UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Grainger WW Inc. |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045-5201
(847) 535-1000
March 18, 2005
Dear Grainger Shareholder:
The W.W. Grainger, Inc. 2005 annual meeting of shareholders will be held at our headquarters located at 100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois (see map overleaf), on Wednesday, April 27, 2005, at 10 a.m. (CDT).
We will report at the meeting on our operations and other matters of current interest. The Board of Directors and management cordially invite you to attend.
The formal notice of the annual meeting and the proxy statement follow. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please ensure that your shares are represented by giving us your proxy. You can do so by telephone, by Internet, or by signing and dating the enclosed proxy form and returning it promptly in the envelope provided.
Sincerely,
/s/ R. L. KEYSER
Richard L. Keyser
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045-5201
(847) 535-1000
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD APRIL 27, 2005
The annual meeting of shareholders of W.W. Grainger, Inc. will be held at its headquarters at 100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois (see map on previous page), on April 27, 2005, at 10 a.m. (CDT) for the following purposes:
The Board has fixed the close of business on March 7, 2005 as the record date for the meeting. Shareholders may vote either in person or by proxy.
By order of the Board of Directors.
L.
M. Trusdell
Corporate Secretary
Lake
Forest, Illinois
March 18, 2005
W.W.
Grainger, Inc.
100 Grainger Parkway
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045-5201
(847) 535-1000
PROXY STATEMENT
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
Introduction | 1 | |
Election of Directors | 4 | |
Board of Directors and Board Committees | 7 | |
Director Compensation | 10 | |
Ownership of Grainger Stock | 11 | |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 13 | |
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board | 14 | |
Audit Fees and Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures | 15 | |
Executive Compensation | 16 | |
Equity Compensation Plans | 20 | |
Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board | 21 | |
Company Performance | 25 | |
Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Independent Auditors | 26 | |
Proposal to Approve the 2005 Incentive Plan | 27 | |
Appendix ACategorical Standards for Director Independence | A-1 | |
Appendix B2005 Incentive Plan | B-1 |
What is the purpose of this proxy statement?
This proxy statement relates to Grainger's 2005 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 27, 2005 and any adjournment of that meeting. It contains information intended to help you make your voting decisions. We are sending the proxy statement to you because Grainger's Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the meeting. The mailing of the proxy statement and other proxy-soliciting materials to you and other shareholders began on or about March 18, 2005.
What matters are scheduled to be presented?
Who is entitled to vote?
Holders of shares of common stock outstanding on Grainger's books at the close of business on March 7, 2005, the record date for the meeting, may vote. There were 90,819,959 shares of common stock outstanding at that time.
How many votes do I have?
You have the right to cumulative voting in the election of directors. This means that you have a number of votes in the election equal to the number of shares you own multiplied by the number of directors being elected. You can cast those votes as you choose. For example, you may direct that all your votes be cast for one nominee or you may direct that your votes be apportioned among two or more of them.
In any matter other than the election of directors, each of your shares is entitled to one vote.
What if I don't indicate my voting choices?
If Grainger receives your proxy in time to permit its use at the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions you indicate. If you have not indicated otherwise, your shares will be voted as recommended by Grainger's Board. More particularly, your shares will be voted, either individually or cumulatively, FOR the election of the director nominees, FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of independent auditors, and FOR the proposal to approve the 2005 Incentive Plan.
How does discretionary voting apply?
Grainger is not aware of any matter not described in this proxy statement that will be presented for consideration at the meeting. If another matter is properly presented and your proxy does not withhold discretionary authority, your shares will be voted on the matter in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxy.
1
May I revoke my proxy?
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the voting at the meeting. You can do so in one of the following ways:
What does it mean if I receive more than one set of proxy materials?
Receiving multiple sets of proxy-soliciting materials generally means that your shares are held in different ways or are held in more than one account. You should respond to all of the proxy requests to ensure that all your shares are voted.
What constitutes a quorum at the meeting?
A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on a matter, whether present in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for consideration of that matter at the meeting. A quorum is necessary for valid action to be taken on the matter. Your shares will be present by proxy and count towards the quorum if you give us your proxy by telephone, by Internet, or by signing, dating, and returning a proxy form.
Who pays the costs of soliciting proxies?
Grainger will pay all the costs of soliciting management proxies. Brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries, and other intermediaries are being asked to forward the proxy-soliciting materials to beneficial owners of Grainger common stock and to obtain their authority to give proxies. Grainger will reimburse these intermediaries for their reasonable expenses.
In addition to mailing proxy-soliciting materials, Grainger's directors, officers, and regular employees may solicit proxies personally, by telephone or by other means. They will not receive additional compensation for these services, other than normal overtime pay, if applicable. Representatives of Grainger's transfer agent may also solicit proxies. Grainger additionally has employed D.F. King & Co., Inc. to help solicit proxies and will pay that firm approximately $6,000 for its services, plus reasonable costs and expenses.
How do I submit a shareholder proposal or directly nominate a director at the 2006 annual meeting?
If you wish to have a shareholder proposal included in Grainger's proxy-soliciting materials for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, please send a notice of intent to submit the proposal at that meeting to the Corporate Secretary at Grainger's headquarters. The notice, including the text of the proposal, must be in writing, signed, and in compliance with the timing and other requirements of proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For a shareholder proposal relating to the 2006 annual meeting to be timely, Grainger must receive the notice no later than November 18, 2005.
2
Grainger's by-laws require written notice concerning a shareholder submission of a proposal or a shareholder nomination of a person for election as a director at a meeting of shareholders. For either a shareholder proposal or a nomination, certain information about the shareholder, and the proposal or nominee (as the case may be), is required. For the submission of a proposal, the notice must be furnished generally not less than 90 days and not more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the prior year's annual meeting. For a nomination, the notice must be furnished no later than November 18, 2005 in the case of the 2006 annual meeting. A copy of the by-laws may be obtained free of charge on written request to the Corporate Secretary at Grainger's headquarters.
3
Grainger's directors are elected each year at the annual meeting. Directors and nominees are encouraged to attend annual meetings. At the 2004 annual meeting, ten directors were in attendance, representing all of the directors.
Ten directors will be elected at this year's annual meeting. The directors will serve until the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified.
Janiece S. Webb, who has served as a Grainger director since 1995, has decided for health reasons that she does not wish to stand for reelection. Also deciding that he will not stand for reelection is Frederick A. Krehbiel, who first became a director in 2001. Grainger thanks Ms. Webb and Mr. Krehbiel for their many valuable contributions to the success of the Company.
Grainger's Board has nominated William K. Hall to stand for election at this year's annual meeting. Details concerning Mr. Hall, and the other nominees, are provided below.
Directors are elected by the votes of a majority of the shares of Grainger common stock represented in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. Directions to withhold authority will have the same effect as votes against the election of directors. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote.
If any of the nominees mentioned below should be unavailable for election, a circumstance which is not expected, the person or persons voting your proxy may exercise discretion to vote for a substitute nominee selected by the Board.
The Board has adopted "categorical standards" to assist it in evaluating the independence of nominees. The categorical standards, which are set forth in Appendix A to this proxy statement, are intended to help the Board in determining whether certain relationships between nominees and Grainger are "material relationships" for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) independence standards. The categorical standards adopted by the Board are consistent with, and in some respects more strict in their requirements than, the NYSE's "bright line" independence criteria.
The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Anderson, Gantz, Hall, McCarter, Novich, Rogers, Slavik, and Smith has no material relationship with Grainger within the meaning of the NYSE independence standards and with reference to the categorical standards. The other nominees, Messrs. Grainger and Keyser, are Grainger employees and, accordingly, are not considered "independent." All of the nominees except Mr. Hall are presently directors and, except for Messrs. Hall and Rogers, were previously elected by the shareholders. The nominees have provided the following information about themselves, including ages in March 2005. Unless otherwise indicated, each has served for at least the past five years in the principal business position currently or most recently held.
Brian P. Anderson, age 54, is the former Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax Incorporated, a distributor of business-to-business and retail office products. Prior to assuming this position in 2004, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Baxter International Inc., a position he assumed in 1998. Mr. Anderson's previous positions at Baxter included Vice President, Finance, Corporate Controller, and Vice President, Corporate Audit. He was first elected a director of Grainger in 1999, is Chairman of the Audit Committee, is Grainger's "audit committee financial expert," and is a member of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee. | ||
4
Wilbur H. Gantz, age 67, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a privately-owned specialty pharmaceutical company that focuses on under-promoted and late-stage development products. He assumed this position in 2002. Mr. Gantz previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PathoGenesis Corporation and as President of Baxter International Inc. He is also a director of Gambro, A.B., The Gillette Company, and Harris Financial Corp. Mr. Gantz was first elected a director of Grainger in 1985 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee. |
||
David W. Grainger, age 77, is the company's Senior Chairman of the Board, a position assumed in 1997 after serving as Chairman of the Board. He was the company's Chief Executive Officer until 1995. Mr. Grainger joined the company in 1952 and was first elected a director in 1953. |
||
William K. Hall, age 61, is the co-founder and Chairman of Procyon Technologies, Inc., a privately-owned, Chicago-based holding company which focuses on the acquisition and growth of suppliers to the global aerospace and defense industry. Prior to assuming that position in 2000, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Falcon Building Products, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of products for residential and commercial construction and home improvement markets. Mr. Hall currently serves on the boards of Actuant Corporation, GenCorp Inc., Great Plains Energy Incorporated, A.M. Castle & Co., and Woodhead Industries, Inc. |
||
Richard L. Keyser, age 62, is Grainger's Chairman of the Board, a position assumed in 1997, and Chief Executive Officer, a position assumed in 1995. Previously he served as Grainger's President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Keyser is also a director of Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Rohm and Haas Company. He joined Grainger in 1986 and became a director in 1992. |
||
5
John W. McCarter, Jr., age 67, is President and Chief Executive Officer of The Field Museum of Natural History, a position assumed in 1996. He served as Senior Vice President of Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc., a management consulting firm, until 1997. Mr. McCarter is also a director of A.M. Castle & Co., Divergence, Inc., Harris Insight Funds, and Janus Funds. He was first elected a director of Grainger in 1990 and is Chairman of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee. |
||
Neil S. Novich, age 50, is Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, as well as a director, of Ryerson Tull, Inc., a large metal distributor and processor. He became Ryerson Tull's President and Chief Executive Officer in 1996 and its Chairman in 1999. Previously, Mr. Novich served as Ryerson Tull's President and Chief Operating Officer. He was first elected a director of Grainger in 1999 and is a member of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee. |
||
Gary L. Rogers, age 60, was Vice Chairman of General Electric Company from 2001 until his retirement in December 2003. Previously, he was Senior Vice President of General Electric Company and President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Plastics from 1992 to 2001. Mr. Rogers is also a director of Rohm and Haas Company and a trustee of the Florida State University Foundation. He was first appointed as a director of Grainger in 2004 and is a member of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee. |
||
James D. Slavik, age 52, is Chairman (formerly President) and a director of Mark IV Capital, Inc., an investment company dealing in real estate development and corporate investments. He was first elected a director of Grainger in 1987 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee. |
||
Harold B. Smith, age 71, is Chairman of the Executive Committee and a director of Illinois Tool Works Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of engineered components and industrial systems and consumables. He is also a director of Northern Trust Corporation. Mr. Smith was first elected a director of Grainger in 1981 and is Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee. Mr. Smith will soon reach the age at which, under Grainger's Criteria for Membership on the Board of Directors, an outside director would generally not be nominated. However, the Board has determined that in the case of Mr. Smith, an exception to this general principle is appropriate. |
6
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND BOARD COMMITTEES
Five meetings of the Board were held in 2004. In addition, the directors acted once by unanimous consent during the year.
The Board has three standing committees: Audit, Board Affairs and Nominating, and Compensation. All members of these committees are required to be "independent" directors. All non-employee directors have been determined to be independent. Committee memberships are shown in the following table:
|
|
Board Affairs and Nominating |
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Audit |
Compensation |
|||||
Brian P. Anderson | Chair | Member | |||||
Wilbur H. Gantz | Member | Member | |||||
Frederick A. Krehbiel | Member | Member | |||||
John W. McCarter, Jr. | Chair | Member | |||||
Neil S. Novich | Member | Member | |||||
Gary L. Rogers | Member | Member | |||||
James D. Slavik | Member | Member | |||||
Harold B. Smith | Member | Chair | |||||
Janiece S. Webb | Member | Member | |||||
Each non-employee director of Grainger is an alternate member of each Board committee of which the director has not been specifically appointed a member. An alternate committee member may serve for all purposes at a committee meeting in place of a regular member who is absent.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee met five times in 2004. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is "independent," as that term is defined in the independence requirements for audit committee members contained in the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Board has also determined that Mr. Brian P. Anderson, Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an "audit committee financial expert," as that term is defined in the applicable rules of the SEC.
The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight responsibility with respect to Grainger's financial reporting process, Grainger's systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the integrity of Grainger's financial statements, Grainger's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of Grainger's independent auditors, and the performance of Grainger's internal audit function and independent auditors. It also has oversight responsibilities for various aspects of certain employee benefit plans. Additionally included among the responsibilities of the Audit Committee are the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditors, the establishment of procedures for the treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters, and the pre-approval of audit and non-audit
7
services to be provided by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has the further responsibility of overseeing compliance with Grainger's Business Conduct Guidelines.
Board Affairs and Nominating Committee
The Board Affairs and Nominating Committee met three times in 2004. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee is "independent," as that term is defined in the independence requirements for members of nominating committees contained in the applicable standards of the NYSE. The Chairman of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee reviews all agendas of Board meetings and acts as Chairman and presides at regular executive sessions of the Board without management participation.
The Board Affairs and Nominating Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the makeup of the Board and its committees, establishes specific criteria by which potential directors shall be qualified, identifies potential nominees, and makes recommendations concerning director and nominee independence. It also has primary responsibility for corporate governance oversight, including the responsibility to recommend corporate governance principles, recommend Board committee responsibilities and members, evaluate the Board in the area of corporate governance, including the adequacy of the information supplied to the Board and the Board's performance of its oversight responsibilities relative to the management of Grainger, and to recommend retirement, compensation, and other policies applicable to directors. Additional responsibilities are to review senior management organization and succession and to make initial assessments regarding major issues or proposals.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee met five times in 2004. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is "independent," as that term is defined in the independence requirements for members of compensation committees contained in the applicable standards of the NYSE.
The Compensation Committee oversees Grainger's activities in the area of compensation and benefits (generally with regard to all employees and specifically with regard to officers) and reviews and makes recommendations concerning compensation-related matters to be submitted to the Board and/or shareholders for approval. It also acts as the administration committee under various stock and incentive plans. Included among its duties are the review and approval of corporate goals and objectives relevant to chief executive officer compensation, the evaluation of chief executive officer performance in light of those goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors, the determination and approval of the chief executive officer's compensation level based on this evaluation.
Available Information
Grainger has adopted Business Conduct Guidelines for directors, officers, and employees, which incorporate the Code of Ethics required by rules of the SEC to be applicable to a company's chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and chief accounting officer or controller, and intends to satisfy any disclosure requirements with respect to the Business Conduct Guidelines by posting the information on its Web site. Grainger has also adopted Operating Principles for the Board of Directors, which are its corporate governance guidelines.
8
Grainger's Business Conduct Guidelines and Operating Principles for the Board of Directors are available in the Corporate Governance section of Grainger's Web site at www.grainger.com/investor. Also available in the Corporate Governance section of that Web site are the charters, adopted by the Board, of the Board's Audit Committee, Board Affairs and Nominating Committee, and Compensation Committee. All of these documents are additionally available to shareholders in print, free of charge, upon request to the Corporate Secretary at Grainger's headquarters.
Recommending Candidates for Board Membership
The Board Affairs and Nominating Committee recommends candidates for Board membership based on a number of criteria, including ethical standards, judgment, independence and objectivity, strategic perspective, record of accomplishments, and business knowledge and experience applicable to Grainger's goals. Suggestions as to candidates are received from members of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee, other directors, employees and others, including shareholders. Messrs. Rogers and Hall have not previously stood for election to the Board. Mr. Rogers was initially recommended by Grainger's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hall was initially proposed by a group of directors, including the Chairman of Grainger's Board Affairs and Nominating Committee. In the case of both Messrs. Rogers and Hall, the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee considered their backgrounds and qualifications in detail against other potential candidates before recommending them to the full Board, which proposes nominees for election. The Board Affairs and Nominating Committee has also engaged an executive search firm to assist it in identifying and evaluating potential candidates.
Any shareholder who would like the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee to consider a candidate for Board membership should send a letter of recommendation containing the name and address of the proposing shareholder and the proposed candidate and setting forth the business, professional, and educational background of the proposed candidate, as well as a description of any agreement or relationship between the proposing shareholder and proposed candidate. A written consent of the proposed candidate to being identified as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected should also be provided. The communication should be sent by mail or other delivery service to the attention of the Corporate Secretary at Grainger's headquarters.
Other Communications With Directors
A process has been established by which shareholders may communicate with the Board, Board committees, and/or individual directors on matters of interest to shareholders. Shareholders may write to the intended director(s) or director group(s) in care of W.W. Grainger, Inc., P.O. Box 856, Skokie, Illinois 60076-0856. Additional information concerning this process is available in the Corporate Governance section of Grainger's Web site at www.grainger.com/investor.
9
Members of Grainger's Board of Directors who are not employees of Grainger or any Grainger subsidiary are compensated at a level which approximates median market practice for an appropriate comparator group, as confirmed by independent compensation consultants. Such directors receive from Grainger an annual retainer of $60,000, which is intended to cover all regularly scheduled meetings of the Board and its committees. If additional meetings are held, a per-meeting fee of $1,500 is paid to each attending director.
The Chairmen of Board committees receive annual retainers in the amount of $10,000 for the Audit Committee Chair and $7,500 for the other committee Chairs. Other directors receive an annual retainer of $5,000 for each committee on which the director serves as a member. Directors may elect to defer, in a deferred stock unit account, their chair and committee retainers and the retainers and fees described in the preceding paragraph.
In addition, directors receive annual deferred stock unit grants. The number of shares covered by each grant is equal to $60,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of Grainger common stock at the time of grant, rounded up to the next ten-share increment. The deferred stock units are settled on termination of service as a director. In addition, Grainger reimburses travel expenses relating to service as a director, and reimburses directors for attending continuing education programs.
A director who is an employee of Grainger or any Grainger subsidiary does not receive any compensation for serving as a director.
Stock ownership guidelines applicable to non-employee directors were established in 1998. These guidelines provide that within five years after election, a director must own Grainger common stock and common stock equivalents having a value of at least five times the annual retainer fee for serving on the Board. Unless a director complies with the guidelines, he or she is ineligible to receive awards of stock options under the Director Stock Plan. All directors subject to the guidelines are in compliance with them.
In the ordinary course of business during 2004, Grainger engaged in various types of business transactions with organizations with which Grainger directors are associated in their principal business occupations or otherwise. These transactions are not deemed material to any of the directors. Similar transactions, which are not expected to be material to any of the directors, are likely to occur in the future.
10
The table below shows how many shares of Grainger common stock the directors, the nominees, certain executive officers, and all directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned as of March 7, 2005.
Beneficial ownership is a term broadly defined by the SEC. In general, a person beneficially owns securities if the person, alone or with another, has voting power or investment power (the power to sell) over the securities. Being able to acquire either voting or investment power within 60 days, such as by exercising stock options, also results in beneficial ownership of securities. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes following the table, each of the named persons had beneficial ownership of the indicated number of Grainger shares by sole voting and investment power.
Beneficial Owner |
Shares |
Option Shares Exercisable Within 60 Days (1) |
Stock Units (2) |
Total |
Percentage of Common Stock (3) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David W. Grainger (4) (5) (6) 100 Grainger Parkway Lake Forest, IL 60045 |
9,384,450 | -0- | -0- | 9,384,450 | 10.3 | % | |||||
James D. Slavik (7) (8) | 4,273,603 | 15,290 | 6,041 | 4,294,934 | 4.7 | % | |||||
Brian P. Anderson | 4,340 | 11,630 | 3,399 | 19,369 | * | ||||||
Y. C. Chen | 4,875 | 40,770 | 28,050 | 73,695 | * | ||||||
Wilbur H. Gantz | 11,340 | 15,290 | 11,351 | 37,981 | * | ||||||
William K. Hall | 2,000 | -0- | -0- | 2,000 | * | ||||||
John L. Howard | 1,713 | 61,550 | 24,000 | 87,263 | * | ||||||
Richard L. Keyser (6) (9) (10) | 692,426 | 617,390 | 60,595 | 1,370,411 | 1.4 | % | |||||
Frederick A. Krehbiel | 7,680 | 5,300 | 955 | 13,935 | * | ||||||
P. Ogden Loux (10) (11) | 26,566 | 190,090 | 15,000 | 231,656 | * | ||||||
John W. McCarter, Jr. (12) | 12,540 | 15,290 | 4,229 | 32,059 | * | ||||||
Neil S. Novich | 5,340 | 11,630 | 2,968 | 19,938 | * | ||||||
Gary L. Rogers | 310 | -0- | 91 | 401 | * | ||||||
James T. Ryan (13) | 11,213 | 69,210 | 37,500 | 117,923 | * | ||||||
Harold B. Smith (14) | 44,540 | 15,290 | 6,041 | 65,871 | * | ||||||
Janiece S. Webb (15) | 11,302 | 4,780 | 6,359 | 22,441 | * | ||||||
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (10) (16) (17) | 13,984,013 | 1,161,020 | 210,629 | 15,355,662 | 16.5 | % |
11
The table below sets forth information concerning beneficial ownership of Grainger's common stock as of December 31, 2004, as reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Schedule 13G filers generally are institutional investors who acquire beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a public company's voting securities in the ordinary course of business without the purpose of changing or influencing control of the company.
Beneficial Owner |
Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percentage of Common Stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC 90 Hudson Street Jersey City, NJ 07302 |
4,648,113 | * | 5.16 | % |
12
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that Grainger's directors, executive officers, and 10% shareholders file with the SEC reports concerning their ownership, and changes in their ownership, of Grainger equity securities. Based on a review of copies of the reports provided to Grainger and representations of those persons, Grainger believes that these filing requirements were met during 2004 and the subsequent period prior to the filing of this proxy statement, except as follows: Timothy M. Ferrarell, Senior Vice President, Enterprise Systems, amended a Form 3 which was originally filed in January 2002 to include 866 shares which were inadvertently omitted from that Form 3; and, due to an administrative error by Grainger, Judith E. Andringa, Vice President and Controller, filed a late Form 4 reporting Grainger's withholding of 1,504 shares to satisfy tax obligations upon the vesting of a restricted stock award.
13
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is "independent," as that term is defined in the independence requirements for audit committee members contained in the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee acts under a charter that was last amended by the Board on December 10, 2003, and included as Appendix A to the proxy statement for the 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.
Management is responsible for the Company's internal controls and the financial reporting process. Grant Thornton LLP, the Company's independent auditor, was responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company's most recent consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as well as expressing an opinion on (i) management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and (ii) the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In performing these responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting with management and Grant Thornton LLP. The Audit Committee discussed with Grant Thornton LLP matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, "Communication with Audit Committees," and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2, "An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with An Audit of Financial Statements." Grant Thornton LLP also provided to the Audit Committee the letter and written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, "Independence Discussions with Audit Committees," and the Audit Committee discussed with Grant Thornton LLP the matter of the firm's independence.
Based on the review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Brian
P. Anderson (Chairman)
Wilbur H. Gantz
Frederick A. Krehbiel
James D. Slavik
Janiece S. Webb
Members
of the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors
14
AUDIT FEES AND AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The following table sets forth the fees that were billed to Grainger by Grant Thornton LLP for professional services rendered with respect to fiscal years 2004 and 2003:
Fee Category |
2004 |
2003 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees | $ | 873,897 | $ | 615,063 | ||
Audit Related Fees | 113,568 | 150,656 | ||||
Tax Fees | 7,000 | 51,755 | ||||
All Other Fees | -0- | -0- | ||||
Total Fees |
$ |
994,465 |
$ |
817,474 |
Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of Grainger's annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for fiscal 2004, the audit of the annual financial statements for fiscal 2003, review of the interim financial statements included in Grainger's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other services normally provided in connection with Grainger's statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Grainger's financial statements. These services include the audits of Grainger's employee benefit plans, the review of documentation related to the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in fiscal 2003, and various attest services.
Tax Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These services include assistance with the preparation of various tax returns.
All Other Fees. Consists of fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for all other professional services rendered to Grainger. No such services were rendered during fiscal years 2004 and 2003.
Pre-Approval Policy for Audit and Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by Grainger's independent auditor. Also, specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee is required for any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority for audit and non-audit services to one or more of its members, and such authority has been delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The decisions of any member to whom such authority is delegated must be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee periodically reviews reports summarizing all services provided by the independent auditor.
15
Summary Compensation Information
This table provides summary information about compensation paid to or accrued for the named executive officers for services during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.
|
|
Annual Compensation |
Long-Term Compensation Awards |
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name and Principal Position (at 12/31/2004) |
Year |
Salary (1) |
Bonus (2) |
Grainger Restricted Stock / Restricted Stock Unit Awards (3) |
Stock Options (Shares) |
All Other Compensation (4) |
|||||||||||
Richard L. Keyser Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 2004 2003 2002 |
$ |
1,000,040 1,000,040 963,050 |
$ |
1,918,918 686,028 617,425 |
$ |
1,461,780 -0- -0- |
81,000 174,000 175,000 |
$ |
250,396 145,710 176,234 |
|||||||
P. Ogden Loux Sr. Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ |
450,005 420,020 411,020 |
$ |
548,240 196,010 176,409 |
$ |
406,050 -0- -0- |
20,000 45,000 45,000 |
$ |
94,085 52,578 67,370 |
|||||||
James T. Ryan Group President |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ |
426,290 370,040 355,040 |
$ |
501,250 134,765 121,289 |
$ |
947,450 -0- -0- |
20,000 30,000 30,000 |
$ |
81,316 42,991 45,124 |
|||||||
John L. Howard Sr. Vice President and General Counsel |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ |
350,840 340,040 328,790 |
$ |
297,652 112,014 100,813 |
$ |
216,560 -0- -0- |
12,000 25,000 25,000 |
$ |
66,577 30,710 28,007 |
|||||||
Y. C. Chen Sr. Vice President, Supply Chain Management |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ |
335,750 281,667 250,966 |
$ |
299,590 86,625 64,260 |
$ |
232,802 506,600 -0- |
13,100 20,000 10,000 |
$ |
60,474 23,935 73,917 |
(5) |
16
Stock Option Grants
This table contains information about grants of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2004 to the named executive officers.
Name |
Options Granted (Shares) |
Percentage of Total Options Granted to Employees in 2004 |
Exercise or Base Price (Per Share) (1) |
Earliest Exercise Date (2) |
Expiration Date |
Grant Date Present Value (3) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Richard L. Keyser | 81,000 | 6.66 | % | $ | 54.14 | 4/28/2007 | 4/27/2014 | $ | 1,085,797 | |||||
P. Ogden Loux | 20,000 | 1.64 | % | 54.14 | 4/28/2007 | 4/27/2014 | 268,098 | |||||||
James T. Ryan | 20,000 | 1.64 | % | 54.14 | 4/28/2007 | 4/27/2014 | 268,098 | |||||||
John L. Howard | 12,000 | 0.99 | % | 54.14 | 4/28/2007 | 4/27/2014 | 160,859 | |||||||
Y. C. Chen | 13,100 | 1.08 | % | 54.14 | 4/28/2007 | 4/27/2014 | 175,604 |
The actual value, if any, an executive may realize will depend on the excess of the stock price over the exercise price on the date the option is exercised. There is no assurance that the value realized by an executive will be at or near the value estimated by the Black-Scholes model.
17
Stock Option Exercises and Holdings
This table contains information about stock options exercised by the named executive officers during 2004 and the number of shares of Grainger common stock covered by, and the values of, outstanding stock options held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at 12/31/2004 |
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at 12/31/2004 (3) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Shares Acquired on Exercise (1) |
Value Realized (2) |
|||||||||||||
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
||||||||||||
Richard L. Keyser | 46,080 | $ | 1,015,142 | 442,390 | 438,100 | $ | 10,850,431 | $ | 7,023,382 | ||||||
P. Ogden Loux | 9,380 | 229,036 | 145,090 | 112,800 | 3,583,825 | 1,821,986 | |||||||||
James T. Ryan | 8,060 | 196,019 | 39,210 | 130,000 | 804,928 | 2,699,500 | |||||||||
John L. Howard | -0- | -0- | 36,550 | 63,440 | 965,036 | 1,019,943 | |||||||||
Y. C. Chen | 10,460 | 172,142 | 30,770 | 43,810 | 703,156 | 726,663 |
Other Benefits
The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan permitted participants selected by a committee of management prior to 1986 to elect a salary reduction of between 5% and 15% (or more with special agreement) for up to four years. Under the related plan agreement, a participant is entitled to 180 monthly payments, commencing at age 65, in an annual amount that is based upon the amount of the salary reduction, the additional amount allocated by Grainger, and the number of years from deferment to normal retirement age. Reduced or increased payments are provided if the participant begins receiving payments before or after age 65, respectively. If Grainger reduces plan benefits or terminates the plan, or if there is a "change in control" of Grainger, various benefits are provided to the participant, ranging from a return of the amount of salary deferral plus interest to a lump-sum benefit equal to the present value of a projected payment stream. If a participant dies before retirement or before having received the full amount of the benefits, the balance will be paid to the participant's designated beneficiary. Although payment deferrals have not been permitted for several years, Mr. Keyser and another key executive had elected to defer salary payments under the plan for prior years. If Mr. Keyser commences receiving payments under the plan at age 65, his monthly payments would be $10,509.
Under the 2004 Voluntary Salary and Incentive Deferral Plan, elected officers of Grainger may elect to defer receipt of up to 50% of base salary and/or 85% of annual cash bonus under an unfunded deferred compensation plan. The rate of return on the individual accounts (positive or negative) will be a function of the participant-selected investment funds. Investment choices for employees who
18
elect to defer salary and/or bonus may be made only from the same investment funds available under Grainger's profit sharing plan. A participant may elect to receive distribution of deferred amounts upon his or her retirement or disability or upon a specified date certain, as a single sum or in annual installments over a period of up to 15 years. If a participant dies before or after distribution has begun, the deferred amounts will be distributed to the participant's designated beneficiary in a single sum as soon as administratively practicable. If a participant's employment terminates for any reason other than retirement, disability or death, the deferred amounts will be paid to the participant as soon as administratively practicable. In the event of a "change in control" of Grainger, all deferred amounts will be paid to participants in a lump sum within five days after the "change in control." Certain of the named executive officers and other officers voluntarily participate in this plan.
A committee of Grainger management determines which of Grainger's officers participate in Grainger's Executive Death Benefit Plan. The beneficiary of a participant who dies while employed by Grainger is generally entitled to 120 monthly payments of 50% of the participant's monthly compensation, calculated on the basis of salary and target bonus under the applicable cash incentive program. If a participant dies after retirement, an after-tax, lump-sum benefit approximating the participant's annual salary and annual target bonus under the applicable cash incentive program is payable to the participant's designated beneficiary. Prior to retirement, however, a participant may elect to receive a reduced payment following retirement on a pre-death basis. In the event of a "change in control" of Grainger, the plan assumes retirement on that date if the participant is then eligible for retirement (with the participant being credited with an additional three years of age and service for this purpose). The plan then provides for a lump-sum payment of the present value of the post-retirement benefit on the basis of the participant's death at age 80. All of the named executive officers and certain other key executives participate in the plan.
Grainger has purchased and owns life insurance contracts to reduce its exposure relating to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and the Executive Death Benefit Plan.
All of the named executive officers and certain other key executives have entered into Change in Control Employment Agreements with Grainger. Under each agreement, the executive is entitled to certain benefits if, within a two-year period following a "change in control" of Grainger, (a) the executive's employment is terminated other than for "cause," (b) the executive terminates employment for "good reason," or (c) in the case of Mr. Keyser and certain of the other named executive officers, the executive terminates employment for any reason within the 30-day period following the one-year anniversary of the "change in control." Benefits include a lump-sum payment generally equal to a multiple of the sum of (i) the executive's annual salary, (ii) the higher of the executive's target annual bonus or the average of the executive's last three annual bonuses, and (iii) in connection with Grainger's non-contributory profit sharing plans, a percentage of annual salary and bonus equal to the greater of (x) the highest percentage of covered compensation contributed by Grainger under the plans for any of the last three fiscal years or (y) 15%. In the case of Mr. Keyser and certain of the other named executive officers, the multiple is three. In the case of most of the other key executives, the multiple is two. Benefits additionally include continuation of health and dental benefits for a number of years equal to the applicable multiple. Each agreement further provides that the executive is to be made whole on an after-tax basis with respect to excise tax due as a consequence of payments (whether or not under the agreement) being classified as "parachute payments" under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In certain cases the lump-sum payment upon termination is limited under the agreement to an amount above which this excise tax would be due.
19
U.S. employees who have not entered into Change in Control Employment Agreements with Grainger are generally covered by a Change in Control Severance Policy. Under the policy, employees whose employment with Grainger is terminated other than for "cause" or who resign under certain circumstances within two years following a "change in control" of Grainger are entitled to certain benefits. These benefits are severance pay and continuation of health and dental benefits in amounts and for durations that are based upon years of service, pay, and other factors.
This table contains information as of December 31, 2004 about Grainger's equity compensation plans, consisting of the 1990 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan, the 2001 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan, and the Director Stock Plan. All of these plans have been approved by Grainger's shareholders.
|
Number of common shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants, and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights |
Number of common shares available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding common shares reflected in the first column) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | 9,205,794 | $ | 46.86 | 1,202,276 | (1) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders | -0- | N/A | -0- | |||||
Total | 9,205,794 | $ | 46.86 | 1,202,276 |
20
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD
This report of the Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Committee") discusses the Company's compensation policy and programs for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and others who served as executive officers during the year.
The Committee, all members of which are independent directors, administers the Company's executive compensation programs, reviews and approves corporate goals relevant to compensation, evaluates performance, and recommends to the Board the compensation design and pay levels for all executive officers. The Committee's charter, which sets out its duties and responsibilities, can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company's Web site, www.grainger.com. The Committee considers information and data supplied by management and by compensation and benefits consultants. The Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant, who reports directly to the Committee.
Executive Compensation Policy
The Company's compensation programs are designed to attract and retain high-quality executive and managerial talent and to provide appropriate incentives, including equity-based awards, for achieving the Company's business goals. The overall program includes significant variable pay components which link total executive compensation to performance and to the creation of long-term shareholder value.
The Company endeavors to accomplish these objectives through executive officer compensation consisting of base salary, cash incentive compensation, stock options, restricted stock units and benefits. When Company performance is at target, the Company's general objective is to pay executive officers at median. This means the Company intends total compensation to be at or near the size-adjusted median of total compensation paid to similar executive positions at a representative group of other companies that are considered to be comparative as competitors for executive talent. All elements of compensation are valued and reviewed to determine the Company's compensation practices relative to the median of this compensation comparator group.
The compensation comparator group is determined regularly by the Committee, with input from consultants. The current comparator group is similar in complexity and size (based on revenues and market capitalization) to the Company and is representative of the types of major companies with which the Company historically competes for executive talent. This "competitive market" for executive talent is not necessarily the same as is used for industry or sector performance considerations. Therefore, companies used for compensation comparison purposes are not identical to those in the industry indices (S&P 500 Stock Index, Dow Jones Industrial Suppliers Index, Dow Jones Industrial Services Index) used in the performance graph of company total shareholder returns.
Base Salaries
The Committee reviews base salaries annually. Adjustments to base salaries are determined based on a detailed evaluation of individual performance, the competitive market, executive experience and internal equity. After evaluating the competitive market, merit increases consistent with market rates were approved by the Committee for 2004.
21
Cash Incentives
Executive officers and other key managers generally participate in the Management Incentive Program (MIP), which provides for cash incentives based on the achievement of specified financial performance measures. For 2004, the MIP was structured to provide a balance between short term and long term results and to align the interests of management with shareholders by providing incentive payments that correspond with long term creation of shareholder value. For 2004, the financial measures used were return on invested capital (ROIC) and year-over-year growth in revenue. These measures were selected as they balance revenue growth with profitability, expense management and asset management. In addition, for 2004 there was an individual performance component worth up to 30% of the target incentive. This component is designed to reward based on an assessment of the individual's achievement against specific goals related to Company objectives.
Target incentive awards under the MIP and similar programs are based on a review of competitive market practice and range from 10% to 110% of base salary. Actual MIP payments are a product of the incentive target adjusted by the actual results achieved under the financial measures and the assessment of individual performance against specific goals. Incentive awards for officers in charge of business units were primarily based on the performance of the individual unit, although these officers also participated in the Company MIP results with respect to a portion of their total incentive opportunity.
Results for 2004 were above target on ROIC and year-over-year growth in sales. These results translated to an actual incentive multiple that caused the 2004 incentive awards to be greater than the target incentive awards. In addition to these financial measures, the individual performance components were assessed.
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer participated in the Office of the Chairman Incentive Program, a separate shareholder-approved plan providing for incentive bonuses determined by reference to the Company's reported net earnings. Bonuses under this plan were calculated for the year using the same financial measures as MIP incentives for most other executive officers.
In 2005, the Company intends to continue to use ROIC, year-over-year growth in revenue, and individual performance for its incentive program.
Long Term Incentives
Long term incentives provided under a shareholder-approved stock plan are considered an important means of aligning the financial interests of executive officers and other key employees to the longer term financial interests of the shareholders. In 2004, the Company started using a combination of stock options and restricted stock units as a part of its annual long term incentive program for top management. To keep the target grant value of long term incentives consistent with Company pay objectives and median market practice, the target annual stock option awards were significantly lowered from the 2003 levels, reflecting the accompanying award of restricted stock units. Including restricted stock units as a component of the long-term incentive program is intended to reduce annual share usage, increase the retentive qualities (given four-year cliff vesting provisions for RSUs and three-year cliff vesting provisions for stock options), and lessen the primary reliance on stock options. The number of shares covered by stock options and RSUs is designed to provide an economic value that is generally competitive with awards made by other companies to their employees in comparable jobs. Recipients are required to sign an agreement containing confidentiality and non-competition provisions.
22
In April 2004, approximately 675 employees received stock options covering 990,000 shares through this program. This number includes approximately 161,000 stock options awarded to seven executive officers. In addition, approximately 150 employees received restricted stock units covering 161,000 shares through this program. This number includes approximately 54,000 restricted stock units awarded to seven executive officers.
The Company also periodically issues options to its employees under the broad-based stock option program. Under this program, employees who do not participate in any other option program are awarded stock options covering 100 shares upon reaching five-year service-level milestones. Under this broad-based program, 2,380 employees received options covering 238,000 shares. The general option terms are similar to those of the annual stock option program.
In all cases, stock options are awarded at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock reported for the business day before the grant. Stock option repricing is not permitted under the plan.
The Company also has granted restricted stock (generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates before the end of the restriction) to executive and other officers of the Company, in each case subject to the execution of a confidentiality and non-competition agreement with the Company. The objectives of the grants and related confidentiality and non-competition agreements are to align more closely the interests of executives with those of shareholders, to protect proprietary Company information, to preserve the Company's competitive advantages, to provide a strong executive retention incentive, and to provide for executive continuity.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In 1996, the Company established stock ownership guidelines for its officers. Ownership of Company stock creates alignment between executives and shareholders and encourages executives to act to increase shareholder value. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is required to achieve stock ownership of at least five times annualized base salary. Other U.S. officers are required to achieve stock ownership of at least three times or two times annualized base salary. These ownership guidelines must be met within three years of being elected an officer. Officers who fail to achieve these ownership levels will not be eligible to receive any stock-based awards until they achieve their required ownership level. As of the date of this report, all officers subject to the guidelines are in compliance with them. The Company believes the guidelines are important in aligning the interests of the executive officers of the Company and the shareholders.
Deferred Compensation
Officers of the Company may elect to defer receipt of up to 50% of base salary and/or 85% of annual cash bonus under an unfunded deferred compensation plan. The rate of return on the individual accounts (positive or negative) will be a function of the participant-selected investment funds. Investment choices for employees who elect to defer salary and/or bonus generally may be made only from the same investment funds available under the Company's profit sharing plan.
Other Benefits
Most other benefits, including profit sharing and various welfare benefits, provided to executive officers are comparable to those provided to the majority of salaried and hourly Company employees.
23
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to a public company for compensation over $1 million per fiscal year paid to the company's chief executive officer and its four other most highly compensated executive officers serving at the end of that year. Not subject to the deductibility limit, however, is compensation that qualifies as "performance-based" compensation. A Company objective is to maximize the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) to the extent doing so is reasonable and consistent with Company strategies and goals. Awards under the cash incentive plan in which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer participates and gains on exercises of stock options awarded under the 1990 and 2001 Long Term Stock Incentive Plans are considered to be "performance-based" compensation not subject to the Section 162(m) deductibility limit.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Compensation
All elements of compensation for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, including base salary, bonus and long-term incentives, are reviewed and approved solely by independent directors in executive sessions of this Committee or the full Board. The Committee reviews and approves the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer's compensation. These goals and objectives include quantitative measures such as sales growth, profitability, and shareholder value, as well as qualitative measures such as strategic execution and overall Company performance. The Committee then evaluates performance in light of those goals and objectives, and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determines and approves the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer's compensation level.
In determining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer's compensation for 2004, the Committee believes that the goals and objectives set forth above were successfully achieved as demonstrated by leadership that produced favorable sales growth results and returns on invested capital. Additional factors in determining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer's compensation included the value of compensation paid to chief executive officers at comparable companies as well as awards paid in past years.
Harold B. Smith, Chairman John W. McCarter, Jr. Neil S. Novich Gary L. Rogers |
||
Members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors |
24
This stock price performance graph compares the cumulative total return on an investment in Grainger common stock with the cumulative total return of an investment in each of the S&P 500 Stock Index, a peer group index described below, and the Dow Jones Industrial Services Index (the "Services Index"), supplemented for 2004 as described below. The graph covers the period commencing December 31, 1999 and ending December 31, 2004.
As of December 31, 2003, Dow Jones discontinued the Services Index previously used by Grainger in its stock performance graph. Grainger has selected as a replacement a peer group index made up of all the companies, other than Grainger, which constitute the Dow Jones Industrial Suppliers Index. The discontinued Services Index had approximately 60 constituent companies, whereas the Dow Jones Industrial Suppliers Index is comprised of a smaller number of companies whose lines of business more closely resemble those of Grainger. Those companies (other than Grainger) are Black Box Corp., Hughes Supply Inc., Kaman Corp., MSC Industrial Direct Co., and Stewart & Stevenson Services Inc.
Because the Services Index was discontinued, information as to that index for 2004 was calculated by Grainger based on the performance of its constituent companies during 2004.
The graph assumes that the value for the investment in Grainger common stock and in each index was $100 on December 31,1999 and that all dividends were reinvested.
25
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has decided to make a change in Grainger's independent auditors. Subject to shareholder ratification at the meeting, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as Grainger's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005. On March 1, 2005, the Audit Committee dismissed Grant Thornton LLP, effective as of the filing of Grainger's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Grant Thornton LLP's reports on Grainger's consolidated financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and through the date of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, there were no disagreements with Grant Thornton LLP on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to Grant Thornton LLP's satisfaction, would have caused Grant Thornton LLP to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report on Grainger's consolidated financial statements for such years. There were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and prior to the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, Grainger did not consult Ernst & Young LLP with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Grainger's consolidated financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events as set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of independent auditors.
Approval of the proposal requires the affirmative votes of a majority of the shares of Grainger common stock represented in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote. In the event the proposal is not approved, the Board will consider the negative vote as a mandate to appoint other independent auditors for the next year.
Representatives of Grant Thornton LLP and Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the meeting to respond to appropriate questions of shareholders and to make any desired statements.
26
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE 2005 INCENTIVE PLAN
On February 23, 2005, the Board adopted the 2005 Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan"), subject to approval of Grainger's shareholders. A copy of the 2005 Plan is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement. The 2005 Plan will replace Grainger's 1990 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan, 2001 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan, Director Stock Plan, and Office of the Chairman Incentive Plan (the "Prior Plans").
The Board believes that the 2005 Plan, like the Prior Plans, will be an important part of Grainger's overall compensation program. The 2005 Plan will enable Grainger to attract and retain high-quality executives, managers, employees, and nonemployee directors, and to strengthen the alignment between these individuals and Grainger's shareholders.
The 2005 Plan incorporates all the features that exist in the Prior Plans. In addition, the 2005 Plan provides new features that will allow greater flexibility, such as performance shares, performance units, and cash-based awards. As with the Prior Plans, all awards can only be made pursuant to the authority of the Board. Importantly, the 2005 Plan does not allow reloads, repricing, stock options issued at a discount to fair market value, or nonqualified stock options or stock appreciation rights to be transferred by a participant for consideration.
Description of the 2005 Plan
The 2005 Plan provides a means whereby employees can receive equity awards which will help them develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in the development and financial success of Grainger, and will encourage them to devote their best efforts to Grainger's business, thereby advancing the interests of Grainger and its shareholders.
The 2005 Plan is designed as a flexible share authorization plan. With a flexible share authorization plan, a company's share authorization is based on the least costly award vehicle (generally stock options). The value of an option is compared to a so-called "full value share" (discussed further below) to determine a valuation ratio. The Company has used a binominal model provided by an outside institutional shareholder advisory service to determine its valuation ratio of 1:2.36. This means that every time an option is granted, the authorized pool is reduced by one (1) share and every time a full value share is granted, the authorized pool is reduced by 2.36 shares.
The 2005 Plan will become effective upon shareholder approval and will terminate ten years later unless terminated sooner.
A summary of the material features of the 2005 Plan is provided below, but is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2005 Plan attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement.
2005 Plan Share Limits
The maximum number of shares of common stock authorized to be issued under the 2005 Plan is 9.5 million shares (subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of various corporate events as described in the 2005 Plan), all of which shall be new or treasury shares. Also available will be any of the shares already subject to awards granted and outstanding under the Prior Plans that cease to be subject to such awards for any reason (other than by exercise for, or settlement in, shares). If the 2005 Plan is approved by shareholders, no additional awards will be made after the date of approval under any of the Prior Plans, though awards previously granted under the Prior Plans will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.
27
Shares are counted against the authorization only to the extent they are actually issued. Thus, shares which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise are settled in cash in lieu of shares, or exchanged for awards not involving shares, shall again be available for grant under the 2005 Plan, including those awards granted under Prior Plans. Shares issued pursuant to "Full Value Awards" (awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights which are settled by the issuance of shares, e.g., restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units if settled with stock, or other stock-based awards) count against the 2005 Plan's share authorization at a rate of 2.36 to 1, while shares issued as stock options or stock appreciation rights count against the share authorization at a rate of 1 to 1.
Up to 5 percent of the 2005 Plan's share authorization may be issued pursuant to Full Value Awards without regard to the nature or extent of the applicable restrictions. Additional awards of Full Value Awards may be made only if the awards either vest more slowly than prorated annual vesting over a three-year period or vest based on the attainment of performance goals by reference to a performance period of at least 12 months.
Participant Award Limits
The 2005 Plan also imposes annual per-participant award limits for employees and executives, starting with calendar year 2005. The annual per-participant limits are as follows:
Award(s) |
Annual Limit |
|
---|---|---|
Stock Options |
600,000 shares, plus any unused limit from prior years |
|
SARs |
600,000 shares, plus any unused limit from prior years |
|
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units |
200,000 shares, plus any unused limit from prior years |
|
Performance Shares and Performance Units |
Value of 200,000 shares, plus any unused limit from prior years |
|
Cash-Based Awards |
$6,000,000, plus any unused limit from prior years |
|
Other Stock-Based Awards |
200,000 shares, plus any unused limit from prior years |
The number of shares that may be issued or subject to outstanding awards, the option price or grant price applicable to outstanding awards, the annual per-participant award limits, and other value determinations are subject to adjustment by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Committee") to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, reverse stock splits, and other corporate events or transactions, including without limitation distributions of stock or property other than normal cash dividends. The Committee may also make adjustments to reflect unusual or nonrecurring events.
Administration
The Committee is responsible for administering the 2005 Plan and has the discretionary power to interpret the terms and intent of the 2005 Plan and any related documentation, to determine eligibility for awards and the terms and conditions of awards, and to adopt rules, regulations, forms, instruments, and guidelines. Determinations of the Committee made under the 2005 Plan are final and binding. The Committee may delegate administrative duties and powers to one or more of its members or to one or more officers, agents, or advisors. The Committee may also delegate to one or more Grainger
28
officers the power to designate other employees (other than officers subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) to be recipients of awards.
Eligibility
Employees of Grainger and its affiliates and/or subsidiaries and nonemployee directors of Grainger who are selected by the Committee are eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan. There are currently approximately 15,000 eligible employees, and nine eligible nonemployee directors.
Types of Awards
The 2005 Plan provides that the Committee may grant awards of various types. A description of each of the types of awards follows.
Stock Options. The Committee may grant both incentive stock options ("ISOs") and nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs") under the 2005 Plan. Eligibility for ISOs is limited to employees of Grainger and its subsidiaries. The exercise price for options cannot be less than the fair market value of Grainger common stock as of the date of grant. The latest expiration date cannot be later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of grant (for an ISO, the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of grant if the recipient is a more than 10% shareholder). Fair market value under the 2005 Plan may be determined by reference to market prices on a particular trading day or on an average of trading days. The exercise price may be paid with cash or its equivalent, with previously acquired shares of common stock, or by other means approved by the Committee, including by means of a broker-assisted exercise.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may grant stock appreciation rights ("SARs") under the 2005 Plan either alone or in tandem with stock options. The grant price of an SAR cannot be less than the fair market value of Grainger common stock as of the date of grant. The grant price of an SAR granted in tandem with a stock option will be the same as the option price of the tandem option. SARs cannot be exercised later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of grant.
Freestanding SARs may be exercised on such terms as the Committee determines and tandem SARs may be exercised by relinquishing the related portion of the tandem option. Upon exercise of an SAR, the holder will receive from Grainger shares of common stock, equal in value to the difference between the fair market value of the common stock subject to the SAR, determined as described above, and the grant price.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may award restricted common stock and restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards consist of shares of stock that are transferred to the participant subject to restrictions that may result in forfeiture if specified conditions are not satisfied. Restricted stock unit awards result in the transfer of shares of stock to the participant only after specified conditions are satisfied. A holder of restricted stock is treated as a current shareholder and is entitled to dividend and voting rights, whereas the holder of a restricted stock unit award is treated as a shareholder with respect to the award only when the shares of common stock are delivered in the future. The Committee will determine the restrictions and conditions applicable to each award of restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Performance Share and Performance Unit Awards. Performance share and performance unit awards may be granted under the 2005 Plan. Performance shares will have an initial value that is based on the fair market value of the stock as of the date of grant. Performance unit awards will have an initial
29
value that is determined by the Committee. Such awards will be earned only if performance goals over performance periods established by or under the direction of the Committee are met. The performance goals may vary from participant to participant, group to group, and period to period. The performance goals for performance share and performance unit awards and any other awards granted under the 2005 Plan that are intended to constitute "qualified performance-based compensation" will be based upon one or more of the following:
The Committee will determine whether the performance targets or goals that have been chosen for a particular performance award have been met and may provide in an award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following that are objectively determinable and that occur during the performance period to which the award is subject: asset write-downs, litigation, claims, judgments, or settlements; the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reporting results; any reorganization and restructuring programs; extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in management's discussion of financial condition and results of operations appearing in Grainger's annual report to shareholders for the applicable year; acquisitions or divestitures; and foreign exchange gains and losses.
Awards that are designed to qualify as performance-based compensation may not be adjusted upward. However, the Committee has the discretion to adjust these awards downward. In addition,
30
the Committee has the discretion to make awards that do not qualify as performance-based compensation. Generally, awards may be paid in the form of cash, shares of common stock, or in any combination, as determined by the Committee.
Covered Employee Annual Incentive Awards. The Committee may designate the covered employees who will receive an annual incentive award based on a percentage of an incentive pool. The incentive pool is equal to 5 percent (5%) of Grainger's net earnings for the year. The Committee will allocate the pool among the covered employees designated by the Committee; however, no covered employee can receive more than 100 percent (100%) of the incentive pool, and the sum of the incentive pool percentages for all covered employees cannot exceed 100 percent (100%) of the total pool. The Committee cannot adjust these awards upward, but retains the discretion to adjust the awards downward.
Cash-Based Awards. The Committee may grant cash-based awards under the 2005 Plan that specify the amount of cash to which the award pertains, the conditions under which the award will be vested and exercisable or payable, and such other conditions as the Committee may determine that are consistent with the terms of the 2005 Plan. Although based on a specified amount of cash, cash-based awards may be paid, in the Committee's discretion, either in cash or by the delivery of shares of common stock.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant equity-based or equity-related awards, referred to as "other stock-based awards," other than options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, or performance units. The terms and conditions of each other stock-based award shall be determined by the Committee. Payment under any other stock-based award will be made in common stock or cash, as determined by the Committee.
Dividend Equivalents
Unless the Committee determines otherwise, dividend equivalents will be paid with respect to any shares of common stock subject to a Full Value Award that have not actually been issued under the award. Dividend equivalents will not be paid with respect to any option or SAR.
Termination of Employment
The Committee will determine how each award will be treated following termination of the holder's employment with or service for Grainger, including the extent to which unvested portions of the award will be forfeited and the extent to which options, SARs, or other awards requiring exercise will remain exercisable.
Treatment of Awards Upon a Change in Control
In the event of a "change in control" of Grainger, as defined in the 2005 Plan, then unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, any outstanding option or SAR shall become fully exercisable, and any outstanding restricted stock, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards, or other award that was forfeitable shall become nonforfeitable and fully vested, and, to the extent applicable, shall be converted into shares of Grainger common stock. Any payout or conversion of a performance-based award shall be done assuming performance was "at target" for the applicable performance period.
31
Treatment of Awards Upon Disposition of a Facility or Operating Unit
If Grainger closes or disposes of a facility or operating unit or sells or otherwise disposes of a subsidiary, then with respect to awards held by participants employed at the facility, unit, or subsidiary, the Committee may, but need not, to the extent consistent with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended ("Code") (if applicable) (i) accelerate the exercisability of the awards, (ii) remove any restrictions applicable to the awards, and/or (iii) extend for up to five years the period during which the awards may be exercised.
Amendment of Awards or 2005 Plan, and Adjustment of Awards
The Committee may at any time alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the 2005 Plan or any outstanding award in whole or in part. No amendment of the 2005 Plan will be made without shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required by law. No amendment may adversely affect the rights of any participant without his or her consent under an outstanding award, unless specifically provided for in the 2005 Plan.
Additional Provisions
Under no circumstances may a participant transfer an NQSO or an SAR for consideration. Neither ISOs nor, except as the Committee otherwise expressly determines, other awards may be transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. During a recipient's lifetime, an ISO and, except as the Committee may determine, other non-transferable awards requiring exercise, may be exercised only by the recipient.
If provided in the award agreement or an associated agreement, a participant's rights to an award may be subject to the participant agreeing to not compete with Grainger or any of its subsidiaries, and to not solicit away Grainger's business or employees. In addition, participants generally shall be subject to nondisclosure and nondisparagement requirements, as well as other requirements consistent with protecting the interests of the shareholders and Grainger. A breach of these restrictions may result in cancellation of awards or the recovery by Grainger of gain realized under an award.
No deferral of compensation, as defined under Code Section 409A, is permitted under the 2005 Plan. However, the Committee may permit a participant to defer compensation received under the 2005 Plan pursuant to a separate plan or a subplan which meets the requirements of Code Section 409A.
To comply with the laws in other countries in which Grainger or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries operate or may operate or have employees or directors, the Committee may establish subplans under the 2005 Plan and modify the terms of the awards made to such employees, and directors.
Nonemployee Director Awards
The 2005 Plan will also be used to grant equity awards to nonemployee directors, so that they too will develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in the development and financial success of Grainger and so that their interests will be more closely aligned with those of Grainger's shareholders.
No more than 450,000 shares in total may be issued to nonemployee directors, and no nonemployee director may receive an award for more than 10,000 shares in any calendar year.
32
Nonemployee directors can be granted any of the awards available under the 2005 Plan except ISOs, which are only available for employees. The Board shall from time to time determine the nature and number of awards to be granted to nonemployee directors.
New Plan Benefits
The future benefits or amounts that would be received under the 2005 Plan by executive officers, nonemployee directors and nonexecutive officer employees are discretionary and are therefore not determinable at this time. In addition, the benefits or amounts that would have been received by or allocated to such persons for the last completed fiscal year if the 2005 Plan had been in effect cannot be determined.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax consequences of the issuance and receipt of stock options under the 2005 Plan under the law in effect on the date of this proxy statement. The summary does not purport to cover all federal employment tax or other federal tax consequences that may be associated with the 2005 Plan, nor does it cover state, local, or non-U.S. taxes.
ISOs
In general, an optionee realizes no taxable income upon the grant or exercise of an ISO. However, the exercise of an ISO may result in an alternative minimum tax liability to the optionee. With some exceptions, a disposition of shares purchased under an ISO within two (2) years from the date of grant or within one (1) year after exercise produces ordinary income to the optionee equal to the value of the shares at the time of exercise less the exercise price. The same amount is deductible by Grainger as compensation. Any additional gain recognized in the disposition is treated as a capital gain for which Grainger is not entitled to a deduction.
NQSOs
In general, in the case of an NQSO, the optionee has no taxable income at the time of grant but realizes income in connection with exercise of the option in an amount equal to the excess (at the time of exercise) of the fair market value of shares acquired upon exercise over the exercise price. For employee optionees, the same amount is deductible by Grainger as compensation, provided that income taxes are withheld from the employee. Upon a subsequent sale or exchange of the shares, any recognized gain or loss after the date of exercise is treated as capital gain or loss for which Grainger is not entitled to a deduction. In general, an ISO that is exercised by the optionee more than three months after termination of employment is treated as an NQSO. ISOs are also treated as NQSOs to the extent they first become exercisable by an individual in any calendar year for shares having a fair market value (determined as of the date of grant) in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000).
Other
Awards under the 2005 Plan may be subject to tax withholding. Where an award results in income subject to withholding, Grainger may require the participant to remit the necessary taxes to Grainger. Participants may satisfy their tax withholding requirements by causing shares of common stock to be withheld.
33
In general, under Code Section 162(m), remuneration paid by a public corporation to its chief executive officer or any of its other top four named executive officers, ranked by pay, is not deductible to the extent it exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000) for any year. Taxable payments or benefits under the 2005 Plan may be subject to this deduction limit. However, under Code Section 162(m), qualifying performance-based compensation, including income from stock options and other performance-based awards that are made under shareholder-approved plans and that meet certain other requirements, is exempt from the deduction limitation. The 2005 Plan has been designed so that the Committee in its discretion may grant qualifying exempt performance-based awards under the 2005 Plan.
Under the so-called "golden parachute" provisions of the Code, the accelerated vesting of stock options, restricted stock and benefits paid under other awards in connection with a change in control of a corporation may be required to be valued and taken into account in determining whether participants have received compensatory payments, contingent on the change in control, in excess of certain limits. If these limits are exceeded, a portion of the amounts payable to the participant may be subject to an additional 20 percent (20%) federal tax and may be nondeductible to the corporation.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the proposal to approve the 2005 Incentive Plan.
Approval of the proposal requires the affirmative votes of a majority of the shares of Grainger common stock represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal.
34
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
Categorical Standards for Director Independence
Business Transactions. A director's independence will not be deemed to be impaired by reason of his or her service as an executive officer of another company that does business with Grainger if in each of the three most recent fiscal years the other company's annual sales to Grainger are less than one percent (1%) of that company's consolidated gross revenues and if in each of the three most recent fiscal years Grainger's sales to the other company are less than one percent (1%) of that company's consolidated gross revenues.
Tax-Exempt Contributions. A director's independence will not be deemed to be impaired by reason of his or her service as an officer, director or trustee of a tax-exempt organization that receives contributions from Grainger if Grainger's contributions to the organization are less than one percent (1%) of the organization's total annual contributions.
A-1
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
2005 Incentive Plan
Article 1. Establishment, Purpose, and Duration
This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Covered Employee Annual Incentive Awards, Other Stock-Based Awards, and Cash-Based Awards.
This Plan shall become effective upon shareholder approval (the "Effective Date") and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
Article 2. Definitions
Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized.
B-1
provided, however, that if the consummation of an event described in this paragraph (i) (a "Transaction") is subject to an Other Party Approval Requirement (as defined below), the approval of such Transaction by the shareholders of the Company shall not be deemed a Change in Control until the first date on which such Other Party Approval Requirement has been satisfied. For this purpose, "Other Party Approval Requirement" means a requirement expressly set forth in a Transaction Agreement (as defined below) between the Company and another Person to the effect that such Person shall obtain the approval of one or more elements of the Transaction by the shareholders, members, partners, or other holders of equity interests of such Person (or of a parent of such Person) prior to the consummation of such Transaction in order to comply with the mandatory provisions of (x) the law of the jurisdiction of the incorporation or organization of such Person (or its parent) or (y) the articles of incorporation or other charter or organizational documents of such Person (or its parent) that are applicable to such
B-2
Transaction. For this purpose, "Transaction Agreement" means a written agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions of the Transaction;
Notwithstanding the occurrence of any of the events specified in paragraphs (i), (ii), or (iii) of this definition, no Change in Control shall occur with respect to any Participant if (x) the event which otherwise would be a Change in Control (or the transaction which resulted in such event) was initiated by such Participant, or was discussed by him with any third party, without the approval of the Board with respect to such Participant's initiation or discussion, as applicable, or (y) such Participant is, by written agreement, a participant on his own behalf in a transaction in which the persons (or their affiliates) with whom such Participant has the written agreement cause the Change in Control to occur and, pursuant to the written agreement, such Participant has an equity interest (or a right to acquire such equity interest) in the resulting entity.
B-3
B-4
defined as the "Slavik Family Members." The Grainger Family Members and the Slavik Family Members are collectively defined as "Family Members);
B-5
hereunder, the determination of their Fair Market Value shall be made by the Committee in such manner as it deems appropriate. Such definition(s) of FMV shall be specified in each Award Agreement and may differ depending on whether FMV is in reference to the grant, exercise, vesting, settlement, or payout of an Award; provided, however, that upon a broker-assisted exercise of an Option, the FMV shall be the price at which the Shares are sold by the broker.
B-6
B-7
Article 3. Administration
B-8
Article 4. Shares Subject to this Plan and Maximum Awards
B-9
The Committee, in its sole discretion, may also make appropriate adjustments in the terms of any Awards under this Plan to reflect or related to such changes or distributions and to modify any other terms of outstanding Awards, including modifications of performance goals
B-10
and changes in the length of Performance Periods. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under this Plan.
Subject to the provisions of Article 18, without affecting the number of Shares reserved or available hereunder, the Committee may authorize the issuance or assumption of benefits under this Plan in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, or reorganization upon such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate, subject to compliance with the ISO rules under Section 422 of the Code, where applicable.
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation
Article 6. Stock Options
B-11
A condition of the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option shall be exercised shall be the payment of the Option Price. The Option Price of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the Option Price (provided that except as otherwise determined by the Committee, the Shares that are tendered must have been held by the Participant for at least six (6) months (or such other period, if any, as the Committee may permit) prior to their tender to satisfy the Option Price if acquired under this Plan or any other compensation plan maintained by the Company, or have been purchased on the open market); (c) by a combination of (a) and (b); or (d) any other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole discretion, including, without limitation, if the Committee so determines, a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise.
Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of written notification of exercise and full payment (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding), the Company shall deliver to the Participant evidence of book entry Shares, or upon the Participant's request, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares purchased under the Option(s).
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated above shall be paid in United States dollars.
B-12
Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of SARs granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions of this Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to such SARs.
The Grant Price for each grant of a Freestanding SAR shall be determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Award Agreement; provided, however, the Grant Price must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares as of the date of grant. The Grant Price of Tandem SARs shall be equal to the Option Price of the related Option.
B-13
The payment upon SAR exercise shall be in Shares.
Article 8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
B-14
To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company's possession until such time as all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse.
Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding obligations), and Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares as the Committee, in its sole discretion shall determine.
"The sale or transfer of Shares of stock represented by this certificate, whether voluntary, involuntary, or by operation of law, is subject to certain restrictions on transfer as set forth in the W.W. Grainger, Inc. 2005 Incentive Plan, and in the associated Award Agreement. A copy of this Plan and such Award Agreement may be obtained from W.W. Grainger, Inc."
B-15
Committee, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may be granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares during the Period of Restriction. A Participant shall have no voting rights with respect to any Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder.
Article 9. Performance Shares/Performance Units
B-16
any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of payout of such Awards shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the Award.
Article 10. Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards
B-17
Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, such provisions may be included in an Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, but need not be uniform among all Awards of Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards issued pursuant to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
Article 11. Performance Measures
B-18
Any Performance Measure(s) may be used to measure the performance of the Company, Affiliate, and/or Subsidiary as a whole or any business unit of the Company, Affiliate, and/or Subsidiary or any combination thereof, as the Committee may deem appropriate, or any of the above Performance Measures as compared to the performance of a group of comparator companies, or published or special index that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, or the Company may select Performance Measure (j) above as compared to various stock market indices. The Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified in this Article 11.
Article 12. Covered Employee Annual Incentive Award
B-19
the incentive pool percentages for all Covered Employees cannot exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the total pool.
Article 13. Nonemployee Director Awards
The Board or Committee shall determine all Awards to Nonemployee Directors. The terms and conditions of any grant to any such Nonemployee Director shall be set forth in an Award Agreement.
Article 14. Dividend Equivalents
Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, dividend equivalents shall be granted for each Full Value Award based on the dividends declared on Shares that are subject to such Full Value Award, to be credited as of dividend payment dates, during the period between the date the Full Value Award is granted and the date the Full Value Award is exercised, vests or expires. Such dividend equivalents shall be converted to cash or additional Shares by such formula and at such time and subject to such limitations as may be determined by the Committee. Under no circumstances may dividend equivalents be granted for any Option or SAR.
Article 15. Beneficiary Designation
Each Participant under this Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under this Plan is to be paid in case of his death before he receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant's lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant's death shall be paid to the Participant's estate.
Article 16. Rights of Participants
Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries and, accordingly, subject to Articles 3 and 18, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be terminated at any time in the
B-20
sole and exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to any liability on the part of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries.
Article 17. Change in Control
Except as otherwise provided at the time of grant in the certificate, notice or agreement relating to a particular Award, if a Change in Control occurs, then:
Article 18. Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination
B-21
Article 19. Withholding
Article 20. Successors
All obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.
Article 21. General Provisions
B-22
to the Participant, or other conduct by the Participant that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries.
B-23
Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries operate or have Employees and/or Directors, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to:
Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate applicable law.
B-24
B-25
resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under this Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him in settlement thereof, with the Company's approval, or paid by him in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him, provided he shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he undertakes to handle and defend it on his own behalf, unless such loss, cost, liability, or expense is a result of his own willful misconduct or except as expressly provided by statute.
The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such individuals may be entitled under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation of Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.
B-26
0945-PS-05
C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694
Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.
Vote-by-Internet | OR | Vote-by-Telephone | ||
Log on to the Internet and go to http://www.eproxyvote.com/gww |
Call toll-free 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683) |
If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.
DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL | ZWWG21 |
ý |
Please mark votes as in this example. |
#WWG |
MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" ITEMS 1, 2, AND 3. |
||||||||||||||||||
1. Election of Directors. Nominees: (01) Brian P. Anderson, (02) Wilbur H. Gantz, (03) David W. Grainger, (04) William K. Hall, (05) Richard L. Keyser, (06) John W. McCarter, Jr., (07) Neil S. Novich, (08) Gary L. Rogers, (09) James D. Slavik, (10) Harold B. Smith |
2. |
Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005. |
FOR o |
AGAINST o |
ABSTAIN o |
|||||||||||||
3. | Proposal to approve the 2005 Incentive Plan. | o | o | o | ||||||||||||||
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
o |
o |
WITHHOLD FROM ALL NOMINEES |
4. |
In their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. |
|||||||||||||
o |
For all nominees except as noted above |
|||||||||||||||||
MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE AT LEFT | o | |||||||||||||||||
MARK HERE IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING | o | |||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear hereon. Joint owners should each sign personally. If signing in a fiduciary or representative capacity, give full title as such. |
Signature: |
Date: |
Signature: |
Date: |
DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL | ZWWGC2 |
COMMON PROXY |
W.W. GRAINGER, INC. |
COMMON PROXY |
100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045-5201 |
||
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
||
Proxy for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, April 27, 2005 |
The undersigned hereby appoints David W. Grainger and Richard L. Keyser, and each of them, proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote all of the shares of the Common Stock of W.W. Grainger, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of W.W. Grainger, Inc. to be held on April 27, 2005 and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present and voting thereat.
A majority of said proxies or substitutes who shall be present at the meeting may exercise all powers hereunder. All proxies will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, the proxy will be voted FOR items 1, 2, and 3. If authority is given to vote for the election of directors, this proxy may be voted cumulatively for directors as set forth in the proxy statement.
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
CONTINUED, AND TO BE SIGNED AND DATED, ON REVERSE SIDE | SEE REVERSE SIDE |