e10vq
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the transition period from ____ to ____ |
Commission file number 1-10356
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
58-0506554
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1001 Summit Boulevard
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
30319
(Zip Code) |
(404) 300-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of common stock as of July 30,
2010 was as follows:
Class A
Common Stock, $1.00 par value: 27,993,572
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: 24,697,172
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
Index
2
Part 1 Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements |
|
$ |
238,151 |
|
|
$ |
249,664 |
|
Reimbursements |
|
|
17,835 |
|
|
|
21,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
255,986 |
|
|
|
271,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided, before reimbursements |
|
|
176,424 |
|
|
|
183,884 |
|
Reimbursements |
|
|
17,835 |
|
|
|
21,979 |
|
|
Total costs of services |
|
|
194,259 |
|
|
|
205,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
|
|
50,411 |
|
|
|
54,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate interest expense, net of interest income
of $193 and $486, respectively |
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other costs |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
7,303 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs and Expenses |
|
|
257,632 |
|
|
|
357,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before Income Taxes |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(86,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
|
(2,511 |
) |
|
|
(87,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Attributable to Crawford & Company |
|
$ |
(2,527 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Per
Share, Based on Net Loss Attributable to Crawford & Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Number of Shares Used to Compute: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
|
52,619 |
|
|
|
51,877 |
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
|
52,619 |
|
|
|
51,877 |
|
(See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements)
3
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements |
|
$ |
474,417 |
|
|
$ |
485,747 |
|
Reimbursements |
|
|
33,622 |
|
|
|
36,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
508,039 |
|
|
|
521,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided, before reimbursements |
|
|
352,970 |
|
|
|
359,046 |
|
Reimbursements |
|
|
33,622 |
|
|
|
36,179 |
|
|
Total costs of services |
|
|
386,592 |
|
|
|
395,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
|
|
99,378 |
|
|
|
105,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate interest expense, net of interest income
of $296 and $1,066, respectively |
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other costs |
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
7,303 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs and Expenses |
|
|
505,732 |
|
|
|
604,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes |
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
(82,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
(84,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Crawford & Company |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
(85,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share, Based on Net Income (Loss)
Attributable to Crawford & Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(1.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Number of Shares Used to Compute: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
|
52,504 |
|
|
|
51,625 |
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
|
52,949 |
|
|
|
51,625 |
|
(See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements)
4
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
*
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,234 |
|
|
$ |
70,354 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $10,747 and $11,983, respectively |
|
|
150,489 |
|
|
|
139,215 |
|
Unbilled revenues, at estimated billable amounts |
|
|
104,034 |
|
|
|
93,796 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
24,851 |
|
|
|
22,350 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
317,608 |
|
|
|
325,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
142,467 |
|
|
|
144,254 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(102,274 |
) |
|
|
(102,108 |
) |
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
40,193 |
|
|
|
42,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
122,162 |
|
|
|
123,169 |
|
Intangible assets arising from business acquisitions, net |
|
|
100,979 |
|
|
|
104,409 |
|
Capitalized software costs, net |
|
|
52,841 |
|
|
|
50,463 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
68,072 |
|
|
|
69,504 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
26,460 |
|
|
|
27,499 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
370,514 |
|
|
|
375,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
728,315 |
|
|
$ |
742,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements)
5
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONTINUED
Unaudited
(In thousands except par value amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
17,914 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
34,205 |
|
|
|
35,449 |
|
Accrued compensation and related costs |
|
|
59,842 |
|
|
|
70,871 |
|
Self-insured risks |
|
|
16,807 |
|
|
|
18,475 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
56,208 |
|
|
|
47,318 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
50,071 |
|
|
|
53,664 |
|
Mandatory company contributions due to pension plan |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Current installments of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
8,189 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
253,212 |
|
|
|
258,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current installments |
|
|
171,920 |
|
|
|
173,061 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
33,524 |
|
Self-insured risks |
|
|
15,957 |
|
|
|
14,824 |
|
Accrued pension liabilities, less current mandatory contributions |
|
|
180,128 |
|
|
|
187,507 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
14,390 |
|
|
|
13,705 |
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
414,259 |
|
|
|
422,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $1.00 par value; 50,000
shares authorized; 27,767 and 27,355 shares issued and
outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
27,767 |
|
|
|
27,355 |
|
Class B common stock, $1.00 par value; 50,000
shares authorized; 24,697 shares issued and
outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
24,697 |
|
|
|
24,697 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
29,891 |
|
|
|
29,570 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
140,990 |
|
|
|
140,463 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(167,339 |
) |
|
|
(165,403 |
) |
|
Total Crawford & Company Shareholders Investment |
|
|
56,006 |
|
|
|
56,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
4,838 |
|
|
|
4,604 |
|
|
Total shareholders investment |
|
|
60,844 |
|
|
|
61,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
$ |
728,315 |
|
|
$ |
742,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements)
6
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
(84,876 |
) |
Reconciliation
of net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
15,568 |
|
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
7,303 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
Loss on disposals of property and equipment, net |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(12,753 |
) |
|
|
8,645 |
|
Unbilled revenues, net |
|
|
(12,600 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
Accrued or prepaid income taxes |
|
|
(837 |
) |
|
|
(2,723 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(6,617 |
) |
|
|
(13,409 |
) |
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(4,826 |
) |
|
|
(6,189 |
) |
Accrued retirement costs |
|
|
(14,311 |
) |
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other operating activities |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(29,632 |
) |
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of property and equipment |
|
|
(4,973 |
) |
|
|
(4,630 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Capitalization of computer software costs |
|
|
(7,249 |
) |
|
|
(6,780 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,191 |
) |
|
|
(12,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to settle withholding taxes under stock-based
compensation plans |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
Increases in short-term borrowings |
|
|
22,108 |
|
|
|
15,086 |
|
Payments on short-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,688 |
) |
|
|
(15,444 |
) |
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(7,053 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
Capitalized loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(944 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
11,625 |
|
|
|
(4,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(32,120 |
) |
|
|
(15,024 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
70,354 |
|
|
|
73,124 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
38,234 |
|
|
$ |
58,100 |
|
|
(See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements)
7
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Class A |
|
Class B |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Crawford & |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Non-Voting |
|
Voting |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Company |
|
Interests |
|
Investment |
| |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
27,355 |
|
|
$ |
24,697 |
|
|
$ |
29,570 |
|
|
$ |
140,463 |
|
|
$ |
(165,403 |
) |
|
$ |
56,682 |
|
|
$ |
4,604 |
|
|
$ |
61,286 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) Note 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,765 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777 |
|
Dividends
paid to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Common stock activity, net |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
27,767 |
|
|
|
24,697 |
|
|
|
29,232 |
|
|
|
143,517 |
|
|
|
(165,689 |
) |
|
|
59,524 |
|
|
|
4,562 |
|
|
|
64,086 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) Note 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
(4,177 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(3,901 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
Common stock activity, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
27,767 |
|
|
$ |
24,697 |
|
|
$ |
29,891 |
|
|
$ |
140,990 |
|
|
$ |
(167,339 |
) |
|
$ |
56,006 |
|
|
$ |
4,838 |
|
|
$ |
60,844 |
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Class A |
|
Class B |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Crawford & |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Non-Voting |
|
Voting |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Company |
|
Interests |
|
Investment |
| |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
26,523 |
|
|
$ |
24,697 |
|
|
$ |
26,342 |
|
|
$ |
256,146 |
|
|
$ |
(158,157 |
) |
|
$ |
175,551 |
|
|
$ |
4,808 |
|
|
$ |
180,359 |
|
Comprehensive
income (loss) Note 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
|
|
(13,833 |
) |
|
|
(10,751 |
) |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(11,404 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Common stock activity, net |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,886 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
27,149 |
|
|
|
24,697 |
|
|
|
25,425 |
|
|
|
259,228 |
|
|
|
(171,990 |
) |
|
|
164,509 |
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
168,664 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
(loss) income Note 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,124 |
) |
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
(74,756 |
) |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
(74,362 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
Common stock activity, net |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
27,219 |
|
|
$ |
24,697 |
|
|
$ |
26,612 |
|
|
$ |
171,104 |
|
|
$ |
(158,622 |
) |
|
$ |
91,010 |
|
|
$ |
4,549 |
|
|
$ |
95,559 |
|
|
|
|
(See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements)
8
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Based in Atlanta, Georgia, Crawford & Company (the Company) is the worlds largest independent
provider of claims management solutions to the risk management and insurance industries as well as
self-insured entities, with a global network of more than 700 locations in 63 countries. The
Crawford System of Claims Solutionssm offers comprehensive, integrated claims
services, business process outsourcing and consulting services for major product lines including
property and casualty claims management, workers compensation claims and medical management, and
legal settlement administration. Shares of the Companys two classes of common stock are traded on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols CRDA and CRDB, respectively. The Companys website
is www.crawfordandcompany.com. The information contained on the
Companys website is not a part of, and is not incorporated by
reference into, this report.
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Accordingly, these unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. There have been no material
changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Operating results for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2010 or for other future periods.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain prior period
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet information presented herein as of December 31, 2009
has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date, but does not
include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
9
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
For variable interest entities (VIE), the Company determines when it should include the assets,
liabilities, and results of operations of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. The
Company consolidates the assets of a rabbi trust, which is considered a VIE of the Company. The
rabbi trust was created to fund the liabilities of the Companys deferred compensation plan. The
Company is considered the primary beneficiary of the rabbi trust because the Company directs the
activities of the trust and can use the assets of the trust to satisfy the liabilities of the
Companys deferred compensation plan. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the liabilities of
the deferred compensation plan were $8,980,000 and $8,570,000, respectively, and the values of the
assets held in the related rabbi trust were $13,795,000 and $13,551,000, respectively. These
assets and liabilities are included in Other Noncurrent Assets and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on
the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
2. Adoption of New Accounting Standards in 2010
Variable Interest Entities
On
January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved With
Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17), which amended Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 810, Consolidations, and other related guidance. ASU 2009-17 made certain changes to the
guidance used to determine when an entity should consolidate a variable interest entity in its
consolidated financial statements. Based on the status of the entities that are evaluated for
consolidation in the Companys consolidated financial statements, the adoption of ASU 2009-17 did
not impact the Companys results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Fair Value Disclosures
On January 21, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value
Measurements, (ASU 2010-06) which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to
add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair
value hierarchy and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
relating to Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. This ASU also clarifies existing
fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. This ASU was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010,
except for the requirements to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuance, and
settlements, if any, which will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2011.
Since ASU 2010-06 is a disclosure-only standard, its adoption had no impact on the Companys
results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. For the three-month and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no transactions requiring disclosure under
ASU 2010-06.
10
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. Pending Adoption of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements
On October 7, 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple Revenue Arrangements a consensus of
the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2009-13), which will supersede certain guidance in ASC
605-25, Revenue Recognition-Multiple Element Arrangements, (ASC 605-25) and will require an
entity to allocate arrangement consideration to all of its deliverables at the inception of an
arrangement based on their relative selling prices (i.e., the relative-selling-price method). The
use of the residual method of allocation will no longer be permitted in circumstances in which an
entity recognized revenue for an arrangement with multiple deliverables subject to ASC 605-25. ASU
2009-13 will also require additional disclosures. The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU
2009-13 on January 1, 2011. Based on the Companys current revenue arrangements, the adoption of
ASU 2009-13 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
Stock-Based Compensation
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Effect
of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in
Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force
(ASU 2010-13). ASU 2010-13 addresses whether an entity should classify a share-based payment
award as equity or a liability if the awards exercise price is denominated in the currency in
which the underlying security trades and that currency is different from the 1) entitys functional
currency, 2) functional currency of the foreign operation for which the employee provides services,
and 3) payroll currency of the employee. Under the existing guidance in ASC 718-10,
Compensation-Stock Compensation, the Company does not classify any of its stock-based
compensation as liabilities. ASU 2010-13 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2011. However,
the adoption of ASU 2010-13 is not expected to change the Companys current accounting for its
stock-based compensation plans as equity awards since ASU 2010-13s application contains an
exception for share-based payments that, like the Companys, use exercise prices denominated in the
currency of the market in which substantial portions of the entitys equity securities trade.
11
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
4. Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Shareholders of |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Crawford & Company |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(2,527 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(2,511 |
) |
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign currency translation (loss) gain |
|
|
(4,205 |
) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(3,945 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreement, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reclassified into income |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
|
Gain recognized during period |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
Amortization
of cost of retirement plans, net of taxes |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(4,177 |
) |
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
(3,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Shareholders of |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Crawford & Company |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(88,124 |
) |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
(87,889 |
) |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign currency translation gain |
|
|
11,433 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
11,592 |
|
Interest rate swap agreement, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reclassified into income |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896 |
|
Loss recognized during period |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
Amortization of cost of retirement plans, net of taxes |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(74,756 |
) |
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
$ |
(74,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Comprehensive (loss) income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Shareholders of |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Crawford & Company |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign
currency translation (loss) gain |
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(5,527 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreement, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reclassified into income |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
Loss recognized during period |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
Amortization of cost of retirement plans, net of taxes |
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(1,409 |
) |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Shareholders of |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Crawford & Company |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(85,042 |
) |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
(84,876 |
) |
Other
Comprehensive (Loss) Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign currency translation loss |
|
|
(3,927 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(4,352 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreement, net of taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reclassified into income |
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
Loss recognized during period |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
Amortization of cost of retirement plans, net of taxes |
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Loss |
|
$ |
(85,507 |
) |
|
$ |
(259 |
) |
|
$ |
(85,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Attributable to Crawford & Company
Both classes of the Companys common stock, Common Stock Class A (CRDA) and
Common Stock Class B (CRDB) , share equally in the
Companys earnings for purposes of computing (loss) earnings per share (EPS).
The
computations of basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share attributable to Crawford &
Company were as follows:
13
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands, except (loss) earnings per share) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Crawford &
Company |
|
$ |
(2,527 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,124 |
) |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
(85,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used to compute
basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
|
52,619 |
|
|
|
51,877 |
|
|
|
52,504 |
|
|
|
51,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effects of shares issuable under
stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common share equivalents used
to compute diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
|
52,619 |
|
|
|
51,877 |
|
|
|
52,949 |
|
|
|
51,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.70 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(1.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
(loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.70 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(1.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, weighted-average common share
equivalents of 355,000 shares were not included in the calculation of diluted loss
per share since the Company recorded a net loss. For the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, weighted-average common share
equivalents of 610,000 and 933,000 shares, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted loss
per share since the Company recorded a net loss for these periods.
The inclusion of these shares would have been anti-dilutive.
Weighted-average outstanding stock options to purchase approximately 1,742,000 and 2,496,000 shares
of CRDA were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive based on the average price of CRDA during those periods. Weighted-average
outstanding stock options to purchase approximately 1,992,000 and 2,527,000 shares of CRDA were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive based
on the average price of CRDA during those periods. In addition, performance stock grants of approximately 746,000 and 766,000 shares of CRDA were excluded from
the computation of EPS for the respective periods because the expected performance conditions had not been met as of June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Compensation cost is recognized for these performance stock grants
based on expected achievement rates, however no consideration is given for these performance stock
grants when calculating EPS until the performance measurements have actually been achieved. The
performance goals for approximately 316,000 of these performance stock grants are expected to be
achieved at the end of 2010.
6. Interest Rate Swap Agreements
The
Company attempts to manage a portion of its exposure to the impact of interest rate changes by entering interest rate
swap agreements.
In May 2007, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap agreement that effectively
converted the LIBOR-based portion of the interest rate under the Companys Credit Agreement for a portion of its floating-rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.25%. The Company initially
14
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of exposure to changes in cash flows due to changes in
interest rates on an equivalent amount of debt. The notional amount of the swap was reduced over
its three-year term. The swap agreement expired May 31, 2010.
In connection with the Fifth Amendment to the Companys Credit Agreement entered into in October
2009, this interest rate swap was discontinued as a cash flow hedge of exposure to changes in cash
flows due to changes in interest rates. Accordingly, subsequent changes in the fair value of this
swap agreement were recorded by the Company as an expense adjustment
rather than as a
component of the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss. Such amount was not material for
the quarter or six months ended June 30, 2010. Because it was still probable that the forecasted transactions
that were hedged would occur, the amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the
interest rate swap agreement was reclassified into earnings as an increase to interest expense over
the remaining life of the interest rate swap agreement as the forecasted transactions occurred.
As of June 30, 2010, all amounts had been reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings and the
associated liability was reduced to zero upon expiration and settlement
of the swap agreement.
In November 2009, the Company entered into a two-year forward-starting interest rate swap agreement
that was effective beginning on June 30, 2010. This swap agreement effectively converts the
LIBOR-based portion of the interest rate on an initial notional amount of $90,000,000 of the
Companys floating-rate debt to a fixed rate of 3.05% plus the applicable credit spread. The
Company designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of exposure to changes in cash
flows due to changes in interest rates on an equivalent amount of debt. The notional amount of the
swap will be reduced to $85,000,000 on March 31, 2011 to match the expected repayment of the
Companys outstanding debt. The Company does not believe there have been any material changes in
the creditworthiness of the counterparties to this interest-rate swap agreement
and believes the risk of nonperformance by such
parties is minimal.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a liability
of $1,645,000 and $2,067,000, respectively. The amount of gain/loss recognized in
income/expense, respectively, on the Companys interest rate
hedge contract (with the ineffective portion excluded from any
effectiveness testing) were not material for the three months or six months ended June 30, 2010 or
2009. The pretax amount expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into
earnings during the twelve months subsequent to June 30, 2010 is approximately $941,000.
The effective portions of the pretax losses on the Companys interest-rate swap derivative
instruments are categorized in the tables below:
15
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
Loss Reclassified from |
|
|
(OCL) on Derivative - |
|
Accumulated OCL into Income - |
(in thousands) |
|
Effective Portion |
|
Effective Portion (1) |
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash Flow Hedging Relationship: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate hedge
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
|
NA
|
|
$ |
(1,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Discontinued as a Cash Flow Hedge
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
$ |
(593 |
) |
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reclassified from |
|
|
|
Loss Recognized in OCL on |
|
|
Accumulated OCL into Income - |
(in thousands) |
|
Derivative - Effective Portion |
|
|
Effective Portion (1) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flow Hedging Relationship: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate hedge |
|
$ |
(1,245 |
) |
|
$ |
(789 |
) |
|
NA |
|
$ |
(2,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Discontinued as a Cash
Flow Hedge |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
$ |
(1,593 |
) |
|
NA |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The losses reclassified from accumulated OCL into income
(effective portion) are reported in Net Corporate Interest Expense on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
The balances and changes in accumulated OCL related to the effective portions
of the Companys interest rate hedges for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 were as follows:
16
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Amount in accumulated OCL at beginning of period
for effective portion of interest rate hedges, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,998 |
) |
Loss reclassified into income, net of tax |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
Gain (loss) recognized during period, net of tax |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in accumulated OCL at end of period for
effective portion of interest rate hedges, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,020 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Amount in accumulated OCL at beginning of period
for effective portion of interest rate hedges, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,354 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,285 |
) |
Loss reclassified into income, net of tax |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
Loss recognized during period, net of tax |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in accumulated OCL at end of period for
effective portion of interest rate hedges, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,020 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys interest rate swap agreement contains provisions providing that if the Company
is in default under its Credit Agreement, the Company may also be deemed to be in default under its
interest rate swap agreement. If there was such a default, the Company could be required to
contemporaneously settle some or all of the obligations under the interest rate swap agreement at
values determined at the time of default. At June 30, 2010, no such default existed, and the
Company was not required to have assets posted as collateral under its interest rate swap agreement.
7. Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy:
17
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market
funds (1) |
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
designated as
hedging
instrument: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate
swap (2) |
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair values of the money market funds were based on recently quoted market prices and
reported transactions in an active marketplace. Money market funds are reported on the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as Cash and Cash Equivalents. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of the interest rate swap was derived from a discounted cash flow analysis
based on the terms of the contract and the forward interest rate curve adjusted for the
Companys credit risk. $941,000 of the fair value of the hedge instrument is included in
Other Accrued Liabilities and $704,000 of the fair value of the hedge instrument is included
in Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, based
upon the term of the hedged item. |
Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximates their respective carrying
values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
The
carrying value of the Companys term note payable was
$173,750,000
at June 30, 2010. The
Companys term note payable is held by a small number of lenders, and thus it trades infrequently.
The Company estimates the fair value of its term note payable based
on trading activity for the term note and estimates provided by the
administrative agent under its credit facility. At June
30, 2010, the Company estimated the value of its term note payable to
be approximately $169,800,000.
18
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
8. Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Net periodic benefit cost related to the Companys defined benefit pension plans for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
584 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
795 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
|
8,670 |
|
|
|
17,967 |
|
|
|
17,453 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(8,801 |
) |
|
|
(7,132 |
) |
|
|
(17,788 |
) |
|
|
(14,373 |
) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
|
$ |
3,823 |
|
|
$ |
6,828 |
|
|
$ |
7,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company
made contributions of $6,984,000 and $18,214,000, respectively, to its
underfunded U.S. and U.K. defined benefit pension plans
compared with contributions of $3,711,000 and $7,395,000,
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2009.
9. Income Taxes
The Companys consolidated effective income tax rate may change periodically due to changes in
enacted tax rates, fluctuations in the mix of income earned from the Companys various domestic and
international operations which are subject to income taxes at different rates, the Companys
ability to utilize net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and amounts related to
uncertain income tax positions. At June 30, 2010, the Company estimates that its
effective annual income tax rate for 2010 will be approximately 22% before considering discrete
items.
The decrease in the Companys income tax expense in the first six months of 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009 was due primarily to an internal restructuring of certain international
operations in the second quarter of 2009 that resulted in an ongoing reduction in foreign taxes,
which was partially offset by the expiration of a research and
development tax credit and changes in
discrete items.
19
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10. Segment Information
Financial information for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 related to
the Companys reportable segments, including a reconciliation
from segment operating earnings to (loss) income before income
taxes, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
$ |
46,954 |
|
|
$ |
54,789 |
|
|
$ |
96,148 |
|
|
$ |
110,083 |
|
International Operations |
|
|
105,751 |
|
|
|
95,885 |
|
|
|
210,202 |
|
|
|
186,515 |
|
Broadspire |
|
|
61,180 |
|
|
|
73,056 |
|
|
|
123,143 |
|
|
|
147,657 |
|
Legal Settlement Administration |
|
|
24,266 |
|
|
|
25,934 |
|
|
|
44,924 |
|
|
|
41,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Segment Revenues before Reimbursements |
|
|
238,151 |
|
|
|
249,664 |
|
|
|
474,417 |
|
|
|
485,747 |
|
Reimbursements |
|
|
17,835 |
|
|
|
21,979 |
|
|
|
33,622 |
|
|
|
36,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
255,986 |
|
|
$ |
271,643 |
|
|
$ |
508,039 |
|
|
$ |
521,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Earnings (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
$ |
3,271 |
|
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
|
$ |
12,362 |
|
International Operations |
|
|
7,321 |
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
13,873 |
|
|
|
15,877 |
|
Broadspire |
|
|
(1,772 |
) |
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
(4,105 |
) |
|
|
(2,560 |
) |
Legal Settlement Administration |
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
|
8,849 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment Operating Earnings |
|
|
14,386 |
|
|
|
18,353 |
|
|
|
26,984 |
|
|
|
31,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add/(deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
corporate and shared costs, net |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
(5,294 |
) |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
(7,270 |
) |
Restructuring and other costs |
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,650 |
) |
|
|
(1,815 |
) |
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
Net corporate interest expense |
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
(7,809 |
) |
|
|
(7,125 |
) |
Amortization of customer-relationship intangible assets |
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
(1,496 |
) |
|
|
(2,999 |
) |
|
|
(2,994 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
(1,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(86,274 |
) |
|
$ |
2,307 |
|
|
$ |
(82,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment transactions are not material for any period presented.
Operating earnings is the primary financial performance measure used by the Companys senior
management and chief operating decision maker to evaluate the financial performance of the
Companys four operating segments. The Company believes this measure is useful to investors in
that it allows investors to evaluate segment operating performance using the same criteria used by
the Companys senior management. Operating earnings will differ from net income computed in
accordance with GAAP since operating earnings exclude income tax expense, net corporate interest
expense, amortization of customer-relationship intangible assets, stock option expense, certain
other gains and expenses, and certain unallocated corporate and shared costs. Net income or loss
attributable to noncontrolling interests has also been removed from segment operating earnings.
Segment
operating earnings include allocations of certain corporate overhead
and shared costs. If the Company changes its allocation methods
20
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
or changes the types of costs that are allocated to
its four operating segments, prior period results are adjusted to reflect the current allocation
process.
Revenue by major service line for the U.S. Property & Casualty and Broadspire segments is shown in
the following table. It is not practicable to provide revenue by service line for the
International Operations segment. Legal Settlement Administration considers all of its revenue to
be derived from one service line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims Field Operations |
|
$ |
32,096 |
|
|
$ |
36,042 |
|
|
$ |
65,298 |
|
|
$ |
74,315 |
|
Catastrophe Services |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
7,178 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
12,086 |
|
Technical Services |
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
14,705 |
|
|
|
15,370 |
|
Contractor Connection |
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,954 |
|
|
$ |
54,789 |
|
|
$ |
96,148 |
|
|
$ |
110,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadspire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims Management Services |
|
$ |
25,465 |
|
|
$ |
32,527 |
|
|
$ |
53,746 |
|
|
$ |
66,014 |
|
Medical Management Services |
|
|
30,970 |
|
|
|
35,868 |
|
|
|
59,981 |
|
|
|
72,232 |
|
Risk Management Information Services |
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
9,416 |
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,180 |
|
|
$ |
73,056 |
|
|
$ |
123,143 |
|
|
$ |
147,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Commitments and Contingencies
The
Companys and its subsidiary guarantors obligations under
the Credit Agreement are secured by liens on all of their respective personal property and
mortgages over certain of their owned and leased properties.
As part of the Companys Credit Agreement, the Company maintains a letter of credit facility to
satisfy certain of its own contractual requirements. At June 30,
2010, the aggregate committed amount
of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement was $19,319,000.
In the normal course of the claims administration services business, the Company is sometimes named
as a defendant in suits by insureds or claimants contesting decisions made by the Company or its
clients with respect to the settlement of claims. Additionally, certain clients of the Company
have, in the past brought, and may in the future bring, actions for indemnification on the basis of alleged negligence by the
Company, its agents, or its employees in rendering service to clients. The majority of these known
claims are of the type covered by insurance maintained by the Company. However, the Company is
responsible for the deductibles and any self-insured retentions under various insurance coverages.
In the opinion of Company management, adequate provisions have been made for such known and foreseeable
risks.
21
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The Company is subject to numerous federal, state, and foreign employment laws, and from time to
time the Company faces claims by its employees and former employees under such laws. In addition,
the Company has become aware that certain employers are becoming subject to an increasing number of
claims involving alleged violations of wage and hour laws. The outcome of any of these allegations
is expected to be highly fact specific, and there has been a substantial amount of recent
legislative and judicial activity pertaining to employment-related issues. Such
claims or litigation involving the Company or any of the Companys current or former employees
could divert managements time and attention from the Companys business operations and could
potentially result in substantial costs of defense, settlement or other disposition, which could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial position, and cash
flows.
As previously disclosed, on October 31, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of Broadspire
Management Services, Inc. (BMSI) from Platinum Equity, LLC (Platinum). BMSI and Platinum are
together engaged in certain legal proceedings against the former owners of certain entities
acquired by BMSI prior to the Companys acquisition of BMSI. Pursuant to the agreement under which
the Company acquired BMSI (the Stock Purchase Agreement), Platinum has full responsibility to
resolve all of these matters and is obligated to fully indemnify BMSI and the Company for all
monetary payments that BMSI may be required to make as a result of any unfavorable outcomes related
to these pre-existing legal proceedings. Pursuant thereto, Platinum has also agreed to indemnify
the Company for any additional payments required under any purchase price adjustment mechanism,
earnout, or similar provision in any of BMSIs purchase and sale agreements entered into prior to
the Companys acquisition of BMSI. In the event of an unfavorable outcome in which Platinum does
not indemnify the Company under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company may be
responsible for funding any such unfavorable outcomes. At this time, the Companys management does
not believe the Company will be responsible for the funding of any of these matters. The Company
has not recognized any loss contingencies for these matters in its consolidated financial
statements.
Separately, the Company and Platinum previously agreed to, and have been engaged in an arbitration regarding the application of the
purchase price adjustment mechanism contained in the Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Price
Arbitration). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, any amounts payable resulting from such
arbitration are considered to be adjustments to the purchase price, and will accrue interest at the
prime rate from October 31, 2006. As described in more detail in Note 13, a decision and contingent
determination in this arbitration was rendered on July 30, 2010.
Separately,
the Company has asserted claims for damages from Platinum due to breaches in the
representations and warranties contained in the Stock Purchase
Agreement, which claims are in
arbitration (the Representations and Warranties
Arbitration). Any damages awarded by the arbitration panel
in connection with the Representations and Warranties Arbitration
are limited by the Stock Purchase Agreement to $15.0 million. The Company does not expect this
arbitration to be completed in 2010 and is unable to determine any
possible outcome of this
arbitration.
Any payments made or to be made, or recoveries resulting from the Purchase Price Arbitration or the
Representations and Warranties Arbitration
could result in additional goodwill impairment charges or gains, as
applicable, and will be recorded in the period in which the
settlement is reached.
22
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
12. Restructuring Charges and Losses on Sublease
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $1,987,000 for severance
costs related to reductions in administrative staff. Approximately $556,000 of this charge was
paid prior to June 30, 2010, with the remainder expected to be paid during the third quarter of
2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the total restructuring and other costs was
$4,650,000, which included this restructuring charge plus a pretax loss of approximately $2,663,000
on the Plantation sublease recorded in the first quarter of 2010, discussed below.
The restructuring charge recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $1,815,000 for
professional fees incurred in connection with an internal realignment of certain of the Companys legal
entities in the U.S. and internationally. The realignment of these legal entities did not impact
segment financial reporting. These realignment activities commenced in the fourth quarter of 2008.
During October 2009, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with respect to a portion of a
leased office building in Plantation, Florida, that was utilized by
its Broadspire operations. At that time, the Company realized a pretax loss of
$1,810,000 on that phase of the sublease. This sublease agreement provides the sublessor with
options to sublease all or a portion of the remainder of the building at various dates in 2010.
In February 2010, the sublessor exercised one of its options for additional space in the building,
and the Company recognized a pretax loss of approximately $2,663,000 on that phase of the sublease
which is included in Restructuring and Other Costs on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the space subleased in
February 2010, the Company expects to receive approximately $9,318,000 in additional sublease
payments from the sublessor over the life of the sublease. If the sublessor exercises its
remaining option, the Company would record an additional loss of approximately $658,000 in 2010 on
that phase of the sublease, and the Company would receive additional sublease payments of
approximately $5,323,000 over the life of the sublease. These sublease losses are not reported
within the operating results for the Broadspire segment, but instead are reported as a corporate
charge. Due to the subleases, during the first quarter of 2010 the Company relocated its
Broadspire operations in Broward County Florida to another leased building.
13. Subsequent Event
On July 30, 2010, the independent auditor arbitrating the Purchase Price Arbitration issued a
decision and contingent determination in connection therewith. This decision and contingent
determination purports to resolve certain issues being arbitrated thereunder, and provides certain
additional guidance with respect to other issues, subject to further determinations. Although the
Company is reserving all of its rights with respect to the issues purported to be resolved
and has asked the arbitrator to reconsider certain aspects of the
decision and contingent determination, the
Company
made a payment of $6,099,000 plus
interest on August 6, 2010, to Platinum in connection therewith
representing additional purchase price consideration for the October
31, 2006 acquisition of BMSI. All of the goodwill in the Broadspire
segment was previously impaired
and the fair value of the Broadspire segment does not support
additional goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recorded an additional goodwill impairment charge
of $7,303,000 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010.
All but the interest portion of the charge is nondeductible for tax
purposes. The charge
recorded in the second quarter of 2010 does not impact the
Companys Credit Agreement.
At the present time, the Company
is unable to determine any further possible outcome of this arbitration, or the timing thereof,
although the Company expects that an unfavorable result in all remaining portions of the Purchase
Price Arbitration could result in the Company being required to pay
to Platinum up to an additional
$6,619,000, plus interest, fees and expenses. No assurances can be provided that any future required payments would
not materially adversely affect the Companys liquidity, financial condition or results of
operations.
23
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Crawford & Company:
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Crawford & Company as of June 30,
2010, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the condensed consolidated
statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Crawford & Company as of
December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders investment, noncontrolling interests,
and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our
report dated March 5, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements and included an explanatory paragraph for the adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (codified in
FASB Accounting Standards Codification ASC 810, Consolidation).
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2009, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
August 9, 2010
24
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains and incorporates by reference forward-looking statements within the meaning of
that term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements contained
in this report that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions. These statements are included throughout this report and
relate to, among other things, discussions regarding reduction of our operating expenses in our
Broadspire segment, anticipated contributions to our underfunded defined benefit pension plans,
collectability of our billed and unbilled accounts receivable, projections regarding payments under
existing earnout agreements, discussions regarding our continued compliance with the financial and
other covenants contained in our financing agreements, and other long-term liquidity requirements.
These statements also relate to our business strategies, goals and expectations concerning our
market position, future operations, margins, case volumes, profitability, contingencies, and
capital resources. The words anticipate, believe, could, would, should, estimate,
expect, intend, may, plan, goal, strategy, predict, project, will and similar
terms and phrases identify forward-looking statements in this report.
Although we believe the assumptions upon which these forward-looking statements are based are
reasonable, any of these assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and the forward-looking
statements based on these assumptions could be incorrect. Our operations and the forward-looking
statements related to our operations involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our
control, and any one of which, or a combination of which, could materially affect our financial
condition, results of operations and whether the forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be
correct. Included among, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties we face are:
|
|
|
declines in the volume of cases referred to us for many of our service lines, |
|
|
|
|
changes in global economic conditions, |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, |
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates, |
|
|
|
|
changes in regulations and practices of various governmental authorities, |
|
|
|
|
changes in our competitive environment, |
|
|
|
|
changes in the financial condition of our clients, |
|
|
|
|
the performance of sublessors under certain subleases related to our leased properties, |
|
|
|
|
regulatory changes related to funding of defined benefit pension plans, |
|
|
|
|
the fact that our U.S. and U.K. defined benefit pension plans are significantly
underfunded and our future funding obligations thereunder, |
|
|
|
|
changes in the degree to which property and casualty insurance carriers outsource their
claims handling functions, |
|
|
|
|
changes in overall employment levels and associated workplace injury rates in the U.S., |
|
|
|
|
unfavorable outcomes in any current or future legal
proceedings, including our various arbitration proceedings relating
to the acquisition of BMSI, |
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify new revenue sources not tied to the insurance underwriting
cycle, |
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop or acquire information technology resources to support and grow
our business, |
25
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, |
|
|
|
|
renewal of existing major contracts with clients on satisfactory terms, |
|
|
|
|
our ability to collect amounts recoverable from our clients and others, |
|
|
|
|
continued availability of funding under our financing agreements, |
|
|
|
|
general risks associated with doing business outside the U.S., |
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with any applicable debtor or other covenant in our financing or
other agreements, |
|
|
|
|
possible legislation or changes in market conditions that may curtail or limit growth in
product liability and securities class actions, |
|
|
|
|
man-made disasters and natural disasters, |
|
|
|
|
our failure to complete the implementation of RiskTech on schedule, |
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill or our other indefinite-lived intangible assets, and |
As a result, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Actual results and trends in the future may differ materially from those suggested or implied by
the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made
and we undertake no obligation to publicly update any of these forward-looking statements in light
of new information or future events.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) should be read in conjunction with 1) our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes thereto for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 contained in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and 2) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The financial
statements of our subsidiaries comprising our International Operations segment, other than
subsidiaries in Canada and the Caribbean, are included in our consolidated financial statements on
a two-month delayed basis as permitted by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
order to provide sufficient time for accumulation of their results.
Business Overview
Based in Atlanta, Georgia, Crawford & Company (www.crawfordandcompany.com) is the
worlds largest independent provider of claims management solutions to the risk management and
insurance industry, as well as to self-insured entities, with a global network of more than 700
locations in 63 countries. The Crawford System of Claims Solutionssm offers
comprehensive, integrated claims services, business process outsourcing and consulting services for
major product lines including property and casualty claims management, workers compensation claims
and medical management, and legal settlement administration, including class
action and bankruptcy administration, as well as risk management information services. Shares of
the Companys two classes of common stock are traded on the NYSE under the symbols CRDA and CRDB,
respectively.
As discussed in more detail in subsequent sections of this MD&A, we have four operating segments:
U.S. Property & Casualty, International Operations, Broadspire, and Legal Settlement
Administration. Our four operating segments represent components of our Company for which
26
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by our chief operating
decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing operating performance. U.S.
Property & Casualty serves the U.S. property and casualty insurance company market, including the
product warranties and inspections marketplace. International Operations serves the property and
casualty insurance company markets outside of the U.S. Broadspire serves the self-insurance
marketplace primarily within the U.S. Legal Settlement Administration serves the securities,
bankruptcy, and other legal settlements markets primarily in the U.S.
Insurance companies, which represent the major source of our global revenues, customarily manage
their own claims administration function but often rely on third parties for certain services which
we provide, primarily including field investigation and the evaluation of property and casualty insurance
claims. We also conduct inspections of building component products related to warranty and product
performance claims.
Self-insured entities typically rely on us for a broader range of services. In addition to field
investigation and evaluation of their claims, we also provide initial loss reporting services, loss
mitigation services such as medical case management and vocational rehabilitation, risk management
information services, and administration of trust funds established to pay claims.
We also perform legal settlement administration services related to securities, product liability,
and other class action settlements and bankruptcies, including identifying and qualifying class
members, determining and dispensing settlement payments, and administering settlement funds. Such
services are generally referred to by us as class action services.
The claims management services market, both in the U.S. and internationally, is highly competitive
and comprised of a large number of companies of varying size and that
offer a varied scope of
services. The demand from insurance companies and self-insured entities for services provided by
independent claims service firms like us is largely dependent on industry-wide claims volumes,
which are affected by, among other things, the insurance underwriting cycle, weather-related
events, general economic activity, overall employment levels, and associated workplace injury
rates. Accordingly, we are limited in our ability to predict case volumes that may be referred to
us in the future. In addition, our ability to retain clients and maintain and increase case
referrals is also dependent in part on our ability to continue to provide high-quality,
competitively priced services.
We generally earn our revenues on an individual fee-per-claim basis for claims management services
we provide to property and casualty insurance companies and self-insured entities. Accordingly,
the volume of claim referrals to us is a key driver of our revenues. Generally, fees are earned on
claims in the period the claim is assigned to us, although sometimes a portion or substantially all
of the revenue generated by a specific claim assignment will be earned in subsequent periods. Industry-wide claims volume in general will
vary depending upon the insurance underwriting cycle.
In the insurance industry, the underwriting cycle is often said to be in either a soft or hard
market. A soft market generally results when insurance companies focus more on increasing their
premium income and focus less on controlling underwriting risks. A soft market often occurs in
conjunction with strong financial markets or in a period with a lack of catastrophe losses.
Insurance companies often attempt to derive a significant portion of their earnings from their
investment portfolios, and their focus may turn to collecting more premium income to invest under
the assumption that increased investment income and gains will offset higher claim costs that
usually result from relaxed underwriting standards. Due to
competition in the industry during a soft market, insurance companies usually concentrate on growing their premium base by
27
increasing the number of policies in-force instead of raising individual policy premiums. When the
insurance underwriting market is soft, insurance companies are generally more aggressive in the
risks they underwrite, and insurance premiums and policy deductibles typically decline. This
usually results in an increase in industry-wide claim referrals which generally will increase claim
referrals to us provided that we are able to maintain our existing market share. However, if a
soft market coincides with a period of low catastrophic claims activity, industry-wide claim
volumes may not increase.
A transition from a soft to a hard market is usually caused by one or two key factors, or sometimes
a combination of both: weak financial markets or unacceptable losses from policy holders. When
investments held by insurance companies begin to perform poorly, insurance companies typically turn
their focus to attempting to better control underwriting risks and claim costs. However, even if
financial markets perform well, the relaxed underwriting standards in a soft market can lead to
unacceptable increases in the frequency and cost of claims, especially in geographic areas that are
prone to frequent weather-related catastrophes. Either of these factors will usually lead the
insurance industry to transition to a hard market. During a hard insurance underwriting market,
insurance companies generally become more selective in the risks they underwrite, and insurance
premiums and policy deductibles typically increase, sometimes quite dramatically. This usually
results in a reduction in industry-wide claim volumes, which generally reduces claim referrals to
us unless we are able to offset the decline in claim referrals with growth in our market share.
During 2009 and into 2010, the insurance industry underwriting cycle could be characterized as a
soft market. Because the underwriting cycle can change suddenly due to unforeseen events in the
financial markets and catastrophic claims activity, we cannot predict what impact the current
soft market may have on us in the future.
We are also impacted by decisions insurance companies and other clients may make to change the
level of claims outsourced to independent claim service firms as opposed to those handled by their
own in-house claims adjusters or contracted to other third party administrators, whether or not
associated with insurance companies. Our ability to grow our market share in a highly fragmented
and competitive market is primarily dependent on the delivery of superior quality service and
effective sales efforts.
The legal settlement administration market is also highly competitive but comprised of a smaller
number of specialized entities. The demand for legal settlement administration services is
generally not directly tied to or affected by the insurance underwriting cycle. The demand for
these services is largely dependent on the volume of securities and product liability class action
settlements, the volume of Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings and the resulting settlements, and general
economic conditions. Our revenues from legal settlement administration services are generally
project-based and we earn these revenues as we perform individual tasks and deliver the outputs as
outlined in each project.
28
Results of Operations
Executive Summary
Consolidated revenues before reimbursements declined 4.6% and 2.3% for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same
periods of 2009. Increases in
revenues in our International Operations segment, due primarily to a
weaker U.S. dollar, were offset
by revenue declines in both the second quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2010, in our U.S.
Property & Casualty and Broadspire segments. Excluding the impact of foreign currency translation,
consolidated revenues before reimbursements during the second quarter of 2010 were 8.9% lower than
revenues in the second quarter of 2009, and revenues in our International Operations segment
decreased by 0.9% in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009. For the
first six months of 2010, excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, consolidated
revenues before reimbursements were 7.3% lower than revenues in the first six months of 2009, and
revenues in our International Operations segment decreased by 0.1%, compared to the first six
months of 2009.
Excluding
noncash goodwill impairment charges of $ 7.3 million, or $(0.13) per
share, in the second quarter of 2010, which are described more fully in Note 13 to the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements,
and $94.0 million, or $(1.81) per share, in the second
quarter of 2009, net income attributable to Crawford & Company was $4.3 million and $5.9 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $7.4 million and $9.0 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Including the goodwill impairment charge in the second quarter of 2010,
the net (loss) income attributable to Crawford & Company was $(2.5)
million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and
$527,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Including the goodwill impairment
charge in the second quarter of 2009, net loss attributable to Crawford & Company was $(88.1)
million and $(85.0) million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Consolidated net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 included a pretax charge of $2.0
million, or $(0.02) per share, due to severance costs for administrative staff reductions. For
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the total restructuring and other costs was $4.7 million, or
$(0.05) per share, which included this restructuring charge plus a pretax loss of
approximately $2.7 million on the sublease of the Broadspire facility in Plantation, Florida and
the relocation of those operations to Sunrise, Florida, as described in more detail in Note 12 to
the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The restructuring charge
recorded in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $1.8 million, or $(0.02) per share, due to professional fees incurred in connection with a previously disclosed internal realignment
of certain of our legal entities.
Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were
7.4% and 6.2% lower in the quarter and six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to the same periods of 2009.
The decreases were due primarily to lower expenses
associated with our self-insured risks lower expenses resulting from the termination of a
computer systems hosting contract, and administrative cost control.
Operating Earnings (Loss) of our Operating Segments
We believe that a discussion and analysis of the operating earnings of our four operating segments
is helpful in understanding the results of our operations. Operating earnings is the primary
financial performance measure used by our senior management and chief operating decision maker
(CODM) to evaluate the financial performance of our operating segments and make resource
allocation decisions. Unlike net income, our operating earnings measure is not a standard
performance measure found in GAAP. However, since it is our segment measure of profitability
presented in conformity with the Financial Accounting Standards
Boards (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
29
Topic 280 Segment Reporting, it is not considered a
non-GAAP financial measure requiring reconciliation pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
guidance contained in Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. We believe this measure is
useful to others in that it allows them to evaluate segment operating performance using the same
criteria our management and CODM use. Operating earnings represent segment earnings excluding
income tax expense, net corporate interest expense, amortization of customer-relationship
intangible assets, stock option expense, certain other gains and expenses, and certain unallocated
corporate and shared costsall for reasons described below. Net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests has also
been removed from operating earnings.
Income tax expense, net corporate interest expense, amortization of customer-relationship
intangible assets, and stock option expense are recurring components of our net income or loss, but
they are not considered part of our segment operating earnings because they are managed on a
corporate-wide basis. Income tax expense is based on statutory rates in effect in each of the
jurisdictions where we provide services, and vary throughout the world. Net corporate interest
expense results from capital structure decisions made by management
and affecting the Company as a whole. Amortization
expense relates to non-cash amortization expense of customer-relationship intangible assets
resulting from business combinations. Stock option expense represents the non-cash costs generally
related to stock options and employee stock purchase plan expenses which are not allocated to our
operating segments. None of these costs relate directly to the performance of our services or
operating activities and, therefore, are excluded from segment operating earnings in order to
better assess the results of each segments operating activities on a consistent basis.
Certain other gains and expenses may arise from events (expenses related to restructurings, losses on subleases, and goodwill impairment charges) that are not
allocated to any particular segment since they historically have not regularly impacted our
performance and are not expected to impact our future performance on a regular basis.
Unallocated corporate and shared costs represent expenses and credits related to our CEO and Board
of Directors, certain provisions for bad debt allowances or subsequent recoveries such as those
related to bankrupt clients, defined benefit pension costs or credits for our frozen U.S. defined
benefit pension plan, and certain self-insurance costs and recoveries. These items are not
allocated to our individual operating segments.
Additional discussion and analysis of our income taxes, net corporate interest expense,
amortization of customer-relationship intangible assets, stock option expense, unallocated
corporate and shared costs, and other gains and expenses follows the discussion and analysis of the
results of operations of our four operating segments.
Segment Revenues
In the normal course of business, our operating segments incur certain out-of-pocket expenses that
are thereafter reimbursed by our clients. Under GAAP, these out-of-pocket expenses and associated
reimbursements are reported as revenues and expenses, respectively, in our consolidated results of
operations. In the following discussion and analysis of segment results of operations, we do not
include a gross-up of segment revenues and expenses for these pass-through reimbursed expenses.
The amounts of reimbursed expenses and related revenues offset each other in our results of
operations with no impact to our net income (loss) or operating earnings (loss). A reconciliation of
revenues before reimbursements to consolidated revenues determined in accordance with GAAP is
self-evident from the face of the accompanying
30
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Unless noted in the following
discussion and analysis, revenue amounts exclude reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses.
Segment Expenses
Our discussion and analysis of segment operating expenses is comprised of two components. Direct
Compensation and Fringe Benefits includes all compensation, payroll taxes, and benefits provided
to our employees which, as a service company, represents our most significant and variable
operating expense. Expenses Other Than Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits includes
outsourced services, office rent and occupancy costs, office operating expenses, cost of risk,
amortization and depreciation expense other than amortization of customer-relationship intangible
assets, and allocated corporate and shared costs. These costs are more fixed in nature as compared
to direct compensation and fringe benefits.
Allocated corporate and shared costs are allocated to our four operating segments based primarily
on usage. These allocated costs are included in the determination of segment operating earnings.
If we change our allocation methods or change the types of costs that are allocated to our four
operating segments, prior periods are adjusted to reflect the current allocation process.
Operating results for our U.S. Property & Casualty, International Operations, Broadspire, and Legal
Settlement Administration segments reconciled to pretax (loss) income attributable to Crawford & Company
and net (loss) income attributable to Crawford & Company, were as follows:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
$ |
46,954 |
|
|
$ |
54,789 |
|
|
$ |
96,148 |
|
|
$ |
110,083 |
|
International Operations |
|
|
105,751 |
|
|
|
95,885 |
|
|
|
210,202 |
|
|
|
186,515 |
|
Broadspire |
|
|
61,180 |
|
|
|
73,056 |
|
|
|
123,143 |
|
|
|
147,657 |
|
Legal Settlement Administration |
|
|
24,266 |
|
|
|
25,934 |
|
|
|
44,924 |
|
|
|
41,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total revenues, before reimbursements |
|
|
238,151 |
|
|
|
249,664 |
|
|
|
474,417 |
|
|
|
485,747 |
|
Reimbursements |
|
|
17,835 |
|
|
|
21,979 |
|
|
|
33,622 |
|
|
|
36,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
255,986 |
|
|
$ |
271,643 |
|
|
$ |
508,039 |
|
|
$ |
521,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Compensation & Fringe Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
$ |
28,963 |
|
|
$ |
32,685 |
|
|
$ |
58,147 |
|
|
$ |
65,250 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
61.7 |
% |
|
|
59.7 |
% |
|
|
60.5 |
% |
|
|
59.3 |
% |
International Operations |
|
|
72,157 |
|
|
|
65,459 |
|
|
|
145,246 |
|
|
|
129,832 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
68.2 |
% |
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
69.6 |
% |
Broadspire |
|
|
35,396 |
|
|
|
40,950 |
|
|
|
72,575 |
|
|
|
83,771 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
57.9 |
% |
|
|
56.1 |
% |
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
56.7 |
% |
Legal Settlement Administration |
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
9,821 |
|
|
|
20,816 |
|
|
|
17,836 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
46.3 |
% |
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total |
|
$ |
147,256 |
|
|
$ |
148,915 |
|
|
$ |
296,784 |
|
|
$ |
296,689 |
|
% of Revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
61.8 |
% |
|
|
59.6 |
% |
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses Other than Direct Compensation &
Fringe Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
$ |
14,720 |
|
|
$ |
15,903 |
|
|
$ |
29,634 |
|
|
$ |
32,471 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
International Operations |
|
|
26,273 |
|
|
|
21,955 |
|
|
|
51,083 |
|
|
|
40,806 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
Broadspire |
|
|
27,556 |
|
|
|
32,712 |
|
|
|
54,673 |
|
|
|
66,446 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
44.7 |
% |
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
Legal Settlement Administration |
|
|
7,960 |
|
|
|
11,826 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
45.6 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total before reimbursements |
|
$ |
76,509 |
|
|
$ |
82,396 |
|
|
$ |
150,649 |
|
|
$ |
157,565 |
|
% of Revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
Reimbursements |
|
|
17,835 |
|
|
|
21,979 |
|
|
|
33,622 |
|
|
|
36,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total |
|
$ |
94,344 |
|
|
$ |
104,375 |
|
|
$ |
184,271 |
|
|
$ |
193,744 |
|
% of Revenues |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Earnings (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Property & Casualty |
|
$ |
3,271 |
|
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
|
$ |
12,362 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
International Operations |
|
|
7,321 |
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
13,873 |
|
|
|
15,877 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Broadspire |
|
|
(1,772 |
) |
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
(4,105 |
) |
|
|
(2,560 |
) |
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
-2.9 |
% |
|
|
-0.8 |
% |
|
|
-3.3 |
% |
|
|
-1.7 |
% |
Legal Settlement Administration |
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
|
8,849 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
% of related revenues before reimbursements |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add/(deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate and shared costs, net |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
(5,294 |
) |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
(7,270 |
) |
Restructuring and other costs |
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,650 |
) |
|
|
(1,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
Net corporate interest expense |
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
(7,809 |
) |
|
|
(7,125 |
) |
Amortization of customer-relationship intangibles |
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
(1,496 |
) |
|
|
(2,999 |
) |
|
|
(2,994 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pretax (Loss) Income |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(86,274 |
) |
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
(82,141 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
(1,758 |
) |
|
|
(2,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(2,511 |
) |
|
|
(87,889 |
) |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
(84,876 |
) |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net (loss) income attributable to Crawford & Company |
|
$ |
(2,527 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,124 |
) |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
(85,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
U.S. PROPERTY & CASUALTY
Operating
earnings for our U.S. Property & Casualty segment decreased from $6.2 million, or 11.3%
of revenues before reimbursements, in the second quarter of 2009, to $3.3 million, or 7.0% of
revenues before reimbursements, in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30,
segment operating earnings decreased from $12.4 million, or
11.2% of revenues before reimbursements,
in 2009 to $8.4 million, or 8.7% of revenues before reimbursements, in 2010. The decline in U.S.
Property & Casualtys operating earnings was primarily due
to the decline in revenues discussed
below.
Revenues before Reimbursements
U.S. Property & Casualty revenues are primarily generated from the property and casualty insurance
company markets, with additional revenues generated from the warranties and inspections marketplace
and from our Contractor Connection direct repair network. U.S. Property & Casualty revenues before
reimbursements by major service line for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
( in thousands, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Claims Field Operations |
|
$ |
32,096 |
|
|
$ |
36,042 |
|
|
|
(10.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
65,298 |
|
|
$ |
74,315 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
%) |
Catastrophe Services |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
7,178 |
|
|
|
(61.2 |
%) |
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
12,086 |
|
|
|
(50.2 |
%) |
Technical Services |
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
14,705 |
|
|
|
15,370 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
%) |
Contractor Connection |
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Property & Casualty
Revenues before Reimbursements |
|
$ |
46,954 |
|
|
$ |
54,789 |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
%) |
|
$ |
96,148 |
|
|
$ |
110,083 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
overall revenue decrease in the second quarter and first six months
of 2010 in U.S.
Property & Casualty was due to a decline in Claims Field Operations revenues caused by reduced
property, casualty, vehicle and warranty services claims and declines in Catastrophe Services and Technical
Services resulting from an overall decrease in weather-related events in 2010. These reductions
were partially offset by increases in revenues from our direct repair network, Contractor
Connection.
U.S. Property & Casualtys 14.3% and 12.7% revenue decline in the second quarter and first six
months of 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009 was due to a 3.1% and 6.4% decline,
respectively, from changes in the mix of services provided and in the rates charged for those
services, and a 11.2% and 6.3% decline, respectively, in segment unit volume, measured principally
by cases received.
Reimbursed Expenses included in Total Revenues
Reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses included in total revenues for our U.S. Property &
Casualty segment were unchanged, at $2.6 million for the second
quarters of both 2010 and 2009.
Reimbursements for the six-month periods decreased slightly in 2010, to $5.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, from $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
33
Case Volume Analysis
U.S. Property & Casualty unit volumes by underlying case category, as measured by cases received,
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
(whole
numbers, except percentages ) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Property |
|
|
28,378 |
|
|
|
31,632 |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
%) |
|
|
54,905 |
|
|
|
60,577 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
%) |
Casualty |
|
|
13,723 |
|
|
|
17,161 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
%) |
|
|
28,243 |
|
|
|
33,568 |
|
|
|
(15.9 |
%) |
Vehicle |
|
|
12,642 |
|
|
|
15,508 |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
%) |
|
|
25,949 |
|
|
|
31,991 |
|
|
|
(18.9 |
%) |
Warranty Services |
|
|
3,476 |
|
|
|
9,299 |
|
|
|
(62.6 |
%) |
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
21,068 |
|
|
|
(64.1 |
%) |
Workers Compensation and Other |
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
8,288 |
|
|
|
8,272 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Claims Field Operations |
|
|
62,406 |
|
|
|
77,602 |
|
|
|
(19.6 |
%) |
|
|
124,948 |
|
|
|
155,476 |
|
|
|
(19.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor Connection |
|
|
37,223 |
|
|
|
30,388 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
82,872 |
|
|
|
61,453 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
Catastrophe Services |
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
|
|
(55.2 |
%) |
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
12,922 |
|
|
|
(39.0 |
%) |
Technical Services |
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
(11.0 |
%) |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
(15.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Property & Casualty Cases Received |
|
|
105,276 |
|
|
|
118,537 |
|
|
|
(11.2 |
%) |
|
|
219,398 |
|
|
|
234,247 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2010 decrease in property and casualty claims was due primarily to lower industry-wide
claims volumes, which have resulted in fewer claims referred to us from our clients. The 2010
decline in vehicle claims was due primarily to general economic conditions which we believe have
resulted in fewer miles driven and thus fewer claims, and also due to decisions by certain
insurance companies to reduce third-party adjuster involvement in handling vehicle-related claims.
We expect the trend of reduced third-party adjuster involvement in vehicle claims to continue. The
2010 decrease in warranty services claims resulted from the expiration of several long-running
class action contracts. This trend is expected to continue as we are not aware of any large new
class action warranty claims that will replace the expiring contracts. The 2010 increase in
workers compensation claims was due primarily to increased referrals for outside investigations
from insurance carriers and internal referrals from our Broadspire segment.
The 2010 increase in Contractor Connection cases was due to the ongoing expansion of our contractor
network and due to the trend of insurance carriers moving high-frequency, low-severity property
claims directly to repair networks, which we expect to continue. The 2010 decreases in catastrophe
services and technical services claims were due primarily to decreases in weather-related claims.
We cannot predict the future trend of case volumes for a number of reasons, including the frequency
and severity of weather-related claims and the occurrence of natural and man-made disasters, which
are a significant source of claims for us and are generally not subject to accurate forecasting.
Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
The most significant expense in our U.S. Property & Casualty segment is the compensation of
employees, including related payroll taxes and fringe benefits. U.S. Property & Casualty direct
compensation and fringe benefits expense, as a percent of segment revenues before reimbursements,
increased to 61.7% in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 59.7% in the comparable 2009 quarter.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, U.S. Property & Casualty direct compensation and
fringe benefits expense, as a percent of segment revenues before reimbursements, was 60.5%,
increasing from 59.3% in the comparable 2009 period.
34
These percentage increases were primarily due to lower utilization of our employees in the
first six months of 2010 compared to the comparable period of 2009. There was an average of 1,478
full-time equivalent employees (including 68 catastrophe adjusters)
in this segment during the first six months of
2010, compared to an average of 1,654 employees (including 95 catastrophe adjusters) during the
comparable 2009 period.
U.S.
Property & Casualty salaries and wages totaled $24.3 million and $27.6 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the first six months of 2010 and 2009, U.S.
Property & Casualty salaries and wages totaled
$48.2 million and $54.1 million, respectively. The
overall decreases in the 2010 second quarter and year-to-date period compared to the same periods
in 2009 were primarily a result of the lower number of full-time equivalent employees in the 2010
quarter and six-month period. Payroll taxes and fringe benefits for U.S. Property & Casualty
totaled $4.7 million and $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. For
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, payroll taxes and fringe benefits for U.S. Property &
Casualty totaled $9.9 million and $11.2 million, respectively. The overall decrease was due to
the decreased number of employees in this segment, as well as a reduction in the employer match on
employee contributions to the Companys 401(k) plan.
Expenses Other than Reimbursements, Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
U.S. Property & Casualty expenses other than reimbursements, direct compensation and related
payroll taxes and fringe benefits were $14.7 million, or 31.3% of segment revenues before
reimbursements, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, decreasing from $15.9 million, or 29.0% of
segment revenues before reimbursements, for the comparable quarter of 2009. For the six-month
period ended June 30, 2010, these expenses were $29.6 million, or 30.8% of segment revenues before
reimbursements, decreasing from $32.5 million, or 29.5% of segment revenues before reimbursements,
in the comparable 2009 period. The amount of these expenses declined
7.4% and 8.7% for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009 due to cost
reductions as a result of the decline in revenue.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Operating earnings in our International Operations segment decreased to $7.3 million and $13.9
million in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to 2009s second quarter and six
months operating earnings of $8.5 million and $15.9 million, respectively. Operating margins
declined from 8.8% and 8.5% for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively,
to 6.9% and 6.6% for the comparable 2010 periods.
Revenues before Reimbursements
Substantially all International Operations revenues are derived from the property and casualty
insurance company market. Revenues before reimbursements by major region for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
( in thousands, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
United Kingdom (U.K.) |
|
$ |
31,775 |
|
|
$ |
30,089 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
$ |
65,087 |
|
|
$ |
59,737 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
31,853 |
|
|
|
30,558 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
64,162 |
|
|
|
60,124 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Continental Europe, Middle East,
Africa (CEMEA) |
|
|
23,262 |
|
|
|
20,178 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
45,208 |
|
|
|
39,023 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
15,290 |
|
|
|
12,496 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
28,775 |
|
|
|
22,673 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Americas |
|
|
3,571 |
|
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
% |
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International Operations
Revenues before Reimbursements |
|
$ |
105,751 |
|
|
$ |
95,885 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
$ |
210,202 |
|
|
$ |
186,515 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compared
to the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, during the same periods in 2010 the
U.S. dollar was weaker against most major foreign currencies, resulting in a positive net exchange
rate impact of 11.2% and 12.8%, respectively. Excluding the positive impact of exchange rate
fluctuations, International Operations revenues would have been $95.0 million and $186.3 million
in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, reflecting a decline in revenues on a
constant dollar basis of less than 1.0% for both periods.
International Operations unit volume, measured by cases received, increased 11.9% and 6.5% in the
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009. This overall
increase was primarily due to higher case referrals during 2010 in the U.K., CEMEA (as defined in
the table above), Asia/Pacific and the Americas regions, partially offset by decreases in case
referrals in Canada, as discussed below. Average revenue per claim
decreased 12.8% and 6.6% during
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, due to changes in the mix of
services provided and in the rates charged for those services.
Reimbursed Expenses included in Total Revenues
Reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses included in total revenues for our International
Operations segment decreased to $6.9 million and $12.9 million for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from $7.1 million and $14.1 million in the comparable 2009 periods.
Case Volume Analysis
International Operations unit volumes by region, measured by cases received, for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
(whole
numbers, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
United Kingdom (U.K.) |
|
|
42,230 |
|
|
|
35,173 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
89,107 |
|
|
|
72,974 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
26,765 |
|
|
|
31,268 |
|
|
|
(14.4 |
%) |
|
|
52,107 |
|
|
|
74,441 |
|
|
|
(30.0 |
%) |
Continental Europe, Middle East, and
Africa (CEMEA) |
|
|
36,308 |
|
|
|
31,104 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
72,078 |
|
|
|
59,900 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
29,404 |
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
55,473 |
|
|
|
53,186 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Americas |
|
|
19,329 |
|
|
|
13,591 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
37,340 |
|
|
|
26,989 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International Cases Received |
|
|
154,036 |
|
|
|
137,613 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
306,105 |
|
|
|
287,490 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2010 increase in the United Kingdom was due primarily to an increase in weather-related
activity. The decrease in Canada was due primarily to a reduction in weather-related activity. The 2010 increase in CEMEA resulted primarily from growth in our claims management
36
business in
Holland, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden. The increase in Asia/Pacific was due to weather-related activity in Australia. The
increase in the Americas was due primarily to an increase in high
frequency, low severity claims in Brazil. We cannot predict the future trend of case volumes for a
number of reasons, including the frequency and severity of weather-related claims and the
occurrence of natural and man-made disasters, which are significant sources of claims for us and
are generally not subject to accurate forecasting.
Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
As a percentage of revenues before reimbursements, direct compensation expenses, including related
payroll taxes and fringe benefits, were 68.2% and 69.1% for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to 68.3% and 69.6% for the comparable periods in 2009. These
percentage decreases primarily reflected increased utilization of our staff as a result of the
increase in the number of cases received. The dollar amount of these expenses increased to $72.2
million and $145.2 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, from $65.5 million
and $129.8 million for the comparable periods in 2009. The increase in the dollar amount was
primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar in the 2010 periods as the number of full-time equivalent
employees decreased. There was an average of 4,192 full-time
equivalent employees in this segment in the first six
months of 2010 compared to an average of 4,315 in the comparable 2009 period.
Salaries
and wages of International Operations segment personnel increased to $60.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, from $55.2 million in the comparable 2009 period. For the
six-month periods, salaries and wages of International Operations segment personnel increased to
$120.3 million in 2010 from $108.7 million in 2009. Payroll taxes and fringe benefits for the
International Operations segment totaled $12.1 million and $24.9 million for the second quarter and
six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to
$10.3 million and $21.1 million for the
same periods in 2009. These increases were primarily related to a weaker U.S. dollar during the
2010 periods.
Expenses Other than Reimbursements, Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
Expenses other than reimbursements, direct compensation and related payroll taxes and fringe
benefits were 24.9% and 24.3% of International Operations revenues before reimbursements for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, up from 22.9% and 21.9% for the comparable periods
in 2009, primarily due to foreign exchange gains recorded in 2009. The dollar amount of these
expenses increased in the 2010 quarter to $26.3 million from $22.0 million in the second quarter of
2009 primarily due to a weaker U.S. dollar during the 2010 quarter. The amounts increased from
$40.8 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 to $51.1 million for the comparable
period in 2010.
37
BROADSPIRE
As previously disclosed in the Companys consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $94.0 million during the
second quarter of 2009 related to our Broadspire segment. The Company also recorded an impairment charge of $7.3 million during the second quarter of 2010 related to our Broadspire segment. Substantially all of these
impairment charges are not deductible for income tax purposes and are
not reflected in Broadspires segment operating loss. They are also not included in the following
discussion and analysis of Broadspires segment operating results.
Our Broadspire segment reported an operating loss of $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2010,
compared to an operating loss of $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2009. For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, Broadspires operating loss was $4.1 million, compared to $2.6 million for the
comparable period in 2009. These declines were primarily due to lower workers compensation and
casualty claim referrals as a result of lower U.S. employment levels
and due to the loss of a significant client at the end of 2009.
Revenues before Reimbursements
Broadspire segment revenues are primarily derived from workers compensation and liability claims
management, medical management for workers compensation, vocational rehabilitation, and risk
management information services provided to the U.S. self-insured market place. Broadspire
revenues before reimbursements by major service line for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
( in thousands, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Claims Management Services |
|
$ |
25,465 |
|
|
$ |
32,527 |
|
|
|
(21.7 |
%) |
|
$ |
53,746 |
|
|
$ |
66,014 |
|
|
|
(18.6 |
%) |
Medical Management Services |
|
|
30,970 |
|
|
|
35,868 |
|
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
|
|
59,981 |
|
|
|
72,232 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
%) |
Risk Management Information Services |
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
9,416 |
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Broadspire Revenues before
Reimbursements |
|
$ |
61,180 |
|
|
$ |
73,056 |
|
|
|
(16.3 |
%) |
|
$ |
123,143 |
|
|
$ |
147,657 |
|
|
|
(16.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit volumes for the Broadspire segment, measured principally by cases received, decreased
10.1% from the 2009 second quarter to the 2010 second quarter and 9.0% for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Revenue also decreased 6.2% and 7.6% in the
second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009 due
to changes in the mix of services provided and in the rates charged for those services. The
combined result of these factors was a 16.3% and 16.6% decrease in Broadspire segment revenues
before reimbursements for the second quarter and six months of 2010 compared to the comparable
periods of 2009.
Reimbursed Expenses included in Total Revenues
Reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses included in total revenues for the Broadspire segment
were $0.8 million and $1.5 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010,
decreasing from $1.3 million and $2.6 million in the comparable 2009 periods. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the corresponding decrease in revenues before reimbursements.
38
Case Volume Analysis
Broadspire unit volumes by major underlying case category, as measured by cases received, for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
(whole
numbers, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Workers Compensation |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
35,973 |
|
|
|
(11.0 |
%) |
|
|
64,169 |
|
|
|
71,131 |
|
|
|
(9.8 |
%) |
Casualty |
|
|
14,791 |
|
|
|
17,210 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
%) |
|
|
29,335 |
|
|
|
33,571 |
|
|
|
(12.6 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
3,978 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
7,877 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Broadspire Cases Received |
|
|
51,386 |
|
|
|
57,161 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
%) |
|
|
102,403 |
|
|
|
112,579 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2010 decline in workers compensation claims reflected a continuing decline in reported
workplace injuries in the U.S primarily as a result of the overall
continued lower level of employment due to the
current economic climate, as well as the loss of a significant client discussed below. The U.S. market
has experienced a decline in reported workplace injuries over the past decade resulting in a loss
in revenue from our existing customer base. The 2010 declines in casualty claims were primarily
due to reductions in claims from our existing clients as a result of the overall industry-wide
reduction in claims volume, partially offset by net new business gains. The 2010 increases in
other claims were primarily due to increases in health management services resulting from employers
that added such services to their employee benefits programs. We cannot predict the future trend
of case volumes as they are generally dependent on the timing and extent of job creation in the
U.S. and the occurrence of casualty-related events which are not subject to accurate forecasting.
During
2009, we were notified by a significant client of our Broadspire segment that the client would not
renew its existing contract with us upon the scheduled expiration of that contract in December
2009. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, revenues related to this client
totaled approximately $4.8 million and $10.6 million, or 6.6% and 7.2% of total segment revenues
before reimbursements for the second quarter and six months of 2009.
Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
Our most significant expense in our Broadspire segment is the compensation of employees, including
related payroll taxes and fringe benefits. Broadspires direct compensation and fringe benefits
expense, as a percent of the related revenues before reimbursements, increased from 56.1% for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 to 57.9% in the 2010 second quarter. For the six months ended June 30,
direct compensation and fringe benefits, as a percent of revenues before reimbursements increased
from 56.7% in 2009 to 58.9% in 2010. This percentage increase primarily reflected increased
capacity due to the decline in claims volume. Average full-time
equivalent employees in this segment totaled 2,031
in the first six months of 2010, down from 2,292 in the comparable 2009 period.
Broadspire segment salaries and wages totaled $29.5 million and $60.0 million for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, decreasing 13.5% and 12.8%, respectively from
$34.1 million and $68.8 million in the comparable 2009 periods. Payroll taxes and fringe benefits
for the Broadspire segment totaled $5.9 million and $12.6 million in the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, decreasing 13.2% and 16.0%, respectively, from 2009
expenses of $6.9 million and $15.0 million for the same comparable
39
periods. These 2010 decreases
were primarily the result of the reduction in the number of full-time equivalent employees as well
as a reduction in the employer match on employee contributions to
the Companys 401(k) plan.
Expenses Other than Reimbursements, Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
Broadspire segment expenses other than reimbursements, direct compensation and related payroll
taxes and fringe benefits as a percent of revenues before reimbursements were 45.0% and 44.4% for
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to
44.7% and 45.0% in the comparable
2009 periods. The amount of these expenses declined 15.8% and 17.7%
for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009 due to cost reductions as a
result of the decline in revenue.
LEGAL SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Our Legal Settlement Administration segment reported operating earnings of $5.6 million and $8.8
million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, increasing from $4.3
million and $5.8 million in the comparable 2009 periods. The related segment operating margin
increased from 16.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to 22.9% in the comparable 2010
period, and from 14.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to 19.7% in the comparable 2010
period.
Revenues before Reimbursements
Legal Settlement Administration revenues are primarily derived from securities, product liability
and other legal settlement services, and bankruptcy administration. Legal Settlement
Administration revenues before reimbursements decreased 6.4% to $24.3 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to $25.9 million in the comparable 2009 period. For the six-month
period ended June 30, 2010, Legal Settlement Administration revenues before reimbursements
increased 8.3% to $44.9 million, compared to $41.5 million in the same period in 2009. Legal
Settlement Administration revenues are project-based and can fluctuate significantly in any period.
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, we
were awarded 69 and 136 new
assignments, compared to 68 and 140 during the comparable periods in 2009. At June 30, 2010 we had
a backlog of projects awarded totaling approximately $56.5 million, compared to $62.8 million at
June 30, 2009. Of the $56.5 million backlog at June 30,
2010, an estimated $41.3 million is
expected to be recognized as revenues over the remainder of 2010.
Reimbursed Expenses included in Total Revenues
The nature and volume of work performed in our Legal Settlement Administration segment typically
requires more reimbursable out-of-pocket expenditures than our other operating segments.
Reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses included in total revenues for Legal Settlement
Administration in the second quarter were $7.6 million in 2010 and $11.0 million in 2009. For the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, reimbursements totaled $14.2 million.
Transaction Volume
Legal Settlement Administration services are generally project based and not denominated by
individual claims. Depending upon the nature of projects and their respective stages of
completion, the volume of transactions or tasks performed by us in any period can vary, sometimes
significantly.
40
Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
Legal Settlement Administrations direct compensation expense, including related payroll taxes and
fringe benefits, as a percent of revenues before reimbursements, was 44.3% in the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to 37.9% in the comparable 2009 period. For the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, these expenses as a percent of revenues before reimbursements were 46.3%,
compared to 43.0% in the same 2009 period. The dollar amount of these expenses increased to $10.7
million and $20.8 million for the second quarter and six months of 2010 compared to $9.8 million
and $17.8 million for the comparable 2009 periods, due primarily to increases in incentive
compensation and commission expenses, merit pay increases and an increase in the number of
full-time equivalent employees in 2010. There was an average of 355
full-time equivalent employees in this segment
in the first six months of 2010, compared to an average of 344 in the comparable 2009 period.
Legal Settlement Administration salaries and wages totaled $9.5 million and $18.0 million for the
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, increasing 8.0% and 16.9% respectively, from $8.7
million and $15.4 million in the comparable 2009 periods. Payroll taxes and fringe benefits for
Legal Settlement Administration totaled $1.2 million and $2.8 million for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1.1 million and $2.4 million for the comparable 2009
periods.
Expenses Other than Reimbursements, Direct Compensation and Fringe Benefits
One of our most significant expenses in Legal Settlement Administration is outsourced services due
to the variable, project-based nature of our work. Legal Settlement Administration expenses other
than reimbursements, direct compensation and related payroll taxes and fringe benefits decreased as
a percent of related revenues before reimbursements to 32.8% and 34.0% for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2010 from 45.6% and 43.0% for the comparable 2009 periods. The dollar amount
of these expenses decreased to $8.0 million and $15.3 million for the second quarter and six months
of 2010 compared to $11.8 million and $17.8 million for the comparable 2009 periods, due primarily
to the decreased use of outsourced service providers in 2010 compared to the same periods in
2009.
EXPENSES AND CREDITS EXCLUDED FROM SEGMENT OPERATING EARNINGS
Income Taxes
Our consolidated effective income tax rate for financial reporting purposes may change periodically
due to changes in enacted tax rates, fluctuations in the mix of income earned from our various
domestic and international operations which are subject to income taxes at varied rates, our
ability to utilize net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and amounts related to
uncertain income tax positions. At June 30, 2010 we estimate that our effective annual income tax
rate for 2010 will be approximately 22%.
Income tax expense on consolidated income totaled $1.8 million and $2.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense in 2010 compared to
2009 was due primarily to an internal restructuring of certain international operations in the
second quarter of 2009 that resulted in an ongoing reduction in foreign taxes, which was partially
offset by the expiration of a research and development tax credit and changes in certain discrete
items.
41
Net Corporate Interest Expense
Net corporate interest expense consists of interest expense that we incur on our short- and
long-term borrowings, partially offset by interest income we earn on available cash balances and
short-term investments. These amounts vary based on interest rates, borrowings outstanding,
interest rate swaps, and the amounts of invested cash and investments. Corporate interest expense
totaled $3.9 million and $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Interest income totaled $193,000 and $486,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Corporate interest expense totaled $8.1 million and $8.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Interest income totaled $296,000 and
$1,066,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Amortization of Customer-Relationship Intangible Assets
Amortization of customer-relationship intangible assets represents the non-cash amortization
expense for customer-relationship intangible assets acquired as part of our 2006 acquisitions of
Broadspire Management Services, Inc. (BMSI) and Specialty Liability Services, Ltd. (SLS).
Amortization expense associated with these intangible assets totaled approximately $1.5 million and
$3.0 million for the second quarter and first six months of both 2010 and 2009. This amortization is
included in SG&A expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock Option Expense
Stock option expense, a component of stock-based compensation, is comprised of non-cash expenses
related to stock options granted under our various stock option and employee stock purchase plans.
Stock option expense is not allocated to our operating segments. Other stock-based compensation
expense related to our executive stock bonus plan (performance shares and restricted shares) is
charged to our operating segments and included in the determination of segment operating earnings
or loss. Stock option expense of $187,000 and $391,000 was recognized during the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $197,000 and $430,000 for the comparable
periods in 2009, respectively.
Unallocated Corporate and Shared Costs
Certain unallocated costs and credits are excluded from the determination of segment operating
earnings. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, unallocated corporate and
shared costs primarily represented costs of our frozen U.S. defined benefit pension plan, expenses
for our CEO and our Board of Directors, certain adjustments to our self-insured liabilities, and
certain adjustments and recoveries to our allowances for doubtful accounts receivable. Unallocated
corporate and shared costs were $1.4 million and
$1.5 million for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, and $5.3 million and $7.3 million for the comparable periods in 2009.
Our U.S. defined benefit pension plan expense was $1.9 million and
$3.7 million for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $2.9 million and $5.7 million for the same
periods of 2009. In addition, self-insurance expenses were $1.4
million
and $2.7 million lower in the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009.
Restructuring and Other Costs
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $2.0 million for
severance costs related to reductions in administrative staff. Approximately $556,000 of this
charge was paid prior to June 30, 2010 with the remainder expected to be paid during the third
quarter of 2010. The Company terminated 146 employees. As a
result, the Company expects annual pretax savings of approximately $9.6
million. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 we also recorded
pretax expenses totaling $2.7 million for a loss incurred on the sublease of
42
the Broadspire facility in Plantation, Florida and
the relocation of those operations to Sunrise, Florida, as described in more detail in Note 12 to
the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, we recorded pretax expenses totaling $1.8 million for professional fees incurred in
connection with an internal realignment of certain of our legal entities in the U.S. and
internationally. This realignment did not impact our segment financial reporting.
Goodwill Impairment Charge
On July 30, 2010, the independent auditor arbitrating the Broadspire Purchase Price Arbitration issued a decision and contingent determination in connection
therewith, which is described more fully in Note 13 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. This decision and contingent determination purports
to resolve certain issues being arbitrated thereunder, and provides certain additional guidance
with respect to other issues, subject to further determinations.
Although the Company is reserving all of its rights with respect
to the issues purported to be resolved
and has asked the arbitrator to reconsider certain aspects of the
decision and contingent consideration, the Company
made a payment of $6.1 million, plus
interest on August 6, 2010, to Platinum in connection therewith
representing additional purchase price consideration for the October
31, 2006 acquisition of Broadspire Management Services, Inc. All
of the goodwill in the Broadspire segment was previously impaired
and the fair value of the Broadspire segment does not support
additional goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recorded an additional
goodwill impairment charge of $7.3 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010.
All but the interest portion of the charge is nondeductible for tax
purposes.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
At June 30, 2010, our working capital balance (current assets less current liabilities) was
approximately $64.4 million, a decrease of $2.3 million from the working capital balance at
December 31, 2009.
Our cash and cash equivalents were $38.2 million at June 30, 2010,
compared to $70.4 million at December 31, 2009.
Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $29.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to cash provided by operating activities of $3.7 million for the comparable period of
2009. During the first six months of 2010, we made cash contributions of $15.1 million and $3.1
million, respectively, to our U.S. and U.K. defined benefit pension plans, compared to $5.1 million
and $2.3 million, respectively, for the same period in 2009.
Also contributing to the increase in
cash used in operating activities in the 2010 period was a $25.3 million increase in accounts receivable and unbilled
revenue. The Companys operating cash needs typically peak during the first quarter and decline
during the balance of the year, due in part to annual payments made in the first quarter of each
year to fund defined contribution retirement plans and incentive compensation plans. Over the
remaining months of 2010, we expect to use $6.2 million to fund our frozen U.S. defined benefit
pension plan.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash used
in investing activities, primarily for acquisitions of property and
equipment and for capitalized software, was $12.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared
to cash used in investing activities of $12.5 million in the comparable period of 2009.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to cash used in financing activities of $4.4 million for the comparable period of 2009.
During 2010, we increased our short-term borrowings and book
overdraft by $19.4 million, made a mandatory excess cash
flow payment of $5.9 million to reduce the balance outstanding on our term note payable, and paid
$700,000 of statutory employee withholding taxes on behalf of certain employees who elected to
reduce the number of shares of common stock that would have otherwise been issued to them under
employee stock-based compensation plans. During 2009, we paid $1.9 million of statutory employee
withholding taxes on behalf of certain employees who elected to reduce the number of shares of
common stock that would have otherwise been issued to them under employee stock-based compensation
plans and paid loan costs of $944,000 in connection with an amendment to our Credit Agreement.
In April 1999, our Board of Directors authorized a discretionary share repurchase program of an
aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock. Through
June 30, 2010, we have reacquired 2,150,876 shares of Class A and 143,261 shares of Class B common
stock at an average cost of $10.99 and $12.21, respectively. We have not reacquired any shares
since 2004 under this plan. We believe it is unlikely that we will repurchase shares under this
program in the foreseeable future due to the underfunded status of
43
our defined benefit pension
plans and the covenants and related restrictions contained in our Credit Agreement.
Other Matters Concerning Liquidity and Capital Resources
As a component of our Credit Agreement, we maintain a committed $100.0 million revolving
credit line with a syndicate of lenders in order to meet seasonal working capital requirements and
other financing needs that may arise. This revolving credit line expires on October 30, 2013. As
a component of this credit line, we maintain a letter of credit facility to satisfy certain
contractual obligations. Including $19.3 million of undrawn letters of credit issued under the
letter of credit facility, the balance of our unused line of credit totaled $62.8 million at June
30, 2010. Our short-term debt obligations typically peak during the first quarter of each year due
in part to the annual payment of incentive compensation, contributions to retirement plans, and
certain other recurring payments, and generally decline during the balance of the year. At June
30, 2010 and 2009, the outstanding balances under our revolving line of credit facility were $17.9
million and $32,000, respectively. Long-term borrowings outstanding, including current
installments, totaled $174.2 million as of June 30, 2010, compared to $181.3 million at December
31, 2009. We have historically used the proceeds from our long-term borrowings to finance, among
other things, business acquisitions.
We believe our current financial resources, together with funds expected to be generated from
operations and existing and potential borrowing capabilities, will be sufficient to maintain our
current operations for the next 12 months.
Financial Condition
Other significant changes in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30,
2010, compared to our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009, were as
follows:
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents decreased $32.1 million, or $30.2 million net of currency
exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenues increased $21.5 million, or $25.4 million net
of currency exchange impacts. This increase was primarily due to an increase in our
average number of days of revenue outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
Short-term Borrowings increased $17.9 million and Current Installments of Long-term
Debt decreased by $5.9 million. |
|
|
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Related Costs decreased $11.0 million due primarily to the
payment of annual incentive compensation and the funding of various retirement plans. |
|
|
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities increased $8.9 million, primarily
due to the additional purchase price consideration of $7.3 million from the Broadspire
Purchase Price Arbitration, paid in August 2010. |
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan Funding
In June 2010, the Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief
Act of 2010 was signed into law. Among other things, the act provides two alternatives to extend
the amortization period of the unfunded pension liability that is recognized in the calculation of
the minimum required contribution.
The act will require additional funding based on certain compensation, dividend and stock
redemption thresholds. We are in the process of evaluating whether any of these requirements may apply. The amounts shown do not reflect any additional funding requirements which
may be required.
We have
revised the estimated annual minimum contributions we expect we
will be required to make to our frozen U.S. defined benefit pension plan during the seven years
after 2010 in order to meet the funding requirements under the new act as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Minimum |
|
|
Funding Requirements |
Year Funded |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
23,600 |
|
2012 |
|
|
25,800 |
|
2013 |
|
|
32,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
2015 |
|
|
16,000 |
|
2016 |
|
|
10,300 |
|
2017 |
|
|
8,300 |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At
June 30, 2010, we were not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating
leases, which we believe could materially impact our operations, financial condition, or cash
flows.
As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, we
have certain material obligations under operating lease agreements to
which we are a party. In accordance with GAAP, these operating lease
obligations and the related leased assets
44
are not reported on our consolidated balance sheet. Other than reductions to the lease obligations
resulting from scheduled lease payments, our obligations under these operating lease agreements
have not changed materially since December 31, 2009.
We maintain funds in various trust accounts to administer claims for certain clients. These funds
are not available for our general operating activities and, as such, have not been recorded in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. We have concluded that we do not
have a material off-balance sheet risk related to these funds.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
There have
been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended
December 31, 2009.
New Accounting Standards Adopted
Additional information related to new accounting standards adopted during 2010 is provided in Note
2 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Pending Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Additional information related to pending adoption of recently issued accounting standards is
provided in Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Our exposures to market risk have not changed materially since December 31,
2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. Management necessarily applies its judgment in assessing the costs and
benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable
assurance regarding managements control objectives. The Companys management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and
procedures can prevent all possible errors or fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived
45
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. There are inherent limitations in all control systems, including the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of
one or more persons. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and, while our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to be effective under circumstances where they should reasonably be
expected to operate effectively, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent
limitations in any control system, misstatements due to possible errors or fraud may occur and not
be detected.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we performed an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b). Based upon the
foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
at providing reasonable assurance that all information relating to the Company (including its
consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported in a timely manner.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have identified no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The
information in the last two paragraphs of Note 11,
Commitments and Contingencies in the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements is incorporated
by reference herein.
Item 1.A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the factors discussed in Part I,
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
could materially affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. The risks
described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to
be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or future
results.
46
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on page 49.
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crawford & Company
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Bowman
|
|
|
Jeffrey T. Bowman |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
/s/ W. Bruce Swain, Jr.
|
|
|
W. Bruce Swain, Jr. |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) |
|
48
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 14, 2007) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated By-laws of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on December 22, 2008) |
|
|
|
15
|
|
Letter of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Press Release issued August 9, 2010 |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Second Quarter 2010 Earnings Conference Call Presentation, presented August 9, 2010 |
|
|
|
101
|
|
XBRL Documents |
49