Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to            

Commission file number 001-16265

LIME ENERGY CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

4 Gateway Center, 100 Mulberry Street, Newark NJ  07102
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(201) 416-2559
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

9,659,454 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.0001 par value per share, were outstanding as of August 12, 2016.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Our disclosure and analysis in this report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not purely historical may be forward-looking. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “hope,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” “plan,” “goal,” “target,” “should,” and similar expressions, including when used in the negative.

Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. The following are some of the factors that could affect our financial performance or could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates contained in or underlying the forward-looking statements:

·                  our business model has changed significantly since our inception in response to a constantly changing and evolving market, which may make it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects, and may expose us to increased risks and uncertainties;

·                  we have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future;

·                  failure to comply with covenants contained in our loan agreements could trigger prepayment obligations, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition;

·                  we may not be able to raise additional capital to fund future operating losses;

·                  the Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating us and the results of that investigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition;

·                  it is difficult for us to estimate our future operating results;

·                  we operate in a highly competitive industry and if we are unable to compete successfully, our revenue and profitability will be adversely affected;

·                  we depend upon a limited number of utility contracts to generate substantially all of our revenues;

·                  failure of our subcontractors to properly and effectively perform their services in a timely manner could cause delays in the delivery of our energy efficiency solutions; and

·                  we currently do not meet NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements and our common stock may be delisted if we are not successful on our appeal of NASDAQ’s delisting determination.

Table of Contents

The factors listed above should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; particularly under “Item 1A, Risk Factors.”  Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement is made and, except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update, review or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. It is not possible to identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, users of this report are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Lime Energy Co.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)

1

Table of Contents

Lime Energy Co.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

(1)         Derived from audited financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

2

Table of Contents

Lime Energy Co.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

Lime Energy Co.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)

(in thousands, unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Lime Energy Co.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands, unaudited)

5

Table of Contents

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Table of Contents

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (the “Financial Statements”) of Lime Energy Co. (“Lime Energy” and, together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In management’s opinion, however, the Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the interim periods.

The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The December 31, 2015 balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. For further information, refer to the audited financial statements and the related footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Starting on March 24, 2015, the date of the acquisition of EnerPath, the results of EnerPath’s operations have been consolidated with the Company’s results. For a more complete discussion of the EnerPath acquisition, refer to Note 5 — Acquisition of EnerPath below.

Note 2 - Share-Based Compensation

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) grants stock options and restricted stock under the Company’s 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2008 Plan”). Prior to an amendment to the 2008 Plan that became effective on October 15, 2015, the 2008 Plan provided that up to 407,143 shares of common stock could be delivered under the 2008 Plan to certain of the Company’s employees, consultants, and non-employee directors. As amended, the 2008 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 1,585,718 shares of common stock. In addition, the 2008 Plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the number of shares of common stock reserved under the 2008 Plan in an amount equal to 35,715 shares.

As of June 30, 2016, there were 1,463,155 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2008 Plan. During the first six months of 2016, options to purchase 100,000 shares were granted under the 2008 Plan, and options to purchase 1,248,155 shares were outstanding under the 2008 Plan as of June 30, 2016.

All options granted under the 2008 Plan were granted at a price equal to or greater than the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Substantially all outstanding stock options under the 2008 Plan vest ratably over three years and expire 10 years from the date of grant. In addition to grants made under the 2008 Plan, the Company gave employees the right to purchase shares at a discount to the market price under the Company’s employee stock purchase plans. The employee stock purchase plans allow Company employees to purchase the Company’s common stock at a discount using payroll deductions and entitle employees in the United States to receive favorable tax treatment provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

7

Table of Contents

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Board adopted, and subsequently the stockholders approved, the Lime Energy Co. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2014 ESPP”). The 2014 ESPP provided for two successive six-month offering periods commencing on July 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Board adopted, and subsequently the Company’s stockholders approved, the Lime Energy Co. 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2015 ESPP”). The 2015 ESPP provided for the issuance of up to 100,000 shares of common stock in two successive six-month offering periods commencing on July 1, 2015 and January 1, 2016, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Board adopted, and subsequently the Company’s stockholders approved, the Lime Energy Co. 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2016 ESPP”). The 2016 ESPP provided for the issuance of up to 100,000 shares of common stock in two successive six-month offering periods commencing on July 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017, respectively. On June 30, 2016, the Board terminated the 2016 ESPP.

The Board grants restricted stock to non-employee directors under the Company’s 2010 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”). Restricted stock granted to date under the Directors’ Plan for Board service vest 50% upon grant and 50% on the first to occur of the first anniversary of the grant date, if the director is then still serving on the Board, or the director’s death, disability, or retirement. Restricted stock granted under the Directors’ Plan for committee service vest 50% upon grant and 50% on the first to occur of the first anniversary of the grant date, if the director is then still serving on the committee, or the director’s death, disability, or retirement. During the first six months of 2016, the Company granted 71,344 shares of restricted stock under the Directors’ Plan. As of June 30, 2016, there were 213,020 shares of common stock available for issuance under the Directors’ Plan.

The Company accounts for employee share-based awards in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 — Compensation — Stock Compensation, which requires companies to measure the cost of employee service received in exchange for a share-based award based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant, with expense recognized over the requisite service period (generally equal to the vesting period of the grant).

The following table summarizes the Company’s total share-based compensation expense (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

The compensation expense to be recognized in future periods with respect to the Company’s employee options and restricted stock is as follows (in thousands):

Note 3 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 “Financial Instruments—Credit losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. Topic 326 amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The amendments in this update broaden the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The use of forecasted information incorporates more timely information in the estimate of expected credit loss, which will be more useful to users of the financial statements. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The areas for simplification in this update involve several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): “Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments”. Topic 815 requires that embedded derivatives be separated from the host contract and accounted for separately as derivatives if certain criteria are met, including the “clearly and closely related” criterion. The amendments in this update clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. The amendments apply to all entities that are issuers of or investors in debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have a debt host) with embedded call (put) options. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-06 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

9

Table of Contents

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 will require organizations that lease assets—referred to as “lessees”—to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP—which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet—the new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 provides guidance concerning certain matters involving the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance does not alter the basic framework for classifying debt instruments held as financial assets. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted, with some exceptions. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” ASU 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in a classified statement of financial position. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2015-17 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. FASB issued the ASU to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs, and to align with other existing FASB guidance. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts With Customers.” ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing guidance on revenue recognition under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled for those goods or services using a defined five-step process. More judgment and estimates may be required to achieve this principle than under existing GAAP. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect upon initial adoption recognized at the date of adoption which includes additional footnote disclosures. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method of adoption.

10

Table of Contents

Note 4 — Earnings Per Share

The Company computes income or loss per share under ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share,” which requires presentation of two amounts: basic and diluted loss per common share. Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing income or loss available to common stockholders by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding, and includes all common stock issued.  Diluted earnings include all common stock equivalents.  The Company has not included the outstanding options or warrants as common stock equivalents in the computation of diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, because the effect would be anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options:

Note 5 — Acquisition of EnerPath

On March 24, 2015, the Company acquired EnerPath International Holding Company, a Delaware corporation (“EnerPath”).  EnerPath is a California-based provider of software solutions and program administration for utility energy efficiency programs. The consideration paid in connection with the EnerPath acquisition was approximately $11.0 million in cash with $0.3 million held in escrow, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among EIHC Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, EnerPath, and the EnerPath stockholders.

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the acquisition are based on estimates and assumptions.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the closing of the acquisition (in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

The intangible assets acquired from EnerPath, fair value, average amortization periods, and estimated annual amortization expense are as follows:

Acquisition costs on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are related to acquisition activities, which include legal, accounting, banking, and other expenses.

12

Table of Contents

Pro Forma Information:

The following unaudited pro forma data is presented as if the acquisition of EnerPath had occurred on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma data does not include the impact of forecasted operating expense synergies.

The unaudited pro forma data is provided for informational purposes only and may not necessarily be indicative of future results of operations or what the results of operations would have been had the Company and EnerPath operated as a combined entity for the period presented.

Unaudited pro forma income statement line items for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows (amounts in thousands):

13

Table of Contents

Note 6 — Subordinated Convertible Term Notes to Fund Acquisition

The Company financed the purchase price of the acquisition of EnerPath (as described in Note 5 above) through the issuance of debt. The Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with Bison Capital Partners IV, L.P. (“Bison”) on March 24, 2015, pursuant to which the Company issued a subordinated convertible note due March 24, 2020 (the “Bison Note”) in the principal amount of $11,750,000 (the “Note Issuance”). The proceeds from the sale of the Bison Note were used to finance the EnerPath acquisition and to pay $0.9 million of fees and expenses incurred in connection therewith, including fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, which were capitalized and included as a discount to long-term debt. As of the date the Bison Note was issued, Bison owned 10,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) — which was, as of the date thereof, convertible into approximately 30% of the Company’s common stock — and was the Company’s single largest stockholder. Two members of the Board, Andreas Hildebrand and Peter Macdonald, are partners of an affiliate of Bison. As such, they recused themselves from the Board’s consideration of the Note Issuance.

Based upon the initial conversion price of the Bison Note ($3.16), all or any portion of the principal amount of the Bison Note, plus, subject to the terms of the Bison Note, any accrued but unpaid interest, but not more than the principal amount of the Bison Note, may, at the election of the note holder, be converted into 3,718,354 shares of common stock after March 24, 2018 or the occurrence of a change of control of the Company, whichever occurs first. The conversion price is subject to anti-dilution adjustments in connection with stock splits and similar occurrences and certain other events set forth in the Bison Note, including future issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents at effective prices lower than the then-current conversion price. Due to the terms of the anti-dilution provision, the Company separated this conversion feature from the debt instrument and accounts for it as a derivative liability that must be carried at its estimated fair value with changes in fair value reflected in the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Upon issuance, the initial estimate of fair value was established as both a derivative liability and as a discount on the Bison Note. That discount, absent the amendments to the Bison Note described below, would have been amortized to interest expense over the term of the Bison Note. The Company determined the estimated fair value of the derivative liability to be $4.3 million and $6.7 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The fair value of the derivative liability was determined using a binomial option pricing model with the following assumptions: a risk-free rate of 1.20%; expected volatility of 85%; a maturity date of March 24, 2020; probability factors regarding the Company’s ability to meet the EBITDA covenants in the Bison Note; and a 0% probability that a future financing transaction would reduce the conversion price.

On March 31, 2015, the Company executed an amendment to the Bison Note (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No.1 provided that, should the Company fail to meet certain trailing EBITDA targets as of June 30, September 30 or December 31, 2015, then for each such quarter in which such EBITDA target was not met, an additional $1.0 million in interest would have accrued and been added to the note principal.

On March 30, 2016, the Company entered into a second amendment to the Bison Note (“Amendment No. 2”). Amendment No. 2 revised the covenants related to minimum consolidated EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2016. Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, if the Company fails to meet the specified trailing EBITDA targets for any of these quarters, then for each such quarter in which such EBITDA target is not met up to an additional $0.5 million in interest will accrue and be added to the note principal. As a result of Amendment No. 2, the Company’s

14

Table of Contents

failure to meet the specified trailing EBITDA targets for any of the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2016 would not be an event of default under the Bison Note. Amendment No. 2 did not, however, revise the required minimum consolidated EBITDA targets for periods subsequent to December 31, 2016. Going forward, if the Company is unable to further amend the Bison Note or significantly improve its EBITDA, the Company’s consolidated EBITDA may not exceed the minimum consolidated EBITDA tests required by the Bison Note and, as a result, an event of default would exist under the Bison Note for which Bison could accelerate the Company’s repayment of the indebtedness.

Pursuant to prevailing accounting guidance, Amendment No. 2, for accounting purposes, was treated as an extinguishment of the original amended note and the issuance of a new note, with the conversion derivative left intact and unchanged. Upon extinguishment, the net carrying amount of the extinguished note (including its principal amount and related discounts) of $7.4 million was written off and the fair value of the amended note was established, resulting in a net charge to earnings in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 of $2.1 million. The fair value of the amended note was determined by reference to its probability weighted average expected cash flows discounted at an estimated market interest rate for a hypothetical similar non-convertible note issued by the Company. The March 30, 2016 carrying value of $9.5 million will incur interest charges at an effective interest rate required to result in the ultimate amount of cash flows needed to service the Bison Note. As of March 30, 2016, that effective interest rate was estimated at 26.4% but may change depending on actual cash requirements to service the Bison Note pursuant to the various interest payment alternatives described above.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company was not in compliance with the revised covenants related to minimum consolidated EBITDA and, as a result, $0.5 million of interest was accrued and added to the note principal. As of June 30, 2016, $11.8 million of principal and accrued interest was outstanding under the Bison Note.

Note 7 — Sale of Series C Preferred Stock

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with Bison, pursuant to which Bison purchased 10,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock at a price of $1,000 per share of Series C Preferred Stock.

The shares of Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to an accruing dividend of 12.5% per annum of their base amount (subject to adjustments for stock splits, combinations and similar recapitalizations), payable every six months. The base amount is adjusted on each dividend payment date for the unpaid dividends accrued. The Company accrued dividends of $0.4 million and $0.7 million during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

The shares of Series C Preferred Stock may be converted, at any time, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price which was initially equal to $2.40 per share (the “Series C Conversion Price”). The Series C Conversion Price shall be proportionately adjusted for stock splits, combinations and similar recapitalizations, and shall be adjusted for future issuances of common stock.

At any time after the fourth anniversary of the closing date, the Company shall have the right to redeem all, but not less than all, of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock for an amount equal to the original issue price of the shares plus all accrued but unpaid dividends, with such redemption to occur 30 days after the

15

Table of Contents

Company’s giving notice thereof to the holder(s) of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock. During such 30-day period, the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock may convert the Series C Preferred Stock to common stock in lieu of receiving the redemption payment. At any time after the fourth anniversary of the closing date, a holder of Series C Preferred Stock shall have the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of its Series C Preferred Stock for an amount equal to the original issue price of the shares plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. In the event the Company fails to make the required redemption payment by the date fixed for such payment, the dividend rate will increase to 15% per annum and increase by an additional 1% per annum each quarter until paid.

In connection with the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, the Company, Bison, Richard Kiphart and The John Thomas Hurvis Revocable Trust entered into a Shareholder and Investor Rights Agreement dated as of December 23, 2014 (the “Shareholder Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Shareholder Agreement, in the event the Company proposes to issue new securities (subject to certain exceptions), the Company must allow Bison to purchase a proportion of the new securities equal to the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by Bison divided by the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding, on a fully-diluted basis.

The Shareholder Agreement also provides Bison with operational consent rights and director appointment rights that apply so long as Bison holds at least five percent of the total voting power of the Company. The stockholders of the Company party to the Shareholder Agreement have agreed to vote in favor of Bison’s director appointees. The Shareholder Agreement entitles Bison to appoint one director to the Company’s Compensation Committee and any new board committee that is established, other than the Audit Committee or the Governance and Nominating Committee. It also entitles Bison to receive certain financial information. Bison may not, subject to certain exceptions in the Shareholder Agreement, acquire additional shares of common stock or seek to influence the management of the Company without the Company’s consent. Such restrictions will no longer apply upon certain changes of control of the Company.

If, on the fifth anniversary of the closing date or any succeeding anniversary of such date, ten percent of the average daily trading volume of common stock is less than the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by Bison divided by 240, then Bison may require the Company to initiate a sale process. Subject to the terms of the Shareholder Agreement, the stockholders of the Company party to the Shareholder Agreement have agreed to vote in favor of and otherwise support such a sale. If such a sale is not consummated within nine months, Bison shall have the right to require the Company to purchase, subject to the terms of the Shareholder Agreement, all or any portion of its Series C Preferred Stock or common stock into which such Series C Preferred Stock has converted, for a per share price generally equal to the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 60 trading days immediately preceding giving notice of exercise of such right.

The Company incurred costs of approximately $0.6 million to issue the Series C Preferred Stock. These costs were recorded net of the proceeds of the Series C Preferred Stock. The Series C Preferred Stock is classified outside of permanent equity as the rights of redemption and the ability to initiate a sale are not solely within the control of the Company.

On March 24, 2015, the Company amended and restated the Shareholder Agreement (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement”) and that certain Registration Rights Agreement dated December 23, 2014 by and among the Company, Bison and certain other stockholders of the Company (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement, in the event the Company proposes to issue new securities (subject to certain exceptions), the Company must allow Bison to purchase

16

Table of Contents

a proportion of the new securities equal to the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by Bison (including the shares of common stock into which the Bison Note could convert) divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on a fully-diluted basis. The operational consent rights and director appointment rights held by Bison under the Shareholder Agreement remain in the Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement; provided, however, that, in the event Bison is no longer entitled to designate at least one director under the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock, Bison will be entitled under the Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement to designate that number of directors that is consistent with its ownership of common stock (including shares of common stock that are convertible from the Series C Preferred Stock and the Bison Note, assuming the Bison Note was immediately convertible) if it holds at least five percent of the common stock (computed in the same fashion).

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, Bison is entitled to certain registration rights in connection with the common stock into which its shares of Series C Preferred Stock and the Bison Note may convert, including the right to demand the registration of such shares at any time after December 23, 2015 and rights to include such shares in other registration statements filed by the Company. Additionally, Mr. Kiphart and the John Thomas Hurvis Revocable Trust are entitled to include certain of their shares of common stock in a registration statement filed by the Company. The Company has agreed to indemnify the other parties to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement in connection with any claims related to their sale of securities under a registration statement, subject to certain exceptions.

Note 8 — Letter of Credit Agreement

On August 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Letter of Credit Agreement with Mr. Kiphart (the “LOC Agreement”), which replaced a previous letter of credit agreement the Company had entered into with Mr. Kiphart on December 7, 2012. Pursuant to the LOC Agreement, Mr. Kiphart agreed to cause, at the Company’s request, the issuance of one or more letters of credit (collectively, the “Kiphart Letter of Credit”) for the benefit of a surety, up to an aggregate amount of $1.3 million. The Kiphart Letter of Credit was used to guarantee certain obligations of the Company in connection with its performance under a contract between the Company and a utility customer.

The Company agreed to pay Mr. Kiphart simple interest on the aggregate amount of the Kiphart Letter of Credit at a rate of six percent per annum. The Company accrued interest of approximately $19,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

As consideration for Mr. Kiphart’s obligations under the LOC Agreement, the Company issued to Mr. Kiphart warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The value of the warrants, which had been determined to be $0.1 million, was capitalized as deferred financing costs. In connection with the issuance of Series C Preferred Stock discussed in Note 7 - Sale of Series C Preferred Stock, the warrants were forfeited and deferred financing costs of $0.1 million were recorded to interest expense.

In May 2015, the Company replaced the Kiphart Letter of Credit with restricted funds of the Company.  The restriction on these funds was released in January 2016 as the Company entered into two letter of credit agreements with Heritage Bank of Commerce in December 2015 for letters of credit of $1.3 million and $0.1 million (the “Letters of Credit”) as discussed under Note 9 — Line of Credit — Heritage Bank of Commerce.  The Letters of Credit are used to guarantee certain obligations of the Company in connection with its performance under contracts between the Company and two utility customers.  The Letters of Credit reduce the Company’s borrowing base as calculated in the Company’s Line of Credit with Heritage Bank of Commerce as described in Note 9.

17

Table of Contents

Note 9 — Line of Credit — Heritage Bank of Commerce

On July 24, 2015, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Heritage Bank of Commerce (the “Bank”), whereby the Bank agreed to make available to the Company a secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consisting of a $6.0 million revolving line of credit which the Company may draw upon from time to time, subject to the calculation and limitation of a borrowing base, for working capital and other general corporate purposes. As additional incentive to the Bank to enter into the Credit Facility and make available to the Company funds thereunder, the Company issued to the Bank a warrant to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock up to $60,000 in the aggregate.

The line of credit, which matures on July 24, 2017, bears variable interest at the prime rate plus 1.00% and is collateralized by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries including their respective accounts receivable, certain deposit accounts, and intellectual property.

On December 21, 2015, the Company entered into an amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement with the Bank. The First Amendment established a sublimit of $2.0 million for Letters of Credit under the Credit Facility. Except as specifically amended and modified by the First Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement remain in effect.

In December 2015, the Company entered into two Letter of Credit agreements with Heritage Bank of Commerce for letters of credit of $1.3 million and $0.1 million. The Letters of Credit are used to guarantee certain obligations of the Company in connection with its performance under contracts between the Company and two utility customers. The Letters of Credit reduce the Company’s borrowing base as calculated under the Loan Agreement.

The Loan Agreement requires the Company to comply with a number of conditions precedent that must be satisfied prior to any borrowing. In addition, the Company is required to remain compliant with certain customary representations and warranties and a number of affirmative and negative covenants. The occurrence of an event of default under the Loan Agreement may cause amounts outstanding during the event of default to accrue interest at a rate of 3.00% above the interest rate that would otherwise be applicable.

On June 10, 2016, the Company entered into a further amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement with the Bank.  The Second Amendment increased the Credit Facility to $10.0 million.

The Second Amendment also extends the maturity date one year to July 24, 2018 and requires the Company to achieve revised rolling four-quarter EBITDA targets, measured as of the last day of each quarter, as follows:  $2,179,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; $2,006,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2016; $2,437,000 for the quarter ending September 30, 2016; and $3,995,000 for the quarter ending December 31, 2016.  The Company and the Bank agreed to negotiate and agree on EBITDA targets for 2017 by January 15, 2017, absent which all amounts then outstanding would be due and payable on March 31, 2017. Similarly, EBITDA targets for 2018 shall be set by January 15, 2018 or the amounts then outstanding shall become due and payable on March 31, 2018. Except as specifically amended and modified by the Second Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement remain in effect.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with its asset coverage ratio covenant but was not in compliance with its EBITDA covenant with the Bank which could impact its ability to draw down on the Credit Facility. Although no assurance can be given, the Company expects to receive a waiver from the Bank along with renegotiation of its covenant targets. As of June 30, 2016, the calculation of the borrowing base left

18

Table of Contents

approximately $5.9 million available to draw down from the Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2016, the Company has not drawn down on the Credit Facility.

Note 10 — Preferred Stock Dividends

The Company accrued dividends of $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, on its Series C Preferred Stock.

Note 11 — Legal Matters

SEC Investigation.  In 2012, the SEC commenced an investigation with respect to certain of the Company’s revenue recognition practices and financial reporting.  The Company has cooperated with the Staff of the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC staff”) throughout the course of the investigation.  During the second quarter of 2016, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the SEC staff to resolve the investigation. At this time the Company, in accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies”, has recorded a $1.0 million charge to income, being the amount it believes is now probable will be paid. This charge is recorded in Other expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The SEC staff has not yet presented the proposed settlement to the Commission and no assurance can be given that the Commission will approve the proposed settlement or that the amount estimated will not change.

Dressler v. Lime Energy, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Case 3:14-cv-07060-FLW-DEA. This purported “whistleblower” case was filed on November 10, 2014, alleging illegal retaliation by the Company for the plaintiff’s alleged disclosure of activity she believed violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The plaintiff alleges that she made repeated disclosures to various individuals employed by the Company that certain accounting practices were improper and could lead to a restatement of financial statements. The plaintiff filed her complaint pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1514A), and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. §78u-6, et seq.). This case has been accepted for coverage under the Lime Energy Executive Protection Portfolio Policy. Although the Company believes the lawsuit has no merit, the court has denied the Company’s motion to dismiss the case. The Company can provide no assurances that this matter will be successfully resolved. As of the date of this report, a potential loss or a potential range of loss cannot be reasonably estimated.

Note 12 — Discontinued Operations

The Company sold the majority of its public sector business on February 28, 2013 to PowerSecure.  During the third quarter of 2013, the Company’s board of directors authorized management to sell or dispose of GES-Port Charlotte, its contract with the Army Corps of Engineers under the Federal Renewal and Renovation program (the FRR contract), and the regional service business located in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.  These businesses, along with the public sector business, which the Company exited in 2013, and Asset Development business, which the Company shut down at the end of 2012, have all been reported as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.

19

Table of Contents

The revenue and operating loss related to discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

The assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

Note 13 — Business Segment Information

All of the Company’s operations, including EnerPath, which was acquired on March 24, 2015, are included in one reportable segment, the Energy Efficiency segment.

20

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate and management’s current beliefs and assumptions. Any statements contained herein (including, without limitation, statements to the effect that we “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “plan” and similar expressions) that are not statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this report and the discussion below. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include those set forth in the section entitled “Item 1A — Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The risks and uncertainties described therein and herein are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties, including those not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impair the business. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law. See Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.

Overview

Lime Energy provides utilities with the comprehensive customer relationship services they need in order to satisfy their shareholders, regulators and customers.  Working on behalf of utilities and with their business customers, Lime Energy delivers energy services aimed at customer satisfaction, grid reliability and cost-effective environmental compliance. Our innovative contracting methods and software platform enables the integrated delivery of energy efficiency, demand response, renewable energy, customer engagement and behavioral change.  We believe that the next century of energy infrastructure investment will focus on the customer side of the meter, and Lime Energy is helping utilities to build the new business model that this energy future demands.

We are a leader in designing and implementing energy efficiency programs that enable our utility clients to reach their underserved markets and achieve their energy reduction goals. We offer utilities energy efficiency program delivery services targeted to their small and medium-sized business customers.  Our programs help these businesses use less energy through the upgrade of existing equipment with new, more energy efficient equipment.  This service allows the utility to delay investments in transmission and distribution upgrades and new power plants while cost-effectively complying with environmental regulations. The same programs provide benefits to their customers in the form of lower energy bills, improved equipment reliability, reduced maintenance costs and a better overall operating environment.

We currently deliver energy efficiency programs for 12 of the 25 largest electric utilities in the country.  We focus on deploying direct install energy efficiency solutions for small and mid-size commercial businesses that improve energy efficiency, reduce energy-related expenditures and lessen the impact of energy use on the environment.  These programs include energy efficient lighting upgrades, mechanical (“HVAC”) upgrades, water

21

Table of Contents

conservation measures, building controls, refrigeration, pool pumps, building shell improvements and appliance recycling. Our small business energy solutions (“SBES”) programs provide a cost-effective avenue for our utility clients to offer products and services to a hard-to-reach customer base, while satisfying aggressive state-mandated energy reduction goals.

Our SBES model is a turnkey solution under which we contract with our utility clients to design and market their small and mid-size energy efficiency programs within a defined territory, perform the technical audits, sell the solution to the end-use customer and oversee the implementation of the energy efficiency measures. This model makes it easy and affordable for small businesses to upgrade to new, more energy efficient equipment.  We deliver these programs for our utility clients on a performance basis, where we are only paid for delivered energy efficiency resources.

Failure to satisfy a continued listing rule

On May 20, 2016, we received a notice (the “Notice”) from The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) indicating that the Company currently does not meet the continued listing requirement set forth in Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires companies listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market to maintain a minimum of $2.5 million in stockholders’ equity for continued listing. The Notice indicated that the Company also does not meet NASDAQ’s alternatives for market value of listed securities or net income from continuing operations.

On July 5, 2016, we submitted a plan to NASDAQ on how we intend to regain compliance with NASDAQ’s listing requirements.

On July 12, 2016, we received a letter from the NASDAQ Listing Qualification staff indicating that, unless the Company timely requests a hearing before the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel (the “Panel”), the Company’s securities would be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market due to the Company’s non-compliance with Listing Rule 5550(b).

We have a hearing before the Panel scheduled on August 25, 2016, at which we will present a plan to evidence compliance with the Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires the Company to maintain a minimum of $2.5 million in stockholders’ equity, or with Listing Rule 5550(b)(3), which requires net income from continuing operations of $500,000.  The Company’s common stock will continue to trade on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “LIME” pending the completion of the hearing process and the expiration of any extension period granted by the Panel. A ruling is likely to be received 7 days after the hearing.