Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

RITE AID CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

LOGO

RITE AID CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 3165
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17105



NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on June 19, 2014

To Our Stockholders:

What:

  Our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

When:

 

June 19, 2014 at 10:30 a.m., local time

Where:

 

Holiday Inn Harrisburg-East
4751 Lindle Road
Harrisburg, PA 17111

Why:

 

At this Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to:

     

1.

 

Elect eight directors to hold office until the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

     

2.

 

Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm;

     

3.

 

Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as presented in the proxy statement;

     

4.

 

Approve the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan;

     

5.

 

Consider and vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

     

6.

 

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

        The close of business on April 28, 2014 has been fixed as the record date for determining those Rite Aid stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date will receive this notice of, and be eligible to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. The above items of business for the Annual Meeting are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.

        Your vote is important.    Please read the proxy statement and the instructions on the enclosed proxy card and then, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, and no matter how many shares you own, please submit your proxy promptly by telephone or via the Internet in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card, or by completing, dating and returning your proxy card in the envelope provided. This will not prevent you from voting in person at the Annual Meeting. It will, however, help to assure a quorum and to avoid added proxy solicitation costs.

        You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken by delivering to the Secretary of Rite Aid a written revocation or a proxy with a later date (including a proxy by telephone or via the


Table of Contents

Internet) or by voting your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, in which case your prior proxy would be disregarded.

  By order of the Board of Directors

 

 


GRAPHIC

 

Marc A. Strassler
Secretary
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
May 19, 2014


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page  

Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting

    1  

Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors

    7  

Board of Directors

    8  

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2014

    20  

Proposal No. 2 Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    22  

Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote on the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers

    23  

Proposal No. 4 Approval of the Adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

    24  

Proposal No. 5 Stockholder Proposal—Independent Chairman

    33  

Executive Officers

    36  

Executive Compensation

    38  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    38  

Compensation Committee Report

    52  

Summary Compensation Table

    53  

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal 2014

    54  

Executive Employment Agreements

    55  

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2014 Year-End

    57  

Options Exercises and Stock Vested Table for Fiscal 2014

    58  

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2014

    58  

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

    58  

Audit Committee Report

    64  

Equity Compensation Plan Information

    66  

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

    67  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

    67  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

    69  

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

    70  

Stockholder Proposals for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

    71  

Incorporation by Reference

    71  

Other Matters

    71  

Important Notice Regarding Delivery of Stockholder Documents

    72  

Annual Report

    72  

Appendix A: Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

    A-1  

Table of Contents

LOGO

RITE AID CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 3165
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17105



PROXY STATEMENT



FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on June 19, 2014



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to be Held on June 19, 2014:

The proxy statement and annual report, as well as the Company's proxy card, are available at
www.proxyvote.com.



        This proxy statement is being furnished to you by the Board of Directors (the "Board" or "Board of Directors") of Rite Aid Corporation (the "Company" or "Rite Aid") to solicit your proxy to vote your shares at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"). The Annual Meeting will be held on June 19, 2014 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the Holiday Inn Harrisburg-East, 4751 Lindle Road, Harrisburg, PA 17111. This proxy statement, the foregoing notice and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed on or about May 19, 2014 to all holders of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At Rite Aid and in this proxy statement, we refer to our employees as associates.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

        Holders of Rite Aid common stock as of the close of business on the record date, April 28, 2014, will receive notice of, and be eligible to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, Rite Aid had outstanding and entitled to vote 975,433,737 shares of common stock. No other shares of Rite Aid capital stock are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

        There are five proposals that are scheduled to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting:


Table of Contents

        Stockholders also will be asked to consider and vote at the Annual Meeting on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. At this time, the Board of Directors is unaware of any matters, other than those set forth above, that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

What are the Board's voting recommendations?

        The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the nominees of the Board in the election of directors, "FOR" the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, "FOR" the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as presented in this proxy statement, "FOR" the approval of the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and "AGAINST" the stockholder proposal.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

        If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered the "stockholder of record" with respect to those shares.

        If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, those shares are held in "street name" and you are considered the "beneficial owner" of the shares. As the beneficial owner of those shares, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee how to vote your shares, and you will receive separate instructions from your broker, bank or other holder of record describing how to vote your shares.

How can I vote my shares before the Annual Meeting?

        If you hold your shares in your own name, you may submit a proxy by telephone, via the Internet or by mail.

        By casting your vote in any of the three ways listed above, you are authorizing the individuals listed on the proxy to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

        If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted. The availability of telephonic or Internet voting will depend on the bank's or broker's voting process. Please check with

2


Table of Contents

your bank or broker and follow the voting procedures your bank or broker provides to vote your shares. Also, please note that if the holder of record of your shares is a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares and present that proxy and proof of identification at the Annual Meeting; otherwise, you will not be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If I am the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares for me?

        New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules applicable to brokers grant your broker discretionary authority to vote your shares without receiving your instructions on certain matters. Your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, unless you provide voting instructions to your broker, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and the stockholder proposal. Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.

How will my shares be voted if I give my proxy but do not specify how my shares should be voted?

        If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you hold shares in your name and sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted "FOR" the nominees of the Board in the election of directors, "FOR" the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, "FOR" the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, "FOR" the approval of the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and "AGAINST" the stockholder proposal.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

        At this time, we are unaware of any matters, other than as set forth above, that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted substitutes acting at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, will be deemed authorized to vote or otherwise act on such matters in accordance with their judgment.

Who may attend the Annual Meeting?

        All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Persons who are not stockholders may attend only if invited by the Board of Directors. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must bring proof of ownership (e.g., a current broker's statement) in order to be admitted to the meeting. You can obtain directions to the Annual Meeting by contacting our Investor Relations Department at (717) 975-3710.

Can I vote in person at the Annual Meeting?

        Yes. If you hold shares in your own name as a stockholder of record, you may come to the Annual Meeting and cast your vote at the meeting by properly completing and submitting a ballot. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must first obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote those shares and submit that proxy along with a properly completed ballot at the meeting; otherwise, you will not be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

3


Table of Contents

How can I change my vote?

        You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:

        Any written notice of revocation, or later dated proxy, should be delivered to:

Rite Aid Corporation
30 Hunter Lane
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Attention: Marc A. Strassler, Secretary

        Alternatively, you may hand deliver a written revocation notice, or a later dated proxy, to the Secretary at the Annual Meeting before we begin voting.

        If your shares of Rite Aid common stock are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by the bank, broker or other nominee if you wish to change your vote.

What is an "abstention" and how would it affect the vote?

        An "abstention" occurs when a stockholder sends in a proxy with explicit instructions to decline to vote regarding a particular matter. Abstentions are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. An abstention with respect to the election of directors is neither a vote cast "for" a nominee nor a vote cast "against" the nominee and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions with respect to the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers, the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and the stockholder proposal will have the same effect as voting "against" the proposal.

What is a broker "non-vote" and how would it affect the vote?

        A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee who holds shares for the beneficial owner is unable to vote those shares for the beneficial owner because the broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power for the proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokers will have discretionary voting power to vote shares for which no voting instructions have been provided by the beneficial owner only with respect to the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Brokers will not have such discretionary voting power to vote shares with respect to the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or the stockholder proposal. Shares that are the subject of a broker non-vote are included for quorum purposes, but a broker non-vote with respect to a proposal will not be counted as a vote cast and will not be counted as a vote represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners of Rite Aid shares instruct their brokers how to vote their shares.

4


Table of Contents

What are the quorum and voting requirements for the proposals?

        In deciding the proposals that are scheduled for a vote at the Annual Meeting, each holder of common stock as of the record date is entitled to one vote per share of common stock. In order to take action on the proposals, a quorum, consisting of the holders of 487,716,869 shares (a majority of the aggregate number of shares of Rite Aid common stock) issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date for the Annual Meeting, must be present in person or by proxy. This is referred to as a "quorum." Proxies marked "Abstain" and broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of votes cast is required for the election of each director nominee named in Proposal No. 1. This means that the votes cast "for" that nominee must exceed the votes cast "against" that nominee. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. For more information on the operation of our majority voting standard, see the section entitled "Board of Directors—Corporate Governance—Majority Voting Standard and Policy."

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal No. 2. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the approval of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers in Proposal No. 3. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal. Any broker non-votes with respect to the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will not be counted as shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the approval of the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan in Proposal No. 4. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal. Any broker non-votes with respect to the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan will not be counted as shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the approval of the stockholder proposal in Proposal No. 5. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal. Any broker non-votes with respect to the stockholder proposal will not be counted as shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

5


Table of Contents

What happens if a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting?

        If the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting are not sufficient to constitute a quorum, the stockholders by a vote of the holders of a majority of votes present in person or represented by proxy (which may be voted by the proxyholders) may, without further notice to any stockholder (unless a new record date is set), adjourn the meeting to a different time and place to permit further solicitations of proxies sufficient to constitute a quorum.

Who will count the votes?

        Representatives of Broadridge Financial Services will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of election.

Who will conduct the proxy solicitation and how much will it cost?

        We are soliciting proxies from stockholders on behalf of our Board and will pay for all costs incurred by it in connection with the solicitation. In addition to solicitation by mail, the directors, officers and associates of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries may solicit proxies from stockholders of Rite Aid in person or by telephone, facsimile or email without additional compensation other than reimbursement for their actual expenses.

        We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated ("Innisfree"), a proxy solicitation firm, to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. Rite Aid will pay Innisfree a fee of approximately $12,000 and reimburse the firm for approximately $2,000 of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

        Arrangements also will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock held of record by such persons, and we will reimburse such custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of our stock.

        If you have any questions about voting your shares or attending the Annual Meeting, please call our Investor Relations Department at (717) 975-3710.

6


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

        Our By-Laws provide that the Board of Directors may be composed of up to 15 members, with the number to be fixed from time to time by the Board. The Board has fixed the number of directors at eight and there are eight nominees for director at our Annual Meeting.

Director Nominees

        The Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, has nominated Joseph B. Anderson, Jr., Bruce G. Bodaken, David R. Jessick, Kevin E. Lofton, Myrtle S. Potter, Michael N. Regan, John T. Standley and Marcy Syms to be elected directors at the Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees for director to be elected at the Annual Meeting currently serves as a director of the Company.

        Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office until the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

        If any nominee at the time of election is unable or unwilling to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, and as a consequence thereof other nominees are designated, then the persons named in the proxy or their substitutes will have the discretion and authority to vote or to refrain from voting for other nominees in accordance with their judgment.


RECOMMENDATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

7


Table of Contents


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our director nominees as of April 28, 2014. If elected, each of the following person's terms will expire at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Name
  Age   Position with Rite Aid   Year First
Became
Director
 

John T. Standley

    51   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer     2009  

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

    71   Director     2005  

Bruce G. Bodaken

    62   Director     2013  

David R. Jessick

    60   Director     2009  

Kevin E. Lofton

    59   Director     2013  

Myrtle S. Potter

    55   Director     2013  

Michael N. Regan

    66   Director     2007  

Marcy Syms

    63   Director     2005  

Board Composition

        The Board is committed to ensuring that it is composed of a highly capable and diverse group of directors who are well-equipped to oversee the success of the business and effectively represent the interests of stockholders. In addition, the Board believes that having directors with a mix of tenure on the Board helps transition the knowledge of the more experienced directors while providing a broad, fresh set of perspectives and a Board with a diversity of experiences and viewpoints.

Director Tenure   Board Gender Diversity


GRAPHIC

 



GRAPHIC

        In assessing Board composition and selecting and recruiting director candidates, the Board seeks to maintain an engaged, independent Board with broad experience and judgment that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers a wide range of factors, including the size of the Board, the experience and expertise of existing Board members, other positions the director candidate has held or holds (including other board memberships), and the candidate's independence. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account a candidate's ability to contribute to the diversity of background and experience represented on the Board, and it reviews its effectiveness in balancing these considerations when assessing the composition of the Board.

        Following the 2013 Annual Meeting, the Nominating and Governance Committee sought to recruit additional Board members whose qualifications align with the Company's long-term growth strategy. After considering a number of candidates and comprehensively reviewing these candidates' abilities and qualifications, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended and the Board appointed Mr. Lofton, on November 8, 2013, and Ms. Potter, on November 29, 2013, for election to the Board.

8


Table of Contents

Mr. Lofton and Ms. Potter bring to the Board extensive experience in senior management and leadership roles and in-depth knowledge and experience in the healthcare industry.

        The chart below summarizes the qualifications, attributes, and skills for each of our directors. The fact that we do not list a particular experience or qualification for a director nominee does not mean that nominee does not possess that particular experience or qualification.

Skills and Experience
  Standley   Anderson   Bodaken   Jessick   Lofton   Potter   Regan   Syms

Current/Former CEO

  X   X   X       X           X

Management/Business Operations

  X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X

Retail Industry

  X           X               X

Healthcare Industry

          X       X   X        

Finance/Accounting

  X   X       X           X    

Board/Corporate Governance

  X   X   X   X   X   X       X

Director Biographies

        Following are the biographies for our director nominees, including information concerning the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board to conclude that such person should serve on the Board:

        John T. Standley.    Mr. Standley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has been Chairman of the Board since June 21, 2012, Chief Executive Officer since June 2010 and was President from September 2008 until June 2013. Mr. Standley served as the Chief Operating Officer from September 2008 until June 2010. He also served as a consultant to Rite Aid from July 2008 to September 2008. From August 2005 through December 2007, Mr. Standley served as Chief Executive Officer and was a member of the Board of Directors of Pathmark Stores, Inc. From June 2002 to August 2005, he served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Rite Aid and, in addition, in January 2004 was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid. He had served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid from September 2000 to June 2002 and had served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid from December 1999 until September 2000. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fleming Companies, Inc., a food marketing and distribution company from May 1999 to December 1999. Between July 1998 and May 1999, Mr. Standley was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fred Meyer, Inc. Mr. Standley served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ralphs Grocery Company between January 1997 and July 1998. Mr. Standley also served as Senior Vice President of Administration at Smith's Food & Drug Stores, Inc. from May 1996 to February 1997 and as Chief Financial Officer of Smitty's Supervalue, Inc. from December 1994 to May 1996. Mr. Standley is Chairman of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores' Board of Directors and also serves on the SUPERVALU INC. Board of Directors.

        As the Company's Chief Executive Officer, with more than 20 years of retail, financial and executive experience, Mr. Standley brings to the Board an in-depth understanding of all aspects of the Company, including its customers, operations and key business drivers. In addition, his experience serving as a chief financial officer of a number of companies, including the Company, provides the Board with additional insights into financial and accounting matters relevant to the Company's operations.

        Joseph B. Anderson, Jr.    Mr. Anderson has been the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TAG Holdings, LLC, a manufacturing, service and technology business, since January 2002. Mr. Anderson was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Chivas Industries, LLC from 1994 to 2002. Mr. Anderson also serves as a director of Quaker Chemical Corporation and

9


Table of Contents

Meritor, Inc. Mr. Anderson previously served as a director of NV Energy Inc. until December 2013 and Valassis Communications, Inc. until February 2014.

        Mr. Anderson has a broad base of experience, including 19 years of chief executive officer experience at manufacturing, service and technology companies. From this experience, Mr. Anderson brings an array of skills, including in the areas of strategic, business and financial planning and corporate development. In addition, his service on the boards of directors of a number of publicly-traded companies provides the Board with insights into how boards at other companies have addressed issues similar to those faced by the Company.

        Bruce G. Bodaken.    From 2000 through December 2012, Mr. Bodaken served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blue Shield of California. Mr. Bodaken also previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Blue Shield of California from 1995 to 2000 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 1995. Prior to joining Blue Shield of California, Mr. Bodaken served as Senior Vice President and Associate Chief Operating Officer of F.H.P., Inc., a managed care provider, from 1990 to 1994 and held various positions at F.H.P. from 1980 to 1990, including Regional Vice President. Mr. Bodaken is currently a director and audit committee chairman of WageWorks, Inc. He is also a member of the Institute of Medicine's Roundtable on Value and Science-Driven Health Care.

        Mr. Bodaken brings to the Board an in-depth knowledge of the health insurance and managed care industries and more than 20 years of executive leadership skills.

        David R. Jessick.    Self-employed since 2005, Mr. Jessick served as a consultant to Rite Aid's Chief Executive Officer and senior financial staff from July 2002 until February 2005 and was Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer of Rite Aid from December 1999 to July 2002. From July 1998 to June 1999, Mr. Jessick was Executive Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations of Fred Meyer, Inc., and from February 1997 to July 1998, Mr. Jessick was Chief Financial Officer of Fred Meyer, Inc. From 1979 to 1996, he held various financial positions including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Thrifty Payless Holdings, Inc. Mr. Jessick began his career as a Certified Public Accountant for Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. Mr. Jessick is currently a director and audit committee chairman of DFC Global Corp. and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation. In addition, he previously served as a director of Source Interlink, Inc. from 2005 to 2009.

        Mr. Jessick brings over 33 years of retail, executive and financial experience to the Board. His familiarity with our business and his experience as a chief financial officer provide useful insights into operational and financial matters relevant to the Company's business. In addition, his service on other boards of directors enables Mr. Jessick to share insights with the Board regarding corporate governance best practices.

        Kevin E. Lofton.    Mr. Lofton has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Catholic Health Initiatives ("CHI"), a healthcare system operating the full continuum of services from hospitals to home health agencies nationwide since 2002 and as President of CHI from 2002 through January 2014. Mr. Lofton previously served as Chief Executive Officer of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital and Howard University Hospital in Washington, D.C. Mr. Lofton is also a director and member of the audit committee of Gilead Sciences, Inc.

        Mr. Lofton brings to the Board an in-depth knowledge and understanding of the healthcare industry and valuable executive leadership skills from senior management and leadership roles in healthcare systems and hospitals.

        Myrtle S. Potter.    Ms. Potter has served since 2005 as the Chief Executive Officer of Myrtle Potter & Company, LLC, a private consulting firm she founded, and since 2009 as the Chief Executive Officer of Myrtle Potter Media, Inc., a consumer healthcare content company she founded. Ms. Potter

10


Table of Contents

previously served at Genentech, Inc., as President of Commercial Operations from 2004 to 2005 and as Executive Vice President, Commercial Operations and Chief Operating Officer from 2000 to 2004. Ms. Potter serves as a director of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Everyday Health, Inc. and Proteus Digital Health, Inc. and as a trustee of The University of Chicago. Ms. Potter served on the board of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. from December 2007 until its acquisition by Express Scripts, Inc. in April 2012. She continued on the board at Express Scripts until June 2012.

        Ms. Potter brings to the Board extensive experience in senior management and leadership roles in the healthcare industry and valuable experience as a consultant to life science, biopharmaceutical and biotechnical companies regarding corporate strategy, customer engagement, commercialization, product development and business development and as a board member of a pharmacy benefits management company.

        Michael N. Regan.    Mr. Regan has been a special situations senior executive since January 2012; serving as the Hold Separate Manager on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission, operating the Lumiere Place Casino and Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri from August 2013 through its expected sale in spring 2014 and prior to that as Chief Financial Officer of Indianapolis Downs LLC, a casino and horse track complex located near Indianapolis, Indiana during its bankruptcy from January 2012 through its sale in February 2013. Beginning May 2007 through December 2011, Mr. Regan was a self-employed private equity investor. Prior thereto, Mr. Regan served as Chief Financial Officer of The St. Joe Company, a major real estate development company based in Florida, from November 2006 to May 2007. From 1997 to November 2006, he served as Senior Vice President, Finance and held various other positions with The St. Joe Company and was a member of the senior management team. Prior to joining The St. Joe Company, he served in various financial management functions at Harrah's Entertainment from 1980 through 1997, including as Vice President and controller from 1991 to 1997.

        Mr. Regan's over 30 years of experience, including serving as a chief financial officer and as a senior vice president of finance, provides the Board with additional perspectives on financial, operational and strategic planning, and real estate matters relevant to the Company.

        Marcy Syms.    Marcy Syms served as a director of Syms Corp., a chain of retail clothing stores, from 1983, when she was named President and COO, until 2012. Marcy Syms became CEO of Syms Corp. in 1998 and was named Chair in 2010. In November 2011, Syms Corp. and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and ceased all retail operations. Marcy Syms is also a founding member of the Board of Directors of the Syms School of Business at Yeshiva University. Currently, Marcy Syms serves as President of the Sy Syms Foundation and Founder and President of the TPD Group LLC, a multi-generational succession planning company.

        Marcy Syms brings to the Board over 18 years of experience as a chief executive officer of a chain of retail stores, including an array of skills in strategic planning, marketing and human resources matters similar to those faced by the Company.

Board Leadership

        Mr. Standley serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Regan has served as our Lead Independent Director since 2011 and will continue in that role.

        The Company's governance framework provides the Board with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for the Company. In connection with the 2012 Annual Meeting, the Board reviewed its leadership structure in light of the Company's operating and governance environment and determined that Mr. Standley should serve as the Chairman of the Board effective as of the 2012 Annual Meeting, based on the Board's belief that Mr. Standley's in-depth knowledge of the Company, keen understanding of the Company's operations and proven leadership and vision positioned him to provide strong and effective leadership to the Board. The Board has determined to maintain its current leadership structure, taking into account the foregoing factors as well as the evaluation of Mr. Standley's performance as Chief Executive Officer, his very positive relationships with other members of the Board and the leadership and strategic vision he has brought to the Chairman position.

11


Table of Contents

        The Board has no policy mandating the combination or separation of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions and believes that, given the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, the right leadership structure may vary from time to time based on changes in circumstances. The Board makes this determination based on what it believes best serves the needs of the Company and its stockholders at any particular time. For the reasons described above, the Board continues to believe that Mr. Standley provides excellent leadership of the Board in the performance of its duties and that a unified structure provides decisive and effective leadership both within and outside the Company.

        In addition, the Board continues to maintain the position of Lead Independent Director that it created in 2009. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in the event that the Chairman of the Board is also the Chief Executive Officer or otherwise is not an independent director, the independent members of the Board will choose an independent director to serve as Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director, who is expected to serve at least one year, has the following responsibilities, which are described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines:

Corporate Governance

        We recognize that good corporate governance is an important means of protecting the interests of our stockholders, associates, customers, suppliers and the community. The Board of Directors, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, monitors corporate governance developments and proposed legislative, regulatory and stock exchange corporate governance reforms.

        Website Access to Corporate Governance Materials.    Our corporate governance information and materials, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, current charters for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Executive Committee, our Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, our Stock Ownership Guidelines and our Related Person Transaction Policy, are posted on our website at www.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance" and are available in print upon request to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Secretary. The Board regularly reviews corporate governance developments and will modify these materials and practices from time to time as warranted.

12


Table of Contents

        Codes of Ethics.    The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics that is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Board has also adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all of our officers, directors and associates. Any amendment to either code or any waiver of either code for executive officers or directors will be disclosed promptly on our website at www.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Codes of Ethics."

        Director Independence.    For a director to be considered independent under the NYSE corporate governance listing standards, the Board of Directors must affirmatively determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, including any of the relationships specifically proscribed by the NYSE independence standards. The Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making its independence determinations. Only independent directors may serve on our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.

        As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following directors, including each director serving on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards: Joseph B. Anderson, Jr., Bruce G. Bodaken, David R. Jessick, Kevin E. Lofton, Myrtle S. Potter, Michael N. Regan and Marcy Syms. The Board also had determined that John M. Baumer, François J. Coutu, Michel Coutu and James L. Donald, each of whom served as a director for a portion of the last fiscal year, were independent during the time he was a director. The Board also determined that the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and the NYSE requirements for audit committee members. In determining each individual's status as an independent director, the Board considered the following transactions, relationships and arrangements:

        There is no family relationship between any of the nominees and executive officers of Rite Aid.

        Majority Voting Standard and Policy.    Under the Company's By-Laws, a nominee for director in uncontested elections of directors (as is the case for this Annual Meeting) will be elected to the Board if the votes cast "for" such nominee's election exceed the votes cast "against" such nominee's election. In contested elections, directors will be elected by a plurality of votes cast. For this purpose, a contested election means any meeting of stockholders for which (i) the Secretary of the Company receives a notice that a stockholder has nominated a person for election to the Board in compliance with the advance notice requirements for stockholder nominees for director set forth in the By-Laws and (ii) such nomination has not been withdrawn by such stockholder on or prior to the 14th day preceding the date the Company first mails its notice of meeting for such meeting to the stockholders.

        Under the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director who fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election in accordance with the By-Laws will, within five days following certification of the stockholder vote, tender his or her written resignation to the Chairman of the Board for consideration by the Board, subject to the procedures set forth in the Guidelines.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

        The Board of Directors, as a whole and through the various committees of the Board, oversees the Company's management of risk, focusing primarily on five areas of risk: operational, financial performance, financial reporting, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational.

13


Table of Contents

        Management of the Company is responsible for developing and implementing the Company's plans and processes for risk management. The Board believes that its leadership structure, described above, supports the risk oversight function of the Board. The Board of Directors, at least annually, reviews with management its plans and processes for managing risk. The Board also receives periodic updates from the Company's Chief Compliance Officer with regard to the overall effectiveness of the Company's risk management program and significant areas of risk to the Company, focusing on the five primary areas of risk set forth above as well as other areas of risk identified from time to time by either the Board, a Board committee or management.

        In addition, other Board committees consider risks within their respective areas of responsibility and advise the Board of any significant risks. For example, the Compensation Committee considers risks relating to the Company's compensation programs and policies and the Audit Committee focuses on assessing and mitigating financial reporting risks, including risks related to internal control over financial reporting and legal and compliance risks.

Compensation-Related Risk Assessment

        The Compensation Committee reviews all incentive plans relative to established criteria and conducts an assessment to ensure that none of our incentive plans encourage excessive risk-taking by our executives or associates. Together with executive management, the Compensation Committee has considered the risks arising from the Company's compensation programs for its executives and associates and has concluded that the compensation policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

        The Compensation Committee reviews the risk profile and the relationship between the Company's compensation programs to the overall risk profile of the Company. Some of the features of our incentive programs that limit risk include:

Committees of the Board of Directors

        The Board of Directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Executive Committee. Current copies of the charters for each of these committees are available on our website at www.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Corporate Governance Committees—Committee Charters."

14


Table of Contents

        The current members of the committees are identified in the following table.

Director
  Audit   Compensation   Nominating
and
Governance
  Executive

John T. Standley

              Chair

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

          Chair    

Bruce G. Bodaken

      X   X    

David R. Jessick

  Chair           X

Kevin E. Lofton

  X            

Myrtle S. Potter

          X    

Michael N. Regan

  X   X       X

Marcy Syms

      Chair        

        Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee, which held eight meetings during fiscal year 2014, currently consists of David R. Jessick (Chair), Kevin E. Lofton and Michael N. Regan. François J. Coutu served on the Audit Committee until November 8, 2013, when his resignation from the Board became effective. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards and satisfies the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the additional requirements of the NYSE listing standards for audit committee members. See the section entitled "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" above. The Board has determined that David R. Jessick qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules.

        The functions of the Audit Committee include the following:

        The independent auditors and internal auditors meet with the Audit Committee with and without the presence of management representatives. For additional information, see the section entitled "Audit Committee Report," as well as the Audit Committee's charter, which is posted on our website at www.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Corporate Governance Committees—Committee Charters."

        Compensation Committee.    The Compensation Committee, which met five times during fiscal year 2014, currently consists of Marcy Syms (Chair), Bruce G. Bodaken and Michael N. Regan. Michel Coutu served on the Compensation Committee until April 17, 2013, when he resigned from the Board. James L. Donald served on the Compensation Committee until his term expired in June 2013 and David R. Jessick served on the Compensation Committee from June 19, 2013 until November 29, 2013. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards. See the section entitled "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" above.

        The functions of the Compensation Committee include the following:

15


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Company's executive personnel, including the Company's named executive officers, and develops and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to executive compensation policies. The Compensation Committee is empowered by the Board of Directors to award to executive officers appropriate bonuses, stock options, stock appreciation rights and stock-based awards. The details of the processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of the compensation of our named executive officers are described in the section entitled "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis." The objectives of the Compensation Committee are to support the achievement of desired Company performance, to provide compensation and benefits that will attract and retain superior talent, reward performance and to fix a portion of compensation to the outcome of the Company's performance.

        As provided in its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to engage an external compensation consultant and to determine the scope of services. The Compensation Committee may terminate the engagement at any time. The external compensation consultant reports to the Compensation Committee Chair.

        Since June 2010, the Committee has utilized Exequity LLP as its independent consultant. With respect to fiscal year 2014, Exequity LLP reviewed recommendations and analysis prepared by management and provided advice and counsel to the Committee. Exequity LLP does not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Exequity LLP, taking into consideration the factors set forth in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules, and determined that the engagement of Exequity LLP does not raise any conflicts.

        Nominating and Governance Committee.    The Nominating and Governance Committee, which held two meetings during fiscal year 2014, currently consists of Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. (Chair), Bruce G. Bodaken and Myrtle S. Potter. François J. Coutu served on the Nominating and Governance Committee until November 8, 2013, when his resignation from the Board became effective. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards. See the section entitled "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" above.

        The functions of the Nominating and Governance Committee include the following:

16


Table of Contents

        Executive Committee.    The members of the Executive Committee currently are John Standley (Chair), David R. Jessick and Michael N. Regan. The Executive Committee did not meet during fiscal year 2014. The Executive Committee, except as limited by Delaware law, is empowered to exercise all of the powers of the Board of Directors.

Nomination of Directors

        The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. In considering such recommendations, the Nominating and Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the candidate. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been held. To have a candidate considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee, a stockholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must include the following information:

        The stockholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Secretary. The Nominating and Governance Committee will accept recommendations of director candidates throughout the year; however, in order for a recommended director candidate to be considered for nomination to stand for election at an upcoming annual meeting of stockholders, the recommendation must be received by the Secretary not less than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of Rite Aid's most recent annual meeting of stockholders.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the minimum qualifications for serving as a Rite Aid director are that a candidate demonstrate, by significant accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make a meaningful contribution to the Board's oversight of Rite Aid's business and affairs and have an impeccable record and reputation for honest and ethical conduct in his or her professional and personal activities. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee examines a candidate's specific experiences and skills, time availability in light of other commitments, potential conflicts of interest and independence from management and the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee also seeks to have the Board represent a diversity of backgrounds and experience. The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses its achievement of diversity through the review of Board composition as part of the Board's annual self-assessment process.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies potential candidates by asking current directors and executive officers to notify the committee if they become aware of persons, meeting the criteria described above, who have had a change in circumstances that might make them available to serve on the Board—for example, retirement as a CEO or CFO of a public company or exiting government or military service. The Nominating and Governance Committee also, from time to time, may engage firms that specialize in identifying director candidates. As described above, the committee will also consider candidates recommended by stockholders. Mr. Lofton and Ms. Potter were recommended for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee by Cook Associates, Inc., an executive search firm.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee may review publicly available information, conduct an interview and/or check references to assess the person's accomplishments and qualifications in light of the needs of the Board and the accomplishments and qualifications of any other candidates that the

17


Table of Contents

committee might be considering. The committee's evaluation process does not vary based on whether or not a candidate is recommended by a stockholder, although, as stated above, the Board may take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been held.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

        In order to promote discussion among the non-management directors, regularly scheduled executive sessions (i.e., meetings of non-management directors without management present) are held to review such topics as the non-management directors determine. Mr. Regan, our Lead Independent Director, presides at our executive sessions. The non-management directors met in executive session five times during fiscal year 2014.

Communications with the Board of Directors

        The Board has established a process to receive communications from stockholders and other interested parties. Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board, any Board committee or any chair of any such committee by mail or electronically. To communicate with the Board of Directors, the non-management directors, any individual directors or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board of Directors or any such individual directors or committee of directors by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent to Rite Aid Corporation, c/o Secretary, P.O. Box 3165, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105. To communicate with any of the directors electronically, stockholders should go to our website at www.riteaid.com. Under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Board of Directors—Contact the Board of Directors" you will find an on-line form , as well as an email address, that may be used for writing an electronic message to the Board, the non-management directors, any individual directors, or any committee of directors. Please follow the instructions on the website in order to send your message.

        All communications received as set forth above will be opened by the Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to the directors, and depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication, will be distributed to the Board, the non-management directors, an individual director or committee of directors, as appropriate. The Secretary will make sufficient copies of the contents to send to each director who is a member of the Board or of the committee to which the envelope or e-mail is addressed.

Directors' Attendance at Board, Committee and Annual Meetings

        The Board of Directors held eight meetings during fiscal year 2014. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings held by all committees on which such director served, during the period for which such director served.

        It is our policy that directors are invited and encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Six of our eight directors attended the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Directors' Compensation

        Each non-management director receives an annual payment of $100,000 in cash, payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, (i) the Lead Independent Director receives an additional annual payment of $25,000; (ii) the Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual payment of $20,000; (iii) the Chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive an additional annual payment of $10,000; and (iv) each member of the Audit Committee (other than the Chair) receives an additional annual payment of $10,000. Non-management directors also receive an annual award of restricted stock or restricted stock units valued at $90,000. The annual grant

18


Table of Contents

vests 80% on the first anniversary of the grant and 10% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant. Directors who are officers and/or Rite Aid associates receive no separate compensation for service as directors or committee members. Directors are reimbursed for travel and lodging expenses associated with attending Board of Directors and Board Committee meetings.

        During fiscal year 2014, for the period of the year she was on the Board, Ms. Sammons received the same compensation arrangements generally available to Rite Aid's non-management directors in addition to post-termination medical benefits for the life of her and her spouse, which applied upon the expiration of Ms. Sammons' employment agreement in June 2012.

        Non-management directors are subject to our Stock Ownership Guidelines discussed on pages 51-52.

19


Table of Contents


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014

        The following Director Compensation Table sets forth fees, awards and other compensation paid to or earned by our non-management directors who served during the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014:

Name
  Fees
Paid in
Cash ($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(3)(4)
  Option
Awards
($)(5)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change In
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total ($)  

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

    110,000     90,000                     200,000  

John M. Baumer(1)

    75,000     90,000                     165,000  

Bruce G. Bodaken

    63,462     90,000                     153,462  

François J. Coutu(1)

    94,157     90,000                     184,157  

Michel Coutu(1)

    25,000                         25,000  

James L. Donald(1)

    51,978                         51,978  

David R. Jessick

    120,000     90,000                     210,000  

Kevin E. Lofton(2)

    16,141     58,002                     74,143  

Myrtle S. Potter(2)

    8,967     53,002                     61,969  

Michael N. Regan

    135,000     90,000                     225,000  

Mary F. Sammons(1)

    47,253                         47,253  

Marcy Syms

    105,000     90,000                     195,000  

(1)
The following directors served as directors in fiscal year 2014 until the dates opposite their names: Mr. Baumer—September 20, 2013; Mr. François J. Coutu—November 8, 2013; Mr. Michel Coutu—April 17, 2013; Mr. Donald—June 20, 2013; and Ms. Sammons—June 20, 2013.

(2)
The following directors were appointed as directors in fiscal year 2014 on the dates opposite their names: Mr. Lofton—November 8, 2013; and Ms. Potter—November 29, 2013.

(3)
Represents the grant date fair value of awards in fiscal year 2014 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information regarding the assumptions used in determining the fair value of an award, please refer to Note 13 to our financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014. We recognize expense ratably over the three-year vesting period.

20


Table of Contents

(4)
The number of unvested restricted stock units outstanding as of March 1, 2014 for each individual who served as a director during fiscal year 2014 is detailed in the table below.

Name
  Grant Date   Number of
Stock
Awards (#)
 

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

    June 20, 2013     31,250  

    June 21, 2012     15,384  

    June 23, 2011     7,692  

John M. Baumer. 

         

Bruce G. Bodaken

    June 20, 2013     31,250  

François J. Coutu

         

Michel Coutu

         

James L. Donald

         

David R. Jessick

    June 20, 2013     31,250  

    June 21, 2012     15,384  

    June 23, 2011     7,692  

Kevin E. Lofton

    November 8, 2013     11,048  

Myrtle S. Potter

    November 29, 2013     8,953  

Michael N. Regan

    June 20, 2013     31,250  

    June 21, 2012     15,384  

    June 23, 2011     7,692  

Mary F. Sammons

         

Marcy Syms

    June 20, 2013     31,250  

    June 21, 2012     15,384  

    June 23, 2011     7,692  
(5)
The number of unexercised options outstanding as of March 1, 2014 for each individual who served as a director during fiscal year 2014 is detailed in the table below.

Name
  Grant Date   Exercise
Price($)
  Outstanding(#)   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options(#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options(#)
Unexercisable
 

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

    9/21/2005     3.65     100,000     100,000      

    6/21/2006     4.55     50,000     50,000      

    6/27/2007     6.15     50,000     50,000      

John M. Baumer

                     

Bruce G. Bodaken

                     

François J. Coutu

    6/4/2007     6.55     100,000     100,000      

Michel Coutu

    6/4/2007     6.55     100,000     100,000      

James L. Donald

    5/13/2008     2.40     100,000     100,000      

David R. Jessick

                     

Kevin E. Lofton

                     

Myrtle S. Potter

                     

Michael N. Regan

    6/27/2007     6.15     100,000     100,000      

Mary F. Sammons

    6/24/2004     5.38     292,208     292,208      

    6/26/2007     6.07     247,117     247,117        

Marcy Syms

    9/21/2005     3.65     100,000     100,000      

    6/21/2006     4.55     50,000     50,000      

    6/27/2007     6.15     50,000     50,000      

21


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        The accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte & Touche") has been selected as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2015. Deloitte & Touche has audited the accounts and records of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries since 2000. Although the selection of accounting firms does not require ratification, the Board of Directors has directed that the appointment of Deloitte & Touche be submitted to the stockholders for ratification due to the significance of their appointment by the Company. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, the Audit Committee will consider the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of Deloitte & Touche will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.


RECOMMENDATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY'S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015.

22


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are including in this proxy statement a resolution, subject to stockholder vote, to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (as defined in the section entitled "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis").

        Prior to voting, stockholders may wish to carefully review our discussion of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, tables and narrative disclosure, on pages 38-63, as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on pages 15-16.

        The Company's primary compensation goals for our Named Executive Officers are to attract, motivate and retain the most talented and dedicated executives and to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with the interests of our stockholders. The Company's compensation programs are designed to reward our Named Executive Officers for the achievement of annual and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total stockholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. The Company encourages stockholders to review the executive compensation disclosure in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and executive compensation tables in this proxy statement for complete details of how its compensation policies and procedures for its Named Executive Officers operate and are designed to achieve the Company's compensation objectives.

        We believe that the Company's compensation programs for its Named Executive Officers have been effective at promoting the achievement of positive results, appropriately aligning pay and performance and in enabling the Company to attract and retain very talented executives within our industry, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

        We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a "say-on-pay" proposal, gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to express your views on our fiscal year 2014 compensation for our Named Executive Officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

        Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for a stockholder vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

        Although this is an advisory vote which will not be binding on the Compensation Committee or the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Board will carefully review the results of the stockholder vote. The Compensation Committee will consider stockholders' concerns and take them into account in future determinations concerning compensation of its Named Executive Officers. The Board therefore recommends that you indicate your support for the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Offices in fiscal year 2014, as outlined in the above resolution.


RECOMMENDATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF ITS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,
AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

23


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 4

APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE
RITE AID CORPORATION 2014 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

Introduction

        The Compensation Committee views equity ownership as a significant motivation for its executives and associates to maximize value for its stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that grants of stock options and other stock-based awards provide a long-term incentive for associates and executives to contribute to the growth of Rite Aid. In addition, the Compensation Committee values performance-based awards that establish a direct link between compensation and stockholder return, such as stock options (which only yield value to the extent that our stock price appreciates) and performance-conditioned stock awards (which require the attainment of specified performance goals in order for the recipient to realize value).

        The Compensation Committee also feels that it is important for equity and equity-based awards to be made to key managers and associates across the entire Rite Aid organization. Consequently, the Compensation Committee feels that it is important to ensure that it will be able to continue to provide equity and equity-based compensation to Rite Aid associates in the future. The Compensation Committee believes that the new plan will help ensure that Rite Aid has a reasonable number of additional shares available for future equity-based incentive awards to attract and retain Rite Aid's associates, key personnel and officers, as well as reward such individuals for the attainment of long-term achievements, provide awards in connection with our continued expansion through corporate acquisitions, and compensate non-employee directors for service on the Board.

Reasons for Seeking Stockholder Approval

        We use equity compensation as a key tool for the attraction, retention and motivation of the best available talent. We anticipate that our future equity program design is likely to utilize a larger number of full value awards than has historically been the case. Some of those full value awards will be performance-based and need to be counted against the Equity Plans at the maximum payout level in order to ensure the Equity Plans have sufficient shares to cover payouts of such awards. Based on these expected changes to our equity grant program, we anticipate that the number of shares available for issuance as full value awards under our 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and 2012 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plans"), which is limited to only 5.1 million of the remaining 11.4 million shares in our Equity Plans at the end of fiscal year 2014, will have been granted prior to the time of our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Accordingly, approval of the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (referred to herein as the "2014 Plan") is critical to ensuring that we have adequate shares available to continue to attract, retain and motivate top talent.

        In addition, we are seeking approval of the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan in order, among other things, to: (i) comply with NYSE rules requiring stockholder approval of equity compensation plans; (ii) allow the Compensation Committee to be more effective with the mix of equity awards through utilization of the fungible design; (iii) allow the Compensation Committee to grant incentive stock options (ISOs) to participants who are associates in the 2014 Plan; and (iv) allow the Compensation Committee the ability to grant stock awards intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Historical Overhang and Annual Share Usage

        While the use of equity is an important part of our compensation program, we are mindful of our responsibility to our stockholders to exercise judgment in the granting of equity awards. As a result, we

24


Table of Contents

evaluated both our "overhang percentage" and annual share usage, or "burn rate," in considering the advisability of the 2014 Plan and its potential impact on our stockholders.

 
  Fiscal Year
2014
  Fiscal Year
2013
  Fiscal Year
2012
  Three-Year
Average
 

A Stock Options Granted

    4,828,100     12,020,400     23,201,044     13,349,848  

B Restricted Stock Awards and Units Granted

    2,743,051     5,450,341     8,525,646     5,573,013  

C Total Options and Shares Granted (A+B)

    7,571,151     17,470,741     31,726,690     18,922,861  

D Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

    922,199,000     889,562,000     885,819,000     899,193,333  

E Annual Share Usage (C/D)

    0.8 %   2.0 %   3.6 %   2.1 %

        Although our future annual share usage will depend upon and be influenced by a number of factors, such as the number of plan participants, the price per share of our common stock and the methodology used to establish the equity award mix, the 58,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan will enable us to continue to utilize equity awards as an important component of our compensation program and help meet our objectives to attract, retain and incentivize talented personnel. The calculation of the share reserve took into account, among other things, our stock price and volatility, our share burn rate and overhang, the existing terms of our outstanding awards, and our proposed fungible share rate of 1.45:1 for full-share awards under the 2014 Plan. The results of this analysis were presented to our Compensation Committee of our Board for their consideration. In addition, we anticipate that the fungible design will permit a more efficient and effective use of those shares for future equity awards. Upon approval of the proposal, based on the factors described above, we estimate that the pool of available shares would last for approximately 4 to 6 years.

Highlights of the 2014 Plan

        On April 16, 2014, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, unanimously approved the 2014 Plan, subject to stockholder approval.

        The 2014 Plan is intended to promote the interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders by providing officers and other key associates with equity-based incentives and rewards to encourage them to enter into and continue in the employ of Rite Aid and to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of Rite Aid, thereby aligning their interests with those of Rite Aid's stockholders, to compensate non-employee directors for their services while further aligning their interests with the interests of stockholders, and to reward the performance of individual officers, other key associates and consultants in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range achievements. The number of persons eligible to participate in the 2014 Plan will be approximately 900.

        The 2014 Plan is intended to permit the grant of performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which generally limits the annual deduction

25


Table of Contents

that Rite Aid may take for compensation of its covered officers, which consist of its CEO and three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than its CFO) who are serving at the end of the year. Under Section 162(m), certain compensation, including compensation based on the attainment of performance goals, will not be subject to this limitation if certain requirements are met. Among these requirements is a requirement that the material terms pursuant to which the performance-based compensation is to be paid be disclosed to and approved by the stockholders. Accordingly, if the 2014 Plan is approved by stockholders and the other conditions of Section 162(m) relating to performance-based compensation are satisfied, qualified performance-based compensation paid to covered officers pursuant to the 2014 Plan will not fail to be deductible due to the operation of Section 162(m).

        If this proposal is approved at the Annual Meeting, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan will be 58,000,000 plus (i) the number of shares that remain available for issuance as of the effective date of the 2014 Plan under the Equity Plans and (ii) the number of shares that are subject to awards as of the effective date of the 2014 Plan that, in the future, are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged, surrendered or terminate under the terms of the Equity Plans, without a distribution of shares to the recipient. If the 2014 Plan is approved at the Annual Meeting, the Company will not grant any new awards under our existing Equity Plans.

        Additional considerations which demonstrate Rite Aid's commitment to governance best practices and which are relevant to the adoption of the 2014 Plan are highlighted below:

        A form of the 2014 Plan is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement and the following description of the material terms of the 2014 Plan is qualified in its entirety by the complete text of the plan.

26


Table of Contents

Description of Principal Features of the 2014 Plan

        Types of Awards.    The following types of awards may be granted under the 2014 Plan: stock options (including both incentive stock options ("ISOs") within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and nonqualified options ("NQSOs"), which are options that do not qualify as ISOs), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, phantom units, stock bonus awards, and other equity-based awards valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, Rite Aid's common stock.

        Shares Available; Certain Limitations.    The number of shares of common stock in the aggregate that are reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan include 58,000,000 shares plus any shares remaining available for grant under the Equity Plans as of the effective date of the 2014 Plan, in each case, subject to equitable adjustment upon the occurrence of any extraordinary dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, combination, repurchase, or share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event. As of April 28, 2014, there were 10,959,457 shares of common stock in the aggregate, with a restriction that only 4,651,203 of those shares can be used for awards other than Stock Options, that remained available for grant under the Equity Plans. In addition, the number of shares of common stock that are subject to awards as of the effective date of the 2014 Plan under our existing Equity Plans that, in the future, are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or terminate (in each case, other than due to the expiration of stock options on the options' expiration date) under the Equity Plans without a distribution of shares to the Participant, will be added to the number of shares available for grant under the 2014 Plan. As of April 28, 2014, there were 50,362,617 shares of common stock subject to outstanding options and 10,685,126 shares of common stock subject to other types of awards under our existing Equity Plans. The options outstanding as of April 28, 2014 have a weighted average exercise price of $1.68 and a weighted average remaining life of 6.42 years.

        Shares of common stock subject to an award under the 2014 Plan that remain unissued upon the cancellation or termination of the award will again become available for award under the 2014 Plan. However, shares of common stock that are exchanged by a participant or withheld by Rite Aid as full or partial payment in connection with any award under the 2014 Plan, as well as any shares of common stock exchanged by a participant or withheld by Rite Aid to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award, will not be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan. To the extent an award is paid or settled in cash, the number of shares of common stock previously subject to the award will again be available for grants pursuant to the 2014 Plan. To the extent that an Award can only be settled in cash, such Award will not be counted against the total number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2014 Plan.

        All shares underlying stock appreciation rights (as opposed to only the net number of shares issued to settle an award) will be counted against the various limits under the 2014 Plan. Under the 2014 Plan, in any fiscal year, no participant who is likely to be a covered associate for purposes of Section 162(m) may be granted (i) options or stock appreciation rights with respect to more than 6,000,000 shares of common stock, (ii) restricted stock, phantom stock or other equity-based awards with respect to more than 6,000,000 shares of common stock, or (iii) with respect to any award denominated in cash, $10,000,000 for such single fiscal year, including with respect to each fiscal year within a performance period of more than one year (subject in each case to equitable adjustment). The market price of Rite Aid's common stock on April 28, 2014 was $6.95 per share.

27


Table of Contents

        Administration.    The 2014 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee is a "non-employee director" (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), an "outside director" (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code) and an "independent director" (within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange listed company manual).

        Eligibility.    Officers of Rite Aid, including the named executive officers listed in the summary compensation table in this proxy statement, associates, non-employee directors and consultants to Rite Aid are eligible to receive awards under the 2014 Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of non-employee directors, the board of directors).

        Exercisability and Vesting.    Awards will become exercisable or otherwise vest at the times and upon the conditions that the Compensation Committee may determine, as reflected in an applicable agreement. In general, options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and phantom units which vest solely based on continued employment may not fully vest prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (except with respect to awards made to non-employee directors and except with respect to no more than 5% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock authorized under the 2014 Plan). The Compensation Committee has the authority to accelerate the vesting and/or exercisability of any outstanding award at such times and under such circumstances as it deems appropriate.

        Performance Goals.    The vesting of awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code will be based upon one or more of the following business criteria: return on total stockholder equity; earnings or book value per share of common stock; net income (before or after taxes); earnings before all or any interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and/or other adjustments; inventory goals; return on assets, capital or investment; market share; cost reduction goals; earnings from continuing operations; levels of expense, costs or liabilities; store level performance; operating profit; sales or revenues; stock price appreciation; total stockholder return; implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; prescription counts; customer service or customer service satisfaction; associate satisfaction; clinics opened; stores remodeled or constructed; cost of capital; Accountable Care Organization results; medical services delivered; leverage ratio; or any combination of the foregoing. The business criteria may be expressed in terms of attaining a specified level of the particular criteria or the attainment of a percentage increase or decrease in the particular criteria, and may be applied to Rite Aid, an affiliate, a division or strategic business unit of Rite Aid, or may be applied to the performance of Rite Aid relative to a market index, a group of other companies or a combination thereof, all as determined by the Compensation Committee. The business criteria may also be subject to a threshold level of performance below which no payment will be made, levels of performance at which specified payments will be made, and a maximum level of performance above which no additional payment will be made. Where applicable, business criteria will be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (with such adjustments as the Compensation Committee may prescribe) and achievement of the criteria will require certification by the Compensation Committee.

        Stock Options.    Options entitle the participant to purchase shares of common stock during a specified period at a purchase price specified by the Compensation Committee (at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the day the option is granted). Each option granted under the 2014 Plan will have a maximum term of 10 years from the date of grant, or such lesser period as the Compensation Committee shall determine. Options may be exercised in whole or in part by the payment in cash of the full option price, by tendering shares of common stock with a fair market value equal to the option price or by other methods in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Options granted under the 2014 Plan may not be re-priced to lower the exercise price or be cancelled in exchange for another type of award or cash payment without stockholder approval, nor

28


Table of Contents

may they provide for automatic "re-load" grants upon the exercise of an option with shares of common stock.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    A stock appreciation right may be granted in connection with an option, either at the time of grant or at any time thereafter during the term of the option, or may be granted unrelated to an option. Stock appreciation rights generally permit the participant to receive cash or shares of common stock equal to the difference between the exercise price of the stock appreciation right (which must equal or exceed the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant) and the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise for a period of no more than ten years. Stock appreciation rights granted under the 2014 Plan may not be re-priced to lower the exercise price or be cancelled in exchange for another type of award or cash payment without stockholder approval.

        Restricted Stock.    The Compensation Committee may grant restricted shares of common stock to such persons, in such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions (including the attainment of performance goals) as the Compensation Committee may determine in its discretion. Except for restrictions on transfer and such other restrictions as the Compensation Committee may impose, participants will have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the restricted stock.

        Phantom Units.    A phantom unit award is an award of the right to receive an amount of cash or common stock at a future date based upon the value of the common stock at the time of vesting of the award, or if the award is denominated in cash, the right to receive an amount of cash per unit that is determined by the Compensation Committee.

        Stock Bonus Awards.    A stock bonus award is an award of common stock made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee upon such terms and conditions (if any) as the Compensation Committee may determine.

        Other Awards.    Other forms of awards valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, common stock, including but not limited to dividend equivalents, may be granted either alone or in addition to other awards under the 2014 Plan. For example, the 2014 Plan will permit the grant of performance-based awards denominated in cash, and performance-based awards denominated in shares and with respect to which participants may earn a range of shares, depending upon the actual level of performance. Subject to the provisions of the 2014 Plan, the Compensation Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which such other awards shall be granted, the number of shares of common stock to be granted pursuant to such other awards and all other conditions of such awards.

        Change in Control.    Unless otherwise set forth in an agreement or provided by the Compensation Committee, following a change in control of Rite Aid (as described below), (i) each outstanding award that is assumed or substituted in connection with the change in control will become fully vested and exercisable, free of all applicable restrictions, and all applicable performance criteria will be deemed to be achieved at target levels if the participant's employment or service is terminated pursuant to a qualifying termination (as defined in the 2014 Plan) within the 24 month period following the change in control; and (ii) each outstanding award that is not assumed or substituted in connection with the change in control will become fully vested and exercisable, free of all applicable restrictions, and all applicable performance criteria will be deemed to be achieved at target levels immediately upon the occurrence of the change in control. In addition, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, cancel outstanding awards in exchange for a payment in cash, shares of common stock, or any combination thereof, equal to the value of the award based on the price per share received by other Rite Aid stockholders.

29


Table of Contents

        For purposes of the 2014 Plan a "change in control" means, in general: (i) a person or entity acquires securities of Rite Aid representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of Rite Aid; (ii) an unapproved change in the majority membership of the Board; (iii) consummation of a merger or consolidation of Rite Aid or any subsidiary of Rite Aid, other than a merger or consolidation that results in the Rite Aid voting securities continuing to represent at least 60% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent, or a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization or similar transaction involving Rite Aid in which no person or entity acquires at least 35% of the combined voting power of Rite Aid; or (iv) stockholder approval of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of Rite Aid or the consummation of an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of Rite Aid's assets, other than a sale or disposition to an entity, at least 60% of the combined voting power of which is owned by Rite Aid stockholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Rite Aid immediately prior to such sale.

        Amendment and Termination of the Plan.    The 2014 Plan may be amended by the Board, subject to stockholder approval where necessary to satisfy legal or regulatory requirements.

        The 2014 Plan will terminate not later than the tenth anniversary of its effective date. However, awards granted before the termination of the 2014 Plan may extend beyond that date in accordance with their terms.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences

        Set forth below is a discussion of certain United States federal income tax consequences with respect to certain awards that may be granted pursuant to the 2014 Plan. The following discussion is a brief summary only, and reference is made to the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations and interpretations issued thereunder for a complete statement of all relevant federal tax consequences. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not describe state, local or foreign tax consequences of participation in the 2014 Plan.

        Incentive Stock Options.    In general, no taxable income is realized by a participant upon the grant of an ISO. If shares of common stock are issued to a participant pursuant to the exercise of an ISO, then, generally (i) the participant will not realize ordinary income with respect to the exercise of the option, (ii) upon sale of the underlying shares acquired upon the exercise of an ISO, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price paid for the shares will be taxed to the participant as capital gain and (iii) Rite Aid will not be entitled to a deduction. The amount by which the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date of an ISO exceeds the purchase price generally will, however, constitute an item which increases the participant's income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. However, if the participant disposes of the shares acquired on exercise before the later of the second anniversary of the date of grant or one year after the receipt of the shares by the participant (a "disqualifying disposition"), the participant generally would include in ordinary income in the year of the disqualifying disposition an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of the shares), over the exercise price paid for the shares. If ordinary income is recognized due to a disqualifying disposition, Rite Aid would generally be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. Subject to certain exceptions, an ISO generally will not be treated as an ISO if it is exercised more than three months following termination of employment. If an ISO is exercised at a time when it no longer qualifies as an ISO, it will be treated for tax purposes as a nonqualified stock option, or "NQSO," as discussed below.

        Nonqualified Stock Options.    In general, no taxable income is realized by a participant upon the grant of an NQSO. Upon exercise of an NQSO, the participant generally would include in ordinary income at the time of exercise an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price paid for the shares. At the time the participant recognizes ordinary income, Rite Aid generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. In

30


Table of Contents

the event of a subsequent sale of shares received upon the exercise of an NQSO, any appreciation after the date on which taxable income is realized by the participant in respect of the option exercise should be taxed as capital gain in an amount equal to the excess of the sales proceeds for the shares over the participant's basis in such shares. The participant's basis in the shares will generally equal the amount paid for the shares plus the amount included in ordinary income by the participant upon exercise of the NQSO.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    In general, the grant of a stock appreciation right will not result in income for the participant or in a tax deduction for Rite Aid. Upon the settlement of a stock appreciation right, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the aggregate value of the payment received, and Rite Aid generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at such time in the same amount.

        Restricted Stock.    In general, a participant will not recognize any income upon the grant of restricted stock, unless the participant elects under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, within thirty days after such grant, to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at the time of grant, less any amount paid for the shares. If the election is made, the participant will not be allowed a deduction for amounts subsequently required to be returned to Rite Aid. If the election is not made, the participant will generally recognize ordinary income on the date that the restrictions to which the restricted stock lapse, in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on such date, less any amount paid for the shares. At the time the participant recognizes ordinary income, Rite Aid generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. Generally, upon a sale or other disposition of restricted stock with respect to which the participant has recognized ordinary income (i.e., where a Section 83(b) election was previously made or the restrictions were previously removed), the participant will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on such sale or other disposition and the participant's basis in such shares.

        Phantom Units.    In general, a participant will not recognize any income upon the grant of phantom units. Rather, upon the settlement of the phantom units, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of cash or the fair market value of common stock received, as applicable. The Company will generally be entitled to a tax deduction at such time equal to the amount of income recognized by the participant.

        Stock Bonus Awards.    In general, a participant will recognize ordinary income upon the receipt of a vested stock bonus award granted under the 2014 Plan equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock received, and Rite Aid will become entitled to a deduction at such time equal to the amount of income recognized by the participant.

        Other Awards.    In general, a participant will recognize ordinary income upon the receipt of shares or cash with respect to other awards granted under the 2014 Plan and Rite Aid will become entitled to a deduction at such time equal to the amount of income recognized by the participant.

New Plan Benefits

        The 2014 Plan was designed by the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of an outside compensation consultant, as part of a comprehensive compensation strategy to provide a long-term broad based incentive for associates and executives to contribute to the growth of Rite Aid and attain specified performance goals.

        If approved by the stockholders, participants in the 2014 Plan will be eligible for annual long-term awards which may include performance shares, stock options and restricted stock (or other awards permitted under the 2014 Plan). The level and types of awards will be fixed by the Compensation Committee in light of the participants' targeted long-term incentive level. The Compensation

31


Table of Contents

Committee may impose additional conditions or restrictions to the vesting of such awards as it deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, the achievement of performance goals based on one or more business criteria.

        Awards under the 2014 Plan are made in the discretion of the Compensation Committee and therefore are not determinable at this time. Moreover, the ultimate value of any grants that are made will depend on the value of the underlying shares of common stock at the time of settlement, which likewise is not determinable at this time. Please refer to the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal 2014" to review equity and equity-based awards made to our named executive officers in 2013.

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

        Approval of the adoption of the 2014 Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal. Any broker non-votes with respect to the adoption of the 2014 Plan will not be counted as shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners of Rite Aid shares instruct their brokers or nominees how to vote their shares. If the 2014 Plan is not approved by the stockholders, the 2014 Plan will not become effective.


RECOMMENDATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE
RITE AID CORPORATION 2014 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

32


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 5

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN

        Steven Krol, who owns 255,325 shares of common stock (based on information provided to us by Mr. Krol) and whose address will be provided by the Company promptly upon oral or written request, has notified us that he intends to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposal and supporting statement may contain assertions about Rite Aid or other statements that we believe are incorrect. We have not attempted to refute all of the inaccuracies in the proposal and supporting statement and the Company is not responsible for the content of the proposal.

Excessive salary when combined; separate Chair and CEO function salaries added together cost less

Undeserved job security

Abusive personal usage of corporate aircraft

Resistance to change

Shareholder value destroyed over the longer term. Companies with separation provide five year returns nearly 28% higher than when functions combined.

Greater investment risk

33


Table of Contents


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "AGAINST" THIS
PROPOSAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

        The Board has considered this proposal and concluded for the reasons described below that the adoption of this resolution is not in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders.

        Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines the Board has the flexibility to determine whether it is in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders to separate or combine the roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer at any point in time. This proposal would remove this flexibility and narrow the governance arrangements that the Board may consider, which could be contrary to the best interests of our stockholders. Given the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, the right leadership structure may vary from time to time based on changes in circumstances. Accordingly, the Board believes it should be permitted to use its business judgment to determine the right leadership structure based on what it believes best serves the needs of the Company and its stockholders at any particular time.

        The Board believes that its current structure and governance practices allow it to provide effective, independent oversight of the Company and the Chief Executive Officer.

        Our clearly defined Lead Independent Director role, independent key committee chairs, experienced and committed directors and frequent executive sessions provide a framework for effective

34


Table of Contents

direction and oversight by the Board. In addition, the Board believes that Mr. Standley's in-depth knowledge of the Company, perspective on competitive developments, understanding of stockholder interests and relationships with customers, business partners and the communities in which we do business allow him to provide decisive and effective leadership both within and outside the Company.

        In view of our highly independent board structure and the Company's sound governance practices, the Board believes that the proposal is an unnecessary limitation on the Board's flexibility and would not strengthen the Board's independence or oversight functions. Moreover, the Board believes that its current leadership structure provides accountability, allows Rite Aid to present its strategy with a unified voice and serves the best interests of stockholders at this time.


RECOMMENDATION

FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "AGAINST"
THIS STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.

35


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Set forth below is information regarding the current executive officers of Rite Aid.

Name
  Age   Position with Rite Aid

John T. Standley(1)

    51   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Kenneth Martindale

    54   President and Chief Operating Officer

Frank G. Vitrano

    58   Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer

Dedra N. Castle

    48   Executive Vice President, Human Resources

Enio Anthony Montini, Jr. 

    61   Executive Vice President, Merchandising

Marc A. Strassler

    66   Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Robert I. Thompson

    60   Executive Vice President, Pharmacy

Robert K. Thompson

    56   Executive Vice President, Store Operations

Douglas E. Donley

    51   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(1)
Mr. Standley's biographical information is provided above in the section identifying the Board of Directors.

        Kenneth A. Martindale.    Mr. Martindale was appointed President as of June 2013, and has served as Rite Aid's Chief Operating Officer since June 2010. From December 2008 until June 2010, he served as Rite Aid's Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising, Marketing and Logistics Officer. Mr. Martindale served as Co-President, Chief Merchandising and Marketing Officer for Pathmark Stores, Inc. from January 2006 until its acquisition by the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company in December 2007. In January 2000, Mr. Martindale joined the Board of Directors of Intesource, Inc.; became Chairman of the Board in March 2004; and served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board from November 2004 until January 2006. From September 1999 until November 2004, Mr. Martindale was Principal of Martindale Development Group, L.L.C. In September 1999 until July 2003, Mr. Martindale was Managing Director/CEO of Orchard Street, Inc., a privately held specialty food retailer which he founded and owned. Mr. Martindale was Executive Vice President of Sales and Procurement with Fred Meyer, Inc. from January 1998 until September 1999 and was Senior Vice President of Sales and Procurement with Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc. from June 1996 until January 1998. Mr. Martindale currently serves on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores.

        Frank G. Vitrano.    Mr. Vitrano has served as our Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer since September 2008. Previously, Mr. Vitrano spent 35 years at Pathmark Stores, Inc., where most recently he served as President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from October 2002 until December 2005 and Co-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from January 2006 until its acquisition by the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company in December 2007.

        Dedra N. Castle.    Ms. Castle joined Rite Aid as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer effective March 24, 2014. Prior to joining Rite Aid, from 2012 until 2014, Ms. Castle was a founding member and managing partner of Castle Partners, LLC, a human resources management services firm, and Level Mediation, LLC, a multi-state mediation firm. From 2008 until 2012, Ms. Castle worked for the Sam's Club Division of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., where she served as the Vice President of Club/Field Support, People, Inclusion, Diversity and Policy. Prior to joining Sam's Club, she held senior human resources positions at Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and Auto Zone Stores, Inc.

        Enio Anthony Montini, Jr.    Mr. Montini has served as our Executive Vice President, Merchandising since April 2011. From February 2010 to April 2011, he served as Senior Vice President, Category

36


Table of Contents

Management. Prior to serving in this position, from February 2008 until January 2010 he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer with MARC USA, a privately held company. From February 2005 until January 2008, Mr. Montini was Senior Vice President of Operations with MARC USA and from September 2004 until January 2005, he served as Senior Vice President, Channel Marketing with MARC USA.

        Marc A. Strassler.    Mr. Strassler has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since March 2009. Previously, Mr. Strassler served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary with Pathmark Stores, Inc. from 1997 until its acquisition by the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company in December 2007. From 1987 until 1997, he served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Pathmark.

        Robert I. Thompson.    Mr. Thompson has served as our Executive Vice President, Pharmacy since September 2009. From August 2008 until September 2009, Mr. Thompson served as Senior Vice President, Pharmacy Operations. From February 2008 to August 2008, he served as Senior Vice President, Northeast Division, and from June 2007 to February 2008, Mr. Thompson served as Vice President, Integration. From July 2004 (when he first joined Rite Aid) to June 2007, he served as Vice President, Pharmacy Business Development.

        Robert (Bob) K. Thompson.    Mr. Thompson has served as our Executive Vice President of Store Operations since July 2011. From November 2007 to July 2011, Mr. Thompson served as Senior Vice President of our Western Division. Prior to joining Rite Aid in 2007, he was a Senior Vice President for the West Region of Target Corporation where he served for nearly 20 years in operations positions of increasing responsibility.

        Douglas E. Donley.    Mr. Donley has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer since October 2005. He had been Group Vice President, Corporate Controller from 1999 to October 2005. Mr. Donley served as the acting principal financial officer of the Company from October 7 to October 8, 2008, and as a financial analyst for the Company from 1996 to 1999. He was an internal auditor for Harsco Corporation from 1994 to 1996. Prior to joining Harsco, he was an auditor for KPMG Peat Marwick. In March 2007, pursuant to a plea agreement, Mr. Donley pled guilty to state misdemeanor offenses related to driving under the influence. Mr. Donley has subsequently satisfied all terms of the plea agreement. The Company believes that this matter does not adversely affect Mr. Donley's fitness to serve as an officer.

37


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

        We encourage you to read this Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a detailed discussion and analysis of our fiscal year 2014 executive compensation program for the individuals named below. We refer to these individuals throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the accompanying tables as our "Named Executive Officers."

Name
  Title
John T. Standley   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Kenneth A. Martindale   President and Chief Operating Officer
Frank G. Vitrano   Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
Robert K. Thompson   Executive Vice President, Store Operations
Marc A. Strassler   Executive Vice President, General Counsel

Executive Summary

        Rite Aid Corporation is the third largest retail drugstore chain in the United States based on revenues and number of stores, operating 4,587 stores as of March 1, 2014 in 31 states and the District of Columbia. Our goals are to consistently understand and exceed the expectations of our customers at each of these stores by providing them with the best products, services and advice to meet their unique needs, thereby allowing us to meet our key business objectives and ultimately provide sustainable long-term value to our stockholders.

        We believe that accomplishing these goals starts with our ability to attract, retain and appropriately motivate executive officers who have the knowledge, experience and leadership ability to manage our business and promote a culture of teamwork and development that inspires each and every one of our associates to give their best effort every day.

        We feel that we have assembled a very strong team of executives, which has in turn resulted in our ability to attract and retain highly talented individuals at all levels of the organization who are committed to our core values of excellence, integrity and respect for people and have the ability to execute our strategic and operational priorities. This combination of strong executive leadership and highly talented and motivated team-driven associates played a key role in our outstanding financial performance in fiscal year 2014, as described below.

        We had a very successful year in fiscal 2014, as evidenced by our strong corporate performance in the key areas described below:

38


Table of Contents

        We believe strongly that pay should align with performance and this focus is reflected in our executive compensation programs. We seek to provide our Named Executive Officers with opportunities to earn total direct compensation (base salary, annual incentives, and long-term incentives) that are generally aligned with compensation levels provided to peer company executives and executives within similarly sized retailers more broadly.

        Because of our desire to reinforce a performance-based culture, the Company emphasizes a pay mix that is comprised primarily of variable pay. As a result, base salary makes up the smallest portion of total direct compensation for the Named Executive Officers, with variable pay in the form of annual and long-term incentives comprising the remaining portion. The mix varies by position, taking into account each position's ability to influence Company results, as well as competitive practice.

        We used Adjusted EBITDA as the primary financial metric in our annual incentive plan and long-term performance awards in fiscal year 2014. We believe this was appropriate because EBITDA growth has historically shown a strong positive correlation with three-year and five-year total stockholder return for Rite Aid and its peer group, and that it represented the best indicator of Rite Aid's operating performance based on our financial situation and corporate structure. With respect to long-term performance awards, the Compensation Committee, like it did in fiscal year 2013, included leverage ratio as an additional performance metric over the three-year performance period. The Compensation Committee believes that leverage ratio is a key indicator of our corporate performance, as it measures how efficiently we use our available capital and focuses management on the need to improve the Company's financial condition over time. Additionally, with respect to our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee added a provision subjecting the long-term performance award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 2000 Index over the three year measuring period.

        As discussed above, our Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2014 was $1,325 million which exceeded our annual operating plan of $1,125 million by approximately 18%. Consequently, and as described in more detail below under "Cash Incentive Bonuses," we paid annual incentives to our Named Executive Officers at the maximum level.

        In June 2011, our stockholders voted to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year. Consistent with that vote, the Board resolved to hold an advisory "say-on-pay" vote every year in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders. At our 2013 Annual Meeting approximately 97% of shares voting on the proposal approved the compensation of our Named Executive Officers on a

39


Table of Contents

non-binding, advisory basis. As a result of the overwhelming support of our stockholders in respect of the say-on-pay vote conducted at our 2013 Annual Meeting, the Compensation Committee determined that no material changes should be made to our executive compensation program for our Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2014. As in the past, the Compensation Committee will continue to review the results of future advisory say-on-pay votes and will consider stockholders' concerns and take them into account in future determinations concerning the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

        All of our executive compensation and benefits programs are within the purview of the Compensation Committee, which bases these programs on the same objectives that guide the Company in establishing all of its compensation programs. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company's equity incentive compensation plans. In establishing or approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in any given year, the Compensation Committee is generally guided by the following objectives:

40


Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee's Processes

        The Compensation Committee has established a number of processes to assist it in ensuring that the Company's executive compensation program is achieving its objectives. Among those are:

        Assessment of Company performance.    The Compensation Committee uses Company performance measures in two ways. First, in assessing the linkage between actual total compensation and performance, the Compensation Committee considers various measures of Company and industry performance, such as comparable store sales growth, EBITDA growth, return on sales, return on average invested capital and assets and total stockholder return. In determining performance relative to the Company's peer group (as discussed further below), the Compensation Committee does not apply a formula or assign these performance measures relative weights. Instead, it makes a subjective determination after considering such measures collectively. Second, as described in more detail below, the Compensation Committee has established specific Company target incentive/award levels and performance measures that determine the size of payouts under the Company's two formula-based incentive programs—the cash incentive bonus program and performance awards granted under the Company's long-term incentive program.

        Assessment of competitive compensation levels.    The Compensation Committee, with the help of its independent compensation consultant Exequity LLP, assesses the Company's programs relative to a peer group of retail organizations and published survey data. For the Company's 2014 fiscal year, this peer group consisted of the companies listed below. During the second half of fiscal year 2014, the Company conducted a comprehensive review of its peer group and the Compensation Committee approved a modification to the peer group (which is also shown below under the heading "Fiscal Year 2015 Peer Group") for use beginning in the 2015 fiscal year.

        Because the Company has a limited number of publicly-traded direct competitors and because pharmacy sales (which account for over two-thirds of the Company's revenue) have a different cyclicality than the sales of many other retailers, we reviewed potential peers relative to multiple criteria including:

The Compensation Committee determined that the following group best represented our peers based on the criteria described above at the time it was developed. As described above, following the comprehensive peer group review conducted in the second half of the 2014 fiscal year, the peer group was modified for use beginning in the 2015 fiscal year to consist of the companies listed below under "Fiscal Year 2015 Peer Group," which the Compensation Committee determined represented the most accurate group of our peers based on the criteria described above as of the time the review was conducted.

41


Table of Contents


Fiscal Year 2014 Peer Group

Peer Company
  Revenues
($ Millions)
 

McKesson Corp. 

    130,088  

CVS Caremark Corp. 

    126,761  

Costco Wholesale Corp. 

    106,458  

The Kroger Co. 

    99,306  

AmerisourceBergen Corp. 

    96,076  

Target Corp. 

    73,807  

Walgreen Co. 

    73,230  

Sears Holding Corp. 

    37,855  

Safeway Inc. 

    35,809  

Dollar General Corp. 

    17,218  

SUPERVALU INC. 

    17,155  

J.C. Penney Company, Inc. 

    11,961  

Office Depot, Inc. 

    11,242  

Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (acquired by The Kroger Co.)

    not reported  


Fiscal Year 2015 Peer Group

Peer Company
  Revenues
($ Millions)
 

CVS Caremark Corp

    126,761  

AmerisourceBergen Corp

    96,076  

The Home Depot, Inc. 

    79,362  

Target Corp. 

    73,807  

Walgreen Co. 

    73,230  

Lowe's Companies, Inc. 

    52,803  

Sears Holding Corp

    37,855  

Safeway Inc. 

    35,809  

Macy's, Inc. 

    28,079  

The TJX Companies, Inc. 

    27,338  

Staples Inc. 

    23,809  

Dollar General Corp. 

    17,218  

SUPERVALU INC. 

    17,155  

Catamaran Corporation

    14,780  

Whole Foods Market Inc. 

    13,330  

J.C. Penney Company, Inc. 

    11,961  

Office Depot, Inc. 

    11,242  

Family Dollar Stores, Inc. 

    10,469  

Dollar Tree, Inc. 

    7,851  

Note:
Revenue reflects trailing 12 month data through December 2013 as available per Standard & Poor's Research Insight.

        The Compensation Committee compares the compensation levels of Rite Aid's Named Executive Officers to peer company compensation levels in the aggregate, and also compares the pay of individual executives if the jobs are sufficiently similar to make the comparison meaningful.

        In addition to the peer group data, the Compensation Committee reviews market data based on specific functional responsibility for each executive from published survey data. The survey analysis

42


Table of Contents

targets data from similarly-sized retail organizations based on each executive's functional responsibility. The surveys used in the analysis include Mercer's Global Premium Executive Remuneration Suite and Towers Watson's Survey Report on Top Management Compensation.

        The Compensation Committee uses the peer group and survey data primarily to ensure that the executive compensation program as a whole is competitive, meaning generally within 25% of the median range of comparative pay of the market when Rite Aid achieves the targeted performance levels. The Compensation Committee further designed the incentive plans in such a way that executives can earn above competitive levels for superior performance and below competitive levels if performance is below expectations. The Compensation Committee assesses overall alignment of the compensation program rather than benchmarking a specific target position with consideration of factors such as company and individual performance, how executive roles function within Rite Aid, concerns about executive retention, and availability of equity compensation. The Compensation Committee assesses Rite Aid's performance relative to its peer group on both a one-year and three year basis and observed alignment of performance with actual total direct compensation levels for the executives in the aggregate.

        In fiscal year 2014, management engaged Mercer, a compensation consultant, to provide management with compensation information for certain executive officers. Pursuant to the terms of its retention, Mercer reported directly to management, and not to the Compensation Committee, although the Compensation Committee did review recommendations and analysis prepared by management and Mercer in determining fiscal year 2014 compensation for the Named Executive Officers.

        Total compensation review.    The Compensation Committee reviews each executive's base pay, annual bonus, and long-term incentives annually with the guidance of the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant. Following the fiscal year 2014 review, the Compensation Committee determined that the target level and components of compensation for fiscal year 2014 were reasonable in the aggregate.

Components of Executive Compensation for Fiscal Year 2014

        For fiscal year 2014, the compensation program for our Named Executive Officers consisted of four primary components—base salary, a cash incentive bonus opportunity under the Company's annual incentive bonus plan, long-term incentives consisting of stock options, restricted stock and performance units and a benefits package, including a Supplemental Executive Retirement Program ("SERP"). A significant portion of total compensation is variable, i.e., subject to performance and is comprised of target annual incentives and target long-term incentives.

        The Compensation Committee believes that this program appropriately balances the mix of cash and equity compensation, the mix of currently-paid and longer-term compensation, and the security of base benefits in a way that best furthers the compensation objectives discussed above. The chart below shows the overall mix of base salary, target annual incentives, target long-term incentives, and contributions under the SERP for each of the Named Executive Officers.

43


Table of Contents


Target Total Remuneration(1)

Compensation Component as a % of Total Remuneration for Fiscal Year 2014(2)

GRAPHIC


(1)
Target Total Remuneration represents the sum of base salary, target annual incentives, target long-term incentives, and SERP contributions. Value of broad-based benefits provided to all employees and components of other compensation (except the SERP) have been excluded.

(2)
Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Base Salary

        Base salary is one element of an executive's annual cash compensation during employment. The value of base salary reflects the executive's long-term performance, skill set and the market value of that skill set. In setting base salaries for fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee considered the following factors:

        Pay levels at comparable companies.    As noted above, the Compensation Committee uses the peer group data to test for the reasonableness and competitiveness of base salaries, but it also exercised subjective judgment in view of the Company's compensation objectives.

44


Table of Contents

        Internal relativity.    Meaning the relative pay differences for different job levels.

        Individual performance.    Except for increases associated with promotions or increased responsibility, increases in base salary for executives from year to year are generally limited to minimal adjustments to reflect individual performance.

        Consideration of the mix of overall compensation.    Consistent with our compensation objectives, as executives progress to higher levels in the organization, a greater proportion of overall compensation is directly linked to company performance and stockholder returns. Mr. Standley's overall compensation, for example, is more heavily weighted toward short- and long-term incentive compensation (82% in the aggregate as shown in the bar chart above) than that of the other Named Executive Officers.

        The Compensation Committee reviewed the Named Executive Officers' base salaries in April of fiscal year 2014 (June for Mr. Standley) and considered the principles described above under "The Compensation Committee's Processes" in establishing Named Executive Officers' base salaries for the fiscal year. The table below shows changes in base salaries for the Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2014, which reflect promotions and changes in role as noted below.

Executive
  Base Salary at
End of FY 2014
  Increase from
Prior Fiscal Year
  Rationale

John T. Standley

  $ 1,050,000     5 % Merit increase

Kenneth A. Martindale

  $ 900,000     13 % Merit increase and promotion to President in June 2013

Frank G. Vitrano

  $ 819,545     3 % Merit increase

Robert K. Thompson

  $ 477,405     3 % Merit increase

Marc A. Strassler

  $ 456,968     3.5 % Merit increase

Cash Incentive Bonuses

        The Company established an annual incentive plan in order to incentivize the Named Executive Officers to meet the Company's Adjusted EBITDA target for fiscal year 2014. The Compensation Committee establishes a target percentage of salary for each participant at the beginning of the fiscal year and approves the financial goals required for the Company to pay an award. Payouts for the Named Executive Officers are then determined by the Company's financial results for the year relative to the predetermined performance measures. As shown in the Summary Compensation Table under "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation," incentives were paid to Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2014 performance.

        Bonus targets.    Targets for each Named Executive Officer were determined based on job responsibilities, internal relativity, and peer group and survey data. The Compensation Committee's objective was to set bonus targets such that total annual cash compensation (including base salary and annual incentive assuming a target payout) was generally aligned with the market with a substantial portion of that compensation linked to corporate performance. Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, individuals with greater job responsibilities had a greater proportion of their total cash compensation tied to company performance through the incentive plan. Thus, the

45


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee established the following targets for fiscal year 2014 (expressed as a percentage of base salary):


Annual Incentive Opportunity

Executive
  Threshold Payout
(as a % of Salary)
  Target Payout
(as a % of Salary)
  Maximum Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 

John T. Standley

    50 %   200 %   400 %

Kenneth A. Martindale

    38 %   150 %   300 %

Frank G. Vitrano

    31 %   125 %   250 %

Robert K. Thompson

    19 %   75 %   150 %

Marc A. Strassler

    19 %   75 %   150 %

        Company performance measures.    The Compensation Committee established the following Company performance goals, which applied to all plan participants, in February 2013:


Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan Performance Goals

Performance Level
  Adjusted EBITDA Goal (millions)  

Maximum

  $ 1,238  

Target

  $ 1,125  

Threshold

  $ 1,069  

        The Compensation Committee believes that using Adjusted EBITDA as the primary measure for the annual incentive plan appropriately encourages officers, including the Named Executive Officers, to focus on improving operating results which ultimately drive stockholder value. EBITDA growth has historically shown a strong positive correlation with three-year and five-year total stockholder return for Rite Aid and its peer group. The majority of Rite Aid's peer companies use an EBITDA measure in their annual incentive plans. Based on Rite Aid's current financial situation and capital structure, the Committee believes that Adjusted EBITDA is the best indicator of Rite Aid's operating performance. The measure is tracked regularly, clearly understood by the officers, and the officers can impact the measure by taking actions to improve the operating performance of our stores. In addition, the Company regularly communicates Adjusted EBITDA to the investment community.

        Under the plan formula, payouts can range from 0% to 200% of bonus targets depending on company performance. For fiscal year 2014, the target level of Adjusted EBITDA was $1,125 million which was based on our annual operating plan and in line with guidance provided to the investment community.

        In fiscal year 2014, Rite Aid's actual Adjusted EBITDA was $1,325 million, which was above the maximum performance level of $1,238 million, resulting in bonus payments at the maximum level. As discussed in greater detail in our Annual Report, we define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) excluding the impact of income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, LIFO adjustments, charges or credits for facility closing and impairment, inventory write-downs related to store closings, stock- based compensation expense, debt modifications and retirements, sale of assets and investments, revenue deferrals related to customer loyalty programs and other items. We reference this particular non-GAAP financial measure not only as a basis for incentive compensation but also in our corporate decision-making because it provides supplemental information that facilitates internal comparisons to the historical operating performance of prior periods and external comparisons to competitors' historical operating performance.

46


Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Program

        Long-term incentive target opportunity.    The purpose of the long-term incentive program is to support the long-term perspective necessary for continued success in our business and focus our Named Executive Officers on creating long-term, sustainable stockholder value. Our annual long-term incentive targets for each Named Executive Officer are shown below:


Long-Term Incentive Targets

Executive
  Target
(as a % of Salary)
 

John T. Standley

    350 %

Kenneth A. Martindale

    200 %

Frank G. Vitrano

    220 %

Robert K. Thompson

    110 %

Marc A. Strassler

    110 %

        Because long-term incentive targets have been below the median of our peer companies for the past 7 years, the Committee changed the annual targets of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2014. The Compensation Committee reviewed available peer group data and found that the design of the long-term incentive program is reasonably aligned with general retail industry market practice. Grant values for individual executive officers were determined by individual performance and internal relativity. Consistent with the Company's compensation philosophy, executive officers at higher levels received a greater proportion of total pay in the form of long-term incentives.

        Long-term incentive mix.    In fiscal year 2014 we used the following types of awards:

Vehicle
  Proportion of 2014
Long-Term
Incentive Target
Opportunity
  Purpose

Stock Options

    40 % Provides a vehicle measured by stock price that rewards increases in shareholder value.

Performance Awards

    35 % Links compensation to multi-year operating results on key measures tied to shareholder value creation.

Restricted Stock

    25 % Supports retention and provides a vehicle with more stability and less risk. Aligns executive and shareholder interests and focuses executives on value creation.

        In determining the overall mix of long-term incentive vehicles, the following factors were considered:

47


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee's process for setting grant dates is discussed below. Then, on the approval date those values are converted to the equivalent number of shares based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of approval for restricted shares and using the Black-Scholes valuation method for stock options. Performance awards are denominated in cash (1 unit = $1).

        Grant timing.    The Compensation Committee has a policy that annual long-term incentive awards (other than special or new hire grants) will be approved by the Committee once a year at its annual meeting held in connection with the annual stockholders meeting with a grant date of the second business day after release of the Company's first quarter earnings. Grants are made to the Named Executive Officers at the same time as awards are made to all other associates as part of the annual grant process.

        Special awards.    From time to time, the Company may make grants in addition to the annual equity grant including those to Named Executive Officers. Typically these grants include awards to new hires, promotional awards, or retention awards.

Performance Awards

        Performance awards provide the Named Executive Officers with units, which are denominated in a target cash value and payable in cash if the designated Company performance goals are achieved over the prescribed performance period. Payouts can range from 0% to 200% of target. Performance awards are intended to align interests of executives with those of stockholders through the use of measures the Company believes drive its long-term success. Performance awards are normally granted annually and are structured as a targeted number of units based on the Company's achievement of specific performance levels with payout occurring after a three-year period.

        Prior to fiscal year 2013, performance awards were based solely on the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA goals. As noted above under "Cash Incentive Bonuses," Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure used to both assess and communicate Rite Aid's performance.

        We considered several alternative measures for the fiscal year 2013 performance award grant in response to investor concerns about using Adjusted EBITDA as the sole measure in both our annual incentive and long-term incentive programs. While we believe Adjusted EBITDA continues to be the best measure of Company performance, we decided to base a portion of the 2013-2015 Plan on leverage ratio (net debt / Adjusted EBITDA), which is a key performance metric that measures how efficiently we use our available capital and focuses management on the need to improve the financial condition of the Company over time. We determined that the optimum mix of the performance goals for the 2013-2015 Plan was 80% Adjusted EBITDA and 20% leverage ratio. We believe that the weighting appropriately balances the goals of maximizing profitability and improving of financial condition through the reduction of debt leverage.

        For the fiscal year 2014 performance award grant, the Compensation Committee again determined to base 80% of the award on the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA goals and the remaining 20% on leverage ratio goals, in each case to be measured over the 2014-2016 measuring period. In addition, the Compensation Committee also added a provision subjecting the award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 2000 Index over the three year measuring period, which the Compensation Committee believes would further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and add an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company.

48


Table of Contents

        2012-2014 Plan.    Based on concerns related to the predictability of performance targets and executive retention, the plan design was modified in June 2011. Awards granted under the 2012-2014 cycle were earned based on Rite Aid's achievement of a 2012 Adjusted EBITDA goal. These awards are subject to forfeiture if the executive leaves the Company prior to June 27, 2014, except by reason of a change in control or by consent of the Compensation Committee. Based on Rite Aid's actual performance of Adjusted EBITDA of $942.9 million for fiscal year 2012, executives who remain with the Company through June 2014 will receive an award of 167.9% of the target award. The 2012 Adjusted EBITDA targets are shown below:

Performance Level
  2012 Performance
Award Goal
 
 
  ($ millions)
 

Maximum

  $ 983  

Target

  $ 855  

Threshold

  $ 813  

        2013-2015 Plan.    After additional conversations with certain of our institutional shareholders, we decided to make two changes to the 2013-2015 Plan in order to improve alignment between pay and long-term performance. First, the Plan was changed to measure performance based on cumulative performance over the three years. Second, 80% of the payout is based on Adjusted EBITDA performance and 20% on leverage ratio. Adjusted EBITDA is compared to the sum of annual targets over the three years in the performance period. The leverage ratio is compared to the weighted average target over the three years in the performance period. For both fiscal years 2013 and 2014, performance exceeded target levels for both measures. Adjusted EBITDA was $1,128 million compared to a target of $967 million for 2013 and $1,325 million compared to a target of $1,125 million for 2014. Actual leverage ratio was 5.23 compared to a target of 6.28 for 2013 and 4.23 compared to a target of 5.13 for 2014 (note that lower leverage ratios represent better performance).

        2014-2016 Plan.    As was the case with the 2013-2015 Plan, the 2014-2016 Plan is again based 80% on the Adjusted EBITDA goals and 20% on leverage ratio goals to be determined over the three year performance period, as the Compensation Committee again determined that these goals appropriately balanced maximizing profitability and improving our financial condition through the reduction of debt leverage. In addition, in order to further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and add an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company, the Compensation Committee also determined to subject the award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 2000 Index over the three year measuring period. For fiscal year 2014, performance exceeded target levels for both measures. Adjusted EBITDA was $1,325 million compared to a target of $1,125 million. Actual leverage ratio was 4.23 compared to a target of 5.13 (note that lower leverage ratios represent better performance). Additionally, our stockholder return is performing in the top one-third of the Russell 2000 Index, which if sustained over the performance period would result in a positive modification of the awards.

Stock Options

        Stock options are intended to reward executives for value creation and they only have value if our stock price increases over time, which aligns the interests of our executives with our stockholders. The Company's ten-year options, granted at the market price on the date of grant, help focus executives on long-term growth. In addition, because options vest ratably over a four-year period, they are intended to help retain executives and keep them focused on long-term performance.

49


Table of Contents

Restricted Stock

        Restricted stock grants are intended to support retention of executives and focus them on long-term performance because they generally vest over a multi-year period (three years or longer) and are tied to the value of our stock. The risk profile of restricted stock is aligned with stockholders as it can motivate executives to both increase and preserve stock price.

Post-Retirement Benefits

        Supplemental Executive Retirement Program.    Each of the Named Executive Officers receive benefits under a defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan ("SERP"). Under the SERP, Rite Aid credits each participant with a specific sum to an individual account established for the participant, on a monthly basis while the participant is employed. The amount credited is equal to 2% of the executive officer's annual base compensation. The participants are able to select among a choice of earnings indexes, and their accounts are credited with earnings that mirror the investment results of such indexes. Participants vest in their accounts at the rate of 20% per year for each calendar year of participation in the SERP at a five-year rolling rate with the entire account balance for each participant vesting upon termination without cause during the twelve month period following a "change in control" of the Company, as defined in the SERP.

        Subject to certain tax rules or deferral elections made by the executive, which may require a delay in payment, participants will receive their vested account balance upon the earliest to occur of: (i) their retirement at age 60 or greater, with at least five years of participation in the SERP; (ii) termination of employment with the Company (including due to death or disability); and (iii) a hardship withdrawal pursuant to the terms of the SERP.

Other Post-Employment and Change in Control Benefits

        To attract and retain highly skilled executives and to provide for certainty of rights and obligations, Rite Aid has historically provided employment agreements to its executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers. The terms of the employment agreements are described in more detail under the caption "Executive Employment Agreements." Additional information regarding the severance and change in control benefits provided under the employment agreements is described under the section "Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."

Deductibility Cap on Executive Compensation

        The Compensation Committee is aware that Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, treats certain elements of executive compensation in excess of $1,000,000 a year payable to our Chief Executive Officer and three other most highly compensated executives (other than our Chief Financial Officer) as an expense not deductible by the Company for federal income tax purposes. Payments to these individuals in excess of the $1,000,000 limit will be deductible if they meet the definition of "performance-based compensation" as defined in Section 162(m).

        While the Compensation Committee plans to continue taking actions intended to limit the impact of Section 162(m), it also believes that the tax deduction is only one of several relevant considerations in setting compensation. Therefore, in order to maintain the flexibility to provide compensation programs for our Named Executive Officers that will best incentivize them to achieve our key business objectives and create sustainable long-term shareholder value, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to pay compensation that may not be deductible to the Company if it determines that doing so would be in the best interests of the Company. Based on the Company's current tax situation, compliance with Section 162(m) is not a significant concern.

50


Table of Contents

Policy Regarding Recoupment of Certain Compensation

        The Company has adopted a formal compensation recovery or "clawback" policy for its executive officers, including all Named Executive Officers. Pursuant to this policy, the Board of Directors of the Company may seek to recoup certain incentive compensation, including cash bonuses and equity incentive awards paid based upon the achievement of financial performance metrics, from executives in the event that the Company is required to restate its financial statements.

Prohibition on Hedging and Similar Transactions

        Our executive officers and directors, including the Named Executive Officers, are subject to an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits them from engaging in put or call options, short selling or similar hedging activities involving our stock. We prohibit these transactions because they may reduce the individual's incentive to improve our performance, focus the individual on short-term performance at the expense of long-term objectives and misalign the individual's interests with those of our stockholders generally.

Director and Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

        In September 2008, we adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines in order to further the investment of our non-management directors, executive officers, and Senior Vice Presidents in the success of the Company and to encourage a long-term perspective in managing the Company. The stock ownership requirements are:

Position
  Minimum Ownership
Requirements
(Number of Share
Equivalents)
 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    2,500,000  

President and Chief Operating Officer

    1,000,000  

Senior Executive Vice Presidents

    1,000,000  

Executive Vice Presidents

    500,000  

Senior Vice Presidents

    200,000  

Non-Management Directors

    100,000  

        Newly appointed or promoted executives who are or become subject to our Stock Ownership Guidelines and newly elected non-management directors have five years from the time they are appointed, promoted or elected, as the case may be, to meet the stock ownership requirements. Currently, all of those persons subject to the guidelines, including all Named Executive Officers and senior vice presidents, have achieved the minimum holding ownership requirement or have not yet served for five years.

        For the purposes of determining stock ownership levels, the following forms of equity interests in the Company are included:

        Restricted stock and restricted stock units, whether or not vested and shares owned count as one (1) share equivalent per share beneficially owned and stock options whether or not vested count as one-half (.5) share equivalent per stock option.

51


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee is responsible for interpreting and administering the Stock Ownership Guidelines, and may, from time to time, reevaluate and revise the Stock Ownership Guidelines, including when there are changes to the Company's capital structure or where implementation of the Stock Ownership Guidelines would cause a non-management director, executive officer or Senior Vice President to incur a hardship due to his or her unique financial circumstances.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Marcy Syms, Chair
Bruce G. Bodaken
Michael N. Regan

52


Table of Contents


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

        The following summary compensation table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014, March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively, paid to or earned by (i) our principal executive officer, (ii) our principal financial officer and (iii) the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who were serving as of the end of the 2014 fiscal year (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"). Fiscal Year 2012 "Salary" and "Total" reflect the 53 weeks in the fiscal year.

Name and Principal Position
  Fiscal
Year
  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  Change In
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total
($)
 

John T. Standley

    2014     1,035,000         810,060     1,788,333     4,200,000     240,511     273,325     8,347,229  

(CEO)

    2013     1,000,000         564,168     1,255,163     4,654,700     100,026     265,225     7,839,282  

    2012     1,019,231         2,066,728     3,087,370     4,485,559     38,186     280,483     10,977,556  

Kenneth A. Martindale

   
2014
   
878,250
   
   
396,888
   
875,926
   
2,587,500
   
102,797
   
308,158
   
5,149,519
 

(President & COO)

    2013     795,675         303,490     549,276     2,259,299     43,292     284,990     4,236,021  

    2012     787,356         774,318     1,161,744     2,107,339     18,582     293,049     5,142,387  

Frank G. Vitrano

   
2014
   
819,545
   
   
397,440
   
877,454
   
2,048,862
   
267,137
   
303,256
   
4,713,694
 

(Senior Executive VP,

    2013     795,675         303,490     549,276     2,259,299     86,143     312,235     4,306,118  

CAO & CFO)

    2012     787,356         774,318     1,161,744     2,113,219     3,405     311,508     5,151,550  

Robert K. Thompson

   
2014
   
477,405
   
   
115,644
   
255,558
   
716,107
   
118,397
   
133,626
   
1,816,737
 

(Executive VP, Store

                                                       

Operations)(1)

                                                       

Marc A. Strassler

   
2014
   
456,968
   
   
110,676
   
244,671
   
685,452
   
   
220,883
   
1,718,649
 

(Executive VP, General

    2013     441,515         105,864     235,508     646,168     27,653     213,452     1,670,160  

Counsel)

    2012     439,029         660,858     210,658     656,464     29,595     219,450     2,216,055  

(1)
Mr. Thompson, who has served the Company in his position since fiscal year 2012, first became a Named Executive Officer in fiscal year 2014.

(2)
The amounts reported reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of each award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information regarding the assumptions used in determining the fair value of an award, please refer to Note 13 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 23, 2014, Note 15 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 23, 2013 and Note 13 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 24, 2012, as applicable.

(3)
The amounts reported in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column consist of the annual cash incentive bonus paid to the Named Executive Officer for performance in the applicable fiscal year.

(4)
Represents above-market earnings (over 120% of the "applicable federal rate") under the Company's defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plans.

(5)
The amounts in the "All Other Compensation" column for fiscal year 2014 consist of the following:

Name
  Financial
Planning
($)
  Personal
Use of
Company
Aircraft
($)(A)
  Supplemental
Executive
Retirement
Plan
Allocations
($)
  Housing/
Transportation
Expenses
($)(B)
  Employer
Paid
Taxes
($)(C)
  Automobile
Allowance
($)
  401(k)
Matching
Contributions
($)
 

Mr. Standley

    4,125         247,000             12,000     10,200  

Mr. Martindale

    3,290         206,841     45,643     30,184     12,000     10,200  

Mr. Vitrano

    5,000         195,259     48,528     32,269     12,000     10,200  

Mr. Thompson

            111,426             12,000     10,200  

Mr. Strassler

    1,300         108,745     47,795     40,842     12,000     10,200  

(A)
With respect to personal use of aircraft, the Company determines the incremental cost of an officer's aircraft usage by calculating the variable flight-hour cost associated with the particular aircraft. Variable cost in general includes fuel, landing fees, maintenance costs per flight, per hour and catering.

(B)
Each of Messrs. Martindale, Vitrano and Strassler is reimbursed for certain housing and transportation expenses pursuant to his respective employment agreement. The Company determines the incremental cost of these expenses based on the out-of-pocket amounts paid for rent, utilities and travel.

(C)
Figures in this column represent the Company-paid taxes related to housing and transportation expenses reimbursed by the Company for Messrs. Martindale, Vitrano and Strassler pursuant to their respective employment agreements.

53


Table of Contents


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE FOR FISCAL 2014

        The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made to Named Executive Officers during our fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.

 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
 
 
   
   
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
   
   
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 
 
   
   
  All
Other
Stock
Awards
(#)(2)
  All
Other
Option
Awards
(#)(3)
 
Name
  Committee
Action
Date
  Grant
Date
  Threshold
50% ($)
  Target
100% ($)
  Max
200%($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Max
(#)
 

John T. Standley

              1,050,000     2,100,000     4,200,000                              

    6/21/2013     6/24/2013     643,150     1,286,300     2,572,600                 293,500     936,300     2.76     2,598,393  

Kenneth A. Martindale

         
   
675,000
   
1,350,000
   
2,700,000
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

    6/21/2013     6/24/2013     315,000     630,000     1,260,000                 143,800     458,600     2.76     1,272,814  

Frank G. Vitrano

         
   
512,216
   
1,024,431
   
2,048,863
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

    6/21/2013     6/24/2013     315,500     631,000     1,262,000                 144,000     459,400     2.76     1,274,894  

Robert K. Thompson

         
   
179,027
   
358,054
   
716,107
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

    6/21/2013     6/24/2013     91,900     183,800     367,600                 41,900     133,800     2.76     371,202  

Marc A. Strassler

         
   
171,363
   
342,726
   
685,452
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

    6/21/2013     6/24/2013     87,950     175,900     351,800                 40,100     128,100     2.76     355,347  

(1)
The first amount for each Named Executive Officer relates to an annual cash incentive bonus, as discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the caption "Cash Incentive Bonuses." On June 24, 2013, each Named Executive Officer received a grant of performance-based units that will be earned based upon cumulative performance against targeted levels of Adjusted EBITDA and average leverage ratio modified by the Company's total stockholder return for fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2016. Vesting for the performance units will occur, provided the performance target has been met, on February 27, 2016 (the end of the Company's fiscal year 2016), provided that the Named Executive Officer is continuously employed at the Company through the date of the earnings release for fiscal year 2016. The award payout will be equivalent to $1.00 for each unit earned.

(2)
On June 24, 2013, the Named Executive Officers received a grant of restricted stock, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, under the caption "Components of Executive Compensation for Fiscal Year 2014—Restricted Stock." These restricted shares will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date based on continued employment:

Name
  Restricted
Shares
(#)
 

Mr. Standley

    293,500  

Mr. Martindale

    143,800  

Mr. Vitrano

    144,000  

Mr. Thompson

    41,900  

Mr. Strassler

    40,100  
(3)
On June 24, 2013, the Named Executive Officers received a grant of stock options, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, under the caption "Components of Executive Compensation for Fiscal Year 2014—Stock Options." These stock options will vest one-fourth on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date based on continued employment:

Name
  Stock
Options
(#)
 

Mr. Standley

    936,300  

Mr. Martindale

    458,600  

Mr. Vitrano

    459,400  

Mr. Thompson

    133,800  

Mr. Strassler

    128,100  
(4)
Represents the grant date fair value, measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of stock and option awards made in fiscal year 2014. Grant date fair values are calculated pursuant to assumptions set forth in Note 13 of the Company's 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 23, 2014.

54


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

        Rite Aid has entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers, the material terms of which are described below.

        Term.    The term of each executive's employment commenced on the effective date of his employment agreement, as follows: Mr. Standley, September 24, 2008 (as amended and restated as of January 21, 2010); Mr. Martindale, December 3, 2008; Mr. Vitrano, September 24, 2008; Mr. Thompson, July 11, 2011; and Mr. Strassler, March 9, 2009. Unless earlier terminated, the initial term of each employment agreement will expire on its second anniversary, other than in the case of Mr. Standley, whose agreement will terminate on the date that is three years following June 23, 2010 (each such period, the "Initial Term"). Each agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year terms (each, a "Renewal Term"), unless either the executive or Rite Aid provides the other with notice of non-renewal at least 180 days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or a Renewal Term, as applicable.

        Salary and Incentive Bonus.    The respective agreements provide each executive with a base salary and an incentive compensation target (which may be reviewed periodically for increase by the Compensation Committee). The current base salary and incentive compensation amounts are set forth below:

55


Table of Contents

        Other Benefits.    Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of the Named Executive Officers is also entitled to participate in Rite Aid's welfare benefits, fringe benefit and perquisite programs, and savings plans.

        Restrictive Covenants.    The employment agreement of each Named Executive Officer prohibits the officer from competing with Rite Aid during his or her employment period and for a period of one year, or with respect to Mr. Strassler, two years, thereafter.

        Termination and Change in Control Benefits.    The provisions of the employment agreements relating to termination of employment are described under the caption "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" below.

56


Table of Contents


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2014 YEAR-END

        The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying outstanding equity awards for the Named Executive Officers as of March 1, 2014:

 
  Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
  Date of
Grant
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(1)(2)(4)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)(2)(4)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
# of
Unearned
Shares
or Units
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

John T. Standley

    9/24/2008     1,700,000             0.96     9/24/2018                      

    10/2/2008     168,800             0.89     10/2/2018                      

    6/25/2009     580,600             1.24     6/25/2019                      

    1/21/2010     2,555,000             1.52     1/21/2020                      

    6/23/2010     1,071,450     357,150         1.07     6/23/2020                      

    6/27/2011     701,750     3,063,335         1.24     6/27/2021     1,366,382     9,004,457              

    6/25/2012     344,825     1,034,475         1.32     6/25/2022     284,933     1,877,708              

    6/24/2013         936,300         2.76     6/24/2023     293,500     1,934,165              

Kenneth A. Martindale

   
12/3/2008
   
67,000
   
   
   
0.47
   
12/3/2018
   
   
             

    6/25/2009     387,100             1.24     6/25/2019                      

    6/23/2010     1,491,975     497,325         1.07     6/23/2020                      

    6/27/2011     271,050     1,145,711         1.24     6/27/2021     508,450     3,350,686              

    6/25/2012     150,900     452,700         1.32     6/25/2022     153,277     1,010,095              

    6/24/2013         458,600         2.76     6/24/2023     143,800     947,642              

Frank G. Vitrano

   
6/23/2010
   
1,491,975
   
497,325
   
   
1.07
   
6/23/2020
   
   
             

    6/27/2011     271,050     1,145,711         1.24     6/27/2021     508,450     3,350,686              

    6/25/2012     150,900     452,700         1.32     6/25/2022     153,277     1,010,095              

    6/24/2013         459,400         2.76     6/24/2023     144,000     948,960              

Robert K. Thompson

   
12/18/2007
   
210,811
   
   
   
4.04
   
12/18/2017
   
   
             

    10/2/2008     117,200             0.89     10/2/2018                      

    6/23/2010     143,475     47,825         1.07     6/23/2020                      

    6/27/2011     95,850     95,850         1.24     6/27/2021                      

    7/11/2011         250,000         1.28     7/11/2021     20,500     135,095              

    6/25/2012     67,925     203,775         1.32     6/25/2022     56,133     369,916              

    6/24/2013         133,800         2.76     6/24/2023     41,900     276,121              

Marc A. Strassler

   
6/25/2009
   
224,800
   
   
   
1.24
   
6/25/2019
   
   
             

    6/23/2010     190,425     63,475         1.07     6/23/2020                      

    6/27/2011     128,450     128,450         1.24     6/27/2021     477,950     3,149,691              

    6/25/2012     64,700     194,100         1.32     6/25/2022     53,466     352,341              

    6/24/2013         128,100         2.76     6/24/2023     40,100     264,259              

(1)
Refer to "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control," below for circumstances under which the terms of the vesting of equity awards would be accelerated.

(2)
Except with respect to a portion of the stock options granted on June 27, 2011, these stock options will generally vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, based on continued employment. With respect to the restricted stock awards listed above, other than the restricted shares granted on June 27, 2011, listed below in footnote (4), one-third of the restricted shares will vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, based on continued employment.

(3)
Determined with reference to $6.59, the closing price of a share of Rite Aid common stock on the last trading day before March 1, 2014.

(4)
A portion of the June 27, 2011 grants to the Named Executive Officers of both stock options and restricted stock awards, in the amounts listed below, will vest one-half on the third anniversary and one-half on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, based on continued employment.

Name
  Stock
Options(#)
  Restricted
Stock Awards(#)
 

Mr. Standley

    2,361,585     1,216,216  

Mr. Martindale

    874,661     450,450  

Mr. Vitrano

    874,661     450,450  

Mr. Strassler

        450,450  

57


Table of Contents


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR FISCAL 2014

        The following table summarizes for each Named Executive Officer the stock option exercises and shares vested during fiscal year 2014:

 
  Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
  Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
  Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

John T. Standley

    1,800,000     10,772,820     448,400     1,269,294  

Kenneth A. Martindale

    1,000,000     5,984,901     198,906     562,719  

Frank G. Vitrano

    1,982,900     9,904,788     198,906     562,719  

Robert K. Thompson

    500,000     2,072,575     69,433     196,355  

Marc A. Strassler

    750,000     2,929,485     81,934     231,895  


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2014

        The following table sets forth the non-qualified deferred compensation activity for each Named Executive Officer during fiscal year 2014:

Name
  Executive
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
  Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY ($)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions ($)
  Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE ($)
 

John T. Standley(1)

        247,000     271,347         1,790,148  

Kenneth A. Martindale(1)

        206,841     124,230         1,197,461  

Frank G. Vitrano(1)

        195,259     292,639         1,544,200  

Robert K. Thompson(1)

        111,426     132,588         830,430  

Marc A. Strassler(1)

        108,745     4,933         600,044  

(1)
Amounts shown relate to a defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan covering the Named Executive Officers. Please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the caption "Post-Retirement Benefits" for a description of the material terms of this plan.


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

        As discussed above under the caption "Executive Employment Agreements," the Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers. Upon written notice, the employment agreement of each of the Named Executive Officers is terminable by either Rite Aid or the individual officer seeking termination.

        Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, if Mr. Standley is terminated by the Company without "cause," if he terminates his employment for "good reason" (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement) or if the Company provides a notice of nonrenewal at least 180 days prior to the expiration of his employment agreement, a "Company Nonrenewal," and such Company Nonrenewal occurs within six months of a change in control, then he will be entitled to receive:

58


Table of Contents

        If Rite Aid terminates Mr. Standley for "cause," or he terminates his employment without "good reason":

        If Mr. Standley's employment is terminated as a result of his death or "disability" (as such term is defined in his employment agreement), he (or his estate, as the case may be) will be entitled to receive all accrued but unpaid salary and benefits payable under death or disability benefit plans in which he participates, a pro-rata bonus (paid at the same time it is paid to other eligible participants in the bonus plan and based on actual achievement of performance targets for the fiscal year), continued health insurance (or reimbursement for the cost of such benefits) for two years for Mr. Standley and/or his immediate family, as applicable, vesting of all stock options and vesting of an amount of restricted stock that would have vested had he remained employed for three years following the date of termination.

        Pursuant to their employment agreements with the Company, if any of Messrs. Martindale, Vitrano, Thompson, and Strassler is terminated by Rite Aid without "cause" or if such officer's employment is terminated by the officer for "good reason" (as such terms are defined in the applicable employment agreement), then the officer will be entitled to receive:

        If Rite Aid terminates any of the Named Executive Officers for "cause," or if any of the Named Executive Officers terminates his employment without "good reason" (with the exception of Mr. Standley, whose termination provisions are described above):

59


Table of Contents

        If the employment of any of the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Standley whose benefits upon such termination are described above) is terminated as a result of death or "disability" (as such term is defined in each employment agreement), the officer will be entitled to receive all accrued but unpaid salary and benefits payable under death or disability benefit plans in which the officer participates, continued health insurance (or reimbursement for the cost of such benefits) for two years for the officer and/or his immediate family, as applicable (other than Messrs. Thompson and Strassler who will receive continued coverage for one year), vesting of all stock options and vesting of an amount of restricted stock that would have vested had the officer remained employed for two years following the date of termination. Messrs. Martindale and Vitrano will also be entitled to receive a pro-rata bonus, based on actual achievement of performance targets for the fiscal year, that is paid at the same time that it is paid to other eligible participants in the bonus plan.

        Upon the termination of employment of any of the Named Executive Officers, the officer would generally become entitled to receive a distribution of his vested account balance under the nonqualified deferred compensation plans maintained by the Company. Pursuant to applicable tax regulations, any such distributions will generally be delayed for a period of six months following the Named Executive Officer's separation from service. The account balance of each Named Executive Officer is shown in the "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2014" table above.

        Under Employment Agreements.    Under Mr. Standley's employment agreement, upon a change in control, all of his stock options awarded pursuant to his employment agreement and all stock options awarded pursuant to the Company's executive equity program then held by him shall immediately vest and be exercisable. Severance benefits would not be triggered pursuant to a change in control unless it is followed by Mr. Standley's termination of employment under the circumstances described above. Similarly, severance benefits would not be triggered pursuant to a change in control unless it is followed by either Mr. Martindale's, Mr. Vitrano's, Mr. Thompson's or Mr. Strassler's termination of employment, respectively, under the circumstances described above.

        For purposes of the employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers, where applicable, the term "change in control" generally means an acquisition of 35% (50% in the case of Mr. Thompson) or more of the Company's combined voting power; the incumbent directors (generally including current directors and future directors whose election or nomination is approved by the Board) ceasing to constitute a majority of the Board; the consummation of a merger or similar transaction, other than (i) such a transaction in which the voting securities outstanding immediately prior to such transaction continue to represent at least 60% (50% in the case of Mr. Thompson) of the voting power of the Company immediately after the transaction or (ii) a recapitalization or similar transaction in which no person becomes the beneficial owner of 35% or more of the Company's combined voting power; or the stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

        Each of Messrs. Standley, Martindale, Vitrano and Strassler's employment agreement provides that the Named Executive Officer will receive an additional payment to reimburse the officer for any excise taxes imposed pursuant to Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, together with reimbursement for any additional taxes incurred by reason of such payments.

        Under Rite Aid's Equity Program.    Pursuant to the terms of the Company's equity program, unless otherwise provided in a Named Executive Officer's employment agreement or individual award agreement, if outstanding equity awards are assumed or substituted in connection with a change in control, the change in control will not cause the vesting of such awards to accelerate unless the change in control is followed by a qualifying termination of employment within the 24-month period following the change in control. All outstanding equity awards granted pursuant to the Company's equity

60


Table of Contents

program that are not assumed or substituted in connection with a change in control will become fully vested and exercisable, free of applicable restrictions, and all performance criteria will be deemed to have been achieved at target levels, upon the occurrence of the change in control.

        For purposes of Rite Aid's equity program, a "change in control" means, in general: (i) a person or entity acquires securities of Rite Aid representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of Rite Aid; (ii) an unapproved change in the majority membership of the Board; (iii) consummation of a merger or consolidation of Rite Aid or any subsidiary of Rite Aid, other than a merger or consolidation that results in the Rite Aid voting securities continuing to represent at least 60% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent, or a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization or similar transaction involving Rite Aid in which no person or entity acquires at least 35% of the combined voting power of Rite Aid; or (iv) stockholder approval of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of Rite Aid or the consummation of an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of Rite Aid's assets, other than a sale or disposition to an entity, at least 60% of the combined voting power of which is owned by Rite Aid stockholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Rite Aid immediately prior to such sale. For more information regarding the equity program, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the caption "Long-Term Incentive Program."

        Under Rite Aid's Supplemental Retirement Plan.    The unvested account balance of the supplemental executive retirement plan in which the Named Executive Officers participate will vest upon a change in control of the Company as defined in the supplemental executive retirement plan, only if such Named Executive Officer is involuntarily terminated without cause within twelve months of the change in control. For more information regarding the supplemental executive retirement plan, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the caption "Post-Retirement Benefits."

        The termination and change in control payments that would have been made to the Named Executive Officers had their employment been terminated as of March 1, 2014 under the circumstances described in the tables below are quantified in the tables below.

John T. Standley
  Death ($)   Disability ($)   Change in Control ($)   Termination by the
Company Without
Cause or by the
Executive for Good
Reason ($)(a)
 

2 × Base Salary

    N/A     N/A     N/A     2,100,000  

2 × Bonus

    N/A     N/A     N/A     4,200,000  

Pro-Rated Bonus for Past Fiscal Year

    4,200,000     4,200,000     N/A     4,200,000  

Benefits 2 Years

    26,618     26,618     N/A     26,618  

SERP Vesting

    678,011     678,011     678,011     678,011  

Vesting of Options and Restricted Stock(1)

    39,569,634     39,569,634     40,214,353 (2)   40,214,353  

280G Gross Up

    N/A     N/A     N/A     5,023,000 (b)

(a)
As discussed above, in the event of a Company Nonrenewal, Mr. Standley's termination payments are as follows: (i) severance is equal to 1x base salary and bonus, plus a pro-rated bonus; (ii) health benefits will continue for one year; (iii) the unvested account balance in his SERP will vest; and (iv) options will vest and become exercisable and the restrictions with respect to awards of restricted stock will lapse to the extent such options would have become vested and exercisable or such restrictions would have lapsed had Mr. Standley remained employed for one year. If a Company Nonrenewal occurs within six months of a change in control, the severance formula is the same as termination by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Standley for Good Reason, as reflected in the table.

61


Table of Contents

(b)
This payment is shown under the assumption that the termination occurred on or after a change in control.

Kenneth A. Martindale
  Death ($)   Disability ($)   Change in
Control ($)
  Termination by the
Company Without
Cause or by the
Executive for Good
Reason ($)
 

2 × Base Salary

    N/A     N/A     N/A     1,800,000  

2 × Bonus

    N/A     N/A     N/A     2,700,000  

Pro-Rated Bonus for Past Fiscal Year

    2,587,500     2,587,500     N/A     2,587,500  

Benefits 2 Years

    10,501     10,501     N/A     10,501  

SERP Vesting

    503,282     503,282     503,282     503,282  

Vesting of Options and Restricted Stock(1)

    18,009,493     18,009,493     18,325,371 (2)   18,325,371  

280G Gross Up

    N/A     N/A     N/A     3,063,000 (a)

(a)
This payment is shown under the assumption that the termination occurred on or after a change in control.

Frank G. Vitrano
  Death ($)   Disability ($)   Change in
Control ($)
  Termination by the
Company Without
Cause or by the
Executive for Good
Reason ($)
 

2 × Base Salary

    N/A     N/A     N/A     1,639,090  

2 × Bonus

    N/A     N/A     N/A     2,048,862  

Pro-Rated Bonus for Past Fiscal Year

    2,048,862     2,048,862     N/A     2,048,862  

Benefits 2 Years

    26,357     26,357     N/A     26,357  

SERP Vesting

    554,788     554,788     554,788     554,788  

Vesting of Options and Restricted Stock(1)

    18,013,440     18,013,440     18,329,760 (2)   18,329,760  

280G Gross Up

    N/A     N/A     N/A      

 

Robert K. Thompson
  Death ($)   Disability ($)   Change in
Control ($)
  Termination by the
Company Without
Cause or by the
Executive for Good
Reason ($)
 

2 × Base Salary

    N/A     N/A     N/A     954,810  

2 × Bonus

    N/A     N/A     N/A     N/A  

Pro-Rated Bonus for Past Fiscal Year

    N/A     N/A     N/A     N/A  

Benefits 2 Years

    24,700     24,700     N/A     24,700  

SERP Vesting

    293,031     293,031     293,031     293,031  

Vesting of Options and Restricted Stock(1)

    3,765,551     3,765,551     4,471,779 (2)   4,471,779  

280G Gross Up

    N/A     N/A     N/A      

62


Table of Contents


Marc A. Strassler
  Death ($)   Disability ($)   Change in
Control ($)
  Termination by the
Company Without
Cause or by the
Executive for Good
Reason ($)
 

2 × Base Salary

    N/A     N/A     N/A     913,936  

2 × Bonus

    N/A     N/A     N/A     N/A  

Pro-Rated Bonus for Past Fiscal Year

    685,452     685,452     N/A     685,452  

Benefits 2 Years

    2,138     2,138     N/A     2,138  

SERP Vesting

    255,449     255,449     255,449     255,449  

Vesting of Options and Restricted Stock(1)

    6,229,328     6,229,328     6,317,410 (2)   6,317,410  

280G Gross-up

    N/A     N/A     N/A      

(1)
The value of stock options shown is based on the excess of $6.59, the closing price of a share of Rite Aid common stock on the last trading day before March 1, 2014, over the exercise price of such options, multiplied by the number of unvested stock options held by the officer that would become vested under the applicable circumstances. The value of restricted stock shown is determined by multiplying $6.59, the closing price of a share of Rite Aid common stock on the last trading day before March 1, 2014 and the number of shares of restricted stock held by the officer that would become vested under the applicable circumstances.

(2)
The value is shown under the assumption that outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards are not assumed or substituted in the change in control transaction, resulting in full vesting upon the change in control, as described above in the "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Change in Control Arrangements" narrative.

63


Table of Contents


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter of the Audit Committee which further describes the role of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, among other things, appoints and engages our independent registered public accounting firm and oversees our financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting processes on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for our financial statements, our accounting principles and our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our independent registered public accounting firm also is responsible for expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

        In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee met eight times during fiscal year 2014.

        During those meetings and in subsequent meetings, the Audit Committee:

64


Table of Contents

        In addition to pre-approving the audit and other audit-related and tax services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee requests fee estimates associated with each proposed service. Providing a fee estimate for a service incorporates appropriate oversight and control of the independent registered public accounting firm relationship. On a quarterly basis, the Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-date against pre-approved services and fee estimates.

        As outlined in the table below, we incurred the following fees, including expenses billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013 by our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates.

 
  Year Ended  
Description of Fees
  Mar. 1, 2014   Mar. 2, 2013  
 
  (Amounts in millions)
 

Audit Fees, including audit of annual financial statements and reviews of interim financial statements, registration statement filings and comfort letters related to various refinancing activities

  $ 2.4   $ 2.1  

Audit-Related Fees, acquisition due diligence fees and audits of employee benefit plans' financial statements

  $ 0.4   $ 0.2  

Tax Fees, tax compliance advice and planning

  $ 0.1   $ 0.4  

Total

  $ 2.9   $ 2.7  

        Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 for filing with the SEC.

David R. Jessick, Chair
Kevin E. Lofton
Michael N. Regan

65


Table of Contents


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table provides information as of March 1, 2014, with respect to the compensation plans under which our common stock may be issued:

Plan Category
  Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Further Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
 
 
  (a)
  (b)
  (c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

    51,912,034   $ 1.60     11,359,857 (3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders(1)

    3,990,665   $ 2.40      

Total(2)

    55,902,699   $ 1.68     11,359,857 (3)

(1)
These plans include the Company's 1999 Plan, under which 10,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for the grant of stock options at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and the 2001 Plan, under which 20,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for the grant of stock options, also at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Both plans provide for the Compensation Committee to determine both when and in what manner options may be exercised; however, option terms may not extend for more than 10 years from the applicable date of grant. The plans provide that stock options may only be granted with exercise prices that are not less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. No securities remain available for future issuance under either the 1999 Plan or the 2001 Plan.

(2)
On a fully diluted basis, which reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, the number of shares outstanding was 996,130,636.

(3)
Of the 11,359,857 shares remaining, there are 5,051,603 shares available for the grant of awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights.

66


Table of Contents


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Rite Aid's executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of Rite Aid common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish Rite Aid with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to Rite Aid, we have determined that during fiscal year 2014, no persons subject to Section 16(a) reporting submitted late filings.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth, as of April 28, 2014 (except as otherwise noted), certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of (a) each director and nominee for director, (b) each of our "Named Executive Officers" (as such term is defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act), (c) each holder known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock and (d) all directors and executive officers as a group (based on 975,433,737 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 28, 2014). Each of the persons named below has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite his or her name, except as otherwise noted.

Beneficial Owners
  Number of
Common Shares
Beneficially Owned(1)
  Percentage of
Class
 

Named Executive Officers, Directors and Nominee for Director:

             

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

    495,266 (2)   *  

Bruce G. Bodaken

    25,000 (3)   *  

David R. Jessick

    255,266 (4)   *  

Kevin E. Lofton

    8,839 (5)   *  

Ken Martindale

    4,881,008 (6)   *  

Myrtle S. Potter

    7,163 (7)   *  

Michael Regan

    395,266 (8)   *  

John T. Standley

    12,565,101 (9)   1.29 %

Marc Strassler

    1,307,369 (10)   *  

Marcy Syms

    495,266 (11)   *  

Robert K Thompson

    990,297 (12)   *  

Frank Vitrano

    2,519,315 (13)   *  

All Executive Officers and Directors (16 persons)

    27,799,159     2.85 %

5% Stockholders:

             

The Vanguard Group

    56,073,666 (14)   6.1 %

100 Vanguard Blvd

             

Malvern, PA 19355

             

BlackRock, Inc. 

    55,978,009 (15)   5.8 %

40 East 52nd Street

             

New York, NY 10022

             

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 

    48,016,350 (16)   5.2 %

100 E. Pratt Street

             

Baltimore, MD 21202

             

*
Percentage less than 1% of class.

(1)
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, thereby including options exercisable as of June 27, 2014.

67


Table of Contents

(2)
This amount includes 200,000 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options and 255,266 restricted stock units that have vested or will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Mr. Anderson leaves the Board.

(3)
This amount represents 25,000 restricted stock units that will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Mr. Bodaken leaves the Board.

(4)
This amount includes 255,266 restricted stock units that have vested or will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Mr. Jessick leaves the Board.

(5)
This amount represents 8,839 restricted stock units that will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Mr. Lofton leaves the Board.

(6)
This amount includes 3,703,756 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options.

(7)
This amount represents 7,163 restricted stock units that will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Ms. Potter leaves the Board.

(8)
This amount includes 100,000 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options and 255,266 restricted stock units that have vested or will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Mr. Regan leaves the Board.

(9)
This amount includes 9,590,143 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options.

(10)
This amount includes 608,000 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options.

(11)
This amount includes 200,000 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options and 255,266 restricted stock units that have vested or will vest before June 27, 2014 at which time said units will be payable in shares of common stock when Ms. Syms leaves the Board.

(12)
This amount includes 832,386 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options.

(13)
This amount includes 1,335,931 shares which may be acquired within 60 days by exercising stock options.

(14)
This information is as of December 31, 2013 and based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 12, 2014.

(15)
This information is as of December 31, 2013 and based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 11, 2014.

(16)
This information is as of December 31, 2013 and based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. with the SEC on February 13, 2014.

68


Table of Contents


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

        We have adopted a written policy concerning the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for review, approval or ratification of "related person transactions" between the Company or its subsidiaries and related persons. Under SEC rules, a related person is, or any time since the beginning of the last fiscal year was, a director, executive officer, nominee for director, an immediate family member (as defined under applicable SEC rules) of such persons, or a 5% stockholder of the Company. A related person transaction is any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company or a subsidiary is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

        Directors, executive officers and nominees must complete an annual questionnaire and disclose all potential related person transactions involving themselves and their immediate family members that are known to them. Throughout the year, directors and executive officers must notify the Corporate Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer of any potential related person transactions as soon as they become aware of any such transaction. The Corporate Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer inform the Nominating and Governance Committee of any related person transaction of which they are aware. The Corporate Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer are responsible for conducting a preliminary analysis and review of potential related person transactions and presentation to the Nominating and Governance Committee for review including provision of additional information to enable proper consideration by the Committee. As necessary, the Nominating and Governance Committee shall review approved related person transactions on a periodic basis throughout the duration of the transaction to ensure that the transactions remain in the best interests of the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee may, in its discretion, engage outside counsel to review certain related person transactions. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee may request that the full Board of Directors consider the approval or ratification of related person transactions if the Committee deems it advisable. A copy of our full policy concerning transactions with related persons is available on the Governance section of our website at www.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Related Person Transactions."

Agreements with Jean Coutu Group

        In connection with Rite Aid's acquisition of the Brooks and Eckerd drugstore chains, Rite Aid and The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc., or Jean Coutu Group, became parties to a stockholder agreement and registration rights agreement, which agreements expired following the disposition in July 2013 of all of the shares of Rite Aid common stock held by the Jean Coutu Group.

Stockholder Agreement

        The stockholder agreement contained provisions relating to board and board committee composition, corporate governance, stock ownership, stock purchase rights, transfer restrictions, voting arrangements and other matters.

        Board and Board Committee Representation.    Under the stockholder agreement, Jean Coutu Group initially had the right to designate four of the 14 members of Rite Aid's Board of Directors. Thereafter, Jean Coutu Group had the right to designate a certain number of director nominees for election to our Board, subject to Jean Coutu Group's maintenance of specified percentage thresholds of Rite Aid total voting power and the total number of members on Rite Aid's Board of Directors. As of April 13, 2012, Jean Coutu Group's ownership of shares of our common stock entitled it to designate two directors. In April 2013, Jean Coutu Group sold 72,500,000 shares of our common stock,

69


Table of Contents

reducing its ownership percentage to approximately 11.7% and entitling it to designate only one director. Following the sale of shares, Michel Coutu, one of the two Jean Coutu Group board designees at that time, resigned as a director of Rite Aid effective as of April 17, 2013.

        In June 2013, Jean Coutu Group sold 40,500,000 shares of our common stock, reducing its ownership percentage to approximately 7.2%. In July 2013, Jean Coutu Group sold 65,401,162 shares of our common stock, reducing its ownership percentage to 0%. Under the stockholder agreement, because Jean Coutu Group's percentage of total voting power fell below 5%, Jean Coutu Group no longer was entitled to have any board designee represented on the Board. Accordingly, following the sale of shares and discussion with Rite Aid, François J. Coutu, the Jean Coutu Group board designee at that time, resigned as a director of Rite Aid effective as of November 8, 2013.

        Voting Arrangements.    The stockholder agreement provided that Jean Coutu Group would vote its shares for each Rite Aid director nominee it designated and, in its discretion, either for each other Rite Aid director nominee recommended by the Board or for each other Rite Aid director nominee recommended by the Board and for nominees recommended by other persons in the same proportion as votes cast by all other Rite Aid stockholders for those nominees.

        Other Restrictions.    The stockholder agreement provided that for so long as Jean Coutu Group (or any Coutu family stockholder or group of Coutu family stockholders) owned at least 5% of the total voting power of Rite Aid and for nine months thereafter, Jean Coutu Group or such Coutu family stockholders or group of Coutu family stockholders would be subject to (i) restrictions on the acquisition of additional Rite Aid voting securities, other than with Rite Aid's consent or certain stock purchase rights, (ii) restrictions on taking certain actions relating to Rite Aid and (iii) restrictions on transfer, other than transfers in accordance with Rule 144, in a registered public offering, in connection with a pro rata dividend, spinoff or distribution to Jean Coutu Group stockholders and certain other permitted transfers. These restrictions expired in April 2014.

Registration Rights Agreement

        Rite Aid, Jean Coutu Group and certain Coutu family members had entered into a registration rights agreement. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, subject to certain conditions, Jean Coutu Group had the right, on six occasions, to demand that Rite Aid register shares of Rite Aid common stock held by Jean Coutu Group for resale in an underwritten public offering, provided that the anticipated aggregate offering price would exceed $100 million or the registration was for at least 25% of the Rite Aid common stock held by Jean Coutu Group. Jean Coutu Group also had the right to request that Rite Aid include those shares in certain registration statements that Rite Aid may file in the future in connection with underwritten offerings.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        The Compensation Committee currently consists of Marcy Syms (Chair), Bruce G. Bodaken and Michael N. Regan. During fiscal year 2014, Michel Coutu served on the Compensation Committee until April 17, 2013, when he resigned from the Board, James L. Donald served on the Compensation Committee until his term expired in June 2013 and David R. Jessick served on the Compensation Committee from June 19, 2013 until November 29, 2013. Except with respect to Mr. Jessick, who is a former officer of the Company, no member of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2014 was an employee or former employee or officer of the Company.

70


Table of Contents


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR
THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        Any stockholder desiring to present a proposal for inclusion in Rite Aid's proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must deliver the proposal to the Secretary at the address below not later than January 19, 2015. Only those proposals that comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act will be included in Rite Aid's proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting.

        In order for proposals of stockholders made outside of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act to be considered "timely" within the meaning of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, such proposals must be received by the Secretary at the address below by March 21, 2015.

        Stockholders may present proposals that are proper subjects for consideration at an annual meeting, even if the proposal is not submitted by the deadline for inclusion in the proxy statement. To do so, the stockholder must comply with the procedures specified in Rite Aid's By-Laws. The By-Laws, which are available upon request from the Secretary, require all stockholders who intend to make proposals at an annual meeting of stockholders to submit their proposals to the Secretary not fewer than 90 and not more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the previous year's annual meeting of stockholders. The By-Laws also provide that nominations for director may only be made by the Board of Directors (or an authorized Board committee) or by a stockholder of record entitled to vote who sends notice to the Secretary not fewer than 90 nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the previous year's annual meeting of stockholders. Any nomination by a stockholder must comply with the procedures specified in Rite Aid's By-Laws. To be eligible for consideration at the 2015 Annual Meeting, proposals which have not been submitted by the deadline for inclusion in the proxy statement and any nominations for director must be received by the Secretary between February 19, 2015 and March 21, 2015. This advance notice period is intended to allow all stockholders an opportunity to consider all business and nominees expected to be considered at the meeting. All submissions to, or requests from, the Secretary should be made to:

Rite Aid Corporation
30 Hunter Lane
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Attention: Marc A. Strassler, Secretary


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

        In accordance with SEC rules, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate this proxy statement or future filings made by Rite Aid under those statutes, the information included under the caption "Compensation Committee Report" and those portions of the information included under the caption "Audit Committee Report" required by the SEC's rules to be included therein, shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" with the SEC and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any of those prior filings or into any future filings made by Rite Aid under those statutes, except to the extent we specifically incorporate these items by reference.


OTHER MATTERS

        The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that have been submitted for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement. If any other matters come before stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders intend to vote the shares they represent in accordance with their best judgment.

71


Table of Contents


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY
OF STOCKHOLDER DOCUMENTS

        The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy proxy material delivery requirements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is referred to as "householding," potentially provides extra convenience for stockholders and reduces printing and postage costs for companies.

        Rite Aid and some brokers utilize the householding process for proxy materials. In accordance with a notice sent to certain stockholders who share a single address, only one copy of this proxy statement is being sent to that address, unless we received contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until one or more stockholders at your address revokes consent. If you revoke consent, you will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of the revocation. If you hold your Rite Aid stock in "street name," additional information regarding householding of proxy materials should be forwarded to you by your broker.

        However, if you wish to receive a separate copy of this proxy statement, we will promptly deliver one to you upon request. You can notify us by sending a written request to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Marc A. Strassler, Secretary, or by calling the Secretary at (717) 975-5833. In addition, if you would like to receive separate proxy statements and annual reports of Rite Aid in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies of annual reports and proxy statements at an address shared with another stockholder and would like to participate in householding, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or us if you hold registered shares.


ANNUAL REPORT

        A copy of Rite Aid's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014 is being mailed together with this proxy statement to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. A copy of our Annual Report, including the financial statements included therein, is also available without charge by visiting the Company's website or upon written request to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Marc A. Strassler, Secretary.

72


Table of Contents


APPENDIX A

RITE AID CORPORATION
2014 OMNIBUS EQUITY PLAN

1.    Purpose; Establishment.    

        The Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Plan (the "Plan") is intended to promote the interests of the Company and its stockholders by providing officers and other associates of the Company and its affiliates (including directors who are also associates of the Company or its affiliates) with appropriate incentives and rewards to encourage them to enter into and continue in the employ of the Company and its affiliates and to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company; and to reward the performance of individual officers, other associates, non-employee directors and consultants in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range achievements. The Plan is also designed to encourage stock ownership by such persons, thereby aligning their interest with those of the Company's stockholders and to permit the payment of compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, to the extent that any Award would be subject to Section 409A of the Code, no such Award may be granted if it would fail to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 409A of the Code and any regulations or guidance promulgated thereunder. The Plan has been adopted and approved by the Board of Directors (defined below) and shall become effective as of June 19, 2014, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company.

2.    Definitions.    

        As used in the Plan, the following definitions apply to the terms indicated below:

A-1


Table of Contents

A-2


Table of Contents

A-3


Table of Contents

3.    Stock Subject to the Plan.    

A-4


Table of Contents

4.    Administration of the Plan.    

A-5


Table of Contents

5.    Eligibility.    

        The persons who shall be eligible to receive Awards pursuant to the Plan shall be such associates of the Company (including officers of the Company, whether or not they are directors of the Company), consultants to the Company and non-employee directors of the Company, in each case as the Committee (or, in the case of non-employee directors, the Board of Directors) shall select from time to time. The grant of an Award hereunder in any year to any associate, non-employee director or consultant shall not entitle such person to a grant of an Award in any future year.

A-6


Table of Contents

6.    Awards Under the Plan; Agreement.    

        The Committee may grant Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Phantom Units, Stock Bonuses and Other Awards in such amounts and with such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine, subject to the provisions of the Plan. Each Award granted under the Plan (except an unconditional Stock Bonus) shall be evidenced by an Agreement which shall contain such provisions as the Committee may in its sole discretion deem necessary or desirable and which are not in conflict with the terms of the Plan. By accepting an Award, a Participant shall be deemed to agree that the Award shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Agreement.

7.    Options.    

A-7


Table of Contents

A-8


Table of Contents

8.    Stock Appreciation Rights.    

A-9


Table of Contents

9.    Restricted Stock.    

A-10


Table of Contents

A-11


Table of Contents

10.    Phantom Units.    

11.    Stock Bonuses.    

        In the event that the Committee grants a Stock Bonus, a certificate for the shares of Company Stock constituting such Stock Bonus shall be issued in the name of the Participant to whom such grant was made and delivered to such Participant as soon as practicable after the date on which such Stock Bonus is payable, or, as determined by the Committee, the Company shall make a book entry record of such share.

12.    Other Awards, Including Cash-Based and Other Stock-Based Awards.    

        Other forms of Awards ("Other Awards") valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, Company Stock, including but not limited to dividend equivalents or cash incentive awards, may be granted either alone or in addition to other Awards (other than in connection with Options or Stock Appreciation Rights) under the Plan. Any dividend or dividend equivalent awarded under the Plan shall be subject to the same restrictions, conditions and risks of forfeiture as the underlying Award. Cash incentive awards may be denominated in units that have a dollar value established by the Committee as of the date of grant. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which such Other Awards shall be granted, the number of shares of Company Stock to be granted pursuant to such

A-12


Table of Contents

Other Awards, or the manner in which such Other Awards shall be settled (e.g., in shares of Company Stock or cash), or the conditions to the vesting and/or payment or settlement of such Other Awards (which may include, but not be limited to, achievement of performance goals including goals based on one or more Business Criteria) and all other terms and conditions of such Other Awards. If a cash incentive award is not by its terms exempt from Code Section 409A, then the applicable Agreement shall contain terms and conditions intended to avoid adverse tax consequences specified in Code Section 409A.

13.    Special Provisions Regarding Certain Awards.    

        The Committee may make Awards hereunder to Covered Associates (or to individuals whom the Committee believes may become Covered Associates) that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. The exercisability and/or payment of such Awards may be subject to the achievement of performance goals based upon one or more Business Criteria and to certification of such achievement in writing by the Committee. Such performance goals shall be established in writing by the Committee not later than the time period prescribed under Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder. The Committee may adjust the applicable Business Criteria as specified in Section 2(e), and in connection with an event described in Section 3(b) to the extent permitted by Section 162(m) to prevent the dilution or enlargement of a Participant's rights with respect to Awards. The Committee may adjust downward, but not upward, any amount determined to be otherwise payable with respect to such an Award. The Committee may also provide, in an Agreement or otherwise, that the achievement of specified performance goals in connection with an Award described in this Section 13 may be waived upon death or disability or under any other circumstance with respect to which the possible waiver will not cause the Award to fail to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). All provisions of such Awards which are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation shall be construed in a manner to so comply.

14.    Change in Control Provisions.    

A-13


Table of Contents

A-14


Table of Contents

15.    Rights as a Stockholder.    

        No person shall have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares of Company Stock covered by or relating to any Award until the date of record issuance of such shares of Company Stock in the books of the Company or the issuance of a stock certificate with respect to such shares. Except for adjustments provided in Section 3(b), no adjustment to any Award shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date occurs prior to the date such book entry is made or stock certificate is issued.

16.    No Employment Rights; No Right to Award.    

        Nothing contained in the Plan or any Agreement shall confer upon any Participant any right with respect to the continuation of employment by or provision of services to the Company or interfere in any way with the right of the Company, subject to the terms of any separate agreement to the contrary, at any time to terminate such employment or service or to increase or decrease the compensation of the Participant. No person shall have any claim or right to receive an Award hereunder. The

A-15


Table of Contents

Committee's granting of an Award to a Participant at any time shall neither require the Committee to grant any other Award to such Participant or other person at any time nor preclude the Committee from making subsequent grants to such Participant or any other person.

17.    Securities Matters and Regulations.    

18.    Withholding Taxes.    

        Whenever cash is to be paid pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to deduct therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state and local withholding tax requirements related thereto. Whenever shares of Company Stock are to be delivered pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to require the Participant to remit to the Company in cash an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state and local withholding tax requirements related thereto. With the approval of the Committee, a Participant may satisfy the foregoing requirement by electing to have the Company withhold from delivery shares of Company Stock having a value equal to the minimum amount of tax required to be withheld. Such shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of which the amount of tax to be withheld is determined. Fractional share amounts shall be settled in cash. Such a withholding election may be made with respect to all or any portion of the shares to be delivered pursuant to an Award.

19.    Notification of Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code.    

        If any Participant shall, in connection with the acquisition of shares of Company Stock under the Plan, make the election permitted under Section 83(b) of the Code, such Participant shall notify the Company of such election within 10 days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service.

A-16


Table of Contents

20.    Notification Upon Disqualifying Disposition Under Section 421(b) of the Code.    

        Each Agreement with respect to an Incentive Stock Option shall require the Participant to notify the Company of any disposition of shares of Company Stock issued pursuant to the exercise of such Option under the circumstances described in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), within 10 days of such disposition.

21.    Amendment or Termination of the Plan.    

        The Board of Directors may, at any time, suspend or terminate the Plan or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever; provided, however, that stockholder approval shall be required for any such amendment if and to the extent such approval is required in order to comply with applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement. Nothing herein shall restrict the Committee's ability to exercise its discretionary authority pursuant to Sections 3 and 4, which discretion may be exercised without amendment to the Plan. No action hereunder may, without the consent of a Participant, reduce the Participant's rights under any outstanding Award.

22.    Transfers Upon Death.    

        Upon the death of a Participant, outstanding Awards granted to such Participant may be exercised only by the executor or administrator of the Participant's estate or by a person who shall have acquired the right to such exercise by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. No transfer of an Award by will or the laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Committee shall have been furnished with (a) written notice thereof and with a copy of the will and/or such evidence as the Committee may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer and (b) an agreement by the transferee to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Award that are or would have been applicable to the Participant and to be bound by the acknowledgments made by the Participant in connection with the grant of the Award.

23.    Expenses and Receipts.    

        The expenses of the Plan shall be paid by the Company. Any proceeds received by the Company in connection with any Award may be used for general corporate purposes.

24.    Effective Date and Term of Plan.    

        The Plan shall be subject to the requisite approval of the stockholders of the Company. In the absence of such approval, any Awards shall be null and void. Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the right to grant Awards under the Plan shall terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. Awards outstanding at Plan termination shall remain in effect according to their terms and the provisions of the Plan.

25.    Participant Rights.    

        No Participant shall have any claim to be granted any award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment for Participants.

26.    Unfunded Status of Awards.    

        The Plan is intended to constitute an "unfunded" plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Agreement shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company.

27.    No Fractional Shares.    

        No fractional shares of Company Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan. The Committee shall determine whether cash, other Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in

A-17


Table of Contents

lieu of such fractional shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

28.    Beneficiary.    

        A Participant may file with the Committee a written designation of a beneficiary on such form as may be prescribed by the Committee and may, from time to time, amend or revoke such designation. If no designated beneficiary survives the Participant, the executor or administrator of the Participant's estate shall be deemed to be the Participant's beneficiary.

29.    Paperless Administration.    

        In the event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the documentation, granting or exercise of Awards, such as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless documentation, granting or exercise of Awards by a Participant may be permitted through the use of such an automated system.

30.    Severability.    

        If any provision of the Plan is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions of the Plan shall not be affected but shall be applied as if the invalid or unenforceable provision had not been included in the Plan.

31.    Applicable Law.    

        Except to the extent preempted by any applicable federal law, the Plan shall be construed and administered in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to its principles of conflicts of law.

32.    Section 409A Compliance.    

        The Plan as well as payments and benefits under the Plan are intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code to the extent subject thereto, and, accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted, the Plan shall be interpreted and be administered to be in compliance therewith. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, to the extent required in order to avoid accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A of the Code, the Participant shall not be considered to have terminated employment with the Company for purposes of the Plan and no payment shall be due to the Participant under the Plan or any Award until the Participant would be considered to have incurred a "separation from service" from the Company within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. Any payments described in the Plan that are due within the "short term deferral period" as defined in Section 409A of the Code shall not be treated as deferred compensation unless applicable law requires otherwise. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, to the extent that any Awards are payable upon a separation from service and such payment would result in the imposition of any individual tax and penalty interest charges imposed under Section 409A of the Code, the settlement and payment of such awards shall instead be made on the first business day after the date that is six (6) months following such separation from service (or death, if earlier).

33.    Forfeiture and Compensation Recovery.    

A-18


Table of Contents

A-19


Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: M74704-P52766 For Against Abstain For Against Abstain Yes No RITE AID CORPORATION 1. Election of Directors Nominees: The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each of the nominees named in Proposal 1, and FOR Proposal 2, Proposal 3 and Proposal 4: 1a. John T. Standley 1b. Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 1c. Bruce G. Bodaken 1e. Kevin E. Lofton 1d. David R. Jessick 1g. Michael N. Regan 1f. Myrtle S. Potter 1h. Marcy Syms For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. 3. Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as presented in the proxy statement; 2. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm; The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5: 4. Approve the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan; and Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. RITE AID CORPORATION ATTN: BYRON PURCELL 30 HUNTER LANE CAMP HILL, PA 17011 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic proxy form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. You can obtain directions to the Annual Meeting by contacting Rite Aid's Investor Relations Department at (717) 975-3710. 5. Consider a stockholder proposal regarding an independent chairman, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

 


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com. M74705-P52766 Address Changes/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side RITE AID CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Stockholders June 19, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) John T. Standley, Frank G. Vitrano, and Marc A. Strassler, or any of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of RITE AID CORPORATION that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:30 a.m., EDT on June 19, 2014, at the Holiday Inn Harrisburg-East, 4751 Lindle Road, Harrisburg, PA 17111, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. If applicable, the proxy shall also govern the voting of stock held for the account of the undersigned in the Company's Investment Opportunity Plan, or any applicable employee benefit plan. The validity of this proxy is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. This proxy does not revoke any prior powers of attorney except for prior proxies given in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED, OR, IF NO SPECIFICATIONS ARE MADE, WILL BE VOTED (1) "FOR" THE ELECTION OF ALL THE NOMINEES OF THE BOARD IN THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, (2) "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, (3) "FOR" THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS PRESENTED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT, (4) "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE RITE AID CORPORATION 2014 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AND (5) "AGAINST" THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING AN INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN. IF ANY OTHER MATTER IS PROPERLY PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE NAMED PROXIES' DISCRETION ON SUCH MATTER. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.