applicable to that holder (including certain indemnification provisions). If a shelf registration statement covering those securities is not effective, they may not be sold or otherwise ttd width="40" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">

73

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Costs

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Gross Amounts at which Carried
at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Location

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Buildings and
Improvements

 

Land

 

Buildings and
Improvements

 

Land

 

Buildings and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Date of
Acquisition

 

100 Oaks

 

Fultondale, AL

 

 

$         —

 

 

$     358

 

 

$     2,030

 

 

$  —

 

 

$     241

 

 

$     358

 

 

$     2,271

 

 

Rule 13e-4 under the Exchange Act requires the dissemination of information to securityholders if an issuer tender offer occurs and may apply if the repurchase option becomes available to holders of the notes. We will comply with this rule to the extent applicable at that time.

We will comply with the provisions of any tender offer rules under the Exchange Act that may then be applicable, and will file any schedule required under the Exchange Act in connection with any offer by us to purchase notes at the option of the holders of notes upon a fundamental change. In some circumstances, the fundamental change purchase feature of the notes may make more difficult or discourage a takeover of us and thus the removal of incumbent management. The fundamental change purchase feature, however, is not the result of management’s knowledge of any specific effort to accumulate shares of common stock or to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, solicitation or otherwise, or part of a plan by management to adopt a series of anti-takeover provisions. Instead, the fundamental change purchase feature is the result of negotiations between us and the initial purchasers of the notes.

133




We may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, at any time purchase the notes in the open market or by tender at any price or by private agreement. Any note purchased by us (a) after the date that is two years from the latest issuance of the notes may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be reissued or sold or may be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation or (b) on or prior to the date referred to in (a), will be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation. Any notes surrendered to the trustee may not be reissued or resold and will be canceled promptly.

The foregoing provisions would not necessarily protect holders of the notes if highly leveraged or other transactions involving us occur that may adversely affect holders. Our ability to repurchase notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change is subject to important limitations. The occurrence of a fundamental change could cause an event of default under, or be prohibited or limited by, the terms of indebtedness that we may incur in the future. Further, we cannot assure you that we would have the financial resources, or would be able to arrange financing, to pay the repurchase price for all the notes that might be delivered by holders of notes seeking to exercise the repurchase right. Any failure by us to repurchase the notes when required following a fundamental change would result in an event of default under the indenture. Any such default may, in turn, cause a default under indebtedness that we may incur in the future.

No notes may be purchased by us at the option of holders upon the occurrence of a fundamental change if there has occurred and is continuing an event of default with respect to the notes, other than a default in the payment of the fundamental change purchase price with respect to the notes.

No Stockholder Rights for Holders of Notes

Holders of notes, as such, will not have any rights as stockholders of ARC (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to receive any dividends or other distributions on shares of ARC common stock), except in limited circumstances described above under “—Exchange Rights—Exchange Right Adjustments.”

Ownership Limit

In order to assist ARC in maintaining its qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, ownership by any person of more than 7.3% of outstanding ARC common stock is restricted, unless waived or modified by ARC’s board of directors. See “Description of ARC Capital Stock and Our Partnership Units—ARC’s Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

Calculations in Respect of the Notes

Except as explicitly specified otherwise herein, we will be responsible for making all calculations required under the notes. These calculations include, but are not limited to, determinations of the exchange price and exchange rate applicable to the notes. We will make all these calculations in good faith and, absent manifest error, our calculations will be final and binding on holders of the notes. We will provide a schedule of our calculations to the trustee, and the trustee is entitled to rely upon the accuracy of our calculations without independent verification. The trustee will forward our calculations to any holder of notes upon the request.

Merger, Consolidation or Sale

The Partnership may consolidate with, or sell, lease or convey all or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with or into, any other entity, provided that the following conditions are met:

·       we shall be the continuing entity, or the successor entity (if other than the Partnership) formed by or resulting from any consolidation or merger or which shall have received the transfer of assets

134




shall expressly assume payment of the principal of and interest on all of the notes and the due and punctual performance and observance of all of the covenants and conditions in the indenture;

·       if as a result of such transaction the notes become convertible or exchangeable into common stock or other securities issued by a third party, such third party fully and unconditionally guarantees all obligations under the notes and the indenture;

·       immediately after giving effect to the transaction, no Event of Default under the indenture, and no event which, after notice or the lapse of time, or both, would become an Event of Default, shall have occurred and be continuing; and

·       an officer’s certificate and legal opinion covering these conditions shall be delivered to the trustee.

Events of Default

The following are events of default under the indenture:

·       default in the payment of any principal amount or any redemption price, purchase price, or fundamental change purchase price due with respect to the notes, when the same becomes due and payable;

·       default in payment of any interest (including liquidated damages) under the notes, which default continues for 30 days;

·       default in the delivery when due of shares of ARC common stock or any cash in lieu of such shares payable upon exchange with respect to the notes, including any make whole premium, which default continues for 15 days;

·       our failure to comply with any of our other agreements in the notes or the indenture upon our receipt of notice of such default from the trustee or from holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the noteak-after:avoid;text-align:right;">$     2,628

 

 

$       63

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Alafia Riverfront

 

Riverview, FL

 

 

865

 

 

312

 

 

1,830

s, and the failure to cure (or obtain a waiver of) such default within 30 days after receipt of such notice;

·       default in the payment of principal when due or resulting in acceleration of other indebtedness of us or any significant subsidiary for borrowed money where the aggregate principal amount with respect to which the default or acceleration has occurred exceeds $5 million and such acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled or such indebtedness repaid within a period of 30 days after written notice to us by the trustee or to us and the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes, provided that if any such default is cured, waived, rescinded or annulled, then the event of default by reason thereof would be deemed not to have occurred; and

·       certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization affecting us.

If an event of default shall have happened and be continuing, either the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding may declare the principal of the notes and any accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration immediately due and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency, the principal amount of the notes together with any accrued interest through the occurrence of such event shall automatically become and be immediately due and payable.

135




Modification

The trustee and we may amend the indenture or the notes with the consent of the holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding. However, the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected is required to:

·       alter the manner of calculation or rate of accrual of interest on the note or change the time of payment;

·       make the note payable in money or securities other than that stated in the note;

·       change the stated maturity of the note;

·       reduce the principal amount, redemption price, purchase price or fundamental change purchase price (including any make-whole premium payable) with respect to the note;

·       make any change that adversely affects the rights of a holder to exchange the note in any material respect;

·       make any change that adversely affects the right to require us to purchase the note in any material respect;

·       impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment with respect to the note or with respect to exchange of the note; or

·       change the provisions in the indenture that relate to modifying or amending the indenture.

Without the consent of any holder of notes, the trustee and we may amend the indenture:

·       to evidence a successor to us and the  

 

 

 

343

 

 

312

 

 

2,173

 

 

2,486

 

 

63

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Aledo

 

Aledo, TX

 

 

·       to add to our covenants for the benefit of the holders of the notes or to surrender any right or power conferred upon us;

·       to secure our obligations in respect of the notes;

·       to evidence and provide the acceptance of the appointment of a successor trustee under the indenture;

2,262

 

 

390

 

 

2,210

 

 

 

 

1,152

 

 

390

 

 

3,362

 

 

3,752

 

 

675

 

 

 

Oct-99

 

 

Amber Village

 

Dallas, TX·       to comply with the requirements of the SEC in order to effect or maintain qualification of the indenture under the Trust Indenture Act, as contemplated by the indenture or otherwise;

·       to cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency in the indenture; or

·       to make any change that does not adversely affect the rights of the holders of the notes in any material respect.

The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes may, on behalf of all the holders of all notes:

·       amend, alter or change the terms and provisions of the agreement described below under
“—Agreement between Us and ARC”;

·       waive compliance by us with restrictive provisions of the indenture, as detailed in the indenture; or

·       waive any past default under the indenture and its consequences, except a default in the payment of any amount due, or in the obligation to deliver common stock, with respect to any note or in respect of any provision which under the indenture cannot be modified or amended without the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected.

136




Rule 144A Information

If at any time we or ARC are not subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, we will promptly furnish to the holders, beneficial owners and prospective purchasers of the notes or underlying shares of ARC common stock, upon their request, the information required to be delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933 to facilitate the resale of those notes or shares pursuant to Rule 144A.

Reports to Trustee

We will regularly furnish to the trustee copies of ARC’s annual report to its stockholders, containing audited financial statements, and any other financial reports which ARC furnishes to its stockholders.

Discharge of the Indenture

We may satisfy and discharge our obligations under the indenture by delivering to the trustee for cancellation all outstanding notes or by depositing with the trustee, the paying agent or the exchange agent, if applicable, after the notes have become due and payable, whether at stated maturity or any redemption date, or any purchase date, or a fundamental change purchase date, or upon exchange or otherwise, cash or shares of common stock (as applicable under the terms of the indenture) sufficient to pay a>

 

 

2,500

 

 

600

 

 

2,923

 

 

 

 

1,155

 

 

600

 

 

4,078

 

Unclaimed Money

If money deposited with the trustee or paying agent for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or accrued and unpaid interest or additional interest on, the notes remains unclaimed for two years, the trustee and paying agent will pay the money back to us upon our written request. However, the trustee and paying agent have the right to withhold paying the money back to us until they publish in a newspaper of general circulation in New York City, or mail to each holder, a notice stating that the money will be paid back to us if unclaimed after a date no less than 30 days from the publication or mailing. After the trustee or paying agent pays the money back to us, holders of notes entitled to the money must look to us for payment as general creditors, subject to applicable law, and all liability of the trustee and the paying agent with respect to the money will cease.

Governing Law

The indenture and the notes are governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.

Trustee

U.S. Bank National Association is the trustee, registrar, exchange agent and paying agent.

If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the trustee will be required to use the degree of care and skill of a prudent man in the conduct of his own affairs. The trustee will become obligated to exercise any of its powers under the indenture at the request of any of the holders of any notes only after those holders have offered the trustee indemnity satisfactory to it.

If the trustee becomes one of our creditors, it will be subject to limitations on its rights to obtain payment of claims or to realize on some property received for any such claim, as security or otherwise. The trustee is permitted to engage in other transactions with us. If, however, it acquires any conflicting interest, it must eliminate that conflict or resign.

137




Agreement between Us and ARC

In connection with the issuance of the notes, we anr:avoid;"> 

4,678

 

 

408

 

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

Arbor Ld ARC entered into an agreement by which we acknowledge our responsibility as sole obligor of the notes. The agreement provides that if we are obligated to deliver shares of ARC common stock pursuant to the indenture, ARC will issue the required number of shares and deliver them to the exchanging noteholder. At such time, we will issue to ARC an equal number of common partnership units. Under the agreement, ARC has agreed not to consolidate with or merge into another business entity or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets, unless:

·       either (1) ARC is the continuing entity in the case of a merger or consolidation or (2) the resulting, surviving or acquiring entity, if other than ARC, is a U.S. entity and it expressly assumes ARC’s obligations under the agreement and the indenture;

·       immediately after giving effect to the transaction, no event of default under the indenture and no circumstances which, after notice or lapse of time or both, would become an event of default under the indenture, shall have happened and be continuing; and

·       ARC has delivered to the trustee an officers’ certificate and a legal opinion confirming that ARC has complied with the indenture.

No provision of the agreement may be amended, modified, or waived without the consent of a majority in principal amount of notes then outstanding, except that the unanimous consent of the holders of all outstanding notes is required in order to amend, modify, or waive the provisions the agreement that may advake

 

Grinnell, IA

 

 

 

 

69

 

 

392

Book-Entry System

We have issued the notes in the form of one or more global securities. The global security has been deposited with the trustee as custodian for DTC and registered in the name of a nominee of DTC. Except as set forth below, the global security may be transferred, in whole and not in part, only to DTC or another nominee of DTC. A holder of the notes will hold its beneficial interests in the global security directly through DTC if it has an account with DTC or indirectly through organizations that have accounts with DTC. Notes in definitive certificated form (called “certificated securities”) will be issued only in certain limited circumstances described below.

DTC has advised us that it is:

·       a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York;

·       a member of the Federal Reserve System;

·       a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code; and

·       a “clearing ath:4.9pt;">

 

 

 

 

215

 

 

69

 

 

607

 

 

676

 

 

DTC was created to hold securities of institutions that have accounts with DTC (called participants) and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions among its participants in such securities through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of the participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities certificates. DTC’s participants include securities brokers and dealers, which may include the initial purchasers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Access to DTC’s book-entry system is also available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (called, the indirect participants) that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a participant, whether directly or indirectly.

138




We expect that pursuant to procedures established by DTC upon the deposit of the global security with DTC, DTC will credit, on its book-entry registration and transfer system, the principal amount of notes represented by such global security to the accounts of participants. The accounts to be credited shall be designated by the initial purchasers. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global security will be limited to participants or persons that may hold interests through participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global security will be shown on, and the transfer of those beneficial interests will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to participants’ interests), the participants and the indirect participants.

The laws of some jurisdictions may require that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. These limits and laws may impair the ability to transfer or pledge beneficial interests in the global security.

Owners of beneficial interests in global securities who desire to exchange their interests for common stock should contact their brokers or other participants or indirect participants through whom they hold such beneficial interests to obtain information on procedures, including proper forms and cut-off times, for submitting requests for exchange. So long as DTC, or its nominee, is the registered owner or holder of a global security, DTC or its nominee, as the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the notes represented by the global security for all purposes under the indenture and the notes. In addition, no owner of a beneficial interest in a global security will be able to transfer that interest except in accordance with the applicable procedures of DTC.

Except as set forth below, an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security, will not be entitled to have the notes represented by the global security registered in its name, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of certificated securities and will not be considered to be the owner or holder of any notes under the global security. We understand that under existing industry practice, if an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security desires to take any action that DTC, as the holder of the global security, is entitled to take, DTC would authorize the participants to take such action. Additionally, in such case, the participants would authorize beneficial owners owning through such participants to take such action or would otherwise act upon the instructions of beneficial owners owning through them.

We will make payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest (including any liquidated damages) on the notes represented by the global security registered in the name of and held by DTC or its nominee to DTC or its nominee, as the case may be, as the registered owner and holder of the global security. Neither we, the trustee nor any paying agent will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial interests in the global security or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests.

 

 

1,460

 

 

667

 

 

5,234

 

 

5,902

We expect that DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest (including liquidated damages) on the global security, will credit participants’ accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in the principal amount of the global security as shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. We also expect that payments by participants or indirect participants to owners of beneficial interests in the global security held through such participants or indirect participants will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the responsibility of such participants or indirect participants. We will not have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to, or payments made on account of, beneficial interests in the global security for any note or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests or for any other aspect of the relationship between DTC and its participants or indirect participants or the relationship between such participants or indirect participants and the owners of beneficial interests in the global security owning through such participants.

Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected in the ordinary way in accordance with DTC rules and will be settled in same-day funds.

139




DTC has advised us that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction of one or more participants to whose account the DTC interests in the global security is credited and only in respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of notes as to which such participant or participants has or have given such direction. However, if DTC notifies us that it is unwilling to be a depositary for the global security or ceases to be a clearing agency or there is an event of default under the notes, DTC will exchange the global security for certificated securit.0pt;">

 

 

135

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

Audora

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

775

 

 

 

 

111

 

If,

·       on the 180th day following the earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes, the shelf registration statement has not been declared effective;

·       the registration statement shall cease to be effective or fail to be usable without being succeeded within five business days by a post-effective amendment or a report filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act that cures the failure of the registration statement to be effective or usable; or

140




·       on the 30th day of any period that the prospectus has been suspended as described in the preceding paragraph, such suspension has not been terminated,

(each, a registration default), additional interest as liquidated damages will accrue on the notes, from and including the day following the registration default to but excluding the day on which the registration default has been cured.

Liquidated Damages

Liquidated damages will be paid semi-annually in arrears, with the first semi-annual payment due on the first interest payment date, as applicable, following the date on which such liquidated damages begin to accrue, and will accrue at a rate per year equal to:

 

73

 

 

886

 

 

959

 

 

141

 

 

 

Feb-97

 

 

·       an additional 0.25 percent of the principal amount to and including the 90th day following such registration default; and

·       an additional 0.50 percent of the principal amount from and after the 91st day following such registration default.

In no event will liquidated damages accrue at a rate per year exceeding 0.50 percent. If a holder has exchanged some or all of its notes into common stock, the holder will not be entitled to receive liquidated damages with respect to the principal amount of the notes exchanged.

We have gin:0pt 0pt .0001pt 7.5pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-7.5pt;">Autumn Forest

 

Brown Summit, NC

 

 

1,982

 

 

692

 

 

4,187

 

 

 

 

369

 

 

692

 

 

4,557

 

 

5,248

 

The specific provisions relating to the registration described above are contained in the registration rights agreement that was entered into on the closing of the initial offering of the notes. This summary of the registration rights agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the registration rights agreement.

141




DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

At June 30, 2005, the Partnership had $1,089.0 million of outstanding indebtedness. $767.2 million, or 70%, of our total indebtedness was fixed rate and $321.8 million, or 30%, was variable rate. The following table sets forth information with respect to the Partnership’s total indebtedness at June 30, 2005, adjusted to give effect to the original offering of the notes to the initial purchaser and the use of proceeds therefrom. On a pro forma basis, the Partnership had $1,049.3 million of outstanding indebtedness, $768.1 million, or 73%, of our indebtedness was fixed rate and $281.2 million, or 27%, was variable rate. See “Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data” for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes.

le="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

>

 

 

Amount

 

Average
Rate

 

Average
maturity

 

 

 

(dollars in
thousands)

 

 

 

(in years)

 

Long-term debt: 

129

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009

 

$

83,067

 

 

Beaver Run

 

Linkwood, MD

 

 

615

 

 

 

226

 

5.05

%

 

 

4

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012

 

276,278

 

 

 

1,362

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

226

 

7.35

%

 

 

7

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014

 

 

 

1,383

 

189,522

 

 

5.53

%

 

 

 

1,609

 

 

23

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Belaire

 

9

 

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 to 2031

 

121,641

 

 

7.20

%

Pocatello, ID

 

 

2,090

 

 

566

 

 

3,687

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

566

 

 

3,689

 

 

4,255

 

 

456

 

 

 

Dec-99

 

 

Bermuda Palms

 

Indio, CA

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006(1)

 

108,520

 

 

6.22

%

 

 

1

 

 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2006

 

58,764

 

 

6.17

%

 

 

 

 

 

888

 

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035 (due to ARC)

 

25,780

 

5,145

 

 

 

 

217

 

 

888

 

 

5,362

 

 

6,250

 

 

145

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Big Country

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

6.26

%

 

 

30

 

 

Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025

 

96,600

 

 

 

4,518

 

 

926 

7.50

%

 

 

20

 

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008

 

9,369

 

 

6.18

%

 

 

3

 

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007

 

42,100

 

 

10.22

%

 

 

2

 

 

Floorplan line of credit due 2007

 

35,367

 

 

6.59

%

 

 

5,426

 

 

 

 

602

 

 

926

 

 

6,028

 

 

6,953

 

 

162

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Other loans

 

2,332

 

 

7.70

 

Feb-04

 

 

Birch Meadows

 

Wilton, NY

 

 

1,087

 

%

 

 

3

 

 

Total debt

 

$

1,049,340

 

 

206

 

 

1,159

 

 

 

 

606

 

 

206

 

 

 

6.71

%

 

 

 

 

 


(1)    The senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month periods at our option, and subject to certain conditions.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009

We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $98.9 million was outstanding ($83.1 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009.

142




Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012

We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 on May 2, 2002. It is an obligation of some of our special purpose real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and matures on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $302.3 million was outstanding ($276.3 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014

We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 on February 18, 2004 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $211.9 million was outstanding ($189.5 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014.

Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages Due 2005 Through 2031

We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by specific manufactured home communities and subject to early pre-payment penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are as follows:

(a)    Mortgages assumed and one refinanced as part of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately $46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006 through 2028 and have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%.

(b)   Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.06%.

(c)    Notes assumed in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately $29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.18%.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2006

We entered into the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown Communities acquisition. It is an obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a

143




spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006. At our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance, respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by the lenders to refinance the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. We may repay the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. As of June 30, 2005, $140.5 million was outstanding ($108.5 million on a pro forma basis) under the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006.

Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006

In September 2004, we obtained a revolving credit mortgage facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and is secured by 33 communities that previously secured our prior senior revolving credit facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARC’s IPO. Advances under the revolving credit mortgage facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing the loan. As amended in September 2005, the revolving credit mortgage facility bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005) and has an extended term through September, 2006. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and an additional fee of 0.5% at the amendment date and will pay an advance feeze:7.5pt;">1,765

 

 

1,971

 

 

167

 

 

 

Feb-02

 

Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035 (Due to ARC)

On March 15, 2005, we issued $25.8 million in unsecured trust preferred securities to ARC. The $25.8 million trust preferred securities bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30, 2005). Interest on the securities is paid on the 30th of March, June, September and December of each year. We may redeem these securities on or after March 30, 2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if not redeemed sooner.

 

Birchwood Farms

 

Birch Run, MI

 

 

3,064

 

 

662

 

 

3,817

 

 

 

 

340

 

 

662

 

 

4,157

 

 

4,819

 

 

113

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Blue Ridge MHP

 

Conklin, NY

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

311

 

 

 

 

170

 

 

52

 

 

481

 

 

532

 

 

8

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Blue Valley

 

Manhattan, KS

 

 

983

 

 

84

 

 

496

Consumer Finance Facility Due 2008

We entered into the retail home sales and consumer finance debt facility due in 2006 with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in connection with entering into a two-year secured revolving lease receivables credit facility (see “—Lease Receivables Facility” below). The consumer finance facility, as amended, has a total commitment of $125.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of one of our subsidiaries, and borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing conditional sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR

144




(6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the original committed amount and 0.75% of the amended committed amount and will pay additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional sales contract.

The availability of advances under the consumer finance facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio. As of June 30, 2005, $9.4 million was outstanding under the consumer finance facility.

Lease Receivables Facility Due 2008

On April 6, 2005, we obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving credit facility, or the lease receivables facility, with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, to be used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and for general corporate purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the facility increased to $150 million effective October 14, 2005.

This facility is an obligation of two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP, or, collectively, Housing. Borrowings under the lease receivables facility are secured by an assignment of all lease receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii)pt;width:4.9pt;">

 

 

 

 

< increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. The fee charged by the lender in connection with the amendment was 0.5%, or $750,000. The ability to access funding under the amended facility is conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent set forth in the amendment.

Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional collateral for the facility.

Floorplan Line Of Credit Due 2007

In August 2004, we amended our floorplan line of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due

145




upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended line of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended line of credit requires us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million, all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the line of credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit is subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and an early termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination date. As of June 30, 2005, $43.9 million was outstanding ($35.4 million on a pro forma basis) on the floorplan line of credit.

DESCRIPTION OF ARC CAPITAL STOCK AND PARTNERSHIP UNITS

The following is a summary of the material terms of the capital stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and the partnership units of the Partnership. Copies of ARC’s charter and its Amended and Restated Bylaws are filed as exhibits to ARC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005. A copy of the Partnership’s Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

General

ARC’s charter provides that it may issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 41,027,689 shares have been issued and are outstanding as of October 21, 2005; 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 5,750,000 shares have been classified as 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock, of which 5,000,000 shares are issued and outstanding as of October 21, 2005; and 5,252,876 shares of special voting stock, par value $.01 per share, of which 3,527,896 shares have been issued and are outstanding as of October 21, 2005. Under Maryland law, ARC’s stockholders generally are not liable for ARC’s debts or obligations.

Common Stock

All shares of ARC common stock outstanding are duly authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of ARC common stock are entitled to receive dividends when authorized by ARC’s board of directors out of assets legally available for the payment of dividends and declared by ARC. They are also entitled to share ratably in ARC’s assets legally available for distribution to ARC’s stockholders in the event of ARC’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after payment of or adequate provision for all of ARC’s known debts and liabilities. These rights are subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of ARC’s stock and to the provisions of ARC’s charter regarding restrictions on transfer of ARC’s stock.

Subject to ARC’s charter restrictions on transfer of ARC’s stock, each outstanding share of ARC common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of ARC stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, including the special voting stock described below, the holders of ARC common stock will possess the exclusive voting power of ARC. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Holders of ARC common stock have no preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund, redemption or appraisal rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any of ARC’s securities. Subject to ARC’s charter restrictions on transfer of stock, all shares of common stock will have equal dividend, liquidation and other rights.

146




Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast at least two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Except for the amendment of the provisions of ARC’s charter relating to the removal of directors and amendment of the charter, ARC’s charter provides for approval of these matters by a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast. Maryland law permits a corporation to transfer all or substantially all of its assets without the approval of the stockholders of the corporation to one or more persons if 90% or more of the equity interests of the person or persons are owned, directly or indirectly, by the corporation. In addition, because operating assets may be held by a corporation’s subsidiaries, as in ARC’s situation, these subsidiaries may be able to transfer all or substantially all of such assets without a vote of ARC’s stockholders.

Restricted Stock Grants

During 2004 ARC granted to some of its executive officers 95,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted shares were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional 37,500 shares of restricted common stock were forfeited pursuant to the terms of their issuance. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, 3,000 of these shares vested. In April 2005, the ARC board of directors font size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:7.5pt;">2,620

 

 

84

 

 

3,116

 

 

3,200

 

 

734

 

 

 

May-99

 

 

Bluebonnet Estates

 

Temple, TX

 

 

 

 

204

 

 

1,185

 

 

 

 

1,811

 

 

204

 

 

2,996

 

 

3,200

 

 

474

 

 

All shares, vested and unvested, are entitled to receive dividends and to vote unless forfeited.

ARC considers the number of vested shares issued under its 2003 equity incentive plan as common stock outstanding and includes them in the denominator of its calculation of basic earnings per share. ARC also considers the total number of restricted shares granted under our 2003 equity incentive plan in the denominator of our calculation of diluted earnings per share if they are dilutive. ARC returns shares forfeited to the 2003 equity incentive plan as shares eligible for future grant and adjusts any compensation expense previously recorded on such shares in the period the forfeiture occurs.

Special Voting Stock

We and ARC have entered into a pairing agreement pursuant to which each of our 1,830,961 partnership units issued in connection with ARC’s 2002 reorganization was issued as part of a paired unit that includes 1.9268 shares of ARC special voting stock. Each of the paired units is currently exchangeable by its holder for cash, or, at ARC’s election, one share of ARC common stock, and each paired unit entitles its holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of ARC’s stockholders who have voting rights generally. Collectively, our limited partners who hold these paired units and ARC common stock have approximately 5.2% of the total voting power of ARC common stock at June 30, 2005. A holder of special voting stock is not entitled to any regular or special dividend payments or other distributions, including any dividends or other distributions declared or paid with respect to shares of ARC common stock or any of ARC’s other stock, and is not entitled to receive any distributions in the event of liquidation or dissolution. The holders of special voting stock have no class voting rights except as specifically set forth in our charter.

ARC may not issue any additional shares of special voting stock in the future unless such shares are paired with common partnership units. ARC does not intend to issue any additional shares of its special voting stock. Upon any redemption of a partnership unit that is paired with a share of special voting stock

147




in accordance with the redemption provisions of our partnership agreement, the share of special voting stock will be cancelled and will become reclassified as an authorized but unissued share of special voting stock.

Preferred Stock

General

Under ARC’s charter, ARC’s board of directors is authorized without further stockholder action to provide for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, with such terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption in each case, if any, as permitted by Maryland law and as shall be set forth in resolutions providing for the issue of preferred stock adopted by ARC’s board of directors.

8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

The Articles Supplementary adopted by ARC’s board of directors creating ARC’s Series A preferred stock sets forth the number and fixes the terms, designations, powers, preferences, rights, limitations and restrictions of a series of ARC preferred stock classified as 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock. ARC designated up to 5,750,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares of which were issued in connection with the IPO. ARC’s Series A preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “ARC Pr A.” ARC’s Series A preferred stock has the following terms:

·       a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share;

·       ranks senior to ARC common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation;

·       subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of senior stock, is entitled to receive, when and as authorized by ARC’s board of directors and declared by ARC, out of funds legally available for payment thereof, cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 8.25% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference (equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.0625 per share);

·       source of funds for dividends on ARC’s Series A preferred stock is distributions paid on the Partnership’s Series A preferred units;

·       not redeemable prior to February 18, 2009, except in certain limited circumstances relating to maintaining ARC’s ability to qualify as a REIT as described below in “—ARC’s Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer;”

·       redeemable in whole or from time to time in part, on and after February 18, 2009, by ARC, at its option, to the extent permitted by law, at a cash redemption price equal to $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated dividends;

·       does not have any voting rights, except in limited circumstances, including where ARC has not been current on payment of dividends for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive; and

·       is not convertible into or exchangeable for any of ARC’s other property or securities.

Warrants

On August 9, 2000, ARC issued 1,250,000 warrants, each giving its holder the right to purchase one share of ARC common stock at an exercise price of $11.70 per share. On January 23, 2004, in preparation for the IPO, ARC effected a 0.519-for-1 reverse split of ARC common stock. On May 23, 2005, ARC declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.1875 per share of ARC common stock that was paid on

148




July 15, 2005 to holders of record of ARC common stock at the close of business on June 30, 2005. As a result of these events, pursuant to the terms of the warrants, effective immediately following payment of the dividend, the exercise price per share of ARC common stock under the outstanding warrants to purchase ARC common stock was adjusted to $18.103 and the total number of shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exercise of all of such warrants was adjusted to 807,877. The warrants expire if not exercised prior to 5:00 PM, New York City time, on July 23, 2010.

ARC’s Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer

For ARC to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value of ARC’s outstanding shares of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of a taxable year, and ARC’s shares of stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Because its board of directors believes that it is essential for ARC to continue to qualify as a REIT and to provide additional protection for its stockholders in the event of certain transactions, ARC’s board has adopted, and the stockholders have approved, provisions of ARC’s charter restricting the acquisition of shares of ARC’s stock in order to assist ARC in maintaining its REIT qualifications under circumstances that could cause ARC to violate the foregoing requirements.

Subject to certain exceptions specified in ARC’s charter, no individual may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of various attribution and constructive ownership provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 7.3% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of ARC common stock or more than 7.3% in value of the outstanding shares of ARC’s capital stock, other than with respect to Gerald J. Ford and certain affiliated parties for whom the aggregate limit was set by the board of directors of ARC on May 23, 2005 at 19.9%. ARC’s charter further prohibits (i) any individual from owning shares of its stock that would result in ARC being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise cause ARC to fail to qualify as a REIT, (ii) any individual from transferring shares of its stock if the transfer would result in its stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons and (iii) any individual from owning shares of its stock that would result in non U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of its stock. Any person who acquires or intends to acquire shares of ARC’s stock that may violate any of these restrictions, or who is the intended transferee of shares of its stock which are transferred to a trust, as discussed below, is required to give ARC immediate notice and provide ARC with such information as ARC may request in order to determine the effect of the transfer on ARC’s status as a REIT.

ARC’s board of directors may waive the 7.3% ownership limit if evidence satisfactory to it is presented that such ownership will not then or in the future result in ARC being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of its stock or otherwise result in its failing to qualify as a REIT. In order to be considered by the board for exemption, an individual also must not own and must represent that it will not own, directly or indirectly, an interest in a tenant of ARC’s (or a tenant of any entity which ARC owns or controls) that would cause ARC to own, directly or indirectly, more than a 9.8% interest in the tenant. The individual also must agree that any violation or attempted violation of these restrictions will result in the automatic transfer of the shares of stock causing the violation to the trust. As a condition of such waiver,eak-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

Jul-01

 

 

Breazeale

 

Laramie, WY

 

 

3,250

 

If any issuance or transfer of ARC’s stock would cause the outstanding shares of its stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, such issuance or transfer will be null and void, and the

149




intended transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Any attempted transfer of ARC’s stock which, if effective, would result in any individual owning shares of its stock in excess of the 7.3% ownership limit, or would result in ARC being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, would result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of ARC’s stock or would otherwise result in ARC failing to qualify as a REIT, will cause the number of shares causing the violation (rounded to the nearest whole share) to be automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more qualifying charitable organizations to be designated by ARC and the intended transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Shares transferred to such trust will remain outstanding, and the trustee of the trust will have all voting and dividend rights pertaining to such shares. Any dividend or other distribution paid prior to ARC’s discovery that shares of stock have been transferred to the trust will be paid by the recipient to the trustee upon demand. Any dividend or distribution paid to the trustee will be held in trust for the charitable beneficiary. Subject to Maryland law, the trustee will have the authority (1) to rescind as void any vote cast by the intended transferee prior to ARC’s discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and (2) .0pt;"> 

488

 

 

2,813

 

 

 

 

71

 

Within 20 days of receiving notice from ARC that shares of stock have been transferred to the trust, the trustee of such trust shall sell such shares to a person whose ownership of such shares does not violate the 7.3% or other applicable limitations. Upon a sale of such shares by the trustee, the interest of the charitable beneficiary will terminate, and the sales proceeds would be paid, first, to the original intended transferee, to the extent of the lesser of (1) such transferee’s original purchase price (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and (2) the price received by the trustee, and, second, to the charitable beneficiary, to the extent of any sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the original intended transferee. In addition, shares of stock held in such trust are purchasable by ARC until the trustee has sold the shares at a price equal to the lesser of the price paid for the stock by the original intended transferee (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and the market price for the stock on the date that ARC determines to purchase the stock. Upon such sale to ARC, the interest of the trust in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds to the original intended transferee.

All certificates representing shares of ARC common stock and ARC’s Series A preferred stock bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above. For purposes of the foregoing discussion, shares of special voting stock that are at any time held in trust as a result of the excess share provisions of ARC’s charter shall include any of our partnership units paired therewith.

All persons who own more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Internal Revenue Code or the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder) in the aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of ARC’s stock, excluding special voting stock, must give written notice containing the information specified in ARC’s charter within 30 days after the end of each taxable year, which is December 31. In addition, each stockholder shall upon demand be required to disclose to ARC in writing such information with respect to the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as ARC’s board of directors deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to a REIT or to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental agency.

The ownership limitations may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of ARC by a third party unless ARC’s board of directors determines that maintenance of REIT status is no longer in its best interests.

150




Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for ARC common stock and ARC Series A preferred stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Partnership Units

Series C Partnership Preferred Partnership Units

The Partnership currently has outstanding 705,688 units of Series C preferred partnership units, or Series C PPUs. The Partnership’s Series B and Series D preferred partnership units were redeemed in July 2005 and July 2004, respectively. The Partnership’s Series C PPUs have the following terms:

·       rank senior to the common partnership units as to the payment of distributions and as to the distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up;

·       subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are entitled to receive quarterly cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum;

·    ">

 

488

 

 

2,884

 

 

3,371

 

 

79

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Brittany Place

 

Topeka, KS

 

 

859

 

 

243

 

 

1,449

 

 

 

 

209

 

 

243

 

 

1,658

 

 

1,901

 

 

198

 

 

 

Jul-97

 

 

Broadmore

 

Goshen, IN

 

 

5,750

 

 

1,297

 

 

7,777

 

 

subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are entitled to a liquidation preference per Series C PPU of $25.00 per unit, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions;

·       may not be redeemed at the Partnership’s option prior to July 30, 2009; on or after such date, the Partnership has the right to redeem the Series C PPUs, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption;

·       at any time after January 1, 2007, any holder of Series C PPUs has the right to require the Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the Series C PPUs held by such holder in exchange for one-eighth of the redemption price in cash and the balance in a negotiable note, bearing interest at a rate of 7% per annum;

·       exchangeable for ARC common stock in some circumstances; and

·       no voting rights or right to consent to any matter.

Common Partnership Units

The 5.2% ownership interest in the Partnership that is not held by ARC as of June 30, 2005 represents outstand style="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

856

 

 

1,297

 

 

8,633

 

 

9,929

 

 

252

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Brookshire Village

Holders of the Partnership’s OP units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available cash (i) first, with respect to any OP units that are entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any OP units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests).

151




CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following discussion is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties, and was written to support the promotion or marketing of the offering described herein. Each investor should seek advice based on such person’s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consont size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

House Springs, MO

 

 

2,135

 

 

657

 

 

4,015

 

 

 

 

457

 

 

657

 

 

4,472

 

 

5,129

 

 

276

 

 

 

Feb-03

 

 

Brookside

 

West Jordan, UT

 

 

3,145

 

 

795

 

 

4,505

 

 

 

 

780

 

 

795

 

 

5,285

 

 

6,080

 

·       U.S. expatriates;

·       persons who mark-to-market the notes or common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes;

·       subchapter S corporations;

·       U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;

·       financial institutions;

·       insurance companies;

·       broker-dealers;

·       regulated investment companies;

·       trusts and estates;

·       holders who receive the notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation;

·       persons holding the notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion transaction,” “synthetic security” or other integrated investment;

·       persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;

·       persons holding their interest through a partnership or similar pass-through entity;

·       width="7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">

 

606

 

 

 

Oct-01

 

 

Brookside Village

 

Berwick, PA

 

 

1,848

 

 

423

 

 

2,601

 

 

 

 

173

 

 persons holding a 10% or more (by vote or value) beneficial interest in ARC or The Partnership;

152




and, except to the extent discussed below:

·       tax-exempt organizations; and

·       non-U.S. Holders (as defined below).

In addition, this summary does not discuss any non-federal, state, or local tax considerations. This summary deals only with investors who purchase the notes as part of the initial offering for the issue price (as discussed below), and assumes that investors will hold their notes and ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) under the Internal Revenue Code.

Investors considering the purchase of notes should consult their tax advisors with respect to the application of the U.S. federal income tax laws to their particular situations as well as any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means any beneficial owner of a note, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, other than an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, (iv) a trust if (A) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (B) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (v) certain eligible trusts that elect to be taxed as U.S. Persons under applicable Treasury Regulations. As used herein, the term “Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of a note, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, that is not a U.S. Holder.

If a partnership (including for this purpose any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, the treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A holder of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, that is a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, holding and disposing of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note.

U.S. Holders of the Notes

Interest.   If the issue price of a note is less than its stated redemption price at maturity, then the note will be treated as being issued with original issue discount, or OID, for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless the difference between the note’s issue price and its stated redemption price at maturity is less than a statutory de minimis amount (1¤4 of 1 percent of the stated redemption price at maturity of the note times the number of complete years from issuance to maturity). Generally, the “issue price” of a note is the first price at which a substantial amount of the notes is sold to purchasers other than bond houses, brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers. The “stated redemption price at maturity” of a note is the total of all payments to be made under the note other than qualified stated interest (generally, stated interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or property at least annually at a single fixed rate or at certain floating rates that properly take into account the length of the interval between stated interest payments) and, in this case, is expected to equal the principal amount of the note.

It is anticipated that the difference, if any, between the issue price and the stated redemption price at maturity of the notes will be less than the statutory de minimis amount and that the notes, therefore, will not be treated as having been issued with OID. Thus, rather than being characterized as interest, such

153




difference should be characterized as if it were gain from the sale of the notes and must be included in income as principal payments are received on the notes (based on the proportion of the principal payments received to the original principal amount of the notes).

The remaining discussion assumes that the notes have not been issued with OID equal to or in excess of the statutory de minimis amount.

Payments of Stated Interest.   Stated interest on a note without OID generally will be included in the income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income at the time such interest is received or accrued, in accordance with the U.S. Holder’s regular method of tax accounting.

Market Discount.   If a U.S. Holder purchases a note after original issue for an amount that is less than its stated redemption price at maturity, such U.S. Holder will be treated as having purchased such note at a “market discount,” unless such market discount is less than a de minimis amount (1¤4 of 1 percent of the stated redemption price of the note at maturity times the number of complete years to maturity after the U.S. Holder acquires the note). Under the market discount rules, a U.S. Holder will be required to treat any partial principal payment on a note, or any gain realized on the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a note, as ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of (i) the amount of such payment or realized gain or (ii) the market discount which has not previously been included in income and is treated as having accrued on such note at the time of such payment or disposition. Market discount will be considered to accrue ratably during the period from the date of acquisition to the maturity date of the note, unless the U.S. Holder elects to accrue market discount on a constant yield basis. Once made, such an election may be revoked only with the consent of the IRS and, therefore, should only be made in consultation with a tax advisor.

A U.S. Holder may be required to defer the deduction of all or a portion of the interest paid or accrued on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase or carry a note with market discount until the maturity of the note or certain earlier dispositions, because a current deduction is only allowed to the extent that the interest expense exceeds the portion of market discount allocable to the days during the taxable year in which the note was held by the taxpayer. A U.S. Holder may elect to include market discount in income currently as it accrues (on either a ratable or constant yield basis), in which case the rules described above regarding the treatment as ordinary income of gain upon the disposition of the note and upon the receipt of certain cash payments and regarding the deferral of interest deductions will not apply. Generally, such currently included market discount is treated as ordinary interest for federal income tax purposes. Such an election will apply to all debt instruments with market discount acquired by the U.S. Holder on or after the first day of the taxable year to which such election applies and may be revoked only with the consent of the IRS. The election, therefore, should only be made in consultation with a tax advisor.

Amortizable Bond Premium.   If a U.S. Holder purchases a debt instrument for an amount that is greater than the sum of all amounts payable on the debt instrument after the purchase date, other than payments of qualified stated interest, such U.S. Holder will be considered to have purchased the debt instrument with “amortizable bond premium,” generally equal in amount to such excess. However, in the case of a debt instrument that may be redeemed prior to maturity at the option of the issuer (such as the notes), the amount of amortizable bond premium is determined by substituting the first date on which the debt instrument may be redeemed (the “redemption date”) for the maturity date and the applicable redemption price on the redemption date for the amount payable at maturity, if the result would maximize the U.S. Holder’s yield to maturity (i.e., result in a smaller amount of amortizable bond premium properly allocable to the period before the redemption date). If the issuer does not in fact exercise its right to redeem the debt instrument on the applicable redemption date, the debt instrument will be treated (solely for purposes of the amortizable bond premium rules) as having matured and then as having been reissued for the U.S. Holder’s “adjusted acquisition price,” which is>

423

 

 

2,774

 

 

3,197

 

 

44

 

154




the debt instrument (as determined under the applicable Treasury Regulations), less the sum of (i) any amortizable bond premium allocable to prior accrual periods and (ii) any payments previously made on the debt instrument (other than payments of qualified stated interest). The debt instrument deemed to have been reissued will again be subject to the amortizable bond premium rules with respect to the remaining dates on which the debt instrument is redeemable.

A U.S. Holder may elect to amortize bond premium on a debt instrument. Once made, the election applies to all taxable deb0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Brookside Village

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

6,536

 

 

1,674

 

 

8,592

 

 

 

 

1,639

 

 

1,674

 

 

10,231

 

 

11,905

 

 

290

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Burntwood

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

5,196

 

 

1,509

 

 

5,185

 

 

 

 

839

 

 

1,509

Election to Include All Interest in Income Using a Constant Yield Method.   All U.S. Holders may generally, upon election, include in income all interest (including stated interest, acquisition discount, original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market discount, de minimis market discount, and unstated interest, as adjusted by any amortizable bond premium or acquisition premium) that accrues on a debt instrument by using the constant yield method applicable to original issue discount, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. Because this election will affect how the U.S. Holder treats debt instruments other than the notes, it should be made only in consultation with a tax advisor.

Disposition of the Notes.   Upon the sale, exchange (including an exchange for cash and any ARC common stock), redemption, repurchase, retirement or other disposition of a note, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash proceeds and the fair market value of any property (including ARC common stock) received on the disposition (except to the extent such amount is attributable to accrued but unpaid stated interest, which is taxable as ordinary income if not previously included in such holder’s income) and (ii) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the note. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in a note generally will equal the cost of the note to such Holder (i) increased by any accrued market discount if the U.S. Holder has included the accrued market discount in income and (ii) decreased by (A) the amount of any payments, other than qualified stated interest payments, received, and (B) amortizable bond premium taken, with respect to such note. Capital gain or loss recognized upon the disposition of a note will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the note was held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains to non-corporate U.S. Holders is generally 15% (for taxable years through December 31, 2008). The deductibility of capital losses may be subject to limitations.

Upon the exchange of a note for cash and ARC common stock, if any, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in any ARC common stock received equal to the fair market value of such ARC common stock at the time of the exchange. The U.S. Holder’s holding period for any ARC common stock received upon an exchange of notes will begin on the date immediately following the date of such exchange.

Adjustments to Exchange Rate.   The exchange rate is subject to adjustment under specified circumstances. Although it is not clear how or to what extent Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable Treasury regulations would apply to the notes because the notes are issued by The Partnership, rather than ARC, it is possible that the IRS would seek to apply Section 305 to the notes. If

155




Section 305 were applicable, a holder of notes would, in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution of ARC common stock if and to the extent that the exchange rate is adjusted, resulting in ordinary income to the extent of ARC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Adjustments to the exchange rate made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula which has the effect of preventing the dilution of the interest of the holders of the debt instruments will generally not be deemed to result in a constructive distribution of ARC common stock. Certain of the possible adjustments provided in the notes (including, without limitation, adjustments in respect of taxable dividends to ARC’s stockholders) do not qualify as being made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula. If such adjustments are made, we intend to take the position that you will be deemed to have received constructive distributions from ARC, even though you have not received any cash or property as a result of such adjustments. The tax consequences of the receipt of a distribution from ARC are described below under “—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders” and “—Taxation of Tax-Exempt U.S. Stockholders.”

Even if an adjustment to the exchange rate were not to result in a taxable constructive distribution to a holder of notes under Section 305 because the notes are issued by The Partnership rather than ARC, it is possible that the IRS could assert that, under principles similar to those of Section 305, a holder should recognize taxable income, which might be considered interest and that you should include such interest in income upon the adjustment to the exchange rate or, alternatively, accrue such interest prior to such adjustment.

Non-U.S. Holders of the Notes

The rules governing the U.S. federal income taxation of a Non-U.S. Holder are complex and no attempt will be made herein to provide more than a summary of such rules. Non size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

6,024

 

 

7,533

 

 

707

 

 

 

Oct-97

 

 

Bush Ranch

 

Interest.   A Non-U.S. Holder holding the notes on its own behalf generally will be exempt from U.S. federal income and withholding taxes on payments of interest on a note so long as such payments are not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, unless, in the case of interest payments, such Non-U.S. Holder is a direct or indirect 10% or greater partner (as defined in section 871(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code) in The Partnership, a controlled foreign corporation related to The Partnership or a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business.

In order for a Non-U.S. Holder that is an individual or corporation (or entity treated as such for U.S. federal income tax purposes) to qualify for the exemption from taxation, the “withholding agent” (generally, the last U.S. payor or a non-U.S. payor who is a qualified intermediary or withholding foreign partnership) must have received a statement (generally made on IRS Form W-8BEN) from the individual or corporation that: (i) is signed under penalties of perjury by the beneficial owner of the note, (ii) certifies that such owner is not a U.S. Holder and (iii) provides the beneficial owner’s name and address. Certain securities clearing organizations and other entities that are not beneficial owners, may provide a signed statement accompanied by a copy of the beneficial owner’s IRS Form W-8BEN to the withholding agent. An IRS Form W-8BEN is generally effective for the remainder of the year of signature plus three full calendar years unless a change in circumstances renders any information on the form incorrect. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a W-8BEN with a U.S. taxpayer identification number will remain effective until a change in circumstances makes any information on the form incorrect, provided that the withholding agent reports at least annually to the beneficial owner. The beneficial owner must inform the withholding agent within 30 days of such change and furnish a new IRS Form W-8BEN. A Non-U.S. Holder that is not an individual or corporation (or an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding the notes on its own behalf may have substantially increased reporting requirements and should consult its tax advisor.

156




To the extent that interest income with respect to a note is not exempt from the United States tax as described above, a Non-U.S. Holder may still be able to eliminate or reduce such taxes under an applicable income tax treaty.

House Springs, MO

 

 

751

 

 

101

 

 

601

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

101

 

 

676

 

 

777

 

 

132

Disposition of the Notes.   Any gain realized on the sale, redemption, exchange, repurchase, (including an exchange for cash and any ARC common stock), retirement or other taxable disposition of a note by a Non-U.S. Holder (except to the extent such amount is attributable to accrued but unpaid stated interest, which would be taxable as described under the preceding two paragraphs) will be exempt from U.S. federal income and withholding taxes so long as: (i) the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, (ii) in the case of a foreign individual, the Non-U.S. Holder is not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year, and (iii) the notes do not constitute “U.S. real property interests” within the meaning of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, or FIRPTA.

Although the applicable rules are not entirely clear, we intend to take the position that the notes constitute “U.S. real property interests” and, accordingly, that U.S. federal withholding tax applies under FIRPTA to any redemption, repurchase or exchange of the notes (including an exchange of a note for cash and any ARC common stock). Therefore, we intend to withhold 10% of any amounts payable on the redemption, or repurchase or exchange by us of a note (including an exchange of a note for cash and any ARC common stock). Further, any other sale or disposition of a note may be subject to U.S. federal income tax withholding.

You are urged to consult your tax advisor as to whether the sale, redemption, repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA if (i) the ARC common stock are part of a class of stock that is regularly traded on and established securities market and you held notes that, on the date of their acquisition, had a fair market value of 5 percent or less of the fair market value of the ARC common stock, or (ii) ARC is a domestically-controlled REIT. ARC will be a domestically-controlled REIT if at all times during a specified testing period it is a REIT and less than 50% in value of the ARC’s shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. ARC believes that it currently is a domestically-controlled REIT, but because its common stock is publicly traded, there can be no assurance that it in fact is qualified or will continue to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT. If a sale, redemption, repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA, any amounts withheld from such payments to you may be refunded or credited against your federal income tax liability, if any, if you file with the IRS, on a timely basis, the required IRS forms.

Adjustments to Exchange Rate.   The exchange rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Any such adjustment could, in certain circumstances, give rise to a deemed distribution or additional interest payment to Non-U.S. Holders of the notes. See “—United States Holders—AdjustTimes New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

Jan-00

 

 

Camelot

 

Salt Lake City, UT

 

In the case of a deemed distribution or additional interest payment, because such deemed distributions will not give rise to any cash from which any applicable U.S. federal withholding tax can be satisfied, the indenture provides that we may set off any withholding tax that we are required to collect with respect to any such deemed distribution or payment against cash payments of interest or from cash or shares of ARC common stock otherwise deliverable to a holder upon an exchange of notes or a redemption or repurchase of a note.

Except to the extent that an applicable income tax treaty otherwise provides, a Non-U.S. Holder whose gain or interest income with respect to a note is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by such Non-U.S. Holder, although exempt from the withholding tax

157



 

12,127

 

 

1,927

 

 

10,957

 

 

 

 

1,006

 

 

1,927

 

 

11,963

 

 

13,890

 

 


previously discussed if an appropriate statement is furnished, will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain or interest income at regular U.S. federal income tax rates, as if the holder were a U.S. person, provided that the holder files an IRS Form W-8ECI. In addition, if the Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30 percent of its “dividend equivalent amount” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code for the taxable year, subject to adjustment, unless it qualifies for a lower rate under an applicable tax treaty.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting requirements and back-up withholding at the applicable rate will apply to payments on a note (including stated interest payments and payments of the proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption, repurchase, retirement or other disposition of a note), unless the holder of the note (i) is a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates that fact or (ii) provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies as to its exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Certain penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a holder that is required to supply information but does not do so in the proper manner.

Information reporting requirements and backup withholding generally will not apply to payments on a note to a Non-U.S. Holder if the statement described in “Non-U.S. Holders of the Notes” is duly provided by such Holder, provided that the Withholding Agent does not have actual knowledge that the Holder is a United States person. Information reporting requirements and backup withholding will not apply to any payment of the proceeds of the sale of a note effected outside the United States by a foreign office of a “broker” (as defined in applicable Treasury Regulations), unless such broker (i) is a United States person, (ii) derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, (iii) is a controlled foreign corporation as to the United States or (iv) is a U.S. branch of a foreign bank or a foreign insurance company. Payment of the proceeds of any such sale effected outside the United States by a foreign office of any broker that is described in (i), (ii) or (iii) of the preceding sentence will not be subject to backup withholding, but will be subject to the information reporting requirements unless such broker has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner is a Non-U.S. Holder and certain other conditions are met, or the beneficial owner otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of any such sale to or through the United States office of a broker is subject to information reporting and backup withholding requirements, unless the beneficial owner of the note provides the statement described in “—Non-U.S. Holders of the Notes” or otherwise establishes an exemption.

Any amount withheld from a payment to a holder of a note under the backup withholding rules is allowable as a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (which might entitle such holder to a refund), provided that such holder furnishes the required information to the IRS.

Taxation of ARC

ARC has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998. ARC believes that it has been organized and has operated in a manner which allows it to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998, and it intends to continue to be organized and operate in such a manner.

ARC has received the opinion of Skadden to the effect that commegn="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">

2,073

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Carnes Crossing

 

Summerville, SC

 

 

10,000

 

 

1,979

158




REIT. It must be emphasized that the opinion of Skadden is based on various assumptions relating to the organization and operation of ARC, and is conditioned upon representations and covenants made by the management of ARC and affiliated entities regarding its organization, assets, and the past, present and future conduct of its business operations. While ARC believes that it is qualified and operated as a REIT, and intends to continue to operate so that it will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in the circumstances of ARC, no assurance can be given by Skadden or ARC that ARC will so qualify for any particular year. Skadden will have no obligation to advise ARC or the holders of ARC common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed, or of any subsequent change in the applicable law. You should be aware that opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions set forth in such opinions.

Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on the ability of ARC to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual operating results, distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code, the compliance with which will not be reviewed by Skadden. ARC’s ability to qualify as a REIT also requires that it satisfy certain asset tests, some of which depend upon the fair market values of assets directly or indirectly owned by ARC. Such values may not be susceptible to a p6.0pt;">

 

 

11,550

 

 

Taxation of REITs in General

As indicated above, qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon ARC’s ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code. The material qualification requirements are summarized below, under “—Requirements for Qualification—General.” While ARC intends to continue to operate so that it qualifies as a REIT, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge ARC’s qualification as a REIT or that it will be able to operate in accordance with the REIT requirements in the future. See “—Failure to Qualify.”

Provided that ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will generally be entitled to a deduction for dividends that it pays and, therefore, will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its net income that is currently distributed to our stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” at the corporate and stockholder levels that results generally from investment in a corporation. Rather, income generated by a REIT generally is taxed only at the stockholder level, upon a distribution of dividends by the REIT.

For tax years through 2008, stockholders who are individual U.S. stockholders (as defined below) are generally taxed on corporate dividends at a maximum rate of 15% (the same as long-term capital gains), thereby substantially reducing, though not completely eliminating, the double taxation that has historically applied to corporate dividends. With limited exceptions, however, dividends received by individual U.S. stockholders (as defined below) from ARC or from other entities that are taxed as REITs will continue to be taxed at rates applicable to ordinary income, which will be as high as 35% through 2010.

 

 

604

 

 

1,979

 

 

12,154

 

 

14,133

 

 

338

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Carriage Court Central

Net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT generally do not pass through to the stockholders of the REIT, subject to special rules for certain items, such as capital gains, recognized by REITs.

159




If ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will nonetheless be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances:

·       It will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed net taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains;

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

2,082

 

 

420

 

 

2,142

 

 

 

 

62

 

 

420

 

 

2,204

·       It may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on our items of tax preference, if any;

·       If it has net income from prohibited transactions, which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a 100% tax. See “—Prohibited Transactions,” and “—Foreclosure Property,” below;

·       If it elects to treat property that it acquires in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or from certain leasehold terminations as “foreclosure property,” we may thereby avoid (a) the 100% tax on gain from a resale of that property (if the sale would otherwise constitute a prohibited transaction) and (b) the inclusion of any income from such property not qualifying for purposes of the REIT gross income tests discussed below, but the income from the sale or operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest applicable rate (currently 35%);

·       If it fails to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but nonetheless maintains its qualification as a REIT because other requirements are met, it will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the greater of (1) the amount by which it fails the 75% gross income test or (2) the amount by which it fails the 95% gross income test (for its taxable year ended December 31, 2004, the amount by which 90% of its gross income exceeds the amount qualifying under the 95% gross income test), as the case may be, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability;

·       Commencing with its taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if it fails to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests, as described below, by larger than a de minimis amount, but its failure is due to reasonable cause and it nonetheless maintains its REIT qualification because of specified cure provisions, it will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate (currently 35%) of the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it failed to satisfy the asset tests;

·       Commencing " style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.55pt;">

 

 

2,624

 

 

220

 

 

 

May-98

 

 

Carriage Court East

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

·       If it fails to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, or the “required distribution,” it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of (1) the amounts actually distributed (taking into account excess distributions from prior years), plus (2) retained amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level;

·       It may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if it fails to meet record-keeping requirements intended to monitor its compliance with rules relating to the composition of its stockholders, as described below in “—Requirements for Qualification—General;”

160




·       A 100% excise tax may be imposed on some items of income and expense that are directly or constructively paid between ARC and its “taxable REIT subsidiaries&tom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:35.25pt;">

2,139

 

 

444

 

 

2,318

 

 

 

·       If it acquires appreciated assets from a corporation that is not a REIT in a transaction in which the adjusted tax basis of the assets in its hands is determined by reference to the adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of the non-REIT corporation, it will be subject to tax on such appreciation at the highest corporate income tax rate then applicable if it subsequently recognizes gain on a disposition of any such assets during the 10-year period following their acquisition from the non-REIT corporation. The results described in this paragraph assume that the non-REIT corporation will not elect, in lieu of this treatment, to be subject to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired by ARC;

·       It may elect to retain and pay income tax on its net long-term capital gain. In that case, a stockholder would include its proportionate share of ARC’s undistributed long-term capital gain (to the extent it makes a timely designation of such gain to the stockholder) in its income, would be deemed to have paid the tax that ARC paid on such gain, and would be allowed a credit for its proportionate share of the tax deemed to have been paid, and an adjustment would be made to increase the stockholder’s basis in ARC common stock; and

·       It may have subsidiaries or own interests in other lower-tier entities that are subchapter C corporations, the earnings of which could be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax.

In addition, ARC and its subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes other than U.S. federal income tax, including payroll taxes and state, local, and foreign income, property;"> 

150

 

 

444

 

 

2,468

 

 

2,912

 

Requirements for Qualification—General

The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

(1)         that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2)         the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;

(3)         that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the special Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to REITs;

(4)         that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;

(5)         the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;

(6)         in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include specified entities);

(7)         which meets other tests described below, including with respect to the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its distributions; and

(8)        style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">

 

239

 

 

 

161




The Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable year, and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Conditions (5) and (6) do not need to be satisfied for the first taxable year for which an election to become a REIT has been made. ARC’s charter provides restrictions regarding the ownership and transfer of its shares, which are intended to assist in satisfying the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6) above. For purposes of condition (6), an “individual” generally includes a supplemental unemployment compensation benefit plan, a private foundation or a portion of a trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes, but does not include a qualified pension plan or profit sharing trust.

To monitor compliance with the share ownership requirements, ARC is generally required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of its shares. To do so, ARC must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of its stock, in which the record holders are to disclose the actual owners of the shares, i.e., the persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid by ARC. A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand must be maintained as part of its records. Failure by ARC to comply with these record-keeping requirements could subject it to monetary penalties. If ARC satisfies these requirements and has no reason to know that condition (6) is not satisfied, it will be deemed to have satisfied such conditiont-size:7.5pt;letter-spacing:-.05pt;">May-98

 

 

Carsons

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

944

 

 

231

 

 

1,391

 

 

 

 

20

 

In addition, a corporation may not qualify as a REIT unless its taxable year is the calendar year. ARC has and will continue to have a calendar taxable year.

Effect of Subsidiary Entities

Ownership of Partnership Interests.   In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, Treasury regulations provide that the REIT is deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnership’s assets and to earn its proportionate share of the partnership’s gross income based on its pro rata share of capital interest in the partnership for purposes of the asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs, as described below. However, solely for purposes of the 10% value test, described below, the determination of a REIT’s interest in partnership assets will be based on the REIT’s proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership, excluding for these purposes, certain excluded securities as described in the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, the assets and gross income of the partnership generally are deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, the proportionate share of ARC of the assets and items of income of partnerships in which it owns an equity interest is treated as its assets and items of income for purposes of applying the REIT requirements described below.

Disregarded Subsidiaries.   If a REIT owns a corporate subsidiary that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary,” that subsidiary is disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the subsidiary are treated as assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT itself, including for purposes of the gross income and asset tests applicable to REITs, as summarized below. A qualified REIT subsidiary is any corporation, other than a TRS (as described below), that is wholly-owned by a REIT, by other disregarded subsidiaries or by a combination of the two. Single member limited liability companies that are wholly-owned by a REIT are also generally disregarded as separate entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including for purposes of the REIT gross income and asset tests. ARC’s corporate subsidiary, ARC IV GV, Inc., is a qualified REIT subsidiary.

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.   A REIT, in general, may jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned, to treat the subsidiary corporation as a TRS. The separate existence of a TRS or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed above, is not ignored for

162




U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such an entity would generally be subject to corporate income tax on its earnings. A REIT is not treated as holding the assets of a TRS or other taxable subsidiary corporation or as receiving any income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued by the subsidiary is an asset in the hands of the REIT, and the REIT generally recognizes as income the dividends, if any, that it receives from the subsidiary. A TRS may be used by the parent REIT to undertake indirectly activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries or render commercially unfeasible (for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as nonqualifying hedging income or inventory sales).

Certain restrictions are imposed on TRSs intended to ensure that such entities will be subject to appropriate levels of U.S. federal income taxation. Generally, the Internal Revenue Code limits the ability of a TRS to deduct certain interest payments made in any year to an affiliated REIT. In addition, if amounts are paid to a REIT or deducted by a TRS due to transactions between a REIT, its tenants and/or a TRS that exceed the amount that would be paid to or deducted by a party in an arm’s length transaction, absent certain statutory safe harbor provisions, the REIT generally will be subject to an excise tax equal to 100% of such excess.

ARC and several of ARC’s corporate subsidiaries, ARC Dealership, Inc., Windstar Aviation Corp., ARC Insurance Services, Inc., ARC Management Services, Inc., ARC DAM Management, Inc., ARC TRS, Inc., Colonial Gardens Water, Inc., and ARCMS, Inc., have made an election for those subsidiaries to be treated as a TRS for U.S. federal income tax purposes. ARC may form additional TRSs in the future. To the extent that any such TRSs pay any taxes, they will havsize:1.0pt;"> 

231

 

 

1,411

 

 

1,641

 

 

24

 

Gross Income Tests

In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, ARC annually must satisfy two gross income tests. First, at least 75% of its gross income for each taxable year, excluding gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in “prohibited transactions,” must be derived from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including “rents from real property,” dividends received from other REITs, interest income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property (including certain types of mortgage-backed securities), and gains from the sale of real estate assets, as well as income from certain kinds of temporary investments. Second, at least 95% of its gross income in each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must be derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% income test described above, as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real property.

Dividend Income.   Dividends received (directly or indirectly) from a REIT, to the extent of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing REIT, will be qualifying income for purposes of both the 95% and 75% gross income tests. Distributions received (directly or indirectly) from TRSs or other corporations that are not REITs or qualified REIT subsidiaries will be classified as dividend income to the extent of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. Such distributions will generally constitute qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, but not under the 75% gross income test.

163




Rents from Real Property.   Rents received will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the gross income tests described above, only if seve6.0pt;">

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

In addition, in order for rents received to qualify as “rents from real property,” the rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount will not be excluded from rents from real property solely by being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of sales. Moreover, for rents received to qualify as “rents from real property,” the REIT generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish or render certain services to the tenants of such property, other than through an “independent contractor” who is adequately compensated and from which the REIT derives no income, or through a TRS. A REIT is permitted, however, to perform services that are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not otherwise considered rendered to the occupant of the property. In addition, a REIT may directly or indirectly provide non-customary services to tenants without disqualifying all of the rent from the property if the payment for such services does not exceed 1% of the total gross income from the property. In such a case, only the amounts for non-customary services are not treated as rents from real property and the provision of the services does not disqualify the related rent. Moreover, a REIT is permitted to provide services to tenants or others through a TRS without disqualifying the rental income received from tenants for purposes of the REIT income tests.

Rental income will qualify as rents from real property only to the extent that the REIT does not directly or constructively own, (1) in the case of any tenant which is a corporation, stock possessing 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, or 10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of such tenant, or (2) in the case of any tenant which is not a corporation, an interest of 10% or more in the assets or net profits of such tenant. However, rental payments from a TRS will qualify as rents from real property even if the REIT owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of the TRS if at least 90% of the property is leased to unrelated tenants and the rent paid by the TRS is substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for comparable space.

Interest Income.   Interest income constitutes qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% gross income test to the extent that the obligation is secured by a mortgage on real property. If interest income is received with respect to a mortgage loan that is secured by both real property and other property and the highest principal amount of the loan outstanding during a taxable year exce"font-size:7.5pt;">Castle Acres

 

O’Fallon, IL

 

 

2,333

 

 

450

 

 

2,654

 

 

 

 

579

 

 

450

 

 

3,233

 

 

3,683

 

 

698

 

 

 

Oct-99

 

 

Castlewood Estates

 

Mableton, GA

 

 

 

 

1,001

 

 

5,889

 

 

 

 

499

 

 

1,001

 

 

6,388

 

 

7,389

 

 

170

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Casual Estates

 

Liverpool, NY

 

 

8,425

 

 

1,742

 

 

10,529

 

To the extent that interest income is derived from a loan where all or a portion of the amount of interest payable is contingent, such income generally will qualify for purposes of the gross income tests only if it is based upon the gross receipts or sales and not the net income or profits of any person.

Failure to Satisfy the Gross Income Tests.   ARC intends to monitor its sources of income, including any non-qualifying income received, so as to ensure its compliance with the gross income tests. If ARC fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, it may still qualify as a REIT for the year if the failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and, following the identification of such failure, it sets forth a description of each item of gross

164




income that satisfies the gross income tests in a schedule for the taxable year filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Treasury. It is not possible to state whether ARC would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving ARC, it would not qualify as a REIT. As discussed above under “—Taxation of ARC,” even where these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed upon the profit attributable to the amount by which it fails to satisfy the particular gross income test.

Asset Tests

At the close of each calendar quarter, ARC must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature of its assets. First, at least 75% of the value of its total assets must be represented by “real estate assets,” cash, cash items, U.S. government securities and, under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased with new capital. For this purpose, real estate assets include interests in real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property, stock of other corporations that qualify as REITs and certain kinds of mortgage loans. Second, except for securities that qualify for as real estate assets purposes of the 75% test and securities of TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiaries, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by ARC may not exceed 5% of the value of its gross assets. Third, except for securities that qualify for as real estate assets purposes of the 75% test and securities of TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiaries, ARC may not own more than 10% of any one issuer’s outstanding securities, as measured by either voting power or value. Fourth, the aggregate value of all securities of TRSs held by ARC may not exceed 20% of the value of its gross assets.

The 10% value test does not apply to certain “straight debt” and other excluded securities, as described in the Internal Revenue Code, including but not limited to any loan to an individual or an estate, any obligation to pay rents from real property and any security issued by a REIT. In addition, (a) a REIT’s interest as a partner in a partnership is not considered a security for purposes of applying the 10% value test; (b) any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income is derived from sources that would qualify for the 75% REIT gross income test; and (c) any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership.

 

 

 

1,298

 

 

1,742

 

 

11,827

 

After initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, ARC will not lose its qualification as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values. If ARC fails to satisfy the asset tests because it acquires securities during a quarter, it can cure this failure by disposing of sufficient non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. Commencing with its taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if ARC fails the 5% asset test or the 10% vote or value asset tests at the end of any quarter and such failure is not cured within 30 days thereafter, it may dispose of sufficient assets or otherwise come into compliance with such asset diversification requirements (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in which the identification of the failure to satisfy these asset tests occurred) to cure such a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of its assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000. In addition, if ARC fails any of the asset tests (including a failure of the 5% and 10% asset tests) in excess of the de minimis amount described above, as long as such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, it is permitted to avoid disqualification as a REIT, after the 30 day cure period, by taking steps including the disposition of sufficient assets to meet the asset test or otherwise coming into compliance with such asset diversification requirements (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in which the identification of the failure to satisfy the REIT asset test occurred) and paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate income tax rate (currently 35%) of the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it failed to satisfy the asset test.

165




ARC believes that its assets generally will be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. However, other debt instruments secured by non-real estate assets, or unsecured debt securities may not be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. Moreover, values of some assets, such as the value of the TRSs, may not be susceptible to a precise determination and are subject to change in the future. Furthermore, the proper classification of an instrument as debt or equity for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the application of the REIT asset tests. As an example, an investment in equity securities of a REIT issuer that were determined by the IRS to represent debt securities of such issuer, such securities would also not qualify as real estate assets. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that interests in subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers (including REIT issuers) cause a violation of the REIT asset tests.

Annual Distribution Requirements

In order to qualify as a REIT, ARC is required to distribute dividen.0pt;">

 

13,569

 

 

298

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

(a)          the sum of: 90% of its “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and net capital gains) and 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from “foreclosure property” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code); minus

(b)         the sum of specified items of non-cash income that exceeds a percentage of its income.

These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate or in the following taxable year if such distributions are declared in October, November or Dece style="border:none;">

F-61

 




 

ARC and the Partnership have issued unregistered securities as described below. None of the transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering and each of the registrants believes that each transaction, if deemed to be a sale of a security, was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the 1933 Act by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The recipients of securities in each such transaction represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, such securities were restricted as to transfers and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates and instruments issued in such transactions. Neither the registrant, nor anyone acting on its behalf, offered or sold any of the securities by any form of general solicitation or general advertising.

On June 15, 2001, April 1, 2002 and May 1, 2002, ARC sold 1,497,559, 748,779 and 748,779 shares of common stock to certain accredited investors for an aggregate cash purchase price of $33,760,000, $16,879,999.50 and $16,879,999.50, respectively. The sales of shares of common stock were made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

On May 2, 2002, the registrants completed a reorganization in which the Partnership acquired three limited partnerships (the “LPs”). In exchange for their partnership interests in each of the LPs (the “Partnership Interests”), the former partners of the LPs received common partnership units (“OP Units”) of the Partnership and/or cash with an aggregate value of approximately $178 million. Each of these OP Units was paired with one share of Special Voting Stock of ARC. ARC did not receive any direct consideration for the issuance of the shares of Special Voting Stock. The Partnership acquired the LPs in exchange for a total of 2,726,187 million OP Units and $113 million in cash. The exchange of Partnership Interests for OP Units and shares of Special Voting Stock was made in reliance of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and Regulation D thereunder.

Also as part of the reorganization, ARCd width="55" valign="top" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:41.05pt;">

D.A.M.

Cedar Creek

 

Huntsville, AL

 

 

379

 

To the extent that a REIT distributes at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, it will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate tax rates on the retained portion. In addition, the REIT may elect to retain, rather than distribute, its net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such gains.

If a REIT fails to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed (taking into account excess distributions from prior periods) and (y) the amounts of income retained on which it paid corporate income tax. ARC intends to make timely distributions so that it is not subject to the 4% excise tax.

It is possible that ARC, from time to time, may not have sufficient cash to meet the distribution requirements due to timing differences between (a) the actual receipt of cash, including receipt of distributions from its subsidiaries and (b) the inclusion of items in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that such timing differences occur, in order to meet the distribution requirements, it might be necessary to arrange for short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowings or to pay dividends in the form of taxable in-kind distributions of property.

A REIT may be able to rectify a failure to meet the distribution requirements for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to stockholders in a later year, which may be included in its deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, the REIT may be able to avoid losing its qualification as a REIT or

166




being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. However, it will be required to pay interest and a penalty based on the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.

 

152

 

 

1,276

 

 

 

 

Prohibited Transactions

Net income derived from a prohibited transaction is subject to a 100% tax. The term “prohibited transaction” generally includes a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held primarily for sale to customers, in the ordinary course of a trade or business by a REIT, by a lower-tier partnership in which the REIT holds an equity interest or by a borrower that has issued a shared appreciation mortgage or similar debt instrument to the REIT. ARC intends to hold its properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of owning and operating properties and to make sales of properties that are consistent with its investment objectives. However, whether property is held “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business” depends on the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any particular property in which ARC holds a direct or indirect interest will not be treated as property held for sale to customers or that certain safe-harbor provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that prevent such treatment will apply. The 100% tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate income tax rates.

Foreclosure Property

Foreclosure property is real property and any personal property incident to such real property (1) that is acquired by a REIT as a result of the REIT having bid on the property at foreclosure or having otherwise reduced the property to ownership or possession by agreement or process of law after there was a default (or default was imminent) on a lease of the property or a mortgage loan held by the REIT and secured by the property, (2) for which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT at a time when defa>147

 

 

152

 

 

1,423

 

 

1,575

 

 

233

 

 

 

Jan-98

&nbsult was not imminent or anticipated and (3) for which such REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure property. REITs generally are subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate (currently 35%) on any net income from foreclosure property, including any gain from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that would otherwise be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has been made will not be subject to the 100% tax on gains from prohibited transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute inventory or dealer property in the hands of the selling REIT. ARC does not anticipate that it will receive any income from foreclosure property that is not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, but, if it does receive any such income, ARC intends to elect to treat the related property as foreclosure property.

Failure to Qualify

Commencing with its taxable year beginning January 1, 2005, in the event that ARC violates a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in its failure to qualify as a REIT, specified relief provisions will be available to avoid such disqualification if (1) the violation is due to reasonable cause, (2) it pays a penalty of $50,000 for each failure to satisfy the provision and (3) the violation does not include a violation under the gross income or asset tests described above (for which other specified relief provisions are available). This cure provision reduces the instances that could lead to a disqualification as a REIT for violations due to reasonable cause. If ARC fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and none of the relief provisions of the Internal Revenue Code apply, it will be subject to tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to its stockholders in any year in which it is not a REIT will not be deductible, nor will they be required to be made. Unless entitled to relief under the specific statutory provisions, it will also be

167




disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following a year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether, in all circumstances, ARC will be entitled to statutory relief.

Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders

This section summarizes the taxation of U.S. stockholders that are not tax-exempt organizations. For these purposes, a U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of ARC’s stock that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a U.S. Holder

If an entity or arrangemp;

 

Cedar Creek, KS

 

Salina, KS

 

 

741

 

 

223

 

Distributions.   Provided that ARC qualifies as a REIT, distributions made to its taxable U.S. stockholders out of current and accumulated earnings and profits, and not designated as capital gain dividends, will generally be taken into account by them as ordinary dividend income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations. In determining the extent to which a distribution with respect to ARC’s stock constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes, earnings and profits will be allocated first to distributions with respect to ARC’s preferred stock, if any, and then to ARC’s common stock. Dividends received from REITs are generally not eligible to be taxed at the preferential qualified dividend income rates applicable to individual U.S. stockholders who receive dividends from taxable subchapter C corporations.

In addition, distributions from ARC that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed to U.S. stockholders as long-term capital gains, to the extent that they do not exceed the actual net capital gain of ARC for the taxable year, without regard to the period for which the U.S. stockholder has held its stock. To the extent that ARC elects under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to retain its net capital gains, U.S. stockholders will be treated as having received, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the undistributed capital gains as well as a corresponding credit for taxes paid by ARC on such retained capital gains. U.S. stockholders will increase their adjusted tax basis in their stock by the difference between their allocable share of such retained capital gain and their share of the tax paid by ARC. Corporate U.S. stockholders ma">

 

2,754

 

 

Distributions in excess of ARC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a U.S. stockholder to the extent that they do not exceed the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. stockholder’s shares in respect of which the distributions were made, but rather will reduce the adjusted tax basis of these shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of an individual U.S. stockholder’s shares, they will be included in income as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend declared by ARC in October, November or December of any year and payable to a U.S. stockholder of record on a specified date in any such month will be treated as both paid by ARC and received by the U.S. stockholder on December 31 of such year, provided that the dividend is actually paid before the end of January of the following calendar year.

168




With respect to U.S. stockholders who are taxed at the rates applicable to individuals, ARC may elect to designate a portion of its distributions paid to such U.S. stockholders as “qualified dividend income.” A portion of a distribution that is properly designated as qualified dividend income is taxable to non-corporate U.S. stockholders as capital gain, provided that holding period and other requirements are met by both ARC and the U.S. stockholder. The maximum amount of ARC’s distributions eligible to be designated as qualified dividend income for a taxable year is equal to the sum of:

(a)          the qualified dividend income received by ARC during such taxable year from non-REIT C corporations (including dividends attributable to any TRSs, which are subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that ARC designates such dividends as qualified dividend income);

(b)         the excess of any “undistributed” REIT taxable income recognized during the immediately preceding year over the U.S. federal income tax paid by ARC with respect to such undistributed REIT taxable income; and

(c)          the excess of any income recognized during the immediately preceding year attributable to the sale of a built-in-gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a non-REIT C corporation over the U.S. federal income tax paid by ARC with respect to such built-in gain.

Dispositions of ARC’s Stock

In general, a U.S. stockholder will realize gain or loss upon the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of ARC’s stock in an amount equal to the difference between the sum of the fair market value of any property and the amount of cash received in such disposition and the U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the stock at the time of the disposition. In general, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate U.S. stockholders upon the sale or disposition of shares of ARC’s stock will be subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15% for taxable years through 2008, if the stock is held for more than 12 months, and will be taxed at ordinary income rates (of up to 35% through 2010) if the stock is held for 12 months or less. Gains recognized by U.S. stockholders that are corporations are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 35%, whether or not classified as long-term capital gains. The IRS has the authority to prescribe, but has not yet prescribed, regulations that would apply a capital gain tax rate of 25% (which is generally higher than the long-term capital gain tax rates for non-corporate holders) to a portion of capital gain realized by a non-corporate holder on the sale of REIT stock or depositary shares that would correspond to the REIT’s “unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.” Holders are advised to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to their capital gain tax liability. The ability of a U.S. stockholder to deduct capital losses may be subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code.

Passive Activity Losses and Investment Interest Limitations

Distributions made by ARC and gain arising from the sale or exchange by a U.S. stockholder of ARC’s stock will not be treated as passive activity income. As a result, U.S. stockholders will not be able to apply any “passive losses” against income or gain relating to ARC’s stock. Distributions made by ARC, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally will be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment interest limitation. A U.S. stockholder that elects to treat capital gain dividends, capital gains from the disposition of stock or qualified dividend income as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation will be taxed at ordinary income rates on such amounts.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

 

305

 

 

223

 

 

3,059

 

 

3,282

 

 

500

 

 

 

Sep-98

 

 

Cedar Knoll

 

ARC will report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of any tax withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or

169




comes within other exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct taxpayer identification number or social security number may also be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign status.

ARC must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. stockholder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty. A non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless applicable certification requirements are met.

Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC’s stock within the United States is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC’s stock conducted through certain United State:7.5pt;">Waterloo, IA

 

 

3,952

 

 

940

 

 

5,330

 

 

 

 

142

 

 

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Taxation of Tax-Exempt U.S. Stockholders

U.S. tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from U.S. federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income, which we refer to in this prospectus as UBTI. While many investments in real estate may generate UBTI, the IRS has ruled that dividend distributions from a REIT to a tax-exempt entity do not constitute UBTI. Based on that ruling, and provided that (1) a tax-exempt U.S. stockholder has not held our stock as “debt financed property” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e. where the acquisition or holding of the property is financed through a borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder), and (2) the stock is not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business, distributions from ARC and income from the sale of ARC stock generally should not give rise to UBTI to a tax-exempt U.S. stockholder.

Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to characterize distributions from us as UBTI.

940

 

 

5,472

 

 

6,412

 

 

137

In certain circumstances, a pension trust (1) that is described in Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, (2) is tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (3) that owns more than 10% of ARC’s stock could be required to treat a percentage of the dividends from us as UBTI if we are a “pension-held REIT.” ARC will not be a pension-held REIT unless (1) either (A) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of ARC’s stock, or (B) a group of pension trusts, each individually holding more than 10% of the value of ARC’s stock, collectively owns more than 50% of such stock;

170




and (2) ARC would not have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that Section 856(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that stock owned by such trusts shall be treated, for purposes of the requirement that not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding stock of a REIT is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) by the beneficiaries of such trusts. Certain restrictions on ownership and transfer of ARC’s stock should generally prevent a tax-exempt entity from owning more than 10% of the value of ARC stock, or ARC from becoming a pension-held REIT.

Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of owning ARC stock.

Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders

The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisit size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

Apr-04

 

 

Cedar Terrace

 

Cedar Rapids, IA

 

 

Ordinary Dividends.   The portion of dividends received by non-U.S. stockholders payable out of ARC’s earnings and profits that are not attributable to gains from sales or exchanges of U.S. real property interests and which are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholder will generally be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at the rate of 30%, unless reduced or eliminated by an applicable income tax treaty. Under some treaties, however, lower rates generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs.

In general, non-U.S. stockholders will not be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of ARC stock. In cases where the dividend income from a non-U.S. stockholder’s investment in ARC stock is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the non-U.S. stockholder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the non-U.S. stockholder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. stockholders are taxed with respect to such dividends, and may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on the income after the application of the income tax in the case of a non-U.S. stockholder that is a corporation.

Non-Dividend Distributions.   Unless (A) ARC stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest, or USRPI, or (B) either (1) if the non-U.S. stockholder’s investment in ARC stock is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. stockholder (in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. stockholders with respect to such gain) or (2) if the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States (in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s net capital gain for the year), distributions by ARC which are not dividends out of its earnings and profits will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the non-U.S. stockholder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of ARC’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. If ARC’s stock constitutes a USRPI, as described below, distributions by ARC in excess of the sum of its earnings and profits plus the non-U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in its ARC stock will be taxed under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains rates, that would apply to a U.S. stockholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds the stockholder’s share of ARC’s earnings and profits.

171




Capital Gain Dividends.   Under FIRPTA, a distribution made by ARC to a non-U.S. stockholder, to the extent attributable to gains from dispositions ofp>

 

 

835

 

 

Dispositions of Our Stock.   Unless ARC stock constitutes a USRPI, a sale of the stock by a non-U.S. stockholder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under FIRPTA. The stock will not be treated as a USRPI if less than 50% of ARC’s assets throughout a prescribed testing period consist of interests in real property located within the United States, excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a capacity as a creditor. ARC does not expect that more than 50% of its assets will consist of interests in real property located in the United States.

In addition, ARC stock will not constitute a USRPI if ARC is a “domestically controlled REIT.” A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its outstanding stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. ARC believes that it is, and it expects to continue to be, a domestically controlled REIT and, therefore, the sale of ARC stock should not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, because ARC stock is widely held, ARC cannot assure its investors that it is or will remain a domestically controlled REIT. Even if ARC does not qualify as a domestically controlled REIT, a non-U.S. stockholder’s sale of ARC stock nonetheless will generally not be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI, provided that (a) the ARC stock owned is of a class that is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury Department regulations, on an established securities market, and (b) the selling non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less of ARC’s outstanding stock of that class at all times during a specified testing period.

If gain on the sale of ARC stock were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. stockholder would be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of non-resident alien individuals, and the purchaser of the stock could be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the IRS.

Gain from the sale of ARC stock that would not otherwise be subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a non-U.S. stockholder in two cases: (a) if the non-U.S. stockholder’s investment in ARC stock is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such

172




non-U.S. stockholder, the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, or (b) if the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’ s capital gain.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

ARC will report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of any tax withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or comes within other exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct taxpayer identification number or social security number may also be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign status.

ARC must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. stockholder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty. A non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless applicable certification requirements are met.

Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC stock within the United States is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC stock conducted through certain United States related financial intermediaries is subject to information reporting (but not backup withholding) unless the financial intermediary has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner is a non-U.S. stockholder and specified conditions are met or an exemption is otherwise established.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

State, Local and Foreign Taxes

ARC and its subsidiaries and stockholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which it or they transact business, own property or reside. ARC owns interests in properties located in a number of jurisdictions, and may be required to file tax returns in certain of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of ARC and its stockholders may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax treatment discussed above. Any foreign taxes incurred by ARC would not pass through to stockholders as a credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability. Prospective stockholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application and effect of state, local and foreign income and other tax laws on an investment in ARC’s stock.

173




SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated was the initial purchaser for the original offering of the notes in private placements. We were advised by the initial purchaser that it sold the notes to “qualified institutional buyers,” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act, in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The notes and the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon the conversion of the notes that may be offered pursuant to this prospectus are being offered by the selling securityholders, which includes their transferees, distributees, pledgees or donees or their successors.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the selling securityholders and the principal amounts of notes and ARC common stock beneficially owned by each selling securityholder that may be offered pursuant to this prospectus. The information is based on information provided to us by or on behalf of the selling securityholders on or prior to October 21, 2005. The selling securityholders may offer all, some or none of the notes or the ARC common stock into which the notes are convertible. Because the selling securityholders may offer all or some portion of the notes or common stock, we cannot estimate the amount of the notes or common stock that will be held by the selling securityholders after any of these sales. Information concerning other selling securityholders will be set forth in prospectus supplements or, if appropriate, post-effective amendments to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, from time to time, if required. The percentage of notes outstanding beneficially owned by each selling securityholder is based on $96.6 million aggregate principal amount of notes outstanding.

For the purposes of the following table, the number of shares of ARC common stock beneficially owned has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, and such information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under Rule 13d-3, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a selling securityholder has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which that selling securityholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this prospectus through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other rights. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes shown in the table assumes conversion of the full amount of notes held by each selling securityholder at an initial conversion rate of 69.8812 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes and a cash payment in lieu of r:avoid;text-align:right;">4,918

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

835

 

 

5,227

 

 

6,062

 

 

145

 

 

 

Feb-04

No selling securityholder named in the table below beneficially owns two percent or more of ARC’s common stock, based on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding on July 27, 2005. None of the selling securityholders currently listed in the following table has, or within the past three years has had, any position, office or other material relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates.

174




 

 

 

Principal Amount of Notes(1)

 

Number of Shares of Common Stock(1)(2)

 

Selling Security Holder

 

 

 

Beneficially Owned
Prior to the Offering
and Offered Hereby

 

Percentage
of Notes
Outstanding

 

 

 

Chalet City

 

Crowley, TX

 

 

3,757

 

 

808

 

 

4,573

 

 

 

 

921

 

 

808

 

 

5,494

 

 

6,302

 

 

571

 

 

 

May-98

 

 

Chalet North

 

Apopka, FL

 

 

5,646

 

 

1,275

 

 

7,044

 

 

 

 

3,481

 

Beneficially
Owned Prior to
the Offering

 

Percentage of ARC
Common Outstanding
that May Be Sold(3)

 

CC Convertible Arbitrage, Ltd.(4)

 

 

2,500,000

 

 

2.59

 

 

174,703

 

 

 

0.43

 

 

Mohican VCA Master Fund, Ltd.

 

 

750,000

 

 

0.78

 

 

52,411

 

1,275

 

 

10,525

 

 

 

0.13

 

 

Frontpoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P.(5)

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

1.55

 

 

104,822

 

 

 

0.26

 

 

 

11,800

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

Dec-01

 

 

Chambersburg I & II

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

NFJ Dividend, Premium & Interest Strategy Fund

 

 

2,500,000

 

 

2.59

 

 

174,703

 

 

 

0.43

 

979

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

167

 

 

1,032

 

 

1,199

 

 

Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income Fund

 

 

7,500,000

 

 

7.76

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Chelsea

 

Sayre, PA

524,109

 

 

 

1.28

 

 

 

610

 

 

125

 

 

738

 

 

 

 

97

 

 

125

 

 

835

 

 

960

 

 

13

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Chisholm Creek

 

Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income Fund II

 

 

6,500,000

 

 

6.73

 

 

454,228

 

 

 

1.11

 

 

Vicis Capital Master Fund

 

 

5,000,000

 

 

5.18

 

 

349,406

 

 

 

0.85

 

 

All other holders of notes or future transferees, pledgees, donees, assignees or successors of any such holders(6)

 

 

70,350,000

 

 

72.83

 

 

4,916,142

(7)

 

 

12.00

 

&;width:6.0pt;">

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

2,200

 

 

667

 

 

3,855

 

 

 

 

663

 

 

667

 

 

4,518


(1)     

 

5,185

 

 

126

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Cimmaron Village

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

 

2,091

 

 

431

 

 

3,075

 

 

 

Since the date on which we were provided with the information regarding their notes, selling securityholders may have acquired, sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of all or a portion of their notes or the underlying shares of ARC common stock for which the notes may be exchanged. Accordingly, the information provided here for any particular securityholder may understate or overstate, as the case may be, such securityholder’s current ownership. The aggregate principal amount of notes outstanding as of the date of this registration statement is $96,600,000, which is the aggregate principal amount of notes registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Any such changed information will be set forth in supplements to this registration statement if and when necessary.

(2)    For purposes of presenting the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by holders of notes, we assume an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per each $1,000 principal amount of notes (the initial exchange rate), which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $14.31 per share of ARC common stock, and a cash payment in lieu of the issuance of any fractional share interest. However, the conversion price is subject to adjustment as described under “Description of Notes—Exchange Rights—Exchange Rate Adjustments.” As a result, the number of shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes, and as a consequence, the number of shares beneficially owned by the holders of notes, may increase or decrease in the future.

(3)    Percentages based on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding as of July 27, 2005.

(4)    Selling securityholder has identified itself as an affiliate of a broker-dealer. Each such selling securityholder has informed us that: (a) such selling securityholder purchased its notes in the ordinary course of business, and (b) at the time the notes were purchased, the selling securityholder had no agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the notes.

(5)    FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC is the general partner of FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P. FrontPoint Partners LLC is the managing member of FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC and as such has voting and dispositive power over the securities held by the fund. Philip Duff, W. Gillespie Caffray and Paul Ghaffari are members of the board of managers of FrontPoint Partners LLC and are the sole members of the management committee. Messrs. Duff, Caffray and Ghaffari and FrontPoint Partners LLC and FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC each disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities held by the fund except for their pecuniary interest therein.

(6)    We are unable to provide the names of certain holders of notes and/or ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at this time because they have not provided us with information and/or their notes are evidenced by a global note that has been deposited with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as DTC’s nominee. Information concerning any such holders who are not listed in the above table will be set forth in post-effective amendments from time to time, if and when required.

(7)    Assumes that any other holder of notes or any future transferee from any such holder does not beneficially own any of ARC’s common stock other than the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at the initial exchange rate.

175




PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the notes and shares on behalf of the selling securityholders. The selling securityholders and their successors, which includes their transferees, distributees, pledgees or donees or their successors, may sell the notes and the underlying common stock directly to purchasers or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. Underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling securityholders or the purchasers. These discounts, concessions or commissions may0pt;width:7.7pt;">

 

76

 

 

431

 

 

3,151

 

 

3,582

The notes and the underlying ARC common stock may be sold in one or more transactions:

·       at fixed prices;

·       at prevailing market prices at the time of sale;

·       at prices related to such prevailing market prices;

·       at varying prices determined at the time of sale; or

·       at negotiated prices.

Such sales may be effected in transactions in the following manner (which may involve crosses or block transactions):

·       on any national securities exchange or quotation;

· 

 

431

 

 

 

Oct-96

 

 

Cloverleaf

 

Moline, IL

 

 

4,669

 

 

789

 

 

4,596

 

 

       in the over-the-counter market;

·       in transactions otherwise than on such exchanges or services or in the over-the-counter market;

·       through the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise; or

·       through the settlement of short sales.

 

 

245

 

 

789

 

 

4,841

 

 

5,630

 

 

560

 

Selling securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which may in turn engage in short sales of the notes or the underlying ARC common stock and deliver these securities to close out such short positions, or lend or pledge the notes or the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities.

From time to time, one or more of the selling securityholders may distribute, devise, gift, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in some or all of the securities owned by them. Any such distributees, devisees or donees will be deemed to be selling securityholders. Any such pledges, secured parties or persons to whom the securities have been hypothecated will, upon foreclosure in the event of default, be deemed to be selling securityholders.

The aggregate proceeds to the selling securityholders from the sale of the notes or underlying ARC common stock will be the purchase price of the notes or ARC common stock, less any discounts and commissions. A selling securityholder reserves the right to accept and, together with its agents, to reject, any proposed purchase of notes or common stock to be made directly or through agents. We will not receive any of the proceeds from this offering.

ARC’s underlying common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. We do not intend to list the notes for trading on any national securities exchange or on the Nasdaq National Market. We cannot guarantee that any trading market will develop for the notes.

The notes and underlying ARC common stock may be sold in some states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. The selling securityholders and any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents that

176




 

 

Dec-96

 

 

College Park

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

2,211

 

 

397

 

 

2,061

 

 

 

 

51

 

 

397

 

 

2,112

 

 

2,509

 

 

199

 

 

 

Sep-98

 

 

Collingwood MHP

 

Horseheads, NY

 

 

673

 

 

98

 

 

615

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

98

 

 

714

 

 

812

 

 

10

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Colonial Gardens

 

Manhattan, KS

 

 

3,688

 

 

938

 

 

6,132

 

 

 

 

693

 

 

938

 

 

6,825

 

 

7,763

 

 

823

 

 

 

Apr-98

 

 

Columbia Heights

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

 

6,880" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">participate in the sale of the notes and common stock into which the notes are convertible may be “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. Any discounts, commissions, concessions or profit they earn on any resale of the shares may be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act. Selling securityholders who are “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. The selling securityholders have acknowledged that they understand their obligations to comply, and have agreed to comply, with the prospectus delivery requirements and other provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and the respective rules thereunder, particularly Regulation M thereunder, in connection with any offering of the securities offered hereby.

In addition, any securities covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 or Rule 144A rather than pursuant to this prospectus. A selling securityholder may not sell any notes or ARC common stock described herein and may not transfer, devise or gift such securities by other means not described in this prospectus.

If required, the specific notes or common stock to be sold, the names of the selling securityholders, the respective purchase prices and public offering prices, the names of any agent, dealer or underwriter, and any applicable commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer will be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if appropriate, a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, we and the selling securityholders will be indemnified by each other against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the Securities Act or will be entitled to contribution in connection with these liabilities.

We have agreed to pay substantially all of the expenses incidental to the registration, offering and sale of the notes and underlying common stock to the public, other than applicable transfer taxes and commissions, fees and discounts of underwriters, brokers, dealers and agents.

We have agreed to maintain the effectiveness of this registration statement until the holders of the notes and the common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all such securities immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume limitations of Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act. We may suspend sales under the registration statement upon notice to the selling securityholders in order to update the registration statement or otherwise comply with federal securities laws.

177




LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the notes was passed upon for us by Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C., Denver, Colorado. The validity of the shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes was passed upon for us by Venable LLP, Baltimore, Maryland. Certain tax matters will be passed upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities LP as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. incorporated in this prospectus by reference to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been so incorporated in reliance on the reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

178




INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002

 

 

1,218

 

 

7,083

 

 

 

 

479

 

 

1,218

 

 

7,562

 

 

8,780

 

 

206

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Commerce Heights

 

Commerce City, CO

 

 

930

 

 

195

 

 

1,160

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

195

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004

F-38

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

F-39

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004

F-40

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

F-41

Schedule III—Real Estate and Related Depreciation as of December 31, 2004

F-61

 

F-1




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of Affordable Residential Communities LP:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Affordable Residential Communities LP and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion the accompanying financial statement schedule “Schedule III” presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Denver, Colorado

October 25, 2005

 

F-2




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(In thousands)

" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:46.5pt;">

26,626

;">

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,532,780

 

$

863,515

 

Assets held for sale

 

54,123

 

44,362

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

39,802

 

 

 

1,174

 

 

1,369

 

 

133

 

 

 

Jun-98

 

 

Connelly Terrace

 

Connelly, NY

 

 

2,377

 

 

426

 

 

2,445

 

 

 

 

252

 

 

426

 

 

2,697

 

 

3,123

 

 

206

 

 

 

Sep-02

 

 

 

Restricted cash

 

 

13,669

 

Tenant, notes and other receivables, net

 

19,029

 

8,468

 

Inventory

 

11,230

 

3,878

 

Loan origination costs, net

 

14,403

 

11,921

 

Loan reserves

 

31,019

 

32,414

 

Goodwill

 

85,264

 

86,127

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

19,106

 

10,987

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

6,476

 

24,102

 

Total assets

 

$

Connie Jean

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

698

 

 

98

 

 

577

 

 

 

 

353

 

 

98

 

 

930

 

 

1,028

 

 

195

 

 

 

May-00

 

 

Cottonwood Grove

 

Plano, TX

 

 

3,765

 

 

741

 

 

5,340

 

 

 

 

345

 

 

1,813,232

 

$

1,126,069

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

$

1,001,622

 

$

773,394

 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

741

 

 

5,685

 

 

6,426

 

 

787

 

 

 

Mar-98

 

 

Country Club Crossing

 

Altoona, IA

 

 

3,350

 

 

485

 

 

2,687

29,516

 

16,975

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

37,877

 

19,828

 

Distributions payable

 

15,505

 

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

 

 

 

1,859

 

 

485

 

 

4,546

 

 

5,031

 

 

1,201

 

 

 

Jan-99

 

 

12,773

 

7,655

 

Total liabilities

 

1,097,293

 

817,852

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ capital (see Note 4)

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred OP units

 

144,250

 

 

Common OP units:

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

539,382

 

265,578

 

Limited partners

 

32,307

 

42,639

 

 

 

715,939

 

308,217

 

Country Club Manor

 

Imperial, MO

 

 

3,878

 

 

709

 

 

4,049

 

 

 

 

1,622

 

 

709

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

1,813,232

 

5,671

 

 

6,380

 

$

1,126,069

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

1,224

 

 

 

Sep-99

 

 

Country Club Mobile
Estates

 

Salt Lake City, UT

 

 

9,866

 

 

1,654

 

 

9,404

 

 

2002

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

187,267

 

$

125,915

 

$

92,610

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

15,221

 

21,681

 

 

1,195

 

 

1,654

 

 

10,599

 

 

12,253

 

 

1,931

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Countryside (CO)

 

Greeley, CO

 

 

3,884

 

31,942

 

Utility and other income

 

20,065

 

15,599

 

11,942

 

Net consumer finance income

 

104

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

222,657

 

163,195

 

136,494

 

 

600

 

 

3,418

 

 

 

 

1,010

 

 

600

 

 

4,428

 

 

5,028

 

 

1,065

 

 

 

Mar-99

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Countryside (KS)

 

Hays, KS

 

 

 

Property operations

 

75,150

 

44,295

 

33,341

 

Real estate taxes

 

16,621

 

10,247

 

6,633

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

18,267

 

18,357

 

25,826

 

Retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations

 

8,198

 

7,382

 

 

1,175

 

 

467

 

 

3,358

 

 

8,582

 

Property management

 

7,127

 

5,527

 

4,105

 

General and administrative

 

29,361

 

16,855

 

 

 

396

 

 

467

 

 

3,754

 

 

4,221

 

 

533

 

 

 

Oct-98

 

 

Countryside (OK)

 

Stillwater, OK

 

 

983

 

 

191

 

 

2,010

 

 

 

 

(76

)

 

191

 

 

1,934

 

 

2,125

 

 

303

 

 

 

Apr-98

 

 

Countryside Village (TN)

 

Columbia, TN

 

 

3,820

 

 

1,089

 

 

13,087

 

Initial public offering costs

 

4,417

 

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

16,685

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,014

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

Real estate and retail asset impairment

 

3,591

 

1,385

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

863

 

 

13,557

 

Interest expense

 

56,892

 

57,386

 

43,804

 

Total expenses

 

309,186

 

207,901

 

185,993

 

Interest income

 

(1,616

)

(1,439

)

7,165

 

 

 

 

1,122

 

 

1,089

 

(1,390

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(84,913

)

(43,267

)

(48,109

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

8,287

 

 

9,376

 

 

1,007

 

 

 

 

1,915

 

31

 

Nov-98

 

 

Cowboy

 

Pocatello, ID

 

 

2,502

 

 

587

 

 

3,520

 

 

 

 

374

 

 

587

 

 

3,894

 

 

4,481

 

 

479

 

1,040

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

 

Net loss

 

(91,547

)

(39,903

)

(47,069

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(9,752

)

 

 

Oct-96

 

 

Creekside

 

Seagoville, TX

 

 

4,104

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

 

908

 

 

4,729

 

 

 

 

2,087

 

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

$

(95,445

)

$

(34,386

)

$

(40,818

)

Limited partners

 

908

 

 

6,816

 

 

7,724

 

 

607

 

 

 

Apr-97

 

 

 

(5,854

)

(5,517

)

Creekside Estates

 

Seagoville, TX

 

 

1,515

 

 

242

 

 

1,361

 

 

 

 

870

 

 

242

 

 

2,231

 

 

2,473

 

 

236

 

 

 

Jun-97

 

 

Crescentwood Village

 

Sandy, UT

 

 

7,847

 

 

(6,251

)

 

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Net loss per common OP unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.34

)

$

(2.20

)

$

(2.94

)

Income (loss) per common OP unit from discontinued operations

 

(0.17

)

0.17

 

0.06

 

Net loss per common OP unit

 

$

(2.51

)

$

(2.03

)

$

(2.88

)

Weighted average OP units outstanding

 

1,255

 

 

7,192

 

 

 

 

330

 

 

1,255

 

 

7,522

 

 

8,777

 

 

1,341

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Crestview

 

Sayre, PA

 

 

775

 

 

120

 

 

749

 

 

 

 

129

 

 

120

 

 

878

 

 

998

 

 

14

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Crestview

 

Stillwater, OK

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

16,353

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

 

 

Common OP Unitholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General
Partner

 

Limited
Partners

 

Preferred
OP Unitholders

 

Total

 

Balance January 1, 2002

 

$

158,957

 

$

62

 

 

$

 

 

$

159,019

 

Sales of OP units

 

33,760

 

 

 

 

 

33,760

 

OP Units retired in the Reorganization

 

 

(62

)

 

 

 

1,750

 

 

445

 

 

2,617

 

 

 

 

651

 

 

445

 

 

3,267

 

 

3,713

 

 

107

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

CV-Jacksonville

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

13,139

 

 

 

(62

)

OP Units issued in the Reorganization

 

137,652

 

64,820

 

 

 

 

202,472

 

Transfer from limited partners to general partner resulting from issuance of OP units

 

10,413

 

(10,413

)

 

 

 

 

2,840

 

 

16,699

 

 

 

 

1,337

 

Net loss

 

(40,818

)

(6,251

)

 

 

 

(47,069

)

Balance December 31, 2002

 

299,964

 

48,156

 

 

 

 

348,120

 

Net loss

 

(34-break-after:avoid;"> 

2,840

 

 

18,036

 

 

20,876

 

 

513

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Cypress Shores

 

Winter Haven, FL

 

 

3,023

 

 

660

 

 

3,950

 

 

 

 

)

(5,517

)

 

 

 

(39,903

)

Balance December 31, 2003

 

265,578

 

42,639

 

 

 

 

308,217

 

Issuance of common OP units

 

410,724

 

 

 

 

 

410,724

 

Issuance of preferred OP units

 

 

 

 

144,250

 

 

144,250

 

Restricted common units issued, net of current year amortization

 

199

 

 

 

 

 

199

 

Forfeiture of restricted common OP units

211

 

 

660

 

 

4,161

 

 

4,821

 

 

319

 

 

 

Sep-02

 

 

Deerhurst

 

Wendell, NC

 

 

2,929

 

 

525

 

 

2,997

 

 

 

 

1,432

 

 

525

 

 

4,429

 

 

4,954

 

 

841

 

 

 

(150

)

 

 

 

 

(150

)

Redemption of OP units

 

 

(125

)

 

 

 

(125

 

Sep-00

 

 

Deerpointe

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

2,250

 

 

391

 

 

2,233

 

 

 

 

2,454

 

 

391

 

 

4,687

 

 

5,078

 

 

1,044

 

 

 

Feb-99

 

 

)

Transfer of capital

 

1,737

 

(1,737

reak-after:avoid;text-indent:-7.5pt;">Denton Falls

 

Denton, TX

 

 

3,633

 

 

680

 

 

4,650

 

 

 

 

728

 

 

680

 

)

 

 

 

 

Distributions to OP unitholders

 

(44,469

)

(2,616

)

 

 

 

(47,085

)

Net loss

 

(95,445

 

5,378

 

 

6,058

 

 

680

 

 

 

May-96

 

 

Desert Palms

 

Hemet, CA

 

 

4,960

 

 

900

 

 

4,424

 

 

 

 

1,674

 

 

900

 

 

6,098

 

 

6,998

 

 

456

 

 

)

(5,854

)

 

 

 

(101,299

)

Other comprehensive income—mark to market of interest rate swap

 

1,208

 

 

 

 

 

1,208

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

Dynamic

 

DeSoto, TX

 

 

2,803

 

 

518

 

 

2,737

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

 

 

(100,091

)

Balance December 31, 2004

 

$

539,382

 

$

32,307

 

 

$

144,250

 

 

$

715,939

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-5




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

13,557

 

 

For the Year Ended Decem"1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

518

 

 

3,285

 

 

3,803

 

 

302

 

 

 

May-97

 

 

Dynamic II

 

DeSoto, TX

 

 

2,797

 

 

375

 

 

2,235

 

 

 

 

1,073

 

 

375

 

 

3,308

 

 

3,683

 

 

388

 

 

 

Jul-01

 

 

Eagle Creek

 

Tyler, TX

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Cash flow from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,014

 

46,467

 

37,058

 

 

 

 

260

 

 

2,126

 

 

 

 

273

 

 

260

 

 

2,399

 

 

2,659

 

 

70

 

 

Adjustments to fair value for interest rate caps

 

241

 

 

1,561

 

OP unitholders grant compensation expense

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Eagle Ridge

 

10,120

 

 

 

Preferred unit distribution declared

 

8,966

 

 

 

PPU distributions declared

 

786

 

 

 

Non-cash REIT IPO related costs

 

389

 

 

 

Early termination of debt

 

10,358

 

 

 

Retail home sales impairment and other expense

 

 

1,385

 

 

Real estate asset impairment

 

3,591

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

863

 

 

 

Lewisville, TX

 

 

4,683

 

 

765

 

 

4,404

 

 

 

 

793

 

 

765

 

 

5,197

 

 

5,962

 

 

510

 

 

 

Feb-99

 

 

Eastern Villa

 

Stillwater, OK

 

 

1,107

 

 

294

 

 

1,914

 

 

 

 

Depreciation included in income from discontinued operations

 

3,134

 

2,613

 

2,026

 

(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations

 

8,549

 

(3,333

)

 

Rent expense related to vacated office space

 

 

255

 

 

294

 

 

2,169

 

 

2,463

 

 

321

 

 

 

 

864

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions

 

9,322

 

Mar-98

 

 

Eastview

 

Gillette, WY

 

 

3,141

 

 

507

 

 

3,597

 

 

 

 

729

 

 

507

 

2,596

 

7,148

 

Net cash provided by op;width:4.55pt;">

 

4,326

 

 

4,833

 

 

572

 

 

 

Dec-97

 

 

F-62

 




 

Easy Living

 

Lawrence, KS

 

 

4,392

 

27,034

 

10,689

 

14,281

 

Cash flow from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of Hometown communities

 

(507,136

)

 

 

Acquisition of communities and manufactured homes

 

 

702

 

 

4,198

 

 

 

 

1,547

 

 

702

 

 

 

(87,693

)

(34,288

)

5,745

 

 

6,447

 

 

1,550

 

 

 

Mar-00

 

 

El Caudillo

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

731

 

 

179

 

 

1,241

 

 

 

 

258

 

 

179

 

 

1,499

 

 

(121,611

)

Proceeds from community sales

 

36,922

 

14,879

 

 

Deposits and deferred acquisition costs on purchase of Hometown assets

 

 

(15,559

)

 

Community improvements and equipment purchases

 

(49,708

)

(12,725

)

(15,862

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(607,615

)

1,678

 

 

197

 

 

 

Dec-98

 

 

El Dorado

 

(47,693

)

(137,473

)

Cash flow from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow from REIT IPO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sherman, TX

 

 

847

 

 

148

 

 

1,109

 

 

 

 

196

 

 

148

 

 

1,305

 

 

1,453

 

 

165

 

 

 

Feb-97

 

 

El Lago

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

 

Common stock offering

 

438,078

 

 

 

Preferred stock offering

 

125,000

 

 

 

Common stock offering expenses

 

(37,421

)

 

 

Preferred stock offering expenses

 

(5,892

)

 

 

Cash flow from REIT IPO related financing transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt issued in the financing transactions

 

500,000

 

 

 

Debt paid in the financing transactions

 

1,847

 

 

409

 

 

1,934

 

 

 

 

274

 

 

409

 

 

2,208

 

 

2,617

 

 

255

 

 

 

Jan-97

 

 

El Lago II

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

853

 

 

201

 

 

1,130

 

 

 

 

286

 

 

201

 

 

1,416

 

 

1,617

 

 

156

 

 

 

Apr-97

 

 

Encantada

pt 0pt 0pt;width:42.85pt;">

(439,048

)

 

 

Payment of loan origination costs

 

(8,122

)

Las Cruces, NM

 

 

7,187

 

 

1,801

 

 

9,558

 

 

 

Release of restricted cash

 

12,278

 

 

 

Release of loan reserves

 

19,089

 

 

 

New loan reserves

 

(14,247

)

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-6




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

1,801

 

 

9,653

 

 

11,455

 

 

273

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Enchanted Village

 

Alton, IL

 

 

5,600

 

 

1,275

 

 

lspan="2" valign="bottom" style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:39.2pt;">

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Cash flow from the Reorganization:

 

 

7,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt issued in the Reorganization

 

 

 

578,000

 

Debt paid in the Reorganization

 

 

 

(431,165

)

Redemption of Limited Partnership interests

 

 

 

(112,966

)

Payment of loan costs

 

 

 

(13,365

)

Net release of restricted cash

 

 

 

2,609

 

Net release of loan reserves

 

 

 

4,695

 

Other

 

 

 

(4,678

)

Proceeds from the issuance of common OP units

 

 

 

33,760

 

Deferred common and preferred OP unit issuance costs

 

 

(1,026

)

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

96,421

 

49,038

 

126,119

 

Deferred debt issuance costs

 

 

 

 

3,540

 

 

1,275

 

 

11,000

 

 

12,275

 

 

2,613

 

 

 

 

Repayment of debt

 

(42,660

)

(25,356

ter:avoid;text-align:right;">Aug-99

 

 

Englewood Village

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

 

1,131

 

 

195

 

 

1,042

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

195

 

 

1,196

 

 

1,391

 

 

118

 

 

 

Oct-96

 

 

Evergreen Village

)

(14,416

)

Payment of common distributions

 

(33,563

)

 

 

Payment of preferred distributions

 

(7,247

)

 

 

Payment of partnership preferred distributions

 

(524

)

 

 

Repurchase of OP units

 

(125

)

 

 

Restricted cash

 

1,391

 

(240

)

(1,906

)

Loan reserves

 

(3,447

)

6,867

 

(28,185

)

Loan origination costs

 

(6,204

)

(3,894

)

(715

)

 

Sioux City, IA

 

 

4,632

 

 

1,439

 

 

9,075

 

 

 

 

1,222

 

 

1,439

 

 

10,297

 

 

11,736

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

Dec-98

 

 

Evergreen Village

 

Pleasant View, UT

 

 

4,146

 

 

1,041

 

 

6,158

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

593,757

 

25,389

 

137,787

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

13,176

 

(11,615

)

14,595

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

26,626

 

38,241

 

23,646

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

39,802

 

$

26,626

 

$

38,241

 

Non-cash financing and investing transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions

 

$

96,898

 

$

4,294

 

$

5,944

 

Preferred OP units issued in connection with acquisitions

 

25,142

 

 

 

Distributions declared but not paid

 

13,524

 

 

 

 

Accrual of loan origination costs

 

 

748

 

 

1,041

 

 

6,906

 

 

7,948

2,000

 

 

 

 

OP units issued in the Reorganization

 

 

 

64,820

 

Common stock issued in the Reorganization

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Ewing Trace

 

 

 

137,652

 

Limited Partnership debt assumed in the Reorganization

 

 

 

233,915

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

56,765

 

$

56,941

 

36,077

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-7




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.   Business, Liquidity and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business

Affordable Residential Communities LP (formerly Affordable Residential Communities IV, LP) (the “Partnership,” the “Operating Partnership” or “OP”) is a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning and operation of manufactured home communities, the rental of manufactured homes, the retail sale of manufactured homes and other related businesses. We were organized in July of 1998 and operate primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (“ARC” or “REIT”) (formerly known as ARC IV REIT Inc.).

As described in Note 2, on May 2, 2002, ARC completed the acquisition of Affordable Residential Communities, L.P. I (“LP I”), Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., II (“LP II”), Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., III (“LP III”) (collectively, LP I, LP II, and LP III are the “Limited Partnerships”) and their respective subsidiaries and certain of the assets and subsidiaries of ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company (“Holdings”) (the “Reorganization”).

As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of 13 communities classified as discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 63,661 homesites (net of 2,566 homesites classified as discontinued operations) in 27 states with occupancy of 81.5%. Our five largest markets are Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.4% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.8% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, Kansas, with 3.8% of our total homesites. We also conduct a retail home sales business.

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of 22.3 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of co>Des Moines, IA

 

 

1,629

 

 

With the proceeds from ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction, we acquired 87 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C. (“Hometown”). We acquired an additional three communities on April 9, 2004 upon the completion of the mortgage debt loan assumption process. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and total 26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for these communities and related assets was approximately $615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $93.1 million (See Note 3).

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of our accounts but the results of operations of the manufactured home communities acquired only for the periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. We have eliminated all significant inter-entity balances and transactions.

F-8




The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Ultimate actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts.

We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to current year presentation.

Rental and Other Property

We carry rental property at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize significant renovations and improvements that substantially improve asset quality and/or extend the useful life of assets and depreciate them over their estimated remaining useful lives. We expense maintenance and repairs as incurred.

Depreciation is computed primarily on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are primarily as follows:

ding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">

630

Asset Class

 

 

 

Estimated Useful
Lives (in Years)

 

Manufactured home communities and improvements

 

 

10 to 30

 

 

 

 

3,582

 

 

 

 

85

 

 

630

 

 

3,667

 

 

4,297

 

 

877

 

 

 

Apr-99

 

 

Falcon Farms

 

Port Byron, IL

 

 

4,100

 

 

798

 

 

4,793

 

 

 

 

808

 

 

798

 

 

5,602

 

 

6,399

 

 

148

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

 

 

774

 

 

4,518

 

 

 

 

727

 

 

774

 

 

5,245

 

 

6,019

 

 

146

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Forest Creek

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

4,250

 

 

765

 

 

4,434

 

 

 

 

417

 

 

765

 

 

4,851

 

 

5,616

 

 

143

Buildings

 

 

10 to 20

 

 

Rental homes

 

 

10

 

 

Furniture and other equipment

 

 

5

 

 

Computer software and hardware

 

 

3

 

 

 

In June 2002, we changed our estimate of the depreciable lives of our communities from 20 years to 30 years to conform to industry experience regarding the estimated useful life of manufactured home communities, improvements and buildings. The change resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense by approximately $7.3 million or $0.45 per unit.

Subsequent to December 31, 2004, we changed our estimate of the depreciable life of our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years. Homes will now be depreciated to an estimated salvage value after 3 years of service in our rental home portfolio. This change was made to conform to our intent to sell homes from our rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the repairs and maintenance costs typically incurred on older homes. This change did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We evaluate the recoverability of our investment in rental property whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that full asset recoverability is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental property may be impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability in which we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if a writedown is required. If this review indicates that the asset’s carrying amount will not be fully recoverable, we would reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value. During 2004, we recorded an impairment charge on rental property of approximately $500,000 (see Note 12). For the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, we recorded no impairment charges.

F-9




Discontinued Operations

The Partnership considers a community to be a discontinued operation when: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the asset, supported by a Board resolution granting approval to proceed with the sale; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year; (v) the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. In accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, “SFAS”, No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we measure each of our assets held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell at the balance sheet date and re-cast any applicable balances and corresponding liabilities related to the communities identified in all comparable periods presented. Depreciation of the assets held for sale, if applicable, is suspended at the date of the determination of discontinuance. Interest and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of the communities classified as held for sale continues to be accrued. The results of operations of the assets sold and those classified as held for sale are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognize any estimated losses on the sales of communities in the period in which the properties are discontinued and recognize any resulting gains on the sales of communities when realized. A description of the facts and circumstances leading to the expected disposal, the expected manner and timing of that disposal, and, if not separately presented on the face of the balance sheet, the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal group is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. We disclose in the notes to our financial statements (and on the face of the income statement) the gain or loss recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and, if applicable, the amounts of revenue and pretax profit or loss reported in discontinued operations. We disclose, if applicable, in the notes to our financial statements the segment in which the long-lived asset is reported under.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash andak-after:avoid;"> 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Forest Park

 

Queensbury, NY

 

 

Restricted Cash and Loan Reserves

Restricted cash and loan reserves represent reserves established pursuant to the debt agreements as described in Note 6.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable from sales of manufactured homes or assumed in connection with acquisitions are generally collateralized by manufactured homes located in our communities and is recorded at face value less allowances for bad debt less a market discount which the Company feels approximates the fair market value of the note.

1,996

 

 

590

 

 

3,314

 

 

 

 

1,340

 

 

590

 

 

4,654

 

 

5,244

 

 

507

 

 

 

Feb-02

Reserves for Bad Debts

We maintain allowances for bad debts on tenant receivables and notes receivable. We fully reserve amounts due from tenants greater than sixty days past due. We establish reserves for notes receivable based on management’s periodic review of specific notes considered wholly or partially uncollectible, plus an amount for estimated future uncollectible amounts based on historical experience. At December 31,

F-10




2004 and 2003, approximately $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, was reserved for tenant and notes receivables. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we charged $3.9 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, to bad debt expense.

Inventory

Inventory consists of new and used manufactured homes held for sale, including costs and materials associated with preparing the units for sale. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on specific identification reduced, as applicable, by dealer volume rebates earned from manufacturers ($14,000 and $101,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively).

Loan Origination Costs

We capitalize loan origination costs associated with financing. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the repayment term of the loans. We amortized $5.9 million, $3.2 million and $4.1 million of loan origination costs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization. The charge in 2002 includes $1.6 million for previously incurred loan origination costs of debt paid in the Reorganization. Accumulated amortization was $6.4 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Reorganization completed on May 2, 2002. We periodically assess and adjust the value of the goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded an impairment charge of $863,000 related to our insurance business as our insurance business estimated fair value was less than its carrying value as of December 31, 2004. For the year end December 31, 2002, we recorded an impairment change of $13.6 million. For additional discussion, see Note 2.

Lease Intangibles and Customer Relationships

We establish the value of lease intangibles and customer relationships at the date of acquisition of a community. We amortize lease intangibles and customer relationships related to community acquisitions on a straight-line basis over the estimated time period that a resident lives in the community (five years). We amortize lease intangibles and customer relationships related to acquisitions of rental homes on a straight-line basis over the lease term (one year). The acquired community customer relationships and rental home customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis since we cannot reliably determine the pattern of economic benefit associated with the individual contracts comprising the intangible assets. We do not have sufficient historical or industry data to reliably estimate the tenure of an individual customer or to pool customer contracts on a homogeneous basis as a basis to amortize the intangible assets in a manner other than straight line. Future amortization of lease intangibles and customer relationship intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):

2005

 

$

6,087

 

2006

 

6,003

 

2007

 

3,827

 

2008

 

2,787

 

2009

 

402

 

Total

 

$

19,106

 

 

F-11




Accumulated amortization was $13.3 million and $7.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Impairment of Intangible Assets

We combine our finite-lived intangible assets, which consist primarily of lease and customer intangibles, with other assets located in each community (prid>

 

 

Four Seasons

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

 

1,991

 

 

962

 

 

5,678

 

 

 

 

1,086

 

 

962

 

 

6,764

 

 

7,726

 

 

177

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Foxhall Village

 

Raleigh, NC

 

 

6,984

 

 

1,518

 

 

8,474

 

 

 

 

1,162

 

 

1,518

 

 

9,636

 

 

11,154

 

 

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

Included in prepaid expenses and other assets are prepaid insurance and other prepaid expenses, as well as earnest money deposits which are treated as deposits until the underlying transactions are complete.

Prepaid expenses and other assets as of December 31, 2004 of $6.5 million were lower than the $24.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2003, primarily due to $17.5 million of earnest money deposits held in escrow at December 31, 2003 related to the Hometown acquisition.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual agreement between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and recognize it in income when earned.

We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title, possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no further obligations to perform significant additional activities.

Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization

We capitalize our interest costs (using our average cost of borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively. The long-lived assets on which we capitalize interest include general construction activities in our communities, manufactured homes, and, in the case of the communities acquired in the Hometown acquisition, the cost of the vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making improvements and placing a manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized $3.9 million of interest and internal costs during 2004. No significant interest or internal costs were capitalized during 2003 and 2002.

Income Taxes

We are a partnership for tax purposes and do not pay federal or state income taxes. Our income is taxed to our members in their individual returns, and we therefore do not record an income tax provision.

F-12




Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of our debt was approximately $1,028.6 million and $813.0 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The fair value of our other financial instruments approximates their carrying vales at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

Interest Rate Caps and Swaps

We use derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates. As required under the guidelines of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, we record all of our derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, we initially report the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassify it into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. We report the ineffective portion of the gain or loss associated with a cash flow hedge in earnings immediately. During 2004, we entered into a $100.0 million interest rate swap agreement with an unrelated third party effectively fixing the interest rate on $100.0 million of our variable rate debt at 5.06%. The swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. At December 31, 2004, $1.2 million of unrealized gain related to this derivative instrument has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the accompanying December 31, 2004 balance sheet.

We further manage our exposure to interest rate risk through the use of interest rate caps which protect us from movements in interest rates above specified levels. We immediately recognize in earnings the change in the fair value of gains or losses associated with interest rate caps. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recorded interest charges of $241,000, $115,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of the interest rate caps. At December 31, 2004 and 2003 the carrying value of our interest rate caps is $7,000 and zero, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (a component of partners’ capital) as of December 31, 2004 represent unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap which qualifies as a cash flow hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Our comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $100.1 million. There were no unrecognized gains or losses related to our interest rate swap during 2003 and 2002, and therefore, our comprehensive loss for 2003 and 2002, is equal to our net loss to Common OP Unitholders as reported on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

OP Unit Grants

We have included a charge of $10.1 million in general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 representing the value of 530,000 Common OP Units we granted February 18, 2004 under our 2003 equity incentive plan that vested at the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP Units that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 of restricted OP Units were forfeited. We have recorded the unvested portion of the remaining 15,000 outstanding restricted OP Units as unearned compensation on the balance sheet (a component of partners’ capital) and are amortizing the balance ratably over the vesting period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be

F-13




recognized in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We will apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting period beginning July 1, 2005 at the same time as ARC. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We are still evaluating the impacts of adopting SFAS 123R upon our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

2.   The Reorganization

On May 2, 2002, ARC completed the Reorganization in which each of the Limited Partnerships was merged with a separate subsidiary of ARC (ARC and the Limited Partnerships hereinafter collectively referred to as the “ARC Partnerships”). Also as part of the Reorganization, the retail home sales, insurance and other businesses previously conducted by the subsidiaries of ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company (“Holdings”) were acquired by the Operating Partnership and Holdings was liquidated. ARC became the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, which then indirectly owned and operated its existing portfolio of manufactured home communities and the Limited Partnerships’ portfolios of manufactured home communities, as well as the other businesses previously conducted by the subsidiaries of Holdings.

As a result of the Reorganization, the limited partners received cash ($113.0 million), partnership units in the Operating Partnership paired with 1.9268 shares of special voting shares of ARC par value $.01 per share (collectively, 2.7 million partnership units and special voting stock, hereinafter collectively referred to as “OP Units”) and common units (1.6 million units). As a result of the combination of Holdings’ subsidiaries with the Operating Partnership, Holdings received shares of ARC’s common stock (4.2 million shares) and distributed them to its owners upon the liquidation of Holdings.

In connection with the Reorganization, several of our subsidiaries incurred fixed rate mortgage debt of $310 million and floating rate mortgage debt of $193 million and issued $75 million out of a commitment to issue a preferred interest of $150 million. The proceeds of these borrowings were used to repay existing indebtedness of certain subsidiaries of the ARC Partnerships, fund the cash portion of the consideration to the limited partners of the Limited Partnerships in the Reorganization, pay fees and expenses related to the Reorganization and provide working capital.

We have used the purchase method to account for the combination of the businesses and assets of the Limited Partnerships and Holdings. We have allocated the aggregate purchase price of the businesses and assets of Holdings and the Limited Partnerships to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Purchase
Price
  Allocation  

 

Purchase price, including transaction costs

 

 

$

328,551

 

 

Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and othent-size:7.5pt;">263

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Frieden Manor

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

 

1,816

 

 

582

 

 

3,480

 

 

 

 

188

 

 

582

 

 

3,668

 

 

4,250

 

 

407,832

 

 

Intangible lease contracts and customer relationship value

 

 

18,917

 

 

Other operating assets and liabilities

 

 

36,033

 

 

Debt assumed

 

 

(233,915

)

 

 

 

 

228,867

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

$

99,684

 

 

 

We allocated this goodwill to the real estate reporting unit ($85.3 million), retail home sales and finance reporting unit ($12.1 million) and insurance reporting unit ($2.3 million). At December 31, 2002,

F-14




we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value the reporting units. As a result, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales business $12.1 million and the insurance business of $1.4 million. The impairment for retail home sales business arose as a result of a worsening of conditions since the Reorganization including adverse operating performance in our retail home sale business, the retail home sales industry, the related finance industry and the market for retail home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance business arose because the retail home sales business provides a significant portion of the insurance business’ revenue. We realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2003. See Note 13 for discussion regarding 2004 impairment.

We determined the fair value of the tangible community assets (other than rental homes discussed below) acquired in the Reorganization (which includes land, land improvements, and buildings) by valuing the property as if it were vacant. We then allocated the “as-if-vacant” value to land, land improvements and buildings based on our determination of the relative fair values of these assets.

We determined the as-if-vacant fair value of the real estate by considering the expected lease-up period for individual communities (based on vacancies in the surrounding market and lease-up history for the communities acquired), the expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates), and expected move-in bonuses to tenants.

We measure the aggregate value of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships as the excess of the purchase price paid for a property over the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, as set forth above. We amortize the in-place lease value and tenant relationships for communities acquired over the estimated life that a resident resides in the community (five years) based on our historical experience with turnover in our communities and industry market studies. The lease term for communities is generally month-to-month. However, based on our own experience and industry data, the average time that a resident remains in the community is five years based on renewals of those month-to-month leases.

We also determined fair value for the rental manufactured homes acquired in the Reorganization as if they were vacant. We determined the as-if-vacant fair value of the rental homes by considering the expected lease-up period for the home (based on lease-up history for rental homes in that community) and the expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates). We measured the aggregate value of the intangibles related to rental homes, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, by the purchase price paid for the rental homes (after adjusting in-place leases to market) less the fair value of the property as-if-vacant. We amortize the market rate adjustment, i.0pt;"> 

 

58

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Friendly Village—GA

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

 

5,310

 

 

1,045

 

 

6,150

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

1,045

 

 

6,352

 

 

7,397

 

 

175

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Gallant Estates

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

897

 

 

158

 

 

925

 

 

 

 

390

 

 

158

 

 

1,315

 

 

1,473

 

 

184

 

 

 

Aug-01

 

In accordance with the procedures described above, we have established the following intangible assets associated with in-place leases and tenant relationships as of the date of acquisition (in thousands):

Community customer relationships

 

$

15,708

 

Community in place lease value

 

1,709

 

Rental customer relationships

 

1,288

 

Rental in-place lease value

 

45

 

Rental above and below market leases

 

167

 

 

 

$

18,917

 

 

F-15




As a consequence of using the purchase method to account for the Reorganization, our results of operations and financial position include all of our accounts in all periods but include the results of operations of the businesses formerly conducted in the Limited Partnerships and Holdings only for periods subsequent to the Reorganization.

We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information for the year ended December 31, 2002 as if the Reorganization had occurred on January 1, 2002. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the Reorganization had been consummated on January 1, 2002 (amounts in thousands):

Revenue

 

$

176,919

 

Total expenses(1)

 

$

235,545

 

Interest income

 

$

(1,543

)

 

Glen Acres

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

1,513

 

 

492

 

 

2,391

 

 

 

 

329

 

 

492

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(57,083

)

Discontinued operations

 

$

186

 

Net loss

 

$

(56,897

)

Net loss per unit

 

$

(3.35

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

16,973

 


 

 

2,720

 

 

3,212

 

 

297

 

 

 

Jan-00

 

 

Glenview

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

310

 

 

80

 

 

865

 

 

(1)    Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002, include non-recurring charges incurred in the Reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including $1.9 million in exit fees and $1.6 million for the write-off of unamortized loan costs, and include a charge of $13.6 million to write-off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses.

3.   REIT IPO and Acquisitions

REIT IPO and Hometown Acquisition

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued 23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units to ARC.

Also in connection with ARC’s IPO, we granted 530,000 common OP Units that vested at the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted OP Units. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted OP Units were forfeited.

 

 

50

 

 

80

 

 

915

 

 

995

 

 

167

 

 

 

Aug-98

 

 

Golden Rule

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

1,465

 

 

340

 

 

3,422

 

 

 

 

244

 

 

340

 

 

3,666

 

 

4,006

 

 

588

 

 

 

Jul-98

Concurrent with the ARC IPO, we completed the refinancing of $240.0 million of our mortgage debt and raised an additional $260.0 million of new mortgage debt. The new mortgage debt, at the time of the ARC IPO, was comprised of $215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.53%, $100.7 million of 5 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.05% and $184.0 million of floating rate debt (see Note 6). Proceeds from the ARC IPO and new debt were used to purchase the Hometown communities, repay our Rental Home Credit Facility and redeem the Preferred Interest issued by one of our subsidiaries.

On February 18, 2004, and subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include 26,406

F-16




homesites. The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired consisted of the following (in thousands):

Cash purchase price

 

$

522,131

 

Debt assumed in connection with acquisition

 

93,139

 

Total purchase price

 

$

615,270

 

 

Golden Triangle

 

Coppell, TX

 

 

3,704

 

 

525

 

 

3,074

 

 

 

 

Our purchase price allocation is (in thousands):

Land

 

$

89,794

 

Rental and other property

 

494,734

 

 

778

 

 

525

 

 

3,852

 

 

4,377

 

Inventory

 

9,761

 

 

 

780

 

 

Lease intangibles

 

811

 

Customer relationships

 

14,496

 

Notes receivable

 

 

Jan-00

 

 

Golden Valley

 

Douglasville, GA

 

 

1,420

5,674

 

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

615,270

 

 

275

 

 

1,576

 

 

 

 

901

 

 

275

 

 

2,477

 

 

2,752

 

 

67

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Grand Meadow

 

Longmont, CO

 

 

2,624

 

 

555

 

 

3,149

 

 

 

 

65

 

 

555

 

 

3,214

 

 

3,769

 

 

253

 

 

 

Sep-02

 

 

Green Acres

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

174

 

 

51

 

 

306

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

We amortize the lease intangibles acquired on a straight-line basis over the lease term (one year) and the customer relationships acquired on a straight-line basis over the estimated time period that a resident lives in the community (five years).

We assumed management of the Hometown communities prior to our completion of the Hometown acquisition pursuant to a management agreement. We hired all Hometown employees actively employed at the Hometown communities on January 1, 2004, with Hometown reimbursing us for the costs associated with such employment until we completed the acquisition.

D.A.M. Portfolio Acquisition

On June 30, 2004 we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY, L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was approximately $65.5 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt, this acquisition was funded through the issuance of new Series “B”, “C” and “D” Partnership Preferred Units (“PPUs”), for proceeds totaling $33.1 million. All of the “D” series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were redeemed for cash on July 6, 2004. See Note 4 for further discussion of the PPUs.

Our purchase price allocation is (in thousands):

51

 

 

307

 

 

Land

 

$

9,225

 

Rental and other property

 

55,501

 

Inventory

 

803

 

Customer relationships

 

52

 

Other assets/liabilities, net

 

(78

)

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

65,503

 

 

We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M. acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2003. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if we had consummated the acquisitions on January 1, 2003. We have not provided audited financial statements of Hometown for the

F-17




year ended December 31, 2003 because the results of Hometown are included in our results for the year ended December 31, 2004 for approximately ten and one-half months (in thousands).

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Revenue

 

$

236,114

 

$

240,083

358

 

 

5

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Green Cove

 

Huntsville, AL

 

 

1,031

 

 

226

 

 

1,546

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

226

 

 

1,630

 

 

1,856

 

 

217

 

Total expenses

 

$

321,722

 

$

280,474

 

Interest income

 

$

(1,676

)

$

 

 

 

Jan-98

 

 

Green Park South

 

Pelham, AL

 

 

(1,919

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(83,932

)

$

(38,472

)

6,414

 

 

1,442

 

 

8,419

 

 

 

 

24

 

 

1,442

 

Discontinued operations

 

$

 

8,442

 

 

9,884

 

 

234

 

 

 

Feb-04

(6,326

)

 

 

Green Spring Valley

 

Raleigh, NC

$

6,055

 

Net loss

 

$

(90,258

)

$

(32,417

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(100,010

)

$

(32,417

)

 

 

7,113

 

 

750

 

 

4,261

 

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders per unit

 

$

(2.47

)

$

(1.65

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

 

Other Acquisitions

During the years ended Dom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">

 

 

1,957

 

 

750

 

 

6,218

 

 

We have not presented pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 as if these other acquisitions were made on the first day of the year, as the effects of these other acquisitions are not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flow for these periods.

F-18




The table below summarizes all of our manufactured home community acquisitions for the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004.

 

c;font-weight:bold;"> 

Date

6,968

 

 

1,400

 

 

 

Jun-99

 

 

Green Valley Village

 

Casper, WY

 

 

1,139

 

 

 

 

Portfolio

 

Community

 

Location

 

Homesites

 

Jan-02

 

NA

 

size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

162

 

 

2,062

 

 

 

 

501

Sundown

 

Clearfield, UT

 

 

200

 

 

Feb-02

 

NA

 

 

162

 

 

2,563

 

 

2,725

 

 

 

Forest Park

 

Queensbury, NY

 

 

183

 

 

Feb-02

 

NA

400

 

 

 

Mar-99

 

 

Gregory Courts

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

557

 

 

133

 

 

Birch Meadow Estates

 

Wilton, NY

 

 

 

809

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

133

 

 

896

 

 

1,028

 

 

14

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Hampton Acres

 

64

 

 

Feb-02

 

NA

 

Park D’Antoine

 

Wilton, NY

 

DeSoto, TX

 

 

1,089

 

 

335

 

 

1,966

 

 

 

 

1,304

 

 

335

 

 

3,270

 

 

3,605

 

 

358

 

 

 

Jun-02

 

 

Harmony Road

 

Fort Collins, CO

 

 

13,645

 

18

 

 

Apr-02

 

NA

 

Valley Verde

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

 

220

 

 

Apr-02

 

NA

 

Arbor Lake

 

Grinnell, IA

 

 

 

2,738

 

 

15,518

 

40

 

 

May-02

 

 

 

(288

)

 

4,206

 

 

2,450

 

 

19,724

 

 

22,174

 

 

4,888

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

NA

 

Riverside

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

201

 

 

Jun-02

 

 

Harper Woods

 

Lawrence, KS

 

 

2,339

 

 

375

 

 

2,234

 

 

 

NA

 

Hampton Acres

 

Desoto, TX

 

 

119

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

1,404

 

 

375

 

 

3,638

 

 

4,013

NA

 

Southridge Estates

 

Des Moines, IA

 

 

302

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

1,015

 

 

 

Mar-00

 

 

Havenwood

 

Pompano Beach, FL

 

 

3,170

 

 

443

 

 

2,535

 

 

 

 

367

 

 

443

 

 

2,902

 

NA

 

Pleasant Grove

 

Raleigh, NC

 

 

72

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Amber Village

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

206

 

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Village East

 

3,345

 

 

362

 

 

 

May-01

 

 

 

Terrell, TX

 

 

196

Hidden Acres

 

Arnold, MO

 

 

437

 

 

60

 

 

342

 

 

 

 

143

 

 

60

 

 

485

 

 

545

 

 

97

 

 

 

May-00

 

 

Hidden Hills

 

Casper, WY

 

 

1,277

 

 

221

 

 

1,973

 

 

 

 

503

 

 

221

 

Jul-02

 

NA

 

Americana #1 & #2

 

Hemet, CA

 

 

309

 

 

Sep-02

 

NA

 

Connelly Village

 

Connelly, NY

 

 

100

 

 

Sep-02

 

NA

 

Cypress Shores

 

Winter Haven, FL

 

 

204

 

 

Sep-02

 

NA

 

Grand Meadows

 

Longmont, CO

 

 

104

 

 

Dec-02

 

NA

 

Berryhill Commons

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

257

 

 

Dec-02

 

NA

 

Berryhill Acres

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

244

 

 

Dec-02

 

NA

 

Creekside Terrace

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

250

 

 

Feb-03

 

NA

 

Brookshire Village

 

St. Louis, MO

 

 

202

 

 

 

 

2,476

 

 

2,697

 

 

354

 

 

 

Sep-97

 

 

Hidden Oaks

 

Sep-03

 

NA

 

Philbin Estates

 

Pocatello, ID

 

 

180

 

 

Feb-04

 

NA

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

Lebanon, TN

 

 

270

 

 

Feb-04

 

NA

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

637

 

 

157

 

 

890

 

 

 

 

1,389

 

 

157

 

 

2,279

 

 

2,436

 

 

538

 

 

 

Jul-99

 

 

Hideaway

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

 

Weatherly Estates II

 

Clarksville, TN

 

 

 

108

 

 

643

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

108

 

 

647

 

 

756

 

 

131

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

100 Oaks

 

Fultondale, AL

 

 

235

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Jonesboro

 

 

11

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Highland

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

3,196

 

 

982

Jonesboro, GA

 

 

75

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Bermuda Palms

 

Indio, CA

 

 

185

 

 

 

5,168

 

 

 

 

492

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Breazeale

 

Laramie, WY

 

 

982

 

 

5,661

 

 

6,642

 

 

157

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Highland Acres

&16.5pt;">

117

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Broadmore

 

Goshen, IN

 

 

370

 

 

Feb-04

Lewisville, TX

 

 

4,780

 

 

856

 

 

4,946

&"2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

HTA

 

Butler Creek

 

Augusta, GA

 

 

376

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Camden Point

 

Kingsland, GA

 

 

268

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Carnes Crossing

 

Summerville, SC

 

 

604

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

666

 

 

856

 

 

5,612

 

 

6,468

 

 

570

 

Castlewood Estates

 

Mableton, GA

 

 

334

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Casual Estates

 

Liverpool, NY

 

 

961

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Highview

 

Gillette, WY

 

 

 

Riverdale

 

Riverdale, GA

 

 

481

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Columbia Heights

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

 

302

 

 

Feb-04

 

1,568

 

 

373

 

HTA

 

Conway Plantation

 

Conway, SC

 

1,882

 

 

 

 

322

 

 

373

 

 

 

 

2,204

 

 

2,577

 

 

232

 

 

 

Jan-96

 

 

Huguenot Estates

 

Port Jervis, NY

 

 

1,956

 

 

285

 

 

1,789

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

285

 

 

1,830

 

 

2,115

 

 

30

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Hunter Ridge

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

 

16,000

 

 

3,944

 

 

23,062

 

 

 

 

3,114

 

 

3,944

 

 

26,176

 

 

30,120

 

 

730

 

 

 

299

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Crestview

 

Stillwater, OK

 

 

238

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Country Village

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

643

 

 

Feb-04

 

Feb-04

 

 

F-63

 




 

Indian Rocks

 

Largo, FL

 

 

 

 

338

 

 

2,029

 

 

 

 

598

 

 

338

 

 

2,626

 

 

2,964

 

 

79

 

 

 idth:34.25pt;">

HTA

 

Eagle Creek

 

Tyler, TX

 

 

194

 

 

Feb-04

 

Feb-04

 

 

Inspiration Valley

 

Arvada, CO

 

 

4,446

 

 

589

 

 

3,337

 

 

 

 

1,333

 

HTA

 

Eagle Point

 

Marysville, WA

 

 

230

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

589

 

 

4,670

 

 

5,259

 

 

1,168

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Jonesboro (Atlanta Meadows)

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

 

1,555

 

 

329

 

 

1,917

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

329

 

 

<1pt;text-align:center;">HTA

 

Falcon Farms

 

Port Byron, IL

 

 

215

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Forest Creek

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

167

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Fountainvue

 

Lafontaine, IN

1,937

 

 

2,265

 

 

55

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

120

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Foxhall Village

 

Raleigh, NC

 

 

315

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Golden Valley

 

Douglasville, GA

 

 

131

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Huron Estates

 

Chebo0pt;width:5.15pt;">

 

 

Kimberly @ Creekside

 

Seagoville, TX

 

 

1,267

 

 

325

 

 

1,939

 

 

 

 

441

 

 

325

 

 

2,380

 

 

2,705

 

 

215

 

 

 

 

111

 

 

F-19




 

:center;">HTA

e="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">

759

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Indian Rocks

 

Largo, FL

 

 

148

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Knoll Terrace

 

Corvallis, OR

 

 

212

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

Indio, CA

 

 

151

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Apr-97

 

 

Kintner Estates

 

Vestal, NY

 

 

 

 

74

 

 

447

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

74

 

 

500

 

 

574

 

 

6

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

 

Lakewood

 

Montgomery, AL

 

 

396

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakewood Estates

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

Kopper View MHC

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

 

 

275

 

 

180

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Landmark Village

 

Fairburn, GA

 

 

1,574

 

 

 

 

289

 

 

275

 

 

1,863

 

 

2,138

 

524

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Marnelle

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

 

205

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

26

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

Indio, CA

 

Oak Ridge

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

204

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

 

736

 

Oakwood Forest

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

482

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pedaler’s Pond

 

Lake Wales, FL

 

 

214

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pinecrest Village

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

446

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

4,348

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

736

 

 

4,522

 

 

5,258

 

 

121

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Lakeside—GA

 

Lithia Springs, GA

 

 

1,250

 

 

170

 

 

1,028

 

 

 

 

149

 

 

170

 

 

1,177

 

 

1,347

 

 

33

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pleasant Ridge

 

Mount Pleasant, MI

 

 

305

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

President’s Park

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

 

174

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Lakeside—IA

 

Davenport, IA

 

HTA

 

Riverview

 

Clackamas, OR

 

 

133

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Saddlebrook

 

N. Charleston, SC

 

 

425

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sherwood

 

Hartford City, IN

 

 

134

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Southwind Village

 

Naples, FL

 

 

337

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

318

 

 

1,968

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

318

 

 

2,277

 

 

2,595

 

 

63

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Lakeside of the Palm
Beaches

 

 

HTA

 

Springfield Farms

 

Brookline Sta, MO

 

 

290

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Stonegate

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

157

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Terrace Heights

 

Dubuque, IA

 

 

317

 

 

West Palm Beach, FL

 

 

4,136

 

 

1,262

 

 

8,653

 

 

 

 

324

 

 

1,262

 

 

8,977

 

 

10,239

 

 

1,162

 

 

 

Sep-98

 

 

Lakeview Estates

 

Layton, UT

 

 

5,099

 

 

963

 

 

5,342

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Torrey Hills

 

Flint, MI

 

 

377

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Twin Pines

 

Goshen, IN

 

 

238

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Villa

 

Flint, MI

 

 

319

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Winter Haven Oaks

 

Winterhaven, FL

 

 

343

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Green Park South

 

Pelham, AL

 

 

421

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Hunter Ridge

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

 

838

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Friendly Village

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

 

203

 

 

1,066

 

 

963

 

 

6,408

 

 

7,371

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Misty Winds

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

 

354

 

 

 

 

 

Oct-01

 

 

Lakewood—TX

 

Royse City, TX

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shadow Hills

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

670

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Smoke Creek

 

Snellville, GA

 

 

264

 

 

2,250

 

 

640

 

 

5,683

 

 

 

 

1,015

 

 

640

 

 

6,698

 

 

7,338

 

 

895

 

 

 

Oct-00

 

 

Lakewood Estates

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

3,011

 

 

621

 

 

3,885

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

Kennesaw, GA

 

 

273

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sunset Vista

 

Magna, UT

 

 

207

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sea Pines

 

Mobile, AL

 

 

429

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Woodland Hills

 

Montgomery, AL

 

 

628

 

 

 

 

459

 

 

621

 

 

4,344

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

The Pines

 

Ladson, SC

 

 

204

 

4,965

 

 

124

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shady Hills

 

Nashville, TN

 

 

251

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lamplighter Village

 

Marietta, GA

 

 

9,506

 

 

2,635

 

 

15,668

 

 

 

 

Trailmont

 

Goodlettsville, TN

 

 

131

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

1,367

 

 

2,635

 

 

17,035

 

 

19,670

 

 

486

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

Landmark Village

 

Fairburn, GA

Chisholm Creek

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

254

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Big Country

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

 

251

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Heritage Point

 

Montgomery, AL

 

 

264

 

 

9,600

 

 

2,048

 

 

11,320

 

 

 

 

2,289

 

 

2,048

 

 

13,609

 

 

15,657

 

 

360

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Lido Estates

 

Lancaster, CA

 

 

2,537

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Lithia Springs, GA

 

 

103

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Plantation Estates

 

Douglasville, GA

 

 

138

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

398

 

 

2,257

 

 

Green Acres

 

Petersburg, VA

 

 

182

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

124

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Evergreen Village

 

Pleasant View, UT

 

 

238

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

1,810

 

 

398

 

 

4,067

 

 

4,465

 

 

738

 

 

 

May-01

 

 

Loveland

 

Loveland, CO

 

 

1,949

 

 

661

 

 

3,038

 

 

 

 

260

 

 

661

 

 

Four Seasons

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

 

214

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

3,298

 

 

3,959

 

 

306

 

 

 

Apr-95 

Alafia Riverfront

 

Riverview, FL

 

 

96

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

Magnolia Circle

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

Highland

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

246

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Birchwood Farms

 

Birch Run, MI

 

 

143

 

 

F-20




 

pt 0pt .0001pt;text-align:center;">D.A.M.

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Terrace

 

Cedar Rapids, IA

 

 

255

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

270

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Creek

 

Davenport, IA

 

 

280

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Encantada<7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">

 

 

 

 

123

 

 

706

 

 

 

 

1,957

 

 

123

 

 

2,663

 

 

2,786

 

 

594

 

 

 

May-99

 

 

Mallard Lake

 

Pontoon Beach, IL

 

 

5,138

 

 

1,177

 

 

6,695

 

 

 

 

(267

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

 

354

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Royal Crest

 

Los Alamos, NM

 

 

180

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Brookside Village

)

 

1,177

 

 

6,428

 

 

7,605

 

 

169

 

 

 

Apr-04

 

 

Maple Manor

 

Taylor, PA

 

 

3,704

 

 

862

 

 

5,195

 

 

 

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

394

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Meadow Glen

 

Keller, TX

 

 

409

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Leaf

 

Mansfield, TX

 

 

145

 

208

 

 

862

 

 

5,403

 

 

6,266

 

 

88

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Marion Village

 

Marion, IA

t 0pt .0001pt;"> 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Lamplighter Village

 

Marietta, GA

 

 

431

 

 

 

7,657

 

 

1,605

 

 

8,140

 

 

15

 

 

654

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Shadowood

 

Acworth, GA

 

 

506

 

1,620

 

 

8,794

 

 

10,415

 

 

249

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

Marnelle

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

 

4,152

 

 

917

 

 

5,364

 

 

 

 

819

 

 

917

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Stone Mountain

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

 

354

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Marion Village

 

Marion, IA

 

 

486

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Autumn Forest

 

Brown Summit, NC

 

 

299

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Woodlake

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

6,183

 

 

7,100

 

 

169

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Martin’S

 

Nottingham, PA

 

 

 

 

225

 

 

1,318

 

 

 

 

47

 

 

225

 

 

1,365

 

 

1,590

 

 

22

 

 

308

 

 

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Arlington Lakeside

 

Arlington, TX

 

 

233

 

 

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Pine Ridge

 

Sarasota, FL

 

 

126

 

 

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Knoll

 

Waterloo, IA

 

 

290

 

 

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Mallard Lake

 

Pontoon Beach, IL

 

 

278

 

 

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Kopper View

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Meadow Glen

 

Keller, TX

 

 

 

 

1,417

 

 

8,363

 

 

 

 

926

 

 

1,417

 

 

9,289

 

 

10,706

 

 

522

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Meadowbrook

 

Pueblo, CO

 

 

3,866

 

61

 

 

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Overpass Point

 

Tooele, UT

 

 

 

942

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

 

182

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pleasant View

 

Berwick, PA

 

(28

)

 

942

 

 

8,405

 

 

9,347

 

 

1,157

 

 

 

Apr-95

 

 

Meadowood

 

Topeka, KS

 

 

3,212

 

 

762

 

108

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

 

4,628

 

 

 

 

542

 

 

762

 

 

5,170

 

 

5,932

 

 

527

 

 

D.A.M.

 

Brookside

 

Berwick, PA

 

 

171

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Beaver Run

 

Linkwood, MD

 

 

118

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Carsons

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

130

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Oct-00

 

 

Meridian Sooner

 

 

Chelsea

 

Sayre, PA

 

 

85

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Collingwood

 

Horseheads, NY

 

 

101

 

 

Jun-04

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

1,615

 

 

262

 

 

1,492

 

 

 

 

1,988

 

 

262

 

 

3,480

 

D.A.M.

 

Crestview

 

Sayre, PA

 

 

98

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Danboro

 

Danboro, PA

 

 

231

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Ephrata

 

Ephrata, PA

 

 

149

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Frieden

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

3,742

 

 

768

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Meridian Terrace

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

 

4,592

 

 

1,012

 

 

5,747

 

 

 

 

1,868

 

 

1,012

 

 

7,615

 

 

8,627

 

 

 

192

 

 

Jun-04tyle="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 

1,148

 

 

 

May-01

 

 

Merrimac Manor

 

Huntsville, AL

 

 

 

 

147

 

 

3,252

 

 

 

 

289

 

 

147

 

 

3,541

 

 

3,688

 

 

757

 

 

 

May-99

 

 

Mesquite Green

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

1,759

 

 

352

 

 

1,697

 

D.A.M.

 

Green Acres

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

24

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Gregory Courts

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

39

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Honey Brook

 

 

 

 

 

550

 

 

352

 

 

2,247

 

 

2,599

 

 

218

 

 

 

Jan-98

 

 

Mesquite Meadows

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

3,212

 

 

443

 

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

146

 

 

2,819

 

 

 

 

1,262

 

 

443

 

 

4,081

 

 

4,524

 

 

403

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Huguenot

 

Port Jervis, NY

 

 

166

 

Dec-97

 

 

Mesquite Ridge

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

2,282

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Maple Manor

 

Taylor, PA

 

 

316

 

 

387

 

 

2,013

 

 

 

 

941

 

 

387

 

 

2,954

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Monroe Valley

 

Jonestown, PA

 

 

44

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Moosic Heights

 

Avoca, PA

 

 

152

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Mountaintop

 

Narvon, PA

 

 

39

 

  

3,341

 

 

248

 

 

 

Dec-97

 

 

Mission Estates

 

El Paso, TX

 

 

2,841

 

 

795

 

 

4,549

 

 

 

 

1,414

 

 

795

 

 

5,963

 

 

6,758

 

 

828

 

 

 

Aug-01

 

 

Misty Hollow

 

Midwest City, OK

 

 

279

 

 

97

 

 

883

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

97

 

 

929

 

 

1,026

font>

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Haven

 

Blossvale, NY

 

 

130

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunny Acres

 

Somerset, PA

 

 

207

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Suburban

 

 

139

 

 

 

Sep-98

 

 

Misty Winds

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

 

5,170

 

 

812

 

 

4,845

 

 

 

 

259

 

 

Greenburg, PA

 

 

202

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Blue Ridge

 

Conklin, NY

 

 

69

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Chambersburg I&II

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

 

100

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Hideaway

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

40

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Kintner

 

Vestal, NY

 

 

55

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Martins

 

Nottingham, PA

 

 

60

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Nichols

 

Phoenixville, PA

 

 

10

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

 

812

 

 

5,104

 

 

5,916

 

 

161

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Mobile Gardens

 

Denver, CO

 

 

3,806

Scenic View

 

East Earl, PA

 

 

18

 

 

440

 

 

2,497

 

 

 

 

879

 

 

440

 

 

3,376

 

 

3,816

 

 

854

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Monroe Valley

 

Jonestown, PA

 

 

271

 

 

120

 

 

717

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

120

 

 

720

 

 

840

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Shady Grove

 

Atglen, PA

 

 

40

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

F-21




 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Blandon

 

Fleetwood, PA

 

 

30

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Morgantown

 

Morgantown, PA

 

 

23

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Tuckerton

 

Reading, PA

 

 

74

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Wernersville

 

Wernersville, PA

 

 

29

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Terrace

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

 

25

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunnyside

 

Trooper, PA

 

 

71

 

 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

Tunkhannock, PA

 

 

79

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Moosic Heights

 

Avoca, PA

 

 

1,864

 

 

389

 

 

2,354

 

 

 

 

112

 

Jul-04

 

NA

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

145

 

 

389

 

 

2,466

 

 

2,854

 

 

39

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Mountainside Estates

 

Golden, CO

 

 

7,932

 

 

1,120

 

 

6,351

 

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

1,120

 

 

7,982

 

 

9,102

 

 

1,985

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Mountaintop

 

Narvon, PA

 

Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

Sep-04

 

NA

 

Willow Creek Estates

 

Ogden, UT

 

 

137

 

 

387

 

 

141

 

 

4.   Partners’ Capital

As of December 31, 2004, the Company has a total of 43.3 million Common OP Units, 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units, 300,000 Series B Preferred Units and 706,000 Series C Preferred OP Units outstanding. The following table summarizes our partner capital transactions from inception of the Company (in thousands):

 

 

Year

 

Common
OP Units

 

Series A
Preferred
OP Units

 

 

 

851

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

141

 

 

887

 

 

1,028

 

 

15

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Mulberry Heights

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

 

 

105

 

 

625

 

Series B
Preferred
OP Units

 

Series C
Preferred
OP Units

 

Series D
Preferred
OP Units

 

Total
Net capital

 

Initial capitalization

 

 

 

1,102

 

 

105

 

 

1,727

 

1998

 

 

1,038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

20,000

 

Sales of OP Units

 

 

 

1,832

 

 

362

 

 

 

Oct-99

 

 

Navajo Lake Estates

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

2,097

 

 

468

 

 

3,018

 

 

 

1999

 

 

4,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

<"> 

295

 

 

468

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78,804

 

Sales of OP Units

 

2000

 

 

2,995

 

 

 

 

3,313

 

 

3,781

 

 

394

 

 

 

Jul-97

 

 

New Twin Lakes

 

Middletown, NY

 

 

6,458

 

 

898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,859

 

Sales of OP Units

 

2001

 

 

1,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,913

 

 

 

 

1,203

 

 

898

 

 

6,116

 

 

7,014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

840

 

 

 

Jul-01

 

 

F-64

 




 

 

33,700

 

Sales of OP Units

 

Nichols

 

Phoenixville, PA

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

214

 

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

214

 

 

250

 

 

4

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Northern Hills

 

Springdale, AR

 

 

2,294

 

 

520

 

 

3,294

 

 

 

 

180

 

 

520

 

 

3,474

 

 

3,994

 

 

379

 

 

 

Nov-97

 

 

Northland

 

Kansas City, MO

 

 

5,239

 

 

720

 

 

4,077

 

 

 

 

1,045

 

 

720

 

 

5,122

 

2002

 

 

1,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,760

 

OP Units issued in Reorganization

 

2002

 

 

8,516

 

 

 

 

5,842

 

 

1,131

 

 

 

Sep-99

 

 

Oak Glen

 

Fayetteville, AR

 

 

1,122

 

 

241

 

 

1,474

 

 

 

 

62

 

 

241

 

 

1,536

 

 

1,777

 

 

189

 

 

 

Nov-97

 

 

Oak Grove

 

Godfrey, IL

 

 

660

 

 

129

 

 

759

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

670

 

 

129

 

 

1,429

 

 

1,558

 

 

384

 

 

 

 

202,472

 

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

19,699

 

Sep-99

 

 

Oak Park Village (FL)

 

Gainesville, FL

 

 

4,479

 

 

406

 

 

1,358

 

 

 

 

1,128

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

432,595

 

Issuance of Common OP Units in connection with ARC IPO

 

2004

 

 

23,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

410,724

 

Restricted common units issued, net of current year amortization

 

2004

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

406

 

 

2,486

 

 

2,892

 

 

487

 

 

 

Jun-98

 

 

Oak Park Village (TX)

 

Coppell, TX

 

 

2,563

 

 

971

 

 

4,383

 

 

 

 

357

 

 

971

 

 

4,740

 

 

5,711

 

 

234

 

 

 

Apr-97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

199

 

Forfeiture of restricted common OP units

0pt 0pt;width:5.15pt;">

 

 

Oak Ridge

 

Elkhart, IN

 

 

4,100

 

 

815

 

 

4,656

 

 

 

 

424

 

 

 

2004

 

 

(80

)

 

 

 

 

815

 

 

5,080

 

 

5,896

 

 

148

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Oakridge / Stonegate

 

Stillwater, OK

 

 

833

 

 

333

 

 

1,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(150

)

Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with ARC IPO

 

 

 

 

191

2004

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119,108

 

 

333

 

 

2,019

 

 

2,352

 

 

272

 

 

 

Mar-98

 

 

Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with D.A.M. portfolio acquisition

 

2004

 

 

Oakwood Forest

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

6,100

 

 

1,609

 

 

8,697

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

706

 

 

 

320

 

 

33,142

 

Redemption of Preferred OP Units

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

725

 

 

1,609

 

 

9,421

 

 

11,031

 

 

 

 

(320

)

 

(8,000

)

Redemption of Common OP Units

 

2004

 

261

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

Tunkhannock, PA

 

 

(8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

605

 

 

181

 

 

1,090

 

 

 

 

128

 

 

181

 

 

1,219

 

 

1,400

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Oasis

 

Pueblo, CO

 

 

3,817

 

 

 

(125

)

Common OP Unit distributions

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

907

 

 

5,142

 

 

 

 

929

 

 

907

 

 

6,071

 

 

6,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(47,085

)

Subtotal

1,524

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Ortega Village

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

3,023

 

 

486

 

 

 

 

 

43,278

 

2,416

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

300

 

 

 "10" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.7pt;">

 

3,198

 

 

486

 

 

5,614

 

 

6,100

 

 

1,423

 

 

 

Jun-99

 

 

Overholser Village

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

1,233

 

 

706

 

 

 

 

 

940,408

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

&nbst 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">

446

 

 

2,779

 

 

 

 

119

 

 

446

 

 

2,898

 

 

3,344

 

 

390

 

 

 

Jan-98

 

 

Overpass Point MHC

 

Tooele, UT

 

 

 

 

544

 

 

3,629

 

 

 

 

472

 

 

544

 

 

4,100

 

 

4,644

 

&np;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,208

 

Cumulative net losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Park Avenue Estates

 

Haysville, KS

 

 

401

 

 

180

 

 

1,021

 

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

180

 

 

2,053

 

 

2,233

 

 

533

 

 

 

Feb-00

 

 

Park D’Antoine

 

Wilton, NY

 

 

330

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(225,677

)

Partners’ capital, December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

715,939

 

 

F-22




 

58

 

 

332

 

 

 

 

33

 

Common OP Units

On January 23, 2004 our partners approved a reverse split by which all of our partners received 0.519 Common OP Unit for every Common OP Unit they previously owned. As a result, we have restated all historical Common OP Unit data to give effect to this reverse split.

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued 23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units to ARC.

Also in connection with ARC’s IPO, we granted 530,000 Common OP Units that vested at the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted Common OP Units. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted Common OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted Common OP Units were forfeited.

In addition, as of December 31, 2004 ARC has outstanding warrants to certain ARC shareholders authorizing the purchase of up to 775,000 shares of ARC common stock at $18.85 per share, as adjusted for dividends paid by ARC. The warrants expire on July 23, 2010 and, if exercised, would result in issuance of 775,000 additional Common OP Units. To date, no warrants have been exercised.

We repurchased a total of 8,025 Common OP Units from Common OP Unitholders for total cash of approximately $125,000 during 2004. No repurchases were completed in 2003 or 2002.

Series “A” Preferred OP Units

At the ARC IPO, the Company issued 5.0 million Series “A” Preferred OP Units at a price of $25.00 per unit that have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions. The holders of our Series “A” Preferred OP Units are entitled to receive cash distributions at a rate of 8.25% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference. The Series “A” Preferred OP Units have no voting rights and no stated maturity. We may not redeem the Series “A” Preferred OP Units prior to February 18, 2009. On and after February 18, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem our Series “A” Preferred OP Unith="8" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.15pt;">

 

58

 

 

365

 

 

423

 

 

40

 

 

 

Feb-02

 

 

Park Plaza

 

Gillette, WY

 

 

1,507

 

 

169

 

 

964

 

 

 

 

441

 

 

169

 

 

1,405

 

 

1,574

 

Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units

At December 31, 2004, we had 300,000 Series “B” Preferred OP Units and 705,688 Series “C” Preferred OP Units outstanding that were issued as part of the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition (see Note 3). Each Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at our election, one share of ARC common stock (which would necessitate the issuance of one Common OP Unit).

The Series “B” OP Units carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “B” OP Units can be redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance at the option of the Operating Partnership. Series “B” OP Unitholders can request redemption of their units after the 1st anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series “B” OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or cash and a note payable, at the Operating Partnership’s option. As of December 31, 2004, we have accrued

F-23




$78,125 of the Series “B” OP Unit preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “B” Preferred Unitholders through that date.

The Series “C” Preferred OP Units carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “C” Preferred OP Units can be redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance at the option of the Operating Partnership. Series “C” Preferred OP Unitholders can request redemption of their units after the two and a half year anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series “C” Preferred OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or with cash and a note payable, at the Operating Partnership’s option. Series “B” and “C” Preferred OP Units have the same priority as to the payment of distributions. As of December 31, 2004, we had accrued $183,773 of the Series “C” Preferred OP Unit preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “C” Preferred OP Unitholders through that date.

Distributions

On March 10, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1493 per Common OP Unit, prorated from February 18, 2004 to March 31, 2004. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $6.5 million on April 15, 2004 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2004. In addition, on March 10, 2004 we declared a distribution of $0.4182 on each unit of our Series “A” Preferred OP Unit, prorated from February 18, 2004 to April 30, 2004. We paid the Series “A” Preferred OP Units distribution of $2.1 million on April 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2004.

On June 14, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Units. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.6 million on July 15, 2004 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2004. In addition, on June 14, 2004 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid July 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on July 15, 2004. In addition, on July 30, 2004 we paid a $0.13 per unit distribution, prorated from July 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004, on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units.

On September 14, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on October 15, 2004 to unitholders of record on September 30, 2004. Also, on September 14, 2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid October 29, 2004 to unitholders of record on October 15, 2004. In addition, on September 14, 2004 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on October 29, 2004 to unitholders of record on October 15, 2004.

On December 10, 2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on January 14, 2005 to unitholders of record on December 31, 2004. Also, on December 10, 2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series “A” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid January 31, 2005 to unitholders of record on January 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we had accrued $1.7 million of the Series “A” Preferred OP Unit distribution, representing the portion of the distribution earned by preferred shareholders through that date. In addition, on December 10, 2004 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on January 31, 2005 to unitholders of record on January 15, 2005.

On March 10, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We will pay the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on April 15, 2005 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2005. Also, on March 10, 2005, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series “A” Preferred OP Units. This distribution is payable on April 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2005. In addition, on March 10, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and

F-24




Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution is payable on April 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2005.

5.   Rental and Other Property, net

The following summarizes rental and other property (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

194

 

 

 

Apr-01

 

 

Parkview Estates

 

San Jacinto, CA

 

 

2,400

 

 

600

 

 

3,419

 

 

 

 

2,859

 

 

600

 

 

6,278

 

 

6,878

 

 

951

 

 

 

May-01

 

 

Pedaler’s Pond

 

Lake Wales, FL

 

 

2,617

 

 

581

 

 

3,253

  

2003

 

Land

 

$

211,383

 

$

119,779

 

Land improvements and buildings

 

1,268,002

 

705,573

 

Rental homes and improvements

 

197,668

 

129,194

 

Furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

12,434

 

8,656

 

Subtotal

 

1,689,487

 

963,202

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

 

1,470

 

 

581

 

 

4,723

 

 

5,304

 

 

144

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Philbin Estates

 

Pocatello, ID

 

 

 

 

306

 

 

(156,707

)

(99,687

)

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,532,780

 

$

863,515

 

 

Land improvements and buildings comprise primarily infrastructure, roads and common area amenities.

6.   Notes Payable

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our debt (in thousands).

width="2" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">

 

 

 

December 31,

 

1,779

 

 

 

 

418

 

 

306

 

 

2,197

 

 

2,503

 lign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:345.2pt;">

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum

 

$

303,903

 

$

306,767

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014, 5.53% per annum

 

213,333

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

Sep-03

 

 

Picture Ranch

 

Clifton, CO

 

 

1,633

 

 

479

 

 

2,613

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum

 

99,651

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum (5.40% at December 31, 2004)

 

150,871

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2005, LIBOR plus 2.85% per annum (3.97% at December 31, 2003)

 

 

 

100

 

 

479

 

 

2,713

 

 

3,192

 

 

248

 

 

 

174,756

 

BFND credit facility due 2005, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum (4.12% at December 31, 2003)

 

 

52,414

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through 2031, averaging 7.31% per annum

 

Jun-00

 

 

Pine Haven MHP

 

Blossvale, NY

 

 

944

153,818

 

40,380

 

Preferred interest due 2005, 14.0% per annum

 

 

170,000

 

Rental home credit facility due 2010, LIBOR plus 4.7% per annum (5.82% at December 31, 2003)

 

 

24,055

 

Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility, LIBOR plus 2.95% (5.35% at December 31, 2004)

 

51,000

 

 

Floorplan lines of credit, ranging from prime plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 7.79% at December 31, 2004)

 

27,999

 

 

 

137

 

 

864

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

137

 

 

858

<0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">3,897

 

Other loans due 2005

 

1,047

 

 

995

 

 

15

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Pine Hills

 

Lawrence, KS

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

$

773,394

 

 

The fair value of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $1,028.6 million and $813.0 million, respectively.

F-25




Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 on May 2, 2002. It is an obligation of certain of our special purpose real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and matures on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05%, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2006

We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

1,303

 

 

204

 

 

1,641

 

 

 

 

94

 

 

204

 

 

1,735

 

 

1,939

 

 

247

 

 

 

Jan-98

 

 

Pine Terrace

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

296

 

 

 

 

79

 

 

50

 

 

374

 

 

424

 

 

5

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Pinecrest Village

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

3,264

 

 

689

 

 

3,558

 

 

 

 

663

 

 

689

 

 

4,221

 

 

4,910

 

 

134

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Plainview

 

Casper, WY

 

 

713

 

 

86

 

 

484

 

 

F-26




and property operating expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2005

We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2005 on May 2, 2002. It was an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and was collateralized by 71 manufactured home communities. The floating rate debt bore interest at a variable rate calman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

1,233

 

 

86

 

 

1,717

 

 

1,803

 

 

399

 

 

 

Nov-00

 

 

Plantation Estates

 

BFND Credit Facility

We entered into a $150 million credit facility on November 14, 2000, (the “BFND Credit Facility”). Proceeds from the BFND Credit Facility were available for community acquisitions and anticipated capital expenditures with advances up to 70% of the purchase price and related costs. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARC’s IPO, we repaid the BFND Credit Facility in full and incurred $786,000 in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages

We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at the time of acquisition as follows:

a)              Mortgages assumed as part of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately $46.3 million at December 31, 2004, mature from 2006 through 2028 and have an average effective interest rate of 7.56%. These mortgages are secured by 14 specific manufactured home communities.

b)              Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $78.2 million, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective interest rate of 5.12%. These mortgages are secured by 20 specific manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage.

c)               Notes assumed in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately $29.3 million, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.18%. These mortgages are secured by 22 specific manufactured home communities.

Preferred Interest

We entered into the Preferred Interest on May 2, 2002. The Preferred Interest had a preferred distribution rate of 12.5% per annum. On October 17, 2003, we modified our Preferred Interest to increase our borrowing limit by $25.0 million with a preferred distribution rate of 14.0% to apply to all outstanding balances beginning on the date of the first draw of the additional loan amount. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARC’s IPO, we repaid the Preferred Interest obligation in full and incurred $3.4 million in extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

F-27




Rental Home Credit Facility

On December 31, 2002, ARC Housing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of ARC RE, entered into a $27.0 million credit facility collateralized by rental homes (the “Rental Home Credit Facility”). Proceeds from the Rental Home Credit Facility were available for acquisitions of rental homes and related capital expenditures. The Rental Home Credit Facility would have matured on February 1, 2010, bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 4.7% (5.82% at December 31, 2003), required level monthly principal and interest payments of $421,000 beginning February 1, 2003, and was secured by 3,339 rental homes. We fully funded the Rental Home Credit Facility on January 3, 2003. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARC’s IPO, we repaid the Rental Home Credit Facility in full and incurred $235,000 in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Senior Revolving Credit Facility

We entered into the Senior Revolving Credit Facility on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility had a total commitment of $125.0 million, and an initial term of three years. The facility was an obligation of our Operating Partnership and was secured by 40 communities owned by a real property subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, our rental homes, and certain other assets. In August 2004, we cancelled the Senior Revolving Credit Facility and incurred $3.3 million in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by the same 40 communities that previously secured the Senior Revolving Credit Facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARC’s IPO. Advances under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flow of the communities securing the loan. The Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.95% (5.35% at December 31, 2004) and has a term of one year. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and will pay origination fees of 0.5% with each advance. The facility contains no significant financial covenants.

Consumer Finance Facility

We entered into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARC’s IPO and the Hometown acquisition. The Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility has a total commitment of $225.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of various subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, and borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2004. This facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the debt facility as of December 31, 2004. Upon the initial drawing under this facility, we will pay a commitment fee of 1.00% on the committed amount and additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the sales contract.

F-28




The availability of advances under the retail home sales and consumer finance debt facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if in its judgment this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio (see Note 19).

Floorplan Lines of Credit

In August 2004, we amended our floorplan lines of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million, secured by manufactured homes in inventory. The amended lines of credit mature in September 2007. Under the amended lines of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended lines of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 75bp to the prime rate plus 4.00% (5.50% to 8.75% at December 31, 2004), based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended lines of credit require the Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million. We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the lines of credit as of December 31, 2004. The lines of credit are subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and a termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination date.

The aggregate amount of annual principal maturities for all notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Fixed Rate Debt

Douglasville, GA

 

 

1,508

 

 

331

 

 

1,851

 

 

Variable Rate Debt

 

Total 

 

 

564

 

 

331

 

 

2,415

 

 

2,747

 

 

70

 

2005

 

 

$

11,957

 

 

 

$

78,999

 

 

$

90,956

 

2006

 

 

22,487

 

 

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Pleasant Grove (CO)

 

Fort Collins, CO

 

 

2,667

 

150,871

 

 

173,358

 

2007

 

 

10,790

 

 

 

582

 

 

3,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,790

 

2008

 

 

61,685

 

 

 

 

532

 

 

582

 

 

3,769

 

 

4,351

 

 

390

 

 

 

Oct-96

 

 

Pleasant Grove (NC)

 

Fuquay-Varina, NC

 

 

950

 

 

191

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

 

369

 

 

191

 

 

1,463

 

 

1,654

 

 

129

 

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

Pleasant View Estates

 

 

61,685

 

2009

 

 

113,456

 

 

 

 

 

113,456

 

Thereafter

 

 

551,377

 

 

 

Berwick, PA

 

 

912

 

 

 

551,377

 

 

 

 

$

771,752

 

 

 

$

229,870

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

F-29




7.   Loss Per Unit

The following reflects the calculation of loss per unit on a basic and diluted basis (in thousands, except per unit information):

 

 

Years ending December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Loss per unit from continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(84,913

)

$

(43,267

)

$

(48,109

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(9,752

)

 

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

(94,665

)

$

(43,267

)

$

(48,109

)

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(2.34

)

$

 

231

 

 

1,361

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

231

 

 

1,441

 

 

1,672

 

 

23

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Portside

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

 

18,395

 

 

5,487

 

 

30,607

 

 

 

 

1,012

 

 

5,487

 

(2.20

)

$

(2.94

)

Income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

1,915

 

$

31

 

$

1,040

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

(8,549

)

3,333

 

 

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

$

(6,634

 

31,619

 

 

37,106

 

 

3,021

 

 

 

Mar-00

 

 

Prairie Village

 

Salina, KS

 

 

1,958

 

 

448

 

 

2,132

 

 

 

 

272

 

 

448

 

 

2,404

 

 

2,852

 

 

260

 

 

 

Sep-98

 

 

President’s Park

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

2,437

 

 

 

 

614

)

$

3,364

 

$

1,040

 

Income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations

 

$

(0.17

)

$

0.17

 

$

0.06

 

Loss per unit to common OP unitholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss to common OP unitholders

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Loss per unit to common OP unitholders

 

$

(2.51

)

$

(2.03

)

$

(2.88

)

Weighted average unit information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units outstanding

 

40,413

 

19,699

 

16,353

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2004 we have excluded 0.9 million common units related to PPUs and restricted common units from the loss per unit calculation as the impact would be anti-dilutive in nature.

8.   Property Operations Expense

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred property operations expenses as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

3,051

 

 

3,472

 

 

84

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Quail Run

 

Hutchins, TX

 

 

1,600

 

 

430

 

 

2,164

 

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

 

3,051

 

 

430

 

 

5,215

 

 

5,645

 

 

681

 

 

 

Jul-01

 

 

Rambling Oaks

 

Huntsville, AL

 

 

485

 

 

74

 

 

911

 

 

 

 

66

 

 

74

 

 

977

 

 

1,051

 

 

178

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Utilities and telephone

 

$

27,128

 

$

16,911

 

$

13,849

 

Salaries and benefits

 

21,224

 

11,704

 

8,607

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

13,264

 

6,837

 

5,615

 

Insurance

 

3,870

 

 

 

Jan-98

 

 

Redwood Village

 

Salt Lake City, UT

 

 

1,110

 

 

158

 

 

905

2,269

 

1,679

 

Bad debt expense

 

3,745

 

2,394

 

 

 

 

 

145

 

 

158

 

 

1,464

 

Advertising

 

1,099

 

904

 

553

 

Other operating expenses

 

4,820

 

3,276

 

1,050

 

 

1,208

 

 

1,574

 

 

 

$

75,150

 

$

44,295

184

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Ridgewood Estates

 

Topeka, KS

margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;text-align:right;"> 

 

 

3,868

 

 

1,041

 

 

5,224

 

 

 

 

241

 

 

1,041

 

 

5,465

 

 

6,506

 

 

609

 

 

 

Jan-97

 

 

River Oaks

 

Kansas City, KS

 

 

3,398

 

 

1,179

 

 

7,357

 

 

 

 

933

 

 

1,179

 

 

8,290

 

$

33,341

 

 

F-30

dth="8" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">

 

9,469

 

 

929

 

 

 

Nov-98

 




9.   Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expenses

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expenses as follows (in thousands):

"font-size:10.0pt;">268

 

 

Riverchase

 

Manhattan, KS

 

 

1,080 

 

 

403

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

3,070

 

 

 

 

367

 

 

403

 

 

3,437

 

 

3,840

 

 

451

 

 

 

Apr-98

 

 

Riverdale

 

Riverdale, UT

 

 

5,541

 

 

1,027

 

 

5,850

 

 

2002

 

Utilities and telephone

 

$

79

 

$

320

 

$

308

 

Salaries and benefits

 

2,310

 

 

887

 

 

1,027

 

 

6,737

 

 

7,764

 

 

1,164

 

 

 

Sep-00

 

 

Riverdale (Colonial
Coach)

 

Riverdale, GA

 

 

7,671

 

 

1,737

 

 

10,252

 

 

 

 

1,692

 

 

1,737

 

 

11,943

 

4,469

 

4,991

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

354

 

801

 

 

 

13,681

 

 

325

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

Insurance

 

187

 

179

 

257

 

Bad debt expense

 

188

 

95

 

20

 

Advertising

 

3,632

 

433

 

509

 

Other operating expenses

 

1,448

 

1,085

 

2,229

 

 

 

$

8,198<

Riverside (KS)

 

Lawrence, KS

 

 

1,187

 

 

268

 

 

1,649

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

268

 

 

1,685

 

 

1,953

 

 

$

7,382

 

$

8,582

 

 

10.   General and Administrative Expense

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred general and administrative expenses as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

 

197

 

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

Salaries and benefits(b)

 

$

21,087

Jan-98

 

 

Riverside (UT)

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

4,038

 

 

690

 

 

$

9,274

 

$

 

3,900

 

 

 

 

3,609

 

 

690

 

 

7,148

 

7,509

 

 

8,199

 

 

904

 

 

 

May-02

 

 

F-65

 




 

Rockview Heights

 

Arnold, MO

 

 

1,302

 

 

209

 

 

1,246

 

 

 

 

1,498

 

 

209

 

 

2,744

 

 

2,953

 

 

Travel

 

2,140

 

1,712

 

1,276

 

Professional services

 

2,580

 

2,205

 

693

 

Insurance

 

1,012

 

384

 

788

 

Rent(a)

 

379

 

1,715

 

444

 

Management fees(c)

 

 

 

1,007

 

804

 

 

 

Mar-99

 

 

Rolling Hills

 

Dallas, TX

 

 

3,197

 

 

382

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

 

897

 

 

382

 

 

2,784

 

 

3,166

Other administrative expenses

 

2,163

 

1,565

 

1,731

 

 

 

$

29,361

 

$

16,855

 

$

13,087

 


(a)    Includes approximately $864,000 of one time expenses related to vacating unused corporate office space for the year ended December 31, 2003.

(b)    Includes approximately $10.1 million of one time expenses related to Common OP Units issued to employees in connection with ARC’S IPO.

(c)     Represents fees paid to an affiliate prior to the Reorganization.

11.   Discontinued Operations

In September 2003, we sold our Sunrise Mesa Community located in Apache Junction, Arizona for $15.0 million and recorded a gain of $3.3 million after giving effect to net assets sold of $11.5 million and closing costs of $121,000. In connection with the sale, we repaid $10.3 million of our Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2005 related to this community.

In July 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell twelve communities, comprising 2,933 homesites, geographically located where the company does not have market concentration. The auction was held in September 2004. In addition to the twelve communities sold, as part of the auction, the company also contracted to sell two parcels of undeveloped commercial land located adjacent to one of its communities in Colorado. All of these sales, except one, closed during the fourth quarter of 2004. The remaining community continues to be held for sale and classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 based on the company’s intent to sell this community during 2005.

F-31




In September 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of approximately $5.9 million. These sales also closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

In October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell twelve communities, comprising 2,440 homesites, geographicallye="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

296

 

 

 

Mar-98

 

 

Rose Country Estates

 

In December 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our Sunswept, Berryhill Acres and Berryhill Commons communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of approximately $8.3 million. These sales also closed during the fourth quarter of 2004.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, each of the communities sold during 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. We have included $54.1 million and $44.4 million of net assets related to these communities as assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We have also included $29.5 million and $17.0 million of obligations related to these communities as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying balance sheets. In addition, we have recast the operations of each of these communities as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and recorded a loss of $8.5 million related to the sale of the discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 in connection with these sales. The following table summarizes combined balance sheet and income statement information for the discontinued operations noted above (in thousands):

 

 Tyler, TX

 

 

760

 

 

163

 

 

1,804

 

 

 

 

261

 

 

163

 

 

2,065

 

 

2,228

 

 

319

 

 

 

Jan-97

 

 

Royal Crest

 

Los Alamos, NM

 

 

4,741

December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

52,848

 

 

 

1,069

 

 

6,310

 

 

 

 

$

43,533

 

Tenant, notes and other receivables, net

 

309

 

158

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

593

 

640

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

181

 

 

1,069

 

 

6,491

 

 

7,560

 

 

373

 

31

 

 

 

$

54,123

 

185

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Saddlebrook

 

N. Charleston, SC

 

 

7,610

 

 

1,548

 

 

9,044

 

 

 

 

606

 

 

1,548

 

 

9,649

 

 

11,198

 

 

267

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Scenic View

 

$

44,362

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

$

28,951

 

$

16,179

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

262

 

312

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

303

 

484

 

 

 

$

29,516

 

$

16,975

 

 

 

 

For the Year
Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Statement of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

East Earl, PA

 

 

 

 

73

 

 

438

 

 

 

 

2

 

13,166

 

$

7,278

 

$

6,625

 

Operating expenses

 

11,251

 

73

 

 

441

 

 

514

 

 

7

 

7,247

 

5,585

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

1,915

 

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Seamist

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

 

$

31

 

$

1,040

 

 

180

 

 

1,021

 

 

 

 

2,321

 

 

180

 

 

 

F-32




12.   Asset Impairments

Retail Home Sales Asset Impairment Expense

Prior to 2003, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of manufactured homes, in late 2002 we began redirecting our retail home sales subsidiary’s sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence and into an in-community presence focused exclusively on sales of homes in our communities. During March 2003 we ceased operations at one of our stand-alone retail dealership locations and during June 2003 we sold two of our retail locations recording minor charges to write down fixed assets to fair value.

As of July 1, 2003 we operated the remaining 16 separate, stand-alone dealership retail locations in five states. During the six months ended December 31, 2003 we substantially completed the redirection of our retail home sales subsidiary’s sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence by selling twelve of our ret1.0pt;"> 

3,342

 

 

3,522

 

 

792

 

 

 

Mar-00

Real Estate Asset Impairment

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate long-lived assets based on estimated future undiscounted net cash flows whenever significant events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. If that evaluation indicates that impairment has occurred, a charge is recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the discounted cash flows or fair value of the asset, whichever is more readily determinable.

At December 31, 2004, we evaluated the carrying amount of certain real estate assets for potential impairment and determined write-downs using recent appraisals and capitalization rates to estimate the long-lived assets’ undiscounted future cash flows. As a result of these valuations, we recorded an impairment charge to older vacant mobile homes in our rental home portfolio and to three mobile home communities of $3.0 million and $500,000, respectively.

 

 

Seascape

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

 

2,375

 

 

525

 

 

3,641

 

 

 

 

497

 

 

525

 

 

4,138

 

 

4,663

 

 

587

 

 

 

Aug-96

 

 

Shadow Hills

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

8,266

 

 

2,254

 

 

13,241

 

 

 

 

2,803

 

 

2,254

 

 

16,044

 

 

18,298

 

 

400

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Shadow Mountain

 

Sherman, TX

 

 

1,483

 

 

369

 

 

2,404

 

 

 

 

524

 

 

369

 

 

2,928

 

 

3,297

 

 

329

 

 

 

13.   Goodwill Impairment

As discussed in Note 2, in connection with our Reorganization, we allocated goodwill of $12.1 million and $2.3 million to the retail home sales and finance reporting unit and insurance reporting unit, respectively. At December 31, 2002, we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using estimated market values, capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value each reporting unit. As a result of this valuation, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales business of $12.1 million and in the insurance business of $1.4 million. The impairment for the retail home sales business arose as a result of a worsening of conditions since the Reorganization including adverse operating performance in our retail home sales business, the retaNew Roman" style="font-size:7.5pt;">Feb-98

 

 

Shadowood

 

F-33




sales business provides a significant portion of the insurance business’ revenue. We realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2003.

At December 31, 2004, we evaluated our remaining goodwill for potential impairment using capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value the real estate and insurance reporting units. As a result of these valuations, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the insurance business of $863,000. The impairment for the insurance business was necessary due to the negative growth projectd>

Acworth, GA

 

 

9,074

 

 

2,48ions for the business product.

14.   Employee Savin1

 

 

14,996

 

 

 

 

2,491

 

 

2,481

 

 

17,487

 

 

19,968

 

 

471

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

Shady Creek

 

Seagoville, TX

 

 

1,217

 

 

241

 

 

1,504

 

 

 

 

553

 

 

241

 

 

2,057

 

 

2,298

 

 

221

 

 

 

May-99

 

 

Shady Grove

 

Atglen, PA

 

 

 

 

103

 

 

615

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

103

 

 

624

 

 

727

 

 

10

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Shady Hills

 

Nashville, TN

 

 

 

 

433

 

 

2,524

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

433

 

 

2,621

 

 

The Company provides to its employees a qualified retirement savings plan (“Plan”) designed to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan allows employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to defer a portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis subject to certain maximum amounts. The Plan does not provide for matching contributions to be made by the Company to employee accounts.

15.   Commitments and Contingencies

We lease office space and various pieces of office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. These leases have expiration dates beginning in 2005 through July 2009. Minimum future lease and sublease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

2005

 

$

748

 

3,053

 

 

72

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Shady Lane

 

Commerce City, CO

 

 

1,193

 

2006

 

101

 

2007

 

104

 

2008

 

48

 

157

 

 

893

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

16

 

Total

 

$

1,017

 

 

In December 2003, we recorded a one time charge of $864,000 for vacating unused office space.

In the normal course of business, from time to time we are involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In the normal course of business, from time to time we incur environmental obligations relating to the ownership and operation of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such environmental obligations, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

During August and September 2004, our manufactured home communities located in the southeastern United States were impacted by hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Our communities sustained aggregate estimated damages of approximately $1.6 million consisting primarily of fallen trees and branches, roof and water damage to clubhouses and buildings, damage to company-owned manufactured homes, and debris removal. The company has adequate property and business interruption insurance coverage. The impact of the hurricanes, net of insurance proceeds, on the company’s 2004 results of operations was $453,000.

F-34




16.   Related Party Transactions

One of our subsidiaries provides accounting services to six communities that are controlled by our Chief Executive Officer under two separate year to year asset management agreements for which we received $27,000 $29,000 and $28,000 in compensation in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Also, during 2004, 2003 and 2002 we billed these same companies controlled by our Chief Executive Officer $105,000, $67,000 and $30,000 for property management expenses in accordance with those agreements. In addition, we lease an airplane hangar from a company controlled by our Chief Executive Officer for which we paid $53,000, $53,000 and $52,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, companies owned by our Chief Executive Officer owed to us approximately $68,000 and $4,000, respectively.

During 2002, we purchased ten mobile homes on behalf of one of these affiliates in its rental unit acquisition operations. As a result, at December 31, 2002 the affiliate owed $206,000 related to these purchases.

During 2002, an officer borrowed $100,000 from a subsidiary in exchange for a note. an" style="font-size:7.5pt;">286

 

 

157

 

 

1,179

 

 

1,336

 

 

274

 

 

 

Mar-99

 

Prior to the Reorganization, a subsidiary of the company reimbursed certain related parties for specific and allocated expenses of $2.7 million during 2002. These expenses included salaries and benefits, rent and travel and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The related party calculated the allocated costs monthly based on the proportion of the subsidiary’s total assets to the total assets under the related party’s control.

Prior to the Reorganization, a subsidiary purchased manufactured homes from a related party amounting to $1.5 million in 2002. The homes were purchased at a price that approximated the related party’s cost and included them in manufactured homes and improvements.

 

Shawnee Hills

 

Topeka, KS

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

712

 

 

17.   Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

 

 

Quarter ended

 

 

 

Mar 31

 

Jun 30

 

Sep 30

 

Dec 31

 

For the quarters ended 2004:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,749

 

 

120

 

 

2,461

 

 

2,581

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

 

 

591

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Sheridan

 

Arvada, CO

 

 

3,369

 

 

465

 

 

2,639

 

 

 

 

905

 

 

465

 

 

3,544

 

 

4,009

 

 

816

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Sherwood Acres

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

 

 

414

 

 

42,981

 

$

55,106

 

$

60,088

 

$

64,482

 

Total expenses

 

$

80,539

 

$

60,898

 

$

73,995

 

$

93,754

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(38,032

)

$

(7,547

)

$

(18,227

)

$

(37,493

)

Loss per unit(a)

 

$

(1.20

)

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.42

)

$

(0.87

)

For the quarters ended 2003:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

2,688

 

 

 

 

240

 

 

414

 

 

2,928

 

 

3,342

 

 

363

 

 

 

Jan-00

 

 

Shiloh Pines

 

Tyler, TX

 

 

3,800

 

 

738

$

41,390

 

$

42,572

 

$

41,747

 

$

37,486

 

Total expenses

 

$

51,704

 

$

52,663

 

$

53,316

 

 

 

4,616

 

 

 

 

1,097

 

 

738

h:5.0pt;">

$

50,218

 

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(9,741

)

$

(9,894

)

$

(7,882

)

$

(12,386

 

 

5,713

 

 

6,451

 

 

693

 

 

)

Loss per unit(a)

 

$

(0.49

)

$

(0.50

)

$

(0.40

)

$

(0.63

)


(a)     Quarterly loss per unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and to changes in the number of common partnership units outstanding.

F-35




18.   Segment Information

We operate in three business segments which are based on the nature of business in each segment—real estate, retail home sales and finance and insurance. A summary of our business segment information is shown below (in thousands).

th:6.0pt;">

 

" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Real estate

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Total revenue

 

May-96

 

 

Siesta Lago

 

Kissimmee, FL

 

 

10,476

 

 

2,025

 

 

10,835

 

 

<"Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,050

 

 

2,025

 

 

12,885

 

 

Real estate

 

$

206,690

 

$

139,402

 

$

102,321

 

Retail home sales

 

15,248

 

22,027

 

32,795

 

Finance and insurance

  

 

14,910

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

Dec-01

 

 

Siesta Manor

 

Fenton, MO

 

 

719

 

1,766

 

1,378

 

Corporate and other

 

 

2,128

 

 

487

 

 

2,764

 

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

487

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

222,657

 

$

4,183

 

 

4,670

 

 

628

 

 

 

Aug-99

163,195

 

$

136,494

 

in:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

Silver Creek

 

Davenport, IA

Operating expenses, cost of manufactured homes sold and real estate taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

913

 

 

5,338

 

 

 

$

91,756

 

$

55,318

 

$

39,991

 

Retail home sales

 

 

 

287

 

 

913

 

 

5,625

 

 

6,538

24,931

 

23,799

 

32,565

 

Finance and insurance

 

1,357

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Silver Leaf

695

 

1,174

 

Corporate and other

 

192

 

Mansfield, TX

 

 

 

 

 

469

 

652

 

495

 

 

2,896

 

 

 

 

479

 

 

$

118,236

 

$

80,281

 

$

74,382

 

Net segment income(a)

 

 

 

 

495

 

 

3,375

 

 

3,870

 

 

182

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

114,934

 

$

 

Siouxland Estates

 

S. Sioux City, NE

 

 

3,952

 

 

425

 

 

2,407

 

 

 

 

2,111

 

 

425

 

 

4,518

 

 

4,943

 

84,084

 

$

62,330

 

Retail home sales

 

(9,683

)

(1,772

)

230

 

Finance and insurance

 

(638

)

1,071

 

204

 

Corporate and other

 

(192

)

(469

)

 

1,072

 

 

 

Mar-99

 

 

Sleepy Hollow

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

684

 

 

 

 

1,007

 

 

120

 

 

1,691

 

 

1,811

 

 

517

 

 

 

Apr-99

 

 

Smoke Creek

(652

)

 

 

$

104,421

 

$

82,914

 

$

62,112

 

Property management expense

 

Snellville, GA

 

 

5,306

 

 

1,104

 

 

6,282

 

 

 

 

900

$

7,127

 

$

5,527

 

$

4,105

 

 

 

1,104

 

 

7,181

 

 

8,285

 

 

200

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

South Arlington Estates

 

Arlington, TX

 

General and administrative expense

 

$

29,361

 

$

16,855

 

$

13,087

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

2,037

 

 

689

 

 

4,618

 

 

  

 

 

2,814

 

 

689

 

 

7,432

 

 

8,121

 

 

366

 

 

 

May-03

 

 

Southfork

 

Denton, TX

 

 

5,675

 

 

912

 

 

7,108

 

 

 

 

1,319

 

 

912

 

 

8,427

 

 

9,339

 

 

1,132

 

 

 

May-96

 

 

Southridge Estates

 

Des Moines, IA

 

 

4,227

 

 

810

 

 

4,286

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

52,815

 

$

35,283

 

ter:avoid;text-align:right;">2,224

 

 

810

 

 

$

2,138

 

Retail home sales

 

456

 

477

 

 

Finance and insurance

 

195

 

 

 

Corporate and other

 

3,426

 

21,626

 

41,666

 

 

 

$

56,892

 

$

57,386

 

$

6,510

 

 

7,320

 

 

523

 

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

Southwind Village

 

Naples, FL

 

 

 

 

1,439

 

 

8,401

 

 

 

 

137

 

 

1,439

 

 

8,537

 

 

9,977

43,804

 

Amortization expense

 

$

12,400

 

$

6,961

 

$

5,723

 

Depreciation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Spring Valley Village

 

 

$

59,391

 

$

38,482

 

$

30,904

 

Retail home sales

 

92

 

298

 

 

Finance and insurance

 

7

 

9

 

 

Corporate and other

 

124

 

717

 

431

 

 

 

$

59,614

 

$

39,506

 

$

31,335

 

Initial public offering costs

 

$

4,417

 

Spring Valley, NY

 

 

4,310

 

 

639

 

 

3,640

 

 

 

 

1,803

 

$

 

$

 

Early termination of debt

 

$

16,685

 

639

 

 

5,443

 

 

6,082

 

 

701

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

Jul-01

 

 

 

Real estate and retail home asset impairment

 

$

3,591

 

$

1,385

 

Springdale Lake

 

Belton, MO

 

 

6,940

 

 

1,218

 

$

 

7,301

 

 

 

 

968

 

 

1,218

 

 

8,269

 

 

9,487

 

 

923

 

 

 

Oct-96

 

 

Stone Mountain

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

 

7,662

 

 

1,844

 

 

10,669

 

 

 

 

1,591

 

 

1,844

 

 

12,260

 

 

14,104

 

 

322

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

Stonegate

 

Shreveport, LA

 

 

1,650

 

 

421

 

 

2,669

 

 

 

 

429

 

 

421

 

 

3,098

 

 

3,519

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

$

863

 

$

 

$

13,557

 

F-36




 

Interest income

 

$

(1,616

)

$

(1,439

)

$

(1,390

)

Net loss before discontinued operations

 

$

(84,913

)

$

(43,267

)

$

96

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Stoneybrook

 

Greeley, CO

 

 

9,766

 

 

2,151

 

 

12,190

 

 

 

 

5,037

 

 

2,151

 

 

17,227

 

 

19,378

 

 

4,604

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Stony Brook North

 

Raleigh, NC

 

 

4,360

 

 

958

 

 

5,183

 

 

—bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:41.5pt;">

(48,109

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

1,915

 

$

31

 

$

1,040

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

$

(8,549

)

$

3,333

 

 

794

 

 

958

 

 

5,977

 

 

6,935

 

 

623

 

 

$

 

Preferred unit distributions

 

$

(9,752

)

$

 

$

 

Net loss

 

$

(101,299

)

$

(39,903

)

$

(47,069

)

Identifiable assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

1,738,226

 

$

1,108,967

 

$

1,104,228

 

Retail home sales

 

30,053

 

4,043

 

8,867

 

Finance and insurance

 

735

 

984

 

1,113

 

Corporate and other

 

44,218

 

12,075

 

22,529

 

 

 

$

1,813,232

 

$

1,126,069

 

 

 

Jun-00

 

 

Suburban Estates

 

Greenburg, PA

 

 

1,671

 

 

599

 

 

3,574

 

 

 

 

162

-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$

1,136,737

 

Notes payable and preferred interest

 

 

 

599

 

 

3,736

 

 

4,335

 

 

61

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Summit Oaks

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

972,059

 

$

768,373

 

$

726,201

 

Retail home sales

 

28,516

 

3,896

 

9,421

 

Finance and insurance

 

 

 

 

 

4,924

 

 

1,052

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

1,025

 

 

1,052

 

 

7,191

 

 

8,243

 

 

709

 

 

 

Corporate and other

 

1,047

 

1,125

Apr-99

 

 

Sundown

 

 

1,197

 

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

$

773,394

 

$

736,819

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

Clearfield, UT

 

 

3,765

 

 

762

 

 

4,315

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

$

644,114

 

$

46,683

 

$

 

 

1,296

 

 

762

 

 

5,611

 

 

6,373

 

 

655

 

 

 

Jan-02

 

 

Sunny Acres

137,209

 

Retail home sales

 

 

4

 

259

 

Finance and insurance

 

4

 

44

 

 

Somerset, PA

 

 

1,525

e="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">4

 

Corporate and other

 

419

 

282

 

1

 

 

 

$

644,537

 

$

47,013

 

$

137,473

 

 

499

 

 

2,988

 

 

 

 

426

 

 

499

 

 

3,414

 

 

3,913

 

 

51

 

 

 

Jun-04


(a)     Net segment income represents total revenues less expenses for property operations, real estate taxes, cost of manufactured homes sold and retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations. Net segment income is a measure of the performance of the properties before the effects of the following expenses: property management, general and administrative, IPO costs, early termination of debt costs, impairment charges, depreciation, amortization, interest and impairment of fixed assets.

19.   Subsequent Events

In March 2005, the Company secured an additional $100.0 million in financing commitments, consisting of an unsecured $25.8 million trust preferred security, and a $75.0 million lease receivables facility secured by substantially all of the Company’s rental homes and the related leases. The $25.8 million trust preferred security was borrowed on March 15, 2005, matures in 30 years, and bears interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. The lease receivables facility commitment is for $75.0 million, decreasing $3.0 million quarterly through March 31, 2007. The facility will bear interest at the 1-month LIBOR plus 7.0%, decreasing to the 1-month LIBOR plus 3.25% if certain conditions are met. The facility will mature in March 2007. The closing of the lease receivable facility will reduce the combined borrowing capacity under the consumer finance facility to $200.0 million and eliminate $25.0 million of previous chattel financing. The lease receivables facility is subject to customary closing conditions and documentation. There can be no assurance that we will close the facility and fund.

F-37




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2005 AND DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

 

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and other property, net

 

$

1,587,040

 

 

$

 

 

Sunnyside

 

Trooper, PA

 

 

1,453

 

 

396

 

 

2,386

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

396

 

 

2,390

 

 

2,786

 

 

40

 

 

1,532,780

 

 

Assets held for sale

 

3,368

 

Jun-04

 

 

Sunrise Terrace

 

Newton, IA

 

 

2,248

 

 

375

 

 

2,099

 

 

 

54,123

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

19,616

 

 

39,802

 

 

Tenant notes and other receivables, net

 

 

 

 

1,140

 

 

375

 

 

32,826

3,239

 

 

3,614

 

 

847

 

 

 

Sep-99

 

 

Sunset 77

 

Douglass, KS

 

 

221

 

 

99

 

 

805

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

99

 

 

795

 

 

894

 

 

108

 

 

 

Sep-98

 

 

Sunset Country

 

Pueblo, CO

 

 

3,856

 

 

988

 

 

5,604

 

 

 

 

1,414

 

 

988

 

 

7,018

 

 

8,006

 

 

1,874

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Sunset Mobile Village

 

Aztec, NM

 

 

502

 

 

 

 

19,029

 

 

Inventory

 

307

 

 

11,230

 

 

Loan origination costs, net

 

14,510

 

 

14,403

 

 

Loan reserves

 

35,453

 

 

31,019

 

 

Goodwill

 

85,264

 

 

85,264

 

 

Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net

 

16,087

 

 

19,106

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

10,315

 

 

6,476

 

 

Total assets

 

234

 

 

1,402

 

 

 

 

167

 

 

234

 

 

1,569

 

 

1,803

 

 

169

 

 

 

Nov-95

 

 

F-66

 




 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

Sunset Village

 

Gainesville, TX

 

 

$

1,804,786

 

 

$

1,813,232

 

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

 

223

 

 

1,634

 

 

 

 

576

 

 

223

 

 

2,210

 

 

2,433

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable (including $25.8 million due to general partner at June 30, 2005)

 

$

1,089,004

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

 

 

295

 

 

 

Sep-97

 

 

Sunset Vista

 

Magna, UT

 

 

4,632

 

 

1,127

 

 

6,474

 

 

 

 

613

 

 

 

2,656

 

 

29,516

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

31,273

 

 

37,877

 

 

Dividends payable

 

10,084

 

 

15,505

 

 

Tenant deposits and other liabilities

 

15,109

 

 

12,773

 

 

Total liabilities

 

1,148,126

 

 

1,097,293

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,127

 

 

7,087

 

 

8,214

 

 

199

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Sunshine City

 

Plantation, FL

 

 

10,066

 

 

2,271

 

 

12,164

 

 

 

 

1,330

 

 

2,271

 

 

13,494

 

 

15,765

 

 

1,342

 

 

 

Oct-00

&0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Partners’ capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred OP units

 

144,250

 

 

144,250

 

 

Common OP units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sycamore Square

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

120

 

 

65

 

 

374

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

486,112

 

 

539,382

 

 

Limited partners

 

28

 

 

65

 

 

402

 

 

467

 

26,298

 

 

32,307

 

 

Total partners’ capital

 

656,660

 

 

715,939

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

1,804,786

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

$

1,813,232

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-38




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Dec-98

 

 

Tallview Terrace

 

Sioux City, IA

 

 

2,075

 

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

422

 

 

2,384

 

 

 

 

1,391

 

 

422

 

 

3,775

 

 

4,197

 

 

933

 

 

 

Mar-99

 

 

Tanglewood

 

Huntsville, TX

 

 

2,692

 

 

659

 

 

4,676

 

 

 

 

(48

)

 

659

 

 

4,628

 

 

5,287

 

 

606

 

 

 

Nov-96

 

 

Terrace

 

Casper, WY

 

 

1,101

 

 

165

 

 

1,200

 

 

 

 

263

 

 

165

 

 

1,463

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,628

 

 

193

 

 

 

Dec-97

 

 

Terrace Heights

 

Dubuque, IA

 

 

5,827

 

 

1,186

 

 

6,932

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

 

 

692

 

 

1,186

 

 

7,624

 

 

8,810

 

 

205

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Terrace II

 

Casper, WY

 

 

950

 

 

94

 

 

535

 

 

 

 

921

 

 

94

 

 

1,456

 

 

1,550

 

 

304

 

 

 

May-01

 

 

Terrell Crossing

 

Terrell, TX

 

 

1,250

 

 

330

 

 

1,936

 

 

 

 

3,069

 

 

$

51,366

 

$

47,884

 

$

102,224

 

$

86,210

 

Sales of manufactured homes

 

18,288

 

2,082

 

26,278

 

2,789

 

330

 

 

5,005

 

 

5,335

 

 

570

 

 

 

Jul-02

 

 

The Meadows

 

Aurora, CO

 

 

11,840

 

Utility and other income

 

5,835

 

5,114

 

11,481

 

9,097

 

Net consumer finance interest income (expense)

 

155

 

32

 

205

 

(40

)

Total revenue

 

75,644

 

55,112

 

140,188

 

98,056

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

20,042

 

1,800

 

 

10,192

 

 

 

 

1,960

 

 

1,800

 

 

12,152

 

 

13,952

 

 

2,575

 

 

 

Jun-99

 

 

17,626

 

40,363

 

30,234

 

Real estate taxes

 

4,407

 

4,080

 

8,698

 

7,390

 

Cost of manufactured homes sold

 

16,190

 

1,809

 

24,405

 

2,365

 

Retail home sales, finance and insurance

 

4,112

 

1,498

 

7,317

 

2,079

 

Property management

 

2,494

 

1,600

 

4,759

 

3,054

 

General and administrative

 

6,259

 

4,304

 

11,618

 

19,099

 

The Pines

 

Ladson, SC

 

 

 

 

286

 

 

1,676

 

 

 

 

139

 

 

286

 

 

1,815

 

 

2,101

 

 

54

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

The Towneship at Clifton

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

5,720

 

 

1,408

 

 

9,921

 

 

 

 

859

 

 

1,408

 

 

10,780

 

 

Initial public offering related costs

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

12,188

 

 

1,444

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

 

 

13,427

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

22,224

 

17,242

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

Interest expense

 

16,544

 

12,729

 

31,817

 

27,209

 

Total expenses

 

92,272

 

60,888

 

171,232

 

141,426

 

Interest income

 

(277

)

(450

)

(660

)

(792

)

Loss from continuing operations

 

(16,351

)

(5,326

)

(30,384

)

 

 

Aug-97

 

 

The Vineyards

(42,578

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

72

 

343

 

1,000

 

795

 

Clifton, CO

 

 

1,823

 

 

296

 

 

1,720

 

Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations

 

52

 

 

(678

)

 

Net loss

 

(16,227

 

 

 

 

659

 

 

296

 

 

2,379

)

(4,983

)

(30,062

)

(41,783

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(2,971

 

 

2,675

 

 

)

(2,578

)

(5,942

)

(3,810

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(19,198

)

$

505

 

 

 

Feb-00

 

 

The Woodlands

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

(7,561

)

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

2,863

 

 

732

 

 

4,389

 

 

 

 

354

 

 

732

 

 

4,743

 

 

5,475

 

 

591

 

 

 

Dec-96

 

 

Thornton Estates

 

Denver, CO

 

 

6,982

 

 

1,012

 

 

5,739

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

$

(18,193

)

$

(7,126

 

 

926

 

 

1,012

 

 

6,665

 

)

$

(34,065

)

$ 

7,677

 

 

1,723

 

 

 

Nov-98

 

 

Timberland

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

1,115

(42,095

)

Limited Partners

 

(1,005

)

(435

)

(1,939

)

(3,498

)

 

 

$

(19,198

)

$

(7,561

)

$

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Net loss per common OP unit from continuing operations

 

$

(0.45

)

$

(0.18

)

$

(0.84

)

 

 

270

 

 

2,386

 

 

 

 

344

 

 

270

 

 

2,730

 

 

3,000

 

 

409

 

 

 

Jan-97

 

 

Torrey Hills

 

Flint, MI

 

 

9,749

 

 

1,697

 

 

8,480

 

 

 

 

981

 

 

1,697

$

(1.24

)

Income per common OP unit from discontinued operations

 

 

0.01

 

0.01

 

0.02

 

Net loss per common OP unit

 

$

(0.45

)

$

 

 

9,461

 

 

11,158

 

 

258

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Trailmont

 

(0.17

)

$

(0.83

)

$

(1.22

)

Weighted average of units outstanding

Goodlettsville, TN

 

 

2,298

 

 

476

 

 

2,784

 

 

43,260

 

43,269

 

43,262

 

37,531

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-39




AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

g:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.65pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

 

121

 

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

476

 

 

2,905

 

 

3,382

 

 

 78

 

Cash flow from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to Partners

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

$

 

Twin Oaks

 

Wichita, KS

 

 

4,164

 

 

794

 

 

5,643

 

 

 

 

662

 

 

794

 

 

6,305

 

 

7,099

 

(36,004

)

$

(45,593

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

42,255

 

32,152

 

963

 

 

 

Jan-97

 

 

Twin Pines

 

Goshen, IN

 

 

5,360

 

 

1,093

 

OP unit grant compensation expense

 

326

 

10,144

 

Preferred unit distributions declared

 

5,156

 

3,810

 

Partnership preferred unit distributions declared

 

 

 

6,400

 

 

 

 

526

 

 

1,09tyle="line-height:8.5pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">786

 

 

Non-cash ARC IPO related costs

 

 

389

 

 

 

6,926

 

 

8,019

 

 

199

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Valley Verde

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

 

2,750

 

 

510

 

 

2,536

 

 

 

 

1,099

 

 

510

 

 

3,635

 

 

4,145

 

 

372

 

 

 

Apr-02

 

 

Valley View—Blandon

 

Fleetwood, PA

 

 

 

 

90

 

 

531

 

 

 

 

64

 

 

90

 

Early termination of debt

 

 

7,100

 

Depreciation included in income from discontinued operations

 

5

 

1,859

 

Loss on sale of discontinued operations

 

678

 

 

Gain on sale of manufactured homes

 

 

595

 

 

685

 

 

10

 

 

 

(1,873

)

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions

 

(10,340

)

9,110

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

989

 

18,971

 

Cash flow from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of Hometown communities

 

 

(507,136

)

Acquisition of D.A.M. and other communities

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Danboro

 

Danboro, PA

 

 

3,123

 

 

1,006

 

 

6,044

 

 

 

 

31

 

 

1,006

 

 

6,075

 

 

 

 

(14,754

)

Purchases of manufactured homes

 

(68,300

)

(44,856

)

Proceeds from community sales

 

48,721

 

 

Proceeds from manufactured home sales

 

13,014

 

 

Community improvements and equipment purchases

 

(32,605

)

(10,068

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(39,170

)

(576,814

)

Cash flow from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow from REIT IPO

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock offering

 

 

7,081

 

 

101

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Ephrata

 

Ephrata, PA

 

 

1,041

 

 

392

 

 

2,366

 

t>

437,790

 

Preferred stock offering

 

 

125,000

 

Common stock offering expenses

 

 

(36,813

)

Preferred stock offering expenses

 

 

(5,593

)

Cash flow from REIT IPO related financing transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

392

 

 

2,419

 

 

2,811

 

 

40

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Ephrata II

 

Ephrata, PA

 

 

 

 

168

 

 

966

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

168

 

 

975

 

 

1,143

 

 

16

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Honey
Brook

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

 

1,874

 

 

527

 

 

3,175

 

 

 

 

295

 

 

527

 

 

3,470

 

 

3,998

 

 

54

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Morgantown

 

Morgantown, PA

 

 

 

 

82

 

 

486

Debt issued in the financing transactions

 

 

500,000

 

Debt paid in the financing transactions

 

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

82

 

 

 

(439,048

)

Payment of loan origination costs

 

 

(8,122

)

Release of restricted cash

532

 

 

614

 

 

10

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Tuckerton

 

Reading, PA

 

 

 

 

166

 

 

980

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

166

 

 

1,021

 

 

1,187

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

12,278

 

Release of loan reserves

 

 

19,089

 

New loan reserves

 

 

(14,247

 

Jun-04

 

 

Valley View—Wernersville 

 

Wernersville, PA

 

 

 

 

79

 

 

472

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

79

 

 

487

)

Proceeds from issuance of debt (including $25.0 million from parent)

 

155,483

 

5,000

 

Repayment of debt

 

(94,352

)

(5,690

)

Payment of OP unit dividends

 

(27,045

)

(6,474

)

Payment of preferred dividends

 

(5,156

)

(2,091

)

Payment of partnership preferred distributions

 

(786

)

 

Repurchase of OP units

 

(1,836

)

 

Restricted cash

 

 

456

 

Loan reserves

 

(4,434

)

(992

)

Loan origination costs

 

(3,879

)

(1,589

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

17,995

 

578,954

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(20,186

)

21,111

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

39,802

 

26,631

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

19,616

 

$

47,742

 

Non-cash financing and investing transactions:

 

 

 

566

 

 

8

 

 

 

Jun-04

 

 

 

 

 

Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions

 

Viking Villa

 

Ogden, UT

 

 

4,120

 

 

775

 

 

$

 

$

122,863

 

Preferred OP units issued in connection with acquisitions

 

$

 

$

33,142

4,180

 

 

 

Notes receivable for manufactured home sales

 

$

11,402

 

$

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 0pt;">

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

33,931

 

$

28,243

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-40

493

 

 

775

 

 

4,673

 

 

5,448

 


AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

1.   Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business

Affordable Residential Communities LP (the “Partnership,” “Operating Partnership” or “OP”) is a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning and operation of primarily all-age manufactured home communities, the retail sale and financing of manufactured homes, the rental of manufactured homes and other related businesses including acting as agent in the sale of homeowners’ insurance and related products, all exclusively to residents and prospective residents of our communities. We were organized in July 1998 and operate primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (“ARC,” “General Partner,” or “REIT”).

On February 18, 2004, ARC completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of approximately 22.3 million shares of its common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding approximately 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of its preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The net proceeds to ARC from its IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. All of the proceeds from the IPO were contributed by ARC to the Partnership in exchange for 23.1 million Common OP units and 5.0 million Series ”A” Preferred OP units. In conjunction with the IPO, ARC also completed a financing transaction consisting of $500.0 million of new mortgage debt and the repayment of certain existing indebtedness (see Note 2).

Concurrent with ARC’s IPO and the financing transaction noted above, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C. (“Hometown”). The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and totaled 26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for these communities and related assets was approximately $615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $93.1 million. See Note 2 for a discussion of the Company’s significant 2004 acquisitions.

As of June 30, 2005, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of one community classified as discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 62,942 homesites (net of 126 homesitean" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

Villa West (UT)

 

West Jordan, UT

 

 

5,629

 

 

844

 

ARC’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC”. ARC’s Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARC-PA”. ARC has no public trading history prior to February 12, 2004.

Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of

F-41




assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts.

The interim consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments that are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership, and all such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our December 31, 2004 financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of our accounts, which include the results of operations of the manufactured home communities acquired only for the periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. We have eliminated all significant interentity balances and transactions.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Rental and Other Property

We carry rental property at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize significant renovations and improvements that substantially improve asset quality and/or extend the useful life of assets and depreciate them over their estimated remaining useful lives. We expense maintenance and repairs as incurred.

Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are as follows:

Asset Class

 

4,803

 

 

 

 

645

 

 

844

 

 

 

 

Estimated Useful
Lives (Years)

 

Manufactured home communities and improvements

 

 

10 to 30

 

 

Buildings

 

 

10 to 20

 

 

Rental homes

 

 

 

5,448

 

 

6,292

 

 

929

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Village North

 

Lewisville, TX

3

 

 

Furniture and other equipment

 

 

 

 

6,946

 

 

1,193

 

 

6,155

 

 

 

 

731

 

 

5

 

 

Computer software and hardware

 

 

3

 

 

 

We evaluate the recoverability of our investment in rental property whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the recoverability of the net book value of the asset is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental property may be impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability in which we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if an impairment adjustment is required. If this review indicates that the asset’s carrying amount will not be fully recoverable, we will reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value. We recorded no impairment charges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

Effective January 1, 2005, we changed our estimate of the depreciable life of our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years. Homes in our rental home portfolio will now be depreciated over 3 years of service to an estimated salvage value of 70%. This change was made to align the depreciable lives of our rental homes to our intent to sell homes from our rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the costs of repairs and maintenance. This change in estimate did not have a material impact on our financial positions, results of operations or cash flows.

F-42




Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual agreement between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and recognize it in income when earned. On lease with option to purchase contracts, we defer recognition of all down-payments, supplemental lease payments and sales commissions until the point of sale, which generally is at the end of the lease term.

We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title, possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no further obligations to perform significant additional activities.

OP Unit Grants

We have included a charge of $10.1 million in general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004, representing the value of 530,000 common OP units that were granted on February 18, 2004 under our 2003 equity incentive plan and vested on the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO (see Note 2). In addition, during 2004, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP units that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted units were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional h="40" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">

1,193

 

 

6,886

 

 

8,079

 

 

665

 

 

 

Apr-97

 

 

Village Park

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

2,617

 

 

856

 

 

4,644

 

 

 

 

733

Vested units may not be sold by Mr. Jackson until the first anniversary date of vesting without the prior written consent of the Compensation Committee. All units, vested and unvested, are entitled to receive dividends and to vote unless forfeited.

We have recorded the unvested portion of the 72,000 outstanding restricted common OP units as of June 30, 2005 as unearned compensation (a compomes New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

856

 

 

5,377

Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization

We capitalize interest costs (using our average cost of borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively. The long-lived assets on which we capitalize interest include general construction activities in our communities, manufactured homes and, in the case of the communities acquired, the cost of the vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making improvements and placing a manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized interest and internal costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to $1.2 million and $1.8 million capitalized during the same periods in 2004.

F-43




Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive Loss

Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (a component of partners’ capital) as of June 30, 2005 represent unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap, which qualifies as a cash flow hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Including these unrecognized gains or losses, our comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $18.5 million and $34.1 million, respectively, compared with a comprehensive loss of $5.3 million and $40.8 million during the same periods in 2004.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”. SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We will be required to apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting period beginning January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements, including options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 123R to have a material impact upon our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

2.   REIT IPO and Acquisitions

REIT IPO and Hometown Acquisition

On February 18, 2004, ARCt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 

 

6,233

 

 

565

 

 

 

Mar-01

 

 

Vogel Manor MHC

 

Arnold, MO

 

 

1,033

 

 

144

 

 

823

 

 

 < completed its IPO of approximately 22.3 million shares of its common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding approximately 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of its preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The net proceeds to ARC from its IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds to the Company of $14.0 million. Concurrent with the IPO, ARC also completed the refinancing of $240.0 million of its mortgage debt and raised an additional $260.0 million of new mortgage debt. The new mortgage debt at the time of the IPO consisted of $215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.53%, $100.7 million of 5-year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.05% and $184.0 million of floating rate debt. Proceeds from the IPO and new debt were used to purchase the Hometown communities, repay ARC’s Rental Home Credit Facility and redeem the Preferred Interest issued by one of ARC’s subsidiaries (see Note 6 to ARC’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-K).

On February 18, 2004 and subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include 26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired consisted of the following (in thousands):

Cash purchase price

 

$

522,131

 

Debt assumed in connection with the acquisition

 

93,139

 

258

 

 

144

 

 

1,081

 

 

1,225

 

 

260

 

 

 

pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">

 

Total purchase price

 

$

615,270

 

 

F-44




Our purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):

Land

 

$

90,296

 

Rental and other property

 

494,429

 

Manufactured homes

 

9,761

 

Lease intangibles

 

811

 

Customer relationships

 

14,496

 

Notes receivable

 

5,477

 

 

 

$

615,270

 

May-99

 

 

Washington Mobile Estates

 

Ogden, UT

 

 

4,517

 

 

676

 

 

3,848

 

 

 

 

613

 

 

676

 

 

4,461

 

 

D.A.M. Portfolio Acquisition

On June 30, 2004, we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY, L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was approximately $65.5 million, including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt, this acquisition was funded through the issuance of Series “B”, “C” and “D” Partnership Preferred Units (“PPUs”), for proceeds totaling $33.1 million. All of the “D” series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were redeemed for cash on July 6, 2004. See Note 3 for further discussion of the PPUs.

Our purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):

Land

 

$

9,225

 

Rental and other property

 

55,501

 

Manufactured homes

 

803

 

Customer relationships

 

52

 

Other assets/liabilities, net

 

(78

)

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

65,503

 

 

We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M. acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if we had consummated the acquisitions on January 1, 2004 (in thousands, except per share information):

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

fter:avoid;"> 

5,137

 

 

769

 

 

 

Aug-00

 

 

Washingtonville Manor

 

Washingtonville, NY

 

 

1,390

 

 

292

 

 

1,668

 

 

 

 

112

 

 

292

 

 

1,780

 

 

2,072

 

 

222

 

 

 

Jul-01

 

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

Lebanon, TN

 

 

 

 

891

 

 

5,020

 

 

 

 

Actual

 

Pro forma

 

Actual

 

Pro forma

 

Revenue

 

$

75,644

 

 

$

57,676

 

 

$

140,188

 

$

111,513

 

Total expenses

 

92,272

 

 

63,198

 

 

171,232

 

153,962

 

Interest income

 

(277

)

 

(450

)

 

 

285

 

 

891

 

 

5,305

 

 

 

(660

)

(852

)

Loss from mes New Roman" style="font-size:7.5pt;">6,196

 

 

145

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Weatherly Estates II

 

 

(16,351

)

 

(5,072

)

 

(30,384

)

(41,597

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

124

 

 

343

 

 

322

 

ttom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:70.45pt;">

Clarksville, TN

 

 

 

1,100

 

Net loss

 

$

(16,227

)

 

$

(4,729

)

 

$

(30,062

)

$

(40,497

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders

 

$

(19,198

)

 

$

(7,307

)

 

$

(36,004

)

$

(44,307

 

355

 

 

1,097

 

 

 

 

202

 

)

Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders per unit

 

$

(0.44

)

 

$

(0.17

)

 

355

 

 

1,299

 

 

1,654

 

 

37

 

$

(0.83

)

$

(1.18

)

Weighted average units outstanding

 

43,260

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

West Cloud Commons

 

Salina, KS

 

 

1,047

 

 

43,269

 

 

43,262

 

37,531

 

 

F-45




Other Acquisitions

During the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, in addition to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions, we acquired six manufactured home communities from unaffiliated third parties for approximately $16.5 million in cash and $3.8 million in assumed debt. We accounted for these acquisitions utilizing the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, have allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of their acquisition. We allocated the majority of the purchase price to the rental property and intangible assets, including customer relationships and leases intangibles. No acquisitions were made in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. We have not presented pro forma results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as if these other acquisitions were made on the first day of the year, as the effects of these other acquisitions are not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash fidth="7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">

 

 

275

 

 

2,161

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

275

 

 

2,315

 

 

2,590

 

F-46




The table below summarizes all of our manufactured home community acquisitions for the period January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005:

Date

 

 

 

Portfolio

 

Community

 

Location

 

Homesites

Feb-04

 

NA

 

Weatherly Estates I

 

Lebanon, TN

 

270

Feb-04

 

NA

 

 

329

 

 

 

Jul-98

 

 

Western Hills

 

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Weatherly Estates II

 

Clarksville, TN

 

131

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

100 Oaks

 

Fultondale, AL

 

 

11,811

 

 

1,489

 

 

8,499

 

 

man" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

235

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

5,205

 

 

Jonesboro

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

75

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Bermuda Palms

 

Indio, CA

 

185

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Breazeale

 

Laramie, WY

 

117

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

1,489

 

 

13,704

 

 

15,193

 

 

2,166

 

 

Broadmore

 

Goshen, IN

 

370

Feb-04

 

May-01

 

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

West Valley City, UT

 

 

3,759

 

 

570

 

 

3,429

 

 

 

 

232

 

 

570

 

 

3,661

 

 

4,231

 

 

53

 

 

 

Jul-04

 

 

 

F-67

 




< style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Costs

 

Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Gross Amounts at which Carried
at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

Community Name

 

 

 

Locatipadding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:11.7pt;">

 

HTA

 

Butler Creek

 

Augusta, GA

 

376

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Camden Point

 

Kingsland, GA

 

268

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Carnes Crossing

 

Summerville, SC

 

604

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Castlewood Estates

 

Encumbrances

 

 

Mableton, GA

Land

 

Buildings and
Improvements

 

 

334

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Casual Estates

 

Liverpool, NY

 

961

Land

 

Buildings and
Improvements

 

Land

 

Buildings and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Date of
Acquisition

 

Western Park

 

Fayetteville, AR

 

 

1,606

 

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Riverdale

 

Riverdale, GA

 

481

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Columbia Heights

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

302

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Conway Plantation

 

Conway, SC

 

299

Feb-04

247

 

 

1,408

 

 

 

 

447

 

 

247

 

 

1,855

 

 >

 

HTA

 

Crestview

 

2,102

 

 

448

 

 

 

Jul-99

 

 

Westlake

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

2,898

Stillwater, OK

 

238

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Country Village

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

643

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Eagle Creek

 

Tyler, TX

 

194

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Eagle Point

 

Marysville, WA

 

230

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

836

 

 

5,499

 

 

 

 

328

 

 

836

 

 

5,827

 

 

6,663

 

 

818

 

 

 

Oct-97

 

 

Westmoor

 

Oklahoma City, OK

 

 

2,253

 

 

498

 

 

5,400

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

498

 

Falcon Farms

 

Port Byron, IL

 

215

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Forest Creek

 

Elkhart, IN

 

167

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Fountainvue

 

Lafontaine, IN

 

 

5,650

 

 

6,148

 

 

925

 

 

 

 

120

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Foxhall Village

 

Raleigh, NC

 

315

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Golden Valley

Jul-98

 

 

Westview

 

Gillette, WY

 

 

2,153

 

 

 

Douglasville, GA

 

131

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Huron Estates

 

Cheboygan, MI

 

111

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Indian Rocks

 

Largo, FL

 

148

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Knoll Terrace

 

Corvallis, OR

 

212

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

La Quinta Ridge

 

Indio, CA

 

331

 

 

2,102

 

 

 

 

323

 

 

331

 

 

2,425

 

151

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakewood

 

Montgomery, AL

 

396

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakewood Estates

 

Davenport, IA

 

180

Feb-04

 

HTA 

2,756

 

 

280

 

 

 

Nov-95

 

 

 

Landmark Village

 

Fairburn, GA

 

Wheel Estates

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

554

 

 

134

 

 

793

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

134

 

 

809

 

 

943

 

 

82

 

 

 

Oct-00

524

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Marnelle

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

205

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Oak Ridge

 

Elkhart, IN

 

204

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Oakwood Forest

 

Greensboro, NC

 

482

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pedaler’s Pond

 

Lake Wales, FL

 

214

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Pinecrest Village

 

Shreveport, LA

 

446

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

Whispering Hills

 

Coal Valley, IL

 

 

384

 

 

92

 

 

777

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

92

 

 

792

 

 

884

 

 

121

 

 

 

Jul-97

 

 

Whitney

 

Pleasant Ridge

 

Mount Pleasant, MI

 

305

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

President’s Park

 

Grand Forks, ND

 

174

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Riverview

 

Clackamas, OR

 

133

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Gainesville, FL

 

 

2,476

 

 

450

 

 

2,662

 

Saddlebrook

 

N. Charleston, SC

 

425

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sherwood

 

 

 

 

286

 

 

450

 

 

2,948

Hartford City, IN

 

134

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Southwind Village

 

Naples, FL

 

 

 

3,398

 

 

671

 

 

 

Aug-99

 

 

Wikiup

 

Henderson, CO

 

 

11,402337

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Springfield Farms

 

 

1,475

 

 

8,383

 

 

 

 

1,920

 

 

1,475

 

 

10,303

 

 

11,778

 

 

Brookline Sta, MO

 

290

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Stonegate

 

Shreveport, LA

 

157

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Terrace Heights

 

Dubuque, IA

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

Mar-99

 

 

Willow Creek Estates

 

Ogden, UT

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Torrey Hills

 

Flint, MI

 

377

F-47




 

 

 

 

480

 

right" style="margin:0pt 10.0pt .0001pt 0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">670

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

 

2,766

 

 

 

 

(26

)

 

480

 

 

2,739

 

 

3,219

 

 

22

 

 

 

Sep-04

 

 

Willow Springs

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

1,639

 

 

262

 

 

2,241

 

 

 

 

837

 

 

262

 

 

3,078

 

 

3,340

 

 

406

 

 

 

Jan-97

 

Twin Pines

 

Goshen, IN

 

238

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Villa

 

Flint, MI

 

319

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Winter Haven Oaks

 

Winterhaven, FL

 

343

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Green Park South

 

Pelham, AL

 

421

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Hunter Ridge

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

838

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Friendly Village

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

203

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Misty Winds

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

354

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shadow Hills

 

Orlando, FL

 

 

Willow Terrace

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

 

2,261

 

 

515

 

 

3,369

 

 

 

 

778

 

 

515

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Smoke Creek

 

Snellville, GA

 

264

Feb-04

 

4,147

 

 

4,662

 

 

580

 

 

 

 

HTA

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

Kennesaw, GA

 

273

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sunset Vista

 

Magna, UT

 

207

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Sea Pines

 

Mobile, AL

 

429

Feb-04

Nov-97

 

 

Windsor Mobile Estates

 

 

HTA

 

Woodland Hills

 

Montgomery, AL

 

628

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

The Pines

 

Ladson, SC

 

204

West Valley City, UT

 

 

7,690

 

 

1,178

 

 

6,701

 

 

 

 

824

 

 

1,178

 

 

7,525

 

 

8,703

 

 

2,261

 

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Shady Hills

 

Nashville, TN

 

251

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Trailmont

 

Goodlettsville, TN

 

131

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Chisholm Creek

 

Wichita, KS

 

254

Febface="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

 

Aug-00

 

 

 

HTA

 

Big Country

 

Cheyenne, WY

 

251

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Heritage Point

 

Montgomery, AL

 

264

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Lithia Springs, GA

 

103

Feb-04

Winter Haven Oaks

 

Winter Haven, FL

 

 

3,700

 

 

804

 

 

4,754

 

 

 

 

80

 

HTA

 

Plantation Estates

 

Douglasville, GA

 

138

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

804

 

 

4,834

 

 

5,638

 

 

140

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

Green Acres

 

Petersburg, VA

 

182

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Lakeside

 

Woodlake

 

Greensboro, NC

 

 

2,292

 

 

887

 

 

5,267

 

 

 

 

541

 

 

887

 

 

5,808

 

 

6,695

 

 

168

 

 

 

Mar-04

 

 

Woodlands of Kennesaw

 

 

Davenport, IA

 

124

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Evergreen Village

 

Pleasant View, UT

 

238

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Four Seasons

 

Fayetteville, GA

 

214

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Alafia Riverfront

 

Kennesaw, GA

 

 

4,750

 

 

997

 

 

5,806

 

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

997

 

 

6,881

Riverview, FL

 

96

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Highland

 

Elkhart, IN

 

246

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Birchwood Farms

 

Birch Run, MI

 

143

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Terrace

 

Cedar Rapids, IA

 

255

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Five Seasons Davenport

 

Davenport, IA

 

270

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Silver Creek

 

Davenport, IA

 

280

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Encantada

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

354

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Royal Crest

 

Los Alamos, NM

 

180

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

Brookside Village

 

Dallas, TX

 

394

Feb-04

 

 

 

7,878

 

 

198

 

 

 

Feb-04

 

 

Zoppe’s

 

Seagoville, TX

 

 

564

 

 

57

 

 

473

 

 

 

 

123

 

 

57

 

 

596

 

 

653

 

HTA

 

Meadow Glen

 

Keller, TX

 

409

Feb-04

 

HTA

 

 

110

 

 

 

Jan-00

 

 

Miscellaneous other assets*

 

 

Silver Leaf

 

Mansfield, TX

 

145

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Lamplighter Village

 

Mariettsize:1.0pt;"> 

 

79,020

 

 

 

431

Mar-04

 

HTA

1,294

 

 

6,162

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,294

 

 

6,162

 

 

7,455

 

 

1,838

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

$ 1,001,622

 

 

$ 211,656

 

 

 

Shadowood

 

Acworth, GA

 

506

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Stone Mountain

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

354

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Marion Village

 

Marion, IA

 $ 1,242,360

 

 

$ (273

)

 

486

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Autumn Forest

 

Brown Summit, NC

 

299

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Woodlake

 

Greensboro, NC

 

308

Mar-04

 

HTA

 

Arlington Lakeside

 

Arlington, TX

 

233

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

$ 235,744

 

 

$ 211,383

 

 

$ 1,478,104

 

 

$ 1,689,487

(a)(b)

 

$ 156,707

(c)

 

 

 

 

 


*                      Encumbrances on miscellaneous other assets includes $51,000 of our revolving credit mortgage facility at LIBOR plus 2.95% and $28,000 of our floorplan lines (ranging from prime plus 0.75% to prime plus 4.00%)

(a)              The changes in total real estate and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Total real estate:

 

 

Pine Ridge

 

Sarasota, FL

 

126

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Cedar Knoll

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$ 963,202

 

$ 916,741

 

Waterloo, IA

 

290

Apr-04

 

HTA

 

Mallard Lake

 

Pontoon Beach, IL

 

$ 366,319

 

Acquisitions

 

806,048

 

38,582

 

537,815

 

Improvements and Equipment Purchases

 

49,708

 

12,725

 

15,862

style="font-size:10.0pt;">278

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Kopper View

 

Dispositions and Other

 

(129,471

)

(4,846

)

(3,255

)

Balance at end of year

 

$ 1,689,487

 

$ 963,202

 

 

West Valley City, UT

 

61

Jun-04

 

NA

 

Overpass Point

 

Tooele, UT

 

182

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pleasant View

 

Berwick, PA

 

108

F-48




 

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Brookside

 

Berwick, PA

 

171

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Beaver Run

 

Linkwood, MD

 

118

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Carsons

 

Chambersburg, PA

$ 916,741

 

Accumulated depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$   99,687

 

$ 62,296

 

$ 30,932

 

Depreciation for the year

 

59,614

 

39,506

 

130

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Chelsea

 

Sayre, PA

 

85

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Collingwood

 

Horseheads, NY

 

101

Jun-04

 

 

31,335

 

Dispositions and other

 

(2,594

)

(2,115

)

29

 

Balance at end of year

 

$ 156,707

 

$ 99,687

 

$ 62,296

 

 

(b)              The aggregate cost for U.S. federal income tax purposes is $1,579.1 million.

(c)     The Company depreciates buildings over 10 to 20 years and improvements over 10 to 30 years.

F-68

 




 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 26, 2005

PROSPECTUS

$96,600,000

GRAPHIC

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP

AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES INC.

71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025
and
Shares of Common Stock Issuable Upon Exchange of the Notes

[             ], 2005

 

 




PART II

D.A.M.

 

Crestview

 

Sayre, PA

 

98

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Danboro

 

Danboro, PA

 

231

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Ephrata

 

Ephrata, PA

 

149

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Frieden

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 31.                 Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The estimated expenses payable by us in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities described in this registration statement are as follows:

t>

Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee

 

$  11,370

 

Legal fees and expenses

 192

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Green Acres

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

24

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Gregory Courts

 

Honey Brook, PA

200,000

 

Accounting fees and expenses

 

165,000

 

Transfer Agent and Registrar fees

 

25,000

 

NYSE listing fees

 

5,000

 

Miscellaneous expenses

 

293,630

 

Total

 

700,000

 

 

Item 32.                 Sales to Special Parties.

None.  

Item 33.                 Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

 

39

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Honey Brook

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

146

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Huguenot

 

Port Jervis, NY

 

166

Jun-04

 

 

Maple Manor

 

Taylor, PA

II-1




Partnership, and for certain intellectual property and service mark assets of ARC Holdings, which businesses and assets were valued at approximately $100 million. The exchange was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and Regulation D thereunder.

On June 30, 2004, the Partnership acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY, L.P., or D.A.M., for a total purchase price of approximately $65.5 million, including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt, the acquisition was funded through the issuance by the Partnership to D.A.M. of approximately 300,000 new Series “B”, 705,668 new Series “C” and 320,000 Series “D” preferred partnership units (“PPUs”) for proceeds totalling $33.1 million. The issuance of the units was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and Regulation D thereunder.

On August 9, 2005, the Partnership sold $87 million in aggregate principal amount of its 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 to Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as initial purchaser, in a private offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) as a transaction not involving a public offering. The 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 were sold to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act. Aggregate underwriting discounts amounted to approximately $3,045,000.

On August 23, 2005, the Partnership sold $9.6 million in aggregate principal amount of its 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 to Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as initial purchaser, in a private offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) as a transaction not involving a public offering. The 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 were sold to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act. Aggregate underwriting discounts amounted to approximately $336,000.

Item 34.                 Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Section 17-108 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act empowers a Delaware limited partnership to indemnify and hold harmless any partner or other person from and against all claims and demands whatsoever. The Partnership’s limited partnership agreement expressly limit’s ARC’s liability as the Partnership’s sole general partner by providing that ARC and its officers and directors are not liable or accountable in damages to the Partnership, its limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if ARC or its director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, the Partnership is required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or the other persons in connection with any actions relating to the Partnership’s operations, provided that the Partnership will not indemnify for willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or any transaction for which the person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the limited partnership agreement.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. ARC’s charter contains such a provision which eliminates directors’ and officers’ liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

ARC’s charter authorizes it, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while a director or officer of ARC and at ARC’s request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee, from and

II-2




against any claim or liability to which that individual may become subject or which that individual may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. ARC’s bylaws obligate it, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while a director or officer of ARC and at ARC’s request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and who is made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity from and against any claim or liability to which that individual may become subject or which that individual may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. ARC’s charter and bylaws also permit ARC to indemnify and advance expenses to any individual who served a predecessor of ARC in any of the capacities described above and any employee or agent of ARC or a predecessor thereof.

The MGCL requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which ARC’s charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made or threatened to be made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. The MGCL permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or are threatened to be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad faith or (ii) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification and then only for expenses. In addition, the MGCL permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporation’s receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

Item 35.                 Treatment of Proceeds for Stock Being Registered

None.

II-3




Item 36.                 Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a)   Financial Statements.   See Page F-1 for an index of the financial statements included in the registration statement.

(b)   Exhibits.   The following is a complete list of exhibits filed as part of the registration statement, which are incorporated herein:

Exhibit No.

 

 

 

Exhibit Description

2.1

 

Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2003, by and among Hometown America:avoid;"> 

316

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Monroe Valley

 

Jonestown, PA

 

44

 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

2.2

 

Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 4, 2003, to the Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2003, by and among Hometown America, L.L.C., AffordaTimes New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Moosic Heights

 

Avoca, PA

 

152

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Mountaintop

 

Narvon, PA

 

39

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Haven

 

Blossvale, NY

 

130

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunny Acres

 

Somerset, PA

 

207

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

3.1

 

Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

3.3

 

Articles Supplementary of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. Designating a Series of Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

3.4

 

First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Affordable Residential Communities L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.1

 

Certificate of Common Stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.2

 

Certificate of 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.3

 

Second Amended and Restated Supplemental Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2004, by and among Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund IV, L.P., Thomas H. Lee Foreign Fund IV, L.P., Thomas H. Lee Foreign Fund IV-B, L.P., Thomas H. Lee Charitable Investments Limited Partnership, Thomas H. Lee Limited Partnership, Capital ARC Holdings, LLC, Nassau Capital Funds L.P., Nassau Capital Partners II, L.P., NAS Partners I, L.L.C. and the individuals listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

II-4



 

Suburban

 

Greenburg, PA

 

202

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Blue Ridge

01" align="center">

 

ttom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.3pt;">

 

4.4

 

Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2004, by and among Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and the parties listed on the exhibits thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.5

 

First Amended and Restated Pairing Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2004, by and between Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Affordable Residential Communities LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.6

 

Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2005, between Affordable Residential Communities LP and U.S. Bank National Association, including therein the forms of the notes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.7

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 9, 2005, among Affordable Residential Communities LP, Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 3, 2005 and filed August 9, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.8

 

Conklin, NY

 

69

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Chambersburg I&II

 

Chambersburg, PA

 

100

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Hideaway

 

Honey Brook, PA

 

40

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Kintner

 

Vestal, NY

 

55

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Martins

 

Nottingham, PA

 

60

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Nichols

 

Phoenixville, PA

 

10

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Scenic View

 

East Earl, PA

 

18

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Shady Grove

 

Atglen, PA

 

40

 

Common Stock Delivery Agreement, dated August 9, 2005, by and between Affordable Residential Communities LP and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 3, 2005 and filed August 9, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

5.1**

 

Opinion of Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C. with respect to legality of notes being registered.

5.2**

 

Opinion of Venable LLP with respect to shares of ARC common stock being registered.

8.1*

 

Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP with respect to tax matters.

10.1

 

Employment Agreement between Scott D. Jackson and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987).

10.2

 

Employment Agreement between John G. Sprengle and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.3

 

Separation and Release Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2004, by and between George W. McGeeney, Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and ARC Management Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (File No. 001-31987).

10.4

 

Severance Agreement between Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Lawrence E. Kreider (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.5

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Blandon

Severance Agreement between Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Scott L. Gesell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.6

 

Affordable Residential Communities Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

II-5




 

10.7

 

Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for use under the Affordable Residential Communities Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.8

 

Affordable Residential Communities Inc. Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.9

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC18TX LP, ARC Communities 18 LLC, ARC18FLD LLC, ARC18FLWHO LLC, ARC18FLSH LLC

 

Fleetwood, PA

 

30

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Morgantown

 

Morgantown, PA

 

23

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Tuckerton

 

Reading, PA

 

74

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Valley View in Wernersville

 

Wernersville, PA

 

29

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Pine Terrace

 

Schuylkill Haven, PA

 

25

Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Sunnyside

 

Trooper, PA

 

71

 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.10

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC19TX LP, ARC Communities 19 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.11

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC4BFND, L.L.C. and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.12

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 11 LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.13

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 13 LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.14

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 14 LLC, ARC14FLCV LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by refege-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Jun-04

 

D.A.M.

 

Oakwood Lake Village

 

Tunkhannock, PA

 

79

Jul-04

 

NA

 

Western Mobile Estates

 

West Valley City, UT

 

145

Sep-04

 

NA

 

Willow Creek Estates

10.15

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 17 LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.16

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 9 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.17

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 10 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.18

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and width="16" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:11.7pt;">

 

Ogden, UT

 

137

 

3.   Partners’ Capital

On March 16, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on April 15, 2005 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2005. In addition, on March 16, 2005 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid April 30, 2005 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2005. In addition, on March 16, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on April 30, 2005 to the unitholders of record on April 15, 2005.

F-49




On May 23, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1875 per Common OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $8.1 million on July 15, 2005 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2005. In addition, on May 23, 2005 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series “A” Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid July 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on July 15, 2005. In addition, on May 23, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series “B” and Series “C” Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on July 29, 2005 to the unitholders of record on July 15, 2005.

At June 30, 2005, Partners’ Capital included 2,261,451 OP Units that were issued to various limited partners and 1,005,688 PPUs issued on June 30, 2004 as part of the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition. Each OP Unit outstanding is paired with 1.9268 shares of ARC’s special voting stock (each a “Paired Equity Unit”) that allows each holder to vote an OP Unit on matters as if it were a common share of ARC’s stock. Each OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at ARC’s election, one share of ARC’s common stock. During the second quarter of 2005, the Partnership redeemed for cash approximately 142,000 OP Units totaling approximately $1.8 million.

The PPUs outstanding as of June 30, 2005 consist of 300,000 Series “B” units and 705,688 Series “C” units. The Series “B” PPUs carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “B” PPUs can be redeemed at the option of the Operating Partnership for ARC’s common stock, cash and/or notes payable after the fifth anniversary of their issuance. In July 2005, according to the terms of the Series “B” PPUs, the Series “B” PPU holders requested redemption of their units, and the Operating Partnership elected to repurchase them for approximately $2.5 million in cash and notes payable totaling approximately $5.0 million. As of June 30, 2005, we have accrued $78,125 of the Series “B” PPU preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “B” preferred unitholders through that date.

The Series “C” PPUs carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series “C” PPUs can be redeemed at the option of the Operating Partnership for cash after the fifth anniversary of their issuance. Series “C” PPU holders can request redemption of their units after the two and a half year anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the PPUs or repurchase them with ARC common stock, cash and/or a note payable, at the Operating Partnership’s option. Series “B” and “C” units have the same priority as to the payment of distributions. As of June 30, 2005, we had accrued $183,773 of the Series “C” PPU preferred distribution, representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series “C” preferred unitholders through that date.

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.19

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 15 LLC, ARC15FLOV LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.20

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 16 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

II-6




 

10.21

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 1 LLC and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.22

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 2 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.23

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 3 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.24

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 4 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.25

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 5 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.26

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 6 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.27

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 7 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.28

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 8 LLC and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.29

 

Loan Agreement between ARC SPEI I, L.L.C. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Arc’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.30

 

Credit Agreement among Affordable Residential Communities LP, Affordable Residential Communities Inc., Citicorp North America, Inc., Bank One, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).<10.0pt;">4.   Rental and Other Property, Net

The following summarizes rental and other property (in thousands):

 

 

10.31

 

Master Repurchase Agreement Between Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. and Enspire Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.32

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Land

 

$

211,822

 

 

$

211,383

 

 

Land improvements and buildings

 

1,297,792

 

 

1,268,002

Amendment No. 1 to Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2005, by and between Enspire Finance LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.33

 

Loan Agreement dated September 23, 2004 by and among ARC III, L.L.C. as Borrower and Citigroup Global Market Realty Corp. as Lender and as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-31987).

10.34

 

Credit Agreement, dated as April 6, 2005, by and among ARC Housing LLC, ARC HousingTX LP and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)) 

 

Rental homes and improvements

 

249,169

 

.

II-7



 

197,668

 

 

Furniture, equipment and vehicles

 

14,478

 

 

12,434

 

 

Subtotal

 

1,773,261


 

10.35*

 

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2005, by and among ARC Housing LLC, ARC HousingTX LP and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.36

 

Guarantee, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by Affordable Residential Communities LP in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.37

 

First Amendment, dated as of October 14, 2005, to the ARC LP Guarantee, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by Affordable Residential Communities LP in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.38

 

Second Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by Affordable Residential Communities LP in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.39

 

Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by ARC Dealership, Inc. in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.40*

 

Security Agreement, dated October 14, 2005, made by ARC Real Estate Holdings LLC in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

21.1

 

List of ARC Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-31987).

23.1**

 

Consent of Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C. (included in Exhibit 5.1).

23.1**

 

Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.2).

23.3*

 

Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1).

23.4**

 

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

24.1**

 

Powers of Attorney (included on the signature pages of this registration statement).

25.1**

 

Statement of Eligibility of Trustee.


                     Exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan.

*                    To be filed by amendment.

**             Filed herewith.

II-8




Item 37.                 Undertakings

The undersigned registrants hereby undertake:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i)          To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii)        To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

(iii)       To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(5) ARC hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and where, applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-9




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that the registrant meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-11 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Denver, State of Colorado, on October 26, 2005.

Affordable Residential Communities LP

 

By:

Affordable Residential Communities Inc.,

 

 

its sole general partner

 

By:

/s/ LARRY D. WILLARD

 

 

Name: Larry D. Willard

 

 

Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Larry D. Willard and Scott L. Gesell, and each of them, with full power to act without the other, as such person’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Registration Statement, and any and all amendments thereto (including post-effective amendments), and to file the same, with exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

 

1,689,487

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on October 26, 2005.

Name

 

 

Title

 

/s/ LARRY D. WILLARD

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(186,221

)

 

(156,707

)

 

Rental and other property, net

 

:1.0pt;"> 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Affordable

Larry D. Willard

 

Residential Communities Inc.

/s/ JAMES F. KIMSEY

 

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of Affordable

James F. Kimsey

 

Residential Communities Inc.

/s/ SCOTT D. JACKSON

 

Vice Chairman and Director of Affordable Residential

Scott D. Jackson

 

Communities Inc.

/s/ JOHN G. SPRENGLE

 

Vice Chairman and Director of Affordable Residential

John G. Sprengle

$

1,587,040

 

 

$

1,532,780

 

 

 

We have capitalized interest and internal costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million in the cost of land and building improvements and manufactured home purchases for the three and six months ended

F-50




June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to $1.7 million and $2.4 million capitalized during the same periods in 2004.

5.   Notes Payable (including $25.8 million due to general partner)

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our notes payable (in thousands):

 

Communities Inc.

/s/ EUGENE MERCY, JR.

 

Director of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

Eugene Mercy, Jr.

 

 

II-10




 

 

Director of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

W. Joris Brinkerhoff

 

 

/s/ GERALD J. FORD

 

Director of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

Gerald J. Ford

 

 

June 30,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum

 

$

302,325

 

 

$

303,903

 

 

 

/s/ JAMES R. STAFF

 

Director of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

James R. Staff

 

 

/s/ CARL B. WEBB

 

Director of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

Carl B. Webb

 

 

/s/ J. MARKHAM GREEN

 

Director of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

J. Markham Green

 

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014, 5.53% per annum

 

211,921

 

 

213,333

 

 

Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum

 

/s/ LAWRENCE E. KREIDER

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief

Lawrence E. Kreider

 

98,926

 

 

99,651

 

 

Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum (6.22% at June 30, 2005)

 

140,468

 

 

150,871

 

 

Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through 2031, averaging 7.31% per annum

 

153,074

 

 

153,818

 

 

Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2005, LIBOR plus 2.95% per annum (6.17% at June 30, 2005)

 

58,764

 

 

51,000

 

 

Trust preferred securities due 2035, LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum (6.26% at June 30, 2005) (due to general partner)

 

25,780

 

 

 

 

Consumer finance facility due 2008, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum (6.18% at June 30, 2005)

 

9,369

 

 

 

 

Lease receivable facility due 2007, LIBOR plus 7.00% per annum (10.22% at June 30, 2005)

 

42,100

 

 

 

Information Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

/s/ SCOTT L. GESELL

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Affordable

Scott L. Gesell

 

Residential Communities Inc.

 

II-11




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that the registrant meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Denver, State of Colorado, on October 26, 2005.

Affordable Residential Communities Inc.

 

By:

/s/ LARRY D. WILLARD

 

 

Name: Larry D. Willard

 

 

Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Larry D. Willard and Scott L. Gesell, and each of them, with full power to act without the other, as such person’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Registration Statement, and any and all amendments thereto (including post-effective amendments), and to file the same, with exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on October 26, 2005.

Name

 

 

Title

 

/s/ LARRY D. WILLARD

 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Larry D. Willard

 

 

/s/ JAMES F. KIMSEY

 

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

James F. Kimsey

 

 

/s/ SCOTT D. JACKSON

 

Vice Chairman and Director

Scott D. Jackson

 

 

/s/ JOHN G. SPRENGLE

 

Vice Chairman and Director

John G. Sprengle

 

 

/s/ EUGENE MERCY, JR.

 

Director

Eugene Mercy, Jr.

 

 

 

 

Director

W. Joris Brinkerhoff

 

 

 

Floorplan line of credit due 2007, ranging from prime plus 0.75% to prime plus 4.00% per annum (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005)

 

43,945

 

 

27,999

 

 

Other loans

 

II-12




 

/s/ GERALD J. FORD

 

Director

Gerald J. Ford

 

 

/s/ JAMES R. STAFF

 

Director

James R. Staff

 

 

/s/ CARL B. WEBB

 

Director

Carl B. Webb

 

 

2,332

 

 

1,047

 

 

 

 

$

1,089,004

/s/ J. MARKHAM GREEN

 

Director

J. Markham Green

 

 

/s/ LAWRENCE E. KREIDER

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and

Lawrence E. Kreider

 

Chief Information Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ SCOTT L. GESELL

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Scott L. Gesell

 

 

 

II-13




EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

 

 

 

Exhibit Description

2.1

 

 

 

$

1,001,622

 

 

 

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 on May 2, 2002. It is an obligation of certain of our special purpose real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and matures on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

F-51Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2003, by and among Hometown America, L.L.C., Affordable Residential Communities LP (formerly known as Affordable Residential Communities IV, LP) and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (formerly known as ARC IV REIT, Inc.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

2.2

 

Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 4, 2003, to the Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2003, by and among Hometown America, L.L.C., Affordable Residential Communities LP (formerly known as Affordable Residential Communities IV, LP) and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (formerly known as ARC IV REIT, Inc.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

3.1

 

Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

3.3

 

Articles Supplementary of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. Designating a Series of Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

3.4

 

First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Affordable Residential Communities L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.1

 


Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009

We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity.

Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due 2006

We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006. At our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage duet .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;">Certificate of Common Stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.2

 

Certificate of 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.3

 

Second Amended and Restated Supplemental Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2004, by and among Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund IV, L.P., Thomas H. Lee Foreign Fund IV, L.P., Thomas H. Lee Foreign Fund IV-B, L.P., Thomas H. Lee Charitable Investments Limited Partnership, Thomas H. Lee Limited Partnership, Capital ARC Holdings, LLC, Nassau Capital Funds L.P., Nassau Capital Partners II, L.P., NAS Partners I, L.L.C. and the individuals listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.4

 

Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2004, by and among Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and the parties listed on the exhibits thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

II-14




 

4.5

 

First Amended and Restated Pairing Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2004, by and between Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Affordable Residential Communities LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.6

 

Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2005, between Affordable Residential Communities LP and U.S. Bank National Association, including therein the forms of the notes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.7

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 9, 2005, among Affordable Residential Communities LP, Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 3, 2005 and filed August 9, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

4.8

 

Common Stock Delivery Agreement, dated August 9, 2005, by and between Affordable Residential Communities LP and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to ARC’s Current Report on F 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance, respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by the lenders to refinance the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid.

Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages Due 2005 Through 2031

We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by specific manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are as follows:

a)     Mortgages assumed and one refinanced as part of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately $46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006 through 2028 and have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%.

b)     Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.06%.

c)     Notes assumed in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately $29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual interest rate of 7.18%.

F-52




Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility

In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by 33 communities that previously secured the cancelled Senior Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 6 to the ARC’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-K), as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to our IPO. Advances under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing the loan. As amended in September 2005, the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005) and has an extended term through September 2006. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and an additional fee of 0.5% at the amendment date and will pay an advance fee to the extent that any advance takes the amount of indebtedness outstanding under the facility above $58.764 million.

Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035 (Due to General Partner)

On March 15, 2005, the Company issued $25.8 million in unsecured trust preferred securities to ARC. The $25.8 million trust preferred securities bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30, 2005). Interest on the securities is paid on the 30th of March, June, September and December of each year. The Company may redeem these securities on or after March 30, 2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if not redeemed sooner.

.

5.1**

 

Opinion of Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C. with respect to legality of notes being registered.

5.2**

 

Opinion of Venable LLP with respect to shares of ARC common stock being registered.

8.1*

 

Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP with respect to tax matters.

10.1

 

Employment Agreement between Scott D. Jackson and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987).

10.2

 

Employment Agreement between John G. Sprengle and Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.3

Consumer Finance Facility

We entered into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility (the “Consumer Finance Facility”) on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in connection with entering into a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving lease receivables credit facility (see Lease Receivables Facility below). The Consumer Finance Facility, as amended, has a total commitment of $125.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, and borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing conditional sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month LIBOR (6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the quarter, we paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the original committed amount and 0.75% of the amended committed amount and will pay additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional sales contract.

The availability of advances under the Consumer Finance Facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio.

F-53




Lease Receivables Facility

On April 6, 2005, the Company obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving credit facility (the “Lease Receivables Facility”) with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. to be used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and for general corporate purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the facility increased to $150 million effective October 14, 2005.

This facility is an obligation of two indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, ARC Housing LLC and ARC Housing TX LP (collectively, “Housing”). Borrowings under the Lease Receivables Facility are secured by an assignment of all lease receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and located in ARC’s communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. The fee charged by the lender in connection with the amendment was 0.5%, or $750,000. The ability to access funding under the amended facility is conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent set forth in the amendment.

Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional collateral for the facility.

Floorplan Lines of Credit

In August 2004, "2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 

Separation and Release Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2004, by and between George W. McGeeney, Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and ARC Management Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (File No. 001-31987).

10.4

 

Severance Agreement between Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and Lawrence E. Kreider (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affordable Residential Communities Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.5

 

we amended our floorplan line of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended line of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the home’s original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the home’s purchase. The amended line of credit requires the Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million, all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the line of credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit is subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and an early termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination date.

F-54




6.   Loss Per Unit

The following table reflects the calculation of loss per unit (amounts in thousands, except per unit information):

Severance Agreement betwele="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:246.55pt;">

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.6

 

2005

 

      2004      

 

Affordable Residential Communities Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

II-15




 

10.7

 

2005

 

2004

 

oid;">Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for use under the Affordable Residential Communities Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.8

 

Affordable Residential Communities Inc. Management Incentive Plan

 

 

 

 style:italic;">(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.9

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC18TX LP, ARC Communities 18 LLC, ARC18FLD LLC, AR;

 

 

 

 

 

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.10

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC19TX LP, ARC Communities 19 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.11

 

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC4BFND, L.L.C. and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.12

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 11 LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.13

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 13 LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.14

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 14 LLC, ARC14FLCV LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.15

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 17 LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.16

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 9 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.17

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 10 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.18

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 12 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.19

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 15 LLC, ARC15FLOV LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

II-16




 

10.20

 

Loan Agreement, dated February 18, 2004, by and among ARC Communities 16 LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.21

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 1 LLC and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.22

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 2 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.23

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 3 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.24

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 4 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.25

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 5 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.26

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 6 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.27

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 7 LLC and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to ARC’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.28

 

Loan Agreement between ARC Communities 8 LLC and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.29

 

Loan Agreement between ARC SPEI I, L.L.C. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Arc’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-109816)).

10.30

 

Credit Agreement among Affordable Residential Communities LP, Affordable Residential Communities Inc., Citicorp North America, Inc., Bank One, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.31

 

Master Repurchase Agreement Between Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. and Enspire Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.32

 

Amendment No. 1 to Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2005, by and between Enspire Finance LLC and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

II-17




 

10.33

 

Loan Agreement dated September 23, 2004 by and among ARC III, L.L.C. as Borrower and Citigroup Global Market Realty Corp. as Lender and as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-31987).

10.34

 

Credit Agreement, dated as April 6, 2005, by and among ARC Housing LLC, ARC HousingTX LP and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.35*

 

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2005, by and among ARC Housing LLC, ARC HousingTX LP and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.36

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(16,351

)

 

$

(5,326

)

 

$

(30,384

)

$

(42,578

)

Preferred unit distributions

 

(2,971

)

 

(2,578

)

 

(5,942

)

(3,810

)

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

 

Guarantee, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by Affordable Residential Communities LP in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.37

 

First Amendment, dated as of October 14, 2005, to the ARC LP Guarantee, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by Affordable Residential Communities LP in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.38

 

Second Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by Affordable Residential Communities LP in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.39

 

Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of April 6, 2005, made by ARC Dealership, Inc. in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

10.40*

 

Security Agreement, dated October 14, 2005, made by ARC Real Estate Holdings LLC in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. (incorporated by reference to ARC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2005 (File No. 001-31987)).

(19,322

)

 

$

(7,904

)

 

$

(36,326

)

$

(46,388

)

Loss per unit from continuing operations

 

$

(0.45

)

 

$

(0.18

)

 

$

(0.84

)

$

(1.24

)

Income per unit from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

72

21.1

 

List of ARC Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to ARC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-31987).

23.1**

 

Consent of Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C. (included in Exhibit 5.1).

23.1**

 

Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.2).

23.3*

 

Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1).

23.4**

 

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

24.1**

 

Powers of Attorney (included on the signature pages of this registration statement).

25.1**

 

Statement of Eligibility of Trustee.


                     Exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan.

*                    To be filed by amendment.

**             Filed herewith.

II-18