U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

Commission File No. 333-74710

Georgia Bancshares, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 2,974,512 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding as of August 12, 2005.

GEORGIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Index

2

GEORGIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

GEORGIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

GEORGIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

GEORGIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

GEORGIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial statements and, accordingly, they are condensed and omit disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the most recent annual report to shareholders.  The financial statements as of June 30, 2005 and for the interim periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation.  The financial information as of December 31, 2004 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.  For further information, refer to the financial statements and the notes included in Georgia Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Annual Report.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation of our financial statements.  Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2004 as filed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities.  We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies.  The judgments and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates which could have a material impact on our carrying values of assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

We believe the process for establishing the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We have developed policies and procedures for evaluating the overall quality of our credit portfolio and the timely identification of potential credit problems. The loan portfolio is periodically reviewed to evaluate the outstanding loans and to measure both the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. We have established an allowance for loan losses through a provision for loan losses charged to expense on our statement of operations.

Stock Compensation Plans

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, encourages all entities to adopt a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock compensation plans, whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.  However, it also allows an entity to continue to measure compensation costs for those plans using the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, whereby compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date (or other measurement date) over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.  Accordingly, the Company has recorded no expense in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 related to its stock options.  The Company has elected to continue with the accounting methodology in Opinion No. 25 and, as a result, has provided the following pro forma disclosure of net income and basic and diluted earnings per common share.

7

NOTE 2 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income includes net income and other comprehensive income, which is defined as non-owner related transactions in equity.  The following table sets forth the amounts of other comprehensive income included in equity along with the related tax effect for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists solely of the unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of the deferred tax effects.

8

NOTE 3 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income per share - basic is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Net income per share - diluted is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive common share equivalents using the treasury stock method.  Dilutive common share equivalents include common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options.

All information has been adjusted for any stock splits and stock dividends effected during the periods presented.

9

All information has been adjusted for any stock splits and stock dividends effected during the periods presented.

10

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Report contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  These statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance.  Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors that are beyond our control.  The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements.  Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

•                  significant increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries;

•                  changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;

•                  changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment;

•                  the level of allowance for loan loss;

•                  the rate of delinquencies and amounts of charge-offs;

•                  the rates of loan growth;

•                  adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;

•                  general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in our primary service area, becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;

•                  changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;

•                  changes in technology;

•                  changes in monetary and tax policies;

•                  loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from terrorist activities;

•                  changes in the securities markets; and

•                  other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

For the three months ended June 30, 2005, net interest income increased $445,720, or 21.00% to $2,567,981 as compared to $2,122,261 for the same period in 2004.  Interest income from loans, including fees, increased $922,062 or 32.80% to $3,733,297 at June 30, 2005, as compared to $2,811,235 at June 30, 2004.  This increase in net interest income is a direct result of the combination of an increase in the outstanding balances of net loans, which increased from $161,313,540 at June 30, 2004, to $206,303,138 at June 30, 2005, and increases in loan rates as evidenced by the gradual increases in the prime interest rate experienced over the past twelve months.  Income on investment securities decreased $27,853, or -9.43%, to $267,502 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $295,355 at June 30, 2004.  This decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in the overall size of the investment securities portfolio during the period.  Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $1,454,847 as compared to $1,005,201 for the same period in 2004.

For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net interest income increased $1,058,794, or 25.46%, to $5,216,807 as compared to $4,158,013 for the same period in 2004.  Interest income from loans, including fees, increased $1,811,852, or 32.67%, to $7,358,197 at June 30, 2005, as compared to $5,546,345 at June 30, 2004.  Income on investment securities, however, declined $14,533 or -2.39% to $592,734 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $607,267 at June 30, 2004.  This decrease was primarily attributable to heavy prepayments on higher yielding mortgage backed securities experienced during 2004 and 2005.  Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $2,756,285 as compared to $2,033,556 for the same period in 2004.

11

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is the charge to operating earnings that management believes is necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level.  For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the provision charged to expense was $96,600 as compared to $70,000 for the same period in 2004.  For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the provision charged to expense was $193,200 as compared to $150,000 for the same period in 2004.   The total loan loss allowance as a percentage of gross loans changed only slightly, as it represented 1.36% of gross loans at June 30, 2005 and 1.38% at December 31, 2004.  There are risks inherent in making all loans, including risks with respect to the period of time over which loans may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, and, in the case of a collateralized loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral.  We maintain an allowance for loan losses based on, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation of economic conditions, and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality.  Our judgment about the adequacy of the allowance is based upon a number of assumptions about future events, which we believe to be reasonable, but which may not prove to be accurate.  We consider our loss history, the practices of other financial institutions in regard to loan loss allowances, general economic conditions nationally and within our market area, business conditions within each segment of the markets that we lend to and loss exposures on specific loans that we have identified for special scrutiny.

In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review our allowance for loan losses for adequacy. Our losses will undoubtedly vary from our estimates, and there is a possibility that charge offs in future periods could exceed the allowance for loan losses as estimated at any given point in time or that substantial additional increases in the allowance for loan losses could be required.  Additions to the allowance for loan losses could result in a decrease of our net income and, possibly, our capital.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $357,303, an increase of $229,671, or 179.95%, from the $127,632 recorded during the comparable period in 2004.  Gains on sales of securities available-for-sale amounted to only $4,795 in 2004 and were $0 in 2005.  We sell securities from time to time in order to adjust the mix of our investment portfolio or, on rare occasions, to provide liquidity for ongoing operations.  The service charge income component of noninterest income increased $14,701, or 18.69%, to $93,345 as compared to $78,644 for the three- months ended June 30, 2004.  This increase is reflective of the increase in consumer deposit accounts realized between the two periods.  Also, other operating income increased $60,215 to $104,408 for the three-months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $44,193 for the three month period in 2004.  This amount is reflective of the additional ATM surcharge fees that are generated as we continue to expand our branch network and a $42,520 increase in the cash value of bank owned life insurance recognized during the second quarter of 2005. The most significant component of noninterest income has become mortgage banking income. A mortgage origination department within the bank was started up on July 1, 2004. Mortgage origination and related fees totaled $159,550 during the three months ended June 30, 2005.

For the six months ended June 30, 2005, noninterest income was $634,772, an increase of $401,335, or 171.92%, over the $233,437 recognized for the same period in 2004. Service charges on deposit accounts increased from $157,983 in 2004 to $164,415 for the period ended June 30, 2005. Sales of other assets produced a gain of $599 during the first six months of 2005 and a $4,678 loss during the same period in 2004. Gains on sales of securities available-for-sale totaled $5,869 in 2004 and were $0 in 2005.  Mortgage banking income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 totaled $265,103. There were no comparable figures for 2004, as the mortgage origination department was started up during the third quarter of 2004. Reflected in the $130,392 increase in other operating income between the two periods, is $87,599 increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance. These policies were acquired by the bank in December 2004.

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $1,948,370 or 32.23% higher than the $1,473,519 for the three months ended June 30, 2004.  The largest increase was in personnel costs, which increased from $849,785 in the second quarter of 2004 to $1,211,787 in the second quarter of 2005, or an increase of 42.60%.  The increase is attributable to the hiring of additional staff to support the growth in our branch network as well as the staffing of our mortgage origination department.  Occupancy expense increased to $210,921 from $180,580.  This increase is attributable to the opening of new locations in Sharpsburg in early 2004 and in Fairburn in late 2004.  Data processing

12

costs rose modestly to $154,165 from $140,909, for an increase of $13,256, or 9.41%, over the comparable period from a year ago.  Other operating expenses increased to $371,497 from $302,245, an increase of $69,252, or 22.91%, over the same period in 2004.  Other operating expenses include legal and accounting fees, office supplies, telephone service, postage expense, credit related expenses such as credit reports and filing fees, FDIC insurance premiums and business insurance premiums.  This increase is attributable to the growth we have experienced during the past twelve months.  This growth is evidenced by the fact that total assets have increased from $238,633,006 at June 30, 2004 to $249,550,051 at December 31, 2004, to $259,897,618 at June 30, 2005.

For the six months ended June 30, 2005, total noninterest expense was $3,853,579, or 31.15% higher than the $2,938,217 realized during the six months ended June 30, 2004.  The salaries and employee benefits component of noninterest expense realized the largest increase over the two periods, increasing from $1,729,078 at June 30, 2004 to $2,413,856, or an increase of 39.60%.  As mentioned in the previous paragraph, additional personnel have been hired to support the growth realized in the past twelve months.  These additional personnel include branch personnel and middle managers to support the expanding branch network as well as staffing a new mortgage origination department.  Occupancy expense increased from $344,585 in 2004 to $421,304 in 2005.  Data processing costs rose to $310,477 from $290,591 for an increase of $19,886, or 6.84% over the comparable period from a year ago.  The modest increase in data processing costs is reflective of our efforts to lessen our dependence on outside contractors for our information technology support.  Other operating expenses increased to $707,942 from $573,963, an increase of $133,979, or 23.34%, over the same period in 2004.  The largest component of other operating expenses was credit related expenses, which increased $40,343, or 104.30% between the two periods.

Income Taxes

The income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $248,071 as compared to $213,000 for the same period in 2004, and $551,071 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $423,000 for the same period in 2004.  These increases in provisions for income taxes resulted from increased income before taxes.  The effective tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 are lower than previous periods.  The effective rate in 2005 was adjusted during the second quarter to bring the current year’s income tax provision in line with our calculations for an adequate provision based on projected income and tax preference items.

Net Income

The combination of the above factors resulted in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 of $632,243 as compared to $493,374 for the same period in 2004, an increase of $138,869, or 28.15%.  For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net income was $1,253,729 as compared to $880,233 for the same period in 2004, an increase of $373,496 or 42.43%.

Assets and Liabilities

During the first six months of 2005, total assets increased $10,347,567, or 4.15%, to $259,897,618 as compared to $249,550,051 at December 31, 2004.  The primary sources of growth in assets were net loans, which increased $16,662,591 from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005, and federal funds sold, which increased from $0 to $1,903,000 during the first six months of 2005.  This increase in federal funds sold is a result of prepayments on our investments in mortgage-backed securities, the maturity of securities in our portfolio, the proceeds of which were being held as overnight funds until they could be profitably redeployed into loans and other investments, and growth in deposits resulting from expansion of our retail branch network. Investment securities have decreased by $8,686,742 over the balances reflected in the December 31, 2004 financial statements, primarily due to certain securities reaching scheduled maturity dates to meet anticipated cash requirements.  Total deposits increased $6,385,951, or 3.01%, to $218,643,969 from the December 31, 2004 amount of $212,258,018.  At June 30, 2005, securities sold under agreements to repurchase had decreased slightly to $527,283 from $529,358.  These agreements are for our commercial sweep accounts for corporate customers and are not FDIC insured.  $5,500,000 in federal funds purchased were outstanding on December 31, 2004, however we were in a net federal funds sold position at June 30, 2005.  In order to fund loan growth and provide liquidity for daily operating needs, we occasionally utilize advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.  At December 31, 2004, we had $2,000,000 outstanding in FHLB advances.  These were repaid at their maturity in February 2005 and $10,000,000 in new advances was borrowed in May 2005.

13

Investment Securities

Investment securities available-for-sale decreased from $35,039,356 at December 31, 2004 to $26,352,614 at June 30, 2005.  Changes in the investment securities portfolio (as reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows), include $625,000 in new purchases, $7,000,000 in maturities and $2,175,854 in pay downs during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The maturities of the $7,000,000 in securities were scheduled to meet certain cash requirements in the second quarter of 2005. The recent refinancing boom among homeowners has caused high rates of repayments on certain of our higher coupon mortgage backed securities. These prepayments have also caused many of our mortgage backed security balances to decrease rapidly. Generally, our purpose in purchasing mortgage backed securities is that they provide good income yields as well as a consistent cash flow from the monthly mortgage payments. These cash flows are then reinvested in new loans or additional purchases of mortgage backed securities, depending on loan demand and market conditions. This also allows us to regularly invest at current market rates.  While we do invest in traditional government agency securities on occasion, recent market conditions have resulted in historically low yields on those securities and we have chosen to maximize our yields by investing in other segments of the market. We also allocate a portion of our investment portfolio to tax-free securities and we have increased our purchases of tax-free securities during the last 12 months. When we purchase tax-free securities we typically give priority to the purchase of tax-free municipal securities issued by municipalities domiciled in the State of Georgia, although we do purchase securities from other states when we deem it beneficial. It is generally our policy to designate our marketable investment securities as available-for-sale, and all securities were so designated at June 30, 2005.

Other investments increased by $456,775 from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005 as a result of the Federal Home Loan Bank requiring the bank to increase the amount of FHLB stock owned by the company.

14

Loans

Net loans increased $16,662,591, or 8.79%, from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005.  As shown below, the main component of growth in the loan portfolio was real estate construction and land development loans, which increased 11.54%, or $12,292,354.  In addition, residential mortgage loans increased $4,041,662, or 75.64%, over the balances outstanding on December 31, 2004.  Generally, we do not make and retain first mortgages on 1-4 family real estate. Our typical real estate-mortgage loan is on commercial real estate.  Balances within the major loans receivable categories as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are as follows:

COMPOSITION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO

Risk Elements in the Loan Portfolio

The following is a summary of risk elements in the loan portfolio:

15

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our allowance for loan losses and the composition of charge-offs and recoveries for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

16

Deposits

At June 30, 2005, total deposits were $218,643,969, an increase of $6,385,951, or 3.01%, from December 31, 2004. All categories of deposits realized a gain over amounts recorded as of December 31, 2004, with the exception of savings (which includes money market) accounts.  Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $6,970,230, or 30.75%, from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005.  During this same period, interest-bearing demand deposits increased $1,984,856, or 6.81%. Certificates of deposit increased $7,674,218, or 5.85%, from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005.  At June 30, 2005, certificates of deposit included brokered deposits totaling $39,587,000. We have found that the cost of using brokered deposits is reasonable in comparison to the cost of obtaining traditional local deposits.  For this reason, we anticipate continuing to utilize brokered deposits as a funding source.  However, our business plan places a strong emphasis on local deposit growth.  In order to build local core deposits, we believe we need to provide convenience to both retail and consumer depositors in our market area.  We believe this convenience can best be provided through a series of branch banks providing attractive deposit products, located in growth areas.  Toward this end, we opened the supermarket branch in the Kroger store in Towne Center south of Fayetteville in June 2003, we opened our new full-service branch in Tyrone in August 2003, we opened our new full-service branch in Sharpsburg in April 2004 and we opened our new full-service branch in Fairburn in November 2004.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

As of December 31, 2004, we had $2,000,000 in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank outstanding.   These advances were repaid at their maturity in February 2005.  We borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank from time to time.  On May 6, 2005, we borrowed $10,000,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank at a fixed rate of 3.33% for 90 days.  We use these borrowings as a source of liquidity and to fund loans when appropriate.  Borrowings are under a blanket lien agreement that we have executed with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.  Under this agreement, we assign the proceeds of loan repayments and payoffs to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta as collateral against future advances.  This arrangement will provide greater access to borrowings if the need for such borrowings arises in the future.

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future obligations through liquidation or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional liabilities. Cash and federal funds sold are our primary sources of asset liquidity. We generate cash and federal funds sold from scheduled maturities of loans and investments on the asset side and through pricing policies on the liability side for interest-bearing deposit accounts and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank.  The level of liquidity is measured by the loan-to-total funds ratio, which was at 88.67% at June 30, 2005 and 84.72% at December 31, 2004.

Securities available-for-sale, which totaled $26,352,614 at June 30, 2005, serve as a secondary source of liquidity.  We also have lines of credit available with correspondent banks to purchase federal funds for periods from one to seven days.  At June 30, 2005, unused federal funds lines of credit totaled $14,700,000.

When we deem it necessary and prudent we access deposit markets other than the local market for sources of funds. These funds include “brokered” deposits and deposits generated from Internet sources.

17

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity increased from $21,106,183 at December 31, 2004 to $22,352,280 at June 30, 2005.  The increase is due to net income for the six months ending June 30, 2005 of $1,253,729, an after tax decrease of $21,233 in the fair value of securities available-for-sale and $13,601 in proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.

The Federal Reserve Board and bank regulatory agencies require bank holding companies and financial institutions to maintain capital at adequate levels based on a percentage of assets and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for risk-weights ranging from 0% to 100%.  Under the risk-based standard, capital is classified into two tiers.  Tier 1 capital consists of common shareholders’ equity, excluding the unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, minus certain intangible assets.  Tier 2 capital consists of the general reserve for loan losses subject to certain limitations.  An institutions’ qualifying capital base for purposes of its risk-based capital ratio consists of the sum of its Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.  The regulatory minimum requirements are 4% for Tier 1 and 8% for total risk-based capital.

Banks and bank holding companies are also required to maintain capital at a minimum level based on total assets, which is known as the leverage ratio.  The minimum requirement for the leverage ratio is 3%, but all but the highest rated institutions are required to maintain ratios 100 to 200 basis point above the minimum.  Both the company and the bank exceeded their minimum regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2005.  The following table summarizes our risk-based capital at June 30, 2005:

(1) limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets

Regulatory Matters

From time to time, various bills are introduced in the United States Congress with respect to the regulation of financial institutions.  Certain of these proposals, if adopted, could significantly change the regulation of banks and the financial services industry.  We cannot predict whether any of these proposals will be adopted or, if adopted, how these proposals would affect us.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates.  Our market risk arises principally from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, deposit, and borrowing activities.  We actively monitor and manage our interest rate risk exposure.  Although we manage certain other risks, such as credit quality and liquidity risk, in the normal course of business we consider interest rate risk to be our most significant market risk and the risk that could potentially have the largest material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  We do not maintain a trading portfolio or deal in international instruments, and, therefore, other types of market risks, such as foreign currency risk and commodity price risk, do not arise in the normal course of our business activities.

18

Our interest rate risk management is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”).  ALCO has established policies and limits to monitor, measure and coordinate the bank’s sources, uses, and pricing of funds.

Interest rate risk represents the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates.  As interest rates change, the interest income and expense associated with the bank’s interest sensitive assets and liabilities also change, thereby impacting net interest income, the primary component of our earnings.  ALCO utilizes the results of both a static and dynamic gap report to quantify the estimated exposure of net interest income to a sustained change in interest rates.

The gap analysis projected net interest income based on both a rise and fall in interest rates of 200 basis points (i.e. 2.00%) over a twelve-month period.  The model is based on actual repricing dates of interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities.  The model incorporates assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets.

We measure this exposure based on an immediate change in interest rates of up or down 200 basis points.  Given this scenario, the bank had, at the end of the period, an exposure to falling rates and a benefit from rising rates.  More specifically, for the period ended June 30, 2005 the model forecasts a decline in net interest income of $856 thousand or -16.41%, as a result of a 200 basis point decline in rates.  The model also predicts a $468 thousand increase in net interest income, or +8.97% as a result of a 200 basis point increase in rates.  The forecasted results of the model are within the limits specified by ALCO.  The following chart reflects our sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of June 30, 2005.  The numbers are based on a static balance sheet, and the chart assumes that pay downs and maturities of both assets and liabilities are reinvested in like instruments at current interest rates, rates down 200 basis points, and rates up 200 basis points.

Interest Rate Risk

Income Sensitivity Summary

As of June 30, 2005

The preceding sensitivity analysis is a modeling analysis, which changes periodically and consists of hypothetical estimates based upon numerous assumptions including interest rate levels, shape of the yield curve, prepayments on loans and securities, rates on loans and deposits, reinvestment of paydowns and maturities of loans, investments and deposits, among others.  In addition, there are no assumptions for growth or a change in asset mix. While assumptions are developed based on the current economic and market conditions, management cannot make any assurances as to the predictive nature of these assumptions including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.

19