sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 18, 2008
Registration
No. 333-150227
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
FLUIDIGM CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3826
|
|
77-0513190
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
7000 Shoreline Court, Suite 100
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 266-6000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrants principal executive
offices)
Gajus V. Worthington
President and Chief Executive Officer
7000 Shoreline Court, Suite 100
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 266-6000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Segre
Robert F. Kornegay
Asaf H. Kharal
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati P.C.
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
(650) 493-9300
Telecopy:
(650) 493-6811
|
|
William M. Smith
Vice President, Legal Affairs
and General Counsel
7000 Shoreline Court, Suite 100
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Telephone: (650) 266-6000
Telecopy: (650) 871-7152
|
|
Charles K. Ruck
B. Shayne Kennedy
Latham & Watkins LLP
650 Town Center Drive,
20th Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (714) 540-1235
Telecopy: (714) 755-8290
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act, as amended, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Ruler
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment that
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to such
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is declared effective. This preliminary prospectus is
not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an
offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or
sale is not permitted.
|
PROSPECTUS
(Subject to Completion)
Issued
July 18, 2008
Shares
COMMON STOCK
Fluidigm Corporation is
offering shares
of its common stock. This is our initial public offering, and no
public market currently exists for our shares. We anticipate
that the initial public offering price will be between
$ and
$ per share.
We have applied to list our common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol FLDM.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See
Risk Factors beginning on page 8.
PRICE
$
A SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
Fluidigm
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an
additional shares
of common stock to cover over-allotments.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities
regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated expects to deliver
the shares to purchasers
on ,
2008.
MORGAN
STANLEY
UBS
INVESTMENT BANK
LEERINK
SWANN
,
2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
EXHIBIT 23.1 |
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus and in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on
behalf of us. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with information different
from, or in addition to, that contained in this prospectus or
any related free writing prospectus. This prospectus is an offer
to sell only the shares offered hereby but only under
circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so.
The information contained in this prospectus is current only as
of its date.
Through and
including, ,
2008 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to a dealers obligation to
deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.
For investors outside the United States: Neither we nor any of
the underwriters have done anything that would permit this
offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any
jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other
than the United States. You are required to inform yourselves
about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering
and the distribution of this prospectus.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained in greater
detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not
contain all the information that you should consider before
investing in our common stock. You should read the entire
prospectus carefully, including Risk Factors
beginning on page 8 and our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus, before making an investment decision. Unless
otherwise indicated, the terms Fluidigm,
we, us and our refer to
Fluidigm Corporation.
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Overview
We develop, manufacture and market proprietary Integrated
Fluidic Circuit systems that significantly improve productivity
in the life science industry. Our Integrated Fluidic Circuits,
or IFCs, address critical industry needs by providing very
large-scale integration of essential laboratory functions on a
single microfabricated device. IFCs can measure, combine,
diffuse, fold, mix, separate or pump nanoliter volumes of fluids
with precise control and reproducibility. Based on their
similarities to the integrated circuit that revolutionized the
microelectronics industry, we often refer to our IFCs as
integrated circuits for biology. These devices
enable our customers to perform thousands of sophisticated
biochemical reactions and measurements in parallel on samples
smaller than the content of a single cell, while reducing the
consumption of expensive laboratory chemicals. Particularly for
large-scale experimentation, our IFC systems increase
throughput, decrease costs and enhance sensitivity compared to
conventional laboratory systems.
We have commercialized IFC systems, consisting of
instrumentation, software and single-use IFCs, for a wide range
of life science applications. Researchers and clinicians have
successfully employed our products in achieving breakthroughs
across diverse scientific disciplines such as genetic variation,
cellular function and structural biology. These advances include
using our systems to help detect life-threatening mutations in
patients cancer cells, discover indicators of
susceptibility to cancer, manage some of the worlds most
valuable fisheries, analyze the genetic composition of
individual stem cells, identify fetal chromosomal abnormalities
from maternal blood samples, analyze the aggressiveness of the
avian flu virus and assess the quality of agricultural seed
products. We believe that the flexible architecture of our IFC
technology will lead to the development of IFC systems for a
wide variety of additional markets and applications, including
molecular diagnostics.
We believe our success and continued growth prospects are
attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Disruptive Technology. We believe we have
achieved a level of miniaturization in microfluidics that allows
us to integrate the components required to automate a broad
range of life science applications in an area less than half the
size of a credit card. Our IFCs deliver orders of magnitude
improvements in cost and labor efficiencies, while being easily
incorporated into existing laboratory workflows and allowing the
use of broadly accepted chemistries.
|
|
|
|
Proven Customer Adoption. We have sold our
IFCs to over 100 customers. These customers include many leading
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, academic
institutions and life science laboratories worldwide.
|
|
|
|
Broad Application in the Life Science
Market. We have developed and commercialized IFCs
for several significant life science research applications and
believe that the inherent flexibility of our technology will
enable the development of IFCs for a wide variety of additional
markets and applications.
|
|
|
|
Strong Research and Development Capabilities and Intellectual
Property Position. We have and will continue to
invest substantially in research and development to increase the
density, throughput and functionality of our IFCs. We have
developed an extensive portfolio of intellectual property,
including more than 80 issued U.S. patents and 240 patent
applications pending worldwide either owned by or licensed to us.
|
|
|
|
Efficient Manufacturing and Process
Development. Our sophisticated manufacturing
process, which combines standard semiconductor methods with
proprietary techniques, enables us to produce large quantities
of IFCs to stringent quality standards. We have established our
manufacturing facility in
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore because of the availability of a skilled workforce, an
extensive supplier and partner network, lower operating costs
and significant government support.
|
Our
Target Markets
The life science industry is currently facing challenges similar
to those faced by the information technology industry when
computational power was constrained by the inherent limitations
of the vacuum tube. Life science research efforts, ranging from
large-scale initiatives, such as the Human Genome Project, to
more traditional academic and commercial research projects, are
continuing to reveal the complex biological and chemical
processes that are fundamental to living organisms. Developing
and applying this knowledge increasingly requires performing
experimentation on a scale and with a precision that can be
achieved only through automation. However, the most common forms
of life science automation rely on cumbersome robotic systems
that are slow, expensive and labor intensive and, we believe,
fundamentally constrain life science research. In much the same
way that integrated circuits overcame the limitations of early
computers by placing an increasing number of transistors on a
single silicon chip, our IFCs are designed to overcome many of
the limitations of conventional laboratory systems by
integrating an increasing number of fluidic components on a
single microfabricated IFC.
Currently, researchers and clinicians use our IFCs to perform
large-scale experimentation in the fields of genomics and
proteomics. Genomics is the in-depth study of the genetic makeup
of microorganisms, plants, animals and people, including
analyzing variations in genes and gene activity. Proteomics is
the large-scale study of the structure and function of proteins.
Our IFC systems support the following types of genomic and
proteomic studies:
|
|
|
|
|
Genotyping: determining the specific genetic traits of an
individual or individuals.
|
|
|
|
Gene expression analysis: measuring the activity of genes.
|
|
|
|
Protein crystallization: determining the
three-dimensional structure of proteins.
|
|
|
|
Digital PCR: quantifying scarce genetic sequences in a
biological sample.
|
According to Strategic Directions International, in 2005 the
principal segments of the genomic analysis market, gene
expression and genotyping, accounted for $4.9 billion
worldwide in expenditures and are expected to grow annually by
8% through 2010. We believe that our products may further be
developed for use in molecular diagnostics. Molecular
diagnostics is a rapidly growing market that seeks to apply
information learned from genomic and proteomic analysis to
clinical practice in diagnosing, monitoring and treating disease.
The
Fluidigm Solution
Our IFC systems are designed to overcome many of the limitations
of conventional laboratory systems by enabling researchers and
clinicians to rapidly perform a large number of experiments at
one time and in nanoliter volumes, significantly increasing
throughput, reducing reagent costs, conserving patient samples
and reducing workflow complexity.
We commercially introduced our Topaz IFC system in the first
quarter of 2003 and our Biomark IFC system in the fourth quarter
of 2006. Our first IFC, the 1.96 Dynamic Array for our Topaz
system, was introduced in the first quarter of 2003 and allowed
researchers to test a single sample against 96 different
reagents. In May 2008, we introduced the 96.96 Dynamic Array IFC
for our Biomark system. This IFC is based on a matrix
architecture that allows a researcher to test each of 96
different samples against each of 96 different reagents in
parallel, and thus perform 9,216 individual experiments
simultaneously.
The advantages of our IFC systems over conventional laboratory
systems include:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Complexity. Loading our IFC requires
orders of magnitude fewer liquid handling steps than
conventional systems for the same experiment.
|
|
|
|
Improved Throughput. Our most advanced IFCs
can conduct up to 24 times more experiments than a conventional
system can perform in a single run.
|
|
|
|
Nanoliter Precision. Our IFC systems allow
researchers to dispense samples and reagents in nanoliter, or
billionths of a liter, volumes, which supports high sensitivity
techniques.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Reagent and Sample Requirements. Our
systems operate on volumes of reagents and samples that are
typically less than 1% of the volumes required by conventional
systems.
|
|
|
|
Decreased Capital Cost. For high volume users,
the cost of purchasing one BioMark system is much lower than the
cost of purchasing the number of conventional systems required
to provide the same throughput.
|
|
|
|
Ease of Adoption. Our IFC systems support
widely-used chemistries and are compatible with standard
laboratory equipment, allowing researchers to easily incorporate
our products into their laboratory workflow and processes.
|
We believe that our IFC systems also offer significant
advantages over other high-throughput methods for large scale
experimentation. These alternative approaches have one or more
limitations such as lack of flexibility, poor data quality,
complex and slow workflows or high running costs. However, some
of these methods are able to detect thousands of genetic markers
in a single sample and may be more suitable for certain
applications than our products. In addition, some of these
alternative approaches are more widely adopted and better
validated than our systems.
Our IFC systems address the needs of researchers and clinicians
who perform large-scale studies in the areas of genomics,
proteomics and molecular diagnostics. Nevertheless, researchers
and clinicians may be slow to adopt our IFC systems as they are
based on technology that is not yet well-established in the
industry. Moreover, many of the existing laboratories have
already made substantial capital investments in their existing
systems and may be hesitant to abandon that investment. In
addition, our IFC systems are less well suited for smaller scale
research initiatives where complexity and workflow issues may be
less pressing and conventional systems may be more economical.
As life science research continues to evolve and is
commercialized, we believe that there will be increasing demand
for life science automation solutions that enable
experimentation on the scale supported by our IFC systems.
Risks
Affecting Us
Our business is subject to numerous risks, as more fully
described in the section entitled Risk Factors
immediately following this prospectus summary, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
We have incurred significant losses since our inception, had an
accumulated deficit of $140.4 million as of March 29,
2008 and expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
If our products fail to achieve and sustain market acceptance,
our revenue will be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
Our sales cycle for the BioMark and Topaz systems is lengthy and
unpredictable, which makes it difficult for us to forecast
revenue and could cause significant quarterly fluctuations in
revenue and other operating results.
|
|
|
|
We receive a substantial portion of our revenues from a limited
number of customers and other entities, and the loss of, or a
significant reduction in, orders or grants from one or more of
our major customers or grantors would adversely affect our
operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
The life science industry is highly competitive and subject to
rapid technological change, and we may not be able to
successfully compete.
|
|
|
|
We have limited experience in producing our products, and we may
experience development or manufacturing problems or delays that
could limit the growth of our revenue or increase our losses.
|
|
|
|
We are dependent on single source suppliers for some of the
components and materials used in our systems, and the loss of
any of these suppliers could harm our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary
technology through patents and other means is uncertain, and we
are dependent on certain licensed-in technology. In addition,
our suit seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement and
invalidity against Applied BioSystems, Inc. and Applera
Corporation, as well as future third-party claims of
intellectual property infringement could adversely affect our
operations and financial condition.
|
3
Corporate
History and Information
We were incorporated in California in May 1999 as Mycometrix
Corporation, changed our name to Fluidigm Corporation in April
2001 and reincorporated in Delaware in July 2007. Our principal
executive offices are located at 7000 Shoreline Court,
Suite 100, South San Francisco, California 94080. Our
telephone number is
(650) 266-6000.
Our website address is www.fluidigm.com. Information contained
on our website is not incorporated by reference into this
prospectus, and should not be considered to be part of this
prospectus.
Fluidigm, the Fluidigm logo, Topaz,
BioMark, AutoInspeX, MSL and
NanoFlex are trademarks or registered trademarks of
Fluidigm. Other service marks, trademarks and trade names
referred to in this prospectus are the property of their
respective owners.
4
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to expand
our sales force, support the commercialization of our products,
continue research and development, expand our facilities and
manufacturing operations and for working capital and other
general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net
proceeds to acquire other businesses, products or technologies.
However, we do not have agreements or commitments for any
specific acquisitions at this time. See Use of
Proceeds. |
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
FLDM |
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding
following this offering is based on 66,638,462 shares of
our common stock outstanding as of March 29, 2008, but
excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
8,103,050 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding as of March 29, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $0.93 per share;
|
|
|
|
598,720 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants outstanding as of March 29, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $2.97 per share, after conversion of
our convertible preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock reserved for future issuance under our
stock-based compensation plans,
including shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan, which will become effective on the date of this
prospectus, and any future automatic increase in shares reserved
for issuance under such plan; and
|
|
|
|
1,503,945 shares of our Series E preferred stock issued
upon the conversion of principal and accrued interest on a
convertible promissory note held by Biomedical Sciences
Investment Fund Pte Ltd on April 30, 2008.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, this prospectus reflects and assumes
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a -for-
reverse split of our outstanding common stock and convertible
preferred stock, to be effected prior to the completion of this
offering;
|
|
|
|
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible
preferred stock into an aggregate of 56,670,894 shares of
common stock upon the closing of this offering;
|
|
|
|
the filing of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation immediately prior to the effectiveness of this
offering; and
|
|
|
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
|
5
SUMMARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
We have derived the summary consolidated statement of operations
data for the years ended December 31, 2005,
December 31, 2006 and December 29, 2007 from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. We have derived the summary consolidated
statement of operations data for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of March 29, 2008 from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected in the future.
The following summary consolidated financial data should be read
in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Grant revenue
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
4,764
|
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,449
|
|
|
|
15,589
|
|
|
|
14,389
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
|
|
9,699
|
|
|
|
12,898
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
24,168
|
|
|
|
28,061
|
|
|
|
30,801
|
|
|
|
7,078
|
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(16,494
|
)
|
|
|
(21,663
|
)
|
|
|
(23,526
|
)
|
|
|
(5,510
|
)
|
|
|
(6,523
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(25,346
|
)
|
|
|
(6,334
|
)
|
|
|
(6,589
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
|
(6,613
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock,
basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
9,316
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
9,913
|
|
Pro forma net loss per share of common stock, basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing pro forma net loss per share of common
stock, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Please see Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus for an explanation of the method used to calculate
basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock and pro
forma net loss per share of common stock.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro
Forma(1)
|
|
|
As
Adjusted(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
31,235
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
29,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
47,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
12,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(136,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The pro forma balance sheet data in
the table above reflects (i) the automatic conversion of
principal and accrued interest of a convertible promissory note
held by Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd into
1,503,945 shares of our common stock, which conversion
occurred on April 30, 2008, (ii) the conversion of all
outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into common
stock and (iii) the reclassification of the convertible
preferred stock warrant liabilities to additional
paid-in
capital, each effective upon the closing of this offering.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The pro forma as adjusted balance
sheet data in the table above also reflects the pro forma
conversions and reclassifications described immediately above
plus the sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering and the application of the
net proceeds at an initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
(3)
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would
increase (decrease) each of cash, cash equivalents and
available-for-sale securities, working capital, total assets and
total stockholders equity by
$ million, assuming that the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. Each increase of
1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us
would increase each of cash, cash equivalents,
available-for-sale securities, working capital, total assets and
total stockholders equity by approximately
$ million. Similarly, each
decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares
offered by us would decrease each of cash, cash equivalents,
available-for-sale securities, working capital, total assets and
total stockholders equity by approximately
$ million. The pro forma as
adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and
will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and
other terms of this offering determined at pricing.
|
7
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties
described below, together with all of the other information in
this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements
and related notes, before deciding whether to purchase shares of
our common stock. If any of the following risks is realized, our
business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that
event, the price of our common stock could decline and you could
lose part or all of your investment.
Risks
Related to our Business and Strategy
We have incurred losses since inception, and we expect to
continue to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable
future.
We have a limited operating history and have incurred
significant losses in each fiscal year since our inception,
including net losses of $16.4 million, $23.6 million,
$25.5 million and $6.6 million during 2005, 2006, 2007
and the three months ended March 29, 2008. As of
March 29, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of
$140.4 million. These losses have resulted principally from
costs incurred in our research and development programs and from
our selling, general and administrative expenses. We expect to
continue to incur operating and net losses and negative cash
flow from operations, which may increase, for the foreseeable
future due in part to anticipated increases in expenses for
research and product development and expansion of our sales and
marketing capabilities. Additionally, following this offering,
we expect that our selling, general and administrative expenses
will increase due to the additional operational and reporting
costs associated with being a public company. We anticipate that
our business will generate operating losses until we
successfully implement our commercial development strategy and
generate significant additional revenues to support our level of
operating expenses. Because of the numerous risks and
uncertainties associated with our commercialization efforts and
future product development, we are unable to predict when we
will become profitable, and we may never become profitable. Even
if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or
increase our profitability.
If our products fail to achieve and sustain sufficient
market acceptance, our revenue will be adversely
affected.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and
market products that are recognized and accepted as reliable,
enabling and cost effective. Most of our potential customers
already use expensive research systems in their laboratories and
may be reluctant to replace those systems. Market acceptance of
our instrument systems will depend on many factors, including
our ability to convince potential customers that our systems are
an attractive alternative to existing technologies. Compared to
other technologies, our Integrated Fluidic Circuit, or IFC,
technology is new and unproven, and most potential customers
have limited knowledge of, or experience with, our products.
Prior to adopting our technology, potential customers generally
need to devote significant effort to testing and validating our
systems and benchmarking them against their current systems and
performance requirements. Any failure of our systems to meet
these customer benchmarks could result in customers choosing to
retain their existing systems or to purchase systems other than
ours.
In addition, many customers intend to publish the results of
their experiments in scientific and medical journals. Therefore,
it is important that our systems be perceived as accurate and
reliable by the scientific and medical research community as a
whole. Many factors influence the perception of a system
including its use by leading research groups and the publication
of their results in well regarded journals. A significant part
of our sales and marketing efforts have been directed at
convincing industry leaders of the advantages of our systems and
encouraging such leaders to publish or present the results of
their evaluation of our system. If we are unable to induce
leading researchers to use our system or if such researchers are
unable to achieve and publish or present significant
experimental results using our system, acceptance and adoption
of our systems will be slowed.
Our sales cycle is lengthy and unpredictable, which makes
it difficult for us to forecast revenue and could cause
significant quarterly fluctuations in revenue and other
operating results.
The sales cycles for our instrument systems is lengthy, which
makes it difficult for us to accurately forecast revenues in a
given period, and may cause revenue and operating results to
vary significantly from period to period.
8
Due in part to the high up-front cost associated with our
systems, potential customers for our instrument systems
typically need to commit significant time and resources to
evaluate our technology and their decision to purchase our
instruments may be further limited by budgetary constraints and
several layers of internal review and approval, which are beyond
our control. Even after initial approval by appropriate decision
makers, the negotiation and documentation processes for a
purchase can be lengthy. As a result of these factors, our sales
cycle has varied widely and, in certain instances has been
longer than 12 months. The complexity and variability of
our sales cycle has made it difficult for us to accurately
project quarterly revenues, and we have frequently failed to
meet our internal quarterly projections. Moreover, we do not
recognize revenue on sales of our systems until the system has
been delivered to the customer and, in many instances, installed
and our other revenue recognition criteria have been met. This
further complicates our ability to project quarterly revenue as
we may have entered into a sale agreement with a customer for a
system but cannot predict when that customer will take delivery
of the system and when we will be able to recognize the revenue.
We expect that our sales will continue to fluctuate on a
quarterly basis and that our financial results for some periods
may be below those projected by securities analysts. Such
fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our
business and on the price of our common stock.
Our sales efforts require significant time and effort and
could hinder our ability to increase sales.
Before purchasing one of our systems, customers typically
require input from one or more scientific evaluators as well as
a review by personnel with finance or operational expertise. As
a result, during our sales effort, we must identify all persons
involved in the purchasing decision and devote a sufficient
amount of time to presenting our systems to those individuals.
The newness and complexity of our products often requires us to
spend substantial time and effort assisting potential customers
in evaluating our instruments including providing demonstrations
and benchmarking our products against other available
technologies. This process can be costly and time consuming. We
expect that our sales process will become less burdensome as our
products become more widely known and used. However, if this
change does not occur, we will not be able to expand our sales
effort as quickly as anticipated and our sales will be adversely
affected.
Our future success is dependent upon our ability to expand
our customer base and introduce new applications.
Our customer base is primarily composed of pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, academic institutions and life science
laboratories that perform large-scale experimentation for life
science research purposes. Our success will depend in part upon
our ability to increase our market share amongst these
customers, attract life science research customers who do not
currently perform large-scale experimentation, attract customers
outside the life science research market and market new
applications to existing and new customers as we develop such
applications. Attracting new customers and introducing new
applications requires substantial time and expense. For example,
it may be difficult to identify, engage and market to customers
who do not currently perform large-scale experimentation or are
unfamiliar with our current applications. In addition, certain
new applications that we are considering developing are not
practical to perform with conventional techniques. Any failure
to expand our existing customer base or launch new applications
would adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues.
Our inability to develop new systems and enhance the
capabilities of our IFC systems to keep pace with rapidly
changing technology and customer requirements could adversely
affect our business.
Our success depends on our ability to develop new applications
for our IFC technology in existing and new markets, while
improving the performance and cost effectiveness of our systems.
New technologies, techniques or products could emerge that might
offer better combinations of price and performance than our
current or future product lines and systems. Existing markets
for our products, including gene expression analysis,
genotyping, digital polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, and
proteomics, as well as potential markets for our products such
as molecular diagnostics, are characterized by rapid
technological change and innovation. It is critical to our
success for us to anticipate changes in technology and customer
requirements and to successfully introduce new, enhanced and
competitive technology to meet our customers and
prospective customers needs on a timely basis. While we
have planned substantial improvements to the BioMark system,
including enhancing the capabilities of our IFCs, we may not be
able to successfully implement these improvements. Even if we
successfully implement some or all of these planned
improvements, we could incur substantial development costs in
doing so. We may not have adequate resources available to
develop new technologies or be able to successfully introduce
new applications of, or
9
enhancements to, our systems. We cannot guarantee that we will
be able to maintain technological advantages over emerging
technologies in the future. If we fail to keep pace with
emerging technologies, demand for our systems will not grow and
may decline, and our business, revenue, financial condition and
operating results could suffer materially.
We have limited resources for marketing, selling and
distributing our products and we may not be able to develop a
direct sales and marketing force or distribution capabilities
that can meet our customers needs.
We have limited marketing, sales and distribution resources and
capabilities. We sell our products primarily through our own
sales force and through distributors in certain territories. Our
first product line, the Topaz system for protein
crystallization, was introduced for commercial sale in 2002. Our
BioMark system was introduced for commercial sale in 2006.
Our future sales will depend in large part on our ability to
develop and expand our direct sales force and to increase the
scope of our marketing efforts. Our products are technically
complex and used for highly specialized applications. As a
result, we believe it is necessary to develop a direct sales
force that includes people with specific scientific backgrounds
and expertise and a marketing group with technical
sophistication. Competition for such employees is intense. We
may not be able to attract and retain personnel or be able to
build an efficient and effective sales and marketing force,
which could negatively impact sales of our products, and reduce
our revenues and profitability.
In addition, we may seek to enlist one or more parties to assist
with sales, distribution and customer support globally or in
certain regions of the world. If we do seek to enter into such
arrangements, we may not be successful in attracting desirable
sales and distribution partners, or we may not be able to enter
into such arrangements on favorable terms. If our sales and
marketing efforts, or those of any third-party sales and
distribution partners, are not successful, our technologies and
products may not gain market acceptance, which would materially
impact our business operations.
The life science industry is highly competitive and
subject to rapid technological change, and we may not be able to
successfully compete.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly
changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in
customer needs, emerging competition, new product introductions
and strong price competition. We compete with both established
and development stage life science companies that design,
manufacture and market instruments for gene expression analysis,
genotyping, other nucleic acid detection and additional
applications using well established laboratory techniques, as
well as newer technologies such as bead encoded arrays,
microfluidics, nanotechnology, next-generation DNA sequencing
and inkjet and photolithographic arrays. Most of our current
competitors have significantly greater name recognition, greater
financial and human resources, broader product lines and product
packages, larger sales forces, large existing installed bases,
substantial intellectual property portfolios and greater
experience in research and development, manufacturing and
marketing than we do. For example, companies such as Affymetrix,
Applied Biosystems, BioTrove, Illumina, Roche Diagnostics and
Sequenom have products that compete in certain segments of the
market in which we sell our BioMark system.
Competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively
than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies,
standards or customer requirements. In light of these
advantages, even if our technology is more effective than the
product or service offerings of our competitors, current or
potential customers might accept competitive products and
services in lieu of purchasing our technology. We anticipate
that we will face increased competition in the future as
existing companies and competitors develop new or improved
products and as new companies enter the market with new
technologies. We may not be able to compete effectively against
these organizations. Increased competition is likely to result
in pricing pressures, which could harm our sales, profitability
or market share. Our failure to compete effectively could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We receive a substantial portion of our revenue from a
limited number of customers and other entities, and the loss of,
or a significant reduction in, orders or grants from one or more
of our major customers or grantors would adversely affect our
operations and financial condition.
We receive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited
number of customers and grantors. We received an aggregate of
approximately 37%, 44%, 38% and 30% of our total revenue from
our top three customers in 2005, 2006,
10
2007 and the three months ended March 29, 2008. Grant
revenue from the Singapore Economic Development Board, or EDB,
represented 0%, 14%, 24% and 16% of our total revenue in 2005,
2006 and 2007 and the three months ended March 29, 2008. We
anticipate that we will continue to be dependent on a limited
number of customers and grantors for a significant portion of
our revenue in the near future and in some cases the portion of
our revenue attributable to certain customers or grantors may
increase in the future. However, we may not be able to maintain
or increase sales to our top customers or grants from our top
grantors for a variety of reasons, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our agreements with our customers and grantors do not require
them to purchase a minimum quantity of our products or make a
minimum amount of grants in any year;
|
|
|
|
our customers can stop using our products with limited notice to
us and suffer little or no payment penalty;
|
|
|
|
our grants are subject to the achievement of milestones that we
may not meet; and
|
|
|
|
many of our customers have pre-existing or concurrent
relationships with our current or potential competitors that may
affect the customers decisions to purchase our products.
|
In the past, we have relied in significant part on our strategic
relationships with customers that are technology leaders in our
target markets. We intend to pursue the expansion of such
relationships and the formation of new strategic relationships
but we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. These
relationships often require us to develop new products that may
involve significant technological challenges. Our customers
frequently place considerable pressure on us to meet their tight
development schedules. Our grantors frequently condition their
present and future grants on our compliance with certain
development, hiring and local investment milestones.
Accordingly, we may have to devote a substantial amount of our
resources to our strategic relationships, which could detract
from or delay our completion of other important development
projects. Delays in development could impair our relationships
with our strategic customers and grantors and negatively impact
sales of the products under development or future grant
activity. The loss of a key customer or grantor, a reduction in
sales to any key customer, a reduction in grants from a key
grantor, or our inability to attract new significant customers
could seriously impact our revenue and materially and adversely
affect our results of operations.
Our business depends on research and development spending
levels of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and
academic, clinical and governmental research institutions and
any reduction in such spending could limit our ability to sell
our products.
We expect that our revenue in the foreseeable future will be
derived primarily from sales of instruments and IFCs to academic
institutions, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and
life science laboratories worldwide. Our success will depend
upon their demand for and use of our products. Accordingly, the
spending policies of these customers could have a significant
effect on the demand for our technology. These policies may be
based on a wide variety of factors, including the resources
available to make purchases, the spending priorities among
various types of equipment, policies regarding spending during
recessionary periods and changes in the political climate. In
addition, academic, governmental and other research institutions
that fund research and development activities may be subject to
stringent budgetary constraints that could result in spending
reductions, reduced allocations or budget cutbacks, which could
jeopardize the ability of these customers to purchase our
system. Our operating results may fluctuate substantially due to
reductions and delays in research and development expenditures
by these customers. For example, reductions in capital
expenditures by these customers may result in lower than
expected system sales and, similarly, reductions in operating
expenditures by these customers could result in lower than
expected sales of IFCs. These reductions and delays may result
from factors that are not within our control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in government programs that provide funding to research
institutions and companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory environment affecting life science
companies and life science research;
|
|
|
|
market-driven pressures on companies to consolidate operations
and reduce costs;
|
|
|
|
mergers and acquisitions in the life science industry; and
|
|
|
|
other factors affecting research and development spending.
|
11
Any decrease in our customers budgets or expenditures or
in the size, scope or frequency of capital or operating
expenditures as a result of the foregoing or other factors could
materially adversely affect our operations or financial
condition.
If we cannot provide quality technical support, we could
lose customers and our operating results could suffer.
The placement of our products at new customer sites, the
introduction of our technology into our customers existing
systems and ongoing customer support can be complex.
Accordingly, we need highly trained technical support personnel.
Hiring technical support personnel is very competitive in our
industry due to the limited number of people available with the
necessary biochemistry background and ability to understand our
systems at a technical level. We are currently expanding our
technical support staff and will need to increase it further to
support expected new customers as well as the expanding needs of
existing customers. If we are unable to attract, train or retain
the number of highly qualified technical services personnel that
our business needs, our business and prospects will suffer.
To use our products, customers typically need to purchase
specialized reagents. Any interruption in the availability of
these reagents for use in our products could limit our ability
to market our products.
Our products must be used in conjunction with one or more
reagents designed to produce or facilitate the particular
biological or chemical reaction desired by the user. Many of
these reagents are highly specialized and available to the user
only from a single supplier or a limited number of suppliers.
Our customers typically purchase these reagents directly from
the suppliers and we have no control over the supply of those
materials. In addition, our products are designed to work with
these reagents as they are currently formulated. We have no
control of the formulation of these reagents and the performance
of our products might be adversely affected if the formulation
of these reagents was changed. If one or more of these reagents
were to become unavailable or were reformulated, our ability to
market and sell our products could be materially and adversely
affected.
In addition, the use of a reagent for a particular process may
be covered by one or more patents relating to the reagent
itself, the use of the reagent for the particular process, the
performance of that process or the equipment required to perform
the process. Typically, reagent suppliers, who are either the
patent holders or their authorized licensees, sell the reagents
along with a license or covenant not to sue with respect to such
patents. The license accompanying the sale of a reagent often
purports to restrict the purposes for which the reagent may be
used. If a patent holder or authorized licensee were to assert
against us or our customers that the license or covenant
relating to a reagent precluded its use with our systems, our
ability to sell and market our products could be materially and
adversely affected. For example, the current applications of our
BioMark system, which represented 41% of our product revenue in
2007, involve real-time polymerase chain reaction, or PCR. The
primary producers of reagents for PCR reactions are Applied
Biosystems and Roche Diagnostics, who are our direct
competitors, and their licensees. These PCR reagents are sold
pursuant to limited licenses or covenants not to sue with
respect to patents held by these companies. We do not have any
contractual relationship with Roche Diagnostics or Applied
Biosystems regarding these PCR reagents, and we cannot assure
you that these reagents will continue to be available to our
customers for use with our systems, or that these patent holders
will not seek to enforce their patents against us, our
customers, or suppliers.
We are dependent on single source suppliers for some of
the components and materials used in our systems, and the loss
of any of these suppliers could harm our business.
We rely on single source suppliers for certain components and
materials used in our systems. Of these single source suppliers,
the loss of any of the following would require significant time
and effort to locate and qualify an alternative source of supply:
|
|
|
|
|
An essential component of our BioMark system is a specialized
thermal cycler that is available from a limited number of
suppliers. We purchase this thermal cycler from one supplier,
Eppendorf AG, which customizes it to our specifications pursuant
to a supply agreement.
|
|
|
|
Our IFCs are fabricated using a specialized polymer that is
available from a limited number of sources. In the past we have
encountered quality issues that have reduced our manufacturing
yield or required the use of additional manufacturing processes.
We do not have a long term contract with our current sole
supplier.
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
The plastic carriers that hold the core components of our IFCs
need to be produced to specifications and tolerances that few
manufacturers are able to meet. We have experienced quality
issues in the past and, as a result, have recently switched
suppliers. We do not have a long term contract with either of
our current sole suppliers for particular carriers.
|
|
|
|
The reader for our BioMark system requires specialized high
resolution camera lenses that are available from a limited
number of sources. We do not have a long term contract with our
current sole supplier.
|
Our reliance on these suppliers also subjects us to other risks
that could harm our business, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may be subject to increased component costs;
|
|
|
|
we are not a major customer of many of our suppliers, and these
suppliers may therefore give other customers needs higher
priority than ours;
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to obtain adequate supply in a timely manner
or on commercially reasonable terms;
|
|
|
|
our suppliers may make errors in manufacturing components that
could negatively affect the efficacy of our systems or cause
delays in shipment of our systems; and
|
|
|
|
our suppliers may encounter financial hardships unrelated to our
demand for components, which could inhibit their ability to
fulfill our orders and meet our requirements.
|
We have in the past experienced supply problems with some of our
suppliers, such as manufacturing errors, and may again
experience problems in the future. We may not be able to quickly
establish additional or replacement suppliers, particularly for
our single source components. Any interruption or delay in the
supply of components or materials, or our inability to obtain
components or materials from alternate sources at acceptable
prices in a timely manner, could impair our ability to meet the
demand of our customers and cause them to cancel orders or
switch to competitive products.
We have limited experience in producing our products, and
we may experience development or manufacturing problems or
delays that could limit the growth of our revenue or increase
our losses.
We have limited experience manufacturing and assembling our
products in commercial quantities and we may encounter
unforeseen situations that would result in delays or shortfalls.
In addition, our production processes and assembly methods may
have to change to accommodate any significant future expansion
of our manufacturing capacity. If we are unable to keep up with
demand for our products, our revenue could be impaired, market
acceptance for our products could be adversely affected and our
customers might instead purchase our competitors products.
Our inability to successfully manufacture our products would
have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We first produced the IFCs used in our current Topaz system in
June 2002 at our facility in South San Francisco. We have
since moved our commercial production of IFCs to our facility in
Singapore, which first produced commercial IFCs for our Topaz
systems in October 2006 and first produced commercial IFCs for
our BioMark system in December 2007. Production of the
elastomeric block that is at the core of our IFCs is a complex
process requiring advanced clean rooms, sophisticated equipment
and strict adherence to procedures. Any contamination of the
clean room, equipment malfunction or failure to strictly follow
procedures can significantly reduce our yield in one or more
batches. Such a drop in yield can greatly increase our cost to
manufacture our IFCs or, in more severe cases, require us to
halt the manufacture of IFCs until the problem is resolved.
Identifying and resolving the cause of a drop in yield can
require substantial time and resources. We have had significant
yield problems in the past and cannot assure you that these
types of yield issues will not occur again. Sustained yield
problems would have a material adverse affect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, developing an IFC for a new application typically
requires developing a specific production process for that type
of IFC. While all of our IFCs are produced using the same basic
processes, significant variations are required to ensure
adequate yield of any particular type of IFC. Developing such a
process can be very time consuming, and any unexpected
difficulty in doing so can delay the introduction of a product.
For example, in the second quarter of 2006, our ability to
conduct demonstrations for potential customers for our BioMark
system
13
was impaired because we were unable to produce sufficient
quantities of that IFC. Though these production problems were
resolved, the delay in conducting customer demonstrations
resulted in the loss and delay of orders from potential
customers. We cannot assure you that we will not face similar
difficulties in developing new processes in the future.
If we are unable to recruit and retain key executives and
scientists, we may be unable to achieve our goals.
Our performance is substantially dependent on the performance of
our senior management and key scientific and technical
personnel, particularly Gajus V. Worthington, our President and
Chief Executive Officer. We do not maintain fixed term
employment contracts with any of our employees. The loss of the
services of any member of our senior management or our
scientific or technical staff might significantly delay or
prevent the development of our products or achievement of other
business objectives by diverting managements attention to
transition matters and identification of suitable replacements,
if any, and could have a material adverse effect on our
business. We do not maintain significant key man life insurance
on any of our employees.
In addition, our research and product development efforts could
be delayed or curtailed if we are unable to attract, train and
retain highly skilled employees, particularly, senior scientists
and engineers. To expand our research and product development
efforts we need additional people skilled in areas such as
molecular and cellular biology, assay development and
manufacturing. Competition for these people is intense. Because
of the complex and technical nature of our system and the
dynamic market in which we compete, any failure to attract and
retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could
materially harm our ability to develop and commercialize our
technology.
We may be unable to manage our anticipated growth
effectively.
The rapid growth of our business has placed a significant strain
on our managerial, operational and financial resources and
systems. We have increased the number of our employees from 78
at December 31, 2005 to 137 at March 29, 2008. In
addition, since October 2006 we have commenced manufacturing
operations in Singapore and opened sales offices in Europe and
Japan. To execute our anticipated growth successfully, we must
continue to attract and retain qualified personnel and manage
and train them effectively. We must also upgrade our internal
business processes and capabilities to create the scalability
that a growing business demands.
We believe our primary commercial manufacturing facility located
in Singapore is sufficient to meet our short-term manufacturing
needs. However, the current lease for our manufacturing facility
in Singapore expires in October 2008. In order to meet the
long-term demand for our IFC systems, we believe that we will
need to add to our existing manufacturing space in Singapore or
move all of our manufacturing facilities to a new location in
Singapore. Such a move will involve significant expense in
connection with the establishment of new clean rooms, the
movement and installation of key manufacturing equipment and
modifications to our manufacturing process and we cannot assure
you that such a move would not delay or otherwise adversely
affect our manufacturing activities.
Further, our anticipated growth will place additional strain on
our suppliers and manufacturing facilities, resulting in an
increased need for us to carefully monitor quality assurance.
Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively could have an
adverse effect on our ability to achieve our development and
commercialization goals.
Our research and product development efforts may not
result in commercially viable products within the timeline
anticipated, if at all.
Our business is dependent on the improvement of our existing
products, our development of new products to serve existing
markets and our development of new products to create new
markets and applications that were previously not practical with
existing systems. We intend to devote significant personnel and
financial resources to research and development activities
designed to advance the capabilities of our IFC technology. Our
IFC technology is new and complex and the behavior of fluids and
surrounding compounds in a nanoscale environment is difficult to
predict in advance. Though we have developed design rules for
the implementation of our IFC technology, these are frequently
revised to reflect new insights we have gained about the
technology. In addition, we have discovered that biological or
chemical reactions sometimes behave differently when implemented
on IFCs rather than in a standard laboratory environment. As a
result, significant research and development efforts may be
14
required to transfer even well-understood reactions to our
technology. In the past, product development projects have been
significantly delayed when we encountered unanticipated
difficulties in implementing a process on our IFCs. We may have
similar delays in the future, and we may not obtain any benefits
from our research and development activities. Any delay or
failure by us to develop new products or enhance existing
products would have a substantial adverse effect on our business
and results of operations.
Our products, although not currently regulated, could in
the future be subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration or other regulatory agencies.
Our products are currently labeled and sold for research
purposes only and are not subject to U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, or FDA, clearance or approval. However, in the
future, certain of our products or related applications could be
subject to the FDAs regulation, the FDAs regulatory
jurisdiction could be expanded to include our products, or both.
For example, if we wished to label and market our products for
use in performing clinical diagnostics, FDA clearance or
approval would be required. Even where a product is exempted
from FDA clearance or approval, the FDA may impose restrictions
on how and to whom we can market and sell our products.
Obtaining FDA approval can be expensive and uncertain, generally
takes several years to obtain and requires detailed and
comprehensive scientific and clinical data. Notwithstanding the
expense, these efforts may never result in FDA approval or
clearance. Even if we were to obtain regulatory approval or
clearance, it may not be for the uses we believe are important
or commercially attractive. As a result, these regulations and
restrictions could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Similar laws and
regulations are also in effect in many foreign countries that
could affect our ability to market certain products. The number
and scope of these requirements are increasing. We may not be
able to obtain regulatory approvals in such countries or may
incur significant costs in obtaining or maintaining our foreign
regulatory approvals.
Our future capital needs are uncertain and we may need to
raise additional funds in the future.
We believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together
with our existing cash and cash equivalents, available for sale
securities balances and cash receipts generated from sales of
our products, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash
requirements for at least the next 18 months. However, we
may need to raise substantial additional capital to:
|
|
|
|
|
expand the commercialization of our products;
|
|
|
|
fund our operations;
|
|
|
|
continue our research and development;
|
|
|
|
defend, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that we infringe
third-party patents or violate other intellectual property
rights;
|
|
|
|
commercialize new products; and
|
|
|
|
acquire companies and in-license products or intellectual
property.
|
Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products;
|
|
|
|
the cost of our research and development activities;
|
|
|
|
the cost of filing and prosecuting patent applications;
|
|
|
|
the cost of defending, in litigation or otherwise, any claims
that we infringe third-party patents or violate other
intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of regulatory clearances or approvals, if
any;
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of establishing additional sales, marketing
and distribution capabilities;
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of establishing additional technical support
capabilities;
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of competing technological and market
developments; and
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products
and technologies, although we currently have no commitments or
agreements relating to any of these types of transactions.
|
If we require additional funds in the future, such funds
may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
We may require additional funds in the future and we may not be
able to obtain such funds on acceptable terms, or at all. If we
raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our
stockholders may experience dilution. Debt financing, if
available, may involve covenants restricting our operations or
our ability to incur additional debt. Any debt or additional
equity financing that we raise may contain terms that are not
favorable to us or our stockholders. If we raise additional
funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with
third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to
our technologies or our products, or grant licenses on terms
that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise adequate
funds, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets, or
delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate some or all of our
development programs.
If we do not have, or are not able to obtain, sufficient funds,
we may have to delay development or commercialization of our
products or license to third parties the rights to commercialize
products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to
commercialize. We also may have to reduce marketing, customer
support or other resources devoted to our products or cease
operations. Any of these factors could harm our operating
results.
Our products could have unknown defects or errors, which
may give rise to claims against us and adversely affect market
adoption of our systems.
Our IFC systems utilize novel and complex technology applied on
a nanoliter scale and such systems may develop or contain
undetected defects or errors. We cannot assure you that material
performance problems, defects or errors will not arise, and as
we increase the density and integration of our IFCs, these risks
may increase. While we do not provide express warranties that
our IFCs will meet performance expectations or be free from
defects, we have done so in the past, and expect to in the
future in response to customer concerns in order to preserve
customer relationships and help foster continued adoption and
use of our systems. We typically do provide warranties relating
to other parts of our IFC systems. The costs incurred in
correcting any defects or errors may be substantial and could
adversely affect our operating margins.
In manufacturing our products, we depend upon third parties for
the supply of various components. Many of these components
require a significant degree of technical expertise to produce.
If our suppliers fail to produce components to specification, or
if the suppliers, or we, use defective materials or workmanship
in the manufacturing process, the reliability and performance of
our products will be compromised.
If our products contain defects, we may experience:
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to achieve market acceptance or expansion of our
product sales;
|
|
|
|
loss of customer orders and delay in order fulfillment;
|
|
|
|
damage to our brand reputation;
|
|
|
|
increased cost of our warranty program due to product repair or
replacement;
|
|
|
|
product recalls or replacements;
|
|
|
|
inability to attract new customers;
|
|
|
|
diversion of resources from our manufacturing and research and
development departments into our service department; and
|
|
|
|
legal claims against us, including product liability claims,
which could be costly and time consuming to defend and result in
substantial damages.
|
The occurrence of any one or more of the foregoing could
negatively affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
16
We generate a substantial portion of our revenues
internationally and are subject to various risks relating to
such international activities which could adversely affect our
international sales and operating performance.
During 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008, approximately 28%, 40%, 52% and 49% of our
total revenue was generated outside of North America. We believe
that a significant percentage of our future revenue will come
from international sources as we expand our overseas operations
and develop opportunities in additional international areas. Our
international business may be adversely affected by changing
economic, political and regulatory conditions in foreign
countries. Because the majority of our product sales are
currently denominated in U.S. dollars, if the value of the
U.S. dollar increases relative to foreign currencies, our
products could become more costly to the international consumer
and therefore less competitive in international markets, which
could affect our financial performance. In addition, if the
value of the U.S. dollar decreases relative to the
Singapore dollar, it would become more costly in
U.S. dollars for us to manufacture our products in
Singapore. Furthermore, fluctuations in exchange rates could
reduce our revenue, particularly with respect to grant revenue
under agreements in Singapore, and affect demand for our
products. Engaging in international business inherently involves
a number of other difficulties and risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
required compliance with existing and changing foreign
regulatory requirements and laws;
|
|
|
|
export or import restrictions;
|
|
|
|
laws and business practices favoring local companies;
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles and difficulties in enforcing agreements
and collecting receivables through certain foreign legal systems;
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, tariffs, customs charges,
bureaucratic requirements and other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign
operations; and
|
|
|
|
difficulties protecting or procuring intellectual property
rights.
|
If one or more of these risks occurs, it could require us to
dedicate significant resources to remedy, and if we are
unsuccessful in finding a solution, our financial results will
suffer.
We use hazardous chemicals and biological materials in our
business. Any claims relating to improper handling, storage or
disposal of these materials could be time consuming and
costly.
Our research and development and manufacturing processes involve
the controlled use of hazardous materials, including flammables,
toxics, corrosives and biologics. Our operations produce
hazardous biological and chemical waste products. We cannot
eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or discharge and
any resultant injury from these materials. In addition, our IFC
systems involve the use of pressurized systems and may involve
the use of hazardous materials, which could result in injury. We
may be sued for any injury or contamination that results from
our use or the use by third parties of these materials. We do
not currently maintain separate environmental liability coverage
and any such contamination or discharge could result in
significant cost to us in penalties, damages and suspension of
our operations.
If our facilities become inoperable, we will be unable to
continue manufacturing our products and as a result, our
business will be harmed until we are able to secure a new
facility.
We manufacture and assemble our IFCs for commercial sale at our
facility in Singapore and assemble our instrument platforms at
our facilities in Singapore and South San Francisco,
California. No other manufacturing or assembly facilities are
currently available to us. Our facilities and the equipment we
use to manufacture our products would be costly to replace and
could require substantial lead time to repair or replace. The
facilities may be harmed or rendered inoperable by natural or
man-made disasters, including earthquakes, flooding and power
outages, which may render it difficult or impossible for us to
perform our research, development and manufacturing for some
period of time. The inability to perform our research,
development and manufacturing activities, combined with our
limited inventory of reserve raw materials and manufactured
supplies, may result in the loss of customers
17
or harm our reputation, and we may be unable to reestablish
relationships with those customers in the future. Although we
possess insurance for damage to our property and the disruption
of our business, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover
all of our potential losses and may not continue to be available
to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
If we fail to maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timing of
our financial reporting may be adversely affected.
In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006
we, together with our independent registered public accounting
firm identified material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting.
The material weaknesses related to our financial statement close
process, revenue recognition and accrual processes and inventory
costing, cost of sales, purchases cut-off and stock-based
compensation. These material weaknesses resulted in the
recording of numerous audit adjustments over the two year period
ending December 31, 2006. Since the date of our independent
registered public accounting firms reports on our
consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2006 and through the date of this
prospectus, we have taken steps intended to remediate these
material weaknesses, primarily through the hiring of additional
accounting and finance personnel with technical accounting and
financial reporting experience. In addition, we have implemented
procedures and controls in the financial statement close process
designed to improve the accuracy and timeliness in financial
accounting and reporting.
In April and May 2008, we reviewed our internal control over
financial reporting and concluded that we had certain
significant deficiencies. A significant deficiency is defined as
a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting that is less severe than a
material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by
those responsible for oversight of a companys financial
reporting. The significant deficiencies identified by us related
to: our controls for the consolidation and elimination entries
relating to intercompany transfer pricing and elimination of
intercompany profits embedded in deferred costs of our Japanese
subsidiary; our controls for applying SFAS 123R to option
grants with non-standard vesting terms and validation of stock
compensation expenses calculated by our option tracking
software; and our controls and procedures for the valuation of
inventory.
We do not know the specific time frame that we will require to
remediate the significant deficiencies identified. In addition,
we expect to incur some incremental costs associated with this
remediation. If we fail to enhance our internal control over
financial reporting to meet the demands that will be placed upon
us as a public company, including the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may be
unable to report our financial results accurately and prevent
fraud. While we expect to remediate the significant
deficiencies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so
in a timely manner, which could impair our ability to accurately
and timely report our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
No material weaknesses in internal control over financial
reporting were identified in our April 2008 review. However, our
management and independent registered public accounting firm did
not perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial
reporting during any period in accordance with the provisions of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Had we and our
independent registered public accounting firm performed an
evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with the provisions of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, additional control deficiencies may have
been identified by management or our independent registered
public accounting firm.
We will incur significant increased costs as a result of
operating as a public company, and our management will be
required to devote substantial time to new compliance
initiatives.
We have never operated as a public company. As a public company,
we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses
that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as new rules subsequently
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
NASDAQ Global Market, have imposed various new requirements on
public companies, including requiring changes in corporate
governance practices. Our management and other personnel will
need to devote a substantial amount of time to these new
compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations
will increase our legal and financial compliance costs
18
and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
For example, we expect these new rules and regulations to make
it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director
and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur
substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In
particular, commencing in 2009, we must perform system and
process evaluation and testing of our internal control over
financial reporting to allow management to report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our
testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered
public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal
control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses. Our compliance with Section 404 will require
that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend
significant management time on compliance-related issues. We
currently do not have an internal audit group and we will
evaluate the need to hire additional accounting and financial
staff with appropriate public company experience and technical
accounting knowledge. Moreover, if we are not able to comply
with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or
if we or our independent registered public accounting firm
identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial
reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market
price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to
sanctions or investigations by the NASDAQ Global Market, the
Securities and Exchange Commission or other regulatory
authorities, which would require additional financial and
management resources.
Some of our programs are partially supported by government
grants, which may be reduced, withdrawn, delayed or
reclaimed.
We have received and may continue to receive funds under
research and economic development programs funded by the
governments of Singapore and the United States. Funding by these
governments may be significantly reduced or eliminated in the
future for a number of reasons. For example, some
U.S. programs are subject to a yearly appropriations
process in Congress. Similarly, our grants from the Singapore
government are part of an official policy to develop a life
science industry in Singapore; that policy could change or the
role of grants in it could be reduced or eliminated at any time.
In addition, we may not receive funds under existing or future
grants because of budgeting constraints of the agency
administering the program. A restriction on the government
funding available to us would reduce the resources that we would
be able to devote to existing and future research and
development efforts. Such a reduction could delay the
introduction of new products and hurt our competitive position.
Our agreements with the Singapore Economic Development Board, or
EDB, provide that our continued eligibility for incentive grant
payments from EDB is subject to our satisfaction of agreed upon
targets for increasing levels of research, development and
manufacturing activity in Singapore, including the use of local
service providers, the hiring of personnel in Singapore, the
incurrence of eligible expenses in Singapore, our receipt of new
equity investment and our achievement of certain milestones
relating to new product development or completion of specific
manufacturing process objectives. These agreements further
provide EDB with the right to demand repayment of a portion of
past grants in the event that we did not meet our obligations
under the applicable agreements. Based on correspondence with
EDB, we believe that we have satisfied the conditions applicable
to our EDB grant revenue through March 29, 2008.
Our ability to use net operating losses to offset future
taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.
In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code,
a corporation that undergoes an ownership change is
subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change
net operating losses or NOLs to offset future taxable income.
Our existing NOLs may be subject to limitations arising from
previous ownership changes, and if we undergo an ownership
change in connection with or after this offering, our ability to
utilize NOLs could be further limited by Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code. Future changes in our stock ownership,
some of which are outside of our control, could result in an
ownership change under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code. We may not be able to utilize a material portion of the
NOLs reflected on our balance sheet and for this reason, we have
fully reserved against the value of our NOLs on our balance
sheet.
19
Risks
Related to Intellectual Property
Our ability to protect our intellectual property and
proprietary technology through patents and other means is
uncertain.
Our commercial success may depend in part on our ability to
protect our intellectual property and proprietary technologies.
We rely on patent protection, where appropriate and available,
as well as a combination of copyright, trade secret and
trademark laws, and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other
contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary technology.
However, these legal means afford only limited protection and
may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or
keep any competitive advantage. Our pending U.S. and
foreign patent applications may not issue as patents or may not
issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. Any patents we
have obtained or do obtain may be subject to re-examination,
reissue, opposition or other administrative proceeding, or may
be challenged in litigation, and such challenges could result in
a determination that the patent is invalid or unenforceable. In
addition, competitors may be able to design alternative methods
or devices that avoid infringement of our patents. To the extent
our intellectual property, including licensed intellectual
property, offers inadequate protection, or is found to be
invalid or unenforceable, we are exposed to a greater risk of
direct competition. If our intellectual property does not
provide adequate protection against our competitors
products, our competitive position could be adversely affected,
as could our business. Both the patent application process and
the process of managing patent disputes can be time consuming
and expensive. Furthermore, the laws of some foreign countries
may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same
extent as do the laws of the United States.
The patent positions of life science companies can be highly
uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for
which important legal principles remain unresolved. No
consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in
such companies patents has emerged to date in the United
States. The laws of some
non-U.S. countries
do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent
as the laws of the United States, and many companies have
encountered significant problems in protecting and defending
such rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of
certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do
not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual
property protection, particularly those relating to
biotechnology, which could make it difficult for us to stop the
infringement of our patents. Proceedings to enforce our patent
rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial cost
and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our
business. Changes in either the patent laws or in
interpretations of patent laws in the United States or other
countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property.
We cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or
enforced in our patents or in third-party patents. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
We might not have been the first to make the inventions covered
by each of our pending patent applications.
|
|
|
|
We might not have been the first to file patent applications for
these inventions.
|
|
|
|
Others may independently develop similar or alternative products
and technologies or duplicate any of our products and
technologies.
|
|
|
|
It is possible that none of our pending patent applications will
result in issued patents, and even if they issue as patents,
they may not provide a basis for commercially viable products,
or may not provide us with any competitive advantages, or may be
challenged and invalidated by third parties.
|
|
|
|
We may not develop additional proprietary products and
technologies that are patentable.
|
|
|
|
The patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business.
|
|
|
|
We apply for patents covering our products and technologies and
uses thereof, as we deem appropriate. However, we may fail to
apply for patents on important products and technologies in a
timely fashion or at all.
|
In addition to pursuing patents on our technology, we take steps
to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology
by entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual
property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants,
corporate partners and, when needed, our advisors. Such
agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful
protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary
information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or
other breaches of the agreements, and we may not be able to
prevent such unauthorized disclosure. Monitoring unauthorized
disclosure is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we
20
have taken to prevent such disclosure are, or will be, adequate.
If we were to enforce a claim that a third party had illegally
obtained and was using our trade secrets, it would be expensive
and time consuming, and the outcome would be unpredictable. In
addition, courts outside the United States may be less willing
to protect trade secrets.
We depend on certain technologies that are licensed to us.
We do not control these technologies and any loss of our rights
to them could prevent us from selling our products.
We rely on licenses in order to be able to use various
proprietary technologies that are material to our business,
including our core integrated fluidic circuit and multi-layer
soft lithography technologies. We do not own the patents that
underlie these licenses. Our rights to use these technologies
and employ the inventions claimed in the licensed patents are
subject to the negotiation of, continuation of and compliance
with the terms of those licenses. In some cases, we do not
control the prosecution, maintenance, or filing of the patents
to which we hold licenses, or the enforcement of these patents
against third parties. Some of our patents and patent
applications were either acquired from another company who
acquired those patents and patent applications from yet another
company, or are licensed from a third party. Thus, these patents
and patent applications are not written by us or our attorneys,
and we did not have control over the drafting and prosecution.
The former patent owners and our licensors might not have given
the same attention to the drafting and prosecution of these
patents and applications as we would have if we had been the
owners of the patents and applications and had control over the
drafting and prosecution. We cannot be certain that drafting
and/or
prosecution of the licensed patents and patent applications by
the licensors have been or will be conducted in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations or will result in valid and
enforceable patents and other intellectual property rights.
Enforcement of our licensed patents or defense or any claims
asserting the invalidity of these patents is often subject to
the control or cooperation of our licensors. Certain of our
licenses contain provisions that allow the licensor to terminate
the license upon specific conditions. Our rights under the
licenses are subject to our continued compliance with the terms
of the license, including the payment of royalties due under the
license. Termination of these licenses could prevent us from
marketing some or all of our products. Because of the complexity
of our products and the patents we have licensed, determining
the scope of the license and related royalty obligation can be
difficult and can lead to disputes between us and the licensor.
An unfavorable resolution of such a dispute could lead to an
increase in the royalties payable pursuant to the license. If a
licensor believed we were not paying the royalties due under the
license or were otherwise not in compliance with the terms of
the license, the licensor might attempt to revoke the license.
If such an attempt were successful, we might be barred from
producing and selling some or all of our products.
We are subject to certain U.S. government regulations
because we have licensed technologies that were developed with
U.S. government grants. In accordance with these
regulations, these licenses provide that products embodying the
technologies will be manufactured substantially in the United
States. If this domestic manufacturing requirement is not met,
the government agency that funded the relevant grant is entitled
to exercise specified rights, referred to as march-in rights,
which if exercised would allow the government agency to require
the licensors or us to grant a non-exclusive, partially
exclusive or exclusive license in any field of use to a third
party designated by such agency. As of June 30, 2008, most of
the instrumentation components of our IFC systems were
manufactured in the United States and all commercial IFC
components were manufactured in Singapore, though this division
of manufacturing activities could change in the future. All of
our IFC system revenue is dependent upon the availability of
IFCs, which incorporate technology developed with U.S.
government grants. As there is limited judicial or
administrative guidance with respect to the interpretation or
application of the U.S. manufacturing requirement, we are
uncertain as to whether the current division of manufacturing
for our IFC systems is in compliance with the requirement. The
federal regulations allow the funding government agency to
grant, at the request of the licensors of such technology, a
waiver of the domestic manufacturing requirement. Waivers may be
requested prior to any government notification. We are assisting
the licensors of these technologies with the analysis of the
domestic manufacturing requirement, and we believe that at least
one of our licensors will be requesting a waiver with our
assistance. If it were to be determined that we are in violation
of the domestic manufacturing requirement and a waiver of such
requirement was either not requested or not granted, then the
U.S. government could exercise its march-in rights. In
addition, these licenses contain provisions relating to
compliance with this domestic manufacturing requirement. If it
were to be determined that we are not in compliance with these
provisions and such non-compliance constituted a material breach
of the licenses, the licenses could be terminated.
21
Either the exercise of march-in rights or the termination of one
or more of our licenses could materially adversely affect our
business, operations and financial condition.
We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our
patents and proprietary rights and to determine the scope,
coverage and validity of others proprietary rights.
Litigation may be necessary to enforce our patent and
proprietary rights
and/or to
determine the scope, coverage and validity of others
proprietary rights. Litigation on these matters has been
prevalent in our industry and we expect that this will continue.
To determine the priority of inventions, we may have to initiate
and participate in interference and re-examination proceedings
declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that could
result in substantial legal fees and could substantially affect
the scope of our patent protection. Also, our intellectual
property may be subject to significant administrative and
litigation proceedings such as invalidity, unenforceability and
opposition proceedings against our patents. The outcome of any
litigation or interference proceeding might not be favorable to
us, and we might not be able to obtain licenses to technology
that we require. Even if such licenses are obtainable, they may
not be available at a reasonable cost. In addition, if we resort
to legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights
or to determine the validity, scope and coverage of the
intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others, the
proceedings could be burdensome and expensive, even if we were
to prevail. Any litigation that may be necessary in the future
could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results or financial condition.
For example, on June 4, 2008 we received a letter from
Applied Biosystems, Inc., one of our competitors, asserting that
our BioMark System for gene expression analysis infringes upon
U.S. Patent No. 6,814,934, or the 934 patent,
and its foreign counterparts in Europe and Canada, owned by
Applied Biosystems parent company, Applera Corporation. In
response to this letter, we filed suit against Applied
Biosystems and Applera in federal district court in the Southern
District of New York seeking declaratory judgments of
non-infringement and invalidity of the 934 patent. In
response to our action, Applied Biosystems and Applera may file
suit against us in other jurisdictions asserting that our
products infringe the 934 patent or other proprietary
rights held by them, or they may seek to dismiss or move our
suit. Applied Biosystems has recently announced that it expects
to be acquired by Invitrogen Corporation. This may make it more
difficult for us to predict the direction of discussions and
litigation among the parties.
Litigation, other proceedings or third party claims of
intellectual property infringement could require us to spend
significant time and money and could prevent us from selling our
products or services or impact our stock price.
Our commercial success may depend in part on our
non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third
parties. Applied Biosystems, one of our competitors, has
asserted that our BioMark System for gene expression analysis
infringes upon Appleras 934 patent, and we have
filed suit against Applied Biosystems and Applera seeking
declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of the
Applera patent. Other third parties have asserted and may assert
in the future that we are employing their proprietary technology
without authorization. Competitors may assert that our products
infringe their intellectual property rights as part of a
business strategy to impede our successful entry into those
markets. For example, numerous significant intellectual property
issues have been litigated between existing and new participants
in the PCR market, including litigation initiated by Applied
Biosystems, Inc. In addition, our competitors and others may
have patents or may in the future obtain patents and claim that
use of our products infringes these patents. As we move into new
markets and applications for our products, incumbent
participants in such markets may assert their patents and other
proprietary rights against us as a means of slowing our entry
into such markets or as a means to extract substantial license
and royalty payments from us.
Patent infringement suits can be expensive, lengthy and
disruptive to business operations. We could incur substantial
costs and divert the attention of our management and technical
personnel in prosecuting or defending against any claims. There
can be no assurance that we will prevail in our suit against
Applied Biosystems and Applera in our defense of any claims
brought against us by Applied Biosystems or Applera or in any
other suit initiated against us by third parties. If we do not
prevail in our suit against Applied Biosystems and Applera and
we are unable to secure any required licenses from such parties,
we could be precluded from selling our BioMark products, which
comprised 43% of our total product revenue in 2007 and 56% of
our total product revenue for the three months ended
March 29, 2008. Parties making claims against us may be
able to obtain injunctive or other
22
relief, which could block our ability to develop, commercialize
and sell products, and could result in the award of substantial
damages against us, including treble damages and
attorneys fees and costs in the event that we are found to
be a willful infringer of third party patents. In addition, our
agreements with some of our suppliers, distributors, customers
and other entities with whom we do business may require us to
defend or indemnify these parties to the extent they become
involved in infringement claims against us, including the claims
described above. We could also voluntarily agree to defend or
indemnify third parties in instances where we are not obligated
to do so if we determine it would be important to our business
relationships. If we are required or agree to defend or
indemnify any of these third parties in connection with any
infringement claims, we could incur significant costs and
expenses that could adversely affect our business, operating
results, or financial condition. In the event of a successful
claim of infringement against us, we may be required to obtain
one or more licenses from third parties, which we may not be
able to obtain at a reasonable cost, if at all. In addition, we
could encounter delays in product introductions while we attempt
to develop alternative methods or products to avoid infringing
third-party patents or proprietary rights. Defense of any
lawsuit or failure to obtain any required licenses on favorable
terms could prevent us from commercializing our products, and
the risk of a prohibition on the sale of any of our products
could adversely affect our ability to grow and gain market
acceptance for our products.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery
required in connection with intellectual property litigation,
there is a risk that some of our confidential information could
be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In
addition, during the course of this kind of litigation, there
could be public announcements of the results of hearings,
motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If
securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be
negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the
price of our common stock.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we
or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade
secrets of our employees former employers.
Many of our employees were previously employed at universities
or other life science companies, including our competitors or
potential competitors. Although no claims against us are
currently pending, we may be subject to claims that these
employees or we have inadvertently or otherwise used or
disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of
their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend
against these claims. If we fail in defending such claims, in
addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable
intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key
research personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent
our ability to commercialize certain potential products, which
could severely harm our business. Even if we are successful in
defending against these claims, litigation could result in
substantial costs and be a distraction to management.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock and this Offering
We expect that our stock price will fluctuate
significantly, and you may not be able to resell your shares at
or above the initial public offering price.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for
shares of our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to
which investor interest in our company will lead to the
development of an active trading market on the NASDAQ Global
Market or otherwise or how liquid that market might become. If
an active trading market does not develop, you may have
difficulty selling any of our shares of common stock that you
buy. We and the underwriters will determine the initial public
offering price of our common stock through negotiation. This
price will not necessarily reflect the price at which investors
in the market will be willing to buy and sell our shares
following this offering. In addition, the trading price of our
common stock following this offering may be highly volatile and
could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various
factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated quarterly variation in our results of
operations or the results of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of new commercial
products, significant contracts, commercial relationships or
capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
issuance of new or changed securities analysts reports or
recommendations for our stock;
|
|
|
|
developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or
other proprietary rights;
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the life science sector;
|
|
|
|
any major change in our Board or management; and
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of our
markets.
|
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the
research and reports that equity research analysts publish about
us and our business. We do not control these analysts or the
content and opinions included in their reports. Securities
analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our
common stock after the completion of this offering, and such
lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market price
of our common stock. The price of our stock could decline if one
or more equity research analysts downgrade our stock or if those
analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing
reports about us or our business. If one or more equity research
analysts ceases coverage of our company, we could lose
visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock
price to decline.
Purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and
substantial dilution in the book value of their
investment.
The initial public offering price of our common stock is
substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share
of our common stock immediately after this offering. Therefore,
if you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will
incur an immediate dilution of $
in net tangible book value per share from the price you paid,
based on an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. In
addition, new investors who purchase shares in this offering
will contribute approximately % of
the total amount of equity capital raised by us through the date
of this offering, but will only own
approximately % of the outstanding
share capital and approximately %
of the voting rights. The exercise of outstanding options and
warrants will result in further dilution. For a further
description of the dilution that you will experience immediately
after this offering, see Dilution.
Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could
cause our stock price to decline.
If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intention to
sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market after the
lock-up and
other legal restrictions on resale discussed in this prospectus
lapse, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Based on shares outstanding as of April 30, 2008, upon
completion of this offering, we will have outstanding a total
of shares
of common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option. Of these shares, only
the shares
of common stock sold in this offering by us will be freely
tradable, without restriction, in the public market immediately
after the offering. Each of our directors and officers, and
certain of our stockholders, have entered into
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters that restrict their ability to
sell or transfer their shares. The
lock-up
agreements pertaining to this offering will expire 180 days
from the date of this prospectus, although they may be extended
for up to an additional 34 days under certain
circumstances. Our underwriters, however, may, in their sole
discretion, permit our officers, directors and other current
stockholders who are subject to the contractual
lock-up to
sell shares prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements. After the
lock-up
agreements expire, based on shares outstanding as of
April 30, 2008, up to an additional 68,101,494 shares
of common stock will be eligible for sale in the public
market,
of which are held by directors, executive officers and other
affiliates and will be subject to volume limitations under
Rule 144 under the Securities Act and various vesting
agreements. In
addition, shares
of common stock that are subject to outstanding options as of
April 30, 2008 will become eligible for sale in the public
market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various
vesting agreements, the
lock-up
agreements and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act.
If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that
they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of
our common stock could decline.
Our directors and executive officers will continue to have
substantial control over us after this offering and could limit
your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions,
including changes of control.
Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates will
beneficially own or control
approximately % of the outstanding
shares of our common stock, following the completion of this
offering. Accordingly, these executive officers, directors and
their affiliates, acting as a group, will have substantial
influence over the outcome of
24
corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the
election of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all
or substantially all of our assets or any other significant
corporate transactions. These stockholders may also delay or
prevent a change of control of us, even if such a change of
control would benefit our other stockholders. The significant
concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the
trading price of our common stock due to investors
perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and
under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be
beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent
attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current
management and limit the market price of our common
stock.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as
amended and restated upon the closing of this offering, may have
the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or
changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws to become
effective upon completion of this offering include provisions
that:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize our Board of Directors to issue, without further
action by the stockholders, up to 20,000,000 shares of
undesignated preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be
effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by
written consent;
|
|
|
|
specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called
only by our Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board, the
Chief Executive Officer or the President;
|
|
|
|
establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals
to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders,
including proposed nominations of persons for election to our
Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
establish that our Board of Directors is divided into three
classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with
each class serving staggered terms;
|
|
|
|
provide that our directors may be removed only for cause;
|
|
|
|
provide that vacancies on our Board of Directors may be filled
only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less
than a quorum;
|
|
|
|
specify that no stockholder is permitted to cumulate votes at
any election of directors; and
|
|
|
|
require a super-majority of votes to amend certain of the
above-mentioned provisions.
|
These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our current management by
making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of
our Board of Directors, which is responsible for appointing the
members of our management. In addition, because we are
incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of
our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us.
We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds
from this offering and may not use them effectively.
We will have broad discretion in the application of the net
proceeds from this offering and could spend the proceeds in ways
that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the
value of our common stock. Our failure to apply these funds
effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, delay the development of our product candidates and
cause the price of our common stock to decline.
We have never paid dividends on our capital stock, and we
do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
We have paid no cash dividends on any of our classes of capital
stock to date, have contractual restrictions against paying cash
dividends and currently intend to retain our future earnings to
fund the development and growth of our business. As a result,
capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your
sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
25
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements that relate
to future events or our future financial performance and involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to differ materially from any future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by these forward-looking statements. Words such as, but
not limited to, believe, expect,
anticipate, estimate,
intend, plan, targets,
likely, will, would,
could, and similar expressions or phrases, or the
negative of those expressions or phrases identify
forward-looking statements. Although we believe that we have a
reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement contained in
this prospectus, we caution you that these statements are based
on our projections of the future that are subject to known and
unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause
our actual results, level of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements, to differ. The sections in this prospectus entitled
Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and Business, as well as other sections in this
prospectus, discuss some of the factors that could contribute to
these differences.
Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our
results. Consequently, actual results or developments
anticipated by us may not be realized or, even if substantially
realized, may not have the expected consequences to, or effects
on, us. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no
obligation to update or revise publicly any of the
forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus.
This prospectus contains market data that we obtained from
industry sources. These sources do not guarantee the accuracy or
completeness of the information. Although we believe that the
industry sources are reliable, we have not independently
verified the information. The market data include projections
that are based on a number of other projections. While we
believe these assumptions to be reasonable and sound as of the
date of this prospectus, actual results may differ from the
projections.
26
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale
of shares
of our common stock that we are selling in this offering will be
$ million, based on an
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us. A $1.00 increase
(decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share would increase
(decrease) the net proceeds to us by
$ million, after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses, assuming that the number of shares offered by
us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains
the same. We may also increase or decrease the number of shares
we are offering. An increase of 1.0 million shares in the
number of shares offered by us would increase the net proceeds
to us by $ million.
Similarly, a decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number
of shares offered by us would decrease the net proceeds to us by
$ million. If the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full,
we estimate that we will receive net proceeds of
$ million.
Of the net proceeds that we will receive from this offering, we
expect to use approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
$ million for sales and
marketing initiatives, including significantly expanding our
sales force, to support the ongoing commercialization of our
products;
|
|
|
|
$ for research and product
development activities;
|
|
|
|
$ million to expand our
facilities and manufacturing operations; and
|
|
|
|
the balance for working capital and other general corporate
purposes.
|
We may also use a portion of our net proceeds to acquire and
invest in complementary products, technologies or businesses;
however, we currently have no agreements or commitments to
complete any such transaction and are not involved in
negotiations to do so. Pending these uses, we intend to invest
our net proceeds from this offering primarily in
investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments.
As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with
certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be
received upon the completion of this offering. The amount and
timing of our expenditures will depend on several factors,
including cash flows from our operations and the anticipated
growth of our business. Accordingly, our management will have
broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds and
investors will be relying on the judgment of our management
regarding the application of the proceeds from this offering. We
reserve the right to change the use of these proceeds as a
result of certain contingencies such as the results of our
commercialization efforts, competitive developments,
opportunities to acquire products, technologies or businesses
and other factors.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. We currently intend to retain all future earnings for the
operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, we do
not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. In addition, we are subject to several
covenants under our debt arrangements that place restrictions on
our ability to pay dividends. The payment of dividends will be
at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on
our results of operations, capital requirements, financial
condition, prospects, contractual arrangements, any limitations
on payment of dividends present in our current and future debt
agreements, and other factors that our Board of Directors may
deem relevant.
27
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
March 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to (1) the conversion
of principal and accrued interest on a convertible promissory
note held by Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd into
1,503,945 shares of our Series E preferred stock on
April 30, 2008, (2) the conversion of all outstanding
shares of convertible preferred stock into common stock and
(3) the reclassification of the convertible preferred stock
warrant liabilities to additional
paid-in
capital, each effective upon the closing of this
offering; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to also give effect to the pro
forma conversions and reclassifications described above and the
sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering and the application of the
net proceeds at the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
You should read this table together with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
as
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
3,178
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock issuable in series, $0.001 par
value: 61,798 shares authorized, 56,671 shares issued
and outstanding (actual); no shares authorized, issued or
outstanding (pro forma and pro forma as adjusted)
|
|
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 87,386 shares
authorized, 9,928 shares issued and outstanding
(actual); shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding (pro
forma); shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding (pro forma as adjusted)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: no shares authorized, issued
or outstanding
(actual); shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding (pro forma and pro
forma as adjusted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital(1)
|
|
|
3,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(140,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
(deficit)(1)
|
|
|
(136,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capitalization(1)
|
|
$
|
34,340
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would
increase (decrease) each of additional paid-in capital, total
stockholders equity and total capitalization by
$ million, assuming that the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. Each increase of
1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us,
together with a $1.00 increase in the assumed offering price of
$ per share, would increase
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
additional paid-in capital, total
stockholders equity and total capitalization by
approximately $ million.
Similarly, each decrease of 1.0 million shares in the
number of shares offered by us, together with a $1.00 decrease
in the assumed offering price of $
per share, would decrease additional paid-in capital, total
stockholders equity and total capitalization by
approximately $ million. The
pro forma as adjusted information discussed above is
illustrative only and will be adjusted based on the actual
public offering price and terms of this offering determined at
pricing.
|
The table above excludes the following shares:
|
|
|
|
|
8,103,050 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding as of March 29, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $0.93 per share;
|
|
|
|
598,720 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants outstanding as of March 29, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $2.97 per share, after conversion
of our convertible preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock reserved for future issuance under our
stock-based compensation plans,
including shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan, and any future increase in shares reserved for
issuance under such plan, each of which will become effective on
the date of this prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
27,084 shares of common stock that were legally issued and
outstanding but were not included in stockholders deficit
as of March 29, 2008 pursuant to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, as these shares were
subject to a right of repurchase by us.
|
29
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the initial public
offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma
as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common
stock immediately after this offering. Net tangible book value
dilution per share to new investors represents the difference
between the amount per share paid by purchasers of shares of
common stock in this offering and the pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after
completion of this offering.
Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing our
total tangible assets less our total liabilities by the number
of shares of common stock outstanding. Our historical net
tangible book value (deficit) as of March 29, 2008, was
$25.2 million, or $2.53 per share. Our pro forma net
tangible book value as of March 29, 2008 was
$ million, or
$ per share, based on the total
number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of
March 29, 2008, after giving effect to (1) the
conversion of an outstanding convertible promissory note into
1,503,945 shares of common stock, (2) the conversion
of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock
into common stock and (3) the reclassification of the
convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities to additional
paid-in
capital, each effective upon the closing of this offering.
After giving effect to our sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share, the
midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, and after deducting the estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, our
pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of
March 29, 2008 would have been
$ million, or
$ per share. This represents an
immediate increase in net tangible book value of
$ per share to existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book
value of $ per share to purchasers
of common stock in this offering, as illustrated in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Historical net tangible book value per share as of
March 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of
March 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share attributable to new investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after
this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma dilution per share to new investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering
price of $ per share, the midpoint
of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, would
increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book
value by approximately
$ million, or approximately
$ per share, and the pro forma
dilution per share to investors in this offering by
approximately $ per share,
assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us. We may also increase
or decrease the number of shares we are offering. An increase of
1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us,
together with a $1.00 increase in the assumed offering price of
$ per share, would result in a pro
forma as adjusted net tangible book value of approximately
$ million, or
$ per share, and the pro forma
dilution per share to investors in this offering would be
$ per share. Similarly, a decrease
of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by
us, together with a $1.00 decrease in the assumed public
offering price of $ per share,
would result in an pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value
of approximately $ million,
or $ per share, and the pro forma
dilution per share to investors in this offering would be
$ per share. The pro forma as
adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and
will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and
other terms of this offering determined at pricing.
If the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in
full, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share after this offering would be
$ per share, the increase in pro
forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share to existing
stockholders would be $ per share
and the dilution to new investors purchasing shares in this
offering would be $ per share.
30
The following table presents on a pro forma as adjusted basis as
of March 29, 2008, after giving effect to the automatic
conversion of all outstanding shares of convertible preferred
stock into common stock, the differences between the existing
stockholders and the purchasers of shares in this offering with
respect to the number of shares purchased from us, the total
consideration paid, which includes net proceeds received from
the issuance of common and convertible preferred stock, cash
received from the exercise of stock options and the value of any
stock issued for services and the average price paid per share
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
66,611
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
163,458
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in
the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would
increase (decrease) the total consideration paid to us by new
investors and total consideration paid to us by all stockholder
by $ million, assuming that
the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. An increase of 1.0 million
shares in the number of shares offered by us would increase the
total consideration paid to us by new investors and total
consideration paid to us by all stockholder by
$ million. Similarly, a
decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares
offered by us would decrease the total consideration paid to us
by new investors and total consideration paid to us by all
stockholder by $ million.
|
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, our existing stockholders would
own % and our new investors would
own % of the total number of shares
of our common stock outstanding after this offering.
The table above excludes the following shares:
|
|
|
|
|
8,103,050 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding as of March 29, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $0.93 per share;
|
|
|
|
598,720 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants outstanding as of March 29, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $2.97 per share, after conversion of
our convertible preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock reserved for future issuance under our
stock-based compensation plans,
including shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan, and any future increase in shares reserved for
issuance under such plan, each of which will become effective on
the date of this prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
27,084 shares of common stock that were legally issued and
outstanding but were not included in stockholders deficit
as of March 29, 2008 pursuant to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, as these shares were
subject to a right of repurchase by us.
|
Assuming the exercise in full of the outstanding options and
warrants, pro forma net tangible book value before this offering
at March 29, 2008 would be $
per share, and after giving effect to the sale of shares in this
offering, there would be immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors in
this offering.
Effective upon the closing of this offering, an aggregate
of shares
of our common stock will be reserved for future issuance under
our stock-based compensation plans. To the extent that any of
these options or warrants are exercised, new options are issued
under our stock-based compensation plans or we issue additional
shares of common stock in the future, there will be further
dilution to investors participating in this offering.
31
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
We have derived the selected consolidated statement of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005,
December 31, 2006 and December 29, 2007 and the
selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,
2006 and December 29, 2007 from our audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We
have derived the summary consolidated statement of operations
data for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008 and the consolidated balance sheet data as
of March 29, 2008 from our unaudited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have
derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005 from our audited consolidated financial
statements not included in this prospectus. Our historical
results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for any future period. The following selected
consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
3,133
|
|
|
$
|
4,603
|
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Grant revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
3,362
|
|
|
|
4,764
|
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
9,608
|
|
|
|
11,449
|
|
|
|
15,589
|
|
|
|
14,389
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
7,263
|
|
|
|
8,690
|
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
|
|
9,699
|
|
|
|
12,898
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
20,399
|
|
|
|
21,660
|
|
|
|
24,168
|
|
|
|
28,061
|
|
|
|
30,801
|
|
|
|
7,078
|
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(17,266
|
)
|
|
|
(16,621
|
)
|
|
|
(16,494
|
)
|
|
|
(21,663
|
)
|
|
|
(23,526
|
)
|
|
|
(5,510
|
)
|
|
|
(6,523
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes and cumulative of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
(17,304
|
)
|
|
|
(16,838
|
)
|
|
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(25,346
|
)
|
|
|
(6,334
|
)
|
|
|
(6,589
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(17,304
|
)
|
|
|
(16,838
|
)
|
|
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
|
(6,613
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(17,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(2.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock,
basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
|
7,775
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
9,316
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
9,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Please see Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements for an explanation of the
method used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per share of
common stock.
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
28,874
|
|
|
$
|
12,520
|
|
|
$
|
19,659
|
|
|
$
|
25,518
|
|
|
$
|
40,363
|
|
|
$
|
31,235
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
23,689
|
|
|
|
9,710
|
|
|
|
14,764
|
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
38,754
|
|
|
|
29,851
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
34,908
|
|
|
|
20,150
|
|
|
|
27,750
|
|
|
|
36,493
|
|
|
|
54,776
|
|
|
|
47,338
|
|
Total long-term debt and convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
|
|
6,111
|
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
|
|
25,910
|
|
|
|
14,359
|
|
|
|
12,742
|
|
Convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
75,072
|
|
|
|
76,596
|
|
|
|
88,966
|
|
|
|
112,295
|
|
|
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
162,082
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(49,812
|
)
|
|
|
(65,471
|
)
|
|
|
(83,154
|
)
|
|
|
(106,172
|
)
|
|
|
(130,331
|
)
|
|
|
(136,921
|
)
|
33
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of the financial
condition and results of our operations should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ
materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause
or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited
to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section
titled Risk Factors included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Overview
We develop, manufacture and market proprietary Integrated
Fluidic Circuit systems that significantly improve productivity
in the life science industry. Our Integrated Fluidic Circuits,
or IFCs, enable the simultaneous performance of thousands of
biochemical measurements in extremely minute volumes. We created
this integrated circuit for biology by
miniaturizing, integrating and automating sophisticated liquid
handling processes on a single microfabricated device.
Particularly in large-scale experimentation, our IFC systems,
consisting of instrumentation, software and single-use IFCs,
increase throughput, decrease costs and enhance sensitivity
compared to conventional laboratory systems. We have sold our
IFCs to over 100 customers, including many leading biotechnology
and pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, and life
science laboratories worldwide.
We have commercialized IFC systems for a wide range of life
science applications, including our BioMark system for gene
expression analysis, genotyping and digital PCR, and our Topaz
system for protein crystallization. Researchers and clinicians
have successfully employed our products to help achieve
breakthroughs in the fields of genetic variation, cellular
function and structural biology. We believe that the broad
applicability of our IFC technology will lead to the development
of IFC systems for a wide variety of additional markets and
applications, including molecular diagnostics.
We were founded in 1999. In the first quarter of 2003, we
introduced our first product line, the Topaz system for protein
crystallization based on our first generation Topaz IFC. In
subsequent years, we enhanced the capability of the Topaz system
by introducing IFCs with increased throughput. Prior to 2007,
Topaz system products accounted for substantially all of our
product revenue. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we announced the
commercial availability of our BioMark system. We currently sell
two types of single-use IFCs for use with the BioMark system,
the Dynamic Array for gene expression and genotyping and the
Digital Array for digital PCR.
We have incurred significant losses since our inception,
including net losses of $16.4 million, $23.6 million,
$25.5 million and $6.6 million in 2005, 2006, 2007 and
the three months ended March 29, 2008. As of March 29,
2008, we had an accumulated deficit of $140.4 million. We
sell our IFC systems around the world. For 2007 and the three
months ended March 29, 2008, customers in North America
accounted for approximately 48% and 51% of our total revenue
while European customers accounted for 10% and 12% and Asian
customers accounted for 42% and 31%. We distribute our systems
through our direct field sales and support organizations located
in North America, Europe and Asia and through distributors or
sales agents in several European countries. Our manufacturing
operations are located in Singapore and South
San Francisco. Our facility in Singapore fabricates all of
our IFCs for commercial sale and some IFCs for our own research
and development purposes and assembles certain elements of our
BioMark and Topaz instrumentation. Our South San Francisco
facility also assembles certain elements of our BioMark and
Topaz instrumentation and fabricates IFCs for our own research
and development purposes.
Since 2002, we have received significant revenue from government
grants. Our most significant grant relationship has been with
the Singapore Economic Development Board, or EDB. The EDB, an
agency of the Government of Singapore, promotes research,
development and manufacturing activities in Singapore and
associated employment of Singapore nationals by providing
incentive grants to companies willing to conduct operations in
Singapore and satisfy the requirements of EDBs government
programs. Under our agreements with EDB, we are eligible to
receive incentive grant payments from EDB, provided we satisfy
agreed upon targets for increasing levels of research,
development and manufacturing activity in Singapore, including
the use of local service providers, the hiring of personnel in
Singapore, local spending in Singapore, our receipt of new
equity investment, and our achievement of agreed upon targets
relating to new product development or completion of
34
specific manufacturing process objectives. If we satisfy the
grant conditions, we receive incentive grant payments equal to a
portion of the qualifying expenses we incur in Singapore,
relating to salaries, overhead, outsourcing and subcontracting
expenses, operating expenses and royalties paid. Expenses not
qualifying for the incentive grant program include raw materials
purchases. We submit requests to EDB for incentive grant
payments on a quarterly basis, and these requests are subject to
EDBs review and our satisfaction of the grant conditions.
Together these agreements provide for incentive funding
eligibility through 2011, subject to our compliance with the
requirements of these agreements.
In addition, we have entered into collaboration and license
agreements with other parties that generally provide us with
up-front and periodic milestone fees or fees based on agreed
upon rates for time incurred by our research staff.
Fiscal
Year Presentation
During the year ended December 29, 2007, we adopted a 52 or
53 week year convention for our fiscal years and,
therefore, our 2007 fiscal year ended on December 29, 2007
and the first three-month periods of 2007 and 2008 ended on
March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008. Future fiscal years
will end on the last Saturday in December of each year. Prior to
the adoption of this method, we reported our fiscal years on a
calendar basis. The fiscal years discussed in this
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations ended on December 31, 2005,
December 31, 2006 and December 29, 2007.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and
Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these consolidated financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Changes in the accounting estimates are
reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly,
actual results could differ significantly from the estimates
made by our management. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. To the extent that there are
material differences between these estimates and actual results,
our future financial statement presentation, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies
involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity than our
other accounting policies. Accordingly, these are the policies
we believe are the most critical to understanding and evaluating
our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Revenue
Recognition
We generate revenue from sales of our products and services,
collaboration agreements and government grants. Our products
consist of single-use IFCs, various instruments and software
related to our BioMark and Topaz systems. Our services include
system installation, training and customer support services. We
also have entered into a number of research and development
contracts and have received government grants to conduct
research and development activities.
We record revenue in accordance with the guidelines established
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, or SAB 104. In addition, we have concluded
that software included with certain of our instruments is
essential to their functionality. In these instances, we apply
AICPA Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, or
SOP 97-2.
If the arrangement includes IFCs, we use the separation criteria
in EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, to
separate revenues related to IFCs, which are non-software
related deliverables, from software related deliverables.
Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are
met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed
or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
evaluation of these revenue recognition criteria requires
significant management judgment. For instance, we use judgment
to assess collectibility based on factors such as the
customers creditworthiness and past collection history, if
applicable. If we determine that collection of a payment is not
reasonably assured, revenue
35
recognition is deferred until the time collection becomes
reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment.
We also use judgment to assess whether a price is fixed or
determinable by reviewing contractual terms and conditions
related to payment terms.
In 2007, and thereafter, no right of return existed for our
products. In prior years, if an agreement included a right of
return, the related revenue was deferred until the right had
lapsed. Historically, we have not experienced any significant
returns of our products. Also, accruals are provided for
estimated warranty expenses at the time that the associated
revenue is recognized. We use judgment to estimate these
accruals and, if we were to experience an increase in warranty
claims or if costs of servicing our products under warranty were
greater than our estimates, our gross margins could be adversely
affected in future periods.
Some of our sales contracts which include items such as our
BioMark instrument systems or our Topaz readers involve the
delivery or performance of multiple products and services within
contractually binding arrangements. Significant contract
interpretation is sometimes required to determine the
appropriate accounting, including whether the deliverables
specified in a multiple element arrangement should be treated as
separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes,
and, if so, how the price should be allocated among the
elements, when to recognize revenue for each element, and the
period over which revenue should be recognized. We use judgment
to evaluate whether a delivered item has value on a stand-alone
basis prior to delivery of the remaining items by determining
whether we have made separate sales of such items or whether the
undelivered items are essential to the functionality of the
delivered items. Further, we use judgment to evaluate whether
there is vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of fair
value of the undelivered items, determined by reference to
stand-alone sales of such items. We recognize revenue for
delivered elements only when we determine that the fair values
of undelivered elements are known. For a multiple element
arrangement that includes both IFCs and instruments we separate
these elements into separate units of accounting as we consider
these elements to have standalone value to the customer. We
recognize revenue for the IFCs under SAB 104 and the
instruments under SAB 104 or
SOP 97-2,
as applicable. If the fair value of any undelivered item related
to instruments and software included in a multiple element
arrangement cannot be objectively determined, revenue will be
deferred until all items are delivered, or until fair value can
objectively be determined for any remaining undelivered items.
However, if the only such undelivered element is post-contract
customer support services, such as maintenance agreements, the
entire revenue is recognized ratably over the service period.
Recognition of revenue from these arrangements generally begins
upon installation of the instruments as installation is deemed
essential to the functionality of the instruments. The
corresponding costs of products sold related to multiple element
arrangements are also deferred and amortized over the same
period.
Our deferred revenue balance increased by $1.6 million
during 2007 and decreased by $0.1 million during the three
months ended March 29, 2008. The increase during 2007 was
primarily due to the increase in sales of our BioMark instrument
systems, all of which included maintenance agreements. Although
there was a slight decrease in deferred revenue during the three
months ended March 29, 2008, we expect our deferred revenue
balance to continue to increase until we are able to establish
VSOE of the fair value of the post-contract customer support. We
expect to establish VSOE for post-contract customer support as
we enter into renewal agreements for maintenance with our
customers upon the expiration of the initial agreements;
however, we are not able to estimate when that will occur.
Changes in judgments and estimates regarding application of
these revenue recognition guidelines as well as changes in facts
and circumstances including the establishment of VSOE of fair
value could result in a change in the timing or amount of
revenue recognized in future periods.
Revenue from the sales of our products that are not part of a
multiple element arrangement is recognized when no significant
obligations remain undelivered and collection of the receivables
is reasonably assured, which is generally upon shipment of the
product and transfer of title to the customer.
We have entered into collaboration research and development
arrangements that generally provide us with up-front and
periodic milestone fees or fees based on agreed upon rates for
time incurred by our research staff. Revenue is recognized
either ratably over the term of the agreement or as time is
incurred on the project. Revenue from government grants is for
the achievement of agreed upon milestones and expenditures and
is recognized in the period in which the related costs are
incurred, provided that the conditions under which the
government grants are awarded have been substantially met and
only perfunctory obligations remain outstanding.
36
Stock-Based
Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock
options granted to employees using the intrinsic value method
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, or APB 25, and
related interpretations as permitted by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, or SFAS 123, and
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transaction and Disclosure, or
SFAS 148. Accordingly, any compensation cost relating to
stock options was recorded on the date of the grant in
stockholders equity as deferred compensation and was
thereafter amortized to expense over the vesting period of the
grant, which was generally four years. We amortized deferred
stock-based compensation using the multiple option method as
prescribed by FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for
Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or
Award Plans, or FIN 28, over the option vesting period
using an accelerated amortization schedule.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R), which requires
companies to measure the cost of employee services received in
exchange for an award of equity instruments, including stock
options, based on the grant date fair value of the award. The
fair value is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The resulting cost is recognized over the period during
which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for
the award, usually the vesting period.
We adopted SFAS 123(R) using the prospective-transition
method as all prior grants were measured using the minimum value
method for the pro forma disclosures previously required by
SFAS 123. The prospective-transition method requires us to
continue to apply APB 25 in future periods to equity awards
outstanding at the date of our adoption of SFAS 123(R) on
January 1, 2006. Under the prospective-transition method,
any compensation costs that will be recognized from
January 1, 2006 will include only: (a) compensation
cost for all stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of, December 31, 2005, based on the intrinsic
value method in accordance with the provisions of ABP 25; and
(b) compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted or
modified subsequent to December 31, 2005, net of estimated
forfeitures, based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). We amortize
the fair value of stock-based compensation under
SFAS 123(R) on a straight-line basis. In accordance with
the prospective-transition method as prescribed under
SFAS 123(R), results for prior periods are not restated.
We account for stock options issued to nonemployees in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) and EITF Issue No.
96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to
Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with
Selling, Goods or Services, or EITF
96-18. In
accordance with SFAS 123(R) and EITF
96-18, stock
options issued to nonemployees are accounted for at their
estimated fair value determined using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The fair value of the options granted to
nonemployees is remeasured as they vest, and the resulting
increase in value, if any, is recognized as expense during the
period the related services are rendered.
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the
fair value of our options on the grant date. This model requires
inputs such as expected term, expected volatility and risk-free
interest rate. Further, the forfeiture rate also affects the
amount of aggregate compensation. These inputs are subjective
and generally require significant judgment.
Our expected volatility is derived from the historical
volatilities of several unrelated public companies within the
life science industry because we have little information on the
volatility of the price of our common stock since we have no
trading history. When making the selections of our industry peer
companies to be used in the volatility calculation, we also
considered the stage of development, size and financial leverage
of potential comparable companies. Our historical volatility is
weighted based on certain qualitative factors and combined to
produce a single volatility factor. The risk-free interest rate
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time
of grant for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with
maturities approximately equal to each grants expected
life. Given our limited history to accurately estimate the
expected lives for the various employee groups, we used the
simplified method as provided by Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share Based Payment. The
simplified method is calculated as the average of
the
time-to-vesting
and the contractual life of the options.
37
Beginning on January 1, 2006 upon the adoption of
SFAS 123(R), the fair value of each new option awarded was
estimated on the grant date for the periods below using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
March 29, 2008
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
72.8%
|
|
63.0%
|
|
54.7%
|
Expected life
|
|
6.1 years
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
5.9 years
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.8%
|
|
4.4%
|
|
3.0%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
If in the future we determine that another method is more
reasonable, or if another method for calculating these input
assumptions is prescribed by authoritative guidance, and,
therefore, should be used to estimate expected volatility or
expected life, the fair value calculated for our stock options
could change significantly. Higher volatility and longer
expected lives result in an increase to stock-based compensation
expense determined at the date of grant. Stock-based
compensation expense affects our cost of revenue, sales and
marketing expense, research and development expense, and general
and administrative expense.
We estimate our forfeiture rate based on an analysis of our
actual forfeitures and will continue to evaluate the
appropriateness of the forfeiture rate based on actual
forfeiture experience, analysis of employee turnover behavior
and other factors. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture
rate can have a significant effect on reported stock-based
compensation expense, as the cumulative effect of adjusting the
rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the period
the forfeiture estimate is changed. If a revised forfeiture rate
is higher than the previously estimated forfeiture rate, an
adjustment is made that will result in a decrease to the
stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. If a revised forfeiture rate is lower than
the previously estimated forfeiture rate, an adjustment is made
that will result in an increase to the stock-based compensation
expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The
effect of forfeiture adjustments during 2006, 2007 and the three
months ended March 29, 2008 was insignificant. We will
continue to use judgment in evaluating the expected term,
volatility and forfeiture rate related to our own stock-based
compensation on a prospective basis and incorporating these
factors into the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Also required for the fair value calculation of the options is
the fair value of the underlying common stock. We have
historically granted stock options with exercise prices no less
than the fair market value of our common stock as determined at
the date of grant by our Board of Directors with input from
management. The following table summarizes, by grant date, the
number of stock options granted since January 1, 2007 and
the associated per share exercise price, which equaled the fair
value of our common stock for each of these grants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
and Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Per Share of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
May 8, 2007
|
|
|
1,613,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
September 20, 2007
|
|
|
100,700
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
December 28, 2007
|
|
|
328,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
February 7, 2008
|
|
|
723,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
Given the absence of an active market for our common stock prior
to this offering, our Board of Directors determined the fair
value of our common stock for our grants of stock options. Our
Board of Directors determined the estimated fair value of our
common stock based in part on an analysis of relevant metrics,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the prices of our convertible preferred stock sold to outside
investors in arms-length transactions;
|
|
|
|
the rights, preferences and privileges of our convertible
preferred stock relative to those of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
the rights of freestanding warrants and other similar
instruments related to shares that are redeemable;
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
our operating and financial performance;
|
|
|
|
the hiring of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new products;
|
|
|
|
our stage of development;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the option grants involve illiquid securities in a
private company;
|
|
|
|
the risks inherent in the development and expansion of our
products and services; and
|
|
|
|
the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an
initial public offering or sale of our company given prevailing
market conditions.
|
From January 2007 through March 2008, our Board of
Directors performed contemporaneous valuations of our common
stock for each grant of stock options during this period.
The valuations were prepared using the market approach and the
income approach to estimate our aggregate enterprise value at
each valuation date. The market approach measures the value of a
company through the analysis of recent sales of comparable
companies. Consideration is given to the financial condition and
operating performance of the company being valued relative to
those of publicly traded companies operating in the same or
similar lines of business. When choosing the comparable
companies to be used for the market approach, we focused on
companies in the life science industry. Some of the specific
criteria used to select comparable companies within this
industry include the business description, business size,
projected growth, financial condition and historical earnings.
The income approach measures the value of a company as the
present value of its future economic benefits by applying an
appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate to expected cash flows,
based on forecasted revenue and costs. We prepared a financial
forecast for each valuation report to be used in the computation
of the enterprise value for both the market approach and the
income approach. The financial forecasts took into account our
past experience and future expectations. The risks associated
with achieving these forecasts were assessed in selecting the
appropriate discount rate. There is inherent uncertainty in
these estimates.
In assessing the fair value of our common stock, our Board of
Directors applied an equal weighting to the value indications
presented by the income approach and market approach. In order
to arrive at the estimated fair value of our common stock, the
indicated enterprise value of our company calculated at each
valuation date was allocated to the shares of convertible
preferred stock and the warrants to purchase these shares, and
shares of common stock and the options to purchase these shares
using an option-pricing methodology. The option-pricing method
treats common stock and preferred stock as call options on the
total equity value of a company, with exercise prices based on
the value thresholds at which the allocation among the various
holders of a companys securities changes. Under this
method, the common stock has value only if the funds available
for distribution to stockholders exceed the value of the
liquidation preference at the time of a liquidity event, such as
a strategic sale, merger or initial public offering, assuming
the enterprise has funds available to make a liquidation
preference meaningful and collectable by the holders of
preferred stock. The common stock is modeled as a call option on
the underlying equity value at a predetermined exercise price.
In the model, the exercise price is based on a comparison with
the total equity value rather than, as in the case of a regular
call option, a comparison with a per share stock price. Thus,
common stock is considered to be a call option with a claim on
the enterprise at an exercise price equal to the remaining value
immediately after the preferred stock is liquidated. The
option-pricing method uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to price the call options. This model defines the
securities fair values as functions of the current fair
value of a company and uses assumptions such as the anticipated
timing of a potential liquidity event and the estimated
volatility of the equity securities. The anticipated timing of a
liquidity event utilized in these valuations was based on
then-current plans and estimates of our Board of Directors and
management regarding a liquidity event. Estimates of the
volatility of our stock were based on available information on
the volatility of capital stock of comparable publicly traded
companies. This approach is consistent with the methods outlined
in the AICPA Practice Guide, Valuation of
Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as
Compensation. Also, we considered the fact that our
stockholders cannot freely trade our common stock in the public
markets. Therefore, the estimated fair value of our common stock
at each grant date reflected a non-marketability discount.
39
There is inherent uncertainty in these estimates and if we had
made different assumptions than those described above, the
amount of our stock-based compensation expense, net loss and net
loss per share amounts could have been significantly different.
Our Board of Directors performed a contemporaneous valuation in
order to determine the fair value of our common stock for the
grant of options on May 8, 2007 which indicated a fair
value of $1.36 per share for our common stock. Our Board of
Directors performed a second contemporaneous valuation in order
to update the determination of the fair value of our common
stock for the grant of options on September 20, 2007 which
indicated a fair value of $1.38 per share for our common stock.
The increase in the fair value between the contemporaneous
valuation performed for the grant of options on May 8, 2007
and the date of this contemporaneous valuation was minimal,
however, it relates mostly to a slight decrease in the
non-marketability discount rate and the time to a liquidity
event. Our Board of Directors performed another contemporaneous
valuation in order to update the determination of the fair value
of our common stock for the grant of options on
December 28, 2007 which indicated a fair value of $2.40 per
share for our common stock. The increase in the fair value
between the contemporaneous valuation performed for the grant of
options on September 20, 2007 and December 28, 2007
valuation relates mostly to the decrease in the
non-marketability discount rate, the risk-adjusted discount and
the time to a liquidity event.
We recorded stock-based compensation of $5,000,
$0.1 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million
during 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008. Included in these amounts was employee
stock-based compensation of $0, $0.1 million, $0.5 million
and $0.2 million, and nonemployee stock-based compensation
of $5,000, $59,000, $0.2 million and $50,000 during 2005,
2006, 2007 and the three months ended March 29, 2008. In
future periods, stock-based compensation expense is expected to
increase as a result of our existing unrecognized stock-based
compensation and as we issue additional stock-based awards to
continue to attract and retain employees and nonemployee
directors. Additionally, SFAS 123(R) requires that we
recognize compensation expense only for the portion of stock
options that are expected to vest. If the actual rate of
forfeitures differs from that estimated by management, we may be
required to record adjustments to stock-based compensation
expense in future periods. As of December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, we had $1.7 million and $2.5 million
of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to stock
options granted under our 1999 Stock Option Plan, which is
expected to be recognized over an average period of 2.9 and
2.6 years.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
Significant management judgment is required in determining our
provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and
liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net
deferred tax assets. We have recorded a full valuation allowance
on our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2006,
December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008 due to
uncertainties related to our ability to utilize our deferred tax
assets in the foreseeable future. These deferred tax assets
primarily consist of certain net operating loss carryforwards
and research and development tax credits.
We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainties in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48, effective
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 requires us to recognize the
financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more
likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the
position will be sustained upon examination. Upon adoption, the
Company recorded a charge of $75,000 as a cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle in the accumulated deficit during
2007.
Inventory
Valuation
We record adjustments to inventory for potentially excess,
obsolete or impaired goods in order to state inventory at net
realizable value. The business environment in which we operate
is subject to rapid changes in technology and customer demand.
We regularly review inventory for excess and obsolete products
and components, taking into account product life cycle and
development plans, product expiration and quality issues,
historical experience and our current inventory levels. If
actual market conditions are less favorable than anticipated,
additional inventory adjustments could be required.
40
Warrants
to Purchase Convertible Preferred Stock
We account for freestanding warrants related to shares that are
redeemable in accordance with FASB Staff Position
No. 150-5,
Issuers Accounting Under FASB Statement No. 150
for Freestanding Warrants and Other Similar Instruments on
Shares That Are Redeemable, or
FSP 150-5,
an interpretation of SFAS No. 150, Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both
Liabilities and Equity. Under
FSP 150-5,
freestanding warrants to purchase shares of our convertible
preferred stock are classified as liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value because the warrants
may conditionally obligate us to transfer assets at some point
in the future. The warrants are subject to remeasurement at each
balance sheet date, and any change in fair value will be
recognized as a component of other income (expense), net in the
consolidated statements of operations. We estimated the fair
value of these warrants at the respective balance sheet dates
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. A number of our
assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes
option-pricing
model, especially the market value and the expected volatility,
are highly judgmental and could differ materially in the future.
We will continue to record adjustments to the fair value of the
warrants until they are exercised, expire or, upon the closing
of this offering, become warrants to purchase shares of our
common stock, wherein the warrants will no longer be subject to
FSP 150-5.
At that time, the then-current aggregate fair value of these
warrants will be reclassified from current liabilities to
additional paid-in capital, a component of stockholders
equity, and we will cease to record any related periodic fair
value adjustments. Upon the closing of this offering, the
preferred stock warrants will be converted into common stock
warrants with the same exercise prices and expiration dates.
Results
of Operations
Revenue
The following table presents our revenue by source for each
period presented (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Grant revenue
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
7,674
|
|
|
$
|
6,398
|
|
|
$
|
7,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We generate revenue from sales of our products, collaboration
agreements and government grants. Our products consist of
single-use IFCs, various instruments, software and service
related to our BioMark and Topaz systems. We also have entered
into a number of research and development contracts and have
received government grants to conduct research and development
activities.
Total
Revenue
Our total revenue increased $0.9 million, or 60%, for the
three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007. Total revenue increased
$0.9 million, or 14%, for 2007 as compared to 2006, and
decreased by $1.3 million, or 17%, for 2006 as compared to
2005. Total revenue from our five largest customers comprised
48%, 56%, 47% and 40% of revenue in 2005, 2006, 2007 and the
three months ended March 29, 2008.
41
As we expand our business through Europe and Asia, we expect our
sales from outside of North America to increase as a percentage
of our revenue. The following table presents our revenue by
geography based on the billing address of our customers for each
period presented (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
March 29, 2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
5,557
|
|
|
|
72%
|
|
|
$
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
$
|
3,492
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
|
|
43%
|
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
Revenue
We derive product revenue from sales to biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions and life science
laboratories worldwide. These sales are generally made through
direct sales personnel to customers in North America, Asia and
most of Europe and through distributors in parts of Europe and
Asia.
Product revenue increased $1.2 million, or 158%, for the
three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase relates mostly to
the increase in sales of our BioMark instrument systems and
related IFCs in the amount of $1.0 million, as we
sold five BioMark instrument systems for the three months ended
March 29, 2008 compared to one BioMark instrument system
for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Sales of our
Topaz instrument systems and related IFCs increased
$0.1 million for the three months ended March 29, 2008
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Product revenue for 2007 increased by $0.5 million, or 12%,
compared to 2006. Revenues from our BioMark instrument systems
and related IFCs which were introduced in late 2006 increased by
$1.3 million, as we sold 14 BioMark instrument systems
during 2007 compared to three BioMark instrument systems during
2006. This increase, however, was mostly offset by a decrease of
$1.2 million related to a decrease in the sales of our
Topaz IFCs. The unit sales of our Topaz instrument systems
remained constant as we sold 10 Topaz instrument systems during
both 2006 and 2007. In addition, our deferred revenue balance
increased from $1.8 million at December 31, 2006 to
$3.4 million at December 29, 2007 as we sold more
BioMark instrument systems as part of multiple element
arrangements for which we did not have VSOE on post-contract
support. We recognized $1.0 million of the deferred revenue
balance at December 31, 2006 during 2007. We expect the
current portion of our deferred revenue balance as of
December 29, 2007 in the amount of $2.6 million will
be recognized as revenue during 2008. Product revenue for 2006
decreased by $2.1 million, or 35%, when compared to 2005.
The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the sales of our
Topaz instrument systems as we sold 10 Topaz instrument systems
during 2006 compared to 16 Topaz instrument systems during 2005;
however, sales of our Topaz IFCs remained relatively consistent
with 2005.
The increase in sales of our BioMark instrument systems in 2007
and the concurrent decrease in sales of our Topaz systems
reflect the refocusing of our product development and sales and
marketing efforts, beginning in 2005, to focus on the larger
markets served by our BioMark instrument systems. Since then, we
have reduced new Topaz product introductions. We will continue
to manufacture and sell our Topaz instrument systems and IFCs
and we expect unit sales of Topaz instrument systems and IFCs in
2008 and future periods to be consistent with or slightly lower
than the 2006 and 2007 levels. We expect unit sales of our
BioMark instrument systems and IFCs to increase in 2008.
Collaboration
Revenue
We receive payments from third parties under research and
development contracts. Fixed-fee research and development
contracts generally provide us with up-front and periodic
milestone-based fees. Variable-fee research and development
contracts generally provide us with fees based on an
agreed-upon
rate for time incurred by our research staff.
42
Collaboration revenue decreased $0.2 million, or 70%, for
the three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease relates to the
completion of one of our development agreements in the first
quarter of 2007. Collaboration revenue for 2007 decreased by
$0.9 million, or 67%, compared to 2006. This decrease was
primarily due to the completion of one of our collaboration
agreements during 2006 that accounted for $1.0 million of
our 2006 collaboration revenue. Collaboration revenue for 2006
decreased by $0.2 million, or 12%, compared to 2005. The
decrease was primarily due to the termination of one of our
collaboration agreements in December 2005. We expect
collaboration revenue to continue to decrease as we complete our
current collaboration agreements, most of which are likely to
terminate during 2008.
Grant
Revenue
We receive payments in the form of grants from certain
government entities. Government grants are agreements that
generally provide incentive grant payments for specified
research and development activities over a contractually defined
period.
Grant revenue decreased $0.1 million, or 11%, for the three
months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The decrease relates to the reduction
in activity for the National Institutes of Health, or NIH, grant
agreement that will terminate in June 2008. Grant revenue
for 2007 increased by $1.3 million, or 122%, when compared
to 2006, and our grant revenue for 2006 increased by
$1.0 million when compared to 2005. These increases were
primarily due to the addition of a grant from the NIH, which was
entered into in June 2006, and grants from EDB, which were
entered into in October 2005 and February 2007. We recognized
revenue from the 2005 EDB grant in the amount of
$0.9 million during 2006, $1.1 million during 2007
and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 29, 2008. In
addition, we recognized revenue in the amount of
$0.6 million during 2007 and $0.3 million during the three
months ended March 29, 2008 from the 2007 EDB grant. Under our
incentive grant agreements with EDB, eligible expenses incurred
by us in Singapore were $4.0 million in 2006,
$4.5 million in 2007 and $1.0 million in the three
months ended March 29, 2008. Also, we recognized revenue
from the NIH grant in the amount of $0.2 million during
2006 and $0.6 million during 2007.
Our agreements with EDB provide that grants extended to us in
the past and future grants are subject to our operation of
increasing levels of research, development and manufacturing in
Singapore, including the use of local service providers, the
hiring of personnel in Singapore, the incurrence of research and
development expenses in Singapore, our receipt of new investment
in our company and our achievement of certain agreed upon
milestones relating to the development of our products.
Development and manufacturing milestones achieved during the
three years ended December 29, 2007 included completion of
feasibility studies and prototype development, establishment of
manufacturing lines, implementation of quality control
improvements, manufacturing process simplification and cost
improvements and manufacturing yield improvements for our Topaz
and BioMark IFCs and related systems. These agreements further
provide EDB with the right to demand repayment of a portion of
past grants in the event that we did not meet our obligations
under the applicable agreements. Based on correspondence with
EDB, we believe we have satisfied the conditions applicable to
our EDB grant revenue through March 29, 2008.
Although the NIH grant is scheduled to terminate in
June 2008, we expect grant revenue from the EDB research
grants to increase in 2008 and remain at such levels through
2011. As a result, we expect our total grant revenue in 2008
through 2011 to be consistent with 2007 levels.
Cost of
Product Revenue and Gross Margin
The following table presents our cost of revenue and gross
margin for each period presented (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
$
|
4,764
|
|
|
$
|
2,773
|
|
|
$
|
3,514
|
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
$
|
1,294
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Cost of product revenue includes manufacturing costs incurred in
the production process, including component materials, assembly
labor and overhead, testing, installation, warranty, packaging
and delivery costs. In
43
addition, cost of product revenue includes royalty expenses for
licensed technologies included in our products, provisions for
warranties and stock-based compensation expense. Costs related
to collaboration and government grant revenue are included in
research and development expense.
Cost of product revenue increased $0.4 million, or 53%, for
the three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The increase related to the
increase of product revenue from both higher instrument and IFC
sales. Cost of product revenue in the first three months of 2007
was adversely affected by
start-up
costs for our new Singapore manufacturing facility and
underutilized capacity as we transitioned manufacturing from the
United States to Singapore. Cost of product revenue for 2007
increased $0.7 million, or 27%, compared to 2006, primarily
driven by higher instrument sales, start-up costs for our new
Singapore manufacturing facility and underutilized capacity as
we transitioned manufacturing from the United States to
Singapore. Additionally we wrote-off obsolete raw materials in
2007 in the amount of $0.2 million, which decreased our
gross margin by 5 percentage points. Cost of product
revenue for 2006 decreased by $2.0 million, or 42%, when
compared to 2005, primarily driven by a decrease in sales of our
Topaz instruments during 2006. We expect our unit costs to
decline in future periods as a result of our ongoing efforts to
automate our manufacturing processes and expected increases in
production volumes and yields. However, improvement in unit
costs may be offset by increasing price competition, which could
cause our gross margins to fluctuate from
year-to-year
and
quarter-to-quarter.
Operating
Expenses
The following table presents our operating expenses for each
period presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
11,449
|
|
|
$
|
15,589
|
|
|
$
|
14,389
|
|
|
$
|
3,473
|
|
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
|
|
9,699
|
|
|
|
12,898
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
19,404
|
|
|
$
|
25,288
|
|
|
$
|
27,287
|
|
|
$
|
6,231
|
|
|
$
|
7,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and Development
Research and development expense is the largest component of our
operating expenses and consists primarily of personnel costs,
independent contractor costs, prototype expenses and other
allocated facilities and information technology expenses. We
have made substantial investments in research and development
since our inception. Our research and development efforts have
focused primarily on the tasks required to optimize our
technologies and to support commercialization of the products
and services derived from these technologies.
Research and development expense decreased $0.2 million, or
6%, for the three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease relates
to a decrease of $0.3 million in supply costs and
$0.2 million in license costs partially offset by a
$0.4 million increase in compensation costs due to
increased research and development headcount. Research and
development expense decreased in 2007 by $1.2 million, or
8%, compared to 2006, primarily due to decrease contractor costs
of $0.7 million and decreased research and development
license costs of $0.3 million. Research and development
expense for 2006 increased by $4.1 million, or 36%,
compared to 2005, primarily due to increased compensation costs
of $2.1 million due mostly to a significant increase in
research and development headcount and $0.1 million related
to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) during 2006,
$0.6 million attributable to increased contractor expenses,
$0.6 million in increased license costs and royalties, and
$0.2 million attributable to increased equipment costs. We
believe that our continued investment in research and
development is essential to a long-term competitive position and
expect these expenses, including stock-based compensation, to
increase in future periods.
44
Selling,
General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense consists primarily
of personnel costs for our sales and marketing, business
development, finance, legal, human resources and general
management, as well as professional services, such as legal and
accounting services.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$1.7 million, or 62%, for the three months ended
March 29, 2008 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The increase relates to a $0.6 million
increase for accounting and consulting services, a
$0.6 million increase in compensation costs due to
increased head count, a $0.2 million increase in patent
filings and a $0.1 million increase in supplies. Selling,
general and administrative expense for 2007 increased by
$3.2 million, or 33%, compared to 2006, primarily due to
increased compensation costs of $1.4 million due mostly to
an increase in headcount and a $0.3 million increase in
stock-based compensation over 2006, an increase of
$1.4 million in spending primarily for accounting and legal
services, $0.3 million resulting from increased advertising
and promotions, and $0.2 million attributable to increased
supplies for customer demonstrations. However, this increase was
partially offset by a decrease of $0.6 million due to fewer
patent filings. Selling, general administrative expense for 2006
increased by $1.7 million, or 22%, compared to 2005,
primarily due to increased compensation costs of
$1.1 million due to an increase in headcount, an increase
of $0.6 million in spending primarily for accounting and
legal services, and $0.4 million due to the filing of
additional patents. We expect selling, general and
administrative expense, including stock-based compensation, to
significantly increase in 2008 and future periods as we continue
to grow our sales, technical support, marketing and
administrative headcount, support increased product sales,
broaden our customer base and incur additional costs to support
the growth in our business.
Interest
Income and Expense
We receive interest income from our cash and cash equivalents
and our
available-for-sale
security balances held with certain financial institutions.
Conversely, we incur interest expense from our long-term debt
and convertible promissory notes and the amortization of our
debt discounts related to these items. The following table
presents our interest income and expense for each period
presented (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
Interest income increased $0.1 million, or 37%, for the
three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007 due to higher average cash and
available-for-sale securities balances. Interest income for 2007
increased by $0.6 million compared to 2006. The increase in
interest income was due to higher cash and available-for-sale
securities balances during 2007 as compared to 2006. Interest
income for 2006 increased by $0.2 million compared to 2005.
The increase in interest income was also primarily due to higher
cash and available-for-sale securities balances during 2006 as
compared to 2005. We expect interest income to increase as we
invest a portion of the net proceeds from this offering in
available-for-sale securities.
Interest expense decreased $0.7 million, or 59%, for the
three months ended March 29, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007 due to lower average debt
balance due to conversion of the $10.0 million promissory
notes in March 2007. Interest expense for 2007 increased by
$0.5 million compared to 2006. The increase was primarily
due to higher debt balances during 2007 as compared to 2006
primarily due to the $5.0 million convertible promissory
note issued in March 2007. Interest expense for 2006 increased
by $1.4 million compared to 2005. The increase was
primarily due to higher debt balances from the
$13.0 million loan and security agreement that was fully
drawn by December 2005. In February 2008, this loan and security
agreement was amended to provide us with an additional credit
line in the amount of $10.0 million that could be drawn
down prior to July 1, 2008. We borrowed the full
$10 million under this additional credit line in June 2008
and, as a result, we expect our interest expense to increase in
future periods.
45
Cumulative
Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
Upon adoption of
FSP 150-5
on July 1, 2005, we reclassified the fair value of warrants
to purchase shares of our convertible preferred stock from
stockholders equity to liabilities and recorded a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the
amount of $0.6 million during 2005 in the statement of
operations.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Sources
of Liquidity
As of March 29, 2008, we had $29.2 million of cash and
cash equivalents and $2.0 million of available-for-sale
securities. As of March 29, 2008, our working capital was
$29.9 million, and we had an accumulated deficit of
$140.4 million. Since our inception, we have principally
funded our operations through issuances of convertible preferred
stock, which have provided us with aggregate net proceeds of
$162.1 million. We have also received significant funding
in the form of loans and convertible note purchase agreements
that have provided us with aggregate net proceeds of
$36.6 million, of which $20.0 million was provided by
companies affiliated with EDB.
We have received funding in the form of grants from government
entities, the most significant of which have been associated
with two grant agreements with EDB that have helped support the
establishment and operation of our Singapore manufacturing,
research and development facilities in October 2005.
The maximum amount of grant revenue available to us under our
first grant agreement with EDB from March 29, 2008 through
July 31, 2010 is SG$5.5 million (approximately US$4.0
using a March 29, 2008 exchange rate), and the maximum
amount of grant revenue available to us under our second grant
agreement with EDB from March 29, 2008 through May 31,
2011 is SG$2.6 million (approximately US$1.9 million).
To maintain eligibility for incentive grant payments under these
agreements, we are required to achieve development and
manufacturing milestones as agreed to by the parties. In
addition, to maintain eligibility for incentive grant payments
under our first grant agreement, we are required to incur annual
spending in Singapore of at least SG$6.5 million
(approximately US$4.7 million) in 2008 and 2009 and at
least SG$8.0 million (approximately US$5.8 million) in
2010. To maintain eligibility for grant payments under our
second grant agreement, we are required to incur annual spending
in Singapore of at least SG$6.5 million (approximately
US$4.7 million) for the 12 months ending May 31,
2009 and 2010 and at least SG$9.0 million (approximately
US$6.5 million) for the 12 months ending May 31,
2011. For this purpose, spending in Singapore includes overhead,
salaries, outsourcing and subcontracting expenses, operating
expenses and royalties paid, with limited exceptions such as raw
materials purchases. Expenditures that are used to satisfy the
requirements of one grant agreement are not eligible for
satisfaction of the other grant agreement. To qualify for
payment under the second grant agreement, expenditures must
relate to the development of instrumentation for our IFC systems
and not our IFCs themselves. Our first grant agreement also
requires that we employ at least 24 research scientists and
engineers in Singapore by December 31, 2009, and our second
grant agreement requires that we employ at least 10 new research
scientists and engineers in Singapore by May 31, 2009, that
we employ at least 12 new research scientists and engineers in
Singapore by May 31, 2011 and that we maintain at least 12
research scientists and engineers in total until May 31,
2013. The requirements of the second grant agreement may only be
satisfied by personnel employed in the research and development
of IFC instrumentation. As of June 30, 2008, we employed
16 research scientists and engineers involved in the
research and development of our IFCs and 10 research
scientists and engineers involved in the research and
development of related instrumentation in Singapore. We cannot
assure you that we will take all actions required to remain
eligible for grants under our agreements with EDB and, in the
event that we do not comply with such requirements, whether
intentionally or unintentionally, we may not receive further
grants under such agreements. In the event that we do not
receive grant funding from EDB in the future, we do not believe
that our liquidity would be materially affected.
We have entered into multiple convertible note purchase
agreements with Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte.
Ltd., or BMSIF, pursuant to which we issued convertible notes
and received proceeds in the amount of $20.0 million
through March 29, 2008. BMSIF is wholly-owned by EDB
Investments Pte. Ltd., whose parent entity is EDB. Ultimately,
each of these entities is controlled by the government of
Singapore. As of March 29, 2008, the outstanding principal
and accrued interest balance of our convertible note purchase
agreements with BMSIF was $5.2 million, net of unamortized
debt discounts of $0.2 million, all of which was converted
into shares of our Series E preferred stock in
April 2008.
46
In November 2002, we entered into a master security agreement
with a lender under which we borrowed $3.6 million to be
used for purchases of capital equipment, software and tenant
improvements. The outstanding principal and accrued interest
balance for this loan was paid in February 2008. Upon full
payment of the debt in February 2008, restricted cash in the
amount of $0.5 million was released by the lender.
In March 2005, we entered into a loan and security agreement
with a lender under which we borrowed $13.0 million to be
used for general corporate purposes. We are currently making
equal monthly payments of $0.3 million towards the loan
which is to be paid off in February 2010. The loan is subject to
prepayment penalties if paid off prior to 2010. As of
March 29, 2008, the outstanding principal and accrued
interest balance for this loan and security agreement was
$7.6 million, net of unamortized debt discounts of $25,000.
In February 2008, this loan and security agreement was amended
to provide us with an additional credit line in the amount of
$10.0 million that we can draw upon until July 1, 2008
for general corporate purposes. Amounts drawn down under this
additional line of credit plus accrued interest will be repaid
in installments through June 2011 and outstanding amounts will
accrue interest at the rate of 11.5% per year. In
June 2008, we borrowed the full $10.0 million
available on this additional line of credit.
The loan and security agreement contains customary covenants
that, among other things, require us to deliver both annual
audited and periodic unaudited financial statements by specified
dates and maintain collateral on company premises and restrict
our ability, without the consent of the lender, to incur
additional debt, pay dividends or make certain other
distributions, or payments in respect of our capital stock,
engage in transactions with affiliates or engage in the sale,
lease or license of our assets outside of the ordinary course of
business. As of March 29, 2008, we were in compliance with
the above covenants with the exception of the timely delivery of
our audited financial statements for 2007. In this instance, we
obtained a waiver from the lender and subsequently complied with
the covenant. We are currently unaware of any circumstances that
would prevent us from complying with these covenants in the
future.
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
We derive cash flows from operations primarily from cash
collected from the sale of our products and related services,
collaboration agreements and grants from certain government
entities. Our cash flows from operating activities are also
significantly influenced by our use of cash for operating
expenses to support the growth of our business. We have
historically experienced negative cash flows from operating
activities as we have expanded our business and built our
infrastructure domestically and internationally and we expect
this trend to continue for the foreseeable future as our
business grows and we continue to expand into new markets.
Net cash used by operating activities was $7.8 million for
the three months ended March 29, 2008. Net cash used by
operating activities primarily consisted of a net loss of
$6.6 million, changes in our working capital amounts in the
amount of $1.8 million and foreign exchange gain in the
amount of $0.3 million, which were partially offset by
non-cash expense items such as depreciation and amortization of
our property and equipment in the amount of $0.4 million,
adjustments to the fair value of convertible preferred stock
warrants in the amount of $0.3 million, and stock-based
compensation in the amount of $0.2 million.
Net cash used by operating activities was $21.8 million
during 2007. Net cash used by operating activities primarily
consisted of a net loss of $25.5 million, which was
partially offset by non-cash expense items such as depreciation
and amortization of our property and equipment in the amount of
$1.6 million, amortization of debt discounts in the amount
of $0.5 million, stock-based compensation in the amount of
$0.7 million, and changes in our working capital accounts
in the amount of $0.5 million.
Net cash used by operating activities was $22.3 million
during 2006. Net cash used by operating activities primarily
consisted of a net loss of $23.6 million and changes in our
working capital accounts in the amount of $1.2 million. The
cash used by operating activities for these items was partially
offset by non-cash expense items such as depreciation and
amortization of our property and equipment in the amount of
$1.4 million, amortization of our debt discounts in the
amount of $0.1 million, stock-based compensation in the
amount of $0.1 million, and the issuance of convertible
preferred stock under a license agreement in the amount of
$0.6 million.
47
Net cash used by operating activities was $14.3 million
during 2005. Net cash used by operating activities primarily
consisted of a net loss of $16.4 million. The cash used by
operating activities was partially offset by non-cash expense
items such as depreciation and amortization of our property and
equipment in the amount of $1.3 million and increases in
our working capital accounts in the amount of $1.4 million.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Historically, our primary investing activities have consisted of
capital expenditures for laboratory, manufacturing and computer
equipment and software to support our expanding infrastructure
and work force; restricted cash related to leased space and
lending agreements; and purchases, sales and maturities of our
available-for-sale
securities. We expect to continue to expand our manufacturing
capability, primarily in Singapore, and expect to incur
additional costs for capital expenditures related to these
efforts in 2008.
We generated $4.7 million of cash in investing activities
for the three months ended March 29, 2008 primarily
from maturities of available-for-sale securities in the amount
of $3.0 million, sales of available-for-sale securities in
the amount of $2.3 million and a reduction of restricted
cash of $0.5 million, partially offset by purchases of
available-for-sale securities in the amount of $1.0 million
and purchases of capital equipment of $0.1 million.
We used $6.7 million of cash in investing activities during
2007, primarily for purchases of
available-for-sale
securities in the amount of $6.3 million and
$1.0 million for capital expenditures related to purchases
of equipment, including $0.5 million for our Singapore
manufacturing facility, partially offset by maturities of
available-for-sale
securities in the amount of $0.5 million.
We used $2.9 million of cash in investing activities during
2006, primarily for capital expenditures in the amount of
$2.9 million related to purchases of equipment, including
$1.2 million for our Singapore manufacturing facility.
During 2005, investing activities provided cash of
$6.8 million. This cash was generated primarily from sales
and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities in the amount of $8.9 million, partially offset
by purchases of
available-for-sale
securities in the amount of $0.5 million and capital
expenditures in the amount of $1.7 million. Our capital
expenditures during 2005 consisted of $1.0 million related
to purchases of manufacturing equipment for our Singapore
facility, which began operations during the year.
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Historically, we have principally funded our operations through
issuances of convertible preferred stock.
During the three months ended March 29, 2008, we used
$1.8 million of cash from financing activities primarily
due to repayment of long-term debt. During 2007, we generated
$37.6 million of cash from financing activities primarily
due to $35.9 million of net proceeds from sales of our
Series E preferred stock and $5.0 million of proceeds
from the issuance of convertible promissory notes, partially
offset by repayments of our long-term debt in the amount of
$3.5 million. During 2006, we generated approximately
$31.1 million of cash from financing activities primarily
due to $22.0 million of net proceeds from sales of our
Series E preferred stock and $13.0 million of proceeds
from the issuance of convertible promissory notes, partially
offset by repayments of our long-term debt in the amount of
$4.0 million. During 2005, we generated approximately
$23.0 million of cash from financing activities, primarily
due to $10.0 million of net proceeds from sales of our
Series D preferred stock and $14.7 million of net
proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, partially offset
by repayments of our long-term debt in the amount of
$1.7 million.
Capital
Resources
We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
securities, amounts available under current credit lines and the
net proceeds from this offering, will be sufficient to meet our
working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the
next 18 months. However, we may need to raise substantial
additional capital to expand the commercialization of our
products, fund our operations, continue our research and
development, defend, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that
we infringe third-party patents or violate other intellectual
property rights, commercialize new products and acquire
companies and in-license products or intellectual property. Our
future
48
funding requirements will depend on many factors, including
market acceptance of our products, the cost of our research and
development activities, the cost of filing and prosecuting
patent applications, the cost of defending, in litigation or
otherwise, any claims that we infringe third-party patents or
violate other intellectual property rights, the cost and timing
of regulatory clearances or approvals, if any, the cost and
timing of establishing additional sales, marketing and
distribution capabilities, the cost and timing of establishing
additional technical support capabilities, the effect of
competing technological and market developments, and the extent
to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products and
technologies, although we currently have no commitments or
agreements relating to any of these types of transactions. We
currently expect to use the proceeds from this offering to
expand our sales force, to support the ongoing commercialization
of our products, for research and product development
activities, to expand our facilities and manufacturing
operations, and for working capital and other general corporate
purposes. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot predict
with certainty all of the particular uses for the proceeds from
this offering or the amounts that we will actually spend on the
uses set forth above.
We may require additional funds in the future and we may not be
able to obtain such funds on acceptable terms, or at all. If we
raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our
stockholders may experience dilution. Debt financing, if
available, may involve covenants restricting our operations or
our ability to incur additional debt. Any debt or additional
equity financing that we raise may contain terms that are not
favorable to us or our stockholders. If we raise additional
funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with
third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to
our technologies or our products, or grant licenses on terms
that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise adequate
funds, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets, or
delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate some or all of our
development programs. If we do not have, or are not able to
obtain, sufficient funds, we may have to delay development or
commercialization of our products or license to third parties
the rights to commercialize products or technologies that we
would otherwise seek to commercialize. We also may have to
reduce marketing, customer support or other resources devoted to
our products or cease operations. Any of these factors could
harm our operating results.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Since our inception, we have not had any off-balance sheet
arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities
and Exchange Commissions
Regulation S-K.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 29, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
4,459
|
|
|
$
|
1,436
|
|
|
$
|
2,782
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
10,908
|
|
|
|
4,478
|
|
|
|
6,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
5,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,660
|
|
|
$
|
6,349
|
|
|
$
|
15,070
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating lease obligations relate to leases for our current
headquarters and leases for office space for our foreign
subsidiaries. Principal and interest on our convertible
promissory notes are convertible into shares of our
Series E preferred stock at the lenders election, at
any time, or upon our election upon the achievement of certain
milestones or automatically upon the completion of this
offering. Purchase obligations consist of contractual and
legally binding commitments to purchase goods. We have entered
into several patent license agreements in which we are obligated
to pay annual license maintenance fees, non-refundable license
issuance fees and royalties as a percentage of sales for the
sale or sublicense of products using the licensed technology.
We have entered into several license and patent agreements.
Under these agreements, we pay annual license maintenance fees,
nonrefundable license issuance fees, and royalties as a
percentage of net sales for the sale or sublicense of products
using the licensed technology. If we elect to maintain these
license agreements, we will pay
49
aggregate annual fees of $315,000 in 2008 and $270,000 per year
until 2027. Future payments related to these license agreements
have not been included in the contractual obligations table
above as the period of time over which the future license
payments will be required to be made, and the amount of such
payments are indeterminable.
On March 7, 2003 we entered into a Master Closing Agreement
with Oculus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the UAB Research
Foundation, or UAB, related to certain intellectual property and
technology rights licensed by us from UAB. Pursuant to the
agreement, we are obligated to issue UAB shares of our common
stock with a value equal to $1.5 million upon the
achievement of a certain milestone and based upon the fair
market value of our common stock at the time the milestone is
achieved. We currently do not anticipate achieving this
milestone in the foreseeable future and do not anticipate
issuing these shares.
Our manufacturing operations in Singapore, which commenced in
October 2005, have generated incentive grant payments from EDB
for our research, development and manufacturing activity in
Singapore. To remain eligible for future incentive grant
payments, we are required to maintain a significant and
increasing manufacturing and research and development presence
in Singapore. Under our current grant agreements with EDB, we
expect our spending related to these grant agreements to
increase in order to maintain our manufacturing facility in
Singapore. Future expenditures related to these grant agreements
have not been included in the contractual obligations table
above as the amounts of future expenditures, if any, and the
timing of when they will be incurred are still indeterminable.
Subsequent to our year ended December 29, 2007, the
remaining outstanding principal and accrued interest balance for
a master security agreement in the amount of $1.1 million
was paid in February 2008. The loan was originally scheduled to
be repaid in monthly installments though July 2009 and,
accordingly, was reflected in the table above as such. Also, the
convertible promissory notes noted in the table above were
converted into shares of our Series E preferred stock
during April 2008 in accordance with the convertible note
purchase agreements with BMSIF.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurement, or SFAS 157, which defines
and establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of
assets and liabilities when required or permitted by other
standards within generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States but does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 also expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for all financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008 the FASB
issued FSP
No. 157-2,
or
FSP 157-2
which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 in accordance
with the provisions in
FSP 157-2
as of January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 did
not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements and the resulting fair values calculated in
accordance with SFAS 157 were not significantly different
than the fair values that would have been calculated in
accordance with the previous guidance.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, or SFAS 159, including an amendment of
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities, which allows an entity to choose
to measure certain financial instruments and liabilities at fair
value. Subsequent measurements for the financial instruments and
liabilities an entity elects to measure at fair value will be
recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 also establishes
additional disclosure requirements. SFAS 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a significant impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Agreements, or
EITF 07-1,
which addresses the accounting for participants in collaborative
agreements, defined as contractual arrangements that involve a
joint operating activity, that are conducted without the
creation of a separate legal entity.
EITF 07-1
requires participants in a collaborative agreement to make
separate disclosures for each period a statement of operations
is presented regarding the nature and purpose of the agreement,
the rights and obligations under the agreement, the accounting
policy for the agreement, and the classification of and amounts
arising from the agreement between participants. These
arrangements involve two or more parties who are both active
participants in
50
the activity and that are exposed to significant risks and
rewards dependent on the commercial success of the activity.
EITF 07-1
provides that a company should report the effects of adoption as
a change in accounting principle through retrospective
application to all periods and requires specific additional
disclosures.
EITF 07-1
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the
impact the adoption of
EITF 07-1
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or
Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities, or
EITF 07-3.
EITF 07-3
provides clarification surrounding the accounting for
nonrefundable research and development advance payments, whereby
such payments should be recorded as an asset when the advance
payment is made and recognized as an expense when the research
and development activities are performed.
EITF 07-3
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2007. We adopted
EITF 07-3
as of December 30, 2007. The adoption of
EITF 07-3
did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result
of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest
rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading
purposes.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
As we expand internationally our results of operations and cash
flows will become increasingly subject to fluctuations due to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our revenue is
generally denominated in the local currency of the contracting
party. Historically, the substantial majority of our revenue has
been denominated in U.S. dollars. Our expenses are
generally denominated in the currencies in which our operations
are located, which is primarily in the United States, with a
portion of expenses incurred in Singapore where our other
manufacturing facility is located. Our results of operations and
cash flows are, therefore, subject to fluctuations due to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Fluctuations in
currency exchange rates could harm our business in the future.
However, the effect of a 10% adverse change in exchange rates on
foreign denominated receivables and payables as of
December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008 would not have been material. To date, we
have not entered into any foreign currency hedging contracts
although we may do so in the future.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We had cash and cash equivalents of $25.0 million,
$34.1 million and $29.2 million and
available-for-sale
securities of $0.5 million, $6.3 million and
$2.0 million as of December 31, 2006,
December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008. These amounts
were held primarily in cash on deposit with banks, money market
funds, commercial paper, corporate notes or notes from
government-sponsored agencies, which are short-term. Cash and
cash equivalents and
available-for-sale
securities are held for working capital purposes and restricted
cash amounts are held as letters of credit for collateral for a
security agreement with a lender and for our facility lease
agreements. Due to the short-term nature of these investments,
we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes
in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of
changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however,
will reduce future investment income. If overall interest rates
had decreased by 10% during 2007 or the three months ended
March 29, 2008, our interest income would not have been
materially affected.
As of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, the principal amount of our long-term debt
outstanding was $12.8 million, $9.4 million
$7.6 million and the principal amount of our convertible
promissory notes outstanding was $13.1 million,
$5.0 million and $5.2 million. The interest rates on
our long-term debt and convertible promissory notes are largely
fixed, however, a small portion of our long-term debt
outstanding has interest rates that are variable and adjust
periodically based on the prime rate. If overall interest rates
had increased by 10% during 2007 or the three months ended
March 29, 2008, our interest expense would not have been
materially affected.
51
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
We do not have material exposure to market risk with respect to
investments as our investments consist primarily of highly
liquid securities that approximate their fair values due to
their short period of time to maturity. We do not use derivative
financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes,
however, we may adopt specific hedging strategies in the future.
Controls
and Procedures
In January 2008, in connection with the audit of our
consolidated financial statements for 2005 and 2006, we
determined that we had material weaknesses relating to our
financial statement close and accrual process, revenue
recognition, inventory costing, cost of sales, purchases cut-off
and stock-based compensation. A material weakness is defined as
a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
companys annual or interim financial statements will not
be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the companys
internal controls. These material weaknesses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
we did not have a sufficient number of personnel in the
accounting and finance department with sufficient proficiency
and technical accounting expertise;
|
|
|
|
we did not have effective controls in place or designed to
evaluate the accounting implications of our business
transactions during 2005 and 2006 and to determine if such
matters had been properly accounted for in a timely
manner; and
|
|
|
|
we had not designed or maintained effective operating controls
over the financial statement close and reporting process in
order to ensure the accurate and timely preparation of our
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
|
These material weaknesses resulted in the recording of numerous
audit adjustments for 2005 and 2006. We have taken steps
intended to remediate these material weaknesses through:
|
|
|
|
|
the hiring of additional accounting and finance personnel with
technical accounting and financial reporting experience,
including Vikram Jog, our new Chief Financial Officer, who
joined us in February 2008;
|
|
|
|
the engagement of a consulting firm to provide further
accounting expertise to complement the skills of our existing
team;
|
|
|
|
the engagement of an accounting firm to advise us on local and
international tax planning and compliance;
|
|
|
|
the hiring of an experienced finance manager for Fluidigm
Singapore Pte. Ltd., who is expected to start in May 2008;
|
|
|
|
increased scheduled communication and coordination among our
finance teams in the United States and our foreign subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
enhanced coordination among, and training of, accounting, sales,
technical support and legal personnel on transactional issues;
|
|
|
|
enhancements to our financial statement close process and
financial close calendar to help enable processes and procedures
to be completed on a timely basis; and
|
|
|
|
installation of common accounting software and systems in our
U.S. and Singapore offices.
|
In April and May 2008, following the audit of our consolidated
financial statements for 2007 and the review of our financial
statements for the three months ended March 29, 2008, we
reviewed our internal control over financial reporting and
concluded that we had certain significant deficiencies, none of
which were determined to be material weaknesses. A significant
deficiency is defined as a deficiency, or combination of
deficiencies, in internal control
52
over financial reporting that is less severe than a material
weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those
responsible for oversight of a companys financial
reporting. These significant deficiencies were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
we did not have sufficient controls in place to review
consolidation and elimination entries relating to intercompany
transfer pricing to detect and eliminate intercompany profits
embedded in deferred costs of our Japanese subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
we did not have effective controls in place designed to apply
SFAS 123R to option grants with a variety of vesting terms
and to validate stock compensation expenses calculated by our
option tracking software; and
|
|
|
|
we did not have sufficient controls in place to review the
valuation of our inventory.
|
We do not know the specific time frame needed to remediate the
significant deficiencies identified. In addition, we expect to
incur some incremental costs associated with this remediation.
If we fail to enhance our internal control over financial
reporting to meet the demands that will be placed upon us as a
public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, we may be unable to report our financial results
accurately. The actions we plan to take are subject to continued
management review supported by confirmation and testing, as well
as audit committee oversight. While we expect to remediate these
significant deficiencies, we cannot assure you that we will be
able to do so in a timely manner, which could impair our ability
to report our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows accurately and timely.
53
BUSINESS
Overview
We develop, manufacture and market proprietary Integrated
Fluidic Circuit systems that significantly improve productivity
in the life science industry. Our Integrated Fluidic Circuits,
or IFCs, integrate a diverse set of critical liquid handling
functions on a nanoliter scale. Our IFCs can meter, combine,
diffuse, fold, mix, separate or pump nanoliter volumes of
fluids, with precise control and reproducibility, many thousands
of times all in parallel on a single chip. This
technology enables our customers to perform thousands of
sophisticated biochemical measurements on samples smaller than
the content of a single cell, with minute volumes of reagents,
in half the area of a credit card. We achieved this
integrated circuit for biology by miniaturizing and
integrating liquid handling components on a single
microfabricated device. Through innovations in material science
and manufacturing, our IFC architectures are highly flexible,
and can be designed to support a wide range of applications and
assay types. For large-scale experimentation, our IFC systems,
consisting of instrumentation, software and single-use IFCs,
increase throughput, decrease costs and enhance sensitivity
compared to conventional laboratory systems. We have sold our
IFCs to over 100 customers, including many leading biotechnology
and pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions and life
science laboratories worldwide.
We have commercialized IFC systems for a wide range of life
science applications, including our BioMark system for gene
expression analysis, genotyping and digital PCR, and our Topaz
system for protein crystallization. Researchers and clinicians
have successfully employed our products in achieving
breakthroughs across diverse scientific disciplines such as
genetic variation, cellular function and structural biology.
These advances include using our systems to help detect
life-threatening mutations in patients cancer cells,
discover indicators of susceptibility to cancer, manage some of
the worlds most valuable fisheries, analyze the genetic
composition of individual stem cells, identify fetal chromosomal
abnormalities from maternal blood samples, analyze the
aggressiveness of the avian flu virus and assess the quality of
agricultural seed products. We believe that the flexible
architecture of our IFC technology will lead to the development
of IFC systems for a wide variety of additional markets and
applications, including molecular diagnostics.
Schematic of our 96.96 Dynamic Array IFC including an
enlarged section showing four of the IFCs 9,216 test
chambers.
The life science industry is currently facing challenges similar
to those faced by the information technology industry when
computational power was constrained by the inherent limitations
of the vacuum tube. Life science research efforts, ranging from
large-scale initiatives, such as the Human Genome Project, to
more traditional academic and commercial research projects, are
continuing to reveal the complex biological and chemical
processes that are fundamental to living organisms. Automated,
high-precision and large-scale experimentation is increasingly
necessary to develop and apply this knowledge. However, the most
common forms of life science automation rely on cumbersome
robotic systems that are slow, expensive and labor-intensive
and, we believe,
54
fundamentally constrain the pace and productivity of life
science research. In much the same way that integrated circuits
overcame the limitations of early computers by placing an
increasing number of transistors on a single silicon chip, our
IFCs overcome many of the limitations of conventional laboratory
systems by integrating an increasing number of fluidic
components on a single microfabricated IFC.
We believe that much of analytical biology and chemistry can be
performed more efficiently and more economically in nanoliter,
or one billionth of a liter, volumes than in conventional
microliter volume platforms. Moreover, we believe that these
advantages can be further enhanced through high levels of
integration. Our IFC systems overcome many of the limitations of
conventional methods by integrating on a single device the
ability to perform thousands of experiments at one time and in
nanoliter volumes. Our IFCs consist of an elastomeric, or
rubber-like, core bonded to a specialized hard plastic input
frame. The input frame is compatible with standard laboratory
workflow equipment and facilitates loading the IFC with samples
and reagents. Each IFC contains an extensive network of
microfluidic components, such as valves, channels, pumps, mixers
and other components that deliver samples and reagents to
thousands of nanoliter chambers across the IFC where individual
tests can be performed. This high level of nanofluidic
integration significantly reduces the time and complexity of
large-scale experimentation and the volume of costly reagents
and scarce patient samples required. In addition, our IFC
systems enable users to address problems that would be difficult
or impractical to solve using conventional life science tools.
We believe that our ongoing research efforts to increase the
density and degree of miniaturization of our IFCs will result in
further such benefits to our customers.
Our
Target Markets
Biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, academic
institutions and life science laboratories collectively spent
approximately $35 billion in 2007 for analytical and life
science instruments, according to Strategic Directions
International, or SDI. Growth in the life science equipment and
supplies industry has been driven in part by increased demand
for tools that allow researchers to discover how fundamental
functional elements of biology such as nucleic acids, proteins,
carbohydrates and cells interact within living organisms. This
research often entails analyzing or identifying numerous such
elements across large sample populations. Conducting and
commercializing this research requires equipment that reliably
performs experimentation with precision, on a large scale and at
an affordable cost. The need for equipment with these
capabilities is particularly evident in the areas of genomics,
proteomics and molecular diagnostics, which comprise our initial
target markets.
Genomics
Genomics is the analysis of nucleic acids, including DNA and
RNA, the fundamental building blocks of life. The entire DNA
content of an organism is known as its genome and is commonly
organized into functional units known as genes. Analysis of
variations in genomes, genes and gene activity in and between
organisms can provide tremendous insight into its health and
functioning. The worldwide demand for genomic analysis
instruments and supplies was approximately $4.9 billion in
2005, according to SDI. Of this total, SDI estimated that 56%,
or about $2.7 billion, was spent on gene expression
analysis, and 20%, or about $1.0 billion, was spent on
genotyping. In a 2006 report, SDI projected that the markets for
gene expression analysis and genotyping would grow approximately
8% per year from 2005 to 2010.
Gene expression and genotyping today are studied through a
combination of various technology platforms that characterize
gene function and genetic variation. Gene expression and
genotyping are commonly performed using a technique known as
polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, and often with a chemistry
branded as TaqMan, which is proprietary to Roche Molecular
Systems, Inc. and is widely used in the industry. The PCR method
is used to replicate a strand of DNA or RNA into millions of
copies to facilitate detection in a sample. Real-time
quantitative PCR, or real-time qPCR, is a more advanced form of
PCR that makes it possible to identify the number of copies of
DNA present in a sample at a certain time. According to Frost
and Sullivan, the U.S. market for real-time qPCR was
approximately $741 million in 2007, growing at
approximately 11% per year from 2005 to 2012. Based on our
estimates, we believe the global market for real-time qPCR was
approximately $1.7 billion in 2007. Gene expression,
genotyping and digital PCR are three powerful forms of genomic
analysis.
55
|
|
|
|
|
Gene Expression Analysis. One of the ways
genes control cellular activity is through a process known as
gene expression, when a cell transcribes a section of a
genes DNA to create another nucleic acid sequence, known
as messenger RNA. This messenger RNA may then be translated by
the cell into a protein. Messenger RNA can be detected and
quantified by performing real-time qPCR tests, or assays. Gene
expression analysis typically entails determining which genes
are active by measuring messenger RNA levels in a blood or
tissue sample. These results can be correlated with disease
activity and clinical outcomes. As multiple genes are involved
in most biological processes, gene expression analysis usually
requires assaying the expression levels of many genes
simultaneously across many samples. We estimate that
approximately 80% of the market for real-time qPCR involves gene
expression analysis.
|
|
|
|
Genotyping. Genotyping involves the analysis
of variations across individual genomes. These variations often
take the form of single nucleotide changes, known as single
nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, that can determine the
characteristics or health of the individual. In SNP genotyping
studies, the DNA sequences of a group of individuals are
analyzed to determine patterns of SNPs. Statistical analysis is
then performed to determine whether a SNP or group of SNPs can
be associated with a particular characteristic, such as
propensity for a disease. We estimate that approximately 20% of
the market for real-time qPCR involves genotyping analysis. We
believe this percentage share of the real-time qPCR market is
growing based on technological innovations allowing increasing
amounts of genetic content to be analyzed more quickly and cost
effectively.
|
|
|
|
Digital PCR. Digital PCR is a technique that
allows researchers to detect nucleic acid sequences that are
present in a patient sample in concentrations that are too low
to be detected by conventional methods. Digital PCR typically
relies on standard PCR techniques, but increases their
sensitivity by dividing a sample into hundreds or thousands of
smaller samples and performing a PCR assay on each such sample.
The ability to actually count the presence or absence of
amplification in this assay format provides quantitative
measurement capabilities known as absolute quantification.
Digital PCR has the potential to enable early detection of
diseases and other conditions, thereby improving prospects for
effective treatment. In addition, this technique enhances the
precision of single molecule assays and copy number variation.
While the digital PCR market is currently nascent, we believe it
has the potential to grow significantly as researchers learn how
to apply this technique to a broader range of research
applications and associated diseases.
|
Proteomics
Proteomics is the large-scale study of the function and
structure of proteins. Proteins are produced by all living
organisms and directly affect cellular function, the overall
health of an organism and, in the case of pathogens, how the
organism interacts with its host. Developing drugs to treat a
disease often involves identifying molecules that are able to
interfere with the activity of a particular protein in the
pathway for that disease. One approach to finding such molecules
is to first determine the structure of the protein and then look
for molecules that bind to the structure and interfere with the
activity of the protein. A technique known as protein
crystallization is typically used to determine protein
structures. Crystallizing a protein can be a time-consuming and
labor-intensive process because different proteins will
crystallize in the presence of different reagents and under
different conditions. As samples of particular proteins are
often scarce and expensive, researchers usually conduct only a
limited number of experiments, none of which might provide a
crystallized protein.
Molecular
Diagnostics
Molecular diagnostic tests are used in clinical practice to
diagnose, classify or monitor a disease; determine a
patients susceptibility to a disease; or monitor a
patients response to therapy by detecting one or more
biomarkers, such as nucleic acids or proteins, in a blood,
tissue or other type of patient sample. The advancement of
molecular diagnostics is being driven by researchers performing
large-scale experiments analyzing the prevalence of SNPs,
variations in gene expression levels and patterns of protein
production. SNPs, gene expression levels and proteins often
directly cause or control diseases. Molecular diagnostic tests
based on measuring these biomarkers have the potential to be
much more accurate, discriminating and robust than conventional
diagnostics. According to Frost and Sullivan, the
U.S. market for molecular diagnostics was estimated at
$2.0 billion in 2007, growing at a compound annual growth
rate of 17% from 2005 to 2012.
56
The
Limitations of Existing Laboratory Systems
Scientists increasingly seek to identify and measure a large
number of characteristics across large populations. The most
common existing methods of large-scale experimentation require a
workflow that is complex, labor-intensive and expensive. In this
workflow, biological samples and chemical compounds, usually in
solution, are generally dispensed or pipetted into standard
microwell plates, which usually consist of 96 or 384 wells
each in a standardized format. The plates may then be moved to
another station where reagents can be applied to the sample or
compound to create a single assay in each microwell. The
microwell plates may be moved again to attain ideal reaction
temperatures or other conditions. The plates are then generally
moved into a reader to detect the results of the experiment in
each well. This process of dispensing materials and conveying
the plates may include robotically performed steps but generally
also requires a significant manual labor component. To
accomplish these steps on a large scale typically requires the
use of large laboratories equipped with many types of equipment,
robotics, conveyor systems and personnel.
Conventional microwell plate workflows have a number of
characteristics that inherently limit their effectiveness as
tools for large scale experimentation:
|
|
|
|
|
Complex Workflow. Pipetting stations may have
to perform hundreds of thousands of pipetting steps using
hundreds of microwell plates in order to conduct a single set of
experiments. These microwell plates must typically be moved
among several work stations to complete and measure the results
of each assay. Maintaining and overseeing complex workflows
involving large numbers of microwell plates requires ongoing
attention from trained technicians.
|
|
|
|
Limited Throughput. Due to the large number of
pipetting steps, microwell plates and process steps involved in
a conventional microwell workflow, these systems are often
unable to perform large-scale experiments in a timely and
cost-effective manner.
|
|
|
|
Limited Low Volume Capabilities. Conventional
systems are typically unable to dispense samples and reagents in
quantities small enough to conduct certain high sensitivity, low
volume techniques, such as digital PCR.
|
|
|
|
Large Sample Requirements and Significant Running
Costs. Biological samples are often available in
only very small quantities. As a result, the sample amount that
needs to be placed in each well often limits the number of
experiments that can be performed. In addition, reagents can be
expensive to purchase or produce, and consuming them in
microliter or larger quantities results in significant and
sometimes prohibitive costs.
|
|
|
|
High Capital Cost. Because of the limited
throughput of conventional systems, multiple pipetting stations,
plate handlers and readers may be required to meet the demands
of large-scale experimentation, resulting in high capital
equipment costs.
|
Other methods of large-scale experimentation, including
microarrays, pre-formatted arrays, bead arrays and mass
spectrometer analysis, have been developed to address some of
the limitations of conventional microwell plate systems.
However, each of these high throughput methods has one or more
limitations that reduce its utility for large-scale
experimentation.
Microarrays, pre-formatted arrays and bead arrays all lack
flexibility because researchers must specify the assays they
wish to perform at the time the products are ordered. This in
turn limits researchers ability to refine their assay
panel during the course of a study. In addition, if researchers
wish to use assay panels other than a manufacturers
standard panels, it may take weeks for a customized product to
be produced, and the cost may be significant. Furthermore, it is
often difficult or impossible to convert existing validated
assays for use with these technologies or with mass spectrometry
analysis.
The quality of the data produced by microarrays, pre-formatted
arrays and mass spectrometer analysis is insufficient for
certain research activities. For genotyping studies, data
quality is typically measured by a call rate, which is the
percentage of time that a method provides a reading with respect
to a particular SNP. Both pre-formatted arrays and mass
spectrometer analysis generally have call rates lower than
conventional microwell plate systems. For gene expression
studies, it is often important to measure expression levels over
a broad dynamic range to capture all or most of the variation
typically found among subjects. None of microarrays,
pre-formatted arrays,
57
bead arrays or mass spectrometer analysis routinely measure gene
expression levels over as broad a dynamic range as conventional
microwell plates.
The workflow for bead arrays and mass spectrometer analysis is
complex, time consuming and expensive. For example, standard
protocols often require multiple complex operations to be
performed over several days by skilled technicians.
These methods can also be very expensive for certain types of
large-scale experimentation. For example, a single microarray or
bead array is capable of analyzing thousands of genes from a
single sample and these devices have been successfully used for
surveying the genome to discover basic patterns of gene
expression and genotyping. These surveys or association
studies are commonly performed on tens or hundreds of
samples and are intended to identify a subset of genes for
further study. However, for validation studies, which typically
require the analysis of thousands or tens of thousands of
samples, the high per sample cost of microarrays and bead arrays
often make them uneconomical. Similarly, the high initial setup
costs for mass spectrometry analysis generally make it
economical only for very large-scale studies.
A number of companies have attempted to develop more universal
lab-on-a-chip
solutions which could perform large numbers of complex
biochemical operations on a single device. These chips typically
incorporate a variety of micron-level features, such as channels
and wells, but lack robust methods of fluid control such as
valves. As a result, the products have been unable to support
the complex fluidic manipulation required by large-scale
experimentation.
The limitations of existing technologies become even more acute
when clinicians attempt to translate scientific research into
molecular diagnostics. Given the commercial nature of their
operations, clinical laboratories need systems that can test
large numbers of patient samples at low cost and with minimal
labor requirements. Moreover, many of the most promising
research studies rely on measuring each sample across tens or
even hundreds of SNPs, gene expression levels or protein
concentrations to diagnose or classify a disease. We believe
that using standard microwell plate technology to make multiple
measurements on a large number of samples is often too complex
and expensive for most clinical laboratories. As a result, the
molecular diagnostic tests adopted by clinical laboratories have
generally been relatively simple or have required specialized
machines to perform. Diagnostic approaches that require
measuring large numbers of SNPs, gene expression levels or
protein concentrations are generally not available or are
available only from a diagnostic laboratory that specializes in
the particular test.
To achieve and exploit breakthroughs in genomics, proteomics and
molecular diagnostics, research and clinical laboratories need
robust systems that deliver increased throughput and simpler
workflows with decreased costs.
The
Fluidigm Solution
Our IFC systems are designed to overcome many of the limitations
of conventional methods by empowering researchers and clinicians
to rapidly perform a large number of experiments at one time and
in nanoliter volumes, significantly increasing throughput,
reducing costs associated with reagents and patient samples and
reducing the time and number of steps involved. Our IFCs deliver
these advantages through integration of sophisticated nanoliter
fluid handling in an easy-to-use format. We believe the
advantages of our IFC systems can be applied to a wide variety
of applications across many fields using standard chemistries.
For each application, we provide a complete IFC system
consisting of specially designed single-use IFCs,
instrumentation, software and support services. Our IFC systems
are designed to be easily incorporated into our customers
laboratory environments and analysis workflow. For example, our
IFCs are the same size and shape as standard 384 microwell
plates, which facilitate the loading and handling of our IFCs by
standard laboratory equipment. Each IFC includes an elastomeric,
or rubber-like, core that contains an extensive network of
microfluidic components, such as valves, channels, pumps, mixers
and other components that deliver samples and reagents to
thousands of nanoliter volume chambers where individual assays
can be performed. In much the same way that semiconductor
technology has enabled tremendous computational power to be
placed onto a single silicon chip, the integration of large
numbers of miniaturized components on our IFCs enables
sophisticated fluid handling at high throughput and low cost.
58
Our BioMark 48.48 Dynamic Array IFC allows users to individually
assay 48 samples against 48 primer-probe sets, generating 2,304
separate real-time qPCR reactions on a single device. In May
2008, we launched our 96.96 Dynamic Array IFC, which is
configured to run 96 samples against 96 primer-probe sets,
generating 9,216 separate reactions.
The following table compares the performance of one conventional
384 microwell plate to that of one of our 48.48 Dynamic Array
IFCs and one of our 96.96 Dynamic Array IFCs for a genotyping
study involving 1,000 samples and 96 SNPs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluidigm 48.48
|
|
Fluidigm 96.96
|
|
|
384 Microwell
|
|
Dynamic Array
|
|
Dynamic Array
|
|
|
Plate (5 µl/well)
|
|
IFC
|
|
IFC
|
|
Runs for Study
|
|
250
|
|
42
|
|
11
|
Total reaction volume
|
|
480 ml
|
|
20 ml
|
|
10 ml
|
Pipetting Steps
|
|
192,000
|
|
4,032
|
|
2,112
|
The advantages of our IFC systems over existing microwell-based
systems include:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Complexity. Loading our IFC requires
orders of magnitude fewer pipetting steps than
384 microwell plates for the same experiment, which reduces
the time, cost and potential for error.
|
|
|
|
Improved Throughput. A single IFC based on our
96.96 format can conduct 9,216 real-time qPCR or other assays,
or 24 times more assays than a single 384 microwell plate. The
improved throughput reduces the time and cost associated with
complex experiments and expands the number and range of
experiments that may be conducted.
|
|
|
|
Nanoliter Precision. Our IFC systems allow
users to dispense samples and reagents in microliter volumes
which are automatically combined and mixed in nanoliter and
sub-nanoliter volumes. In addition to cost and workflow
benefits, this capability makes it practical for users to
conduct certain high sensitivity, low volume techniques, such as
digital PCR and single cell analysis.
|
|
|
|
Reduced Sample and Reagent
Requirements. Obtaining patient samples for
assays can also be costly, and in many cases the amount of those
samples is finite. Our systems typically require between 0.5%
and 1.0% of the amount of sample and reagent per reaction as
conventional systems, allowing scarce samples and costly
reagents to be conserved or tested more extensively.
|
|
|
|
Decreased Capital Cost. A single BioMark
system has the same throughput as the combined throughput of
multiple conventional systems. As a result, for high volume
users, the cost of purchasing one BioMark system can be much
lower than the cost of purchasing the number of competing
systems and associated robotic equipment required to provide the
same throughput, even though our BioMark system may cost more on
a per unit basis.
|
|
|
|
Compatibility with Existing
Infrastructure. Our IFCs incorporate plastic
input frames that are the same size as standard microwell plates
and are designed to work with the most commonly used laboratory
systems, including existing robotic pipetting systems, bar code
readers, plate handling systems and other equipment. Our IFCs
are also designed to work with standard real-time qPCR
techniques and TaqMan chemistries. As a result, we believe users
are able to quickly introduce our systems into their
laboratories and achieve results equal to or better than they
were obtaining with conventional systems.
|
Our IFC systems also have significant advantages over other
high-throughput approaches. For example, our BioMark system can
detect gene expression levels over a much broader dynamic range
than microarrays, pre-formatted arrays, bead arrays or mass
spectrometry analysis. For genotyping, our BioMark system has a
call rate equal to or better than conventional microwell-based
systems. Also, our IFC systems provide researchers with needed
flexibility in assay selection and study design. Unlike
microarrays, bead arrays and pre-formatted arrays, our IFCs are
not limited to detecting certain predetermined genetic markers.
Instead, users can perform experiments with our IFCs using
assays from their existing libraries, purchased from a wide
variety of commercial sources or developed in their own
laboratories. Finally, the efficient workflow of our IFC systems
enables users to complete an IFC run in less than three hours.
59
Other high throughput approaches have advantages over
conventional microwell plate systems that are similar to the
advantages of our IFC systems. For example, microarrays,
pre-formatted arrays, bead arrays and mass spectrometry analysis
all reduce complexity and increase throughput as compared to
conventional approaches when used for large scale
experimentation, and, in many instances, are more cost-effective
than conventional approaches. In addition, pre-formatted arrays
significantly reduce sample and reagent consumption as compared
to microwell plates. Also, microarrays and bead arrays have call
rates for genotyping that are comparable to those obtained with
our systems or with microwell plate systems. Because these
systems are designed to detect thousands of genetic markers,
they are often chosen by researchers to perform very large-scale
association or survey studies over conventional microwell plate
systems or our systems.
Our IFC systems address the needs of researchers and clinicians
who perform large-scale experimentation in the areas of
genomics, proteomics and molecular diagnostics. In particular,
for validation studies or projects of a similar scale, our IFC
systems substantially reduce cost, simplify workflow and
increase throughput as compared to conventional microwell plate
systems. Nevertheless, researchers and clinicians may be slow to
adopt our IFC systems as they are based on technology that,
compared to conventional technology, is new and not yet
well-established in the industry. Moreover, many of the existing
laboratories have already made substantial capital investments
in their existing systems and may be hesitant to abandon that
investment. While we believe our systems provide significant
cost-savings, the initial price of our systems and the price of
our IFCs is higher than conventional systems and standard
384 microwell plates. Our IFC systems are less well suited
for smaller scale research initiatives where complexity and
workflow issues may be less pressing and conventional systems
may be more economical. As life science research continues to
evolve and is commercialized, we believe that there will be
increasing demand for life science automation solutions that
enable experimentation on the scale supported by our IFC systems.
Applications
Our IFC technology has the potential to be applied to a vast
range of research and commercial applications. We have
commercialized IFC systems for life science research
applications such as gene expression analysis, genotyping,
digital PCR and protein crystallization. We believe that these
applications are relevant to markets beyond life science
research, such as the development of molecular diagnostics, and
that IFC systems can be developed for numerous other life
science applications. We and our academic collaborators have
developed non-commercial IFCs for a wide variety of applications
in the areas of genomics, proteomics, cellular biology and
synthetic chemistry. As illustrated by the examples below,
researchers have been able to utilize the advantages of our IFC
systems in their laboratories to achieve significant research
successes.
Current
Commercial Applications
Gene Expression Analysis. Researchers may
conduct gene expression studies to measure the activity of tens
or hundreds of genes across hundreds or thousands of
individuals. For these validation studies, it is often important
to know the expression level of a gene, not merely whether the
gene is on or off, as often either high
or low activity level is associated with a particular
characteristic or disease state. Our IFC systems have been used
to deliver high throughput and precise measurements in gene
expression analysis applications. For example, researchers at
Myriad Genetics have identified panels of genes that could be
used to predict cancer progression or select treatment options.
However, the cost and complexity of high-throughput real-time
qPCR using conventional microwell plates significantly limited
researchers ability to perform the appropriate assays. In
response, Myriad Genetics adopted our BioMark system which,
together with our Dynamic Array IFCs, has allowed them to
significantly reduce their pipetting workload, and therefore
pursue research projects that may have been prohibitively
cumbersome without our system.
Genotyping. Researchers performing genotyping
studies may begin by surveying the genomes of relatively few
individuals looking for tens of thousands or even hundreds of
thousands of SNPs. Analysis of these studies will often reveal
that a relatively small number of SNPs appear to be correlated
with the characteristic of interest. In order to validate this
analysis, researchers may conduct additional studies involving
hundreds or even thousands of individuals focused on tens or
hundreds of SNPs. For example, the National Cancer
Institutes Core Genotyping Facility, or the CGF,
collaborates with researchers at other government research
centers and academic institutions
60
with the goal of developing screens to identify individuals
susceptible to particular forms of cancer and guiding the
development of targeted therapeutics. One of the CGFs
primary responsibilities in these collaborations is conducting
the large-scale experiments necessary to accurately interrogate
hundreds of SNPs on many patient samples. In a typical
association study, the CGF runs 30 to 300 assays on 1,000 to
10,000 patient samples. Such large-scale studies are
difficult and expensive to perform with conventional microwell
plate technology. Using our BioMark system, the CGF continues to
perform the same assays previously developed in its existing
library of over 5,000 assays.
Genotyping analysis is also used in situations where research
has already identified particular genetic profiles of interest
and there is a need to test a group of subjects to determine
which profile they fit. For example, the Alaska Department of
Fish and Game uses our BioMark system to perform genotyping
analysis to determine the region of origin of salmon caught in
commercial or sport fisheries. By analyzing a large number of
salmon, the department can gain an understanding of the effects
that fisheries have on populations of salmon and thereby manage
the resource more effectively. The department has developed
panels for three species which range from 40 to 60 SNPs, and its
throughput approaches 100,000 samples per year.
Digital PCR. The widespread use of genetic
testing in high-risk pregnancies has created strong interest in
rapid and accurate molecular diagnostics for certain common
chromosomal abnormalities. However, conventional methods have
limitations related to speed, precision and the risks associated
with sampling a significant amount of material from the fetus
during an invasive procedure such as amniocentesis or chorionic
villi sampling. Digital PCR has been identified as a technique
for highly sensitive and precise nucleic acid measurement, but
performing it with conventional laboratory equipment is so
cumbersome that it has not been widely adopted. In an article
published by Analytical Chemistry in August 2007, researchers at
the laboratory of Professor Stephen Quake, our
co-founder,
at Stanford University demonstrated that digital PCR can be used
for accurate measurement of trisomy 21, or Down syndrome.
Using our Digital Array IFC and DNA from human cell lines,
Dr. Quakes laboratory was able to precisely measure
the number of copies of a DNA sequence from this chromosome and
at the same time measure the number of copies of a DNA sequence
from another chromosome whose copy number does not vary. For
trisomy 21, the ratio of these markers is significantly higher
than normal. Similar work in pre-natal genetic testing is being
pursued using our IFCs by other customers at leading academic
institutions. We believe that with further clinical validation
and development, such research could be developed into a
diagnostic test that would require significantly less material
from the fetus and provide results much more rapidly than
current methods. We also believe that digital PCR will enable
such diagnostics to ultimately be used in a non-invasive
fashion, thus further reducing risk to the fetus.
Cancer researchers have identified a particular mutation in
chronic myeloid leukemia cells that render those cells resistant
to the drug Gleevec. Gleevec is typically used as the initial
treatment for this type of leukemia and is often able to put the
disease into remission for months or years. However, a
significant proportion of these leukemia patients eventually
develop mutated leukemia cells that are resistant to Gleevec.
These mutated cells are initially very scarce and undetectable
using conventional systems, but they eventually multiply and
cause the patient to become symptomatic again. Researchers at
the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center have used our Digital
Array IFC in their laboratory to test patient samples and have
been able to detect these mutated cells earlier than with
conventional techniques. With additional validation and
demonstration of clinical relevance, we believe a test based on
digital PCR could be a useful tool for monitoring patients who
are diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Protein Crystallization. In order to determine
how a particular protein interacts with other components of a
disease pathway, researchers often attempt to determine its
structure using protein crystallization. Because most proteins
will crystallize only under very precise conditions that are
specific to the particular protein, protein crystallization
involves performing numerous assays to determine the conditions
under which the protein crystallizes. As described in the April
2006 issue of the journal Science and supporting online
material, researchers at the Wilson lab of Scripps Research
Institute in La Jolla, California used our Topaz system to
understand how the H5N1 avian flu virus can infect humans.
Researchers at the Wilson lab had prepared a small sample of the
protein that the virus uses to attach itself to cells in the
respiratory tract. With the Topaz system, they were able to
quickly screen a few microliters of the sample across a wide
variety of different conditions and determine the optimum
conditions for protein crystallization. Using this information,
they were able to grow larger crystals using standard
61
crystallization techniques. Subsequent analysis of the structure
of the crystallized protein revealed why the current form of the
avian H5N1 virus has not yet acquired the ability to readily
infect humans compared to other flu viruses.
Potential
Future Applications
Molecular Diagnostics. Life science research
is revealing an increasing number of diseases and conditions
that can be diagnosed, evaluated and monitored by measuring
panels of gene expression levels, SNPs, proteins or other
biomarkers. Validating these research findings and translating
them into clinically available tests often requires life science
automation systems that are able to efficiently measure multiple
biomarkers in a large number of patient samples. Our existing
IFC systems are able to measure certain nucleic acid biomarkers
that are commonly used in these tests, and we expect that we
will be able to develop IFC systems to measure other relevant
biomarkers. As described above, researchers have used our IFC
systems to detect clinically relevant biomarkers, such as drug
resistant leukemia cells and fetal chromosomal abnormalities. We
believe that the high throughput, flexibility and simplified
workflow of our IFC systems could make them an attractive
solution for validating and commercializing a wide range of
molecular diagnostic tests being developed by researchers. In
addition, we believe that our IFC systems ability to
measure gene expression levels across a broad range and to
detect nucleic acid sequences present in very low concentrations
will support the development and commercialization of molecular
diagnostic tests that would not be practical with conventional
systems. Our IFC systems have not been cleared or approved by
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for use in
any molecular diagnostic tests and we cannot currently market
them for the purpose of performing molecular diagnostic tests.
We do not have any current plans to develop products that are
regulated by the FDA.
Other Applications. We believe that the
inherent design flexibility of our core technology allows us to
build IFC systems that can provide significant benefits in a
wide range of fields and industries. For example, the
architecture of our Dynamic Array is flexible and supports the
development of IFCs that create matrixed combinations of a
variable number of samples versus a variable number of reagents.
In addition, our IFC technology utilizes a variety of
microfluidic components, such as pumps, mixers and separation
columns, that allow the implementation of sophisticated
biochemical processes on our IFCs. While we have not commenced
commercial development of IFC systems for these fields, we have
developed IFCs for internal research purposes in such diverse
fields as:
|
|
|
|
|
immunoassays, which can measure levels of protein expression and
other molecules in a highly-parallel, multiplexed format;
|
|
|
|
high-throughput drug screening, including the analysis of
molecules that inhibit protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid
interactions;
|
|
|
|
chemical synthesis, including production of radio-labeled sugars
which in combination with advanced medical imaging can help
diagnose and monitor cancer;
|
|
|
|
pharmacogenomics, an emerging field that analyzes how variations
in human genomes affect the performance and toxicity of
therapeutic agents;
|
|
|
|
systems biology, an effort to understand the collective behavior
of genes as they collaborate in networks;
|
|
|
|
synthetic biology, an emerging field aimed at engineering
biological systems to build novel biological functions, systems
and perhaps organisms; and
|
|
|
|
cellular assays, including stem cells and regenerative medicine,
where our IFCs have been used to isolate, cultivate and analyze
single cells.
|
Strategy
We intend to become a global leader in providing automated
bio-analytical research and molecular diagnostic systems. Our
business strategy consists of the following elements:
Establish our IFC Technology as the Leading Solution for a
Broad Range of Life Science Applications. Our
initial sales and marketing efforts have been focused on
establishing our IFC systems as leading solutions
62
for high throughput life science research applications. We
intend to leverage the market awareness and acceptance created
by our initial product offerings to market new products and
applications to life science researchers and to sell new and
existing applications to customers in other markets, such as
molecular diagnostics and applied genomics.
Continue to Increase the Throughput and Efficiency of Our
IFCs. A primary focus of our research and
development efforts is the development of IFCs with increased
component density and, therefore, the ability to conduct an
increased number of experiments on a single IFC. Increasing
density provides value to our customers by increasing
throughput, enhancing efficiency, reducing labor costs and
reducing reagent and sample volumes. We expect that these
increased capacity IFCs will allow us to deliver additional
capabilities and cost savings, and further improve our
competitive position.
Expand Recurring IFC Revenue Stream Through Product
Innovation and System Sales. We intend to drive
revenue growth by increasing the number of installed IFC
systems, improving the cost per test of our IFCs and developing
IFCs and systems for additional applications.
Provide Superior Customer Service. We have a
global sales force and support organization that offers
technical solutions and customer support through direct
relationships with our current and potential customers. Through
the direct connection with our customers, we are able to better
understand their needs and apprise them of new product offerings
and technological advances in our current IFC systems, related
instrumentation and software, while maintaining a consistent
marketing message and high level of customer service.
Enhance IFC Manufacturing Efficiency. We
intend to enhance our manufacturing efficiency through
improvements in our existing processes, development of new IFC
designs and implementation of new manufacturing methods in order
to improve our manufacturing yields and reduce our manufacturing
costs. We believe that these improvements will enable us to
deliver additional value to our customers and to maintain or
enhance our advantages over competing systems.
Continue to Develop our Technology and Intellectual Property
Position. Our products are based on a set of
related proprietary technologies that we have either developed
internally or licensed from third parties. We intend to continue
making significant investments in research and development to
further expand and deepen our technological base. At the same
time, we intend to maintain and strengthen our intellectual
property position through the continued filing and prosecution
of patents in the United States and internationally and through
the in-licensing of third party intellectual property as
appropriate.
Products
We currently market two IFC systems, the BioMark system for
real-time qPCR and the Topaz system for protein crystallization.
Each system consists of single-use IFCs, loaders that control
the IFCs, readers that detect reactions on the IFCs and software
for analyzing, annotating and archiving the data produced by the
readers.
The
BioMark System for Real-Time qPCR
The BioMark system allows users to perform gene expression
analysis, genotyping and digital PCR using standard TaqMan
chemistry.
BioMark
Dynamic Array IFCs
Our BioMark 48.48 Dynamic Array IFC is based on matrix
architecture that allows users to individually assay 48 samples
against 48 primer-probe sets, generating 2,304 real-time qPCR
reactions on a single device. One version of this IFC is
optimized to perform gene expression analysis and another is
optimized for genotyping, each assay in volumes of
10 nanoliters or less.
We commercially introduced our Dynamic Arrays in the fourth
quarter of 2006 and, as of March 29, 2008, 23 customers
have purchased Dynamic Array IFCs for use in applications, such
as SNP association follow-up studies and single stem-cell gene
expression profiling. In May 2008, we launched our 96.96
Dynamic Array IFC, which is configured to run 96 samples against
96 primer-probe sets, generating 9,216 reactions.
63
BioMark
Digital Array IFCs
The BioMark 12.765 Digital Array IFC is based on partitioning
architecture that allows users to divide 12 separate
samples into 765 smaller samples and perform a real-time qPCR
assay against each sample in less than 10 nanoliter
volumes. This IFC can be used for digital PCR and to precisely
quantify the amount of a particular nucleic acid sequence
present in a sample. We have been selling Digital Array IFCs
since March 2007 and, as of March 29, 2008, 14 customers
have purchased Digital Array IFCs for use in applications, such
as characterizing unculturable bacteria and cancer detection.
BioMark
Instrumentation and Software
Our NanoFlex IFC Controller for the BioMark system fully
automates the setup of IFCs for real-time qPCR-based experiments
and includes software for implementing and tracking experiments.
The instrumentation for our BioMark system controls the
real-time qPCR process and detects the fluorescent signals
generated using a white light source, emission and excitation
filters, precision lenses, a licensed thermal cycler and a
digital camera. We also offer various software packages that
provide data analysis following data collection. Our analysis
software shows data as color-coded maps of every position on the
IFC, as amplification curves and as numeric tabular data.
The
Topaz System for Protein Crystallization
The Topaz system allows users to screen protein samples against
a set of reagents in order to determine the optimum conditions
for crystallizing a protein. The Topaz system includes IFCs
similar to our Dynamic Array architecture that have been
optimized for highly efficient protein crystallization screening.
Topaz
Screening IFCs and Reagents
Our 1.96, 4.96 and 8.96 Screening IFCs for our Topaz system
allow users to test 96 different reagents or reagent
concentrations against one, four or eight different protein
samples. We estimate that our screening IFCs require only
1% the amount of sample used in standard microwell plate
technologies, which is important because protein samples are
often extremely scarce or difficult to prepare. The 4.96 and
8.96 IFCs provide greater fluid handling efficiency by enabling
the parallel processing of different samples containing a
particular protein or different constructs of the same protein
on a single IFC. This parallel processing saves pipetting steps
and allows the user to determine the best sample or construct to
use when scaling up production of a protein to generate
diffraction-quality crystals.
We also re-sell third party reagents that we have tested with
our Topaz system. Though our customers may purchase or make
their own reagents for use with our system, we recommend that
they use reagents that we have validated.
We commercially introduced our Topaz systems in the first
quarter of 2003 and, as of March 29, 2008, 75 customers
have purchased Topaz IFCs for use in applications such as
functional studies and structure-based drug design.
Topaz
Instrumentation and Software
The NanoFlex IFC controller for the Topaz system fully automates
the setup of diffusion-based protein crystallization experiments
and includes software for tracking experiments.
The Topaz AutoInspeX II workstation automates the scanning of
Topaz IFCs and the identification of reaction chambers where
crystallization has occurred. The AutoInspeX II incorporates
high-end optical performance and a full suite of software for
analyzing and archiving crystallization results. The
sophisticated instrumentation and software included in our Topaz
system enables users to automatically image and accurately score
crystals as small as 10 microns by 20 microns.
64
Sales and
Marketing
We distribute our systems through our direct field sales and
support organizations located in North America, Europe and Asia
and through distributors or sales agents in several European
countries. Our global sales force is able to apprise our current
and potential customers of new product offerings and
technological advances in our current IFC systems, related
instrumentation and software to help drive revenue growth. As
our primary point of contact in the marketplace, our sales force
ensures a consistent marketing message and high level of
customer service, while enhancing our understanding of customer
needs. As of December 29, 2007, we had 24 people employed
in sales, sales support and marketing, including 9 sales
representatives.
Our sales and marketing efforts are targeted at laboratory
directors and principal investigators at leading companies and
institutions who need reliable, high throughput life science
automation solutions to conduct large-scale experimentation. We
seek to increase awareness of our products among our target
customers through participation in tradeshows and academic
conferences including sponsoring scientific lectures by
prominent users of our systems. Because our systems are
relatively new and require a capital investment, the sales
process typically involves numerous interactions and
demonstrations with multiple people within an organization. In
addition, potential customers will often wish to conduct
in-depth evaluations of the system including running identical
sets of samples and reagents on both our system and competing
systems. As a result of these factors and the budget cycles of
our customers, our sales cycle, the time from initial contact
with a customer to our receipt of a purchase order, can often be
12 months or longer.
Customers
We have sold our BioMark and Topaz systems to a wide variety of
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and to academic,
governmental and clinical research institutions. As of
March 29, 2008, 75 of our Topaz systems have been installed
at customer sites and 20 of our BioMark systems have been
installed at customer sites. The following is a list of our
representative customers in each of the listed markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
Market
|
|
Application
|
|
MedImmune
|
|
Gene Expression
|
|
Pharmaceutical drug development real-time qPCR for
gene expression profiling in research and clinical trials
|
Myriad Genetics
|
|
Gene Expression
|
|
Cancer and diagnostics research real-time qPCR for
differential gene expression in cancer studies
|
Merck & Co.
|
|
Gene Expression
|
|
Gene expression profiling for pharmaceutical drug development
|
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
|
|
Genotyping
|
|
Government wild-life resource management SNP
genotyping for identification of salmon species
|
National Cancer Institute
|
|
Genotyping
|
|
Academic basic research; clinical diagnostics
research genotyping for cancer research
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
|
|
Digital PCR
|
|
Academic basic research; clinical diagnostics
research digital PCR for early cancer detection
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Protein crystallization
|
|
Pharmaceutical drug discovery
|
Revenue Concentration. We receive a
substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of
customers and grantors. For the year ended December 29,
2007, the Singapore Economic Development Board, or EDB,
accounted for 24% of our total revenue. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, CTI Molecular Imaging accounted for 16%
of our total revenue, Kikotech Co., Ltd. accounted for 14% of
our total revenue and EDB accounted for 14% of our total
revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2005, Kikotech
accounted for 16% of our total revenue and a collaboration
agreement accounted for 14% of our total revenue. We anticipate
that we will continue to be
65
dependent on a limited number of customers and grantors for a
significant portion of our revenue in the near future. The loss
of any of these customers could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and cash flows.
Competition
We compete with both established and development stage life
science companies that design, manufacture and market
instruments for gene expression analysis, genotyping, other
nucleic acid detection and additional applications using
established laboratory techniques. For example, companies such
as Affymetrix, Applied Biosystems, BioTrove, Illumina, Roche
Diagnostics and Sequenom have products for gene expression
and/or
genotyping that compete in certain segments of the market in
which we sell our BioMark system. In addition, a number of other
companies and academic groups are in the process of developing
novel technologies for genetic analysis, many of which have also
received grants from the National Human Genome Research
Institute, a branch of the National Institutes of Health.
The high-throughput life science platforms industry is highly
competitive and expected to grow more competitive with the
increasing knowledge gained from molecular biology
experimentation. Many of our competitors are either
publicly-traded or are divisions of publicly-traded companies
and enjoy several competitive advantages over us, including:
|
|
|
|
|
significantly greater name recognition;
|
|
|
|
greater financial and human resources;
|
|
|
|
broader product lines and product packages;
|
|
|
|
larger sales forces;
|
|
|
|
larger and more geographically dispersed customer support
organization;
|
|
|
|
substantial intellectual property portfolios;
|
|
|
|
established customer bases and relationships; and
|
|
|
|
greater experience in research and development, manufacturing
and marketing.
|
We believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets
include:
|
|
|
|
|
cost of capital equipment and supplies;
|
|
|
|
ease of use;
|
|
|
|
accuracy and reproducibility of results; and
|
|
|
|
compatibility with existing laboratory processes.
|
In order to successfully compete with existing products and
future technologies, we will need to demonstrate to potential
customers that the cost savings and performance of our
technologies and products, as well as our customer support
capabilities, are superior to those of our competitors.
Technology
Our products are based on a tiered set of related proprietary
technologies that we have either developed internally or
licensed from third parties.
Multi-Layer
Soft Lithography
Our IFCs are manufactured using a technology known as
multi-layer soft lithography, or MSL. With MSL, we are able to
use standard semiconductor manufacturing techniques, along with
certain proprietary processes, to create complex integrated
microfluidic devices.
Using MSL technology, we are able to create valves, chambers,
channels and other fluidic components on our IFCs at high
density. We combine these components in complex arrangements
that allow nanoliter quantities of
66
fluids to be precisely directed to specific positions within the
IFC. Unlike most prior microfluidic technologies, our IFCs do
not rely on electricity, magnetism or similar approaches to
control fluid movement. Rather, our IFCs control fluid flow with
valves. The most important components on our IFCs are our
NanoFlex valves, which are created by the intersection of two
channels. When the valve is open, fluid is able to flow through
the lower channel. When the upper or control channel
is pressurized, the material separating the two channels is
deflected into the lower channel, closing the valve and stopping
fluid flow. If pressure is removed from the control channel, the
channels return to their original form, and the valve is again
open. The elastomeric properties of IFC cores allow our NanoFlex
valves to form a reliable seal and cycle through millions of
openings and closings.
The elastomer we currently use for our commercial products is a
form of silicone rubber known as polydimethylsiloxane, or PDMS,
but we have researched other materials with different properties
for specific purposes. PDMS is transparent, which allows fluid
movement to be easily monitored with a variety of existing
optical technologies, such as bright field or phase contrast
microscopy. In addition, the gas permeability of PDMS allows the
reliable metering of fluids with near picoliter precision by
eliminating the bubble problems encountered by most other
microfluidic technologies. In essence, we are able to pump
fluids into closed reaction chambers at sufficient pressure to
drive any air out of the chamber directly through the chamber
walls. PDMS also supports an environment that is favorable to
maintaining cell cultures.
We have developed commercial manufacturing processes to
fabricate valves, channels and chambers with dimensions in the
10 to 100 micron range, at high density and with high
reliability. For research purposes, we have created devices with
both substantially smaller and larger features. Though our
manufacturing is based on standard semiconductor manufacturing
technologies and techniques, we have also developed novel
processes for mold fabrication that enable mass production of
high density IFCs with nanoliter volume features.
Integrated
Fluidic Circuits
Our IFCs incorporate several different types of technology that
together enable us to use MSL to rapidly design and deploy new
microfluidic applications.
Microfluidic Components. The first level of
our IFC technology is a library of components that perform basic
microfluidic functions. We have proven designs for numerous
elements, such as pumps, mixers, separation columns, control
logic and reaction chambers. These are readily integrated to
create circuits capable of performing a wide range of
biochemical reactions. Even when it is necessary to integrate
multiple elements to perform a particularly complex reaction,
the area taken up on a circuit for a single reaction is small
compared to a typical overall circuit size of three centimeters
by three centimeters. As a result, we are routinely able to
develop IFCs that perform thousands of reactions per square
centimeter.
Architectures. The second level of our IFC
technology comprises the architectures we have designed to
exploit our ability to conduct thousands of reactions on a
single IFC. The first of these is the Dynamic Array, a matrix
architecture that allows multiple different samples and multiple
different reagents to be loaded onto a single IFC and then
combined so that there is an isolated reaction between each
sample and each reagent. The primary advantage of this
architecture is that each sample and reagent has to be pipetted
only once per IFC rather than once per reaction, as is the case
with plate-based technologies. For example, a single 48.48
Dynamic Array IFC can perform a total of 2,304 unique reactions
between 48 samples and 48 reagents with only 96 pipetting steps.
With conventional microwell plate-based technologies, the same
experiment would require about 4,608 pipetting steps and at
least six conventional microwell plates. Our Digital Array
architecture provides similar benefits with respect to pipetting
steps and fluid handling. The Digital Array architecture allows
a sample to be split into hundreds or thousands of smaller
samples. Separate reactions can then be conducted on each of the
smaller samples.
Interface and Handling Frames. The third level
of our IFC technology involves the interaction of our IFCs with
the actual laboratory environment. The elastomeric blocks at the
center of our IFCs sit in specially designed frames that are
able to deliver samples and reagents to the block. These frames
are the same size as standard 384 microwell plates and have
sample and reagent input ports laid out in a standard
384 microwell plate format. As a result, our IFCs can be
loaded with standard laboratory pipetting robots and can be used
with standard plate handling equipment.
67
Technological Advances. In the second quarter
of 2002, we sold the first prototype of our 1.48 IFC for our
Topaz system, which featured 22 valves capable of 2.5 assays per
square centimeter. In the second quarter of 2006, we introduced
our 12.765 Digital Array IFC, with over 1,000 valves
capable of more than 1,000 assays per square centimeter, a
46-fold increase in valve density and a 400-fold increase in
assay capability. The chart below illustrates the timing of a
number of our technological advances. We introduced our
96.96 Dynamic Array IFC in May 2008, which again increased
the number of valves and assays per square centimeter relative
to the 48.48 Dynamic Array. In the semiconductor industry,
Moores Law describes the principle that the shrinking of
features has allowed for a doubling of transistors on a chip
approximately every 18 months. Based on manufacturing
processes borrowed from those in the semiconductor industry,
Fluidigm has similarly achieved significant gains in the density
and productivity of our IFCs.
Software
and Instrumentation
We have developed instrumentation technology to load samples and
reagents on to the IFC and to control and monitor reactions
within our IFCs. Our NanoFlex controller consists of commercial
pneumatic components and both custom and commercial electronics.
It uses precise control of multiple pressures to independently
move fluid through up to four IFCs simultaneously and can be
configured for use with either our BioMark or Topaz systems. Our
Topaz Auto-InspeX II workstation consists of a commercial
microscope, illumination source, stage and camera system in a
single package. Our BioMark system consists of a commercial
thermal cycler packaged with a sophisticated fluorescence
detection system. All of these instruments are designed to be
easily introduced into standard automated lab environments.
We have developed specialized software packages to manage and
analyze the unusually large amounts of data produced by our
systems. Our BioMark gene expression analysis software
automatically identifies individual real-time qPCR reactions
from fluorescent images and generates amplification threshold
crossing values allowing researchers to readily perform complete
normalized comparative gene expression analysis across large
numbers of samples and assays. Similarly, the BioMark genotyping
analysis software automatically clusters fluorescent intensities
from individual genotype reactions and makes genotype calls
across individual and multiple IFC runs. Our Topaz system
software incorporates sophisticated image processing and
analysis functionality that enables the automatic detection and
classification of protein crystals. Most of our software
development uses Microsoft.NET tools to facilitate interaction
with typical laboratory information management systems.
Manufacturing
Our manufacturing operations are located in Singapore and South
San Francisco. Our Singapore facility fabricates all of our
IFCs for commercial sale. IFCs for research and development
purposes are fabricated at both
68
locations. We manufacture instrument systems at both locations,
with certain instruments assembled in Singapore and others in
South San Francisco.
Our Singapore facility commenced operations in October 2005 and
established full process capability for its first product, the
Topaz Screening IFC, in June 2006 and for its first Dynamic
Array, the 48.48 Dynamic Array in October 2006. Our Singapore
facility has been producing components for our Topaz system
since October 2006 and components for our BioMark system since
December 2007.
We established our manufacturing facility in Singapore to take
advantage of the skilled workforce, supplier and partner
network, lower operating costs and government support available
there. Our IFC manufacturing process includes photolithography
and fabrication technologies that are very similar to those used
in the fabrication of semiconductor chips. As a result, we are
able to hire from a pool of skilled manpower created by the
existing semiconductor industry in Singapore. Similarly, the
Singapore semiconductor industry has created a broad network of
potential suppliers and partners for our manufacturing
operations. We are able to locally source a large proportion of
the raw materials required in our processes and have been able
to collaborate with local engineering companies to develop
enabling technologies for IFC fabrication. We have made
significant improvements in yields through process improvements
at our Singapore facility and IFC production increased
three-fold in 2007 compared to 2006.
Our manufacturing operations in Singapore have been supported by
grants from the Singapore Economic Development Board, or EDB,
which provide incentive grant payments for research, development
and manufacturing activity in Singapore. Our arrangements with
EDB require us to maintain a significant and increasing
manufacturing and research and development presence in Singapore.
Our South San Francisco facility began producing Topaz
systems in 2002. In 2005, our South San Francisco facility began
assembling instrumentation for our BioMark system.
We expect that our existing manufacturing capacity for
instrumentation and IFCs is sufficient to meet our needs for at
least the next two years. However, we are considering developing
additional capacity in order to ensure that all or most of our
products are produced by at least two different facilities. We
believe that having dual sources for our products would help
mitigate the potential impact of a production disruption at any
one of our facilities and that such redundancy may be required
by our customers in the future. We have not determined the
timing or location of any additional manufacturing capacity.
We rely on a limited number of suppliers for certain components
and materials used in our systems. While we are in the process
of qualifying additional sources of supply, we cannot predict
how long that qualification process will last. If we were to
lose one or more of our limited source suppliers, it would take
significant time and effort to qualify alternative suppliers.
Key components in our products that are supplied by sole or
limited source suppliers include a thermal cycler customized to
our specifications, a specialized polymer from which our IFC
cores are fabricated, the plastic carrier that holds the IFC
core in certain of our products and the specialized high
resolution camera lenses used in the reader for our BioMark
system. We are neither a major customer of our suppliers, nor do
we have long term supply contracts with most of these suppliers.
These suppliers may therefore give other customers needs
higher priority than ours, and we may not be able to obtain
adequate supply in a timely manner or on commercially reasonable
terms.
We have entered into a supply agreement with Eppendorf AG to
provide to us a thermal cycler customized to our specifications.
Pursuant to this agreement, we have agreed to purchase from
Eppendorf at least a specified minimum number of units each year
in exchange for volume discounts. We have also agreed, during
the term of the agreement, not to manufacture or sell a product,
in stand-alone form, or compete in any way directly or
indirectly with the customized thermal cycler provided by
Eppedorf in stand-alone form. Eppendorf has agreed to refrain
from providing a similarly customized unit to any person or
entity until two years after the agreement has terminated.
Either party may terminate the agreement with good reason, which
includes a failure to timely deliver conforming units, subject
to a cure period. Eppendorf may terminate the agreement if we
purchase fewer than 75% of the specified minimum units for each
of two consecutive years. After April 1, 2010, either party
may terminate the supply agreement upon six months prior written
notice.
69
Research
and Development
We have assembled experienced research and development teams at
our South San Francisco and Singapore locations with the
scientific, engineering, software and process talent that we
believe is required to grow our business.
New
Product and Application Development
The largest component of our current research and development
effort is in the areas of new product and new application
development. In particular, we are focused on extending and
supporting the BioMark and Topaz product lines by developing new
DNA-based applications, improving the introduction of these
products into existing workflows of our customers and increasing
the functionality of the products. For example, the addition of
multi-color analysis allows Digital Array users to analyze as
many as 36,720 real-time qPCR assays in parallel on a single
Digital Array.
We are also developing new product lines that leverage our
investment in our Dynamic Array and Digital Array architectures.
As an example, we have demonstrated Dynamic Array formats that
can implement over 1,000 immunoassays in parallel. We also
invest in extending the reach of existing chip designs through
new chemistries. From time to time, we collaborate with other
life science companies, universities and government labs on the
development of prototype IFCs for particular purposes. For
example, there have been a variety of publications by
independent researchers demonstrating the use of MSL for
applications such as immunoassays based on surface-plasma
resonance, cell culturing and complementary DNA library
synthesis from single cells.
Process
Development
The second component of our research and development effort is
process development. We frequently develop new manufacturing
processes and test methods to support new IFC designs, drive
down manufacturing cost and increase manufacturing throughput.
We also invest in manufacturing automation, process changes and
design modifications in order to improve yield and lower costs
on existing IFCs.
New
Technology Development
We have active research and development efforts to increase the
density of components on our IFCs and to lower the materials
cost of our current production methods. We are evaluating new
materials that can increase the functionality of existing
products and that would allow our IFCs to be used for a wider
variety of biological and chemical reactions. Over the longer
term, we are seeking ways to transfer functionality from
instrumentation to IFCs to support development of field-based
and point-of-care applications.
Our research and development expenses were $11.4 million,
$15.6 million, $14.4 million and $3.3 million in
2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended March 29, 2008.
As of December 29, 2007, 68 of our employees were engaged
in research and development activities.
Scientific
Advisory Board
We maintain a scientific advisory board, consisting of members
with experience and expertise in the field of microfluidic
systems and their application, who provide us with consulting
services. The scientific advisory board generally does not meet
as a group but instead, at our request, the individual members
advise us on matters related to their areas of expertise. We
have entered into agreements with each of our advisors, other
than Stephen Quake, that require them spend between 6 and
12 days each year advising us and provide for stock option
grants to the advisor. Dr. Quake serves as chair of the
Scientific Advisory Board pursuant to a broader consulting
agreement with us. As Chairman, Dr. Quake advises us on the
composition of the advisory board and is involved in discussions
with us more frequently than other advisory board members. When
the advisory board meets, Dr. Quake is responsible for
setting the agenda for the meetings and chairing such meetings.
Our scientific advisory board consists of the following members:
Stephen Quake, Ph.D. is a co-founder of Fluidigm and the
chair of our scientific advisory board. He is a co-chair of the
bioengineering department at Stanford University and an
investigator of the Howard Hughes
70
Medical Institute. Dr. Quake received a B.S. in Physics and
a M.S. in Mathematics from Stanford University and a Ph.D. in
Physics from Oxford University. Dr. Quake has been a member of
our scientific advisory board since June 1999.
Frances H. Arnold, Ph.D. is the Dick and Barbara
Dickinson Professor of chemical engineering and biochemistry at
the California Institute of Technology. She is a member of the
National Academy of Engineering and a fellow at the American
Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering.
Dr. Arnold received a B.S. in Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in Chemical
Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. Dr.
Arnold has been a member of our scientific advisory board since
August 1999.
James M. Berger, Ph.D. is a Professor of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology at the University of California, Berkeley and
a member of the Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory. Dr. Berger received a B.S. in
Biochemistry from the University of Utah and a Ph.D. in
Biochemistry from Harvard University. Dr. Berger has been a
member of our scientific advisory board since June 2002.
Carl Hansen, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the
Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of British
Columbia. Dr. Hansen received a Ph.D. and M.S. in Applied
Physics from the California Institute of Technology and a B.S.
in Engineering Physics/Electrical Engineering/Honors Math from
the University of British Columbia. Dr. Hansen has been a
member of our Scientific Advisory Board since May 2008.
Frank McCormick, Ph.D. is the David A. Wood Distinguished
Professor of Tumor Biology and the E. Dixon Heise Distinguished
Professor in Oncology at the University of California,
San Francisco, or UCSF. He is also the director of
UCSFs Comprehensive Cancer Center. He is a member of the
Institute of Medicine and a fellow of The Royal Society.
Dr. McCormick received a B.Sc. in Biochemistry from the
University of Birmingham and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the
University of Cambridge. Dr. McCormick has been a member of our
scientific advisory board since November 2006.
Howard M. Shapiro, M.D. is a lecturer on Pathology
at Harvard Medical School, a visiting scientist at the
Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center at Brandeis
University and a research associate in Medicine and Pathology at
Beth Israel Hospital. Dr. Shapiro received a B.A. from
Harvard College and an M.D. from New York University School of
Medicine. Dr. Shapiro has been a member of our scientific
advisory board since December 1999.
Richard N. Zare, Ph.D. is the Marguerite Blake
Wilbur Professor of Natural Science and chair of the chemistry
department at Stanford University. He is a member of the
National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences and the recipient of the National Medal of Science.
Dr. Zare received a B.S. in Chemistry and Physics and a
Ph.D. in Chemical Physics from Harvard University. Dr. Zare
has been a member of our scientific advisory board since
December 2000.
Intellectual
Property Strategy and Position
Fluidigms core technology originated at the California
Institute of Technology, or Caltech, in the laboratory of
Professor Stephen Quake, who is a co-founder of Fluidigm.
Dr. Quake, his students and their collaborators pioneered
the application of multilayer soft lithography in the field of
microfluidics. In particular, Dr. Quakes laboratory
developed technologies that enabled the production of
specialized valves and pumps capable of controlling fluid flow
at nanoliter volumes. In a series of transactions, we
exclusively licensed from Caltech the relevant patent filings
relating to these developments.
Our license agreement with Caltech provides us with an
exclusive, worldwide license to certain patents and related
intellectual property, as well as the right to prosecute
licensed patent filings worldwide at our expense and to initiate
any infringement proceedings. Caltech retains the right to use
the licensed materials for noncommercial educational and
research purposes, as well as any rights necessary to comply
with the statutory rights of the U.S. government. We have
issued shares of our common stock to Caltech and, in addition to
an annual license fee, we agreed to pay to Caltech royalties
based on sales revenues of licensed products on a
country-by-country
basis.
71
The license agreement will terminate as to each country and
licensed product upon expiration of the last-to-expire patent
covering licensed products in each country. As of June 30,
2008, we licensed 38 issued U.S. patents and 42 pending U.S.
patent applications, as well as corresponding international
patent filings, from Caltech. The early termination of our
license agreement with Caltech could preclude us from
manufacturing or selling any of our IFCs and IFC systems, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business.
We also have co-exclusive licenses to patents and patent
applications owned by Harvard University, a non-exclusive,
field-limited license to patents and patent applications
controlled by Gyros AB and additional patent licenses from other
academic institutions and companies.
Our license agreements with Harvard University allow sublicenses
(i) provided we can demonstrate that we have added
significant value to the patent rights to be sublicensed and
that such sublicense also contains a substantial and essentially
simultaneous license to intellectual property owned by us, or
(ii) when we grant a sublicense under other Harvard
University patent rights licensed to us which are dominated by
the patent rights to be sublicensed and such sublicense is
necessary to practice the other Harvard University patent
rights. We have issued shares of our common stock to Harvard
and, in addition to an annual license fee, we agreed to pay to
Harvard royalties based on sales revenues of licensed products
on a
country-by-country
basis. Harvard is responsible for filing and maintaining all
licensed patents, but we must reimburse Harvard for our share of
its related patent prosecution expenses. We have the right to
prosecute any infringement of our licensed patent rights. The
license agreement will terminate with the last-to-expire of the
licensed patents. As of June 30, 2008, we licensed five
issued U.S. patents and four pending U.S. patent applications,
as well as corresponding international patent filings, from
Harvard. The early termination of our license agreements with
Harvard could preclude us from manufacturing or selling any of
our IFCs and IFC systems, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our license agreement with Gyros AB grants us a non-exclusive,
field-limited license to specified patents and patent
applications filings in exchange for an upfront fee plus annual
royalty payments based on net revenues of licensed products
above an annual license fee. Gyros has the right to terminate if
we assign our interest to a third party competitor of Gyros or
if we come under common control of such a third party.
Otherwise, the license will terminate at the expiration of the
last-to-expire of the licensed patents. As of June 30,
2008, we licensed one issued U.S. patent as well as
corresponding international patent filings from Gyros. The early
termination of our license agreement with Gyros AB could
preclude us from manufacturing or selling any of our IFCs and
IFC systems, which would have a material adverse effect on our
business.
Our license agreement with The UAB Research Foundation grants us
an exclusive worldwide license, including the right to
sublicense, under certain intellectual property rights. Such
license grant is subject to prior existing license grants, plus
the reservation of rights to UAB for internal research, academic
and educational purposes
and/or for
performance of services for other institutions and to fulfill
obligations to the U.S. government. We prosecute and
maintain the patent rights licensed under this agreement. The
license agreement will terminate at the expiration of the
last-to-expire of the licensed patents. As of June 30,
2008, we licensed four issued U.S. patents and six pending U.S.
patent applications, as well as corresponding international
patent filings, from UAB. The early termination of our license
agreement with UAB could preclude us from manufacturing or
selling any of our Topaz IFCs and Topaz IFC systems, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our patent strategy is to seek broad patent protection on new
developments in microfluidic technology and then later file
patent applications covering new implementations of the
technology and new microfluidic circuit architectures utilizing
the technology. As these technologies are implemented and
tested, we file new patent applications covering scientific
methodology enabled by our technology. Additionally, where
appropriate, we file new patent applications covering
instrumentation and software that are used in conjunction with
our IFCs.
As of June 30, 2008, we own or have licensed 81 issued U.S.
patents and 62 issued international patents. There are
240 pending patent applications, including 116 in the
United States, 118 international applications and 6 applications
filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The U.S. issued
patents we have licensed from Caltech expire between 2017 and
2024, the U.S. issued patents we have licensed from UAB expire
between 2020 and 2024, the U.S. issued patents we have licensed
from Harvard expire between 2019 and 2023, the U.S. issued
patent we have licensed from Gyros expires in 2012 and the U.S.
issued patents owned by us expire between 2018 and 2025.
72
The patent positions of companies like ours are generally
uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Our
patents may not enable us to obtain or keep any competitive
advantage. Our pending U.S. and foreign patent applications
may not issue as patents or may not issue in a form that will be
advantageous to us. Any patents we have obtained or do obtain
may be challenged by re-examination, opposition or other
administrative proceeding, or may be challenged in litigation,
and such challenges could result in a determination that the
patent is invalid. In addition, competitors may be able to
design alternative methods or devices that avoid infringement of
our patents. To the extent our intellectual property protection
offers inadequate protection, or is found to be invalid, we are
exposed to a greater risk of direct competition. If our
intellectual property does not provide adequate protection
against our competitors products, our competitive position
could be adversely affected, as could our business. Both the
patent application process and the process of managing patent
disputes can be time consuming and expensive. Furthermore, the
laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual
property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United
States.
In addition to pursuing patents on our technology, we have taken
steps to protect our intellectual property and proprietary
technology by entering into confidentiality agreements and
intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees,
consultants, corporate partners and, when needed, our advisors.
Such agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide
meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary
information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or
other breaches of the agreements, and we may not be able to
prevent such unauthorized disclosure. Monitoring unauthorized
disclosure is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we
have taken to prevent such disclosure are, or will be, adequate.
Our commercial success may depend in part on our
non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third
parties. Third parties have asserted and may assert in the
future that we are employing their proprietary technology
without authorization. Competitors may assert that our products
infringe their intellectual property rights as part of a
business strategy to impede our successful entry into those
markets. In addition, our competitors and others may have
patents or may in the future obtain patents and claim that use
of our products infringes these patents. We could incur
substantial costs and divert the attention of our management and
technical personnel in defending against any of these claims.
Parties making claims against us may be able to obtain
injunctive or other relief, which could block our ability to
develop, commercialize and sell products, and could result in
the award of substantial damages against us. In the event of a
successful claim of infringement against us, we may be required
to pay damages and obtain one or more licenses from third
parties, or be prohibited from selling certain products. We may
not be able to obtain these licenses at a reasonable cost, if at
all.
Government
Regulation
The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FFDCA, defines
medical devices to mean, among other things, an
instrument, apparatus . . . in vitro reagent, or other
similar or related article . . . intended for use in the
diagnosis of disease or other conditions . . .. This broad
definition includes in vitro diagnostic products, or IVDs.
Our products are currently labeled and sold for research
purposes only, and we sell them to pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, academic institutions and life sciences
laboratories. Because our products are not intended for use in
clinical practice, they do not fit the definition of a medical
device under the FFDCA and thus are not subject to regulation by
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. However, in
the future, certain of our products or related applications
could be subject to the FDAs regulation, the FDAs
regulatory jurisdiction could be expanded to include our
products, or both. For example, if we wished to label and market
our products for use in performing clinical diagnostics, they
would be considered medical devices and FDA clearance or
approval would be required.
Unless an exemption applies, each medical device we wish to
commercially distribute in the United States would require
either prior 510(k) clearance or prior pre-market approval from
the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three
classes. Devices deemed to pose lower risk to the patient are
placed in either class I or II, which, unless an exemption
applies, requires the manufacturer to submit a pre-market
notification requesting FDA clearance for commercial
distribution pursuant to Section 510k of the FFDCA. This
process, known as 510(k) clearance, requires that the
manufacturer demonstrate that the device is substantially
equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a
pre-amendment
class III device for which pre-market approval
applications, or PMAs, have not been required by the FDA. This
process typically takes from four to twelve months, although it
can take
73
longer. Most class I devices are exempted from this
requirement. Devices deemed by FDA to pose the greatest risk,
such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices,
or those deemed not substantially equivalent to a legally
marketed predicate device, are placed in class III.
Class III devices typically require PMA approval. To obtain
PMA approval, an applicant must demonstrate the safety and
effectiveness of the device based, in part, on data obtained in
clinical studies. PMA reviews generally last between one and two
years, although they can take longer. Both the 510(k) and the
PMA processes can be expensive and lengthy and may not result in
clearance or approval. If we are required to submit our products
for pre-market review by FDA, we may be required to cease
marketing while we obtain premarket clearance or approval from
FDA. There would be no assurance that we could ever obtain such
clearance or approval.
Changes to a device which have received PMA approval typically
require a new PMA or PMA supplement. Changes to a device that
receives 510(k) clearance, that could significantly affect its
safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change
in its intended use, require a new 510(k) clearance or possibly
PMA approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to make this
determination initially, but the FDA can review any of these
decisions. If the FDA disagreed with our determination not to
seek a new 510(k) clearance, the FDA could require us to seek a
new 510(k) clearance or pre-market approval. The FDA also could
require us to cease manufacturing
and/or
recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance or pre-market
approval was obtained. Also, in these circumstances, we could be
subject to warning letters, significant regulatory fines or
penalties, seizure or injunctive action, or criminal prosecution.
In addition, if our products become subject to regulation as a
medical device, we would become subject to additional FDA
requirements, and we could be subject to unannounced inspections
by FDA and other governmental authorities, which could increase
our costs of doing business. Specifically, manufacturers of
medical devices must comply with various requirements of the
FFDCA and its implementing regulations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the Quality System Regulations, labeling regulations,
|
|
|
|
medical device reporting, or MDR, regulations,
|
|
|
|
correction and removal regulations, and
|
|
|
|
post-market surveillance regulations, which include restrictions
on marketing and promotion.
|
We would need to continue to invest significant time and other
resources to ensure ongoing compliance with FDA quality system
regulations and other post-market regulatory requirements.
Our failure to comply with applicable FDA regulatory
requirements, or our failure to timely and adequately respond to
inspectional observations, could result in enforcement action by
the FDA, which may include the following sanctions:
|
|
|
|
|
fines, injunctions and civil penalties;
|
|
|
|
recall or seizure or our products;
|
|
|
|
operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of
production;
|
|
|
|
delays in clearance or approval, or failure to obtain approval
or clearance of future product candidates or product
modifications;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on labeling and promotion;
|
|
|
|
warning letters, fines, or injunctions;
|
|
|
|
withdrawal of previously granted clearances or
approvals; and
|
|
|
|
criminal prosecution.
|
International sales of medical devices are subject to foreign
government regulations, which vary substantially from country to
country. The primary regulatory environment in Europe is that of
the European Union (EU), which includes most of the major
countries in Europe. Currently, 27 countries make up the EU.
Other countries, such as Switzerland, have voluntarily adopted
laws and regulations that mirror those of the EU with respect to
medical
74
devices. The EU has adopted numerous directives and standards
regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling
and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Devices that
comply with the requirements of a relevant directive will be
entitled to bear the CE conformity marking, indicating that the
device conforms to the essential requirements of the applicable
directives and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed
throughout Europe.
Outside of the EU, regulatory approval needs to be sought on a
country-by-country
basis in order to market medical devices. Although there is a
trend towards harmonization of quality system standards,
regulations in each country may vary substantially which can
affect timelines of introduction.
Employees
As of December 29, 2007, we had 131 employees, of
which 68 work in research and development, 18 work in general
and administrative, 21 work in manufacturing and 24 work in
sales and marketing. None of our employees are represented by a
labor union or are the subject of a collective bargaining
agreement.
Property
and Environmental Matters
We lease approximately 35,000 square feet of office and
laboratory space at our headquarters in South
San Francisco, California under leases and subleases that
expire in March 2011, and 13,000 square feet of
manufacturing and office space at our facility in Singapore
under a lease that expires in September 2008. In addition, we
lease office space in Tokyo and Osaka, Japan. We are in
negotiations to extend and expand our lease relating to our
Singapore facility and we believe that our existing office,
laboratory and manufacturing space, together with additional
space and facilities available on commercially reasonable terms,
will be sufficient to meet our needs for at least the next two
years.
Our research and development and manufacturing processes involve
the controlled use of hazardous materials, including flammables,
toxics, corrosives and biologics. Our research and manufacturing
operations produce hazardous biological and chemical waste
products. We seek to comply with applicable laws regarding the
handling and disposal of such materials. Given the small volume
of such materials used or generated at our facilities, we do not
expect our compliance efforts to have a material effect on our
capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position.
However, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental
contamination or discharge and any resultant injury from these
materials. We do not currently maintain separate environmental
liability coverage and any such contamination or discharge could
result in significant cost to us in penalties, damages and
suspension of our operations.
Legal
Proceedings
On June 4, 2008 we received a letter from Applied
Biosystems, Inc., one of our competitors, asserting that our
BioMark System for gene expression analysis infringes upon
U.S. Patent No. 6,814,934, or the 934 patent,
and its foreign counterparts in Europe and Canada, owned by
Applied Biosystems parent company, Applera Corporation. In
response to this letter, on June 9, 2008, we filed suit
against Applied Biosystems and Applera in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking
declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of the
934 patent. A response from Applied Biosystems and Applera
is due July 30, 2008. The Court has yet to set a schedule
for this litigation. Applied Biosystems has recently announced
that it expects to be acquired by Invitrogen Corporation. This
may make it more difficult for us to predict the direction of
discussions and litigation among the parties. The 934
patent is scheduled to expire in May 2011.
Patent infringement suits can be expensive, lengthy and
disruptive to business operations. We could incur substantial
costs and divert the attention of our management and technical
personnel in prosecuting our claims. There can be no assurance
that we will prevail in our suit against Applied Biosystems and
Applera or in our defense of any claims against us by Applied
Biosystems or Applera. Applied Biosystems and Applera may be
able to obtain injunctive or other relief, which could block our
ability to develop, commercialize and sell products, and could
result in the award of substantial damages against us, including
treble damages and attorneys fees and costs in the event
that we are found to be a willful infringer of the asserted
patent or patents. In addition, we may incur significant costs
and expenses as a result of our requirement to defend and
indemnify some of our suppliers, distributors, customers and
other partners as a result of such claims. In the event that
Applied Biosystems is
75
successful in its claim of infringement against us, we may be
required to obtain one or more licenses to the asserted patent,
which we may not be able to obtain at a reasonable cost, if at
all. In addition, we could encounter delays in product
introductions while we attempt to develop alternative methods or
products to avoid infringing the asserted patent or patents.
This lawsuit or the failure to obtain any required licenses on
favorable terms could prevent us from commercializing our
BioMark products for gene expression, and the risk of a
prohibition on the sale of any of our products could adversely
affect our ability to grow and gain market acceptance for our
products.
We are not engaged in any other material legal proceedings.
76
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
Our executive officers and directors, and their ages and
positions as of March 29, 2008, are as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Gajus V. Worthington
|
|
38
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Vikram Jog
|
|
52
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Robert C. Jones
|
|
53
|
|
Executive Vice President, Research and Development
|
William M. Smith
|
|
57
|
|
Vice President, Legal Affairs and General Counsel, Secretary
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow
|
|
49
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide Manufacturing and Managing Director of
Fluidigm Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
Samuel
Colella(2),(3)
|
|
68
|
|
Director
|
Michael W. Hunkapiller,
Ph.D(2)
|
|
59
|
|
Director
|
Elaine V. Jones,
Ph.D.(1),(3)
|
|
53
|
|
Director
|
Kenneth
Nussbacher(1),(2)
|
|
55
|
|
Director
|
John A.
Young(3)
|
|
75
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Compensation Committee
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the Nominating and
Governance Committee
|
Executive
Officers
Gajus V. Worthington is a Co-Founder of Fluidigm and has
served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a
Director since our inception in June 1999. From May 1994 to
April 1999, Mr. Worthington held various staff and
management positions at Actel Corporation, a public
semiconductor corporation. Mr. Worthington received a B.S.
in Physics and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford
University.
Vikram Jog has served as our Chief Financial Officer
since February 2008. From April 2005 to February 2008,
Mr. Jog served as Chief Financial Officer for XDx, Inc., a
molecular diagnostics company. From March 2003 to April 2005,
Mr. Jog was a Vice President of Applera Corporation, a life
science company, and Vice President of Finance for its related
businesses, Celera Genomics and Celera Diagnostics. From April
2001 to March 2003, Mr. Jog was Vice President of Finance
for Celera Diagnostics and Corporate Controller of Applera
Corporation. Mr. Jog received a Bachelor of Commerce degree
from Delhi University and an M.B.A. from Temple University.
Mr. Jog is a member of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants.
Robert C. Jones has served as our Executive Vice
President, Research and Development since August 2005. From
August 1984 to July 2005, Mr. Jones held various managerial
and research and development positions at Applied Biosystems, a
laboratory equipment and supplies manufacturer that is a
division of Applera Corporation, including: Senior Vice
President Research and Development from April 2001 to August
2005, Vice President and General Manager Informatics Division
from 1998 to 2001, and Vice President PCR Business Unit
from 1994 to 1998. Mr. Jones received a BSEE and an MSEE in
Computer Engineering from the University of Washington.
William M. Smith has served as our Vice President, Legal
Affairs and General Counsel as well as our Secretary since May
2000 and served as a Director from May 2000 to April 2008.
Mr. Smith served as a partner at the law firm of Townsend
and Townsend and Crew, LLP from 1985 through April 2008.
Mr. Smith received a J.D. and an M.P.A. from the University
of Southern California and a B.A. in Biology from the University
of California, San Diego.
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow has served as our Vice President,
Worldwide Manufacturing, and Managing Director, Fluidigm
Singapore Pte. Ltd., our Singapore subsidiary, since March 2006.
From June 2005 to March 2006,
77
Ms. Yow served as General Manager of Fluidigm Singapore
Pte. Ltd. From August 2004 to May 2005, Ms. Yow served as
Vice President Engineering (Asia) for Kulicke and Soffa, a
public semiconductor equipment manufacturer. From March 1991 to
July 2004, Ms. Yow served as Director, Assembly Operations,
Plant Facilities and EHS, for National Semiconductor Singapore,
a semiconductor fabrication subsidiary of National Semiconductor
Corporation. Ms. Yow received a BE in Electronic
Engineering from Curtin University, a Certificate in Management
Studies from the Singapore Institute of Management and a Diploma
in Electrical Engineering from Singapore Polytechnic.
Board of
Directors
Samuel Colella has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since July 2000. Mr. Colella is a managing
director of Versant Ventures, a healthcare venture capital firm
he co-founded in 1999, and has been a general partner of
Institutional Venture Partners since 1984. Mr. Colella is a
member of the Board of Directors of Alexza Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Genomic Health, Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Mr. Colella received a B.S. in business and engineering
from the University of Pittsburgh and an M.B.A. from Stanford
University.
Michael Hunkapiller, Ph.D. has served as a member of our
Board of Directors since August 2005. He has been a Partner at
Alloy Ventures, a venture capital firm, since February 2004.
From July 1983 to August 2004, he served in various managerial
and research and development positions at Applied Biosystems,
most recently as President, from March 1997 to August 2004. He
received a B.S. in Chemistry from Oklahoma Baptist University
and a Ph.D. in Chemical Biology from Caltech.
Elaine V. Jones, Ph.D. has been a member of our
Board of Directors since October 2001. Since August 2003, she
has been a general partner of EuclidSR Associates, L.P., which
is the general partner of EuclidSR Partners, L.P., a venture
capital fund that focuses on life sciences and information
technology companies, and also a general partner of EuclidSR
Biotechnology Associates, L.P., which is the general partner of
Euclid Biotechnology Partners, L.P., a venture capital fund that
focuses on the life sciences. Dr. Jones was an investment
manager from June 1999 to September 2001, and was a Vice
President from September 2001 to August 2003, for S.R. One,
Limited, a venture capital subsidiary of SmithKline Beecham.
Dr. Jones received a B.S. in Biology from Juniata College
and received a Ph.D. in Microbiology from the University of
Pittsburgh.
Kenneth J. Nussbacher has been a member of our Board of
Directors since July 2003. Since 2000, Mr. Nussbacher has served
as an Affymetrix Fellow, a non-executive employee position, at
Affymetrix, Inc., a biotechnology company. From 1995 to 2000,
Mr. Nussbacher was Executive Vice President of Affymetrix,
Inc. and from 1995 to 1997, he was also Chief Financial Officer
of Affymetrix. Prior to joining Affymetrix, Mr. Nussbacher
was Executive Vice President for business and legal affairs of
Affymax Technologies N.V. He received a B.S. from Cooper Union
and a J.D. from Duke University. Mr. Nussbacher is also a
member of the Board of Directors of Xenoport, a
biopharmaceutical company.
Gajus V. Worthington is a Co-Founder of Fluidigm
Corporation and has served as our President and Chief Executive
Officer and a Director since our inception in June 1999.
John A. Young has been a member of our Board of Directors
since March 2001. Mr. Young retired as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard Company, a diversified
electronics manufacturer, in October 1992, where he had served
as President and Chief Executive Officer since 1978.
Mr. Young received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
Oregon State University and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.
Mr. Young serves as a director of Affymetrix, Inc.,
Vermillion, Inc., a molecular diagnostics company, Perlegen
Sciences, Inc., a drug development company, and Nanosys, Inc., a
nanotechnology company.
Board
Composition
Our Board of Directors is currently composed of six members,
five of whom are independent within the meaning of the
independent director guidelines of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
Immediately prior to this offering, our Board of Directors will
be divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each
annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be
elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose
terms are then expiring. The terms of the directors will expire
upon the election and qualification of successor directors at
the
78
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held during the years 2009
for the Class I directors, 2010 for the Class II
directors and 2011 for the Class III directors.
|
|
|
|
|
Our Class I directors will be Elaine Jones and Michael
Hunkapiller.
|
|
|
|
Our Class II directors will be Samuel Colella and Kenneth
Nussbacher.
|
|
|
|
Our Class III directors will be John Young and Gajus
Worthington.
|
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
provide that the number of our directors, which is currently six
members, shall be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the
majority of our Board of Directors. Each officer serves at the
discretion of the Board of Directors and holds office until his
successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her
earlier resignation or removal. There are no family
relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
The division of our Board of Directors into three classes with
staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our
management or a change of control. See Description of
Capital Stock Anti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Law
and Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws for a
discussion of other anti-takeover provisions found in our
certificate of incorporation.
Board
Committees
Our Board has an audit committee, a compensation committee and a
nominating and governance committee, each of which has the
composition and the responsibilities described below.
Audit Committee. Our audit committee oversees
our corporate accounting and financial reporting process and
assists the Board in monitoring our financial systems and our
legal and regulatory compliance. Our audit committee will also:
|
|
|
|
|
oversee the work of our independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
approve the hiring, discharging and compensation of our
independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
approve engagements of the independent auditors to render any
audit or permissible non-audit services;
|
|
|
|
review the qualifications and independence of the independent
auditors;
|
|
|
|
monitor the rotation of partners of the independent auditors on
our engagement team as required by law;
|
|
|
|
review our financial statements and review our critical
accounting policies and estimates;
|
|
|
|
review the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal
controls; and
|
|
|
|
review and discuss with management and the independent auditors
the results of our annual audit, our quarterly financial
statements, and our publicly filed reports.
|
The members of our audit committee are Elaine Jones and Kenneth
Nussbacher. Mr. Nussbacher is our acting audit committee
chairman. We are currently conducting a search for an additional
audit committee member who we expect to serve as chairman and as
financial expert under the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, implementing Section 407 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. We expect that, prior to the
completion of this offering, that the composition of our audit
committee will meet the requirements for independence under the
current requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and SEC
rules and regulations. We believe that the functioning of our
audit committee complies with the applicable requirements of the
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and SEC rules and regulations.
Compensation Committee. Our compensation
committee oversees our corporate compensation programs. The
compensation committee will also:
|
|
|
|
|
review and recommend policy relating to compensation and
benefits of our officers and employees;
|
|
|
|
review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other senior
officers;
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
evaluate the performance of our officers in light of established
goals and objectives;
|
|
|
|
recommend compensation of our officers based on its
evaluations; and
|
|
|
|
administer the issuance of stock options and other awards under
our stock plans.
|
The members of our compensation committee are Samuel Colella,
Michael Hunkapiller and Kenneth Nussbacher. Mr. Colella is
the chairman of our compensation committee. Our Board of
Directors has determined that each member of our compensation
committee is independent within the meaning of the independent
director guidelines of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. We believe
that the composition of our compensation committee meets the
requirements for independence under, and the functioning of our
compensation committee complies with, any applicable
requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and SEC rules and
regulations.
Nominating and Governance Committee. Our
nominating and governance committee oversees and assists our
Board of Directors in reviewing and recommending nominees for
election as directors. The nominating and governance committee
will also:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluate and make recommendations regarding the organization and
governance of the Board and its committees;
|
|
|
|
assess the performance of members of the Board and make
recommendations regarding committee and chair assignments;
|
|
|
|
recommend desired qualifications for Board membership and
conduct searches for potential Board members; and
|
|
|
|
review and make recommendations with regard to our corporate
governance guidelines.
|
The members of our nominating and governance committee are
Elaine Jones, John Young and Samuel Colella. Ms. Jones is
the chairman of our nominating and governance committee. Our
Board of Directors has determined that each member of our
compensation committee is independent within the meaning of the
independent director guidelines of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
Our Board of Directors may from time to time establish other
committees.
Director
Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning
compensation paid or accrued for services rendered to us by
members of our Board of Directors for the fiscal year ended
December 29, 2007. The table excludes Mr. Worthington
and Mr. Smith, who are Named Executive Officers and did not
receive any compensation from us in their roles as directors in
the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Cash ($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Bruce
Burrows(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Samuel D. Colella
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Hingge
Hsu(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Michael Hunkapiller
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Elaine V. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
S. Edward
Torres(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Kenneth J.
Nussbacher(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,885
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
112,885
|
|
John A. Young
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts represent the aggregate
compensation expense recognized by us for financial statement
reporting purposes in fiscal 2007 related to grants of stock
options in 2007, calculated in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004) (SFAS
No. 123(R)) without regard to estimated forfeitures.
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for a discussion of valuation assumptions made in determining
the grant date fair value and compensation expense of our stock
options.
|
80
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
For his service as a director,
Mr. Nussbacher was granted an option to purchase 100,000
shares of common stock on December 28, 2007 at an exercise
price of $2.40, with a grant date fair value of $143,151,
computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
Mr. Nussbacher was paid fees of $40,000 for services
rendered pursuant to a consulting agreement with us. This
consulting agreement was terminated on April 14, 2008.
|
(3)
|
|
Resigned from the Board of
Directors on or prior to April 2008.
|
The aggregate number of shares subject to stock options
outstanding at December 29, 2007 for each director is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Number of Stock Options
|
Name
|
|
Outstanding as of December 29, 2007 (#)
|
|
Bruce Burrows
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Samuel D. Colella
|
|
|
|
|
Hingge Hsu
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Hunkapiller
|
|
|
|
|
Elaine V. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Nussbacher
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
S. Edward Torres
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Young
|
|
|
|
|
Our directors do not currently receive any cash compensation for
their services as members of our Board of Directors or any
committee of our Board of Directors.
Upon consummation of our initial public offering, non-employee
directors will receive an annual retainer of $20,000. The
chairman of the audit committee will be paid an additional
annual retainer of $15,000. The chairman of the compensation
committee will be paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000.
The chairman of the nominating and governance committee will be
paid an additional annual retainer of $5,000.
Our outside director equity compensation policy was adopted by
our Board of Directors on January 29, 2008 and will become
effective immediately upon the completion of this offering. The
policy is intended to formalize the granting of equity
compensation to our non-employee directors under the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. Non-employee directors may receive all types of
awards under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, except for
incentive stock options, including discretionary awards not
covered by the policy. The policy provides for automatic and
nondiscretionary grants of nonstatutory stock options subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy and the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan.
Under the policy, each non-employee director, who first becomes
a non-employee director following the effective date of the
first registration statement filed by us and declared effective
with respect to any class of our securities, will be
automatically granted a stock option to purchase
40,000 shares of our common stock on the date such person
first becomes a non-employee director. A director who is an
employee and who ceases to be an employee, but who remains a
director will not receive such an initial award.
In addition, each non-employee director will be automatically
granted an annual stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of
our common stock on the date of each annual meeting beginning on
the date of the first annual meeting that is held at least
six months after such non-employee director received his or
her initial award. In connection with the closing of this
initial public offering, each non-employee director serving on
our Board at the time of this offering will be automatically
granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares of our common
stock at the price per share at which such common stock is sold
in this offering.
The exercise price of all stock options granted pursuant to the
policy will be equal to the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of grant. The term of all stock options will
be 10 years. Subject to the adjustment provisions of the
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, initial awards will vest as to 25%
of the shares subject to such awards each anniversary of the
date of grant, provided such non-employee director continues to
serve as a director through each such date. Subject to the
adjustment provisions of the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the
annual awards, including such awards granted in connection with
this offering, will vest monthly over a twelve month period
following the date of grant, provided such non-employee director
continues to serve as a director through such date.
81
The administrator of the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan in its
discretion may change or otherwise revise the terms of awards
granted under the outside director equity compensation policy.
In the event of a change in control, as defined in
our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, with respect to awards granted
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to non-employee directors,
the participant non-employee director will fully vest in and
have the right to exercise awards as to all shares underlying
such awards and all restrictions on awards will lapse, and all
performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed
achieved at 100% of target level and all other terms and
conditions met.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
Prior to the completion of this offering, we expect to adopt a
code of business conduct and ethics that is applicable to all of
our employees, officers and directors.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is an officer
or employee of our company. None of our executive officers
currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of
the Board of Directors or compensation committee of any entity
that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of
Directors or compensation committee.
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
We seek to have a compensation program that supports a team
ethic among our management, fairly rewards executives for
corporate performance and provides incentives for executives to
meet or exceed our short and long term goals. The primary
components of our compensation program are base salary, an
annual incentive bonus plan, option awards and change of control
arrangements. In addition, we provide our executive officers a
variety of benefits that are available generally to all salaried
employees. The compensation committee of our Board of Directors
is responsible for evaluating the compensation of our executive
officers and making recommendations to the Board of Directors.
The independent members of the Board of Directors have final
approval authority with respect to executive compensation.
Objectives
and Principles of Our Executive Compensation
The primary goal of our executive compensation program is to
ensure that we hire and retain talented and experienced
executives that are motivated toward achieving or exceeding our
short-term and long-term corporate goals. As a starting point,
we believe that it is critical that our executive officers work
together as a team and look beyond departmental lines to achieve
overall corporate goals rather than focusing on individual
departmental objectives. Our compensation philosophy is team
oriented and our success dependent on what our management team
can accomplish together. Therefore, we seek to provide the
executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation table
below, or our named executive officers, with
comparable levels of base salary, bonuses and equity awards that
are based largely on overall company performance.
For our fiscal year 2007, our named executive officers were
Gajus Worthington, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Richard DeLateur, our former Chief Financial Officer, Michael
Lucero, our former Executive Vice President, Sales and
Marketing, William Smith, Vice President, Legal Affairs and
General Counsel, Robert Jones, our Executive Vice President,
Research and Development, Grace Yow, Vice President, Worldwide
Manufacturing and Managing Director, Fluidigm Singapore.
Mr. DeLateur resigned as our Chief Financial Officer
effective February 29, 2008 and Mr. Lucero resigned as
our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing on
March 14, 2008.
82
While the compensation level of Mr. Worthington, our Chief
Executive Officer, is marginally higher than our other executive
officers, his compensation has historically been based on our
team-based compensation philosophy rather than on CEO
compensation levels reported in market surveys of other
companies in the life science industry.
We strongly believe that executive compensation should be
directly linked to our performance. Our compensation program is
designed so that a significant portion of the potential
compensation of all of our executive officers is contingent on
the achievement of our business objectives. In rewarding
performance, we seek to reward both short and long term
performance. We expect our executive leadership to manage our
company so that we achieve our annual goals while at the same
time positioning us to achieve our longer term strategic
objectives. Short term elements of compensation include annual
salary reviews, stock option awards and incentive bonuses that
are tied closely to achieving our corporate and, to a lesser
extent, on achieving individual performance objectives. Long
term elements have historically been limited to stock options
with multi-year vesting designed to retain executives and align
their long term interests with those of our stockholders.
We believe that hiring and retaining well performing executives
is important to our ongoing success. While we review generally
available surveys on executive compensation to confirm that our
compensation decisions do not result in compensation levels that
are dramatically different from other companies in our industry,
the compensation committee has not in the past attempted to
benchmark our executive compensation against any particular
indices or salary surveys. While occasional review of market
surveys is considered helpful, the compensation committee has
historically placed substantially greater weight on internal
considerations than on position-specific pay differences found
in the market.
Except as described below, neither the Board of Directors nor
the compensation committee has adopted any formal or informal
policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between cash
and non-cash compensation, among different forms of non-cash
compensation or with respect to long and short term performance.
The determination of the Board of Directors or compensation
committee as to the appropriate use and weight of each component
of executive compensation is subjective, based on their view of
the relative importance of each component in meeting our overall
objectives and factors relevant to the individual executive.
Historically, our Board of Directors has focused significantly
on the affordability of our compensation arrangements. As a
result, when weighting forms of compensation, the Board of
Directors and the compensation committee have historically
placed greater emphasis on non-cash equity incentive
compensation together with base salary. In 2006, the Board of
Directors determined that our business was of sufficient
maturity to permit us to establish a cash bonus plan.
As a publicly held company, we expect to periodically engage the
services of a compensation consultant to assist us in further
aligning our compensation philosophy with our corporate
objectives. In particular, in order to attract and retain key
executives, we may be required to modify individual executive
compensation levels to remain competitive in the market for such
positions.
Compensation
Process and Compensation Committee
For 2007 and January 2008, the compensation committee consisted
of Messrs. Colella and Nussbacher and Ms. Jones. Since
January 29, 2008, the compensation committee has consisted
of Messrs. Colella, Nussbacher and Hunkapiller, each of
whom is an independent director under the rules of the NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC and a non-employee director for
purposes of
Rule 16b-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The compensation committee makes recommendations to the Board
regarding compensation structure, goals and individual
compensation levels, which recommendations are considered for
approval by the independent members of the Board. The
compensation committee makes its compensation recommendations
based on input from Mr. Worthington, our Chief Executive
Officer, the judgment of its members based on their tenure and
experience in our industry, and, starting with compensation
levels for 2007, the advice of Compensia, Inc., an independent
compensation consultant hired by the compensation committee in
April 2007. The compensation committee has the responsibility of
formulating, evaluating and recommending to the Board of
Directors the compensation of our executive officers.
Historically, our annual compensation review process has been
initiated by Mr. Worthington who performs a review of the
performance of each executive officer in the prior year and
formulates proposals regarding the elements of compensation,
corporate and individual goals and compensation levels for our
executive officers, other than himself.
Mr. Worthingtons proposals for compensation
structure, goals
83
and individual compensation levels are typically based on
discussions with and directions from members of the compensation
committee. Mr. Worthington does not prepare proposals or
advise the compensation committee on his own compensation.
Compensation levels and mix for Mr. Worthington, our Chief
Executive Officer, are recommended by the compensation committee
based on the committees assessment of our overall
corporate performance and Mr. Worthingtons
contribution to that performance. Mr. Worthington does not
participate in compensation committee or Board deliberations
regarding his own compensation. As with other members of our
executive team, the compensation committee determines
Mr. Worthingtons compensation based on our
achievement of corporate objectives and compensation levels of
other members of our executive team, rather than attempting to
tie Mr. Worthingtons compensation to a specific
percentile of CEO compensation reported in market compensation
surveys.
Subject to any limitations or guidelines that may be adopted by
the Board of Directors in the future, the compensation committee
does have the authority to approve the grant of stock options or
stock purchase rights to individuals eligible for such grants,
including officers and directors. The compensation committee met
three times during 2007 and we expect that it will meet at least
quarterly during 2008.
The compensation committee has the authority under its charter
to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others
for assistance. In April 2007, the compensation committee
engaged Compensia, Inc., an outside consulting firm, to advise
it on developing a principles based executive compensation
strategy to help transition us from a privately held to a
publicly held company and on matters relating to our equity
compensation plans as a whole. Compensia reviewed our proposed
2007 compensation philosophy and compensation levels and
provided advice regarding the suitability of our executive
compensation structure for a company at our stage of development
and the impact the structure was likely to have on executive
performance and our ability to attract executive talent.
Compensia did not prepare a formal report or recommend specific
compensation levels. In 2008, we expect the compensation
committee will engage an outside consulting firm to review more
broadly our compensation practices and provide specific
recommendations on executive compensation levels.
After setting compensation levels for our executive officers for
2007, but before making its recommendations to the Board, the
compensation committee reviewed the 2006 Radford Biotechnology
Survey by Aon Consulting and the 2006 Executive Compensation
Survey for pre-IPO life science companies by Top Five Data
Services, Inc. to confirm that the proposed mix and levels of
compensation for our executive officers was not outside of the
ranges reported for senior executive officers in general. The
compensation committee did not benchmark or tie compensation
levels for our executive officers to any particular compensation
level provided by the companies included in these surveys.
Corporate
and Individual Performance Goals
2007 Corporate Goals. Our corporate and
individual performance goals for each year are formulated by the
Board of Directors with input from the compensation committee
and our Chief Executive Officer. For 2007, two corporate goals
were established. The first related to our selling a certain
number of IFC systems and reaching certain revenue targets,
whether through system sales or collaboration agreements. The
second goal related to our equity fund raising activity. The
compensation committee believed attaining these goals would take
a high level of executive performance and that such goals would
be very challenging given the initial lack of market awareness
of our products in 2007. The committee did not assign weights to
these goals, except to treat them as equally important.
84
2007 Individual Goals. Individual goals for
2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
2007 Individual Goals
|
|
Gajus Worthington, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Achieving target levels of sales of our IFC systems and
achieving target revenues, whether through system sales or
collaboration agreements.
|
|
|
Raising target levels of equity financing.
|
Richard DeLateur, former Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Preparing our finance organization for an initial public
offering and public company status.
|
Michael Lucero, former Executive Vice President,
|
|
Launching our BioMark product and developing a
|
Sales and Marketing
|
|
strategy for new market penetration.
|
William Smith, Vice President, Legal Affairs and
|
|
Maintaining and advancing our intellectual property
|
General Counsel
|
|
position with respect to existing and new products.
|
Robert Jones, Executive Vice President, Research
|
|
Deliver commercial genotyping applications, digital
|
and Development
|
|
array applications and finish feasibility phase of additional
products.
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow, Vice President, Worldwide
|
|
Achieving specified IFC manufacturing yields and
|
Manufacturing and Managing Director of
|
|
output levels.
|
Fluidigm Singapore
|
|
|
2008 Corporate Goals. For 2008, the Board,
with the participation of the compensation committee and members
of management, reassessed our corporate goals in light of the
maturation of our business and commercialization of our
products. Following this reassessment, the Board approved
corporate goals that include achieving specified levels of
product sales and product gross margins, completing an initial
public offering and keeping expenses and cash outlays within the
budget approved by the Board of Directors. The Board believes
that the goals are attainable with a very high level of
executive performance. The target sales level represents
significant growth from 2007 levels and will be achieved only if
we are able to increase market awareness of our products and
expand our customer base. The targeted gross margin will require
significant contributions from both our manufacturing and
research and development groups. Given the uncertainty in global
financial markets, our ability to complete an initial public
offering was also uncertain at the time these corporate goals
were established. Achieving our overall corporate goals while
staying within our proposed budget will require strong fiscal
discipline.
85
2008 Individual Goals. The goals for our
individual executives in 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
2008 Individual Goals
|
|
Gajus Worthington, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Achieving specified levels of product sales and product gross
margins, completing an initial public offering and keeping
expenses and cash outlays within the budget approved by the
Board of Directors.
|
Vikram Jog, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Ensuring accurate revenue recognition during each quarter,
closing our books in an accurate and timely manner, completing
our 2005, 2006 and 2007 audits and ensuring compliance with
applicable financial and disclosure regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
William Smith, Vice President, Legal Affairs and
|
|
Maintaining our intellectual property position and
|
General Counsel
|
|
supporting our initial public offering.
|
Robert Jones, Executive Vice President, Research
|
|
Completing market-ready 96.96 BioMark IFC, loaders
|
and Development
|
|
and readers for 96.96 and certain future applications.
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow, Vice President, Worldwide
|
|
Achieving overall IFC yields sufficient to achieve our
|
Manufacturing and Managing Director of
|
|
gross margin goals, achieving specified yields on our
|
Fluidigm Singapore
|
|
new 96.96 Dynamic Array IFC, maintaining or improving 2007
quality levels for our IFC systems and ensuring on-time
manufacture and delivery of IFCs and IFC systems.
|
Elements
of Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation program consists of four main
elements: base salary, an annual incentive bonus plan, option
awards and change of control arrangements. The following is a
discussion of each element.
Base Salary.
Prior to 2007, the Board and the compensation committee
established base salaries based on a number of factors including
the scope of responsibility of each individual and a desire to
encourage a team ethic. In 2007, the compensation committee and
the Board concluded that our company and its stockholders would
be better served by placing greater emphasis on creating a team
ethic among our executive officers and that a team ethic would
be better supported if all executive officers received
approximately the same salary. Therefore, in May 2007, the
compensation committee recommended and the Board approved a
raise in the base annual salaries of Richard DeLateur, Michael
Lucero, William Smith and Robert Jones to $265,000 effective
February 1, 2007, which represented a 20% increase for
Mr. DeLateur, a 2.5% increase for Mr. Lucero, a 16%
increase for Mr. Smith and a 6% increase for
Mr. Jones, based on their salaries for 2006. This salary
increase was based upon the compensation committees
assessment of the life science industry in the
San Francisco Bay Area gathered from the active involvement
of committee members as investors in such industry and the
committees conclusion that competition for executives in
our industry was increasing. Ms. Yows salary was set
at SG$307,224, or US$200,000 using the exchange rate at the time
such salary was set, to reflect the lower cost of living in
Singapore where she is based. At the same time, the compensation
committee also recommended that Mr. Worthingtons
salary be increased by 5% to $283,920 based on the factors
described above. However, Mr. Worthington requested that
this salary increase be deferred until his performance during
2007 could be assessed. In December 2007, the compensation
committee reviewed Mr. Worthingtons overall
performance during the year. In particular, it noted that
Mr. Worthington had fully met his individual goal for
equity financing as we had raised more money than had been
targeted and had partially met his individual goal for revenue,
as we had strong sales performance although the target revenue
level was not achieved. The compensation committee therefore
recommended and the Board approved the 5% raise that had been
originally proposed for Mr. Worthington. The raise was made
retroactive to February 15, 2007 so that it would be
effective as of the same date as the raises for all the other
executive officers.
86
In January 2008, the compensation committee reviewed 2008 base
salaries in light of general market conditions in the
San Francisco Bay Area life science industry. The
compensation committee concluded that competition for executive
talent remained strong as a result of the solid economic
performance of the industry and the region overall, the
continued high level of investment by venture capital firms in
new and existing life science companies and the specialized
skills and experiences required to manage life science
companies. The compensation committees assessment of
general market conditions in the life science industry, and the
life science industry in the San Francisco Bay Area in
particular, was based on the experience of the committee members
who were and are actively involved in venture capital investing
in such industry and area. The compensation committee did not
rely on any formal compensation survey data in making its
assessment. The compensation committee therefore recommended and
the Board approved a 4.0% raise for all executive officers other
than Messrs. DeLateur and Lucero, who were expected to be
leaving Fluidigm in early 2008. This 4.0% raise was applied to
Ms. Yows salary in Singapore dollars, resulting in an
increase of SG$12,289. As a result, the 2008 base salary for
Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones was increased to $275,600, the
2008 base salary for Ms. Yow was increased to SG$319,513,
or US$232,002 on the date of the increase, and the 2008 salary
for Mr. Worthington was increased to $294,840. These salary
increases became effective on February 1, 2008.
In January 2008, we entered into an offer letter with Vikram
Jog, our Chief Financial Officer that provides for him to
receive a base salary of $278,000 per year and a signing bonus
of $20,000. The Board approved this departure from our standard
base salary and bonus practice for executive officers based on
several factors, including his unique qualifications, the need
to induce him to leave his existing employment, his base salary
at his previous employer and our need to fill the position as
soon as possible.
Incentive Bonus Plan.
For 2007, the compensation committee and the Board established a
bonus structure for all named executive officers that provided
for performance bonuses of up to 35% of base salary. 80% of the
performance bonus was payable based upon our reaching our
corporate goals described above, with each corporate goal
receiving equal weighting and the remaining 20% payable to each
executive based on the executives attainment of his or her
individual performance goals described above. Payment of
performance bonuses was allocated among corporate and individual
goals in this manner in recognition of our compensation
philosophy in which the compensation committee sought to
incentivize executive officers to look beyond their individual
departmental goals and work with other executive officers to
achieve our overall corporate goals. The compensation committee
and Board concluded that the corporate goals portion of the
bonus would not be payable if the goals were less than 80%
attained, based on the average percentage completion of all such
goals, and would be paid in full if the goals were 100%
attained. The compensation committee retained discretion to
determine the portion of the bonus that would be paid if the
corporate goals were achieved at a level between 80% and 100%.
The compensation committee also retained the discretion to
change the bonus structure and the bonus payment amounts as it
considered appropriate.
In January 2008, the compensation committee concluded that the
first 2007 corporate goal described above had been partially met
and the second 2007 corporate goal had been fully met, but that
taken together the 80% threshold had not been attained. As a
result, no 2007 bonuses were paid to our executive officers with
respect to achievement of corporate goals.
The compensation committee also considered the achievement of
2007 individual performance goals in January 2008 and concluded
that Mr. Smith had achieved his goals by maintaining and
advancing our intellectual property position with respect to
existing and new products. The Board awarded Mr. Smith 100%
of his individual performance bonus of $18,550. The compensation
committee concluded that Mr. Jones achieved his 2007
individual goals of delivering a commercial genotyping
application and digital array applications and awarded him his
maximum individual performance bonus of $18,550. The
compensation committee concluded that Ms. Yow had achieved
her 2007 individual goals by achieving specified IFC
manufacturing yields and output levels in 2007 and the Board
awarded Ms. Yow 100% of her individual performance bonus of
$14,000. The compensation committee concluded that
Mr. Worthington had partially achieved his 2007 individual
performance goals of achieving target levels of IFC system sales
and revenue and raising target levels of equity financing, and
the Board awarded Mr. Worthington a partial bonus of
$14,175. No other individual performance bonuses were awarded to
our named executive officers for 2007.
87
For 2008, the compensation committee and Board have approved the
same bonus structure and potential bonus percentages as for 2007.
In making recommendations regarding and approving compensation
with respect to 2007, the compensation committee and the Board
have not exercised their discretion to either award compensation
absent attainment of relevant performance goals or to reduce the
size of an award or payout following the attainment of relevant
performance goals. We intend for the bonus plan to provide a
significant portion of an executives potential
compensation. It is designed to help ensure that executives are
focused on our near-term performance and on working together to
achieve key corporate objectives. We expect that corporate and
individual goals will be reviewed each year and adjusted to
reflect changes in our stage of development, competitive
position and corporate objectives.
Option Awards.
We grant options to new executives upon the commencement of
their employment and on an annual basis make additional grants
to existing executives based on our overall corporate
performance, individual performance and the executives
existing option grants and equity holdings. We believe that
option awards are an effective means of aligning the interests
of executives and stockholders, rewarding executives for our
achieving success over the long term and providing executives an
incentive to remain with us. Most option grants to our named
executive officers provide the holder with the right to exercise
the option and purchase shares prior to vesting, subject to our
right to repurchase unvested shares pursuant to the terms of our
restricted stock purchase agreement.
In 2007, the compensation committee redesigned our option
granting policy in light of the shift in our compensation
philosophy toward team-based compensation. The compensation
committee concluded that the number of shares that vest each
year for each executive should be relatively consistent and
should be comparable to the number of shares that vest for other
executives. The committee determined that each executive should
vest in approximately 70,000 shares per year over a four
year period. For each executive, the exact number of shares that
vest in any year would be subject to adjustment either upward or
downward by up to 35,000 shares based on the
executives performance relative to the corporate goals and
his or her individual performance goals. The compensation
committees selection of 70,000 shares as the target
number of shares to vest annually for each executive officer was
based on the committees determination that such number of
shares would provide meaningful compensation to our executive
officers. The committee did not rely on compensation surveys or
other third party sources in arriving at the 70,000 annual
vesting target. In addition to this annual vesting target and
the possible adjustment of actual vesting amounts by up to
35,000, the compensation committee retained the authority to
approve additional option grants to executive officers who
demonstrated exceptional performance in a given year.
As a result of our adoption of this new approach to equity
compensation, our grants in 2007 were primarily intended to
regularize each executives vesting schedules to
approximately 70,000 per year. As a result, certain executives
received option grants where shares were immediately vested
while others received grants where the vesting occurs largely
three or four years from the grant of the date. The number of
shares vesting for each such officer in 2007 were
68,332 shares for Mr. Worthington, 187,499 shares
for Mr. DeLateur, 104,083 shares for Mr. Lucero,
68,750 for Mr. Smith, 91,667 for Mr. Jones and 97,500
for Ms. Yow. Variations in the number of shares vested in
2007 for these officers was the result of vesting under options
granted prior to 2007 rather than intentional variation in 2007
grants on the part of the compensation committee. In the future,
once the vesting of existing options are normalized at
approximately 70,000 shares per year, we intend for
executives to receive additional grants that vest only in the
fourth year following the date of their grant. We also expect to
reconsider the target share amount each year and may in the
future consider granting restricted stock as a form of equity
compensation.
For 2008, the compensation committee did not alter the target
amount of annual vesting for any executive. To give effect to
this target annual vesting rate, the committee recommended and
the Board approved grants of options to purchase
70,000 shares each to Mr. Jones, Mr. Smith,
Mr. Worthington and Ms. Yow. These options vest fully
on December 31, 2011, subject to continued service through
the vesting date. In addition, the compensation committee
recommended that additional discretionary option grants be made
to Mr. Jones, Mr. Smith, Mr. Worthington and
Ms. Yow for their exceptional performance in 2007.
Mr. Jones, Mr. Smith and Mr. Worthington received
a fully-vested option to purchase 70,000 shares and
Ms. Yow received a fully-vested option to purchase
40,000 shares. These grants were issued separately from the
annual grants and were not considered an adjustment to the
annual grants. Accordingly, the 35,000 share adjustment
limit for annual grants did not apply.
88
As discussed above, the compensation committee retains the
discretion to grant additional options to executive officers as
a reward for exceptional performance. In addition, the committee
may decide to grant options that vest upon the achievement of
certain performance goals. Finally, the committee is exploring
the desirability of other forms of equity based compensation
including restricted stock grants.
In January 2008, the Board approved amendments to our 1999 Stock
Option Plan to permit the use of performance based vesting in
connection with equity grants under the plan. The amendment
provided the Board and compensation committee with the ability
to grant options or other equity awards under the plan that vest
upon the achievement of specified milestones or goals. These
amendments were made to enhance the ability of the Board and
compensation committee to closely align equity compensation with
the achievement of corporate or individual goals.
Our Board adopted our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan in January 2008
and we expect our stockholders will approve it prior to the
completion of this offering. Subject to stockholder approval,
the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is effective upon its adoption by
our Board, but is not expected to be utilized until after the
completion of this offering. Our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
provides for the grant of incentive stock options, within the
meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, to our
employees and any parent and subsidiary corporations
employees, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation
rights, performance units and performance shares to our
employees, directors and consultants and our parent and
subsidiary corporations employees and consultants. Our
Board and compensation committee are evaluating the costs and
benefits of the various forms of equity compensation issuable
under the 2008 plan and may elect to use restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance
units and performance shares in the future to further align the
interests of our management and stockholders and to manage the
financial statement impact of such forms of equity compensation.
89
In January 2008, the compensation committee participated in the
negotiation of a compensation package for Vikram Jog, our Chief
Financial Officer, in which the compensation committee agreed to
grant Mr. Jog compensation that exceeded our standard
compensation package for the named executive officers. As
indicated above, the compensation committee approved this
package based on Mr. Jogs unique qualifications, our
need to fill this position and the need to induce Mr. Jog
to leave his then current employer. In February 2008, the
compensation committee approved the grant of the following
options to Mr. Jog in February 2008 under our 1999 Stock
Option Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Vesting if
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Standard Vesting
|
|
Milestones Met
|
|
Performance Milestones
|
|
500,000
|
|
25% on first anniversary
of the vesting commencement date, and 1/48 per month thereafter
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
50,000
|
|
100% on December 31, 2011
|
|
100% upon achievement
of Milestones prior to December 31, 2008
|
|
(1) Revenue recognition - no material changes upon quarterly
reviews and annual audit;
(2) Accurate and timely closing of books and reporting
(timeliness as required by investors and SEC);
(3) SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, as needed; and
(4) Produce audited financial statements for 2005, 2006 and 2007
(and the first quarter of 2008, if necessary) to enable the
filing of a Form S-1 registration statement.
|
50,000
|
|
25% on first anniversary
of the vesting commencement date and 1/48 per month thereafter
|
|
100% upon achievement
of Milestones prior to December 31, 2008
|
|
(1) Achievement of target revenues;
(2) Achievement of target margins for 2008;
(3) Completion of an initial public offering in 2008; and
(4) Compliance with 2008 budget for expenses and cash outflows.
|
In light of the performance based option grants made to
Mr. Jog and our team-based approach to executive
compensation, the compensation committee recommended to the
Board, and the Board approved similar grants for all other named
executive officers other than Mr. Worthington. Thus,
Mr. Jones, Mr. Smith and Ms. Yow each received
two additional options to purchase 50,000 shares on
April 24, 2008. The first option becomes fully vested on
the earlier of December 11, 2011 or, with respect to each
officer, December 31, 2008 if that officer meets his or her
individual goals for 2008. The second option vest with respects
25% of the shares subject to the option on February 1, 2009
and 1/48th of the shares each month thereafter; provided
that the option becomes fully vested on December 31, 2008
if the corporate goals for 2008 are achieved.
Employment and Severance Agreements.
In February 2008, we entered into Employment and Severance
Agreements with each of our named executive officers that
provide for specified payments and benefits if the
officers employment is terminated without cause, or if the
officers employment is terminated without cause or for
good reason within 12 months following a change of control.
The terms of these agreements are described under
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of
90
Control. We adopted these arrangements because we
recognize that we will from time to time consider the
possibility of an acquisition by another company or other change
of control transaction and that such consideration can be a
distraction to our executive officers and can cause such
officers to consider alternative employment opportunities.
Accordingly, the Board concluded that it is in the best
interests of our company and its stockholders to provide
executives with certain severance benefits upon termination of
employment without cause or for good reason following a change
of control. Our Board determined to provide such executives with
certain severance benefits upon their termination of employment
without cause outside of the change of control context in order
to provide executives with enhanced financial security and
incentive to remain with our company. In addition, we believe
that providing for acceleration of options if an officer is
terminated following a change of control transaction aligns the
executive officers interest more closely with those of
other stockholders when evaluating the transaction rather than
putting the officer at risk of losing the benefits of those
equity incentives.
In determining the amount of cash payments, benefits coverage
and acceleration of vesting to be provided to officers upon
termination prior to a change of control or within
12 months following a change of control, our Board
considered the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the expected time required for an officer to find comparable
employment following a termination event;
|
|
|
|
feedback received from potential candidates for officer
positions at our company as to the level of severance payments
and benefits they would require to leave other employment and
join our company;
|
|
|
|
in the context of a change of control, the amount of vesting
acceleration that would align the officers interests more
closely with the interests of stockholders when considering a
potential change of control transaction; and
|
|
|
|
the period of time following a change of control during which
management positions are evaluated and subject to a heightened
risk of elimination.
|
In addition, all outstanding options granted to our employees
will become fully vested upon a change of control if the options
are not assumed by the acquiring company.
In connection with the resignation of Mr. Lucero, our
former Vice President of Sales and Marketing, on March 22,
2008, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release
of Claims with Mr. Lucero that provided for mutual releases
of us and Mr. Lucero, our continued payment of
Mr. Luceros salary and health insurance premiums
through July 2008 and payment of an additional $90,000 to
Mr. Lucero. The amount and timing of payments to
Mr. Lucero under this agreement were the result of
negotiations between us and Mr. Lucero, with the
involvement of the compensation committee. The compensation
committee concluded that this agreement was in the best
interests of our company in reaching an amicable separation with
Mr. Lucero.
In connection with Mr. DeLateurs resignation, we
entered into a consulting agreement dated February 29,
2008. Under the consulting agreement, we agreed to pay
Mr. DeLateur $200 per hour for performing various
consulting services, provided that Mr. DeLateur work no
more than five hours per week without our written authorization.
We entered into this arrangement to ensure that
Mr. DeLateur would be available as needed to ensure an
orderly transition to our new Chief Financial Officer,
Mr. Jog.
Other Benefits.
Executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our
employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, vision, group
life, disability, and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance and our 401(k) plan, in each case on the same basis as
other employees, subject to applicable law. We also provide
vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including our
executive officers, which we believe are comparable to those
provided at peer companies.
CEO
Loan and Stock Repurchase
On January 20, 2004, we entered into an Employee Loan
Agreement, Secured Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement
with Mr. Worthington pursuant to which we loaned
Mr. Worthington $250,000 at an interest rate of 3.52% per
annum. The loan was secured by the pledge of 833,334 shares
of our common stock held by
91
Mr. Worthington. On April 10, 2008,
Mr. Worthington repaid the loan in full in accordance with
Section 2.2(d) of the note by exchanging shares of our
common stock held by Mr. Worthington to us at the fair
market value of such stock, which was determined by the Board of
Directors to be $3.19 per share. The note and
Mr. Worthingtons loan were repaid in full and
cancelled in exchange for 90,913 shares of our common stock
which Mr. Worthington transferred to us pursuant to the
terms of a repurchase agreement dated April 10, 2008. This
loan repayment and share cancellation transaction were approved
by the Board based on its determination that we received full
and fair consideration for the cancellation of the loan and that
the cancellation of the loan was in the best interests of our
company and its stockholders.
Accounting
and Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
or the Code, places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of
compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any
year with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and certain of
our highly paid executive officers. We can, however, preserve
the deductibility of certain performance-based compensation in
excess of $1,000,000 if the conditions of Code
Section 162(m) are met. Under applicable tax guidance for
newly-public companies, the deduction limitation generally will
not apply to compensation paid pursuant to any plan or agreement
that existed before the company became publicly held. In
addition, compensation provided by newly-public companies
through the first stockholder meeting to elect directors after
the close of the third calendar year following the year in which
the initial public offering occurs, or earlier upon the
occurrence of certain events (e.g., a material modification of
the plan or agreement under which the compensation is granted),
will not be included in for purposes of the Code
Section 162(m) limit provided the arrangement is adequately
described in this prospectus. Accordingly, we believe that
deductibility of all income recognized by executives pursuant to
equity compensation granted by us prior to this offering, as
well as any equity compensation granted by us under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan following this offering through the
expiration of the reliance period, will not be limited by Code
Section 162(m). While the compensation committee cannot
predict how the deductibility limit may impact our compensation
program in future years, the compensation committee intends to
maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly
links pay to performance. While the compensation committee has
not adopted a formal policy regarding tax deductibility of
compensation paid to our executive officers, the compensation
committee intends to consider tax deductibility under
Section 162(m) as a factor in compensation decisions.
Code Section 409A imposes additional taxes on certain
non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements that do not
comply with its requirements. These requirements regulate an
individuals election to defer compensation and the
individuals selection of the timing and form of
distribution of the deferred compensation. Code
Section 409A generally also provides that distributions of
deferred compensation only can be made on or following the
occurrence of certain events (i.e., the individuals
separation from service, a predetermined date, a change in
control, or the individuals death or disability). For
certain executives, Code Section 409A requires that such
individuals distribution commence no earlier than six
(6) months after such officers separation from
service. We have and will continue to endeavor to structure our
compensation arrangements to comply with Code Section 409A
so as to avoid the adverse tax consequences associated therewith.
92
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table presents information concerning the total
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and our four other most highly compensated officers
during the last fiscal year (the Named Executive
Officers) for services rendered to us in all capacities
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007:
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Gajus V. Worthington
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
283,357
|
|
|
$
|
33,631
|
|
|
$
|
14,175
|
|
|
$
|
331,163
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A.
DeLateur(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
241,375
|
|
|
$
|
71,384
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
312,759
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Jones
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
247,502
|
|
|
$
|
4,263
|
|
|
$
|
18,550
|
|
|
$
|
270,315
|
|
Executive Vice President
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Y.
Lucero(3)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
264,517
|
|
|
$
|
14,361
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
278,878
|
|
Former Executive Vice President,
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Smith
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
261,983
|
|
|
$
|
36,590
|
|
|
$
|
18,550
|
|
|
$
|
317,123
|
|
Vice President, Legal
Affairs and General
Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
204,214
|
|
|
$
|
84,310
|
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
$
|
302,524
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide
Manufacturing and Managing Director of Fluidigm Singapore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts represent the aggregate
expense recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
for fiscal 2007 calculated in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R) without regard for estimated
forfeitures. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for a discussion of assumptions made in determining
the grant date fair value and compensation expense of our stock
options.
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. DeLateur resigned
effective February 29, 2008. From August 16, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, Mr. DeLateur worked for us on a
part-time
basis. Currently Mr. DeLateur serves as a consultant. See
Employment Agreements and Offer Letters.
|
(3)
|
|
Mr. Lucero resigned effective
March 22, 2008. See Employment and Severance
Agreements.
|
(4)
|
|
The amounts in this column
represent total
performance-based
bonuses earned for service rendered during fiscal 2007 under our
incentive bonus plan. Under our incentive bonus plan, each
executive was eligible to receive a cash bonus of up to 35% of
his or her base salary based on achievement of certain corporate
goals and certain individual performance goals. Please see
Incentive Bonus Plan under Compensation
Discussion and Analysis above for additional information
regarding our fiscal 2007 cash bonuses.
|
93
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
The following table presents information concerning grants of
plan-based awards to each of the Named Executive Officers during
the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
All Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts Under
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Base Price of
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($/Sh)(8)
|
|
|
Awards(7)
|
|
|
Gajus V. Worthington
|
|
5/8/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
131,533
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007
|
|
$
|
99,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard DeLateur
|
|
5/8/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
115,668
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007
|
|
$
|
92,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Jones
|
|
5/8/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
69,288
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007
|
|
$
|
92,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Y. Lucero
|
|
5/8/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
21,753
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007
|
|
$
|
92,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Smith
|
|
5/8/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
101,114
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007
|
|
$
|
92,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow
|
|
5/8/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,000
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
165,250
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
10,000 of the shares subject to
this grant were vested as of the grant date, 10,000 shares
vested on February 1, 2008, 65,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2009, and 70,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2010.
|
(2)
|
|
70,000 of the shares subject to
this grant were vested as of the grant date and
70,000 shares vest on February 1, 2010.
|
(3)
|
|
All of the shares subject to this
grant vest on February 1, 2010.
|
(4)
|
|
10,000 of the shares subject to
this grant vested on February 1, 2008, 38,000 shares
vest on February 1, 2009, and 70,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2010.
|
(5)
|
|
50,000 of the shares subject to
this grant were vested as of the grant date, 50,000 shares
vested on February 1, 2008, 40,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2009, and 59,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2010.
|
(6)
|
|
10,000 of the shares subject to
this grant vest on February 1, 2009 and 70,000 shares
vest on February 1, 2010.
|
(7)
|
|
Amounts represent the aggregate
grant date fair value of stock options granted in fiscal 2007,
calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) without
regard to estimated forfeitures. See Note 2 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
assumptions made in determining the grant date fair value of our
stock options.
|
(8)
|
|
Our shares of common stock were not
publicly traded during the 2007 fiscal year; our board of
directors in good faith determined the fair market value on the
date of grant.
|
94
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table presents certain information concerning
equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers at the end of
the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable(1)
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Gajus V. Worthington
|
|
|
200,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
01/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017
|
|
Richard DeLateur
|
|
|
95,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
235,000
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
12/20/2015
|
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017
|
|
Robert C. Jones
|
|
|
400,000
|
(22)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
08/03/2015
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
(23)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017
|
|
Michael Y. Lucero
|
|
|
300,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12/04/2011
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
04/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(9)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
07/15/2013
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
01/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
08/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(12)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017
|
|
William M. Smith
|
|
|
39,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12/04/2011
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
(14)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
07/15/2013
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
(15)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
04/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(16)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
01/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(17)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
08/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
118,000
|
(18)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017
|
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow
|
|
|
150,000
|
(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
08/03/2015
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
09/27/2006
|
|
|
|
|
199,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise noted, all option
grants may be exercised pursuant to a restricted stock purchase
agreement prior to vesting; any shares purchased prior to
vesting are subject to a right of repurchase in our favor in the
event the individual ceases to provide services for any reason
which right lapses in accordance with the vesting schedule of
the option.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
January 18, 2005 and vest over 4 years. 20% of the
shares subject to the stock option vest one year after grant.
1.667% of the shares vest at the end of each monthly period
during the subsequent year and 2.5% of the shares vest at the
end of each monthly period thereafter.
|
|
(3)
|
|
10,000 of the shares subject to
this grant were vested as of May 8, 2007, the grant date,
10,000 shares vested on February 1, 2008,
65,000 shares vest on February 1, 2009, and 70,000
vest on February 1, 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
December 21, 2005 and vest over 4 years. 25% of the
shares vest one year after grant and 2.083% of the shares vest
at the end of each monthly period thereafter.
|
|
(5)
|
|
70,000 of the shares subject to
this grant were vested as of May 8, 2007, the grant date,
and 70,000 shares vest on February 1, 2010.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This option may not be exercised
prior to vesting.
|
|
(7)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
December 4, 2001 and vest over 4 years. 25% of the
shares vest one year after grant and 2.083% of the shares vest
at the end of each monthly period thereafter.
|
|
(8)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
April 19, 2004 and vest over 4 years at the rate of
2.083% of the shares per month.
|
|
(9)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
July 16, 2003 and vest over 4 years at the rate of
2.083% of the shares per month.
|
95
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
January 18, 2005 and vest over 4 years. 20% of the
shares subject to the stock option vest one year after grant.
1.667% of the shares vest at the end of each monthly period
during the subsequent year and 2.5% of the shares vest at the
end of each monthly period thereafter.
|
|
(11)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
August 15, 2006 vest over 4 years. 1.67% of the shares
vest each month for the first two years and 2.5% of the shares
vest each month in the final two years.
|
|
(12)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
May 8, 2007. All of the shares subject to this grant vest
on February 1, 2010.
|
|
(13)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
December 4, 2001 and vest over 4 years at the rate of
2.083% of the shares per month.
|
|
(14)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
July 16, 2003 and vest over 4 years at the rate of
2.083% of the shares per month.
|
|
(15)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
April 19, 2004 and vest over 4 years at the rate of
2.083% of the shares per month.
|
|
(16)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
January 18, 2005 and vest over 4 years. 20% of the
shares subject to the stock option vest one year after grant.
1.667% of the shares vest at the end of each monthly period
during the subsequent year and 2.5% of the shares vest at the
end of each monthly period thereafter.
|
|
(17)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
August 15, 2006 vest over 4 years. 1.67% of the shares
vest each month for the first two years and 2.5% of the shares
vest each month in the final two years.
|
|
(18)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
May 8, 2007. 10,000 of the shares subject to this grant
vested on February 1, 2008, 38,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2009, and 70,000 shares vest on
February 1, 2010.
|
|
(19)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
August 3, 2005 and vest over 4 years. 25% of the
shares vest one year after grant and 2.083% of the shares vest
at the end of each monthly period thereafter.
|
|
(20)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
September 27, 2006. These stock options vest over
4 years in monthly increments. During the first two years,
1.67% of the shares vest each month and during the final two
years, 2.5% of the shares vest each month.
|
|
(21)
|
|
50,000 of the shares subject to
this grant were vested as of May 8, 2007, the grant date,
50,000 shares vested on February 1, 2008,
40,000 shares vest on February 1, 2009, and
59,000 shares vest on February 1, 2010.
|
(22)
|
|
This option was granted on
August 3, 2005 and vests over 4 years. Twenty-five
percent of the shares vest one year after grant and 2.083% of
the shares vest each month thereafter.
|
(23)
|
|
These stock options were granted on
May 8, 2007. 10,000 of the shares subject to this grant
vest on February 1, 2009, and 70,000 shares subject to
this grant vest on February 1, 2010.
|
Employment
Agreements and Offer Letters
Richard A DeLateur. We entered into a
consulting agreement dated February 29, 2008 with Richard
A. DeLateur, our former Chief Financial Officer. Under the
consulting agreement, we agreed to pay Mr. DeLateur $200
per hour for performing various consulting services, provided
that Mr. DeLateur shall work no more than five hours per
week without our written authorization. The consulting agreement
terminated on May 17, 2008.
Michael Y. Lucero. We entered into to a
Settlement Agreement and General Release of Claims effective
March 30, 2008 with Michael Y. Lucero, our former Executive
Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Under the settlement
agreement, we agreed, in exchange for a general release of all
claims and other customary terms and conditions, (i) to pay
Mr. Lucero on each pay day through July 15, 2008 an
amount equal to what he would have received on that pay day
based on an annual base salary of $265,000 and (ii) to
reimburse Mr. Lucero for costs of coverage under the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, or
COBRA, that are incurred during April, May, June and July of
2008, in an amount no greater than the amount we contributed on
Mr. Luceros behalf for February 2008. We also agreed
to make a one time payment to Mr. Lucero of $90,000.
Vikram Jog. We are a party to an offer letter
dated January 29, 2008, with Vikram Jog, our Chief
Financial Officer. Under the offer letter, we employ
Mr. Jog on an at-will basis for no specified term and
agreed to pay Mr. Jog an annual base salary of $278,000,
which continues to be his base salary. We also agreed to pay
Mr. Jog a signing bonus of $20,000 pursuant to his offer
letter. Pursuant to the offer letter, we granted Mr. Jog an
initial options to purchase a total of 600,000 shares of
our common stock.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
In February 2008, we entered into employment and severance
agreements with Gajus V. Worthington, William M. Smith, Mai Chan
(Grace) Yow, Robert C. Jones and Vikram Jog, which require us to
make payments if the named executive officers employment
with us is terminated in certain circumstances.
96
Pursuant to our employment and severance agreements with our
named executive officers, a change of control is
defined as the occurrence of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
any person, as such term is used in
Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, is or becomes the beneficial
owner, as such term is defined in
Rule 13d-3
under said Act, directly or indirectly, of our securities
representing 50% or more of the total voting power represented
by our then outstanding voting securities;
|
|
|
|
a change in the composition of our Board occurring within a
two-year period, as a result of which fewer than a majority of
our directors are incumbent directors, which term is
defined as either (i) our directors as of the execution
date of the relevant agreement or (ii) directors who are
elected, or nominated for election, to our Board with the
affirmative votes of at least a majority of the incumbent
directors at the time of such election or nomination (but will
not include an individual whose election or nomination is in
connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating
to the election of our directors);
|
|
|
|
the date of the consummation of our merger or consolidation with
any other corporation that has been approved by the our
stockholders, other than a merger or consolidation that would
result in our voting securities outstanding immediately prior
thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding
or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving
entity) more than 50% of the total voting power represented by
our voting securities or such surviving entity outstanding
immediately after such merger or consolidation, or our
stockholders approve a plan of our complete liquidation; or
|
|
|
|
the date of the consummation of the sale or disposition by us of
all or substantially all of our assets.
|
Pursuant to our employment and severance agreements with our
named executive officers, cause is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
an act of dishonesty in connection with a named executive
officers responsibilities as an employee;
|
|
|
|
a conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony
or any crime involving fraud, embezzlement or any other act of
moral turpitude;
|
|
|
|
gross misconduct;
|
|
|
|
an unauthorized use or disclosure of any of our proprietary
information or of any other party to whom he or she owes an
obligation of nondisclosure as a result of his or her
relationship with us;
|
|
|
|
a willful breach of any obligations under any written agreement
or covenant with us; or
|
|
|
|
a named executive officers continued failure to perform
his or her employment duties after he or she has received a
written demand of performance from us and has failed to cure
such non-performance to our satisfaction within 10 business days
after receiving such notice.
|
Pursuant to our employment and severance agreements with Gajus
V. Worthington, William M. Smith, Robert C. Jones and Vikram
Jog, good reason means the occurrence of one or more
of the following events effected without the named executive
officers prior consent, provided that he or she terminates
his or her employment within one year thereafter:
|
|
|
|
|
the assignment to the named executive officer of any duties or a
reduction of the named executive officers duties, either
of which significantly reduces his or her responsibilities;
provided that the continuance of his or her responsibilities at
the subsidiary or divisional level following a change of
control, rather than at the parent, combined or surviving
company level following such change of control shall not be
deemed good reason within the meaning of this clause;
|
|
|
|
a material reduction of the named executive officers base
salary;
|
|
|
|
the relocation of the named executive officer to a facility or a
location greater than 50 miles from his or her present
location;
|
|
|
|
a material breach by us of any material provision of the
employment and severance agreement.
|
97
However, no act or omission by us shall constitute good
reason if we fully cure that act or omission within
30 days of receiving notice of receiving notice from the
named executive officer.
Pursuant to our employment and severance agreement with Mai Chan
(Grace) Yow, good reason means the occurrence of one
or more of the following events effected without her consent,
provided that she terminates her employment within one year
thereafter:
|
|
|
|
|
the assignment to Ms. Yow of any duties or a reduction of
her duties, either of which significantly reduces her
responsibilities; provided that the continuance of her
responsibilities at the subsidiary or divisional level following
a change of control, rather than at the parent, combined or
surviving company level following such change of control shall
not be deemed good reason within the meaning of this
clause;
|
|
|
|
a material reduction of Ms. Yows base salary;
|
|
|
|
the relocation of Ms. Yow to a facility or a location
outside the country of Singapore;
|
|
|
|
a material breach by us of any material provision of the
employment and severance agreement.
|
However, no act or omission by us shall constitute good
reason if we fully cure that act or omission within
30 days of receiving notice of receiving notice from the
named executive officer.
The employment and severance agreements provide that in the
event the named executive officers employment is
terminated by us or our successor without cause
prior to a change of control or after 12 months
following a change of control and the named
executive officer executes a standard release of claims with us,
the named executive officer is entitled to receive, in addition
to such officers salary payable through the date of
termination of employment and any other benefits earned and owed
through the date of termination, the following cash payments:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount, payable in accordance with our customary payroll
practices, equal to six months of the named executive
officers base salary in effect immediately prior to the
time of termination; and
|
|
|
|
reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred by the executive
officer and his or her eligible dependents for coverage under
group health plans, policies or arrangements sponsored by us for
a period of up to six months, provided that such coverage
is timely elected under COBRA or similar applicable state
statute.
|
The employment and severance agreements further provide that in
the event the named executive officers employment is
terminated by (i) us or our successor without
cause and within 12 months following a
change of control or (ii) by the executive
officer for good reason and within 12 months
following a change of control, and in each case the
named executive officer executes a standard release of claims
with us, the executive officer is entitled to receive, in
addition to such officers salary payable through the date
of termination of employment and any other benefits earned and
owed through the date of termination, the following cash
payments and benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount, payable in a lump sum, equal to the greater of
(i) six months of the named executive officers
base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control
or (ii) six months of the named executives
officers base salary in effect immediately prior to the
time of termination;
|
|
|
|
all outstanding unvested stock options, equity appreciation
rights or similar equity awards then held by the named executive
officer as of the date of termination will immediately vest and
become exercisable as to all shares underlying such options;
|
|
|
|
any shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and
similar equity awards then held by the named executive officer
will immediately vest and any of our rights of repurchase or
reacquisition with respect to such shares will lapse as to all
shares; and
|
|
|
|
reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred by the executive
officer and his or her eligible dependents for coverage under
group health plans, policies or arrangements sponsored by us for
a period of up to six months, provided that such coverage is
timely elected under COBRA or similar applicable state statute.
|
The following table describes the payments and benefits that
each of our named executive officers would be entitled to
receive pursuant to the employment and severance agreements,
assuming that each of the following
98
triggers occurred in December 29, 2007: their employment
was terminated without cause prior to or after
12 months following a change of control and
(ii) their employment was terminated without cause
or for good reason within 12 months following a
change of control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Terminated without Cause Prior
|
|
|
Employment Terminated within 12 Months
|
|
|
|
to or After 12 Months Following Change of Control
|
|
|
Following Change of
Control(1)
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Health Care
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Health Care
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Acceleration
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
|
Gajus V. Worthington
|
|
$
|
135,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,213
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,213
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Smith
|
|
$
|
132,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,056
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
132,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,056
|
|
Vice President, Legal Affairs and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mai Chan (Grace) Yow
|
|
$
|
106,130
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
525
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
106,130
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
525
|
(5)
|
Vice President, Worldwide Manufacturing and Managing Director of
Fluidigm Singapore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Jones
|
|
$
|
132,500
|
|
|
$
|
9,213
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
132,500
|
|
|
$
|
9,213
|
|
Executive Vice President, Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vikram Jog
|
|
$
|
139,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,142
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,142
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes involuntary termination
other than for cause, death or disability, and voluntary
termination for good reason.
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts shown in this column
are equal to 6 months of the named executive officers
base salary as of December 29, 2007.
|
(3)
|
|
The amounts shown in this column
are equal to the spread value between (i) the unvested
portion of all outstanding stock options, equity appreciation
rights or similar equity awards held by the named executive
officer on December 29, 2007 and (ii) the initial
public offering price of our common stock, which we have assumed
to be the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus.
|
(4)
|
|
The amounts shown in this column
are equal to the cost of covering the named executive officer
and his or her eligible dependents coverage under our benefit
plans for a period of six months, assuming that such coverage is
timely elected under COBRA.
|
(5)
|
|
Amount shown has been converted
from Singapore dollars to U.S. dollars based on the interbank
exchange rate for December 29, 2007 of 1 Singapore
dollar = 0.6909 U.S. dollars.
|
In addition to the benefits described above, our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan and 1999 Stock Option Plan provide for full
acceleration of all outstanding options in the event of a change
of control of our company where the successor company does not
assume our outstanding options and other awards in connection
with such acquisition transaction. We estimate the value of this
benefit for each named executive officer to be equal to the
amount listed above in the column labeled Equity
Acceleration.
Employee
Benefit Plans
2008
Equity Incentive Plan.
Our Board of Directors adopted our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan on
January 29, 2008, and we expect our stockholders will
approve it prior to the completion of this offer. Subject to
stockholder approval, the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is
effective upon its adoption by our Board of Directors, but is
not expected to be utilized until after the completion of this
offering. Our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant
of incentive stock options, within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, to our employees
and any parent and subsidiary corporations employees, and
for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance
units and performance shares to our employees, directors and
consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations
employees and consultants.
A total
of shares
of our common stock are reserved for issuance pursuant to the
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, of which no options are issued and
outstanding. In addition, the shares reserved for issuance under
our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will also include (a) those
shares reserved but unissued under the 1999 Stock Option
99
Plan as of the effective date of the first registration
statement filed by us and declared effective with respect to any
class of our securities and (b) shares returned to the 1999
Stock Option Plan as the result of expiration or termination of
options (provided that the maximum number of shares that may be
added to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to (a) and
(b) is shares).
The number of shares available for issuance under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan will also include an annual increase on
the first day of each fiscal year beginning
in ,
equal to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
shares;
|
|
|
|
4% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the last day
of our immediately preceding fiscal year; or
|
|
|
|
such other amount as our Board of Directors may determine.
|
Our Board of Directors or a committee appointed by our Board
administers our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Our compensation
committee will administer our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan after
the completion of the offering. In the case of options intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation within
the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code,
the committee will consist of two or more outside
directors within the meaning of Section 162(m).
Subject to the provisions of our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the
administrator has the power to determine the terms of the
awards, including the exercise price, the number of shares
subject to each such award, the exercisability of the awards and
the form of consideration, if any, payable upon exercise. The
administrator also has the authority to amend existing awards to
reduce their exercise price, to allow participants the
opportunity to transfer outstanding awards to a financial
institution or other person or entity selected by the
administrator and to institute an exchange program by which
outstanding awards may be surrendered in exchange for awards
with a higher or lower exercise price.
The exercise price of options granted under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan must at least be equal to the fair market value
of our common stock on the date of grant. The term of an
incentive stock option may not exceed 10 years, except that
with respect to any participant who owns 10% of the voting power
of all classes of our outstanding stock, the term must not
exceed 5 years and the exercise price must equal at least
110% of the fair market value on the grant date. Subject to the
provisions of our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the administrator
determines the term of all other options.
After the termination of service of an employee, director or
consultant, he or she may exercise his or her option for the
period of time stated in his or her option agreement. Generally,
if termination is due to death or disability, the option will
remain exercisable for 12 months. In all other cases, the
option will generally remain exercisable for three months
following the termination of service. However, in no event may
an option be exercised later than the expiration of its term.
Stock appreciation rights may be granted under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. Stock appreciation rights allow the recipient to
receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common
stock between the exercise date and the date of grant. Subject
to the provisions of our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the
administrator determines the terms of stock appreciation rights,
including when such rights become exercisable and whether to pay
any increased appreciation in cash or with shares of our common
stock, or a combination thereof, except that the per share
exercise price for the shares to be issued pursuant to the
exercise of a stock appreciation right will be no less than 100%
of the fair market value per share on the date of grant.
Restricted stock may be granted under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan. Restricted stock awards are grants of shares of our common
stock that vest in accordance with terms and conditions
established by the administrator. The administrator will
determine the number of shares of restricted stock granted to
any employee, director or consultant. The administrator may
impose whatever conditions to vesting it determines to be
appropriate (for example, the administrator may set restrictions
based on the achievement of specific performance goals or
continued service to us); provided, however, that the
administrator, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the time
at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. Shares of
restricted stock that do not vest are subject to our right of
repurchase or forfeiture.
100
Restricted stock units may be granted under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. Restricted stock units are bookkeeping entries
representing an amount equal to the fair market value of one
share of our common stock. The administrator determines the
terms and conditions of restricted stock units including the
vesting criteria (which may include accomplishing specified
performance criteria or continued service to us) and the form
and timing of payment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
administrator, in its sole discretion may accelerate the time at
which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.
Performance units and performance shares may be granted under
our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Performance units and
performance shares are awards that will result in a payment to a
participant only if performance goals established by the
administrator are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. The
administrator will establish organizational or individual
performance goals in its discretion, which, depending on the
extent to which they are met, will determine the number
and/or the
value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out
to participants. After the grant of a performance unit or
performance share, the administrator, in its sole discretion,
may reduce or waive any performance objectives or other vesting
provisions for such performance units or performance shares.
Performance units shall have an initial dollar value established
by the administrator prior to the grant date. Performance shares
shall have an initial value equal to the fair market value of
our common stock on the grant date. The administrator, in its
sole discretion, may pay earned performance units or performance
shares in the form of cash, in shares or in some combination
thereof.
Our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan provides that all non-employee
directors will be eligible to receive all types of awards
(except for incentive stock options) under the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. Please see the description of our Outside
Director Equity Compensation Policy below.
Unless the administrator provides otherwise, our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan generally does not allow for the transfer of
awards and only the recipient of an award may exercise an award
during his or her lifetime.
Our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a
merger or change in control, as defined in the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as
the administrator determines, including that the successor
corporation or its parent or subsidiary will assume or
substitute an equivalent award for each outstanding award. The
administrator is not required to treat all awards similarly. If
there is no assumption or substitution of outstanding awards,
the awards will fully vest, all restrictions will lapse, all
performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed
achieved at 100% of target levels and the awards will become
fully exercisable. The administrator will provide notice to the
recipient that he or she has the right to exercise the option
and stock appreciation right as to all of the shares subject to
the award, all restrictions on restricted stock will lapse, and
all performance goals or other vesting requirements
1999
Stock Option Plan, as amended
Our 1999 Stock Option Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors
and approved by our stockholders on May 12, 1999. Our 1999
Stock Option Plan was most recently amended on April 24,
2008. Our 1999 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of
incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422
of the Internal Revenue Code, to our employees and any parent
and subsidiary corporations employees, and for the grant
of nonstatutory stock options to our employees, directors and
consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations
employees and consultants. Our Board of Directors has decided
not to grant any additional options under our 1999 Stock Option
Plan following the completion of this offering. However, our
1999 Stock Option Plan will continue to govern the terms and
conditions of the outstanding stock options previously granted
thereunder.
Subject to the provisions of our 1999 Stock Option Plan, the
maximum aggregate number of shares which may be subject to
option and sold under our 1999 Stock Option Plan is
14,800,000 shares. As of December 29, 2007, options to
purchase 7,467,230 shares of our common stock were
outstanding and 1,197,154 shares were available for future
grant under the 1999 Stock Option Plan.
Our compensation committee appointed by our Board of Directors
currently administers our 1999 Stock Option Plan. Under our 1999
Stock Option Plan, the administrator has the power to determine
the terms of the stock options, including the employees,
directors and consultants who will receive stock options, the
number of shares subject to each stock option, the vesting
schedule, any vesting acceleration, and the exercisability of
stock options.
101
The administrator also has the authority to initiate an option
exchange program whereby stock options are exchanged for stock
options with a lower exercise price. The administrator may also
reduce the exercise price of any option to the then current fair
market value if the fair market value of our common stock has
declined since the date the option was granted.
The exercise price of options granted under our 1999 Stock
Option Plan must at least be equal to the fair market value of
our common stock on the date of grant. The term of an incentive
stock option may not exceed 10 years, except that with
respect to any optionee who owns 10% of the voting power of all
classes of our outstanding stock as of the grant date, the term
must not exceed 5 years and the exercise price must equal
at least 110% of the fair market value on the grant date.
Subject to the provisions of our 1999 Stock Option Plan, the
administrator determines the terms of all other options in its
discretion.
After the termination of service of an employee, director or
consultant, he or she may exercise his or her option for the
period of time stated in his or her option agreement. Generally,
if termination is due to death or disability, the option will
remain exercisable for 12 months. In all other cases, the
option will generally remain exercisable for three months
following the termination of service. In some cases, options
issued to consultants pursuant to our 1999 Stock Option Plan
provide that they may be exercised at anytime prior to the
expiration of the ten year term of the option. However, in no
event may an option be exercised later than the expiration of
its term.
Unless the administrator provides otherwise, our 1999 Stock
Option Plan generally does not allow for the transfer of awards
and only the recipient of an award may exercise an award during
his or her lifetime.
Our 1999 Stock Option Plan provides that in the event of a
merger of our company or a sale of substantially all of our
assets, each outstanding stock option will be assumed or an
equivalent option or right substituted by the successor
corporation. If there is no assumption or substitution of
outstanding options (or portions thereof), the options (or
portions thereof) will fully vest and become fully exercisable.
In such case, the administrator will provide notice to the
optionee that he or she has the right to exercise the option as
to all of the shares subject to the option for a period of at
least 15 days. The option will terminate upon the
expiration of the period of time the administrator provides in
the notice.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to amend, suspend or
terminate the 1999 Stock Option Plan provided such action does
not impair the rights of any optionee without his or her written
consent.
Retirement
Plans
401(k) Plan. We maintain a tax-qualified
retirement plan that provides eligible employees with an
opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis.
Eligible employees are able to participate in the 401(k) plan as
of the first day of the month on or following the date they
begin employment and participants are able to defer up to 60% of
their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual
Internal Revenue Code limits. All participants interests
in their deferrals are 100% vested when contributed. The 401(k)
plan permits us to make matching contributions and profit
sharing contributions to eligible participants, although we have
not made any such contributions to date. Pre-tax contributions
are allocated to each participants individual account and
are then invested in selected investment alternatives according
to the participants directions. The 401(k) plan is
intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan,
contributions to the 401(k) plan and earnings on those
contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed
from the 401(k) plan and all contributions are deductible by us
when made.
Limitation
on Liability and Indemnification Matters
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
that will become effective upon the completion of this offering
contain provisions that limit the personal liability of our
directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted
by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be
personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages
for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except
liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law; or
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that will
become effective upon the completion of this offering, provides
that we indemnify our directors to the fullest extent permitted
by Delaware law. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws,
that will become effective upon the completion of this offering,
provides that we indemnify our directors and officers to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and
restated bylaws, that will become effective upon the completion
of this offering, also provide that we shall advance expenses
incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final
disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure
insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other
agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in
that capacity, regardless of whether we would otherwise be
permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of
Delaware law. We have entered and expect to continue to enter
into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers
and other employees as determined by the Board of Directors.
With certain exceptions, these agreements provide for
indemnification for related expenses including, among others,
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts
incurred by any of these individuals in any action or
proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and
indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain
directors and officers liability insurance.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws, that will become effective upon the completion of this
offering, may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit
against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty of
care. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative
litigation against our directors and officers, even though an
action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders.
Further, a stockholders investment may be adversely
affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and
damage awards against directors and officers. At present, there
is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our
directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is
sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that
may result in claims for indemnification.
103
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the director and executive compensation
arrangements discussed above in Management, we have
been a party to the following transactions since January 1,
2005, in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed
$120,000, and in which any director, executive officer or holder
of more than 5% of any class of our voting stock, or any member
of the immediate family of or entities affiliated with any of
them, had or will have a material interest.
Sales of
Series E Preferred Stock
The table below summarizes purchases of shares of our
Series E preferred stock since January 1, 2005, by our
directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of any
class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate
family of or any entities affiliated with any of the foregoing
persons. In connection with these sales, we granted the
purchasers certain registration rights with respect to their
securities. See Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights. Each outstanding share of our
preferred stock will be converted automatically into one share
of our common stock upon the completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series E
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Purchasers
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Alloy
Funds(1)
|
|
|
161,250
|
|
|
$
|
645,000
|
|
Bruce
Burrows(2)
|
|
|
394,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,579,000
|
|
Entities affiliated with EuclidSR
Funds(3)
|
|
|
211,750
|
|
|
$
|
847,000
|
|
Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte
Ltd(4)
|
|
|
4,458,282
|
|
|
$
|
16,049,815
|
|
Entities affiliated with InterWest
Funds(5)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Entities affiliated with Lehman Brothers Holdings,
Inc.(6)
|
|
|
159,749
|
|
|
$
|
638,996
|
|
Lilly
Ventures(7)
|
|
|
89,750
|
|
|
$
|
359,000
|
|
Entities affiliated with Versant
Ventures(8)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,775,531
|
|
|
$
|
21,318,811
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of 2,120 shares
purchased by Alloy Partners 2002, L.P., 78,505 shares
purchased by Alloy Ventures 2002, L.P. and 80,625 shares
purchased by Alloy Ventures 2005, L.P. Michael Hunkapiller, an
affiliate of Alloy Ventures, is a member of our Board of
Directors.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Bruce Burrows served as member of
our Board of Directors from January 3, 2000 to
January 15, 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of 105,875 shares
purchased EuclidSR Biotechnology Partners, L.P. and
105,875 shares purchased by EuclidSR Partners, L.P. Elaine
Jones, an affiliate of Euclid SR Partners, is a member of our
Board of Directors.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of shares issued to
Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd in connection
with the conversion of convertible promissory notes.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of 2,285 shares
purchased by InterWest Investors VII, L.P. and
47,715 shares purchased by InterWest Partners VII, L.P.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of 39,937 shares
purchased by Lehman Brothers Healthcare Venture Capital L.P.,
8,932 shares purchased by Lehman Brothers Offshore
Partnership Account 2000/2001, L.P., 76,440 shares
purchased by Lehman Brothers P.A., LLC, and 34,440 purchased by
Lehman Brothers Partnership Account 2001/2001, L.P. Hingge Hsu,
an affiliate of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., served as a
member of our Board of Directors at the time of the financing.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Ed Torres, an affiliate of Lilly
Ventures, served as a member of our Board of Directors at the
time of the financing.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Consists of 5,000 shares
purchased by Versant Affiliates
Fund 1-A,
L.P., 10,500 shares purchased by Versant Affiliates
Fund 1-B,
L.P., 4,500 shares purchased by Versant Side Fund I,
L.P. and 230,000 shares purchased by Versant Venture
Capital I, L.P. Sam Colella, an affiliate of Versant
Ventures, is a member of our Board of Directors.
|
Transactions
with the Singapore Government
Convertible
Note Financings
On December 18, 2003, we entered into a convertible note
purchase agreement (as amended December 17, 2004) with
Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd, or BMSIF, an
investment arm of the Singapore Economic Development Board, or
EDB. Upon execution of the agreement, BMSIF purchased a
convertible promissory note in the principal amount of
$2,000,000 at an interest rate equal to 8% per annum. The
principal and
104
interest on this note was convertible into our Series D
preferred stock at a price of $2.80 per share, which was equal
to the per share purchase price of our Series D preferred
stock sold to other investors in December 2003. This note was
converted into 832,635 shares of our Series D
preferred stock on December 15, 2005. Additionally, the
agreement provided for the issuance of up to two additional
convertible promissory notes, each in the principal amount of
$1,500,000, or a single additional convertible promissory note
in the principal amount of $3,000,000, and all at an interest
rate of 8% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, on
June 20, 2006 we issued a single note in the principal
amount of $3,000,000 to BMSIF. The principal and interest on
this note was also convertible into our Series D preferred
stock at a price of $2.80 per share. This note was converted
into 1,157,142 shares of our Series D preferred stock
on July 2, 2007.
On August 7, 2006, we entered into a second convertible
note purchase agreement with BMSIF pursuant to which BMSIF
purchased three convertible promissory notes each in the
principal amount of $5 million, for an aggregate principal
amount of $15,000,000, and each at an interest rate equal to 8%
per annum. The principal and interest on these notes was
convertible into our Series E preferred stock at a price of
$3.60 per share, which represented a 10% discount on the $4.00
per share price at which our Series E preferred stock was
sold to other investors in our Series E preferred stock
financing which occurred between June 2006 and December 2007.
The first note was issued on August 7, 2006 and was
converted into 1,460,730 shares of our Series E
preferred stock on March 31, 2007. The second note was
issued on November 20, 2006 and was converted into
1,493,607 shares of our Series E preferred stock on
March 31, 2007. The last note was issued on April 19,
2007 and was converted into 1,503,945 shares of our
Series E preferred stock on April 30, 2008. Each such
conversion was completed following the agreement of the parties
that the required milestones had been met to the parties
satisfaction or waived.
Government
Incentive Grants
In October 2005, Fluidigm Singapore entered into a letter
agreement providing for up to SG$10 million (approximately
US$7.2 million) in incentive grants from the Singapore
Economic Development Board, or EDB. The incentive grants are
payable for the period August 1, 2005 through July 31,
2010 in connection with the establishment and operation of a
research, development and manufacturing center for IFCs in
Singapore. Incentive grant payments are calculated as a portion
of qualifying expenses we incur in Singapore relating to
salaries, overhead, outsourcing and subcontracting expenses,
operating expenses and royalties paid. Fluidigm Singapore is
required to submit requests for incentive grant payments on a
quarterly basis along with reports regarding its compliance with
the development, hiring, expenditure and other conditions
through the end of the applicable quarter.
On January 11, 2006, Fluidigm Singapore and EDB entered
into a supplement to the October 2005 letter agreement. This
supplement was entered into to create a process whereby Fluidigm
Singapore and EDB would agree on new quarterly development
targets at the start of each year, Fluidigm Singapore would
submit to EDB a progress report and evidence of the achievement
of targets on a quarterly basis and the parties would resolve
any disagreements regarding the satisfaction of targets using an
established procedure and the parties would be entitled to
obtain a third party audit of our incentive grant payment
requests on a semi-annual rather than an annual basis.
Fluidigm Singapores continued eligibility for such
incentive grant payments is subject to its compliance with
increasing levels of research, development and manufacturing
activity in Singapore, including employment of specified numbers
of research scientists and engineers, its incurrence of
specified levels of research and development expenses in
Singapore over the course of each calendar year, its use of
local service providers, its manufacture in Singapore of the
products developed in Singapore and its achievement of certain
targets relating to new product development or completion of
specific manufacturing process objectives. Specifically, this
agreement requires that we must employ at least 24 research
scientists and engineers in Singapore by December 31, 2009
to remain eligible for incentive grant payments. As of
June 30, 2008, we employed 16 research scientists and
engineers involved in the research and development of our IFCs.
These required levels of research, development and manufacturing
activity in Singapore and the associated increases from one year
to the next are the result of negotiations between the parties
and are generally consistent with our business strategy for our
Singapore operations. All ownership rights in the intellectual
property developed by Fluidigm Singapore remain with Fluidigm
Singapore and no such rights are conveyed to EDB under the
agreement.
105
On February 12, 2007, Fluidigm Singapore entered into a
second letter agreement with EDB which provided for up to an
additional SG$3.7 million (approximately
US$2.7 million using a March 29, 2008 exchange rate)
in incentive grant payments. The terms and conditions of this
letter agreement are substantially the same as the October 2005
letter agreement, with the exception of the size of the
potential grant, the term of the agreement and the specific
levels of research, development and manufacturing activity
required to maintain eligibility for such grants. This letter
agreement requires that we employ at least 10 new research
scientists and engineers in Singapore by May 31, 2009, that
we employ at least 12 new research scientists and engineers in
Singapore by May 31, 2011 and that we maintain at least 12
research scientists and engineers in total until May 31,
2013 to remain eligible for incentive grant payments. The
requirements of the February 2007 agreement may only be
satisfied by personnel employed in the research and development
of IFC instrumentation. As of June 30, 2008, we employed
10 research scientists and engineers involved in the
research and development of our IFC instrumentation. The primary
focus of this grant agreement was the ongoing development and
manufacture in Singapore of instrumentation to be used with our
IFCs. This letter agreement applies to research, development and
manufacturing activity by Fluidigm Singapore in Singapore from
June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2011.
On March 27, 2008, Fluidigm Singapore entered into amended
and restated versions of our October 2005 and February 2007
letter agreements with EDB. The purpose of these amendments was
to consolidate and streamline the original agreements to
eliminate sub-categories of eligible expenditures and rely on
more general descriptions of the eligible expenditures that the
parties had been applying in practice, to consolidate certain
administrative terms and conditions of the incentive grant
payments, and to remove various forms attached to the original
letter agreements that had changed over time or were not part of
the ongoing agreement between the parties. The January 2006
supplement to the October 2005 letter agreement remains in
effect.
Loan to
Gajus Worthington
On January 20, 2004, we entered into an Employee Loan
Agreement, Secured Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement
with Mr. Worthington pursuant to which we loaned
Mr. Worthington $250,000 at an interest rate of 3.52% per
annum and the principal and interest were not due and payable
until 7 years after the date of the loan or upon the
earlier occurrence of certain events. The loan was secured by
the pledge of 833,334 shares of our common stock held by
Mr. Worthington and was otherwise non-recourse. The loan
was extended to Mr. Worthington to assist him in purchasing
a home for his personal residence in Northern California. On
April 10, 2008, Mr. Worthington repaid the loan in
full in accordance with Section 2.2(d) of the note by
selling shares of our common stock held by Mr. Worthington
to us at the fair market value of such stock on the date of such
sale, which was determined by the Board of Directors to be $3.19
per share. The note and Mr. Worthingtons loan were
repaid in full and cancelled in exchange for 90,913 shares
of our common stock which Mr. Worthington transferred to us
pursuant to the terms of a repurchase agreement dated
April 10, 2008. This loan repayment and share cancellation
transaction was approved by the Board based on its determination
that we received full and fair consideration for the
cancellation of the loan and that the cancellation of the loan
was in the best interests of our company and its stockholders.
Consulting
Agreement with Stephen Quake
In May 2006, we entered into an agreement with Stephen Quake
pursuant to which we have agreed to pay Dr. Quake $8,333
per month for providing various consulting services to us
including serving on our Scientific Advisory Board. The
agreement has a term of 10 years and is terminable by us
only for cause. At approximately the same time, we repurchased
from Dr. Quake approximately 124,000 shares of our
common stock for aggregate consideration of $69,425. In 2005 and
2006, we paid Dr. Quake $45,000 and $97,000 pursuant to a
consulting agreement that was entered into in 2000 and
terminated in 2006. Dr. Quake served as a director of
Fluidigm from its inception until December 2005 and, at the time
of these transactions, was the holder of more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock.
Engagement
of Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP
Since before 2005, the law firm of Townsend and Townsend and
Crew LLP, or Townsend, has served as our primary outside patent
counsel. William Smith, our Vice President, Legal Affairs and
General Counsel as well as our Secretary since May 2000 and a
director from May 2000 until April 7, 2008, was a partner
at Townsend from
106
1985 to April 1, 2008. Amounts paid to Townsend for
services and direct patent fees were $880,000, $960,000,
$576,000 and $180,000 for 2005, 2006, 2007, and the three months
ended March 29, 2008. Accrued amounts payable to
Townsend were $174,000, $257,000, and $175,000 as of
December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008.
Registration
Rights Agreement
Holders of our preferred stock and our co-founders are entitled
to certain registration rights with respect to the common stock
issued or issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock. See
Registration Rights under Description of
Capital Stock below for additional information.
Stock
Option Grants
Certain stock option grants to our directors and executive
officers and related option grant policies are described above
in this prospectus under the caption Management.
Employment
Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into employment arrangements with certain of our
executive officers. See Management Employment
Agreements and Offer Letters above.
We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each
of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification
agreements and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws
require us to indemnify our directors and executive officers to
the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. See
Management Limitations on Liability and
Indemnification Matters above.
Related
Party Transaction Policy
We have adopted a formal policy that our executive officers,
directors, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting
securities, and any member of the immediate family of and any
entity affiliated with any of the foregoing persons, are not
permitted to enter into a related party transaction with us
without the prior consent of our audit committee, or other
independent members of our Board in the case it is inappropriate
for our audit committee to review such transaction due to a
conflict of interest. Any request for us to enter into a
transaction with an executive officer, director, principal
stockholder, or any of their immediate family members or
affiliates, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 must
first be presented to our audit committee for review,
consideration and approval. In approving or rejecting any such
proposal, our audit committee is to consider the relevant facts
and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit
committee, including, but not limited to, whether the
transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally
available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or
similar circumstances and the extent of the related partys
interest in the transaction. All of the transactions described
above were entered into prior to the adoption of this policy.
107
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the beneficial ownership of our common stock at
April 30, 2008, as adjusted to reflect the sale of common
stock offered by us in this offering, for:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who we know beneficially owns more than five percent
of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with SEC
rules. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe,
based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and
entities named in the table below have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that
they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property
laws.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on
68,101,494 shares of common stock outstanding at
April 30, 2008. For purposes of the table below, we have
assumed
that shares
of common stock will be outstanding upon completion of this
offering, based upon an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share. In computing the
number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person
and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed to be
outstanding all shares of common stock subject to options,
warrants or other convertible securities held by that person or
entity that are currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days of April 30, 2008. We did not deem these
shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership
representing less than one percent is denoted with an
*.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner
listed in the table below is
c/o Fluidigm
Corporation, 7000 Shoreline Court, Suite 100, South
San Francisco, California 94080.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Offering
|
|
|
After the Offering
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Alloy
Funds(1)
|
|
|
3,732,679
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with EuclidSR
Funds(2)
|
|
|
4,898,996
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with the Singapore
government(3)
|
|
|
9,008,967
|
|
|
|
13.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Fidelity
Funds(4)
|
|
|
6,250,000
|
|
|
|
9.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with InterWest
Funds(5)
|
|
|
3,776,885
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Lehman
Funds(6)
|
|
|
3,693,907
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMALLCAP World Fund,
Inc.(7)
|
|
|
4,378,695
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Versant
Funds(8)
|
|
|
5,879,980
|
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Burrows
|
|
|
3,647,339
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gajus V.
Worthington(9)
|
|
|
2,836,087
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
DeLateur(10)
|
|
|
324,582
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C.
Jones(11)
|
|
|
690,000
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
%*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Y.
Lucero(12)
|
|
|
718,500
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M.
Smith(13)
|
|
|
1,117,000
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mai Chan (Grace)
Yow(14)
|
|
|
307,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel
Colella(8)
|
|
|
5,879,980
|
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
Hunkapiller(1)
|
|
|
3,732,679
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elaine V.
Jones(2)
|
|
|
4,898,996
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth
Nussbacher(15)
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
Young(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)
|
|
|
20,199,742
|
|
|
|
28.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Less than one percent.
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of 1,866,340 shares
held of record by Alloy Ventures 2005, L.P.,
1,817,272 shares held of record by Alloy Ventures 2002,
L.P., and 49,067 shares held of record by Alloy Partners
2002, L.P. Michael Hunkapiller, a member of our Board of
Directors, is a Managing Member of
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
Alloy Ventures 2005, LLC, the
General Partner of Alloy Ventures 2005, L.P. Alloy Ventures
2002, LLC is the General Partner of Alloy Ventures 2002, L.P.
and Alloy Partners 2002, L.P. The Managing Members of Alloy
Ventures 2002, LLC are Craig C. Taylor, John F. Shoch, Douglas
E. Kelly, Daniel I. Rubin and Tony Di Bona. Each of the Managing
Members of Alloy Ventures 2002, LLC is also a Managing Member of
Alloy Ventures 2005, LLC. The individuals listed herein may be
deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power over the
shares which are or may be deemed to be beneficially owned by
Alloy Ventures 2005, L.P., Alloy Ventures 2002, L.P. and Alloy
Partners 2002, L.P. Each Managing Member disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares except to extent of their pecuniary
interest therein. The address of the entities affiliated with
Alloy Ventures is 400 Hamilton Avenue, Fourth Floor, Palo Alto,
CA 94301.
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of 2,449,498 shares
held of record by EuclidSR Partners, L.P. and
2,449,498 shares held of record by EuclidSR Biotechnology
Partners, L.P. Elaine V. Jones, a member of our Board of
Directors shares voting and investment power with Graham D.S.
Anderson, Raymond J. Whitaker, Milton J. Pappas and Stephen K.
Reidy, each of whom are General Partners of EuclidSR Associates,
L.P., the General Partner of EuclidSR Partners and EuclidSR
Biotechnology Associates, L.P., the General Partner of EuclidSR
Biotechnology Partners. Each General Partner of EuclidSR
Associates, L.P. and EuclidSR Biotechnology Associates, L.P.
disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares except to the
extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The address of the
entities affiliated with EuclidSR Associates, L.P. and EuclidSR
Biotechnology Associates, L.P. is 45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite
3240, New York, NY 10111.
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of 8,233,773 shares
held of record by Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd
which includes 1,503,945 shares issued upon conversion of a
convertible promissory note, and 775,194 shares held of
record by Singapore Bio-Innovations Pte Ltd, EDB Investments Pte
Ltd. EDB Investments Pte Ltd, or EDB Investments, is the parent
entity of Biomedical Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd and
Singapore Bio-Innovations Pte Ltd. The Economic Development
Board of Singapore, or EDB, is the parent entity of EDB
Investments. EDB is a Singapore government entity. EDB
Investments, EDB and the Singapore government may be deemed to
have shared voting and dispositive power over the shares owned
beneficially and of record by Biomedical Sciences Investment
Fund Pte Ltd and Singapore Bio-Innovations Pte Ltd. The
address associated with entities affiliated with EDB is 20
Biopolis Way, #09-01 Centros, Singapore 138668.
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of 481,170 shares
held of record by Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Advisor New
Insights Fund, 4,389,865 shares held of record by Fidelity
Contrafund: Fidelity Contrafund and 1,378,965 shares held
of record by Variable Insurance Products Fund II:
Contrafund Portfolio. Each of these entities is a registered
investment fund (each, a Fund) advised by Fidelity
Management & Research Company (FMR Co.), a
registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940, as amended. The address of FMR Co., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of FMR Corp. and an investment adviser registered
under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 is
82 Devonshire Street, Boston Massachusetts 02109. Edward C.
Johnson 3d, FMR Corp., through its control of FMR Co., and each
Fund has power to dispose of the securities owned by such Fund.
Neither FMR Corp. nor Edward C. Johnson 3d, Chairman of FMR
Corp., has sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares
owned directly by each Fund, which power resides with each
Funds Board of Trustees. Each Fund is an affiliate of a
broker-dealer. Each Fund purchased the securities in the
ordinary course of business and, at the time of the purchase of
the securities, no Fund had any agreements or understandings,
directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the
securities. No Fund intends to sell, transfer, assign, pledge or
hypothecate or otherwise enter into any hedging, short sale,
derivative, put or call transaction that would result in the
effective economic disposition of the securities through an
affiliated broker-dealer.
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of 172,602 shares
held of record by InterWest Investors VII, L.P. and
3,604,283 shares held of record by InterWest Partners VII,
L.P. InterWest Management Partners VII, L.L.C. has sole voting
and investment control over the shares owned by InterWest
Partners VII, L.P. and InterWest Investors VII, L.P. Harvey B.
Cash, Philip T. Gianos, W. Scott Hedrick, W. Stephen Holmes,
Gilbert H. Kliman, Thomas L. Rosch and Arnold L. Oronsky, each
Managing Directors of InterWest Management Partners VII, LLC,
have shared voting and investment control over the shares owned
by InterWest Partners VII, L.P. and InterWest Investors VII,
L.P. Stephen C. Bowsher, Alan W. Crites, Rodney A. Ferguson and
Karen A. Wilson are Members of InterWest Management Partners
VII, L.L.C. All Managing Directors and Members disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by InterWest Partners
VII, LP and InterWest Investor VII, LP except to the extent of
their pro rata partnership interests in such shares. The address
of the entities affiliated with InterWest is 2710 Sand Hill
Road, Second Floor, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of 923,476 shares
held of record by Lehman Brothers Healthcare Venture Capital,
L.P., 206,536 shares held of record by Lehman Brothers
Offshore Partnership Account 2000/2001, L.P.,
1,767,535 shares held of record by Lehman Brothers P.A.,
LLC and 796,360 shares held of record by Lehman Brothers
Partnership Account 2000/2001, L.P. Hingge Hsu, a former member
of our Board of Directors, was formerly employed by Lehman
Brothers Inc., and now serves as a consultant of Lehman Brothers
Inc. In each of the limited partnerships referenced above,
Lehman Brothers Inc. controls the general partner of the fund.
In the limited liability company, Lehman Brothers Inc. controls
the manager of that fund. In all four funds listed above, Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc., a reporting company under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, ultimately controls the
manager and the general partners of the funds and ultimately has
voting and investment control over the shares held by such
funds. No one person controls Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. The
address of the entities affiliated with Lehman Brothers Inc. is
399 Park Avenue,
11th
Floor, New York, NY 10022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Consists of 4,378,695 shares
held of record by SMALLCAP World Fund, Inc, or SMALLCAP.
SMALLCAP is an investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940. Capital Research and Management
Company, or CRMC, an investment adviser registered under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, is the investment adviser to
SMALLCAP and has sole dispositive power over these shares.
Gordon Crawford, J. Blair Frank, Jonathan Knowles,
Brady L. Enright, Mark E. Denning and Claudia P.
Huntington are the primary portfolio counselors of CRMC. In such
capacity, CRMC Messrs. Crawford, Frank, Knowles, Enright,
Denning and Ms. Huntington may be deemed to beneficially
own the shares held by SMALLCAP. CRMC, however, each disclaims
such beneficial ownership. The address of the SMALLCAP is The
Capital Group Companies, 333, South Hope Street, Los Angeles,
California 90071.
|
(8)
|
|
Consists of 5,378,019 shares
held of record by Versant Venture Capital I, L.P.,
98,662 shares held of record by Versant Affiliates
Fund I-A,
L.P., 291,146 shares held of record by Versant Affiliates
Fund I-B,
L.P. and 112,153 shares held of record by Versant Side
Fund I, L.P. Voting and investment power over the shares
directly held by Versant Venture Capital I, L.P., Versant
Affiliates
Fund I-A,
L.P., Versant Affiliates
Fund I-B,
L.P., and Versant Side Fund I, L.P. is held by Versant
Ventures I, LLC, their sole General Partner. Samuel D.
Colella, a member of our Board of Directors is a Managing Member
of Versant Ventures I, LLC but he disclaims beneficial
ownership of these shares, except to the extent of his pecuniary
interest in such shares. The individual Managing Members of
Versant Ventures I, LLC are Brian G.
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
Atwood, Samuel D. Colella, Ross A.
Jaffe, William J. Link, Barbara N. Lubash, Donald B. Milder, and
Rebecca B. Robertson, all of whom share voting and dispositive
control. Each respective individual General Partner disclaims
beneficial ownership of these shares, except to the extent of
their pecuniary interest in such shares. The address of the
entities affiliated with Versant Ventures is 3000 Sand Hill
Road, Building Four, Suite 210, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
|
(9)
|
|
Consists of 2,341,087 shares
held of record by Gajus Worthington and Jami A. Worthington as
TTEES of the Worthington Family Trust dtd 3-6-07 and options to
purchase 495,000 shares of Common Stock that are
exercisable within 60 days of April 30, 2008, of which
254,999 shares are vested as of June 29, 2008.
|
(10)
|
|
Consists of 140,000 shares
held of record by Richard A. DeLateur and options to purchase
184,582 shares of common stock that are vested and
exercisable no later than May 29, 2008.
|
(11)
|
|
Consists of options to purchase
690,000 shares of common stock that are exercisable within
60 days of April 30, 2008 of which 323,332 shares
are vested as of February 27, 2008.
|
(12)
|
|
Consists of options to purchase
718,500 shares of common stock that are vested and
exercisable no later than June 14, 2008.
|
(13)
|
|
Consists of 300,000 shares
held of record by William M. Smith and options to purchase
817,000 shares of common stock that are exercisable within
60 days of April 30, 2008, of which 771,500 are vested
as of June 29, 2008.
|
(14)
|
|
Consists of options to purchase
307,500 shares of common stock that are exercisable within
60 days of April 30, 2008, of which 270,000 are vested
as of June 29, 2008.
|
(15)
|
|
Consists of options to purchase
137,500 shares of common stock that are exercisable within
60 days of April 30, 2008, all of which are vested as
of June 29, 2008.
|
(16)
|
|
Mr. Young disclaims beneficial
ownership of 270,000 shares as all of the shares were
subsequently transferred to his children, Diana Young, Gregory
Young and John Peter Young. As of February 27, 2008
29,167 shares of common stock are subject to a right of
repurchase at cost. The right of repurchase lapses at a rate of
approximately 2,083 shares of common stock per month.
|
110
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
The following is a summary of the rights of our common stock and
preferred stock and of certain provisions of our restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as they will be in
effect upon the completion of this offering. For more detailed
information, please see our restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is part.
Immediately following the completion of this offering, our
authorized capital stock will consist of
320,000,000 shares, all with a par value of $0.001 per
share, of which:
|
|
|
|
|
300,000,000 shares are designated as common stock; and
|
|
|
|
20,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock.
|
As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding
68,217,839 shares of common stock held of record by 248
stockholders, assuming the automatic conversion of all
outstanding shares of our preferred stock on a one-for-one basis
into 58,191,261 shares of common stock. In addition, as of
June 30, 2008, 8,297,257 shares of our common stock
were subject to outstanding options and 757,436 shares of
our capital stock were subject to outstanding warrants. No
options will expire prior to the completion of this offering.
For more information on our capitalization, see
Capitalization above.
Common
Stock
The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per
share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders. Subject
to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares
of preferred stock, holders of common stock are entitled to
receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by our Board
of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. In
the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the
holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all
assets remaining after the payment of liabilities, subject to
the prior distribution rights of preferred stock then
outstanding. Holders of common stock have no preemptive,
conversion or subscription rights. There are no redemption or
sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.
Preferred
Stock
Immediately after the completion of this offering, no shares of
preferred stock will be outstanding (assuming the automatic
conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock on a
one-for-one basis into 58,174,839 shares of common stock
immediately prior to the completion of this offering). Though we
currently have no plans to issue any shares of preferred stock,
upon the closing of this offering and the filing of our restated
certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors will have
the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to
designate and issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred
stock in one or more series. Our Board of Directors may also
designate the rights, preferences and privileges of the holders
of each such series of preferred stock, any or all of which may
be greater than or senior to those granted to the holders of
common stock. Though the actual effect of any such issuance on
the rights of the holders of common stock will not be known
until our Board of Directors determines the specific rights of
the holders of preferred stock, the potential effects of such an
issuance include:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the holders of common stock;
|
|
|
|
reducing the likelihood that holders of common stock will
receive dividend payments;
|
|
|
|
reducing the likelihood that holders of common stock will
receive payments in the event of our liquidation, dissolution,
or winding up; and
|
|
|
|
delaying, deterring or preventing a
change-in-control
or other corporate takeover.
|
111
Warrants
As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 757,436 shares of our preferred
stock, all of which will be converted into warrants to purchase
an equal number of shares of our common stock at exercise prices
ranging from $2.18 per share to $4.00 per share. These warrants
will expire at various times between July 2008 and February
2015. In the event of a distribution of dividends, a stock
split, a reorganization, a reclassification, a consolidation, or
a similar event, each warrant provides for adjustment of the
exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise.
In June 2008, the number of shares subject to a certain warrant
to purchase Series E Preferred Stock issued to Lighthouse
Capital Partners V, L.P. increased by 200,000 shares
pursuant to its terms as a result of our borrowing an additional
$10 million under our loan agreement with Lighthouse.
Potential
Issuance of Common Stock
On March 7, 2003, we entered into a Master Closing
Agreement with Oculus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and The UAB Research
Foundation, or UAB, related to certain intellectual property and
technology rights licensed by us from UAB. Pursuant to the
agreement, we are obligated to issue UAB shares of our common
stock with a value equal to approximately $1,500,000 upon the
achievement of a certain milestone and based upon the fair
market value of our common stock at the time the milestone is
achieved. We currently do not anticipate achieving this
milestone in the foreseeable future and do not anticipate
issuing these shares. The potential issuance discussed above is
not reflected in the number of shares of common stock
outstanding in this prospectus.
Registration
Rights
As of April 30, 2008, the holders of an aggregate of
63,541,524 shares of our common stock, which includes
58,174,839 shares of common stock issued on conversion of
outstanding preferred stock and 598,720 shares of common
stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and conversion of
preferred stock underlying such warrants, are entitled to the
following rights with respect to the registration of such shares
for public resale under the Securities Act, pursuant to an
investor rights agreement by and among us and certain of our
stockholders. In addition, the aggregate number above includes
an additional 4,767,965 shares of common stock entitled to
the rights described below, in the section titled
Piggyback Registration Rights. We refer to these
shares collectively as registrable securities.
The registration of shares of common stock as a result of the
following rights being exercised would enable the holders to
trade these shares without restriction under the Securities Act
when the applicable registration statement is declared
effective. Ordinarily, we will be required to pay all expenses,
other than underwriting discounts and commissions, related to
any registration effected pursuant to the exercise of these
registration rights.
The registration rights terminate upon the earlier of five years
after completion of this offering, or, with respect to the
registration rights of an individual holder, when the holder of
one percent or less of our outstanding common stock can sell all
of such holders registrable securities in any three-month
period without registration, in compliance with Rule 144 of
the Securities Act or another similar exemption.
Demand
Registration Rights
If at any time after this offering the holders of at least a
majority of the registrable securities request in writing that
we effect a registration that has a reasonably anticipated
aggregate price to the public in excess of $20,000,000, we may
be required to register their shares. At most, we are obligated
to effect two registrations for the holders of registrable
securities in response to these demand registration rights.
Depending on certain conditions, however, we may defer such
registration for up to 90 days. If the holders requesting
registration intend to distribute their shares by means of an
underwriting, the managing underwriter of such offering will
have the right to limit the number of shares to be underwritten
for reasons related to the marketing of the shares.
112
Piggyback
Registration Rights
If at any time after this offering we propose to register any
shares of our common stock under the Securities Act, subject to
certain exceptions, the holders of registrable securities will
be entitled to notice of the registration and to include their
shares of registrable securities in the registration. If our
proposed registration involves an underwriting, the managing
underwriter of such offering will have the right to limit the
number of shares to be underwritten for reasons related to the
marketing of the shares.
Form S-3
Registration Rights
If at any time after we become entitled under the Securities Act
to register our shares on
Form S-3
a holder of registrable securities requests in writing that we
register their shares for public resale on
Form S-3
and the reasonably anticipated price to the public of the
offering exceeds $2,000,000, we will be required to use our best
efforts to effect such registration; provided, however, that if
such registration would be seriously detrimental to us or our
stockholders, we may defer the registration for up to
90 days.
Voting
Rights
Under the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation to become effective upon completion of this
offering, holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote
for each share of common stock held by such holder on any matter
submitted to a vote at a meeting of stockholders. In addition,
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that certain corporate actions require the approval of our
stockholders. These actions, and the vote required, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the removal of a director requires the vote of a majority of the
voting power of our issued and outstanding capital stock
entitled to vote in the election of directors; and
|
|
|
|
the amendment of provisions of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation relating to blank check preferred
stock, the classification of our directors, the removal of
directors, the filling of vacancies on our Board of Directors,
cumulative voting, annual and special meetings of our
stockholders and the amendment of certain provisions of our
restated certificate of incorporation require the vote of 66
2/3% of our then outstanding voting securities.
|
Anti
Takeover Effects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws
Certain provisions of Delaware law and our restated certificate
of incorporation and bylaws that will become effective upon
completion of this offering contain provisions that could have
the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging another party
from acquiring control of us. These provisions, which are
summarized below, are expected to discourage certain types of
coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These
provisions are also designed in part to encourage anyone seeking
to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our Board of
Directors. We believe that the advantages gained by protecting
our ability to negotiate with any unsolicited and potentially
unfriendly acquirer outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging
such proposals, including those priced above the then-current
market value of our common stock, because, among other reasons,
the negotiation of such proposals could improve their terms.
Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
to become effective upon completion of this offering include
provisions that:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize our Board of Directors to issue, without further
action by the stockholders, up to 20,000,000 shares of
undesignated preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be
effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by
written consent;
|
|
|
|
specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called
only by our Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board, the
Chief Executive Officer or the President;
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals
to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders,
including proposed nominations of persons for election to our
Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
provide that directors may be removed only for cause;
|
|
|
|
provide that vacancies on our Board of Directors may be filled
only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less
than a quorum;
|
|
|
|
establish that our Board of Directors is divided into three
classes, Class I, Class II, and Class III, with
each class serving staggered terms;
|
|
|
|
specify that no stockholder is permitted to cumulate votes at
any election of the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
require a super-majority of votes to amend certain of the
above-mentioned provisions.
|
Delaware
Anti-Takeover Statute
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers.
In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly-held Delaware
corporation from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a
business combination with an interested stockholder for a period
of three years following the date the person became an
interested stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the date of the transaction, the Board of Directors of
the corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding, but not for determining the outstanding voting
stock owned by the interested stockholder, (1) shares owned
by persons who are directors and also officers, and
(2) shares owned by employee stock plans in which employee
participants do not have the right to determine confidentially
whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a
tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
at or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business
combination is approved by the Board of Directors of the
corporation and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative
vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or
stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial
benefit to the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder
is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns
or, within three years prior to the determination of interested
stockholder status, did own 15% or more of a corporations
outstanding voting stock. We expect the existence of this
provision to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions our Board of Directors does not approve in advance.
We also anticipate that Section 203 may discourage
business combinations or other attempts that might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares of common stock
held by our stockholders.
The provisions of Delaware law and our restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws to become effective upon completion of
this offering could have the effect of discouraging others from
attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may
also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our
common stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile
takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of
preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these
provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish
transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their
best interests.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. The transfer agents
address is 250 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021, and its
telephone number is (781) 575-2900.
NASDAQ
Global Market Listing
We have applied to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol FLDM.
114
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Before this offering, there has not been a public market for
shares of our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts
of shares of our common stock, including shares issued upon the
exercise of outstanding options, in the public market after this
offering, or the possibility of these sales occurring, could
cause the prevailing market price for our common stock to fall
or impair our ability to raise equity capital in the future.
Upon the completion of this offering, a total
of shares
of common stock will be outstanding, assuming that there are no
exercises of options or warrants after April 30, 2008. Of
these shares,
all shares
of common stock sold in this offering by us, plus any shares
sold upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option, will be freely tradable in the public market without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act,
unless these shares are held by affiliates, as that
term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The remaining 68,101,494 shares of common stock will be
restricted securities, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. These restricted
securities are eligible for public sale only if they are
registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an
exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 under
the Securities Act, which are summarized below.
Subject to the lock up agreements described below and the
provisions of Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act,
these restricted securities will be available for sale in the
public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Date
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
On the date of this prospectus
|
|
|
0
|
|
Between 90 and 180 days after the date of this prospectus
|
|
|
0
|
|
At various times beginning more than 180 days after the
date of this prospectus
|
|
|
68,101,494
|
|
In addition, of the 9,395,448 shares of our common stock
that were subject to stock options outstanding as of
April 30, 2008, options to purchase 4,384,570 shares
of common stock were vested as of April 30, 2008 and will
be eligible for sale 180 days following the effective date
of this offering.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, once we
have been subject to public company reporting requirements for
at least 90 days, a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any
time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who has
beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least
six months, including the holding period of any prior owner
other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell those shares
without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or
notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with
the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a
person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for
at least one year, including the holding period of any prior
owner other than our affiliates, then that person is entitled to
sell those shares without complying with any of the requirements
of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our
affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates
are entitled to sell upon expiration of the
lock-up
agreements described above, within any three-month period
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a
number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding,
which will equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on
Form 144 with respect to that sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling
shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
115
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 as currently in effect, any of
our employees, consultants or advisors who purchase shares from
us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or
other written agreement in a transaction before the effective
date of this offering that was completed in reliance on
Rule 701 and complied with the requirements of
Rule 701 will, subject to the lock up restrictions
described below, be eligible to resell such shares 90 days
after the effective date of this offering in reliance on
Rule 144, but without compliance with certain restrictions,
including the holding period, contained in Rule 144.
Lock Up
Agreements
We and all of our directors and officers, as well as the other
holders of substantially all shares of common stock outstanding
immediately prior to this offering, have agreed that, without
the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will
not, during the period ending 180 days after the date of
this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of our common stock,
|
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of shares of our common stock or such other securities,
in cash or otherwise. This agreement is subject to certain
exceptions, and is also subject to extension for up to an
additional days, as set forth in Underwriters.
Registration
Rights
Upon completion of this offering, the holders of
63,541,524 shares of common stock or their transferees will
be entitled to various rights with respect to the registration
of these shares under the Securities Act. Registration of these
shares under the Securities Act would result in these shares
becoming fully tradable without restriction under the Securities
Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration,
except for shares purchased by affiliates. See Description
of Capital Stock Registration Rights for
additional information.
Registration
Statements
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of common
stock subject to options outstanding or reserved for issuance
under our stock plans. We expect to file this registration
statement as soon as practicable after this offering. In
addition, we intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act for the resale of shares of common
stock issued upon the exercise of options that were not granted
under Rule 701. We expect to file this registration
statement as soon as practicable after this offering. However,
none of the shares registered on
Form S-8
will be eligible for resale until the expiration of the lock up
agreements to which they are subject.
116
MATERIAL
U. S. FEDERAL INCOME AND ESTATE TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U. S. HOLDERS
The following is a general discussion of certain material United
States federal income and estate tax considerations with respect
to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares of our
common stock applicable to
non-U.S. holders.
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
is any holder other than:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States
for United States federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or
the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is includible in gross income for
United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (a) a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more United States persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (b) it
has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury
regulations to be treated as a United States person.
|
This discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code, final, temporary or proposed Treasury regulations
promulgated thereunder, judicial opinions, published positions
of the Internal Revenue Service and all other applicable
authorities, all of which are subject to change (possibly with
retroactive effect). We assume in this discussion that a
non-U.S. holder
holds shares of our common stock as a capital asset (generally
property held for investment).
This discussion does not address all aspects of United States
federal income and estate taxation that may be important to a
particular
non-U.S. holder
in light of that
non-U.S. holders
individual circumstances, nor does it address any aspects of
United States state or local taxes or
non-U.S. taxes.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or
circumstances that may apply to a
non-U.S. holder
subject to special treatment under the United States
federal income tax laws, including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
partnerships or other pass-through entities or persons that hold
shares of our common stock through such entities;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
tax-qualified retirement plans;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method
of accounting for their securities holdings;
|
|
|
|
United States expatriates; and
|
|
|
|
persons that will hold common stock as a position in a hedging
transaction, straddle or conversion
transaction for tax purposes.
|
Accordingly, we urge prospective investors to consult with their
own tax advisors regarding the United States federal, state and
local income and
non-U.S. income
and other tax considerations of acquiring, holding and disposing
of shares of our common stock.
If a partnership or other pass-through entity holds shares of
our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such
partnership or an owner of such other pass-through entity will
generally depend upon the status of such partner or other owner
and the activities of such partnership or other entity. Any
partnership or other pass-through entity that holds shares of
our common stock or any partner in such partnership or owner of
such other entity should consult its own tax advisors.
117
Dividends
If we make cash or other property distributions on our common
stock, such distributions will constitute dividends for United
States federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our
current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
United States federal income tax principles. To the extent those
distributions exceed both our current and our accumulated
earnings and profits, such excess will constitute a return of
capital and will first reduce the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in our common stock, but not below zero. Any
remaining excess will be treated as gain from the sale or other
disposition of shares of our common stock (as described under
Gain on Sale or Other Disposition of Common
Stock below).
In general, dividends we pay, if any, to a
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to United States withholding tax at a rate of
30% of the gross amount. The withholding tax might not apply or
might apply at a reduced rate under the terms of an applicable
income tax treaty between the United States and the
non-U.S. holders
country of residence. A
non-U.S. holder
must demonstrate its entitlement to treaty benefits by
certifying, among other things, its nonresident status. A
non-U.S. holder
generally can meet this certification requirement by providing
an Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
or appropriate substitute form to us or our paying agent. Also,
special rules apply if the dividends are effectively connected
with a trade or business carried on by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States and, if a treaty applies, are
attributable to a permanent establishment of the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States. Dividends effectively connected with
this United States trade or business, and, if a treaty applies,
attributable to such a permanent establishment of a
non-U.S. holder,
generally will not be subject to United States withholding tax
if the
non-U.S. holder
files certain forms, including Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8ECI
(or any successor form), with the payor of the dividend, and
generally will be subject to United States federal income tax on
a net income basis, in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a resident of the United States. A
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may be subject to an additional
branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or a reduced
rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty) on
the repatriation from the United States of its effectively
connected earnings and profits, subject to certain
adjustments. A
non-U.S. holder
of shares of our common stock eligible for a reduced rate of
United States withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty
may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely
filing an appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue
Service.
Gain on
Sale or Other Disposition of Common Stock
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to United States federal income tax on any
gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of the
holders shares of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business
carried on by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States and, if required by an applicable
income tax treaty as a condition to subjecting a
non-U.S. holder
to United States income tax on a net basis, the gain is
attributable to a permanent establishment of the
non-U.S. holder
maintained in the United States, in which case a
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to United States federal income tax on any gain
realized upon the sale or other disposition on a net income
basis, in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a resident of the United States. Furthermore, the branch
profits tax discussed above may also apply if the
non-U.S. holder
is a corporation;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual and is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and
certain other tests are met, in which case a
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to a flat 30% tax on any gain realized upon the
sale or other disposition, which tax may be offset by United
States source capital losses (even though the individual is not
considered a resident of the United States); or
|
|
|
|
we are or have been a United States real property holding
corporation (a USRPHC) for United States federal income tax
purposes at any time within the shorter of the five-year period
preceding the disposition and the
non-U.S. holders
holding period. We do not believe that we are or have been a
USRPHC, and we do not anticipate becoming a USRPHC. If we have
been in the past or were to become a USRPHC at any time during
this period, generally gains realized upon a disposition of
shares of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
that did not directly or indirectly own more than 5% of our
common stock during this period would not be subject to United
States federal income tax, provided that our common stock is
regularly traded on an established securities market
(within the meaning of Section 897(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code). Our common stock will be treated as regularly
traded on an established securities market during any period in
which it is listed on a registered national securities exchange
or any over-the-counter market.
|
118
United
States Federal Estate Tax
Shares of our common stock that are owned or treated as owned by
an individual who is not a citizen or resident (as defined for
United States federal estate tax purposes) of the United States
at the time of death will be includible in the individuals
gross estate for United States federal estate tax purposes,
unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise, and
therefore may be subject to United States federal estate tax.
Backup
Withholding, Information Reporting and Other Reporting
Requirements
Generally, we must report annually to the Internal Revenue
Service and to each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of dividends paid to, and the tax withheld with
respect to, each
non-U.S. holder.
These reporting requirements apply regardless of whether
withholding was reduced or eliminated by an applicable tax
treaty. Copies of this information also may be made available
under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement with the
tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides or is established.
United States backup withholding tax is imposed (at a current
rate of 28%) on certain payments to persons that fail to furnish
the information required under the United States information
reporting requirements. A
non-U.S. holder
of shares of our common stock will be subject to this backup
withholding tax on dividends we pay unless the holder certifies,
under penalties of perjury, among other things, its status as a
non-U.S. holder
(and we or our paying agent do not have actual knowledge or
reason to know the holder is a United States person) or
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Under the Treasury regulations, the payment of proceeds from the
disposition of shares of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
made to or through a United States office of a broker generally
will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding
unless the beneficial owner certifies, under penalties of
perjury, among other things, its status as a
non-U.S. holder
(and we or our paying agent do not have actual knowledge or
reason to know the holder is a United States person) or
otherwise establishes an exemption. The payment of proceeds from
the disposition of shares of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
made to or through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker generally will not be subject to backup withholding
and information reporting, except as noted below. In the case of
proceeds from a disposition of shares of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
made to or through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker that is:
|
|
|
|
|
a United States person;
|
|
|
|
a controlled foreign corporation for United States
federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income from certain
periods is effectively connected with a United States trade or
business; or
|
|
|
|
a foreign partnership if at any time during its tax year
(a) one or more of its partners are United States persons
who, in the aggregate, hold more than 50% of the income or
capital interests of the partnership or (b) the foreign
partnership is engaged in a United States trade or business;
|
information reporting (but not backup withholding) will apply
unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the
owner is a
non-U.S. holder
and certain other conditions are satisfied, or the beneficial
owner otherwise establishes an exemption (and the broker has no
actual knowledge or reason to know to the contrary).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
non-U.S. holder
may generally be refunded or credited against the
non-U.S. holders
United States federal income tax liability, if any, provided
that the required information is furnished to the Internal
Revenue Service in a timely manner.
EACH PROSPECTIVE HOLDER OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK SHOULD
CONSULT HIS, HER OR ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE
UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES AND
NON-U.S. TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF
OUR COMMON STOCK.
119
UNDERWRITERS
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the
underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated is acting as the representative, have severally
agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to them,
severally, the number of shares indicated in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Leerink Swann LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject
to their acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior
sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations
of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of
the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are
subject to the approval of certain legal matters by their
counsel and to certain other conditions. The underwriters are
obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of common stock
offered by this prospectus if any such shares are taken.
However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for
the shares covered by the underwriters over-allotment
option described below.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares
of common stock directly to the public at the offering price
listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to certain
dealers at a price that represents a concession not in excess of
$ per share under the public offering price. After
the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering
price and other selling terms may from time to time be varied by
the representative.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
an aggregate
of additional
shares of common stock at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts
and commissions. The underwriters may exercise this option
solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made
in connection with the offering of the shares of common stock
offered by this prospectus. To the extent the option is
exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to
certain conditions, to purchase approximately the same
percentage of the additional shares of common stock as the
number listed next to the underwriters name in the
preceding table bears to the total number of shares of common
stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the
preceding table.
The following table shows the per share and total public
offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions and
proceeds before expenses to us. These amounts are shown assuming
both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters
option to purchase up to an
additional shares
of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
No exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated offering expenses payable by us, exclusive of the
underwriting discounts and commissions are approximately
$ .
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales
to discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total
number of shares of common stock offered by them.
We have applied to have the common stock listed on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol FLDM.
120
We and all directors, officers and substantially all of our
other security holders have agreed that, without the prior
written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, during the
period ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend, or
otherwise transfer or dispose of directly or indirectly, any
shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of the common stock; or
|
|
|
|
in our case only, file or cause to be filed a registration
statement, including any amendments with respect to the
registration statement of any shares of common stock or
securities convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into our
common stock or any other securities of the company (other than
any registration statement on
Form S-8),
|
whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or
otherwise. In addition, each such person agrees that, without
the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, they will not,
during the period ending 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, make any demand for, or exercise any right with
respect to, the registration of any shares of common stock or
any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
common stock.
Subject to certain restrictions, the restrictions described in
the immediately preceding paragraph do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares to the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
transactions relating to shares of common stock or other
securities acquired in open market transactions after the
completion of this offering, provided that no filing under
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, shall be required or shall be voluntarily made in
connection with subsequent sales of common stock or other
securities acquired in such open market transactions;
|
|
|
|
the exercise of any options to acquire common stock or
conversion of any convertible security into common stock;
|
|
|
|
transfers of shares of common stock or any security convertible
into common stock as a bona fide gift;
|
|
|
|
distributions of shares of common stock or any security
convertible into common stock to limited partners, members or
stockholders of the transferor;
|
|
|
|
transfers of shares of common stock or any security convertible
into common stock by will or intestacy to the transferors
immediate family or to a trust, the beneficiaries of which are
members of the transferors immediate family; or
|
|
|
|
the establishment of a trading plan pursuant to
Rule 10b5-1
under the Exchange Act for the transfer of shares of common
stock, provided that such plan does not provide for the transfer
of common stock during the restricted period.
|
The 180-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the
180-day
restricted period, we issue a release regarding earnings or
regarding material news or events relating to us; or
|
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
period,
|
in which case, the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event, unless such
extension is waived, in writing, by Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters.
121
In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the
underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain
or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically,
the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to
purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short
position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no
greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the
underwriters under the over-allotment option. The underwriters
can close out a covered short sale by exercising the
over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open market.
In determining the source of shares to close out a covered short
sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the
open market price of shares compared to the price available
under the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also sell
shares in excess of the over-allotment option, creating a naked
short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short
position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the common stock in the open market after pricing that could
adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. As an
additional means of facilitating the offering, the underwriters
may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open
market. Finally, the underwriting syndicate may reclaim selling
concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for
distributing the common stock in the offering, if the syndicate
repurchases previously distributed common stock to cover
syndicate short positions or to stabilize the price of the
common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market
price of the common stock above independent market levels or
prevent or retard a decline in the market price of the common
stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these
activities, and may end any of these activities at any time.
We and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on
websites maintained by one or more underwriters participating in
this offering. Other than the prospectus in electronic format,
the information on the underwriters websites is not part
of this prospectus. The underwriters may agree to allocate a
number of shares of common stock to underwriters for sale to
their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions
will be allocated by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same
basis as other allocations.
European
Economic Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, each underwriter
has represented and agreed that with effect from and including
the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in
that Member State it has not made and will not make an offer of
the common stock to the public in that Member State, except that
it may, with effect from and including such date, make an offer
of the common stock to the public in that Member State:
|
|
|
|
|
at any time to legal entities which are authorized or regulated
to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities;
|
|
|
|
at any time to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts; or
|
|
|
|
at any time in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by us of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of
the Prospectus Directive.
|
For the purposes of the above, the expression an offer of
the common stock to the public in relation to any shares
of common stock in any Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the common stock to be offered so as to enable
an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe shares of common
stock, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any
measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member
State, and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
that Member State.
122
United
Kingdom
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that it has only
communicated or caused to be communicated and will only
communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or
inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning
of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000) in connection with the issue or sale of shares of
common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of
such Act does not apply to us and it has complied and will
comply with all applicable provisions of such Act with respect
to anything done by it in relation to any shares of common stock
in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
Other
Relationships
In October 2007, we sold shares of our Series E preferred
stock in a private placement transaction. Leerink Swann LLC
acted as the placement agent in the October 2007 offering and
received a fee of $1,000,000 for services rendered. Entities
affiliated with Leerink Swann LLC also participated in the
October 2007 offering and purchased an aggregate of
141,250 shares of our Series E preferred stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $565,000. One or more of the
underwriters may in the future provide investment banking
services to us for which they would receive customary
compensation.
Pricing
of the Offering
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price will be
determined by negotiations between us and the underwriters.
Among the factors to be considered in determining the initial
public offering price are:
|
|
|
|
|
our future prospects and those of our industry in general;
|
|
|
|
our sales, earnings and certain other financial and operating
information in recent periods; and
|
|
|
|
the price-earnings ratios, price-sales ratios and market prices
of securities and certain financial and operating information of
companies engaged in activities similar to ours.
|
An active trading market for the shares may not develop. It is
also possible that after the offering the shares will not trade
in the public market at or above the initial public offering
price.
123
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will
be passed upon for us by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto, California.
Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, California is acting
as counsel to the underwriters. Members of Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation and investment
funds associated with that firm hold 160,956 shares of our
common stock.
EXPERTS
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm, has audited our consolidated financial statements at
December 31, 2006 and December 29, 2007, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 29, 2007,
as set forth in their report. We have included our consolidated
financial statements in the prospectus and elsewhere in the
registration statement in reliance on Ernst & Young
LLPs report, given on their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common
stock offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes a part
of the registration statement, does not contain all of the
information set forth in the registration statement or the
exhibits and schedules filed therewith. For further information
about us and the common stock offered hereby, we refer you to
the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed
thereto. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the
contents of any contract or any other document that is filed as
an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily
complete, and each such statement is qualified in all respects
by reference to the full text of such contract or other document
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Upon
completion of this offering, we will be required to file
periodic reports, proxy statements, and other information with
the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may
read and copy this information at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC, 100 F. Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the public reference rooms by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains
reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers,
like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of
that site is www.sec.gov.
We intend to provide our stockholders with annual reports
containing financial statements that have been audited by an
independent registered public accounting firm, and to file with
the SEC quarterly reports containing unaudited financial data
for the first three quarters of each year.
124
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Fluidigm Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Fluidigm Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and
December 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, convertible preferred stock and
stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of
the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29,
2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Fluidigm Corporation at December 31,
2006 and December 29, 2007, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal
years in the period ended December 29, 2007, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, Fluidigm Corporation changed its method of
accounting for preferred stock warrants as of July 1, 2005,
its method of accounting for stock-based compensation as of
January 1, 2006, and its method of accounting for uncertain
tax positions as of January 1, 2007.
Palo Alto, California
April 12, 2008
F-2
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,018
|
|
|
$
|
34,077
|
|
|
$
|
29,231
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $3, $0 and $0;
includes accounts receivable from related parties of $272, $690
and $481, respectively)
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
5,498
|
|
|
|
6,457
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
31,089
|
|
|
|
50,329
|
|
|
|
42,788
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
3,056
|
|
Other assets (includes receivables from related parties of $277,
$287 and $290, respectively)
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
36,493
|
|
|
$
|
54,776
|
|
|
$
|
47,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable (includes accounts payable to related parties
of $174, $290 and $183, respectively)
|
|
$
|
1,188
|
|
|
$
|
2,725
|
|
|
$
|
2,912
|
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
Deferred revenue, current portion (includes deferred revenue
from related parties of $227, $276 and $260, respectively)
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
Long-term debt, current portion
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
Convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,150
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
12,937
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion (includes deferred
revenue from related parties of $493, $359 and $306,
respectively)
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
9,362
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
Convertible promissory notes from related parties
|
|
|
13,072
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
30,370
|
|
|
|
23,025
|
|
|
|
22,177
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock issuable in series, $0.001 par
value: 52,438, 61,798 and 61,798 shares authorized, 43,284,
56,671 and 56,671 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively; aggregate liquidation
preference of $165,169 as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
112,295
|
|
|
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
162,082
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 77,857, 87,386 and
87,386 shares authorized, 9,498, 9,901 and
9,928 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31,
2006, December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
3,592
|
|
|
|
3,824
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(108,272
|
)
|
|
|
(133,798
|
)
|
|
|
(140,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(106,172
|
)
|
|
|
(130,331
|
)
|
|
|
(136,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and
stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
36,493
|
|
|
$
|
54,776
|
|
|
$
|
47,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue (includes product revenue from related parties
of $205, $241, $15, $0 and $19, respectively)
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Grant revenue (includes grant revenue from related parties of
$0, $879, $1,758, $463 and $401, respectively)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
4,764
|
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
Research and development (includes research and development
expenses from related parties of $45, $97, $67, $25 and $50,
respectively)
|
|
|
11,449
|
|
|
|
15,589
|
|
|
|
14,389
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (includes selling, general
and administrative expense from related parties of $880, $960,
$576, $208 and $180, respectively)
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
|
|
9,699
|
|
|
|
12,898
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
24,168
|
|
|
|
28,061
|
|
|
|
30,801
|
|
|
|
7,078
|
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(16,494
|
)
|
|
|
(21,663
|
)
|
|
|
(23,526
|
)
|
|
|
(5,510
|
)
|
|
|
(6,523
|
)
|
Interest expense (includes interest to related parties of $160,
$445, $1,286, $806 and $152)
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(25,346
|
)
|
|
|
(6,334
|
)
|
|
|
(6,589
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
|
(6,613
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, basic and
diluted
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock,
basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
9,316
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
9,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2005
|
|
|
32,845
|
|
|
$
|
76,596
|
|
|
|
|
8,929
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65,471
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash
and for vesting of stock options that were exercised early
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock for cash
at $2.80 per share, net of issuance costs of $11
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
|
10,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Issuance of convertible preferred stock warrants in connection
with financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock upon
conversion of promissory note at $2.80 per share
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of convertible preferred stock warrants to
liabilities upon adoption of FSP
150-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,473
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
37,267
|
|
|
|
88,966
|
|
|
|
|
9,179
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(84,719
|
)
|
|
|
(83,154
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash
and for vesting of stock options that were exercised early
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock at $2.80
per share upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series E convertible preferred stock for cash
at $4.00 per share, net of issuance costs of $133
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
22,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock at $2.80
per share under license agreement, net of issuance costs of $3
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature for convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
43,284
|
|
|
|
112,295
|
|
|
|
|
9,498
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(108,272
|
)
|
|
|
(106,172
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash
and for vesting of stock options that were exercised early
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Issuance of Series E convertible preferred stock for cash
at $4.00 per share, net of issuance costs of $1,189
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
35,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
Issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock upon
conversion of promissory note at $2.80 per share
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
3,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series E convertible preferred stock upon
conversion of promissory notes at $3.60 per share
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature for convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 (carried forward)
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
$
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
|
9,901
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
3,592
|
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(133,798
|
)
|
|
$
|
(130,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders Equity (Deficit) (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 (brought forward)
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
$
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
|
9,901
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
3,592
|
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(133,798
|
)
|
|
$
|
(130,331
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash
and for vesting of stock options that were exercised early
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net loss (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 29, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
$
|
162,082
|
|
|
|
|
9,928
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
3,824
|
|
|
$
|
(344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(140,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(136,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,613
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
1,643
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of convertible preferred stock warrants
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
Loss on retirement of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of convertible preferred stock under license agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
|
(2,460
|
)
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(1,552
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(14,292
|
)
|
|
|
(22,306
|
)
|
|
|
(21,759
|
)
|
|
|
(5,664
|
)
|
|
|
(7,752
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
(6,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
|
|
(973
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
6,838
|
|
|
|
(2,943
|
)
|
|
|
(6,740
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
14,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,745
|
)
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,503
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(1,776
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible preferred stock, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
10,042
|
|
|
|
22,003
|
|
|
|
35,911
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
22,994
|
|
|
|
31,124
|
|
|
|
37,555
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
(1,762
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,538
|
|
|
|
5,856
|
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
(4,518
|
)
|
|
|
(4,846
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of period
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
|
|
25,018
|
|
|
|
25,018
|
|
|
|
34,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of period
|
|
$
|
19,162
|
|
|
$
|
25,018
|
|
|
$
|
34,077
|
|
|
$
|
20,500
|
|
|
$
|
29,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
1,826
|
|
|
$
|
1,523
|
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of convertible promissory notes into convertible
preferred stock
|
|
$
|
2,328
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,876
|
|
|
$
|
10,636
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashless net exercise of convertible preferred stock warrants
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants in connection with long-term debt
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of convertible preferred stock under license agreement
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-7
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Fluidigm Corporation (the Company) was incorporated in the state
of California on May 19, 1999, to commercialize
microfluidic technology initially developed at the California
Institute of Technology. In July 2007, the Company was
reincorporated in Delaware. The Companys headquarters are
located in South San Francisco, California.
The Company develops, manufactures and markets proprietary
Integrated Fluidic Circuit systems that significantly improve
the productivity of life science research. The Companys
Integrated Fluidic Circuits (IFCs), enable the simultaneous
performance of thousands of biochemical measurements in
extremely minute volumes. The Company created this
integrated circuit for biology by miniaturizing,
integrating and automating sophisticated liquid handling
processes on a single microfabricated device. The Companys
customers include many leading biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies, academic institutions, and life science laboratories
worldwide.
The Company has incurred significant net losses since inception.
As of March 29, 2008, the Company had an accumulated
deficit of approximately $140.4 million and cash, cash
equivalents and available-for-sale securities of approximately
$31.2 million. The Company expects to incur significant
expenses to fund operations to develop new products and to
support existing product sales. Failure to generate sufficient
revenues, achieve planned gross margins, control operating
costs, or to raise sufficient additional funds may require the
Company to modify, delay, or abandon some of its future
expansion or expenditures, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, operating results,
financial condition, and ability to achieve its intended
business objectives.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation and Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been
prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company has wholly owned
subsidiaries in Singapore, the Netherlands, Japan, and France.
All subsidiaries, except for Singapore, use their local currency
as their functional currency. The Singapore subsidiary uses the
U.S. dollar as its functional currency. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal
Year
During 2007, the Company adopted a 52 or 53 week year
convention for its fiscal years and, therefore, the 2007 fiscal
year ended on December 29, 2007 and the first quarterly
periods of 2007 and 2008 ended on March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008. Future fiscal years will end on the last
Saturday in December of each respective year. Prior to 2007, the
Company used a calendar year. The fiscal years presented in
these consolidated financial statements ended on
December 31, 2005, December 31, 2006 and
December 29, 2007.
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of
March 29, 2008, the interim consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 and the interim
consolidated statements of convertible preferred stock and
stockholders equity (deficit) for the three months ended
March 29, 2008 are unaudited. The unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and, in
the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which
include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present
fairly the Companys financial position as of
March 29, 2008 and its results of operations and its cash
flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008. The financial data and the other financial
information disclosed in these notes to the consolidated
financial statements related to the three months periods are
unaudited. The results of operations
F-8
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
for the three months ended March 29, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for 2008 or
any other interim period or for any other future year.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. The Company regularly assesses these
estimates which affect the fair value of undelivered elements
for revenue recognition purposes, the valuation of accounts
receivable, the valuation of inventories, accrued liabilities,
the fair value of the Companys convertible preferred stock
and common stock, warrants, stock-based compensation, beneficial
conversion features, and valuation allowances associated with
deferred tax assets. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions believed
to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
Foreign
Currency
Assets and liabilities of
non-U.S. subsidiaries
that use the local currency as their functional currency are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at
the balance sheet date, with the resulting translation
adjustments recorded to a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders
equity. Income and expense accounts are translated at average
exchange rates during the year. Foreign currency transaction
gains and losses for
non-U.S. subsidiaries
that use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency are
recognized in other income (expense), net. The Company had net
foreign currency transaction losses of $27,000 and $70,000
during 2005 and 2006, respectively, and net foreign currency
transaction gains of $72,000, $23,000 and $308,000 during 2007
and the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid financial instruments
with maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less
to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of
cash on deposit with banks, money market funds, commercial
paper, corporate notes, and notes from government-sponsored
agencies.
Available-for-Sale
Securities
Available-for-sale securities are comprised of corporate notes
and notes from government-sponsored agencies. Investments
classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at
estimated fair value, as determined by quoted market rates, on
the consolidated balance sheets with any unrealized gains and
losses reported in stockholders equity as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains
and losses and declines in the fair value of available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are deemed to be other
than temporary are reflected in interest income. No
other than temporary unrealized losses have been
incurred to date and realized gains and losses were immaterial
during the years presented. The cost of securities sold is based
on the specific-identification method.
Restricted
Cash
The Company had restricted cash balances of $900,000, $881,000
and $381,000 as of December 31, 2006, December 29,
2007 and March 29, 2008, respectively. Included in
restricted cash is cash amounts that collateralize the
Companys standby letters of credit issued under operating
lease agreements for office facilities that it currently
occupies.
F-9
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
As of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, the respective carrying values of the
Companys financial instruments, including accounts
receivable, restricted cash, and accounts payable, approximated
their fair values due to their short period of time to maturity
or repayment. Based on borrowing rates currently available to
the Company for loans with similar terms, the carrying value of
long-term debt and convertible promissory notes approximated
their fair values.
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement
(SFAS 157), clarifies that fair value is an exit price,
representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants. As such, fair value is a
market-based measurement that should be determined based on
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions,
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
(Level I) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active
markets; (Level II) inputs other than the quoted prices in
active markets that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and (Level III) unobservable inputs in which there
is little or no market data, which requires the Company to
develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company
to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize
the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a
recurring basis, the Company measures its cash equivalents and
available-for-sale securities at fair value.
All of the Companys cash equivalents and
available-for-sale securities are classified within Level I or
Level II of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued
using quoted market prices, market prices for similar
securities, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable
levels of price transparency. Instruments valued based on quoted
market prices in active markets, i.e. level I, include the
Companys money market funds. Instruments valued based on
other observable inputs, i.e. level II, include notes from
government-sponsored agencies, corporate notes and commercial
paper.
Accounts
Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at net invoice value. The
Company considers receivables past due based on the contractual
payment terms. The Company reviews its exposure to accounts
receivable and reserves specific amounts if collectibility is no
longer reasonably assured based on historical experience and
specific customer collection issues. The Company reevaluates
such reserves on a regular basis and adjusts its reserves as
needed. Write-offs of accounts receivable were insignificant
during 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents,
available-for-sale securities, and accounts receivable. The
Company maintains cash, cash equivalents, and available-for-sale
securities with major financial institutions. The Companys
cash, cash equivalents, and available-for-sale securities
consist of deposits held with banks, commercial paper, money
market funds, and other highly liquid investments that, at
times, exceed federally insured limits. The Company performs
periodic evaluations of its investments and the relative credit
standing of these financial institutions and limits the amount
of credit exposure with any one institution.
F-10
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company does not require collateral to support credit sales.
To reduce credit risk, the Company performs periodic credit
evaluations of its customers. The Company has had no credit
losses to date. Customers with revenues of 10% or greater of
total revenues for 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
Customers:
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
B
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
C
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
D
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 10% of total revenues. |
The Companys products include components that are
currently available from a single source or a limited number of
sources. The Company believes that other vendors would be able
to provide similar components; however, the qualification of
such vendors may require
start-up
time. In order to mitigate any adverse impacts from a disruption
of supply, the Company attempts to maintain an adequate supply
of critical limited-sourced components.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (which approximates
actual cost on a
first-in,
first-out method) or market. Inventories include raw materials,
work-in-process,
and finished goods that may be used in the research and
development process, and such items are expensed when they are
designated for use in research and development. Provisions for
slow moving, excess, and obsolete inventories are recorded based
on product life cycle, development plans, product expiration,
and quality issues.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are
stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is
calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets or the remaining term of the lease, whichever is shorter.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, if indicators
of impairment exist, the Company assesses the recoverability of
the affected long-lived assets by determining whether the
carrying value of such assets can be recovered through
undiscounted future operating cash flows. If impairment is
indicated, the Company measures the future discounted cash flows
associated with the use of the asset and adjusts the value of
the asset accordingly. While the Companys current and
historical operating and cash flow losses are indicators of
impairment, the Company believes the future cash flows to be
received from the long-lived assets recorded as of
March 29, 2008 will exceed the assets carrying value,
and, accordingly, the Company has not recognized any impairment
losses through March 29, 2008.
Reserve
for Product Warranties
The Company generally provides a one-year warranty on
instruments. The Company reviews its exposure to estimated
warranty expenses associated with instrument sales and
establishes an accrual based on historical product failure rates
and actual warranty costs incurred. This expense is recorded as
a component of cost of product revenue in the consolidated
statements of operations. Warranty accruals and expenses were
immaterial for all periods presented.
F-11
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenue
Recognition
The Company generates revenue from sales of its products and
services. The Companys products consist of single-use
IFCs, various instruments, software, and reagents. The
Companys services include instrument installation,
training, and customer support services. The Company has also
entered into a number of research and development agreements and
received government grants to conduct research and development
activities.
The Company records revenue in accordance with the guidelines
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition (SAB 104). In addition, the Company has
concluded that pursuant to AICPA Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
software included with certain of its instruments is more than
incidental to their functionality. Accordingly, the Company
applies
SOP 97-2
to sales of such instruments and related deliverables. Revenue
is recognized when all of the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services rendered, the sellers price to the
buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably
assured.
Product
Revenue
The Company sells instruments in arrangements that may include
related installation and training, customer support services and
software and may also include single-use IFCs. If the
arrangement includes IFCs, the Company uses the separation
criteria in EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, to
separate revenues related to IFCs, which are non-software
related deliverables, from software related deliverables. IFC
revenue is recognized upon delivery. Revenue from software
related deliverables is recognized in accordance with
SOP 97-2
and related pronouncements. Under
SOP 97-2,
the Company recognizes revenue for delivered elements only when
it determines that undelivered elements are not essential to the
functionality of the delivered elements and the vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of fair values of undelivered elements
are known. Installation is deemed essential to the functionality
of certain instruments; for those instruments recognition of
revenue begins after installation has been completed. Fair value
of undelivered elements is established by reference to VSOE
which is based on stand-alone sales of such elements. If any
undelivered element does not have VSOE of fair value, revenue is
deferred until all of such elements are delivered, or until VSOE
of fair value can objectively be determined for any remaining
undelivered elements. However, if the only undelivered element
is post-contract customer support services, such as those
included in the Companys maintenance agreements, revenue
on the software related deliverables is recognized ratably over
the service period. When revenues are deferred, the
corresponding costs of products sold are also deferred in other
assets in the consolidated financial statements and recognized
over the same period. If VSOE of fair value exists for all
undelivered elements, but does not exist for the delivered
elements in the arrangement, revenue is allocated to the
undelivered elements based on their VSOE of fair values, with
the residual amount allocated to the delivered elements and
recognized upon their delivery.
During 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008, the Company did not have VSOE of fair value
for software support services. Therefore, revenue and the
corresponding costs of software-related deliverables is deferred
and recognized over the customer support period ranging from one
to three years. All revenue from these arrangements has been
classified as product revenue in the statements of operations,
as the amount attributed to services was immaterial.
In 2007 and thereafter, no right of return has existed for the
Companys products. In prior years, if there was a right of
return, the entire revenue from the arrangement was deferred
until the right had lapsed. The Company has not experienced any
significant returns of its products. Accruals are provided for
anticipated warranty expenses at the time the associated revenue
is recognized. Amounts received in advance of when revenue
recognition criteria are met are recorded as deferred revenue on
the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company sells its products to third-party resellers located
in certain international markets. From time to time, these
arrangements may be subject to contingencies such as completion
of the instrument delivery to or
F-12
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
installation at the end customer. The Company recognizes revenue
on sales of products to the resellers if all revenue recognition
criteria have been met and any contingency provisions related to
the sale have been satisfied.
Collaboration
Revenue
The Company has entered into agreements with third parties,
including government entities, to provide research and
development services. Fixed-fee research and development
agreements generally provide the Company with up-front and
periodic milestone fees. Variable-fee research and development
agreements generally provide the Company with fees based upon
agreed upon rates for time incurred by research staff. Under
EITF 00-21,
the Company evaluates whether these arrangements contain
multiple units of accounting by evaluating whether delivered
elements have value on a stand-alone basis and whether there is
objective and reliable evidence of fair value of the undelivered
items. During 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008, the Company concluded that these
arrangements consisted of a single unit of accounting, namely,
research and development services. Accordingly, the Company
recognizes the fees under these arrangements over the period the
Company performs these services. Costs associated with the
research and development agreements are included in research and
development expense.
Grant
Revenue
Government grants provide the Company with incentive payments
for certain types of research and development activities
performed over a contractually defined period. Revenue from
government grants is recognized during the period during which
the related costs are incurred, provided that the conditions
under which the government grants were provided have been met
and the Company has only perfunctory obligations outstanding.
Amounts received in advance of when revenue recognition criteria
are met are recorded as deferred revenue on the consolidated
balance sheets. Costs associated with the grants are included in
research and development expense.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs incurred for product shipments are
included within cost of product revenue in the consolidated
statements of operations.
Research
and Development
The Company expenses research and development expenditures in
the period incurred. Research and development expense consists
of personnel costs, independent contractor costs, prototype
expenses, and allocated facilities and information technology
expenses. These costs include direct and research-related
overhead expenses.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company
incurred advertising costs of $237,000, $324,000, $701,000,
$221,000 and $228,000 during 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008,
respectively.
Income
Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income
taxes, whereby deferred income taxes reflect the impact of
temporary differences for items recognized for financial
reporting purposes over different periods than for income tax
purposes. Valuation allowances are provided when the expected
realization of deferred tax assets does not meet a more
likely than not criterion.
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48), effective January 1, 2007.
FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize the financial
statement effects of a tax position when it is more likely
F-13
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will
be sustained upon examination. Upon adoption, the Company
recorded a charge of $75,000 as a cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle in the accumulated deficit during 2007.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its
employee stock option plans using the intrinsic value method
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), which
required the Company to recognize the difference between the
exercise price of an employee option and the fair value of the
underlying common stock as of the grant date. The resulting
stock-based compensation expense, if any, was recorded on the
date of the grant in stockholders equity as deferred
compensation and amortized to expense over the vesting period of
the grant, which was generally four years.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)),
that addresses the accounting for stock-based payment
transactions in which a company receives services in exchange
for equity instruments, including stock options. The Company
adopted SFAS 123(R) beginning January 1, 2006 using
the prospective-transition method, as options granted prior to
January 1, 2006 were measured using the minimum value
method for the pro forma disclosures previously required by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123). Under the
prospective-transition method, the Company continues to apply
APB 25 to employee equity awards outstanding at the date of the
Companys adoption of SFAS 123(R). Any compensation
costs recognized from January 1, 2006 onward consists of:
(a) compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted
prior to, but not vested as of, December 31, 2005 based on
the intrinsic value determined in accordance with the provisions
of APB 25; and (b) compensation cost for all stock-based
awards granted or modified subsequent to December 31, 2005,
net of estimated forfeitures, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period of the respective
grants. In accordance with the prospective-transition method,
results for prior periods have not been restated.
The Company applies SFAS 123(R) and EITF Issue
No. 96-18,
Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling,
Goods or Services
(EITF 96-18),
to options and other stock-based awards issued to nonemployees.
In accordance with SFAS 123(R) and
EITF 96-18,
the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
measure the fair value of the options at the measurement dates.
The nonemployee options are subject to periodic reevaluation
over their vesting terms.
Comprehensive
Loss
Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and other
comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss)
includes unrealized holding gains and losses on the
Companys available-for-sale securities and foreign
currency translation adjustments. Total comprehensive loss for
all periods presented has been disclosed in the consolidated
statements of convertible preferred stock and stockholders
equity (deficit).
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Convertible
Preferred Stock Warrants
Freestanding warrants related to shares that may be redeemable
are accounted for in accordance with FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 150-5,
Issuers Accounting Under FASB Statement No. 150
for Freestanding Warrants and Other Similar Instruments on
Shares That Are Redeemable
(FSP 150-5),
an interpretation of SFAS No. 150, Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both
Liabilities and Equity. Under
FSP 150-5,
freestanding warrants to purchase the Companys convertible
preferred stock are classified as liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets and carried at fair value because
the warrants may conditionally obligate the Company to transfer
assets at some point in the future. The warrants are subject to
remeasurement at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair
value is recognized as a component of other income (expense),
net in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company
will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value
until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants,
the completion of a deemed liquidation event, conversion of
preferred stock into common stock, or until the convertible
preferred stockholders can no longer trigger a deemed
liquidation event. At that time, the convertible preferred stock
warrant liabilities will be reclassified to convertible
preferred stock or additional paid-in capital.
FSP 150-5
is effective for all periods beginning after June 30, 2005,
and accordingly, it was adopted by the Company on July 1,
2005. Upon adoption, the Company reclassified the fair value of
its warrants to purchase shares of its convertible preferred
stock as of the adoption date from additional paid-in capital to
liabilities and recorded a gain of $637,000 as the cumulative
effect of a change in an accounting principle in the
consolidated statement of operations during 2005.
Net Loss
per Share of Common Stock
The Companys basic net loss per share of common stock is
calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. The
weighted-average number of shares of common stock used to
calculate the Companys basic net loss per share of common
stock excludes those shares subject to repurchase related to
stock options that were exercised prior to vesting as they are
not deemed to be issued for accounting purposes until they vest.
The diluted net loss per share of common stock is computed by
dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common
stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using
the treasury-stock method. For purposes of this calculation,
convertible preferred stock, options to purchase common stock,
common stock subject to repurchase, warrants to purchase
convertible preferred stock, and shares of convertible preferred
stock subject to conversion of the Companys convertible
promissory notes are considered to be common stock equivalents
but have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss
per share of common stock as their effect is anti-dilutive.
F-15
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of net loss per
share of common stock (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
March 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
(17,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,553
|
|
|
$
|
25,451
|
|
|
$
|
6,355
|
|
|
$
|
6,613
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock,
basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
|
9,316
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
9,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, basic and
diluted
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following outstanding shares of common stock equivalents
were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share
of common stock for the periods presented because including them
would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited))
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
37,267
|
|
|
|
43,284
|
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
|
46,654
|
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
7,467
|
|
|
|
5,962
|
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
Common stock subject to repurchase
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Convertible promissory notes convertible into shares of
convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
F-16
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, which
establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets
and liabilities when required or permitted by other standards
within generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States but does not require any new fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 also expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for all financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008 the FASB
issued FSP
No. 157-2
(FSP 157-2)
which allows companies to delay the effective date of
SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008. Generally, the
provisions of this statement should be applied prospectively as
of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is
initially applied. The Company adopted SFAS 157 in
accordance with the provisions in
FSP 157-2
as of December 30, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 157 did
not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159), including an amendment of
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities, which allows an entity to choose
to measure certain financial instruments and liabilities at fair
value. Subsequent measurements for the financial instruments and
liabilities an entity elects to measure at fair value will be
recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 also establishes
additional disclosure requirements. SFAS 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company adopted SFAS 159 as of December 30, 2007 but
chose not to measure the financial instruments and liabilities
permitted by the standard to be measured at fair value.
Therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Agreements
(EITF 07-1),
which addresses the accounting for participants in collaborative
agreements, defined as contractual arrangements that involve a
joint operating activity, that are conducted without the
creation of a separate legal entity.
EITF 07-1
requires participants in a collaborative agreement to make
separate disclosures for each period a statement of operations
is presented regarding the nature and purpose of the agreement,
the rights and obligations under the agreement, the accounting
policy for the agreement, and the classification of and amounts
arising from the agreement between participants. These
arrangements involve two or more parties who are both active
participants in the activity and are exposed to significant
risks and rewards dependent on the commercial success of the
activity.
EITF 07-1
provides that a company should report the effects of adoption as
a change in accounting principle through retrospective
application to all periods and requires specific additional
disclosures.
EITF 07-1
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing
the impact of the adoption of
EITF 07-1
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or
Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities
(EITF 07-3).
EITF 07-3
provides clarification surrounding the accounting for
nonrefundable research and development advance payments, whereby
such payments should be recorded as an asset when the advance
payment is made and recognized as an expense when the research
and development activities are performed.
EITF 07-3
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2007. The Company adopted EITF 07-3 as
of December 30, 2007. The adoption of
EITF 07-3
did not impact the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
3.
|
License,
Development, Collaboration and Grant Agreements
|
License
Agreements
In March 2003, the Company entered into a license agreement to
obtain an exclusive worldwide license for certain technology
regarding nanovolume crystallization arrays. The Company may, in
its sole discretion, cancel the license agreement with a
30-day
notice; otherwise, the license terminates at the end of the life
of the last patent
F-17
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
to expire. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is
obligated to issue up to $2,100,000 of shares of the
Companys common or convertible preferred stock if the
Company achieves certain milestones. As a result of achieving
one of these milestones during 2006, the Company issued
214,285 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock
at $2.80 per share for an aggregate value of $597,000, net of
issuance costs. During 2003, the Company also entered into a
separate research sponsorship agreement under which the Company
agreed to pay a total of $900,000 over 5 years in 20
quarterly installments of $45,000 to sponsor certain research.
As of March 29, 2008, the entire $900,000 had been paid.
Following the final $45,000 payment, which was paid during the
three months ended March 29, 2008, the agreement terminated.
In December 2003, the Company entered into a license agreement
to obtain a nonexclusive worldwide license for certain
technology regarding submicroliter protein crystallization. The
Company may, in its sole discretion, cancel the agreement with a
30-day
notice; otherwise, the license terminates at the end of the life
of the last licensed patent to expire. Pursuant to the
agreement, the Company made four payments for annual
nonrefundable license fees, each in the amount of $250,000,
beginning in January 2004 with subsequent payments made in
January 2005, 2006 and 2007. Also pursuant to the agreement, the
Company began making quarterly payments in the amount of $25,000
starting in the first quarter of 2007. These quarterly payments,
which are scheduled to continue until the agreement is
terminated, could increase in future periods if the Company
meets certain sales volumes. The annual nonrefundable license
fee payments were recorded as expense during the year in which
they were paid.
Development
Agreements
In June 2004, the Company entered into a development agreement
to evaluate two application areas of interest. Under the
agreement, the Company performed research and development
services, manufactured prototypes, and licensed certain
nonexclusive rights. In addition, the Company issued a fully
vested warrant to purchase 507,407 shares of Series D
convertible preferred stock at $2.80 per share (see
Note 8). As consideration, the Company received payments
totaling $1,500,000 during 2004 and 2005. The Company determined
that the license, research and development services, and
prototypes should be accounted for as a combined unit of
accounting and recognized the revenues ratably over the
12-month
project period. The fair value of the warrant issued was
estimated to be $750,000, as determined using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, and was recognized as a reduction to the
collaboration revenue. The Company recognized collaboration
revenue of $366,000 and $384,000 related to this agreement
during 2004 and 2005, respectively. The agreement terminated
during 2005.
In June 2005, the Company entered into another development
agreement to develop another application area of interest. Under
the agreement, the Company performed research and development
services and manufactured prototype instruments. The agreement
provided for payments to the Company in the amount of $942,000,
to be paid in installments over the
30-month
life of the agreement. The Company determined that the research
and development services and the manufacturing of prototype
instruments should be accounted for as a combined unit of
accounting and revenue was therefore recognized ratably over the
estimated project period. The Company recognized revenue of
$94,000, $377,000, $377,000, $94,000 and $94,000 related to this
agreement during 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008, respectively. The
agreement terminated during the three months ended
March 29, 2008.
Collaboration
Agreement
In January 2005, the Company entered into a collaborative
agreement to develop and commercialize radiopharmaceutical
manufacturing products for use in the positron emission
tomography field. As consideration, the Company received an
up-front fee of $1,000,000, which the Company deferred and
recognized over the obligation period of approximately two
years, with $458,000 and $542,000 recognized as revenue during
2005 and 2006, respectively. Also, the Company recognized
additional revenue of $635,000 and $500,000 during 2005 and
2006, respectively, related to payments for research and
development activities under the agreement based on agreed upon
rates for time incurred by the research staff. The agreement
terminated on December 31, 2006.
F-18
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Grants
National
Institutes of Health
In June 2006, the Company was awarded a government grant from
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the amount of
$1,048,000 to be earned over a two-year period. Under the grant,
the Company performs research and development activities to
design a diffraction capable Topaz screening chip. The agreement
provides for quarterly reimbursement of the eligible research
and development expenses, including salaries, equipment,
scientific consumables, and certain third-party costs. The grant
revenue is recognized as the related services are performed and
costs associated with this grant are reported as research and
development expense in the period incurred. The Company
recognized revenue of $184,000, $606,000, $6,000, and $116,000
during 2006 and 2007 and the three months ended March 31,
2007 and March 29, 2008, respectively, under this grant.
This agreement terminates in June 2008.
Singapore
Economic Development Board
In October 2005, Fluidigm Singapore, a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company, entered into a letter agreement providing for up
to SG$10 million (approximately US$7.2 million using
March 29, 2008 exchange rates) in grants from the Singapore
Economic Development Board (EDB). The grants are payable for the
period August 1, 2005 through July 31, 2010 in
connection with the establishment and operation by Fluidigm
Singapore of a research, development and manufacturing center
for IFCs in Singapore. Grant payments are calculated as a
portion of qualifying expenses incurred in Singapore relating to
salaries, overhead, outsourcing and subcontracting expenses,
operating expenses and royalties paid. Fluidigm Singapore is
required to submit incentive payment requests for qualifying
expenditures on a quarterly basis along with reports regarding
its compliance with the incentive payment conditions, as
described below, through the end of the applicable quarter.
In January 2006. Fluidigm Singapore and EDB entered into a
supplement to the October 2005 letter agreement. This
supplement was entered into to create a process whereby Fluidigm
Singapore and EDB would agree on new quarterly development
targets at the start of each year, Fluidigm Singapore would
submit to EDB a progress report and evidence of the achievement
of targets on a quarterly basis and the parties would resolve
any disagreements regarding the satisfaction of targets using an
established procedure and the parties would be entitled to
obtain a third party review of the incentive payment requests on
a semi-annual rather than an annual basis. These agreements
further provide EDB with the right to demand repayment of a
portion of past grants in the event the Company does not meet
its obligations under the agreements. Based on correspondance
with EDB, the Company believes that it has fulfilled its
obligations under the grants and it will, therefore, not have to
repay any of the grant proceeds received through March 29,
2008.
Fluidigm Singapores continued eligibility for such grants
is subject to its compliance with the following conditions:
increasing levels of research; its development and manufacturing
activity in Singapore, including employment of specified numbers
of research scientists and engineers; its incurrence of
specified levels of research and development expenses in
Singapore over the course of each calendar year; its use of
local service providers; its manufacture in Singapore of the
products developed in Singapore and its achievement of certain
targets relating to new product development or completion of
specific manufacturing process objectives. These required levels
of research, development and manufacturing activity in Singapore
and the associated increases from one year to the next are the
result of negotiations between the parties and are generally
consistent with Companys business strategy for its
Singapore operations. All ownership rights in the intellectual
property developed by Fluidigm Singapore remain with Fluidigm
Singapore and no such rights are conveyed to EDB under the
agreement.
In February 2007, Fluidigm Singapore entered into a second
letter agreement with EDB which provided for up to an additional
SG$3.7 million (approximately US$2.7 million using
March 29, 2008 exchange rates) in grants. The terms and
conditions of this letter agreement are substantially the same
as the October 2005 letter agreement, with the exception of
the size of the potential grant, the term of the agreement and
the specific levels of research,
F-19
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
development and manufacturing activities required to maintain
eligibility for such grants. The primary focus of this letter
agreement is the ongoing development and manufacture in
Singapore of certain instrumentation. This letter agreement
applies to research, development and manufacturing activity by
Fluidigm Singapore in Singapore from June 1, 2006 through
May 31, 2011.
The Company recognized revenue of $879,000, $1,758,000,
$463,000 and $401,000 related to EDB grants during 2006, 2007
and the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2006,
December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008, the Company had
deferred revenue of $720,000, $635,000 and $566,000,
respectively, related to incentive payments for equipment
expenditures, which is being recognized ratably over the
estimated useful life of the equipment of four years. As of
December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, the Company had accounts receivable from
EDB in the amounts of $272,000, $679,000 and $466,000,
respectively.
Cash
Equivalents and Available-for-Sale Securities
The following are summaries of cash equivalents and
available-for-sale securities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,094
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
2,787
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,787
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
Notes from government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
28,207
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
28,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,283
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,985
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 29, 2008 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
27,499
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,499
|
|
Notes from government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,498
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,499
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, the contractual maturities of the
Companys available-for-sale securities were less than one
year.
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
2,983
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
Finished goods and demonstration units
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,038
|
|
|
$
|
5,498
|
|
|
$
|
6,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
|
$
|
1,328
|
|
|
$
|
1,328
|
|
Lab and manufacturing equipment
|
|
|
7,707
|
|
|
|
8,207
|
|
|
|
8,271
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Office furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,916
|
|
|
|
10,489
|
|
|
|
10,564
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
|
(7,177
|
)
|
|
|
(7,593
|
)
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
4,068
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
|
$
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,309,000,
$1,379,000, $1,643,000, $426,000 and $416,000 for 2005, 2006,
2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively. During 2005, 2006, 2007 and
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 29,
2008, the Company recognized a loss on retirement of property
and equipment of $0, $111,000, $20,000, $0 and $0, respectively.
In November 2002, the Company entered into a master security
agreement with a lender. Per the terms of the agreement, the
Company could draw up to $4,000,000 for purchases of capital
equipment, software, and tenant improvements. A second master
security agreement entered into in March 2004 increased the
amount of the allowable draw for the Company to $11,000,000. The
draw down period expired on December 31, 2005, at which
time the Company had drawn down $3,584,000 under the agreement.
The loan, which was secured by the underlying equipment and a
letter of credit, carried an interest rate between 8.0% and
10.5% per annum, and each draw under the agreement was to be
repaid in 42 varying monthly installments, which was originally
scheduled to end on July 1, 2009. In connection with the
execution of the second agreement in 2004, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase 37,500 shares of Series D
convertible preferred stock at $2.80 per share (see
Note 8) which was recorded on the consolidated balance
sheet at fair value of $90,000 as a debt discount that was
amortized to interest expense over two years. As of
December 31, 2006 and December 29, 2007, the
outstanding principal balance of this loan was $2,267,000 and
$1,130,000, respectively. In February 2008, prior to the due
date, the Company paid off the outstanding principal and accrued
interest balance and paid a prepayment fee in the amount of
$41,000 to the lender. Accordingly, the entire outstanding
principal balance for this loan as of December 29, 2007 was
classified as
F-21
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
a current liability on the consolidated balance sheet. Upon full
payment of this debt, restricted cash in the amount of $500,000
was released by the lender and thus has been classified as a
current asset as of December 29, 2007.
In March 2005, the Company entered into a loan and security
agreement with another lender. Under this agreement the Company
borrowed $13,000,000 during 2005 for general corporate purposes.
This loan is secured by the Companys assets except for
intellectual property; however, the security interest does
include proceeds from sales of the intellectual property. The
loan was originally scheduled to be repaid by 2009; however, the
agreement was amended in August 2006 to extend the final
repayment date to February 1, 2010. The agreement carried a
variable interest rate of prime plus 2.5% through March 2006.
Thereafter, the agreement carried a fixed interest rate of 10.0%
through July 2006 and a fixed interest rate of 9.75% following
the amendment to the agreement in August 2006. In August 2006,
the Company began making monthly payments in the amount of
$310,000 for principal and interest under the agreement. The
agreement also requires payment of fees in March 2009 in the
amount of $1,612,500. The fees are accreted as interest expense
over the term of the loan. The agreement restricts the
Companys ability to pay dividends. The Company is subject
to a prepayment fee in the amount of 1% of the outstanding
principal amount being prepaid if paid during 2008 or 2009. In
connection with the execution of this loan and security
agreement, the Company issued a warrant to purchase
185,714 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock
at $2.80 per share (see Note 8) which was recorded on
the consolidated balance sheet at fair value of $54,000 as a
debt discount. In connection with the final draw down of this
loan, the Company issued another warrant to purchase
185,714 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock
at $2.80 per share (see Note 8) which was recorded on
the consolidated balance sheet at fair value of $50,000 as a
debt discount. The debt discounts are amortized to interest
expense over the life of the agreement. As of December 31,
2006, December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008, the
outstanding principal balance of this loan was $10,570,000,
$8,232,000 and $7,592,000, respectively, net of the unamortized
debt discounts of $58,000, $31,000 and $25,000, respectively.
In February 2008, the Company amended this loan and security
agreement to provide the Company with an additional credit line
in the amount of $10,000,000 that the Company can draw upon
until July 1, 2008 for general corporate purposes. In
connection with the amendment of this loan and security
agreement, the Company issued a warrant to purchase
100,000 shares of Series E convertible preferred stock at
$4.00 per share (see Note 8). The warrant was recorded
on the consolidated balance sheet as a deferred charge at a fair
value of $111,000 and will be amortized to interest expense over
the period of the availability of the funds. As of
March 29, 2008, the Company had not utilized any of this
facility. If the Company does borrow from this credit line, the
borrowing will bear interest at 11.5% per annum and will be
repaid in installments through June 2011. In addition, the
Company could be required to issue additional warrants to
purchase up to 200,000 shares of Series E convertible
preferred stock at $4.00 per share depending on the amounts
of draws on the facility, if any.
The amortization of the debt discounts for the Companys
long-term debt agreements was recorded as interest expense in
the consolidated statements of operations in the amounts of
$9,000, $37,000, $27,000, $7,000 and $6,000 during 2005, 2006,
2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively. As of March 29, 2008,
the Company was either in compliance with all loan covenants or
had obtained waivers from the respective lenders.
F-22
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table does not include principal payments for the
master security agreement with a principal balance of $1,130,000
as of December 29, 2007 that was paid off in February 2008.
The scheduled principal payments of the Companys other
long-term debt as of December 29, 2007 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
2,724
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4,929
|
|
2010
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments due in future periods
|
|
|
8,262
|
|
Less: debt discounts
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company leases its headquarters in South San Francisco,
California, under multiple noncancelable lease agreements that
expire in February 2011. These agreements include renewal
options which provide the Company with the ability to extend the
lease terms for an additional three years. The Company also
leases office and manufacturing space under noncancelable leases
in Singapore that expire in September 2008. The Companys
other operating leases are for office space in the Netherlands,
Japan, and France and are on a month-to-month basis. As of
December 29, 2007, future minimum lease payments under
noncancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,436
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
2011
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
$
|
4,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys lease payments are recognized as an expense
on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease. Rental
expense under operating leases for 2005, 2006, 2007 and the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008
totaled $1,468,000, $1,494,000, $1,574,000, $354,000 and
$367,000, respectively.
The Company has entered into a supply agreement with a vendor to
provide inventory components customized to the Companys
specifications. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company has
agreed to purchase from the vendor a specified minimum number of
units each year in exchange for volume discounts. After
April 1, 2010, either party may terminate the supply
agreement upon six months prior written notice. As of
December 29, 2007, future minimum payments under the supply
agreement were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
2009
|
|
|
435
|
|
2010
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Contingencies
The Company is party to various claims arising in the ordinary
course of business. These claims relate to intellectual property
rights and employment matters. While there is no assurance that
an adverse determination of any of such matters will not occur,
management does not believe, based upon information known to it,
that a potential resolution of any of these matters will have a
material adverse effect upon the Companys financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Indemnifications
From time to time, the Company has entered into indemnification
provisions under certain of its agreements with other companies
in the ordinary course of business, typically with business
partners, customers, and suppliers. Pursuant to these
agreements, the Company may indemnify, hold harmless, and agree
to reimburse the indemnified parties on a case by case basis for
losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties in
connection with any patent or other intellectual property
infringement claim by any third-party with respect to its
products. The term of these indemnification provisions is
generally perpetual from the time of the execution of the
agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the
Company could be required to make under these indemnification
provisions is typically not limited to a specific amount. In
addition, the Company has entered into indemnification
agreements with its officers and directors. The Company has not
incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims
related to these indemnification provisions. As of
March 29, 2008, the Company had not accrued a liability for
these indemnification provisions because the likelihood of
incurring a payment obligation was remote.
|
|
7.
|
Convertible
Promissory Notes
|
In December 2003, the Company entered into a convertible note
purchase agreement with the Biomedical Sciences Investment
Fund Pte Ltd (BMSIF). BMSIF is wholly-owned by EDB
Investments Pte. Ltd., whose parent entity is EDB. Ultimately,
each of these entities is controlled by the government of
Singapore. Under this agreement BMSIF agreed to provide a
$2,000,000 credit facility to be used for general corporate
purposes. In December 2003, the Company issued a $2,000,000
convertible promissory note to BMSIF. The note, which was
unsecured, carried an interest rate of 8% per year. Per the
agreement, principal and interest were convertible into the
Companys Series D convertible preferred stock at
$2.80 per share at the lenders election, at any time, or
upon the election of the Company upon the achievement of certain
milestones by the Company. In June 2005, the agreement was
amended to allow the Company to issue additional convertible
promissory notes in the amount of $3,000,000 if the Company
achieved certain milestones. In December 2005, upon the
successful completion of specified milestones, the $2,000,000
convertible promissory note and interest of $331,000 converted
into 832,635 shares of Series D convertible preferred
stock at $2.80 per share as settlement of the outstanding
balance on the date of the conversion. In June 2006, the Company
issued a $3,000,000 convertible promissory note, which was also
unsecured, that carried an interest rate of 8% per year.
Principal and interest are also convertible into the
Companys Series D convertible preferred stock at
$2.80 per share at the lenders election, at any time, or
upon the election of the Company upon the achievement of certain
milestones by the Company or upon the completion of an initial
public offering in which the convertible preferred stock has
converted into common stock. As of December 31, 2006, the
outstanding principal and accrued interest balance for the
convertible promissory note was $3,128,000. In July 2007, upon
the successful completion of specified milestones, the principal
balance in the amount of $3,000,000 for the convertible
promissory note and accrued interest of $240,000 converted into
1,157,142 shares of Series D convertible preferred
stock at $2.80 per share.
In August 2006, the Company entered into another convertible
note purchase agreement with BMSIF. Under this agreement, BMSIF
agreed to provide a $15,000,000 credit facility, to be issued in
three separate $5,000,000 tranches, and to be used for general
corporate purposes. The Company issued two $5,000,000
convertible promissory notes against equal amounts of borrowings
under this facility, each unsecured and carrying an interest
F-24
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
rate of 8% per year, in August and November 2006. In March 2007,
BMSIF exercised the conversion provision of the convertible note
purchase agreement and the Company issued 2,954,337 shares
of Series E convertible preferred stock at $3.60 per share
as settlement of the outstanding principal and accrued interest
balance on the date of the conversion in the amount of
$10,636,000. Upon conversion of these convertible promissory
notes, the Company issued the third and final $5,000,000
convertible promissory note against an equal amount of borrowing
under this facility with an interest rate of 8% per year in
April 2007.
For these convertible note purchase agreements in which the
repayment was in the form of Series E convertible preferred
stock, the conversion price of $3.60 per share was a discount to
the estimated fair values of $3.71 and $4.00 per share for the
Series E convertible preferred stock at the times of the
borrowings. The intrinsic value of the embedded beneficial
conversion option associated with each borrowing of convertible
promissory notes under the arrangement was measured as the
difference between the conversion price and the fair value of
Series E convertible preferred stock on the commitment date
and the resulting debt discount is being amortized to interest
expense over the two year contractual term of the debt. Upon
conversion of the notes to convertible preferred stock, any
remaining unamortized debt discount was immediately recognized
as interest expense.
During 2006 and 2007, the Company recognized debt discounts of
$306,000 and $485,000, respectively, related to the beneficial
conversion feature of the notes. Amortization of the debt
discounts for the convertible note purchase agreements was
recorded as interest expense in the consolidated statements of
operations in the amount of $43,000, $468,000, $0 and $52,000
during 2006, 2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2007
and March 29, 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, the outstanding principal and accrued
interest balance for the convertible note purchase agreements
with BMSIF was $9,944,000, $4,997,000 and $5,150,000,
respectively, net of the unamortized debt discounts of $263,000,
$280,000 and $228,000, respectively.
F-25
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock Warrant Liabilities
|
The Company issued warrants to purchase 1,211,203 shares of
the Companys convertible preferred stock at various times
between 2001 and 2005. The Company did not issue any warrants to
purchase convertible preferred stock during 2006 or 2007. The
convertible preferred stock warrants are generally exercisable
immediately and can only be exercised for cash or net share
settled. Changes in the fair value of the underlying stock do
not affect the settlement amounts of the warrants, therefore,
the maximum amount of shares to be issued upon the settlement of
these warrants is noted in the table below. As of
December 29, 2007, the following warrants were issued and
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant to Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason for
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Grant
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
May 2001
|
|
Debt financing
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
41,284
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) May 14, 2008
|
March 2002
|
|
Debt financing
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 27, 2012
|
November 2002
|
|
Debt financing
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
31,008
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) December 16, 2012
|
September 2003
|
|
Collaboration agreement
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
March 2004
|
|
Debt financing
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 18, 2012
|
March 2005
|
|
Debt financing
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
185,714
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 29, 2012
|
December 2005
|
|
Debt financing
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
185,714
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 29, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, warrants to purchase 5,076 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock expired. Upon
expiration, the related warrant liability was eliminated and
reflected as other income (expense), net. During 2006, warrants,
issued in connection with a collaboration agreement (see
Note 3), to purchase 507,407 shares of the
Series D convertible preferred stock were exercised
utilizing a cashless exercise option that allowed the holder to
receive 267,857 shares of convertible preferred stock. The
fair value of the warrants and the shares of convertible
preferred stock issued upon the cashless exercise was $729,000
on the exercise date, calculated as the fair value of the shares
of convertible preferred stock issued.
F-26
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of March 29, 2008, the following warrants were issued
and outstanding (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant to Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason for
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Grant
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
May 2001
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
41,284
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) May 14, 2008
|
March 2002
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 27, 2012
|
November 2002
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
31,008
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) December 16, 2012
|
March 2004
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 18, 2012
|
March 2005
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
185,714
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 29, 2012
|
December 2005
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
185,714
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) March 29, 2012
|
February 2008
|
|
Debt Financing
|
|
Series E
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
Earlier of (i) the closing of an acquisition of the Company or
(ii) February 15, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 29, 2008, the Company
issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of
Series E convertible preferred stock in connection with the
amendment of a loan and security agreement (see Note 5).
Warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of the Companys
Series C convertible preferred stock expired unexercised on
December 31, 2007.
The following is a summary of the warrants to purchase
convertible preferred stock outstanding and their fair values as
of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Shares as of
|
|
|
Fair Value as of
|
|
Warrants to
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
Purchase
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
294,868
|
|
|
|
289,792
|
|
|
|
89,792
|
|
|
$
|
29,000
|
|
|
$
|
61,000
|
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
408,928
|
|
|
|
408,928
|
|
|
|
408,928
|
|
|
|
194,000
|
|
|
|
407,000
|
|
|
|
584,000
|
|
Series E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703,796
|
|
|
|
698,720
|
|
|
|
598,720
|
|
|
$
|
223,000
|
|
|
$
|
468,000
|
|
|
$
|
851,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair values of the outstanding convertible preferred stock
warrants were measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 29,
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
63.6%
|
|
49.7%
|
|
50.0%
|
Expected life (equals the remaining contractual term)
|
|
3.7 years
|
|
2.8 years
|
|
4.3 years
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.8%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
2.2%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
A decrease in fair value of the convertible preferred stock
warrant liabilities in the amount of $72,000 and $16,000 during
2005 and the three months ended March 31, 2007, and
increases in fair value in the amounts of $138,000, $245,000 and
$272,000 during 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008, respectively, were recognized as other
income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of
operations. Upon adoption of
FSP 150-5
on July 1, 2005, the Company recorded a gain of $637,000 as
a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the
consolidated statement of operations during 2005.
|
|
9.
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
As of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007, and
March 29, 2008 (unaudited) convertible preferred stock was
comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
Designated
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Net Proceeds
|
|
|
|
Designated
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Net Proceeds
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
6,461
|
|
|
|
6,461
|
|
|
|
11,479
|
|
|
|
|
6,461
|
|
|
|
6,461
|
|
|
|
11,479
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
16,365
|
|
|
|
42,030
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
16,365
|
|
|
|
42,030
|
|
|
|
42,221
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
12,196
|
|
|
|
33,794
|
|
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
13,353
|
|
|
|
37,034
|
|
|
|
37,388
|
|
Series E
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
22,003
|
|
|
|
|
20,110
|
|
|
|
17,765
|
|
|
|
68,550
|
|
|
|
71,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,438
|
|
|
|
43,284
|
|
|
$
|
112,295
|
|
|
|
|
61,798
|
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
$
|
162,082
|
|
|
$
|
165,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys convertible preferred stock had been
classified as temporary equity on the consolidated balance sheet
instead of in stockholders equity (deficit) in accordance
with EITF Abstracts Topic
No. D-98,
Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.
Upon certain change in control events that are outside of the
control of the Company, including liquidation, sale or transfer
of control of the Company, holders of the convertible preferred
stock can cause its redemption. Accordingly, these shares are
considered contingently redeemable. The Company has not adjusted
the carrying values of the convertible preferred stock to their
redemption values since it is uncertain whether or when a
redemption event will occur. Subsequent adjustments to increase
the carrying values to the redemption values would be made if it
becomes probable that such redemption will occur. The
significant rights, privileges, and preferences of the
convertible preferred stock are as follows:
Conversion
Each share of convertible preferred stock is convertible, at any
time at the option of the holder, into common stock based upon a
conversion rate of one share of common stock for each share of
convertible preferred stock regardless of the series.
Conversion is automatic upon: (i) the closing of an
underwritten initial public offering of the Companys
common stock at an offering price of not less that $5.69 per
share (appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock
F-28
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
dividends, recapitalization, or similar events) and with
aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $25,000,000,
(ii) the closing of an underwritten initial public offering
of the Companys common stock at an offering price of less
than $5.69 per share (appropriately adjusted for any stock
splits, stock dividends, recapitalization, or similar events) or
with aggregate gross proceeds of less than $25,000,000 and
written consent of the holders of two-thirds of all shares of
convertible preferred stock voting together for such automatic
conversion, or (iii) the written consent of the holders of
two-thirds of all shares of convertible preferred stock voting
together, except that the written consent of the holders of
greater than two-thirds of all shares of Series E
convertible preferred stock voting separately is required for
Series E convertible preferred stock to convert if such
conversion is not in connection with the closing of an
underwritten initial public offering of the Companys
common stock.
Dividends
Holders of Series A, B, C, D, and E convertible preferred
stock are entitled to noncumulative dividends of $0.11, $0.18,
$0.26, $0.30, and $0.43 per share, respectively, if and when
declared by the Board of Directors (adjusted for any stock
splits, stock dividends, recapitalization, or similar events)
and subject to the preferences described below. Holders of
Series D and E convertible preferred stock shall be
entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared, in
preference and priority to any declaration or payment of
dividends to holders of Series A, B, or C convertible
preferred stock or common stock, other than for dividends
payable in only common stock. Payments of any dividends to the
holders of Series D and E convertible preferred stock shall
be on a pro rata, pari passu basis in proportion to the entitled
dividend rates for these respective series, as applicable.
Holders of Series C convertible preferred stock shall be
entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared, in
preference and priority to any declaration or payment of
dividends to holders of Series A and B convertible
preferred stock or common stock, other than for dividends
payable in only common stock. Holders of Series A and B
convertible preferred stock shall be entitled to receive
dividends, when and if declared, in preference and priority to
any declaration or payment of dividends to holders of common
stock, other than for dividends payable in only common stock.
Payments of any dividends to the holders of Series A and B
convertible preferred stock shall be on a pro rata, pari passu
basis in proportion to the entitled dividend rates for these
respective series, as applicable. No dividends have been
declared or paid through March 29, 2008.
Liquidation
Preferences
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the
Company, holders of Series E convertible preferred stock
shall be entitled to receive a liquidation preference of $4.00
per share, together with any declared but unpaid dividends,
prior to any payment or distribution to holders of Series A, B,
C, or D convertible preferred stock or common stock.
After payment to the holders of Series E convertible
preferred stock, holders of Series D convertible preferred
stock shall be entitled to receive a liquidation preference of
$2.80 per share, together with any declared but unpaid
dividends, prior to any payment or distribution to holders of
Series A, B, or C convertible preferred stock or common stock.
After payment to the holders of Series D convertible
preferred stock, holders of Series C convertible preferred
stock shall be entitled to receive a liquidation preference of
$2.58 per share, together with any declared but unpaid
dividends, prior to any payment or distribution to holders of
Series A or B convertible preferred stock or common stock.
After payment to the holders of Series C convertible
preferred stock, holders of Series B convertible preferred
stock shall be entitled to receive a liquidation preference of
$1.78 per share, together with any declared but unpaid
dividends, prior to any payment or distribution to holders of
Series A convertible preferred stock or common stock.
F-29
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
After payment to the holders of Series B convertible
preferred stock, holders of Series A convertible preferred
stock shall be entitled to receive a liquidation preference of
$1.10 per share, together with any declared but unpaid
dividends, prior to any payment or distribution to holders of
common stock.
After the payment to the holders of convertible preferred stock
or their respective liquidation preferences, the entire
remaining assets of the Company shall be distributed on a pro
rata basis to the holders of common stock. A change of control
or a sale, transfer, or lease of all or substantially all of the
assets of the Company is considered to be a liquidation event.
Voting
Rights
Holders of convertible preferred stock are entitled to the
number of votes they would have upon conversion of their
convertible preferred stock into common stock on the applicable
record date. So long as 2,000,000 shares of Series D
convertible preferred stock remain outstanding, the holders of
Series D convertible preferred stock are entitled to elect
two members to the Companys Board of Directors, and so
long as 2,000,000 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock remain outstanding, the holders of Series C
convertible preferred stock are entitled to elect three members
to the Board of Directors. The holders of Series A, B, and
E convertible preferred stock and the holders of common stock,
voting together as a single class, are entitled to elect any
additional members to the Board of Directors.
|
|
10.
|
Stock
Option Activity
|
1999
Stock Option Plan
On May 12, 1999, the Board of Directors adopted the 1999
Stock Option Plan (the Stock Plan) under which incentive stock
options and nonstatutory stock options may be granted to
employees, officers, and directors of, or consultants to, the
Company.
Options granted under the Stock Plan expire no later than ten
years from the date of grant. The exercise price of each
incentive stock option granted to an employee shall be at least
110% of the fair market value of the underlying common stock on
the date of grant if, on the grant date, the employee owns stock
representing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of
the Companys capital stock; otherwise, the exercise price
shall be at least 100% of the fair market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price
for each nonstatutory stock option granted to a service provider
shall be at least 110% of the fair market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant if, on the grant
date, the service provider owns stock representing more than 10%
of the voting power of all classes of the Companys capital
stock; otherwise, the exercise price shall be at least 85% of
the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date
of grant. The fair market value of the underlying common stock
shall be determined by the Board of Directors until such time as
the Companys common stock is listed on any established
stock exchange or national market system. Options may be granted
with different vesting terms from time to time, but the vesting
terms may not exceed five years from the date of grant.
Generally, outstanding options are immediately exercisable and
vest at a rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the option
grant date and
1/48
of the total grant each month thereafter.
As of December 29, 2007, the Stock Plan is the
Companys only stock-based compensation plan and a total of
12,800,000 shares of common stock have been authorized for
issuance under the Stock Plan.
F-30
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Activity under the Stock Plan is as follows (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2005
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
3,858
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Additional shares authorized
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(2,559
|
)
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(1,216
|
)
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
(817
|
)
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
Additional shares authorized
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(2,042
|
)
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
7,467
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
Options granted (unaudited)
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
Options exercised (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
Options canceled (unaudited)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 29, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised during 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months
ended March 29, 2008 exclude options that are exercised
prior to vesting. These shares generally vest over a four-year
period. Unvested shares, which amount to 65,000, 33,334 and
27,084 as of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively, are subject to a repurchase
option held by the Company at the original exercise price and
are not deemed to be issued for accounting purposes until those
shares vest.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS 123(R). The fair value of each new
option awarded was estimated on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following
weighted-average assumptions. No options were granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 29,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
72.8%
|
|
63.0%
|
|
54.7%
|
Expected life
|
|
6.1 years
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
5.9 years
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.8%
|
|
4.4%
|
|
3.0%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
$0.55
|
|
$0.92
|
|
$1.31
|
F-31
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Expected volatility is derived from historical volatilities of
several unrelated public companies within the biomedical
instrument and system industry. Each companys historical
volatility is weighted based on certain qualitative factors and
combined to produce a single volatility factor used by the
Company. The risk-free interest rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant
for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities
approximately equal to the options expected life. Given
the limited history to accurately estimate expected lives of
options granted to the various employee groups, the Company used
the simplified method as provided by the SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share Based Payment
(SAB 107). The simplified method is
calculated as the average of the time-to-vesting and the
contractual life of the options. The Company estimates its
forfeiture rate based on an analysis of its actual forfeitures
and will continue to evaluate the adequacy of the forfeiture
rate based on actual forfeiture experience, analysis of employee
turnover behavior, and other factors. The impact from a
forfeiture rate adjustment will be recognized in full in the
period of adjustment, and if the actual number of future
forfeitures differs from that estimated by the Company, the
Company may be required to record adjustments to stock-based
compensation expense in future periods. Adjustments to the
forfeiture rates have not had a significant impact on any of the
periods presented. Each of these inputs is subjective and
generally requires significant judgment to determine.
The absence of an active market for the Companys common
stock required the Companys Board of Directors, with input
from management, to estimate the fair value of the common stock
for purposes of granting options and for determining stock-based
compensation expense for the periods presented. In response to
these requirements, the Companys Board of Directors
estimated the fair value of the common stock at each meeting at
which options were granted based on factors such as the price of
the most recent convertible preferred stock sales to investors,
the preferences held by the convertible preferred stock classes
in favor of common stock, the valuations of comparable
companies, the hiring of key personnel, the status of the
Companys development and sales efforts, revenue growth and
additional objective, and subjective factors relating to the
Companys business. The Company has historically granted
stock options at not less than the fair value of the underlying
common stock as determined at the time of grant by the
Companys Board of Directors.
Information regarding the Companys stock option grants
during 2007 and the three months ended March 29, 2008,
including the grant date; the number of stock options issued
with each grant; and the exercise price, which equals the grant
date fair value of the underlying common stock for each grant of
stock options, is summarized as follows (in thousands, except
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
and Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
May 8, 2007
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
September 20, 2007
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
December 28, 2007
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
February 7, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
F-32
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Additional information regarding the Companys stock
options outstanding and exercisable as of December 29, 2007
is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Subject
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
to Options
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
$0.15
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,467
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
6,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Certain options under the Stock
Plan may be exercised prior to vesting but are subject to
repurchase at the original exercise price in the event the
optionees employment is terminated.
|
Options exercisable as of December 29, 2007 had a
weighted-average remaining contractual life of 7.4 years, a
weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.74, and an
aggregate intrinsic value of $3,662,000.
Additional information regarding the Companys stock
options outstanding and exercisable as of March 29, 2008 is
summarized in the following table (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Subject
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
to Options
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
$0.15
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
7,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Certain options under the Stock
Plan may be exercised prior to vesting but are subject to
repurchase at the original exercise price in the event the
optionees employment is terminated.
|
F-33
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Options exercisable as of March 29, 2008 had a
weighted-average remaining contractual life of 7.4 years, a
weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.91, and an
aggregate intrinsic value of $16,565,000.
Options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest as
of December 29, 2007 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
$
|
8,097
|
|
Expected to vest
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
11,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value was
calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the
underlying options and the fair value of the Companys
common stock in the amount of $2.40 per share as of
December 29, 2007.
|
Options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest as
of March 29, 2008 are summarized as follows (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
$
|
8,380
|
|
Expected to vest
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
11,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value was
calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the
options and the fair value of the Companys common stock in
the amount of $3.19 per share as of March 29, 2008.
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2006, 2007
and the three months ended March 29, 2008 was $167,000,
$259,000 and $39,000, respectively.
There were no stock-based compensation tax benefits during 2005,
2006, 2007 or the three months ended March 29, 2008.
Capitalized stock-based compensation costs were insignificant
during 2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended
March 29, 2008.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of
$5,000, $145,000, $708,000, $122,000 and $218,000 during 2005,
2006, 2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008. Included in these amounts was employee
stock-based compensation expense of $0, $86,000, $526,000,
$64,000 and $168,000 and nonemployee stock-based compensation
expense of $5,000, $59,000, $182,000, $58,000 and $50,000 during
2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2007
and March 29, 2008, respectively. As of December 29,
2007 and March 29, 2008, there was $1,698,000 and
$2,474,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to
stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Stock
Plan, which is expected to be recognized over an average period
of 2.9 and 2.6 years, respectively.
F-34
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock
Options Granted to Nonemployees
The Company accounts for options granted to nonemployees under
the fair value method in accordance with SFAS 123(R) and
EITF 96-18.
The fair value of these options was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions for 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008: risk-free interest
rates of 3.5% to 5.0%, dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility
of 54.7% to 82.9%, and an expected life of the options equal to
the remaining contractual terms of one to ten years. In
accordance with
EITF 96-18,
options granted to nonemployees are remeasured at each
accounting period-end until the award is vested.
The Company granted options to nonemployees to purchase 17,050,
88,250 and 236,000 shares of common stock during 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively. No such options were granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008.
As of December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008, there were
127,085 and 112,453 shares, respectively, subject to
unvested options held by nonemployees with a weighted-average
exercise price of $1.63 and $2.12, respectively, and an average
remaining vesting period of 2.7 years for both periods.
|
|
11.
|
Shares
Reserved for Issuance
|
As of December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008, the
Company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
7,467
|
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
Options available for grant
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
Conversion of convertible preferred stock upon exercise of
warrants
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,034
|
|
|
|
65,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above table does not include shares of common stock reserved
for potential conversions of the convertible promissory notes
(see Note 7) into shares of convertible preferred
stock. The only outstanding convertible promissory note as of
December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008 was converted in
April 2008, at which time the Company issued
1,503,945 shares of Series E convertible preferred
stock.
The Companys net loss before the provision for income
taxes is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,816
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,372
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
(1,204
|
)
|
|
|
(1,737
|
)
|
|
|
(2,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Significant components of the Companys provision for
income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of the benefits for income taxes at the statutory
rate to the provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Tax benefit at federal statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State income taxes (net of federal benefit)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
(31.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and accruals
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
37,557
|
|
|
|
47,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
43,177
|
|
|
|
52,747
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(43,177
|
)
|
|
|
(52,747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of deferred tax assets is appropriate when
realization of these assets is more likely than not. The Company
has incurred losses since its inception; accordingly, the net
deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation
allowance. The valuation allowance increased by $5,954,000,
$8,534,000 and $9,570,000 during 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
As of December 29, 2007, the Company had net operating loss
carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $121,531,000
which expire in the years 2019 through 2026 and federal research
and development tax credits of $2,749,000 which expire in the
years 2008 through 2016. As of December 29, 2007, the
Company had net operating
F-36
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of $119,340,000
which expire in the years 2012 through 2016 and state research
and development tax credits of $2,722,000 which do not expire.
As of December 29, 2007, the Company had foreign net
operating loss carryforwards of $4,768,000. A significant
portion of the foreign net operating losses relate to activity
in Singapore that has an indefinite carryforward period.
Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and credits
may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the
ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The
annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating
losses and credits before utilization. If an ownership change
has occurred at different dates or in addition to the dates
preliminarily identified, the utilization of net operation loss
and credit carryforwards could be significantly reduced.
The Company has not provided for U.S. federal and state income
taxes on all of the non U.S. subsidiaries undistributed
earnings as of December 29, 2007, because such earnings are
intended to be indefinitely reinvested under APB 23. Upon
distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or
otherwise, the Company would be subject to applicable U.S.
federal and state income taxes.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the
provisions of FIN 48. As a result, the Company recorded a
liability for net unrecognized tax benefits of $75,000, and
recognized a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle that resulted in a charge to the accumulated deficit.
The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified as
non-current.
The aggregate changes in the balance of the Companys gross
unrecognized tax benefits during 2007 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,157
|
|
Increases in balances related to tax provisions taken during
current periods
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits are classified as income tax expense and were
immaterial. As of December 29, 2007, unrecognized tax
benefits of $162,000, if recognized, would affect the
Companys effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized
tax benefits were netted against deferred tax assets with a full
valuation allowance, and if recognized, would not affect the
Companys effective tax rate. The Company does not
anticipate that the amount of existing unrecognized tax benefits
will significantly increase or decrease within the next
12 months. The Company files income tax returns in the
United States, various states and certain foreign jurisdictions.
The tax years 1999 through 2007 remain open in most
jurisdictions.
|
|
13.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan that stipulates that eligible
employees can elect to contribute to the plan, subject to
certain limitations, up to the lesser of 60% of eligible
compensation or the maximum amount allowed by the IRS on a
pretax basis annually. The Company has not made contributions to
this plan since its inception.
|
|
14.
|
Related-Party
Transactions
|
As discussed further in Note 7, the Company has entered
into multiple Convertible Note Purchase Agreements with BMSIF
pursuant to which the Company issued convertible notes and
received proceeds in the amount of $20.0 million. Principal
and interest on the notes is convertible into shares of
Series E convertible preferred stock at the lenders
election, at any time, and automatically convert upon the
achievement of certain targets or upon the completion of an
initial public offering in which the convertible preferred stock
has converted into common stock. Through March 29, 2008,
$15.0 million of these notes had been converted to shares
of Series E convertible preferred stock.
F-37
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BMSIF and its related companies held 7,505,022 shares of
the Companys common stock as of March 29, 2008, which
constitutes 9.7% of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted
basis. In addition, the Companys manufacturing operations
in Singapore, which commenced operations in October 2005, have
been supported by grants from EDB which provide incentive
payments for research, development and manufacturing activity in
Singapore by the Company. These agreements are discussed further
in Note 3.
In January 2004, the Company loaned an officer of the Company
$250,000 in connection with the purchase of a new home, which is
secured by 833,334 shares of the Companys common
stock held by the officer. The loan carried an interest rate of
3.52% per annum. The outstanding balance of this loan, including
accrued interest, was $277,000, $287,000 and $290,000 as of
December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively. On April 10, 2008, the
principal amount of this note and all accrued interest was
settled with 90,913 shares held by the officer at fair
value of the common stock, which was determined by the Board of
Directors to be $3.19 per share.
Dr. Stephen Quake, who is a professor of bioengineering at
Stanford University, is one of the Companys founding
stockholders and as such held 2,326,000 shares of common
stock as of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008. In June 2006, the Company repurchased
124,000 shares of the Companys common stock held by
Dr. Quake for $0.56 per share.
Dr. Quake also serves as a consultant to the Company and is
a member of the Companys Scientific Advisory Board. The
Company paid consulting fees of $45,000, $97,000, $67,000,
$25,000 and $50,000 to Dr. Quake during 2005, 2006, 2007
and the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively, and accrued amounts payable
to Dr. Quake related to these payments were $0, $33,000 and
$8,000 as of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively. The Company recognized
$205,000, $241,000, $15,000, $0 and $19,000 in revenue related
to products and services sold to Stanford University during
2005, 2006, 2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2007
and March 29, 2008, respectively, and had accounts
receivable balances related to these sales of $0, $11,000 and
$15,000 as of December 31, 2006, December 29, 2007 and
March 29, 2008, respectively.
The Companys general counsel was also a member of a law
firm whose services are utilized by the Company. On
April 1, 2008, the Companys general counsel resigned
his position from such law firm. Amounts paid to the law firm
for services and direct patent fees were $880,000, $960,000,
$576,000, $208,000 and $180,000 for 2005, 2006, 2007 and the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008,
respectively, and accrued amounts payable to the law firm were
$174,000, $257,000 and $175,000 as of December 31, 2006,
December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008, respectively.
|
|
15.
|
Information
about Geographic Areas
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards
for reporting information about operating segments. Operating
segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by a companys chief operating decision maker, or
decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and
in assessing performance. The chief operating decision maker for
the Company is the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive
Officer reviews financial information presented on a
consolidated basis, accompanied by information about revenue by
geographic region, for purposes of allocating resources and
evaluating financial performance. The Company has one business
activity and there are no segment managers who are held
accountable for operations, operating results or plans for
levels or components below the consolidated unit level.
Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has a single
reporting segment and operating unit structure which is the
development, manufacturing and commercialization of IFCs and
complementary laboratory instruments.
F-38
FLUIDIGM
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenue by geography is based on the billing address of the
customer. The following tables set forth revenue and long-lived
assets by geographic area (in thousands):
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
5,557
|
|
|
$
|
3,807
|
|
|
$
|
3,492
|
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Other
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,674
|
|
|
$
|
6,398
|
|
|
$
|
7,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,068
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
|
$
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Subsequent
Events (Unaudited)
|
In April 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved
the filing of a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for an initial public offering of the
Companys common stock.
In April 2008, BMSIF exercised the conversion provision
for the third and final convertible promissory note and the
Company issued 1,503,945 shares of Series E convertible
preferred stock at $3.60 per share as settlement of the
outstanding principal and accrued interest balance on the date
of the conversion in the amount of $5,414,000.
In June 2008, the Company received a letter from a competitor
asserting that the Company had infringed upon a patent currently
held by the competitor. In response, the Company filed a
countersuit against the competitor seeking declaratory judgments
of non-infringement and invalidity of the patent.
In June 2008, the Company drew down the $10 million
available under an existing loan and security agreement. In
accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of Series E
convertible preferred stock to the lender.
F-39
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table sets forth all expenses to be paid by the
registrant, other than estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions, in connection with this offering. All amounts shown
are estimates except for the SEC registration fee, the NASD
filing fee and the NASDAQ Global Market listing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
9,125
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Blue sky fees and expenses (including legal fees)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be provided by amendment. |
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
authorizes a corporations board of directors to grant, and
authorizes a court to award, indemnity to officers, directors
and other corporate agents.
As permitted by Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, the registrants certificate of
incorporation includes provisions that eliminate the personal
liability of its directors and officers for monetary damages for
breach of their fiduciary duty as directors and officers.
In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, the bylaws of the registrant provide
that:
|
|
|
|
|
The registrant shall indemnify its directors and officers for
serving the registrant in those capacities or for serving other
business enterprises at the registrants request, to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides
that a corporation may indemnify such person if such person
acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
registrant and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe such persons conduct was
unlawful.
|
|
|
|
The registrant may, in its discretion, indemnify employees and
agents in those circumstances where indemnification is not
required by law.
|
|
|
|
The registrant is required to advance expenses, as incurred, to
its directors and officers in connection with defending a
proceeding, except that such director or officer shall undertake
to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such
person is not entitled to indemnification.
|
|
|
|
The registrant will not be obligated pursuant to the bylaws to
indemnify a person with respect to proceedings initiated by that
person, except with respect to proceedings authorized by the
registrants Board of Directors or brought to enforce a
right to indemnification.
|
|
|
|
The rights conferred in the bylaws are not exclusive, and the
registrant is authorized to enter into indemnification
agreements with its directors, officers, employees and agents
and to obtain insurance to indemnify such persons.
|
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
The registrant may not retroactively amend the bylaw provisions
to reduce its indemnification obligations to directors,
officers, employees and agents.
|
The registrants policy is to enter into separate
indemnification agreements with each of its directors and
officers that provide the maximum indemnity allowed to directors
and executive officers by Section 145 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law and also provides for certain additional
procedural protections. The registrant also maintains directors
and officers insurance to insure such persons against certain
liabilities.
These indemnification provisions and the indemnification
agreements entered into between the registrant and its officers
and directors may be sufficiently broad to permit
indemnification of the registrants officers and directors
for liabilities (including reimbursement of expenses incurred)
arising under the Securities Act.
The underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
registration statement provides for indemnification by the
underwriters of the registrant and its officers and directors
for certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act and
otherwise.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
|
In the three years prior to the filing of this registration
statement, the registrant has issued the following unregistered
securities:
(a) From March 2005 through July 17, 2007, Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation, issued and sold an
aggregate of 470,965 shares of its common stock upon the
exercise of options issued to certain employees, directors and
consultants under the registrants 1999 Stock Option Plan,
as amended, at exercise prices ranging from $0.30 to $0.83, for
aggregate consideration of $188,442. From July 18, 2007
through May 22, 2008, the registrant issued and sold
an aggregate of 250,720 shares of its common stock upon the
exercise of options issued to certain employees, directors and
consultants under the registrants 1999 Stock Option Plan,
as amended, at exercise prices ranging from $0.30 to $1.36 per
share, for aggregate consideration of $123,346.
(b) From March 2005 through July 17, 2007, Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation, granted to certain of its
employees, directors and consultants under the registrants
1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended, options to purchase an
aggregate of 3,986,044 shares of its common stock at
exercise prices ranging from $0.30 to $1.36 per share. From
July 18, 2007 through May 22, 2008, the registrant
granted to certain of its employees, directors and consultants
under the registrants 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
options to purchase an aggregate of 452,200 shares of the
registrants common stock at exercise prices ranging from
$1.38 to $2.40 per share.
(c) In March 2005, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, pursuant to a loan and security agreement, issued
and sold a warrant to purchase 371,428 shares of its
Series D Preferred Stock to one accredited investor at an
exercise price of $2.80 per share. In connection with the
registrants reincorporation into the State of Delaware on
July 18, 2007, the warrant was converted into a warrant to
purchase an equal number of shares of the registrants
Series D Preferred Stock.
(d) In November 2005, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, issued and sold 70,000 shares of its common
stock to one accredited investor at an issuance price of $0.56
per share for aggregate monetary consideration of $39,200, which
amount was deemed paid by the transfer of certain rights granted
to registrant pursuant to the terms of a licensing agreement.
(e) In December 2005, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, issued 832,635 shares of its Series D
Preferred Stock to one accredited investor in connection with
the conversion of a convertible promissory note at a conversion
price per share of $2.80.
(f) In June 2006, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, issued to one accredited investor a convertible
promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000
convertible into shares of its Series D Preferred Stock. In
July 2007, the notes were converted into 1,157,142 shares
of Series D Preferred Stock at a conversion price per share
of $2.80.
II-2
(g) In June 2006, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, issued 214,285 shares of its Series D
Preferred Stock to one accredited investor at an issuance price
of $2.80 per share, for aggregate monetary consideration of
$599,998, which amount was deemed paid by the transfer of
certain rights granted to registrant pursuant to the terms of a
licensing agreement.
(h) In June 2006, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, issued 267,858 shares of its Series D
Preferred Stock to one accredited investor in connection with
the exercise of a warrant to purchase shares of its
Series D Preferred Stock at an exercise price per share of
$2.80.
(i) From August 2006 through April 2007, Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation, issued three convertible
promissory notes to one accredited investor in an aggregate
principal amount of $15,000,000, all of which were convertible
into shares of its Series E Preferred Stock. In March 2007,
two of the notes were converted into an aggregate of
2,954,337 shares of the Series E Preferred Stock of
Fluidigm Corporation, a California corporation. In connection
with the registrants reincorporation into the State of
Delaware on July 18, 2007, the remaining outstanding
convertible promissory note was made convertible into shares of
the registrants Series E Preferred Stock.
(j) In March 2007, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to
one accredited investor at an issuance price of $0.83 per share,
for aggregate monetary consideration of $83,000, which amount
was deemed paid by the transfer of certain rights granted to
registrant pursuant to the terms of a licensing agreement.
(k) In May 2007, Fluidigm Corporation, a California
corporation, granted to seven of its employees and directors
under the registrants 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
options to purchase an aggregate of 767,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $1.36 per share.
(l) In connection with the registrants
reincorporation into the State of Delaware on July 18,
2007, the registrant issued an aggregate of
9,695,998 shares of common stock to a total of 128
stockholders in exchange for the outstanding shares of common
stock Fluidigm Corporation, a California corporation.
(m) In connection with the registrants
reincorporation into the State of Delaware on July 18,
2007, the registrant issued an aggregate of
2,727,273 shares of the registrants Series A
Preferred Stock to a total of 41 investors in exchange for the
outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation.
(n) In connection with the registrants
reincorporation into the State of Delaware on July 18,
2007, the registrant issued an aggregate of
6,460,675 shares of the registrants Series B
Preferred Stock to a total of 35 investors in exchange for the
outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock of Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation.
(o) In connection with the registrants
reincorporation into the State of Delaware on July 18,
2007, the registrant issued an aggregate of
16,364,832 shares of the registrants Series C
Preferred Stock to a total of 62 investors in exchange for the
outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock of Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation.
(p) In connection with the registrants
reincorporation into the State of Delaware on July 18,
2007, the registrant issued an aggregate of
12,196,191 shares of the registrants Series D
Preferred Stock to a total of 52 investors in exchange for the
outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock of Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation.
(q) In connection with the registrants
reincorporation into the State of Delaware on July 18,
2007, the registrant issued an aggregate of
8,969,836 shares of the registrants Series E
Preferred Stock to a total of 35 investors in exchange for the
outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock of Fluidigm
Corporation, a California corporation.
(r) From October 2007 through December 2007, the registrant
issued and sold an aggregate of 8,794,945 shares of
Series E Preferred Stock to a total of seven investors at
$4.00 per share, for aggregate proceeds of $35,179,780.
II-3
(s) In December 2007, the registrant issued
6,000 shares of its common stock to one accredited investor
at an issuance price of $1.36 per share for aggregate monetary
consideration of $8,160, which amount was deemed paid by the
transfer of certain rights granted to registrant pursuant to the
terms of a licensing agreement.
(t) In December 2007, the registrant granted to one of its
directors under the registrants 1999 Stock Option Plan, as
amended, options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares
of the registrants common stock at an exercise price of
$2.40 per share.
(u) In February 2008, the registrant issued a warrant to
purchase 100,000 shares of the registrants
Series E Preferred Stock to one accredited investor at an
exercise price of $4.00 per share.
(v) In February 2008, the registrant granted to one of its
executive officers under the registrants 1999 Stock Option
Plan, as amended, options to purchase an aggregate of
600,000 shares of the registrants common stock at an
exercise price of $2.40 per share.
(w) In April 2008, the registrant granted to six of its
employees and directors under the registrants 1999 Stock
Option Plan, as amended, options to purchase an aggregate of
1,090,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price
of $3.19 per share.
(x) On May 12, 2008, the registrant issued
16,422 shares of its Series C Preferred Stock to
Imperial Bank pursuant to Imperial Banks net exercise of
its warrant to purchase up to 41,284 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock. The remainder of the warrant was
cancelled pursuant to the terms of the net exercise.
None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters,
underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering,
and the registrant believes that each transaction was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in
reliance on the following exemptions:
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to the transactions described in paragraphs
(a) and (b), Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities
Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan
approved by the registrants Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
with respect to the transactions described in paragraphs (1)
through (q), Rule 145(a)(2) promulgated under the
Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a plan or agreement
for statutory merger or similar plan or acquisition in which
securities of the registrant were exchanged for the securities
of Fluidigm Corporation, a California corporation, the sole
purpose of which was to change the registrants domicile
solely within the United States, and a Permit granted pursuant
to Section 25121 of the California Corporations Code; and
|
|
|
|
with respect to the transactions described in paragraphs
(c) through (k) and paragraphs (r) through (x),
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, or Rule 506 of
Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as transactions by an
issuer not involving a public offering. Each recipient of the
securities in this transaction represented his or her intention
to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to, or for resale in connection with, any distribution
thereof, and appropriate legends were affixed to the share
certificates issued in each such transaction. In each case, the
recipient received adequate information about the registrant or
had adequate access, through his or her relationship with the
registrant, to information about the registrant.
|
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are
included herein or incorporated herein by reference:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1(1)
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1(3)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as currently in
effect.
|
|
3
|
.2(3)
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant,
to be in effect upon the completion of this offering.
|
|
3
|
.3(3)
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.4(1)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, to be in
effect upon completion of this offering.
|
|
4
|
.1(1)
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant.
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.2(3)
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated
June 13, 2006 through October 26, 2007 between the
Registrant and the Purchasers set forth therein, as amended.
|
|
4
|
.3(3)
|
|
Eighth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement between
the Registrant and certain holders of the Registrants
common stock named therein, including amendments No. 1 and
No. 2.
|
|
4
|
.4(2)(3)
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement No. 4561 between the Registrant
and Lighthouse Capital Partners V, L.P. dated
March 29, 2005, including amendments Nos. 1 through 4.
|
|
4
|
.4A(3)
|
|
Preferred Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Lighthouse Capital
Partners V, L.P. effective March 29, 2005.
|
|
4
|
.4B(3)
|
|
Negative Pledge Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Lighthouse Capital Partners V, L.P. dated March 29,
2005.
|
|
4
|
.5(3)
|
|
Convertible Note Purchase Agreement by and between Biomedical
Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd and the Registrant dated
August 7, 2006.
|
|
4
|
.5A(2)(3)
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued to Biomedical Sciences
Investment Fund Pte Ltd dated April 19, 2007, as
amended.
|
|
5
|
.1(1)
|
|
Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation.
|
|
10
|
.1(3)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.2(3)
|
|
1999 Stock Plan of the Registrant, as amended April 24,
2008.
|
|
10
|
.2A(3)
|
|
Forms of agreements under the 1999 Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.3(1)
|
|
2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.3A(1)
|
|
Forms of agreements under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.4(2)(3)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between
California Institute of Technology and the Registrant effective
as of May 1, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.4A(2)(3)
|
|
First Addendum, effective as of March 29, 2007, to Second
Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between California
Institute of Technology and the Registrant effective as of
May 1, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.5(2)(3)
|
|
Co-Exclusive License Agreement between President and Fellows of
Harvard College and the Registrant effective as of
October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.5A(2)(3)
|
|
First Amendment to Co-Exclusive License Agreement between
President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Registrant
effective as of October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.6(2)(3)
|
|
Co-Exclusive License Agreement between President and Fellows of
Harvard College and the Registrant effective as of
October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.7(2)(3)
|
|
Co-Exclusive License Agreement between President and Fellows of
Harvard College and the Registrant effective as of
October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.8(2)(3)
|
|
Patent License Agreement by and between Gyros AB and the
Registrant dated January 9, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.8A(2)(3)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 9, 2005 to Patent
License Agreement by and between Gyros AB and the Registrant
dated January 9, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.9(2)(3)
|
|
Master Closing Agreement by and between UAB Research Foundation,
Oculus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the Registrant dated
March 7, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.9A(2)(3)
|
|
License Agreement by and between UAB Research Foundation and the
Registrant dated March 7, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.10(2)(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement Regarding Application for
Incentives Under the Research Incentive Scheme for Companies
(RISC) dated March 27, 2008 (originally dated
October 7, 2005), by and between Singapore Economic
Development Board and Fluidigm Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.10A(2)(3)
|
|
Supplement Dated January 11, 2006 to Letter Agreement
Relating to Application for Incentives under the Research
Incentive Scheme for Companies (RISC), dated October 7,
2005 between Singapore Economic Development Board and Fluidigm
Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.11(2)(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement Regarding Application for
Incentives Under the Research Incentive Scheme for Companies
(RISC) dated March 27, 2008 (originally dated
February 12, 2007), by and between Singapore Economic
Development Board and Fluidigm Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.12(2)(3)
|
|
Distribution Agreement by and between Eppendorf AG and the
Registrant effective as of April 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.13(3)
|
|
Form of Employment and Severance Agreement between the
Registrant and each of its executive officers.
|
|
10
|
.14(3)
|
|
Consulting Agreement by and between the Registrant and Richard
DeLateur dated February 29, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.15(3)
|
|
Employee Loan Agreement with Gajus Worthington dated
January 20, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.15A(3)
|
|
Stock Repurchase Agreement between the Registrant and Gajus V.
Worthington dated April 10, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.16(3)
|
|
Offer Letter to Vikram Jog dated January 29, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.17(3)
|
|
Settlement Agreement and General Release of all Claims by and
between Michael Ybarra Lucero and the Registrant dated
March 20, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.18(2)(3)
|
|
Letter Agreement between President and Fellows of Harvard
College and the Registrant dated December 22, 2004.
|
|
21
|
.1(3)
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Registrant.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
23
|
.2(1)
|
|
Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
24
|
.1(3)
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
To be filed by amendment.
|
(2)
|
|
Confidential treatment has been
requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit.
Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
|
(3)
|
|
Previously filed.
|
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
All schedules have been omitted because the information required
to be presented in them is not applicable or is shown in the
consolidated financial statements or related notes.
Item 17. Undertakings.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to
II-6
the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
(3) For the purpose of determining liability under the
Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant is
subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to
an offering, other than registration statements relying on
Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on
Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the
registration statement as of the date it is first used after
effectiveness; provided, however, that no statement made in a
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement or made in a document incorporated or
deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will,
as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such
first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in
the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the
registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to such date of first use.
(4) For the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser to
the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned
registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to
the purchasers and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
II-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 4 to the
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of South San
Francisco, State of California, on the 18th day of July 2008.
FLUIDIGM CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Gajus
V. Worthington
|
Gajus V. Worthington
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 4 to the registration statement has been signed by
the following persons in the capacities indicated on the 18th
day of July 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Gajus
V. Worthington
Gajus
V. Worthington
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vikram
Jog
Vikram
Jog
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial
Officer)
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Samuel
Colella
|
|
Director
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Michael
W. Hunkapiller
|
|
Director
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Elaine
V. Jones
|
|
Director
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Kenneth
Nussbacher
|
|
Director
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
John
A. Young
|
|
Director
|
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Gajus
V. Worthington
Gajus
V. Worthington
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-8
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1(1)
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1(3)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as currently in
effect.
|
|
3
|
.2(3)
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant,
to be in effect upon the completion of this offering.
|
|
3
|
.3(3)
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
3
|
.4(1)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, to be in
effect upon completion of this offering.
|
|
4
|
.1(1)
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant.
|
|
4
|
.2(3)
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated
June 13, 2006 through October 26, 2007 between the
Registrant and the Purchasers set forth therein, as amended.
|
|
4
|
.3(3)
|
|
Eighth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement between
the Registrant and certain holders of the Registrants
common stock named therein, including amendments No. 1 and
No. 2.
|
|
4
|
.4(2)(3)
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement No. 4561 between the Registrant
and Lighthouse Capital Partners V, L.P. dated
March 29, 2005, including amendments Nos. 1 through 4.
|
|
4
|
.4A(3)
|
|
Preferred Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Lighthouse Capital
Partners V, L.P. effective March 29, 2005.
|
|
4
|
.4B(3)
|
|
Negative Pledge Agreement by and between the Registrant and
Lighthouse Capital Partners V, L.P. dated March 29,
2005.
|
|
4
|
.5(3)
|
|
Convertible Note Purchase Agreement by and between Biomedical
Sciences Investment Fund Pte Ltd and the Registrant dated
August 7, 2006.
|
|
4
|
.5A(2)(3)
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued to Biomedical Sciences
Investment Fund Pte Ltd dated April 19, 2007, as
amended.
|
|
5
|
.1(1)
|
|
Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation.
|
|
10
|
.1(3)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.2(3)
|
|
1999 Stock Plan of the Registrant, as amended April 24,
2008.
|
|
10
|
.2A(3)
|
|
Forms of agreements under the 1999 Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.3(1)
|
|
2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.3A(1)
|
|
Forms of agreements under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.4(2)(3)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between
California Institute of Technology and the Registrant effective
as of May 1, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.4A(2)(3)
|
|
First Addendum, effective as of March 29, 2007, to Second
Amended and Restated License Agreement by and between California
Institute of Technology and the Registrant effective as of
May 1, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.5(2)(3)
|
|
Co-Exclusive License Agreement between President and Fellows of
Harvard College and the Registrant effective as of
October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.5A(2)(3)
|
|
First Amendment to Co-Exclusive License Agreement between
President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Registrant
effective as of October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.6(2)(3)
|
|
Co-Exclusive License Agreement between President and Fellows of
Harvard College and the Registrant effective as of
October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.7(2)(3)
|
|
Co-Exclusive License Agreement between President and Fellows of
Harvard College and the Registrant effective as of
October 15, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.8(2)(3)
|
|
Patent License Agreement by and between Gyros AB and the
Registrant dated January 9, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.8A(2)(3)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 9, 2005 to Patent
License Agreement by and between Gyros AB and the Registrant
dated January 9, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.9(2)(3)
|
|
Master Closing Agreement by and between UAB Research Foundation,
Oculus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the Registrant dated
March 7, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.9A(2)(3)
|
|
License Agreement by and between UAB Research Foundation and the
Registrant dated March 7, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.10(2)(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement Regarding Application for
Incentives Under the Research Incentive Scheme for Companies
(RISC) dated March 27, 2008 (originally dated
October 7, 2005), by and between Singapore Economic
Development Board and Fluidigm Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.10A(2)(3)
|
|
Supplement Dated January 11, 2006 to Letter Agreement
Relating to Application for Incentives under the Research
Incentive Scheme for Companies (RISC), dated October 7,
2005 between Singapore Economic Development Board and Fluidigm
Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.11(2)(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement Regarding Application for
Incentives Under the Research Incentive Scheme for Companies
(RISC) dated March 27, 2008 (originally dated
February 12, 2007), by and between Singapore Economic
Development Board and Fluidigm Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.12(2)(3)
|
|
Distribution Agreement by and between Eppendorf AG and the
Registrant effective as of April 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.13(3)
|
|
Form of Employment and Severance Agreement between the
Registrant and each of its executive officers.
|
|
10
|
.14(3)
|
|
Consulting Agreement by and between the Registrant and Richard
DeLateur dated February 29, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.15(3)
|
|
Employee Loan Agreement with Gajus Worthington dated
January 20, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.15A(3)
|
|
Stock Repurchase Agreement between the Registrant and Gajus V.
Worthington dated April 10, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.16(3)
|
|
Offer Letter to Vikram Jog dated January 29, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.17(3)
|
|
Settlement Agreement and General Release of all Claims by and
between Michael Ybarra Lucero and the Registrant dated
March 20, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.18(2)(3)
|
|
Letter Agreement between President and Fellows of Harvard
College and the Registrant dated December 22, 2004.
|
|
21
|
.1(3)
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Registrant.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
23
|
.2(1)
|
|
Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
24
|
.1(3)
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
To be filed by amendment.
|
(2)
|
|
Confidential treatment has been
requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit.
Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
|
(3)
|
|
Previously filed.
|