Genesis Energy, L.P. (NYSE: GEL) today announced its third quarter results.

We generated the following financial results for the third quarter of 2021:

• Net Loss Attributable to Genesis Energy, L.P. of $20.9 million for the third quarter of 2021 compared to Net Loss Attributable to Genesis Energy, L.P. of $29.7 million for the same period in 2020.

• Cash Flows from Operating Activities of $54.2 million for the third quarter of 2021 compared to $143.5 million for the same period in 2020.

• Total Segment Margin of $153.9 million for the third quarter of 2021.

• Available Cash before Reserves to common unitholders of $48.2 million for the third quarter of 2021, which provided 2.62X coverage for the quarterly distribution of $0.15 per common unit attributable to the third quarter.

• We declared cash distributions on our preferred units of $0.7374 for each preferred unit, which equates to a cash distribution of approximately $18.7 million and is reflected as a reduction to Available Cash before Reserves to common unitholders.

• Adjusted EBITDA of $140.5 million in the third quarter of 2021.

• Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA of $603.1 million for the last twelve months ended September 30, 2021 and a bank leverage ratio of 5.51X, both calculated in accordance with our credit agreement and are discussed further in this release.

Grant Sims, CEO of Genesis Energy, said, “The third quarter was generally in-line with our expectations, but more importantly, we continue to make steady progress towards our goal of building long-term value for all of our stakeholders. As we look forward, we remain on track to see increasing volumes in the Gulf of Mexico in the first half of 2022 and improving market conditions in our soda ash business, driven by the on-going global economic recovery and the tailwinds associated with the energy transition. We are also now less than 2 years away from first soda ash on the belt from our expanded Granger facility which is poised to benefit from these ongoing market trends. The next 24-36 months will start to bear the fruit of our world-class leading infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico, the competitive strengths of our soda ash business, and ultimately the earnings power of our market leading businesses.

Our offshore pipeline transportation segment performed in-line with our expectations despite a steady level of maintenance by our producer customers and longer than anticipated downtime associated with Hurricane Ida. We did not experience any damage to our assets, nor did any of our producer customers, but the path of the storm greatly impacted a number of onshore facilities critical to the receipt and downstream movement of offshore oil and gas production. As a result, we did experience longer than anticipated downtime during the quarter, primarily on our Poseidon pipeline which was a direct result of the lack of power at certain third-party facilities and gas processing limitations onshore. Once our CHOPS pipeline resumed service, we were able to divert certain barrels that would otherwise flow on our Poseidon pipeline to our CHOPS pipeline which allowed certain producer customers to restart their production earlier than they anticipated. This once again highlights the connectivity and the multi-delivery point optionality of our offshore systems that we provide our producer customers in the Central Gulf of Mexico.

We continue to expect some heavy maintenance in the fourth quarter at one of our major host platforms that will cause certain production volumes to be offline for approximately 3 weeks, which is in part to debottleneck their facility and move a rig in to drill a new development well. In addition, we will experience the financial impact from our Poseidon pipeline being down in September as a result of Hurricane Ida as the distribution we receive in the fourth quarter covers business activities on our Poseidon pipeline from September through November. As such, we would reasonably expect the fourth quarter to come in at the lower end of our previous guidance range of $80 - $85 million per quarter.

Turning to our sodium minerals and sulfur services segment. During the third quarter, we saw a steady improvement in the overall market conditions for soda ash. We remain very encouraged with the overall supply and demand balance dynamics, and we expect the market to do nothing but grind tighter over the coming years as we continue to recover from the pandemic and the demand tailwinds as the various green initiatives and energy transition continue to build. As we sit here today, spot export prices FOB Chinese port have continued to rise throughout the year as Chinese exporters have chosen to supply the Chinese domestic market over exporting soda ash. As we have discussed before, we generally do not place tons into the spot market given the long lead time and logistical challenges but believe the current backdrop positions us well as we begin in earnest both pricing and volume discussions for 2022.

These increases in price have been driven by a significant recovery in global demand as well as rising energy input costs and container and bulk shipping rates. All producers of soda ash are experiencing similar cost inflation from their energy inputs, especially synthetic producers, whose chemical process is 2-3 times more energy intensive than natural producers. One could reasonably infer that synthetic producers are experiencing a much greater cost impact from the rise in their energy input costs and thus need soda ash prices to increase correspondingly to preserve their margins and ultimately provide support for more high cost synthetic tons to enter the market to supply the marginal ton of soda ash demand worldwide.

The effect of rising energy prices on us is quite manageable. We would note that only about a third of our thermal energy demand for both our steam and process heat requirements is directly exposed to fluctuations in the spot price of natural gas. We strive to maintain a balanced portfolio of financial hedges for our natural gas volumes and pass-through mechanisms in an effort to reduce our exposure to any significant fluctuations in our energy input costs. Along these lines, the majority of both domestic and export sales contracts contain existing provisions that allow us to pass along certain increases in natural gas prices directly to our customers, and in the case of ANSAC a fuel surcharge for increases in bunker fuel related to its costs of marine transportation. In fact, ANSAC has just implemented a per ton fuel surcharge in its sales contracts, as applicable, to pass on the cost impact of increases in natural gas prices above $5.00 per MMBtu.

Turning to the Granger expansion, large capital outlays associated with long lead time items were secured in late 2019 and early 2020. When we resumed active work in March and April of this year, we locked in the vast majority of all additional, anticipated costs to get to mechanical completion. As a result, we remain confident that the total project will come in around our initial estimate of approximately $350 million, absent any significant scope changes which would be wholly within our control. The Granger expansion project remains on schedule to be the first global expansion of natural soda ash in over 4 years with the first soda ash scheduled to be on the belt in the third quarter of 2023, if not a little sooner, with an expected ramp to its design capacity of 1.3 million tons per year over the subsequent 9 - 12 months. In the meantime, our team has started to evaluate the possibility of re-starting the original Granger facility in advance of the fully expanded Granger facility. If market conditions persist, and specifically export pricing continues to improve through 2022 and into 2023, we could look to possibly restart the original Granger facility and its roughly 500,000 tons of production as early as the first quarter of 2023.

Our legacy refinery services business performed in-line with our expectations despite the continued increase in caustic soda prices. Approximately 70-75% of our NaHS contracts are indexed to the price of caustic soda and thus any price increases are directly passed through to our customers while our remaining contracts are shorter term in duration which also allows us to re-set our pricing to pass along any increases in our input costs. Demand for our NaHS product continues to be robust driven by our copper customers, who continue to produce as much copper as possible with prices above $4.50 per pound, and our pulp and paper customers as packaging demand continues to remain very strong.

As we look forward, Genesis remains well positioned to benefit from increasing amounts of free cash flow over the coming years and thus we do not foresee a scenario where we do not comfortably live within our senior secured bank covenants moving forward. As a result of the unplanned downtime in our offshore pipeline transportation and marine transportation segments associated with Hurricane Ida, we would expect to come in slightly below our previously announced guidance for the full year of Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA, or around $620 million¹, which includes approximately $30-$35 million of pro forma adjustments. The management team remains steadfast in our commitment to building long-term value for all of our stakeholders, through a combination of leverage reduction and tangible growth in our free cash flow and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA, and we continue to believe the decisions we are making reflect this commitment and our confidence in Genesis moving forward.

I would like to once again recognize our entire workforce, and especially our miners, mariners and offshore personnel who live and work in close quarters during this time of social distancing. I am extremely proud to say we have safely operated our assets under our own Covid-19 safety procedures and protocols with no impact to our business partners and customers. As always, we intend to be prudent, diligent and intelligent and focus on delivering long-term value for everyone in our capital structure without ever losing our commitment to safe, reliable and responsible operations."

Financial Results

Segment Margin

Variances between the third quarter of 2021 (the “2021 Quarter”) and the third quarter of 2020 (the “2020 Quarter”) in these components are explained below.

Segment Margin results for the 2021 Quarter and 2020 Quarter were as follows:

Offshore pipeline transportation Segment Margin for the 2021 Quarter increased $18.7 million, or 33%, from the 2020 Quarter primarily due to higher crude oil and natural gas transportation volumes. During the 2020 Quarter, our offshore pipeline transportation segment experienced an unprecedented period of unplanned downtime and interruption from Hurricanes Laura and Marco as a result of producers shutting in and us taking the necessary safety precautions to remove all personnel from the platforms that we operate and maintain. As a result of these named storms, the majority of our assets were shut in for one to two weeks and our CHOPS pipeline was out of service beginning August 26, 2020 until it resumed service on February 4, 2021. Additionally, we incurred incremental operating expenses during the 2020 Quarter related to certain regulatory inspections and analyses performed to ensure our assets were safe to return to service. While we experienced downtime from Hurricane Ida during the 2021 Quarter, the impact to our results in the period was not as significant as the events during the 2020 Quarter. As it relates to Hurricane Ida, we did not experience any damage to our assets but we did experience longer than anticipated downtime during the quarter, primarily on our Poseidon pipeline which was a direct result of the lack of power at certain third-party facilities and the gas processing limitations onshore. The financial impact from our Poseidon pipeline being down for a part of September as a result of Hurricane Ida will impact the fourth quarter of 2021 as the distribution we receive during that period covers business activities on our Poseidon pipeline from September through November.

Sodium minerals and sulfur services Segment Margin for the 2021 Quarter increased $12.1 million, or 44%. This increase is primarily due to higher soda ash volumes and slightly favorable export pricing in our Alkali Business. During the 2020 Quarter, volume demand in our Alkali Business was significantly impacted by the worldwide economic shutdowns and uncertainty from the Covid-19 pandemic. As economies have continued to open up and reduce restrictions, we have seen demand recovery, both domestically and internationally through ANSAC. We continued to produce at a high rate at our Westvaco facility during the 2021 Quarter. Additionally, we saw slightly favorable export pricing in the 2021 Quarter relative to the 2020 Quarter and sequentially from the first half of 2021, which is evidence that the supply and demand balance is becoming more aligned. In our refinery services business, our NaHS sales volumes remained relatively flat between the 2021 Quarter and 2020 Quarter as demand has continued to recover and return to its pre-pandemic levels over the last twelve months due to the re-opening of economies. NaHS revenues and Segment Margin contribution were higher in the 2021 Quarter due to favorable index pricing and economies of scale associated with the higher production at our largest host refinery in the 2021 Quarter.

Onshore facilities and transportation Segment Margin for the 2021 Quarter decreased $32.2 million, or 52%. This decrease is primarily due to lower cash receipts of approximately $29 million received during the 2021 Quarter from Denbury associated with our previously owned NEJD pipeline. During the 2020 Quarter, we received a total of $46.5 million in cash payments associated with NEJD, including approximately $41 million associated with the exercise of a letter of credit we had issued to us as a result of our customer's default. During the 2021 Quarter, we received $17.5 million in cash payments with our previously owned NEJD pipeline as a result of our agreement reached during the fourth quarter of 2020 with Denbury. Additionally, we divested our Free State pipeline during the fourth quarter of 2020, which contributed positively to Segment Margin during the 2020 Quarter.

Marine transportation Segment Margin for the 2021 Quarter decreased $6.6 million, or 42%, from the 2020 Quarter. This decrease is primarily attributable to lower day rates in our inland business and on our M/T American Phoenix tanker during the 2021 Quarter relative to the 2020 Quarter. During the 2021 Quarter, we began to see improvement (especially as we exited the period) in our inland barge utilization, but we expect to see continued pressure on our utilization and rates as Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries have continued to run at lower utilization rates to better align with overall demand as a result of Covid-19 and the current operating environment, including the negative effects and temporary refinery shutdowns from Hurricane Ida in September. Additionally, we had a period of downtime for certain of our inland barge assets resulting from the storm. In our offshore barge operation, our previous five year contract associated with our M/T American Phoenix ended on September 30, 2020 and we have operated it under shorter term contracts and lower day rates since that period. Beginning in the second quarter of 2021, we re-contracted her with an investment grade refining company through the first quarter of 2022 at a more attractive day rate than the initial short term contracts we entered into between October 2020 and March 2021, albeit still lower than the day rate we received during the 2020 Quarter. We have continued to enter into short term contracts (less than a year) in both the inland and offshore markets because we believe the day rates currently being offered by the market have yet to fully recover.

Other Components of Net Income

We recorded Net Loss Attributable to Genesis Energy, L.P. of $20.9 million in the 2021 Quarter compared to Net Loss Attributable to Genesis Energy, L.P. of $29.7 million in the 2020 Quarter.

Net Loss Attributable to Genesis Energy, L.P. in the 2021 Quarter was impacted, relative to the 2020 Quarter, by: (i) an increase in operating income associated with our offshore pipeline transportation and sodium minerals and sulfur services segments due to higher volumes and corresponding revenue during the 2021 Quarter and (ii) lower impairment expense of $3.3 million as the 2020 Quarter included a write-off of one of our non-core offshore gas platforms. These increases were offset by: (i) higher interest expense of $8.6 million during the 2021 Quarter, (ii) an unrealized (non-cash) gain from the valuation of the embedded derivative associated with our Class A Convertible Preferred Units of $1.7 million in the 2021 Quarter compared to an unrealized (non-cash) gain of $6.7 million during the 2020 Quarter recorded within Other income (expense), (iii) lower equity in earnings of equity investees by approximately $4.1 million, and (iv) higher general and administrative costs by $3.3 million during the 2021 Quarter.

Earnings Conference Call

We will broadcast our Earnings Conference Call on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Central time (10:00 a.m. Eastern time). This call can be accessed at www.genesisenergy.com. Choose the Investor Relations button. For those unable to attend the live broadcast, a replay will be available beginning approximately one hour after the event and remain available on our website for 30 days. There is no charge to access the event.

Genesis Energy, L.P. is a diversified midstream energy master limited partnership headquartered in Houston, Texas. Genesis’ operations include offshore pipeline transportation, sodium minerals and sulfur services, onshore facilities and transportation and marine transportation. Genesis’ operations are primarily located in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Wyoming and the Gulf of Mexico.

This press release includes forward-looking statements as defined under federal law. Although we believe that our expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our goals will be achieved. Actual results may vary materially. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including but not limited to statements relating to future financial and operating results and compliance with our credit facility covenants, the anticipated benefits of our transactions with Denbury, our expectations regarding the potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and our strategy and plans, are forward-looking statements, and historical performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Those forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, factors and risks, many of which are outside our control, that could cause results to differ materially from those expected by management. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, weather, political, economic and market conditions, including a decline in the price and market demand for products (which may be affected by the actions of OPEC and other oil exporting nations) and a reduction in demand for our services resulting in further impairments of our assets, the outbreak or continued spread of disease (including Covid-19), the timing and success of business development efforts and other uncertainties, and the realized benefits of the preferred equity investment in Alkali Holdings Company, LLC by affiliates of GSO Capital Partners LP or our ability to comply with the Granger transaction agreements and maintain control and ownership of our alkali business. Those and other applicable uncertainties, factors and risks that may affect those forward-looking statements are described more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other filings, including our Current Reports on Form 8-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.

NON-GAAP MEASURES

This press release and the accompanying schedules include non-generally accepted accounting principle (non-GAAP) financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA and total Available Cash before Reserves. In this press release, we also present total Segment Margin as if it were a non-GAAP measure. Our non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because such measures may include or exclude other specified items. The accompanying schedules provide reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP). Our non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered (i) as alternatives to GAAP measures of liquidity or financial performance or (ii) as being singularly important in any particular context; they should be considered in a broad context with other quantitative and qualitative information. Our Available Cash before Reserves, Adjusted EBITDA and total Segment Margin measures are just three of the relevant data points considered from time to time.

When evaluating our performance and making decisions regarding our future direction and actions (including making discretionary payments, such as quarterly distributions) our board of directors and management team have access to a wide range of historical and forecasted qualitative and quantitative information, such as our financial statements; operational information; various non-GAAP measures; internal forecasts; credit metrics; analyst opinions; performance, liquidity and similar measures; income; cash flow; and expectations for us, and certain information regarding some of our peers. Additionally, our board of directors and management team analyze, and place different weight on, various factors from time to time. We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures being utilized by management, lenders, analysts and other market participants. We attempt to provide adequate information to allow each individual investor and other external user to reach her/his own conclusions regarding our actions without providing so much information as to overwhelm or confuse such investor or other external user.

AVAILABLE CASH BEFORE RESERVES

Purposes, Uses and Definition

Available Cash before Reserves, also referred to as distributable cash flow, is a quantitative standard used throughout the investment community with respect to publicly traded partnerships and is commonly used as a supplemental financial measure by management and by external users of financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and rating agencies, to aid in assessing, among other things:

We define Available Cash before Reserves ("Available Cash before Reserves") as Adjusted EBITDA as adjusted for certain items, the most significant of which in the relevant reporting periods have been the sum of maintenance capital utilized, net cash interest expense, cash tax expense, and cash distributions paid to our Class A convertible preferred unitholders.

Disclosure Format Relating to Maintenance Capital

We use a modified format relating to maintenance capital requirements because our maintenance capital expenditures vary materially in nature (discretionary vs. non-discretionary), timing and amount from time to time. We believe that, without such modified disclosure, such changes in our maintenance capital expenditures could be confusing and potentially misleading to users of our financial information, particularly in the context of the nature and purposes of our Available Cash before Reserves measure. Our modified disclosure format provides those users with information in the form of our maintenance capital utilized measure (which we deduct to arrive at Available Cash before Reserves). Our maintenance capital utilized measure constitutes a proxy for non-discretionary maintenance capital expenditures and it takes into consideration the relationship among maintenance capital expenditures, operating expenses and depreciation from period to period.

Maintenance Capital Requirements

Maintenance Capital Expenditures

Maintenance capital expenditures are capitalized costs that are necessary to maintain the service capability of our existing assets, including the replacement of any system component or equipment which is worn out or obsolete. Maintenance capital expenditures can be discretionary or non-discretionary, depending on the facts and circumstances.

Initially, substantially all of our maintenance capital expenditures were (a) related to our pipeline assets and similar infrastructure, (b) non-discretionary in nature and (c) immaterial in amount as compared to our Available Cash before Reserves measure. Those historical expenditures were non-discretionary (or mandatory) in nature because we had very little (if any) discretion as to whether or when we incurred them. We had to incur them in order to continue to operate the related pipelines in a safe and reliable manner and consistently with past practices. If we had not made those expenditures, we would not have been able to continue to operate all or portions of those pipelines, which would not have been economically feasible. An example of a non-discretionary (or mandatory) maintenance capital expenditure would be replacing a segment of an old pipeline because one can no longer operate that pipeline safely, legally and/or economically in the absence of such replacement.

As we exist today, a substantial amount of our maintenance capital expenditures from time to time will be (a) related to our assets other than pipelines, such as our marine vessels, trucks and similar assets, (b) discretionary in nature and (c) potentially material in amount as compared to our Available Cash before Reserves measure. Those expenditures will be discretionary (or non-mandatory) in nature because we will have significant discretion as to whether or when we incur them. We will not be forced to incur them in order to continue to operate the related assets in a safe and reliable manner. If we chose not make those expenditures, we would be able to continue to operate those assets economically, although in lieu of maintenance capital expenditures, we would incur increased operating expenses, including maintenance expenses. An example of a discretionary (or non-mandatory) maintenance capital expenditure would be replacing an older marine vessel with a new marine vessel with substantially similar specifications, even though one could continue to economically operate the older vessel in spite of its increasing maintenance and other operating expenses.

In summary, as we continue to expand certain non-pipeline portions of our business, we are experiencing changes in the nature (discretionary vs. non-discretionary), timing and amount of our maintenance capital expenditures that merit a more detailed review and analysis than was required historically. Management’s recently increasing ability to determine if and when to incur certain maintenance capital expenditures is relevant to the manner in which we analyze aspects of our business relating to discretionary and non-discretionary expenditures. We believe it would be inappropriate to derive our Available Cash before Reserves measure by deducting discretionary maintenance capital expenditures, which we believe are similar in nature in this context to certain other discretionary expenditures, such as growth capital expenditures, distributions/dividends and equity buybacks. Unfortunately, not all maintenance capital expenditures are clearly discretionary or non-discretionary in nature. Therefore, we developed a measure, maintenance capital utilized, that we believe is more useful in the determination of Available Cash before Reserves. Our maintenance capital utilized measure, which is described in more detail below, constitutes a proxy for non-discretionary maintenance capital expenditures and it takes into consideration the relationship among maintenance capital expenditures, operating expenses and depreciation from period to period.

Maintenance Capital Utilized

We believe our maintenance capital utilized measure is the most useful quarterly maintenance capital requirements measure to use to derive our Available Cash before Reserves measure. We define our maintenance capital utilized measure as that portion of the amount of previously incurred maintenance capital expenditures that we utilize during the relevant quarter, which would be equal to the sum of the maintenance capital expenditures we have incurred for each project/component in prior quarters allocated ratably over the useful lives of those projects/components.

Because we did not initially use our maintenance capital utilized measure, our future maintenance capital utilized calculations will reflect the utilization of solely those maintenance capital expenditures incurred since December 31, 2013.

ADJUSTED EBITDA

Purposes, Uses and Definition

Adjusted EBITDA is commonly used as a supplemental financial measure by management and by external users of financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and rating agencies, to aid in assessing, among other things:

We define Adjusted EBITDA (“Adjusted EBITDA”) as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including impairment, write-offs, accretion and similar items, often referred to as EBITDA) after eliminating other non-cash revenues, expenses, gains, losses and charges (including any loss on asset dispositions), plus or minus certain other select items that we view as not indicative of our core operating results (collectively, "Select Items"). Although, we do not necessarily consider all of our Select Items to be non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, we believe that an understanding of these Select Items is important to the evaluation of our core operating results. The most significant Select Items in the relevant reporting periods are set forth below.

The table below includes the Select Items discussed above as applicable to the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Available Cash before Reserves to net income:

SEGMENT MARGIN

Our chief operating decision maker (our Chief Executive Officer) evaluates segment performance based on a variety of measures including Segment Margin, segment volumes where relevant and capital investment. We define Segment Margin ("Segment Margin") as revenues less product costs, operating expenses, and segment general and administrative expenses, after eliminating gain or loss on sale of assets, plus or minus applicable Select Items. Although, we do not necessarily consider all of our Select Items to be non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, we believe that an understanding of these Select Items is important to the evaluation of our core operating results.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211104005222/en/